Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.006-81RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING AN APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LOTS ll AND 12, BLOCK 1, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION Resolution No. 81 - ~ WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission considered an application for resubdivision of Lots II and 12, Block 1, Red Butte Subdivision at a public hearing on April 7, 1981, and WHEREAS, the application requests preliminary plat approval on behalf of Parker and Joan Quillen to relocate an existing property line between Lots ll and 12, Block 1, Red Butte Subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Con)nission heard testimony from the applicant, the Planning Office, the City Attorney, the City Engineer, and various neighbors and owners of property in the Red Butte Subdivision who opposed the application, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that: 1. Pursuant to Section 20-5(d) of the Municipal Code, lot lines established in an approved subdivision "shall not be altered by conveyance of a part of such lots, nor shall any part of any lot be joined with a part of any other lot for conveyance or construction unless and until written application has been made to and approved by the planning commission after finding that the general purpose and purport of the (subdivision regulations) shall not be weakened by such change." 2. Should the applicants' request for lot line adjustment be approved, they would be eligible, pursuant to Section 24-11.2 of the Municipal Code, for an exemption from Growth Management for the creation of an additional lot and the subsequent construction of a single-family residence outside the GMP process. The process in question would result in the creation of a developable, free market lot, which could not realistically be accomplished under Growth Management and, as such, the process represents a circumvention of the intent of the Growth Management Policy Plan. The applicants have indicated that their sole purpose for filing a request for a lot line adjustment is to permit a subsequent application for the creation of a third lot with a single family Growth Management exemption. 3. No exemption from Growth Management exists for the construction of a single-family residence on a lot created from the division of two lots. Therefore, an attempt to accomplish in two discrete steps that which otherwise could not be accomplished in one step is incon- sistent with the intent of the Subdivision Regulations, specifically "to safeguard the interest of the public and the subdivider, to provide consumer protection for the purchaser, and to otherwise promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City of Aspen." 4. While there is no specific regulation in the Municipal Code which establishes criteria for eligibility for a lot line adjustment, such adjustments have historically been utilized primarily to reconcile platting errors or to address specific hardship. In no case has the Commission approved a lot line adjustment which was specifically designed to permit or allow for additional development rights. No such demonstration of hardship or need to correct error is apparent in this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission that it does hereby deny the applicants' request for preliminary plat approval. Approved this 21st day of April, 1981, by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~om~~ ~ ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk