The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19980722AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 July 22, 1998 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of May 27, 1998 minutes. II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) V. BUSINESS 5 110 4 '-1 1 9 U. C Z <-3-l - 6~.L<D LA-~-- 8/1 i Yn n i.,i~ - 0,5 1 ' A. 60 303 E. Main St.--request for relief from certain conditions& 24,1, f 0/t B. 203 S. Galena St.--minor review (continued from 7/8/98) for Gucci 0/( C. 735 W. Bleeker--Significant review for landmark designation, conceptual review, partial demolition, site coverage variance and temporary on-site relocation (Public Hearing) 0011 1-1 'll riL / 4-0 1.8 4 . L '2 4-13 VI. ADJOURN 0 PROJECT MONITORING ger Moyer 303 E. Main, Kuhn ISIS 435 W. Main, L'Auberge 514 N. First Susan Dodington 712 W. Francis 918 E. Cooper, Davis 132 W. Main, McCloskey Meadows Trustee and Tennis townhomes 234 W. Francis Melanie Roschko 918 E. Cooper, Davis ISIS 107 S. Mill Elli's bldg. Zona storefront window Suzannah Reid 303 E. Main, Kuhn 702 W. Main, Pearson 218 N. Monarch, Zucker 414 N. First 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis Mary Hirsch Meadows, Trustee and Tennis townhomes 420 W. Francis Street 435 W. Main, L'Auberge Gilbert Sanchez ~ 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis 414 N. First 303 E. Main Jeffrey Halferty 132 W. Main, McCloskey 234 W. Francis, Mullin 414 N. First 701 W. Main Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street 712 W. Francis Street 514 N. First ~NCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1999 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24,1998 514 N. Third Street (Ringsby), expires June 11, 1998 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires August 12,1998 0 0 33.3 -r j d 4,1 July 1,1998 Worksession Notes ~ HPC 1. Staff distributed notes from the last worksession 2. We discussed landscaping approvals; staff indicated that HPC does not have authority to review landscaping, that this would need to be amended in the land use code. 3. We discussed putting together "monitors packets" once building permits are issued. These are to be given to the monitor so they know what was approved under the building permit. 4. Slide presentation for the symposium. Staff distributed rolls of film to HPC members and asked that they photograph good and bad examples of projects in the city. We will review these at a subsequent (August 5th?) worksession. 5. Staff will try to get color Xerox's made ofthe historic inventory maps to HPC members for their use. 6. We discussed the top burning issues that should be discussed at the symposium, which are: The carrots and sticks of inventory vs. landmark status; the land use process and it's impacts on HP cases; and a discussion of the principles and theories of historic preservation. 7. The HPC would like the focus to continue to be educational with specific Aspen emphasis. We would like to. discuss the vision for the program and determine how we get to where we want to go. 8. We discussed potential young people to invite to the symposium, which included Darcy Brown, Billy Madsen, Eric B. from the youth center and Camilla from Studio B. Julie is to follow-up on additional invitations. 1- 37. p A 10/1 0 . Mr. Mac Cunningham ASPEN Â· PrrKIN 605 W. Main St. COMMUNTH DEVE.OPMENT DEPARâ„¢ENT Aspen, CO 81611 July 13, 1998 RE: Maintenance of Historic Fence at 605 W. Main St. (via registered mail) Dear Mr. Cunningham: On behalf ofthe Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, I am advising you that the 1#storic fence on your property at 605 W. Main St. is in a deteriorating condition which is in violation of your historic preservatidn approvals from several years ago. The Commission at that time required that the fence be retained, and properly maintained. It is evident that the fence is no longer being maintained and is being neglected. The Commission is requesting that you takethe necessary and immediate action to 0 remedy the current neglectful condition of this fence. We are askingÂ·that the fence be properly repaired and painted within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Inaction on your part could fesult in further legal action by the city. , If you have any questions regarding this issue. please contact me at 920-5100. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Sincerely, 0 Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director Acting Historic Preservation Officer / CC: John Worcester, City Attorney Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Sara Thomas, Zoning Officer. Amy Guthrie, HPO 0 130 Socni GALENA STREET Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 8I611-1975 Â· PHONE 970.920.5090 Â· FAX 970.920.5439 Printed en Recvcled Paper EXHIBIT~- 1 6-)190/ TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission CE] THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director~~ FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director 01(J [Acting Historic Preservation Officer]~7 3 - RE: 303 E. Main St.--Request for modifications from approvals DATE: July 22, 1998 SUMMARY: On July 14, 1998, staff and monitors met with the owners and tenants of 303 E. Main St. to evaluate what is remaining to be completed in order to sign offon the CO. Attached is a letter which was sent to the owner identifying the remaining issues. The owner is requesting relief from one of the requirements approved this spring, which was to paint the foundation a dark red to match the accent color on the house. The applicant has indicated that he went through a significant amount of time and expense to salvage the stone from a cellar and sandblast it before rebuilding the foundation. Though some HPC members felt strongly that the foundation should be painted in order to make it less noticeable, staff and some monitors feel that painting would be an inappropriate preservation practice, and that the foundation is best left as is. The applicant is asking for reconsideration of this requirement. The applicant has also repainted the mechanical equipment on the roof a flat black color. Staff and some of the monitors feel that this adequately addresses minimizing the visual impacts of this equipment. Staff does not think that a screen should be added to the roof structure to further hide the equipment. If the commissioners agree, then this should be clarified as part of the motion. The owner of Masathisu is also requesting a modification to the approved landscape plan. In order to meet a timeframe established by the Planning and Zoning Commission in order to use the required open space for outdoor dining, the owner evaluated landscaping of other outdoor spaces in the commercial core and installed plane boxes of a similar nature, attached to the wrought iron fence. The restaurateur argues that a large raised plane would reduce the available space for tables and crowd the dining patio. In order to address the desire of some HPC members to have year-round color in this space, the tenant proposes to add several large planters with upright junipers spaced along the fence. Staff and some monitors felt that this would adequately address the issue while allowing the restaurant adequate seating. This also would require reconsideration by the HPC. Staff believes that, with the resolution of the issues highlighted on the attached letter, this project has met the objectives of historic preservation and should be "finalled out." As a point of information, the restaurateur also intends to install some temporary lighting under the umbrellas as well as some heaters which will be used in the evenings. This does not require HPC action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve the following amendments to the approvals for 303 E. Main St.: 1. That the foundation is not to be painted; 2. That the landscape plan be modified to reflect the existing landscaping (plane boxes) with several large planterf added which include upright Junipers to proxideear- round color and interest. Clk-0-Le-1 vis. c_t~ p--4( Lly 3-44( 0-6*'L+Op- 3. That the mechanical equipment on the roof which was recently painted flat black is adequately addressed and will not require additional screening. 9 C f Â«>C:-,7 671) g:/planning/aspett/hpc*ses/sim,15303 doc 1/ -0 - 11 - lit,Ltsw 54 j<jÂ«_d-Alk21' ~07 Affi ./1/4 ya k 5*7 114 61& cfuL /9-4 01,1-0 <34 4 (u--L~~d y 9 -1~ 62 4 5 0-x- 74 5 06/23/98 TUE 16:30 FAX 970 9635684 RSA, Inc. 0004 ~O~'111*4*40:0*04%Â·- -9-1- Â·'- 3. - EXHIBIT Ed'uWA.*M#KFitte3Wte-fÂ·~:=6-rie.-;~-5 . ~Â·Â·6~. Â¢*9434- &392-3*fmdiÂ« 3.4. L G# ./Â·1 A 81 8 4- ) 39 g t.j'Â·Â·*2 , ~Â· ik â€¢-25 ---- - :... -:1-24 -,L.i.E:.'',-~-~.4,1,-59~.1'T~, - 30 â‚¬ Au- A Â· ..3'75,j 1 -lt:-t:â‚¬ ' 71-4 - .:27 2RF-Elt; I-912.*i ,; -fuff/ .=i 0 , 0- lili.% Â· -1_ lilli E-; t.-:17Â£:01-D:R....---EÂ·. - ./. ---12<~~9~?j>F.79-4.99*4 :.lA . ' â€¢ i-: 5.:11'bi . .. *t:2:JJitii-~43.-It- t-4- r.-,2â‚¬352+3~.ia '-'yÂ°'"- .... A 14.- . 1 ,)422 4%...... ....4 -2.-fil-Ili- -:.1 - 1-Â°.49.37 Jug- L.-Â· ..., - -4>ST ' : 72-- 21.- r. 2,9. 7.8< .. I 4 ; r - :/ I I. /1.1 4 41â€ž ' ---A-de't- â‚¬4,-Crr . 01Â·0+...:11'...:0.0.2-Â·Â·Â·,.,Â·Â·.Â·Â·Â·- ,C '.'2'3~. , ~ -022'6-U':31 *30Â·44~.~,Â·.5~p- .1â‚¬1).94Â£Â«11*,1 :. 31. 9,- $71.1 - - lili 1-9 ... eal.4'u :.-6 ... I -V -./ ' I. 4.9.2Â·:'11Â·43*??*#D*%0VÂ· . ,-p.-.,Mi---~.2- j"A~, /45$~-ibi'~-.".; ----: e.-49.1 . I 3'. Saa.-ri~f2 - *fberligÂ·jÂ«40.,13 ..~ 2 - 3".Â·, 11':;c- 14174:.7.:-4'--Â£'1 -<'2*' . 1.2/ZkaÂ·,7'22Â· 3/7./14:5 1 .-1 4%3,ifmito ,â‚¬-22-Up->94"-->21' ;1.*- A, : 2 i.'- ,- ., ~.. ,~ ..r- LY,APPZMWLK.2 , - 1,4~: Â· ... .....4 -41/19% .4}~#*+-Arae t.:t .ill *L,1. 1 9/ 111,, ..'.i.,:./'~-'ic--idy.. . '*,:,1.~;1~*S'~49~Â·f k - ' 0-t. Â·, ....'. - 4.1, .-01.---.411....111.! ..1...11.-%.=.SI- 11+J.. 0 . / ..:1! ' . 4, i~4â€¢CÂ· 404*4 1. .- 6 .1. 1.. .14:-1 kul...21= :-' -- : ..'29Â¥11*' ;?822*~t*.14%71% Â·.--7/Y YA-'aG,Â·tg,0-97 A- -:- I I ?- ..20'WEAJAZ/922Â§5:40/ lic-~: -t . .4.. - 4 0 tkiti*i~4â‚¬314 3.1 -j - I.-I . .1*. - '5'.4'Imnfr##reith#. -- ....... 1.-7Jtpl.-96....:7Â·7. Â·C; It - 1-1 4 ' , . .. 4. .,4 ~ 1' ~ ~~ i o ./.d <6; I.-)- - *,4,- *'b.*43,1-y:-~fÂ·:3'zr.1*i ~-739Â·-Ad.,1 .2.44 ':.2.,9:11,44,;61%'.:4 3 91~384 /1EL:Zi &~ - -- i, 4 44â‚¬*FaiaÂ»53%34 *ibi Â· 3%- ~ fÂ·*4.~ . - .1 -226,PR-Zer--24.,. k 1 ... -- ' .1 f .4,2â€ž14 }Â§92*4*49-1 ./.- 0 22.l iff'*' ./-6123*L.31 - 'S Pâ€¢â€¢iny /~//-Â«,f Â· .... +H Â· â€¢te: r,Ai f #'-rrk#,A . *05 I mber: -8619/'Il-;IAâ‚¬4,/.. 4/91:9<N..0:-'3*g,2. Â·Â· .Â©54*2?024~.' : ': -24*-te r . Â· :lt ~LMS#:45p~7flr~9~%~r-.2.,31~t, 13%~~=,~'4 .:434Â·2 .- i; .... .4 1,4 Irt:C. 4 06/23/98 TUE 16:40 FAX 970 9635684 RSA, Inc. 0007 429*4.2- 1 .. As Pictured: BRACKET 2312 16 7 11 02'L..1 . 10 0 0 2322 20 94 13 8 :te>Â·.Â· f.:Â·.1 _ ~ 2332 25 113,4 161,4 0 - - t 2342 28 14,4 18 4 4Â£:39.-: 38k44 ~TU50:4:;r:.5 dey.â‚¬1 -30-~ #HWP h%%26 | -' ~ WALL 2311 14 7 51/1 .345<M&G/T 2 NA'.6 2321 20 91/2 61,2 :r. Ly.) 2331 25 113/4 73/4 2341 28 141,8 9 fu\\\\ 0O t.1 0 POST 2313 18 7 sq.- ~Â· Â· ~000 2323 23 9,4sq, 4 -mum./0 - 2333 2642 113/4 4 A : 2343 31 1414 sq. L-L=,1, r af - ~ CHAIN 2314 16 7 sq. 2324 20 9 sq. Â»-3/ 2334 25 113/4sq. 2344 28 141/B sq. 12Â·2â€¢9. e.#e., .f.Â¥f - . .Wh 2.-9*=.ir : : -1. &. 11.'f,22,34 - 4 , 1 ASPEN Â· PIn<IN CoMpenm DEVELOPMENT DEPARâ„¢ENT Nicklaus Kuhn P.O. Box 8016 Aspen, CO 81612 July 17, 1998 RE: HPC Issues remaining on 303 E. Main St. (sent via registered mail) Dear Mr. Kuhn: As you are aware, the HPC monitors and myself walked through the subject property to determine the remaining work that is needed to satisfy the HPC. The following is a list of items that remain to be resolved: 1. Re-locate cable pedestal in front of garage (in coordination with the Engineering Dept. and TCI). 2. Add bollards to protect new enclosure offhistoric shed (303 1/2 E. Main) near alley. 3. Foundation is to be painted dark red to match accent color. 4. Light fixture on Bacchus facade has been improperly affixed and hasÂ·cracked the historic wood siding. This fixture will need to be removed, the siding repaired or replaced, and a new fi*ture remounted to a frame which can be carefully affixed to the historic building. (This same light fixture will be used at the rear of Masathisu as well). The hole in the siding above the light fixture must also be patched and painted. There are two or three large cracks in some portions of the siding that must be, repaired and painted. 5. The shiny silver metal light fixture on the front facade of the historic house that shines onto the Bacchus sign should be removed. It was agreed that one smaller spotlight to match that which is under the eave will be installed. The metal box at the - electrical source will be painted light blue to match the house. .. 6. Landscape plan must reflect that which was approved; HPC required raised planters with substantial landscaping for year-round interest, such as evergreens: If required by liquor authority, provide separate gate in fehce to separate two licensees These are the remaining issues with which HPC still has concerns. If you do not agree with any of these remaining issues(e.g. planter boxes, painting the foundation, etc.), you will need to apply to the HPC for amendments to your approvals. I recommend that you . and/or your tenants plan to submit whatever modificaations you'd like to have considered - no later than Friday, July 174 so that they can be added to the July 22nd HPC agenda. - . -- 1 130 SourH GALENA STREET Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 Â· PHONE 970.920.5090 Â· FAx 970.920.5439 Printed on Recycled Paper Please let me know when these issues will be completed so that we can determine when the HPC is able to sign-off on your final CO for the apartment. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, I t CLL.zf> I ~ie Ann Woods, Deputy Director / Acting Historic Preservation Officer CC: Amy Margerum, City Manager Stan Clauson, Community Development Director ' EXHIBIT~ MEMORANDUM 11 64243 1 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director ~ FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director \JAL' i [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] I RE: 203 S. Galena St.-- Minor Review (continued from July 8, 1998) DATE: July 22,1998 SUMMARY: The applicant has modified his proposal in order to more sensitively address the review standards. The Galena Street elevation will now have wood and glass doors which will extend from the transom downward to the new lower street level. The area underneath the beadboard will have stone to match the front elevation, and the entry walk will be colored concrete to match the existing. A metal grate will be inset into the concrete at the entrance to minimize dirt from being tracked into the shop. The E. Hopkins Street elevation will remain as is, but will have a new wood and glass door added as well as the Gucci sign attached in the transom area. Both street elevations will be painted the dark brown color submitted on the material sample board and the door pulls will remain as nickel-plated brass with a satin finish. APPLICANT: Gucci International, represented by Bryan O'Touma of Gensler Arclitects. (For this meeting the owner, Harley Baldwin and local architect Ted Guy - will represent Gucci). LOCATION: 203 S. Galena St. (Brand Building) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. The subject building is an historic landmark, and is within the boundaries of the Commercial Core "H," Historic Overlay District. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on gdjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into Font yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to jive hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a jinding that such variation is more compatible in character with the 1 historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be. development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The proposed changes to the two storefronts are compatible in general design, massing and volume, and scale with the adjacent parcels within the "H," Historic Overlay District. There are no variances being requested, and the setbacks are as established by the existing building. 2. Standard: The proposed development rdects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development will have little to no affect on the character of the neighborhood. The building exists, and was recently remodeled. The Galena St. improvements will generally be in keeping with the adjacent storefronts, although painted a slightly different color. The E. Hopkins St. elevation will remain essentially as is, except for a replacement door which will match the Galena St. door. This elevation will likewise be painted the dark brown which is Gucci's signature color. A new sign will be pin-mounted in the transom, and staff has requested that the applicant provide a drawing detailing this addition. If the drawing is not attached to the packet, it will presented at the meeting. Likewise, the applicant will be forwarding a sample door pull and a larger paint sample for presentation at the meeting. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposedfor development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed change would not detract from the historic significance of the designated historic structures located on the parcel or from those located on adjacent parcels. In fact, the E. Hopkins St. elevation will remain essentially the same, except for a new coat of paint a simpler door design which will enhance the historic significance of the building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development will not diminish the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2 â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to 0 issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ D dny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposed changes to 203 S. Galena (including the E. Hopkins St. elevation), with the following conditions: 1. The improvements are substantially in conformance with the drawings submitted with this application dated July 10, 1998; Â· 2. 'That any significant changes from those shown could result in a project which would require significant review which would require both a conceptual and final review by the HPC; 3. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposed changes to 203 S. Galena St. with the conditions recommended in the staff memorandum dated July 22, 1998." EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - The revised application, dated July 10, 1998. Exhibit "B" - Historic Architectural Building/Structure Form (Inventory) gyplanninghtspen/lipe/cases/minor/203sg.doc 0 3 It / '19r APPLICANT: Gucci America, Inc. represented by Bill Sofield, Gensler Architecl~~â€ž, LOCATION: 203 S. Galena ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet aUfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(13)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. FROM :GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998.07-20 17:09 #584 P.01/03 * .5 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Gensier Date TO See below ' 7/20/98 0 Anention Seebelow _ Fa~Imile Number Time Seebelow 5:00,m Prutect Number Gucci Ajpca 06.8042.001 T-1 number of pages (Including c,wer page) Flle Â· 3 - See below Lee Pearce Gucci (212) 230.9389 Jeolm LaPietta Gueci (212) 230-9389 Bill Sofield Studio Sofield (212) 473-0300 Emma O'Neill Studio Sofield (212) 473-0300 (970) 920-1821 Harley Baldwin Ted Guy Theodore K.GnyAIAPE . (970)927-4813 Bruce Barth TheodcatIC Guy.AIAPE (970) 927-4813 Tim Chid,liz Swanson Rink (303) 832-7563 Mails Smua Swanson Rink (303) 832 7563 Terry Nelson Jolmion Scllwinghammer (212)643-1553 0 Julie Ann Woods City of Aipen Commullity Dev./HPC (970) 920-5439 Jahn Backer Gensier Barry Mc Cormick Genaler Tony Rod,iguez Gensler AS Ieque.ted, sketches showing ad~onal ir,formation are hDowing 1. Stone pat,1~gatarea of removed stepandaddmonofmatwellinmeessed entmnce atthe S. Gatenafacade. 2. Signaga latem mounted 021 exishgtransom atE. Hoplcing {Â»Aâ€¢: . u#omANT/Cof=-: 7 .-- '*1 ... . 8'0111.. Bdim O'Tumna 97. 40 not neceive al:page/. 0/me e.:11 0.2//3/ ax p=ible. Askjbr: Brian O'Tuama On. Reel=reller,1.0 0 Suil. 500 Tok 2114911400 Abw nor* 74â€¢w Yerk 10020 Fg, 211 492. 1472 000 m O 00 mom Naomil i Ill : GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998,07-20 17:10 #584 P.02/03 . NEW WOOD AND GLASS DOOR TO MATCH EXISTING MIM r PATCH WTH STONE TO MA1CH EXISTING --- AT AREA OF REMOVED STEP - . 11.1.11.1.1111 - (E) .Â»~T#+ -TH".144 a. 4ALÂ»k err: Eâ‚¬Â»64'E SCALE:1"=1'-0" RECESSED MATWELL ~ MATCH S]DEWALK FINISH STAINLESS STEEL GRATE -1 ~ TOP TO BE FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK 1-1- .\ -- i \ i T - 4.-5--Â·- t \ - 1 7 I 1' 1 i.....lili.... ..........." ,/ 1 T 4, Fi;â€¢4 *fg - 4Abm,-0. ST: EH-tl=14*,E- 4-2."*Fle.viog GUCCI 903&0*UNASD ASPEN, On JUL'rm 1999 eender Â· muotâ€¢ m unc.o I , I I FROM :GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998,07-20 17:10 #584 P. 03/03 . 0 H 11 -In" X11 1.,11... i.m 1,- .Il'H - 11. 1.-11 1 41 1 0 . -1 11 11-111 H U .â€ž" 11.- IL.. .L . I Â·J "1 1.."T - 11 I - - - A LJ C 41-1 . 1 DOSMNG WOOD AND / MT- 1- LETTERS 4 f __1~ 1 L PIN-MOUNTED ~ GLASS UGHT TO IEEE TO EXISENG REMAIN ~[ =. TRANSOM 102/ ~<= M WT-1 LETTERS PIN MOUNTED 4 - \ TO EXISTING TRANSOM 9-r_3 Or-4 r= IL--2 0 4 4 EXISTING WOOD TRANSOM 'C, TO REMAIN ~ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4'41'-0" L EXISTING WOOD AND - GLASS UGHT TO REMAIN 8 - Ilofi<INe ANA&. EF+THAI*446 ~SECTION SCALE: 1"=1'-O* GUCCI 2.RGAUNAEr. ASPEN, Ca rULY 20 BN 0 Oensler Â· STUD!:1 B uncu) MEMORANDUM - ....#Â¥â€¢91. Gensler Project Project Number Gucci Aspen ~ 06.8042.001 Date Aspen Historic Preservation Commission July 13, 1998 Attention Telephone No. Julie Ann Woods Subject File Revisions to Application for Minor Development Review Memorandum / Discussions / Observations We thank the Aspen HPC for their review of the proposed alterations to the S. Galena Street and E. Hopkins Avenue storefronts. The proposed alterations have been revised according to the HPC's direction and are outlined below, and illustrated on the attached elevations. All finishes indicated below are shown on the enclosed finish sample board, and are keyed to the elevations. In addition, for the HPC's information, a mockup of the proposed door pull and a larger sample of the proposed storefront color (PT-3A) will be sent to your attention prior td ilid hext meeting of July 22, 1998. A. The revised proposed alterations to the S. Galena St. storefroht are as follows: a) Replace existing doors with new wood and glass doors. All dimensions and profiles of the new doors will match those of the existing, except the overall height, which will be increased by approximately 8" to compensate for the removal of the entry step. b) Install new MI'-3 door pulls and kickplates on doors. c) Repaint all wood storefront elements PT-3A. /~d) Install MT-1 Gucci letters on transom above door (pin-mounted). Letters will be lit from above by light fixture ~ concealed in the existing painted wood soffit above the entry. B. The revised proposed alterations to the East Hopkins Ave. storefront are as follows: a) Existing wood storefront will remain with the exception of the existing non-historical door. b) Replace existing door with new wood and glass door to match those on the S. Galena Street facade of the building. c) Install new MT-3 door pull and kickplate on door. d) Repaint all wood storefront elements PT-3A. e) Install MT-1 Gucci letters on transom above window (pin-mounted). In addition to the above proposed alterations, Gucci may wish in the future to erect awnings on both storefronts. These would be of similar type to and would align with the adjoining existing awnings on the Brand Building. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments. Gensler will rely on these notes as the approved record of matters discussed and conduslons reached unless written notice to the contrary is received by Gensler within seven calendar days ~~of the Issue of these notes. ~istribution. Per attached transmittal Prepared by: Date Issued: Brian O'Tuama 7/13/98 s:\068042\current\memos\m071398.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212.492.1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212.492.1472 TRANSMITTAL Gensler To Attention City ofAspen Community Development / Julie Ann Woods Historical Preservation Commission iddress City State Zip 130 S. Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 Project Project Number File Gucci 06.8042.001 Subject Revised Minor Development Review Application For Your: O Approval and selection 2 Use Â¤ Record O Review/Comment O Distribution Â¤ Information Action Required: O Indicated on item transmitted O Comment and return to Gensler O No action required O Sign and return to this ofice Cl See remarks below 2 For Application Review Delivered Via: O Messenger 0 Mail Â¤ UPS 2 Express O Hand carried O Pick-up Quantity Description / Remarks Dated 1 each Revised Proposed S. Galena & E. Hopkins Elevations 1 Finish Materials Board 1 Memorandum containing written description ofrevised proposed development ' 1./:21./. Transmittal Copies To: Enclosures Delivered Via: 2 Messenger O Mail O Fax L. Pearce / Gucci Copies of above O Express O Hand carried O Pick-up 2 Messenger O Mail O Fax E. O'Neill/ Studio Sofield Copies of above O Express O Hand carried O Pick-up O Messenger U Mail 0 Fax L Baldwin Copies ofabove m Express O Hand carried n Pick-up f endosures are not as described, please advise Gensler immediately. Prepared by: Date: Brian O'Tuama (ext. 8684) 7/13/98 s:\068042\current\transmit\hpc.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212.492.1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212.492.1472 664:661- S HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM ~tate Site Number: Local Site Number: 203.SG - Photo Information: ASP-CC-1-6, 7&8 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Hvman Block / Brand Building Full Street Address: 203 South Galena Legal Description: Lots G. H. I. Block 88 Citv and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial core Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Commercial Architectural Style: Victorian with Romanesque influences Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Corner building - storefronts on South Galena and East Hankins Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None ~or the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in he description as appropriate: Roof: Flat Walls: Rough faced; coursed sandstone: A-A-B-C-C bav snacing on east facade; diagonal corner entrv; D-B-E-A-A bav spacing on north facade; bays are framed bv 2-story stone Dilasters; on both east and north facades. paravet steps un 5 feet after A bays; sandstone is corbelled to form dentils at parapet level Foundation / Basement: Sandstone Chimney(s): Unknown Windows: Windows on 1st floor east are fixed one over one wood storefront with each bav representing a different commercial estab- lishment; windows on 1st floor north facade are one over one double hung. typically all 2nd floor windows are one over one double hung Doors: Transom full light double wood entry at corner and typically for individual store entries Porches: N/A General Architectural Description: Use of sandstone as primary material tvvifies commercial architecture demonstrating strength and stability (original use as a bank). Dentil detailing out of sandstone at roofline allows for glav of light and shadows with change of natural and artifical light. The use of sandstone throughout is a definite statement of strength but more imgortant is a feature Victorian architecture: use of different materials and textures for different ~4affect. The roofline detailing. the sandstone dentils displaying ~--lharving light/shadow patterns. The color of the sandstone changes dramaticallv with varving intensitv of light. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 203.SG FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Commercial Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1891 X Actual _ Estimate _ Asseasor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor X Moderate __ Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: First floor alterations of facade. date unknown Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or .Ll - architectural integrity. 0 ___ Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Built for David H. Hyman. an early promoter of Asven. this two-story stone structure was comoleted in 1891. The First National Bank moved from the Aspen Block into the Hvman Block in 1891. The second floor consisted of a large hall which housed the Patriotic Order Sons of America (P.O.S.A.). a lodge dedicated to "society Durooses and social gatherings." During the 1920's. M. H. Brand owned the building and operated a Conoco gas station on the corner. Today numerous shops occuov the space. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * tecorded By: Date: Januarv 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin. Historic Preservation Officer/Planner ' i 1 / /. i / , // 12. \4Â·om<t Alt# i 212 Â£6-ib)/br fil-Li 4 667 1 BUX.#L--A 6 1 : I-~\,OVULki 204 1 i BALS-*. L 1 '0," 1; 1 Â·-, 1- , 1--22 i '3 j i /.i- Al . A. A.EL.â‚¬4, t,LOC.- 1 1 ; LOPT .C- VV#. 1 -- h V I ,-1.-- 1 +208 . 1/ 1 Â·-x- 4 *r. 1 / 86 0 , 1 1 ,-1 7913.0 x ~,/+1==l==:~iL@>1 L_ BLe-K-;-1 XI Ir--- .9 KEENE / DI-Â£30Â· t.. *CL- * feR /ji 4/ . 1 Cuj 1 4-ZIP 432- h f 1 /1 Â· i. i :--9 fri t- 0--'r A' C. 1 1 1 x 7912.9 thi 2< 9/su,t UL i f~10 Al (...._;2 3 1U 1-Â·-2-i ,-EiÂ· C,} f i Â·-: fe \X A 1 b. B \ 1, YEED Of'A 41 6 .M Â£ CL _----+ Y N Freco' 9 WIDEP-.>.U-Â· 1'4.â€¢ : f~It = Â· 1 I'TY<,4Â·4 1 â€¢.............../- 1 1 . 4 -" i 'MOÂ·Â· . E. n*.rÂ·. +J' fe,Â·, t.\ . Â·Â·*4.â€¢1 . I h .Â¢60 . Mi . Pf *' ?<11 ; r.1 1 ' 1 .1 2% 1 6 1. + - 141 41 ... 1/ .4 j A 11,10 1, . D. 1,1,4 ld'. r ./ 1 ':11 r,lit#J]1*110#ALÂ£*6Â«421,1. 1.- '1 'h Â£ 3 2 1 '.. 7.t .: M~CS '11&Pyi<~.4.I,44..4, *tr I. M 1 1,4 1 2 *10 i.4, 1.,1 .2 1 141 - i 1 1 1 . --- 14..,Aic j'P#* 1 2 r-7.1 2 11%. 11~!;ft'~ ., ~t,;4*,~'I ~ ~~'~ Â·~ 4: 1, il. ~11 .:) 43,-A > >flp Bum -Â·'.f"O. H , l... t ill .. 4.- i Â· 4#"4-Â· "~; : ': k.*t............ f.,l $ .1. .,1 1 48'11/ i.47 i -' ~11 f .'Â·. ' 1 4 4 ......1/I'l, -*Ffy '.1, ''' Â¢ , I. 1 â‚¬i<j#' â€¢18*fl V.. ** lit::.Â£2~:C'%.f I ii t le \,-4 1 9 74Â¢ Â·l , â€¢t- 'a IP "'eg: A V,l 1 3 14Â· . 41'. 1 j, 1 f -1 W B â€¢* ff'llilililibliliwililij 1 ..h.6-â€¢Â· I . i.9 ..1*.AW'' V 1, 4 -- Â· 2 'ffi':'14 1 *44 r.:dtl,LA 750 J?tttc :-7.7,1. 96% ~ t].0 0 .42.,44 . :4 3 .r, 4, i! 1 #1. \ 2 11. '1 f.. , 1 42 i - ..1" ....1 1 f a c fl':Â· r. 2 ---- C kE!:Â»-1144 NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-1) 1 1__1 LIL__31_1 L-__-'~ EXIST STONE 300 001I10 -00 DE]E O 30 EXIST WOOD LINTEL (PT-3A) 2 - J G i EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN (PT-3A) 00 DISPLAY NEW WOOD & GLASS WINDOW DOOR TO MATCH GALENA ST. ENTRANCES (PT-3A) EXIST. STREET LIGHT FIXTURE mul NEW DOOR PULL (MT-3) E331O1[73 NEW KICKPLATE (MT-3) DE 1. SECTION THROUGH STOREFRONT 1 3. DETAIL OF NEW STOREFRONT - E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION 0 1 -- --PUL-$ . 0 EXISTING UPPER WINDOWS TO REMAIN (PT-3A) WINDOW DISPLAY - El El - E El GCF EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN (PT-3A) 4. PLAN DETAIL . 2. E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION 0 203 & GALENASr. -EZZIX@E=III - - JEY-*1998 --- Gens|er Â· sTUDIO s Â¤FIELD 0 DE-0-00- 21]121 I)ELIDE EXISTING WOOD RECESSED CORNICE SIGN LIGHT LIIJEL] E]EL]ILE O (PT-3A) Â· Ill-IELIDILL] CI] EXISTING STONE EXISTING LIGHT (TYP.) NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED \\-I- (MT- GUC CI[ E-3 ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-1) SIGN 0 MT-1 1 NEW WOOD & GLASS 0 DOORSTO MATCH EXISTING. (PT-3A) NEW DOOR PULLS EXISTING WOOD Â£ Un STOREFRONT (PT-3A) - DISPLAY MNDOW INSIDE NEW KICKPLATES (MiÂ·-3) 2. S. GALENA STREET ELEVATION 1. SECTION THROUGH ENTRY 3. PLAN DETAIL o at~--=72.--~==---=-1 203 & GALENAST. -ASPEN, CO.- AJLY19,1298 Gensler Â· SrUDIOSOFIELD EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM ikzc-- TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission V THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directo~~ FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Direc [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] 1 RE: 735 W. Bleeker- Landmark Designation, Conceptual Review, Partial Demolition, Site coverage Variance and Temporary On-site Relocation- Public Hearing DATE: July 22, 1998 SUMMARY: A worksession was held to discuss this proposal, which involves landmarking the property, removing a later addition to the rear of the structure, relocating the house on-site, creating a new house where the historic house previously sat, and connecting the two houses to create a duplex. The applicant will also be seeking approval of two ADU's (one in each house) and special review for parking from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant is also seeking a site coverage variance. Staff recommends tabling, with specific direction to the applicant for areas to be restudied. APPLICANT: Drew Dolan, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects. LOCATION: 735 W. Bleeker St., R-6 zone district. HISTORIC LANDMARK Section 26.76.020, Standards for designation. Any structure that meets two or more of the following standards may be designated "H," Historic Overlay District, and/or Historic Landmark. It is not the intention of HPC to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those which are unique or have some special value to the community: A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: This standard is not met. 1 B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is 0 unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type (based on building form or use), or specimen. Response: This structure is a good example of housing built in Aspen in the late 1800's. It has an "L" shaped floor plan, gabled roof, a front porch which has been enclosed, and detailing which was common to these buildings. A modest addition has been added to the rear, which is being proposed to be removed. C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: This standard is not met. D. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: At one time, there were many miner's cabins in this neighborhood. There is at least one other on this W. Bleeker block, and several similar small houses along Main St., behind this building. Staff believes that the preservation of these small houses is e important to maintaining the character of the area. E. Communio; Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The structure is representative of the modest scale, style, and character of homes constructed in the late 19th century, Aspen's primary period of historic significance. It is located on a prominent corner at 7th and W. Bleeker (southeast corner) and is surrounded by several mature evergreen trees and a white picket fence. Even with the modest addition, the structure exemplifies an earlier era of Aspen architecture, and is representative of miner's cottage vernacular. Staff believes that the structure is eligible for landmark status as it meets criteria B, D, and E. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District and all development involving historic landmarks must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 2 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: As stated above, HPC held a worksession on this proposal, to give direction to the applicant. At that time the applicant was looking at two detached units and a possible lot split. Several key issues were raised, namely (1) whether, and/or how the historic house should be relocated on the site, (2) how parking can be accommodated on the site; (3) should the addition be removed from the historic house, and (4) can the house be moved without detriment to the existing Spruce trees. The applicant has submitted a detailed application, dated June 9, 1998. In summary, the applicant proposes to remove the later addition to the historic resource, returning the historic house to it's probable original size of approximately 378 square feet. The house would then be lifted, and temporarily re-located on site. A new lower level basement would be excavated for the historic house as well as a new unit which would be attached to the historic structure to create a duplex. Two ADU's as well as living space for the historic home and new unit would be located in this lower level. The historic house would then be placed back down on a new foundation but oriented to N. 7th St. at the southwest corner of the lot. The new unit would be built approximately where the historic house once stood. The historic house is shown within the dripline of the existing large trees, which could hamper the relocation effort, and could jeopardize the trees. In reviewing the application, staff thought the maximum site coverage was exceeded for this project. The public notice was written taking this into account. The applicant did not provide a calculation to determine this. However, staff ran a rough calculation which indicates that the site is approximately at 52% lot coverage. The variance for the proposed site plan would be to vary the maximum lot coverage from 35% to 52%. The HPC can consider up to a 5% variance to this requirement. It would appear that the request far exceeds what is allowed to be varied. The applicant is not seeking an FAR bonus. With regard to the new house, staff does not feel that the new front entry with it's double doors has any relation with the historic house. The west elevation uses similar double-hung windows as the historic house, though not as tall, and the connecting element is subordinate to the historic house. However, the new house has several gabled ends and window shapes which make it appear overly busy, distracting from the historic resource. Also, the addition 3 behind or to the rear of the historic house appears enormous in proportion, again overshadowing the resource. Staff is not in favor of the concept of the proposal. The existing historic house is 1,084.5 square feet, and with the removal ofthe addition is only 374 square feet. The allowed FAR, which could be added onto that small house is 3,240 square feet. The applicant is proposing a total FAR of 3,176 square feet. If one is to look at just the comparison of the original historic house to the proposed FAR, it is almost ten times the size of the existing house. In an effort to provide further direction to the applicant, staff will address each of the four issues raised at the worksession. (1) Whether, and/or how the historic house should be relocated on the site. HPC has held a special worksession on the topic of relocating historic buildings. The outcome was a general agreement that HPC is interested in seeing historic buildings remain in their original locations. If a house is to be moved, as a result of a lot split or other remodeling activities, the house should be moved in a way that maintains its original character (i.e. a lateral move rather than moving back on the site.) There are several factors that HPC may weigh, on a case by case basis, to determine whether or not a building should be moved. The goal is to place the historic house to its best advantage in terms of historic context, visibility and compatibility with surrounding development. The HPC has approved a number of temporary on-site relocations. However, these are typically approved to allow the excavation of a new basement upon which the historic house is then placed. With the exception of the Ice House (which had been located at the back of the lot and would have been visually lost had it not been moved to the front of the lot), staff is not aware of another re-location whereby the historic resource was allowed to be placed in an entirely new location. (2) How parking can be accommodated on the site. The applicant is seeking special review of the parking before the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 4th. The applicant is required to provide six (6) parking spaces on site. Two single car garages are proposed as part of the project, and there is parking proposed in the driveway and in the rear setback. (3) Should the addition be removed from the historic house? It appears that the addition was actually a series of additions, which is not untypical with these types of houses. The inventory file includes plans for yet another small addition on the west elevation. This addition does show up on the existing west elevation drawings, as a half-story band without windows to the rear of the historic house. The inventory sheet on this house does not provide a significant amount of information on the addition, other than to state that the house "illustrates the family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen in Aspen when it was dominated by the silver mining industry." 4 It is difficult to age the additions to this house. The rear west-facing porch has the proportions of an older addition and has turned wood posts and a beadboard ceiling more typical of turn-of-the century construction. The existing house with its additions has more proper scale than that which is proposed. Staff believes more information is needed before a determination of the removal of the additions can be made. (4) Can the house be moved without detriment to the existing Spruce trees? The house has a significant amount of mature vegetation surrounding it. The trees dwarf the resource somewhat, but appear to serve as protection from the north winds. The trees were probably planted too close to the house when they were first planted. Based on the height and maturity of the trees, they could be 50+ years old. It would be expected that the roots of the trees reach underneath the house, and could be damaged with excavation. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The character of the neighborhood is a mix of both mining cottages and large newer second homes with lots of glass. The scale of the proposed project more closely reflects the newer homes than the historic buildings. By relocating the historic house to the rear of the property, it paves the way for a much larger structure like those immediately across the street. Staff does not believe that this is the proper way to handle a historic resource such as this. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Staff does not feel that this criteria has been met. The scale of the addition to the historic resource as well as the new house overshadows the historic resource. The elevations too literally reflect the architecture of the historic resource to the point that the architecture is confused between old and new. Staff believes that the proposed development detracts from the historic resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: See comments above. Staff does believe that the proposed development diminishes the architectural integrity of the designated historic structure, and therefore this standard has not been met. 5 PARTIAL DEMOLITION 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: A significant amount of the existing building will be removed prior to the relocation. It is difficult to age the additions. The rear west-facing porch has the proportions of an older addition and has turned wood posts and a beadboard ceiling more typical of turn-of-the century construction. The assessor's records may give us more information regarding when the additions were added. Though the applicant has indicated the need to demolish, staff believes more research needs to be done before determining whether this is necessary for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. The existing house with its additions has more proper scale than that which is proposed. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: Staff feels that more historic research should be completed before acting on the removal ofthe rear portion ofthe historic building. b. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: Compatibility is an issue with the new addition and new unit. In some ways, the proposal too closely matches the existing, so it is difficult to tell what is old and what is new. But the proportions are the biggest issue. Again, the project overscales the historic resource. ON-SITE RELOCATION 1. Standard: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation. Response: Staff believes that on-site relocation is probably the best approach if the intent is to excavate a basement. Staff does not support the re-location in order to ultimately relocate at a new location on the site. 6 2. Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: Said report will be a condition of approval. 3. Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: The relocation plan and bond will be a condition of approval. VARIATION REOUEST Please refer to Significant Development (conceptual) Standard 1 which addresses the allowable variance that can be granted. Staff believes that this standard is exceeded and cannot be granted. STAFF SUMMARY AND FINDINGS: Staff believes that more research should be presented in order to more thoroughly age the later additions to determine their value and contribution to the historic resource. Staff does not believe that the relocation to another location on the site is necessary or preferred; and has concerns that the mature landscaping could be jeopardized as a result of the relocation and excavation. Staff also finds that the proportion and scale of the new unit and additions needs further study so as not to dwarf the historic resource, to simplify the design, and to not confuse history by having too similar of detailing. Staff further believes that the fence along W. Bleeker should be retained as it maintains a friendly "face" to the neighborhood and is appropriately scaled. Finally, staff finds that the site coverage should be reduced to more closely meet the 35% requirement. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to final review. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 7 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC table the project with further direction. Staff would recommend that the applicant look at keeping the historic resource in it's current location. If an ADU is desirable, that the applicant look at excavating under the existing addition to the rear, leaving the resource in it's present location, untouched, thus reducing the damage to the tree roots. A second unit could be added to the site, facing 7th Street, and wrapping the white picket fence around the corner to make the project tie together better. The new unit could be brought forward from the existing rear porch of the historic house to make a clear distinction between the old and new. A more simplified front elevation with the bulk and mass off the rear alley would probably work better in this situation. Parking could probably be provided on-site if the overall mass and scale is reduced, as well as site coverage. attachments: Exhibit A Application Exhibit B Historic Inventory glplanning/aspenhpdcases/signific/735wb/735conc.doc 8 PUBLIC NOTICE Ll~ 71998 Liol RE: 735 W. BLEEKER, HPC CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITI(**RLES CUNWifff-iE;hE 0 TEMPORARY ON-SITE RELOCATION, SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE14*41,0 LANDMARK DESIGNATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 22, 1998, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in Council Chambers meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Drew Dolan requesting Landmark Designation, HPC Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Site Coverage Variance and Temporary on-site relocation, to demolish an existing non-historic addition to an inventoried property, relocate the historic resource on-site, create an addition to the historic resource and add another unit witha connection to create a duplex, each with it's own ADU. The property is located at 735 W. Bleeker Street, Lots A and B, Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Julie Ann Woods at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. (970) 920- 5100. 5/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Histodc Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 3, 1998. City ofAspen Account 0 15 Wo~WaspeWnslkesmha.dot &(EL |b + ! 87 ~5724Â£/5-00 i 0 f~~E~'1 Ij aul_Ef 1 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OFNOL~ ~ } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE'Im;Mer,m~ State of Colorado } SECTION 2632-060 (E) L 'Fick* fl,cepr Jk. , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (ID of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice. a copy of which is atmched hereto. by first-class.postage prepaid U.S. Mail to ail owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list. on the 1% day of -fu L Â·Â·~ , 1995(which is ZE days prior to the public hearing date of 7 Â·,M- 98. 1 By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on [he subject property (as k could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posred and visible continuously from the . /O day of Fug , 1993 'Must be posted for at least [en (10) fuil days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. , Fie 7. 4.4. Signature Signed 0213e this ~l~ ~ day , 1996 LJ / PUBLIC NOTICE t>Â«A,4 8 K,10>b DaÂ·rE luz WrrNESS MY HAND Ayp OFFICIAL SEAL TIME 1 0. = PLACE , Â¥6 PURPOSE -26 1 My comrnisâ‚¬ontlige&-~l~Auii, 1 9 , AOO 1 qy-. 1*Y, 11Â¢JE 011. lillitUL=â€¢71- 2*LE. TEATEARI 1 to/&/FAW No 1 1 ~1.24%2- _ Notary Public's Signature / SHAFER ROBERT C & ADRIAN C SANDUNES LTD SANDUNES LTD DORWORTH- 4823 OLD KINGSTON PIKE STE 140 4823 OLD KINGSTON PIKE STE 140 3554 QUEBEC ST NW KNOXVILLE, TN 37919 KNOXVILLE,'IN 37919 WASHINGTON, DC 20016 MANGONE PARTNERSHIP LP HUTCHESON RICHARD L BAYOUD GEORGE S & JOAN 12687 W CEDAR DR #100 PO BOX 161930 3525 TURTLE CREEK BLVD LAKEWOOD, CO 80228. AUSTIN, TX 78716-1930 DALLAS, TX 75219 SIVART HOLDINGS LTD MCMANUS JAMES R BROOKS JOHN A & LORRAINE M PARTNERSHIP 285 RIVERSIDE 720 W BLEEKER 708 W BLEEKER ST WESTPORT, CT 06880 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EPSTEIN MARC L REVOCABLE ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY KRUIDENIER DAVID & ELIZABETH S TRUST #1 620 W BLEEKER ST 3409 SOUTHERN HILLS DR 205 N 6TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 DES MOINES, IA 50321 ASPEN, CO 81611-1103 DOLAN ANDREW C 50% MEANS GRAEME COULTER G LYNNIE 735 W BLEEKER ST 711 W BLEEKER ST PO BOX L3 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 8161 I ASPEN, CO 81612 ~0INVESTMENTS LLC GOLDRICH MELINDA PEARSON MARK M & LEES M HTE MAIN ST 706 W MAIN ST 702 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY MANGHAM NANCY JANE ASPEN/SNOWMASS INC ASPEN/SNOWMASS INC 1709 DAKAR RD E 734 W MAIN ST 344 W MAIN ST FT WORTH, TX 76116-2035 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ANSON WESTON T & SUSAN BAILEY RYANCO PARTNERS XXX 1 WEIEN J ROBERT TRUSTEE OF 715 W MAIN ST STE 203 709 W MAIN ST ANSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 28025 EL JEBEL, CO 81628 MANSON MARGARET J CITY OF ASPEN LE BLANC SHERIE MATILDA MORGENSON CONSTANCE M 130 S GALENA ST 634 W MAIN ST #2 PO BOX 2056 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-5056 ~AN BURTON D 1/2 OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 VI#~OLD LEEDS RD 5408 OLD LEEDS RD 5408 OLD LEEDS RD BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 CHALOUPKA DONALD & VIRGINIA M FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH KLEIN HERBERT S & MARSHA PO BOX 393 726 W FRANCIS ST 201 N MILL ST STE 201 FRASER, CO 80442-0393 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LONG RICHARD E & LOIS N STEINBERG EDWARD M BAVARIAN INN PO BOX 1314 1068 HOLLY ST 1925 CENTURY PK E STE 1900 ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80220 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 HEISLEY MICHAEL E EICHNER SAMUEL L LARNER JACQUELINE L C/O K J LONG EICHNER SUSANA STERN DE 376 DAHLIA 2004 DIANA DR FUENTE PIRAMIDES 243 DENVER, CO 80220 TECAMACHALCO MEXICO CITY, MENDOTA, IL 61342 53950 MURRY PAUL J D'ALESSIO ROBERT J HOGGATT JERRY S MURRY BONITA J D'ALESSIO JEAN M PO BOX 1776 814 W BLEEKER ST C-5 814 W BLEEKER C-4 HARVEY, LA 70059 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 COHEN RICHARD A FATAHI AMENEH TRAN HONG HUONG COHEN ELIZABETH A PO BOX 8080 814 W BLEEKER ST #Cl PO BOX 1806 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~~FFER WILLIAM H MORRIS CHARLES R JR LUU TONG KHON ~FFER KAREN W ASPEN VILLAS MGMT TRAN TUYET LE 127 BRIXWORTH LN APT 7 814 W BLEEKER PO BOX 2785 NASHVILLE, TN 37205-2036 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TOPELSON ALEJANDRO UHLER FRANCES M LICHTENWALTER GARY R TOPELSON REBECA 814 W BLEEKER 350 HOUBOLT RD 5300 DTC PKWY #400 ASPEN, CO 81611-3115 JOLIEL IL 60431-8305 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 POLSE KENNETH A & JOYCE L BOSSART TODD L KHALAF ALEXANDER R & FAHIMA REVOC 1992 TST 814 W BLEEKER ST E4 408 E HYMAN AVE 452 SCENIC AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PIEDMONT, CA 94611 MITTON JOSEPH & PATRICIA 1/2 INT DAILY KIMBERLY DAWN GELLER SCOTT FRANKLE DAVID la INT 814 W BLEEKER PL E2 29 BARKLEY CIR 1015 VOLTZ RD ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT MYERS, FL 33907-7531 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-4722 10~~ESOTA MATERNAL HEISLEY MICHAEL E KURTZ KENNETH T & KAREN ~/ MEDICBTE LW GIES - HEICO INC C/O BRAKUR CUSTOM CABINETRY INC 1775'DWIGHT LN 2075 FOXFIELD RD STE 102 C/O MINNETONKA, MN 55305 ST CHARLES, IL 60174 18656 S RT 59 SHOREWOOD, IL 60435 OLSHAN BURTON D la WOOD HELENA HAYES MARY E OLSHAN KATHLEEN W la C/O AMBIANCE LTD 209 E BLEEKER ST 5408 OLD LEEDS RD PO BOX 420315 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 DALLAS, TX 75342 BRADY LINDSAY KEVIN LINE SUSAN 146 FORREST ST 730 W BLEEKER ST PEPPERMINT GROVE ASPEN, CO 81611-1134 6011 WESTERN AUTRALIA, APPLICANT: Drew Dolan, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects LOCATION: 735 W. Bleeker Street ACTION: Significant Development (Conceptual), Landmark Designation, Partial Demolition, Temporary On-Site Relocation, Site Coverage Variance SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) Significant development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet allfour of the development review standards in order for HPC to grant approval: Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: the proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Standards of review for partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds that aU of the following standards are met: (Note: "Partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel). Standard 1: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration, or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Standard 2: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. ON-SITE RELOCATION Standards for review of on-site relocation: No approval for an on-site relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the following standards have been met: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation, and A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting of a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Landmark Designation To be eligible for landmark designation, a structure or site must meet two (2) or more of the five (5) standards contained in Section 26.76.020 of the Municipal Code. It is not the intention of HPC to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those which are unique or have some special value to the community. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history ofAspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Architectural Importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type (based on building form or use), or specimen. Designer: The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation bf the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. *4/' 52.. ji.' AP/4,~4 . ruiv ---rn:32. 1- 1 --01=+Dr] ,, "47.4 1 0-- 1/111;2* 1 .,r-rA Â· ' 4 I ,.fl'6Ff/" 1WD 4 . W...1 1 Ft, t,4-4 ,, Â» - .1 1, < t N; 4~12, P~*~41 . , I It , 9. , r, t ti 4.wgi , ....1 14.E. V - ./ F 4*L ' --- 4 d. 1 Â·9' ' 11 , 1. 11 . - ..:>. - 'Â¥-2:, Â£ ~il,~2' L-':71Â·iÂ·,11Â£9, --s~ 4, Jte> ,. , :U , r - 0 - . A---71.- .F AL#' ITAM.*4' 3*1~ 34~ .~2*-'9290" Â· 092' * 112:t a .1 J 31. 9 116â‚¬J ' ... ./ . , 1 ./ /1 t 'L~ Â«Â»d . ~/MDFA*E~ ~ 1, a . I .. 1 ' .,01#~$9 , 1 41 : . 0 ~ 4%49?6:Er ftftÂ©>'Bil:.i~~ Lpoi, s< A:#0~ a.~:aÂ£~4-14#f;rua.,m- - 1. 1, 1 Â· 1, 44.64.F-r. . / 1 99.- 1 -i.~,relf ~2-4-45.": ~ 7, ti..â‚¬11*91.6**?f~Ay~,1 lA 0 14//ILAM - 9 8/~ 4 '5. 49" '9.1 ill--.../.1 ST...9.- 241.4///~ 6,///e//11 94 ./ .11& - T"fj~"~ 4 di#fl~:P*:prh#~ d~ i ~g/~~~~~~~~~3~ , t5&2.'~-Ln, li~,)$Â·~,-Â·Â¥Xe, '4 .i# La 1.,0Â¥d '?Yjr~yE:r 7*â€ž- b .,423; : â€¢161|41*,Irikifia - . 4Â·:<, , '4 L /*Ain.Fr7 .*F r. t/lEtlwINA!- --,4 699*#.4*jail,r#,4.. /,1.t. il.. 4.64 .r -â‚¬' 2 -- .- ie, f , dek/*'1Â·.Â£ 3. Mpy.dillgab 997 + I I .I..... .. .. ---2 ... ' I ..El,+Câ‚¬*' 1 ' -44:r A . 4 V ..4. -1 I I /7 1 2.* Ar*v,42*842**N , 109/,- 27*:3#Wig:. Arriy,imas 20. .4 /.9.. ... , 4 1 -} J , A, :4. k 0..4 1 . i 1. 1 i . 4 1 2â‚¬:-i '. 01 , t. 6 . L, I. 4:.. . hil.' 14 r 4 - 3:6407 .7 0= e 45?YW %.i.12 1 '11'0..W. M... , ....t. i. * 0~ .., /4 : , 6.,I ('i*, w*:8 i El / I. 1, 2/ 1 41 , ~18 * *. ~ . * .91 8.41 4%,r 3- 2 45;2Â· 1*1 + r 1 4 .:f 4 Ji. Dâ€¢.~ ./ - 11&. *gr Â· , 2. 22 4 1 Â· -4,1, f -95 < . :.t.Â·,- >te* 'e - ... le . ~t.f~i.I?34+N..4 , 1. 1 I>-:*:p**Â·*12*(574: .i .it b , - I , IÂ·*~*i:>4 41% !& t.Â·: , i . ~ 1 1-35Ut#*. . . L d 3% I. 84 .. ...1-1.25- ' ....'-,I ..6 ..., 1 .44 I . 1 ; r. . ..,1 . r .'.IW, *944'k!*,m ,.-'. t. , I p 1... .... ./ 4 4.â€¢tÂ· 4 ..4 .f? . , *912 . 0 EXHIBIT 72 1,1 (732 9,2%23_ . r ''4.-PS PHIMETY*45;4.frail j i 4 ..T i .am *Â·f 4 ..... *' 4 .- ,0916Â£ i Â· ~Â· ~(.i,: 2 i13 . ,~v ./ 4.i45* 6 :' , R.;41C . , ' ", 4 ~r *~ t'*lk -ip Vi " f t. Â¢10 , .. .*~fil 2.~ rE#*&*1<~~*Bit*~.46:j:J it%0Â·iÂ·.,?i - - A+f,Ak ~01 :n t M;VA~ i)E A: .5 '''.Y .F** 1,+ , i, J I,11,1 ,,,/ /., . 1.1.,4 2'& 9.1 L J*&&. 7 , .?.r'Â°â‚¬KAS/544'7t,7,Â·*0.Â·,*. 9 51'â€¢li .LÂ·'-1Â·â€¢ '1;Â·f.Â· A AA ~~''pÂ·~ 7:'.A,f-*~a~*7~Â·~?%'#.A<$Â·71%111:41.3Â£1 12Â·-~2~34.-1. . .. 3 .?$ ..r'. 4. .ST#*r,myÂ¥:'skÂ·;4'far L ':,3 ./I~* ,\71~T,b<.14;i# twv...; 'n .., 011,404*Fq'>Â·-MÂ·f-~3544 'Â· ,-I, ., I. <:142 .'.if .'Â·.Â·k;e,9*)\ 't '~414:cÂ· 9ity & V q AW'tr'.A - 9.-12 fl 1///L&01 " â€¢Â·- l /1. UÂ· \ A. L. U. n U. M.- 0. 1- CD - In 1 rU- ~4 -I/-3- Dx I I UCE O 1-1 17 1 Ej X \ tabii 1 rr-7 IC>181 726 712 700 .EEK E R 5uu ier 478*. . 15 *-" 2/ 773 701 FE d & rm-| /4 u-14__ak! r: F- D 1.-1 0 1 14%2 X Q X *\ Z 11 81 11 -- 01 1 -1 1 W JI 1 11. 1. W. '4 / 8, 0 c. ~ D. E. F. G. M. ' 7Â«1 8 Fy n 1 \1 18 4 1 Xii XI 9,<6 Ld / 3><2 3><E 341 f Shed.*/ o S. K. L. M. N. 0. R R. S. 9 4 x r,wl IT-1 n 0 1 P *~ ~ .,D~ F~ 0 1, .0 x / ~ 42 1 1 2 --29 |--Ll| 1_-_[EX 1- --1 1 1 Ic. 7 1 6 4 -1 0 .4. 01, 1,. 'L. 1.1 1 04,1 #-* 04 720 714 m EUU 4-W.Pipe, MAIN @' R b. A - - 1.-j Btr ES- 't 29 70 71, . 101- . m--- 1- % CD [7 01~ D' 971 0* 7-11~-7-7 1/3 73*7.11 41.7p 1 1. .kk 1 .0 13 d' - h 'Â· Id.UL. 1- - Fr- 1. 91 U -5.- / m /* A 0 1 U_el 1-4<. Dr l. & 07 iÂ£~ 0, t. F. 6. 91. 1. -XEIZP# i X P- 1-1 7-1-1 R--,1 -* '/---&4/0 -3 R -- 'i -.-- *..7 '' G . uct- 63 99* . Â£401 ':111 i.:P" il'i?41.ElttRImh.1Â·,i: :Â· i i /42 * :.~~~:.~A.'.AL-~,..~.1~T,~:api:. Â·l 1 -1Â· Â· Â·. .rile: 56&1 " '"Â·1 :, tit!Â·Â·:14:ii,- 3 . ~ % 1 4 . = 1**M ** 8 n i ~~ J . Â· c .1, 'f!;ii.1, 12 : !0,040 # 43*diA J ..:9 4; 1 ' fittdis: -1 4*f4 {,frfiffi~.Mifhfpf?dIN 2-2 ..4 -- A.- u'l:~;14,4 41*ia.4,- 411!fil: i --SkMWK/*4~NAVM<;'-- 1 h e ...1 411.1 Â·1'11;1.11 Â·Â· U lili:~. .:.~ 'Â·: 11'I~,4',:i'. 1Â·:: 4i-:'. 8 *iltliiii[Fil~i;i~~~~~Illi~Ki~!lill@! i[ m ]5Â·IÂ· ' i:i :: MB#F~* E:i:,i;! :! ~!!!i/ r- iÂ·'Â·91'Â·~'4'it, 3.-~t:}ft: Ip'li~'*' + ~i''Ui Nkilibtll~:1~!1.1[!,4!I!'[fli,i#i'1;4*4/t,;:1 ". Ai.HIÂ·; ;Â·::''?4:Iii!:1~ 1 -- ~ 9 1: p, 4,Ng#27Â·,' : 2 . W W Â·fil i:'. ,1!,iÂ·K:r: 1. Â·:!Fph: Â·Â·Â·~ Â·Â· . . . . J.ri iIi; iIi 1.:: IiÂ·J 11 , 1:,'1:1Â· " 1', a 4 U Cy b. 1 : ''1:'ima i" nip : 1: i '. . r 9 I I -1.J..f -4 S E-b -%-1 E 01 Ir,Al I Alml MI DOLAN RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1 NV-Id !30013 ON!181)El LEGEND : -0 REMNN CCNSTPUCEGN -0 BE DEMOUSHED LAND USE APPLICATION ExttimÂ·r 'A * PROJECT: Name: ooLAA 2-6510â‚¬*CE Location: 73 9* W. 8,6/leâ‚¬t , Lor A fa Block /0, c frÂ¥ 4 7-0-5/72 OC ASPEÂ¥4 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: 0(Â£4/ 00'AH Address: 135 W. 8462 ICE L Phone #: Hz.6 24 80 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: C HAZ4Â£5 CÂ»#WIFF, ARCM,re,TS Address: ne g. HYMAH Ave. Phone #: 916 15-70 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 0~ Conditional Use m Conceptual PUD 04 Conceptual Historic Devt m Special Review 3 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 1 Final Historic Development ~ Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment E Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) El Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption m Subdivision M Historic Designation U ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream 1 Subdivision Exemption (includes m Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane E Lot Split El Temporary Use E Other: El Lot Line Adjustment El Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) U 15 To U.1 O SINALE FAMYÂ¥ US,c>EMCE PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ULLâ€ž-*r,OM of HisTOR-Ic- sn,AcnW;â‚¬ c..4 srre â‚¬ nopâ€¢'620 LAMDMARâ€¢1Â£ DES{ L.MATI/rl K h*RU DI.FLE,Â¢ Res#Oewa:. Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ m Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form E Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents m Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents El Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment ofCity ofAspen Development Application Fees (Please Print Cleariy) CrrY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CrrY) and PREW 00(AW (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: l. APPUCANT has submitted to CITY anapplicalion for 75 ~ w. Bia)Â¢62â€¢ (hereinafter, THE PROJECT)- APPLICANT undersmnds and agrees thai City of -Aspen Ordinance No. 43 (Series of 1996) establishes a fee smicrure for land use applica:tions and the paymem of all processing fees is a condition precedent zo a demImiilalion OI application Compiereness. APPLICANT and CITY agree thai becouse ofthe size. nature or scope or'le proposed project itisnot possible ar =his dme to ascertain the full extem of:he costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the inreresr of'Ihe parties zo allow APPLIC,iNT to Inake payment of an ininai deposit and to therearter ?ennir addizionai Costs IC) be billed zo APPLIC.ANT on a monthly basis. APPLIC.ANT agrees he wiil be benefired by reIaining gremer cash liquidiry and will make addirional paymems upon notific=ion by the Crrf -when they are necessary as cosrs are incur=i CITY agrees k Will be benefiredthrough the grearer ce:minry of recovering im full costs to process APPLIC.ANTS applicalion. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree thar iz is impramicable for CITY staffro compiere processing or presem sir[Eciem uornlalion zo the Plal]Iling Commission and/or City Councii to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval. uniess currem billings are pid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore..APPLIC.ANT agrees thar in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver of irs right to collect full fees prior to a determinmon of application complereness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $3990 which is for hours of Planning staffrime, and if actual recorded costs exceed the iniâ‚¬al deposit APPLICANT shall pay addidonal momhly billingg to CrrY to reimburse the CnY for the processing of the applicion menrioned above. including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be mafie within 30 days of the billing flme. APPLICANT further agrees thar failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing. CrrY OF ASPEN APPUCANT U Signature: ~-42 Â«Â» stan dausoY Date: 1, VÂ»48 J998 Community Development Director Printed Name: DILEW OOLAM City ofAspen Mailing Address: 115- W. Bue,â‚¬64 /'*76,4. CO. SIGH 970 920 4549 06/30/95 15:11 2970 920 4549 BAIN,HUTZ.&LEV. @002/006 3.4 QUITCLAIM DEED BE IT KNOWN, mat Andrew C. Dolan, GIanto# County ofyitkin , State of -Colondo , hereby QUITCLAIM and transfers to Jamey T. Dolan, ofthe County of_Pitkin Slmic of Colorado ; the following described real property locakd in _Aspen County of_Plicin_ , State of Colorado_ , more padcularly described as: 1/2 interest in Lot A&B Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen The consideration for this transfer is lhe payment of$1.00 and for other good and valuable consideration. The transfer is made wilh QUITCLAIM COVENANTS ONLY. . 01 0 DÂ» - +%94Â« , 6w C. Dolan 3#h,lf.401.Z;k// WITNESSED lhe hands of said Grantor(s) Ais ~42 5 day of 07 , 19 967. State of 60 ) County of)QUAW* SS Onthisdate,Andrew CDolan personally appeared before me and acknowledged tbatihe above signature(s) are valid and binding. Nolary Public b~-~54. My Commission expires:. 6 -6 - 2,2~ f *11"""i'#44, Copyright (c) 1994 McG,aw-Hill, Inc. #'AOTAR P'A All Rights Reserved il -4 )3 , WÂ·Â·fOBLICki *tyÂ·Â·Â·-104 %, OF COL + MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Of#r9 03{* JUNE 6,1998 -3 /4 c 1 Rose 60 Â¥4 Al 6 0 5 4 m , C /1 05- 372- 396368 08/23/96 02:19P PG 1 OF 1 REC DOC UCC SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 6.00 0.00 =7 Account NBEI Mine? | Twn? | Blk/Lot | Condo? ~ Mobile?| Sales? ~[3 N Owner Name/Address ,R000502 31.259 DOLAN ANDREW C 50% Legal Description -I-- Year ' Distrigt 735 W BLEEKER ST r.11.,~1 SUB:CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN BLK: 18 ASPEN CO 81611 1998 001 LOT:A - LOT:B BK:0623 PG:0962 BK:0745 - PG:0857 BK:0783 PG:0900 A St A Parcel Number MH Space Sequence 273512445001 Street No Dir No# Street Name Type Version V. Date V. Time ID Appl 730 W BLEEKER ST 19980421000 21-APR-98 11:34 AM DP ECAM Location City |F-F- Location Zip Acct Type Lagt Land Actual Land Assessed Land AC/SF ASPEN 81611 1000 567,000 55,200 0.000 BACode Business Name Map No imprv Actual Imp Assessed Square Feet 22,600 2,200 1078 Exempt ActUal Exempt Assess New Versibn Administration Appraisal 0 0 19980506000 1 Names 1 Real Properly Total Actual Total Assess 2 Situs Address 2 Personal Propert' 3 Mobile Home 3 Protest 589,600 57,400 4 Tract/Section 4 Mobile Auth/Cer fI:: 5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking 6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging -iX 7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Prior Year Next Version Abatement 8 Miscellaneous T 9 Tax Items NexIYear Clerk's Doc's fR 10 Pre/Succeed X . -. Update Clear Exit Tom Issac tri County Assessor gain Street. Suite 202 -jorado 81611 Tom Issac Pitkin County Assessor 506 East Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 MASTER 1 2 3 4 LEGALDATA 5 ;EQUENCIERSTARVEREND 6 1 | 11'?9801190001?99999999~ Name - ~ Account No k==i IR000502 Address 1 0 Tax Year 1998 ss 2 Tax Area 001 City State Zip Telephone Owner Type Owner Percent S NAME ADDRESS1 Insert DOLAN ANDREW C 50% i735 W BLEEKER ST DOLAN JEFFREY T 50% Update Delete Clear Exit Tcm Issac Pitkin County Assessor 506 East Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS i. 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE (970) 925-5590 FAX (970) 925-5076 Ija Applicant: Drew Dolan ARCHITECTURE 735 W. Bleeker PLANNING Aspen, CO 81611 INTERIORS (970) 925-2180 Architect: Charles Cunniffe Architects 520 E. Hyman Ave. Suite 301 Aspen, CO. 81611 (970) 925-5590 The Owner, Drew Dolan, authorizes the Architect, Charles Cunniffe Architects, as a representative to act on behalf of the Owner for the proposed project to be located at 735 W. Bleeker, Aspen CO. Project Address: 735 W. Bleeker Aspen, Colorado 81611 Legal Description: Lot A& B Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen dincerely - Drew Dolan Enclosure(s) ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 111-â€¢w 'Re,ybbl:.1- Applicant: DgMA ho LAW Location: 739 14/69Â·r pLEEKMA St Zone District: A - 9 Lot Size: W.Ol' A /00' Lot Area: 6 Do A 5.Â¥, (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Eristing: 1 - Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 51 DIMENSIONS: Ploor Area: Existing: /034.5 Allowable: 3&40 Proposed: -M -7 le IMncipalbldg. height.~. Existing: 14 -9 Allowable: 25'-0" Proposed: 21'-20 Access. bldg. height: Existing: - Allowable: - Proposed: - On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required: (.0 Proposed: 3 % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: \15.-0* Required: 15'-2 Proposed: 15'- 011 Rear Setback: Existing: 39'- 0" Required: <6'- 0. Proposed: Iâ‚¬*-00 Combined FIR: Existing: .Ad-o' Required: 30< _ 0* Proposed: 30'-00 41 24 Side Setback: Existing: 1 9 ~- 0" Required: 6 '- 8 Proposed: 4 -D .B ill ,/0 Side Setback: Existing: 11' - 0 ~ Required: 8'- 9 Proposed: u-T Combinedldes: Existing: 3,8-0~ Required: 15'-0' Proposed: 15'Log Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: 'iMKKOY~ YRAIAA; G ?92 LAN bmMU<- *61 0,1.*re TARL#L â€¢ Â·Â·. ran. 6 - 2 Aspen 1 4 1 4, keld K~\34*i 14) g e. a i - -'' ~--tieck 1 9 , L f)<0-4 --~ ~ -2rr~>0 1 4~ F'r . 6-1 i.â€¢re. I.U. So. r..6 .., 6 0,1, 1 04- \ 91 S.,04 unny Ct , 2' N..11,0.4.4636*19....â€¢al-â€¢9 To Airport. Basalt l ~1\ 4-I=,li,00' 0.'4, pâ€žw..pe,ow# 0,â€ž6, M-W 1.83244 94 4 0 7 â‚¬ Te" ~ Â£52*ood Duck La ~ 02 Y //allam . 4 Golf Cour,> < */1 7-'-12*p~ - .a--6 . ~'f S i,hÂ·~'#Mwi - -Maroon Creelt Rd ~--''~-- - >21 1 High 34 -42-,1118*&0 3 ~ School b h 1% Ar/- < Mainist ** ,#4& ~, 11 1 A r'/3 f: ~4w-< M. 4 M - 3,~s- 434~ J To Marion Lake c, ' -711., 0*Mt= 1 * R â‚¬13 A-- . 9 I -*1*" M 3 T 951 22..A PROJECT LOCATION (0- u VICINITY MAP-735 W. BLEEKER A.h ~ q Lg 1:*1.,Atill- tnd~*i,w P.ws CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1. 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE (970) 925-5590 FAX (970) 925-5076 /93 ARCHITECTURE Standards for Designation-Historic Overlay District/ Historic Landmark PLANNING INTERIORS The Owner, Drew Dolan, requests to apply for a Historic Landmark Designation for the structure located at 735 W. Bleeker, Aspen Colorado. The Existing building and site meet four (4) of the five standards as set forth in section 26.76.020 of the Aspen Land Use Code: Historical Importance: The original structure and site are part of the original Aspen Townsite as well as being present on the historic Sandborn Map of this Area. Architectural Importance: The original structure significantly reflects the traditional Aspen character. The architectural style is unique to the early mining time of the town in the late 1800's. Traditional gable roofforms as well as ornamental fagade treatment represent the building style of that time. Neighborhood Character: The original structure and site are a significant component of the established neighborhood in which it is located. The site and Structure, located on 78 and Bleeker, is a integral part of the historic West End neighborhood. Historic Designation is important for the maintenance of this historic part of town. Community Character: The original structure and site are critical in preserving the character Aspen. The highly visible location of the site on the entry to Aspen is an important visual key to the history of the town. This structure is one of the few remaining "Historic Structures" on the entry approach to Aspen. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 9,80 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE (970) 925-5590 FAX (970) 925-5076 I [dal ARCHITECTURE Review Standards: Development of an Accessory Dwelling Unit PLANNING INTERIORS 1. The proposed Residential Duplex is located in a residential (R-6) zone and conforms to the character of the established neighborhood. The attached Accessory Dwelling Units are located within the proposed Duplex, each with separate exterior entrances, and are therefor compatible with the project on the site. 2. Each proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit conforms to all dimensional and code requirements as set forth in the Aspen Land Use Code and the Uniform Building Code, respectively. a) The minimum front and rear yard setbacks are maintained. A 15' front and 15' rear yard setback equal the minimum combined setbacks of30' b) WA c) Each Accessory Dwelling Unit meets and exceeds the minimum Net Livable Area as set forth in section 26.40.070 of the Aspen Land Use Code d) The minimum side yard setbacks are maintained. 2/3 of the front yard setback is required for one side yard with the combined total to be a minimum of 15 ' e) The Accessory Dwelling Units are below grade are therefor the height limit is not applicable 0 The maximum allowable site coverage in not exceeded g) The proposed Accessory Dwelling Units meet the dimensional requirements but request a variance to the required parking requirements on a Landmark Designated Parcel ~ 3. There are no nonconforming structures being converted to detached Accessory Dwelling Units 4. N/A CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS lo 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE (970) 925-5590 FAX (970) 925-5076 Boal ARCHITECTURE Review Standards: Development of Conditional Use PLANNING INTERIORS A. The proposed Residential Duplex is consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the R-6 Zone District in which it is to be located B. The proposed Residential Duplex is consistent and compatible with the adjacent residences in the established neighborhood. C. The proposed Residential Duplex is with in the same mass and scale as surrounding structures and does not create any adverse impacts within the established zone. Pedestrian, vehicular circulation, parking, trash, noise etc will not be impacted nor disrupted. D. Public facilities and services will be accessible to service the proposed project. E. The proposed Residential Duplex will commit to provide two (2) Accessory Dwelling Units on site. These units will meet and or exceed the minimum requirement as set forth in section 26.40.090 of the Aspen Land Use Code. ~ F. The proposed Residential Duplex complies with The Residential Design Standards as well as all additional standards imposed by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and other applicable requirements. * / Exttlfir â€ž 31, HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 735.WB Photo Information: ASP-E-16 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 735 West Bleeker Legal Description: Lots A & B. BLock 18 East Aspen Townsite City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: East End - Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 storv Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: T-shaped gable with asphalt shingles Walls: Clanboard with decorative wood shingles at gable end; decorative barge board Foundation / Basement: Concrete Chimney(s): N/A Windows: Paired one-over-one double hung; picture and easement window infill at Dorch Doors: 1/2 light over wood vanel. contemporary Porches: Shed. enclosed with turned posts General Architectural Description: One-storv Victorian Miner's Cottage Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 735.WB ~UNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: Late 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor . Based On: Building Stvle MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date i Describe Modifications and Date: Porch infill; storm windows Additions and Date: Shed addition at southeast corner NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Registeru Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation ' -I Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register 01 X Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or - architectural integrity. 0 ___ Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Illustrates the family/home environment and lifestvles of the average citizen in Aspen when it was dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Mans Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: 0 ecorded By: Date: January 1991 ffiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin. Historic Preservation Officer/Planner . 4 . ~1 7/,497 2 2 . 1 . . â€¢ - t. . i v r .4 ' 4 (~~~34 . Ek 44, C. .1.r)Â·Â·'.th Â·Â·Â· b. 1 . 4 2 V~ 4 ..... ,< , I 1 /* .. 121 .VI :47*Â».'Â·â€¢7. I i.Â· '6Â©4: -1 -Â·'. , <Â·_ '.Â· 4 1 .. al// & f : 1 I. C r . Â·Â·11 r, r- . -d,!.1 7,424 V. li-~. ... 1 4 ,/ 'Â·117*i ... .~ . , ,%:7.-32:'Â·~2 J,5 -9 .... 'Rfe#VAL,0, '7Â¢t:Â»3 Â¥% ..i:.1 L - mtÂ·:1. . ,-t. 4- i , - - . I 'RCD, 41-,1.-~ 9~8*4944 -- - a. 1 - 11:filigilmill....i Â·*90;1Â«0*2 ~ ~44* tk ultifti:14 (.1.2:6Â·'AN 7Â· 94Â¥41 . I /1//:3*:Kielliff"Ap *41-9rit; 'JÂ·yaan.*2Â»72*21Â»5 . .,9 : i..Â¢%14* 01---Ill ~r)./3 :1.'ar,.4 + >Â·47~~841'E~>r 2\2 -". ~ 't~ ' ~, pou?Â·Â¥yar:16'0 4 ' ..41#6 G-Na:Â»54/#11 . 7 " J f.*WayMEKima#Â£ ---- Â¢A/ef#.~.tw 9# L . ':li.>34*6144"11"Hi. F Â»>22*2**tur,IN,..illlt4v ,1. AERf.*0~ihiftif* *Â·99*-973"fm53y*6, . ay*2*23*â€¢2* ~bf. eÂ·'Â·Â· Â·zui:itl<*:ab.b.4,&~0~#eâ€¢:*~9~Z~â„¢R..==4 ''t '. :,7 22**EN~~ 82*2?0661# B , I 4- rtÂ©eNL/4'52Â» I =45&1,1.-i-, 9 - -L 484'144-1.el~ r. I *S,imENX.*> A. - -- , I. f. mit# 1.=4 1 '29' .,1 .Hy-,7.-JI-,2+..c- ... ...p,11:4506:. t:, , 1~, 9,\'.$52%3:fl~Ai)Z#&33~ ,&-42â‚¬3**2Mt#, ' -<Â· .-.-- f diA.ia"vi#4*421*Mflmi# 1*89'*.*v .... ,... m.'<t,-'<4._423 - imf#.RAP~/1/* ' 1'Â·Â·'' . .. 9,4- Of'. i .h,A . L.ak.}'. , Â· ' ' ?~ :~. A. ':'L ~fÂ·Â·' : ::3yl: Â·5..1 39,Â»4*% ILet s , 1. . 8/*44Â·:1; *1':., Â·4.(73.ic)*.'.13 1 ~Â· , Vi,4 923*13'VEWT#:''A.?..V. . L 'f . , L i .;40*'../. ' . Â·. . , Â·h; lkÂ·N.Sâ„¢.Â·,i.~:fip - 1 ,.A 914'1?34-qI<%33/0 .~ ~~ ~ 14$0Â« .*kiÂ·)141Â·-15.6 - - :a*2&72*aP. 3 .r 'Â·M>YÂ¥ Â¢â‚¬-f i. Â·â‚¬.'. . ~' U\ 'Â·. ~tÂ¢.19.ApKia}Â·iy.6 ~ s . 9184 FIELD TO RECORD 2 9018 FIELD T N 75Â°06'22"E 0.50' S 41018'05nE 51 N 75Â°09'11'W 270.09' on 60.02' r - -l coNc. 4 15.0 1 :11 0 1 F -*-----7 E 12.1 /5 1 1 1/2 STORY HOUSE T ~ 9 18,84/- 5,6 ;~=1 0 tÂ¢Nt/*moN pt.PA f #04!11 2-WATER METER 14.0 -1 hÂ·Er'" .Â·Â¢ J N 'Ti- h / Ar# 1~ â€¢ i ~~*0 PORCH E Or 0/ 1 / Ce>â‚¬1 \ 10.8 1 '0.8'+/3 1 OLIGHT - ----- AREA - A 6.000 S. F.+/- B 0 0 C PIPES PARKING 3 ~ 75Â°09'11 *IE 60.02 9- 0 0 EDGE OF PAVEMENT 33.0'+/- ns 14Â°50'49'W 100.00' n *00*001 3,6*,09.N N -/+18.8Â£ 18 - -1 - : 1Â» l U- L Â£ fE~2:-~-9 - -1 I 1 . C 1 l Ill 1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING WEST ELEVATION U LU LEGEND : k'Â· '- c~ t~ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOUSHED '1~ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMNN LU U Z LU Ce I'* hl.0-2.1 . DRAWING Emr,18 SE,1,101IS DATE 6-15-98 JOB NO. 9836 1 | SHEET NO. EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING EAST ELEVATION X2.1 SHEET OF Â¢toor,mir aNte omm ,Â¤,Ing. Sl)31!HONV 33=11NNA 9Â£09-â‚¬260Â£6 0(W. 0655-5ZG0Â£6 1111. U9!B 03 'NadSV . 10Â£ ilinS . *MV NVWAH 15Â¥3 *ls 1.SaM S Z 2966--et,026 M . aEZE-9Â¤0Â£6 :3131 . 90Â£9 03 '3013fTTELL. 11/IV Â°EZEr'Nadst /5 . 1 / - WEST -BLEEKER STREET LEGEND AND NOTES SLANTED TEXT DENOTES RECORD #NFORMATION BEARINGS BASED ON THE CITY MONUMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BLOCK 18. N. 75Â° 09 '11 'W.. NORTHWEST BLOCK CORNER DETERMINED BY BEARING BEARING INTERSECTION FROM THE SOUTHWEST BLOCK CORNER AND THE NORTHEAST BLOCK CORNER BOTH CITY MONUMENTS 1 3 9184 FIELD TO RECOR~ 98 - g --. 0 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 9018 FIELD TO RECORD 1 N 7Â§:06' 22.E 0.50'198.0 - ~S 41Â°18'05'E 0.17; 97.7 O WOOD FENCE - N 75Â° 09'11 'W 270.09' - 0 CITY MONUMENT SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 3/90 ho 1 C.*'ll..;0- 02' /' ' 3sl v 1-7 A SURVEY CONTROL POINT 1 -99 - - 31* 4 i * -rKEE b]Ankl'BIL MEA>*JiD I .413* 41+1 PEAK -Lik\\ NO RECORD INFORMATION FURNISHED TO SURVEYOR NOR RESEARCH PREFORMED i. I - W \1 - r -, 5.0~6-9 1 ') 7-C 6Â·11Â· 9% ~ MANHOLE Â¤ UTILITY BOXES t__ENTRY 1 C 1 /1 1.1- - n 12.1 CONTOURS ADDED 4/91 TBM 100 ~ 1:i 1 1/2 9~2:~ HOUSE !2 1 ~ , 18.81'/- Lai 3.5 1 0 1 1 /-\ ic -- 1 1 2 \\ l 0 ~ ~ -WATER METER 8 0 14.0 L u 1 NI N 1 0 . PORCH - | - OLIGHT C L _ .==lti:- '110 81+/ 3 1 f B A m 6.000 S. F.â€¢/- 46.El.Ph 0\ 6 1 SEP 04 1691 l C . *Cul BUILOINQ , '00 1./.PIPES *- PARKING 0-100,7 100Â· C A 9 75Â°09'11 9 60.0~ ~- 0 0 EDGE OF PAVEMENT f -101-- _ 1 r\ RIM 101,0 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY ALLEY BLOCK 18 w LOTS A AND B. BLOCK 18. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COLORADO. A toi 2 CERTIFICATION 1. JOHN M HOWORTH HEREBY CERTZFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PLOTTED FROM FIELD NOTES OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER My SUPERVISION. DATED TH IS_101_DAY OF -_N221L- 1 991. 4"'."5~"8#,4, ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEER'S INC. 9 1 RNFDâ€¢ Â¥216*21 49*p,Â°;,e~44. #10 109 . PREPARED BY , JOI!,/M HOWORTH P. L. S. 25947 W 21 25947 j* 199- . 6Â¢ 84*41 210 3. *AL 9,*Sci, 02~1 LINS> . 164 ACCORDINk TO COLOWDO LAW YOU MET COUENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED LPON ANy DEFECT IN THIS SUIVEY 04"linum# p, 0, 901,51$),204Â¥69 -1 )\ WITHIN'nmEE YEANS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT. laY m, ACTION BASED t.PON (303) 92 *Dtkz 44,- ASPEN. COL.06ADO 81610 ANY DEFECT IN THI S St.RVEY BE 00*MENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM TIE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION 311004 leEON. DATF ~ 14â€¢5~'49Â«E 100.00' 7TH STREET rs IRA LEGEND : .W WEST BLEEKER #TREET t Â·Â· ~ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOUSHED 'll \ EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN r . I <411,1 1 .0 , ... - 1 -' .1 2 ~ ** f WyÂ« v /7, r 62 1. .u",11_1-1 , 1 ~\\-7- 01 / , iD r5 4 9 5 0- ' Â·<FO Ot P L ':RONT LETBAU 1 ~ - 11 /E ~ CURRENT LOCAT/0, a: 8 E EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE ur 1 1 2 7 1 1 E 1--iff\\f < 4 n 11 t .7 tr U. 1. it:- .::~~~ 1/t--/.-=4~4:i--/1-i-Ii::J.-f::=-Cli---i--- --~ U m m PARKING k f m b : .6:.:.:L:-Li!:Â·:Â·-i.P::I-:bl:-1*~.Â·I:*..a=r:.i}St~'LÂ·MA; ~'~*ti)-3~ **t~viÂ·- '~:: ' E- :..:t.iliFFIÂ·;h.:iL ~ii:i?::~-i.-/Â·r~.iÂ· Â·~~;-~:~~-:. Â£.~.~ : i?i~~&L.iÂ·? Â·Lit~'; M;*4;i~ i~iF:;.: ~ ~. Y. 7 n....~ E i:::=' f:~. Zi - - i.: I ..::: *.:-: -:.2::-11 :i :~Â·~ .~iii~ . 43~ ~~~ ~~*f - ~Â·FT~ F~~ iti ~~: F.:& 1+MN#OP<*MUR - 84'L GRNEL ? 4 -:Â·Â·~:m-:Â·Se:1: 1:.:?I~~i~:,1.~:.LÂ·.rEMEnwkLMita!:F.i,F iÂ·U-i.,rvi?:i~'E::5Â·:2':.:~~.-:. 4 /2 - ORNEHM ./ - .-' Â£ I .- I I g8 6'' 6/ -Â· : .-f ?:i-, LI:.-- -:- t. - -m: Id:.i.*OP<FLO{intki-i-,QEFT#~L1-=-Efil~~~2Iiin? Â·:-: . Â·Â·Â·b... LFEr :_ ,-3.-:9Â£:--:: PROPOSED LOCATION OF . EXISTING HISTORIC STTUCTURE 0*15â‚¬3:':LU ;T:iNE: I./LT-:.-~'-~~ 731~~-~f= --1- REN? rETBEK ... 111111111111111! 11 PARKING PROPERrf UNE DRAWING ALLEY BLOCK 18 EXm- MOOR PUNS PROPOSED SITE PUN 9 -7_y 3 141 7 50 -2 JOB NO. 9836 DATE 6-15-98 _ 51-5 PROPOSED SITE PLAN EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SHEEr NO. X2.2 SHEET OF r:'COngCHT Ot,1~5 an*-E A~Â«1Ecr S1331IHZ*IV 333!NNAD SB 3DN3CliS321 NVIOCI . QUE-9160Â£6 mill . SE OCMioloO 'N3dSV 0695 26 81*L â€¢ U9W 03 'NadSV '.LS ND[3318 153AA GEL 1.11 0.1. GARAGE ~ f - 1 GARAGE I - I_2 Â¥m-m' L_j ii > .1--- -1-49 -1 WN[m 1 r L [Â© 1-011 * 34--- liE' --- 5754 REFI1 1 1 4 61 1 i - ' LAONDRY KITCHEN LI 2--- -REE--11 3 1 r DINING 1--- i - 1 , BATH ~ L.r-' BATH <4 ENTRY 6~-lp I li ! CP Dll - UP 6 ==Il=./ m I_- ,1--I \-- DINING @ -Ilr- BEDROOM BEDROOM LMNG LIVING - --/ -- mi,1- . -. I 6 - ... ENTRYEFTING - F P . DRAWING IUI La,a. JOB NO. 9836 DATE (Â»15-98 SHEEr NO. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN Â© A2.1 'An - 1*-(râ€¢ SHEET OP r OO F,mIT ONUS 01.H~H Ar{]TECTS .--I-*. 91331!HOMV 33=!INNAD 531MVHD 3DNEIC]IS321 NÂ¥100 9405-526016 1Â¥3 . 0695-SZ60Z6 :1111 . 119!9 00 'NidN . 10Â£ 311(,S '15 MED!33-18 193M SEL 2956-11Â¤026 :XW . BELE-92026 :Mal â€¢ 5010 03 lammal . VAV OCIVIO103'3 02 OCIVMO103 'NEIdSV r.7 ... -1-1-1 9 11 1 . 11 6= m - L It-- -0:I==1*ZIEZZ---7 0 *- I m . 1 I - [Â©77 4>4 v 1, 5 (3 I b -= U u 2==2~ :61 r.7 0 \ i 0 . .r 1 DOLAN RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 735 WEST BLEEKER ST. 520 EAST HYMAN AVE. ' SUITE 301 â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ TELE: 970925-5590 * FAX: 970925-5076 ASPEN, COLORADO 220 E. COLORADO AVE. s TELLURIDE, CO 81435 â€¢ TELE: 970,7263738 â€¢ FAX: 97072&-9567 LI - . LEGEND : ~ ADU UNfr - SEE SHEEr *25 FOR FURTHER INFORWATION 93 13 31 . r 11 m 6-.: 9- 0 -1" ji 88:Â·f O i. :.11 1 - 6 LU ADU Z Z D U . 1 i 'Â·p D-qi ........ 1 27.\ ~: 7- : . MECHANICAL. LAUNDRY .... UP '- UP 1 -- BATH --- 11 EN .- LU -1 '. REC RCK)M MECHAINCAL C X . J 1 - - BATH BEDROOM 2 1 516 9 @ STORAGE N 9 - k = 0 ~-I 1 0 <, BEDROOM - 1 Ig 2 32 3 9 19 = o UGHT WEU E ~ 1 0 DRAWING 1-01 LBIEL JOB NO. 9836 DATE 6-45-98 SHEEr NO. PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN A2.3 01 4 1 SHEEr OF c COMR'Off CH,IM; CUNNIFrE AHOgâ„¢39 B ' Â· XSâ€ž16#26 *6 n9W 03 W)dSV . m . 9EZE--924026 'Inal . SttÂ·19 00 '30!HOT!31. 'PV 00,0 0 0 0 A il=- 1=4 4 \ 1 / ?/ 1 / ~ </8/2 /202 . ~ . 1 Te la j 1 f ./ 1 1/ f /292.82 ;; ~ //2/<-82-82 Â§11 /1, \ DECK '1 --24 1 L - 7 . 642- 1 1 ---- % --r-/ 1 \ 1 41 14 5 6-/2 2 *122_ -123!2_, \ 4 1 m =3 4. DOLAN RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS i 9 :th 735 WEST BLEEKER ST. 520 EAST HYMAN AVE * SUITE 301 *ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ TELE: 970925-5590 â€¢ FAX: 970925-5076 . "mo ASPEN, COLORADO 220 E COLORADO AVE. * TELURIDE, CO 81435 â€¢ TELE: 979728.-3738 â€¢ FAX: 970728-9567 NVnd =IOOW 0380dOI=Id 0 1Â·' 11 llllllll -nv V=1/t + 1 FO L I % Â£1 /134_______--- F j LU--1\ / -~ f i - r.1- 1 , 0 i % 11 1 DOLAN RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 735 WEST BLEEKER ST. 520 EAST HYMAN AVE â€¢ SUTIE 301 ' ASPEN, CO m611 â€¢ TELE 970921-5590 â€¢ FAX: 970925-5076 Aâ‚¬PFN Col ORADO no E. COLORADO AVE * TELLURIDE CO 81435 â€¢ TEU: 970028-3738 * FAX: 97Â®28-9567 .&1 18. Â· 1/3 0 r.aPLATE EL40-0 -El 0 UPPER LEVEL 0 * TO.PLATE / 1% EL~NV , ~ J M 84 ' 6 40 N r===1' V Al M \ CO U WAIN LEVEL 0 El.,100'-0' U Z D LOWER LEVEL 0 LU ELÂ·90'<7 4 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Z ZE U MA 01 4 3 LU * TAMATE EL-#Bq - av= 7 (4 LU Z ,â€¢~ UPPER LEVEL N U EL-iDC \43' a -- i - 3 1 0 - -1 ,â€¢L TaPLATE ----j -w-EGREÂ¥- - - al . - -1 - -- 1 EL| DRAWING 1 Nym- 1 JOB NO. 9836 DATE 6-15=98 1 SHE NO, 0 1~Â©~EVEL 1 A3.1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 01 4 0 SHEET OF *COPÂ¢.'GIT OV/3 (l.A'FE .01[rEC ZOS-5 0 6 4%76 . 0655-St6026 8131 . 119!0 00 'NadsÂ¥â€¢ 10Â£ 11}ns . 9AY . ELE-02*026 63131 â€¢ SED!9 00'30[HfITI31. '3AV 00Â¥001 27~'O-1~~*~S~Â£ /1 .IM TEPUTE 0 ELÂ·11[1-9 0 1- -1 UPPER LEVEL 0 EL##OV ~ - I M 0 #AIN LEVEL EL#Ege | ] GARA@E LEVEL ~ ~ EL*9147 1 1 1 1 0 ~EVEL 1 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 01 4 8 T.Q.PLATE ELMIEr-<7 fl- 2 H ELâ‚¬q h 3- 31 -3 11 TAPLATE - EL-joy-{7 0 0 Xe UAN LEVEL Â¢ DRAW]NG GAR#GE LEV Et. EL 109-0 EL-99+0 aWN- JOB NO. 9836 DATE 6-15-98 SHEET NO. LONER LEVEL- Et 901 A3.2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SHEET OP 01 4 m C {Iri~QI C.'ES ./0,12 AZX!!EC. 9209--GE6026 *VI . . 11918 03'NadSV . IDE 31!rIS . *3/1Â¥ NWVAH 15Vt 029 'ls Â£956-8140Â£6 *Vd 3-131. SEMD 03'301Nfm31.,AV 00Â¥101009 Dir D~glgMSâ‚¬z V 33=UNNAD 931M HO 3DNEICIIS321 NV-100