HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.002-89RESOLUTION OF TH~ ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE RIO GRANDE FINAL SPA
AND G~QS EXEMPTION FOR '1'~ PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY,
PARKING FACILITY AND TRANSPORTATION CENTER
Resolution No. 89-2
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
(hereinafter "Commission") has reviewed the Library and Parking
Facility applications for Final SPA approval and Growth
Management Quota System Exemption (GMQS) at public hearings held
on December 13 and 27, 1988 and January 10, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the applications comply
with Conceptual SPA approval; and
WHEREAS, based upon their review of these applications the
Commission findings were as follows:
Parking Facility - The Commission finds that the design of
the parking facility is appropriate for the site; that the
snow shedding problem on the north face of the
transportation Center roof, has been resolved; and that the
size and location of the elevator building is appropriate.
Transportation Center - The Commission finds that the
Transportation Center is an essential community facility
because it is an asset to the community's transportation
system and therefore is exempt from GMQS.
Spring Street Extension - The Commission finds that the new
location of Spring Street extension works well for the
parking facility and the transportation center and does not
disturb the playing field; however, the Commission still
prefers that the new access road be located to the north and
encourages Council to consider this alignment if the budget
allows. Further, P&Z requests that Council give the new
access road a name other than the Spring Street extension.
Cap's - The Commission finds that Stony Davis (Cap's) has
been extremely cooperative throughout this process and that
the City and Caps should begin work to implement the
necessary land exchange between the City and Caps which was
Resolution No. 89-2
Page 2
approved by the voters in August, 1988. Further,
and Cap's should identify and agree to specific
for access to Cap's.
the City
easements
Library - The Commission finds that the north facade and the
northeast corner of the Library structure are too massive
and therefore, directs the applicant to address those
concerns. The majority of the Commission is, however,
generally satisfied with the design and disagrees with staff
about the importance of the open space located at the
southwest corner of the site, the Commission finds this open
space important to Mill Street.
The Commission also finds that the Library should not be
required to mitigate their parking impact for the following
reasons:
o Both the library and parking facility are public
projects using public funds.
o Staff assumes that a library in an urban location
such as the Rio Grande will generate a significant
amount of walking, transit and multi-destination
automobile trips during the work day. During the
weekend and especially the evening, the library
may generate primarily destination trips, however,
the weekends and evenings are off-peak times when
the parking facility has excess capacity.
Library (public) funds used for parking may
compete directly with funding for other valuable
community services offered by the library or may
compete directly with desired design changes
suggested by the P&Z or Council.
The Transportation Plan found that restricted
parking spaces, i.e., "Library Parking Only",
reduced the effective utilization rate of that
space by 25 percent. A condition of approval
would be that the Library Board not request
exclusive parking for library patrons in the
parking facility. Further, the P&Z finds that if
the Library integrates its elevator with the
parking facility, then the Library's parking
impact will have been mitigated.
o
o
The Library Board is required to fully mitigate
all other impacts.
The Library Board can offer free bus passes or
other incentives to induce employees to walk, bike
Resolution No. 89-2
Page 3
or ride transit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission that it does hereby recommend that the city
Council grant to the Library and Parking Facility applicants
Final SPA approval and Exemption from the Growth Management Quota
System with the following conditions:
Conditions for the Library
As part of City Council review, the Applicant shall
provide to the satisfaction of the Engineering
Department the following (the Engineering Department
shall then provide the Planning office with a
memorandum confirming their satisfaction).
ae
An amended drainage plan with adequate detail to
address the concerns of the Sanitation District.
DJ
An SPA plat with property boundaries and signature
blocks.
Ce
A separate plat sheet showing all utility
locations within the property boundaries and with
signature blocks for each utility certifying
locations.
That the trash area will function and be
appropriately designed.
Any sidewalk or right-of-way improvements must comply
with the City's Streetscape Guidelines.
e
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit the Applicant
shall develop a Fugitive Dust Control Program, to the
satisfaction of the Environmental Health office.
The Applicant shall contact the Environmental Health
office in the event that contaminated soils are
discovered during excavation and shall meet any
requirements imposed by that office.
Se
The Applicant shall agree to purchase bus passes for
its down valley employees as a method of reducing its
parking impact on the new parking facility.
Resolution No. 89-2
Page 4
6. As part of City Council review, the Applicant and the
City shall investigate the possibility of providing a
snowmelt system for pedestrian areas.
As part of City Council review, the Applicant shall
demonstrate how the elevator for the Library will
function for the parking structure.
The Library will not request or receive approval for
parking spaces restricted to Library patrons only.
The alley between the Rio Grande site and Main Street
shall be resurfaced and improved for pedestrian
purposes as the concept plan illustrated. Both the
Library and the City shall share the cost based on
where each entity borders the alley.
Conditions for the Parking Facility
The Employee Generation figure shall be adjusted to
reflect an additional .5 FTE for the Parks Department
and an additional 6 FTE for the Transportation Center.
The Housing Authority shall conduct an employee audit
two years after this facility is operating and make any
necessary adjustments.
As part of City Council review the Applicant shall
provide to the satisfaction of the Engineering
Department the following (the Engineering Department
shall then provide the Planning Office with a
memorandum confirming their satisfaction).
An amended drainage plan with adequate detail to
address the concerns of the Sanitation District.
be
An SPA plat with property boundaries and signature
blocks.
A separate plat sheet showing all utility
locations within the property boundaries and with
signature blocks for each utility certifying
locations.
That the trash area will function and be
appropriately designed.
Any sidewalk or right-of-way improvements must comply
with the city's Streetscape Guidelines.
4. The alley between the Rio Grande site and Main Street
Resolution No. 89-2
Page 5
shall be resurfaced and improved for pedestrian
purposes as the concept plan illustrated. Both the
Library and the City shall share the cost based on
where each entity borders the alley.
St
Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the
Applicant shall develop a Fugitive Dust Control
Program, to the satisfaction of the Environmental
Health office.
Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the
Applicant shall apply for an Air Pollution Emissions
Notice.
The Applicant shall contact the Environmental Health
office in the event that contaminated soils are
discovered during excavation.
Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the
Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Environmental Health office that the air quality
standards for ticket booth attendants is acceptable.
e
As part of City Council review, the Applicant and the
Library shall work together to provide a snowmelt
system for pedestrian thoroughfares and especially
stairways which are part of the parking facility.
10.
Prior to Council review the text of the final
application shall identify trolleys and buses as
adequate transit vehicles for the downtown shuttle
route.
11.
The City and Caps shall implement the land exchange,
including access easements, with Caps which the voters
approved in the Summer of 1988, as part of this review.
BE IT FURTHER RE$OL~-ED that the Commission recommends the
Council undertake the following:
The implementation of an informational and directional
sign program for the parking facility.
Increased enforcement of on-street parking requirements
in the downtown.
Review the existing time zone requirements for parking
in the downtown.
4. Add pedestrian amenities to the downtown, especially in
Resolution No. 89-2
Page 6
the Galena Street corridor.
5. That Council allow P&Z to formally review the parking
facility's operations plan.
6. That the Council rename the new access road Hallam
Street or some other appropriate name.
APPROVED by the Commission at a special meeting on January
10, 1989.
ATTEST:
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION
Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk
C. Welton Anderson, Chairman