The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19980513AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION May 13, 1998 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS (-7 .7 rl SITE VISITS: 6*5 99 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of April 8, 1998 minutes. II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS r, IV. -Diseassien of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) ~ _, l,0.4 1 i 1,11 di / k,3 5:00 V. BUSINESQ) Disc.lbuu 9 41 ---i- A. 520 E. Durant - Minor Development - Julie Ann Woods Â¥\0 ..,(6 2 161 0 L B. Pitkin Cou quic,.4~ ~-iitrra~k - 5~ E. Hyman - Minor Development - Mitch Haasok:~ C. 123 W. Francis, Lot B - Extension of Conceptual - Julie Ann Woods 84 0/\ O, L i / 5 / ) 96*~ D. Food and Wine Magazine - banners on Main St. - Julie Ann Woods 02 5â€¢66- - Â£jl j:9 -- E. 114 Neak Olit LHistoric Landmark Lot Split - PH - Mitch Haas o< L-Ik#pLE L a ke %0~0' F. 114 Neale Ave. Conceptual (cont'd from 3/25 - to be withdrawn by staff V\\-tâ€ž,1 SLL.LI>/- 1Mv \~ ~ G. 234 W. Fraa,cis - PH - Conceptual and Final - Julie Ann Woods +24 /549-, 3)>i' 1,-L.615'IL 1-1131-9- th ~\11-1' 3 1 -91 < H. 101 & 105 E. Hallam - Partial Demolition -4 - Mitch Haas V. WORKSESSIONS 735 W. Bleeker - Julie Ann Woods 0 VI. ADJOURN 0\ PROJECT MONITORING oger Moyer 303 E. Main, Kuhn ISIS 435 W. Main, L'Auberge Susan Dodington 712 W. Francis 918 E. Cooper, Davis 132 W. Main, McCloskey Meadows Trustee and Tennis townhomes 234 W. Francis Melanie Roschko 918 E. Cooper, Davis ISIS Suzannah Reid 303 E. Main, Kuhn 702 W. Main, Pearson 218 N. Monarch, Zucker 414 N. First 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis Mary Hirsch Meadows, Trustee and Tennis townhomes 420 W. Francis Street 435 W. Main, L'Auberge Gilbert Sanchez 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis 414 N. First 303 E. Main Jeffrey Halferty , 132 W. Main, McCloskey 234 W. Francis, Mullin 414 N. First Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street 712 W. Francis Street CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 34 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,1999 23 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24, 1998 514 N. Third Street (Ringsby), expires June 11, 1998 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires August 12,1998 A MEMORANDUM V 22424 1 TO: Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directery v Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner (10 / fle- RE: 520 East Durant Minor Development DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: Ajax Mountain Associates has applied for a minor development review by the HPC on behalf of Malo, a clothier, who wishes to occupy units 201 & 202 ofthe building. The building is within the Downtown Historic Overlay District but is not a Historic Landmark. The development proposed mimics the recent improvement made by Channel in the same building. Staff does not believe these proposed changes will negatively affect the historic resource of downtown. Furthermore, staff does not believe the proposed changes will negatively affect the Ajax Building. Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve this minor development of the Ajax Mountain Building, with conditions. APPLICANT: Aja Mountain Associates, Ltd. Represented by Suzannah Reid, Architect. LOCATION: 520 East Durant Street Units 201 & 202 ZONING: Commercial Core - Downtown Historic Overlay District PREVIOUS AcTION: The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Minor Development in a Historic Overlay District. The Historic Preservation Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a application for minor development at a hearing. 1 D STAFF COMMENTS: A full-scale model has been constructed on-site at the Channel store. The applicant is requesting approval for four changes: 1) Replace the existing storefront windows with new larger windows; 2) One of the two doors will become a glass panel, the same height as the new windows; 3) The other door will become black metal with two horizontal divisions (similar to Channel); 4) The brick sills will be reconstructed in matching materials and details as those on the Channel unit. Review criteria and StaffFindings have been included as Exhibit "A." The application has been included as Exhibit "B." RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the minor development ofthe Ajax Building with the following conditions: 1. Any signs, including signs on the proposed awnings, shall obtain a sign permit. 2, The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. 3. Development shall occur as proposed in this application. Any changes must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Minor Development at the Ajax Building, Units 201 & 202, as proposed with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated May 13, 1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Development Application 0 2 A ' 4 Exhibit A Review Criteria and Staff Findings Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Staff Finding: The proposed development is compatible with the existing structure on the parcel. The applicant is not proposing any dimensional variations. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Finding: The proposed development is in character with the existing building. The existing building is existing, and its incompatibility with the neighborhood will not be increased Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Staff Finding: The proposed development will not detract from the Historic District. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The structure is not a designated Historic Landmark. 3 m ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name IMUO 2. Project location 82,0 6*51- DO BANT- Er AJAK IMTÂ» B[,DO- 81 0/4 15 LOTS p -S kweh) 611> 1)w BATE 4 CATH (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds descMption) 3. Present zoning 66 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number PETE)2- LÂ¥69-G?LI 896- % ORS}thuettle AS Prf 314 S. #fvbtl'@t e r Af pela 4%5 3747 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number SUZ#+ PAH Fâ‚¬15 REID k#6+M -recrs P 6 606. 1363 *SPE~ha 910 1.2-2,5 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD < Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. DescMption of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) l,MÂ¢89 12&741 L CAVI PU?* 4 9. Description of development application /1109/v #-5, IUMâ‚¬ EASE W / W DA,0 51-3&25 Silt\L.*12 16 AbfACeaT' SARE IN 640*1 G C (MA 9 lâ‚¬K V PÂ·% PUR.9 EET EAa#- PAR-S 10. Have you completed and attached the following? ~~ Attachment 1 - Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 7 Response to Attachment 4 1 . ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: FuTERÂ· DI CTBU 8=126- Address: 61(, 9. 4'1) 13.ke- ST C/0 6586+h41â‚¬)EG- Alf,E,J Zone district: CC Lot size: A VAAMI A. Existing FAR: \AlÂ» Allowable FAR: \Alp Proposed FAR: M PL Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 0/A. Proposed % of site coverage: M (A, Existing % of open space: 'ING Proposed % of open space: bl /4- Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 14Â» Accesory bldg: Al<A- Proposed max. height: Princioal bldg: M /1 Accessorv bldo: U /A- Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: 46- Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: P/*6-- On-site parking spaces required: W lA- Setbacks 0,64Â·Â· aff, 0, k-:_. Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: Front/rear: Front/rear: S ide: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined , Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 0Wkt Variations requested: 0/Alt (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) S ' i STEPHENJ. MARCUS RO. Box 1709 ASPEN, CpLORADO 81612 (970) 925-7615 (970) 920-3693 FAx April 23, 1998 To The City of Aspen Gentlemen: The Ajax Mountain Associates, Ltd., hereby grants Peter Dictenberg permission to renovate space# 201 and # 202 in the Ajax Mountain Building, 520 East Durant Street, Aspen, Colorado. Very truly yours, AJAX MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES, LTD., 0 11*~k~ Stephen J. Marcus General Partner 07/05/2994 05:54 5163245028 PAGE 01 CASHMERE 1-]AMPTOn +1 7-91 <19 2. 1 to uion, W Mal Gpld,24Â·k , <42444 64 G a.ujby.4 4 aef- - 4 90)1 7 9Â£44Â£44 Al 4 4!11&11 ),267 . 4 14 0*74-02Â£4ts 0-,t.. ()>2Â·Â»uk K 2,Al4Â·~~~ty/,6,1, j /4,0 W a,4~n O/t,f 41'106~~wd ' q r-ka ~-ltd-1 /Al=- 1444 0 OM t< It ratÂ·U\,4 a,0 'yl* t, Â° u63 2'*+ Oce~,U, tud@ a/# 2* <301 t 2-6 2 , 9uy Vin,4 060{ %*k LM 70 FOOK 1863 ASp*' 65 3(Ule- 1/4 306:~~7 /2 170 100 105- 442 3 +3 â‚¬-Ar= 9.1 ~9 TS<L â„¢13 i c.'Tâ‚¬ Als & Bw- . 0 612 744 3500 4 MAIN STREET. RAN-1- HAMPTON - NEW YORK 1 ]937 516 324-4000 7 14 - . 2,< -Â·>.. '.S .':M' . 6~..:;2 2 HPC Application for Minor Development Ajax Mountain Building 520 East Durant Street, Units 201 & 202 Blk 96 Lots N-S City & Townsite of Aspen (Store is located on the second floor on the Hunter Street side) For MALO, an Italian clothing manufacturer. Interior renovations will combine two existing retail spaces into one large space. Interior finishes will be very spare and clean. There are two exterior issues relating to this project: 1. Windows and Doors The second floor store fronts, in general, are set back from the face of the building by the depth of the walkway that provides access to the stores. This walkway is covered by an overhang which significantly shades the storefronts from the street views. The handrail along the outside of the walkway also significantly blocks views to the display windows. A few years ago, Channel moved into this building and altered their storefronts to increase the size of the display windows. This was somewhat effective in increasing the visibility of the store's display windows to the street. We are proposing to do the same alteration to our store fronts. Proposed Development Drawings A, B&C 1. Replace existing store front windows with new larger windows a. Window head remains the same, window sill is dropped from 2 ' 4" off the walkway to 1 '2" off the walkway. 1. New sill height will match Channel sills. b. New windows will be large glass areas with divisions only at corners and the doorway. 2. Also the same as Channel c. Window glass and frames will match Channel, current frames are bronze not black. We are proposing black frames. 2. One of the two existing doors will become a glass panel the same size as the door and the same height as the adjacent new windows. (Per the building owner's request no brick will be used at this location) 3. The other door will remain the entry door and will be a black metal door with two horizontal divisions. (The existing doors in the building vary for each tenanO. Continued 412 North Mill Street PO Box 1303 Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970920 7723 f Â· vkr@rof.net !Â£,2 9fft.: f; .I~:Â·r:~:.;-1?Â»5*341.TrA.*/:~Fl~~:~':7 Â· 8.1-/M'-d .4/"/Â· *-- . . ~ f bil#~' *.1:..;S.32:4Â·,Â·it, ... @1*92~~*~~~4~:*+~~ 6 ~'~~ 7I ~Â£~L._ -- t~~, j.,:, ~~,Â·.,j,~~**XW:**ltrt~~D*~i,i~~.,:rs;e~~.f~ff.-:)~ff~~~;~C...1.-1 19.-L N 4. The brick sills will be reconstructed in matching materials and details. Every effort will be made to match brick color variation, grout color and joint size. The brick layout will be the same as existing. 2. Awnings Because of the visibility of the stores in this building, the awnings are important for the store identification. Until Channel, all the awnings were dark blue, and of a similar type. Channel installed off white awnings of the same type. We are proposing to use white awnings as well. Currently, the white awnings are the only ones that are visible on the Hunter Street side. Proposed Development Drawings A&C 1. Install two new awnings, at locations indicated on drawing 'As a. Awnings will match Channel's in color, size and detail. With the MALO logo centered in each drop panel. Thank You -CV Suzanngh Reid Reid Architects Representing Peter Dictenberg for MALO 7 COOPER. 41 610 â‚¬Awr 00#AUT gl uwrr toi i tol 960>Nt> PWOR AJAX MTN. 0696- .'ll i. E Â· Â·t)*AIT qI \ , m /1 Area Map / <37. . / , / / \ I . MAIN ST \ 0 0 1 I. / ~ ~ pu~.N, *T,aer s ite Aspen Map 4/2%98 /0 Ajax Mountain Building O peJOIO O 'Uadsv '188Jls qUBJn O 1993 029 I REID â€¢ ARCHITECTS 412 North Mill Street Â· PO Box 1303 Â· Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f Â· vkr@rofnet i 1 1 , AREA Of PF0'OSeD CHANGS GECOND (BVEL ON,Y f- AUTO*6 *TOREPPONT \* FeCEMED S' 6â‚¬+H#D Tr PIGNâ€¢ Titfoo-*# â€¢OT secopo ke\Ih MMN 'FAGADE . 1 .pli-il i. i it . il i 14 i \.-1 -7, El,4,r Imp - Aulhâ€žNes / 1 : /4, P.04 ee dj MUN 1,45=S I i r- -F -M t~r -7--- ((-44,/.1~lut; , 1 ! 1 4 i . . - 7 4 ; i COUTIN.ljovs. - HAN p..16 -2 1 (P'*tte 0 61Wk.:3 i . .t 1 - 1 -1 11 -4. -' 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 EXIST I ~16Â· - t t- 6 T T -+ 1 .- 1 3 '' ' 77- ,-1 - t=-r - ~1 4 198~446/ 6Â®1 fle 1 i 1 1 1 ill 1 . 1-i -i- b 1 , . 2.1 L 13-_t r_. ext'6Â· t-0 --:=- . .410#WA-(A_ /4 -1-- - - - Levet. . r -4 j - $ East Elevation â€¢ Hunter Street Â· 4 . 1 Existing / Proposed AgeA 09 7%01006 CHAN<Gre 612â‚¬k 01= ffk>POSE p 02,4140-6 < (01+AAJUBIA '%601.-39 1061, 411+f '1 / . SeCON D 9@VEL ONUY 96% DErÂ¥4 + AFTEF. PEW\.4 74 e 16 rna O A Ajax Mountain Building < 4/29/98 520 East Durant Street, Aspen, Colorado 0 ' REIDâ€¢ARCHITECTS \ ' 412 North MillStreetÂ· PO Box 1303 Â·Aspen,Colorad0 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f ~ vkr@rof.net 1, 1 11 11 11 1 -1 1 1 --- 1 1 2 il A- Â· 1 , .9 i 1 I Â· Â· 1 .n , C --- Q/---- -4--7 .-=Â·:-Â·t./1-; 4..1 1 / 19 -P P . - -- I. . a . . -1......... -I.-I. -- -' 02 .1 ' 7 1 -- 4 - 1 e*wrnhit. ; -- EXKT I UG- -- 906, 4 4/ ---Wlhlt>OW* lU - V') 10 Po\Ne~ --7---- t POOK- 2.4- - 1. 1 1 11 ir" 111'111 lili Ill'Hliljli.1 ? 111111!Ii!111 1111 ,-Rl.:Ii; : :Ii- 4*MÂ·lp,0<luÂ· ___ ~~_ _ _ /230errk- maw:* WAA, Call- i Mor SHOBI N .fo,Â· 0.0$\TY.. o :;. _- i ..4 1 -- 4,%- I / -1~ \ 1 --- I. I 4 -r .1 , 1 i Â· i 15310â‚¬wdâ€¢* 1-451-0 j : 1 1 - . 1 -1 . .. , r. . .i 1-; i t f ,1 1 . I. East Elevation Detai I â€¢ Hunter Street Existing Window Layout 4/29/98 OpeJ010 0 'Uads V luejna ise3 029 unoIN xe!v "0,0 0 I 4 1. REIDâ€¢ ARCHITECTS 412 North Mill Street Â· PO Box 1303 Â· Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f Â· vkr@rofnet 1 -0 2 Â· Â·'- 1, i 1 1 1- 1- . / 1 / 11 1 1 1 5 CZE.mtÂ·..Â·3.Â·:z:- r.-7/:*/V-r- = -Â·- e 1,; t -- . 2 .., 6 Ji'i ' 12.41 1 il- -, --....- . 1. w + - .t.0 i MkiD. J.. =T -- *-- . i. - .. 1 --1 10 .1 It i 1 - - i - 1- '451,1 +W,94 - . ReN POOR - l-Â»02 Feco,ies PIKED 84*1569 56*,14. FBA*,te Â¥1,50 01,Mt, fju Â· -1â€¢1 Bt,0046 1:Phme. Wit Phit,4 TO MATGH , : Â· ~ 4%16*% fO 51(141~16160 - 0 - 1301)5050 STAIkt\.644 1 1. *APPWARS 1 . MEN 6.10Â· i 11 â€¢ 4.lkÂ»OF#â€¢[k (NOT 4410*41 J ' ' 9 1<- BME - MATOrt j efleTING' 3%164' Folt 04*447% 1 i i ..GÂ·*LUT 1 PETM~'4 flf'11 1,1111% 111111111'1111111111 111111; Â· 1 1,11111111111 jiffilli'~ 4~lili~31,Â· - 1 1 - . 'i '.. 1 i r WALF WAK Level, 3 I 1--0 i 1 li Â· !1 ti Â£ T r 2- _, ..--Â·t i 1 11 i / SIDâ‚¬\NA+ 1.105& ; 9 .: i i ;i . : Iii ! t.14 : 1 . 1 1 . il { 1 Â£ .1 - -1 I ti: ! t . I. ....... i ' 1 11 1 1- i f 1 , .1 ; i i ii i: : i 1 1: 1 El i .1 Â·r---4-- Ill- 0 East Elevation Detail â€¢ Hunter Street ~ Proposed Window Layout 4/29/98 OpeJOIOnju'PI'ng ule~noll xe!v 'uads V '188 e JnQ 1se3 029 REID â€¢ ARCHITECTS 412 North Mill Street Â· PO Box 1303 Â· Aspen, Colorado 81612 ' 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f Â· vkr@rof.net . 1 Age, of: peposgo CHANGâ‚¬_ - L SECOWD 66VEA- ON UY | ... ,- AGTONâ€¢ ST#EFRONT \6 feLE'MED S? 13â‚¬4+1619 ~ M*IN 'FAGAD E Ty Fla,u T#%006'4Â¥ â€¢UT SeurÂ·10 65~10 I .I.-*-Ill-. Ii.Ill.----- .1 --- H .i - --1 . liii 1 i ! 1-- fr ..Â· -- - 0* iâ‚¬r iW . AutUINGâ€¢S -"'ll (24 '004 |Ge 6 Mu N thlo.S I ... -*177 f -- : 1. i'-1 1 . 1 - CVUTINUOUS >- ttAN 20AA 6 ' 1 1 7 - 1 r | r + r=6 1 T Â¥ t-+ 1 1 r -r ExIST1 616Â· 1 Â·iii ! 9" o"w. 9 1 1 L 111' - ~ ill . 1112 1 . 1 ' 4 1 UNL~ - -- *. tAi: 4-2-_ exT'â€¢ 4 , 1 + .I ..4100* 6 -- keyek i* t. 4 . ; 1 East Elevation â€¢ Hunter Street Existing / Proposed 1-___AE*L_M-3MaVIOOS_Â®ANGâ‚¬ 612â‚¬A of 7201205â‚¬0 0Â¥tkNO-6 - z) 988 Dero" 9 APTâ‚¬F- PerkfiR r. 8,6 Ajax Mountain Building 4/29/98 5 2 0 East Durant Street, Aspen, Colorado REID â€¢ ARCHITECT S ~ 412 North Mill)treet Â· P0 80% 1303 Â· Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f Â· vkr@rof.net It 1 4 1 , 1 1 1 . 1 2 L -...........1- t . *33/-- --/ =-Â·1=MU=t-~ -. ... Â£ ' - 'â€¢ 2~22.-Z:-0-Â· ..7-r..Â·. ... 0-- ..- - 6 .--- 1 1 I Z i ft .4 i IME ill_i Â· 9 - Â·Â·Â·- ---~ | * - Â· - Â·Â· f .4 91 -7- ===I- =.--0 ...7.-Â·=.* -1 - .1 i. . ati . iiI . -- V -1- r - - .. . . ... . . .. ... --I.. .. .. ... . ,\. 4 - 1 Â» 1 - - \ 1 '1 - PO" 4 4/ â‚¬114TIUG- C . - --* 161 Po\NÂ¢ --WIKIDOW. --\\ 9 POOF /3< . . Co - 1- j . ---j . 1- 4 lililli , ILâ€¢ !1111â€¢111;- lillil ,111Ilili ~1111}liti- :-Â· 1111ilili!111111:1 ..1 1... 11.11;il,11'111 44+449106. ., 1 Mar SHON N . fb, 000,0\re.. Â· :t _1 - -.,-22164 52%*90#Qi., -- - \'.6 N. --- -- - - 1 - 1 . 1 1 I.. 11 -- I .I 1 2 . 1. r. . . . ; 1 I ~11111 : f 11 --r.! T T 4---- -F Â· 1 1 . i; It 1 i! . - . 1 4 + 1 .. I ': -i Â·Â· $6!Gâ‚¬lk*6* +SU : li 1 : - .../.. I. 1 1 i . 1 ,1 - - 1 Â·-Â·- Â· - -Â·-- 1 - .. .i 1 1 1 i ---- -1- East Elevation Detai I â€¢ Hunter Street Existing Window Layout /2 8 4/29/98 OpeJOiO j 'uads V '1 luejna :19 9 3 029 Bulpl'ng ,unoIN xe!v 4 . . REID â€¢ ARC HITECTS 412 North MiUStreetÂ·PO Box 1303 Â· Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970 920 7723 f Â· vk:*rofnet 1 .11 j k 1 1 1 1 il \ '4 1, - , /1 9 - 1 1 U 1 4- ; - 3 I ./ 0 I. i T' 1 1 - . 1, 1 - -1 - REW +964 - MeN 9000: - 0 ~Poop- 5660}186 FIXED F444564 56,~44 FBAr'.40 Fr#80 54464 846 1 -14 BLAGÂ¥. 70"40 W / & PN64 < TO MATEH) *,tw* ro mu,TIMS -- . 13:1150â‚¬Q STAIN\.6$4 \ i- -- +tk.D\NA'@6 . t 1- . . U E:. , .7 '. REN 6*10/0. 5 #*012â€¢46 (BOT 4410,NA- /1 : 3~ 1- 9~55 - Mâ€¢rut i EMI,TIN' 3%16* FOF, Ow~*rrY) _GPOT 1 PETMp; . . 1 -- X 1 - 'Illl111|1['Ill|1|Illl';1|i I l i lli 1111111" It i l l ' Ir I | | | 11~11.' 0 I m 4 , .... - .2 1 r. ! i; ' . WAL**A Level. 1 ._ _ 1 1 - . ;9 1 1 I - 1-1 r.l 1 1 : :1 i T r +_--.t i i J tÂ· 1 g-SIDâ‚¬*IM,Â¥- dB/Gu - 1 f ! 1 , 1 2 ilÂ·:!1 ' ' 1 1 !' i j 1 i i . i. . ..1 ..t i i 1 ,4 - i 29 Co East Elevation Detai I â€¢ Hunter Street Proposed Window Layout 4/29/98 opeJoloo 'uedgv ' 19 e 3 029 Bulpling i ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name IMU O 2. Project location 42.0 EAs-r Do 12*pr er AJAK 1,11Â» BLDe- 0 BlooP 15 60 TS p -S Age,0 6,0 1)(Al,1317& 4 0(-TY (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 06 4. Lot size 1/11&-. 5. Apolicanfs name, address and phone number ?Elâ‚¬fL- bur WAJBFAL:r- % ORS}Â¥,uele: ASPek; 31(, S. Hu,JTge. 9.1- Â«Pula 4%5 2-14Â·-7 6. Representative's name, address. and phone number SUUrÂ» 1#0+ Be/D RENO '016,079675 P 6 866. /36 3 ks PENS 97# yz-2-â‚¬ 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD *Â·0' Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. HiSIOMc Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the properth l,Ageg )2697*1L Of,â€¢ PUP>Â£ 9. Description ofdevelopment application AW,0/610-5, IUMe EA* W f,J DA,1 81-UPS Silli L.Ke B Aa/MeaÂ·r SA}29 IN 6*1â€¢ G ( MAPLEK 2 94 P M.G En- 04*- Polls 10. Have you completed and attached the following? X Attachment 1 - Land use application form 0 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form i Response to Attachment 3 K' Response to Attachm ent 4 11111111 f â€ž 6.4 0 9- COCFEK- 9'T 41"D i rn %10 EAST 0012AWT uwrr M 6 1.01 9600#t> PWOR AJA* MTNÂ· 6696- & 1-Jp..1 E. PGAMT 4'r. / 1 m 1 W m .- j Area Map / / 5. 1 irt\ 0\ 2 / I . MAIN ST 0 1\ i; 4%44/ Z \ 3 I/ \ r -1 3 0 \ 1 . 1. i. j ! 1 0..Hy Â¢râ€¢eer, 1 -----4 / site < ~ 4/29/98 Aspen Map Bulplln g ule,unoIN xeiv OpeJOiol *Uedgv '188Jls lueJn0 1993 029 tiA HPC Application for Minor Development Ajax Mountain Building 520 East Durant Street, Units 201 & 202 Blk 96 Lots N-S City & Townsite of Aspen (Store is located on the second floor on the Hunter Street side) For MALO, an Italian clothing manufacturer. Interior renovations will combine two existing retail spaces into one large space. Interior finishes will be very spare and clean. There are two exterior issues relating to this project: 1. Windows and Doors The second floor store fronts, in general, are set back from the face of the building by the depth of the walkway that provides access to the stores. This walkway is covered by an overhang which significantly shades the storefronts from the street views. The handrail along the outside of the walkway also significantly blocks views to the display windows. A few years ago, Channel moved into this building and altered their storefronts to increase the size of the display windows. This was somewhat effective in increasing the visibility of the store's display windows to the street. We are proposing to do the same alteration to our store fronts. Proposed Development Drawings A, B&C 1. Replace existing store front windows with new larger windows a. Window head remains the same, window sill is dropped from 2'4" off the walkway to 1'2" off the walkway. 1. New sill height will match Channel sills. b. New windows will be large glass areas with divisions only at corners and the doorway. 2. Also the same as Channel c. Window glass and frames will match Channel, current frames are bronze not black. We are proposing black frames. 2. One of the two existing doors will become a glass panel the same size as the door and the same height as the adjacent new windows. (Per the building owner's request no brick will be used at this location) 3. The other door will remain the entry door and will be a black metal door with two horizontal divisions. (The existing doors in the building vary for each tenant). Continued 412 North Mill Street PO Box 1303 Aspen, Colorado 81612 970 920 9225 v Â· 970920 7723 f Â· vkr@rof.net f lo 4. The brick sills will be reconstructed in matching materials and details. Every effort will be made to match brick color variation, grout color and joint size. The brick layout will be the same as existing. 2. Awnings Because of the visibility of the stores in this building, the awnings are important for the store identification. Until Channel, all the awnings were dark blue, and of a similar type. Channel installed off white awnings of the same type. We are proposing to use white awnings as well. Currently, the white awnings are the only ones that are visible on the Hunter Street side. Proposed Development Drawings A&C 1. Install two new awnings, at locations indicated on drawing 'A' a. Awnings will match Channel's in color, size and detail. With the MALO logo centered in each drop panel. Thank You Suzwinah Reid Reid Architects Representing Peter Dictenberg for MALO 1-7 . 8. MEMORANDUM ~ 24:261 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director naN*. 1, tr FROM: Mitch Haas, planner J L~r RE: Aspen Plaza Building, 533 E. Hopkins Ave. --- Minor Review DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to add one new window to the northwest corner of the top floor of the Aspen Plaza Building (Pitkin County Bank) at 533 E. Hopkins Avenue. The new window would be approximately six (6) feet wide by three (3) feet tall with a styling and finish similar to the building's existing windows. APPLICANT: Strong Structures Ltd., Mr. Dana Strong. LOCATION: 533 East Hopkins Avenue (corner ofHopkins and Hunter). PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. The subject building is not an historic landmark but falls within the boundaries of the downtown "H," Historic Overlay District. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setback extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed,floor area by up tojive hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The proposed addition of a window to the northwest corner (4th floor above grade) of the non-historic Aspen Plaza Building, is compatible with and should have no real affect on the adjacent parcels within the "H," Historic Overlay District. Otherwise, the remainder of this standard is not applicable to the proposed alteration. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development will have little to no affect on the character of the neighborhood. The proposed building materials include a bronze anodized sliding window that would closely match the finish of the existing windows. It's physical dimensions would be six (6) feet wide by three (3) feet high. Bronze flashing would cover the cut brick opening for an appearance conforming closely with that of the existing finish details. No other features that would alter or draw attention to the window are proposed. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the new window on the Aspen Plaza Building as shown in the attached drawings. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the new window on the Aspen Plaza Building (533 E. Hopkins Avenue), as shown in the attached drawings." EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - The submitted land use application. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 4-1.;<pe,n ('LU .9~.6 la...4.9 2/~ Project lacation 53? E. E.r,Adhv, floe (-041Â·q?e... Cl LarAe r 2< il-lerd t\Â©02115 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning C -~v., e.~ e r,Â· i g:-r 4. Lot size kA C . 94 * f -5. Applicant' s name, address and phone number SUUK Liti NE./. 1 daw:a <:L,ve.vÂ« 10~Â©* 100 98:nuu,~9,(t.lricâ‚¬Â¢ ; 9)r, -907- Â¥777 -J 6. Representatiye's name, address, and phone numbe~~tu.49~-rots CS+Gue c.9Â· c~(ix.-) 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD v/' Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/P artial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedropms, any prfvious approvals gra~ed to the property).<-7-E, 5 ,1 CÂ£Â·Â·w,Merct'.1 61)v-t.~,c-Ay ) Irke c_re.21- e'lÂ¥ L.JOÂ¥-M- A tru <~-Le 47Â·,n Y-er.-1' u)Weve o.Â·~â€¢t',;\2.i.-y'..~uet @Â¢,hyd, <WC,16( I.f W D ~B<0 ''~L~BA *-05,AeÂ·4.. fl~*..Re.,TU-fs r .r.'. L.-Ls , ge-6.fc-9 c.,re> \,-41!.4 re / il. fl< e L.t ,7A *,Al CA 9 9. Description of developjaent appliption .9 4 +FL â‚¬ 0 u X- 1 9, e C d I i C, 4~ . 6 \0 rcu \ e-UJÂ·. ~-,2 111 e e~,LÂ·00.i<>2. O 4- C. c 't vt.(aut..r. Lan wr,7 , p..g-L Id ~, '.. '....Cl x 3 i L <\-t, \lie n err C ..9- wc Â·r 1.., 4,0~,\1 . citle <Â£13,5 Icl l ~2* w *'4 ~C~ 1 k w, ' r- Ir .r-, i-*1'f &-; . t..p i 4. i v..k...Â¢Â¥, urEâ€¢ ---1 10. Have you completed and attached the following? J Attachment 1- Land use application form u~_ Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 11111111 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: LL- i j'=44 ' C<'\ iLL U-Jiu x44} f,1- L.7 Address: 1 Zone district: - C. C; Lot size: I ..4 4 c.il i r i %(<1- 94 Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: #1 41 ~ Ch-v~t i-U ' Proposed FAR: AL,Cy--Â«M *'- Existing net leasable (commercial): z 2~: CL.- pe Proposed net leasable (commercial): //7,/1- A c Existing % of site coverage: Allic' 9/ 3 Proposed % of site coverage: 2,1Â£211-, c 1 Existing %of open space: 1 ' (L + F.t.4-. C Proposed % of open space: /1 6210Â« g Existing maximum height Principal blda: Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg:/.4-21.-fr Accessory blda: Proposed Â°/0 of demolition: 0 2/96 .-I/1...f' ;4-5 ,:Â«f , -11.rit Existing number of bedrooms: 0 Proposed number of bedrooms: 0 Existing on-site parking spaces: C On-site parking spaces required: 6 4.~'-. 0/~ 5,Â«C,4. Setbacks Existing: / -Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: Fronurear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: 7 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: r _ .r-:32- ./2 1 Â· grÂ·--=Ir' ~c- /. Variations requested: /7. nit, (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) 12: A ,-It -21. >4-15 71'. a , 6 , - =4 r ~ r / - 1 1 417/Â·15-4 -Ff , ~f., I 1 - C .1 /,f '-2 9 al' 1, 44 25- Â· r*~'4* Â·fr71*.~ 1.,4,f~ki#:: 7'Â·4.2~364,~,A~1~5,~taÂ·Â·,:,1*t,{- .9,44 ; Bi-': i,6-4.;F:,7/ .... 1 .k .0: ...,r,<irÂ®.,7 t.t).<9 'j,~-11,Â·I - EÂ· :;' if'1*~:i~:4 i... ...+1. . > *1<~ #15*.-*-;-~~jtÂ¢** 41} ~42+24124.,~Â·53i.Â· >..9.)itf.-r::.: f~~:Â·:*w~ ~ ; Â·~2.~ . Â· -~i ..; :.â€ž:d Â·Â· Â·--Â· '.~ i;~~~ As n*nI j--:,~ : -: 9 i %'i':iÂ¥~40~ ~28'E r Â·.,ic:.*~Â·, .9~%%.vi3-, tAAN fo......... .,80 T,h,i ' rC;Qâ‚¬iÂ·-Â·ii' 1. ,.14 ,Â· .. . 11 . , '1 4 #54' 49 6 3 v -i'~7~*%- : I . U. Â·'I '0.4 ./ . ... 1Â»4 1*5 *47414,41'.1 4:.t kt4>1.1 +A 9.. 1. 4441... t.., V 1, i, I .. 4 , . .,8:44 < e ... 6 6.41 1- 4 1%~~ :G~ ,~<Bld:v - w . 1.t t. . 1 Creek ...9 .4 'Â·.3-31*.Â·~ :~;~ 0 '+ '4-Â¥ iÂ·ic.... *;,Â·Â»iÂ£Â·I~,it~jj**~ ~?f, rpÂ· 47.164 0, ,. Â· Adp#~/,,0 1. .Â» 402. BÂ¢ 6?Â¥63'.FÂ·:.0â‚¬, 4:Â·~Â»~:.,f:'9,;FÂ·El?-2.: ~. Â·Â·' cw , Â·; I $ ..'.9.:EN:444. . . '9- . i.... I -1... .1 ~ Â·Â·Â· Â· ' Â· 442,Â· r ... 2.14 it. i ., Â· .4)* . 14 . .442*4.Â·40*.. 4' r,>1469*1 /& 0r8:â‚¬46-Â¢ 1 Â» Akport ""-D . .... g. ....T, le :flti}liT ' AwÂ¢k':Â·/45 . ' 1 # Â· FÂ¥â€¢4Â¢. pre . e . 5... N .t 9 , 4 ~ *014 - . - , - : -'~~ 5 4 .lip 5 , &3 5-*: i n~,ty/A* .... :F ...../ ' I. . 1 Dod. 6, I H '' ' 2. I . -I Â·r:~llanam:Â· 1 ~ , .'Laic 'Q ... 4 ... :t 9 14-#0#, K... . . 1-41 "11*14 - p . Â·,rÂ·tii,~wÂ· :m,it*litbal/80 11,1,1 9. - .CIFI L 1 7/ * ; V & .r.,z.:.Â·FÂ·;:2:4..O, <#1~\d*tYdÂ¢*Â·â€¢ rr: ~frti . 0 * i Â· % 4 .. . W#gon Cr-k Rd' <Y:6,2.- 1 972 : 4, . 8 1 %2; 4 .*Al"I . - 1 SIT 1 .t .'Â·*11. ' .. 0 - V .4 4 - . I I ..... 1â€¢/.4,64'p'J.faN5 .. a. 3.0 1 -, Â· . . , . ..It. * 2434'3' 4 1 Â£ 'R. f# 4 Lj2 I ....3 Â¢ P 1 2,1.11/Â£'fli:(Ley#ref'pi}PA~Zatit:.3* Â·Â·: . - ' 74 . 1 - t. k . -. , ; 4 431 44 $. I - 1 ' 7 Â·.4 M.,reaa,Rd....0419&$ 4 Â· e i , 41** e 4 , . ' M.,chic.0 Dr........04+6 ' f'' . # .Â· 1,- -er-,Â· .: * ~. .,Â·*39:949-: M.yn-â€ž _*_-... 4.1.Â« Â¢ , .:raÂ·. . p. . --':4*20;4 LUCE '.~ Â· 2.3 ?91.': ~:tlEs~t~. .* Mal . - :Â·Â·7Â»'ft 07 . : .2 . 1'' 46. 1.7.11*Al Midkadh,APL....H-724 .. -5 4 . L .4 I I *DI' ...:,/ 1. a.n 434 97,4 MUI m 41.3.74. . lf:t...1 ,~ .Â·+*% 4- .(/ ..1 f.,9 -4.2.k,...... 04 *.1Wt . , 1.6-74 624400:rd=* CH-3'1 7*4 *1â€¢ ' 11.7 i vi,eÂ· SijwO '' 11.1 4. u=2 0/1,0/ e, ' , - ., F.o_I j . 947/*.:=*may}tffÂ¢â‚¬141'/<..:EQ? ./ 0 , . ':'T. %2 I %9,==Dr-Â·fll89*,Â·2'i:~ ~ Â· ~* 'lt:i,ZÂ·.12,=41.~3: P.Pt , 1 ALLâ‚¬; P,1/~Oth.a- 1.,gâ‚¬ 4- tt I-4 Â· Â·42 River Dr ~.~rÂ·Â·Â·Â·8.3 F,3-4 'Rovenide Av 11-4 10 M 1_# 0Â·3-3 . Â·.Â·; y 4.k h. ru 2 RiventdÂ¢ DCIED.6-7. 0.0 'Â·. . - . 140, . , q e . 941Â·2 41 Â· Â· P Oritinal q, H-1.6 ; Â·' Roaring Fork Dr J-7 ALE :Ii' Herro. Hed- u - :Â·ovotiook rÂ» 0, ''Â·Roarin:Forkv ad . .... 4' 4814-, OAÂ·H- Â¥ 7 ft.I : j /4.P.*48. ... , 2, p.â€ž n / - '41.3-4- --*- ..44 Ind Tr u.,1 '11,â€¢ Hi,-,Lih 11, Â·r n..,1 O P.4 '' i Sabb rÂ» 4 - , 41. 0/4 - Sa'B I M. Spruce . -Â· ' 0-6 . .111* =97--*~ -,: L m:4 Â· R.24 0. S.L. el. F.1 Summi â€¢ Â· Â·Â·" ; W.I .. . C.d râ€¢ B, Â· 44*At:H=!~FC,4, jiâ€¢ 11-4 -. . 3 4Â· pitkja M.. râ€¢ n.'-' r..Â·Â·. Saw Mill A ' 6-1 . Trin . ,Â·' 6-6 ' â€¢ Deck P A;.1.3 8 &44)*'"47 4Â·HÂ·44, 1? Â·T. Ft.cor f â€¢ g R.pr solamo M i 4.H.7 T,â€¢by 1 â€¢ I.Â·Â·Â·Â· HÂ·S Al ' f 9 cao...t Of 1-471:44Â¥'Au " .' M.44 ,&; f.t. Powiâ€¢ Maat Ild R.0-3,Â· Â·. , Shadowood rÂ· ! 1.1â€¢74 ' Tru=u M 4-1.2 v n..i k ,>,0~ V 1., t. .u Â·Â· i Plinvw, Pâ€¢th 1 r,-6 1 Ut. Av. p{ 1-66 1... 0,*/ , LAceÂ¢ a. I â€¢ H+6-7.,7 111. Puppy Smith .1 ' Â· F.O.3 7.10 JUdgi (p W.i , * , , H-6/,7 1.,kew t. Amid r,â€¢ . N 14: C Suvcr KInr r. I ' m., Vir- t. , A.. . , UL rk 4#UUUN 1 ~ H.4.71 h..Â·Rarkarâ€¢ 1. Â· H.6 Â·,- Â·' Skimn,Ing 'â€¢ 1 W.7 : W.J... t, Â· 46.tv' 4-6 z : 1* Smuiglc, c. 1 . U .' ; 7, 14 r. O.00. 1 1 , 4,0/J.Yl-,%=,A , n.$,4 i fit'i Red euu. râ€¢ ' > a.â€¢-,-â€¢:dim', SmugglÂ¢r Oroil N,1 11+7 f. Well Eed 'f ~ H.1-6 ' /. / .lb 11vtf, LIA,t ' 3 1. f k Red Mououla Rd....,..,....,D.G-34' >.' - Smuggle, Moume Rd.......84111 4 Wvvi,VÂ¥ n' ' 94 $ ' ~~~~~WMeAU n.-4.4:Â·4' 'Â·: Soart " . . Witoughby W, 4-Fo.-3 ./.44 p IL, - . Â· Â·f ~*Â·%',~â€¢'fÂ·' ' ,.'. r V ./ : e.::': ...0..I'&-,pi~,~,~i.,~ ~,I,~~,.0.04. c~Â·21 1 .zi:40:J'(42 :'* 14'~0.,*,iÂ·%,t .t.r:.? 1 , "k Â· ~.": ~ . I /1, â€¢.t iN ' I .....4. ;.*41.1 '.t:V. 1-1.-Ya@#:4.>f:.1%'*:': #R.ha, 7 . ., ,.Â·,:471'~4*42**AM, :Â·.9:1~Â·#14*Ak'~1Â¢likÂ·*~~*W#*,74Â©4T.'*li?,t :6: ~:...H 7 ~-,g~)0*Â£*~ r~.94*da;&:f**â‚¬4%~~ttfi*4'90Â¢'T~,kâ€¢,.4'111.31;69ffifift<~*Â·*~1~92#J~;~~ spienity:#//:i/2'L â€¢Gic.2:V<4'212?~t~ - Â·11 Nk.1 6-M Jir,rB.... E,1.4 411Â· ',. iati~ e ' â€ž f..12... .;A : '-Â·-:-,t;:Â·..Â·,-i,fÂ¢tÂ¢Y*R Â·Â· * ~~~ ..Â·Â·- & I t9- . 4 z 4 1 , .2 1.16.3 ke ,.'.2.- 44 ... <Â· i:. i Â· ~'it~ ,#Bbt .%9~4. ~,. *9, 4 ,<.cE.q....3 t. ''....e 23;~*1 #54 , 1... 4. CNO; ''' ...2/ .. Â·'- Â· 9....... y'. 1 + 4 ..... 2:]v , Â·Â· Â· . E. Fist'Â·. I. 4 4, 9,61. 3- m.,6 .96. I ./ -I I ., './. . YÂ·iâ€¢tE,MR / Â· Â· '' 1 Â·Â·. * 6 . I 4 ....+ I L I 9 4 : .:.4.75 4, f lilid-2 ..: 1.4-4 5 3% Â· 75 e.. . . ' 0 . /9*1Â· '.. 4~i . 1 1. t t. ,1 1 7 W .74 ? S :. -'44 .1~Mt :. :Â· , . I. Â· Â·Â·.a â€¢ I... 7.... Â· 4.2 ..Ar .<1 6:2 ').4 5 ' ., e *. I. vwâ€¢ St 1 'Â·t ...:1 . ... 322:.04;AF *% A *@%7<3 44#~Mff :*,t;i, r .:*: i-of?.M *I<~4.Â·;ro .55 41.7 .... .... . 5 t -VA .W. 1'.(1. .tr".*f., .; .1â‚¬k' - V tÂ·.9 ...: I ./:44.3/< H . ~ tri .421 Z.. 4 42.11 + 444%4# r,4 % ' 4 WilÂ· ' /Â·. 1 i.. . .. .... I . 1+ 3't. ' 1,1 l.'Â· V ./ ... 64.44 $ CLIL)/4*L 24.90Â·13 1.trÂ·'I~~'-' U V- . 1 0 Â·471- ' 4, h.3.3 ,1 :4*9 M.=t- ' u.7. Â· ' I . 943?f,RS#'BRT.Prk,-A :t 1991â‚¬20 - *.:ri' 44.7 Doellsili CIG 2.3 744Â¢M.dow Dr.,0-0Â·H-2 Â· MaN;, f.- S' t, W.. ,Â· 2 4*1 3,3.4/<796.491*mt '' - A- 'P . .... r . ..9:'P ... 1' '11*. t- .9. 1.00 .' t .1'~tt~-4 . .. , 79% W..4 , 041"29. Ment..14 nL_-40 'Amplt'WÂ· .Arrâ€¢:,FW:' . 6.,.tÂ· , 2 -1. , 1 I ..we <. dz- 061- i ..H.7 ..'nW O.rmisch 4.*S'tri,JU". & .. , ~;Tillimag.:M . â€¢Â·3.:fzl:t:t:Pr?icÂ·*Â·itti!' 4 ':Â·~ ./6..4 T V, 5 1 . : I ./'tt:IMP/,60.... ' 46-7 744.' Rio Orand, PL* 0-H- ouiâ€¢,1,8, 1 -' . 0-474: Rim DI ..1 . . .. 4..129 0,1-4 0, . 217**Ef: I 1.84 ' , 1 Rlâ€¢gild, Av I M.6 die.7 " - .. .. .-D, its .tl=NL 4,1-2 â‚¬: frq; o.i,1.1 0 . 01-2 41#,1 Roaring Fock D'' P-4-5 ; 4 Â·r 1 ... ru S~*bAL-~1*4 W .. 4..1 . I. .4 .f - r .boo= P . ... irria*_Hot:.'t,k.'â€¢ --'. '- ..2 r...1 704% ::*,r f 463* . . I.: 45. ,. Summk F ' ' Â· 11.4 .; i 6, C. 16,/Â»g,Hw,FC=kN,1 . ' 4-6 9~ 111'- Akin Meu lâ€¢ Â·Â· I.N.I. . sal MIN ./ :t:viw....,/Jit/#Tainvm:Xer Â· '4::2/Eff.-- : :. . ..42... 11 M-3,4:/1 Sh,dowood 11â€¢ 1 :ty . AA ' f .' UN AV. 0 1.4, , '7... Â·'#1*0%~r .. : ; ,Â· 21'IS?-Cze I . :i Â·,Â· Vi- C. 7:.1,4 .{4 ,.. a, t .. ..4,=tt=14:,; . ?0:1344*.Lrâ€¢Â·**,Â·,Â·"F-70'*twit-L,.._3:0:i.~~ 7tf.... . W,F,t "il 446 ?211:, /f: 3*f~â€¢'*8â€ž :i,;Â¤;4*#10~al/B':2111*NE:lk,M=1'â€¢RdÂ·~Â·-6AV '17.f/.=:=& , ..1@(/* 61:ike#*Exir ,i *24 ./ 15 . WU'Oughby W, .t . W.,A Of, .:0- '.w., - 10. 1 11 , â€¢ + pi. 4' ,4,Â·A**Â·t'*,21Â£<~.:~~.,:C:,~.;*240'Â·~>:-Â·. ' ~'~ - ~~~ '~'' STRONG STRUCTURES, LTD. POST OFFICE BOX 100 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 970/927-3339 FAX 970/927-4080 Attachment # 3 General Submission Requirements 1. Applicant's Name : Strong Structures LTD., Dana Strong PO Box 100 Snowmass, CO. 81654 970-927-3339 : telephone 2. Aspen Plaza building Le\Â· 41 G.Ilier.,61.DC-\c 91 533 E. Hopkins Ave. Aspen, Co. 81612 The corner of Hopkins and Hunter 3. Ownership : Stephen Marcus 4. Vicinity Map (included) STRONG STRUCTURES, LTD. POST OFFICE BOX 100 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 970/927-3339 FAX 970/927-4080 Attachment # 4 Specific Submission Requirements : Minor Development Review 1. NA 2. The building materials will be an bronze anodized sliding window to closely match the finish of the existing windows. It's physical dimensions are 6' wide x 3' high. Bronze flashing will cover the cut brick opening for a look conforming closely with existing finish details. No other features are to be included that would alter or draw attention to this window. 3. The development in relation to the adjacent existing structure does not change in location. The proposed window would be cut into the existing west brick wall in the north west corner of the top (5th as depicted on Plan Sheet) floor. See Plan Sheet submitted with Permit application. 4. The structure is not a historic building but falls within the boundaries of the historic downtown designated area. The building and adjacent property are newer commercial properties. 0 -- ~ â€¢â€¢ ~1 D 4 ... 21 + A.LOVIA. riva Â· . Â· 7 4. e.â€¢ ill'-1 . .. . I. I .- I. I . . - 6... . ... I . / AC- i. h ......, I Â·6â€¢ â€¢ f....:...i 1 : f=: 1 -11 -n ....: -2... @ . i I; 1 .Â· , 1 . f 1 .. I . ..-. Al.eval.~nIA,0 .... I. .. 41 . .- â€¢. , ... 7-4 c * Cl- : -- 1 ..Tt . .. . ---Â·Â·-4........1 Â·' 1 ilt i | I : 23Â°230 au-eVA-rioN * ~ 1 '16: Ul,GAS,4A1,,4/4 1 . + i 6 6*,~,012DJ L.EVEL T Kg .6: 19Â·11 '0.'/ -' ' '* '* ' ' '~'- 4-FAM 1â€¢41â€¢1'â€¢D +.. ..%. .00.. I#.*... ----.-- - 0. - I ---I.--Il.-Il-----.*I ~_~_~m: 7Â«F; *~'~:r;: ;-. . *6 FW. . ------ =:Â·-=.Â·.r~- .-~.--- . *-*.760145 / r \ - U *12\ .1 ..\ / -Â·-Â·Â·Â·N...:17-29- :=uÂ·n:.1-:.Â·. Â· - ..7 ---Â· -Â·U+Z -7.-+Irur..Â·.72... Â· - Â·~ ,: i i.. ~ .. . .. .. ..... -.- . WAA , / . 1 / i 7 -.HI- ./11 ki 3 Iti:twit**=--7%*--8 L - ' . I -- I. .... ......... -- I. . .... -- ... .....,0. -- - -Â· -Â· Â· Â·: - A.. t.n-Â·AÂ·.r~t-.U~:Â·m .M--=-= A t,evel- Pvs 7 R St. 111'-1 . 11:1 1 2 1 4-Â·----r=4 41,1./ 13:97 .In b :i ...â€¢r . . .. r a f li :; r i, I . . I . . ................ 4 . FL- fL. .- * i,Â«ii ~;iii . I. ./-/.------. -. %. .-......... -0. .. ./.-/ ---I' A &%.'.&Â¥/*18 -41.' . 4,7Â£,j~:1~~9 .- Â¥ M e.1 100 13-Ht. ..29 k -:2;.5,11=- ..4 / /râ€ž#a . : iii .. L,1 ,146-%31-0%&2:fija-439.Â·F Eft:Â·64.-R:.6->:Di..Â·.Â·*f:=4?Â·4:.'-1 -Â·.44:Â·pfulz..Â·.EÂ·:1Â·Â· .. - .... 21'. 4 -- .-- ...... ~- -- - biall/'Jilmoi i - ....... . I- ~-4 ~ --4 1.--- i 4--1 11. | =46' 4~00.. wval- 1 - 7 a 66; 91*11 -Â¥Â« Ut,Â·' ' . 1 y 3#1597,-0 2-EVA-Flow * - i %6: Al.049.145,~A~ ,~11,4, L 1 , 47 -1. Ill \ .. , .J r 1 - 7 1 Â«LII' ' i '4 1 f 14 11 1- 1 C_. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director [Acting HPOyU RE: 123 W. Francis Street- Extension of conceptual aÂ®roval DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: This project received conceptual development approval on May 24, 1995. Section 26.72.010 (F)(3)(c) provides that an application for final development review shall be filed within one year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless HPC grants an extension, failure to file the final development application shall make the approval null and void. A one year extension was granted on May 8, 1996, and again in January 1997, allowing the extension until May 24, 1998. At this time the applicant, Jake Vickery, requests HPC approval for an additional one-year extension of conceptual approval. The letter requesting this extension is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conceptual development approval for 123 W. Francis Street (Lot B) be extended until May 13, 1999. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to extend conceptual approval for 123 W. Francis Street (Lot B) to May 13, 1999." Im 0 1221 JAKE VICKERY 100 SOUTH SPRING ST. #3 J O UE AldN lk)00 DS ASPEN,COLORAD081612 POST OFFICE BOX 12360 com 4 0 NITH P.6Ull-.opvvief DerT- (970) 925-3660 TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE & 114 o F Mpol Asret, 04 - paqlu J U Lf g Ald M J 011 J l,ETT:Ert I S 70 726 4 0 Â·ef T â‚¬*Iâ‚¬N 5 tin/l op- cm~ CLVT\) bc. APP?,6 VA,LS (SY\ Il..3/)1-1 106 5-f FR. A,N GLS Fo R- A- *67210-0 oF / 2 /11 dyl -TH-rÂ· 11 +0.u-.rW fo ll C>~4 PLâ‚¬77 a* Dr pINAÂ© DE-91414 . 71#14 4, 40./ dwidaN- dA IDE \) i 64*41 0 D. 40 MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director [Acting HPO] , , nv RE: Food and Wine Magazine Classic at Aspen, temportry banners DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: The Food and Wine Magazine Classic at Aspen wishes to hang banners throughout town this June to highlight the Food and Wine festival. The banners are proposed to hang on the existing lightposts. It is not clear where they propose to hang the signs in town; staff will ask for clarification regarding this. The Food and Wine Magazine Classic at Aspen will purchase the banners. Attached are a letter from the Food and Wine Magazine Classic at Aspen, and the design for the banners. The banners are exactly like last year's, except they do not say "15 years". The banners are 3' x 5'. TheÂ· dates of the classic are June 12, 13, and 14. STAFF REVIEW: Section 26.36.030(3) allows for the installation of temporary banners which advertise a special campaign, drive, activity or event of a civic, philanthropic, educational, or religious organization for noncommercial purposes. These signs may be within the city right-of-way, with the approval of the city manager, however the maximum time they may be in place is seventeen days. The applicant is requesting that the banners be allowed to remain hanging for the month of June. Staff does not believe this is necessary, and it would require an additional review before the City Council to exceed the temporary sign requirements. Staff recommends that the seventeen day period be adhered to. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the banners with the following requirements: 1. That the banners be placed in accordance with an approved location plan to be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Dept. prior to installation. 2. That the banners not exceed 3' x 5' in size. 3. That the banners not interfere with or obstruct access, activity, or vision along any such public right-of-way, and shall be subject to the written approval of the City Manager. 4. That the banners not be installed more than fourteen (14) days prior to the event, and shall be removed within three days following the event. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt the temporary banners for the Food and Wine Festival, with the conditions set forth in the staff memo dated May 13, 1998." Attachments: Exhibit A: Letter from Christina Grdovic, Event Marketing Manager Exhibit B: Drawing of proposed banner I t Aâ‚¬Â« RECEIVED APR 1 3 1998 \95 51 B COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT acrul'. , 1- i INN pril 10, 1998 my Margerum ity of Aspen 30 South Galena Street spen, Colorado 81611 ear Amy, :an't believe it is that time of year again to begin talking about the details for e Food & Wine Magazine Classic at Aspen. I would like to thank you again r allowing us to+hang our Food & Wine banners on the lamp posts in town st year. It meant a lot to us to partner with the town and have your support. ast year our banners read "15 years of Food & Wine in Aspen" however, nce we are celebrating 16 years we would rather not highlight the year and ily highlight Food & Wine and Aspen. Understanding that we can not have a go, I would like to propose that we simply say "Celebrating Food & Wine and spen". The dimensions of the banner will remain the same at 3' x5'. The ates of the Classic are June 12,13 and 14 and we would like to have the anners hanging for the month of June. iank you for your consideration and please call, write or fax with any Jestions. I can be reached at 212-382-5885 or faxed at 212-382-5788. incerely, r, /9 . hristina Grdovic vent Marketingâ‚¬Manager -SU 14. Guthrie .. - D. Moore/ACRA 1120 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036, tel 212.382.5600, fax 212.382.5788 0 0,6 A A --"MAGAZINE; 1 classica A A 1 A .1 MAY-OMB 18:37 From:AMERICAN EXPRESS PULB T-256 P.02/02 Job-971 celebrating =i= .2. .,9. lip.' Â£ ..i',Url .R m. =,92=m Â£ 1 Â·-N- --i:JITIA .-.a. - 421- =[40. ./ 2 - - 1.??1 .... une ...LI:/ ...IN... .....'ll. 1./.il - 16" and 'a*41 â€ž t I ,"I+./.9 -Bil t)#1/ - ..,=6 P./al,CZ'- Â¢â€¢' 41~ 1 - 07'elÂ» 2.437 1-9- - 4-t Â· pf- -1 - r kâ‚¬ I ...,2 I"@:Â·*. ' '0 I j' .' 4%, . ' :' 4 , . , r-:' .1 r -1. ...r- 0 /"a:"i 1.1. 5- 1 EXHIBIT E. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Deve vent Director Julie Ann Woods, Deputy DirectoR \.1 FROM: Mitch Haas, Planner ~i~~ RE: 114 Neale Street, Historic Landmark Lbt Split DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking approval of an Historic Landmark Lot Split. The property has received HPC approval for an historic landmark lot split (Resolution No. 3, Series of 1997) as well as for a subsequent amendment to that lot split (approved October 8, 1997); however, since the plat ratifying said approvals was never recorded, the approvals have expired. The property has a gross area of 21,161 square feet. In a manner consistent with the original approvals, the applicant is seeking to divide the property into one parcel of 6,001 sq. ft. which would contain the historic house and another parcel of 15,160 sq. ft. on which a new house would be built in the future. Per Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1996, which extended the historic landmark lot split provision to the R-15A zone district (including 114. Neale Street), the FAR which would have been allowed for a duplex on the original parcel may be divided between the historic building and new house. The allowable FAR for a duplex on a lot of 21,161 square feet in the R-15A zone district is 5,290 square feet, exclusive of any potentially applicable lot area reductions. The current request, like the original approvals, would allocate 1,345 square feet of floor area for the historic house and 3,945 square feet of floor area for the new house. Community Development Department staff recommends that the III'C advise City Council to approve the proposed lot split with the conditions outlined in this memo. Plans have not been developed for a new residence on the southern site. In the future it will be brought to HPC as a significant development review. APPLICANT: Henry and Lana Trettin, represented by Robyn Glendhill. LOCATION: 17 Queen Street/114 Neale Street, which is located on Neale Street between King Street and Queen Street (across Queen Street from Herron Park). ZONING: R-15A PROCEDURE: Historic Landmark Lot Splits, like all lot splits and subdivisions, must obtain final approval via adoption of an ordinance by City Council. Pursuant to Section 26.72.010(G) of the Land Use Code, "the development of all lots created pursuant to section Eit 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be reviewed by HPC at a public hearing." The Land Use Code defines "development" to include "the subdividing of land into two (2) or more parcels." Therefore, the proposed lot split must be reviewed at a public hearing by the HPC in order to obtain the HPC's recommendation to City Council. In total, the Historic Landmark Lot Split is a two- step process: step one is a public hearing before the HPC in order to obtain their recommendation, and step-two involves conducting two readings before City Council (with a public hearing at second reading) in order to obtain a final decision regarding the proposed lot split. REVIEW STANDARDS: The Historic Landmark Lot Split shall meet the requirements of Section 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5), Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), and Section 26.72.010(G). Section 26.88.0306442). Subdivision Exemptions. Lot Split. The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one additional detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, is exempt from full subdivision review provided all of the following conditions are met. a. The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the city council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Response: The property is not located within a previously approved subdivision, and the lot predates the city's adoption of subdivision regulations. b. No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.04001)(t)(c) [this citation is incorrect and should actually refer to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c)]. Response: The proposal calls for splitting one lot into two. The two resulting lots would conform with the dimensional requirements of the underlying R-15A zone district, with the exception that the historic house has already received a setback variance and parking space variance. Pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(ch the newly created lot will have to mitigate for affordable housing by providing either an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), paying an affordable housing impact fee, or placing a resident occupancy deed restriction on the home. c. The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)(a) [this citation is incorrect and should actually refer to Section 26.100.050(C)(3)(a)]; and Response: The property in question has not been the subject of any prior subdivision exemption application or approval, other than for the same proposal. The property has received Historic Lot Split approval as well as approval of an amendment to that approval, but the required plats were never recorded, thereby rendering those approvals null and void. The expiration of the previous approvals has left the property in its original, undivided condition. d. A subdivision plat which meets the terms Of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. Response: As a recommended condition of approval, a subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Departments for approval and recordation within 180 days of final land use approval. The plat and the agreement shall include a prohibition against further subdivision and a requirement that additional development comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code. Failure to record the plat and agreement within 180 days shall nullify the approval. e. Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be requiredfor a showing of good cause. Response: The language of this criterion is included as a recommended condition of the subdivision exemption approval. Also, see response to the previous criterion (d). f In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. Response: No dwelling units will be demolished. g. Maximum potential buildout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home. Response: The applicant represents that, besides the existing structure (one unit), a total of one (1) additional unit will be created. The end result would be a total of two single family residences, or one per lot. Section 26.88.030(A)(5). Historic Landmark Lot Split The split of a lot that is a designated historic landmark for the development of one new single-family dwelling shall comply with the following standards: a. The original parcel shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet in size and be located in the R-6 zone district or a minimum of 13,000 square feet and be located in the R-1 5A zone district. Response: The parcel is 21,161 square feet (larger than 13,000 square feet) and is located in the R-15A zone district. b. The total FAR for both residences shall not exceed the floor area allowed for a duplex on the original parcel The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the Subdivision Exemption Plat. Response: The allowable FAR for a lot of 21,161 square feet in the R-15A zone district is 5,290 square feet, exclusive of any potentially applicable lot area reductions, plus a possible FAR. bonus of up to 500 square feet from the HPC. This FAR would be divided between the two parcels as follows: 1,345 square feet of floor area would be allocated to the northerly lot with the historic house (plus the potential for an additional 500 square feet via a bonus from HPC), and 3,945 square feet of floor area would be allocated to the southerly lot for the new house. The breakdown of these allocations shall combine to a total of 5,290 square feet of floor area (exclusive of bonuses), and the allocations per lot shall be indicated on the final plat. c. The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. HPC variances and bonuses are only permitted on the parcel that contains a historic structure. 0 Response: The historic house has already received a setback variance and parking space variance. All other dimensional requirements of the R-15A zone district shall be complied with. Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e). GMQS Exemption by the Community Development Director. Historic Landmark Lot Split The construction of a new single-family dwelling on a lot created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be exempted from residential Growth Management allocations and shall not be deducted from the pool of annual development allotments or from the metro area development ceilings. Response: An exemption by the Community Development Director will be processed following approval ofthis application, if approval is granted. , Section 26.72.010(G). Historic Landmark Lot Split The development of alllots created pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be reviewed by HPC at a public hearing. Response: This meeting is a noticed public hearing. 0 ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 1) Recommend approval ofthe application as submitted; 2) Recommend approval ofthe development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit; 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered); or 4) Recommend denial of the application finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards as presented herein. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the HPC forward to City Council a recommendation to approve the application with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by-City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall: a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.88.040(D)(2)(a) of the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that development of the new/southerly lot created by the lot split shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c) of the Municipal Code; c. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application. d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR, on both lots combined, equal to 5,290 square feet of floor area prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into one parcel (the northerly parcel) of 6,001 square feet and a second parcel (the southerly parcel) of 15,160 square feet. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on the northerly parcel would be 1,345 square feet of floor area (plus the potential for a 500 square foot floor area bonus if granted by the HPC), and 3,945 square feet of floor area on the southerly parcel. The information verified by the City Zoning Officer shall be included on the plat, as a plat note or series of notes. . 2. As a minimum, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e). 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement and pay the applicable recording fees. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings with the City Council shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by City Council. Recommended Motion: "I move to forward to City Council a recommendation to approve an Historic Landmark Lot Split for 17 Queen Street/114 Neale Street with the conditions outlined in the staff memorandum dated May 13, 1998." 77 14 .to\1. \/ 17 QUEENS[REETÂ« t- 44 442 '* ~SIT 4 40 441 \11 Rd M 99# Creek 6/0 14%-9 ) 0/7 AN =ZA /9 - Hunter v a / 17 QUEEN STREET t. VICINITY / LOCATION MAP oodouctu U ~1 11 Ch 1 - i 0 LU4 -133 r %L \.rv-/.-7- lj11, /i \ k %*04 L *~ R rl 87% A./44 9 ~64 1 M . L She;77 \ 1 Maae, 2 1 4, Aspen - - 44 4 */SoumA,f*,vl@1495 9 cli;r'FBRELY<4* 24 -* \ 42> 8 2 4%*41- -. S, ./ I. . Â· 1 2 et 4 4, 7 Cht â‚¬-1-7 4 .e-e SrrE I-7 - ../ r .9 0 9 4- C 7 7 9 * Mal| O 1 4. ..E.2-3: St ~,~ f.. , Cl- St 0 232 3 1%44 U -A .*.':.: ~ ..4 m.......3.. rtii,li : I---".1,-Â· 2-1. V \ ~ 2-3 . 1 0::... - 41- 1F River Dr - : W.3 , .......'. I rt.6 Riverside Av ' W.6 4/*e 5v Riverside n. f =.3 Rooring Fork Dr w-6 Roging Fork Prl %45:.:3Â·4Â·~~~ Li. 0.4 149 0 a Â£4 . -r .Clialla*R", 14: 0 9.5 Sabin k J . ~ n.2.6 -:.... outh Av 6 .: r.6.~ bf Sage f' 9-2 SE:1 -g# 1Â·- ' . . AR.54 0 G.6 9 1 2-Z Salvation 9 .-2 Spn 12&<: *- 7-5 Saw Min n Â· r.3 Summit 0Â·- ..1 S f.-G.3 St=me St ; r-H-7 Test o X 4 . H.Z Rhad,-ood > 5 LJ-7-8 Toby I n 9-3 0 9 9=5 G.3 Shdy Tri ; ..0-5 Truscon 1 E-lf-1-2 zi Short A , A.6 nvin Ridge Dr 4----Ek H* silver King > ' 9-2 Ute Av. Pi 1-5-6 r:-6 Skimming I. ' w.7 Vine g 4 Smuelier qi ' R.G-3-5 Walnut St .G.6 . m -, Ada~,/:Â· 1 1 4///a //Iâ€žb Â· Â· I7 QUEEN STREET f Al,en.. Calondo â€¢151: .. . Â»ing â€¢11/121â€¢Mon: 1134 . . - . 7 ..=r =S-Z= . I.. tÂ· 2 ./ . .. 4. I. ... . a. h.p .. ... . . I. I ... .. I-/ . I . . . I .. . ..... .. I la . . .. .. 4 ..,=U.. d I Z... -- ~e- 1. 15. 14% ;09 Â¥, 06470 1"G; . .. . I P ~.4 1' 29, 17.' - 8-:!4 144-37 2,811- - - i .. IIi-"26 E- c Â·.> 1~* * .0129:30' 9,- 107.4â€¢ 16=; - %2.... ./ a. r" 3 . , ,&Â·- , - , 41Â·--- w. 47*e--1 .... . 1/.Ill ' ;**fil,/ Mi,Â£i 77.81' lle:10 imMi.MA 14<60/ ILZE'/.ple/Â·t , â€ži~2- ./ 61 Dil" *f U 119 * 00 I.. 34.42 28.t .1-* th. 40..6 11'69.01: .. J -: *03*/1/*Uttut . â€¢ . /. .6 Â· . .. . Â» . I . . .. 7..' I . ..3. I Â· . .r - 1 I I.- : ty:ed:'-.- Fitdwfâ‚¬- I . . . . I . . . I. I. I . f. I. I . .- . Â·' Â·*:.45*~ t. ).:' :0..:,7.:,9-. I . I . -. 0- - -Il- -1-7 QUEEN STREET EXHIBIT 3 O A *f , i 1.0 C. 11 T. I d>, 4 N -<>, 1 '10&0 .. r . SCALE 111.1 - 20 F.0 , ..l C UT ;P $ 10 . 30 4. 1 4 .... â€¢ 1//10. O/Tal :ST.. ...... : OUS Â· : 4 . lau V . .- le . ,. - LiI i i' LEGEND & NOTES m,1~W 0""'///./#&â„¢ t,- T,1,/ 1,11~. Ca. P.Lt- .. . ,.2Â· pl- c=. 41,-01/*/U 2/11/ U/Ule //l/ Ul- 11 TI ....10.- '11. C=r,ml. . PAI EL 1 ...., CONII {.1, =4 41*017 mi"Ii" FO=Â¥A'"/ mÂ» *I'= 1, .2 TO .S *r. - ..2 k - POU -4- 0.-l Lite - MAOâ€¢ I. ... . p... m CERTIFICATION 4, 9 ~*11- m.. - .111-BT Col. ('Ul -' TO . I . I. 'LOC*Tl- CE!11/ICATE 11 .// 1/ ./8 U- =.= -1 - . 4.f ... , MIg ......... 17 M 10 ..'.1. Ull /0. 1. I . . 9 1.9 - :I/'".'0'ilis-"'lag- = 1- 4.r.=.-0.Â¥.- 96 , e . . 1-1..... . . -- Ol:O n:mi..-al 00 t. ' I.VA I. I I .-Ii.2.. . .. .. 0 - 0. - - . - - HERRON PA*R . IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE . PARCEL t. OG THE aOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT .. RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 3 AT PAGE 35. COUNTY OF P I TKIN. COLORADO ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. .. I . CERIFfâ‚¬.47+10* OF 0@1831**P AM DEDICATION SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT ~ graim- FOR 9 0 17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT DWN/MNW'waa#J- 'tu,w:=Migr=,41,2,#7'*': 10.1.0'm t- 'I".111 ST.8.-6 ri- / iI+R %/7,6 / Ir\ 12=:11.0.0 1.1.6 1.. Ugrnton- ~2- ID.= . 0 -0 -Er Â¢'mueÂ¢ a le<*41. ~-'WY--,=72...'..I--'/* G r 0,4. 0.&.11. It- UP ..A.Y. 11 0- 974*% O w=,minme' . 1.111Â· '21 - /.0 r 1.... ....C 0 .turÂ¢ 0.. SURVEYORS CERT IFICATE / 0 : 1 1 O,//- =Lite 4,/NA 11,4'/9 1-1, T,IN.*./.1 1 . a. #0 \ *I'...+LI. ./. , TITLE CERTIFICATE . ....9 â€¢ , ~~OUSE /2 I '.'. =...'I 9.-.ax. //// / BÂ¥, / ' 4 /. 4 + 1 .6 ....Ine....# r. 2 //4/ 14 . CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL 1 LOT 1 i / r--2\ 4-2 / i 9/ -------~ HI STOR IC PRESERVATION COMISS 10,1 APPROVAL 1 2 1 41 3PS#lt;M,~~ T-JMP'Ija-"eMâ€¢~t:Z \ It== 61 ..lorâ€¢ 1:X* 2 U , .6 0/ Dre IM==muljm--1 I'.al \\ CLERK AND RECORDERS CERT IF ICATE 1 t,-41*.lum=u \ PARCEL 2 â€¢LAfia:"wileeji/frgap':ML' 4% LOT 2 9 4/ 4 . .4 * r - 1.7 -1.1 * R,#imrail.MialiB.~2 .irn [*-ael 99.A 2 0~EVilvwÂ£ 3 '11,1 ~41- ... ...r..lili.01.-1.1- . M,taL: bu UFfilVAm'2&1,~1111,19. . N:,4 \\ 4 = 4,4 . A~W&,iwgirevE/ME#527#Bmi. 90& . .0%*amm/9-9 Â· WAM.1,11= el,6'm/:Am - .... HERRON PARK MEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. :10 0/I -at â€¢TE*. MIN.-. t.. ./.3.1. .. ---,1-MY -- , J~ /1 2 .1- 11. - t - - -1 =A . â‚¬3.,4 1/'ll:& 1/9 - .1 Â· AL 139.13:1$~f.131/b - r. .-.-t "filial'/61 15"/:r. 4/lillilli- i -/////A T.,1 4 -2-= -U- ..A. f- -'' i.'39/4-M' 2-4 'flu ./I'llic/% 7//A 4....ALaillyf ,/I.LA... r-EXHIBIT County of Pitkin } ~ 5-/3-4-r=37-1 ~ AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } sd~ TO ASPEN LAND USEREGIJLATION State of Colorado } SECTION 2632.060 (E) 2 j F) 1 ek- hili L ,/1 0 0 4 A , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (ID of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the25 day of/Lr.i , , 1993(which is ZG days prior to the public hearing date of47/4/49. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the r.2 -7 day of rrp,-0 / , 1993 (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Â° &4200 A SipturÂ£ ~ (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 2 3 day ,1995by WrrNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: //12 27/22 AO A ATe a- n JÂ·'-7-1 â€žb ,--e- Nomy\Public 3 2 t- rn t, 4. j Not*+ublic's Signature PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 114 NEALE AVENUE, InSTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Henry and Lana Trettin, requesting approval for a historic landmark lot split. The property is located at 114 Neale Street (Aka 17 Queen Street), and is described as a metes and bounds parcel, said tract being a part of Tract 40, East Aspen Addition, located in Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M., City of Aspen, Pitkin County. For further information, contact Julie Ann Woods at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920- 5100. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25,1998 City of Aspen Account g:\planning\aspen\notices\114neale.doc I Â£ ATTACHMENT 6 a.- PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Municipal Code, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property, and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice required from Table 1, attached to this summary. Following is a description of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication. Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department Administrative Assistant who will also be responsible for delivering the notice to the newspaper by the deadline. The City pays the cost of publishing the notice. 2. Posting. Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Depattment, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing to show that the posting took place. 3. Mailing. Mailing of notice is to be made to ail owners of property within 300 feet of the subject parcel by the applicant. It is the applicanfs responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof (in the form of a signed affidavit) to the hearing to show that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: â€¢ Any federal agency, State, county, or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. â€¢ All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be given 5 days prior to the hearing. â€¢ Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to Â·all surface owners, mineral owners, and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. \1 records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax date of public hearing. .. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING CANNOT BE HELD WITHOUT PROOF OF NOTICE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. 1 - KE- -.... ..... /J . I /'. *42*aulf..24.:..4, fr.4.-1:-:.2 Yiffil.%1iff:...4..:9.-12~F.Zf'Flpi-j:; A.*4*4 , 5,0-Â·,Â·~.4-- ?Â·*itÂ· 51&4*SOM.~'-'# 9,~f-*1~..1* HOUSTON AND O'LEARY COMPANY 620 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 2.16 in 4 Grâ‚¬- 63- 4 400,2. Are. GE>LL; l*q-* 1 Cl-- 0 G 43 7 - HOUSTON AND O'LEARY COMPANY 620 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 3 n Â£ flirsha L 1 180 X 1 0594 A Â£ CD 21 & LA _ , 1-/ 4 .---XtaÂ¥ --' , 1 t:5\0 14 91 3 17< 2 i B Gn 1 Q 4-j 5 CA t ~ 14) 4 441 \%1 - .N \ r 9 9 0 i & C. . *41'.~ Dll, LU 01011 .-I- A / .\ArA (4 SeS 47Â£(sfkla/)8Â£ 2# r -0 f 0 2 19 a te l.cl Â· La WL - ft\; nneafi>[a, m A â‚¬91 1 4> rONAND O'LEARY COMPANY T HYMANAVENUE CO 81611 0~ /*~, of 45- 0 130 SÂ· 0*f-gyl e AÂ»n I CO Et dll ANVWINOO -&.-2-*--21- OMPANY L 1-753 L 71 c ru-PJ U..0 64 /0 1 11 -4 4â€¢U "4 4 " L"W AL- ASPEN, CO 81611 13 0-401 1 6-a -r- dEL-C 'HtÂ« 66*SuhAL E>o >cÂ£1144 A apal L ED 51 6 14_ k.Â»31- ihoÂ»Â«- 1_**c< 1-4 -3-l j/4, Â« 92.6 3>-1 ? . LD< 6> 71 fÂ«/477< 40 -F ((t f\9 -Flsk- A.of - u-u-Nati Â£ Co W 422 TrlinT(eff Ske,i B 33&< 3'a-3 h-sp-*1 , CD Â© 12 10_ .:CK-/ 0 0 ~ YCOMPANY IPANY 6.<.Il//I,-A, cJoGlk\-111-Jax- 1,6 UL *411Â© -7*~Dr Â»,-02_ le 255 990 14 11 9- - UNds 71 7%04AA) Afan ((B FY&(C ~ - I â‚¬~21:-â‚¬,IL.~.-2221*:221=aa~ e; "' * Â·i i'-1 :~. ti,titâ‚¬ 4-1.4391:29%7~Â·(4 f~Â·31-92~ :Z-*.Ett.20 0-22 2.-*353*ET.73 .li: .- ~t 2.4.1.7: -i . * . -,4;.A-- /b'"a,tÂ·.U--â€¢ i~A~0*~-t~~0Â·,2-CUU--1,< = 4~ 7-- .- ' . 4 Z COMPANY MPANY C>W'/ 19 2 1 11 a a\- L f S t ~~ 21#t<S,_j~Ra,2-0 ~elud - 74 60- 0,) o R,~a- StÂ·tj'.b 14) Li Al . (Yt { l <11- 4 975 %3 31-Â· Rap-47 J co & 61 l Aapn , CO E-/ 4 # Z 1" i 1. e 4 9 i , 91 1 f # 1 i 0 EN ipo 1 t r . HOUSTON AND O'LEARY COMPANY ~ eD EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 i % L.-2 CL gzDâ‚¬- + ~ID Â· A-- 7*+ND(ZSki-9 9<rl K ~ 64- . 075-pul #I~ 166 81-7 74- AÂ·VÂ« 1 peIll 60 9/of ANVE v]918 ~-~ 1 L t fl 1 144? i 344 N 0 Rf \D E % 01 0 P 0, 1 tÂ»Â· <Â· 1Â· 4 . ::1 1-2,111!~ .. Pi el Ll . /milimidimil *i W. 11 9 -. -.Y- ....P-N.- -*I/*I.- %-.I.U.----q .-I- ':t., STON AND O'LEARY COMPANY .ST HYMAN AVENUE 1, CO 81611 lp.V, 0 4 us O RAL-Gp. a)Â© 0 - erant Ag-t . D ted-v 24 N 5 01 49 9- -- - -- -9 -V AJI'VI 081611 -Da-~ Alk.13 +SDk 600 3 Â· flcpkiRS A-5F , Co yl to 1 1 Yl D /2 03 le.I-" 2 Â· -- - _ CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT HENRY AND LANA TRETTIN OWNERS OF CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FOR e PARCEL 1 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 ~T PAGE 35, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, COLORADO. 17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS LAID OUT, PLATTED THE SAME INTO LOTS 1 AND i 2, 17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT AND DEDICATE THE WALK AND DITCH EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON TO THE PUBLIC. OF OWNER: OWNER: PARCEL 1, OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN Â·~ ~~pÂ·~ HENRY TRETTIN LANA TRETTIN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, i STATE OF COLORADO. \ STATE OF ) .0 H UNKNOWN )SS CONTAINING 21,161 SO. FT. â€¢/- (0.486 ACRES ./-) COUNTY OF 1 THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE THIS DAY OF i , 1998, BY HENRY TRETTIN 4 k th WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 14 1, % MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC END OF CUR~ - LEGEND AND NOTES STATE OF ) 4 Iss COUNTY OF ) O F0UND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE THIS - DAY OF * 3- DIA. B.L.M. BRASS CAP E.A.T. 11 %<Kil \ \ 1998; BY LANA TRETTIN. O\ I UTILITY BOX WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 3- N ~,o MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MANHOLE 4r - - 9018 O 0 0 FENCE c, >04/ 0 \ 144,\ NOTARY PU8LIC 0 UTILITY POLE <& SURVEYORS CERT I F I CATE @@ DRAIN N 630 / \ 1, JOHN HOWORTH, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER Â® WATER VALVE 21, 1 MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED PROPERTY, CITY / . 34 1 GRAVEL ~ OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, AND THAT A BUILDING WAS FOUND . SURVEY CONTROL DRIVE \\.4 5::6 TO BE Lod:ATED THEREON, AS SHOWN 061 THIS MAP. THE LOCATION AND Â·2Â·41 DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND FIRE HYDRANT CONC. Â£/ 27 EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE TITLE COMAITMENT NOTED HEREON ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THIS MAP, AND THE MAP ACCURATELY AND SUBSTANTIALLY DEPICTS POSTED ADDRESS: -17- . r]> /r WALK THE LOCATION AND HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND INDIVIDUAL UNITS AND THE UNIT DESIGNATIONS THEREOF. THIS SURVEY WAS - -Â·Â·- OVERHEAD uTILITIES 2 51 of PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLORADO REV I SED STATUTES 1973, TITLE 65 5 ~ 0 38, ARTICLE 51, AS AMENDED FOROM TIME TO TIME. CONTROL SURVEY CLOSES TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: 6 0,0 \ TO GREATER THAN 1:10,000 ~ pl~ COUNTY TITLE, INC. 4-/~ BLM TEE SIGNED: DAyly 03/19/98 . 0\ JOHN HOW~ITH P.L.S. 25947 CASE NO. PCT 12873 4 4 /4 1 TITLE CERTIFICATE O SET 25947 WATER, SEWER AND GAS LINES ARE LocATED + Â£'Ect THE UNDERSIGNED~ DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF PITKIN IN NEAMIAGTREET . ~ ~ ~1 TIES + GRAVEL COUNTY TITLE REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN .,9 COUNTY,COLOR~DO~ES HEREBY CERT I FY THAT THE PERSONS LISTED AS ~ A'. 0 1 0 OWNERS ON THIS PLAT 00 HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE WITHIN "' 4 0% ILL 7922,9 1. DRIVE DESCR I BED REAL PROPERTY. ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS 4 4 HOUSE * 1 CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, NOR AN . 26 OPINION OF TITLE NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE, AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND HISTORIC OVERLAY PARCEL AGREED THAT PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL OF THE TRETTIN PROPERTY 10 FOOT WIDE BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON RECEPT I ON. NO 334163 13 D I TCH EASEMENT ANY STATEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN. AREA 3,543 S.F. â€¢/- ALONG CENTERLINE :MKA:SÂ¥0=LUTLE, INC. 4.1 0 4 ASPEN, CO 81611 St GNED : ~ 4%~ BY: STATE OF COLORADO ) Â® 63 4 4 1 CONC. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) 4 . DRIVE 0 THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 5 - DAY OF , 1998 BY # p OF STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 46. 2 20. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL \9. 12.5 4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: -* H NOTARY PUBLIC ~\4? ~ lo i A CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL 05 + LOT 1 k 4/ THI S PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE C I TY OF ASPEN DEPARTMENT ~? ~\ * OF ENGINEERING THIS -_ DAY OF , 1998. \\ 1 1--10 $ 400+ PUMP 6,001 SO. FT. ./- 2 CITY ENGINEER 0.138 ACRES ./- 9/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVAL 1Â¥ g.Â° 0 10 20 THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 9 OF THE CITY OF ASPEN THIS - DAY OF 4 DISTANCE 47 LINE BEARING 0C CHAIRMAN < .+ L 1 S 52Â°33'09-E 5.90 *, L 2 S 86Â°09'14-E 8.70 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 4 e THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF THE .y CITY OF ASPEN COLORADO SIGNED THIS_____DAY OF ,1998 DIRECTOR + CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE THIS PLAT WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK, _.M. THIS - DAY OF ; 1998, AND RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK -_ _ AT PAGE -S RECEPT I ON NUMRFR CLERK AND RECORDER 6868 V V CP '0 0Â¢ A2 PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, < STATE OF COLORADO. 4 4 LOT 2 e / VICINITY MAP 15,160 SQ. FT. â€¢/- N.T.S. A? 0.348 ACRES ./- 2 &\O 4 0 67. 2.,Pe 00 +L. 0 F f Â® ~~~/--- END OF CURB ..... $*- I e 30. 0-> PL~OTES 4 \ 0Â» 4,0-> 1 THE 17 QUEEN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT WAS CREATED PURSUANT 6 TO RESOLUTION NO. 3, SERIES OF 1997 AS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ASPEN PAVEMEN1 -4#-~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AT A PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY -, 1997 43 AND APPROVED AT A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE HPC ON OCTOBER 8, 1997 AND AMENDED AT A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE HPC ON OCTOBER 8, 1997. THESE SITE DRIVE ENCROACHES SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS APPORTION 1 345 OF THE ALLOWABLE BASE FAR AND AN ADDITIONAL INCREASE OF 500 SQUARE ~EET OF FAR 94 44)99%-po Q?lt' FOR A TOTAL OF 1,845 SQUARE FEET FOR LOT 1. 2 THE AGGREGATE ALLOWABLE BASE FAR FOR BOTH LOTS IS LIMITED TO THE ALLOWABLE BASE FAR FOR A 21 161 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL IN THE R 15A ZONE / Phi*4 0 DISTRICT. THE PARCEL IS EL(GIBLE FOR AN HPC FAR BONUS. --4.-- 3 oF THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE. LOTS 1 AND 2 ARE HISTORIC LANDMARKS SUBJECT TO THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS 14 ry DEVELOPMENT ON LOT 2 SHALL CONFORM TO APPL ICABLE SECTIONS OF WIDTH UNKNOWN PAVED 4 THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE REGARDING EMPLOYEE HOUSING MITIGATION. DRIVE INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPROVALS REFERRED TO ABOVE IS AVAILABLE i G APPROVALS MAY BE FURTHER AMENDED OR MODIFIED BY THE OWNER. 5 THROUGH THE OFFICE OF ASPEN CITY CLERK. THESE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PAVED 4 Â· AFTER A CERTAIN TIME PERIOD UNLESS EXTENDED OR VESTED. THESE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS ARE SUBJECT TO EXPIRATION PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE PROCEDURES DETAILED IN THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE DRIVE 6 ADDITIONAL UNITS BE BUILT WITHOUT RECEIPT OF APPLICABLE APPROVALS NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION MAY BE GRANTED FOR THESE LOTS NOR WILL PURSUANT TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE - OF NO. 5 RE-BAR -\ THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE. EASEMENTS LISTED IN SCHEDULE B IN THE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE 7 PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC CASE NO. PCT 12873, DATED: 03/19/98, THAT AFFECT THE PROPERTY AR~ SHOWN. ACCESS EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 ACCESS TO EACH LOT AT THE TIME OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE FROM THE AT PAGE 35 8 SIDE STREETS KING AND QUEEN STREET RESPECTIVLEY, UNLESS CERTAIN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER ARE MET. NOTE FOR SIDEWALK EASEMENT. IN THE EVENT THE OWNER RELOCATES THE SIDEWALK 9 WITHIN THE STREET R.O.W. THE EASEMENT SHALL TERMINATE. HERRON PARK PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOT ICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU Ft RST DI SCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE DATE JOB CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. 4/98 22129A Â£040. 0, <'SÂ· . .. .. . i \ - i d i f '1 t j .-. 0 7 '1 A ..1 f EXHIBIT El 1 9-7 1.9-Â« 7 .. G r-0EXHIBIT 7-- MEMORANDUM , a/-Â»n~- TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director c vip [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] RE: 234 W. Francis Street- Conceptual and Final Review, Partial Demolition of a non-historic structure, and variances from the rear yard, side yard and combined sideyard setback standards. DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: HPC recently approved a renovation of this structure, which included changes to the carriage house, a new kitchen addition, and a new basement under the house. At this time the applicant wishes to propose the removal of the existing non-historic garage, the reconstruction of the garage, (and setback variances to allow the reconstruction in approximately the same location) and an enclosed connecting element from the garage to the main house. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant is back before the HPC to review the plans for the new garage and an enclosed connecting element between it and the main house. Though the applicant originally presented a breezeway connection, they subsequently withdrew it as the owner decided not to pursue this detail. However, once it was determined that the garage, when reconstructed, would be placed 2' back from the rear property line (to allow a turning movement into the garage from the alley) and hence, 2' closer to the main house, the required distance between buildings could not be met. Therefore, the applicant is back before the commission, seeking approval of the connecting element which should satisfy the building dept. The garage building is proposed to be demolished. It will be rebuilt "in the exact proportions, height, and materials", but will be slightly relocated back onto the subject property, setback 2' from the rear (alley) property line, requiring an 8' variance. Similarly, the garage would be placed on the 2nd St. property line, a 0' setback, requiring a 10' sideyard setback variance. The combined sideyards for this property are 15'. The applicant is requesting a variance of 12' 4" in order to allow the relocation of the garage to occur in approximate the same location it has been. Staff supports the variances requested. The connecting element will count as FAR. The applicant has indicated that they are at or near their allowable FAR for the property. The applicant has indicated that the enclosure will be approximately 30 s.f. of FAR. It appears from the plans that a door will open into the garden from this connecting element. The roof pitch seems to be slight, making the octagonal roof line behind seem wider than it might otherwise. It will also shed rain over the door to the garden. This roofline should be carefully considered by the HPC. The applicant had previously included a design for a connecting trellis between the main house and the carriage house, but has since withdrawn this request. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The overall proposal is a successful renovation of a group of historic structures which will be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: With the modifications discussed above, the proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: With the modifications discussed above, the proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. Partial Demolition. No structure shall be permitted to be demolished unless approved by the HPC or exempted pursuant to Section 26.72.020 (G) or (H). Section (H) indicates that "a structure that does not contribute to the historic significance of an inventoried parcel is exempt from meeting the standards..." The proposed garage structure is non- historic and does not contribute to the historic resource. Staff believes that it should be considered exempt. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Conceptual/Final Development and partial demolition approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the demolition of the existing non-historic garage and the Conceptual/Final plans for the reconstructed garage and breezeway connection and setback variances for 234 W. Francis Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage will be rebuilt to the same proportions, height, and materials as the existing garage and shall be placed on the site as shown on the property site plan as indicated in the application submitted to the HPC on May 13, 1998. 2. The proposed garage shall be granted the following variances: The rear yard setback shall be established at 2', thereby granting an 8' variance; The sideyard setback along 2nd St. shall be 0', thereby granting a 10' variance; and the combined sideyard setbacks shall be 2'8", thereby granting a 12'4" setback. 3. All conditions ofthe October 8,1997, December 10,1997, and January 28, 1998 approvals must be met. Exhibits: A. Letter from Scott Lindenau dated April 22,1998 B. Letter from Arthur Yuenger dated May 7, 1998 04/22/1998 11:09 303-9207822 STUDIO B ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 13% M18 17 h E. i [1 1.1-1. -~ architects 22 April I Ul)>t Amy Guthrie/Mr(- Director City of Aspen 130 South (;alena >trret Aspen, COM 1612 Dear Amy, Thin letter serves aÂ·. the requested infoxmation detailing why we are requesting the demolition of tht> non-histort< 'garag,Â·7 4,cated at 234 West Francis Sheet here in Aspen. To sum up il,c hist,In, Gs you know, we were told that this structureiN non historic and could be completely removtÂ·d. relocated. or re-built because of it not being an original part of the historic houht'. These, Scenkirios wer,r i eviewed with both yourself and Sarah Thomas, city zoning officer. Originally, we were gojng to ret,ovate the interior butbecause of the logistics of raising the existing house to maile way for the basemt,nÂ· and the fact that we cannot get a vehkle into the gar,lge from the alley. We would like li, dellitdi,h the garage, re-build it in the exact proportionsf height, and materials, and mow? it ch,Mer tc, the holiNe by two feet so that we can get a car into the sarage Becaume Ordinance 10 regulated that garages carmot be entered from streets and that alleys are preferred, it is the liegietil solution, Also, the Current atructure is not used as a garage and *ds structuri, needs al] rtrw fc,01 ingS. and a slab to accommodate the garage and the upper leveL Pleame call me if th,Â·nÂ·, 14 additional information that you should require. Best Regarda. Scott A. Lindrnall. Al:1. cr: Don kind C;wril Mitllin,5, Gary Wheeler 5 4 !Â· 1,1111 61 ampen 40. 81511 970Â·920Â·9428 Ing 970-920-7822 8**10< S 4 S .-*T.1-0 .4[1.*,149 [Itt B 2,~ 30 1.. i, ~ 4, - 6, F.1 0 5 2-1 architects AlAY 07 . ~~ 004. 4900 1998 T May, 1998 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Julie An n Woods City Deputy Director City of Aspen From: Arthur Yuenger/Studio B RE: Gardge/Connecting Enclosure Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado Dear Julie: Please find enclosed, drawings 1,2 & 3 illustrating our proposal for the Connecting Enclosure if the Garage is moved two feet toward the Main House. If any additional information and/or drawings are requested please do not hesitate to phone. Respectfully, - Oil i Arthur Yuenger 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970Â·920-9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 May 8, 1998 RECEIVED Historic Preservation Committee MAY 1 1 1998 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street ASPEN / PITKIN Aspen, CO 81611 COMMUNITY 0EVEL0PMENT RE: AN ASPEN HISTORIC LANDMARK 234 W. Francis Street, Aspen, CO Davis H. and Celia Waite Home Ladies and Gentlemen: Aspen has been fortunate to have the right people at the right time to maintain its lifestyle and character. As a silver mining camp, it quickly attracted the investors to fund the expensive mining techniques to produce and ship the silver. Some of the investors and the miners laid out a very cosmopolitan city, which quickly grew into one of tile larger communities of the day. They built beautiful homes in the midst of lovely gardens. and began to enjoy an active lifestyle with social and recreation activities. Davis H. Waite came to Aspen. He was an attorney and he was publisher and Editor of TheÂ· Union Era, one of six Aspen newspapers, copies are available in the archives of the Aspen Historical Society. In 1891 he was elected Governor of Colorado, the only Populist Governor Colorado ever had. He was a supporter of: Women's Suffrage, Labor rights, and a visionary re land ownership, silver and humanitarian rights. The Waite family owned Lots K, L, M, Block 48 in the 1890's and into the 1900's. Shown on the enclosed Sanborn Map 1904, the house located thereon shows an addition to the rear of the building. We believe this is a portion of the house today and is a part of the historic Waite home. This dwelling was later owned by Herbert and Joella Bayer. A noted architect, he had his architectural studio in this northerly portion of the house and there are several people still living in Aspen, who worked there for him in the 1940's and 1950's, who recall a *garage off the alley. Since it is over fifty years old, this garage would be historic. This portion of the house is now a caretakers unit, since it was remodeled by R. O. Anderson, a notable individual who helped establish and fund the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Anderson Park near the Meadows was named in his honor. This entire building is an Aspen Historic Landmark and no pari of it should be demolished. The HPC should furnish LANDMARK homeowners and future purchasers THE HISTORIC DATA on their homes, so they can appreciate the history and character of Aspen. If demolition or overwhelnting additions continue as they have in the recent past, Aspen's Landmark and Historic dwellings and buildings will disappear with all of its community character. PLEASE PRESERVE ASPEN'S HISTORIC TREASURES. S i*Â«ely, 7"4---f <R~mona Markawnas Former City Cohncilwoman who established the HPC. P. S. I will be unable to attend your Wednesday meeting as I will be in Denver on business. I was unable to see the file until May 7 and could not gather all the information as quickly as I would have liked. CC: City Council P .- 0 1-Â· 1J U, 0 4 4 11 1 N. 31110 f 0 ST. U b Soo 3,0 400 R. 75' 9 20' 0 E~~Ir-4 K 11 22 171 K ~- - -li 0 - 1- Fla . -L.t, L 8 # 4 8 1, 01 . 11 -- - U 17 ---x-7 0 0 M C 9 1,77 1 |i- 1-2~ C .i i â‚¬ 9 0 77 1, 1 0 _Pll 1 4 T.177 1 -EII Ar 0 4 4 4 r[ 1 0 ! 1 Len I 11 11 - iol, O --42 1 - 0Â· EA47 0 1 0 E 0 Â£ r-nr-3 44 u i :W G 4 U 9 - 0 4 - 'pIP '-r - I' L ~--1_21 kL_1 0 0 T-El " 4 10 11 1 1.1 3-1 1 , U 1 H 1 9 R H R. 9 - U - 1%17 1 1 9 3 1. I S 1 0 1 40, -. 0 0 - 0 . 11 (et j k N. 240 0 ST. 0 0 300 1 1. 100 1 4 , 20-31_ K 172,1 K 1 tels 0 4 1 11 ! El a 0 0 L# 0 ' 9 0 7-4 . 11-Ill- --I- 11 Â· 0 -- / M C ~ Nd & 9 1% P MIC 44 - 9 - 0 11 N 8 1 0 11 0- / 0 0 0 0 4 710 173 0 012 h 8 0 =2493 2 . 07 11.0 11 . 12 51 r* p F -0 4 Ey] P L * $ co 8 7I-116, 0 4~' 0 8uqgy . -0 9, 1 * 10 0 -iiI rlgf R 6 63 El :11 - 0 141 1.14 0 - --21 9 0, D 11 0 f. Â·0~ 9 8 AN, 4 N.le- V 1 ' 0 a 45 6 300 310 3/2 i â€¢ 4,0 4/2 9Ui K 13 i a rt -LI-:1 r ' x D__1 1 -4 . 1 4 11 71~ 7'. I . Init * 0 0 - 101 + 1,01 0 Z [7-1 'iNVS 1 2, 4 - B 0Â·" 4/DINC.-4 TA#0( Litita / -,1 t ; 14- soe-0:p _11, 46 . 11 -/9 1 i . 111:.?0 ill 1. ill.Ill; 1 1 7 01*161 ' v*Ave j /4 I 0 I y w 1 01*446 -1 f GAIdAGE v* 0-keRAUJ *'RÂ¢Wittl/#U#41& ------- - - - - ---- -- ------ ---i~ f I ~5Â¥6*ACE- Fleg< 0,*A Awk)061.e A,Â«80 8'4 5 1 1 >tgovE 14:Â® 1*)SeteNAY '* 4/ 1~ (-R> te CAIPIRM*eD W /40<42 A l 274 3 00}LOIN&. 0494,2IMPH-f) '1 .to A*fÂ« *0,0 1 1 *A129 Meâ‚¬/0 42$4/76% 12*Ga 4,0 + 4 4- 74= f- 4.. 9140"JER- 5449**4 " 47Â¢O> â‚¬3 'Â· -ra"JI. . '14 l60' Me,/a 641. FL IdE)/ 4 MECHANICAL ~ NJD , 2T 17 f . ;p>495'/~",2,445%,i,8. Â·6 Â· / 0% 1 7 672*1 12 920*928*80*~5267Â«#*t**E* F:Â·,4%8*4*MANk 42 Ell / 4*** \6 #Le 8 cM. ,LL ~ 1" & LIN 12 j Air , /4'- 8" op'*pir*,2') ,314 _ / N 31. 41274.. 1 ./ /\ / iNN toi , 57,/1 Jr Ag#F. . , 1 / \ f X ! "r# 70/lt ht##0#$Â·1,14 .*(*@**Re#0*>52' 1:40:i~51 ..i ./. I t. y .KI b ~ CLOSET ~ â‚¬ pkn.fir .A",1,187.- 9 1. \ 4406'rEL 1 / 44. -Â·Â·Â· 0/ ~~, 7&92 S 00 ' I / b y - , Â£ 1. ls==4* \ .7- 1 =:S- i : t : in 9-* ! 1 1 b el 1, PORCH, 0;?hx MUDROOM | 41,1 \6.- ... 23#6 37# --1 - i . - i-:352-*- ~v ~-- 9 \ < KITCHMN \9- / 19 \ Al 1 2 If \ \ V 1 1 4 f .\\\ 7 tb>3 / IÂ· 5 i j~kÂ«4, 11 4 --- Nuilt '2, El I Attil G)$ .# A-6 \ A - 626 19#04> dAM K Â£- BALiq-YAVT */46W ~ K --~ O, F. 1Tu D - +Ppu MAC.e. it OE - VO d 73 --1 tâ‚¬/. Itt- 11 94 --- - -- 11 . 0 \ r-/Dr; ' 9 12 ,-20 to '8 +P. ikbia 0--- i 1 4 DEN / STUDY DINING e, 40 f Aize,5 ill .16/ ODOA 3 1 23*2@;dE;g=5222Â£4221 E --- 2Â«111- 1& - 9.4 1 . 6 4 155 i =1 0-7 ' 1934Â§~ 44 4:94*22613 4 2*Â»2>3$~~7 amsopua Bugoauuo) 12 'asnoH ufe* PIEAdol laa; OM.1 paAOUI 32 // / 1 1 . li 1 1 1 1 tl r 1 ET /7 \1 :! 1. 1 1 11 i li i 111 ;i - l 11 , 11 1 --- 1 1 0 . 1 : . r. r- Y r-----1 ----11 i I iti / 13 5 1!6 1 1 '.' A j 1 1 . - .... 5 -i/1.4.(21....-- ':Â·'...1 /331 . 27:1*.gl2Â·~~~~-113. 2Â£=32 -- ----W---------- -- -- -1 9 F 4&% 1 t-L- 1- - ---- -- -I-- PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION 114" =V -00' Showing Proposed, Connecting Enclosure between Garage & Main House (Garage moved 2 feet toward main House). 2 1 - *111*fl 00 Wt"RE - 71' Â£31 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 ----- - woo,0 VE*trnATIOW - UOUJRE . -1 am =123L -wy=r== 1 1 , 3----- ;2:.- 7-3= - - --7.-3-9-22559 - 1 .1 Ill IHI AEÂ·FumeR moef 6 WALL + - POA:+1 +NO INCORÂ»EATE e FLjA I- Mr - wl Neu *FROauns 2>JUNG. 51 1 - !! 1 21-2 2--2---- 20**257 . 1 ----- 7---- --1-- ---1 ~ ;L------ - FIN 1592540 414*OE 11' I -- - - i i - ,@22/45. -0Â»Â¥0 OV 1 1 1 22-2.En-- _ CONS. 51+8â€¢ \ 1 1 . %> 1 1 1 11 111 1 1 1 1 47-441Â«44655 /#>422 1 1 '1 1 11 SeE *AÂ« 1 1 1 1 11 . 1 lili 1 . 11 1 1 1 1 lili 1 : 11 11 1 i il : 111 i - 7 - 4 ~ -- 4- - -1- ..._ _1- - -1- - ---L - - 1-- _4-- * - ---*_ . -- -f- - - -__ 11 SECTION THROUGH CONNECTING ENCLOSURE ~ 1/4 â€ž-1, n" - 1 -U As viewed looking south toward main house h'UBLIC NOTICE DATE B MAY TIME 600 PM PLACE 130 5 GALENA PURPOSE TD REVIEW -nle- pRopOSED DEM 06 In. oP fHE NON- HÂ¢4rmic 6 A KA#E AND ro CEBVIED /7- 1-*JO FGGI- c Â¢,05.A Tr TlE 4417#4 Â¥t,gq IN 1* EXACT {>Pâ€¢,POLÂ·r-1 0 NY. 40 1Â·M Mr Â¥.mu. c *-W #N'fl:I- 110 6+A,1,5 F."1 0,>te 44.-4, *$ RGCOMASWDet> 15'f OD-DINAN,6 to, FOR FURTHER INFORMATON CONTACT T,â‚¬ ASPEN,PIT" PL*,ING OFFICE. 130 JOUTH GALENA. ASPEN CO taG- ja irm ~Â»44144 322,,.. /-#//. 7.. J 1 ,4. 4 ./.1 i. V j . t.. e . .1 V 1, - V ~ 0, 1/ 11 03'.6-- R. 1 140*31 County of Pitkin } INOTICE PURSUANT 0 } SS. --TU~XEPE~CXND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 2632.060 (E) LluTT ULNDEN MA , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the30 day of 4#16-4 1990(which is !* days prior to the public hearing date of Â¥45851. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and thai the said sign was posted and visible conrinuously from the Â¢NP day of A/~Y , 199_.(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. L/AF,4,- Signature ~- (Attach photograph here) 4-th day Signed 47 ,1998by Pja.naj Ponce WrrNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expims: L-1 - /5-0 A , 04-n (1 1 90* j / 1 8 l,=Le.Â«41 I 0 1 8 lee, 1 ,~ Notary Public's S&**T*,0 \ ~ 1 1 \4 *l,c 4/ mÂ¥ COMMISSION e.RES.1.02 ' MAY-11-98 12:21 PM BALBOA MARKET 741 673 3761 P.01 4 -3-*be A .- 4-5 8445 Dâ€¢vele?xed,â€¢ D<F) .- C 22. 64 4.1 Orb ,--=mmr--1 8>Pe.Ap.-TK'.3 11 -3431 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 W. FRANCIS, HPC CONCEFTUAL PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIA..u.4 AND FINAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 1 3,1998, at a meeting to begin at 5.00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement ofCity IIall, 130 S. Galcna Street, Aspen, Colondo, to consider an application submitted by Don and Gwcn Mullin< requesting HPC Conceptual. Palial Demolition, Variances. and Final approval to demolish and reconsauct an existmg non-historic garage and make other changes to the existing structures. The property is located ad 234 W. Francis Street, Lots Ki, amd M, Block 48, City and Townsitc of Aspen. The variances are requested to allow for the reconstruction of the existing non-conforming garage, which currently enroaches into City right-of-way, bin will be placed entirely on private propeny when reconstructed. The variances requested are all 8 foot rear yald variance, a combined front and rear yard variance of 12 feet 4 inches, and a west sideyard setback variance of 10 [ent. For further information. comact Julie Ann Woods at the Aspenl Pitkin Community Development Department. 130 S. Gdona St. Aspen CO. (970) 920-5100. 9/Slizannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25, 1998. City of Aspen Account 0: pl=mirtgA.sp=VnoticcV234â€¢*an.doc ~ Zild Â£ C. /g A;45 Â£40* * -1 7Â£L ..544 FR.ca. . * 303 10. F KNA> L,i 1}spen> C.b t 144 -13-die Â· 4 4,11'L ke 647 *F -T â€¢mi 09 5-L)}19, , F DR, 71< V#RJAâ€¢le) 2 08,4, 1 3 t.,fpoiT -1 ke 12-'#"Cs' 31 74 JA,k â€¢1 15 kpo.,auF:.1- '4'6, 704< Pwk< 4*Ju, *Ar C'4,9 10 Ut,fROM; * 99'~51, blet, 0.:* P.Ref~,er~ . :4 Ft-L 74r #4,14-,AI-i #4-4 -r /4 C.7~ tuil\* tle-41'~ Dâ€¢*417 Ee-â€¢M.~ e v=&274 ti~ -714Â£ a 6,14. 1854. -7 5 -74Â·.a... *.u, c. 4 19.<6 90â€¢~ u.14 Y.rr 1-At putekâ€¢,3~&2 -74 i,tr, ,â€¢, A AJ, L Ptâ€¢,4.25 r '74, 41 2, a.,t 21 AkÂ· 1796&>24- 1, ECtUlt PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 W. FRANCIS, HPC CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIANCES, AND FINAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Don and Gwen Mullins requesting HPC Conceptnal: Partial Demolition, Variances, and Final approval to demolish and reconstruct an existing non-historic garage and make other changes to the existing structum. The property is located at 234 W. Francis Street, Lots ICL, and M, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. The variances are requested to allow for the reconstruction ofthe existing non-conforming garage, which currently enroaches into City right-of-way, but will be placed entirely cn priv,â€¢-property when reconst:'ucMed. The variances requested are an 8 foot rear yard variang, a combined toni and rear vard vabance of 12 feet 4 inches, and a west sideyard setback variance of 10 feet For further information. contactfulie Ann Wgads at the Aspeni Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St, Aspen. CO. (970) 920-51 Â®; s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25, 1998. City ofAspen Account 5-11-99 cru,Ue Ad N 1 MY *AMG- i S MALL 266 03,1. fw't W /fEL 30*J ,Â¥Vo / LIVE Neg-lpos,2. 2 â„¢6 MULU ./5 M- 414 N. 56-4-A. WE- #*we- rb UP*/C Taw,9 -rE:)Al,Z:mil~1*Y ~ Mon-Nm G. , Se WIE WANTSâ‚¬) 72, -ro,toÂ·; CASC g: pianning/aspen/nott 4(TA YZELI~ 4% 9*fâ‚¬ - 06+644 F7TLT<,5 Atfvy"S )A) FSBRyMq, CL wl t.,.-r .454.U U * *46*:r OX>t CA 0- Â· "bGCE. ...- ~ 4 47- ya*/2 2.4#rIA &2F (~ AFY L-?\J. tr,G- d:UA,es<LS ,Â¥JOVE ASW dALAGE2.%.l~iMI â€¢HA_ a.,35GtkADâ€¢*/5 \#*/513, ,4-~ 1~21/ â‚¬. (hUGSTre W57 - leg, LIAVE <) MH 9â‚¬v.1657-1 06- Â©PeÂ«.-?14Â»,71Â£39 -p, 10CMOUS,14(9 6~05!c GAX*RTrt,is Gt 11 7;7&'c; c_. 14,0,6,2 2 0,4&â€¢R- Pe/,9â‚¬.:rle;\ 70 Je+4#i-'s }bewe- ANO CONÂ·56684 eices /1= 10#Jâ‚¬ W rnÂ·4:4 r Av- t'DUE hur-Jr>RE LA#Al,L FC/N/13 3 OnowN- PM*ce ~ WttEW CAN } O*L You -To Ser- A n c, M. 4 Ft AÂ®a, 0.45 M~mED 57*iMS: Amoeirr) C P 144 0 47-- 81=-Tb WO -*A/0 lkâ‚¬ . 636 boNr UKE O"hÂ· 1,56= Fi a.. M)'1 SELâ‚¬I Su A-P )21 995 elL 4 4 fâ‚¬Tjlf REgENâ„¢r,0., PLE*95 CAAÂ·U uS kivot Y Nt Grlâ‚¬ -62 11. Vt Ar SICEN ce'< 0,~ wlE '6.6 86-0+gME; 6*asfl--FFN) PI / (S(~).--t-, 33*d... 47â€¢4 0, 02-r *slÂ·c EE- CAM> Au,m Pew, 91*Â£01,1 4 MTIL WE WAW<. aotes/Vt. 4ck HoM â‚¬ 5 141 214694 1*ANICS. r-J (79 14....4 --- 44.~ff:;.4*.Lf'liM& 1*41'.04 . Â· 'W. f.; M '5'. %17 4 1 r. - 1 -iÂ¥ Â· u Â»' * t'~r~o, I 1- , i -real: If....15*Â«41%1*REWIC.: 4*~**~1*~~..~...9-: 9. ...1..4'-9 ' ..el.-- i 7-37â€ž,2&.1ri.7... : . *24,11'9$1*44)02&~4, 4 8 791 , j. 02-e'l,F I 1 :*PÂ¥â‚¬7 EL/kjuâ€¢ Â·Jet Â·Â·:b ' 4 6 fill ./ Â£'ri '&.r& . -Â·- 2/ I. :4.- . f. Â·Af , 4 -4'> w.*f 7 - A. r Dj 21-9 /3 I 1..Â¥ 1.17<2/4/ t .=:,ri- _ 0 + 447*Â¥ 2 2% Â· Alt-* ./ - -1-1 - . r . Ea.3?f a. 49.. .134>I,Ur' 2 V#,: ,t.Â·11>4.- . '. , * C -Â·. R % 'E -2 22& 9=.9 1,\. 49(2<iiI- +. 3,1 - A ..1 >r. 4* Â· ~ 7-'-In~ W.1/M Â· , 4 .//V./8 ty zi i 6*:-Â«3Â· r . A 0 0 =if f t , , Â·_ * 3 Â£ r *il,/,1,1Â·,1,1,1,1 -ilili-riil,Lt,-~~~~ ullf?~~ . D Â¥= s=BA t . - 10. 1 8 -1 - 7/#*4 J MI~umnW,id .1,Â£4 - - 'A *, Ill I#jd.1-Il&]WillLLit. 1111111,V#Sil-il- Illyr!;49 .- I.ZI~.- A. SAL I B .. . 4~tj, '' 42=...01 1,i"tuN-Ent=& C 12 171.1 '1=91.1 -i..-' V. , , - -Ni!#.f~2 2Â·4>2"N:--:: 7 ..:Â· . 11 -4:1 ti*~ Li-J-1 4 &13!,mlk i I~ 15*%Ii-' 1 -2,2-j-3~;'61*4~1,7... I ...., -41,1."14 12?12:1,=Â»*=. 9 1,1141Â«1715@14/ i h,.. N '406 0 -A. f Â· -- -0Â· ;MVEâ€¢ hml,râ€¢ 12171 8 iC?Ezwl- c.121-el p F,r...... $Â·. :L' . 4 ~ V.. r 4 . 2 1. 0 -P,- 1'-4..1. iwi--U/2/ f /Tr.-,2~+Ll N Â» /4,/3/7 #LiÂ¢Pee.:9* fy"'Â·Â· -'11 /4 //P 1 &~Ikh:qpL#'7 a - Ll , /4.44 2/fl , rlk./ / 4.Â£(?Â·4 1.0. 0.? /0,/),/â€¢222. .-- Fam, ' 211%%Cft, 6- Shon ' 1 L,Â¥09 ,,.latw 4 Pr,CN2Â£7-9P. 4* MR'. r . 8.4.9/2/ /7,r-2:9 '' lw<11/-4// 1 Al n Wit,-k 4z~140 l.tenltall*/DI 0 fl *01- 1 '1 0 / 1 ]Tl 'eÂ¥,t LMFU/46/'/Â·'/9/21 - mrÂ·~25&Â£/2 /4 0 147'g= 1-7.......1.:.. I . / in k 'Â·I:'7'~ ~ 61 0~'~thâ€¢" 'P /0. .0 Â· 2 +0 ..*,Â£.U /:ir,/ 222/,2,/7,Â·Â·, 0 l..Â£z.l_LA-/3.~4Â«Â» :/1,B,- 1 r 4 Â·7 & Li / Wi /LL:/ 54,4 n"rM--396-1 4.7 4 1 /imi,EW'Â·Dl J./ ,â€¢Â·5:--LJ / /*ch.t 4 ..Vt--4-l- / /mA. '319.46 /4*4'f-02;~~_. 2 ' ~ ~r 0'. 3611,f4 1.4 'ele'4,1-f.4-1 w . ... 9 Câ€¢M : 1 I i ~rel .1 - 3 )-4/=L ./ 7 2 + / 4 ..Â· Â«.In:_ y:k~lf/'Glj'~ 1 . P , 9 N.**40 ' 4 ipt.Ifvirl/T<trT./.- . N' 9 41, 1~Unib E 1 al"EaBL~'1 Â°!Â·Â¢%Joli 0 4, 6 , . $ 1 4 S - Â¢ 2/ t. . - -.. -... ' ' 0 0 . + 1- ~4:'0/*hL/2 g . I .. 4z , - Â£' f? 6.0 4 1 ,./ 0 4 -L-Â£=r:e W./4 1 .1 .4 1.L b -Ir' 1.1 1 1 4 , O -. 9, '4,+2*D il 4 0 / ,/2./.U f.p-27' y â€¢ * 0 1 ~Im 9,=. I in 93 2 04.2 9 LI PEJOLIâ€¢.1 â€¢1 Â· i. -14 ' ... 9199#1 2 ----147, El:- 115/ 0 2 7 e ~ ~ 0 ;, * ~* TY# I k - 4 l<MIl*@11 Vi'.0.. -0 4 : /9 V. =42 pao Â· -L-CO-7 k '4!0 Hpi 0 i i / i ig*I S 0 797 b O l-,1111**10 1-am*rt- 1%517[3l 9 4 7 a 02,-Ur: TU Â·y. 1 ,-1.1 0 I Â·*10.-1 1 -1 ,Â¥ 6 . I. 1 -1--1071 n' .1 1 )4 L..211 2.4.1 -1/1 I 0- 9-4.44+ / / Wi /./ 1/Â·22 0 ,~242#â‚¬,5/ O '.- 4. ;. -07/86/8 / . - e ..4 , 4â€¢- A r ,--~~h 1 J Lil-Â» 61,5 24 - 2 ...h. Elei i ,Â¥Â£ a gl.|41.4119â€¢iw' 6. 11 r-r-Â·.-- t,, 01 M o g .-U-1 l'91'01 41. 1 1 7,11 ~ ~ 1 1 H,1-1Â»p._. - . 179-2* 2, 1 4 - 2 ge'llÂ¢,1, r-r--2+14*L/744 Â· ly h J I .19 *',1.1!7Â»0 e., f. f r-rrgti -- -71 id<, I.L./ 7-MÂ·,-.. * 1 ~,~Â¥.~'7 J .4 2. 11 0, 191 /1,6 linh "Imit, , 1-19'9 e' 1 1 -Th LJB./-Â£12 /.. 9481# '1 47-1929-j M El#'mag.] ..1/ lk- . 4. df I d Ipl '1 t[Â»1 1~-p-gE*,til#MEl + *144--- 4--Â£-Ull.-~ /Â·'/ r/,Urnr,Â·27 fliMI'/47*MI / A. 4 Â« U 61-12%16Â·Â¥@ r~,25<181'/4 0 57 LM..till' i/Â£/r/ 2.r I . 4 12 1 P A 4' 7 4 0/ I 1 0% f . 4 4 .1 'il;WY,4 lalj1-7-"-a * / 41 ./ . " 1 U ~ 4 1.. P % 93#129!f 0 1 4 1/4 grl'.2-9,4,43 - / 7.384 / 0/ 4711 / / ~~~ ~~ 0 4 S Lt, ZL-- 12% 2 / .1 4.Lkll]' 1,1,1 I cl 1-12 ,~4 /*A~.~ , 2/*/ *Â· Â¥ Â·81 .1131.1,~~'121~ '47 9 1 /1/ ~---, --L-1 ; 9 1 ~Â·'"1~7~Â£Â£10.1 2 *x--70 7\ 4 /Le \'/ 1 7-$ die. I 4#17 3,'21//.7,1$/. - 1,1,1.4 '6'FI4520,4%65.21,4.-Ij1' 12 Â»4\ } . n 11-1-1 4 '144 Z ' 0 - , g 3, i y. 14 1 r 9 - 1 P 4 I .~+Ii J.norriLL:*o *-36"t.r,7 + ,1,7 1 91 - ,- 10, . B; 1 ~,4~ a pl,I/* :â‚¬1:b.J-71 2,4~ 1- +Il:I ~' ~ 1 0 4 f 1%Â£ M,MB *g9 9**gi.-7:6-Avw~1-- .- -,z 29 I h -* B rnâ€¢â€¢a} U , I li ---- - 1.1 1 -- - 4, ir:-IM~TEE{ lf#Â°,6,_i i C 'prl % Wa:r- . ~ ~, 1 3 4 L, A $4 1* Y ~ 1 '4 "'* ii .. W .2 4, , -__--En---r-- -r -1 9 r-1-T-1-1 Â· 17 May 8, 1998 Historic Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: AN ASPEN HISTORIC LANDMARK 234 W. Francis Street, Aspen, CO Davis H. and Celia Waite Home Ladies and Gentlemen: Aspen has been fortunate to have the right people at the right time to maintain its lifestyle and character. As a silver mining camps it quickly attracted the investors to fund the expensive mining techniques to produce and ship the silver. Some of the investors and the miners laid out a very cosmopolitan city, which quickly grew into one of the larger communities of the day. They built -beautiful homes in the midst of lovely gardens. and began to enjoy an active lifestyle with social and recreation activities. Davis H. Waite came to Aspen. He was an attorney and he was publisher and Editor of TheÂ· Union Era, one of six Aspen newspapers, copies are available in the archives of the Aspen Historical Society. In 1891 he was elected Governor of Colorado, the only Populist Governor Colorado ever had. He was a supporter of: Women's Suffrage, Labor rights, and a visionary re land ownership, silver and humanitarian rights. The Waite family owned Lots K, L, M, Block 48 in the 1890's and into the BOO's. Shown on the enclosed Sanborn Map 1904, the house located thereon shows an addition to the rear of the building. We believe this is a portion of the house today and is a part of the historic Waite home. This dwelling was later owned by Herbert and Joella Bayer. A noted architect, he had his architectural studio in this northerly portion of the house and there are several people still living in Asp:n, who worked there for him in the 1940's and 1950's, who recall a *garage off the alley. Since it is over fifty years old, this garage would be historic. This portion of the house is now a caretakers unit, since it was remodeled by R. 0. Anderson, a notable individual who helped establish and fund the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Anderson Park near the Meadows was named in his honor. This entire building is an Aspen Historic Landmark and no part of it should be demolished. The HPC should furnish LANDMARK homeowners and future purchasers THE HISTORIC DATA on their homes, so they can appreciate the history and character of Aspen. If demolition or overwhelming additions continue as they have in the recent past, Aspen's Landmark and Historic dwellings and buildings will disappear with all of its community character. PLEASE PRESERVE ASPEN'S HISTORIC TREASURES. Sin,Â¢Y?v . . Mmona MarkagAas F6rmer City Cohncilwoman who established the HPC. P. S. I will be unable to attend your Wednesday meeting as I will be in Denver on business. I was unable to see the file until May 7 and could not gather all the information as quickly as I would have liked. CC: City Council =WTH Ail:*M= =======di=== ===...===Miz.-=== p=......=â„¢=. =====.===.....====.=-=- -============n. -=== =============-..k===09=.-9 /24 ~~/34 2/0 234 300 306 3/2 320 326 ~ G. 73-' 1 1 1 FErt KE-7 e 3~091 1:Â» ./ 12=1 1 4~ 1 2 IA -7-=_12. 1 1. $ 1 0 *1 1 * 9-1 -E W F 1. -1 2.-2, k-1 2 4 4 4 b 0 2 2 h. 4 4 + 4 ) 0 + k - 4 N KE7 A -4 - 22 It 'tr. 0Â»<4 6 1% -0 4 0% .1 y.' 4 - 79 I 4, AA 10 4 rh<42 * 41 - 6-1 1 E= 1 Li 1 4 . 0 -91*fr. 6 0 $. > F h * 4 0 8 0 4 - rwri Z --1_ Z Z 0 -* - --lits 28 - 0 19-34-7 -1 2Â© 2 2 4. t=~ 71 ,@* 1-1 i *14 %|~| . tal ir la & 1.051-2% 0 1 1 1 1 .9 4 3 /29 135 2#5 217 227 .8 315 3u 323 329 W. FRANCES ST. M e 4' W. PtÂ»e 0% 126 24 202 uz.# 22# 234 { t 3/4 3/6 1.1 0 lili $ E mir= A- & 34 - .6 41 App Fe 1-â€¢*-1-1 f **or Â¥=Ick Fls F Â·4 CD 1 6 2 0 a r' L-1- 0 - 1 h 4 1 - -1 Le -_ -E I r. .I --=/* 9 - CL 71 N lili A 4 4 $ b k .% A b k % t. / 1- F-9 F-9 8 3>4 - '. n. rD><31 Ira 1 71 - t I I I 0- -- 00 1 1 4 \1 1 1.-1 r><38Â· -1 - 0 1 Ik , 1. 1303><2 C, 1 0 1. 4 906 1 6*9-JÂ»Â« ---- 1. 2041 ~ ST. Zo' 4 * S.*T * 11.D 41.1*30 f architects 14 May, 1998 MEMORANDUM (hand delivered) David Hoefer Assistant City Attorney City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 300' Radius List, Mullins Renovation, 234 West Francis Street Dear David, Please find enclosed, a copy of the 300' Radius List which was not included with the submitted Public Notice Affidavit at last night's HPC meeting of May 13, 1998. For the record, it should be noted that the staff at Studio B made an inquiry least week (to whom we thought was the proper authority at the Community Development Department of the City of Aspen) prior to the meeting, to determine exactly what documents were required to be submitted at the meeting We were not told that this document was to be included with the affidavit. It is our sincere desire to provide HPC, with any and all information requested, in a prompt and comprehensive manner, so as to eliminate confusion and provide clear and effective communication. Sincerely /â€¢ b 1 M ;MMII 1 / bAAW~~~~ 7.-p-W V f'- - 7 W Arthur ilenger, Architect /,43;,37677;hi~ 1,1 -- j , Citv Attorney s 4 " office e t tt 02 â‚¬CE / 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 '468LE &4 2735-124-1 103 300' Radius List 08-Apr-98 Parcel Number Schedule Number Owner Name Name 2 / Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Code 2735-124-14-004 R000314 ALLEN ROBERT H & JUDY LEY 4545 POST OAK PL STE 251 HOUSTON TX 77027- 2735-12+18-001 R001025 ASPEN VALENTINE LLC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2735-124-17-002 R001205 BARNHART PAUL F JR 2121 SAGE RD HOUSTON TX 77056- 2735-124-23-003 R000168 CARANO MICHELE PFEIFER 1740 CATALPA RENO NV 89511- 2735-124-17-006 R000317 CONGDON THOMAS E & NOEL TRUSTEE CONGDON QUALIFIED PERSONAL RE 1776 LINCOLN ST STE 1100 DENVER . CO 80203- 2735-124-15-003 R000684 CONOVER CATHRINE M 1666 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 300 WASHINGTON DC 20009- 2735-124-22-001 R000845 DEVOS ESTHER LEONARD PO BOX 3238 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-22-005 R000439 ERICKSON BERYL ARTHUR & MARY ELIZ PO BOX 1207 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-21-001 R000453 FABRY PAUL A 1127 BOURBON ST NEW ORLEANS LA 70116- 2735-124-14-003 R000457 FIGGE THOMAS K C/O CARRIAGE HOUSE ROBERTS AVE DAVENPORT IA 52803- 2735-124-23-007 R005320 FRIEDBERG BARRY S 555 PARK AVE 7W NEW YORK NY 10021- 2735-124-17-032 R009201 FRISHMAN ANDREW J TRUST PO BOX 465 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-15-002 R000525 GATES CHARLES C & JUNE S 990 S BROADWAY DENVER CO 80217- 2735-124-14-020 R012324 GREENWOOD WILLIAM PO BOX 4778 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-22-002 R000569 GRIFFITH JAMES P S 3417 MILAM AVE STE 5 HOUSTON TX 77002- 2735-12+17-007 R008553 HERNANDEZ CECIL M & LORENE M PO BOX 1045 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-14-005 R000196 KOHNER ELLEN P HUNT ELLEN CO PO BOX 8770 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-22-004 R000805 LEE FELICIA M 302 N SECOND ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2735-124-18-005 R008009 LEWIS JONATHAN & POSADA ROBERTO LEWIS JONATHAN D REV TRUST 4649 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #304 CORAL GABLES FL 33146-2119 2735-124-89-005 R015381 LEWIS PETER B PO BOX 5070 CLEVELAND OH 44101- 2735-124-89-004 R015380 LEWIS PETER B PO BOX 5070 CLEVELAND OH 44101- 2735-124-18-002 R000671 MANCLARK Q P RESIDENCE TRUST MANCLARK WILLIAM & DARLEEN TR 313 E BAY FRONT BALBOAISLAND CA 92662- 2735-124-14-001 R001465 MCMAHAN JAMES A & JACQUELINE 2 OAKMONT DR LOS ANGELES CA 90049- 2735-124-17-003 R000021 MULLINS DON R 4520 POST OAK DR STE 144 HOUSTON TX 77027- 2735-124-17-008 R008554 NESSEN MAURICE N 919 3RD AVE C/O NEW YORK NY 10022- 2735-124-88-005 R008705 NICHOLSON JOHN J ADLER LOU REVOCABLE TRUST 9911 W PICO BLVD PHA LOS ANGELES CA 90035- 2735-124-14-002 R000995 NICOLA BETTY B UND 1/4 INT 621 17TH ST #1215 DENVER CO 80293- 2735-124-23-002 R001195 RH ASPEN LLC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2735-124-22-006 R001110 ROBINSON MARYBELLE S 2552 E ALAMEDA ST #97 DENVER CO 80209- 2735-124-23-004 R000283 SAX JOEL D 303 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2735-124-88-004 R008704 SCHERMER LLOYD G & BETTY A 1/2 INT SCHERMER GREGORY P & GRANT E 210 LAKE AVE ASPEN CO 81611-1347 2735-124-23-001 R001169 SCHLOFFER BRUNHILDE P PO BOX 941 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-17-005 R001185 TOBIN JOAN F 1850 K ST NW STE 380 WASHINGTON DC 20006- 2735-124-17-004 R001338 TOBIN MAURICE B 1850 K ST NW #380 WASHINGTON DC 20006- 2735-124-74-851 R013963 TRIANGLE PARK CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2735-124-23-006 R001348 UHL MARGARETE A PO BOX 122 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-124-22-003 R001123 VICENZI GEORGE A PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612- 2735-12+17-031 R009200 ZEISLER KARL ZEISLER JOAN C 426 N SECOND ST ASPEN CO 81611- 1 11 9 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission TIIRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development DireÂ¢3or Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director r\.a J~j FROM: Mitch Haas, City Planner 118r RE: 101 and 105 East Hallam Street, Final Review for partial demolition of structures included inthe "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures ofthe City ofAspen" DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: The Bush family owns the property at 101 E. Hallam and wishes to remodel the existing house and convert the shed along the alley into a garage. Because part of the 101 East Hallam re-model involves an alley shed that crosses the property line to 105 E. Hallam, the owner of 105 E. Hallam is also part of the application, but only insofar as the alley shed is concerned. Mr. Donald Krumm owns the property at 105 E. Hallam and is in support ofthe Bush's application. The properties of 101 and 105 E. Hallam are both on the Inventory ofNon-Landmark Historic Sites and Structures for the City of Aspen. In general, the proposal can be broken down to include the following six (6) major elements: 1. Request to convert the 101 E. Hallam (Bush) side of the shed to an attached garage by lifting the shed roof by approximately 2.5 feet to allow for vehicle entry, removing and re-building the three walls on the Bush side using the existing bricks, and adding onto the back of the garage to attach it to the residence; 2. Request to move (bump-out) the existing, recessed kitchen wall (not historic) on the west elevation by approximately four (4) feet to the west such that it would align with the adjacent existing walls and eliminate the recess; 3. Request to add several new windows; 4. Request to add a basement and five (5) window wells under the house and garage --- four of the window wells would be on the west side, facing N. Garmisch Street, and the other would be on the north side, facing E. Hallam Street; 5. Request to lift the roof ofthe house by five (5) feet atthe peak, and add a hip form to the front in an effort to re-establish the historical/original design and obtain more livable and legal upstairs rooms without adding floor area. This would also involve the addition of several new dormers as well as remodeling ofthe existing dormers; and, 6. Request to relocate/adjust the southerly walls of the upstairs rooms for functional and FAR. purposes. 1 These requests require review and approval by the HPC pursuant to the Land Use Code regulations addressing "Partial Demolition" (Section 26.72.020(CD, Standards for Review of Partial Demolition). If the subject site were a designated landmark, the proposed remodeling would be considered a "significant development," but the portion of the code addressing significant developments applies only to "development within an 'H' Historic Overlay District, and all development involving historic landmarks." Because the site is not a designated landmark and is not within the "H," Historic Overlay District, the partial demolition review standards are the only applicable provisions by which to review the proposal. The proposed remodel would also likely require a variance from the "Volume" (Section 26.58.040(F)(12)) provision ofthe Residential Design Standards, but the information necessary to confirm this finding has not yet been submitted and the notice requirements have not been met; thus, if a variance from the Residential Design Standards is required, it will have to be applied for under separate cover. Similarly, even if the HPC approves the location of the proposed light wells, a variance from criterion 26.58.040(ID(11), Subgrade Areas, of the Residential Design Standards would be reeÂ»ed s\ace said standard provides that"all areaways, lightwells, and/or stairways on the streetfacing side(s) of a building must be entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building facade which is closest to the street." Again, due to an inability to comply with the notice requirements for variances to the Residential Design Standards, an application for this variance will have to be applied for under separate cover. APPLICANT: Alan Bush and Donald Krumm, represented by Augie Reno of Gibson-Reno Architects. LOCATION: 101 E. Hallam (the Bush property) is located on the southeast corner of East Hallam Street and North Garmisch Street. 105 E. Hallam is located immediately to the east ofthe Bush property. SECTION 26.72.020(C). STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF PARTIAL DEMOLITION: No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds all of the following standards are met. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. Response: To respond to this criterion, it is necessary to first sort out the portions of the proposal that require some degree of demolition. The following will address the six main elements of the proposal in the order of the above provided list. First, the request to convert the 101 E. Hallam (Bush) side of the shed to an attached garage by lifting the shed roof by approximately 2.5 feet to allow for vehicle entry, removing and re-building the three walls on the Bush side using the existing bricks, and adding onto the back of the garage to attach it to the residence would involve complete demolition ofthe existing roof and three walls. 2 .. The applicant represents that the existing exterior roof materials of the shed are not historic or original to the structure. The internal construction of the shed is a mix of old beams and new plywood that, according to letters provided by contractors, structural engineers, and brick masons, is not capable of withstanding a move/lift. According to the aforementioned letters, the three walls proposed for removal are in a state of irreparable degeneration, and removal and reconstruction present the only viable option for their preservation; consequently, the applicant proposes to re-use the bricks from the north wall on top of Krumm side of the shed (below the roof, in order to raise the roof height). The south wall would be removed and re-built with 2.5 additional feet of height and five (5) additional feet in length (to the west); and the existing brick would be utilized. The extension of the shed five feet to the west would create a one (1) foot deep jog from the shed portion of the proposed garage to the newly constructed portion of the garage, allowing for visible differentiation between the historic shed and the new construction. Finally, the applicant would like to add a window to the westerly wall of the shed portion of the garage, and the window would match other existing, nearby windows. In staff's estimation, the proposed changes to the existing shed structure are to accommodate the applicant's desire for an attached garage. Staff does not believe it would be reasonable to require an applicant to undertake the task and expense of restoring and rehabilitating the shed structure solely for the sake of historic preservation. That is, without the benefit of increasing the utility of the shed (i.e., converting it to a garage), renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure would be highly unlikely. Further, considering the increasingly dilapidated condition of the shed, its renovation and restoration would likely require tearing the structure down and rebuilding it. Given these considerations and the applicant's desire to re-use the existing materials to the extent practicable, staff feels that the proposed changes are reasonably necessary for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation ofthe structure. With regard to the requested changes to the Krumm portion of the shed, which involve removing the existing roof, adding 2.5 feet of brick layers to the top of the walls (using the existing bricks), and rebuilding the roof, the exterior ofthe existing roof is not original to the structure (not historic). As mentioned above, the internal construction of the shed is a mix of old beams and new plywood that, according to letters provided by contractors, structural engineers, and brick masons, is not capable of withstanding a move/lift. Staff believes this partial demolition to be necessary for the renovation, restoration and rehabilitation ofthe structure. Second, the applicant is requesting to move (bump-out) the existing, recessed kitchen wall (not historic) on the west elevation by approximately four (4) feet to the west such that it would align with the adjacent existing walls and eliminate the recess. The new wall would retain a one (1) foot recess from the adjacent, existing walls, and continue to use the existing door. New windows would be added on both sides and above the door. The subject wall is not historic, rather it was added during the late 1970's or early 1980's by the prior owner. The non-historic north- and south- facing walls that form the recess to the existing wall would be removed/demolished. To the south of the door and new windows, the applicant seeks to add a double-hung window that would match the adjacent, existing windows on the west elevation. In addition, the applicant would like 3 permission to alter the design of three (3) non-historic windows on the south end of the east elevation. Staff finds that all of the proposed changes described in this paragraph affect only non- historic portions of the building and are requested in order to make the home move livable and to increase the compatibility of the new with the old. Also on the main floor, the applicant would like to relocate the door on the east elevation by moving it 5.5 feet toward the south. This would involve placing a door into part of the original structure (requires demolition of portion of wall where door would be located) and filling in the space left by removing the door. The stated purpose of this request is to provide exterior access to the basement and to better reflect the original location of an historic window. Staff does not feel that this proposed change is necessary for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. The exterior basement access is not a necessity and would run counter to the efforts to preserve as much ofthe historic structure as possible. Third, the request involves the addition of several new windows. To add new windows, the existing portion of the wall where the new windows would be located must be demolished. None of the proposed new windows, with the exception of the one mentioned above (in the extended shed) would be located in a portion of the original, historic structure. Most are on the proposed remodel of the second floor, and the second floor itself is the result of a remodel. The other proposed windows would be located on the rear portions of the house which were not part of the original structure. Thus, while the addition of these windows are not "required" for renovation, restoration or rehabilitation, they would not affect the historic portions ofthe structure. Fourth, the application includes a request to add a basement and five (5) window wells under the house and garage --- four of the window wells would be on the west side, facing N. Garmisch Street, and the other would be on the north side, facing E. Hallam Street. The existing house does not have a basement. The basement/new foundation would be constructed by either supporting the home in place (lifted a few inches), or underpinning the house and sectionalizing the construction and foundation pouring. The proposed basement would follow the footprint of the house and its proposed additions, including the garage. With the construction of a basement, the applicant wants to add five light-wells, four of which would be required for ingress/egress and air space building code regulations. The four light wells that would be required would be on the west side of the house, facing N. Garmisch Street, and the other light well would be on the north side, facing E. Hallam Street. Two of the four light well proposed for the west side would affect the original portions of the house and the other two on the west side would be located beneath non-historic additions. The light well proposed under the north side of the house would affect the front, street- facing elevation/facade ofthe original, historic structure. Staff is of the opinion that the construction of the basement (not the light wells), while not necessary for renovation, restoration or rehabilitation, would not affect the appearance of the historic portions of the structure. Moreover, the construction of a basement with window wells would not require demolition of any portions of the historic structure. Staff has not been provided with reports verifying the ability of the historic structure to be lifted. It would seem that if the addition of a basement is allowed, some light wells will be necessary. If the northerly light well (on 4 the E. Hallam side) can be eliminated while still meeting building code requirements, staff would recommend its removal. Similarly, ifthe two northerly light wells on the west side ofthe basement can be relocated to less prominent and less historically significant locations, staff would recommend doing so. Otherwise, there is a substantial amount of precedent in the immediate neighborhood for allowing light wells on street facing facades. It must be noted that even if the HPC approves the location of the proposed light wells, a variance from criterion 26.58.040(F)(11), Subgrade Areas, of the Residential Design Standards would be required for each of the proposed light wells since said standard provides that "all areawÂ«ys, lightwells, and/or stairways on the street facing side(s) of a building must be entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building facade which is closest to the street." Due to an inability to comply with the notice requirements for variances to the Residential Design Standards, an application for this variance will have to be applied for under separate cover. Fifth, the proposal includes a request to lift the roof of the house by five (5) feet at the peak, and add a hip form to the front in an effort to re-establish the historical/original design and obtain more livable and legal upstairs rooms without adding floor area. This would also involve the addition of several new dormers as well as remodeling of the existing dormers. Originally, the house had a hip roof form and only one floor of livable space. At some point in the past, the hip roof was replaced with a gable form in order to obtain some second story living space. The applicant would like to re- create the original roof form, but with a full second story of livable space. The proposal would be accomplished by adding six (6) feet to the second floor walls (on all sides except the second floor study which would maintain the existing roof height), effectively raising the height of the roof peak by five (5) feet (from 25 to 30 feet). This would allow for, besides the master bedroom, two legally sized bedrooms upstairs where there is currently one. No new square footage would be added, but the "pop-top" addition would facilitate use of existing areas that count toward FAR but are currently unusable due to low ceilings. The "pop-top" addition would require that the existing roof be completely demolished, the new six foot tall second-story walls would be added, and a new roof with a sloping element on the north side (hip form) would be built on top. The applicant represents that the existing roof is not historic and leaks, and that roofers have advised him that it needs to be replaced. Staff feels that the effort to restore the original roof form (albeit at an increased height and with new dormers) while gaining additional usable space is consistent with the requirements of this criterion. However, please see the last two paragraphs ofthe staffresponse to Standard 2b., below. On the west side of the house, there are currently three (3) dormers. The applicant seeks to enlarge the height of the one closest to the front of the house, substantially extend the width of the central dormer while slightly increasing its height, and relocate the third dormer 6.5 feet further to the south and slightly expand its height. Also, the applicant wants to construct two new and additional dormers further up the roof in the spaces between the other three dormers. The existing dormers were not part of the original house and, therefore, do not contribute to the historic significance of the structure. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes to the three existing dormers would be inconsistent with the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, but the addition of 5 two new dormers further up the roof is not necessary and would run counter to the preservation efforts being undertaken. The proposed window treatments in the three dormers, however, is something for the HPC to take particular note of and decide on their appropriateness. On the east side of the second story, there is one existing dormer with a chimney. The applicant proposes to replace this dormer with two new dormers: one would be large and of a form matching the dormer proposed for the center of the west elevation, and the other would be of a size and form matching the smaller, flanking dormers proposed on the west side. The roof pitches on the dormers would correspond to that of the proposed hip portion of the rooÂ£ The chinmey would be extended to reach beyond the peak of the new rooÂ£ Staff does not feel that the proposed changes to east elevation's dormers would be inconsistent with the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure since, again, the roof form that would be demolished is not original or historically significant. Again, please see the lasttwo paragraphs ofthe staffresponse to Standard 2b., below. Finally (sixth), the applicant proposes to move the existing south side of the master bedroom to better align with the south end of the existing house. While moving these walls, the applicant would like to change the existing south-facing windows to allow for better access to views and sunlight. Also, the south-facing walls of the study would be pushed approximately two (2) feet further to the west and 5.5 feet to the south, with new windows added to maximize views and solar access. No portion of the existing south side of the house is original to the structure, rather the south side of the house is completely composed of newer additions to the historic structure. In staff's opinion, these proposed changes involve non-historic portions of the house and, therefore, have little bearing on the renovation, rehabilitation or restoration of the historically significant structure. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition oforiginal or significant features and additions. Response: Please refer to the staffresponse to standard 1, above, for a complete explanation ofthe proposal and the impacts on the historic significance of the structure due to demolition. With the exception of the proposed new door on the east elevation (addressed above as part of the "second" paragraphs), staff is satisfied that the applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible, impacts on the historically significant portions of the structures with regard to limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: First, with regard to the proposed additions to the shed structure, staff feels that the additional five (5) feet in length and two and one-half (2.5) feet in height represent modest additions of minimal size to accomplish the goals of the project. While these additions would 6 change the mass and scale of the existing structure, the conversion to a garage will maintain a clear separation on all sides between the historic structure and the new additions. Next, the construction of a new basement would, in staffs opinion, have little to no effect on the perceivable mass and scale of the historic structure provided the house is placed back on the new foundation at the same elevation it is today, nor would the "bumping out" of the recessed portion of the existing east facade. The potential for major impacts to the architectural integrity, in terms of mass and scale, of the historic structure lies with the proposed pop-top addition. The details of this portion ofthe proposal are elaborated upon in the foregoing sections ofthis memo. While the north facing (E. Hallam) elevation would have a hip roof, the front would still maintain a gable end, only the gable end would be the result of placing what would, in effect, be a dormer on the front of the house. Although the new roof would represent a return to its original hip form and this would help to make the entire pop-top more compatible with the mass and scale of the historic portions of the house, due to the dormers proposed, the roof would not read like a true hip roof. Furthermore, staff believes the change from four (4) existing dormers between the east and west elevations to a total of seven larger dormers with fairly modern window treatments on these elevations represents a significant change that would significantly alter the historic mass and scale of the structure. Consequently, staff recommends that the HPC carefully review these proposed second story and roof changes, and table action to a date certain so that there can be further study by the applicant of specific ideas and considerations that would result in the additions being more compatible with the mass and scale of the historic structure. Also, prior to returning to the HPC, the applicant should obtain documentation from a qualified source verifying the ability of the historic structure to support the additional weight loads that the new roof would require. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the staff recommendation (below), as well as any of the following alternatives: 1) Grant final approval to the partial demolition application as submitted; 2) Grant final approval to the partial demolition application with conditions to be met prior to building permit issuance; 3) Table action to a date certain in order to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered); or, 4) Deny the partial demolition application as submitted, finding that the application does not meet the applicable Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 7 â€¢ Approval of the proposed shed remodel as proposed for both the Bush side and the Krumm ~ side, provided: (1) all existing materials that are salvageable are reused and these decisions shall be made by the assigned HPC monitor, and (2) the selection of roof materials must be approved by the assigned HPC monitor. 55 â€¢ The proposed "bump-out of the recessed portion of the west elevation and the proposed double-hung window to the south of the currently recessed portion be approved as proposed provided the window trim design and materials be approved by the assigned HPC monitor prior to installation. â€¢ The proposed door (leading to the basement) on the historic portion of the east elevation be denied. â€¢ All proposed windows on the non-historic portion (southerly end) of the east elevation, but not in the roof or dormers, be approved as proposed provided the window trim design and materials be approved by the assigned HPC monitor prior to installation. â€¢ Construction of a new basement be approved as proposed, provided: (1) structural reports /4 , verifying the ability of the historic structure to withstand the intended method of construction (* are provided by the applicant, and the HI'C approves the intended method of construction; and, (2) the location and amount of light wells to be installed (particularly the one proposed for the north elevation and the two northernmost light wells proposed for the west elevation) come back to the HPC for approval after further study, of each proposed light well's necessity and locational needs has been completed, and provided that even if the HPC approves the location of the proposed light wells, a variance from criterion 26.58.040(F)(11), Subgrade Areas, of the Residential Design Standards would be required. â€¢ All changes to the south elevation be approved as proposed provided there is either a staff finding of compliance with the Residential Design Standards, or the applicant receives a variance from the requirements of said standards. â€¢ The HPC carefully review the proposed second story and roof changes, and table action to a date certain so that there can be further study by the applicant of the specific ideas and considerations offered by the HPC that would result in the additions being more compatible with the mass and scale ofthe historic structure, and prior to returning to the HPC, the applicant shall obtain documentation from a qualified source verifying the ability of the historic structure to support the additional weight loads that the new roof would require. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Submittal Package 8 . The Bush Family 210 East Hyman Ave, Apt 7 ERE Aspen, CO 81611-2912 970-925-7060 May 5, 1998 Dear Historic Preservation Committee, Hello - We are the Bush Family: Lisa, Alan and baby Alexander. We are the owners of 101 East Hallam. We are applying to you because we hope to make this wonderful, historic home better meet our needs as long-time, year round, permanent residents with a growing family. This home is where we plan to live and raise our family. We hope that by getting to know us a bit, you may better appreciate our needs, both as a family and as committed locals. Alan, from Athens, Georgia originally, has lived in Aspen full-time since 1980. Lisa, originally from Denver, Colorado, has lived here since 1985 and Alexander arrived 11 months ago (he was born at AVH on May 28, 1997). For 18 years, Alan has taught skiing at Aspen Highlands and has done real estate and investing the rest of the year. His background is physics and he served on the clean air advisory board for many years, serving as its chair for 2 years. Lisa has had her own graphic design business (Shaw Design Studio) in Aspen for 10 years and has taught computer classes at Colorado Mountain College in Aspen for the past 6 years and skiing for 4. She has done volunteer work for CIVA and other organizations since she moved to town. Alexander goes to Yellow Brick School (though only part-time because we love him too much to leave him there all the time). As you can see, we are all committed to this community. We have been looking for a house in or around Aspen for a long time in hopes of avoiding becoming another casualty to the down valley exodus/The three of us are currently squished into a one-bedroom condo, including Alan's home office. Lisa has been leasing an office in the Patio Building for 10 years. But with the addition of the baby and our plans for more, Lisa would like to work from a home office also, so that she can spend more time with family. We really need more space. When we found 101 East Hallam (just before it was to be foreclosed upon), it was our dream come true. We fell in love with it. We plan to live in the house year-round and raise our family here, in Aspen. Our investment in this house is also our retirement fund. In planning for the future, we hope to expand our family. This creates a delightful problem. It means we believe we would outgrow this house all too soon. We hope to have a bedroom for each child, an indoor place for the kids to play in (especially in the winter) and home offices for both of us. We also need room for an extended family member, while they help us with the little one(s). Even though we usually walk or take the bus most everywhere, even grocery shopping, we realize that with children and their far flung needs, we need a one-car garage so that we can load/unload out of the weather, especially during our winters and our wet seasons. Because of safety and environmental concerns for our family, our only real chance to remodel is before we move in.'Ibat is why we are before you today - we are planning for down the road, so we can remain Aspenites. Sadly, the previous owners neglected this wonderful house and yard. We intend to care for it and return it to the way it was when Jake Boguess owned it - when the house, with those gorgeous gardens was so admired. (Though we don't claim to have a green thumb that talented, we will certainly try.) We appreciate your consideration and expedience in working with us to fulfill our family's dream. Thank You, ob>61 \ A A. J x The Bush's - Lisa, Alan and Alexander Remodel Overview . 101 East Hallam - Home and Alley Shed -Bush Property And 105 East Hallam Alley Shed - Krumm Property OWNERSHIP 101 East Hallam is owned by Alan and Steven Bush for Alan, Lisa and Alexander Bush. They wish to re-model 101 East Hallam. Because part of the 101 East Hallam re-model involves an alley shed that crosses the propeny line to 105 East Hallam, the owner of 105 East Hallam is also part of the application, but only relating to the alley shed. 105 East Hallam is owned by Donald Krumm. From hereon, this overview will refer to 101 East Hallam as "Bush Property or Residence" or similar and 105 East Hallam as "Krumm Property or Residence" or similar. PROJECT OUTLINE NOTE: There are 2 Inventoried (NOT Landmarked) Historic elements: a) Most of the brick front portion of the 1. floor of the Bush house and b) The alley shed that is on both the Bush and the Krumm properties â€¢ Convert Bush side of shed to attached garage and lift shed roof 2 M feet to allow for vehicle entry â€¢ Move indented kitchen wall (not historic) about 4 feet west to align with remaining existing wallis â€¢ Add several windows â€¢ Add Basement and 5 window-wells under house and garage â€¢ Lift roof 5 feet at peak adding hip element to re-establish historical design and for enhanced and legal upstairs rooms without adding any noor area â€¢ Adjust and add dormers to fit enhanced roof â€¢ Adjust south walls of upstairs rooms for FAR and function PROJECT DETAILS â€¢ PER CITY, STAFF OR HPC REQUEST - ELEMENTS CHANGED CHANGES SINCE HPC WORK SESSION â€¢ Per Community Development staff request prior to work-session - removed exterior basement stairs. â€¢ Per HPC request -removed 2 proposed living-room west windows in historic brick section. â€¢ Per HI'C request -removed 1 proposed west light-well window. â€¢ Per Board of Adjustment - Balconv railing moved west 4 feet to remain within setback. â€¢ SHED - Note: Shed was originally built as an outhouse and for coal storage. It is currently in grave disrepair. Goal is return exterior much closer to its historic all brick origins. â€¢ Discovered that shed cannot be lifted to add material to base as HPC desired because of shed construction and condition. Supporting letters from Structural Engineer, Contractor and Brick Mason in application. â€¢ Bush shed walls removed due to condition and by very nature of conversion to garage. Re-use existing brick in garage and Krumm side roof lifting. This was mentioned at work-session, but is worth repeating. â€¢ Krumm shed walls probably can be saved and existing bricks from Bush side used to raised roof. â€¢ If desired, a veneer could be added to base of shed to make it appear a new base had been added. â€¢ UPSTAIRS - Note: The existing upstairs is not historic. It was part of remodel performed in 1970's and 1980's. â€¢ Front roof design changed from existing A-frame to the original historical hip design plus A-frame dormer in conjunction with raising roof 5 feet at peak by adding 2~d floor walls due to need for legal bedrooms. No floor area added or changed by this, just betrer use of current floor area. â€¢ Roof "sash" element added at bottom of upstairs level to enhance design and historical/modern separation. â€¢ House central shed dormer roof element reduced in size for better harmony with main roof. â€¢ West dormers on north and south ends of home enlarged to work better with roof. â€¢ East dormer added to north end due to bedroom redesign. â€¢ Study off Master bedroom on south end of home has been reduced to south and west to meet FAR. â€¢ South end Master bedroom windows re-designed to fit roof and changed Study walls. â€¢ BASEMENT AND INTERIOR â€¢ Basement window light-wells width reduced by M foot to meet FAR. â€¢ Several interior floor Man changes to enhance function and use. Hallam Project Overview for HPC: Last printed 05/08/98 11:36 AM Page 1 of 3 PROJECT DETAILS (continued) B) CHANGES FROM EXISTING STRUCTURES â€¢ BUSH PROPERTY MAIN FLOOR â€¢ Move indented kitchen west wall 4 feet more west to align with existing non-historic wall. This will still maintain a 1-foot indent of wall to enhance historic elements and separate non-historic. Retain kitchen entry door. (Note: This western facing wall is NOT historic. It was done during the late 1970's or early 1980's remodel by prior owner Charles Dwight) â€¢ Add 2 windows, one to each side of west kitchen door. Not on historic wall. â€¢ Add 1 window to west dining area wall. Not on historic wall. â€¢ Change design of non-historic windows on south area of east wall for better appearance and function with garage. â€¢ Move East door (currently accessing mechanical room under existing interior stairs) 5 14 feet south. This is necessary for interior basement stairs and better reflects original location of historic window. â€¢ Add Door to new north portion of garage, near Krumm property line. â€¢ Move Door currently at angle on southeast end several feet south onto new garage section, facing east. â€¢ BUSH PROPERTY SHED: Convert alley shed to garage attached to house with roof lifted 2 M feet. (Note: The shed is currently in grave disrepair. Goal is return exterior much closer to its historic all brick origins.) â€¢ Remove roof. The exterior is not historic. The internal construction is a mix of old beams and new plywood that probably cannot withstand being lifted according to both contractors and structural engineers. â€¢ Remove 3 walls on Bush Property, while saving the existing brick to re-use. (Note: Letters have been included from a Structural Engineer, a General Contractor and a Brick Mason all stating that the existing Bush shed walls are in terrible condition and could not survive any other option. Several contractors say it is near collapse now.) â€¢ North wall removed to allow garage to connect to house and to allow for the depth needed for a car to fit inside. The bricks will be re-used in the Bush side re-build and in Krumm side roof lifting. â€¢ South and West walls described below. â€¢ Rebuild as 1 W car garage using existing brick. â€¢ Lift Shed Roof 2.5 feet higher to allow for vehicle access. â€¢ Remove existing roof. The exterior is not historic. The internal construction is a mix of old beams and new plywood that cannot withstand being lifted according to both contractors and structural engineers. â€¢ Rebuild roof - can re-use the salvageable interior beams. â€¢ South wall removed and re-built in the same location using existing brick 2 W feet higher around the garage door and extended 5 feet to the west to create minimum useable garage and retain historic shed outline. â€¢ West shed wall moved 5 feet west to create minimum useable garage. This creates a 1 foot deep 'sjog" in the shed section of garage to allow the existing shed's historic outline to be retained. (Note: The South side of the alley has a garage that extends north 1.8 feet over the property line into the alley. This requires a wider than minimum Bush garage due to limited turn radius space available to enter the Bush garage.) â€¢ Add window (matching others nearby) to west wall of shed area of garage. â€¢ KRUMM PROPERTY SHED: Lift roof 2 14 feet to maintain consistent roofline per HPC request. â€¢ Remove roof. The exterior is not historic. The internal construction is a mix of old beams and new plywood that cannot withstand being lifted according to both contractors and structural engineers. â€¢ Add 21/6 feet of height to walls, using existing brick from Bush walls, while attempting to retain existing 3 walls (North, East and West). â€¢ Rebuild roof - it may be able to re-use the salvageable interior beams. â€¢ Possibly reworking foundation and adding internal support if structurally required. â€¢ BUSH PROPERTY BASEMENT â€¢ New Foundation: Either support home in place, lifted a few inches or underpin house and sectionalize. â€¢ Build a basement that follows the footprint of house and garage. â€¢ Add 5 light-wells for basement - at least 4 are required for egress and air space regulations. 58 light-well would become necessary under possible later uses for basement. 4 are on west side and 1 on north. It is not possible to place them elsewhere and still have functional basement due to necessary stairs and mechanical room locations and property line restrictions Hallam Project Overview for HPC: Last printed 05/08/98 11:36 AM ' Page 2 of 3 , . PROJECT DETAILS (continued) B) CHANGES FROM EXISTING STRUCTURES (continued) â€¢ BUSH PROPERTY UPSTAIRS - Reminder: The existing upstairs is not historic. It was part of remodel performed in 1970's and 1980's. â€¢ ROOFAND2 ND FLOOR WALLS â€¢ Re-create original historic hiD roof element in front of house by adding 6 foot Yld floor walls all around (except southern study which maintains existing roof heighO, effectively lifting roof peak 5 feet, from 25 feet to 30 feet. This also allows for 2 legal size bedrooms upstairs by dividing existing 2~d bedroom into two children's bedrooms. It does not add any new square footage. It does create useable space from existing areas that count toward FAR, but are currently unusable due to low ceiling. â€¢ Remove roof. It is not historic and leaks. Roofers say it needs replacing. â€¢ Build new 6-foot 2'~d floor walls to create usable space within currently unusable areas. â€¢ Rebuild roof with a north side sloping hip element to re-create currently missing historic hip roof element This will help front of house re-establish a better match with the 2 historic next door companion houses. â€¢ WALLS - SOUTH SIDE â€¢ Move south side of upstairs bedroom south and west walls to line up with south end of house. â€¢ Change existing south windows to allow better access to southern warmth, light and views. â€¢ Move south wall of upstairs bedroom study about 2 feet south toward end of house. â€¢ Change existing study west, south and east windows and south doors for better design harmony and views. â€¢ DORMER - CENTER: WEST & EAST SIDES â€¢ Enlarge central dormers to the south, making each a shed style with central dormer to allow for Master bedroom closet and bathroom. â€¢ DORMERS - WEST SIDE â€¢ Change north end dormer by raising peak slightly and lowering base to function better with new roof. â€¢ Move south end dormer about 6 feet south and raise peak slightly while lowering base to function better with new roof and new Master bedroom location and match north end dormer. â€¢ Add 2 matching smaller dormers above shed dormer to add historic charm and reduce roof mass. â€¢ DORMER - EAST SIDE â€¢ Add a dormer to north part of east roof to match the west side and for window light to newly split bedroom. â€¢ BALCONY/SPIRAL STAIRS â€¢ Move spiral stairs to east side of new garage. â€¢ Roof of new garage becomes new balcony up to the shed roof. â€¢ INTERIOR â€¢ Several interior floor DIan changes to enhance function and use, such as bathroom relocations and remodels, kitchen remodel and moving mechanical room to basement Notice and Disclaimer: This report was written by Alan Bush, one of the owners of 101 East Hallam and an applicant in the approval process, who is not an architect or planner. While all information is believed to be accurate and complete, neither is guaranteed. This is a layperson's report of the proposed remodel. Hallam Project Overview for HPC: Last printed 05/08/98 11:36 AM Page 3 of 3 , R -31,5 K. N , - VICINITY MAP -'V'. . 1 -5 <;4- ir321 -1~34 0 BUSH RESIDENCE SITE 6 1 - fil - V p 1(*Ul ' CLJO - 5 /3 080 4 9429 lili lili''- = 2. Lf \ i N I; e MAI p : lilli - A i 1Â· 43*~~ht. 00 2 4 ~402 4 -: ilo 1 37 4 5 i-Jib 2223.e \4 t-Â· 'lilli. . 0 t./ - GE, 0-0,-* '43:46"/(31~4*f .P H lili 11 1 1 .\ . '-- .4--- 1 .t U 5.29 /R~16j /1 l i -~+ =r~ P D O . A 1 , 62~2 p o ' i prol i 0- - I ' 4 9=/ 1 &â‚¬ ca #3 1 ~ i L.j 4 11 1\... 1 ./. 1 '4'* R ic,i- f----- i lef 77:1 . Y 1 - , r--:Uâ€¢ tO -i-- , 4, / 11 1.04 d 1 5 Â·, I vt. .4. 2/-- . .*.*.Ill- \04* \ 1 - p U 093 4, ter i C -Â· 8 ' //-3#:h.1/ 0 .P 1 Le -0 f AW)~ . , NA , 6 7 54FdY<r;*...+1 - 3 4.11.9 ... ~Â« 00 . ... - N)-O. 4, L p 8 0 7 4 30'3 , Â· 6.66 1 I Â£ ~L-itc:i- 1 + L.1 0 :3.- Afi,46.in- - - e. .. 1. 9 + U 1 - 'if i Elir.4,4 - .+ ...Â«., 2 R-15 CDÂ« ..1 .22Â·. ;:.. ~~~ ~r -: : Â»Â·, 4 )~ jt,/9....I..r26.213*~1 , /-~. .i~ 4 Â£ 4 1 1 1.1 . 7 02.- h k:p Qu 7.20 :,, Â·.~ 4*flj:.l' Â· p RU \ . .Â·: r :x Â·3Â·. . 1 ~ i.Â·f *:*e i 71# 4 $ Â· Â¥04... liC. =' Phvy Shocoy kerrner 1.0 i*k Li,kl-wells ,- A flot. AÂ·11Â£,-. 0 01&25 3,lew Jocel,A on..1 n-.du .4 1- i,j kÂ¢-we,1 lr- 0 4 \3 )\0445 5,40&.rA irâ‚¬ c:rn teratrs ~.,0. 42 "-LAWUP; 1 ...9 . 1 r-93- h COLLINS ~ ENGINEERS, INC. 408 AABC Suite 209 Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-925-2089 tel/fax April 3, 1998 Job #98108 Ms. Amy Guthrie Historical Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 - Re: Bush Property Krumm Property 101 East Hallam 105 East Hallam Aspen, Colorado Aspen, Colorado Dear Ms. Guthrie: Collins Engineers, Inc. has inspected the shed structure at the above location with the following observations and conclusions: 1. The shed is in overall poor condition. The walls on the Bush side of the property line are in worse condition than the walls on the Krumm side. 2. The shed does not appear sound enough to be lifted to install a new foundation. 3. The best option to preserve the structure is to rebuild it, using existing materials. However, it may be possible to save some of the existing walls as suggested below. We recommend that the contractor and our offige decide which option to use. A. Due to its deteriorated and weakened condition, the Bush west side brick wall should be taken down and rebuilt as the proposed plans indicate. The north and south walls are in extremely poor condition and should be removed and the south wall rebuilt for the proposed garage conversion. B. The brick walls on the Krumm side are in better condition and after removing the existing roof. it may be possible to leave them intact and add used brick to bring the walls to the new roof line. Poor mortar joints may be tuckpointed to match existing joints. C. The existing roof materials may be utilized in the new roof, however, we recommend new materials. Collins Engineers, Inc. has the following observations and recommendations regarding adding a basement under the Bush property. 1 r Page 2 Bush Property April 3, 1998 1. The main house appears capable of withstanding the stresses of moving or lifting the structure, PROVIDED - adequate support and bracing is applied prior. to the move by an experienced house-mover and maintained until the house is returned to the new foundation. Please contact our office if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. /4 Charles T. Collins, President CTC/CC CC: Alan Bush t;2'2-ru*w' ,Â·* 1Â·* 1.26Â· .*1 r \91 1 /99:,1.1,49/ i j ...1 ... I: + :, J . .*is#KA! l t ,\'/ R .At ~i'( M.*# Mf APYA,WntÂ¥ DRS Â·:05 !74, â€¢"1â€¢l,"11.1, -1~52 4;\1 1. luMS Alan Bush P.O. Box 8363 Aspen, CO 81612-8363 Dear Alan: We have evaluated the conditions at your storage shed with regards to moving the building. Our observations are as follows: 1. The structure is of solid masonry construction with no apparent reinforcement ofthe masonry. This sort of structure, even i f it were in good condition, would have a high likelihood of suffering irreparable damage by being moved. 2. The structure is in very poor condition. Much of the brick has deteriorated to the point that it crumbles to the touch. Several sections of the walls are no longer tied to the rest of the structure and can easily be moved back and forth. Much of the mortar between the bricks is missing or deteriorated to the point that individual bricks can be pulled out o f the wall by hand. 3. The roo f framing is seriously inadequate. There is neither a supporting ridge beam nor any sort of collar ties to support the rafters. Although it may be possible to reinforce the roof structure to allow it to meet minimum code requirements, it makes no sense to do so when the walls that support the roof structure are in such poor condition. 4. There does not appear to be an adequate foundation of any kind underneath the shed. I f the structure were placed on a foundation in its weakened condition, The weight of the structure would cause it tu seltle in certain places to adjust to its new support base. This would cause the masonry walls to simply crumble. Based upon these observations, we feel that this structure is at the end of its useful lifespan and is a serious hazard as it sits right now. This is a structure that will almost certainly fail in the near future. We feel that this structure would not survive a move. I f it did survive, it would surely be weakened even beyond its existing state and would be a dangerous and unusable building. We feel that a safer, more cost effective and reasonable approach to this problem would be to salvage as many of the materials as possible from the existing shed and then reconstruct it in its new position. Through careful attention to detail, a new structure 210 A.A.B.C. Suite FF â€¢ Aspen, Colorado 81611 â€¢ 970/925-7608 (Office) 970/9i5-2791 (FAX) '. 4 1 could be rebuilt that would appear to be identical to the existing shed. This new shed would have the advantage of meeting modern building codes and while preserving the historic materials and character of the property well into the next millennium. If you have any questions or need any more information please feel free to call at any time. Sincerely, -737 = F--, a~ Rea Coulter Apr-20-98 13:34 VOGELMAN WEST ASSOC. INC. 970 845 7605 P.01 ~OGELMAN |NNOVATIONS |N STONE SINCE 1981 ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. April 20,1998 Alan Bush P.O. Box 8363 Aspen, CO 81612-8363 Dear Alan I was asked by Rea Coulter of Aspen Constructors to give you my opinion of the structural viability ofyour shed located at 101 E Hallam street. I visited the site on April 6, 1998 with Rea. The structure appears to be in an advanced state of deterioration. The shed is constructed of unreinforced masonry, using an English bond laying technique. This building appears to have originally served as an outhouse, and a large portion of the wall facing the alley is collapsing into the old cistern. There are numerous large cracks on this wall that are unrepairable. Much of the brick is spalling badly due to extended exposure to weather. All of the headers have collapsed as the wood supports have rotted out. The original mortar used appears to have been of low quality and is crumbling or missing in numerous spots. In my opinion it would be impossible to movethis structure without destroying it. There is a slight possibility that the eastern half of the structure could be added onto in order to meet the new required height, but even this would result in a structure with a limited lifespan. I believe that the best option for preserving Â¥: ~ 't;!ding would be to tear it down and rebuild it. reusing the existing brick, wind'0- . . .....1 cxterior trim to recreate the shed as it now is. Sincerely yours, 4 4-- Roy Mellor STONE â€¢ PLASTER â€¢ STONE SALES CORPORATE OFFICE â€¢ 910 NorTINGHAM ROAD #N4 â€¢ PosT OFFICE Box 921 â€¢ AvoN, COLORADO 81620 PtioN, 970/949-4 1 18 â€¢ FAx 970/1145-7605 â€¢ AsPFN 970/945 -2871 â€¢ r,~WARD< YARD 970/976-5 144 â€¢ rl, rwwnnn qrÂ·piwr.â‚¬ Y4 Pn 470/44 4 .n')60 Mr. Don Krumm 105 East Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7062 April 24,1998 Ms. Amy Guthie C/O Ms. JulieAnn Woods Aspen/Pilkin County Community Development Department And Historic Preservation Committee and Other Interested Parties 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Alley Shed at 105 East Hallam Dear Amy, JulieAnn, Community Development, Historic Preservation Committee and Other Interested Parties: There is a shed with Split ownership along the Alley that crosse,s the property lines of 101 and 1()5 East Hallam. The property owner of 101 East Hallam (Mr. Bush) is remodeling and raising the roof of the shed on his side. In a prior work session, the HPC stated that they wish to keep the entire shed roof-line contiguous. Therefore, I am co-submitting this application with Mr. Bush to remodel, rebuild and extend the height of the alley shed on my property as shown in the Gibson & Reno Archilechs plans dated 4/15/98, drawn by JC, and that are being submitted herein. These are the same plans being submitted by Mr. Bush for his reinodel at 101 East Hallam. I have reviewed the above plans and hereby approve them as the> relate lo the shed that crosses our properly lines. I also wish to re-slate my support for Mr, Bush 's remodel project as staled in my March 11, 1998 letter to you (copy attached). Please accept this letter as authorization for the firm of Gibson & Reno Architects, L.L.C. located at 210 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, (970) 925-5968, to submit and process the application on my behalf as the owner of 105 East Hallam. Aspen, CO 81611, for the approvals needed to repair, rebuild and extend the height of the alley shed in its existing location as a co-applicant with Alan Bush and his remodel at 101 East Hallam. If I have been notified and if I cannot be present then Gibson & Reno Architects may represent my interest specifically related to approvals needed to repair, rebuild and extend the height of the alley shed in its existing location at meetings, hearing or presentations thal are required. S incerely, CL-â‚¬31.-U%--62.-~ f-j Don Krumm 4- 0.3 -cie Mr. Don Krumm 105 East Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 March 11,1998 RE: 101 East Hallam Remodel, Owner - Alan Bush Dear HPC and other interested Parties: This is an open letter to tile Historic Preservation Committee and any other interested parties regarding the proposed remodel of the Bush Residence aL 101 East Hallam in Aspen, Colorado. I am the owner and resident and nearest neighbor of 105 East Hallam, which is directly to the East of the Bush Residence. I have reviewed the current plans with Alan Bush today and wish to state my support of this project. I am aware of impacts to my property during the remodel. I am also aware of the setback variances that this project requires. I understand the need in our climate for a garage and I support the remodcling of his side of our shared shed to be converted into a garage with the setback infringements. Alan Bush has been communicating with me since the early design phase of this project. I am confident we will continue to work together during the remodeling. Sincerely, CZb Don Krumm 8- \\. 98 ED GROSSE -32& a.061- - /O, '1Â£ 0 +14UJLM . /4Â¥, 9.92 12>GUD UPe. b- ..., 4,4 4.,u.._, (48 2.-2/Â£Â£,Ulh--2,260~7 / ~64*Al.0 75&' *St,SH â‚¬ A~A Obk us.# 4.,u_. MZ . - 04<: LAJ Aiguv ACcat,eAJAI-2* p,Â£11â€¢-,s ,4.+D (100 - L-I. 4/,L>rks> Lo Nw 64 & 069 c#UEÂ»/AG- A;,3 -;E*te,OosÂ£.0 -24ueÂ»,nr-,a,6 0 -#,6 Aze,2,*er.- A#-060 d>,-.DZ,cp,Â£>, 6JouÂ£- 6~0 Â«,0-3,Quâ€¢ . 1Â£),~Aue_*-& AP##Ubv el, ft O%- >20>- -1.nft.e:./Â£Â£ Â· ba 146,0 / 3=>AL, 57,4 e l.,fiR-,2.*--24$.ber.17 -265.De ,â€¢0 4.*G /104Â£7 2*,0 7--0/2,Â»â‚¬05, S 64*Pe/%3 Outitkt, *12-TO Ki, 4(7,-*,$ AQAA As A Z.,v.= tb' 9614-BÂ®Â£11008 416 .44,&,400Â£Â£> 1 Â¥uceut&&.8, nis,ent-:.< c#ZÂ«,W,4 k:f; A.,8 ~27$ 9~11,044â‚¬~ blaer.Â£ 2*L/cA>Â£ 14 6-a.â€¢Z/.04-.S . C<-31â‚¬/,;66/4./b 1_ r 3 '<fbÂ»0Â»-- Â£140 Czy.USS#$- 0 W I g i- in....> Recorded at 418 o'clock P.M., February 18, 1977 k . I -tA ..7 4; f * 0,â€¢crption No. 192154 - A.-- -- F Juli,Â· Ilanr, Recorder GENERAL WARRANTY DEED *325 & 71 :311; .. THIS DEED, made this the lath__ day of rfebruary , r- 1977, between ROBERT H. LESTER, an unmarriea man, of the County ; :1 t . 1Â· 7 of El Paso, and State of Colorado, party of the first part, i ~ and DONALD PAUL KRUMM and PETER H. HOFFMANN.JR., of the County f of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, parties of the second part, mo l whose address is P.O. Box 874, Aspen, Colorado 81611. Â· the -52 for ~ 0 tt ~0 whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargatned, ,. E No WITNESSETH: That the said party of the first part, for t., -4' 1 and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to the said party of the first part, . her d in hand paid by the said pâ€¢Irties of the second part, the receipt abo =: : sold and conveyed, and by these precrnts does grant. bargain, . 14 sell, convey and confirm, unto the said parties of the second part, as tenants in common, their heirs and assigns forever -- all the following described lot or parcel of land. situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, to wit: The East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the West 8.00 STA feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen; COU subject to the following liens, encumbrances, reservations and restrictions: the 1. Reservations as contained in deed recorded November 28, . unm 1888, in Book 59 at Page 518, to-wit: "that no title shall be hereby acquired te any mine of gold, silver. 'cinnabar or copper, or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws; and provided further, that this deed is hereby subiect to ,:'- all the conditions, limitationu and, restrictions contained in ... 1 : Section 2386 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, so ... far as the same is applicable thereto." 2. Any tr"z. for 1977, due and payable in 1978. 3. Any easements for telephone, electricity, water and sanitary sewer, and subject to building and zoning regulations, and restrictive covenants of record. TCLETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and ippurtonances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate right, title, interest claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargaining piemises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, un*o the said parties of the ancond part, their heirs and assigns forever. And the s.lid party of the first part, for himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premiscs above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and 1.wful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convoy *hn S.imr, in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same irr, frru. and clnar from all former and other grants, bargains, r. A r M P 'Â·Cl'.ta,â‚¬: 4 4..imit ... . . . p / / \ . '325 7 f 72 /.11 , r sales, liens, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature whatsoever, excepting those liens, encumbrances, unty reservations and restrictions set forth in numbered paragraphs 1 through 3 above, and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said parties of the second part, nty their heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons i lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, Â· the said party of the first part shall and will warrant and 3-+-;16Â·i Â· forever defend. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the* first part has alirt, _ hereunto set his hand and seal the day, month, and year first :eipt above written. ,argained, 141.1, r 7 0 M. id- 1 / t-'1'lkÂ«' 0,- i,4 /tZ.4 / (SFAL) O, 4 96bert H. Leste~ ; an uhmarried ?har ;3:40 47-/.t STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF EL PASO ) nd | 51+ Th~/foregoing ~stru1nent was acknowledged before me this the X day of , 1977, by Robert H. Lester, an 1 28, unmarried man. ~ be. My commission expires: (r Cl...e~.,It (977 I . I Pul Â· 7.# S. . ...7. . 11 1 Witness my hand and official seal. to .. I:.1 i Ack. ( Cter,.1/l Notary Public *Â·' 1 . S 0 - ' ERTIFICATE OF COPY OF RECORD -. 1.-- - - - 1 - - \TE OF COLORADO, , ) SS. ty of Pitkin to and Recorder in and for said County. in the State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the foregoing is full, true and correct Copy of Reception #.1.22.2.5.3/. Book ....3..43................... page ...Yl ............. rs, 40 qs the same appears upon the records of my office. 12 ...4 i .0 7- 1090 '499-- . Given under my hand and official seal. this .. day .n~AAL#k..........., A.D. 19 9.-E.... .,. .1.1.-4.1-.- oclock..,6.f... 111 i ./ 5%~JU4 1, 11\- County Clerk and Rec 1. - --- - 1 1 ... I -/1 . I 11 ./ 0 1â€¢e,-dat... ..11: 41.---â€¢*I- A ... M., ...July 1...1918 - 4........ ~ Mo â€ž 130 SÂ·129 Lorri ta Banner -- 1 / rias DEED, M- thâ€¢ 3 4 - d JUCV .1/ 78, =250 -826 1 6-- PETER H. HOFâ„¢ANN, Jr. of th. C.... 0 .ad.. of ITATI V.61'r'n ![I 1 Cole 144 7 th. flrot part. ant DONALD PAUL KR,1,01 Uhoae address 18: P.O. Box 874, Aspen, rolorado 81611 JUL 1 PNO . ' :0,the Cout,Of Pitkin anditali d 0 1 . 75 C I Coterâ€¢do. of thâ€¢ I.eoed part. : WlTNESSETH. That thâ€¢ =10 Â»M y 4 thi Ard part, for ind In eonildirmtion ot the eum of - TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration XRRRM#lk I to the Ed part y of the flrâ€¢t Part 1, 1:,1,4 Pild Â» the â€¢old part y nf thâ€¢ -ernd .Mt, the .*pt â€¢he-f 11 her,bl eon/,-4 -1 achn-1041,4 ha,: ,-1-d. Mt.*â€¢ed. -Id. eonâ€¢o,*d ud QUIT CLAIMED,- -1 4 th- pim' dn e, râ€¢mt- mtâ€¢- -11, -ve, - QUM' CLAIM .,- th..14 part y of the ....d part. h 1. * 1.1,10 mgN.*n and a,nion& tu.., all the right, tltle, Ink.4 .talle and de.ma whieh the Iaid i â€žM y of the /Int part ha , 10 Ind lo thi following d.-164 1,t I PINII â€¢f land Ilt,-. t,INg and ! bâ€¢Int In thâ€¢ Coâ€¢,4 4 Pitkin and Stat, of Catorade. to witt Â¥h. East 23.14 feet of Lot B and the Went 8.00 feet of Lot C, Block 63, City and rown.tte of Upin. 1 , TO HAVE AND TO HOLD U,1-4 Ilâ€¢th,1 -thalt .,d.ingular the *V=*mmw- -p.hU...0 ther-to belon*BE ~ In Imrvile th01,09*n a~11*Iming. ad all th, *tatâ€¢, 110*4 UUâ€¢, In#,4 -4 claim whili~,Ir, 01 the -W Party of UN flnt ,Â§15 lither in t- w *ty, to the only pmper -, bemint 8-1 '.he.1 01 - Mid lart, It thi â€¢-nd *rt. hiâ€¢ Wn Id ..Ign. for.w. IN WrrNESS WHEREO/. Thâ€¢ elid /H y .f th. 1(ht part ha , ....nt..4 hiâ€¢ 1"ad -4-9 u. 42 wd ..r {trit *b- .lt-L / 1 A ) . lj. OV~*,OJ P,â‚¬?Elt- fl~HOFâ„¢lf Jr. Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·--tBEAL} 81:,1/4. Se/&.d Ind Dell-â€¢Id In the Pr,1-led . .. . .... . ........... .. ........ .... . ......{BEAL] 1 -+....... .......U.............................+............. .........MEAL] ......... ............+......................... 9 STATE O/ COLORADO, 1 1- 0-ty el 11Â» lop.ILI;* tnitnmant Inâ€¢ I.4,IWWâ€ž4 heem - thi. ~ 4 01 94 f ~41.490 PETER H. 1.OFFMANN, Jr. 4 0 10 BL.h- M hoad .4.0~W -8 It.lk I '. 0 BUBL/0 d :bo.*....6.li~.:6<..'... 1 .MUL (4*.7 .........- --1- T Nd 021 QUIT CLA!11 DZâ€¢&-1.*f- Pâ€¢Ili~,I0l6h tl-l 1-4 -~ o.il-, c-.al â€¢ 1â€¢ 1 4 Nq~GO-'CERTIFICATE OF COPY OF RECORD STATE OF COLORADO, , County of Pitkin ) SS. I. ....4Ark.e.e.......L.....Et)2*li.............ane.uzy..., County Clerk i, and Recorder in and for said County. in the State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct Copy of Reception #.Â£::4~25..92.9.. Book ...5,543?................... page ....22.4......,.. as the same appears upon the records of my office. nnqi- Given under my hand and official seal. this .......cK.Z... ...................... day of ....Al*Ad..)1..........., A.[4 19.9.2 ......, 2/.US-0,0 C. ........................ / T County Clerk and Recorder 1 1' -, C=] A 3 100-4 68 e S /0/ JOB NO.: BUSH LU) _23 1-1 - DRAIN BY: JC DATE: 3-20-98 los CRECKED: AGR SCALE: BUSEUsl FILE ID: 1'= 1'-0Â» E. 404Â» EAST *ALLAU STREET COPâ„¢CHTÂ© ORA 1027 - 2. W l --7 / Qn P / SHEET INDEX 1 /4 N . Wd 4 / AS.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN El I FIRST FLOOR AS-BJ\LT 7 / 1/ SECOND FLOOR AS-BUILT i I BO EXISTING ELEVATIONS (NORTH/SOUTH) 2 U 4.0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS (EASTRVEST) Al.0 PROPOSED BASEMENTÂ· FLOOR PLAN 1 1 A20 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN < AB.0 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN M.O PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (NORTWSOUTH) 1 PROPOSEP ELEVAT\ONS (EAST/VeST) AS.O 1 â„¢D Sro*f 1 1 lb= 11/7 i 1 1 *1 1 -/ \ 1 l;1 H 4 4- / 2 - Lar A oF TkE .errEF51X 4.86 PEET OF LOT B, BLOCK. 65. / CITY AND TOPOISITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, -4./57 CONTAINING 5486 SQ. FEET. Â»20'20 1 / GIBSONÂ·RENO / Â·ARCHITECTSâ€¢ 4 7 --.0 Gae-â€¢LE- iI.I.C. (GJUVEU 448Â¥ SION . As~E~&~DO */ 210 EAST HYMAN 81611 (970) 925-5988 â„¢t (970) 925-5998 ... P.O. BOX 278 1 17 N. WIUOW mu= 01.0 81435 (970)728-6807 FAX ~ SITE PLAN .SEEZE 0 (970) 728-0858 AS.I SITE PLAN NORTH GARMISCH STREET SaH HSAH k . JOB NO.: BUSH DRAWN BY: JC DATE: 12-4-97 CHECKED: AGR SCALE: Bum<-Al m. m: 1/4'=1'-0* COMZGMTÂ© GIL 1997 $ 8 0 -mox p.ops" U. 4 - mN@ 11 1 1 1. Lt--' - i ' 1 1 [Gamil 1!1 It EloTT 3 2-31[qi] L--1 1 / 00 1 IN i 1 Y ~ |BEDROOM 4 Upg - fil -AE T~*F 4 ~ 11 8 -1 8 1 ' 001 50 1 - -6..., h TI' r7 -r L. ..Lic l-AL - V --1--* IL <AOL d GIBSONÂ·RENO ARCHITECTSâ€¢ "1 LLC. - 210 280 m 1~ ]DINING AREAl ircill6DO 81611 I FAX J-43-0 t (970) 025-5993 lt=Il 11=-11 .. P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WIUOW TRUD~ &&RADO 81485 (070) 728-6007 PAX 9 FIRST FLOOR PLAN (AS-BUILT) (870) 728-6688 SHEET # *Â® LO REF. FIRST FLOOR AS-BUILT 1<14<W< laCIOWE[H EIONE[CII HSRE[ j C WRO.ECTS\BUSIADNG\bushjbt.dity Thu Mar 05 10:39 55 1998 0 JOB NO.: BUSH DRAWN BY: IC DAmt 12-6-97 CHECKED- AGR SCALE: BUSa.AZ Mla ID: 1/4-=1'-O- COMZfmrÂ© GEL 1907 - Â»4 0 M:10 APPROX PROPâ„¢rf LthE 4. 0 -4 9 1 3 1 L.1 ' =2*ZE= mag I- 11 GIBSON.RENO 11 â€¢A RC HI T I CT Sâ€¢ 'lg 210 EAST HYMAN / 1. ./ 1 \ 1--I A LLC /:\ / i\ 1-)[100 /1/ 81611 /' i \ As~24 X /1/ Â£---1---1 11 10 L.-3,1 2//=6 - pa (970) 925-0968 (970) 926-5998 .. P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WIUOW =107.6Do 81485 (070) 728-0607 FAX 9 SECOND FLOOR PLAN (AS-BUILT) (870) 728-6858 0 1" .ir SEEm # 2.0 SECOND FLOOR AS-BUILT C \PRaECTS\EliSH\DEVIsh-092.dâ€¢g Ned Mar 11 14: 35: 39 1990 T.O. Rlose (Exter, ~ 125'-O- Sh rh Amjfra :Cl BY: =-0.-,8 ~,_~eRN CRECKED: AGR --- SCALE: BUSH_ABS r.. ,=se m=r) 4 1 BUSH KRUM FnE m: 1/4-=1'-0- RES. RES. COPYRIGNÂ© CRL 1997 - Ig-5. ill :, 6-7 . - 1 B EE 'REBI .-1-1.1- - ff= 0,Â·0.-Aps *aer) 1 --- 1 . /23 SOUTH ELEVATION ra SOUTH ELEVATION (MITHOUT EXIST. SHED IN FOREGROUNP) L./ 1/4..1.4 MWTH EXIST. SHED IN FOREGROU>D) e m Â§@ 0 TO. R'Dee OPOST) A 24,4 PROPE= 7 f W i~ D 4 -01 i m KRUM BUSH RES. RES. JE-Mt- r~ To. Ril,st -ST, -I- r.3/* 'r 9/ - ic.-8. 1 GIBSONÂ·RENO Â·ARCHITICTâ€¢â€¢ 11! -J ---3II'BE LLC. U : (=0 210 EAST HYMAN As~zI~1~~DO : ==73 81611 FAX (970) 926-6993 Jillilll'llilloilli .. PATo. 61â€¢AD,mer) P.O. BOX 270 000.0-, 117 1 WILLOW ==46 81485 (970) 728-07 i /1 NORTH ELEVATION (070) 728-6608 FAX 1 11.01 U *-0- 3.0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 1<14<44 laCIOWE[H SIONE[CII C \PRUCIS\BUSH\DWG\bush.093.dig Thu Mar 12 to: 38: 13 1999 JOB NO- BUSH DmIN BY: :c DAm 03-09-98 70.*Â¤381!BOST)~ CHECKED: AGR SCALE: BUSH..obl MLE ID: 1/451'-0- a COMEIGNTÂ© GRA 1-7 . 1 Afyi f A 4"M#, Il k 14* :'~: U 1 ro. RIpse mxisT).k 5 - /Xâ„¢ 1 -1IIC 41/Sk <1//7 - 1 - L 8 S To. *De masT) ~rmim'mHT 1 i 1 OU09 92 /-h PNEST ELEVATION 4 4 (2.9 - e W *- ME T.O. 11!Pe= mxler) /At T ~B --I ..r=1" uc=... ---L CÂ·* To. Rtpae excer) 1 GIBSONÂ·RENO 21 41 1 , il=E= 111 AlCHITECTSÂ· LLC. - Â¢4 1% 210 EAST HYMAN .~%&4560 - 4% 01 -- -3 - o FAX = -i (970) 926-5968 (970) 926-0998 mwn"wn-,1 ... TO. GRADE aDGST.1* P.O. BOX 278 000'-09 117 N. Intmr SUITE # 2 =96--DO (070) 728-0607 FAX - EAST ELEVATION (070)728-08 l ID j V 1Â»1* 4.0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS IE[GOFNE[H E[ONHC[[SE[H HSRE[ C: \PRGJECTS\BUSH\CM@\Bush_084.d,g Thu le 12 10: 39: 08 1998 - REVMONS JOB NO.: BUSH DRAIN BY: JN DATE: 06-05-98 CHECKED. AGR SCAIS BUSH_Al PnE Ik 1/4-=1'-0. COMEGEr Â© eRa 1997 m~ %Â§ .p.O x. PRS'PERf Ute ..4. - lilli 9 0 9-0 --4 91 ~ , lili 1 1111 ISTORAGE 1 |MEGH. RMi ~' 1 rl TI ... I n 67.- ~ GIBSONÂ·RENO â€¢ARCHITICTSâ€¢ m 0 25~] 1.lce T. 210 EAST HYMAN O 81011 (970) 926-6968 FAX n (070) 920-0998 LT. /â‚¬LL L:r. /â‚¬LL. LT.,â€¢aL 117 N. WILLOW P.O. BOX 278 =10#%&&,ADO 81485 (970) 728-6807 NER PROPOSED (970) 728-8868 Â¥AX rn BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SHER # *Â® ALO - FLOOR PLAN 92. BASEMENT laaOMEnI BIONH JOB No.: BUSH DRAIN BY: JN DATE: 06-0-98 CRECKED. Am* SCAtE: BUSHJ2 FILE m: 1/Col'-0- 00....Â© GE. 1997 /4 ll WI PROPOSED NEM ADDITION ~ 14 -1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 ' 2.8 1 1 1 1 1 - - 7 - - - - - - -=-n- - -* - I 11 1 11 1 1 1 Â«j Â§7 1 i 1 !1 1 1 6===F. ii I 11 1.0 Â£*~:i 1 -L__meal Ir-* 1 [ 0/ '\! i - -1Gtql|I~~~~ d0Iil--E,~r"E*-43 \/ CIO .-21 1 11 -r*/ V -lixÂ¥All 1 11 - 11 I NE[ rl] - - J -02*1619 Â£# ' /' -*p A pRoposm, 1+11 1 , \22, 11 T I I i 11 04/' 0 4 " ili_.1 It-u 1 1 rÂ· ~ ~IlloN n.-r L.=a='f:d &41.J fl -. r 'C=Â«Lr=L -7-=Er..--[6.~- - - 1 GIBSONÂ·RENO - 4 10:NoF- AIW~ .Alicâ€¢tricâ€¢.0 LT. Fâ‚¬LL 0% A I m rT LLC UVIN@FlabRI 1 15Â¥59--1-L,1 210 EAST HYMAN I i r---.11 L---1 1 1 11 11 1 /1 H I 81611 lili 1 FAX lk--Il IH-,0-4I I+-Illk--4 1 1 - 02"993 ... lt==!1 1 117 N. VOLOW UPI ,~67.e-,d:P =21 == &&..0 81435 (970) 728-6807 Â¥AX (970) 728-6658 ~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET 0 *0 A2.0 FlRST FLOOR PLAN 1<14<W<1 JOB No. BUSH DRAWN BY: JC DATE: 06-0-98 CHECKED: Asa SCALE: 1/4'=1'-OÂ® FILE ID: BUSHLAS COMZOErÂ© GRA 1997 1 1 EQ Â»i PROPOSED NEM ADDITION ~ 1 1 1 1 ---1 031 1 1 1 1 1 ~ H 1 1 1 m</6 APPROX PROPER~rf LINE | mi% k J 1 11, -- --- +3*/1- .. 1 .,. r L : I ~- lE 9,cl_ r i /1>. 14-=.oser' 1- =. 461~~ -r ts/=I IF-~~~~~~~~~P~ ==1 | I it . 1=4~ ON lit 1- 0 E GIBSONÂ·RENO Ill ~--u i Tri-m co< -11â„¢!a <:F*i'. , A)<PEr=-1 210 EAST NYMAN -r=nl ~4 1 1 IMAS,ER BEDROO,1 1 .AlcHITICTSÂ· 2 111 LLC. $ 21 .1. 11 I A 14 /1\ ,-14 i SUTTE # 202 '14 \ 1. . ASPEN COLORADO , 1, I X *L.11 -. . 0 I. L_/_ti._-1 61811 /1\ (970) 926-0968 Inl1 2-1 1 '4===7.lixrrlill'..............4 / 1 'n â€¢a (970) 925-0998 .. I -' P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WIUOÂ¥ ~2 U.A. 81480 (970) 728-6007 FAX ~ SECOND FLOOR PLAN (970) 720-0058 1-81'-0â€¢ SHEEX 0 A3.0 SECOND FLOOR PLAN LI<<44 HSAH 1 < TO. RIDGE (KDO 0 JOB NO.: BUSH rk ro. REDE (EX]ST, DRAIN BY: JN DATE: 05-CO-98 CHECKED: AGR SCALE: BUSH_A, FILE m: 1/4"=1'-0- PRCFER:rf INDICATES EXISTNS I COME=Â© GRA 1997 Â¥IU'NA sea / REG. ~ RES 1 rk To. R!08 ..0, d 4 114. -.---=/0, ,~ T.O. RIDGE (Be,7 +- 112'-8- 11 /k T.O. PLATE fPROPJ , ,Â·~ TO. PLAIE EXIST) Â£ -Ic ~d~' U ; T1111111111111111.lifii i i ~ i â€ž6 T.O. GRAZE EXCST) | i L# E $ j 1 1 1 4 1 1 ii i ro.mt,size,er)* 1 11 1 120'-Cr / 1 1 . 1 1-1 1 I -7 L-J L_= 0 << PROPERYY , expiGATES EXSTING 91â‚¬D STI;MIGIURE PROFILE e NORTH ELEVATION I BUSH KRUMM , RES. ~ RES. 1/411'40' ro. RIDGE mxesr)/11 - 114.... LM g / El' 4**JANIm~~~04 1 i - 104.00 0 TO. PLATE (KDO 4 ~~prle -'~~~ ' IRER AI 1 T.O. PLATE MxiSTJA - 106'-0. 9 GIBSONÂ·RENO 3 i -14 -7111.N' 4411-N- i FF=- Â·ARC Â¤;;~T ECTIÂ· 00709 LLC. 1 210 BAST Hâ„¢AN 81611 (970) 920-5999 (970) 926-5988 FAX I. P.O. BOX 278 r~ TO. CONC. (PROP) I [17 N. lfULOW â€¢- M'-10- 2 , 1 -1 TUI:152 &&RADO L-J L-J 81433 (070) 728-6807 FAX (970) 728-6058 ~ SOUTH ELEVATION SHEEr # 1/4â€¢.1â€¢-cr A4.0 ELEVATIONS HSAH < ~ TAR=de..0 $ 130,-cr IL TO. ReNSE aller) * 125'-O. JOB NO= BUSH 7 hk 1 ,/~L 1.CATES EXISTN. DRAWN BY: IN , ST~.16171/e PROPILE DATE: 06-05-98 CHECIED: AGR SCALE: 1/4--1'-0- TIO. 111052 -OP) ~17 FHZ ID: BUSH_AS 114- 9 COM=mÂ© GRA 1097 ~ '.v l' 0,1 1'4'11'1|'4',V,1'16 VJY ;Vi" y.'Â·fid 1 Â·-E. ~~UEP"~~a#yl'#'~'/lA'f'/'*V'I'N,Vil'&'i?J'#,V~1'6'Ji'D, i m 0~~,iq P 1 21]IIÂ» O -4idlity'l A,Vil tilizil ..li 1, id i,ir it,li ilikii ill 'i .1 1 r ~ 13 TOÂ· FLA,re m.op).h \ . - 104.-0. . -- 11=Ill C h T.o. Pt.ATE MxisTJ.k 1----11 N - 106.-6. 9-A 11 .-- - - m: 1 11 f _L---- .-Il- . 1 :oi ~ 1 1 = 1 1 1 I T LA L./L TO. sâ€¢ADE mXIST*, rirl riri rir-1 1 L 1-Fl trirl lili lul IHI 9 '111 1 lili lili lili I lilli 8 64-4-4 644U 42 LJ i k#-LU 1 70.//NG.WROPJ. 1 1 L-J L--1 - REST ELEVATION 88 L-J , 9 ..ar-10. 9 L-J 0 6=â„¢D.8- ,- * ro. RIDGE <ExisTJ -7 2 h. . OF [NOICATES EXISTINS I SHED S~TRUCTURE PROFILE ' I /X r-' - B El li 64 TO. R!08= 0.,up) 0 0 - 114.-1. 71 .... /4 wwbw n"Tr - ~:~~ 06,Â·ro. %062 (EXSO 11 GIBSON.RENO 07.PLAZ== 1// \,3 .ARCHITICTSÂ· 1,1 LLC. - 1064. P 18 - -- - ~04.. 210 EASr HYMAN . ASPEN, C610..DO (970) 926-0908 EI. 81011 *.0.6..DE<exler, 7---7 TlmmmET=4 (970) 925-5898 FAX i 4-1 ... p.0. BOX 278 | 117 1 â€¢11/01, 1 -1- 1- SOME, 2 I -~ TEUAJEI~~~NIORADO Â·r (gm) 708--lem (970) 728-8800 FAI SHEm * 6~, TO. CONG. #'ROPJ -I 1 -er-tcr r, 11 11 L-J L-J L-J , 1 - EAST ELEVATION L--1 A5.0 1 1.01 . t ELEVATIONS 1<1<WMA laCIO}ga ED SE[H HSnE[ MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Commission . THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Developin,qt Dii Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Dir?77[ FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner CiA Wl r RE: 735 West Bleeker -- Worksession DATE: May 13, 1998 SUMMARY: 735 West Bleeker is the small blue house on the corner of 7th and Bleeker Streets It is on the Historic Inventory, but is not a Historic Landmark. A potential owner of the property is contemplating Historic Landmark designation, Conditional Use approval for two detached houses, Partial Demolition, On-Site Relocation, Conceptual and final approval for the historic resource and development of one additional home, and an ADU for each home. The house is currently owned by Drew Dolan, who has given the buyer the authority to approach the HPC regarding development ofthe site. Site plan and elvation drawings have been provided by the Architect, Sven Alstrom. The buyer of the property is seeking a better understanding of the HPC review criteria and processes, any indications from the HI'C regarding obtaining Historic Landmark status, and any suggestions which may inform the design process. This is a worksession and is not binding upon the City or the applicant. The HPC may help the applicant realize the above mentioned issues but should not indicate how an actual development proposal would be accepted or voted upon. ATTACHMENTS: Site plan and elevation drawings. Larger drawings may be presented during the worksession. 1 *. 2Â·Â· 1 p '44 1*4. . ' :Â· .' 4,-,41 9..1. ,Â·plt T . 41 ... 4 k 2 ' 3 il 41 : 1 lili \11 ; '1 1 2'.'.1 ,~lill,1.141,1 1 i'.1 1 1 ~ 1111111 ; /t, 1~{.1, 1 11 1,0 1 ill $ 1! , I r J 1 - 1 1 14 46< 87, ., -7 9 /Â·./ 21*.Â» a:'ll+Ji*8,Â£- - Â·'. . * .--Lir,Â·.fkip- sAn .*.. '. 4 - . f.>U .: 1 -4 ...12* 1-:45 2..."94.- t.,1< 1 ' ,â‚¬ful â€¢- .: '11. 6 41 3 9, r ' -- . . 9/1 .. 1 ' 4* <#<v<6,Â£ ' ~ "' 8: LI i It _ - _ ~ - ilic |i k. 11 ./ / I. r .... 'Â· ixt/$ 4 - . 1 19 - 1 , 986 44 18*r 4 4~ JW i ANDSÂ¥ F>x,M *W A Fe 84* O PC)Rul-L Â¤><IST-INCb -MEG'it. I erTE OEVE;20,4DE *HED 1117 SQ. FT 1- FURNACE, . HOT ' SETjAGHT 6><15-140 FAM 160â€¢-TE,f 1*:01 S , =T L vr,IN FORPON OF 5*151-11~ 1-kISTE)19-10 480%5 3 . lepar--- - h: 1 \ t---4 I GE 0 0 \ '1[P 16 1,1 1 1 BL-55*58 laciaTINO 5 72 PLAN A 0 0 0 Al,LCY 4 . '010 .4 - 1 /86 1 o 1~ rÂ»~RKIN' _ 9 ADU J>n R 28 4 R p ID- 01 illili ..- >V) hi ' IKSLOGATED n 1-HS-TDFLIC; c RES]DENOB-231 - F , 1 DI / 18,1- oil 1 101- oIl ,- '' -~. Ittoll . lat.011 B,AeSMSNT 94"96 -~F O 4 . 1 -: 1- -9 li ry/Nsm /*-0, 1- 01 11\ m .n 01 - 4 19% St7- :58 -TmAC K 2/ eARAge BUSIDENGB 1 \ 2 1 Ber =9 House A w | NINDCIN *, 2 /lip 1 ~ 14, Pop<SH -i \ 1. . 1--4,p*ej spm b 151 of--1 -rv,REMAIN ... -OLA . 81,881<58 PROPOSED SIT= 19/AN 1/6Â°= [?-O Il LANDSCA ING, ..- . -- I -OBWINKLIÂ«5KRUEE-- NARDS . . , 'i'.Erm.=rt=,E,n===7.n~r.N522.W U "-4*t" : %&1,#prf# /~ Fllimpip#*r'J & , '99~Uft -- Â£iy â„¢'4~&2~52Â¥4.134<.ir/201 1.Le -12"iMÂ¥21=*ra. f=rh=e=Â» - - 4 =99-<rk.1 - EN '--'95 83 520 29 -- W LOSU, __ENED-OSURE - .-I 1 . #-ff.r~ IALMIYEIâ‚¬56-N---1 --_ I VAIN VICIDEFENLE@QEL-_SHED-------,~- - ~ ------ Â· . 1 Al oHÂ» 3[,5Â»rrioN *32*Il==-*l:diV<*%-T-~ON ---...Il-.I.-I.*--Il---0--il-I.-Il......--I-- 1 . 1 ' 1 - 1 . 1 1 it Â· 1 1 / .0 1 1 4 14*6-3.1----44499#-f~9*:4*&%~:fiviAF B.- 1 .4 : 4.-1414.Â·719.247 Irickb' 1 61. 4 1 &-*24 1 F j ..1.-1=Dt... .3-n,ke.&*-52.,L--r -....0.25â€¢F ='IE;~U-~,i,~â‚¬r - 3., f: 07 -4 1/ t , 7â€¢. . 4- . . -- 149#64- 1 i ~ MÂ©L_9'(77~1 AN /1, - -- SAED I 5 1 --65094= -2.LiNAITON 0 -.-Ii- -- --3312_*35IinmDEE-Â»S- -3. 1 41... 9-0 - - .Rou 1-90-7 11*KIE~L-~~ %173 VJT [PNS-zanit.v9::~1*TF,imr;-EL-7+- : p. 964+ 44 1-- ~am_-96=1__1 . . - --- -3 3 1 1. 17 - | -[ikl VEINAY--_ TE_2_Hâ‚¬)USE A _-_---- ~ ,AD U (E,&68 MENri- 1 ENTEr< --i---- - - 1. 1 i 1 $. 1,1 1 1 I BARABile jANEÂ»>r 1 - 1. 1 -1 M -1,16 . 1 - -11 ...I\.1 11 1 -pr 1 .4 6*u=24--- I r. ~07 TU 41mrÂ·- - ~ ~ --ft--6-003' 1 -Râ‚¬)0Â»1 _ -PARK'.49-2 --1 - 1 1 2.4 KIT=HEV# O t_-1- 1 ! HOU53 5 -077-_BROUND--fi>00194- 6%\/=44=H.4-_- .- --- ....1-*.............+... I ..... -A USTROM 223 -7-4 MIAY+ 96- - - - - _ _ 4 - 0 -5.+ 24....i .-1.1 j - 19139_"1 r- -Ill-/* . .. ....I---- I....I.- - r 1 L . --*Il .I.I.I.. -/*Ii- I I ~ _ ___ -Â»ous E th -Da[VE-blef A BEDVE l j A . - A t - --Â· Y 4 J. 1 \ - 0 -200 NA, FT ~ ADU t-<24% i Y#49 M/- It d . 1 1 - lil OF ~ B 1 /ue#+7 ~ 1 =U- 1 0 , 14*25Fit _553>ROOM ~ 1 -30 1 f 1 -4 1 , ME# 1 1 5FAGE - -- .-----.---- ---- Ill-*.- -=, 1 -Â»OL'55 6 5452%,<ENT 5 EVENTE- A >STBOIÂ«1 4 MÂ»r 'Fe - I I --~ --0- . 7 -ruiuj ~ -3 --r- r - l -/34,2~M - - 2.-- - .0.-1 4 4-N0 RK/1 13- li j ~ Ill 1 9 Dom - I 1- Lt ~) MEFU~M. bELD lai Â¥1 1 h %1-25%{EN 'rÂ·-7 , DIN iN2 0=CON ~ 1 9 - . 1 350 k -I 0 .. -- -- 1-//-.- --- . 1 1 Â¢99*53 - _A Â©SOOIND- _*t==LOSf 15>5=451~ Al-smoipt ~i 441.-22*f_. -_95.-__-- 21 - /4 . I. Â·r -n 9;/4,44<AR I 1 j 1.1 -1-f - 1 . . %ALL- ~ 300 3 3 %,441 E-El 1 Â·r;ZE Abll -7- .b==2-4 -, 1 rÂ· 7 0 123 0 ADLI b=Zzi --,0.. 6 5NTEâ‚¬ ... ~~-!-4Â·pUSE - ~~<--3---~hiD~ 7L~~ ~----- --~~--- -~* 36/-3/04 6 -- al/STROM 4 WAY 552_ .. -- 0 .... . 1 1 Â«77=12 1 ----- --- 14 ir ~ Sm;*22 + FAMILY/51-71142 - --4 - k / f r.- - fll- 1 2 lit 1 -or lilli .- 94 ' 1 - ' -Â· MUNDY CI 41@A \ CD 11 -itwr 835 'Vi h 1---- -U Â©1 ) 1>ChiES, >EVE L 1 -9-7 -AD J \ / 2 00 ST, m-0 t 7 -----t < \N 0--:- ---* -*I FOUSE Â»4 344559 .-4 1-7- 1- 1 1 51+EENE~ 0 -3- _ _-Â»LSTXC.91"" 4 44Â« 16