The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.110 W Main St.A090-001 2735-124-61â€¢112 U\\\IN A090-0(,1.,~ Hotel Aspen Minor PUD & GMQS Exemp. l__110 W. Main St. <Â«Alo At Eb Â£ l 1, FO C I 1 . P I ( U 1 1 1 11" ./../...'.64.-* 6-- â€ž ... AkE . 1 r. CASE NUMBER A090-00 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-61112 CASE NAME Hotel Aspen Minor PUD and GMQS Exemption PROJECT ADDRESS 110 W. Main St. PLANNER Nick lelack CASE TYPE Minor PUD, and GMQS Exemption OWNER/APPLICANT Hotel Aspen Condo Assoc./Bob Morris REPRESENTATIVE Herb Klein DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3-12-01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION Ord 9-2001 PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 08/04/04 BY D Driscoll PARCEL ID: |2735-124-61112 DATE RCVD: |7/24/00 # COPIES:~ ~ CASE NO|A090-00 CASE NAME:|Hotel Aspen Minor PUD and GMQS Exemption PLNR:F PROJ ADDR:~110 W. Main St. CASE TYP:|Minor PUD, and GMQS Exemption STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Hotel Aspen Condo ADR~415 E. Main St, #210 C/S/Z: |Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~925-8081 REP:~Herb Klein ADR:~201 N. Mill St, ste #20 C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 ' PHN:]925-8700 FEES DUE:~2310 D 320 E 320 H FEES RCVD:|4108D STAT: ~- REFERRALS~ REF:| BY| DUE: | MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED - DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ *Â·le.0 1 CITY COUNCIL: 7~W 9. 5'%'1 REMARKS I AfpWÂ®l--Dbl net A- Tht/TRD pz BOA: CLOSED:| BY: | DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):1 ADMIN: Page 1 of 2 Subject: RE: Hotel Aspen Date: Wed. 5 May 2004 12:14:17 -0600 Thread-Topic: Hotel Aspen Thread-Index: AcQyzHxinxUdhYmlNSineWFT'JuwkDTBAAAEgkQ From: "Ron Garfield" <rgarfield@garfieldhecht.com> To: "Chris Bendon" <chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us> X-MX-Spam: final=0.0038770821; heur=0.5000000000(-6600): stat-0.0090000000; spamtraq-heur=0.3000000000 (2004050502) X-MX-MAIL-FROM: <rgarfield@garfieldhecht.com> X-MX-SOURCE-IP: [209.248.79.35-1 X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Mai]Scanner: Found to be clean Thanks, Chris. -----Original Message---- From: Chris Bendon [mailto:chrisblitcias_pe-<.011.gs] Sent: Wednesday, May 05,2004 12:16 PM To: Ron Garfield Subiect: Re: Hotel Aspen Ron: The project was approved through an ordinance, ord. 9 or 2001. All reviews have been completed but the entitlements have not been perfected through recordation of a final plat and PUD plans and a PUD agreement. The deadline for filing these documents was extended to January 15,2004, and has lapsed. The period of vested rights has expired. This expired on March 12, 2004. The approvals remain valid although the growth allotments granted to the project have expired - the project relies on these allotments. City Council can extend the vested rights for the project through a process we can explain in greater detail if we need to. Chris. At 11:33 AM 5/5/2004, you wrote: >Chris. >This is a follow up to a brief discussion we had a few weeks ago about >Hotel Aspen. I represent Vectra Bank, the lender, and we are trying to >ascertain the status of the entitlements for this property. According to >Augie Reno, all requisite approvals have been obtained for eight >free-market hotel rooms and two affordable housing units, but the >applicant has not taken any of these approvals (other than HPC conceptual) >to the point of resolutions or ordinances signed by the P&Z or City and >duly recorded. Augie said there is some survey work. etc. that needs to be followed up on. My questions are as follows: 1. Is Augie correct about the approvals? 2. Wliat exactly remains to be done? . Most importantly, are these approvals in any .jeopardy of lapsing and, 3>if so, when would that occur? >Ron Garfield, Esq. >Garfield & Hecht, P.C. >601 East Hyman Avenue >Aspen. Colorado 81611 file://C:\DOCUME-l\chrisb\LOCALS-1\Temp\eud37.htm 5/5/2004 gvvvVvv Page 2 of 2 >(970) 925-1936 ext. 200 telephone >(970) 925-3008 facsimile >www.garfigldheclit.coin >garfield@garfieldhecht.com >NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may >contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for >the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended >recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, >distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please >notify the sender immediately by telephone (970-925-1936) and delete this >message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Cheers. Chris Bendon, AICP Senior Long Range Planner City of Aspen 920.5072 chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us www.11*Pglpitkitlgem Long Range Planning Information: IlttpL/-ww>Viaspenpitkin.com/depts/41/plan_ton_grange.*fm file://C:\DOCUME-l\chrisb\LOCALS- 1 \Temp\eud37.htm 5/5/2004 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 (970) 920-5090 ... Aspen Community (970) 920-5439 FAX Development www.aspenpitkin.com Department Fax & AM aw-Ud, From: 04 4 -50~06A Fax: 5-Â·3215 . Pages: 146 Phone: Date: Re: CC: C Urgent E For Review C Please Commint E Please Reply E Please Recycle â€¢ Comments: ORDINANCE N0. _9 (SERIES OF 2001) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING THE HOTEL ASPEN MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 110 WEST MAIN STREET, LOTS F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 58, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Hotel Aspen Condominium Association, owner o f the Hotel Aspen Lodge located at 110 West Main Street, Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen, for a Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate eight (8) new lodge rooms and two (2) new affordable housing units to be contained within an addition to the existing Hotel Aspen; and, WHEREAS, the Hotel Aspen is located in the Office (O) and Medium Density Residential Zone Districts with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070 (M) of the Land Use Code, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may exempt the development of properties in the LP Overlay Zone District to provide additional lodge units and additional affordable housing units from the scoring and competition procedure of growth management at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of said section; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, dimensional requirements of properties located in the LP Overlay Zone District may be established through the PUD review process; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the City Council may approve a PUD final development plan during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, and the Community Development Department reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5,2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, the growth management allotment eight (8) lodge units and two (2) affordable housing units to be included in the Hotel Aspen expansion; and, Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page t WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public heaing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5, 2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, that the Aspen City Council approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions contained herein; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 0 f the Aspen Municipal Code, the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, consisting of an eight (8) lodge unit and two (2) affordable housing unit addition to the existing lodge, is approved subject to the conditions of approval described hereinafter. Section 2: The Official Zone District Map of the City of Aspen shall be, and is hereby, amended by the Community Development Director to reflect Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite .of Aspen, as assigned with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay. Section 3: Conditions ofApproval: 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval by City Council and shall include the following: a) The approved dimensional requirements for the property in a tabular format. b) The information required in Section 26.445.070(C). c) A parking management plan that details the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle programs that will be implemented by the hotel operator. Ordinance No. , Series of2001 Page 2 2. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval granted by City Council and shall include: a) A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and showing easements, encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for any physical improvements within City rights-o ftway, and location of utility pedestals. If any utility mains are to be relocated, those new locations must be shown. If any utility mains exist in the vacated alley, easements shall be granted i f not already established. b) An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the approved dimensional requirements in a tabular format. c) A drawing representing the project's architectural character. d) A lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the City Lighting Regulations. e) A geometric design of the Main Street loading pull-out area with a signature line for the City Engineer. f) A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer maintaining drainage and sediment on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. 3. Prior to application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department the applicant shall: a) Record the PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans. b) Gain final approval from the Historic Preservation Commission. c) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to Category 2, or lower, with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. d) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to employees of Hotel Aspen, or its successors or assigns. e) Review a PM10 mitigation plan with the City Environmental Health Department. 4. The building permit application shall include: a) A copy of the final PUD Ordinance, recorded PUD Agreement, and the applicable HPC approval documents. b) The conditions of approval placed on the project by for Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and the Historic Preservation Commission approvals printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Ordinance No. , Series of2001 Page 3 d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department. e) A completed agreement to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose o f constructing improvements in adj acent public rights-o ftway. f) Construction drawings for improvements to the Main Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. g) An encroachment license for the parking area within the Bleeker Street right- of-way for approval by the City Engineer. This encroachment may also require a lease agreement with the City. h) Encroachment licenses for existing unlicensed improvements in public right- of-way. 5. Prior to issuance o f a building permit: a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b) All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. 6. The applicant shall encourage visitors to not rent a car when staying at the Hotel Aspen through marketing information, supply free taxi vouchers to guests, and the free use o f bicycles to guests. The Hotel manager shall use day parking passes available through the City Parking Department for off-site guest parking. The details o f this ongoing obligation shall be included in the PUD agreement. 7. Two parking spaces shall be made available and signed for the employee units. 8. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation o f the area unless an exemption is granted by the Parking Department. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 9. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. with no construction activity on Sundays. 10. Prior to issuance o f a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion for the employee units, a member o f the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall inspect the units to determine if the units comply with the representations made in the application. 11. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. Section 4: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 4 documentation presented before the Planning and Zomng Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereo f. Section 7: Pursuant to Section 26.304.070 of the Municipal Code, the City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days following final adoption hereof. Section 8: A public hearing on the was held on the 12th day of March, 2001, at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 26th day of February, 2001. Attest: ,7 A~Â£* f~~ ~41 Kattlryn b~och, City Clerk - Terry PaulsÂ°4 Mayor Pro Tem t\ FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this E day of \-D>Ch 2001. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 5 1 j 1 Pr 9,12Â£/1,5// /7r CÂ« /Cd> fuliuvelial \\ City Attorney Terry Pa~un, Mayor Pro Tem Attest: la-*00 444.- Kathryn S25'och, City Clerk C:\home\Chris\CASES\Hotel_Aspen\Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 6 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Hotel Aspen Condominium Association c/o Augie Reno, Reno Smith Architects FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Citv of Aspen Community Development Director Chris Bendon, Senior Planner Al AA.A UNVW 1 RE: Extension for Recordation of PUD Documents Request- Hotel Aspen PUD DATE: October 17,2003 SUMMARY The Hotel Aspen Condominium Association requests an extension (to January 15, 2004) in order to record the necessary PUD Plans and PUD / Subdivision Agreements with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's office for the Hotel Aspen PUD project. Minor modifications of the plans have been initially discussed at a staff level and staff prefers any pre-development changes be reflected on the recorded plans. Staff has not formally reviewed the potential modifications and this extension shall not entitle the modified plans. BACKGROUND The Hotel Aspen PUD received final PUD approval from the Aspen City Council on March 12. 2001. In addition, the Hotel Aspen received final HPC development approval on July 11. 2001 pursuant to Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 30, Series o f 2001. The Applicant has yet to record their PUD agreement or plat and their original deadline of January 11,2002, was extended to October 23,2003. -Minor modifications to the approved PUD are expected and have been initially discussed. These modifications may be administrative amendments or may require additional Board review. Staff recommends any pre-development changes to the plans be reflected in the recorded PUD Plan set and recommends delaying the recordation until the project design is finalized. According to Section 26.445.070(A) of the Land Use Code, the Community Development Director has the authority to extend the reeordation deadline if the request is within the vesting timeline and if there is a community interest for providing for such an extension. STAFF FINDINGS Staff believes that the request to extend the recordation deadline is within the vesting 1h period, which ends July 12 . 2004 (three (3) years after final IIPC approval). The applicant is actively pursuing the project and staff prefers delaying the recordation of the PUD Plans until all amendments are approved and depicted. Staff feels that allowing for the requested extension is within the best interest of the community. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVAL I hereby extend the recordation deadline for the Hotel Aspen PUD project to January 15, 2004, finding that the request has been made within the vesting timeline and there is a community interest for providing such an extension. This extension shall not indicate approval of the potential project revisions outline in the extension request letter and such revisions shall require additional review. \-4ct a dfUL De,0+ ObÂ« lo (50/05 Julie Alin Woods, CommObity Development Director Date ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Letter of Extension Request OCT.17.2003 12:34PM RENO SMITH ARCHITECTS LLC NO.833 P.1 October 17,2003 Mr. Chris Bendon AUGUST Aspen Pitkin County Community Development RENO 130 South Galena AIA Aspen, CO 81611 SCOTT RE: The Hotel Aspen, 110 West Main Street SMITH AIA Dear Chris, On behalf ofthe Owners, we respectfully, request an extension of six (6) weeks for the recordation of the Minor Plan Unit Development. This extension would obligate us to record no later than December 3,2003. /10,e -~-pâ€ž /5Â».9 As we discussed during our last telephone conversation there are a number RENO Â· SMITH of minorrevisions the Owners would like to make. We anticipate per our Â·ARCHITECTS. L.L.C.Â· discussions, that these minor revisions will be able to be addressed at the "I administrative level. The owner does not want to go before the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Historic Preservation Committee or the 605 W. MAIN STREET Aspen City Council. Na 002 ASPEN The revisions that we are working on are: COLORADO 8161I 1, Reconfiguration of the seven (7) units at the third (39 floor South (Main Street) parcel. These revisions will create only 970,925.5968 four (4) units. 1 ~ 111Ft, Areu? 4- 2. The addition of an elevator, FACSIMILE 3. The enlargement of four (4) hotel rooms. 970,92S,5993 kt, \1 Alt#A Â«-4. The addition of two (2) hotel rooms at the Northparcel in lieu EMAIL wept- 01\r A 7 ofthe two (2) employee units. The employee units willb: office@renosmith.com located at the Ullr, which is located on Main Street. We would like to set up a meeting with you to go over these proposed revisions. 0371 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE BASALT Please send us a letter confirming the extension to the December 3,2003 COLORADO date. 81621 If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your help 970.927.6834 and guidance on this matter. FACSIMILE Respectfully yours, 970,927.6840 *96244 August 6. Reno, A.LA. CC: T. Brown, N. Gronkowski, A. Dubroff, J. Warm, M. Hoffman, Esq. E.lu\ ~-, ...- 09/22/2003 05:46 9709276840 RENO SMITH BASALT PAGE 02 PROJECT: Hotel Aspen, Aspen, CO DATE: 9/22/03 START TIME: 9:30 am STOP TIME: 10:00 a.m ATTENDEES: Jeff Warm (RS) & Chris Bendon (City of Aspen) AUGU5T RENO DUIEB; ALA 1. Chris Bcndongavc Jcff Warm a sot ofdrawings for thc Hotcl Aspen SCOTT Minor Planning Unit Developnient (PUD) Second Reading ofOrdinance SMITH AIA No. 9 Series 2001, which shows an addition of(8) new lodge units and (2) new Employee Units. 2. Ifthe owner wants to change the number of units at the new 34 floor kÂ·U44.-4 thenanew iloor plan needs to be submitted to the City of Aspen 8r review. ~---~~.srmLE01:~-n_--=- 3. Any changes to the 34 floor can be made administratively as long as the ~-----\->-N~~>1-----1 exterior kade remains the same. Any exterior fÂ®ade changes along Main Street and Garmisch Street to theabsodoned Aucy-Block 58, will RENO Â· SMITH require approval from HPC. ARCHITECTS, L.LC. 111 4. The owner can purchase off-site Employee Units for the Hotel Aspen. The required ratio between off-site vs. on-site is 1/1. 5. The owner is still required to sign a Deed Restriction for the off-site 605 W. MAIN STREET property. Each off-site Employee Unit shall comply with the minimum NO 002 requirements set forth by the Housing Authority. 6. Changes to Employee Units can be made administratively. Approval ASPEN COLORADO may be required by P&Z depending on the administrative review. 81611 7. Changes made to the new 34 floor can be approved administratively. The review process will take approximately 1 to 2 weeks. 970.925.5968 8. Chris Bendon recommends that all changes be made befbre the Final PUD Plat is submitted in order to help alleviate any future conflicts, FACSIMILE and/or delays to the review process. 970.925.5993 9. Any review required by P&Z will take approximately 4 to 6 weeks. EMAIL office@renosmith.com C Hy:- H / .,-i I Jeff Warm,4Â¤g.k Manager/Architect 0371 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE BASALT COLORADO 81621 Copies To: T. Brown, (Owner) A. Reno, (RSA) 970,927,6834 C. Bendon (City ofAspcn) FACSIMILE 970.927.6840 * If there are any discrepancies to the above information, please contact Reno Smith Architects immediately. MEMORANDUM vII a- TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Steve Barwick, City Manager John Worcester, City Attorney FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director -Â»10*, Chris Bendon, Senior Planner /11:... RE: Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) Second Reading of Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001. DATE: March 12,2001 4Â»* SUMMARY: The Hotel Aspen Condominium Association is requesting approval for a Minor PUD and LP program expansion to construct eight (8) additional lodge rooms and two (2) additional affordable housing units. The project is in the Main Street Historic District and has received Conceptual approval from the HPC. GMQS Allotments for the LP Program have been granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Seven of the eight lodge units are one-bedroom units of approximately 285-450 square feet. The eighth lodge unit is a suite of approximately 700 square - feet. The two proposed affordable housing units are one-bedroom units of approximately 490 square feet. The new affordable housing units are required to be deed restricted to Category 2. This application exemplifies staff s expectations of the revised Lodge Preservation (LP) Program. The hotel is providing additional lodge rooms, mitigating employee generation impacts far in excess of that required, addressing neighborhood compatibility through the PUD process, and respecting the character of the Main Street Historic District through the HPC process. The Minor PUD process requires adoption of an Ordinance by the City Council after a recommendation from the Commission is forwarded. This applicant is requesting dimensional requirements be established for the parcel and staff is in support of the proposed PUD. The P&Z recommended approval of this PUD request by a 4-0 vote. Staff has highlighted four Main Issues for this review. below. Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001. MAIN ISSUES: Affordable Housing: The application is proposing 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. There are no codified formulas for determining employee generation for lodge units and staff 1 typically requests lodge operators submit their existing staff totals and an estimate of the expected staffing needs after the expansion. The Hotel currently staffs 12.14 FTE's, or approximately .27 FTE's per lodge room. This is consistent with an analysis of smaillodge employee generation produced by the Planning Department. The proposed employee housing provides housing for 3.5 employees, according to the Housing Guidelines. Using the .27 figure, this housing mitigates for 162% of the employees generated, significantly more affordable housing than the 60% requirement. The Housing Office and the Planning Department support the proposed employee mitigation. The P&Z approved this mitigation and granted the affordable housing allotments for this project. Garmisch Street Parking: The existing head-in parking along Garmisch Street is entirely within the public right- of-way and no encroachmentlicense exists between the City and the Hotel. This parking is available to the general public and is not posted as private parking for guests. The Hotel is mitigating their additional parking needs on-site and no other changes are affecting this head-in parking. A reconfiguration of Garmisch Street is not required and the applicant is not proposing any changes. The preference of the Community Development staff and the City Engineer is for redeveloping the parking in a parallel configuration with a wide planting strip. A generous planting strip along this street with street trees and a detached sidewalk would improve the pedestrian experience and general aesthetics of the area. Concerns about the aesthetics of this head-in parking and the benefit of converting this parking to parallel have been raised by neighbors. Please see attached letter from Tim Semrau, President of Victorians at Bleeker homeowners association. This change, however, must be balanced with the impacts of reducing the amount of public parking in the area and spaces traditionally available to hotel guests. There are currently 21 parking spaces in the head-in area. Developing this entire street to parallel parking would reduce this to 9 or 10 spaces. The P&Z did not suggest any modification to the existing parking configuration. During first reading, City Council suggested additional investigation on two possible street edge conditions: 1) conversion to parallel parking for the north-half of the block; and, 2) provision of landscape "islands" between parking spaces. (Also see attached graphic.) Converting the north half of the block would reduce the available parking spaces by five (5) spaces. This would reflect the condition on the east side of Garmisch where head-in parking is provided for the commercial use and parallel parking is provided for the residential use. This provides a transition to the residential area, additional street trees, and a detached sidewalk. A drainage pan exists approximately where a new curb would be provided and the street would not require re-crowning. 2 The provision of landscape islands or piers between autos could also improve aesthetics of the area. Ideally, each island would be 12-15 feet wide island, providing for pedestrian access, loading areas, and a street tree. Providing narrower islands would not allow for a street tree and not address the aesthetic concerns. In addition, narrow islands can be hidden with snow and result in autos straddling the island. Each of these islands would equal roughly 1.5 parking spaces and two would be appropriate for this length of street. This would reduce the available parking by three (3) spaces. Again, re-crowning ofthe street would not be necessary. Staff believes the aesthetic benefits outweigh the loss of available parking. The first scenario, parallel for the north half of the block, is the most desirable of the reconfiguration options as the pedestrian amenity is maximized. City Council should specify which reconfiguration scenario, if any, is preferred. This issue relates to conditions 2(f) and 4(f) of the proposed Ordinance. The City Engineer will also be present during the meeting to address specific questions. Loading Zone: The applicant has proposed an area for shuttles, taxis, etc. to load visitors along Main Street in a new pull-out area. This area is currently signed as a loading zone with no pull-out area. The City Engineer believes the additional pull-out area will address safety concerns and supports the concept. The Community Development Department believes a loading area would be a nice amenity to the hotel use but is concerned about the proposed location on Main Street. This area includes bus stops on either side and additional traffic maneuvers could create additional confusion. This curb cut could also create a precedent for additional cuts along Main Street. If, however, City Council prefers the reconfiguration of the Garmisch Street parking, a better location for the loading area could easily be accommodated and still serve the intended function. If, for example, one significant landscape island was provided, taxi parking could be provided along the street-side of the island. On-Site Parking: The Hotel Aspen currently has a shortage of parking according to the prescribed requirement of the Land Use Code. This parking situation, however, has been managed well and vacant parking spaces can be found during the winter season. Under the LP Ordinance, the existing parking deficit can be carried forward and it is only the new units that are subject to new parking space requirements. The proposed expansion requires 7.6 spaces and the applicant is proposing 8 new parking spaces on site. In addition, the applicant is proposing a series of parking management techniques to lessen the impact of the reduced parking ratio including marketing, taxi vouchers, and provision of free bicycles. Staff has included these techniques in the proposed Ordinance. In addition, the Ordinance requires two spaces be signed for residents of the affordable housing units, a request by the Housing Authority. 3 APPLICANT: Hotel Aspen Condominium Association; Robert Morris, Manager. Represented by Herb Klein, Esq., Attorney, and Augie Reno, Architect. LOCATION: 110 West Main Street. ZONING: South half (Main Street) Office-Lodge Preservation Overlay (O-LP). North half (Bleeker) Medium Residential-Lodge Preservation Overlay (R6-LP) No changes to this current zoning are proposed. LOT SIZE: 26,891 square feet. LOT AREA (FOR PURPOSES OF FAR CALCULATION): 26,891 square feet. FAR: Allowable -- The parcel lies in two zone districts and the FAR for the lodge use shall be calculated for the portion of the parcel lying in the office zone. 10,125 square feet Existing -- .882:1 = 23,722 square feet. Proposed -- 1.09:1 = 29,237 square feet. CURRENT LAND USE: Lodge. 45 rooms, 45 bedrooms. Two registered employee units. 10 on-site parking spaces with 21 head-in spaces adjacent to property. PROPOSED LAND USE: Lodge. 53 rooms, 53 bedrooms (addition of 8 lodge rooms). Four employee units (addition oftwo). 18 on-site parking spaces (addition of 8 spaces) with 21 head-in spaces adjacent to property. PREVIOUS ACTION: The project is within the Historic District and has received Conceptual approval from the HPC. Final HPC approval is necessary. The P&Z reviewed this application and granted the Lodge Preservation allotments for the lodge and affordable housing units. The P&Z recommended approval of the PUD to City Council. City Council approved th the first reading of this Ordinance February 26 . REVIEW PROCEDURE: Minor PUD. At a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, after reviewing a recommendation 4 from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Community Development Director. BACKGROUND: The Hotel Aspen is in the Main Street Historic District and the project has received conceptual approval from the HPC. The project must still receive final approval from the HPC after the PUD is established. This has been included as a proposed condition of approval. A recent newspaper article reported the applicant requesting a higher number of lodge and affordable housing units. The application has been amended (at the applicant's direction, not at staff's request) to the 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. ~TAFF COMMENTS: The LP Program seeks to maintain and bolster the quality smaltlodge experience that differentiates Aspen from other resort communities and the character of dispersed lodges in the town's neighborhoods. In staff' s opinion, after aiding the elected and appointed officials in the adoption of the LP Program, this project meets the spirit and intent of the Program and promotes the goals of the AACP. In fact, this project represents what staff envisioned as a product the LP Program. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A letter from Tim Semrau is attached as Exhibit "B." The application was distributed for first reading and has not been duplicated. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001. RECOMMENDED MoTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001, approving the Hotel Aspen Lodge Preservation expansion." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Tim Semrau Letter Development Application included with first reading packet (February 26m) C:\home\Chris\CASES\Hotel_Aspen\CC_MEMO.DOC 5 - C /f t. 64-- - 11 1 1 hL 7- 3 / 4 + itl o /1 i 2 1-1 1 4 rl AL.*.64 64 #are #0 Â¢ IA i.1 4. -1 11-1(kkill*k f ~~t -, - 11 - 1 li , f .3 -- -2 4_J \ 2'10Â· i..Â© . I . 'V ....~ + ~/1- \. 7,2 ~0*~F-S V-- , 4- A0I-- 9 *41 *AM. on 84 ad of FAT#*61 164- In OM *44 awl 4 arMVE# ... rik t . 11 4. 4( 'll 1 1 t r I I - * - Â»L>-,2 ,/ r I - N . - .. 1,1 - \V -4 - & - / a GRÂ»fe *49 u)*h Imdiâ€¢< arm 4 44 -tret \ ORDINANCE N0.9 (SERIES OF 2001) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING THE HOTEL ASPEN MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 110 WEST MAIN STREET, LOTS F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 58, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Ilotel Aspen Condominium Association, owner of the Hotel Aspen Lodge located at 110 West Main Street, Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen, for a Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate eight (8) new lodge rooms and two (2) new affordable housing units to be contained within an addition to the existing Hotel Aspen; and, WHEREAS, the Hotel Aspen is located in the Office (O) and Medium Density Residential Zone Districts with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070 (M) of the Land Use Code, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may exempt the development of properties in the LP Overlay Zone District to provide additional lodge units and additional affordable housing units from the scoring and competition procedure of growth management at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of said section; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, dimensional requirements of properties located in the LP Overlay Zone District may be established through the PUD review process; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the City Council may approve a PUD final development plan during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, and the Community Development Department reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5, 2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, the growth management allotment of eight (8) lodge units and two (2) affordable housing units to be included in the Hotel Aspen expansion; and, Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 1 WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5,2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, that the Aspen City Council approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions contained herein; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, consisting of an eight (8) lodge unit and two (2) affordable housing unit addition to the existing lodge, is approved subject to the conditions of approval described hereinafter. Section 2: The Official Zone District Map of the City of Aspen shall be, and is hereby, amended by the Community Development Director to reflect Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen, as assigned with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay. Section 3: Conditions of Approval: 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval by City Council and shall include the following: a) The approved dimensional requirements for the property in a tabular format. b) The information required in Section 26.445.070(C). c) A parking management plan that details the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle programs that will be implemented by the hotel operator. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 2 ~ t,F 2. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval granted by City Council and shall include: a) A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and showing easements, encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for any physical improvements within City rights-of-way, and location of utility pedestals. If any utility mains are to be relocated, those new locations must be shown. If any utility mains exist in the vacated alley, easements shall be granted if not already established. b) An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the approved dimensional requirements in a tabular format. c) A drawing representing the project' s architectural character. d) A lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the City Lighting Regulations. e~ A geometric design of the Main Street loading pull-out area with a signature line for the City Engineer. f) A geometric design of the Garmisch Street parking reconfiguration with a signature line for the City Engineer. g) A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer maintaining drainage and sediment on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. 3. Prior to application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department the applicant shall: a) Record the PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans. b) Gain final approval from the Historic Preservation Commission. c) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to Category 2, or lower, rental price restrictions with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority and in a manner acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure the units remain permanently affordable. d) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to employees of Hotel Aspen, or its successors or assigns. e) Review a PM10 mitigation plan with the City Environmental Health Department. 4. The building permit application shall include: a) A copy of the final PUD Ordinance, recorded PUD Agreement, and the applicable HPC approval documents. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 3 b) The conditions of approval placed on the project by City Council and the Historic Preservation Commission approvals printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department. e) A completed agreement to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights-of-way. M Construction drawings for improvements to the Main Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. ~)' Construction drawings for improvements to the Garmisch Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. h) An encroachment license for the parking area within the Bleeker Street right- of-way for approval by the City Engineer. This encroachment may also require a lease agreement with the City. i) Encroachment licenses for existing unlicensed improvements in public right- of-way. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b) All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. 6. The applicant shall encourage visitors to not rent a car when staying at the Hotel Aspen through marketing information, supply free taxi vouchers to guests, and the free use of bicycles to guests. The Hotel manager shall use day parking passes available through the City Parking Department for off-site guest parking. The details of this ongoing obligation shall be included in the PUD agreement. 7. Two parking spaces shall be made available and signed for the employee units. 8. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area unless an exemption is granted by the Parking Department. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 9. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. with no construction activity on Sundays. 10. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion for the employee units, a member of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 4 inspect the units to determine if the units comply with the representations made in the application. Section 4: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 7: Pursuant to Section 26.304.070 of the Municipal Code, the City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days following final adoption hereof. Section 8: A public hearing on the was held on the 12th day of March, 2001, at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 26th day of February, 2001. [signatures on following pagel Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Rachel E. Richards, Mayor Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 5 FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of ,2001. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: City Attorney Rachel E. Richards, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk C:\home\Chris\CASES\Hotel_Aspen\Ordinance.doc Ordinance No. 9, Series of 2001 Page 6 Exhibit A Hotel Aspen LP Expansion STAFF COMMENTS: Minor Planned Unit Development - Section 26.445 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding: The Lodge Preservation Program was adopted for the specific purpose of preserving small lodges and aiding in their development and re-development as lodges in response to the 2000 AACP. "The community must find ways to maintain these small lodges and the experience they offer to our guests."- Commercial/Retail section philosophy statement Staff believes this project is consistent with and promotes the goals ofthe AACP. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The Hotel Aspen is located in a primarily commercial neighborhood with some residential to the north. The LP Overlay Zone District, however, allows these smalllodges tocontinue and expand when compatible with the neighborhood. Staff believes the hotel expansion is compatible with the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The development is not expected to adversely affect the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding: The Lodge units were exempted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, subject to PUD approval. There are sufficient allotments for LP and affordable housing development to accommodate this proposal. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 1 B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Finding: Staff believes the proposed dimensions of this PUD to be appropriate and compatible with the surrounding area. There are no natural hazards or site conditions that make this level of development difficult, unsightly, or undesirable. In fact, this addition will benefit the existing development and help ensure the continued desirability of this lodge. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The HPC has worked with the applicant to reduce the massing of the project and staff believes the results have been positive. The quantity of open space is appropriate for the character of the neighborhood. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding: The existing parking situation is somewhat odd and staff requested an explanation of the existing parking be provided in the application. There are 21 parking spaces serving the existing development that are located in the public right-of-way but serve as de-facto spaces for the hotel. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 2 The applicant is proposing 8 additional on-site spaces be developed in the rear of the lot to mitigate for the expansion and mitigation measures to address the existing parking deficit. Staff believes these mitigation measures will work and be a benefit to the project. These have been included in the proposed Ordinance. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding: There are no infrastructure capacity issues that would prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions in the development being proposed. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud fow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding: There are no known natural hazards or site limitations that prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions to the proposed development based on this standard. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 3 c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Staff Finding: The addition of the lodge rooms and the provision of affordable housing on-site both promote goals expressed iii the AACP. The LP Overlay allows the lodge use in addition to the uses allowed in the Office and R-6 Zone Districts. There is technically no increase in density necessary for the lodge units, only an increase in FAR to accommodate additional units. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The addition is proposed in a location to preserve the pool and center courtyard area. This placement maintains the visual interest of the property and adds to its identity. This is a feature of many of the lodges of this era and should be encouraged as an appropriate character of the small lodge experience. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. Staff Finding: This standard has been met. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. Staff Finding: The placement of the addition does not affect the orientation to public streets. The possible redevelopment of the Garmisch Street right-of-way would significantly improve the pedestrian orientation of the project. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Staff Finding: There is a new access way proposed from the alleyway. The Fire Marshall reported no present difficulties in servicing this site and requested no additional improvements to the older portion of the building. The new portion will need to be equipped with a sprinkler system and an alarm. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. Staff Finding: The site plan provides a sufficient amount of pedestrian access. The applicant is responsible for demonstrating compliance with accessibility requirements. Staff believes these requirements can be met with the proposed plans. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 4 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding: The City Engineer has requested a drainage plan and report be prepared, accepted, and recorded with the Final PUD Plans. This drainage will need to be accommodated on-site according to a two-year storm frequency design. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding: The interior courtyard surrounds an outdoor pool area and the space has been designed to accommodate that use. This criteria loosely applies because the pool is already developed and is intended to remain. Staff believes this standard has been met. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Staff Finding: The existing landscape of the parcel provides a variety of species in an attractive manner. The addition is proposed in a location where some of this existing vegetation will need to be removed. The remaining portion of the lot, however, will primarily retain the existing vegetation and no additional landscape treatment is being recommended. Staff believes this criteria has been met with the landscape plan suggested in the application. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The swimming pool is probably the only site feature that falls under this criteria. This outdoor pool does provide some uniqueness to this lodge and is being preserved with this proposal. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding: Staff does not foresee any significant existing vegetation that will need to be protected from construction activities. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City Hotel Aspen Comments Page 5 while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. Staff Finding: The architecture proposed for the addition is in the same style as the existing building and is appropriate. The building is not a historic resource but is located in the Main Street Historic District. The HPC has granted the project conceptual approval. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. Staff Finding: This standard is somewhat difficult to achieve on additions to existing buildings. To the extent practical, the applicant has oriented the structure in a manner conducive to solar heating and the mechanical system of the existing building will serve the new addition. Staff believes this standard has been met, to the extent practical. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Staff Finding: The roof pitches of the proposed additions are flat and will probably not shed snow. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibitted for residential development. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 6 Staff Finding: The applicant is required to utilize lighting that will be down directional and in compliance with the City's lighting code. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. Staff Finding: The courtyard area serves as open space and as a recreation area to the benefit of the property users. This amount, location, and design of this area is beneficial to the overall project and provides a desirable visual relief from the mass of buildings. Staff believes this criteria has been accomplished. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. Staff Finding: The interest in the courtyard area is not proposed to be divided and will remain as a general common element. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. Staff Finding: Due to the undivided nature of this courtyard and the nature of this use, staff does not believe there should be required a separate legal instrument to ensure the continued maintenance of the space. This is primarily due to the fact that the long-term viability of the hotel will depend upon the visual attractiveness of the courtyard and common grounds. An additional legal instrument requiring the applicant to maintain this space would not serve any significant benefit. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: Hotel Aspen Comments Page 7 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. Staff Finding: All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. Staff Finding: The applicant is required to fund his fair share of utility expenses as required. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding: No oversized utility stubs were requested by utility providers for this development and none have been proposed. I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. Staff Finding: The structure and all uses on the lot have adequate access to the public street system. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. Staff Finding: The City Engineer and staff prefer a reconfiguration of the Garmisch Street parking to better provide for pedestrian amenity. J. Phasing of Development Plan. Staff Finding: Not applicable. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 8 RAA J: ry,â€¢--v.Â». Ekk 10} r u._ I .. 2/19/01 11 FEB 2 n ..tiD 6 2001 To: City Council Members Â· Unk.*.,ir,(EN/2/5 42- From: Timothy Semrau , ~ 12 : 3 ,<IAI --vAWENT President-Victorians at Bleeker Homeowner's Association RE; Hotel Aspen Approvals-Pedestrian Right of Way Dear Council Member; Although myself and my fellow owners generally support the Hotel Aspen addition, I ask you to carefully consider as part of the approvals having the Hotel Aspen restore the city right of way on the west side of Garmisch street to pedestrian use. Please note the following; -The two blocks of Garmisch street north of Main has been markedly improved for pedestrian use the last few years. When I received approvals for the Victorians at Bleeker project. both engineering and community development required me to eliminate the head in parking on the city right of way and build at my expense a sidewalk and landscape buffer. This has definitely enhanced the pedestrian experience in the neighborhood. (See attached approvals for Victorians at Bleeker). -The park project at the Yellow Brick has also restored sidewalk in the portion of the city right of way on the west side of Garmisch street. -Engineering and community development both request the Hotel Aspen project do the same in the city right of way on their side of the street. -The Hotel Aspen claims there is insufficient parking to lose the few spaces that would be lost if parallel parking was returned to the street. Please note the attached photographs taken at 7 a.m on president's day weekend. presumably a busier time for the hotel. The parking in front of the hotel is not completely full, Bleeker street on the other side of the hotel is completely empty, and Garmish street farther south is completely empty. We are all trying to diminish the stranglehold automobiles have on the city. This is a small opportunity to restore more pedestrian scale to a neighborhood that deserves it. Please follow planning and engineering's recommendations to restore the city right of way to parallel parking, sidewalks, and landscaping in front of the Hotel Aspen. Thank you, Timothy Semrau I .*./. . -' P . I MEMORANDUM ft ob EN Ap TO: Dave Michaelson, Planning Office a!41 4 From: Chuck Roth. Engineering Department ggâ‚¬_ Date: February 29. 1996 Re: Victorians at Bleeker Razor]ing & Conceptual/Final PUD (101 East Bleeker St.: Lots A & B, Block 66. Original Aspen Townsize: Parcel ID No. 2735-124- 38-012) Having reviewed the above referenced applicarion. and having made a site visir. the Engineering Deparunenr has the following comments: 1. Drainage - The applicarion does nor discuss sire dminage. Storm runoff design must be provided cha[ mes:s [he requiremenrs of Sec:ion 26.88.040,C.4(5 of the City Code. The building permi[ application must liso indicate storm runoff mirigarion auring construction so thar no runoff enters pubiic righrs-of-way 2. Utilities - There is an exising utiliry pedesral which is locared in rhe public righz-of-way adjacent co [he parcel. It should be a condition of approvai rhar rhe pedesral be relocated or.ro an easement on the applicant's propes ar the time of development and tha[ any new surface uriliu, needs for pedesrals or orher ear,inmenr be insmiled on an easement provided by the applicant and not in the public right-of-way. 3. Trash & Utility Area - The site improvement survey does nor indicate the location of the dumpster. The sire visit revealed tha[ Lhe dumpsrer is in the stree: public right-of-way. The development plans do nor indicare the trash storage area. which must nor be in the pubiic righ[-of- way. The final development plan musr inalcare trash srorage areas which should be indicared as trash and recycle area Any cash and recycle aims that include utility meters or other utility' equipment mum provide that the Urility equipment not be blocked by trash and recycle containers. / 4. Access - We have discussed access with rhe applicant. bur the conversation is nor reflected in the / application. A vehicle cannot negotiare a ninety degree turn from an eleven foot wide driveway ~,6 into a garage immediately adjacent to the driveway. We discussed the necessity of the applicant -'~ - V obtaining an access easement from the adjacent properuy owner. The final development plan musT < provide funcdoning access to the garages. ] 1 . 5. Landscaping in the Public Right-of-way - The final development plan must indicate proposed landscaping in the public right-of-way which must conform with City Code as discussed below. 6. Sidewalk. Curb and Gutter - The site is located on the fringe of the West End where the Pedestian Walkway and Bikeway System Plan may not be specific about sidewalks. There is however an existing sidewalk on Bleeker Street at the U.S. West offices and on the west side of Aspen Street. There is also sidewalk in. front of the medical building on Garmisch Street. Therefore, sidewalk should be required on both stre-ft. front*ca i this development. .,This sidewalk -~iT~erve Ah the-future residenrs of the project as well as pedestrian traffic to the Yellow Brick School and other neighboring properties. .Any damaged sections of curb and gutter will be required to be replaced prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7. Street Lights - There is an existing srreer light mounted on a former wooden uriliry pole ar che comer of Garmisch and Bleeker adjacenr to the applicant's properry. Ir should be a requirenien: that ir be replaced with an antique Stree: light. 8. Development of Public Right-of-way - City staff will need co discuss chis applicaion in zile Developrnent Review- Cornrnines zo dere:Inine how Ille puolic nehr-of-vvay adjacen[ to Ike develooment must be reconstructed by Ehe appiicant. It may be preferabie to remove le exist:.9 headin parking and install parallel :arking in order to improve the sri.. 2.-v and the -==r.-Air.3 neighborhood C:larac:er. 9, Easements - The final pla[ muSI indicate easements of =cord based on i c.u .4..L -14.4 ~ 30 1 :cu. -rl 1 Cle sire improvemenr Surve'/ aorears [0 indicate :asements :har might affect site design. 10. Final Plat - The final plat mus: meet the requirements of:he Ciri Code. 11. work in the Public Right-of-way - Clven the conzinuous problems of unapproved work and development in public righrs-oft'way adjacenT [o pnvare properm we advise rhe applicant as follows: The 'applicant must receive approval *orn city engineering (920-5088) fer design of improvements. including landscaping, Within pubiic rights-of-way. parks deparment (920-5120) for vegetation species. and Streets depar[ment (920-5 1 30) for Street and alley cuts. and shil obtain pennirs for any work or developmen[. including landscaping, within public righrs-of-way from the ciry c o rn.rn uni [7 development departmenr. cc: Tim Simrau (FAX 925-6437) 996.68 2 ...... I - e.?, . C - I 172 . I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council *01Â·Â·-1, 'L/, , N THRU: Amy Margerum, City Manage~1> GE'*p t FROM: Dave Michaelson, Deputy Director DATE: April 22, 1996 RE: Second Reading, Ordinance 11, Series of 1996 - Victorians at Bleeker Affordable Housing Project - Rezoning to AHI/PUD, Conceptual and Final PUD, GMQS Exemption SIJMMARY: The "Victorians ar Bleeker" is a proposed affordable housing project located at the southeast corner of Bleeker and Garmisch Streets. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing four-plex and replace ir with 2 free market units, 2 resident occupied (RO) units. 2 Category 4 srudios, and 1 Category 4 1-bedroom unit. The free market and RO units are locared on the primary building fronting on Bleeker. and the three AH units are locared above a single snucture fronring the alley. which includes four garages. A project summary. vicinity map, existing improvement survey, adjacent land use map. and proposed size plan and elevations are attached as Exhibit A. Ordinance 55, Series of 1995 esablishing the requiremenrs and review criteria for the A.Hi/PUD zone district are attached as Edibir B. A color schemaric of the Bleeker Streer eievation was provided with the March 25,1996 staff memorandum. .APPLICANT: Larry Salirerman, represented by Tim Semrau, Semrau Building and Design LOCATION/ZONING: Lots A and B, Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen (101 E. Bleeker Street). The parcel is approximately 6.600 square feet. including a portion of a vacared allet The property is currently zoned R-6. The alley accounts for 600 s.f. (10 x 60'), reducing the lot area to 6,000 s.f. for the purposes of allowable FAR. SURROIINDING NEIGHBORHOOD: The proposed lot is surrounded by commercial uses including the U.S. West facility to the east, Design Workshop and the Medical Building to the south and east. The Hotel Aspen is located on the WeSI side of Garmisch, the Yellow Brick School on the northwest corner of B[eeker and Garmisch, and residential uses are located opposite the project on the north side of Bleeker. An adjacent land use map is included within in Exhibit A. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conceptual and Final PUD approval and a rezoning to AH1/PUD, based on the AHI/PUD amendments recently adopted by Council (ses AHLIPUD zone text as Exhibit B). A summary sheet of development information (uniI/bedroom mix, 1 4 . - ' . Maximum distance between buildings = N/A Maximum Height = 23' (1/3 up rake) Front Yard Setback = 10' from Bleeker, 15' to front facade Side Setback = 5' Rear setback = 11' For comparative purposes, the R-6 zone district, located to the north and east, requires a 10' front and rear setback, and a side yard of 5'. The LP zone district to the west (across Garmisch) has the same requirements. The Office zone to the south requires a front setback of 10', side yard of 5', and a rear yard of 15'. The proposed dimensional requirements for the project do not represenI a radical deparrure from the requirements of adjacent properties. 8. Of-street pcoÂ·king. The number of of-street parking spaces may be varied from that required in the underlying zone district based on thefollowing considerarions: a. Tne probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development. b. The parking need of cmy nonresidential units. c. The varying rime periods of use, wnenever joint use of common parking is proposed. d. The availability of public rransit and other [ransporm:lon yaculnes, including those for pedesrrian access a,ld/or the Commitment to Utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. e. The proximiry of rhe proposed development to the commercial core or public recreational facilities in the city. Response: The off-street parking standards are established by Special Review: with the maximum number of parking spaces to be required nor :O exceed 2 spaces per dwelling unit for free marker units. Parking spaces for affordable units shall nor exceed 1 space per bedroom or 2 spaces per dwelling unit. whichever is less. Based on this standard. required parking for the two 2-bedroom free marker units would require a maximum of 4 spaces, the two 3-bedroom RO units would require a maximum of 4 spaces, and the three AH units @wo studios and one 1- - bedroom) wouid require a maximum of o spaces. Total parking based on the standards within the A.Hl/PUD zone district wouid therefore allow a maximum of 11 off-street spaces. The proposal provides a single car zara2.e for each of the free market and RO units, and 2 - W uncovered spaces are provided east and west of the garages, for a total of 6 off-street spaces accessing off the alley from Garmisch. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to Council that additional parking spaces be satisfied using the Residential Permit parking program with is currently in effect on the portion of Garmisch adjacent to the project. The Residential Permit allows an applicant to purchase a permit with proof that the vehicle is in compliance with the Pirkin Counry clean air program. and proof of residency in the applicable residenrial parking zone. There is precedence for such a waiver, specifically the West Hopkins Project (based on a conversation with Dave Tolen). Parking associated with this project was allowed on-street using the residential parking program. 8 The conversion of the existing on-street parking to a parallel configuration would still allow for 5 spaces: in the 85 feet within the public right-of-way, allowing for a 15' clear zone at the intersection with Bleeker Street. In addition, parallel parking is a safer configuration from an engineering perspective, and provides a transition to the residential uses that continue north from the alley. There are currently no off-street parking available for the existing multi-family unit, and residents utilize the head-in parking located within the existing ROW. In addition, the project is located in close proximity to transit the central core, and recreational facilities. AH units typically generate less demand for vehicles than commercial or free-market residential uses. The additional area between the ne~-21150.2 _cgnfiguration should be landscang, and a... . .~ ltBEWalfinstalled along the Garmisch fronage.O proGide a buffer between the travel lanes and 1 0'~M~ng.*The applicant hal agreed toparticipate in the landscaping between the west lot line and the Garmisch right-of-way. All striping and signing within the right-of-way would be the obligation of the City. The sidewalk installation on both street frontages would the responsibiiity of the applicant. A schematic of the exiszing and proposed configuration is shown on the following page. 9. Open Space. The Open Space requirement shall be that of the underiving zone district. However. a variarion in minimum open space may be permitted if such variation would not be derrimental to the character of the proposed PUD, and if the proposed development shall include open space .,?or the mutual benefr of all development in the proposed PUD through a common Dark Or recreation <27'942. Response: There is no open space requirement in the R-6 distric:, and the A.Hl/PUD zone disrric[ does not establish an open space requirement. Based on the current definition of Open Space, the ske plan depics approximately 30 percent open space, Staff finds thar this is appropriate for both the site and the surrounding neighborhood. 10. Landscape Picm. There shall be a approved as parr of rhe final development plan a landscape plan. which exhibits a well designazed trearmenI of enerior suaces. Ir shall provide I an ample quandry and variery of ornamental plant species that are regarded as suitable for the Aspen area climate. Response: The Parks Departmenr has reviewed the project: and Planning staff has incorporated these suggestions in the proposed conditions of approval. 11. Architectural Site Plan. There shall be approved as part of the final development picm an architectural sle plan, which ensures architecruial consistency with the proposed development, circhirectural characrer, building design, and the preservation of the visual cr.aracter of the C iry. 9 521.2 Z.. . . Existing Parking Configuration Bleeker St 3-1 :Existing Lot i; 4- :7-#Z- ExisEr . Â·Â·i... ,-Â·E.g,Ve-.Â·3.-2 fÂ·* 37;-4 3' r .... 15.....3,2-fÂ·.Â·:.Â·Â·1Â·./1.- Â·e Parking 72: 6.11 - ..il.14: 42* Uf--Â·03943Â· 1.Â· 3.*SE*Vtli>f)(: 1 ...4*.:.'44.?5.-IÂ·~7 4 ) 15' to edge of Pavement Proposed Parking Configuration Ble.ker St. 4.Â·F. Â·91-7Â·9.--;Â·32*7.9.Elp-22 Parallel Parking ~ 96Â»r--Â·=Lv.Â·*b*43 1 4-./ i: E-I- - I &26/*EALÂ·,24Â·5Â·Â·~' 2.-4/2/ '7321*jgi'Fillit>-4. 559.Â©42*1.- ~ .1<.,~ 2â‚¬ --44Â£-49:-f,1:m 7/*213*142'691*424 <IVE-al.- I:/I .#- -i-r..I-'--* aijait.394?Fl.:STAti~Â« :-:.:1Â· it.â‚¬' <-t?;1-22>. 2 1-4.:9 7>64 -23; e 413â‚¬,Â·96&:}â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬1*40*b?Â·224&*,3â‚¬ 6- -4..,*~~I-*.2 5-,-4:-~~1*-94; .9,1 -itz.,u. 1-:Â«CE.132116~.flÂ«â‚¬ -2/941 2,=204*241':1:41 9.2.1.9,1 4,6.23.56...=*02,.7. '21"= '034.4.490â‚¬Â·fSEArd-Â·412 Landscaping ~ - Sidewalk 12 to eage or Davement - I Response: The proposed elevations (Exhibit A) depict a two-story' Victorian design wirh a wrap- around front porch on the Bleeker meade. The Garmisch facade also includes a first-storv wrap- . around porch design, with second-sTOry porches for all four units. The provision oi first- and second-story porches and the proposed entry configurarion are an appropriate design zo encouraize - inreraction with both streets, and is consistent with the intent of Ordinance 30. In comoarison to the existing structure, the proposed archirec-tural size plan is superior and enhances the visual character of the neighborhood. Lighrine, AH lighting shall be arranged so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous I $ interference of any kind co adjoining srreers or lands. Response: The applicant proposes a single 60 watt Victorian fixture at each front door and exterior smirwell. No additional exterior lighting is proposed. 13. Clusrerine. Clustering of Dwelling Units is encouraged. 10 - 51' 1,/ -*..... - 4 - â‚¬.4 21 ; . t. 1 - ... Â»7 ./ty, rep' /1. P. - 4 h , 1.,4 .4 1,1., + 'G *- . --,lili -1 j n ~ Â·k , P..4 I .,71. ,= -- 1 0 -' 77/ I. - .r... - 5,2.4 4,"p~; 7,5 ~L~I.~q~f-~leÂ£ . 4...Ly,k /.-4*2ijES:%0*ZE:*Di,Â£2"F Â·- Â·, --' i. 416'44244431 - 7- 4, .1 4,1....=350=te-0.=/a 7 - 4 In 9 -I-/ ' -. b..14 ' - i / .&./. -0.h I.-Il 5 42* â‚¬=R -- -- - V -IM- - 3,7167--intliftN~FF#319511. ~05~~~r.6~ - Â·. '------- z------priz:il,<tz.jit;2~ Â» $ t, 2%Â· .- - . 11.... 1 .- â€¢ p.Â· Â· -6....-,. ....r #22 ~ EUL- 0 m16**Â£~t~& ~Â«9-' b<71*Ne~ps,41 -15-Â©â€¢-- 2 .... . *-<22/Z#t Â· - =r-- -*-7-N- - - . -- t . I / 24Â·3!/ :Pt' 8 - . 4 ., En_Â¥ -3:.*-- .....= ..1 - .... -1-04.. 44 :..Â£"~l,e..... A..41 - . V. 4, . - . 4. .. --- - - - ..4 Â£ r idtil,2.-.2-1..:L.:UkÂ·9 I , 24 : 2 L â‚¬ 1 -54 . 1- .... 7."%" mi F '1. 9 1 f - , .1*11. , ... I. -- -4.k.-4444. ."Â·*.1, I . -. A'4*,V--.4 . Â·Â·21 .---.. ,~,~1*~~28 ~'~ ' \ 24 \ / /4 343/ - 713\7. - --trfalia i 40\ i j 6\1 9* \ *. I.14 \~33 N H **23 t.qÂ·1:Â·43 069O~L~i[*>7412':(~i6~1;~~~*~-it =t #. *--.- re Â»9=29 - -reb\26 C 9\41 4)07-500 06 43.-3 , i L..2' . W.I UPL i. 1 ..2-1 Q C. i -10.. i\An Â¥ 1, I 1 . I - .... -- - - . . %-Illms> 2-/--1 ./ 1-4- il Y.-- 2- UDD-r T ----=ts-,-1 SE L=~ 1-24- ... /+ C-,-fiTy -- -.....1 .Â»4 - 3&24.-<22---= e.-2-- - -97*16 - ,Â·- " - - 1- .I-:m-:523~kihi; Mt;42),li--- .- 34 G-_t -4 92 Xby ib\':Effeit:...- g'>,01 9\ \3&-\el // \ 04Â¥A \1 -7/1 , 4,40:4 c 7 f-- t, 9 Â¥ ' 0 -t \ '1 47\ 1 46 \*th) 0es'deak /2 \ 4\Â»2 ,/ - \\- 0 - /AX \ ~-c--1.x-i , 1- ~ \ *-L 4\34*\ e- El 73 FÂ·'Ah 81...!t~t,13:Fir-\EOX Â»\ t------ 1%,X=r.t-- 4.. â‚¬1~:.l iÂ·''El(i~Â·~ Â·Â·.2, ~3,Â·=*94>'6: 70 050 27** HNN N- 29 2 9-- - 4. r- 4. 3 tkiqu D / A -1./\ CU o rip(1 -<flÂ· . - - ./3 \ Â»6 74 \2/ 4 \Â« kÂ©=..=71 N /.1 ' Â·Â· 2 - I. n " * al/1/6 - 1.-------2--11--4 / *../44.*1611778.*- . * -9-1...... - Â· .47- pq \-Â»03 4. (f K u Q co thF ./.- 62 % 332 3 0,1 44% i u a ir \ \, \ \ 90 f K ' DD o r 0 ,7 \ 14 ,# ( ft V,x, 1 9 A-M \45 N N N *:*,2. g 91Â·,1.Â·iÂ· Â£ 4 d81 - f 4 ~ 1 nÂ· . L / - -*.-//0.-1 1. -,-Â£.11~ , * Lp//1 7 3-/21-0-9 A ..1. 1 4 0- ee, .*-1. 2-ki>-' - -...../. +I - 44 - /'L â€¢ *i. . .it .r Â· -- I - 20 4* â€¢ - - '~'d~r'I ' :1 - Â¥r :.>f /0-30 1 99\ X.br K Fflc,7 4-/4 \ UL \3373 At:=3 1,01 -/ 9 (95\9=,Tr ~40\ 74\5= , Â£ 4 -'\01 2 ' f-N=/ 2. 16Â«/ 1 , to 0'7 r\\ \\Â»// 1 \: 3> X ~~f ! 9Â·'.c; PAK SUn CHt-Â· Ft..1,:Â·< --I- .4 \7.:2*- . 1<... f ' 1~ .: 1 78 E-Â· 0 .i' 124 >690 048 2 7 0: :4: tÂ·.! tÂ·i 1Â·Â·1 N-OR ..:' -- - 7 3.1= 1 1/ /9 /41\ . 6,11 7\ 'ME-~~L O ~~27 9 ->frti 4 10-1 1 \. /51* \01 re. \ 1- \ r P \A f \ .-/ - , I - 1.4 \ -:2,23,:a:Â·9,91?2/3-,-- Â«1~-:~-*Alt2 1544434%26&:.47. 1....1/..4*4.2Â§N~)0~3*&64 L 7/.1964)4718 1:4 - .-42%9014*Wirt?*t~C'iÂ¢.â€ž+I .'4 2:-' 4&,0,1-'vidi< I itte-Â·14 j.-1 - 22 /- .9.14Â¥%Â¥ty.,79,4 '41<* . , --- f~.a~~/~ ..ai. hz, . M. 1 . . . ...3 - M / 3,=hâ€žAft / 1 -- ----Â·- --2 -A 1 1 4. r A C, A . 24----&-r;10 7 1.4 3 1 -. 4 - ; , ....-~ - 1 0- . 1 -- \â‚¬34 3 1 194 . W 62_ - 1.9./ V, / :Aus\> ~ tx.- 0 - -11 .- /20 , 444 7 1 14-1 2 \ \> 442- 1 -vvf / -h# -- -- \/ ?314*-_ I 4 r. N ::Â· iÂ·:.. - Â·f'3Â·.CEiftnt'N V 1. ~'74<0 9, \.~1.--'' , '/ 4 ~ : ' , arre_,1 1 . 1-14,7 1 . --I- <- .48, .-1 \ '12 ... - 4 / \~ i il - * 1 9. \ 0, 4/ CK q \- .1 . 44 \9~ 1, -- 6,1 2\ I 2 \ Rot, 1 96.19*A â‚¬\15.- \*AC / *7<*.1* A 141 f i 2 +Ackhoi + r -r '-*Sij" 4lA f, '60 *u i inA 7 2 2-4,1 -=-\> 1/19 10 ' 1 4 L *\Â«/.- r - /4 1 , . 1: f-f~ Kid'~71Â·.. I'l#*~mi . 1../.. + .24 /..Rk, 58/US,/2/Fliw.0'L,/* *FRO/*4/li .iN"'9* -i.wk# :CZ;*~#2-412799: . 1,4~ u ...2 - -*.f#,5 t.*m '-6 +Al~ . I. r= .7/grE/112/W/81 59/*4 : *'*1 - - U '*A - 1 4 ...4~-Il/*..1 - * ./ ..1:47 j i : t 4 . 149* i. - - ' ir 2 f kipi*43* 1% - -31 10 6 - 0 - - 2 Â· 'f, i - 06- .-p . - --124, 4 . ,$../ - . 6 4 . " 1 . - -- . --- --'........................A - .; -1_ f--.- 14....~ 99 44744 \UL 4\=\\> \21 9. prL Â¢ 45-\01 / \ ./ 49 21 16Â« /0 - 1 7. -n.\ /AL \ , r,449\> /213 1 79\ .,01 2., X<-1.---7 - - 19/3 4\ 24. - â‚¬\14 / 2 \ r .-A_jÂ·i /3Â© 9Â»r '9 3. d-* 9 1 V\. 5 \-r - 5 \4. 961( > 17Â«1//3 44 - - l' 46 --/1\ . \. .EN 9 4. 2 eski b f + -04,1 '<- ~ ttl. C / -37 z .Â· - 193 1 /1 le/Â© 1 N*=/12 -6*vâ‚¬Â¤Â» S e *in K - 641 1 V, I . ,\*Â« RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2001 2/19/01 To: City Council Members ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN} From: Timothy Semrau President-Victorians at Bleeker Homeowner's Association RE; Hotel Aspen Approvals-Pedestrian Right of Way Dear Council Member; Although myself and my fellow owners generally support the Hotel Aspen addition, I ask you to carefully consider as part of the approvals having the Hotel Aspen restore the city right o f way on the west side o f Garmisch street to pedestrian use. Please note the following; -The two blocks of Garmisch street north of Main has been markedly improved for pedestrian use the last few years. When I received approvals for the Victorians at Bleeker project, both engineering and community development required me to eliminate the head in parking on the city right of way and build at my expense a sidewalk and landscape buffer. This has definitely enhanced the pedestrian experience in the neighborhood. (See attached approvals for Victorians at Bleeker). -The park project at the Yellow Brick has also restored sidewalk in the portion of the city right of way on the west side of Garmisch street. -Engineering and community development both request the Hotel Aspen project do the same in the city right of way on their side of the street. -The Hotel Aspen claims there is insufficient parking to lose the few spaces that would be lost if parallel parking was returned to the street. Please note the attached photographs taken at 7 a.m on president's day weekend, presumably a busier time for the hotel. The parking in front of the hotel is not completely full, Bleeker street on the other side o f the hotel is completely empty, and Garmish street farther south is completely enlpty. We are all trying to diminish the stranglehold automobiles have on the city. This is a small opportunity to restore more pedestrian scale to a neighborhood that deserves it. Please follow planning and engineering's recommendations to restore the city right of way to parallel parking, sidewalks, and landscaping in front of the Hotel Aspen. Thank you, Timothy Semrau d,/ . .. t.0 9) Â· - LtÂ·.1 Â·41'.Â· c knÂ·br,. . 2.. .2 -I .: - ........ . '-I...*p .. . .. Jr MEMORANDUM To: Dave Michaelson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth. Engineeing Department (37â‚¬- Date: February 29, 1996 Re: Victorians at Bleeker Rezoning & Conceptual/Final PUD ~ (101 East Bleeker St.; Lots A & B. Block 66. Original Aspen Townsize: Parcel ID No. 2735-124- 38-012) Having reviewed the above referenced applicarion. and having made a site visit the Engineering Department has Ihe following comments: 1. Drainage - The application does nOI discuss SiIe drainage. Storm runoff design mUSI be provided that meets the requirements of Section 26.88.040.C.4* of the Ciry Code. The building permit application musI also indicate storm runoff mitigation during construction so that no runoff enters public righIS-of-way. 2. Utilities - There is an existing urility pedestal which is located in the public right-of-way adjacent ro the parcel. It should be a condiIiOn of approval that the pedesral be relocated onto an easement on the applicant's proper[y at the time of development and thai any new surface UIility needs for pedestals or other equipment be ins-[alled on an easemenr provided by the applicant and not in the public right-of-way. 3. Trash & Utility Area - The sire improvement survey does not indicate the location of the dumpster. The size visit revealed thai the dumpster is in the streer public right-of-way. The development plans do nor indicate the trash srorage area. which must nor be in the public right-of- way. The final development plan must indicate trash SIorage areas which should be indicated as trash and recycle areas. Any trash and recycle areas that include utility meters or other utility equipment must provide that the utility equipment not be blocked by trash and recycle containers. / 4. Access - We have discussed access wirh the applicant. but the conversarion is not reflected in the / application. A vehicle cannot negotiare a ninety degree turn from an eleven foot wide driveway ~ into a garage immediately adjacent ro the driveway. We discussed the necessity of the applicant obraining an access easement from the adjacent property owner. The final development plan must ~~~~~~provide functioning access to the garages. 1 l r J .Â· .. '' 5. Landscaping in the Public Right-of-way - The final development plan must indicate proposed landscaping in the public right-of-way which must conform with City Code as discussed below. 6. Sidewalk. Curb and Gutter - The site is located on the fringe of the West End where the Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway System Plan may not be specific about sidewalks. There is however an existing sidewalk on Bleeker Street at the U.S. West offices and on the west side of Aspen Street. There is also sidewalk in front of the medical building on Gannisch Street. Therefore, sidewalk should be required on both street frontages of this development. This sidewalk Will serve both the future residents of the project as well as pedestrian traffic to the Yellow Brick School and other neighboring properties. Any damaged sections of curb and gutter will be required to be replaced prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7. Street Lights - There is an existing street light mounted on a former wooden utility pole at the comer of Garmisch and Bleeker adjacent to the applicant's properry. It should be a requirement that it be replaced with an anrique street light. 8. Development of Public Right-of-way - City staff will need to discuss this application in the Development Review Committee ro determine how the public ight-of-way adjacent to the development must be reconstructed by the applicant. It may be preferable to remove the exis-ting head-in parking and install parallel parking in order to improve the stree:scape and the neighborhood character. 9. Easements - The final plat must indicare easements of record based on a current tirle policy. The site improvement survey appears [o indicare easements thar migh[ affect site design. 10. Final Plat - The final pia[ must meet the requiremenrs ofthe City Code. 11. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property. we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920-5088) for design of improvemenrs. including landscaping, Within public righrs-of-way. parks deparunent (920-5120) for vegetation species. and sTreeTS deparrment (920-5130) for street and alley cuts. and shall obrain permits for any work or development. inciuding landscaping, witlin pubiic rights-of-way from the city community development department. cc: Tim Simrau (FAX 925-6437) M96.68 2 .. ~--- - . ..... 11-'.. I.: r,~4=X.-- Viic MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Amy Margerum, City Manag u kr FROM: Dave Michaelson, Deputy Director DATE: April 22, 1996 RE: Second Reading, Ordinance 11, Series of 1996 - Victorians at Bleeker Affordable Housing Project - Rezoning to AE[1/PUD, Conceptual and Final PUD, GMQS Exemption SUMMARY: The "Victorians at Bleeker" is a proposed affordable housing project located at the southeast corner of Bleeker and Garmisch Streets. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing four-plex and replace ir with 2 free market units, 2 resident occupied (RO) units, 2 Category 4 studios, and 1 Category 4 1-bedroom unit. The free market and RO units are located on the primary building fronting on Bleeker, and the three AH uniIs are located above a single structure fronting the alley, which includes four garages. A project summary, vicinity map, existing improvement survey, adjacent land use map, and proposed size plan and elevations are attached as Exhibit A. Ordinance 55, Series of 1995 establishing the requirements and review criteria for the A.Hl/PUD zone district are attached as Exhibit B. A color schematic of the Bleeker Street elevation was provided with the March 25,1996 Staff memorandum. APPLICANT: Larry Saliterman, represented by Tim Semrau, Semrau Building and Design LOCATION/ZONING: Lots A and B, Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen (101 E. Bleeker Street). Tne parcel is approximately 6.600 square feet, including a portion of a vacated alley. The property is currently zoned R-6. The alley accounts for 600 s.f. (10'x 60'), reducing the lot area to 6,000 s.f. for the purposes of allowable FAR. SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: The proposed lot is surrounded by commercial uses including the U.S. West facility to the east, Design Workshop and the Medical Building to the south and east. The Hotel Aspen is located on the west side of Garmisch, the Yellow Brick School on the northwest corner of Bleeker and Garmisch, and residential uses are located opposite the project on the north side of Bleeker. An adjacent land use map is included within in Exhibit A. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conceptual and Final PUD approval and a rezoning to AH1/PUD, based on the AH1/PUD amendments recently adopted by Council (ses AHI/PUD zone text as Exhibit B). A summary sheet of development information (unit/bedroom mix, 1 Maximum distance between buildings = N/A Maximum Height = 23' (1/3 up rake) Front Yard Setback = 10' from Bleeker, 15' to front facade Side Setback = 5' Rear setback = 11' For comparative purposes, the R-6 zone district, located to the north and east, requires a 10' front and rear setback, and a side yard of 5'. The LP zone district to the west (across Garmisch) has the same requirements. The Office zone to the south requires a front setback of 10', side yard of 5', and a rear yard of 15' The proposed dimensional requirements for the project do not represent a radical departure from the requirements of adjacent properties. 8. 05-street parking. The number of off-street parking spaces may be varied from that required in the underlying zone district based on the following considerations: a. The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development. b. The parking need of cmy nonresidenzial units. c. The varying time periods Of use, whenever joint use of common parking ts proposed. d. The availability Of public transit and other transportation facilities. including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment zo utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. e. The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core or public recreational facilities in the city. Response: The off-street parking standards are established by Special Review, with the maximum number of parking spaces to be required not to exceed 2 spaces per dwelling unit for free marker units. Parking spaces for affordable units shall not exceed 1 space per bedroom or 2 spaces per dweiling unit. whichever is less. Based on this standard, required parking for the two 2-bedroom free market units would require a maximum of 4 spaces, the two 3-bedroom RO units would require a maximum of 4 spaces, and the three AH units (two studios and one 1 - bedroom) would require a maximum of 3 spaces. Total parking based on the SIandards within the AlÂ·Il/PUD zone district would therefore allow a maximum of 11 off-street spaces. The proposal provides a single car garage for each of the free market and RO units, and 2 uncovered spaces are provided eaSt and west of the garages, for a total of 6 off-street spaces accessing off the alley from Garmisch. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to Council that additional parking spaces be satisfied using the Residential Permit parking program with is currently in effect on the portion of Garmisch adjacent to the project. The Residential Permit allows an applicant to purchase a permit with proof that the vehicle is in compliance with the Pitkin County clean air program, and proof of residency in the applicable residential parking zone. There is precedence for such a waiver, specifically the West Hopkins Project (based on a conversation with Dave Tolen). Parking associated with this project was allowed on-street using the residential parking program. 8 . The conversion of the existing on-street parking to a parallel configuration would still allow for 5 spaces- in the 85 feet within the public right-of-way, allowing for a 15' clear zone at the intersection with Bleeker Street. In addition, parallel parking is a safer configuration from an engineering perspective, and provides a transition to tile residential uses that continue north from the alley. There are currently no off-street parking available for the existing multi-family unit, and residents utilize the head-in parking located within the existing ROW. In addition, the project is located in close proximity to transit, the central core, and recreational facilities. AH units typically generate less demand for vehicles than commercial or free-market residential uses. The additional area between the new parking configuration should be landscaped, and a sidewalk installed along the Garmisch frontage to provide a buffer between the travel lanes and parking. ' The applicant has agreed to participate in the landscaping between the west lot line and the Garmisch right-of-way. All striping and signing within the right-of-way would be the obligation of the City. The sidewalk installation on both street frontages would the responsibility of the applicant. A schematic of the existing and proposed configuration is shown on the following page. 9. Open Space. The Open Space requirement shall be that of the underlying zone district. However, a variation in minimum open space may be permitted if such variation would not be detrimental to the character of the proposed PUD, and if the proposed development shall include open space for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD through a common park or recreation area. Response: There is no open space requirement in the R-6 district, and the AlÂ·Il/PUD zone district does not establish an open space requirement. Based on the current definition of Open Space, the size plan depicts approximately 30 percent open space. Staff finds that this is appropriate for both the site and the surrounding neighborhood. 10. Landscape Plan. There shall be a approved as part of the final development plan a landscape plan, which exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces. It shall provide an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species that are regarded as suitable for the Aspen area climate. Response: The Parks Department has reviewed the project, and Planning staff has incorporated these suggestions in the proposed conditions of approval. 11. Architectural Site Plan. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural site plan, which ensures architectural consistency with the proposed development, architectural character, building design, and the preservation of the visual character of the City. 9 . , I Existing Parking Configuration Bleeker St. f.":::Existing k P.ta:. 74#my'.. +-:1 . .i<314Â¥12: . 3Â·Â·.2-' f.*25: ....<W:.7 92%Â»1*44 0 -* Â·..;74'/5/AvÂ·*Â·tÂ·~+43' Exisfint 5.1'.~*192* ~..9:1*ytf' 499â‚¬'I~*R<-6/4.%-~%* * . Parking 7%~â‚¬2Â·yÂ¥.e:j 0Â·*3Â·9:.611. ifl~(t: ir:. 323)>3.%?.43:~12~#22 * ~920 4.i.31*3*4%9''I tÂ¢614<422%%*h 4%,0&12*t 1:%43(4805#4&*1'imil"+YE, j.,4*-Aip.:5 .fle" 24:Â»d:~&3:,- +E"* 15' to edge of Pavement Proposed Parking Configuration Bleeker St. : .- .4-. ADLY<.f.,i>.4 .4:1Â·r..19Â»0>9.-92: Parallel Parking ~ 34#91221Â£Ek. =4Â«.Mic..:-ina Lot- E ..... /ned/ALZn 744$.21' -324. L.-*t= 2.-I:>6 â€¢ - 7949%0282:02*%0 0,4.g,9..1.-Ce-U..6.1/*â‚¬44'f.LIL-, :/ Â· /1 i*Â»2â‚¬Â»,21, .t.*21Â»-L#tit NÂ»,8.Z=Na*TÂ»% 163Â£**2+Â·PE.../~/:I/'la- Â· ~ ~*9"*ta-#4 Landscaping ~ Sidewalk 1 1 to edge of pavement Response: The proposed elevations (Exhibit A) depict a tWo-story' Victorian design with a wrap- around front porch on the Bleeker facade. The Garmisch facade also includes a first-story wrap- around porch design. with second-story porches for all four UnitS. The provision of first- and second-story porches and the proposed entry configurarion are an appropriate design to encourage interaction with both streets. and is consistent with the intent of Ordinance 30. In comparison to the existing structure. the proposed architectural size plan is superior and enhances the visual character of the neighborhood. 12. Lighting, All lighting shall be arranged so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining SIreets or lands. Response: The applicant proposes a single 60 watt Victorian fixture at each front door and exterior stairwell. No additional exterior lighting is proposed. 13. Clustering. Clustering of Dwelling Units is encouraged. 10 $3* :.A:6'Â·: +A~*~441~: R~;>3~itit 6, 2,>2 vul a- MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Steve Barwick, City Manager John Worcester, City Attorney Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director 040 FROM: Chris Bendon, Senior Planner ~ RE: Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Develoument (PUD) First Reading of Ordinance No.~ , Series of 2001. DATE: February 26,2001 The Hotel Aspen Condominium Association is requesting approval for a Minor PUD and LP program expansion to construct eight (8) additional lodge rooms and two ( 2) additional affordable housing units. The project is in the Main Street Historic District and has received Conceptual approval from the HPC. GMQS Allotments for the LP Program have been granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Seven of the eight lodge units are one-bedroom units of approximately 285-450 square feet. The eighth lodge unit is a suite of approximately 700 square feet. The two proposed affordable housing units are one-bedroom units of approximately 490 square feet. The new- affordable housing units are required to be deed restricted to Category 2. The Minor PUD process requires adoption of an Ordinance by the City Council after a recommendation from the Commission is forwarded. This applicant is requesting dimensional requirements be established for the parcel and staff is in support o f the proposed PUD. The P&Z recommended approval of this PUD request by a 4-0 vote. Staff has highlighted four Main Issues for this review below. Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. ~ , Series of 2001, upon first reading. 1MAIN ISSUES: Affordable Housing: The application is proposing 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. There are no codified formulas for determining employee generation for lodge units and staff typically requests lodge operators submit their existing staff totals and an estimate of the expected staffing needs after the expansion. 1 . The Hotel currently staffs 12.14 FTE's, or approximately .27 FTE's per lodge room. This is consistent with an analysis of small lodge employee generation produced by the Planning Department. The proposed employee housing provides housing for 3.5 employees, according to the Housing Guidelines. Using the .27 figure, this housing mitigates for 162% of the employees generated, significantly more affordable housing than the 60% requirement. The Housing Office and the Planning Department support the proposed employee mitigation. The P&Z approved this mitigation and granted the affordable housing allotments for this project. Garmisch Street: The existing head-in parking along Garmisch Street is entirely within the public right- of-way and no encroachment license exists between the City and the Hotel. This parking is available to the general public and is not posted as private parking for guests. The Hotel is mitigating their additional parking needs on-site and no other changes are affecting this head-in parking. The City Engineer's preference is for redeveloping the parking in a parallel configuration with a wide planting strip. After discussing the above points with the applicant. the City Engineer is not requiring a reconfiguration and the applicant is not proposing any changes. Staff does believe, however, there are aesthetic benefits to converting this parking to parallel and is recommending this be accomplished by the applicant. A generous planting strip along this street with street trees and a detached sidewalk would improve the pedestrian experience and provide for proper snow storage. This change, however. must be balanced with the impacts of reducing the amount of public parking in the area and spaces traditionally available to hotel guests. There are currently 21 parking spaces in the head-in area. Developing this as parallel parking would reduce this to 9 or 10 spaces. Concerns about the aesthetics of this head-in parking and the benefit of converting this parking to parallel have been raised by neighbors. Please see attached letter from Tim Semrau, President of Victorians at Bleeker homeowners association. The P&Z did not suggest any modification to the existing parking configuration. Staff will present a few options during the first reading to determine if further analysis is needed. The City Engineer will also be present during the meeting to address specific questions. Loading Zone: The applicant has proposed an area for shuttles, taxis, etc. to load visitors along Main Street in a new pull-out area. This area is currently signed as a loading zone with no pull-out area. The City Engineer believes the additional pull-out area will address safety concerns and supports the concept. Staff believes the loading area will be a significant improvement and necessary for the daily operation of the lodge. 2 Iii however, the applicant redevelops the Garmisch Street parking, a better location for the loading area could easily be accommodated and still serve the intended function. On-Site Parking: The Hotel Aspen currently has a shortage of parking according to the prescribed requirement ofthe Land Use Code. This parking situation, however, has been managed well and vacant parking spaces can be found during the winter season. Under the LP Ordinance, the existing parking deficit can be carried forward and it is only the new units that are subject to new parking space requirements. The proposed expansion requires 7.6 spaces and the applicant is proposing 8 new parking spaces on site. In addition, the applicant is proposing a series o f parking management techniques to lessen the impact o f the reduced parking ratio including marketing, taxi vouchers. and provision of free bicycles. Staff has included these techniques in the proposed Ordinance. In addition. the Ordinance requires two spaces be signed for residents o f the affordable housing units, a request by the Housing Authority. APPLICANT: Hotel Aspen Condominium Association; Robert Morris. Manager. Represented by Herb Klein. Esq., Attorney, and Augie Reno. Architect. LOCATION: 110 West Main Street. ZONING: South half (Main Street) Office-Lodge Preservation Overlay (O-LP). North half (Bleeker) Medium Residential-Lodge Preservation Overlay (R6-LP) LOT SIZE: 26.891 square feet. LOT AREA (FOR PURPOSES OF FAR CALCULATION): 26,891 square feet. FAR: Allowable -- The parcel lies in two zone districts and the FAR for the lodge use shall be calculated for the portion of the parcel lying in the office zone. 10,125 square feet Existing -- .882:1 = 23,722 square feet. Proposed -- 1.09:1 = 29,237 square feet. 3 . CURRENT LAND USE: Lodge. 45 rooms. 45 bedrooms. Two registered employee units. 10 on-site parking spaces with 21 head-in spaces adjacent to property. PROPOSED LAND USE: Lodge. 53 rooms, 53 bedrooms (addition of 8 lodge rooms). Four employee units (addition of two). 18 on-site parking spaces (addition of 8 spaces) with 21 head-in spaces adjacent toÂ·property PREVIOUS ACTION: The project is within the Historic District and has received Conceptual approval from the HPC. Final HPC approval is necessary. The P&Z reviewed this application and granted the Lodge Preservation aIlotments for the lodge and affordable housing units. The P&Z recommended approval o f the PUD to City Council. City Council has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Minor PUD. At a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council shall approve. approve with conditions. or deny the application. after reviewing a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Community Development Director. BACKGROUND: The Hotel Aspen is in the Main Street Historic District and the project has received conceptual approval from the HPC. The project must still receive final approval from the HPC after the PUD is established. A recent newspaper article reported the applicant requesting a higher number of lodge and affordable housing units. The application has been amended (at the applicant' s direction, not at staff' s request) to the 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. STAFF COMMENTS: The LP Program seeks to maintain and bolster the quality small lodge experience that differentiates Aspen from other resort communities and the character of dispersed lodges in the town's neighborhoods. In staffs opinion, after aiding the elected and appointed officials in the adoption of the LP Program. this project meets the spirit and intent of the Program and promotes the goals of the AACP. In fact, this project represents what staff envisioned as a product the LP Program. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A letter from Tim Semrau is attached as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit L. 4 . RECOMMENDATION: 0 Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. / , Series of 2001, upon first reading and schedule the second reading and public hearing for March 12th. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance No. ~~ , Series of 2001, upon first reading. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Tim Semrau Letter Exhibit C -- Development Application 5 ORDINANCE NO. ~ (SERIES OF 2001) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING THE HOTEL ASPEN MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 110 WEST MAIN STREET, LOTS F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 58, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Hotel Aspen Condominium Association. owner of the Hotel Aspen Lodge located at 110 West Main Street, Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R. and S. Block 58. City and Townsite of Aspen. for a Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate eight (8) new lodge rooms and two (2) new affordable housing units to be contained within an addition to the existing Hotel Aspen: and. WHEREAS, the Hotel Aspen is located in the Office (O) and Medium Density Residential Zone Districts with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070 (M) of the Land Use Code. the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may exempt the development of properties in the LP Overlay Zone District to provide additional lodge units and additional affordable housing units from the scoring and competition procedure of growth management at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of said section: and. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, dimensional requirements of properties located in the LP Overlay Zone District may be established through the PUD review process; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code. the City Council may approve a PUD final development plan during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing. comments from the general public. a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. the City Water Department, City Engineering. City Parks Department. the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department. the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, and the Community Development Department reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November. 7. 2000, continued to December 5, 2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, the growth management allotment eight (8) lodge units and two (2) affordable housing units to be included in the Hotel Aspen expansion; and, Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 1 . I WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5, 2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, that the Aspen City Council approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions contained herein; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation o f the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies. and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing: and. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions. is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health. safety. and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development. consisting of an eight (8) lodge unit and two (2) affordable housing unit addition to the existing lodge. is approved subject to the conditions of approval described hereinafter. Section 2: The Official Zone District Map of the City of Aspen shall be. and is hereby. amended by the Community Development Director to reflect Lots F, G, H, I. P, Q. R. and S. Block 58. City and Townsite of Aspen. as assigned with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay. Section 3: Conditions o f Approval: 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval by City Council and shall include the following: a) The approved dimensional requirements for the property in a tabular format. b) The information required in Section 26.445.070(C). c) A parking management plan that details the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle programs that will be implemented by the hotel operator. Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 2 , 2. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days ofthe final approval granted by City Council and shall include: a) A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and showing easements. encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for any physical improvements within City rights-of-way, and location of utility pedestals. If any utility mains are to be relocated, those new locations must be shown. If any utility mains exist in the vacated alley, easements shall be granted if not already established. b) An illustrative site plan ofthe project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the approved dimensional requirements in a tabular format. c) A drawing representing the project's architectural character. d) A lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the City Lighting Regulations. e) A geometric design o f the Main Street loading pull-out area with a signature line for the City Engineer. f) A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer maintaining drainage and sediment on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required. a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. 3. Prior to application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department the applicant shall: 1 \ a) Record the PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans. ~ JVA~'~A 1,\ #,r b) Gain final approval from the Historic preservation Commission~ ga-\ Vt 'cÂ·Â£ c) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to Category 2. or lower. with . \ the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. 121â‚¬ C 4-0 -twA\Â» 60&14 \ U d) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to employees o f Hotel Aspen, or its successors or assigns. e) Review a PM10 mitigation plan with the City Environmental Health Department. 4. The building permit application shall include: a) A copy of the final PUD Ordinance, recorded PUD Agreement. and the applicable HPC approval documents. b) The conditions of approval placed on the project by for Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and the Historic Preservation Commission approvals printed on the cover page o f the building permit set. c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 3 d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department. e) A completed agreement to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights-of-way. f) Construction drawings for improvements to the Main Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. g) An encroachment license for the parking area within the Bleeker Street right- of-way for approval by the City Engineer. This encroachment may also require a lease agreement with the City. h) Encroachment licenses for existing unlicensed improvements in public right- of-way. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b) All tap fees. impacts fees. and building permit fees shall be paid. 6. The applicant shall encourage visitors to not rent a car when staying at the Hotel Aspen through marketing information. supply free taxi vouchers to guests. and the free use of bicycles to guests. The Hotel manager shall use day parking passes available through the City Parking Department for off-site guest parking. The details of this ongoing obligation shall be included in the PUD agreement. 7. Two parking spaces shalI be made available and signed for the employee units. 8. All construction vehicles. materials. and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-o f-way unless specifically approved by the Director o f the Streets Department. All vehicle parking. including contractors and their employees'. shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation o f the area unless an exemption is granted by the Parking Department. The applicant shall inform the contractor o f this condition. 9. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. with no construction activity on Sundays. 10. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion for the employee units. a member of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall inspect the units to determine if the units comply with the representations made in the application. 11. Before issuance of a building permit. the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. Ordinance No. , Series of 2001 Page 4 . Exhibit A Hotel Aspen LP Expansion STAFF COMMENTS: Minor Planned Unit Development - Section 26.445 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final. or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding: The Lodge Preservation Program was adopted for the specific purpose of preserving smalllodges and aiding in their development and re-development as lodges in response to the 1993 AACP. "The community must find ways to maintain these small lodges and the experience they offer to " our guests. - Commercial/Retail section philosophy statement '93 AACP. Staff believes this project is consistent with and promotes the goals of, the AACP. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The Hotel Aspen is located in a primarily commercial neighborhood with some residential to the north. The LP Overlay Zone District. however, allows these small lodges tocontinue and expand when compatible with the neighborhood. Staff believes the hotel expansion is compatible with the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The development is not expected to adversely affect the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding: The Lodge units may be exempted by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the application is requesting that action be taken. There are sufficient allotments for LP and affordable housing development to accommodate this proposal. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 1 B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for ali properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, watenvays, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Finding: Staff believes the proposed dimensions of this PUD to be appropriate and compatible with the surrounding area. There are no natural hazards or site conditions that make this level of development difficult, unsightly. or undesirable. In fact. this addition will benefit the existing development and help ensure the continued desirability of this lodge. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The HPC has worked with the applicant to reduce the massing of the project and staff believes the results have been positive. The quantity of open space is appropriate for the character of the neighborhood. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding: The existing parking situation is somewhat odd and staff requested an explanation of the existing parking be provided in the application. There are 21 parking spaces serving the existing development that are located in the public right-of-way but serve as de-facto spaces for the hotel. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 2 .. The applicant is proposing additional on-site spaces be developed in the rear of the lot to mitigate for the expansion and mitigation measures to address the existing parking deficit. Staff believes these mitigation measures will work and be a benefit to the project. These have been included in the propose Ordinance. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding: There are no infrastructure capacity issues that would prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions in the development being proposed. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding: There are no known natural hazards or site limitations that prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions to the proposed development based on this standard. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 3 - 4 c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Staff Finding: The addition of the lodge rooms and the provision of affordable housing on-site both promote goals expressed in the AACP. The LP Overlay allows the lodge use in addition to the uses allowed in the Office and R-6 Zone Districts. There is technically no increase in density necessary for the lodge units, only an increase in FAR to accommodate additional units. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PI-ID enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The addition is proposed in a location to preserve the pool and center courtyard area. This placement maintains the visual interest of the property and adds to its identity. This is a feature of many of the lodges of this era and should be encouraged as an appropriate character of the smalllodge experience. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. Staff Finding: This standard has been met. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. Staff Finding: The placement of the addition does not affect the orientation to public streets. The possible redevelopment of the Garmisch Street right-of-way would significantly improve the pedestrian orientation ofthe project. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Staff Finding: There is a new access way proposed from the alleyway. The Fire Marshall reported no present difficulties in servicing this site and requested no additional improvements to the older portion of the building. The new portion will need to be equipped with a sprinkler system and an alarm. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. Staff Finding: The site plan provides a sufficient amount of pedestrian access. The applicant N responsible for demonstrating compliance with accessibility requirements. Staff believes these requirements can be met with the proposed plans. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 4 ' 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding: The City Engineer has requested a drainage plan and report be prepared. accepted, and recorded with the Final PUD Plans. This drainage will need to be accommodated on-site according to a two-year storm frequency design. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding: The interior courtyard surrounds an outdoor pool area and the space has been designed to accommodate that use. This criteria loosely applies because the pool is already developed and is intended to remain. Staff believes this standard has been met. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Staff Finding: The existing landscape of the parcel provides a variety of species in an attractive manner. The addition is proposed in a location where some of this existing vegetation will need to be removed. The remaining portion of the lot. however. will primarily retain the existing vegetation and no additional landscape treatment is being recommended. Staff believes this criteria has been met with the landscape plan suggested in the application. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The swimming pool is probably the only site feature that falls under this criteria. This outdoor pool does provide some uniqueness to this lodge and is being preserved with this proposal. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding: Staff does not foresee any significant existing vegetation that will need to be protected from construction activities. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City Hotel Aspen Comments Page 5 I I while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. Staff Finding: The architecture proposed for the addition is in the same style as the existing building and is appropriate. The HPC has granted the project conceptual approval. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. Staff Finding: This standard is somewhat difficult to achieve on additions to existing buildings. To the extent practical, the applicant has oriented the structure in a manner conducive to solar heating and the mechanical system of the existing building will serve the new addition. Staff believes this standard has been met. to the extent practical. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Staff Finding: The roof pitches of the proposed additions are flat and will probably not shed snow. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shalI be accomplished: 1. Aillighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibitted for residential development. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 6 ' Staff Finding: The applicant is required to utilize lighting that will be down directional and in compliance with the City's lighting code. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features o f the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. Staff Finding: The courtyard area serves as open space and as a recreation area to the benefit of the property users. This amount, location, and design of this area is beneficial to the overall project and provides a desirable visual relief from the mass of buildings. Staff believes this criteria has been accomplished. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. Staff Finding: The interest in the courtyard area is not proposed to be divided and will remain as a general common element. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential. commercial, or industrial development. Staff Finding: Due to the undivided nature of this courtyard and the nature of this use, staff does not believe there should be required a separate legal instrument to ensure the continued maintenance o f the space. This is primarily due to the fact that the long-term viability o f the hotel will depend upon the visual attractiveness of the courtyard and common grounds. An additional legal instrument requiring the applicant to maintain this space would not serve any significant benefit. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 7 Staff Finding: All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. Staff Finding: The applicant is required to fund his fair share of utility expenses as required. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding: No oversized utility stubs were requested by utility providers for this development and none have been proposed. I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1 &2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. Staff Finding: The structure and all uses on the lot have adequate access to the public street system. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. Staff Finding: The City Engineer has accepted, in concept, the loading area on Main Street. This improvement shall be at the sole cost of the developer. Detailed plans for constructing this improvement will need to be approved by the City Engineer. J. Phasing of Development Plan. Staff Finding: No applicable Hotel Aspen Comments Page 8 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SCORING AND COMPETITION PROCEDURES OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT EIGHT LODGE UNITS AND TWO AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS TO BE LOCATED IN AN ADDITION TO THE HOTEL ASPEN AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE HOTEL ASPEN MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 110 WEST MAIN STREET LOTS F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 58, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 Resolution # 2001-2 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Hotel Aspen Condominium Association, owner of the Hotel Aspen Lodge located at 110 West Main Street, Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen, for a Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate eight (8) new lodge rooms and two (2) new affordable housing units to be contained within an addition to the existing Hotel Aspen; and, WHEREAS, the Hotel Aspen is located in the Office (O) and Medium Density Residential Zone Districts with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070 (M) of the Land Use Code. the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may exempt the development of properties in the LP Overlay Zone District to provide additional lodge units and additional affordable housing units from the scoring and competition procedure of growth management at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of said section; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, dimensional requirements of properties located in the LP Overlay Zone District may be established through the PUD review process; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the City Council may approve a PUD final development plan during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, and the Community Development Department reviewed the P.roject and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7. 2000. continued to December 5,2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a four to zero (4-0) vote. the growth management P&Z Reso 2001-02 Page 1 allotment eight (8) lodge units and two (2) affordable housing units to be included in the Hotel Aspen expansion; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5, 2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, that the Aspen City Council approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Hotel Aspen expansion to include eight lodge units and two affordable housing units is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions, and that the Aspen City Council should approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval by City Council and shall include the following: a) The approved dimensional requirements for the property in a tabular format. b) The information required in Section 26.445.070(C). c) A parking management plan that details the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle programs that will be implemented by the hotel operator. 2. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval granted by City Council and shall include: a) A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and showing easements, encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for any physical improvements within City rights-of-way, and location of utility pedestals. If any utility mains are to be relocated, those new locations must be shown. If any utility mains exist in the vacated alley, easements shall be granted i f not already established. b) An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the approved dimensional requirements in a tabular format. c) A drawing representing the project's architectural character. d) A lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the City Lighting Regulations. e) A geometric design of the Main Street loading pull-out area with a signature line for the City Engineer. f) A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer maintaining drainage and sediment on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation P&Z Reso 2001-02 Page 2 . report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. 3. Prior to application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department the applicant shall: a) Record the PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans. b) Gain final approval from the Historic Preservation Commission. c) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to Category 2, or lower, with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. d) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to employees of Hotel Aspen, or its successors or assigns. e) Review a PM10 mitigation plan with the City Environmental Health Department. 4. The building permit application shall include: a) A copy of the final PUD Ordinance, recorded PUD Agreement, and the applicable HPC approval documents. b) The conditions of approval placed on the project by for Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and the Historic Preservation Commission approvals printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department. e) A completed agreement to j oin any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights-of-way. if) Construction drawings for improvements to the Main Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. g) An encroachment license for the parking area within the Bleeker Street right- of-way for approval by the City Engineer. This encroachment may also require a lease agreement with the City. h) Encroachment licenses for existing unlicensed improvements in public right- of-way. i) Construction drawings for improvements to the Garmisch Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b) All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. P&Z Reso 2001-02 Page 3 . 6. The applicant shall encourage visitors to not rent a car when staying at the Hotel Aspen through marketing information, supply free taxi vouchers to guests, and the free use o f bicycles to guests. The Hotel manager shall use day parking passes available through the City Parking Department for off-site guest parking. The details of this ongoing obligation shall be included in the PUD agreement. 7. Two parking spaces shall be made available and signed for the employee units. 8. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area unless an exemption is granted by the Parking Department. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 9. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. with no construction activity on Sundays. 10. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion for the employee units, a member of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall inspect the units to determine if the units comply with the representations made in the application. 11. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 16,2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C.\home\Chris\CASES\Hotel-Aspen\pz_reso.doc P&Z Reso 2001-02 Page 4 TIE A) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Develo~ment Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director-Â·-JAU FROM: Chris Bendon, Senior Planner d,Wl PROJECT: Hotel Aspen LP Expansion & Minor PUD REQUEST: 8 Lodge Units 2 Affordable Housing Units 8 Additional Parking Spaces PUBLIC HEARING: Yes (continued from Jan. 2, 2001) DATE: January 16, 2001 PROCESS: LP Unit GMQS Exemption: Final at P&Z LP Affordable Housing: Final at P&Z Minor PUD: Recommendation to City Council RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions SUMMARY: The Hotel Aspen Condominium Association is requesting approval for a Minor PUD and LP program expansion to construct eight (8) additional lodge rooms and two (2) additional affordable housing units. The project is in the Main Street Historic District and has received Conceptual approval from the HPC. Allotments for the LP Program are granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Seven ofthe eight lodge units are one-bedroom units of approximately 285-450 square feet. The eighth lodge unit is a suite of approximately 700 square feet. The two proposed affordable housing units are one-bedroom units of approximately 490 square feet. Staff believes these units meet all of the requirements of the LP Program and is recommending the allotments be granted by the P&Z, with conditions. The Aspen Pitkin/County Housing Authority has reviewed the proposed affordable housing and is recommending the allotments be granted by the P&Z, with conditions. The Minor PUD process requires adoption of an Ordinance by the City Council after a recommendation from the Commission is forwarded. This applicant is requesting dimensional requirements compatible with the parcel and the neighborhood and staff is in support ofthe proposed PUD. Staff has highlighted four Main Issues for this review, below. 1 MAIN IssuES: Affordable Housing: The application is proposing 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. There are no codified formulas for determining employee generation for lodge units and staff typically requests lodge operators submit their existing staff totals and an estimate of the expected staffing needs after the expansion. The Hotel currently staffs 12.14 FTE's, or approximately .27 FTE's per lodge room. This is consistent with an analysis of small lodge employee generation produced by the Planning Department. The proposed employee housing provides housing for 3.5 employees, according to the Housing Guidelines. Using the .27 figure, this housing mitigates for 162% of the employees generated, significantly more affordable housing than the 60% requirement. The Housing Office and the Planning Department support the proposed employee mitigation. Garmisch Street: The existing head-in parking along Garmisch Street is entirely within the public right- of-way and no encroachment license exists between the City and the Hotel. This parking is available to the general public and is not posted as private parking for guests. The Hotel is mitigating their additional parking needs on-site and no other changes are affecting this head-in parking. Therefore, the City Engineer is not requiring any improvements to the head-in parking and the applicant is not proposing any changes. Staff does believe, however, there are aesthetic benefits to converting this parking to parallel and is recommending this be accomplished by the applicant. A generous planting strip along this street with street trees and a detached sidewalk would improve the pedestrian experience and provide for proper snow storage. This change, however, must be balanced with the impacts of reducing the amount of public parking in the area and spaces traditionally available to hotel guests. There are currently 21 parking spaces in the head-in area. Developing this as parallel parking would reduce this to 9 or 10 spaces. This request relates to conditions 2g and 4i of the proposed resolution. Loading Zone: The applicant has proposed an area for shuttles, taxis, etc. to load visitors along Main Street in a new pull-out area. This area is currently signed as a loading zone with no pull-out area. The City Engineer believes the additional pull-out area will address safety concerns and supports the concept. Staff believes the loading area will be a significant improvement and necessary for the daily operation of the lodge. If, however, the applicant redevelops the Garmisch Street parking, a better location for the loading area could easily be accommodated and still serve the intended function 2 On-Site Parking: The Hotel Aspen currently has a shortage of parking according to the prescribed requirement of the Land Use Code. This parking situation, however, has been managed well and vacant parking spaces can be found during the winter season. Under the LP Ordinance, the existing parking deficit can be carried forward and it is only the new units that are subject to new parking space requirements. The proposed expansion requires 7.6 spaces and the applicant is proposing 8 new parking spaces on site. In addition, the applicant is proposing a series of parking management techniques to lessen the impact of the reduced parking ratio including marketing, taxi vouchers, and provision of free bicycles. These additional operating techniques are necessary to mitigate the existing parking deficit and allow the lodge to fully realize the benefit of being located adjacent to the downtown. The potential realignment of the Garmisch Street parking will have a certain effect on guest parking, regardless of the general public designation of those existing spaces. Staff has included the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle techniques in the Resolution to lessen impacts of the current parking scenario and to accommodate any future change to the Garmisch Street parking. The Housing Authority has suggested two parking spaces dedicated specifically for the affordable housing units. Staff agrees with this recommendation and has included this as a condition of approval. APPLICANT: Hotel Aspen Condominium Association; Robert Morris, Manager. Represented by Herb Klein, Esq., Attorney, and Augie Reno, Architect. LOCATION: 110 West Main Street. ZONING: South half (Main Street) Office-Lodge Preservation Overlay (O-LP). North half (Bleeker) Medium Residential-Lodge Preservation Overlay (R6-LP) LOT SlzE: 26,891 square feet. LOT AREA (FOR PURPOSES OF FAR CALCULATION): 26,891 square feet. FAR: Allowable -- The parcel lies in two zone districts and the FAR for the lodge use shall be calculated for the portion of the parcel lying in the office zone. 10,125 square feet 3 Existing -- .882:1 - 23,722 square feet. Proposed -- 1.09:1 = 29,237 square feet. CURRENT LAND USE: Lodge. 45 rooms, 45 bedrooms. Two registered employee units. 10 on-site parking spaces with 21 head-in spaces adjacent to property. PROPOSED LAND USE: Lodge. 53 rooms, 53 bedrooms (addition of 8 lodge rooms). Four employee units (addition of two). 18 on-site parking spaces (addition of 8 spaces) with 21 head-in spaces adjacent to property. PREVIOUS ACTION: The public hearing for this application was opened November 7,2000, and continued to this date. No action has been taken other than continuing the hearing date. The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Minor PUD. At a duly noticed public hearing, the Commission shall recommend by Resolution the City Council approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Lodge Expansion/LP Affordable Housing. At a duly noticed public hearing, the Commission shall, by Resolution, approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. BACKGROUND: The Hotel Aspen is in the Main Street Historic District and the project has received conceptual approval from the HPC. The project must still receive final approval from the HPC after the PUD is established. A recent newspaper article reported the applicant requesting a higher number of lodge and affordable housing units. The application has been amended (at the applicant' s direction, not at staffs request) to the 8 lodge units and 2 employee units. STAFF COMMENTS: The LP Program seeks to maintain and bolster the quality small lodge experience that differentiates Aspen from other resort communities and the character of dispersed lodges in the town's neighborhoods. In staff's opinion, after aiding the elected and appointed officials in the adoption of the LP Program, this project meets the spirit and intent of the Program and promotes the goals of the AACP. In fact, this project represents what staff envisioned as a product the LP Program. 4 Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Lodge Preservation Program Expansion of the Hotel Aspen, 110 West Main Street, and recommend City Council approve the Minor Planned Unit Development, with the conditions listed in Resolution 01- 6 . RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve PZ-Resolution 01- 3 approving the Lodge Preservation Expansion of the Hotel Aspen for eight lodge units and two affordable housing units and recommending City Council approve the Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 5 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SCORING AND COMPETITION PROCEDURES OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT EIGHT LODGE UNITS AND TWO AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS TO BE LOCATED IN AN ADDITION TO THE HOTEL ASPEN AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE HOTEL ASPEN MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 110 WEST MAIN STREET LOTS F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 58, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 Resolution # 2001- C@* WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Hotel Aspen Condominium Association, owner of the Hotel Aspen Lodge located at 110 West Main Street, Lots F, G, H, I, P, Q, R, and S, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen, for a Minor Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate eight (8) new lodge rooms and two (2) new affordable housing units to be contained within an addition to the existing Hotel Aspen; and, WHEREAS, the Hotel Aspen is located in the Office (O) and Medium Density Residential Zone Districts with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070 (M) of the Land Use Code, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may exempt the development of properties in the LP Overlay Zone District to provide additional lodge units and additional affordable housing units from the scoring and competition procedure of growth management at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to the requirements of said section; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, dimensional requirements of properties located in the LP Overlay Zone District may be established through the PUD review process; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the City Council may approve a PUD final development plan during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Parks Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Building Department, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, and the Community Development Department reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5,2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a to O_) vote, the growth management P&Z Reso 2001- Page 1 allotment eight (8) lodge units and two (2) affordable housing units to be included in the Hotel Aspen expansion; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November, 7, 2000, continued to December 5,2000, and continued to January 16, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a to (_0 vote, that the Aspen City Council approve the Hotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development, with conditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Hotel Aspen expansion to include eight lodge units and two affordable housing units is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions, and that the Aspen City Council should approve the Ilotel Aspen Minor Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD Agreement shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval by City Council and shall include the following: a) The approved dimensional requirements for the property in a tabular format. b) The information required in Section 26.445.070(C). c) A parking management plan that details the marketing, taxi voucher, and free bicycle programs that will be implemented by the hotel operator. 2. A Final PUD Plan shall be recorded within 180 days of the final approval granted by City Council and shall include: a) A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and showing easements, encroachment agreements and licenses with reception numbers for any physical improvements within City rights-of-way, and location of utility pedestals. If any utility mains are to be relocated, those new locations must be shown. If any utility mains exist in the vacated alley, easements shall be granted if not already established. b) An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the approved dimensional requirements in a tabular format. c) A drawing representing the project's architectural character. d) A lighting plan demonstrating compliance with the City Lighting Regulations. e) A geometric design of the Main Street loading pull-out area with a signature line for the City Engineer. f) A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer maintaining drainage and sediment on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation P&Z Reso 2001- Page 2 report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. g) A geometric design of the Garmisch Street right-of-way redeveloped as parallel parking with a signature line for the City Engineer. 3. Prior to application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department the applicant shall: a) Record the PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Plans. b) Gain final approval from the Historic Preservation Commission. c) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to Category 2, or lower, with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. d) Deed restrict the two one-bedroom employee units to employees of Hotel Aspen, or its successors or assigns. e) Review a PM10 mitigation plan with the City Environmental Health Department. 4. The building permit application shall include: a) A copy of the final PUD Ordinance, recorded PUD Agreement, and the applicable HPC approval documents. b) The conditions of approval placed on the project by for Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and the Historic Preservation Commission approvals printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department. e) A completed agreement to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights-of-way. f) Construction drawings for improvements to the Main Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. g) An encroachment license for the parking area within the Bleeker Street right- of-way for approval by the City Engineer. This encroachment may also require a lease agreement with the City. h) Encroachment licenses for existing unlicensed improvements in public right- of-way. i) Construction drawings for improvements to the Garmisch Street right-of-way for approval by City Engineering. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. P&Z Reso 2001- Page 3 b) All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. 6. The applicant shall encourage visitors to not rent a car when staying at the Hotel Aspen through marketing information, supply free taxi vouchers to guests, and the free use of bicycles to guests. The Hotel manager shall use day parking passes available through the City Parking Department for off-site guest parking. The details of this ongoing obligation shall be included in the PUD agreement. 7. Two parking spaces shall be made available and signed for the employee units. 8. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area unless an exemption is granted by the Parking Department. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 9. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. with no construction activity on Sundays. 10. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion for the employee units, a member of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall inspect the units to determine if the units comply with the representations made in the application. 11. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on January 16,2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C:\home\Chris\CASES\Hotel_Aspen\pz_reso.doc P&Z Reso 2001- Page 4 Exhibit* Hotel Aspen LP Expansion STAFF COMMENTS: Minor Planned Unit Development - Section 26.445 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding: The Lodge Preservation Program was adopted for the specific purpose of preserving small lodges and aiding in their development and re-development as lodges in response to the 1993 AACP. " The community must find ways to maintain these small lodges and the experience they offer to our guests."- Commercial/Retail section philosophy statement '93 AACP. Staff believes this project is consistent with and promotes the goals of, the AACP. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The Hotel Aspen is located in a primarily commercial neighborhood with some residential to the north. The LP Overlay Zone District, however, allows these smalllodges to continue and expand when compatible with the neighborhood. Staff believes the hotel expansion is compatible with the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The development is not expected to adversely affect the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding: The Lodge units may be exempted by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the application is requesting that action be taken. There are sufficient allotments for LP and affordable housing development to accommodate this proposal. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 1 B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Finding: Staff believes the proposed dimensions of this PUD to be appropriate and compatible with the surrounding area. There are no natural hazards or site conditions that make this level of development difficult, unsightly, or undesirable. In fact, this addition will benefit the existing development and help ensure the continued desirability of this lodge. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding: The HPC has worked with the applicant to reduce the massing of the project and staff bel ieves the results have been positive. The quantity of open space is appropriate for the character of the neighborhood. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding: The existing parking situation is somewhat odd and staff requested an explanation of the existing parking be provided in the application. There are 21 parking spaces serving the existing development that are located in the public right-of-way but serve as de-facto spaces for the hotel. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 2 The applicant is proposing additional on-site spaces be developed in the rear of the lot to mitigate for the expansion and mitigation measures to address the existing parking deficit. Staff believes these mitigation measures will work and be a benefit to the project. These have been included in the propose Resolution. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding: There are no infrastructure capacity issues that would prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions in the development being proposed. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud fow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding: There are no known natural hazards or site limitations that prohibit the amount of development being considered. Staff does not recommend any reductions to the proposed development based on this standard. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 3 c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. Staff Finding: The addition of the lodge rooms and the provision of affordable housing on-site both promote goals expressed in the AACP. The LP Overlay allows the lodge use in addition to the uses allowed iii the Office and R-6 Zone Districts. There is technically no increase in density necessary for the lodge units, only an increase iii FAR to accommodate additional units. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The addition is proposed in a location to preserve the pool and center courtyard area. This placement maintains the visual interest of the property and adds to its identity. This is a feature of many of the lodges of this era and should be encouraged as an appropriate character of the small lodge experience. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. Staff Finding: This standard has been met. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. Staff Finding: The placement of the addition does not affect the orientation to public streets. The possible redevelopment of the Garmisch Street right-of-way would significantly improve the pedestrian orientation ofthe project. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. Staff Finding: There is a new access way proposed from the alleyway. The Fire Marshall reported no present difficulties in servicing this site and requested no additional improvements to the older portion of the building. The new portion will need to be equipped with a sprinkler system and an alarm. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. Staff Finding: The site plan provides a sufficient amount of pedestrian access. The applicant is responsible for demonstrating compliance with accessibility requirements. Staff believes these requirements can be i-net with the proposed plans. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 4 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding: The City Engineer has requested a drainage plan and report be prepared, accepted, and recorded with the Final PUD Plans. This drainage will need to be accommodated on-site according to a two-year storm frequency design. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding: The interior courtyard surrounds an outdoor pool area and the space has been designed to accommodate that use. This criteria loosely applies because the pool is already developed and is intended to remain. Staff believes this standard has been met. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Staff Finding: The existing landscape of the parcel provides a variety of species in an attractive manner. The addition is proposed in a location where some of this existing vegetation will need to be removed. The remaining portion of the lot, however, will primarily retain the existing vegetation and no additional landscape treatment is being recommended. Staff believes this criteria has been met with the landscape plan suggested in the application. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. Staff Finding: The swimming pool is probably the only site feature that falls under this criteria. This outdoor pool does provide some uniqueness to this lodge and is being preserved with this proposal. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding: Staff does not foresee any significant existing vegetation that will need to be protected from construction activities. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City Hotel Aspen Comments Page 5 while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. Staff Finding: The architecture proposed for the addition is in the same style as the existing building and is appropriate. The HPC has granted the project conceptual approval. Staff believes this criteria has been met. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. Staff Finding: This standard is somewhat difficult to achieve on additions to existing buildings. To the extent practical, the applicant has oriented the structure in a manner conducive to solar heating and the mechanical system of the existing building will serve the new addition. Staff believes this standard has been met, to the extent practical. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Staff Finding: The roof pitches of the proposed additions are flat and will probably not shed snow. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibitted for residential development. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 6 Staff Finding: The applicant is required to utlize lighting that will be down directional and in compliance with the City's lighting code. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. Staff Finding: The courtyard area serves as open space and as a recreation area to the benefit of the property users. This amount, location, and design of this area is beneficial to the overall project and provides a desirable visual relief from the mass of buildings. Staff believes this criteria has been accomplished. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. Staff Finding: The interest in the courtyard area is not proposed to be divided and will remain as a general common element. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. Staff Finding: Due to the undivided nature of this courtyard and the nature of this use, staff does not believe there should be required a separate legal instrument to ensure the continued maintenance of the space. This is primarily due to the fact that the long-term viability of the hotel will depend upon the visual attractiveness of the courtyard and common grounds. An additional legal instrument requiring the applicant to maintain this space would not serve any significant benefit. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 7 Staff Finding: All appropriate utility agencies and the City Engineer were referenced on this application and reported the ability to serve this project. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. Staff Finding: The applicant is required to fund his fair share of utility expenses as required. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding: No oversized utility stubs were requested to be installed with this development. I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. Staff Finding: The structure and all uses on the lot have adequate access to the public street system. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. Staff Finding: The City Engineer has accepted, in concept, the loading area on Main Street. This improvement shall be at the sole cost of the developer. Detailed plans for constructing this improvement will need to be approved by the City Engineer. J. Phasing of Development Plan. Staff Finding: No applicable Hotel Aspen Comments Page 8 STAFF COMMENTS: Lodge Preservation Program Land Use Code Section 26.470.070(M). Development, or redevelopment after demolition, of properties zoned Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay to increase or decrease the number of lodge units, the number of affordable housing units, or the amount of accessory commercial square footage, or the change in use between said uses, shall be exempted from the growth management competition and scoring procedures, provided that the Planning and Zoning Commission determines, at a public hearing, that the following criteria are met: (1) The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff Finding: Staff believes this project is consistent with the AACP. Please see comments related to the Community Plan under PUD Comments, Exhibit A, page 1. (2) The proposed development is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area and with the purpose of the Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay Zone District. Staff Finding: This lodge has existed in this neighborhood and is characteristic small lodges dispersed throughout town. This lodge is compatible with surrounding uses. Staff believes the proposed addition has been designed in a manner compatible with the neighborhood and with the existing lodge building. Furthermore, this proposal promotes the purpose of the Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay Zoning. (3) Employee housing or cash-in-lieu will be provided to mitigate for additional employees generated by the development or to mitigate for the demolition of multi-family housing, as required by section 26.530. This shall include an analysis and credit for existing employee generation and the incremental impact between the existing development and the proposed development. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be considered for this standard. Staff Finding: The applicant has proposed two one-bedroom employee units. As part of the LP code amendments, staff asked several of the small lodge operators to provide their employment information along with their level of services provided. This study concluded that there is a large range of employment generation based on the services provided by the individual lodge. By any of the generation formulas used for lodges, this proposal mitigated for additional employees well beyond the requirement. The Housing Authority has recommended a few conditions for the employees units. The units are recommended to be deed restricted to Category 2, or lower, and on-site Hotel Aspen Comments Page 9 designated parking provided for the unit residents. Both of these have been included in the proposed Resolution. (4) Adequate parking spaces and public facilities exist, will be provided for the development, or that adequate mitigation measures will be provided. An existing deficit of required parking may be maintained through redevelopment. Staff Finding: The applicant has proposed additional parking to meet the needs of the expansion. The applicant has also suggested several mitigation measures be implemented to address the existing parking deficit. (5) There exists sufficient GMQS allotments to accommodate the proposed development and the allotments are deducted from the respective Annual Development Allotment and Metro Area Development Ceilings established pursuant to Section 26.470.050. Staff Finding: The newly adopted LP Ordinance initiated a growth management "bucket" which currently consists of 29 allotments. This proposal is requesting 8 of those units and the bucket will be reduced accordingly. There are sufficient affordable housing allotmems available and the respective bucket will be reduced accordingly. Hotel Aspen Comments Page 10 Etil bil- 6 MEMORANDUM 114< A.peR To: Chris Bendon, Long Range Planner From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator Date: October 10, 2000 Re: Hotel Aspen LP - PUD Expansion The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Hotel Aspen LP - PUD Expansion application at their September 6,2000 meeting and has compiled the following comments: General 1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we believe that the submitted site plan is conceptually accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is feasible. The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering Department. 2 2. R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way, the encroachments must either be removed or are subject to current encroachment license requirements. Site Review 3. Fire Protection District - Requirement - As of the request of the Fire Protection District revisions need to be made as follows: a. Fire sprinkler system requirements shall apply to the existing and new sections of the building. b. No new fire hydrants are required because there are already 3 in the vicinity. 4. Building Department - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Building Department: a. The proposed structure must provide accessibility compliance, reference section 11.03.1.9.3 of the building code. 5. Parking - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Parking Department: a. The historic ownership of Parking in the Public ROW is not confirmed. The ownership needs to be confirmed before it can be claimed as property of the Hotel Aspen. b. Applicant shall address the need for extra parking spaces. Page 2 of 5 October 10, 2000 Hotel Aspen LP - PUD Expansion 6. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been provided by the Engineering Department: 1 v;Al:,1 < : 64 a. Parking on Public ROW is not restricted to the private use of the Hotel Aspen. b. Currently there is substandard curb and gutter on the south side of the Hotel L. Aspen. As required by City of Aspen Municipal code, it is the responsibility of the adjoining landowner to maintain all curb, gutter, and sidewalk in the public LAT< , 14.trour ROW. Therefore the sidewalk must be replaced. This section of sidewalk is scheduled to be replaced by the Engineering Department's current contract. It is the responsibility of the landowner to reimburse the city for the cost of this section of sidewalk replacement. 7. Streets Department - Requirement- As of the request of the Streets Department revisions need to be made as follows: a. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 8. Housing Office - Information - The following information has been provided by the Housing Office: a. Housing Mitigation must directly be dealt with through the Community Development Department. 9. Community Development - Information - The following information has been provided by the Community Development Office: a. All proposed improvements must be in line with the new PUD/Lodge ordinance. 10. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement - The following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster Coordinator: a. NONE 11. Parks - Requirement- The following comments have been produced by the Parks Department: a. There must be mitigation for any tree removal in front of the proposed new driveway. Cottonwoods will be required for tree replacement in the right-of- way along Bleeker Street if trees are removed for driveway access. Additionally, the conifers shown in the public right-of-way between the building and the sidewalk are not permitted. We will work with the applicant to determine a more appropriate tree species for this location, however, a plan must be submitted for approval prior to any vegetation being planted in the ROW. Page 3 of 5 October 10, 2000 Hotel Aspen LP - PUD Expansion Parks - Recommendation - The following recommendation has been produced by the Parks Department: a. Use the alley for access instead of making another curb cut only 10 feet away. The Parks Department also has concerns regarding the installation of the curb cut on Main Street for a loading zone. There is an existing parallel parking lane along Main St. and this proposed curb cut seems redundant and compromises the function of the existing ROW. 14. Utilities: A utility plan was not submitted with the application. For the utility departments to properly comment, a utility plan must be submitted. Water: City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. If sprinkler system is required, then the applicant must provide a mechanical room in the building. b. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal code as they pertain to utilities. - Wastewater: Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - As a request of the Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows: a. The following information needs to be submitted to the ACSD â€¢ Landscaping Plans â€¢ Drainage Plans â€¢ Utility Plans â€¢ Site Improvement Survey - including all alley utilities b. A flow study of the downstream capacity of the collections system in the area will need to be completed. This will determine if there are any downstream affects requiring proportionate fees. Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Information - As a request of the Consolidated Waste District, the following information has been provided: a. Once detailed plans are available, a tap permit can be completed at ACSD's office that will estimate the total connection fees for the project. b. Tap fees are to be paid before issuance of a building permit. - Electric: City Electric Department - Requirement - As a requirement of the City of Aspen Electric Department, revisions need to be made as follows: Page 4 of 5 October 10,2000 Hotel Aspen LP - PUD Expansion a. Area lighting must meet new City Code and comply with ornamental lighting standards. City Electric Department - Recommendation - As a recommendation of the City of Aspen Electric Department, revisions need to be made as follows: a. A new transformer may be need for the property. This can be determined by the proper determination of electric loads generated by the building. - Construction: Work in the Public Right of Way Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: Approvals 1. Engineering: The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public right of way. 2. Parks: The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920- 5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance. 3. Streets: The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets, and alleyways. 4. Permits: Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department DRC Attendees Staff: Nick Adeh Applicant's Representative: Bob Morris Chris Bendon Denis Murray Nick Lelack Rich Ryan Becca Schickling Ed Van Walraven Phil Overynder Cindy Christensen NOV.29.2000 11:22AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC NO.124 P. 1 ! MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Bendon FROM: Cindy Christensen DATE: November 29,2000 RE: HOTEL ASPEN LP-PUD EXPANSION 110 West Main Street 2735-12441-112 /SSUE: The applicant has requested a change in the original application and is requesting approval to add 8 new hotel rooms and two new employee units (the previous application was to add 16 hotel rooms and three employee units). BACKGROUND: The Hotel presently has 45 hotel rooms and three employee units consisting of one two-bedroom unit and two studio units. The applicant states that they ourrently have three deed-restricted units. Our records show two units - Unit 100 and Unit 219. Our records do not show a third unit. However, this does not affect this application. The applicant is requesting a GMQS exemption. There are two major issues -- the first involves mitigation requirements for the additional employees generated by the expansion. The second involves the size, livability and management of the proposed affordable housing units. The mitigation requirements will be discussed first. Mitigation: As mentioned in the previous referral, there is not a set policy on how to calculate the mitigation requirements for expansion of lodges. The lodge currently employs 17 people, broken down as follows: Full time 4 12 +12 = 1.0 1,0 X4= 4.0 FTE's 8 mo,/year 2 8 + 12 = .67 ,67 X2= 1.34 FTE's 3 mo./year 1 3+12 = .25 .25 X1= .25 FTE's 9 mo./year 5 9+12 = .75 .75 X5= 3,75 FTE's 7.5 mo./year 1 7.5 + 12 = .625 .625 X 1 = .625 FTE's 7.2 mo./year 3 7.2 + 12 = .6 .6 X 3 - 1.8 FTE's 4.5 mo./year 1 4.5 + 12 = .375 .375 X 1 = .375 FTE's TOTAL 12.14 FTE's Therefore, the Hotel Aspen currently has 12.14 FTE's. This Is for 45 hotel rooms, or 0.27 FTE's per room. The Housing Office in past years has used a mitigation fgure of .4 f NOV.29.2000 11:22AM ASPEN HOUSING OFC NO. 124 P.2 1 1 1 FTE's per additional lodge room. The applicant is proposing an additional 8 rooms, therefore, the additional mitigation requirement would be .4 X8= 3.2. Based on the Code, which stipulates that 60% meets the threshold for growth management, the mitigation needed for this redevelopment would be 3.2 X 60% â€¢ 1.92 FTE's. AH Unit: The applicant i8 proposing to construct two one-bedroom units. The one- bedroom units mitigate for 1.75 FTE's each, therefore, the applicant will be providing housing for 3.50 FTE's, which is more than what is required. The units are proposed to be approximately 449 square feet. The units are smaller than the recommended minimum square footage for a Category 1 or 2 unit. Staff would recommend that the units be deed restricted no higher than Category 2. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Growth Management Exemption approval under the following conditions: 1. The mitigation required is for 1.92 FTE's. 2. The two one-bedroom units being proposed by the applicant satisfy the mitigation mquired. 3. The applicant have the ability to rent the unit to a qualified employee of his/her choice as long as the tenant has been approved by the Housing Office under no 1 higher than a Category 2 guideline prior to occupancy, and then provide the tenants with at least a six-month lease, 4. That the deed restriction for the two units should be completed and recorded prior to building perrnit approval, 5. A site visit of all of the deed-restricted units is completed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. / 8. The lack of parking should be reviewed and, if possible, one parking space per affordable housing unit should be provided and reserved for these units. ANorilmferra/hote/aspenm/lt. doc 2 Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District RECEIVED Sy Kelly * Ch airman T 1 "1 1 SEP 1 9 7 - J unn Aelener Paul Smith * T . Fran]2 Loushin Michael Kelly *Â· Secy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN~ruce Mati ierly, Mgr ASPEN / PITKIN September 19, 2000 Chris Bendon Community Development 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Hotel Aspen LP-PUD Dear Chris The only information that we have received for review concerning this project is a set of plans. We have not seen the written portion ofthe application. Based upon the information we've received we will need to see landscaping plans, drainage plans, and utility plans for the project. We will need to see survey ofthe current alley utilities, and any proposed changes to these as well as landscaping and hard surfacing that may be built as part of this expansion. We will need to complete a flow study of the downstream capacity of our collection system in this area. If downstream constraints are identified they will be eliminated through a system of additional proportionate fees. As usual, service is contingent upon compliance with the District' s rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the District office. Once detailed plans are available, a tap permit can be completed at our office, which will estimate the total connection fees for the project. We will request that the fees be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Sincerely, ~* - - -71- *SEk -Â« Bruce Matherly District Manager 565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537 -Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Sy Kelly * Ch airman John Keleher Paul Sinitli * T reas Franle Lousllin Michael Kelly * Secy Bruce Matherly, Mgr October 3,2000 RECEIVED Chris Bendon OCT 3 2000 Community Development 130 S. Galena ASPEN / PITKIN Aspen. CO 81611 C0MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Hotel Aspen (2nd half of application) Dear Chts: We currently have sufficient collection and treatment capacity to serve the proposed expansion of the Hotel Aspen. If downstream collection system constraints are identified they will be eliminated through a system of additional proportionate charges. As usual service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the District office Our primary concern rests with the proposed development of the alley area into something similar to a courtyard. We would need to be certain that the main sewer lines and easements in this area are protected and accessible for future maintenance. A detailed utility plan for the project is needed in order for us to complete our review. We also need to see landscape and drainage plans for the project. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, VK,24 *MÂ»A- Airu cU k., Bruce Matherly District Manager C.&. '44 - 46#i> 242%02 64tfer- 7 08 k 2/0-0 565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537 MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Communitv Development Department Frorn: Lee Cassin, City Environmental Health Director Date: September 21, 2000 Re: Hotel Aspen LP-PUD Expansion Parcel ID #2735-124-61-112 The City of Aspen Environmental Health Department has reviewed the land use submittal for the Hotel Aspen expansion under authority of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Section 11-1.7 "It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupant of any building used for residence or business purposes within the city to construct or reconstruct an on- site sewage disposal device.11 This facility receives sewage treatment through the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD), so the ability of the District to handle the increased flow for the project should be determined by the ACSD. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Section 23-55 "Ali buildings, structures. facilities. parks, or the like within the city limits which use water shall be connected to the municipal water utility system." The City of Aspen Water Department will determine if adequate water is available for the project. The City of Aspen water supply meets all standards of the Colorado Department of Health for drinking water quality. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Section 11-1.3 "For the purpose of maintaining and protecting its municipal water supply from injury and pollution, the city shalI exercise regulatory and supervisory jurisdiction within the incorporated limits of the City of Aspen and over all streams and sources contributing to municipal water supplies for a d istance of five (5) miles above the points from which municipal water supplies are diverted." A drainage plan to mitigate the water quality impacts from drive and parking areas will be evaluated by the Ci ty Engineer. AIR QUALITY: Sections 11-2.1 "It is the purpose of [the air quality section of the Municipal Code] to achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available practical methods and techniques to control, prevent and reduce air pollution throughout the city...11 The Land Use Regulations seek to "lessen congestion" and "avoid transportation demands that cannot be met" as well as to "provide clean air by protecting the natural air sheds and reducing pollutants". The major air quality impact would be the emissions resulting from the traffic generated by this expansion if sufficient mitigation measures are not implemented. PM-10 (83% of which comes from traffic driving on paved roads) is a significant health concern in Aspen. The traffic generated would also produce carbon mono)dde and other emissions that are health concerns. The municipal code requires developments to achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity by using all available practical methods to reduce pollution. The applicant needs to implement measures that will minimize traffic increases of the development or offset the emissions from the project with PM10 reduction measures elsewhere. In order to do this, the applicant will need to determine the traffic increases generated by the project (using standard ITE trip generation rates), commit to a set of control measures, and show that the control measures offset the traffic or PM10 produced by the project. Standards used for trips generated by new development are the trip generation rates and reductions from the 'Pitkin County Road Standards' which are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Report, Fifth Edition. Examples of mitigation measures that have been employed in the past by developers include providing carpool/vanpool financial incentives to employees, providing free bus passes, providing vanpools, providing dial-a-ride service, paying for additional RFTA buses and service, providing private bus service for employees, limiting parking, allowing residents to pay for parking spaces if they choose and giving discounts to those who don't, having homeowners association fees on a sliding scale depending on the number of cars, providing connecting bike path links in populated areas, plowing bike paths in populated areas, paving dirt shoulders or high-use parking lots, providing covered and secure bike storage, providing free bike fleets for residents, building sidewalks to adjacent commercial areas, donating connecting bike path links, and other measures. Whatever combination of measures the applicant chooses to mitigate PM-10 emissions and trips generated, is acceptable as long as it prevents additional traffic that would significantly impact air quality. The City Environmental Health Department has no preference for which trip reduction measures are used, and typically an applicant chooses measures that provide an ancillarv benefit to the project. Without mitigation measures, using the ITE figures, this expansion project would generate 152 additional trips. This would have an adverse air qua lity effect. However, a number of mitigation measures will reduce the trips generated by the project. For example, trips generated by the employee units will be reduced since these are onsite dwelling units, so there will be no need for these employees to drive to work. In addition, trip reduction measures are applied to all the units in the hotel, including the existing ones, so while there are 19 new units or dwellings, the trip reduction measures will apply to all the 61 lodge zinits and the residences. Thus, there are more potential trip reductions than there would be were these measures used for just the 16 new units. One aspect of the proposal that will have a significant beneficial air quality impact is the provision of fewer parking spaces, which encourages use of RFTA bus service, free skier buses, or walking. Due to the location of the site within easy walking distance of skiing and restaurants, the need for parking at this loca tion is much less than it would be in many locations. If no on-street parking permits are provided, there will be an incentive for the marketing program to be effective. The lodge's marketing program to encourage guests to not bring a car will help to reduce trips. A hotel van would be much more effective in reducing trips than will taxi vouchers. We agree with the applicant's observation that they key to reducing trips is to get the visitors into town without their renting a car. From that point on, transit options are easily available. Taxi vouchers are a less secure way to get to the hotel than to be picked up by its own van. However, it may not be feasible and the taxi voucher system may be more effective than anticipated, especially if it is strongly marketed. The applicant might also consider sharing an airport van service with another lodge, or providing other incentives for people to arrive by a means other than a personal car. The free bike fleet will also serve as a reminder to the guests of the ability to use bicycles for recreation and to travel within Aspen. If the City requires additional parking the applicant will need to provide additional trip reduction measures. A condition of approval should be that the applicant provide a PM10 mitigation 4 plan for approval from the City of Aspen Environmental Health Department which documents that measures are sufficient to offset increases in PMio caused by the project. This plan should be approved prior to detailed submission or issuance of building permits. The Environmental Health Department is happy to assist applicants in using the ITE books to determine trip generation rates, and to evaluate trip reduction strategies. FUGITIVE DUST A fugitive dust control plan is required which includes, but is not limited to ~ fencing to keep dust from blowing onto neighboring properties, watering of dirt areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads to remove mud that has been carried out or other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust from crossing the property line or causing a nuisance. Dust control will be crucial due to the closeness of existing homes and businesses to the site. ASBESTOS Prior lo this expansion, including removal of drywall, carpet, tile, etc. from the )if' existing building, the state must be notified and a person licensed by the state to do asbestos inspections must clo an inspection. The Building Department cannot sign any building permits until they get this report. If there is no asbestos, the demolition can proceed. If asbestos is present, a licensed asbestos removal contractor must remove it before the remaining construction can be done. NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 16-1 "The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace and to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and it its visitors. .....Accordingly, it is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in various areas and manners and at various times and to prohibit noise in excess of those levels." During construction, noise can not exceed maximum permissible sound level standards, and construction cannot be done except between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Sified this site is adjacent to residential zones where construction is allowed only from 7 AM to 7 PM'Monday through Saturday, we strongly encourage the applicant to limit constrketion activities to the residential time limits. It is very likely that noise generated during the construction phase of this project will have some negative impac t on the neighborhood. The applicant should be aware of this and take measures to minimize the predicted high noise levels. 4 WILDLIFE PROTECTION ORDINANCE: If the expansion requires changes to the trash area, 47 ' the City Environmental Ranger can review the trash enclosures to help the applicant ensure they are wildlife-resistant. FOOD SERVICE FACILTIIES: The kitchen is large enough to handle the continental breakfast and apres-ski food preparation even with the expansion, so long as the menu is not changed. If the menu is changed, the applicant will need to submit a plan review to this department. Page 1 of 1 X-Sender: nicka@comdev X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:14:20 -0600 To: chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us From: Nick Adeh <nicka@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Hotel Aspen Hello Chris - Following our conversation regarding the redevelopment of the Hotel Aspen > >property, I have the following requests: > >1) The head-in parking along Garmisch Street must, at a minimum, be > >licensed as an encroachment and a lease established with the City of > >Aspen. In this scenario, the parking configuration must become diagonal to > >satisfy safety concerns. This requires modification to the existing curbs > >and the loss of a few spaces. >> > >1 strongly recommend this parking be redeveloped as parallel parking with a > >traditional street tree and snow storage area. This will reduce the number > >of parking spaces but will significantly improve safety in that area, > >provide a better pedestrian environment, and an adequate area for snow in > >the winter months. >> > >2) The proposed pull-out area on Main Street cannot be developed as > >shown. I don't believe this type of modification along Main Street is > >safe.There is already a RFTA stop and a skier shuttle stop on either side > >of the proposed area. In addition, a minimum of 60 feet from the corner is > >needed before the pull-out can be started. This additional distance may > >place the pull-out too close to the skier shuttle stop. >> > >My recommendation is that the parking along Garmisch be redeveloped > >parallel with a planting and snow storage buffer. A loading area on > >Garmisch can be developed within 30 feet of the corner, because it is not a > >primary street, and this configuration would be much safer. I would > >support the necessary signage along Garmisch to facilitate the loading > >function. >> > >Nick Adeh > >Cheers. file://C:\TEMP\eud6.htm 12/4/00 P L J HOTEL ASPEN LODGE EXPANSION - MINOR PUD/GMQS EXEMPTION APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE This application is submitted by the Hotel Aspen Condominium Association, a Colorado not for profit corporation ("Applicant"). The Applicant is the owner of the common elements at the Hotel Aspen which include land and airspace capable of further development. The proposal is for construction of 16 new hotel rooms and three new employee units. The hotel presently has 45 hotel rooms and three employee units consisting of-ga-2-bedroom unit and two studio units: The new hotel rooms and employee units will be added to the hotel by development of a third floor above the existing two story structure fronting Main Street and the construction of a new building on the W. Bleeker Street side of the property. The property is zoned LP Overlay with underlying Office zone for portion fronting Main St./R-6 for portion fronting W. Bleeker St. This application is a combined GMQS Exemption Application and a Minor PUD Application for a lodge expansion in the LP Overlay zone. To avoid redundancy, responses to review issues that are dealt with in both of these code provisions are treated in one, but not both sections of this application. I. GMQS Exemption. Section 1: Section 26.470.070(M), (as amended by Ordinance 39, series of 1999) authorizes the process for exempting certain types of development in the Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay Zone District from the competition and scoring procedures of the GMQS. The criteria for such exemption are as follows: (1) The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Response: The AACP encourages the preservation of existing lodges and those that are located in downtown Aspen within the Lodge Preservation Overlay zone ("LP Zone") are permitted to expand without being processed through the GMQS. (2) The proposed development is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area and with the purpose of the Lodge Preservation (LP) Overlay Zone District. 1 Response: The property is located on Main Street in the vicinity of several other small lodges. The Molly Gibson and Aspen Mountain Lodge are across the street, the Sardy House is one block to the east and many other lodges are located along Main Street, both east and west of the property. The land uses adjacent to the property are an office building and a single family house. The expansion is compatible with existing land uses and is fully contained on the existing parcel. The purpose of the LP overlay zone is stated as follows: "...to provide for and protect smalllodge uses on properties historically used for lodge accommodations, to permit redevelopment of these properties to accommodate lodge and affordable housing uses, to provide uses accessory and normally associated with lodge and affordable housing development, to encourage development which is compatible with the neighborhood and respective of the manner in which the property- has historically operated, and to provide an incentive for upgrading existing lodges on-site or onto adjacent properties." The proposed expansion is fully consistent with these purposes. The property has been historically used for lodge accommodations. The proposed expansion is for additional lodge rooms and three one-bedroom affordable housing units. The lodge will continue to be operated as it has been. The GMQS exemption and PUD flexibility provides an incentive. (3) Employee housing or cash-in-lieu will be provided to mitigate for additional employees generated by the development or to mitigate for the demolition of multi-family housing. as required bv section 26,530. This shall include an analysis and credit for existing employee generation and the incremental impact between the existing development and the proposed development. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authoritv shall be considered for this standard. Response: The applicant proposes the creation of three (3) one-bedroom affordable housing units on-site to house employees of the lodge. These are in addition to three existing on-site employee units consisting of one (1) two-bedroom unit and two studio units. The proposed new sixteen lodge rooms will result in a slight increase in the number of employees necessary to serve the lodge and its guests. There will be no change in management, front desk or administrative personnel. One new maid will be needed to service the new rooms. There will also be some added maintenance duties and some additional time will be incurred by the kitchen staff for the morning breakfast and apres-ski food service. However, the current maintenance person and food service employees are working part time and can pick up a few additional hours if needed. The yard areas which now require some employee time to maintain, will be smaller as a result of the new buildings, so some employee ground work time will be eliminated. The applicant's additional employee housing proposal for three new one-bedroom units provides more than the affordable housing necessary to fully mitigate the new lodge rooms but will assist in providing needed housing for certain of the lodge's existing employees plus the additional employee generated by the new lodge rooms. The category for these units needs to accommodate the salary levels of the employees who need to be housed. Therefore, the applicant requests that it have the 2 ability to adjust the categories as necessary to accommodate the income levels of the employees to be housed. The lodge currently employs 17 people, some of whom are full time (forty hours per week) and some part time. The type of duties and approximate hours are broken down as follows: a) front desk/management: 5 employees -2@ full time, 2@ 2/3 time, one @ 1/4 time; b) office operations: 1 employee @ full time; c) food service/concierge: 2 employees- 1 @ 3/4 time, 1 @ 5/8th time; d) maintenance: 1 employee @ 3/4 time; e) housekeeping: 8 employees- 1 @ full time, 3 @ 3/4 time, 3 @ 3/5th time, 1 @ 3/8th time. (4) Adequate parking spaces and public facilities exist. will be provided for the development. or that adequate mitigation measures will be provided. An existing deficit of required parking may be maintained through redevelopment. Response: On-site parking for the three new affordable housing units meets the code's requirement of one space per unit, however, the lodge is unable to meet the code's.7 parking spaces per lodge room requirement for the new rooms. The expansion will provide six new parking spaces on-site, three of which will be for lodge use and the other three will be for the three new affordable housing apartments. The code's.7 spaces/room would require 11.2 spaces for the sixteen new lodge rooms. With three ofthese being provided on-site, a deficit of 8 spaces remains. An existing deficit will be carried forward with respect to the existing lodge rooms. This deficit is not substantial when the actual parking usage and availability of parking adjacent to the site is considered. The lodge has historically had the use of 21 spaces adjacent to it on Garmish Street and 10 spaces on site. Although the Garmisch Street *aces are in the City right-of-way and not technically "on-site," they are always available for lodge guests and the lodge has never experienced a shortage of parking for its guests. To the public, these spaces appear to be part of the lodge and they function in that manner. In addition, substantial on-street parking is available on W. Bleeker Street on the Southerly boundary of the Yellow Brick property. If the 10 existing on-site spaces and the 21 Garmisch spaces are counted, they total 34 spaces. The .7 code requirement for the entire project of 45 rooms requires 38 spaces. Viewed in this manner, the deficit carried forward is only 4 spaces. The existing deficit is allowed to be carried forward without penalty to the project. The deficit of 8 parking spaces for the new rooms is not significant and will not result in insufficient parking for the new lodge rooms for the following reasons: (i) The lodge is served by all local bus services at stops only steps away from the front entrance. The City bus routes, RFTA buses and the Skico buses serve the lodge; 3 (ii) The downtown location of the lodge facilitates pedestrian travel and most guests do not need cars; (iii) The management proposes to encourage guests not to rent cars through a variety of marketing strategies: (a) When a booking is made the lodge will notify the guest that they do not need to rent a car and inform them of the bus system's convenience and availability, and of the lodge's close proximity to downtown. Based upon the lodge's experience, in the winter, most guests do not bring or rent cars. In the summer, most guests do bring or rent cars. The opportunity for pedestrian and bicycle use in the summer is substantial and if proper marketing is done, a significant reduction the number rental cars can be accomplished. (b) The management will offer free taxi vouchers to guests to get them to and Ji~ from the airport. It is believed that if the guest does not rent a car at the airport, the chances of ~(~A them renting a car once they experience the auto-free convenience of the lodge are greatly reduced. Management has looked into a van service and has found it is simply not feasible for a small lodge operation. Additional employees would be generated and it would be impossible to provide timely service to guests seeking rides to different locations at similar times. The voucher system solves these problems by utilizing the capacity of existing taxi operations and neither puts more vehicles on the road nor generates the need for more employees. (c) The lodge will provide free use of bicycles to its guests in the summer and fall. The availability of these bikes will be included in marketing materials and guests will be informed of their availability when reservations are made. It is believed many guests will use the bikes and when coupled with the taxi vouchers and bus system convenience, many guests will neither rent cars nor chose to drive in Aspen. (iv) The lodge has a high rate of group bookings. It has an intensive marketing effort aimed at groups, particularly international groups, which has yielded excellent results. Approximately 20% of its guests are in groups which arrive by air and by bus, and this percentage is rising. These guests do not rent cars and thus, do not generate the need for parking spaces. (v) Not all of the employees who reside in the employee units have cars. Two of the three employees who are expected to occupy the new employee units do not have cars. While we cannot be certain that in the future these or other employees who occupy these units will not have cars, to the extent they do not use the employee parking spaces, those spaces are available for lodge guests. Under the current likely scenario, 2 of these spaces will be available for lodge guests, thus reducing the deficit to only 6 spaces. We are confident that these measures will result in adequate parking for the lodge. 4 The lodge seeks a variation to reduce the parking requirements under the PUD regulations applicable to lodge expansion in the LP Overlay zone. The foregoing discussion is not repeated in section II below and is intended to address parking considerations for both the GMQS exemption and the Minor PUD portion of this application. (5) There exists sufficient GMQS allotments to accommodate the proposed development and the allotments are deducted from the respective Annual Development Allotment and Metro Area Development Ceilings established pursuant to Section 26.470.050. Response: Sufficient allotments are available. 5 II. MINOR PUD REVIEW. (26.445.01) The LP Overlay zone allows for variations in the dimensional requirements ofthe underlying zone district pursuant to a Minor PUD process under section 26.445. The purpose of Planned Unit Development (PUD) designation is to encourage flexibility and innovation in the development of land which: A. Promotes the purposes, goals, and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan. B. Achieve: a more desirable development pattern, a higher quality design and site planning, a greater variety in the type and character of development, and a greater compatibility with existing and future surrounding land uses than would be possible through the strict application of the underlying zone district provisions. C. Preserves natural and man-made site features of historic, cultural, or scenic value. D. Promotes more efficient use of land, public facilities, and governmental services. E. Incorporates an appropriate level of public input to the planning process to ensure sensitivity to neighborhood and community, goals and objectives. A development application for a Minor Planned Unit Development (Minor PUD) may be applied for by the property owners of a parcel of land located within the Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP) Zone District intended for developinent consistent with the purpose of the LP Overlay Zone District. 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. Response: See GMQS Exemption Section I above. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. Response: See GMQS Exemption Section I above. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. 6 Response: The surrounding area is fully developed and its future development potential will not be adversely affected. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Response: This application seeks a GMQS exemption for this LP Overlay lodge expansion. Sufficient allotments are available. B. Dimensional Requirements. Response: The dimensional requirements for the project based upon the underlying zone district and the variations of the dimensional requirements through the PUD process are set forth on Exhibit 1 attached hereto. The property is located in an area which can accommodate increased density and the variations proposed. There is adequate utility and road infrastructure, a full array of public transit facilities within 100 feet of the entrance to the lodge, pedestrian accessibility to the downtown core and no natural or manmade hazard areas exist. The proposed site plan and architectural design of the expansion are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and are subject to HPC review to ensure their quality and compatible design and open space features. C. Parking Variation Response: With respect to the requested variation in the parking requirements, please see Section I GMQS Exemption for detailed parking variation discussion. D. Density Increase Response: This application proposes an increase in the density of the project over that which is allowed in the underlying zone district. The City's recently adopted amendments to the lodge preservation program were specifically enacted to permit the type of expansion proposed and allowed for such a density increase. The City deems it in the public interest to foster the economic viability of small lodges and provide additional tourist beds to stem the dramatic loss of moderately priced tourist accommodations and to provide an alternative to larger, more expensive hotels. This is fully consistent with relevant goals of the AACP. There is no impact on the surrounding area by reason of the expansion. The expansion of the Hotel Aspen will allow an efficient use of existing infrastructure and take advantage of a location which has proximity to the downtown commercial core and both pedestrian accessibility to venues in the downtown area and public transportation availability to skiing and summer attractions. E. Site Design 7 Response: The existing natural features ofthe site consist primarily ofthe large spruce tees along main street. These trees will not be disturbed by the expansion. The design ofthe project places new lodge rooms on a new third floor of one ofthe existing buildings, set back almost seventy feet from Main Street. The remaining new rooms and affordable housing units are located in two new buildings on the rear ofthe site, adjoining W. Bleeker Street. The utilization of new third floor space is the most efficient method of providing new space without increasing lot coverage and the new buildings in the rear ofthe property cluster development into a compact footprint. A new upper level bridge attaches the building elements and creates a much more efficient circulation and service capability for the lodge than has previously existed. This feature will improve the programmatic attributes of the lodge operation. The architectural plans for the project are subject to an HPC review to ensure neighborhood design compatibility along the Main Street historic district. Their orientation contributes to the urban context and is appropriate "in-fill" development. Pedestrian, emergency and handicap access is provided. Site drainage is provided for and will not negatively impact surrounding properties. F. Landscape Plan. Response: The plans attached to this application (the "Plans") contain a landscape plan. The design of the project, utilizing a new third floor over an existing building and constructing new buildings at the rear ofthe property, preserves existing trees and landscape features. The landscape plan results in a design that is compatible with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The landscape plan meets all requirements of the code. It exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves significant existing vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate; significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner; and, the proposed method ofprotecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate; G. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. Response: The proposed expansion represents a significant improvement in the architectural elements and style of the Hotel Aspen. New roof lines and exterior elevations dramatically change the appearance of the lodge from what is now a nice, but somewhat non-descript, cosmetically updated older lodge (formerly "The Nugget Lodge") to a warm and inviting mountain style lodge 8 which provides architectural elements that are resonant of the Main Street historic district. New features, such as the bridge between buildings, improve the function ofthe hotel operation. This standard also encourages efficient use of resources. These standards are: A. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less- intensive mechanical systems. Response: The new building elements will provide a roof with a higher "R" rating than the current roofand energy efficient glazing that reflects heat in summer and keeps heat in during the winter. The exterior walls will be insulated with R-19 insulation factor materials. The orientation of the building allows the new third floor rooms to have excellent solar exposure. The new boilers will be state-of-the-art, energy efficient units. B. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. Response: The expansion provides snow storage areas and its roof design anticipates areas where snow shedding will occur, and they are designed for pedestrian and structure safety. The design o f the roof with its substantial insulation willlimit the build-up o f ice and water and will not require significant maintenance. H. Lighting. The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. Response: All exterior lighting will fully comply with new City lighting codes and will be appropriate for the site and its structures. I. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. Response: The proposed development includes a common recreation area for the mutual benefit of all lodge guests. The existing swimming pool and Jacuzzi have the capacity to serve the new lodge rooms. These facilities are common elements and are owned by the hotel condominium owners in common. The permanent care and maintenance of the recreation areas and shared facilities are provided for by the existing condominium documents. J. Utilities and Public facilities. 9 The purpose ofthis standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. Response: Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development without any improvements. K. Access and Circulation. The relevant purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network. Response: Each structure within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development. 26.445.060 Application Materials. A. Final, Consolidated, and Minor Development Plan. The contents of this development application for Minor PUD review include the following: The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.304.(sic - 26.52.030) is as follows: 1. The applicant is the Hotel Aspen Condominium Association, a Colorado not-for-profit corporation, whose address is c/o Robert Prentis Morris, The Aspen Group, Inc., 415 East Main Street, #210, Aspen, Colorado 81611,925-8081. 2. A consent to process this application is attached at Exhibit 3. 3. A current title commitment disclosing ownership and liens, etc., is attached at Exhibit 4. 4. An 8 1/6 x 11" vicinity mapisattached at Exhibit 2. 5. The plans for the project are attached as the "Plans" consisting of several sheets. The Plans include a Site Improvement Survey, Architectural drawings, and a Landscape Plan. These Plans provide the applicable information required by Section 26.480.060(A)(3). 6. This Project Description and Statement of Intent and Purpose includes a detailed description and site plan ofthe proposed development including a statement ofthe objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and 10 . pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements and site drainage. 7. A statement specifying the method of maintaining any proposed common areas on the site, including, but not limited to, common parking areas, walkways, landscaped areas and recreational facilities, and what specific assurances will be made to ensure the continual maintenance of said areas is included in this Statement of Intent and Purpose. 8. A description of the dimensional requirements requested to be established through the review is attached at Exhibit 1. 9. A written response to each of the PUD Review Criteria contained in section, Section 26.445.050 is included in this Statement of Intent and Purpose. 10. Proposed PUD Plans and a proposed PUD Agreement will be provided for staff review after approval of this proposal and before the final plat is recorded. The terms of the PUD Agreement will reflect all conditions of the development as approved by City Council. 11. The pre-application summary sheet is attached hereto at Exhibit 5. 12. Staff has requested information concerning the alley relocation that took place in 1984. Attached hereto at Exhibit 6 are two quit claim deeds, one from the owner to the City and the other from the City to the owner, exchanging the alley areas, and a copy of the minutes of the October 22,1984 Council hearing where the relocation of the alley was authorized. Also, Plans attached to this application contain the cover sheet of the Hotel Aspen Condominium Plat which shows the alley areas exchanged by the deeds. Respectfully submitted this 20th day of July, 2000, KLEIN-ZIMET PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By: 1 '1 Herbert S. Klein aspengro\expapp.4 11 L HOTEL ASPEN LODGE EXPANSION INDEX of EXHIBITS Document Tab No. Description of Dimensional Requirements ......... 1. Vicinity Map ...................... 2. Consent & Authorization to Process Land Use Application ................. 3. Title Commitment .................... 4. Pre-Application Conference Summary ........... 5. Deeds exchanging alley areas and Minutes of City Council Meeting on October 22, 1984 .......... 6. 4 fo OfICAy ~ Vivdd#K 406[47 *01*1 c#** 190% (~ME#Â¢7 4Ig * 40 4-1 Abll aspengro\exhibit.lst 04&2 Â»d *1 *cm 10 w. tw (1(Jfily ill p i tnt t 1. A HOTEL ASPEN Existing plus New: F.A.R. Calculations Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Total Lot Area of Lots 26,890.7 Basement Gross Area Not Incl in F.A.R.: Existing -<482.4 New Â· 2679.1 3,161.5 First Floor Gross Area: Main Floor - 9327.1 Storage -750.7 New 2650.1 Total: 12,727.9 Second Floor Gross Area: Main Floor - -10,946.7 New 2707.4 Total 13,654.1 Third Floor Gross Area: Main Floor ---2215.5 New 6530.2 Total 8,745.7 Total Gross Building Area 38,289.2 F . A. R . W < Adol L 190 34,377 OPEN SPACE foodÂ· >/-6 ~397Â· 2 3 - Lf Minimum Open Space N\A (Lot Area-Bldg-Parking)/Lot Area N\A PARKING Existing Parking Spaces 31 (10 on site, 21 adjacent) New Parking Spaces 6 (47 DAs, 2- Total Parking Spaces 37 5-7- i,c. O {40?tâ‚¬ UNITS/BEDROOMS Existing Hotel Units/Bedrooms 45/45 New Hotel Units/Bedrooms 16/16 Total Hotel Units/Bedrooms 61/61 Existing AH Units/Bedrooms 3/4 New AH Units/Bedrooms 3 I 3 Total AH Units/Bedrooms 6/1 EXHIBIT 1 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ZONE PUD EXISTING OFFICE/R6 VARIANCE Minimum Front Yard 10.5 10/10min.total 30 10.5 Minimum Side'Yard 5 5/15min.total 30 see plans - 0' To 7' Minimum Rear Yard 40.5 15/15 At Bleeker- 2.5 At alley - 1.2 Maximum Height 29.75 25/25 31'6" to top of arched roof at new rear building Minimum Distance Between 25 10/5 7.5 Buildings Minimum % Open Space NA/NA Allowable FAR .84/1 .75/1 (R-6 per PUD) 1.3/1 Parking - Existing: 31 (10 on-site, 21 adjacent) Parking - New Units 0.7 spaces/bdrm 11.2 required per (R6 per PUD) .7 x 16 new units, plus 3 spaces for 3 new AH units. Total 14.2. 6 new spaces provided. variation requested to eliminate requirement for 8.2 spaces 3 spaces aspengroup\specificationsOzone.2 N 1ST BT N IST ST N 1 ST ST N 157 ST 1,/ 1 - 1 1 1 1 f C_ la_t 1 ru; it --- 1 . -.--,-1.- 4- 2 J i or-"----~-1 I E---r,St T - ---31 f---~ S ; l h t% r--1 ~ 3 5 1 1 : - - - ---- -16$Â«17 F_' A 14.4 3 Ll *t -uil---1 L--, 8 ' 5 1 a./ J 1 1/1 4 /3--fil A ; 4 0_5 72*1** ~ r -F-~51Lh 1 D. 1 / fl III' '1 41 \ ' 3 11 g ; 41 1 .. N -=72=* , E :,/ lit........C-/Ill..... I 1-- 4 , 6 AE \Al 4.~ F = ; 5 1 1.- 2, - 11~, 11 : 1 11 1 -- --1 - t.. /1 1, ---E 1 1'. ~ ~~f ~ It ' 't- --- --- - -**I- - '' /-- -**#2'-*-*.&- If / 11 1 . ' I -Â·. 11 A k ----- i. -------1 hz--- 1 ' 1 1 1 8 GAJÂ¥,119(,1 ST 8 GARMIBCH ST -=0 N GAR611SCH ST N GAINISCH ST -- -2~ E .~ , k. - r" - , NOA~â€¢SCH" i ; , 11 1 11 1 1, 1 1 Z 1 1 1 m I 1 -F- T -11.793~-Â«-3, R U 1. J F 4 1- 1 1 , f - -. , --fj-110 -EL-Â«-4/.Etâ‚¬31 4-- I ' <5..ST-2-rs Lu - it 5 11 1 4 6 1 1 1 /; r.â€¢41.1...4 : 1,5.4 1.1 -*--... 1//~. m 8 -- 1RetÂ«lt %151 - 11 11 EdcA#.8// 5. E-lai i- 1 / 1 / 4.:.I-/Ic-#-'lilli.'I - 2.-- I. L 1 I. , r-7/rk#ALF *1 n.,1Â£,*fc<.1, IT F 4 i H i-3 E<ThJ 44*sy-] i It ",I<:*"I. : Â·- ' 1--I 1 1.>i= 1. , 1 ' 'It 11 - 0,FS- 501 11 - - 1 1 -,1 al 0.-1 -IrfiÂ·.L-q,~ , Â£-w- 4... --, 22Â·g /1 1 1 -It - â€ž,1 .3 St~,-1 4, R I 'S 1 1 11 1*1 , 1 VL F ' 11'81--~Â·42:mil 2 -- 11 1 - - .... r--*1*. B ASPEN ST NASPEN Err N ASMN BT /$/ f l t tr- 1 1 r--- . 1 lioleâ‚¬ 7flle IHXB -3-~ TO d 1W101 FROM :HERBERT S KLEIN 970 922 8700 luU-â€¢ 1&-iÂ¥, 10â€¢ 10 ./ W~ 1 . L,La -L CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCESS LAND_USE APPLICATION The undersigned, with respect to ite property located at the LotS reâ‚¬ gld.4/ 4 *, Block, Aspen, Colorado, (known aa the Hotel Aspen) hereby authorizes Herbert S. Klein, Esq.. its attorney and Augie Reno, ins architect, to process on its behalf an application for HPC Review and Lodge PUD/GMQS Review for an expansion of the Hotel Aspen; and any permits or other applications necessary for compliance with all conditions associated therewith. A facsimile of this authorization may be treated as an original. Dated: December 42... 1999 Hotel Aspen Condominium Owners Asecciation, Inc. Robert P. Morris - Manager 415 East Main Street, #210 Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-8081 AM#re.epl EXHIBIT 3 I0'd 90:ZI 666I-ET-33a EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL GENERAL COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE HOTEL ASPEN, a condominium, according to the Declaration recorded in Book 482, page 43 and amendments thereto and the Plat thereof recorded in plat book 17, page 1 and amendment thereto recorded in Plat Book 22, page 36 ofthe records of Pitkin County. The property is located on Lots I,H,G,S,R,Q,P AND A PORTION OF LOT O AND LOT F, BLOCK 58, City and Townsite ofAspen. DEC. 1 5. 1999 4:30?M PITKIN COUNTY TITLE NO. 2034 P 2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1 Effective Date: December 1,1999 at 8:30 AM Case No. PCT14851 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Poljcy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 Premium$ 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 PremiumS 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate: $10.00 3. T tie to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: HOTEL ASPEN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, A COLORADO NOT-FOR-PROFIT INC. CORPORATION 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows. ALL GENERAL COMMON ELEMENTS, HOTEL ASPEN. as defined and described in the Condorninium Declaration for Hotel Aspen, a Condominium, recorded in Book 482 at Page 43 and Amendment to the Condominium Declaration for Hotel Aspen, a Condominium, recorded in Book 482 at Page 134 and Second Amendment recorded in Book 590 at Page 457, and the Condominium Map for Hotel Aspen, a Condominium, recorded in Plat Book 17 at Page 1 and Amendment thereto recorded in Plat Book 22 at Page 36. FITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOFKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81(ill unless the Insuring Provision5 and Schedules 1 07(1-925-1766 970-923-6527 FAX A and 8 are attached. AUTHOR]ZED AGENT EXHIBIT 4 D.E C. 15. 1 999 4:30 PM PIr,IN COUNTY TITLE NO.?034 P 3 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOTA CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE. FEC. 15.1999 4:30PM PIr'IN COUNTY TITLE NO. 2034 P. 4 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCENTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions lo the following unless the sarne are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7, Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen of record providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Terms and conditions of Ordinance No. 60 recorded in Book 321 at Page 51- 9. Terms, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process recorded February 28,1985 in Book 482 at Page 43, 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for Hotel Aspen recorded February 28, 1965 in Book 482 at Page 43, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, And Amended by Amendment recorded March 1, 1985 in Book 482 at 134. And Amended by Second Amendment recorded April 21, 1989 in Book 590 at 457. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation of Hotel Aspen Condominium Association recorded March 6, 1985 in Book 482 at Page 294, 12, Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in the By-Laws of Hotel Aspen Condominium Association recorded March 7, 1985jn Book 482 at Page 353. 13- Terms and conditions of Nugget Alley Relocation as set forth in the Minutes of Aspen City Councjl recorded in Book 482 at Page 350. (C,intinued) DEC. 15. 1999 4:31?M P'z"IN COUNTY TITLE : NO. 2034 P. 5 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEFIIONS - (Continued) 14. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded February 28, 1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 1 and amendment thereto recorded in Plat Book 22 at Page 36. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Dedication of Real Property to Employee Housing Restrictions recorded July 19, 1989 in Book 597 at Page 667 (Affects Unit 100) and recorded February 22,1993 in Book 704 at Page 107 (Affects Unit 219). 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1997 by Aspen City Council recorded September 3, 1997 as Reception No. 407979. DEC.27. 1999 4:27PM GIBSON RENO NO.151 P.2 r, 3 17.9 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICAT]ON CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Chris Bendon, 920.5072 DATE: 11.16.99 PROJECT: Hotel Aspen Expansion REPRESENTATIVE: Reno-Smith, Architecture. Herb.Klein, Atty. OWNER: Bob Morris representing Condo Assoc. TYPE OF APPLICATION: 3 Step. HPC conceptual and Final, Minor PUD, LP Expansion. AH GMQS exemption. DESCRIPTION. Addition of 17 (plus or minus) lodge units to existing LP Lodge. 3 (plus or minus) Affordable housing units. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.445 Planned Unit Development (See Ordinance 35.) 26.710.180 Office Zone District 26.710.320 Lodge Preservation Zone District Overlay (See Ordinance 39.) 26.470.070(M) Lodge Preservation Program (See Ordinance 39.) 26.415 Development in an Historic District 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures. Review by: â€¢ Staff for completeness. â€¢ Development review committee (DRC) for technical considerations. The Housing Office may refer the project to the Housing Board â€¢ Community Development Director for recommendations to Boards â€¢ Historic Preservation Commission for Conceptual Development Plan. (PH) â€¢ Â· Planning and Zoning Commission for PUD recommendation and GMQS allotments. (PH) â€¢ City Council for PUD final. (PH) - Historic Preservation Commission for Final Development Plan. (PH) â€¢ Vesting is automatic and initiates after final approval. Public Hearing: Yes, every Board as noted above by (PH). Applicant must post property and mail notice at least 10 days prior to hearing. or at least 15 days prior to the public hearing if any federal agency, state, county. municipal government, school. service district or other governmental or quasi- governmental agency owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development applicanon . Applicant *Mi need toprovide proof of posting and mailingivith an aydavit at the public hearing. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Housing. Parks. Fire Marshall, Water, ACSD, Streets, Building Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Major ($2,220 for 12 hours) 3465/54/ Historic Fees: Significant Development (flat fee). Requires payment for both conceptualand final ($624 x 2) Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Major (3320): Housing. Major ($320) Total Deposit: $4,108 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $185/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proof ofownership. Signed fee agreement 3. Applicanfs name; address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. listing EXHIBIT 3 DEC.27.1999 4:28PM GIBSON RENO NO. 151 P.3 ;Â· 3 4 -0 the names ofall owners of the property, and all mortgages. judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. L/5. Total deposit for review ofthe application. 6. 40 Copies of the complete application packet and maps One to Planner prior to remaining sets. HPC = 12: PZ = 10; GMC = PZ+5; CC - 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff= 1 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status. including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor. licensed in the state of Colorado. This must be current (within one year) and signed by a sun'eyor. 9. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written. graphic, or model fonn of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. Please provide a written response to all criteria. 10. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. Contact Ann Stark in GIS Dept. 920.5453. 11. Copies of prior approvals. Alley vacation. 12. Additional application material as required for specific review. (See attached application packet and Ordinances.) Notes: 1. The application contents and review criteria for both PUD and LP Program are contained in the attached Ordinances. 2. The application should address the demand for. and provision of, guest parking. Opportunity to provide a shuttle service should be considered. 3. Planner recommends a modification of the review procedures, pursuant to Section 26.304; to include parking review for affordable housing with Planned Unit Development. - 4. Upon consultation with the applicant, the schedule between the PUD Ordinance with City Council and the Final development plan with the HPC may be amended. One possible amendment discussed would be to allow City Council to consider the Ordinance on first reading prior to the HPC final review, and then schedule second reading of the Ordinance after HPC' 5 final approval. Procedures maybe amended pursuant to 26.304.060(B) and 26.415.010(C)(2) 5. Planner suggests applicant submit one copy for initial completion review prior to making additional copies. Disclaimer: TIle foregoing summary is advisory in nanire only and is nor binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. V A:Bilm'llfillill"/1/9/"Il//Ili./.".ff.-allillilillillifilillillililillilillily--/............Ilillilliliwill'yoh/3/#R/:Ili'il///RuiÂ£ , 5 d}29 4.* , 4.34. ' . 4 , 2 11,21#riliÂ·,1 nt ... .n'.Â·114Â·k U. 1:re,Pllon X.. i,4 I. 1...â€¢ -01,1/ . 2 LI 2#7,9# 2 i e FIMM: 9011, 01 . r 1 1 .r I Tills DI.ED, M.de thi. flay of . 140 1 t. 85, 1,et.-rl The Hottel Ast,en, Lul, w 710 E. DuranÂ» Avr?., Anr,en, Cl Pl'll Cl I -'' 1 of the County of Pitkin .nel Alat. of " P 0 '11'1 , 1, 1.1 f (-9 Colâ€žrâ€¢do. of theftrat part, nna "he City of Asâ€¢vÂ·n, Colorado 110 F. 'Â·,alena r,t., .AsÂ·y,n, CO Plfll ef thn County of ntt.kin And State of enterado, of' the ircâ€žnd part: WITNESSETH, That th r 0,! party of the firit pirt, fer ird In ronâ€¢Ideration of the ium of Tr'; I.)01.IA:U; r.nd otlier qncY! an,1 valuable consideration -------------- Dott**S, b the irld party of th, firit rart in hâ€¢und pRid by thi Râ€¢Id r,nrty of 'he Reeond pâ€¢rt, the r,relpt whereof li kerâ€¢by .Â·onfrâ€¢,â€¢d ma,! a, knowl,Â·dged. hâ€ž grnite,1, hirkninrd, *01,1 wet conveyed. and hy thrâ€¢e preâ€¢ent, 800* grant, bargain, ' Mell, runt.y .nd confirm, untn thr â€¢nid pnrty of the irrond pArt, hil hrir, Ind 11â€¢â€¢4:fi~ foirver, Rll the following drâ€¢rrk-d Int or r*rrel nf innd, Mituâ€¢te, lying and being In the County of ritkin and Slate of Colorado, tâ‚¬â€¢-wit: 't A percel of land situated in Block 58, City of Aspen, 00]orado, and being nure ~ fully describÂ«i as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of the 1 I Fasterly half of Lot E, said Block 58, thence N 14'50'49" E 100.00 feet to the I northerly boundary line of said Block 58, thence along said boundary line S ' 75'09'11" E 22.94 foot; thence 6 14Â°50'40" W 100.00 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W ~ ~ 22.94 feet to the Fint of brginning, containing 2294 square feet, more or less. TOGETHER with all And ;Ingular th. h ired|tament, Mrd appurtenâ€¢ners thereto brionglng, or In anywlie appertnlning. and thâ€¢ riverâ€¢ion and revirâ€¢lon; r,mitnder and reinalnderi, renli, iâ€¢Rupâ€¢* And profits thereof: and *11 Â· thi pitate, right, titte, Intereit, el*Im and deriand whitioever of the iald pR,ty nf thâ€¢ flrâ€¢t :â€¢rt, either in law or equity, of, In and to t! r al,oveÂ» barirninrd piâ€¢mt,â€¢M, with th,1 hireditament, and appurt,nances. TO NAU' AND TO HOLD thâ€¢ â€¢nld prrmlirs above b,trirâ€¢Ined Rnd dâ€¢,cribed, with the appurteninerâ€¢, unto the ild pirty of the Mecon I pa,t, hin heirs And amilimi forever. And the Maid party of the first part, fo, hlmâ€¢elf, h!, hetri, , exprutori, an d RdmIntâ€¢,tritori, doe, covenant, grant, bargaln, and agree to and with the Mairl party of the lecond part, , hia hrirâ€¢ ind nuignM. that at thâ€¢ time of the rn.ealing and delivery of thele presentl, he 11 wrll Brized of the premliei < above ronve)Â·rd, al of good, lure, Derfect, ihRolute and Ind~frailhle estate of Inherilance, in law, in fee *Imple, and h Râ€¢ 20,Â·d right, futt power and lawfut authorle to /rant, bargain, iell and convey the Iime in mannrr and form al nforâ€žRid-AzittllÂ© the â€¢Am. .re frie Rnfl elitr from all former and other Er. ntâ€¢, hniÂ·Irâ€¢Inâ€¢, Â»al,1, ilriti, tixes, , e -â€¢rier lt.,791 r,14~flt..7,-,f whitover kind or nature *oever. , E 2 8 1985 C C- and the above bargâ€¢In,Â·7Fremip, In the qtilet â€žr,1 pâ€¢aceable poile:,lor .f the iald party of the iwond part, hil hiln ' and a,;Nign* agatnit ,!t ind .very perion or pe,ion, lawfully claiming or to etalm the whole or any part thereof, the laid râ€¢rty of thi flrit pâ€¢rt -halt ind will WAY RANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. Thi itng'ul,Ar number *hall Include the pluril, the plural thi â€¢4.tular, ind the uâ€¢e of any gender .hall ho appllrable to all RendeÂ·.7. !N WITNERq Nt'F:REOF, th~ intrl pirty of thrâ€¢ firit p,Irt hal hereunto set hli hand and â€¢eil the dRy and yeir firmt Above . rlttrn, A'mÂ·ri--r: 1 4:..............................................~.... ' .....,..,..'.[SE4L] p IK~LF. STATEOFCOLORADO .' .1 - Â·./: 'RM. County of Pitkin J ..... The foregolng Initrument wA, acknowledged before me thli a., ot 6 611,7 1 '. e "75Â·b, f i fl /' 141 'r' T IfÂ·,â€¢t ( 1[ 111- f A.Â·,n M L EL My rommlâ€¢Rion â€¢xplr,Â·â€¢ j~LYÂ· , 10 3>. Witneâ€¢â€¢ my hand and official ient. *ff. 19'.k , ' |,<. f k .S f (6(Alt jffl ic. , 1 : CH/tar, rihtle. A '1, EXHI No. 5.' 2.11, . WARM i N TY DFVD. Ar PWAIral'hie Iter.4.- Didfnr.1 r.ibllâ€¢hln, C.. 1421Â·411 9(nu, 91.-t. DrnÂ¥,L. Coloil. 1 75 1 4 4 A . - 041- 2 7 4. + 26694 . W.-4- 11 x Y..1 Â» p , 4 W i . 7-1.4 4 . 1 U, .r 4 . ' :..4.51. .i_ . 3 f. .t . '" .' ' .!1 . 1 3 111'7 Â£142 nu 20 = -re N) = 20% a, 0 -1 94 h N :A cD 1% I M 63 w iÂ· * QUIT CLAIM DEED E 3 5 -1 m 00 , . U.1 =0 Â· '1'11IS DI~ED, Made this L~~L- day of t7 .,iâ€ž 1 ~- , / t. I. .4 1985, between thi City of Ast'en, Colorado, 130 South Galena 5 A Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, of the County o[ Pitkin and State of Colorido, grant.or, and The hotel Aspen, Ltd., 730 East Durant 6 Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611, ef the County o[ Pitkin and State t of Colorado, grantee, WITNESSETH, That the grantot, for and in consideration of the ~ )It . 3 sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration the , 44, i .~ receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has ~ 4~MFi- remised, released, sold, conveyed and quit claimed, and by these , 1 4 ' ' .7.9: '4 presents does remise, release, sell, convey and quit claim unto Â· the grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever, all the 2187 right, title, interest, claim and demand which the grantor has in 1 1*Â· % and to the real property, together with i:nprovtments, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Col)rado, described as follows: l . The Casterly 112.04 feet of the alley of Block 58, City of 4.3,8 Aspen. 1Ztm 4',Â¥g,ta ~~ This conveyance results from the relocation of the above- described alley as indicated on the condominium plat and the conveyance by warranty deed to the City of that property described as follows: A parcel ot land situated in Block 58, City of Aspen, Colo- rado, and being more fully deqcribed as follows: Begineing at the Southwenterly corner of: the Easterly halt of Lot E, said Bleck 58, thence N 14'50'49" E 100.00 feet to the Northerly boundary line of said Block 58; thence along said boundiry line S 75'09"11" E. 22.94 feet; thence S 14'50'49" 3 100.00 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.94 feet to the point - *Al <A of beginning, containing 2294 square feet, more or less. 41.11/ A 941' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, togpther with all and singular ; 1 4 the appurtenar -Â· s and privileges therplinte belonging or in anywise ~ thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title. interest anc] claim whatsoever, of the grantor, either in law or equity, to the only propor use, benefit and behoot of the grantee, its heirs and assignes forever. IN WITNESS ~,litÂ·:RIÂ·332, the grantor has executed this deed on the -ENTARY F 1- E date set forth above. * FEB 2 8 885 1944Â¢'Nd'Kil , -L - ~ ' *d 7- 4 4 tay.6 41'41< A I. Aâ€¢ ; t ... /:Ait r- h:V 'ht 1:. Â¥ . = 7) 3$00 &26%37 MaÂ·,1 7,._CZED 0 482 my['350 R.:c,Â·t - -.. 8 le lo 9 6 3 C'..'. 11 4 74.1 An ,1.4, 1 4. f - If P. 4'21Â·: __ .Regular.Meeting __. _ __ Aspen City Coin:it October_22, 1*R#. MESOLUTION 031, SEM:rS or 1,94 - Adopting 15Â£5 Budget , 4 1 City Minagor Schilling told Council the commurleâ€¢ttorâ€¢ board hai held â€¢VO -*ting, recently i ind hal recom/0-ded funding another dierâ€¢teter Schilling 04.d he hal had ht, conrorn, 0 about the how poiltion iniwe-ed, doei n.it â€¢,Iric, it A, necisiary for puhlle iafety but there ara â€¢ome :paion, to fund thli pentlion. 0Â·10 of thi pro.le/â€¢ 1, perâ€¢on/,1 turnover, Â· which 1. not good. The workload 1, g/tting bunch,d up. Dchitling iald "" prior calculitioN were not correci. The original râ€¢quâ€¢it wal for $9,000 but thli poiltion J can be funded for $5100. Trai is a change in the director'a ialary and Snowmais not j funding the recordi poaltion. Gary Plumley rgque/ted that ihe street tree program of $]500 be r.initated into the budg.t. Thi, ptogramilitâ€¢ matching fund, from Pitkin Cct:lity Parki Aâ€¢*oclation and planti itr,eâ€¢ tr,â€¢ â€¢â€¢h yeat Thli li a viry tornrfictil program and addi to the ae,thetics Of thi town 4 7.. for roldent, and vilitor, both. Thu city hai oven loling cottonwood. over the yeari. a lot of râ€¢op:, about the Coors bike rave and perple would lik, to â€¢ii it happe., Ind thi ~ Thii programs Â·eplacei the trees the city li loling. David Whiti ,/id he hai talked â€¢c Community *hould relook at thts dici,lon. Councilwoman Willi â€žid thi, wai not Council'i derliton but onp of the organizers who â€¢cheduled thi, during a weekend when the lodges were fill,d. Mayer Stlrling Iaid Council could add t.hie mon~y into thâ‚¬ budget and nego- tiate with Coori to change the .olicy about Itaying li privati homes, Councilman Blomquiat ' â€¢â€¢id ho would n,4 like to 4,0 the evwnt put on poorly, , 1.Je:'. 4. Jim Gibb,n, iâ€¢id there li a group of elti:en, ti>ing to inereaw thi quality of the golf c,urio int thde uip of th, courie. Thiâ€¢ Iummer trere wâ€¢ro tâ€¢o larqi qolf tournâ€¢mantâ€¢ and t. ~*it.M 4 7 local on, . Thi. group 1, interested in grtting / PCA tournament in AspH. G tb.boni laid hi would like the city to fund the golf premotion and to uii the money in different * Way.. The promotion thli aummer got bettâ€¢r golf courie exposure, increased b,Â·lineii .94@614.74 revenues, provid~d fundi for ch,rlty Mayor St:Iling said he iupporti this program. Couneilwoman Walli Iaid ihe would like the money for the comparable worth itudy put back w into the budget. The city hai received â€¢ prop<lat from a company to do thiâ€¢ study for ;3500 rocommendations to Council to maze appropriate adjuitmenti. Thli ti not I comparable worth . A? '1 â€¢tudy but a pay equity clailification. Mayor Stirling laid thile requiti total 144,000 1,1 0 Â·ir;r;....3 Fir,t requ,it, additional communication, itaff member $5100 ill in favor. wjth the exception 'll 49.. ~2323 ILITILINLI-2 322 LI~ ~ - *. Third, Coor, clami requilt of $12,]00 Mayor Sti:ling in favort '46* ' ~r- , other oppo.d. Fourth, requeâ€¢t continue promoting golf courie of S/0,000 M.UÂ·or Stlrling â€¢Reertlon of Councllian Blomqulâ€¢t. Council apprbved an additional $12,000 to thi 1915 in favor, other oppoâ€¢ed. rifth $3500 for comparible worth Itudy â€¢11 in favor, with th, >StÂ» . budget al pr,/ented. Councilman Blomquilt moved to adopt Râ€¢lolution IJI, Sorioi of 1~13, al aa,nded, i,condod by Councilman Kn,cht. liff Ittille, ~ld the 0/pwditu.0 are ab rrojâ€¢etâ€¢d but th, ialâ€¢â€¢ tax revinu, le under budgo. by 1/27 per cent. Mayor Stirling iald hr ti concerned about the 4.5 per cont target ' - v~ 3.**m for 1#R5 and dor, not want to get in trouble with thi 1*85 projection. Mayor Stirling i,ld th. 145 budget hai itrmi in it that have mt bâ€¢en in recent budget. one ti Â¥38.000 ..4,7 3, to taki car, of the trails. Councilman Knecht Jointed out that th, contributtin to PCPA 1 k Â·IK:tne hâ€¢â€¢ been reduced the *â€¢me amount. Mayor Stir,ing maid Council hal a contingency fund in the budgit. originally of Sql,000 for Council to uiâ€¢ to fund variou, requoiti during tho year. The budgit al,0 contains thâ€¢ debt lervice for capital improvements fir thi firit 449.: year of â€¢ five year program. Mayor Stirling ,aid Council li not funding any money for Â·21 3 16* Winternational, the golf courâ€¢â€¢ promotion, or the city manalement audit. Mayor Stlrling liked Wich city frii ar, being increaird. Finance Director laid the iottball fe,â€¢ will ~ ratâ€ž will be presented to Council. Golf courie fee, will incriase mlightly. Tâ€¢d Armâ€¢tring I be increâ€¢lid baled on diret coati, thÂ® eng,nrering feei will be increaied ilighily, Mtâ€¢r J It .%1 2 r,er-tion director, Iked how to proceed with tto golf promotion program. Mayor Stirling 1' â€¢aid they ihould comp back with ipecitic propoâ€¢ala. Councilman Knecht iald tbe AHA ought 6. to be involved in fundin9 thli â€¢1,0 and â€¢ propoial brought back. All in fi/or, with thi 0/coption of Mayor Stirling. Motion carrild. t RESOLUTION #35, 51:RZE!; or !#e4 - Certifying Mill Levy Councilman mlomqutit moved. giv,n the addition, to the budget, Council approved ~eaolution ! li giÂ·Â· 135, 1~4, with a mill levy of 4.00 millâ€¢. Motio, DIES for lack of â€¢,cond i.. 0 Mayor Stirling pointed out the â€¢chool board iâ€¢ aiking for a 2.01 mill 1â€¢vy inerâ€žse in an , ~ , Â¢&'<5~ .+ 1 .lection tomorrow. The county li allo aiking for an increas, in mill levy of 1.5 Â£111. â€¢ i ~M Â·yor stirling ..id it il important the city hold their mill lovy , I 9, 1, ~ Mayor Stirling movpd the city decreamo the millÂ·levy from 3.11 to 3.50 milli. Motion DIES for lack of a 8/cond. SAD J â€¢ Counellmin Knecht movrl to adopt Peâ€¢olulle 0 34, Series of 1984, al pre'Inted with a mill . levy of 3.18 millâ€ž ~econded by Councllm,9 Monquist. All in favor, motion carried. NUGGET ALL[Y RELOCATION 25. i Jay Himmond, city onginecr. premented mapi of the property and told Council the city hai an allry th,ougfÂ· the IrriÂ·erty, hÂ·Mich lâ€¢ larâ€¢,dicaped. Thr applic.nt ii re.qu,Rling to trade ~144..4- with the cizy or a .,ul,re fv,t 1,8811 thr alliÂ·y fcâ€¢ the land on the north. The aÂ·'licant, will allow contl.wed uer of the alley a, an utility ra,ement. Councillun Ble,quist notÂ·,Â·d approval of the rrqueâ€¢t for tradet *econdrd by Councilman Knecht. Ma)Â·or f:tirling miked if the put,lie loerâ€¢ ary â€¢c.r,5 h this area 81 a result ef thi, trade. ~,44*4~i i ' I . :4 ; . C. 1 , '.L . ./. '1 'WI~ .....,1 I -, .:11 .LNC J., r..:, .,. ~ ~., ~,~ ... 1. ',, 'k. 1, .,.... . ,-1~~ - . L -. . , . - E . -, f ; 'ti 1 ./ Â£/4 irl-1.' ' -â€¢ , b. 1, *1 - WI?; 3810 . *1. :* 482 p=:331 1.44 I. Regular Meeting Upen City Council October 22, 1914 1 - Mal-ord aaid in tormi of uie, no. Mayor Stirling â€¢â€¢ked if the applicant haM been requeited - to join any improvement diâ€¢tricts. Gideon Kaufman, repreâ€¢â€¢nling the applic.nt, laid thli ./ may alroady be in the previou, documenti. 1 â‚¬, L. Councilman Blomquist amended hli motion â€¢0 include improvement district, if it im not : ~ alroady in the documenti, lecondrd by Councilman Knecht. 2 Mayor Stirling aiked if thiâ€¢ trade b,nefiti thâ€¢ cltizer, of town. Ha-ond laid it binefiti ' them as it formalize, a iltuation that already extiti. Bil Dur.away asked about the Charter ,1 provtâ€¢ion that no land should be sold or e,châ€¢nged without approval of the voters. Kaufman t 1 4 : 2 ' laid the city attorn,y hal recomm,nded tht, be called an alley relocation, as thie 11 4 b , the L-3 zone d letrict mo that owner, could upgrade older lodqâ€¢i. The city ham to cooperato , ~ fo,â€¢aliling a situation extiting for years. Councilman Knecht pointed out the city ereated ~ with applicant, to m.ke these projects work. Councilman Blomquilt Bild in the adjacent , . block the alley ti already vacated. HAnmond told Council in hi, maps, thii alley im shown f 00 vicated, however, no ordinance ham been found. City AttornriÂ· Taddune told Council citiel 1 do no. own itriet, the wâ€¢y cittâ€¢I own property. Citipâ€¢ have tr-n given the right to ule I f..t for 2,250 â€¢quie /,et. D al//â€¢tâ€¢ and alloym. Kaufman told Council the applirant 11 trading th, city 2,250 mquare Â¥4':4Â¢1 4.11> 3 , All in favor, with the exception of Mayor Stirling. Motion carried. Council mad, this Â¥ 49tiof:fâ‚¬4 ~ lubject to the city attorney'. latiâ€¢faction. | i ' .99?iti TROLLEY TASK rORCE I,ErOPT . Councilman Blomquilt moved to loan one of the Aâ€¢pen trolley cari to the Downtown Paladena project for a period 01 18 monthi under the terms and conditions outlined in Charlâ€¢i -44,1 A '.... SiM letter of Auguit 22, 1984; leconded by Councilwoman Walli. w :tiff** < 1 Council-n Knecht told Council the taik force got 811 backgrrund matirial available ,nd , .11 taik force member, ar, aqainit lelling the trolley,carn and are for moving to the nixt J ~ Rio Grande, a loop to thr rest office, and a loop from Rubey to lift IA the group agreed . 1 â€¢t'P. In order to proceed to the cost phase and the routpi, which aze Rubey park lo th, 13.241*6' r to aik Council for $2500 for the coâ€¢t phie update. Councilman Knecht wid the taik force ~ Mayor Ftirling aâ€¢krd how much th, city hai Ipent to dat, on the trolley.. Jon Buâ€¢ch ,â€¢id ., ' thâ€¢ city hal not Ipent any money; th* original itudy wai done privately. Council.ian . 7 .. Rlomquilt eald he made, the motior in ordrr to get at 1nast one of the trolleyi protected, Mâ€¢yor Stirling oblectrd to ipend.r T money 07 a non-existent :yitem. Councilman flomquilt # â€¢greod if thi, â€¢am not worth $2500 to thi city, thâ€¢ city,hould Â§â€¢11 the trollâ€¢y cari, e : augg~Itid aâ€¢king PrTA tÂ· fund the r:500 for the Icudy. Councilâ€¢Man Knecht â€¢ald theme Ire .... 111 . City trollry[ an] th. Council ihould m.ike thiâ€¢ dect,irn. Courcllrian Blomquist pointed out Â·Â·44 *WA 1 if the city loaned the trolley to Puadena and it 1, restored Ly them, the trolley will 0 be worth rore. 2404* Councilman Blomquint withdrew hil motion. Councilâ€¢in Knecht moved to approve a budgâ€¢t item of $2500 for an update to th, Aipon , Trolloy Study to bo prepared by Ben Minnich, Ieco: ded by Councilman Blomqutit. Jon lumch told Council cltie, are buying up antiqur trolley ears acroil the Unlt/d St.â€¢te. Citiou havi found that t.Â·0110$ an. vory valuable to their communitiem. 1 ' All in favor, with the,*reption of Mayor Stirling. Motion carried, i .?,4 (, 1 . city department and covered with plaâ€¢tic. Cuuncilman Knecht iald he would like to explore mulch â€¢u,19â€¢â€¢ted thâ€¢â€¢e trollryâ€¢ be i.orrd in the bul barn or undir th, protrctive iye of . 4 : the altornativea. 1 ~ â€¢ 192,1 44 ' .} Councilman Blomquilt moved to initruct the manager to find a place to ~tore the trelleyi , and get them out of the weather; seconded by Councilman Knecht. All in favor, motion e catried. . 1 Councilman Knecht moved to loan one of the Aipen trolley cari to the downtown Paladena .-I '| projoct for a period of ]8 month, under the termi and condltion, outlinid in tho Auguit 22, t| 1;04, letter from Cha-le, Simi, project managor of the downtown Pandena Inc., Iubjeet to ~ approval in form by the city attorney; ieconded by Councilman Blomquist. 1 , ap,4.- Â· i Mayor Stirlinq Â»aid he did not fe,1 trolleyâ€¢ are indigenou, to Alpon. Buich Iald horse drawn trolley cari â€¢*liting in Airen an,1 may have been electrical at some time. David White . pointed out ther,Â· ti no north/Nouth linK in A[.ven. The buse, run moitly oait/wo,t. The , ., tâ€žk fore, felt the north/louth link li important and Mhould bi taken care of. - ' l~ All in favor, motion carried. |; Councilman Knecht moved to initruet the city attorney to prepare a ballot que,tion concorn- k ,1 46% , ing di,poâ€¢tion of the Aâ€¢pen trolley, and pre,ent same to Cjty Council in time for inclu,ion 1 on the general election ballot in May 198 3, seconded by Count.lman Diomq#it With the â€¢ 1 addition of "pe.mible incluilon", All in fAvor, with th, exception of Mayo, Stlrlir,g A... f ~, Motion carried. 1. ANNEXATION PEPORT - IJ , b' Mayor Stirting Moved to table thii until November 12, 1984, Iecondlet by Counrilwoman Walli. [4 All in favor, motion carried, 0 12 1. 1 .,1 A.&Â¥32. ICY.:4-- 1 l f .46'Ii..'.9 '24 .'30 .. . 149*4?~4445>'210:....~Â·Â· '- ~ / ,*, "--Mr*~~4*,%** 1 ..0 ....~ 1, 94.27>â‚¬'.Ck.6 )14 tÂ·,. .t, * 46 Â·4. Â· â€žEM'ME#4.,4 4Â»*~hy51~1106*4~:X>*94WSk;it<~ 3 41.:0 '4..f 4,#.1 ISSUED FOR: i P.CD. SUBMITTAL CLIENT APPROÂ» AL X REVISION: ~ REVISED PUD 11-23-00 A 1 6 a A PROJECT NO: 9921 DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILE NAME: HOTEL ASPEN ADDITION 110 West Main Street o Aspen, Colorado Z WI UO W 0 RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTS J: L.L.C. 210 FAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (9703 925-5968 Â¥AX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. 3101 BASIL.T, COLORADO REVISED P.U.D. SUBMITTAL (970) 9274840 81621 (970) 927-6834 VAX WEBSITE www.renosmlth.com EMAIL ADDRESS 11-28-00 SHEET T]TLE: ernie@renosm*h.con COVER SHEET SCALE: -Cli coel SHEET NO: AO.0 iviji,~Ovkij#nt:J ISSUED FOR: ABBREVI~ONS SYMBOLS & MATI AL LEGEND DIRECTORY LIST OF DRA...1 JGS PU.D. SUBMITTAL A-0,0 COVER SECTION PLAN SECTION OWNER A.0] INFORMATION SHEET el.!ENT APPROVAL SECTION NO- -7/ S...LS~./....i... SURVEY THE ASPEN GROUP X & AND 1. '1 .PTHAND BUILOINe SECTION 14 1 - 411 EAST MAIN STREET ANOU L LE,101/ ./MFOL OUT .41 ASPEN. COLORADO 816!1 .... . . sOL, co-Acill FILL- ~~ @ AT LTWI LIGHT WEIGBT CONCRE"E C.1 .INTERILNE '. L~W 5HEEr No TEL 970-925-1250 MAIN STREET BLOCK ELEVATION FAX 970.925.6943 BLEEKER STREET ELEVATION REVISION: CH.UNEL LTL UNmi , Â· .....M~/46..ID ./ 1.01.'VER LP LOWPO.l A.1.1 SITE DEVEI.OPMENT PLAN ~ REVMED PUD 1 1-28-00 C'ZP~SUFNm NUM.el SECTION NO PHRMENDICULAR .IN HOLE ARCILITECT A-1.2 LANDSCAPING PLAN A . PLATE MFR MANI/ACTURER(ER) CON<DRETE MASONRY P~;F<* ji:ORI ROUND OR 1}lA~TEM MAS .*SONRY FNALL SECT;ON E/59,1 NON -COÂ»IF' ACTE P FILL RJM#MN .o MA50NRY OPENING SÂ¥M/OL CUT *51 A-2 1 Ist LEVEL FI.OOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG RENO SMITH ARCHITECTS ~ ABBREVIATK)NS MAI MATENJAI (SJ / 9- 2 10 EAST INMANI STREET 'IX MAXIMUM ST.!ITIi #202 A-2.2 2nd LEVEL FL,OOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. ~ A+P Aam' B'SHED FLOOR MECH Mu]HANIC(AL) SHE'I NO AP -CESSPANE' '.[ED MEL)rUM 1551 ASPEN. COLORADO K 161 1 A-2.3 ird LEVEI FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG ADJ ADJACENT MEMI Aih],03.ANE A-2.4 NEW ROOF PLAN ~ AD,r ADJUSTABLE. MEI .fITAL STONE '919 5AN/ PROJECT MGR: ALFRED BEADLESTON AGO AGGREGATE .IEU~'LE CETAIL /0- M O 'JROONmniolinNG MIN MINIMUMNINL.rE DET./.UT .7-r\ TEL: 970-925-5968 A-2.5 NEW ADDITION AND NEW BLDG. FLOOR PLANS ALT ALTERNATE 1Ck MIRRO. SHEE-/O-- I. m. .g,-~~u, bosc kns(FI.LANEOUS FAX. 970-925-5993 Z~ AB ANCHOR SOLT MLD M()IDLNGMOULÂ©!NO A-3.1 EXTER [OR ELEVATIONS - SOUTH & WEST MAIN BLDG F.MAIL: alfredl@renosmith.com ANOD A~OD~E) M. MOUNT (Em.(ING - A-3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NORTH & EAST' MAIN BLDG, APPR<)/ APPROXIMA~~ MOV MOVABLE C-n ) PINISHEC .000 7;/=7 PROJECT NO: 9921 ARCH ARCNnETnAN MULL '11]11~ON HH- I t> AREADRAIN ..AME.All A-3 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- NEW BLDG. A-3.4 EXTERIC)R ELEVATIONS- NEW BLDG. & NEW ADD]TION ASI'll ASPHALT ..RAL PET/1/ CUT DRAWN BY: ANB Al'TO ......c NOM NOb[NAL 1/7/1. 14 Noltâ„¢ N Le NOT [NCONTRACT NOTTOSCALE BSh,rf ....%â‚¬ W rILE EC~~I ATE-1 Rowell FMAMIN* OR ~1~ CHECKED BY: 8/ BE-i EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1 1 R.Lle' SAIN TRIM ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 BR< BEARI' OFF OFFICE tz.y U Pl BFARINGrial*BASEPT.ArE ONCEal BM BENCH MARK ...1>0 1 BET BET~=EN oppolrrE ....LE) OD OUTSIDE nlAMETER FILENAME: HIT ...MINOUS 0. -mLL BLI BLOCK O H OVER!,ANO GLIZING - ZEEBEEHE /OOP BLOOKINe ~ ./. -OCKIN[} ENTRY BOARD POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT IS BOn[ A[DES PLF POLM)5 PER....FOOT rTEE-1 ~OOM NUMBER 80. BOTTOM ?M[ pOD.S PER SQUARE FOOT lo aolÂ·rOM 01 poll/S PER...TARE INCE BOW 130Â·rrOMOFWIL PL FROPBR~LINf I BLDG 81.1LDINI] p~ PAINT(ED) .LU-LAM.00/ 44Â«444&55Â£ 81/R Rt"JTUPROOF~(i P. PANE~ .00/ MA./ l._) PARna.E BOARD 'TEEL PAR.mON ..T FAVINENT PER1 PEJUME.ER FE.Rr .*OR,(11Â·(DJ CAB~Nlrr PLAq PLASTER ~T .Â·ARPET =) 1',1.AM PLAST.I./*ATE ALUMINUM OR r- PARTICLE /0 OR - CSMT CASEWNT PL PLA~ REFE.ENCE GRIP 1-Â»42 ~r - - C 1 CAST nU)N "EET METAL - ~COD /1..... C B CATCH DAslN CK CAUU[ . a PlAm ~AS5 PLMB PLUMBING CLG CEILING PWD PL.-NOOD CLOHT CE[1.ING*'GHT PT IM 4 ....0 Câ„¢ CEMEN[ PVC FODYVIN'el CHLORIDE S/OT ELEVATION CENYBR R!610 INSULATION EmEM 1 00-a BATT INSULATIOH YYUYÂ£Â£ V,Â· Y AVYÂ¥ ' AVY Qr QUARRYTILF CT CIR.,al'LE CLR CLEAR te,;CEO KAI ]Ul)~US RECP RECEP./.F CiO C[OS. CO CLEANOUr RD*Â·D REDWOOD coÂ£ COLUMN *EF REFEUNCE ... .ALL BOARD. - 0 ACOUSTIC GE,LING. BTT-mTTTrr CONC CONCRFrerCASTÂ·THÂ·1'LI,CE REn REFIGATOR ....1.6 .EV.ON $ * CMÂ·' CONCRUE MASONRY 1JNII *Al .EGIS'llgt L_,2 211 .TUCCO/ FLASTER 1---.~ .NFORangthiING, CONN CONNECOON c.ls. C~NSTRUCnON P. CP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CONST Jr CONSTRUCTION JO]NT :==? 1 :=D SE=MOR~im Rer RP11!RN Crr (Ch)OLJolrT LA R.URN AIR INTERMOR ELEVATION 4~2 PLI,LOO' 7-/. IMPET 11 Bll#WWWIWI CFR ./.RE REV KE~SION (S).HEM'ED CORR CO~RIDOR R.H RIGHT .... .. CW COLD WATER Ilow RIGHT OF WAY C.FL COtINTER+L,U.!No . R. EMR//00. 3 RD RuOPDRAIN R O ROUOXIOPENDâ€¢O *Porl .AR' 0 SEC :ION DEO DECREE SHT ... DEP DEFRESSED SFM SIMILAR DETAIL- SC ~OUD CORE ... DIAGONAL SÂ¥ SO~JNDPROOF DIA DIAMETER s SOUTH .ALL /Â¥Pm .All (2Â»h- D. DIFFUS./ SPK ~POU(ER .-. DIM DIMENSION SPEâ‚¬ SPECUICATION{S) DR DOOR DBL DOLmLE :. 9**ya. DWR DPAWER SY SQUAREYARD DWI DU%/ s S STAINLESS .El E STD ...ARD STL STEEL Â¢ STOR 5r/RAGE BAC&. SI STOKM DRAN 4 7 0 F EAST m. r STR1;Cr~Al Z M ..fic OUC]kICAL STD5 371~DS VICINITY MAP El ELEVANON St'SP SUSPENDED 611 75 EL. ELEVArOR SYM "...TRY Â«CA[) EMER .[ERIENCY SYS Sl-51'EM 1Â·N' ENC[,OSE'.* L :UALENT 171 TTIEPHONE TV TELE'LSION E- E H EXH 0 VE TEM:' Ta,GEED U]ST EXIS'[ING T}EK THICK'* EB E.SiON BOLT rl,RES THRESH'll Exp-yr EXPINS~ON}0* Tal rONOUBANDOROOVE FXP EXPOSED T O TOP OF ~ 1, EXT EX./OR TOB TOPOFBEAM TOr TOPOFCONCRE- ros TOPOFS-11 FLOUR DKAIN TO STL TOP OF STEEL FOC FACE OF CONCRETE TOW TOPOFWALL BUILDING SUMMARY GENERAL NOTES FOS FACEOPSTUDS . TREAD TAS FASTEN.FASTENER TYP n'Ple. A Kil. PlBEROLASS F. FI~SH (10] M IR;F]NIS]jED . *Â«<F FE FWIF EX"NOUSIER U.NO miERS NUTED Oâ„¢ERMS' 1 INFORMATION TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPH10 MAP PREPAREDRY JACOBSEN fl~C PrREEX~Â·OU[mAWNET FIREHOS. 5TAT10/ EXISTING BLDG. NEW ADDITION SUBTOTAL ASSOCIATES FOR LOT 332.TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, STA'ZE oF U.*fAWÂ£=/ . FIRB.-FING VAPOR BARR'ER I.P. F[REPLACE V. VENE.I 975.7 sq.ft. 2. BIJII.DINO FOOTPRNT IS TO BE [Â«ATED BY A CERTIFIED SURVEYOR MRIâ‚¬-PROOF ./Â·ClogG VERT VERT[CtE COLORADO - -/7-2 FR FIRF U.SLNTA. ~'IF VERIFY IN FlELD FLi Fi.AE}UNG vo VERNCAI, GR~N BASEMENT LEVEL 482.4 sq.ft. 493.3 sq.ft FLI FLOOR (]NG' 5. VESTIBULE FD FLOOR DU' V VINYL FLLIOR FLUORESCENT Vâ„¢nCOMP05ITiONT[LE RENO SMITH 3. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND ON THESE PL.ANS AND WHERE THEY EX]ST ON M '00. 493.3 sq.ft. 10,571.1 sq.ft. THESE CONSTRt;CTION DOCUMENTS MUST BE BROUGHT 10 TllE ATTENTION ARCHITECTS FT' FC)01114(i WALL To 'ALL GROUND FLOOR 10,077.8 sq.ft. DID , (}'INDITION . C ..ERCLes. FA.1 FRBSHAIRINIAKE *AlaPROOFâ„¢O wp OF Tl {E ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK FS 1~lILL // WR WATER REPELLENT FURR FUnED UNI / ' WEAmiERSTRIPPING L.L.C. wr WEIGHl 2nd FLOOR 10,946.7 sq.ft. 489.2 sq.ft. 11435.9 sq.ft. 4. LOCATE ALI. UTILITIES WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH INDIVIDUAL WWF WllDED-RE]ABRIC OA CIAOE GAUGE w ./sT willunln{ CALV %.VANIZED W wlili UTILITY COMPANY OR PROPERTY MASTER PL.AN :L .LASS...[NO WDW WU'rDO' 3rd FLOOR 2,21 5.5 sq.ft. 4038.5 sq.ft. 6,254 sq.ft. 5. VERIFY SIZE AND LOCAT]ON OF UTILITY LINES WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY N 202 GLBLK GLASSBLOCK WD WOOD GR GRAD. GRAD[NI :P WORKINGPOINT ASPEN. COLORADO COMPANY OR CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM UTII ITY WORK GYP aypsLM 210 EAST HYMAN 8t611 GU B CrYIUM WAI. BOARD TOTAL 23,722.4 sq.ft. 5,5143 sq.ft. 29,236.7 sq.ft. 6 AI I UTIL.ITIES ARE TO BE BITRIED (970) 925-5968 HDW !~AROWIRE 19)WD *RDWOOD 11:]3ll }IEADER 7. ' INDICATES POINTS TO LOCATE PRIOR TO FINAL, STAKING FOR FAX Iro HEATING OWNER APPROVAL AND VERIFICATION OF ACTUAL GRADES (970) 925-5993 HVA.C leATiNG'VENTa~TION/A]RCOND o ID HEAVY De]7 Hl 10:IGHt H 10{. K. DO NOT DISTURB SITE BEYOND 5'-0Â·' PERIMETER FROM BUILDING FOOTPRINT He H]OHPOINF 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. N 101 HOLLOW CaRE 9. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE AS PER SOILS ENGINEER B. SALT, Col.ORADO HI $110. METAL /17 HORIZONT' 81621 11. .CS. B= RECOMMENDATIONS RE: SOILS REPORT BY BUCKHORN GEOTECH FOR HW HoTWAnR H.W. HOTWAÂ·liR I[EATE~ LOT 332 TELLIJRIDE MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, DATED FEBRUARY ]6,1999 Hit HOUR (970) 927-6334 HYD HYDRANT FAX IN INCH . INCL INCLUDE (Di.(LNG) ID INSIDE DIAME.. {970) 927-45840 INSUL Q451-1B ([>J.UON, LNT INTERIOR www.renosmith,com [NV fNVERT WEB SITE EMAIL ADDRESS Jr JOIT /1 JOIST ofnce,@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: K. KITCHEN K.O BOOK Oer N INDEX & LEGEND lai LABI LAI LADDER SCALE: - .9 I...r I LAM LAMINATE LAV L~Vm. 1 SHEET NO: I REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 AO.1 NOI.LI(ICIV NIS[dSV 1.33Mlf BLEEKER S 75Â°09 i [34-98 STREET r FOUND CTÂ¥ MONUMENT CON:,OMININIUM MAP uF E 22Â·94 1 F G I '12Â·04 HI I THE HOTEL ASPEN - A CONDOMINIUM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATBON OF DEDICATIONI GCE 4. DANIEL F MCKENZIE HEREBY CERTIFY THKT IN JANUAR/, 1885, A AND Oy.NERSHOP SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND 5UPERVISION OF THE EAST ONE-HALF (41) OF LGTS E AND O, AND ALL OF LOTS F, G,H.I. P.Q.R, KNovi ALL MEN BY THESE PRÂ£6ENT5 THAT THE HOTEL ASPEN, CrD.,A COLORADO AN D S . THE EiTERLY 112'04 FEET or TME ALLEY, ALL IN ILICK 58, CITY IND CORPORKION, BEING THE OWNER OF CERTAIN LANDS IN P]TKIN COUNTY, n)Â¥.NSITE OF ASPEN. PITI<iIi GOUN Tr, COLOFUDO; THAT THE TWO STORY A ND COLOK*DC). DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. EAST ONE-HALF C 92) OF LOTS E ANCD O. ONE STORY BUILOINGS WERE mUND m BE LOCATED Al SHOWN ON THIS PLAI. ANIC ALL OF LOTS F. G.H.I.P.Q, R AND S , THE EA STERer IllÂ·04 FEET OF ~74 THE ALLEY, ALL IN BLOCK 58, CITÂ¥ AND TOWNS,TE OFASPEN, PITKIN COUNTÂ·K TME LOCATION AND DiMENSIONS OF TME BOUNDARY LINES, UTIL(THEO, COLORADO; DOES HERES'f CERTIFV T,tÂ»I THIS ~AP OF THE HOTEL ASPEN- 65 ACCURITELY 6140WN ON THIS MAP , AND THE MAP ACCURATELY AND STATED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLA,O/10/ FOR SAMO HOTEL ASPEN BUILDING.5, IMPROVEMENTS W EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TD ME ARE A CONDOMINIUM HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES SUBSTANTIALL* DEPÂ¢CTS THE LICAT}ON Â»10 1-HE HORIZONTALAND VERT,/L DATED THE- _DAÂ¥ OF_____ _ ___ _, jeeS, AND RECORDED IN BOOK CON DOM 1/IUM, THEREIN AND THEREON, THE UNIT DESIGNKTIONS THERE - P,TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DOES FIRIBY SUBMIT Â·â„¢E PROPERVI Dâ‚¬5CF(Idtr HEREIN 70 1#E r -,67% -1 DIMENSIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL A,R SPACE UNITS OF TIE HOTEL ASPEN * A __ _ _ ___KT PAGE____--OF THE RECORDS OF â„¢E CLERK AND RE/ORDEROF ~ 2* ADEJN~~,~.I OF LINDER THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED ME er THE OWNER, THE MEASUREE- PlOVIâ‚¬IONS OF SAU) 0% DOMMY M *CLAMâ€¢,710â€¢I, AND DOU HEREBY SPE-CIFICALLY DEDICATE To MENTS OF SAID UNITS, AND THE ELEVATIONS OF FLOORS AND CEILINGS. PU,ue USE ANY AND ALL INTERESÂ·r, FWIT AWD TITLE IT MAY *VE TO-IHE FOLLoWNG PARCEL '17' 'j'i,f BEGINNING Al TME SOUTHWESTERL?r CORNER OF THE EASTERer HALF OF 1 Ill ill LOT E . BLOCK 58, -rMENCE N 11+P 50'45" E tooÂ·00 FEET TO THE NORTHERix SOUNDARY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 38, THENCE ALONG 5.A,D MUNDAR/ LiNE 5 75Â°06'91't 22Â·84 FEET. THENCE Sle 50'43' W 100Â·00 FEET, -1-HENCE 0 ---~--------- N75Â°09'11"W 22 S4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2294. g ALINE SURVEYS al; DANIELE MaKENZIE SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LE55. ,1985 L S 20151 THE MOTEL ASPEN, UD ATTEST: CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL_ ROBERT F? MORRIS. PRESIDENT. SECETARN- 6(: --___-----_-__ -- ' 4///fil f 9,[Illf THIS IMP OF Â·THE HOTEL ASPEN ~ A CONOOMINIUM WAS APPROVED BÂ¥ THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN THIS____-_DAYOF______,1985. STATE OF- COLOR/001 85 r===171- Na- 1 i /.1'jillillillisl COUNTY OF PITION J \\. 5 F~ 3.3 i-i Jill'jilill/j/jil SUBSCRIBED AND SwoRN TO BEFORE ME THI 5-______ -04 011 .,.____ 1585. 229 INGNEER M ROBERT P. MORRIS, PRESIDENT OF THE HOTEL ASPEN, LTD., AND SECRETARÂ¥ OF THE HOTEL ASPEN , LTD WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL B COMMISSION EXPi RES_ PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVAL / THIS MA, OF 1-HE HOTEL ASPEN - A CONDOMINJUM WAS APPROVED BY THE ETWY H/JE Age#Wiltftsb'-.*..irti).f-~i/~1:.4 f:25)5:.5,il -------------------- Crer OFASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMESSION -THIS__----__-DAN- ADDRESS____________ OF_____--_-_.1385. CHAIRMAN IN. /1 f 'll;i'/i,i;flilifi j ASPEN CITY COUNCH. APPROVAL IUPDATE CERBEICATES 22 94 20 0 ,(Alt<.,im:# , 1 , . + 1,-Â£ --- - - ~~~~~---~ AND ACCEPTANCE I ~EKEe,1 CEK/:Fl 10 -1-ITLE USA C.OleFORATIM AMP JM N 75Â°09'11"W A<bENT Al,PEN TITLE COEFOzA-rt ON Â»0 FUPEL{71 BANK, A ALLEY- KELCOUION - AT ITO MEQULÂ« AAEET-ING -THIS MAP OF THE HOTEL ASPEN- A CONOOMINIUM WAS ApPRovED Br THE M(CHie/94 *TATE BAHM~lrÂ·46 CORPE*e-TiON TRAT EN Â·DE.FTE-MaE.A '4> ASPEN CITY COUNCU- ON THE____ _[*f OF__________,158.-: AND 19 0. A V leUAL_ iNS,FECTION VAO M/NDE LAPER MY 5//ENViÂ·5{ CH ON aLE)8â‚¬42 22,1134 Aerly ciTY COUNCIL a ACCEPTED TWIS........_DIÂ¥OF...___-_.1585. OF THE HEKEON PED<.MIDED KEÂ»L Â¥ltoPERT't ANO NO :cE -1-KADED O-110 ALLET FORL " f>AMCEL EmPICATED TED CHANGEÂ» WERE BPOMD E-XCEFT- 45 9tyÂ¥/N Â»+40 NOTÂ·ED ALLEY BLOCK 58 2 Fl)Â©LELL...66'~(â‚¬)ELE MINUTES> -CRE>ED IN N 00 1-{OKEON . ACCORDING -0 ~PEN TITLE CORPOKATION NO APPITIONAL E,A*EMENT# AFFECTIIÂ·Â·6 T.15 FKOf'rJUrl MtÂ«E r.:-E- 44 DOOK 42,2 â‚¬ MAGE 333). - - . liD --------------- CIT~r CLER,<Â· MA~Â·r'O. DEEÂ·/ FUT OF Reccle) Â·51Â»KLE *16 RECOIDING CF- 17-tl 1: L 3Â«1: un LI Tr EAÂ©Gl Kim G u il> ALLEY- KEWAI rdâ‚¬p AS N : c ~9~549'it"28~ ----- CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE - - - -- - B -- -.AL-FINE. 50~VE.19, INC. #3'1 22Â·94 Z,5 1 2 20 5 THIS MAP OF THE HaTEL ASPEN - A CONDOMINIUM WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN â‚¬â‚¬FlÂ·EKABER I&, 0180 / #teÂ·2' THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTÂ¥ OF PITK JN, STATE DES,IN,eED *. < / â„¢AS'AREA. AND RECORDED IN FLAT BOOK____AT F:412__-_._ RECEPTION Nlt-_____ _. , *5. * OF COLOPUDO , AT_ -__. o'CLOCK ,.....M, 1-H}S ______- DAr OF_ ____-_-,1/85, I / I ------------------ 1, JAVIED F. AMDEft HEgE[DY- CE.Knn-THAT ON CLERK AND RECORDER PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. tdorEVIDE< 1 5, 1 191 I elADE A VISUAL roâ€žt>~5<2115;.~4; mJILDING' , , 9,: 1 >ef'ELT-ION OF T-HE. FIKOFEKT-Y- bkdOWN E/ HEKEON AND FOUNIP NO 04*1655 DEEFT AD . 11 .f St-OVS AND NOTED HEMEON. lilli Tifilliti/1111 7/ --- u 39>j~-*M I il j 11i ! ALrINE kv'inÂ»t>E. C===) '533'~ br' 1,2:rELG,U- 1-- 'It-- ___ _ DAm. _--11 915*_-__ ..--1 i*'1 / 6.C E m ME o S o 20 30 40 50 FF/8"9155*1 6/m--0.Â·r- 7 02 lili 1 Al 1 1 1111: 1 SCALE 1" = IO *-55.- I ill/lil// pllill,fillit 44 BASIS OF BEAFING: FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN. GCE GE.004. COMMON ELEMENT hICT-E: ,Â·er~s, LCE LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT CHÂ· CEILING HEIGHT PIT<11Â·4 CCUEÂ·rr TITLE, INE. CkiE NO. fET 13Â·435 1 HOT ./. i 0 .CE 'iii / lI ZONING : L-3 8 / //8- 1jf,, WAD UDED 1 N TNE r'<EFÂ»Wk>1 OF Tl-lie 5ljlÂ«Ey 11111 1 GCE f / \ POOL \ HALLAM STREET 1 sri-1 M N; 4/791 EGE@ RE INDEX BLEEkER STREET SHEET L - SITE PLAN AND DEDICATION LANGUAGE . SHEET 2.- SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS. j I l 11J .. MAIN STREET GCE. 74 1 0 j , 'aL.-4..K 1 1 : : F -----i F-- e | PAEPCKE : L 1 10 0 14 9 E 1-_OL-~ : ~ PARK B Ft /1 1.1 1 1 1 AVENUE HOPKINS O ~ I P I Q 134Â·98 l R I t==I S 1 Fic)WER ./ -] 1 - -7 - ofi . I IET CHISELED X N 00/CRETE VICINITY MAP FOUND: R,[6AR AND CAP N 75Â°09'11" W 1'=300' l. /184- SHEET I OF I M A U M STREET JOE NÂ°Â· 88Â·60. N 14Â°50'49"E DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE 100Â·00 N 14Â°50'49"E 120Â·39 laa Eis N 14Â°50'49"E 13~.lS ONO03S -- 71=r 61 I. \ \ , e A 44 34 46 . I r G Â£ I /:':t / 1 2-~EZEJECIT-%664Â· 114A~L.q lilli 11%*->2 1 .10)~ HI ~471 - --1 -0-r_ li , Eldil~li EL:=IBEEE r-r-~-1 r -* -FZLiali EEI3 i'~1 2990-4 'i EBI [fEREI~ Ele*.. 4"411:...:' I 1...:.-Â»~ 4 . 'PIT ~@~ 71=-3-3 *==tr f==ir=-I=[-= 2-17=r -z~Â£*-;I-~H Flm -Fli -PPrniki[71,7333 32.7 tr Y t * * ./ /2 .E â€¢/ ./t : . I e>' I' 40 , 1 e "r r 1 t.~ 1 -- 9149>I : . D D '1>"r rr-rn ~ - - T ~ 47.--â€ž.,Â·-~- - X i ./- -1 1 1 f -1 :''I ; 4:4Â· 'Â·1, !:1'Â· " '| h| pEi!13Â·' 1 -f , I. t~ '> f h V r / 6. --- ---9- - ---- - --r - - 1 1 1 Â·:aÂ·Â·Â· -- -~ill 431/6Â»Â« -193224Â«491 4 . hi 0 - N-5-3-2-4 A n | 1 11 1 1 1 .1 g U 11 11 1,11 1,5 9- 1 1- '' MA:.6 1-Â·- 'e;, 3, 1 It - Ir -- -Â·- - 1 --- 1 -1 -T'T'.71*Fli[r '"rf~-r~'-Fr---7,~IN111â‚¬ '1. f.: -lp ~ r,#-M - - - -3-- Â·,i ' iiI_U -_ 12!11LL =LI J ' 1--- _ -ir-3 ,-,=Â£ irl.=30 .,671(=ef=712 2=T-111 1 111:11 ;'I''I:,I~ ,!~~1.11 7 - r .â€¢1â€žrr- â€žr'IL-' 1 - I I.' i 1 111 111 111 'll -9 1 1 10--ir-,t. I i â€ž 1 1-- i LILI ~1&lilli[1[1 5. '9. <9~41' h Â·,1 I ili ''' 1 NI'44||1 1 11|~ 11 1 111 1% 1[----11 i I ll 1 11 ~ 11 11-1 - | R L L , 23--MMOT+1[~Ii-,~7[-11-t- -t-f-1~-1--tri-*--PI " ~.4.2 1 --1- - -- r 4111 1 1 -1.r--I.,i in ,,i~.,,,77-4- /60 4.8 / 132 WEST MAIN STREET 120 WEST MAN STREET HOTEL- ASPEN - WEST MAIN STREET NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK ELEVATION SCALE:1/8- = T-0- ~ ' liD 1 1 - 441'rl' f li.. ~g,-- 3--.- '--.' Â· ! -- /4 Ltill- 11;.r'F.2 -: 4- fl4625=241>-7-7-3.'Â¢,r-1 ,1.12==lf, --5 -#*Â· 2 , + \ 1<1-2-/F.I.. Â·... 77-â€¢...: 22- i ' 1.9 - i .1 h 1 -â€ž~TT~r 1 %%Il-246% 33-1 ' 1 42, Hi--51673/M//M/// 3*,--It.~2*,~4#U-4*2/, 1 . 11, IF-!-IM:-':.h'bii I ,_0_ ]LL, .- 9 ~ tl I I lili i ' iii *9~ APT.101 14 - -12Ed ~ 1 91 /22 -9 -1. '~9~3~11 ---2_ " F APT. 105 ' .. ....- LL[iliLL, .2 li 9 lili U 11 1 - ' ' 1111~;ti :'lilli - 11-z'r HOTEL ASPEN N. GARMISCH ALLEY WAY 121 W. BLEEKER i29 W. BLEEKER 118 N. lst W. BLEEKER STREET BLOCK ELEVATION BLEEKER STREET POTENTIALLY, ADDITIONAL OFF-STREET PARKING FOR THE HOTEL ASPEN ,----7-> REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND REPLACE FN/ NEFN SFEGIES - 0 6 LOCATION OF EXISTING TRASH AREA TO REMAIN --- -12.EVISED> BULPING ENVE!,OFEE (91NCE 198711)- 1-12.04' 11 1 ReLOCITED 1<ELOOD~TED EM]STING EXISÂ·fÂ»le -z 1 NEn --wi B 1/:=-:----el NE' NEâ€ž1 1 ./ Â· lilliNÂ¢5 9 PA~KINks 'o PA51* 1 PA//we 2 / <//KiNG 3/ , P.K.Ne 4 , PAKKNGS ~ARK'Ne 1 .....6 8 EXISTING /4... | i i PARKING 21 '40//1 \ EXISTING 1 |1|i EXISTINe PARKINI 10 1 3 (TO BE \ ,â‚¬ ---- -- - RELOCATED) - - -- F U < PARK]NG 20 PROPOSEP NER # m 1 / . ______* -_3-~ ~~J;-ip.EA~Tol-EALMovED \ \ ~ / - _- EXISTING STAIR _ ..Â« 3-STORY APPITION EXISTING \ 4 kK- ~ 1 REAR FNEST 81-23, PARKING / 1 / 40- <~% EXISTING BASEMENT: LAUNPRY TOBE ~ 1 -F---=- --4-1 ---- ~ I \ PARKING 1 q :st FLOOR: 1 AM.U.__.- _. 1 */ 2rld FLOOR: 1 A.H.U. Brd FLOOR: 1 -4. 1- EXISTINe ~1 EXISTING g PARKING 8 1 1 ' < . PARKING 1 8 1 \ 1 3 r- z EXISTING ? 1 1' -~f~'72-''~' -- ..4 -o" , EXISTING Â£ I- PARKING 7 " PARKING 17 IX_ 1 EXIST-INe EXISTINe NEF,1 ALLEY W PARKING 6 -11. -:7.-:kNEL-Â£4711 el ' PARKING 16 SINCE 1 9 84 r 61 *-3 ;17 +1Â« 2/!. 11 EXISTING Â·COF'37- 111 Z PARKINS 5 EXT'e 3-STORY BUILDING: L EXISTING PARKING 15 1 St FLOOR: a RMS. 2nd FLOOR: 1 MS. 1 AH.U. u / L IMIT OF 3rd FLOOR: 4 RMS / Ill EXISTING E < PARKIN6 4 BRIDGE ABOVE- ~, ~ EXISTIN6 EXT'(3 3-STORY f Z PARKINe 14 :BUILPING: ______u Â· Ill 111 EXISTIN6 1 st FLOOR 1 A H.U. / > PARKING B 2nd FLOOR 1 RM EXISTING Brd FLOOR 1 RM. - - ~ ~-- FARKINe 13 111 -- -- 6 -21-- . -1 0 EXISTING ~ ---- - -- ---- Z PARKING 2 : EXJSTINe ~~ - -- ---- PARKING 12 1 1 1 EXISTING ~ PARKING 1 - --LINfrry -- ' ' EXISTING BRIDGE ABOVE -i~~~~~ - -~Ae~QTQIXD4~2,~â‚¬Jmt:iltfl-lfdiitylteme~t----- ~ FARKIN6 1 1 - @ 1~41 1 LIMIT OF NE,4 EXISTING STAIR ADPIT ON ABOVE . e EXISTING f <| ' PATIO FATIO PAT\O f PAT\O PARKING 10 Of lillill- 1 x \ 11111111 -1 -----3 L ~ EXISTING PARKINe q EXISTIN6 PARKING 8 1 EXISTING PARKING 1 ' Â· EXT'e 2-STORÂ¥ BUiLPiNe: lit FLOOR. 13 RMS 2nd FLOOR: 23 RMS. EXISTINS PARKING 6 -3 EXISTINe / / PARKINS 5 ~ EXISTING , , . PARKING 4 :\ 1 PARKIN6 3 / EXISTING 1% 1 EXISTING PARKING 2 // I EXISTING ~4~ ~04' /~ ' PARKING 1 /1 ..2/ I. 0 / m BUILDING EN)/ELOPE- 134.98' ) ~=PROPOSED LOADING/UNLOADIN6 \l 1 ZONE FOR CUSTOMERS MAIN BTREET LEGEND m g Q 222[924 I E Me k Z U- 2 '0 z 2 8 202 HOTEL ASPEN ADDITION 1 / Ex -Ch)- 110 WEST MAIN STREET C W 5% - ASPEN, COLORADO 0 6-1 BUILDING ENVELOPE- 100'-O" OLD BUILDING ENVELOPE- 100'-0" S 1111HOMÂ¥ '381 896Â£-5TS (0Â£6) ECKED BY: DRAN'N BY: ANB PROJECT NO: 9921 31% 3(LISHI.10% ILE HJLIIN ONIG[M VISED PUD 1 1 -28-00 Cl IENI .APPROVAL SUE ATE: 07-/2-00 z----- ExiSTIB TREES TO REMAIN - --- - ..3- â‚¬9{4 1 :r, 4 r--â€¢.g, 1 1 Al> : . 1.-- 1"22 32...ni -2.- . -42 W $ ,-2/j 1% 11 Â· - My u. 4 1 . Â· -4 RB. , , 1 . ~01*twu,4,Â£~,. ..#U..44. ' i. /0 .111,1 1 . I 5- 101â€¢~'4449 . 1.1-4.1 2 10 2 -.,c i E - C:I :I 0 e I'll-'... 0 0 4 ./L""-'- 3 0 0*/'ti: . .. 4/r 1 1 % 23 901/11,lk\'. /~.11.%â€ž*Â» .."r. 4#IR- .....f LNH 11 1 + L1i1 1 , , % 3 . 1. 1 1 . . 6 rr / \ I \ 1 .0.4 43392 ~@~ f I \ I : 4 ..23'4*%'~;~/C, / /\ 1 / 1 1 /0.f / , . *r 1 A n - .,. / 0--------7 \ / 1 [7----mt-. :7---i ' 1 .\11 1 /// . 1 li 11 *93*93<x-*49UUUM~Up,/;li/~4',j/mimu ji, f jpqfÂ·mp- >vipÂ¥~ - 1 wm~*mmam*: 1, 1111/1104- 4//Ilginn//indli,/4111'ilmm '70/Â«Â«Â«Â«â‚¬Â«4'.12 91'..U=== ~~~*~001%Q~,444~ 11111'jill'Illpm'Hillu N '/.+: '' ; '!UNI, . 1 ...0.0,./ ,/ AGGREGATE W ' Â· M....1/>E SMOOTH SANIP 11.11.11.11 1 5-,1 -1-=-7 1 P- COLOREp co< 4 [ ~ Ax ' ~ ' ...>K ~ Â· - -- U,2- ' C A ---- Bp@i.1 Ei,,4 -r)se f---t-liAL A : 27Â»1Â¥1 - -6~*t-ti~''E 7 1 1/1 //// i// i 11 1/1 //l i j //// // /1, 1L-k 1 1 ~ 11 1 1 10*-39.-mi-{31/-~ 1 3:141.2- 9-Farb'- 1%,i / /// //4 1 *â€žh'll*'//l/l}j1 4'./47:fj)fÂ·'Â·/,/?lll//,il/$//1/,/1///////~//1\ \3. 41 -m \\ ~ 1 K=MAL ..ILif#,J?=tifi->=&11.>li 1 '. 'f,( lf ifil/fligi,/ lI lilit l< i ~li Ilifiriljj'#ji'I' WIi''llbil'b,'upÂ® .'7 "il,IN 1.2.:w 2 j' l Â· i'- P '03,1%' 16'' 14111,1 1 11 :'ifillill'll,ip mil'll ji'-1i lt,1 ''11 1'll' jill ji "ilijjillifilitililltlititfyllil;liltii 11 '1' 1,1 1- 1 ,Â· " ' fl 11/1 jâ€¢ 1 ./ ' 11 11 1 lillli .Il 9Â«44419444*WJW~.~~5494~ Av#=~.19/Â» // 2 / Â»Â»99Â«Â»44Â«46Â«44940Â« 11 lilli >.Â»~~Â»~Â«i.~0~feÂ».t~Â«.Â»6~~Â»~Â»Â»f~~~Â»2~f/~~9~~~~ /Â»~ Â«/2 9Â» 9~~49~fjj~f f~ ~ 1. 1.t, ij ~i~i.,~ fitifil 11/jitfi 1 1)1Â£11; i; */11/</Litj2411<11/1/tilifililj# j~ ifilifill ZilififF' ' -- 3,9//,j'rillf/ji)'123/ij=,J/.1,/b fiji/i/1>% Hj11/Jifi,/l/',l//*/,/JIN I/////111$?ff,i, â€ž4 -d mem//hy/N.41. Wkw#W~4~29&4M~W~2 41444 1 J, 11 iii 'i PIP ll, 944*44~*~$%~..~.~~..103 'liflillitp Â·ill, /4 / Â· 9013 0.1/11//Af,4 i fwijIFI/ijliftj/jufili#f#flinnhushift f \ 0 \ - '*10'~- \ 1 0 -11 ,--- I ,//f,/,1////// //fin,Plu/94.n,/p,Pr> - ~ ~ 'i jtll /l l/ / ill ; //1 /il/ /1 f ~ /I f i f i //i f /1 i i]\ 0*/01'll"*44 I. 0 .. im Ii#& i . *4"#*M'INMVM**4*37 0 1 ' $ S & 0 I: -t : 9 19 - 0 rn -i 0 rn W i 0 > Â· X 8 i Â§ 19Â»94#*47 2233~ .r n G n = 2 D>COR>[>R>: . I f. P W = 4 HOTEL ASPEN ADDITION & M E ;$ _ 3 00212 3 1 3 - E 3 %@ME KE, M-34,knÂ· -- 2 U fl 1/ mal qr) . i i @. B 8 + U ~~1 ASPEN, COLORADO - 110 WEST MAIN STREET Â© M. . 0 '*iN, 76* 01 131HS 'ld'34Â¥05(INVI ~ 00-82-1 I a'frd a)[SIA3}I O.L SNmNI NI /1 2 0 -,1 = ..9I/I :31Â¥,2)9 ddVDSUX 511111 131HS omee@reng= LZ# {026) V 21(11681.ROS ILE H.LIINS ONIGIN HECKED BY: RAWN BY: ANB Â£665-926 (0Â£6) OaVIO 1 'N'21dSÂ¥ REVISED PUD 11-28-00 LLENT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. Revisions CLIENT APPROVAL X g LIMIT OF m % BRIDIE ABOVEÂ·-Â«2 ~ ~~-3 REVISION: r, a - EXISTING STAIR 1+ a 2 A / 2 2.1 jil: 9 6 11 ,;ljillimilitilifliillillwi, . *4/4. a a 0MMWN#W//l j/i//mil//m/i//li//iii li?XJ PROJECT NO: 9921 DRAWN BY: ANB 8il j "r,1 131 193)334;1'jitiLL,ilf iji/tli'A'pij lujjifilj'ijjj/j ill 'N@ Ij1./3/li7---~5 CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 03-29-00 ---- LIMIT OF FILENAME: ~c'tl/ll/lti/u/ 4/l/l//U/)031)1Ii~ffgi+~Hili'Â·dul lil/1~/jilti/f)l/j /v u j he F'[ALL ABOVE u////v i y#C ll / ///1/1 / /fl lij ii llizlifi il c /, 14+ 4 j i/ p 4/ 34* / ;I ic 1 144 4; )/4 2111 444 ilhl il k) Ll ;iE j 1 212 1 1Lg $i Wh& 1i 1 /1 11/1 %< 1~ 44 31; jd %AU h 1 i u pj,/pub, pILI 11,1 4' C j )113 l ijy==:1 1 1 1111 114 4 ,,1jii/ffi1 //1/1/12/1/IN//litin,0 1. . p -linf1/,11/ /H 1 1" 2 2 'ff'' tilifilijll// ~filliff/llilll// / i/ilillillillilil flfj1i/ l /jCi/l// /1 illiffifitlliii tl /llifilif i' l)~/lijlitiltibdÂ®Â®MI'N ' '111 ili /1 1 1 /,f ifl Ilif 49449%994 1 1 1 N fo~ a = 2 u < u f 'INi ~ 11~ 'll 11111'ffil flijw~'lf'll'\ hnill/)11#HE/,jij/fil//)3//ll/?Jl|jt//31}} j I'l lg j '1 t#, III f #licittlilltiillini IZZRZE /1225/r RENO SMITH ARCHITECTS L.!-C. 210 EAST HnIAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925Â·5968 FAX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHS]DE AVE. N 101 BASLAT, COLORADO 81621 {970} 927-6834 FAX (970) 927-6840 H'EB SITE www.gib,oureno.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@gibsonreno.com ' SHEET TITLE: ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN. EXISTING M UN BUT!-D]NG ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (~) SCALE: 1/8" = r . 0 SHEET NO: A2.1 NOILIaaV NadSV 12[J[1LLS NIVW S Oâ‚¬[V 0102)'NildSV ~ ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. Revisions CLIENT APPROVAL X j REVISION: A A A 8 A ----- .....1/62 PROJECT NO: 9921 + --- NE. STAIR L- EXISTING STA]R " DRAWN BY: ANB 2 //. 1111 War li||| LI CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 03-29-00 71 t-11- 1-fÂ·*1114111* Ill1111 1\1111|ir| 1 FILENAME: 2'.//90// 9, 944 42 42>~~t~ fit~ f ~ Â«41Â» ~ 422/0397/ ff/, ,//./. /1/2 '1111.1li,ffi ijtit i., 'll'$''ifill'.il zil p~Â»fi~~4Â«Â«t ~1Â»>144244~H~V~~4M~~~~~~~*~~~4 -~~4~~~&<~ M/1~~7 10-- Â»Â»Â«44Â»94Â«Â»Â«Â«Â»Â»Â«Â»Â»09Â«4~Â»49Â«27 -f;'fillf'flyfif'it#ylfl'fiff'ifii'fffi~Id thi:fufiffig<[(,fififif:'lifiNHf'h[Iltii<dÂ£]Â· 91f-ffI ,%!f [ilj,} i,iÂ·Â·Â·aiffÂ·,ff'lif i.Â·Ii phflf"fliti, i ! -NE~STAIR /-9/Â«Â«/Ap ffÂ»Â«~>~9314'~./iN/). 240.2004Â«92~12."0/ , Fi~-4<floff~-2 41*'f,iNy .nifi:im,, j~,ffit,i ,â‚¬,1511;11111#ififi!'11%11't ,|Inlitj':'Ii'lle 4'11 411)~11Nlitift"I''Ii'll-ftill'%%j'U 'l~~l/llN,''il,Iift, j. ~ 1 H 11 1 1.1 h L. 4~4449*3944<4itttettli~ 4 E 14Â»9~'/20Â« C 494Â»4Â«9994/49<*MVVy/ Â»94Â«49Â«4 g 94Â«994Â»44~4{ 0 KE =1 2, t fIC r,fri''Illf/flfuNNm f Iff f 21;1 112~//11111!INIC,0~~finititi/b ' >9~Â«410>4"'~.2~~9~~,5~~I~~,1,/~~~~~~~2~~"~2 1 11// . . 0 --1 949//'~449,1 919754~3'L%24::d'.Â»flof#2212Â«7,4/9/93' i RENO Â· SMITH Â«lfÂ»44Â»40Â«94Â«Â» 1 1 ARCHITECTS fÂ»,Ii.T~~4Â«~ ffÂ«Â«444 [Hi yll~iffillitilluiliblf/fl"jiti'fif~'-fjjilliii'j'!'i/~fljij/2#,filf'f<111'2441Â· . 6" 9299Â«/Â»/ffÂ«Â»Â»49/53Â»34Â»Â»Â«7 04%>f/fÂ»/Â»/fÂ«/2Â«43//Â»322Â»Â»4##VAMKF~~MM,41%=~' 4 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 C")1~443 . 5m.Â»caff{Â«fttÂ«f,>~ ASPEN, COLORADO ..i/ 81611 (970) 925-5968 FAX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHS]DE AVE. N 101 BASI AT, COLORADO 81621 {970)917*834 Â¥AX (970)927-6840 WEB SITE w,vw.gibionreao.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@gibsonreno.com SHEET TITLE: 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- EXISTING MAIN BUILDING 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ SCALE: 1/8 = i' - 0 SHEET NO: A2.2 NOILICaV Nild 132[MLS NIVIAI 1 ' IUMON ED ISSUED FOR: I ./- P.U.D. St'BMITTAL CLIENT APPROT AL REVISION: ~ REViSED PUD 11-28-00 r Hillilli'11111]j .Vil 3i},l/ji)jill//1111',j 1 ~ -, 11 .4 , >5/ ' 1 d' i ill/11 1 i '' - -------- -WI--1 2 PROJECT NO: 992[ % -- NE. BRIP6/ ~Irr-U-~ ~ ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 CHECKED BY: x - NEA STAIR j ' FILENAME: 1-12-+ . --1- / -.-. , -1-== .-r REFR A 1.11 --- NEn ...1. \1 CE 1 Â£ 1 -=: = L 1 -~i . 1 1 62 j HALLINA' S $ Z FOOM BO-J SUITE BONA/SOSA f ROOM 308 1ROOM 30q ROOM 310 ROOM 311 ROOM 312 38.3/*ft "4/5/ir-- , 5'15aN ft 9955*61 4 341564#t 941.554 ft 363 9 84 ft _ - - 0111 -- DECK 1 1 lili DECK -CIZ1~~ PECK DECK PECK 11 1 r I 11 i' f Wr 1 @Â© E- 1 1 - I 1 . 80 $ 4 7 c 1 0 2% --%.-- "-321-------f%/oop pecKEE----27%E---1 4./.-0 P- --- ----- RENO Â· SMITH 11 I _ ARCHITECTS -61 i //1 1 L.L.C. 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 .ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970 925-5968 , 0 FAX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHS[DE AVE. N ] 01 B ASLAT, CO],ORADO 81621 (970) 927-6834 I-fl (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE www. gibionreno.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@glbsonrene. com SHEET TITLE: NEW 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLANÂ· EXISTING MAIN BI H.DING 1 - NEW 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~ SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" 1-1 SHEET NO: REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 I//3 A2.3 HuLHâ‚¬M ISSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMITTAL ct.lENT APPROVAL THENEâ‚¬~8 X i--Â· - --- 11,1 REVISION: ~ REVISED PUD 11-28-00 19{--fifF=JUNT--rpr -C-247 -Â¢ 8 --==Â»:11 A Â«11 --11 -~ -_._ _ : " PROJECT NO: 9921 1 14 DRAWN BY: /UB 111 C}IECKED BY: - ISSUE DATE: 07-12.00 2 FILE NAME: ~ lilli 11.I~ 1 1 1 -- 111 m-22 -------- 11 111 1 - 1 111 â‚¬-P 21 1 19 1 ] cl Â·6 1 14 | ' i ~! i ~ | 0 .. 5;1 11 1 . * a 1 III 1 / NI- 4= - 624 + 3% . ==1 --4 Etti 1 1 1 6 111 ~5>j "j~jjj,!;~ji;I;ij~~~ ~~~~~~i"m""Im'14 k IE=:4 / NI I 14#i 1 I IL4 'Iiff < G9 / 1,11 'Â¥ 11 L-L @4 658 0 *1 22 === I -- EM I - , til'.34 IZEÂ» 51= V RENO SMITH \ ---- ARCHITECTS L.L.C. 210 EAST HYMAN . 3 202 -------- ASPF.N, COLORADO 11611 (970) 925-596S FAX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. N 101 BASLAT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-6334 FAX (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE www.gibsonreno.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@glblnre/0.com SHEET TITLE: NEW ROOF PLAN - EXIST]NG MAIN BUTLDING NEW ROOF PLAN ~ SCALE: 1/8" = 11 - 0 SHEETNO: REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 A2.4 9020 =10.W H.LHON *9 ISSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMITTAL Cl,LENT XPPROVAI X REVISION: ~ REVISED PUD 11-28-00 6 A PROJECT NO: 9921 DRAWN BY: ANB ---EXISTINI STAIR CHECKED BY: X--- EXISTINe ST* ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILE NAME: ~,7-3~P-11 1 I. lili I T lifiliti' ./S; }i, 1 [-IT[1' 0 lift/fil iC fl i I I 1 11 ll/1 l Â£Cl/l/ji/li /1 j# i filll / ll i~ C ll i/ 1j // / Â£ i 1; 1, "Illim. 5 2 f / 4 4 3 i j 1 1 +11 B i jj fl 3l Â£ I L 1I i* F i 11 r 9 $ k J 1 1 31 1 1 r i . jl 1 f i 11 11 1 i 1 ; Z 1 i I 3 1r Ilf,ill, t 11 EMPLOÂ·rEE ~ :3 1 | HOUSING . 1 ~, 1//1/q/111111'll'lll'l//Ill illill l ' Â£ Â£1 11 1 t9 3 1 ~ 1 i t1 lj r i i 2~ 1i 1 l / 1 / / 2 */ 1 512 * / / l i~ l ~l~ ~ ~l / /' / / ~ i i/1 l 1 ~l l' ii Ml i tilT l i i1i r ii# fi F~ l / tll j*/ F l 1 , '' 441 1 1 --t_I 1 -- 7%*44441944% 1 - 9 Â£,01 93" 0 ~MA / ~ xey 7 / |~| ROOM BOB 11 3 = - (44~ 1 '(,#1~Ap~ N qb , /1~ , jis? i lu 33Â« 5 1-1 If=- -9 1 M Â¢~f==+-_â‚¬j /'f l Milm, 4,! k:1 0 Â£ C litl/ / i 1 /1 1 j . v'jil//i//l//li/////lj,ji/frrr~ /Â«ff/%*#r#*tr / fc-y r 1 9 f FtÂ«Â«Off~ 1 1,11/1,1 '411111Nlidilliii,-- .. -. ..... 'litilittilitililf. 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ PARKING LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ 4 6 -2 g ...#.-17 ~glmt' RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTS -IXISTING STAIR L.L.C. 210 EAST HYMAN 1 lili 1-IN 81611 N 201 lilli 1 ASPEN, (01 ORADO H (970) 925-5968 49Â»~ (970) 925-5993 04Â«Â»40'440 1 .-n / / 1// // /////24 371 SOUTHS[DEAVE. N 101 BASLAT. COLORADO 8~621 /1 U .10,1/4-/Ied *:0~~ (970} 917-6834 14; // / //0/13,4 1 Â«/Â«07 4 STORAGE Â¥AX 11 1 {970) 927-6840 _j Â©,Â«fÂ«.99**AL.5,+MAki~I47 Mi.glbsonreno.com Â»-y NEK EM/LOYEE 1 | 1 WEB SITE HOUSINe *2 1 9- V L; 1 1 Â·lilli ' 11111.11 4 #11?ilic,1, /11 flili,!14#,pu 111 1 1 EMAIL ADDRESS " Â· LAUND// /M -' l I I il %fÂ·iill r di fil I '/fli'#i/l/Illb~ili il, office@gibsonreno.com Ir--- 11 ' U "jlfliff/<11/11/11'N,1,/jit,ift,<lii~ifilbill/'111'Illillt"Illi lu , I , 14,j,.",1, f , 0"U,Nl'9/lif~j~~jl~~f<~~ll* 24#in ruitiplilit'lijlt~1111't rBiljj//41 1111 FLOOR PLANS- NEW wunnadafi'lliti/~41/111fi:llitlliitill/tli'ltiill/nllEil'll//fil<litlilliti. - 1 11 i 1111 I ii 111 1111 ( 11111,11 ' d I N I E ! 1 I d 1,1 f 1 1 1 + 1 1 ( l i l i 1 1 31 , I l ! 1 1 1 1 1 I f i l ! 1 1 < 1 1 I d j 13 I N 1 1 1', BLDG. & ADDITION \//////ff//////,0//A . 1 %, , , u id rl 111 lili 1 1111 111'11 1 11,1111 1 3.11 1 01 4 // 0 0 1 1 j i ~i E__3 . I .1 j .11 11 11 11 1 , 1 , 1 111 11 1 1 SHEET TITLE: SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 SHEET NO: 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. (~ A2.5 \\X.. \\~ 03Â»Â» NIOIALICUV NIG[d 110 13IHIS NUVIN is H.LMON 100 '%11)SV ~ ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. Revisions CLIENT APPROVAL X REVISION: A A 1 1 6 A 1 6 PROJECT NO: 9921 T - --11--IF DRAWN BY: ANB -r-,-1 1111 ~1~ 11-~2 -111- - -11~ 1~ 111-2-1 11111%~1,1111, 11 921WMTMA"be 1 | 1142 f 1' 5. te'%1 . 1 CHECKED BY: ' "11%14{4@1,111 '-- ,| /$/,r 1 1 i i ISSUE DATE: 05-08-(jo 1111 11 1 :15742tJ~1 -r-IT-- FII.E NAME: 11- - 1 4 . 7- 2%,111]1'.11.~,1,11~;1.111-,", 1:1-11'~i~~~1 Ul. '1111111.1-C=lu 11,1111111.... mal. 1 2113' ... 11 +Egbiliad' 7-.7-M- I -r-'Tr.7 ' "99/.Il 11 1. t '- rl-' 9' Impirl. 1 - - - --- NEW BRIDGE . ~, -th>--:~ :; TEâ€ž lili-mil_ . ~PFFI~.~,1Il~ EAST ELEVATION ~ A 53 :C BE@ LIMIT OF REVISED ROOF FCâ„¢ -0 MEETIN6 PATED A 617 - RENO Â· SMITH $ TANDINS SEAM 1 . - --U -- 1 MIL Roll--- ~\ 1 Â·ARCHITECTS L- 40 1 x VERT,ICk -- T,O. RIOSE L.LC. 512!Ne TO MATCH --1------- ~~~- ~ __----L_ NO EXISTIN/- ISO'-5Â·* 1 11.O. PLATE , 210 EAST HYMAN 1 291'- 4 5/8 N 202 i- i.SUrT"LUD=32' r--+- ill'Ircilllillilrl" , i ~me7'9#4*f~~~' ./Matft <Frillrill'Irirf.73.941.111 - 1. T.0. PLATE ASPEN, COLORADO r-TEr/ il I Inill,Imil- I, 4 1.1 1-1.1- 1 I ... 1 "I'll 1 201-0.0 81611 (970) 925-5968 3' DIAH. STL. VAX T.O. pro, / 3rd /LGOR * (970)925-5993 TUBES - ---- --Ii# 1 1 I'-3 371 SOU'THSIDE AVE. nASALT, COLORADO ' 11''rt; 111 1 1,1 1 lim' 1 N 101 4. ! 81621 TIMBER OE,â‚¬16 -3 1,n -- Â· -- -p- -Â·-r-- - 1 -7 --1-9,199.-21 (970)927-6834 Ii'*40-*,wriL~ithi~*~r'i~F,;Fr~.,,17?i FAX . /AM, STL ; TENEI~' EI~~:.Â·2 . i#.Zil '.9 - Â·'0 ' 1._,0.11 43. 1.11 11 TUBES <*-- -111 1/4.....u*....-.-*14 ff-/ (970) 927.Â·6840 WEB SITE -1 T O. SLAe * www.renosmith.com 1 I tOO'-O EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com NEW BRIDGE --- SHEET THLE: NORTH ELEVATION ~ ALTERNATE B EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- SCALE: 1/8" = 1' . 0 SHEET NO: A3.2 NIOILIaaV NE[dSV 11 LEIHIS NIVIN OaÂ¥110702) ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. Revisions CLIENT APPROVAL, X REVISION: a A A a 1 1 2 1 6 h + 5 ' PROJECT NO: 9921 + ~~*M-ti=ttt-KI+Ft*Tll'1=1*t Fil-1=11*14] DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: FILE NAME: ISSUE DATE: 05-08-00 i ' P: ~ iii i:; 1 ; -1 !: !..i 7* 1 - i 1-1 It I~ i I'l il''ll':III i ' 1 Il' P'lili!.111111.1,1:,111111 11 lilli '11 1 11 11 11,1 2 11 11 11 1 1.11~ 11 1 1 I I' , !' 1| 1 4 | i 4 |||~| |~ ~| 1!111~ : lilli 1 lilli 11 ; 11 1 I WEST ELEVATION ~ Z 4 2= LIMIT OF ROOF FROM ORIGINAL //Sle/- 02-09.0.--- LIMIT OF 'EviSE' ROOF ) ON ... /<2 MOR HPC MEET{Ne DATED 04- 12-00.---x ) - . /* INPICATES 1 RAFTERS 0 9-0 HT. OF CEILINe- S O ABOVE PLOO' --- ST-ND"GSEAM N RENO Â· SMITH / M/L ROOF --- --- I - STAN./6 9/AM f 1 \: : 1 1 xe VERT. ~ / ~ MIL KOOF 11Â£4- c.-1.=C=it'f~-ina.. _.- ..~~3--4.-_--.552--ip- ------ 3+Â«A& _---------------- 9==9 / i~ ---~ ARCHTECTS L.L.C r -I-~/i.....Z%i TOSE. 130'-8 I 210 EAST HYMAN A ..O, PLATEÂ® N 202 129'- 1 5/5 ASPEN, COLORADO In Â·Â· - 1 -â€¢ 81611 r7 1,11Â·-111 r-~ I--1--ll77 ~ ' r=il 4 T.O. PLATE . lie'-I'/ (970) 925-5968 ];1. 1 i: 11 =1 1 . lilli-ING (970) 925-5993 312.6 TO MATIH FAX - 7 ' -2-7'-4-[ Ati-]tm -- - V I~, *f.r~'~c* '~~'''fâ„¢L- -- â„¢rÂ·.4 --Â·~-â€ž4 1., 11 1 11 ; 1 111 1 1=1141 0 TO .10. Drd FLOOM . 1 N 101 37] SOUTHSIDE AVE. 118'-5 w i 'l 1 (970) 927Â·6834 a m 11~111.1 2 J I Il I ' IL ~I Illil 11 1 1 Il"HII K 81621 HASALT, COLORADO 1.1,1 4- 1 11, , TUBES FAX 1 Ill 1 7---- TIMBEP BEAMS (970) 927-6840 11 4 1 1.1 , 11 1 , ~ 41 ' 11'.11,1 U: 1 - 6 'am. MIL -* COLUMNS WEB SITE :1 'llilli 1 1 lilill 11 1â„¢w.reno,mith.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Am Ill '20 ..a SLAS . i EMAIL ADDRESS -1 ~ ' ' ' L n tod-O~ ' office@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: SOUTH ELEVATION ~) SOUTH & WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 98Â· = 1' - 0" SHEET NO: A3.1 NOI~LICICIV N*[dSV 11.LOH 133[MLS KIVK/.93 oaÂ¥*010)' ,.,G b-,bE ]SSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMITTAL CI.[ENT.U'PROVAL X REVISION: REVISED PUD 1 1-28-00 PROJECT N{): 9921 DRAWN BY ANB CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILENAME: 1111#24111$15â€¢11&11"Inal, , l' I -,JP ~ --.11 11111.14 1[ 11 lili I I L., .CU . i Â· 35.'-Itiff ;P - Ht.:i.-f, 0 In 1 ~1â€žâ€ž" 1- 1111.UU --- 73-2 -2-1-r- 1,1 1 Â·il,1,1 11 11 1111 1111 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 111.11 1 1 ...:ke=*l T.O. M.... Ir â€¢ .,i :~.':,i Â· t'&-?;'â€¢ i -1-~-1-11[ul-P-Ul.-0 - 1 17'-3 1/4. 6 *gir---1 . pr --1; Fi1 ' r-.1 4.44,8 ~1Â¥---r-~r~~9~ 1/'A//1 ~L: f -~~:. 1;4 -.31 it U I~i iwi~ji.~:LL;--J' ril~~Â·~i~4~ ~~~Â·-i- t... .-Â·U ';IN]i 1.-Gl: 98 E 91"1 ~ M.,3-ptl H~ . Â·.4, lili ' PrÂ· r '111 1414 0 Â¥ k 5..,621 il,|aail-L 1' - ITI - ~ nTI", Â·Â· r.1 1 1 1 1.11/1 . 2, ~ '' ' ' ' ' ' 1 /0. Prl... ~ L.- r---M/~ ~I'i 1-th-1**,~Â· 'L~~rtfi f~'~Â· r--5Â·1- ,i .!.i.i~ U!4,' f 106'-1 5/8 I if .1 1 1 0*FAMW' 44 4 WILIi : :Li ?1 40.2.#Ff l.**43.1....Et.:Wiu:'9411,~1~11.~111111'li~1 !11'1~1~ 11; 1 14Â· P..ki *hi i ; Â·.. Â·'.Â· Â· FT- 11!11'11 1,1111'11 lili 1 1 -' 1 r Dll 1 9,1 1 ~I I|| !' Ill~'~I I I TO /~0Â· l 98 -0. lili 1~- 1 1111[1,11111 1 ;L 1 1 4,4;4,0,!4:.. 16 '0 1 1 T.O. SLAe I C M 81'-8" . EAST ELEVATION- EXISTING & NEW BLDG. ~ 9\229<52 RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTS I.L.C. 210 EASI HYMAN 3 202 ASPEN, a}LORADO 81611 (970} 925-5968 FAX 070) 925-5993 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. N 10] BASALT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-Â·6834 FAX {970) 927-6840 WEBSITE ....renosmith.cool EMAIL ADDRESS offee@renomith.com SHEET'TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 A3.3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0' SHEET NO: NIOLLIC(IV NISIdSV 7 13)nI.LS NIVA OUÂ¥210100 'AlldSV ISSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMITTAL CLIENT APPROVAL X REVISION: Â£11 REVISED PUD 1 1 -28-00 A A A A a PROJECT NO: 9921 DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILE NAME: 1 I flIT~ , i UNP' 11 1 11 U' 11011111,11,1 1 1 4 0 1,1, 21.10 0 /,~ 01 2\111 T......2 A T o. prt.. A -4-1 ~,Â·36'i :,i 1 15'-22' 'F -1 41[RI 'Fli + ) '~ i -444444 p_ UU<I'V ''0''~'~~~ ~0 1 -- 1 14 1 1 1111~ DE~Ii To M. A 106'-1 7 T.0./ro / 106-1- 7 Ill= , -*-7 ZO =El 1 To .1.0.4 1 .1.-O V 4-3 T.O. "AP. 4 â€¢ *ISTING I I Ne, ADDITION ~ 1 Ne. mip,E I ~ NE. APPITION I ' 1 ......B / 1-- ---- d TO SLAe A 81'- 11 7 + 6 7- 1 1 Â¥ A., w 0 5 0 4 *C EAST ELEVATION- ADDITION TO NORTHWEST BLDG. ~ NORTH ELEVATION- ADDITION TO NORTHWEST BLDG.~ -1 2 0 = 222 RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTS P] IJ LI.C. 11 1 - =maair.#r,6,0,2-63-42 Â·,1 -; 1 : 202 210 EAST HYMAN P .m ... I. 1 1 1 1 1 1 ASPEN, COI.ORADO -TiT-7 - 71;ZE|~61 Â· - ~.0.25-5968 I i , I~ 816" th' CE Ka /470" 4 49'44r//M/34~ I[[1QE' : 1,1,1,!lili 1 ~~ . 1 41@M,1%1.11 :i 1 ! 11 1 1 lili . FAX I T.O. PIC>. - 1 1.2.1..., 1 (970) 925-5993 / 1 1 1'-3 1/4 44--1-1 ./.libl=/eT/fBM= f.el 1 4 -- - 1. -4 - m 371 SOUâ„¢SIDE AVE. -1 -31231:Â£,In,ME, :flll *, .r" - ..Â· 4*'t--, 1 -Â·. .- . a H#il""~'/* . 1 Ir l N 101 1--".' ~Â»~-~Tli+IÂ«JEEÂ«111.111~~11 ~~~111 ~-1~1~ Ulf} t:1Â·ilti-~ ~~~~~ t--i-~1-4-,-1 El ~I I L Â·. BASALT, COLORADO 81621 .TOP.P. 1 1 1 , :A-- - = 1-= - .. .. I 1. .1-- ,-----.p,1311::EW.,., :- 4,4 .#44. . . Hil<1 lilli lilli,, 111 11,11111,111111 11; (970) 927-6834 V 100'-1 5/8. p | ' -T 1 1 1 11 1 1--1-T--------------- 1 ,FAX 1 ~ B,Â·tÂ·:E -Â·:,iÂ·:ti-iff,--i~#1.F447-143~ilifu?J~~ (970) 927-6840 =* r ...f 11 - - 'A, 1| 11 1! lili 1 J lili 1 1 1 1 1 11'Â· 'i , WEBSITE w./.ren.:mith.corn A TO miD EMAIL ADDRESS . I._OÂ» ernie@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR EI.EVATIONS / T.O. SLAB SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - w I V e I'IlÂ· REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 SHEET NO: ' WEST ELEVATION- EXISTING & NEW BLDG. ~ A3.4 NIC)Iliaâ‚¬IV NG[ ISSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMrrIAL Cll]Wr APPROVAL X REVISION A A A A PROJECT NO: 9921 DRAWN BY: ANE CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILE NAME: HOTEL ASPEN ADDITION Z 110 West Main Street e -1 Aspen, Colorado i Z 1 5 i *r 0 -- 12? â‚¬49 ... .4.4 ) 1-1 RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTSÂ· 000 LLC. 21, EAST HYMAN MÂ·202 ASPEN, COLORADO 11611 0970) ~25-59611 TAX (970) 925-8993 371 SOUTH<mE AVE. Nl. 74 BASALT, COLORADO /1,21 P.U.D. SUBMI I IAL (970) 927*4134 VAX Â¢970) 927.-0 WID m u .. EMAIL ADDRESS 07-12-00 SHEET TITLE: em//01-0/1///1,//m COVER SHEET SCALE: . SHEET NO: AO.0 133*LS NIVIN 1 2 6 3 92 3303?h ..1 33 ISSUED FOR: ABBREV IONS SYMBOLS & MA UAL LEGEND DIRECTORY LIST OF DRA NGS SUBMIITAL P.UD. A-0.0 COVER SECTION K SECTION PLAN SEOTION OWNER A-0.1 U4FORMARON SHEET SYMBOLS -,4 I ~be-.er- -/~1 CLIENT APPRI AL THE ASPEN GROUP I AND .f le,r*ND ./.PING ...... L LENGâ„¢ SÂ·rMaOL OUT *1 41 ] EAST MAIN STREET SURVEY X AN{12 I ..Â· 1 - SCI~ COMPACTEP FILL *M AT LT UGIE ASPEN.COLORAD081611 1.1Â· I. ......Irr CONCRETE CL =7. B 11NEAR .HEE' MO TEL. 970-923-1250 MAIN STREET BLOCK ELEVATION LTL LINTEL BI.EEKER STREET ELEVAnON REVISION: ' 7 DEGRE' h[NVEE 'BCOND LVR LaND FAX. 970-925-6943 MTÂ·â„¢CH Ly 133:m -zry ROCK. 94*M ARCHITECT A-1.2 LANDSCAPING PLAN - -7~ hinâ€¢ MANÂ·}10~ SECTION NO A-1.1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ~ | PLATE 1.{FR MANUFACTUall (ER, CONCRETE ...0 Y ~ 8 A2 OR 0 ROUND.....r,EA MAS MANSO.1 Y .ILL S'/TION . 0.-COMPACTE' FUL W$-2 *Balt...$' hLO Mlealle/40 .IMBOL O.UT __79 MATL 210 EASTHYMAN STREET MAX MAXIMUM RENO SMITH ARCHITECTS A-2.1 ist LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. J 1 ... MBC,i ]â€¢mCH.,Vâ‚¬ (AL) SHEETIO SUITE #202 A-2.2 2nd LEVEL Fl..OOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. . p .CCESS PANEL MED MEIXUM A. I.'Al/Nr MEMB MEMRRAME A-2.3 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. Met METAL IAN/ PROJECT MGR: ALFRED BEADLESTON A-2.4 NEW ROOPPLAN ~ AGO AOGUOATE MEZZ MEZZVaNE DET/11- /0 --irm STONE I mism ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 -T ALTEANAÂ¥Â£ O A.2.5 NEW ADDIÂ·nON AND NEW BLDG. FLOOR PLANS Ar~ Alit CONDrION'IG = DETAIL our TEL 970Â·925-5968 ALUM .'LUMiNUM busc .BOUS ......0--JE-.I A' FAXÂ· 970-925-5993 ,3â€¢a,t>~Dot. W MOLD]NIT'.."I'l A-3.1 EXTERIORELEVATIONS - SOUTH & WEST MAIN BLDG, A ~,BOD ABOOmED E-MAIL: alfred]@tenosmid.com Â·VeROX .d.MIROXDUTE MOV 1Â«}VaLE FINISHED r,000 P-f1 A-3,2 EXIERJOR ELEVATIONS - NORTH & EAST MAIN BLDG. r NWAB,- hall ~JU~14 mi) A.33 EXIERIOR ELEVATIONS- NEW BLDG. PROJECT NO: 99/ FRAME Fl.-L HH= ASâ„¢ .1.SPHAL. PETALOUT i. - NAT NATI.]kAL U~ 4, A-3.4 EXTER]OR ELEVATIONS- NEW BLDG & NEW ADDmON AUTO .lm)MATIC NOM NOM!MAL 'CÂ·Z/'SIM. DRAWN BY: ANH , N NOUTW NOY [N CONTRACT N 7.S NOr TOSCALE BSMT BASEhaNr NO NUM.5* TILE ~ r-t-41-4+1 .OUGH F.AMIN. OR /75,1/,3 CHECKED BY: B. Â»Â£AM ./TER,OR ELEVATION 4 1 ' BRI .GUINO 0~ 019'CP EFEE' ROUGH SAIN T.1. 8 M. BeANJNOMATUASeM~TE .C (,4 c-,1= a) Nlly ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 DI ./.J 1/ARK -Â«3 r 1 BET ...... MS,TE .l .râ€¢'El.ED 0/ CM,rSlDE D,AMm- FILE NAME: .rr .TruMD,cxg 0 I OVE*ALL 66.ZING - HEE ,â€¢000 01.00!~146 FA L BO: BLOC~ OH OVURAMO BLK' .1.0â‚¬X[MO BOUD PCF rouNDs//a.mlc,70(. .00/ NUMBER r=iaE-1 ENTRY B. 00â„¢ 3.e PL Ir P.....MIUM./.1/OT BOT DOTTOM ,3/ FOUNDS FER 'OUARE FOOF BO BOT[g,4 Oip P.Sl 'OUNI]G..SQUAkE INCH BO.W .OmO}.10. WALL ,1 no~=Tru,m I 6-U-LAM MOOD BLDG 'UnD/40 Mt,in'.D~ POO~ MARK '.u/ BUILT UP ROOFING M PAHEL "mil ,.BD rARICLEBOARD STEEL m .Al,rrION M'MT .AVEMEN-r HER mOUTB @) CAMDIT PLAS M.AMSR ~ 2=: :=Cl=A REFE.ENCE %10 UNE ALUMINUM OR. 1-_r pARTICLE ll. OR 7~77~~T~ CAST ~NON U SHEET METAL MOOD PISEn al, CATal BASIN i M.01 M.,J'EGL~,8 CA~X C:Btr~J M.Afe M.l~/DIG nZ> M.YWOOD ~~n-Eâ€¢KIHE~Irr M roLYvrNY. all'll ./.T ELEVATION A TO,Pre . pon,r ~r' 7 oc>-cy .ATT IN5ULATION .161/INSULATION W= I OT QUARRY'ral I. -- 6 ***9 #I>luS *20 *RE.....18 flo a,BAN OCT =D =m 6-rl. MALL BOARD/ 0 .60.STIC ..11-1.6 1777771=TInIT COL COLUMN CONC CCNCKmT~ (CAStÂ·IN FLA(E) Reâ€¢E .5/10*Â·reÂ» PRAP,1,16 REVISION Q 1 A Chil L.yal STUCÂ·00/ pLASTER COPÂ®,1 cONNBC-MON 5, - m* CCN~ CONn-*IrnON W :=NFORCEruxONel,â„¢ ~t~ 1 .sv ==REVISED INTERIOR ELEVAT,ON 4~2 ....ET WN'll.... CoumoR *Â·M Â¥ 6/lam PLÂ·r,NOOP CO[,DIATBR L.O.W mro,wAÂ¥ C.PL COUNTD ./.re: . .~s=.~moo- 3 1 U ROOF ./AIN lo ROUGH 0,8,NO PON.Ort MARK O . -r SEZ SaCTION Sm - so,{ mal.~R 1.C 'OL~â€¢00~E I~(x/ SP SOUNr-OOF , 'ovni~ @k- 1- SFBAKER ~A.LL TY'ME MARK ,~c sp~,~nol . , C~OR DCUBLS :.pr grperr *4 = Oâ€žwm " S. rn 8 9 Sm) STAy{~RD 4 :3 STL Sna VICINITY MAP 41 =20 EACNWAY Aul, == m-BCâ„¢CAL rYâ„¢ = n~Iâ„¢*4 ~15f SUSEENDEZ) Sâ„¢ SY,lhEr~Â¥ (ICAL) CIA ~2Â§ -* SYS 5,"rE)41 ENOI]$E (UNE) TEZ- lm,[â€¢BONE , M U TEXP TDâ‚¬~UI) 0 ME~ ax=T - E.Â» El):FANSOIDOX. &6 =--. m. m.'-/4 ./. 7*0 TONOUB.d,ND Oal/* Err EXTEUOR ..0 lt*OF T.J = 252 1 ... 1,0,0/COHO~ErÂ£ ./S TOPOPSL41 BUILDING SUMMARY F.D FLDOR DRAP4 ..OS. 1,(,sr,621 GENERAL NOTES Foc ./.=OtÂ»KmE;E T.al 1(*V.;al J F.O.S -a. c, snn~ T TREAD 'AS .,isâ„¢~/,srBrn n7 rrMCAL Elll -BROLAI 1 & '.,Mum>, Ulâ‚¬r UKP~mflb F E Fne ECC"ll.,t'R Fic MU Exrperlon CAB.I VNK VE*[Ek EXISTING BLDG, NEW ADDmON SUBTO'PAL ASSOCIATES FOR LOT 3321ELLURIDE MOUNTAIN VE.LAGE. STATE OF .....AD/'.1 1. INFORMATION TAKEN FROMTOPOGRAPHEEMAPPREPARED BYJACOBSEN gla,E COLORADO SE:Qz::Nli*Eas== - I. 'ir-Pr.MELD 482.4 sq.ft. 2,679.1 sq.ft. 3,161.5 sq.ft. 2. BUILDING ~OTPRINT IS TO BE I.OCATED BY ACERTIFIED SURVEYOR FU) 1 =11.: MR . V.N. BASEMENT LEVEL Â»T PD :Vol imme-r ... vp./.COMPOS,nONm.2 PITS Arr'NO 3. ANY DISCREPANCIES TOUND ONTHESEPLANS AND WHERETHEY EXIST ON RENO SMITH WT. .AUTOW.U. GROUND FLOOR 10,077.8 sq.ft. 2,650.1 sq.ft. 12,727.9 sq.ft. IHESE CONSTRUCrION DOCUMENIE MU5r BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENnON ARCHITECTS 1.UNDAâ„¢Â»; LAd pus:,â€¢as,rr,IB '*Â£ WAIRICÂ©glr OFTI[BARCHITECTPRJORTO COMMENCEMENT OFWORK ML PS Mil.50 .R uil.ENT PUU Fu.NED (DIG U *1=0 LLC WT WEIOHI 2nd FLOOR 10,946.7 sq.ft. 2,707.4 sq.ft. 13,654.1 sq.ft. 4. I.OCATE AIL UTCITIES WITH REPRBSENTATIVES oF EACH INDIVIDUAL. GA a.ke GA.. . WEST.WirEWIDâ„¢ GAL. OALVANIZ= .i wrâ„¢ . UTU.rrY COMPANÂ·Y OR PROPERTY MASTER PLAN OL OLISS.OKAZING Â¥DW ~mâ‚¬DOW 0... ......1Â£0 WD WOOD 210 EAST HYMAN OR GRAL' a~A~46 ..ORK. 0 POIN' 3rd FLOOR 2,215.5 sq.ft 6,530.2 sq.ft. 8.745.7 sq.ft 5. VERIFYSIZEANDLOCATION 0FUT11.ITYLINES WITHAPPROPRIATEUmITY M.2 Grp - ASPEN, COLORADO COMPANY OR CONTRACrOR TO PERFORM untrrY WORK GWB GYPSUM WAU BOARD 81611 TOTAL 23,722.4 sq.ft. 14,566.8 sq.ft. 38,289.2 sq.ft. 6. ALL LTIES ARE TO BE BURIED HDW HA~lryWAU HDWD HAADWO'. (970) 925-5968 1{DR HEADB~ 7. ~ INDICATES POINTS TO WCATE PRIOR TO FINAL STAKING FOR Â¥AX m ./.c~ OWNER APPROVALAND VERIFICATION OF ACTUAL GRADES (970)923-5993 IEAVÂ¥ Dul Â· wt ,m,em â€¢0â€¢ H .01{ 8. DO NCI DI5rURB SITE BEYOND 5'-0â€¢ PERIMETER FROM BUII.DING ~OTPRINT ILP ~[Â»HPO[NT 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE HC 1,~Im. N 101 .M HOUOW METAL- 9. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE AS PER SOILS ENGINEER '.1. i./'..... 11.1; "CS.Bl~8 RECOMMENDATIONS RE. SOILS REPORT BY BUCKHORN GEOTECH FOR 81621 HCr WATER BASALT, COLORADO 0/ HOTWAB-= LOT 332 TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN VnLAGE. DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1999 m HOM (970) 927-6834 HYD HYDU,rr FAX : DÂ¢(1 DK]~ (970) 927-6840 laUDE (D)/I} WEB SITE ID DISMEk INSUL ..LgEM*4 -w-,re,e-th.com [NVERT EMAIL ADDRESS 30WY ofnee@r-In*k.com ,Â· E-Tr KfrCHEN SHEET TrrLE: KO K}*XX OUr INDEX a LEGEND L.L N LAD LADDER U LAB #.T t.AM u./NATE 1-KV L,VATOR'r SCALE: SHEET NO: AO.1 94 53 2 40111'A. : 1/qHPH' 919 @it2202192 NIOILLIa(IV NOI BLECKER STREET - ) 11"E 134Â·98 Frou No: linÂ· MoNuM~NT CO )OMININIUM MAF 22Â·94 I I G I '12-04 H I 1 1 1 1 1 THE HOTEL ASPEN - A CONDOMINIUM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION OF DEDICATION G.CE. |, DANIEL F M/KEN71/ HEREBY CERmFY THKr IN JANUARÂ¥ 1585, A AND OWNERSHIP , SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECrION AND OUPERVIMON OF THE EAST ONEÂ«ALF (42) OF LarS E AND O, AND ALL OF LOTS F, G,H,I, P,Q. R, KNOW ALL MEN BI THESE PREIEN,-5 THAT -TIUE },CrrEL A5PEN, CrD., A COLORADO AND S , THE E//TERCY 11206 FEET OF â„¢E ALLEr, ALI IN 61.OCK Se, CITY AND CORPolorION. BE]NG -rHEE Of,hER OF CERT/4 LANDS IN PiTKIN OOUNTY, TOÂ»NSITE (F ASPEN . Pil-KIN COUNTY, OOLORADO ; TMAT -TWEE TWO STDArr AND COLORADO. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EAST ONE-Â·HALF C Vt) OF LOTS E AND O. ONE STORY' BUILDINGS WERE RJUND 70 BE LD~rED AS SHOWN ON TWIS PLKT. IND AL L OF LMV F, G,H.I,P,Q, R AND S , THE OSTERLy 111-04 FEET OF ~6 THE ALLEY, ALL IN BLOCK 58, CrrY AND TOWNSITE OFASPEN, Pin<IN COUNTI THE LOCKTION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES, UTILITIES, COLO*W; DOES HERESY- CERTIFÂ¥ n,Kr THIS MP OF THE Hal-EL ASPEN- full_INGS IM PROVEMENT5 IN EVIDO'CE OR KNOWN m ME ARE A CONDOMINIUM HAS SEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES 4 Â»Ill-+ 8 AcCURK-Ell IHOWhi ON THIS MAr, AND TME MAP ACCUR///2/ ANC} STA:rED iN THE CONDOMINIUM DECL.~ATION FOR SID HOTEL ASPEN SU66TÂ»ITIALLY DEPICTS THE LOCKriON AND THE HORiZONTAL ANC) VERTOL D,JEC> THE _______ DAY OF_ ____...._., 12,85, ANC RECORDED IN IOOK - E--363 1 DIMENISIONS OF THE INDIVIDUAL AIR SPÂ».CE UNITS OF 1-NE HOTEL ASPEN - A ____KTÂ· /AGE_- _.OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDEROF U 2. FL.081 4.7 CON DOMI NIUM, THEREEIN AND> THEREON, THEE UNIT DESIGNKTIONS TMERE- P/KIN CouNTY, COLDRADO; POES w,Rger SUBM,T Â·nE PROP,R-Ir DESUUBW *REN -re lilE 16Â·85 1 OF UNDER THE ISTRUCTIONS PROVI DEEP ME M â„¢E OWNER, TME ME:ASURE- MOÂ¥1410â€¢46 oF SNS} Câ€¢,4 Dorill,1,4 Dic*AM/,7 -9 , A,Â·rD DOES %*187 '2Nciric.â€¢.LLY DIDICATE 70 ,Â«j ji//, /7 I I /1/\1 1i 11 MENTS OF 26*JC UNITS, AND THE ELEÂ¥*rIONS OF FLOORS AND CE,UNGS. MUI USE AHY IND ALLINTERIST,RIGIT AMD Trn E IT MAf HAVE 70 -!HE FOLLOWNG FIZCEL BEGINNING KT THE SOUTHWESTERLY OORNER OF TRE EASTERLY HALF OF LOT E, BLOCK 523, THEENCE N 11,~50'4S~E 100Â·CO FEET TO -THE NORTHEKLY BOUNDARY' UNE OF IND BLOCK 58, -1-XENCE ALONG &41[ eouNOARY UNE 875oOS'/'E 22Â·84. FEET. THENCE 6,4, 50'45~ W !00Â·00 FEET, THENCE O ----------- N 75-05'11'W 22Â·/4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2294- O ALF,NE SURVEYS Br/ DANIL F. MCKENZIE SQUARE FEET, MORE OR UESS. 0 , 1385. L.6 20151 O THE HOTEL ASPEN, LJ'D. ATTEST: CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL SYN_____________________ ROBERT F MORRIS, F'RES,DE.NT SECRETARY ~ TWO ~TORY BUILDING / / TH:S Mar OF THE MOT-EL ASPEN-A CONOOMINIUM WAS APPROVED err THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN THIS_ ____.DAY OF_ ___ __ _.1985 / / (UNDER CONSI) 3JNAÂ·7'3%%'Z7Â°} ss Ir==PI. h*N//0/0/N/0 1.9 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN Tb 8/FoliE ME THIS_______ -Dly O/1 - _____1285, CITY ENGINEER 220 ROBER:r P MORR te, PRESIDENT OF THE HOTEL ASPENI, LTD., AND THIS MAP OF TME ITEL ASPEN-A OONCOMIN,UM WAS APPROVED Er THE NOTARY PUBUC 11'j'li'll'll ..., SECRET*RÂ¥ OF THE HOTEL ASPEN, LID. WITNESS MI HAND AND OFFICK_ SEAL h,rr CoMM 1 6SION EXPIRES- PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVAL ---------- * ULTI-LEVEL/' * CITY OF laPEN PLANNING AND ZONING CDh(MI 5SJON -THIS________DAY ADDRESS___ __... _ _ ______ Jillillifilililit AUILDING / , IND FL. WALKWAY OF-_----*. --___-~_#_- - CIWRMAN WALKWAY, - /' / /0/aff /,1/ i /4 ASPEN COTY COUNCIL APPROVAL UPDATE CERTIFICATES 2294~ ---' AND ACCEPTANCE ~~~~~ I HEKED.1 CEK-rlef -1/ TITLE. U.9.A. Co~02*crION .41[7 63 475Â°09'If'W /'OE+4Â·T At>PEN TITLE COKFCX,mON Â»AO FIDEL ITâ€¢-1 13>Â»Â·lk, A 1 ALLEY- IKELCGJ-104; AT ITY, Freut.Alm k/IEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCL ON THE_..._ _ C*r OF_....... _.., 158. â€ž AND 192,8, A VKWAL- ftll'ECTION V'150 14â‚¬PE UNCEK MY St-;Fâ„¢Vt'>LCH TH,5 r,Ar OF TME HOTEL ASPEN - A CONDOMIMUM WAS APPROvED er THE MlqÂ·(le,+4 STATE 15*â€¢Klh6 CÂ£32PmfeCTION TRAT IN Â·DEFTEMEER It ON COODEâ‚¬ 22, IlÂ©ZI AS,rEN CITY COUNCIL e U ACCEPTED THIS- --- .....Châ€¢Y OF_.. __ _....,laes. OF THEÂ· HEZEON DEÂ·Â·xlrfle}ED KEAL_ rfCOPERS-4 KNO NO C/ANâ‚¬Eet WErtr FULND EXCEPT /5 9-10Â·Â»4 440 NolÂ·Â·ED :CE -TKADED T'-1 5 AL1Â£7- FOX ' MANLEL PED|CATED 10 2 .2 HEAEON . ,<co,21,ING -ID At,PEN rITLE CORF'DeTION NO ALLEY BLOCK 58 Z R.Â»LCUSE " (SEE MI MUTE IUCÂ£*PED IN 00 APP ITIONAL EAes.ME+41'5 AfÂ·FECTING. 1Â·,411> e=gorrM./9 MAvE. N - 50010452 AT MAGE 350). - - :f ETYÂ· CLER,- ..46Â£---------- C>Egh! PUT OF- r.e:CCRD :MN=.5 11â‚¬ 1<SCOKDING, CF -THE- r--I=---t~~~Â·r~ ALLEY- fir.k/IAINS; AD i coN[â„¢INIUM 6,;Ar. 4 1 -Ic>r!11111~UnLITY EASEMENC . 1 595Â·oeÂ·,ir - .I GE-------1 0 ~_ _ CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE AL-FINE- 5GEVE#*, IKE. M .=171 265 ! 1 1235 1 .' I. THIS MAF OF' THEE HarEL AIPEN-A CONDOMINIUM WAS ACCEPTED ki FIUNG !â€¢ (Der-EMBEA 16. 1108 TME OFFICE C:F THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF- TME COUNTY OF FATKIN, STATE DE:51/â€¢UrED ---1 OF COLORADO, AT....._ OeLOCK .....61-, THIS _ __ -__ D.â€¢r OF_ . _ .... .....1585, l TRISH AREA AND RECORDED IN PLKI BOOK ____AT RAGE_._....RECEF'nON N'. ______ 1 1 11,3/ 1 , i / -------------- 1 JAh,lEÂ© R fUE,e#21 HEREerr- CEgilrr THAT- ON . CLERK AND RECORDER I./.1./.Ill / PirK,4 COUNTY, COLORADO, No/EvIDEK. 15 I 191 1 1/!ADE A VISUAL -ililillill lill illf - j r l INEfECTION OF T-HE PROVERTY- 51-loWN HEREON AND FOUNIP INC 01*GED EXCEFT AD 1 ht ... /TWO STORY BUILDING , 7 ' 5-ON'IÂ·.1 Â»O NOT--50 HEFOR.1. lilia Z ALrIHIE 111 .Â»65 , i / / /'fl 1 Lut. 1/ // // j l /1+ , 11 lilli lili , 1 4, 1/ ] 11 = I -..Ii J,92Â£5 5.1<Eâ‚¬)2LRU Il/Illill-/1/lt//iti- 40Â·2 4.C.IL *,0 r 9 9 20 30 50 L+3<91~ I. QF COU' 4-9-5.- .. SCAL.-E 2= 10' EATE, __Ll--Ekee-*e-Z_-_----__ < BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND 640NUMENTS AS SHOWN. lilli/111)711111)11/1 r TES; L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT. G.C.E. GENERAL COMMON E-EMENÂ·r hlorE: 0 CH CEIONG HEIGHT. O ...... HOT TUB lit/lifil///licifilrl-- 9 We LnED IN TWE n<ErÂ»WUN OF TWI 9 52*Err 0 ZONING : L- 3 Pil-KIN ca_Err -riTLE, INC. CASE NO. FET 15435 0 1 ... If,/jilijillill'lll//rl G.I. 0' '1~11''lll/1/1/'Ill \POOL \ /~/4wo STORY BuiLDING / IJU El 1- HALLAÂ¥ STREET S f--*-24/~fl==F 111 ./ INDEX 0,1 1 BLEEKER STREET - E [=:==1 El i-iE SHEET t. - SITE PLAN AND DEDICATION LANGUAGE . . 6.25/ / / SHEET 2.- SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS. , MAIN STREET . /l|jil , G .... :~1121&.6,12/4/ ril-IL-- i 93 PAEPCKE 1II Eiafa5 1 = 10.0 ~ PARK I 5 HOPKINS AVENUE 1- 1 1- 0 4 1 P I Q 84Â·98 1 R 1 02178 S | ...ER... VICINITY MAP 'OUND: R./.RAND â‚¬*p *â€¢ i . W...:Â»CLED ~X ~ IN C,ONCRE-r E . #-%,... L.5 2184Â· N 76*09'Il" W 1" = 300' AA A B AB STREET SHEET 1 OF I L C .U UU U ' JOB NÂ°Â· 88Â·6' N 14*50'49"E "DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE' 100Â·00 6Â£Â·001 3.6*,09.41 N \\41< 132% 1 N 14'50'49"E 133415 N335Â¥ 1. 3.-4 1 ..44 . A 1 ar /1 - 1 31 / \ f 1 43.1 . \ 4 , 1 .fÂ» tic.4 1 -1 1 ~ r T . D .r DA "1 'iNF f - -1-7- - 4- -- 4 rt , / 1 ... .- .26 d t ' t t !â€¢ 4 â€¢ IJ . -- 1 ' f'4ALUZÂ¢â€¢'' * rvE... I 64' I.FYVi' , ": 45-7â€ž 1-~ fr, r>X, Â·Â·*j -t? ~1 - i mEEHEEI J : 8- EB'dID Â· EB- Em iia tr r P F v ./. I : I . I tÂ» Â£ t. T ' 1 1. 2.-~ 1 11 11 1 /9 ...AL: Ir' I , B , A h Et 1' -- - /E~:-3.--/2/1Â»9Â«1 f ' 456_fet M - -ZI-19 -=FE=-9 w 1' rl~i'!11 1.1 1111:1 !._ '. 4.11 1 11I 46"1456 2 9 --- .- -- UI - - -- - - Wj/Efl~<grljg=TTE-1 ......1/4./.r/l -lai -- *Tin=IJACU-Eri--1 7 1: i !1 9 . - 118 hy C.trph'1,1.rry --- .11 01 - Pr p .r 4 â€¢ %, 1.1 Cl' 1:ili....Ujll_~' jiw,i'!' 111Â·,1''I.71.1:|' 1,1 ;lilli.:.1.lip.-1 -1 11 ! 1. , D U ~ -L- r 1 . 4 A + t.4 D . r. 6 r.t .;t 1.6:t.. I . 1 NEFININFViHI ;7-,11 Mr:,1 0. 1,0 4' 1 57 9 . 1.2.-1.-ir 1_......-r, ~71..E]E]-, ~:1 . /7--I-...Â·.'FIâ€ž"'TIET-r-Irrl- r 44 1 iII 1 9,111- 2 #. 1 -En!-1$1nl-IN IL-4 Â°--10-1 1 ir t. .AA 'dU~ jÂ·j'; i Ll.lili li L I - =;= 111 1171 4 ft-: Ftil [!,ht* iff&:,1 11 4,41 0 - - Lilli;, . Iii' 1 -2,4 & ~ 'lili ' ' Ii' 94 9.0 -0 - . 132 WEST MAN STREET -139-ME MANTEÂ«E HOTEL ASPEN - WEST MAN STFUEET ..0,-4 91.311 r .:....4 NEIGIEORHOOD BLOCK ELEVA:nON - 1,-5 ' .?1. L ----- J= Ak. '4*% jm.mt= 54*aâ€¢. i 1*&1 -Â£23- "1-14 1~ r 14 11 lili-,11111111 ER*1=*S#*2Â¥21 /7*FT --apeLEEZ=2= a.---1- < ti112111111Â£11 ~-EEP~LÂ»Â·Â». - ' 1 44=i -E :=t===*Â·6=:,EEL__ME-' - ~ME hE~FEEL-)Â» |ti APT. 105 Apr 101 ' 118 K ht MOTE. ASPEN ~ ALLEY 24Y 121 W. BLEEKER 126 w. BLEBUER 44 . 11%-> i c~. 1 ..h,j?.9 t.2. itte?'.V .>**Firf*. 13 , 91 .* BLEEKER STREET POTENTIALLY, ADDITIONAL OFF-STREET PARKING FOR THE HOTEL ASPEN REMOVE EXISTING TREES ,/--~~~~--7-- REMOVE EXISTING TREES â€¢ITHIN LOCATION OF AND REPLACE Â»1/ NEÂ»1 SPECIES NEFY DRIVEY'IAY --1 f C - .. 13'-{r ~. ) LOCATION OF EXISTING TRASH AREA TO REMAIN REVISED> BUILDING E 4VELOPE (SINCE 1 984)- 112.04' r----7 V ~rtlÂ·:101'un.'4'14'11,7~1 tt~11, '11 Ii,H . gÂ®*11!**{1168}IE][EEE]MO ~1 ~ EXISTIN6 PARKING 2 1 , ~ -iti~@4@-Mk*m!8/bq BASEMENT: 1 STORAGE 1 FB'.nFFFHF/FAÂ·+ ~~241/TING 11*ilk:EME=UtilliNmlml#Ef=i 13t FLOOR: 1 6 PAR~ING SPACES I EXISTINe PARKING 20 *21]MME=4UMImmEPE [ %J Ird F.,11 2\RMS, * 2 SUITE; EXISTIKe 1 3'-BO TALL i .nll.=t= I #4* #-7- ' Imill[11111- PINE TKEES TO BE REMOVED BASEMENT: LAUNDRY Ist FlooR: 1 A.H.U. _ EXISTINe PARKING 1 9 2nd FLOOR: 1 A.M.U. EXISTING ~7 | 'f| \~-j- -----' -L11411 0 BRIDGE ABOVE 3rd FLOOR: 1 A.H.U. EXISTING MARKINGS , 83| .. .. ~ ....... PARKING 18 1\] Eli Ill~'1â‚¬541-*CLLE 1, . EXISTING 114/-11[ElE#:m'IÂ·**111 , 20' 7 . EXISTING PARKI)tel *~149~% ' PARKING 1-1 ir {n 4-61*iÂ·=111+TI -MI ( EXISTING NE,N ALLEY K IN PARKING 16 SINCE 1 cle*h r 1 1 :El.iall--11/ ~ Ex'STING 411[ i-friÂ·=*01*#1*= 111 EXISTINS Z PARKING 5 Wit.i.Â£;;Ifit,112*1122 EXT* 9-STORY BUILDING: Q. PARKING 15 - Â· 1 *t FLOOR: 8 RMS. O Ill EXISTING LIMIT OF : ard FLOOR: 4 RMS -1 : 2nd FLOOR: 1 MS. 1 A.H.U. Ul BRIPSE ABOVEn '> EXISTING U. PARKING 4 <<21 Z PARKIN6 1 4 a =12aSh _____ -2- Ul Ul EXISTIN6 1 st FLOOR: 1 AH.U. > PARKING 3 and FLOORÂ· 1 RM. 7 EXISTING Brd FLOOR: 1 RM. --- r 0 EXISTINe ___Ll_- PARK?Ne 1 3 Ill 1 Z PARKING 2 - In EXISTING PARKING 12 1 1 E! ExisTiNG -3 PARKINS 1 LIMIT OF EXISTING BRIDGE ABOVE-~~~ZEI~~~IM VACATED 611 FÂ¥Â· r,Inr.â€¢tâ€¢,4 or.tr:bar 22nd 1484 PARKING 1 1 0 111 , 14,6' , - EXISTINe STAIR 1 | Bee Book 482, page 350. Alley remains as Utility Easement. L | . -Â· / LIMIT OF NFâ€¢ | , ADDIT ON ABOVE EXISTING PATIO PATIO PAT\O~ PAT\O PARKING 10 M 1,11111 1%'11'' EXISTING PARKING q EXISTING PARKING 8 EXISTING Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· PARKING 7 1 let FLOOR. 15 RMS 2nd FLOOR, 23 RMS - 1 EXISTING f PARKING 6 .- -1 . EXISTING PARKING 5 EXISTING PARKING 4 EXISTINe PARKING 3 , > EXISTING FARKINe 2 EXISTING PARKINe 1 4% 71 M BUILDING EN)/ELOPE- 134.48' / PROPOSED) LOADING/UNLOADINe \~ / ZONE FOR CUSTOMERS ..3 (92. 1-- MAIN STREET - LEGEND: g3 1 Z m 111 1 0 . l 2 ) 1 9 0 29 M 07 ~ 1 ~ 0 1 P~~>~~i M i Egl ; 3 , â€ž 1 i ':1 10. 1.1 61' 1.3 .U Â©~t~ HOTEL ASPEN ADDITION :69:2 83 "5 w 0 41.=741rM~ 110WESTMAIN STREET E ~" - 1.. 6 8 1 al\11 ASPEN, COLORADO , 92 - i '6 ' lf: t'Â· . .Â·. ad.4,. AA,fÂ·-4â€žÂ·.Â·4:- ti '.1 ~ 1/ N#' 2 .1 If . 1=L. ':d:....:2273:Uy#.4 :i'jiI):.1 .'*153Â£% t.c ~,6 BUILDING ENVELOPE- 100'-O" OLD BUILPINS ENVELOPE- 100'-O" $ 84)- 112.04~ NVU~ IN~dOTIASIC ~IS ~ r 133319 HSIN'hIVe C ovt E o / c t 3Â·0\ .0 -,I -.,In :TIVOS S 10 31 I H 3 11 Y ISSUED FOR: P.iT.D. PROGRESS -%.-431 3.-2 1 -30\ SET 3 21 0 ~, i Â«>-U'-PV~Â·: --. CUENT APPROVAL t! 191 REVISION: a 6 Â«11 2- -- L 1~- %~L,â„¢ 4 L FROJECTNO: 9921 n '| C DRAWN BY: ANB Eam~~821;5*10 C CHECKED BY: - 'f --i'â€ž-I'",.- \ 1 F-1 â€¢94 11 .tory: 11 11 9\ - 9 1 LT-1/ 521/2929845*69#51384*8 i ISSUE DATE: WI-0-1-00 1 4,4 -*r.\\.:i u..\\44 9...-9 -FRA 3...HI. 4\4 44. 1 5 0'41Â·fli:, I . L,ENÂ« FILE NAME: 49/.i .31-* 2 9 + 4%49 4 .l: Â· 4 9 m ...1 -It. % 4 42 - . b - 4 + In.. - Â»it=t,--~ = t<1.LS#~212, . A < - b 8 I. I-/. lael.--- 4 9- 12... 7 4 -. 4 *04: U Â«:Â»-9.2.%~ \N \\Â« ~~ ~146 p et.- F -1 2.-=t M :-. 91. . 49:li-'-Ph 5 -'.,3 -f.,~N -.'~~252~'w'+~. -~ | Â·YEA ! tt: \ V/AFT,TION I FAIND ./clo,ote ./les itd= "Â·?AEC:3....Itte&,}t. rtit .r - '49Â» f - INg:*:A 0 *% 1 - 9 - 80 aR.'NA+utW,0/44p. e 98"g./.A . | â‚¬ u44 ' . Ft**mÂ·k*upmaftâ„¢,Mrr = ~ ~ EVERIREEN TREES 2 0 NE 14429:998.Â·Â« r_â€žr,-e~=- ~.~.~-*49291 1 ' 17 - 4 4 Â· ~3(4 144/4/mj, 44.' Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·...2 Â·Â·Â· Â· Â·~..:_-in-'mtÂ«*â‚¬-ar-='wâ€¢ar-*25 ivaisa pgÂ·*p.*.r+~ I ...r - 4~1.- --42 . *-*44 ik / . nfl Â»WÂ» S .:s.v. suÂ·p=F I C ftE*F-nl 1112~ * . -1~afrOF)/fAMS<&331(#Wili < -1 i \ <MI BUSHES- g4*46 TÂ¥.S 0- ... /2 i - - -- _ . -â€žtp.0 * 4:Â·:-<.Â·Â·Â·....:a.Â·Â· - -7.-- - . 1 ~*14-~204Â«19--:Â· Â»4#*k=*-'-1- 114 tal- . 14 -orrÂ·tia< 2132Â£Stzik]~En HED>65 . 495826'621721@6h=U Z . r---*miÂ» 7#*4 4!.--.Â·ft'.3 39 . RENO Â· SMITH -4 Â»NÂ«i . I PLAGSTONE SU~ACE ARCHITECTS F i* 4-- 22.9 . 44 *9â€ž44 (43'11:(01:.4 4% m LLC - ZEm/An,/En RER EZESZfBE#:11#824- Â·0 !~:51''E Â· I B 4 3 3% LAâ€¢IN 210 EAST HYMAN NE!12 ASMEN, COLORADO 11611 4 4 - PAX *22 . 2 (970) 925-5993 EXISTâ„¢6 TIVES TO <~11Â¢ Nlot Re.AIN 371 SOUâ„¢SIDE AVE / BASALL COLORADO Â· 81621 /244 (970) 927-4834 . 6-e-- -- . FAX (970)~274840 \ WEB El'IT r 3.V~...44 N\\ ~ ~ ~ EMAIL ADDRESS / / W.W.-Il-ace. 1 | ..............0 Im.*e.0-th.1- a I z'' K / 8/ ./.OVED / SHEET TITLE: ' LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1/16â€¢-11 -0â€¢ LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO: 1/8" =1'-0" Al.2 H.LOOWS 3 MUTME PRIVE.A. 't tt Z ' "t' 1 ' [ (t 't NOI.LIGUV NISMS TRIES ISSUED FOR: ILP.C. Revisions V/// E.:.#hw.,~741 11 x ClyÂ£,rr APPROVAL LIMIT O. REVISION: BRIDGE 'COVE-~~~C*7--31 1 A ___-- EXISTING STAIR i> a a 2 4*4- 6 1 1 1 1 11 6 PROJECT NO: 9921 11'11 1 lili ! .. 11': U.... DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: 1/1011 ISSUE DATE: 03-29-00 WÂ·~ -L.TOF FILE NAME: MALL ABOVE illh /4 1 De.â‚¬9 Le.4 % ' / IZER lIza V AMITH RENO Â· ARCHITECTS 4, 101 LLC 21, EAST HYMAN N 212 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970)925-5968 FAX (970)925-993 371 SOUrHHIDE AVE. N 101 BASLAT, COLORADO *1621 075) 927-6834 PAX 970) 927-6840 WEB SITE EM*IL ADDRESS SHEEr TITLE: ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- EXISTING MAIN BUIIDING ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~) SCALE: 1/8â€¢ .1'. 0Â· SHEET NO: A2.1 be'DEC -1.10-10Â»il eNIO-Â·IMS NOILIC([V NISMSV 111OH 1132[.LS NIVIA ISHAi OII OaVH0100'NadSV ISSUED FOR: ELF.C. Revisions -IEN'r APPROVAL X REVISION: A A A A- A A 1/ /7\ PROJECT NO: 9921 ,---- Ner' STAIR -EXIST.6 'TAIN .. DRAWN BY: ANB f ( CHECKED BY: 11"U\lillillil ISSUE DATE: 03-29Â·00 ulni-11Nlitilit - FILENAME: ./ ...... I. hu~ / ,:",*4 '48>Â°N.jj'' )/j'1171- I lili 11, 4 4 -- 941'.P1 Â·118111 41/11 'llt , 'Iril'1l11 4~ . jill lilli 0 4% lili 1/1-99 -g. STA. 0 3. : 8 1i lilli} l 11111 1 lilillilli. .... I.'ilillh. ~nnt :fil,u, 1 4 v I Â¢ B. / 9 f 1 1it , 1. *f . m E 3 -F ''11/ C IE=2 1 1i 11l1/1 $1 RENO w SMITH Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· /4/: 1 LLC il 21, ZA,TEnUN N 282 'Mt I lilli ..1 ,.. ASPEN, COLORADO 1=22221 B//f Â·.L- *1611 070) 925-068 A 470) 9859,3 Â¥AX 371 SOUINSIDE AVE Nlet BASLAT, COLORADO 11Â«21 (970) 927-6034 Â¥AX (970) 927-6840 WEBSITE W.W.--/,0 EMAIL ADDRESS SHEET TrrLE: 20< LEVEL FLOOR PLANÂ· EXISTING MAIN BUZLDING Znd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ SCALE: 1/8â€¢.1'.0â€¢ SHEET NO: A2.2 6.. NOII,IaaV NHJISV OaVHOTOO'NEMSV \\\Â» ISSUED FOR: H.P.C Revisions X REVISION: L A PROJECT NO: 9921 , NE' 5/1/6/ -7 r=---1 I 1 CHECKED BY: *52 NE. 'TA- ISSUE DATE: 03-25-00 , ELLE NAME: Ill ' ! NE. STAIR â€¢4,.LlrIA' ROOM 30-7 2Wll-: 307 A /308* ROOM 309 ROOM 301 ROOM 310 ROOM 311 ROOM 312 565.*Ft 6946*Ft ......ft 5/55.44 341.5 N ft --17:WA --5:5-1-*R PECÂ·K PecK PECK DECK } 11 DECK - m 1 n.1 2 , All - 1 1 1 -loor M.< RENO Â· SMITH ------ Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· 1 - m llc 210 EAST HYMAN 1 1 M 262 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 98-5968 FAX (970) 925-5993 ~_______________21______----1 371 SOUTTISIDE AVE. N 101 BASLAT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-6834 (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE ww-w.gibsonreno=ocm EMAIL ADDRESS offke@gibeenrezo=In SHEET TITLE: NEW 3rd LEVEL FLOOR BUILDING NEW 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (~ $ SCALE: 18" = 1' - 0Â· L PLAN- EXIST]NG MAIN --1 A2.3 NIOIALICaV NIDI,ISV 13[1OH 1~11LLS 0(lvi~IO~O~S'~1(~ .:2 6 ISSUED FOR: P,U.D. SUBMITTAL - CLIENT APPROVAL i , 1 1 -- 6 1 REVISION: 1 1 1 - -- - < PROJECT NO: 9921 6 1 CHECKED BY: !11 11 lilli 111 11 1 020Â« Â» ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 L. 1~ % 411 11 01 90 1 9< !10 IiI libll 11 1 1 11 lilli 11 11 11 1 1 11 1111 lili 11 1 FILE NAME: 111~1111111: 111.1~11 1 111 1.111'111,1,11' 1 111111111111111~111 ~ 1,1111~11ill'~1<11111~1 ~ . 1111111 lili 11111111 11~Ill~ 1 1 li .1 lillil 1111111111 lili lilli ~~ 111 111111'1111 ~1~11~ ~ 111 11 hi lili 111'11 3 11 1111111'11 , P '411'11'h'411.1111111'11'11111 1 , Id'111 1~11111'n ALTIAI":FI ~ 1 L 1 1 1 ~11 1111,11 Q lili *44111 11 11111; 11 11111111.1111 111111111111111111 11 1 2 1 1 1 111111 1111111111 1 111 1 lili 11 1 111111111 111~111111'ill 111111'd lili,111 1.1 11111,1.1 1'111111 , 111 ; 1 1 111 1111 11 . ~lili 1111~11~11111'111~111111'll '~i Ill'ill 1111111111 1111'lili 1 11 111 1 11 - ~11 lilli 111 Ii'11111111 lili 11111 111111 1111111111 ~11~1! 111 111111 11 1,~11 Vip 211,2 irI:''I lib~\1 Â®%11 L 'it u 1;11 1 1\\11.4111,11~\\1\\ 1141 1 lili lilli 1 111%111 'l lilill p lill'11'li 11 011,1111 1 '11 ~11111111,1111 d 1 00 ' b lili lili 111,111111111 111' 1 !1 1 1 11 1 -- . Z I . I -1 z. ' LIL ~ 1 i 1. t 22 Z I .. .......1 ARCHITECTS 1 m LLC ' 21, EAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 4 (970) 925-5961 WAX (970)925-5993 ' 371 SOUTUSIDE AVE M 101 BASLAT, COLORADO 2 81421 (*70) 927-4834 t FAX I-11 EMAn. ADOPESS omce@gibsoor-cern ' SHEET TrrLE: NEWROOF PLAN BUILDING NEW ROOF PLAN ~ SCALE: 13â€¢ . I -0â€¢ A2.4 NOILIaâ‚¬[V WadSV 13[ 1311LLS NIVW 0(IVHOTOO'NadSÂ¥ ISSUED FOR: P.U.D. SUBMITTAL â‚¬k . CLIE,rr APrROVAL . B ily- 0 REVISION: 1 6 R.DOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ~ PARKING 13 r.131 fgarl [3331 -trl 6 492.6 N ft 283.3 sq It 283.3 & ft 492.6 sq ft . A E - 7 6 f--4( 9 12-1 ==-1 r 93 -2-11 V./.612 PARKING 1 5 A #Ell[ 71*1 6 _Jh 7--' 19, A E 1 - 1 ocio Â»=-=.t~1 ~ R [-01- *==III 01514 Ill-F= PROJECT NO: 992I 1 1 1 9 ...KING 1 1 PARKING 1 4 A 6 - Ir r b DRAWN BY: AMB Fry STAIR â€¢2 CORRIDOR *2 STAIR *2 011 3 STAIR U u-~IR *2 :' 7 CHECKED BY: 1-1 ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 ~LE NAME: 1 443.4..i,Oft.:tÂ· 4%*' 4153 Â·it: iÂ· Â·Â·.: 3.-30. Â·2,( f.:f./~ 71 (-1 ~m,g EMâ€¢'Loree ] : ~sgr.*iI~-f~f:itÂ·{92#Lti<%~:i --{F*4#&4# R-j}4~ti *3 HOUSING I 1 ~, . + . 94Â»94...:Â·? 9.Â·....Â·...... 1':4.'. /, : i= -4 j {,fl~ffflf~,~443,~~~'~Â·i ffiI,~1,<~-:-,~4-~~,i.- NEr{ EMPLOYEE I 449.38qft HOUSING â€¢ 9 */M' 85/.:/Atfi:,1 ./ft./.>fc 'fy...:Â·04 ....32/:*f -Li ni o~~ rr~ 1. 5.. , Â· S.Â·Â». .Â·Â·" Â· Â·Â» Â«,Â·.Â·.. 49Â»44Â«64 h i Il : - WE- 0.-ilf -1, 1, , 1 1% , .4 1%41*41 1 ff, f~:;.~f~f>Â·'<'ft:;fÂ·~,1}6Â·:<it{%*,%:fi~.Â·fift,ti..~fo.4 :Â· . Â·1.:~244Â·3124%40 31:9:V'.93Â·Â·2 .~/9,14rU: 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ PARKING LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ . ... f i ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM 1 E 02/3 1 li~~7-*-=111 17 E-l STO~ASE I=*52 a , +J) ~glir-u--hj - 080 -~-==Â· 31 It~ r-'-=---1~~~~ RENO Â· SMITH PN. A E Â«til . 4 STAIR .2 ~:37 106 Â£&21 Â·ARCHITECTS ey | STAIR Â«2 ....1.OR' 1 STAIR.2 , * V STAIR â€¢2 LLC 1 - n |~ ~| 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970)925-5968 .le VAX // ...1 ./ (970) 925-5993 it. i.Â·f~~4%6~:341*419Â·~24:~:9Â·6::.:fj. r-=m it 54 1 81621 . 72.:.4.0..4%.29.PJAE.491&#264#.,1./ 2125&16.~~Af5 633L*;M 371 SOUTHBIDE AVE N 101 BASLAT, COLORADO 4 - (970) 927-6834 . FAX STORAGE - 34Â·.TyÂ¢:00 Â·%:. 445'f.:2255~Â·40 < ~:4:2Â·Â·i.d'43:i<2.2.6.wqti.>,5 (970) 927-6840 1 1 A A 221 ,Â¥EB STTE NEW EMMLOVEE [A ~ ~ , ~,7~'",~"~,2~~A,tflf-}24{4,~FlÂ·33~,~~'4~';~~~'~~~,~~~1 ~ HOUSING â€¢2 u E / LAUND,~r KM. ~ 2 Â· irb,ir f} fÂ· ~ â‚¬?fs,J:'/*.9.542 Â·F~Â·~Â·fÂ°:~:~~Â·:523 .36'fM::Â·:1 Z C WWWâ‚¬;- KMAILADDRESS 1 1114 2*juâ‚¬24Â·594~94%,93Â«14Â»7~jf ofnce@gibionrene.com j. i~ d lili 3illd:~*/3*4910144% 4 1161:41*'.#41~i:t Â·~ .1.1:9%%6 FLOOR PLANS- NEW [44%%////A 1]14111 'llifillillitillizill. . .... ... .. ., 'liirlli '*1111111"1111~111111111111;. BLDG. & ADDnION SCALE: USâ€¢ =1'-0Â· SHEEr NO: ind LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. ~ BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW BLDG. (~) A2.5 NOLLIGGV NISMSV 131OH 113}LIS NIVIN 1621Â£ ON 0(IVHO1O0'NagISV 21140# ISSUED FOR. H.P.C. Revt,ions - CUENr APPROVAL X REVISION: ' I. A A 1 1 6 1 6 4/ N. 4 ' PROJECr NO: 9921 e 1 ~~1111|11111|111|1111111111111111111 4 DRAWN BY: AND (H/CK/DBY: 0 6Wfif~~M-V ~Il'P~ ~1~ ill~ll' ~ 111~~111~1111;:11. ~1 ~~1~1 9. ill' FHPL || FteÂ·11#' !1~!1 11~'. i~11::~:11.::: 1 ISSUE DATE: 05Â·08-00 FILE NAME: 1 1 1 1 1 i LI_LIU lillit,|1111111 rn 4.=-11 Â·Imill,[IlilliIHI!11101111.., : 1 21Â·Lil Illilit: 4 41' 1, , 11 1~17, 1 (111 1 11111111 ~~111 1~ 11,1 11 1~1111111 1 '11 111. 111111111111 111111111 11 11 1 1. ~ . 1 WEST ELEVATION (~ b - 64Â§ 99 ED E- ME O Fi ioM ~ 2% LMT OF ROOF FROM .11 O,161'NAL PEN/N- â€ž- 02-04-DO-~ .31 u./1 ./seD ~00, MOR HPI ,/u'ING lilli 04- 1 2-0(>--------~. -L...â‚¬01/ATES I.1 caÂ·a,6- 80. . X ..CM"LIJO~<DL STANDÂ»46 SEAM ,\ RENO Â· SMITH I - - .........AM h\' I Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· 1 / .6.... m --71_-4 --------E-_ -i.F...~.---~.~~~______9 -- D___---:0-.C------------------f--p-----------L------67---7-- LLC 11~22Â£Â». 0. I Tol=, 210 EAST HYMAN 1/LATE, N I. fl 111 ' r21r"M='IT k. 111=~m~*Fy. 124'- 9 5/6 ASPEN. COLORADO 72 SIGU 'A.. T.C. PLATE . . 12/'-Il' (97Â® 925-599 la -1 *VER/14/I 14,1 PAX (979) 125Â·5993 118'-3' I ./i T.O.m., Dr,1 -OOR . ~ 371 SOUTHSIDE AVEâ€¢ BASALT. COLORADO .:i N 101 11621 tri (970) 927-6034 94; YAI TUBES TIMBER BEAMS (9Â·70) 927-840 L'111,111111'~ill li~ 1 i~11111,1111,11111 : I jill'111 4, .}7 44'T. *4*Jit ~ . 2 2@2 8* 'am MTL !:R | ' ~11'~I~ D,|Il ||Â·,~| ,~~|||1~~'dd I'~ li ip pill~|i!111iliml lp~I""~ 1 1~1~1 ,"i , ;Iâ€ž1 il,~ iil , i Â· i~twÂ·*t, b'~ ./%*-*< CÂ·OLUMPS wirâ€¢ srrz Â· '11 -3*L Ed*My...i ' i 411:711'1111'il'11!1!111!11'I;4111.1 1~1113!111'111'11~Â·!,I,!, Id.4|.~|li|'I'd ,|'Id,I Â·79/,|-.- ' 1--O.5LAe . EMAIL ADDRESS 100'4 9 .mc-- SHEET TTI'LE: SOUTH ELEVATION ~ SOITH & WEET EXTERTOR DEVATIONS- 4 SCALE: 1/SM . 1' - 0â€¢ SHEET NO: A3.1 NOLLICaV NJ[JISV ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. Revisions- CLIENr APPROVAL X - REVISION: * 1 ~-----/22../----7 ' 4 -'' IL iii 1TTrmmTTTmTTUTTT i i ii li i ~ E-------------- ----------- --------------7-------- PROJECT NO: 9921 -- ~/~~ IBBY: DRAWN BY: ANB 11 Ilkfit] , ISSUE DATE: 0508-00 -rr, 4 1 1 .n,Im[1111 |]1,1 ,T,â€žJ 1~1 Ilil!~L, 1,1,11!11,1111 1111Ii 111 1! 1 1I]111111 ][ 1,1 111! Ii!1 !{1 F LE NAME: 11 1 1 1111-1111 lilli ;11 11 1 1, 1~1 1 1 lili i t ' '15 2 11.11'11 'in|' |I. |:' Illi:,1 |''llil" 151 iii,1 liI:Illti ;,1~i~11,11 11 8"'ll:,111:HI,:1!Ill P 114 1111 444- - :4 \ 4.7 \TE \ 04..~7(- d lili 1 1 1 _ :994-- x |â€ž:,11611111111111111111111411111, Ill :1 au 11 11 11 1 -- EAST ELEVATION ~ 93 3@ 6-1 49 C FE LDÂ·rT ....Se'looP FOR -0 MEETING PATED - I - -. I - STANDING SEAH RENO Â· SMITH MTL ROOF ARCHATECTS - I I I . Tl=. LLC \ TO.PLATE, 12 M'- I ./S' 210 EAFT HYMAN 1/9 11/lillill//1 lilli \ T.O.,LATE. ASPEN, COLORADO I'l:~ 11 qi,Im= mli mill. 11111~1 (970) 925-5%3 NE 1 26'.5.' 01*11 I.~Illulm v Â£*U I..t.iiliium&-d- ilt lilll<il|- 1~~'I~'ti ~''f-11~w~*~ ~I-Im-ml"mmÂ·'fillmi~i-Vmn 1~Ili':~ 5- PIAM. STL .Al TO..... I Ird FLOOR . (979) 1154993 ' i I - -2.A-' 11 0'-3 I 371 SOUINS[DE AVE. EM N 101 BASALT, COLORADO Illillillilll Illillm}jÂ· ~~~.Hmmp I - Cillillillilll Ill'llITLLliin~ ,= _ _, ~. Â·Â· 3%<.Ri[~Â®Â®Â®1111 mill iii-Â®=lim 81621 TIMBER BEAMS -11, |90"*TF Irilll"'ijp#. I ...Ill VA11 070)9274840 luels - ... U m sITE T.O. SLAS . -â€¢.re...M... flij " I " / I ~81//Glf=-1 1 ' ~ ~4/ /'t, EMAIL ADDRESS SHEEl' TrTLE: NORTH ELEVATION (~) ALTERNATE'B' EXTERIOR UEVATIONS- SCALE: 1/8Â· = r - 0â€¢ SHEET NO. A3.2 4<14<]44 NOILIGGV NV,ISV ISSUED FOR: TO..De/ P.U.D. PROGRESS _LE'LAIR,61 TO 'LATEÂ£. - ./.-1 "Al SET 4 1.-f-iIi/aÂ·'I 1 5/U-/& CUENT //FRIVAL, T Col M._ . 11 1-9 1/4 'F â‚¬.O 'LITE. 1 1 6'-3 5/8/Â·F REVISTE: A T.O.M... A -TE-J-/7/ 011111.lili ---1~ '-' 'I 1 6 A /02-7 PROJECT NO: 9921 T,0. rrl. A || | |~ DRAWN BY: ANH 11 1 1 11 ISSUE DATE: 07-07-00 FILE NAME: LLEVATIQN-mTIN11116 /3 ~ TO /1-ATE. 1 - lili-11/49 T.O. PLATE, 12-7'-10 -7/8 ' 1 2 i'~11~111,111 . 1 1 14119~ 1 110.Nl 1 141.N 1 1111Â§~11 1 1~ lili ~1 1 11'TR.11 12=133 -/ T.O 're. I ROOM- tiEr'-ME 11 11 T.O.PrO..k 11 -7'ZE-,7/ ~11-T. mil i -1-7-TWTTFT-TTTTTTTmIIIIIIIITIMM 11 ~1 lili 115-TTTIFTTTIET 11Â® -Ill--Imm 1-,1111 q T.0 Ir'ID.- 1 lilli-- 1, 1 b 02'PM'iNPA.111 I~'11@1:1' 1 4 1 !,11' Ilki N'l' !. Ii'lil'il 3/.9. ' ~ 2 t: W EAST ELEVATION- EXISTING & NEW BLDG. ~ RENO SMITH ARCHITECTSÂ· i . r.0 PLATE j LLC N 202 1/21â€¢-101/In' 210 EAST HYMAN ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 11) 925-5%1 T.0 M.. A - ----Pri,Cri77~ (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHSIDE AVI. N 101 BASALT, COLORADO 1 ........ 1.EUT-'75 81621 (970) 927-4834 (970) 927-6840 ~111- I TO,/.O . WEB SITE ~ 1 ..=Il -w..reoosm'thâ‚¬om EMAIL ADDRESS 1 1 1 ./OceÂ®reios=Ith-co- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS REW' SCALE: 1/8" -1'-0" .. SHEET NO: NORTH-ELEVATION- EXISTING & NEW BUILDING BI~DGZ (~) 113-1 NOI.LIaCIV NadSV 11,LOH 2. ISSUED FOR: f I P.U.D. SUBMITTAL 1 CLIENT APPROVAL REVISION: A 6 - , 1 A-- 6 - A | DRAWN BY: ANB 1 -- 1- CHECKED BY? ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 FILE NAME: 1!ItÂ·:Il lidrE' MPLIi lin:-r-- 1 - 61Ihi i'~i 1Eii:li~,~,1 1;dill: 141 ''i, 1 Ii|!ill; |â€¢ I ~~ 1 i ~lill' 11~11111 ~:11:11 ill! 111~111:1 ~111!i '/1 lili 1 11 1'lilli' 1111!1111' il'L:,1 'in' I Â®I n.il, h.r-11' I.'ll r~ Il 111~1~1~LT,t~ ~,~1~~~11~111~1'll'1111111!~111 Z - 11 ~11111 lili!lillil: 11 .....0. 'Al.1 4 0 1 - '91# lili 1,1 !111111~ P 1441. ' I vt.M///M//1 To./AD. A. To .... 4 L__.3 .7-Ory W Z ----- ...LA./ 87'-11' 7 ------ â‚¬ 00 fi 9 AiLELEIAIKEEAUnIIIUM.IQ.MURllimiULIZG, (* : 115 8-1 E .'%'32; 0 -1 L ,Â¥ 4.3.. NO Â· SM[TH 1 .... 1 1 1 .ARCHITECTS. .+262 I.2./LAIL_ i - lili-#17/ A T.O. PLATE 1 1 1- -- ---------------------1-I------I----- -*.744 vT'-TUTE./. -' Â· 1 21@EASTHDIAN 1 34- 1 ./.0......... / l ASPEN, COLORADO , n-il-*1>bÂ· !1 i,4111'|1111~||11~1!.|'|'11' !!~ 9 1 -'.7 -I Â§1611 . .- 4 #.- 1 I'll'~111,111,111 770) 925-5968 1 12..1 /11 1 111 lili Elli 1 111 1 11 1 11 T~Â·Â·rr-rr / i lili I,i'Â·Â·1'~i..... 1 11 1 lili -1 1-I,-=-=-===111 11.1 11 -1. 111 1.1 Oild - 11'11'lil././. I'~ill'~Ill''iÂ·I'Â·Ill |~ 1"l" I.I1'|'1~111 1 1 ... I .....,9- lili 1/1"11.1 Ii.m.1 FAX 1 0... i.32 1 111111111'zill'Ill'll'~ - 1 1 1 1 11 Ill' billi 1 11 lilli 1 1 (970) 9255-3 1 91,1-"- , p 111'-3177-- -~ , Al 'i|~||1!U||~|i|1|~|~||~|||~|||'|~ HIE|1111 k. ~~lilli 111.' CU~*CIESSC~ 1|| lil!11'111:inmlll|,Ili Illill.1:1 â€žMIN 4kil4qlrÂ·* 99*11 illi'lill'i~ 1~Ill-I---I- 1 1- 111 111 lilli 371 SOUrnSIDE AVE , â€ž N N 101 BASALT. COLORADO - - 0 TO ... ~11 =1111'11 1 1 81621 102'-1 57/ - - W 'Ir 11'j:t.' (970) 927-6834 1 ;1 :1111.1.1 111 1 111 1:111 11 11 1 lili 11,1 1 1.1 1 1 111 11 1 11 1 Â¥AX I , r--r-r--r-m-m-TTrT-r-T-r-1-r-r~ ||||| || | ||||||||| |i |||I|||||| |||I|||| | |i||| ||| |||4 ~||| |||||| (970) 927%40 -t/. 111 111~ 1111 .1~~ 111'111 lili : 11 lilli 111 ~ 111 '111111 11 -l ili ! 1 1 1 ~ .1/34-,9;3Â® 11 11 WEI S/rE -11*= le//2-____ 1 ~22~~ '344 I rmiEiÂ¥Fir-----1 64~ EXTERJOR ELEVATIONS ~ -14 - Â· d 6 0 SCALE: 1/1" . 1'. 0â€¢ ' ~(f) 1 ~3.4 1 700'NadSV 231~ P#i...t,13; ISSUED FOR: 133319 HGINhIVe orhllech P.U.D. SUBMITTAL al Z Ill CLIENT APPROVAL Ill ' -l REVISION: Ill 9- 0 > 6- a r a Ln 4 (0 el 0 (0 $ M 4 (11 01 0 (31 001 0 0- 0- &0 ZO jI ze Zo ~REVISED PUD 11-28-00 1- Z 1.-Z _tu HZ 1-Z 1- Z 1 1-Z 1 1-Z 1 1-z 1 1-Z 1 1-Z 1 Hz 1- - i=z A 0 2 Ing â‚¬0[ 02 09 9 9 1 02 1 92 1 02 1 02 1 0* 1 182 16 3 1 {i 3 1 MG 1 7 3 1 M 2 1 1 3 1 M g i 11) M in M ID JL X 0Â£ XM '-tu XM XM ~~ ROL A U-1 -< Ill < b /O Ill â‚¬ W â‚¬ 0- 0 4 ~~11111mlkLELLIP Ill â‚¬ 0 D- 00 0- 0- -1 1- r- ul ZZ 0 lu 1 0 f-I E lit W In F 1- .6 PROJECT NO: 9921 O *g 3< Ill 111 0- - - - I- --0 1 L '-0 -'Ill --.M- DRAWN BY: ANB --Nd &.#11&14,1-44+4-bit8 111 If) ~.-'/2.-I.~.I LL :u,":&44.~WA LU*Â»3444? r Â·t ,~...U".* ' V -*.':,4.:h....-/.*u<*Al' CHECKED BY: 1 0 .A./."""*//"L ISSUE DATE: 07-12-00 . K ~ FILE NAME: 11.1 C Z 0 vol a E 0 111 0- ~3 - > 111 â€¢ <C -1 I0 Wr luz 0 :3 ZIU g -I 1- 0 0 0 .1 X ~A Zoir E Ill ~ 5 p OW I m ,G'OL 28 â€¢ 1 E 01 - U L mi 4 2 'n 81 4 4 90\\\ Al ~ 0 =n >-1 I cn I >-1 0Â£ 1 â‚¬ 1 11- 1Â£1 9 1 IE Ddl m m 1 Ut - Ol m r k 01 e 01 F Z / \\ A \ 1 61 2 2 N 2 \1 1|000 in t,00 U.1 -1 Al 000 eli 00 111 1 1 1 \i >DI 2 22 .. 13, >D' 2+ / \1 k.1 * -O -O 0 Al 0=1 G XI 02 toi - 01 m 11.11 r- 01 B- p 4 01 1 L /11 k ID 1% 1 / 1 2 \ 1 / O / 0 -- \ / m m \ / . L v 6% V / \ 1 0 . ZO[ / --\ 1Â« 01 1 HI 11.1 / 1 M 1 1 Ill U.1 % Ul 1 30 I d) -1 - 1 L--1 ~ \\ \ U.1 l \ 1 --- IZ# 1 tQ / 1Â£ 1 1 1 1 fÂ« 1 1 04 0 KV / Ill 1 / 0 1 / Elv-2 -E It_ Ill | r- - 9414 1-1~ 0O ..1 12 2 2 1- O 11 2:It 01000 11I2 111111 J'1111111111111111 IZI 000 3 m . 5 2 xI 31 iii 2 c i 32 lt.11 [01 - 01 m 1 / â‚¬0 1 r 1 4 1 10 4 (0 01 0 30 0 0 20 22 212 4 10*W 1 12=w C 6 2 1 20 ZO ~* H_ F- k- t f 0 -- 13 -Z - Z -Z -Z 1-- 17- 1 my-00 0 14 lf) M lf) M I ~ 2 1 W M lf) d W M lin |PL 00 M t9 90(1.-0 R â‚¬ * OC *10( ARCHITECTS 61<-7 I X tyl R oc SE OC X V *0Â£ 1 Ill , L N \ Ill i 1-Ul Ul< 11_1< ILI< LLIC LU< 1-U~ 2 2 0- 2 L 1 2 L.L.C. ff - RENOÂ·SMIT ,-41*'Ge. 1 20Â·Â¢ A- tgbi 30NI ) BaC~~j~Â¢-#M|Z} 1---1 lilla EIGI N .>- 000 210 EAST IniMAN z o' 011' A NÂ°202 7 ASPEN, COLORADO , 0 4 6 4192 1% 81611 ZI z NImly 4 - 1, Ill - 1- 111 - 41 LI -1 - r- (970) 925-5968 FAX N 24% Â®Â§Â§ f Ad - (970) 925-5993 â‚¬ il 2 g &2~2 Ill Z ul z w Â£ 1 2'pa'*222 -) f #.....g.----%=j--de-17-I..2.:Il.=./.f././.~* Â£ A Â£ m y! c A , 371 SOUTHS]DE AVE. ~ - NÂ°101 W 1- I 0-,00 L -36O13ANE eNIaling 81621 BASALT, COLORADO â‚¬ 0 â€žO-,OO L -ElcIO-IEIANE SNIC-TInG d1O 0< 14 1 1.+ Unit 1[-pd~ (Ait> RECEIVE www.renosmith.co (970) 927-6834 -1 1- FAX (970) 927-6840 ~ 000 WEB SITE EMAIL ADDRESS 8 MEW porti Ib 2 AU l>,ill. SEP 2 2 2003 office@renosmith.com 1 -IJ ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHEET TITLE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 //,7 fa,06 li~ -f SCALE: Â»944 ' SITE DEVELOPMENT PEAN ~SHEET NO: 1/16" = 1' - 0" Al.1 ~ REVISED P.U.D. 11-28-00 I EXISTING T 4 PAER~N~~O PACKN, 6 PARNEING 7 PAR 68 1 PATIO OFF-STREET PARKING FOR THE 360=10'blct POTENTIALLY, APPI A ,â‚¬ b Â»â‚¬ L -Bc!01 laling NIOI~LICUV NAdS 11.LOI~ HOTEL ASPEN 133htl9 NIVH .UnnI.LS NIVAI .I,Sam I EXISTING STAIR OCIVNOTIOO 'NUSV RELOGATED RELOCATED 3-STORY PAR}aN 10 ON OF EX