The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19950726AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION July 26, 1995 REGULAR MEETING SISTER CITIES ROOM - SECOND FLOOR CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of June 28, 1995 minutes II. Commission & Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. NEW BUSINESS 5:10 A. 520 E. Durant Avenue- Minor /) 1 /4, c-4, 4 / 2 ) l.,6.( C't -, Li ,- r'- 4 5:20 B. 205 S. Mill- Minor (l*c u' c ct ... 4Â·64.d ,. 5:30 C. 33-2 W. Hallam - Long- Partial demolition 2.*. 471-A 313 U I V. OLD BUSINESS 6:10 A. 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis- worksession 6:40 B. 525 W. Hallam- worksession 7:10 C. Maroon Creek Bridge- materials and final design 7:30 VI. Project Monitoring 7:35 VI I. Adj ourn HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Proiect Donnelley Erdman The Meadows Collins Block/Alley 624 E. Hopkins (CD:3-8-95) 220 W. Main- European Flower 930 King Street- Cunningham 330 Gillespie Jake Vickery The Meadows 130 S. Galena- City Hall 520 Walnut- Greenwood 205 W. Main- Chisolm , 610 W. Hallam- Iglehart Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Aspen Historic Trust 303 E. Main- Kuhn 930 King- Cunningham 939 E. Cooper- Langley Entrance to Aspen Roger Moyer 409 E. Hopkins 0 Holden/Marolt 303 E. Main- Kuhn 420 E. Main 107 Juan Martha Madsen 132 W. Main- Asia 435 W. Main-L'Auberge 706 W. Main (CD:4-27-94) 702 W. Main- Stapleton Linda Smisek 229 W. Hallam- Pinnington 316 E. Hopkins- Howling Wolf 939 E. Cooper- Langley 801 E. Hyman- Elmore Sven Alstrom 624 E. Hopkins 4-12-95 Barn and historic house approved final Susan Doddington Melanie Roshko Jeff McMenimen 0 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 520 E. Durant- Minor Date: July 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to replace existing double doors with 1/2 panel of glass with double doors with a full panel of glass and to install new awnings. This building is not historic, but it lies within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: D&E Snowboards, represented by Dave Ritchie, architect. LOCATION: 520 E. Durant Avenue , PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development within an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The proposed awning will match the existing awnings in form, materials and color. It must be retractable in order to meet zoning code. The applicant wishes to replace existing double doors which have a half pane of glass with double doors which have a full pane of glass, in order to maximize light into the space. There is another single door into this shop that is a full pane of glass. Staff finds that the change is not obj ectionable, however, HPC should consider whether it is important to have a certain uniformity to the building. There are some other shops that have doors like those proposed, one that has metal frame doors , the Chanel shop which has plexiglass doors, but the majority of the doors in the building are wood with a half pane of glass. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 0 Response: Awnings are traditional in the Commercial Core. The change in doors does not affect the character of the historic district. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This proposal has no impact on the cultural value of any adjacent historic resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application as proposed. Additional Comments: 0 AlmACEIMEN]: 1 I - IAND USE APPIICATICN REM 1) project liame TZ)+ â‚¬ fLAJOLJ -2â‚¬-AF-t> 6 MOP 2) Project Iocation AJAD'Â· M ouNTA, 14 801 LD,Klls 5 Zo E. Dog:ANT AN E A-beâ‚¬ A (indicate street address, lot & block n=ber, legal. descripdon where appropriate) 3) Pre=It Zoning 6 0 4) Iot Size Dâ‚¬*EK Jow,190.\ 5) Applicant:'s Name, Aairess & Ihone # . 12>-râ‚¬ 5Nou)168AUZ> 6>tÂ¥0*) EZIC eâ‚¬g&1:rEOM OLONGLS +6: ~l L L &/ 662.,<3>40004*55 VI L<,46â‚¬ ,. 4-2) 8|61 5 6172) 915 -1'517 6) Representative' s Name. Mdress & Ehone # 13*, 0 ~ vroh E D,w,0 2,Â·,ic-.+1Â£ + Asse c \\01 \NuÂ·*Gâ‚¬ 20.150,-TE UL.512 DALS,>M OALâ‚¬, ck) 8 1 6-2-1 (174 963- 9335 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use _ Conceptual SPA Co~Ttlial Historic Dev. Special Revier .-' Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual POD X Minor Historic Dev. Stzeam Margin I.I.-I.- Final FOD - Historic Demolition Mtuntain View Plane - Subdivision - Historic Designation ~imization Texti/Map Amendment (2CS Allotment Int Split;/Int Line - QCS Ehomption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (nunber and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; nimber of bedroans; ally predous approvals granted tb the property)- ExigrING 2, gbo 1>.F. 6â‚¬-1-8 )6 Tâ‚¬ht ANT S.f A-<Â£- 14 . Arlj k,<. RAD O 4 1-M A bupca . (. Fo,Z-Yu â‚¬2-L;y e 1 -1-2-A HOT- i For â„¢all-Â¥ m AÂ·MA= M A.62.4 A-'S ~ 1 I. 9) Description of DevelcE=arrt Application 1 . Ap[> EFTâ‚¬K--1 oA AuJ B IA 6- 2. 12'EfuALâ‚¬ EXI ST)A 6 MA-ir GLASS Pooll w 111+ rollj 6 LAÂ·55 -,21. 8,0 nt TD M SCNILAL â‚¬K IST-146 â‚¬Lâ‚¬YHâ‚¬AJ15 dr â‚¬h'â‚¬r'48- 10) Have you attached the following? 3 Ucp, 61 6-0 Response to Attad~ment 2, Minimm SKilinission Oontents Response to Attachment 3. Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Beview Standards for Yar Application 1 1 1 EA, sl-, A G b-F>RopoSâ‚¬ D AJAX MOU NTAI 14 - AWNING PwANTâ‚¬ R BUU-Â·P)44 LocATI O 4 620 E. DU12.AN-r ;.EÂ· ></51-\14(a PLAZA 1 /j DW 1 > 1 P LA,41-6 P. 4 4 - - - 3 - D,4 -Tr-7- -- 9 N > - /0 UPi t - PA > 44 1 - FLAA'rE %+ T# r~ - 1 1 Of D,4 PN 4\9â‚¬,WAL.Â¥1 6. DURANT Avâ‚¬ O \-U E. PLAN 9'NOID.VA.515 9ININMIV 2/ 3,SM) e) w r-)92 79>0- PrEYZ gigriva 0149 1 301-19 332200 iWEET# / Ma CA Â«---43/El) 1 p Z. 3>' - 1 >{ARP> PF~05 AvA 444 1%91 / 8046 3,4 60-1- / - 1/g:~ r - 53 '15193 trjivw 01 99 V I N Mv 9012 .Mince e?Fl/34Â¥3 0% VQ c)lv,3.rviÂ·ad A. 0109 117 1 dOHS ak'YOSMONâ‚¬ 3+4 1 \. 5111 63$4 "67-- 9311 1Vll gÂ¥9 ng 1 96:2 >4 -2ko I 2 3,3 y, 5 20 ihi 91 2 1 1 'Â·6314 Â·Â« -zpaa sevU 67 *71Ad e)31.1.91*3 41-31.9 1-4 01 -3100 d 59419 1103 19<[ L ve v-la 1 / M -3006 99Â¥14 81Â¥H 196 37 91 332 ! 4NINMÂ¥ M914 - 1 -toÂ°<3 â‚¬99 19 1 19 71 2 19 hi 1 1761'431 - i 1 -1 7 0- i 5 2\ 3 U J li Ul (f) (3) 1Â£-e MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer DATE: July 26, 1995 RE: 205 S. Mill- vent As mentioned at a previous meeting, a new vent has been installed on the Mill Street Plaza building, without a permit and without HPC approval. The vent is an air conditioning vent for the Elizabeth Locke shop. The vent travels up along Chanin's restaurant, then across the roof. There is no architect involved with this project. The new vent has been made to blend in with Chanin's restaurant, but sits right at the edge of the roof and is unpainted metal. The building owner proposes to paint the vent dark grey. Staff has asked the contractor to attend the meeting and to explain the reasoning for the location of this vent. Recommendation: Staff recommends that, if a better solution is available, the vent be rerouted on the roof so as to be less visible. If this is not possible, the vent should either be painted out or the parapet wall should be built up to hide it. M & W PROPERTIES SUITE 301A 206 SOUTH MILL STREEr 0 ANTHONY J. MAZZA ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 AREA CODE 303 FRANK J. WOODS. III TELEPHONE 925-8032 Pkx 925-6996 July 17, 1995 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Amy Amidon HPC Dear Ms. Amidon: Tom Marshall has informed me that we need to paint the exposed ductwork over the parapet which services Chanin's bar in the Mill Street Plaza Building. We propose to paint this ductwork a gray color which will match the existing roof under the Chanin's bar. This letter is being delivered by Tom Marshall who has my authority to represent us in this matter. Please let Tom know if this is an acceptable solution to you. 0 If you need further information, please feel free to call our office. Thank you. -ery truly yours, 1 nthony J. Mazza - --1 AJM:dr 0 TV~ g MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 323 W. Hallam, Partial Demolition DATE: July 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for partial demolition of the historic residence at 323 W. Hallam. The historic house was built in 1888, apparently by D.E. Frantz, who owned a lumberyard in town. Frantz built at least two other houses in the West End, at 131 W. Bleeker and 333 W. Bleeker. The latter house is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The property affected by this application is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures as a "contributing" structure. APPLICANT: Jim and Anneadare Denkins, represented by Barbara Long. LOCATION: 323 W. Hallam, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite 0 of Aspen. REVIEW STANDARDS: No approval for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 7-602(C). Please note that Section 7-602(C), as well as the rest of the HPC language in the code, has been recently amended through Ordinance #21, Series of 1995. The redevelopment plan is to be reviewed in order for HPC to make findings as to whether or not the standards are met. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: Staff met with the applicant briefly two times before submission of the application to discuss the proposal. While Staff has no concerns with the new construction to the rear of the property, the alterations to the east wing are more problematic. 0 Attached is the Sanborne map of the property from 1904. The only alterations that appear to have been made to the form of the house have occurred at the rear of the structure. A dormer on the west of the main gable appears to have been changed from a gabled dormer to a shed dormer at some point. The applicant wishes to expand the east wing, which includes a first floor kitchen and second floor living space. Their initial thought was to enclose the front porch on the east wing. Staff indicated that this was not appropriate given the City's direction to encourage front porches and the impact that this would have on the character of the historic structure. The applicant also wishes to extend this wing towards the east property line. Staff indicated that this addition should be distinguishable from the historic building, for instance through some change in form, plate height, or ridge height. The applicant's architect revised the plan in a manner which essentially involves demolishing the east wing of the house, reconstructing the wing in a larger dimension but a similar character and reusing the old north wall and porch from the addition. Staff again indicated that this was not the best resolution of their need to add living space from a preservation perspective and would raise discussion at HPC, nevertheless the applicant wishes to come before the Commission for comments. In Staff's opinion, the design must be revised so that the east wing is retained in its existing form (including the porch.) New space could be bdded to the east and to the rear in a way that is clearly distinguishable from the original construction. There is more than enough room in the east sideyard to extend the building further in that direction. In it's current form, and given the amount of demolition proposed, the project does not meet the review standards. Also included in this project is a proposal to enclose an existing carport (requiring a west side yard setback variance from the Board of Adjustments) , and an extension of the master bedroom onto an existing second floor deck. In terms of the "Residential Design Standards," the proj ect seems to meet all but the " inflection" standard. This standard requires that "If the streetfrontage of an adjacent structure is one story in height for a distance of more than twelve feet on the side facing a proposed building, then the adjacent portion of the proposed building must also be one (1) story in height for a distance of twelve (12) feet." The home to the east of this site is entirely one story (it was recently removed from the historic inventory). This implies that if the applicant is going to expand their structure towards the east that this addition may only be one story in height. HPC may consider waiving this requirement if necessary to achieve an appropriate addition to the historic structure. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: The proposal involves total demolition of the east wing of the historic structure. (Please note that the floor level is different between the main gable of the house and the wing. It is possible that the wing was constructed as an addition, but it does appear on the maps of the site by 1896.) The applicant represents that 17.5% of the existing building is to be demolished. Staff finds that the proposed demolition will negatively impact the integrity and historic significance of the structure. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The proposed addition is not distinguishable from the original structure in that it has the same plate height, ridge line and wall plane. ALTERNATIVES: HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Partial Demolition application as submitted. 2) Approve the Partial Demolition application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations to be offered). 4) Deny Partial Demolition approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC table the application for partial demolition, directing the applicant to restudy the added space so that the east wing remains clearly identifiable as part of the historic structure. 1 0 . 11 11 1 .: a 4 11 CIA ST: f (* 1 1 1 ' 1,2 1/a /16 118 11 Led 202 204 206 208 2/0 8!2 t,4 t/6 2/6 75' 4 27' 43 % 1 76- 41 0 - . 8 41 4 2~ f -li-- - '161 t - 9 11 63 4 1 W X 1 1-J , u X 156 11 4 3 / /-zE- 4 11 r--51 74 e B k Mi O/ Q lu 1 03 i *HOJ\ 9 11 % 4 L \/ 7/6 wÂ·1-, tt 14 8 1=14 6 11\ (41 0 Ir- 1-1 6 4 Â£23 it d 1,4 91 0 + 4 41 I 1'11:* 41 2 -A . 1 -== co 1 F--1 k 1 ' ,-4 ---LJ .'-1.- ~ || 4 116 -- 4% trix I & r r ":Â«.9 * D. 1 \P - â„¢ 11 7 - 4 3 1 % 771 0 # i f 2 4 11 r- 221 1 - Â¢ Pl 4 11 1-kly . ; 4, 11 -72 M g 1 ....1:., . 4 61 - 1 - - 1X .* 1 ...1 0 11 (JO 4 -w 11 11 93 _1Â¥P/SE. 0/2/#CH. a 1* -21 11 1 Hawr,Jwy" 4 4 L.a,SH,ts, 21.,ic, br/4'7ok-#rES t *43 /,5 Iii //9 20/ 203 205 207 209 2// 2/3 2/5 2/7 2/9 ' 1 a.----7. ST. - IlfrN, r. ..... 4 11 Â® 1 0,- * ,- .%,A"Arr##i / : ./: 1 4.% Â¢12 114 116 Ila /. / :111' 200 202 204 ' 206 208 2/0 2/2 2/4 2/6 2/8 441 IN " 4 -18 ~1 0 ~ '1 % 11 - 11-- M r. m d . 8 LE -- L.1 M w 1 2 11 % 11 1% tb 9 11 Q 1 4 F-9 0 1 11 Â£7 .9==1 S LL f-EOE 9- 07-5 303-1 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 323.WH Photo Information: ASP-F-18 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 323 West Hallam Legal Description: * Hallam's Addition to the City of Asven City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Cottaqe Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Modified rectangle / "L" shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: N/A Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): N/A For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross-gabled; wood shingles Walls: Clapboard with wood shingles and wood scalloped shingles at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Corbelled brick at center Windows: One-over-one double hunq wood, horizontal cut qlazing at front (east); shed and gable dormers Doors: Cut glass light over wood panel Porches: Front wraps inside "L" at entrv, turned posts and brackets square frieze and balusters General Architectural Description: Simple L-gabled cottaae with large porch with decorative trim. Simple decorative barge board. This structure is a good example of a typical Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottaqe with front qable trimmed out with horizontal clapboard siding with sawtooth fishscales and shinqles in the qable. The cross qable is fronted with a gingerbread porch of turned posts and wood-sawn brackets. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 323.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1888 Actual _ Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Remodeling. specifics unknown. 1967-68; windows. date unknown; dormers, date unknown Additions and Date: Rear carport. date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A- B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is " retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture. although this structure is representative of Aspen' s Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin Countv Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 4,1,2-* -- 1 -U .2 169, R. 0 . 1. / /,4 0, d t. i: 1 -- s Â·p., ..L u -. Â· .. - 4-0 2Â·,7 4. / 2 - I :/â€ž-, 15 ., . ' I'. --LY -$*I . r / 2..71'yffifkli:4#. ~ 4. AL=.tic, *f4 ~611-94-~, i iffÂ« T Â©-iti.4 2 --7 r.i. g .- h .A ..../Â·- - 1 -3=7.- ...gtful-:.9,432,1*:Â·42-. 1 Â«129~ i t~4-24Â£944 -- 4.' -2 L '' 2 -I... ~ ..91.,fit,flft. 20.1 . ,Ut.thÂ¢fwU Â·Â· Â·: L I.* ~~ ~ .- 'M '-. ~ *t~~ ...52; *t~*4., . f .' b *jr~ e : 2.4'We . , -â€¢44 +: I .Wy.. , 40 -,Li'/iric'.- i - . 7.lit'. 6 ... -Â· Â·-fÂ·Â·2Â· 4.-Â·1 I . 9 7 -L '- i,Â· Â· .... I ...2--i--- i..,F ':f.St.0*41-Z'.1 ' ) i -i- 6 2 ki . - . 4 C ' ~ 0 7120'Â·. ... , 4 1, 'Ft '216J1,Aft--: . Ii:...T: '- :. >i~*-t /1 . ..8 * - - I '-- I Al . 3- .- -9222*93 b- .1 .- .1 . 9,1 :4.1 ".25''ri: %,C , ./ ">19/lit, 0, ,,3 TY- Â· ... 9 U : N .3'. %2 21 t 4.; . 4 4-41. ...,N :4:0:$ .-, 99 kir-t .:'%1,7 -3 'Â·fiXA Â·. ... ..â€ž- '. - /&'-I .V-y' pmilt Y..3.14 2,7 --- ..I--I.-I~.I---Ill â‚¬t~~ -# ~-â‚¬};~~~~'~Â£Â·?;~'40#~44~~~ C~~~ -Â· Â·~~ 9:. 9 1 LAND USE APPLICATION F[IRM 13 Project Name DENKINS REMODEL 2) Project location 323 W. HALLAM LOT D & E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN, COLORADO (indicate street address, lot & block mmber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning R-6 4) Iat Size 6000 SQ.FT. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612, 544-0838 6) Representative' s Name, Address & Fbone # BARBARA LONG & ASSOCIATES 315 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611, 925-6880 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Corxlitional Use CL__Lual SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptial ED X Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final FUD Historic Demolition Molmtain View Plane_ Subdivisian Historic Designation Conhniniumization Text/Map Amerxlment - QUS Allotment Lot Split/Lat line ag Ehoemption AdjUStnEIt 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; nmber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 1833 SQ.FT., 3 - BEDROOMS 9) Descriptian of Development Application ADDITION TO THE LEFT WING OF THE BUILDING, RELOCTE COVERED PORCH NORTH 4 FEET, CHANGE EXISTING CARPORT TO AN ENCLOSED GARAGE & EXTEND THE MASTER BEDROOM. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minia= Subnission axrtents Response to Attadnnent 3, Specific Suhnission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application OVI.*-Iwil , 4 1 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear.-_fully_labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"xlr, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. APPLICANT: JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740 ADDRESS: 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO R-6 ZONE DISTRICT: LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 6000 EXISTING FAR: 1832.52 SO.FT. ALLOWABLE FAR: 3240 .. PROPOSED FAR: 2702.94 EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 21.5%_ PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 29.5% w/0 PORCHES, 35% w/ PORCHES EXISTING % OFOPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldg.: 25 FT. / Accessory Blda: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal BlÂ®.: 25 Fr. / Accessorv Bldg: PROPOSED % OF DEMOUTION: 17.5% EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 2 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 2 SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 8.5' Front: 10' min. Front: 8.5' Rean Reac 70' min. Rear: 70, Side: 1 75' Side: -1'_min. Side: 1.75' Combined Front/Rear: Combined Frt/Rr: 30' min. Combined FronURear. 28.5' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCHROACHMENTS INTO THE WEST SIDEYARD & ENCROACHMENTS: FRONTYARD ARE EXTSTTNG. VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibilitv finding must be made bv HPCE FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrURr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): BARBARA LONG AND ASSOCIATES POSTOFFICE BOX 8603â€¢ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 2Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 0 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LOTS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO DEAR SIRS, THIS APPLICATION IS FOR THE REMODEL AND ADDITIONS ON A"NOTABLE STRUCTURE" LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO. PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING AND NEIGHBORHOOD ARE THE PRINCIPAL CONCERNS WITH A REMODEL OF THIS TYPE. THE EXISTING HOUSE IS A 0 LARGER, TWO-STORY QUEEN ANNE VICTORIAN. WE FEEL THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES ON THIS HOME ARE MINIMAL PARTICULARLY FROM THE STREETSCAPE. THE MAJORITY OF THE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS ARE KEFI' AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE OR BEHIND THE MAIN EAST-WEST RIDGELINE. THIS WILL HELP TO BLOCK THEM FROM THE STREET VIEW. THE ALTERATIONS ARE NOT MAXIMIZING THE F.A.R. OR THE ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE, BUT ARE BEING DONE TO CREATE A HOME THAT WORKS FOR TODAY'S NEEDS. THE REQUIREMENT FOR A LARGER KITCHEN AREA IS THE MAIN SPACE PROBLEM AS THE HOUSE EXISTS TODAY. THE VISUAL CHANGES IN THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE ARE BECAUSE OF THESE SPACE REQUIREMENTS. THE FIRST INTENT WAS TO ADD TO THE KITCHEN BY ENCLOSING THE COVERED PORCH. IN ORDER TO STAY CONFORMING WITH THE TRUE VICTORIAN STYLE THE COVERED PORCH SHOULD STAY AS IS AND BE RELOCATED IN FRONT OF THE KITCHEN ADDITION. UNFORTUNATELY THE KITCHEN ADD]TION HAD TO PUSH NORTH AS WELL AS SOUTH. THIS IS BECAUSE OF A SIGNIFICANT ROOF DRAINAGE PROBLEM AROUND THE REAR TOWER. IN ORDER NOT TO ENHANCE THIS PROBLEM ANY FURTHER IT IS ESSENTIAL TO KEEP ANY NEW ADDITIONS AWAY FROM THIS CORNER. THIS CAUSED THE WALL TO MOVE SLIGHTLY NORTH. WE HAVE TRIED TO M[N[MIZE IT BY KEEPING IT TO +0. THE OTHER CHANGE ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE IS A 6-0 ADDITION AND THE CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING GABLE END TO THE EAST. EXrENSIVE PORCHES ARE COMMON ON THESE HOMES. IN STUDYING ELEVATION OFI'IONS IT IS OUR OPINION THAT CONTINUING THE COVERED PORCH AN ADDITIONAL 6-0 TO THE EAST KEEPS THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING COMPATIBLE. 0 BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING -2- WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP A CONSISTENCY IN THE DORMER STYLES BY CHANGING THE EXISTING FRONT SHED DORMER TO COMPLEMENT THE EXISTING BATHROOM AND BEDROOM DORMER. THESE TWO DORMERS ARE 1/2 HIPPED DORMERS. THE UPPER LEVEL IS MAINLY CONTAINED WHHIN THE ROOF STRUCTURE. IN ORDER TO MAKE THE LIV[NG SPACE MORE USABLE THE OTHER TWO DORMERS WERE ADDED. THE REMAINING ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING ARE AN ADDITION TO THE MASTER BEDROOM AND THE ENCLOSURE OF THE EXISTING CARPORT TO MAKE IT A GARAGE. THE MASTER BEDROOM ADDmON IS LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE ON THE GARAGE ROOF DECK. THE EX[STING NORTH-SOUTH ROOF LINES AND GABLE ENDS ARE FOLLOWED TO KEEP THE MASTER BEDROOM'S ROOF CONSISTENT. OUR MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO CREATE SOLUTIONS WHICH ENHANCED THE EXISTING HOME AND MAINTAINED THE NATURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SINCERELY, BARBARA W. LONG p \ 7 -r</ 1.2 i f ./ - T-ET- 1. r- 19<- ~ 68' 1NVE~TO#( 105.1-*Te*fc ES AND STRUCTURES -' \ /1-\ \ )1986 UPD E ASPEN, COL . . PREPAfED RY THE Al,Elâ€¢FITKIN PLAN-la ACE ... 0 4 . 800 It 0 20. 400 . I 1 A...~I.~.= A.. . 0 9 0-\ p y. y . 1 \gV /.*C . \23(-j \ r- 00 1 3.. rt #,in"n\,4 ;~t~Rrin\â€¢034. E 1 - . F[I~] Eli@I,d~;.~ 4~..4%992-N ~.f~ r-- 1 ulnmu.:i!!14,4 ~ IETIEIEIGE 'ifdtill' IE0513121=11; .:'1 ~ 'I:5 7~ 2 iiliwi; mutÂ®intip tililli 111 m-inm, 16# 11 :@hk *ml lug \1 1 If It R--2 - -N. 6 2~ C 1 - J 7 eÂ·=- L.-T--- )* ..i; E W!!!061!.WII': AT:WID Wpalm! LUW IL dillij alFTP Trd.t, Â· 1,1 IIiE,Ul':1.1,;U..1 _1!14.Ill Ily'll'f.!2.1,.@kN-!1. +:1 UlhT,ul :ilim-Il IMigg>41 ! -- -Â·, it 2- -- ; -4â€¢.a /N b Al l I I I IN-T [T:II]T~]:II[@TIN Iligirm]#IB, ir#.I.1 [B*rn =i]Il : gim [ZII} 45&---1- - - PIT Tlilliu MlerMHE&IEile u.liziu.mEE].[[E[0.ImmiII iw[Â®. [#Wl]Atuu;i NJ---314:22 M Ilm[F.I mdlr [En:M?WR[1:[f[WiI'0RWT#Q ~I~Wil~ jll]E]![114[#i]Ilit Will]%[il#]104114[11]4[[~ . Eld] .Will@ lit[*dlf: l[.li-llglk! 11*Ilj0 1,8421]. Ill!.2.J:GS!1111Â·Â· litl-[~ G! NUII]j-[ltli-'W! 11{1111111 !11.1112 - 1 - --- ~ .U[El [EEI.[IWÂ® i .UEJLIN 023 [BE]j -1-III mÂ¥-0' E[jigEWI]]] 8/1/10 1 ' QttmilLEQLLLI flillilli!.~. 1 1 lut:l!11]. 'Ii'.6,10.iddiI;i:11 I L=_1 Ii@lE Ii[&111.1.1 [IiÂ®I[111[[[2 6[12 81 imirbia- EE i*E =~Sl]3' *OIl [I[2' -i'' Illdirm.[[ITWID-EfE . [El[[1] minE ly@ng [imINN~ *[i]IlII- EE 1 - [[E:[[1' EE IRWriTI - ...[ 1,191:1Â·NIm 0/9/ 6 H BlIED M@l]J Uill.L Â·TWI~-Ne ...i_ BUILDING LOCATION .- [WkEN:W 111Â·rtmÂ·nâ„¢i*!Il I ]IWITTI [[[U[Ii~CL~ 81 ill Mmil *Cl~lim[[LEX >C -,r--i Â£ rm-rn * I LL / 7 ~EE I k Â· Â·- [TnTrtl. rm,47 -7 L ' .LL.L 1. E'.. BE 03/ Nmil e 494 - - r 1 : \5 111.19 BARBARA LONG AND ASSOCIATES POSTOFFICE BOX 8603â€¢ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 2Â·303Â·9 25Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 RE; DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DENKINS REMODEL 323 W HALLAM ASPEN, COLORADO TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A LICENSED ENGINEER HAS REVIEWED THE STRUCIURE FOR SOUNDNESS. HE IS PRESENTLY OUT OF TOWN AND HAS NOT YET HAD A CHANCE TO COMPILE HIS REPORT. THIS REPORT WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU AS SOON AS IT IS POSSIBLE. SINCERELY, BARBARA W. LONG BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING BARBARA LONG AND ASSOCIATES POST OFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 0 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LarS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AND APPRAISED VALUE AS IS: $850,000 APPROXIMATE COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $450,000 0 TOTAL COST: $1,300,000 SIMILAR HOMES ON THE MARKET: $2,000,000 PLUS (PLEASE NOTE THAT A COPY OF THE APPRAISAL W[LL BE SUBMnTED AS SOON AS IT IS AVAILABLE, BEFORE THE H.P.C. MEETING SCHEDULED) BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING â€¢ INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING 1. 1\ C i - 1 --7 L I 47----- 2. L-1-1 1 1 -u / \419 E 1 --- 11 / , K ' O 9 0/ 2 W r---~ARKING r.-----0 U) 11. 11 f i t---1 0 .1 hl AREA 2 1 0 1 N 4-U 1 li cr i ji . I.-- M) i N pu--1- 1 h z 19 \ 4 (1 -1 1 --- - , 1 ---1 Z 1 -Â»-7-- If . 11 t 1- :/'--lr fir 1 % ..4\ 6'. :\! I 1 \ h i //1- i i \ _liz> L; 9 ~~ 1 1 0 f L~f 0 W HALLAM ST 1 1 1, A -_--__243 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 -, 1 1 . - | , Â· Â·Â· >Â»60*.1.vy"*tw'Â·pÂ·Â·>e.Â·~~A>Â· Â·>2'-Â·Â·.4*-H,OOÂ·'â€¢054'fre..~.â€že.oe.oo.:.-I:-Â· . .c,0,9>04*,>$4,t:a<â€¢~TI~~11.4<-allÂ· .:.Â·Kx,r+. ....A.,>%:0 -t'...... L *ze $ It 1 $ N NALLA - 1.=aol - j J 1/ - 1 1 1 it t 1 /-1 Itt / I I L. -7 1 00 K 1 / 1 tiM M 61 ' / 1 1 . . CI~l t -j X k ,:~11-- -1 -). I.- 1 1- -ElrE Ir-/ 1 -1 * .- :L - -I.I.-...Ill-- It ~- 1 1 [-1 r ill 1 1 1 ,1 0 â€¢M x x M /7 j l/ ---- * 11 A '' <0-----I , 1 W BLEE sT (016114 512%Mot* L 1 \ 0 0 6,95 W..4--1 11'=Â· 60 '-O" - -- 2 \ , ff- 4/tt It r/Â»13 11 1 1 \ 3- r 11Â« J-1 \ p 1 -I~li- '15 -' .. 59 ' 4 2.Â·AÂ· Mu' .. i 4 ' 1 -1-/7 0 1 3 a r- JO.~\:~1'.~.~2~1}4)P e '. - â‚¬*&. Ap , , .-r *ff -tr frnÂ·. a El -- \4~ 1 4 fi- p"f t,Ut, _-_ r 0 - Nte " - -' r----I i I *h a l, 29' 41 W iÂ· *tr :. 10 1 , V'I':I- , - 1 - r JOK 4- + -I 11 :-= T 1- 6 .1 :A 4 1 0- Ill -- 1 ri -ALf'le-- '1 -3. +4-1.1' 11 1 1 71~ -- 6 I dA,Exttp 11 .1. / 74Â¥154 11 f<-- -----*---- -- -.'I- kr,J : , - lia : Â·Â· 1 11>i, ? \ 11 A - 1 4 11 ...... . -- I . de.. ' I -1 9 ./ 11 1 111 1 3 - liu 1 0 4 if-Â« I r -: - 7,t 1'7 411% , 01 rn 1,/5~1 % 1,7 *~ -1 -I.... A p-Luvr , C :\P ti---- 6- -- -40 - -- .4-3 \\01 1 ! ! it - /\ 24/ 1 2 \ \0Â» -11 . /44 1*0~/ 1.,~r J, P. 7#UIA.1#+ 6 +, 13 /11 1 1. 1 - 1 - 44 9 2 , / BV -4---" . 1 1\\\ 01Â« 1 1 91Â« I )Â»fl _ i . \\\\ 0 & 1 ' / 1 \A / A 1. 1 1 Al hoa\ -- -*3 ' ' - --- -- NUP'/9 - \ *.t' .F i. 1 1 16-7--1 , 9 Â£,1 . IL 1 1 - - w 0-1 . , 2Â·- , r -9----- . \\ r 41 -1 - ~ ' y- - 5- d, 1 1 1 -1 F -- . 1 1,4 / 'TI - 1, k= L----- 1 3 If , DI ,11 1 Â»- '-/9.- - ~ Â· 44 - F>Fl'wr - Pâ€¢Jute .L I , _ba .... - 1 ./ 1 1 --- - - -- - 1 Liff - *rd 7 - ~~F2- 4 rUS- - ~ - 2-1 t . ~a'JOI , i'.1. W />494 , 'I 1-7-, 0 - 'i ... P 11 11 ... ' $111 i 11 + 11-- 0*566*g.6 _~~~ 1 -t- i . I. ./ 65,U-ro '' --1 1- 1 '16ft 4 1 . 0 - I 11 - r 11 1 Fwidzl/piu,J~ Â©J . r r 7!~El ' /4 - Ott\- 1,1 I 11 1 | -4 %- 1\<-10 1 \ 1/ 1 \ r 1 1 11 1 L- + 93 - - 1 â€¢ , 1 - -i - .----*-.* Fl.------*. - 1 - t- -1 , 1 1 1 1 2 KN 1 i 0 -1 1 11 'Aee + .,4 01~~i 11 / Il u -4 1- ir-j V / - 3., . 11 1 1 .4 . . i +1.fc,41,2_ Â¥901 -- 1 1 gn --~ ~-i-i_-nÂ· c-to-___--- --Â·-- --~-- --Â· ~ ~ , ~~~71 :O 11 ~ - -1--14 :. 1 _-3---=4 1-lija :, ,, ~Â·, 4,1.2 '. tpÂ«Â·*â€¢)34Â·~ ' 1 I I ~ ' b I . -3 â€¢-1 4 1% ~ 4 0*00 6 1 1 - - 1--/-4_- ~ 1 4 -- 619 EPE-Ed;Â¥7 9 k 3 1 < I -0 9 11%49- . L Ivid~ 0. r - 1 1 L , 1 Tt - 1 -- r--1 n i 1 A 0.0 .... xy ef FLT ---~r -|~ # 1 \ 11 , f . , -Â·,4 1-2 . %-- 1 11 | Jd LY 1211116 L 1 *' rm A.poÂ· 1 . I - .. . .. .. I -. ~ .id , - kr Il I I fl k --7 -0*/60 70 2,4.- -_-1 #x i Â«T. J.u.0, , k- - - 2 1- J,L,% To % 0*MovEC) L L- -r 0 10 1 1- 0--__- 1-u=221-1 484 4.4.r'k,64 I /1 - . 6,0 - --Ir (,19|f'oJ) I. I'll rim Â»'U.. fuooW f#,1 .. - *WJIP .Eve.10Â· 16 'C Fl...1 F 14.1,0 \ I 4 \ lk- &4 , 1 2 .Â· r BAY '.1 k 0610101 1 0 441 0 :JÂ» f .1 7,0.t.,1.-FRY!> f . 062': 9.....il . . ,ly.44-49..f f,di*'il Â· a %#eft t>649 1 . . 11~ - ~1 i I . t ; i. /In_ LIli \\ Â£-- 11 1 t. - h I 10 1 0 3 1 1 . . r-- ,--I -V- - -- 1 D. 1/ - \ 7/ 1 *1 1 \\ /2 F--r=c 1, --- 1 ie 4- -7 g & 1 . e 11 14 1 U 1,1 ir 00 -La 11 ' a 21 11/ 1 - i 2 0 = 1 04 4- ----71 --1 -7 7 ~---- - -~-fL- l 1-f i 1 I 1 j \ 0 -/ 1 1 I. L If -7 1 I . . b \ ---11- -Ii.--- 1----* -.--I- - JULT 16 '114 1 .JOIT. 11.111.0 / 1 S..94> . I 7'Â·Â·+ %'4' .Tly?+C.1. , fal NJ #%1 40* . . 44 'dt #j-t>f,Kit 4 Y nk!...?f - '. ....4, ... 0092 , - ay 1904 - a 4 *.j- 24. I Â·; 4... 1 ..Â¥- +62 1 *19* .- 1 . - 0Â¢212 (1[+361,745*771 1 (lf,Â·, bl,1-râ€ž7, 4 4 4149) 1 034*0,7/\ . -1 92 M.1-9 0, 1, Â·>I>ea 6. ' i ~ ..34 2- T - .ASA .,. . I \ \ 1 1 IiI 1 I j 7 0 EE - L - <:379; 1 1 1 1 \ 9,1411'i 12Ej -uuu t I .,ArÂ· 1 ' 9 1 9 4 I - ...I---2 tf '~F2 I - 0 t i-tj ' i i9 ~ _ 1 1 -- - lill-Ill..-I-*-----..I#.I--+Il--I.+.--.--*--I---#..-.d---1- ..Â¥,..7-1 '.y.<Ve 1 1 1 1 54* 1. . . 1 , 1 4114/ 1 . 1 - JAJ'Wi , *01 . .rÂ¥.0 4 - .#-* /9 . ~- .4 Â» '7'rl ..1* 1 /M / /7 -f 7 - 1 1 ry,/ , 9/' \ 1 \ 59, 3 . .fyi ;11 - 1.,3 1 4.34 , 1 X A /u . 4. \ \1 : y i â‚¬ I Â£ - 1 <1 .0 4 Â¢ 1/ \1/ .1 .0.1 !4 --- - A I. : valf, 1 11 , 4 T f* i ,1 1 L 1 -.. 6 '0%\\\ E---+ \ 1 4 q W ryÂ¢ ~ f:f, - i P -< gi 4, ..'>i.*4 L // 112--r*-.r 'lit.N I 01 +46 ----- I- li 9 01-1.14 - 4.4 f 1\ 1 -7722* 11 GLElesa , C trBA (Moloat t~* 0.4 - JA~1 --1--M --~;t+ I 1. 4,--. 1+ , I .4 i /1 1 1 1 f J -~ 3 hLei ..117. . 6:1 -~1~~ 0 /1\ . Â· Â· Â·Â· 01:1 1 , r de TE- i I I.'. $ -1--111~ -- 1 1 1 r 'F i 999- ~, ~ 3% 1 -..i .. 4 - 14.. - 1444 [~14 -- - - -- ; ; I LIN . f r 1Â·1't \ 1 fÂ·* LU11) MIL ~ 1 \ &1 11 .-1- 1 ":i; ; m I '1 1 \ -u #9==4 .- . T.9 . 1~ - 26* Â£--. ---r _., -703 *1 ,i: .1 i . PY, /1 1. - I *Â«-M:7*T~,?romÂ·~.0 * ._ :.r -~-7-;'~~"9 7 0 ' :,r./.' -Â·.-41 1 1 1 -IOL.< 11 tl~ 4 - des 4 c>LallÂ»rioJ & 1 , 1 4.14, ,Ar/F.â‚¬Â»98, Â«9 64468:5241 FEÂ°ble'.0 1111,1% Â¢' 0 ' el 16 U vE+4*E>, 4, /,64,ECE?47 B~'15,5, Â£4, 901 10, Â®9'K ,Â»t--i-Â£Â»-1Â»k=p~r-- r=-- =: 6 -Â» 11 22 ~ , 1â‚¬ 44 6 WA * 1 ! 6/1,1 Z Â¢ 1 . Â¢40 LA-Lvl . !21'0' , be Â¢ 2* â€¢eal'-4353' 1 14. 00 4 4,2,0 & o v'p,c. - 006 P .11,6, 40 4 A I L A M 0 -F E E E- -1* 97-,# il"'1Â¢ Â¢ 0'Â·LA,OJ,FM.19 tyf,c*4 /Â»4,9 E;i 65-10 0, 8,9.,to 0 + 171 000''f '6,56 9 53+ 40 41 1 1 K. 4./ . Cal , Ex ,Â¢/: LEÂ»: t.:kÂ·,2,.:.e-Â· : 0 F,6 !, rce M s /2 gy.<4 4 ; - -31 F florÂ·:TAE V : * 21%...78& rl 6 76'09'lin & Ba W' J 6 4 #474 E I . â€¢O,NO REeÂ« 1 4-UM. CAP ~ ~ FOUKIO REeM. t At-UMI. CAF 'Fee.k-- '~ -- ~(40 NUMBER- ' LWO NJMBER) \U / fer,u â€¢t b r , Â·s, â€¢ 4 fit -1 , \ 1 , - -- -[BEEL *ooP FENCES j - 1 1 1 1 -r........Mi==71.-:"=77 r--- - 1 221+ - ~ Â©UILDING CORNEK -2) IVERIT 180 -- ~ 1] 1 31 r . 11 - 1, t.1 4 f 4,01 0 2Â¥'6* j 9 G *V 17,44- ~ .1 flo//'/Â« //4-7:N*r: 09 - . , 1 . I Â«#tilg*LWA-'~4 i.6 yoof om,4444 /X / PRAMS VOL)5E ' /0/21 ...4 ..lf, 4/ ill 1 f 1 1 ~ r ~ j l 4' \ l : <4.4 0 .~ Â· 8 8 .1 BUILD[kle aÂ»ER -10 FÂ©PERTy I,16 1 -41 ju .NiftÂ«.t 1 - 9 / 4 *UN *41# q &*Sk#:0&*,01 ' 4& ' ' FF t ~ 1, 02-60Â¢41 I -8 39*34:86&*Flitmgy . 1 tkiÂ«4Â» ttif I q. 5 4Â»44Â»4Â» 1 1.ab>...p,~99079}LOTD DÂ¢E . .t.. i '.2,~ ,? 'TOOL- el-IED ~ -.<1*M-TwaR4 Â§3~K 43 0 0. 1 1 1 11 - Â· 0510 00 0220*Â©Npal,kER---16*'*T, A.F.r-r Â¢ . ecAL-15 : 1" = 01 +, E 17- ~ 3Â§8*9*HÂ«39Â»Â© . # OWED 'h -f-'' Â¢4~ RM. 436:14 1 " E 2Â»615 OF: rp ON1 1 Â· MEE COP K #+14,5+*H 16/i le,â€¢14 1 '-t; L 7 ?31~*Â§*819*>22<\ 1. ' fÂ» 4 Â»<1* 4 i l.j . 1 ... (le.le'ff) 1 WOOD rENEe- --- r 1 , - 1 / i , 0 t.t .:tilt 1. 01*t,; .dos# 1414 -'. â‚¬*312\ i~ . 1, JA I . T "43 07 6 *. . LOT D. /'/ LOT E -~ 1 ,1Â· 1-Â· r Jl,UE. 19 - , OUFNAVY. COl.0260' , ... . A 'it Â·Â· <,-HAL FaeE 0'9.t)- FDUND 10 .:1 f. .m - Rk XYFud=f 0,/ALL)M. CAP NEKEON. -TUE LCUXI L.a , . UNE35 OF 1 eETÂ· REPAR 4 CAP BUILIPINE* IMPROVEMENrD, ~ ir . / 'f- A..IÂ· 1, ..7,1 .4.1 111' /.r * 0,(*1' IN EhAPENal OR. KNOWN -D N - 't r ' ' I i. t L. 5. 9184 019-\1 - 1 '1 Â·1 . . 1. $ * ._ f L U' E. '1' Â· N 7109'11'49 40000'-Â· MENT'b ef OK Ob-1 T'WeE 1012EMPN95 Afu-, â‚¬44OWN. 1. ...1 . &9 .. . 1- OVERMEAD LM[ILIT125 4 mwtER, Trle. f ~~ ~ FOUND ALUM. CAP (NO NUMBEÂ© ft>WEE FOLE J C ter REe:AR- 4 A.25716 GAP - V / 4-â€¢â€¢ â‚¬ 4 ---Â» FoteteLE WCT.Â·25Â© aÂ»E~- r'llâ€¢ </ f 6. JAME'b M RESER L.6. 964 . c JaX L , 814 .4 ALL EY BLOCK- 45 ' ' < t: I ; .'f f 1, 4 SURVEYOR, s CERTIFICATE % . 1 HEREE>Â¥ CERTIFY THAT ON JANUAIN S, 1995, A r ... i ER . aUAL IN<FECTION WAS PERFORMED UNDER Hr '2 ; 5.]FERVIDION CF THE ABOVE DE<CRIBED FIEPER"rf~ . NO CHANSES WERE R:UND 1...14 41 ~ k 9 - 1 1 1 1 . I , 1 1 . 2 T ri A , U . .,4 l i 1 1 : t . . I / 6.'. '. 4.4 - 1 1< .e , p..4 ALFINE SURVE<5, INC. Dr: JAH 29 r RESER CATE: L.5.904 NY'175:. FITKIN (DUNTY TITLE, INC. aDMHITHENT Kb. rOT- ' i. .ti~' 941561Â· WAS USED IN THE FREFNZAT-Â¤4 OF I Â· THIS SURVEY . .. 1 4 71& TITLE: JOB NO.t: 15- 2 47 i:0,Â·, < TRI-CO Management, Inc. SURVEYED date: JUNE 1918/ 1974. CLIENT:k HYL=~ T.tkfi DRAFTED dates JOC< 1 E , 14-14 SJ~' NOTICE According to Colondo l,â€¢ you mid commence any legal actun bled Box 1730 4 REVISIONS date : 1Â· 27Â· 15 UFSÂ«TE ~ 0 Â¢ 5 1 ~' SHEET *di&<~.2~;ft,'441 9 I. 1 . IMPROVEMENT OURVEÂ¥ .0 t.''I.. .1 upon,Ity defect in this Eurvey within 3 yeers After you fir* discover such detect. , f. ~iÂ¢ i.2 ' . A 1.1. et. 1 :4 i In no ovent m,yany aclon based uport any deted *1 -Iurvey be commer,ced Aspen, Colorado 81611 BLOCK 43 ATEN , aXORACD 1 j 44.C .e; .r A 4 iJEG'j .- 4. . r. *1'., I i.'I 303Â·925Â·2688 Â· AÂ· 1 4-9 . 27*k .Sk. k*doÂ·11-~~4'Â· 444 4 Jud .kw--=29 . 4 . Â· '/1 â€¢ . PÂ¥:Ar-Â·F 1 . 1 / 1 41 - -F . ./.1 I .0/ I h + i 1-1-1 A L LA 41 Â© T E E 6 76.00' 1 In E. Ga~ 1 ~ r ;OUNO RE*\R. 1 ALUM. CAP ~ FOUK.10 KEEAR. t At-UM. CAF LWO NJAYE) 4001 : ~ ,~ h.10 NUMBER- ' 1 *TEF U.\ K 2 +N - 8 _[aiHEL ' ~ NEÂ©0 FENICE~ / 1 1% Â«i 4 1 1 1 1 OUILDING OXNER -0 PIÂ©PEET )00 - - ' - - -- - ='| 1 fÂ«tr < 1 - - 8.-1 1 1 1 i i 1 ELI- ' :11 1 14.el//7 / : / / / / * / / / / / /~ ~ / Ir \.6 903P C\NEÂ»R6 ~. / / ' 1-WO â‚¬:FID#Â¢f 7,50[) ~ Â»h . 1.6 Yoc* o''Ne*4*0. -'f / / EAMC&320~6-/ /,4 = 8 0- 1 / // f/ -0 -0-2 4- 7/ Â»1 7.r.7 \ -6 . f - BUILDIkle mANER -10 MPERTY I,16' - _31 f/ 3 - t f 3 t / Â»46 y / tX 5 ~ CAR. FORT- ~ 1-01-5 0 4 E 72Â»L RDWED ... 1 - ~1 24.-06 K 43 0. \ 0 5 0 2 30 40 50 111 lili . _EE , , 0 ,. ,. oweD - f- ' 0 ~4~r - 1=42=el , e,CALf 5 1'1 = \C> f F /r Â£ : 4 eÂ»61,5 oF MAKINeS : FOUNIP CITY MONUMENTE> ILL NEa32..EbLK. 45 10 WN'V aDâ‚¬ BU<950 575Â°09' )1"E , WOOD FENCE- -r Q i y : 12-.K. 116 Cul05 C .4, g,1 7[15 coge, _1.- -5- '-' ' SUIEVE1012'5 CEKITIPICÂ»TE 't' 4. 1, JAMPE, M REM,ER, WEIZEOf CEKnPr" -TWAT ON L. C:' -7 6Â·. 1_DT D 0~ LOT E JUNE. 19 -[Ed , 1â‚¬)34 A '506'E>r' yvA6 MACE UNPee_ M-r . 1 eUPERVIbION ON' LOTe Di p, el-OCE 43, BeFPEN, 1 4 N I COUXACO. 71-18 -rUD dilo~Â¥ 0,00[) FgAME MOUE,E '6*5> v 7%*9 7/ALL*.A. C.4>P UN!55 OF THE Atove PEÂ©C.ReEP PleOPEg:â‚¬ Ab OMOWN 55: RED&2 1 CAP ~ HMKEON. -THE LDLATON AND DIMENDIONSÂ©FALL- 1 k 1. F i BULD]ItÂ·85, IMFIeCN/EhAEhrI5, EbeeMENr['5. Rle,4-135- OF- . Nâ‚¬ IH 124!PENCE OK MA'KN -D ME. AND ENC}20504- k.4 j.........Â·Â·Â·Â· hi 7909'11'tw 6000' Â·Â· -t NAENT'b tfor ON TUME FREMIâ€¢555 ARE Xa.JIWEer d>NOWN. OVERWEAD UTILInet *FOWEATELE. f TS 3 CÂ©111-~14%:row~#01~F6eÂ© 90*a. 91Â£ --'~ ~ tiET Reeâ€¢12- 4 R..A5TkE, CAP . 0 11. '/ C JA~Ek> 11 RESER L.6. â‚¬>164 ' Jl.)L-f Z, 1974 ' ALLEY BLOCK- 4 3 SURVEÂ¥OR'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREDY CERTIFY THAT ON JANUARÂ¥ 26 1995, A VIDUAL INDFECTION WAD PERFORMED UNDER HY ~ 4~c SUFERVIDION CF THE AEOVE DESCRIBED FIEFER-rr . ~ NO G-*46159 WERE laND. N 0 1 1 - Ai 1. L) 1- c, . , ALFINE ZURVErÂ©,INC. DÂ¥: JAHES F. RESER 13*TE Lei 1184 7\ 1Â©TE: FITKIN COUNPr TITLE. INC. aDHHITHENT Kb. rOT- Â· ': k 941501- WAe USED IN THE FREFWZATION OF THIS SURVEY[ :f .. JOB NO.: die- 3 - LA TITLE: TRI-CO Management, Inc. DRAFTED date: 1.)12( 1 11 , 1 914 61 IMPROVEMErÂ·.4-E â‚¬)012*Ef CLIENT: HYLEI*/' SURVEYED date: JUNE 1919 / 1974. i NOT ICE Accordinl to Colorado law you must clm,mence Ally lega! actur, ..psec Box 1730 REVISIONS ch-te ' 1Â·2715 UPDATE LOTS O {E SHEET Na: 1 Â«r; 4 upon,ny defect m tms jurvey within 3 yearsafteryou firstdiscover such dete.1. BLOCK 43 . Â«:7 4-' In 110 ment, may any acMon bned upon any detect in thts lurve, te c,1:,Imenced Aspen, Colorado 81611 moore th ~ , AiPEN , COL.Ofâ‚¬AOD 303 Â· 925 Â· 2688 ~ , 1 ,--'"20 -4.. r---f - .Aia,Â£-_fi~'11 L i. f 6.....d#00//p/53ZLI hi 14~50'49 18 -- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer DATE: July 26, 1995 RE: 525 W. Hallam HPC granted Conceptual approval for this project on July 12, 1995 with eight conditions. The conditions were: 1. Provide more information about background of house, and any proposed restoration work. 2. Provide more information about decorative detailing on front porch for final review. 3. Lower the height of the garage to meet the 16' height requirement. 4. Provide a report from a structural engineer for final review stating that the shed can be moved. The applicant must secure a bond for the relocation, the amount of which will be set by HPC at final. 5. HPC shall grant the appropriate variances described on pages 4 and 5 of the July 12, 1995 memo. 6. HPC shall waive the residential design standard dealing with primary mass. 7. The applicant must restudy the design of the roof form on the east addition and return to HPC in worksession format. 8. HPC granted the rear yard setback variance required for the deck on the garage, as shown in plans. Following the review, several HPC members indicated that they had not felt comfortable with the approval and with some aspects of the project and wished to reconsider. Any member voting with the majority can call for a reconsideration of a decision at the following meeting. Again, as discussed on July 12, the Commission must remember that tabling an application for more information is always an appropriate solution when there is significant doubt about a proposal. Since the projects that you are approving are permanent additions to our community, the Commission should never feel rushed to make a decision. The project architect was informed of some Commission member's concerns and is very willing to attend worksessions to restudy aspects of the project. 144 -Lboo 4- 14&.AL.11 .. ' 1 ....1.1. ...4 ".--W- 4...Le.g".4,-: - 2 3-9733 11 E-Â» r-- UT - --- X-+ - -4---3-1 - 1.- 1 0_00= _ rl' I ~ 112 FI::: 0 7'Ft .- 13-' -' ~12_4__ ~~f ; 'Mr--47 f 4-- - - - ... ---=--*) --- --,-4 = = . - - liz 2.3- I--ZP-'- -./*. -.1.-- 8. .AL . .4 . -4 - 1- . . yf 44 16-â‚¬.u & /\ A â‚¬ W 9 0 U / - - -JI.'-7.- \\\\ Â· - 1 - - 1- ~ 2Â»Hi+t . - ) ~_lili 1 6111- - - Â·r:_ : 1-J = -4 - -1 I V.~- 7- - I ... 4 / 9- - 11-Â·t_ 1 !:i / 3 3,Â«TI - -79%5 5/- - , ----4- .1 1 1 Flf - 1 1 -- . , 1 1 - *1 .,1 _ 1 1-1 1 J,J 1-A A. 1 /6- 1 1, â€¢ 8 4 ' 9 10 9 N & W 11â‚¬Â·W X151-IRA fÂ°Fc #3 X 0 0 + f Â¥3 JUL 2 6 1995 X BA4 W10+04Â¥ 1 1 . 1 ; 1. h li $ -5 j -ix ..4 1 . _35fk K - A f, f 1-1 I J/L - Al A -1 4-~4 Ae.W 5001-H 0. 40 -- . \ + 4 -4.1-14- 4- 1 _ ~â€ž 1,1, ~ 1 I i - / F r-- I -- ---- --= 1 _ 4 lilli \- .Il. i- MEI- -- -= -* 96 7 - - 2 -- -31 - 1 1- TU-r MY L - - # .itili -- 11.t]. 1 11 1 '1 E K , 4 < 4 1464 Rew 1 &*,41-4 MEW FOFGA 91- A o 8 -r Â»- W- 1 f O 0 /46 4 - 1 /.O " ALT- A 111 1 lili 11 - . 14. p .- 71/ I .- 0 - ,-. st--=S-,0:24:J'*F, I . - 0 --1 ip-.It--~ ---- fF L 1 ,;M#,- -21 - - - T- - 1 -- 1- 4 1 Â» 1 , - PFLI ' AA ,0 --. r I 5 1- C Re-wi Sov<+4 0 0 tti{+Ht - { 0.2 4 0.1 - 9*fri / 1 ---.0- / -1 1 JÂ¢27-~--,/Al . --Ii---I-- *-I.---*#- I U. -49-==- =a lrEE:=Â«--ly=---\ -- - - --4 --- Â¢ 1,--lit 44. A ! .. 2 itt -- --- i- / -- <fL 5 1 - -- -JCZ_-4-2.-71--9,Ir I ..:5~ ~<ux i ~3\' I . - 1- - - 1 11495 ~.39~ :1Â£12.-==i U - E[ 1 - - -1 1. f.flÂ· 1 .-- 1 i--4 - 6 241 H li 1, 1 1! 4 it 1, AJ-- Â£ K IS f '6 LNE W NG.W 8 * , 4 r 'E NEW 1 f0Fc#O â‚¬,AS-r d o R 1- 44- X4301< off )* 4 - 1 to,# A L 7- 8 ~ \f> MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer DATE: July 26, 1995 RE: Maroon Creek Bridge Pedestrian/Bike Path 0 -------il--- ======= On February 8, 1995, HPC reviewed proposed alternatives for a pedestrian/bike path at Maroon Creek. The existing Maroon Creek Bridge is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is listed on the local inventory of historic sites and structures. HPC unanimously supported the concept of a bridge which is totally separate from the historic bridge. (All members of the public who attended the meeting seemed to agree as well.) Their support was based on a finding that the separate bridge is the most appropriate solution from the standpoint of accessibility, safety, cost, and preservation concerns. Subsequent to the HPC meeting, the County proceeded with the design phase of the project, calling frequent meetings with representatives of City/County Engineering, Parks Department, Community Development/Historic Preservation, and Manager's Office. These individuals gave input on important features dealing with the design of the safety rails, lighting, and measures to make snow removal on the bridge easier. The project then stalled briefly as the County's intended financing source for the project was found not to be available. A few weeks ago, local officials agreed on the funding mechanism. The officials, with pressure from area residents, directed County Staff to have the bridge constructed this Fall. An RFP for the project is out and it is hoped that the project could start by October 1. The final design will be brought before the Historic Preservation Commission tonight, during which meeting you will be asked to select the color for the bridge (possibly on another date, at the site) and to offer comments on other aspects of the new bridge in preparation for contracting the project. MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Amidon, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Pitkin County Public Works RE: Maroon Creek Pedestrian Bridge DATE: July 25, 1995 =========================================== This is to review our progress on development of the Maroon Creek Pedestrian Bridge project since review of this issue by the Historic Preservation Commission: February, 1995: Maroon Creek Pedestrian Bridge Task Force formed. The Task Force, named "Missing Link", was formed to develop the project. Missing Link consisted of Tom Newland, Bud Eylar and Stan Berryman of Pitkin County; Amy Amidon, Bill Efting, Mary Lackner, Stan Clauson, George Robinson, Rebecca Baker, and John Kruger of the City of Aspen. At the initial meeting, held February 28th, the task force developed a project schedule that will have the bridge open to public use by November 1,1995. Tom Newland was assigned the task of getting the project through land use approval; Bud Eylar was charged with developing the design, bidding and managing the project; and Stan Berryman was assigned with the task of securing funding. The rest of the task force would assist the three principals in their work to get the bridge approved. Assumptions developed by task force concerning the project: - The bridge will be temporary in nature and will be replaced by the existing Maroon Creek vehicle bridge once CDoT build a new vehicle bridge as a part of the Highway 82 improvements. - Bridge should be made to disassemble easily and to be re-used at other site(s) in the county; - The bridge will be completely separate from the existing Maroon Creek Bridge and therefore does not impact the historical integrity of the existing structure. - The bridge will be for primarily for "commuter" use and secondarily for recreational use; - the bridge will not accommodate nordic skiing; - the entrances to the bridge will be lit to improve safety. The bridge will be designed so that additional lighting along the deck can be added if necessary in the future. March, 1995: Meheen Engineering was hired to design the bridge. Meheen was selected ' because of their close working relationship with the Colorado Department ofTransportation. This relationship was necessary to get all approvals in time for construction this year. Bill Johnson, hydrologist, was hired to obtain 404 Army Corps permits for the project. Tom Newland submitted a land use application for the project on April 15th. The application proposed a temporary girder bridge on two posts or pylons spanning the Maroon Creek canyon immediately adjacent to and downstream from the existing Maroon Creek vehicle bridge. Placement of the new bridge adjacent to the old bridge was required because both bridges had to be contained within the Highway 82 right-of-way, as the adjacent property owner refused to sell property to the county for placement of the bridge. May, 1995: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves bridge proposal with minor conditions. P&Z asks that HPC and P&Z be included when a color for the bridge is selected. June, 1995: Final Design completed by Meheen Engineering. County staff obtains commitment for $500,000 funding from Pitkin County Use Tax. Other sources of funding researched. July, 1995: The Elected Officials Transportation Committee (EOTC) approved a funding strategy for the bridge that includes $500,000 from county use tax, $250,000 from county open space and trails fund, and $250,000 from the City of Aspen and the Town of Snowmass Village. Bud Eylar publishes and distributes final drawings and specifications for bidding by contractors. With the help of the task force, the project is still on schedule for completion by November 1 st. All land use approvals are in place, and CDoT, U.S. Army Corps, and SHPO approvals are pending and should be forthcoming in the near future. A funding strategy has been developed and is in place. Attached for your review are computer-generated renderings of the structure as it will look when constructed. Thank you for your interest in this project. Please contact me at #5209 if you have any questions. .. 4 ./IME 6. . 4*1:.b - .1 - 4 1 19,6. 4 - - ..1, 1*Nt A k ./1 . - 4/' 4, , * 61.,0 tr - 1, P 1 -,W.,19'r- ,~-1U.~ +*f,A 1,Â».2 t -- 4 7 45#7Â· 4 -4 p -r.: . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~*~~ ti *Â·t: ~- -y $ . â‚¬. .V . . '1, -4.4. - w k~â‚¬ t. 4Â¥t-&= 3 1 - ...1 Â¥-~ I --.. ' ~~ -i~ft - r.- 2 -42" 2.. 43- .-~ Existing Condition .. Wall# 21.-w #1601/ 121:I:i.2..#* _ 44[.2.' tk 1 '4 - 10'L U ' **Fd , -1/E.2 .0 tri/Ala/6*9, AL. fltillariiwA/1fil/VI1,1/INPIT ' i '~0 21*,Al lu - 4 , ....0 =4~~INI*:12441~f,3~1rti, I -4/- fa k - -4 ..- 2. , . i. at -.I- I. - ,Â¥41 47.~22Â¥*a~hi96#Â£1Â£Efiffj~'Cl,t,2 -I-75* -t=.- 1 ' ' , - 1 . . / * f F j 6 293,1>1 " rt = - , XI\F ., At ~ - â‚¬L -I-.-/1-./1.<- p -.,m=/ ill,"/'"i:. -'119/1 tr= :- Â·~ - .z r.--2. -r=.1/IF,YE ~-1*:4f-*t -. _-r, - -4.-1. _. --3 A '~ , A --litil I.Â£,dmf - Proposed Condition ... /4 m 1-14,1 1,1.11 il r. . 11 11 N -I.rz-/-/ .M ~l,r,r, Â» .el ~ . - - 7.- '11... 0 -- 9:,- ' Ii. I * r.%1 12 1,11 -1* Mi ll,1,4 1'' M 10.01641,~ 47 - -4. " A' , 1 -1 - . - 1., 414 , 1. 1./ '41 111 . 4 46â€ž . 1 '1., =::='..4-* - lili 4 ' 14*16+7.22â‚¬~ft'~ 1, 1.-17 1. _ 444 #-lilliA#<2..p r ,/,/41)*10rl /r- 1 1,â€ždil- . f-9 & '.4 , I . 1 ..9 R * 'LU., 1 - '4*a. t Â· 'M. ' -10: 9 .11.11.1., ..~ .1.. 4.4 1 *1. . ..91111.11...r- 1 'AC>~-37"~. 3 4 1.111Â«'~ '111, . .i. 11-h -'-â€¢ **I./bl. . 936. I *f' 1~MI#*. Â·Â·4:w,i'~~ :1 11.1,01111. ., 1*11 1â€ž1 >)1.1â€žW,4 /.11 0-1 Jt 1~*Mi#:4 1/+9- .. ..11,1:.-1.44 11 1.11-,1 Im . - 6 14 1. . f . Ir -- 2111141111112 m//'/I/=4111"I/# A# 1 ~Â· /0//,7. ' '111 - '4 7 - .-L - ,, 1/,1, 11 '11Â£1- 111, . 11 11 'llr9*I~, - 0' ' 111IF-' ;14 ia 1."pl.:I.' Existing Conditions , Â·Â·'11 E---Ii--Ii--I--Ii--I-In...9.-Yi:.1...a///////////////m :. rlimâ€¢ :11 111'r"Fr "1- 1 ' 1'**4' .-frr-.-P ti ** ...91~4, 1 1,1 - 1 111,114 11#. . f 'til ' - - .1*~~44 90$ . .lt, 4. ., 'I 1.- , 411. 1 - h. W , i . ' 44, 1 4, 1 1<1Â¢ ..r=1;;4:~ 1,~~/ ill 1 4 41. l ' , -I-- ..,1ir-N"//"-I- 4 /4 * 1 1:111 11 - . L I ., + :.1.1...1,2*3 Â· .. .,RIMFill"114//;M... ~61. - I ..,*1111~1'~Â·~ Â· Â·1 . 4 - 11.~ rill"#* 9 .1111,1,11, , IVe.F~ 9 fialimpllr ..~~ - *, iq. 2 111 1111 F 1 1 1 :.t h. ..... 1 -3@61111 . ...% 1 1,@~ 11.... . 9 .1.Â».1.. , ./.r.lid.â€¢- 11 I ..11' 01.1,1F ltâ€žP Â·â‚¬. 4, 9*' i '0'~14~Wt' 11 141, 1 1 1 1 , E. .,1. , ..34%1 14'IL .1-4$101111 11. ..t ... 1 ,, 41, " 1, . i ..r'*1111|~'4 1, 1,11 IL' L 11. . 4. i - I .'Im.7,"*"WAN-I . Proposed C~itions Â·1Â·' Detailed By 1 1 Quoolilies uy i Checked By Checked By 11 71 1 m 1 0 1 0 1 1 Â» 11 Â£57 CCO N ~4 . 7 32 j (7/ I Â»AÂ«Â»o -9<22YJ 7825 73-1 \ ~ 1 -7 9 Â·-9+se, ,/-77 1)<C<F~~b)' 1 , 7800 -kED-- < 5-22&,J (/ C r--UE---5/ 1, --=22%: j\\ 1//Â»---uny 'i 74*V ~ 1 if 109 - --- ------Il 3 . .-1-/ 1 - +Z / 46 / E E- MAROON ~/ CREEK 27--- A A . - -- 1 1 --- â„¢-- 7780 . *IA % - .,4-3. _jEE2Â«_r- 7800 . .--41Â»~.........A K-/ -Â·â€¢c~/I===/I'irl--*-W/t EL 5-M--% - 7825 -00Â«44Â«1*i~~a 5 VINFEDjf>5114 L - -IZZ'/--0-----1001-----21 - 7850 LCID---Â« C 12}L /r--/ /,1< - v \/1/ 0 9 I 10 1 11 1 12 I 13 I 14 AS CONSTRUCTED 0 kit 1,0 al'64- F. NO REVISIONS REVISED VOID '1, ..4 & 44,1 f .,;61Â§. ".13)1441 'A i t'Â· tt.wÂ·'f,4,9,72 :44 â‚¬ TRUSS & 9 BRIDGE E TRUSS & PIER LEGS PIER LEGS , ," 4 A A . I. '. I 1 '4 "t. ' i ' 0 t 8 0 Me I 19 00 W '?"i h 0- 1 . -1,11. 14 r 4 'E ~ _j g GUARDRAILS ----a . L L ?k, , 111 In , 2 =2-7-IT j HANDRAIL --4.Z- ' 001 . R 114 Â·Â· '.1 CONC.SLAB \ '1++ Nl . ,.22~ -----1,- - Fl 1 " '/ i '.. , C 6 Â¥.160' .41. . 1 1, 1 :I . 1 1 I 't. Â¢1*1 -11. 1 1 ' 4,Â· '9 9 -1,1 1%, 1 1 \0 k. - TS~2 1/2X 2 1/2X1 /4(TYP.)- \ / #Â¥0 9 ,Â£'.,- , 'R It ' 01 - 7875 ~i /2 , '911: 1 1, *, 4 , /4 34111,11 00 t#'*L 1 4,4 \ 1 / fle 4 1 Â·~1 - b tr, X h' 01 1 < 0 9 Â£4, 54 r 1 < 1 - X 00 N -1 / 4/ , 'k i 1 Â·'. 9/ f TO ASPEN 2 3/4 f / 2 3/8-1 â‚¬ BRIDGE - 13'-8 7-\ .4 i. ! , ! h i '-f , I f 41 ,Â· 1, 41 6 Â·Â·4 4)4, :'Â·4i I / VA-\ I - 1 ; 4 4-34.0 / U Z u hi : F * i,l.1, 4 T~ -- -gh 1\1 A ...74: .,11 4 , 4 6 Ir , 14> 1 /: , 2 144 1 i . A i 44*44Â¢ ' 1 1 \ / Â·'e 4 -da-- , 4 47.4 N \ /\ .A.. 1 j / if . '4 / 1 \ i A:' t , 4' -1 - .1.1. .11.1.-1. 1.. .11 -1- .9 I-/ 1. 4 j .tr % 4Â· , ... / F \ /J â‚¬ 9 1/ i. 1 14, 4 K ;i / n 1 R ..1 -1 1 f L N i.4 .i .... , .li 4 / \ ,14 9 , 7 + t' ' .kic 13'|-8" ~ 1Â£ E 1 . r . -. .- ' ~ 45 Â·' *EL, 880.00 AT Q BRIDGE : 7 1 1 /*. 1 \ 1 , Â»tABO'r~ 1 '' \. f7/ \\42229 7850 Â« 12'-8 3/4" AT Â£ BRIDGE S30IS H108 8/Lxgxgl â€ž0-,96=.Â£-,EL O 9 ~ i~**1Â£23/6- ' : * 648' -80 EXIST. ROADWAY BRIDGE ..4 4.. - 19'-ym 672' -0" NEW PED./BIKE BRIDGE PLAN I SCALE : 1 ; 50' * Â« â‚¬ SYM. .7 - J.,4, END TRUSS INTER. TRUSS - PIER TRUSS INTER. TRUSS INTER. TRUSS PIER TRUSS INTER. TRUSS END TRUSS ./ - - EL. 7880.00 AT 9- ABUTM. #1 E F - 12'-0" F - 12'-0" E/'- ABUTM. #4 168'-0" , 36'-05< 36' ipi<" 168'-0" , 36' -0"~ 36' -0," 168' -0" -1- -X:7 - -1414 -xy . I -1- I... 14 PANELS @ 12' -0" 14 PANELS @ 12' -0" 14 PANELS @ 12'~ .. 3 @ 12'-0 3 @ 12'-0" 3 0 12'-0-7 3 0 12'-0" ~ #*PYT.Zâ€¢ ~ -Â·uÂ·.. ~ rri 1 - **4Â»Â»PW . 9 9 . .9. -ZOA, r.4... 3 2 ~ T.O. CONC. PEDESTALS EL 7779.00 44 - 2%93 - -- . h PIER #2 PIER #3 ake 210' -0" 252'-0" 210'-0" I -a- -1. -- 1 ELEVATION -2 .* . K -- 44 0 95&3 Â· SCALE : 1" = 50' - -Vt#/ G '1PeÂ·.2. - 9.42â‚¬.4--7:4(4- I ne-2 - :-4... :za r h 1 - â‚¬55*452~3.... -f i , =./.'I./. /,I.qpl,/4- - t. '.-4 045'>Alt. 2,42#FO#Wit.2- 24 & - -- .. - - 24.6 1- 1.-re . 4 . - 3&94*1- . 32~ 031,1...4. 4.Â·- 5. . . c.:. Â· -'Â· u.~., Â·-ct#trk'$*2222118*. -, :-<iF' --s ---AL-TRI 1-tr.-rot V - - - ru Es.f .Â·fh~li:-:> t. ~tifutÂ·2Â·~;~~~~. ..f.... c 4 3.2 .Â· =:iÂ·., 4-0-5,1 ~-,Â·.zi. ,2,-...1.41-Â£-:~*.c~-I#93.~10'iliB#*SI./0Willbilam~%<14-2 f . 4-~ 11{'4' ' St 21-5 /4 '.