HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.014-05RESOLUTION NO. 14
(SERIES OF 2005)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION APPROVING AN EXEMPTION FROM MOUNTAIN VIEW
PLANE REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT THIRTY-ONE FOOT TALL ADDITIONS TO
EACH OF THE TWO (2) WESTERNMOST CONNOR CABIN SITES, LOCATED
AT 530 AND 532 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, EAST 7'6" OF LOT P, AND ALL OF
LOTS Q AND R, BLOCK 93, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel ID: 2737-073-31-003
Parcel ID: 2737-073-31-004
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Austin Lawrence Partners, LLC, represented by Haas Land Planning, LLC.
requesting approval of an exemption from the Mountain View Plane Review to construct
a thirty-one (31) foot tall addition on each of the two (2) westernmost Cormor Cabin sites
located at 530 and 532 E. Hopkins Avenue; and;
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission granted Conceptual HPC
approval for the proposed development pursuant to Resolution No. 7, Series of 2005; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Conunission shall by resolution approve,
approve with conditions, or disapprove a development application for an exemption from
the Mountain View Plane Review, after considering a recommendation by the
Community Development Department pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.050,
Mountain View Plane Review; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the exemption
from the Mountain View Plane Review and recommended approval; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public heating on April 12, 2005, the
Planning and Zoning Commission denied a motion to approve the view plane review
exemption by a five to two (5 negative-2 affirmative) vote, and then unanimously voted
to reconsider the request and to continue the public hearing to April 19, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public heating on April 19, 2005, the Planning
and Zoning Commission, by a four to two (4-2) vote, approved the proposed exemption
from the Court House View Plane Review to construct a thirty-one (31) foot tall addition
to each of the two (2) westernmost Connor Cabin sites located at 530 and 532 E. Hopkins
Avenue; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds ail applicable development standards and that the
D~V;S PZTKZN COUNTY 00 R :~,ee D e.ee
approval of thc devclopmem proposal, with conditions, ~s consistent wi~ thc goals ~d
clcmcms o~thc Aspen ~ca Co~ty P]~; ~d,
WHE~AS, the A~en Plug ~d Zo~ng Co~ission finds ~at ~s Resolution
~hers ~d is necess~ for ~e promotion of public health, safety, ~d welf~e.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows:
.Section l
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves an exemption from Mountain
View Plane Review for the construction of thirty-one (31) foot tall additions to each of
the two (2) westernmost Connor Cabin sites located at 530 and 532 E. Hopkins Avenue,
on the eastern 7'6" of Lot P, and all of Lots Q and R, Block 93, City and Townsite of
Aspen.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission are hereby
incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if
fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereofi
Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 19, 2005.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City ~ttomey [/
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Jasmine Tygre, Chair {/ ~ --
ATTEST:
e ~thi~r~,-Deputy City Clerk