HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.20050427ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
555 & 557 WALNUT STREET - MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - FINAL PUBLIC
HEARING ......................................................................................................................... 1
530, 532, and 534 E. HOPKINS - CONNER CABINS ................................................. 3
FAR BONUSES ON PROPERTIES CONTAINING MORE THAN ONE
LANDMARK BUIDLING worksession .......................................................................... 5
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
Chairperson, Jeffrey Halferty called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Commissioners in attendance: Derek Skalko, Jason Lasser, Michael
Hoffman and Sarah Broughton. Valerie Alexander was excused.
Staff present:
Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Planner
Kathleen Strickland, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Disclosures:
Derek and Michael will be stepping down on 555 & 557 Walnut St.
MOTION: Derek moved to continue 435 W. Main to June 8th; second by
Jason. All in favor, motion carried.
555 & 557 WALNUT STREET - MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - FINAL
PUBLIC HEARING
Affidavit of posting- Exhibit I
Amy relayed that the application is for the rehabilitation of the Victorian
miner's cottage and the two 1960's era log buildings. In previous meetings
the board was satisfied with the kind of additions that were being made here.
The addition on the Victorian is very sympathetic in scale and there is a lot
of restoration that is needed. The two log cabins will be designated along
with this application. The one issue that is being debated is to add a stone
veneer around the base and add stone chimneys. Staff wanted to point out
by adding these changes the rating score will be lowered. The stone is
bringing in a level of detail that is not present on the buildings right now.
Gilbert Sanchez & Camilla Auger
Gilbert said the height of the addition on the log cabins has been reduced by
9 inches which came about by conversations with the neighbors. All the
new elements will be clad with wood siding in various directions. The
materials will be very sympathetic with the existing Victorian.
Restoration: The applicant is aware of the requirement of working with a
wood conservator as part of the design [eam. Gilbert mentioned that he feels
there will be a very limited amount that will be salvaged and that report will
come back to the board. He will put together a demolition plan. In terms of
the cabins the wood logs are painted and they would like to return to the
natural state. Regarding the roofing materials on the Victorian cottage they
would like to go back to the blue wood shingles. During the construction
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
document process we will be working to find that specific roofing material.
Cabins: The roof was originally wood shingles and they have a metal roof
on them right now. They would like to go back to wood shingles on the
gable portion and because of the shallow slope do a standing seam metal
roof on the shed roofs.
Stone foundation and stone chimneys. Under Rustic architecture it mentions
logs with stone foundations and chimneys. On these cabins the grade
changes just less than 3 feet. We would like to have a masonry foundation
which falls under Rustic architecture. The stone will be minimally exposed.
There is concrete block on the foundation of the cabins right now.
Photo of existing cabins - Exhibit II
Photo of existing stone foundations around town - Exhibit III
Photo of existing house and roof- Exhibit IV
We are introducing fireplaces on the inside and would like to express them
on the outside and we would do that in a scale that is appropriate.
Camilla said the cabins are one of the most challenging elements of the
project. We need them to be a living preservation that someone will buy and
live in. The stone will look nicer than cinder block and it will enhance the
preservation aspects. We will be very careful as to what the stone will look
like.
Jason asked if the stone would come out from the foundation and Gilbert
said it would have the same line and be flush. There are no chimneys, just
flue pipes.
Gilbert also relayed that they intend to paint the Victorian cottage. Amy
said paint was original and the board would not want to see a stain used.
Chairperson, Jeffrey Halferty opened the public hearing.
Jon Busch said he lives on Race Street directly across from the cabins. He
supports the project but the orientation of all these things is toward the open
space. No problem with the chimneys but suggests they be made of native
stone because the logs are native. His only problem is the two car garage
that is attached to the cabins. It is a shed roof and at the highest point five
feet from the edge of the alley. It is the most prominent element of the three
2
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
buildings. Possibly create a roof line that more mirrors the cabins instead of
having the peak right next to the road.
The chair closed the public hearing.
Board Comments:
Jason commented that the guidelines talk about keeping the materials the
same. He is not sure how he will approach the chimneys and stone because
none presently exist.
Sarah commented on the great project. The roofing materials are
appropriate. She could approve the stone but the layout needs to be looked
at to see how it relates to the logs. Camilla said they have no problem using
the native stone.
Jeffrey said the project is in compliance with the guideline and scale.
Chapter 7.11 talks about using conjectural features on the roof. The
structure has been deteriorating and this is an excellent example of rustic
architecture. The open space that is being preserved is an encouragement for
this neighborhood.
Gilbert said the idea behind the guidelines was to create a template that
could be used to achieve the best possible preservations that we could. The
stone base and chimney will be modest. The stone base is an appropriate
way to finish off the exposure.
MOTION: Sarah moved to approve Resolution #15 as stated in staff's
memo taking out condition #2. The stone foundation and chimney may
remain with final details to be approved by staff and monitor; second by
Jason.
Amended motion: #13 with staff and monitor the final roof material will be
reviewed on the Victorian. Jason amended his second Motion carried 3-0.
Yes vote: Jason, Sarah, Jeffrey
530, 532, and 534 E. HOPKINS - CONNER CABINS
Affidavit of posting - Exhibit I
Landscape and lighting plan Exhibit II
Greg Hills, Michael Noda, Mitch Haas
Derek and Michael were seated.
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
Amy relayed that the application has been to the Planning & Zoning
Commission to get an exemption from the view plane. There has been a
slight change to the western most unit, a parapet wall has been dropped
somewhat. This is an excellent proposal. There are a few minor concerns.
The applicant is proposing to put in an accent or decorative tree at each end
of the buildings. That is something that is not a big departure from Victorian
landscaping but it is being brought up only because it will block some of the
decorative nature of the buildings. Also, some of the plants and beds need to
be reviewed. Dwarf spruces were not normally used. The sweet peas and
sunflowers that are being proposed along the cabins should be on the side
and not the front. The light fixtures proposed are very craftsman and HPC in
general would prefer to see something more neutral. A much of the
authentic fabric of the buildings needs to be retained. It is also
recommended that they work with a restoration expert. The entire HPC
should do a walk through of the site.
Mitch said on 530 regarding the view plan the parapet wall has been dropped
on the side facing Conner Park. In doing so we were careful to retain the
spacing between so that there is still a gap between each of the loft spaces.
A new light fixture has been chosen that is more Victorian in character. The
sunflower and sweet peas have been moved where they are not in front of
windows but still on the street frontage. The crab apple trees were removed.
Chairperson, Jeffrey Halferty opened the public hearing.
Clark Conner thanked the board for their cooperation in working with the
applicant. The chair closed the public hearing.
Derek said the firm is outstanding and he wished them continued success.
Jason said the project keeps getting better.
Sarah said on most projects we prefer a recessed fixture. Michael Noda said
he will work with staff to obtain the appropriate fixture. Sarah also
suggested retaining a green area around the cabins as opposed to all of the
brick shown.
Michael said he agreed that the landscape plan can be worked out with staff
and monitor. He also agreed that the cabin light seems a little ornate.
Jeffrey said this is an excellent preservation project and very detailed. The
project requires no setback or FAR bonuses. The project meets the criteria
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 27~ 2005
of Chapter I. Jeffrey suggested screening the light source to hide it or
perhaps choose a different style.
MOTION: Michael moved to approve Resolution #16forfinal approval of
530, 532, 534 E. Hopkins with the conditions as set forth in staff's memo.
Condition #2 - add look at the relationship of soft scape to hard scape that
surround the cabins. Eliminate the crab apple trees. Motion second by
Sarah. All in favor, motion carried 5-0.
Yes vote: Jason, Derek, Sarah, Michael, Jeffrey
FAR BONUSES ON PROPERTIES CONTAINING MORE THAN
ONE LANDMARK BUIDLING
WORKSESSION
MOTION: Jeffrey moved to adjourn, second by Michael. All in favor,
motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
5