HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.hpc.019-1999I IIIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII
43~833 12/J,~/S,98~ ~/~21P RESOLUTI DRVI$ $ILVI
'~ e,f 2 R 'll.ee D e. Be N I.eB P%TKZN COUNTY CO
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND
VARIANCES AT 134 WEST HOPKINS, ASPEN, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 19, SERIES OF 1999
WHEREAS, the applicant, Bill and Peyton Budinger, represented by Bill Poss and
Associates, have requested a minor Historic Preservation Commission development
approval for an addition on the structure, and a sideyard setback variance and site
coverage variance. The property has historical designation; and
WHEREAS, all development in aa "H," Historic Overlay District or development
involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of
Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval,
namely:
Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing
and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the
parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H,"
Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic
Landmarks wbere proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard
and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the
lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the
allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after
making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the
historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with
dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section
exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached
accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090CB)(2).
2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the
character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development.
3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from
the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the
parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels.
4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from
the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or
part thereof; and
WHEREAS, Sarah Oatcs, in her staffreport dated April 14, 1999, recommended denial,
and
I IIIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII
438~33 ~2/1~/~ ~I:2'~P RE$OLUT! D~/~S $ILVI
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of thc Historic Preservation Commission on April 14,
1999, the Commission considered and denied the application by a vote of 7 to 0.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That minor development approval for 134 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado, be denied as
shown on April 14, 1999.
DENIED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14~ day
of April, 1999.
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney --'~/
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Chief Deputy Clerk