Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.199509134 ? AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION September 13, 1995 REGULAR MEETING SISTER CITIES ROOM - SECOND FLOOR CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of Aug. 9th minutes that were distributed at the last meeting. II. Commission & Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. NEW BUSINESS 5:10 A. Entrance to Aspen- formal recommendations regarding "Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Alternative H'I- brief presentation to be made at meeting 5:35 i B. 205 S. Mill, Campo de Fiori- Minor d * cs j //c .-6. . 5:45 C. 228 S. Mill, Sabbatini Building- Minor 4/05~. 5 .1-'1. i:':3 V. OLD BUSINESS 6:05 A. 132 W. Main- Setback variance and minor review, PUBLIC HEARING/Lfy 5 /;liw,an/4-- 0,1 6:20 B. 533 E. Main, St. Mary's- Minor Kee, 4*= cu 6:40 C. Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes- Amendment to Final '2 ~- Vs, 4.3 7:00 D. 523 W. Francis, Dikeou- discussion 7:25 VI. Project Monitoring 7:30 VII. Adjourn NOTE: SITE VISITS WILL BE HELD AT 132 W. MAIN, THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, AND ST. MARY'S AT NOON ON THE DAY OF THE MEETING. PLEASE MEET AT THE SIDE ENTRANCE OF CITY HALL IF YOU WOULD LIKE A RIDE. ALSO, PLEASE CALL TO CONFIRM THAT YOU WILL BE THERE. ALSO NOTE: NO MEETING WILL BE HELD ON OCTOBER 11 DUE TO THE "NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE." OUR UPCOMING MEETINGS WILL BE SEPTEMBER 27 AND OCTOBER 25. HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Proiect Donnelley Erdman The Meadows Collins Block/Alley 624 E. Hopkins (CD:3-8-95) 220 W. Main- European Flower 930 King Street- Cunrtingham 330 Gillespie 426 E. Main - Galena Plaza Jake Vickery The Meadows 130 S. Galena- City Hall 520 Walnut- Greenwood 205 W. Main- Chisolm 610 W. Hallam- Iglehart Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Aspen Historic Trust 9 303 E. Main- Kuhn 930 King- Cunningham 939 E. Cooper- Langley Entrance to Aspen Roger Moyer 409 E. Hopkins Holden/Marolt 303 E. Main- Kuhn 420 E. Main 107 Juan Martha Madsen 132 W. Main- Asia 435 W. Main-L'Auberge 706 W. Main (CD:4-27-94) 702 W. Main- Stapleton 525 W. Hallam Wyckoff Linda Smisek 229 W. Hallam- Pinnington 316 E. Hopkins- Howling Wolf 939 E. Cooper- Langley 801 E. Hyman- Elmore Sven Alstrom 624 E. Hopkins 4-12-95 Barn and historic house approved final j Susan Doddington Melanie Roshko Jeff McMenimen 1 I I . ILL 4,) A . a What is Alternative "H?'0 It is the name given to the Entrance-to-Aspen design created by a team of transportation experts hired by the City of Aspen. The concept was created during a Design Charrette, August 6 - 8, 1995. Why did the City decide to hire these experts? They were asked to address issues which remained unsolved by pre.vious efforts and further the direction suggested by the March 1995 Transportation Symposium. What can Alternative "H" offer to the Colorado Department of Transportation's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)? Although the designers do not see it as a finished concept, it offers a fresh look at the major issues involved in the Entrance-to-Aspen, and as such it will add value to the discussion of alternatives during the EIS comment period. What key concepts did the Charrette participants select to use as the foundation for their design? ¢0 Improvements to Highway 82 for safety and smooth traffic flow without creating more traffic. ¢4> Immediate development of light rail transit improvements to convert automobile trips to transir using intermodal centers. © Comprehensive demand management strategies to reduce the need foradditional highway capacity for the automobile and relieve congestion in the Central Core. \ 23 0 --- I.4' . 0. 2 11 0 9 > /~5~%901 8 P Ve ; 011 3 J 3 - -- I --41/ <**~ 0-Ob.~1, a -46 1% 1#' 61.3 ENTRANCE A A'&PEN 4 121 & . 01 3 ) 90,/,u r#wn&;20 - A#Wir 1-8'"f~) 99 Note: A large map of the Alternative H design is located on the last page. 1 . A General Description of Alternative "H" From the Aspen Airport into Town Airport Intermodal Center ¢0 Served by light rail transit (LRT) with pedestrian underpasses to link the airport, parking, transit and the Airport Business Center. - ¢0 From this point into Aspen, the highway would consist of four automobile lanes, two of which would be dedicated carpool and bus lanes, and the LRT would be located in the median. Buttermilk Intermodal Center © At this point most private vehicles and buses would change modes and use the LRT to continue into Aspen. 4 © Carpool and bus transit lanes would be routed into a parking structure for transfer to light rail. ¢0 This center would be linked to the Buttermilk lift system and might be a point of change to gondola transport if that is developed to serve other ski areas. ¢> From this point into Aspen, the highway would consist of 2 general traffic lanes with the LRT in the median and bike/pedestrian paths on both sides of the highway. Moore Open Space/Podolak Property Options ¢* Option #1 is to reroute Maroon Creek Road on a new alignment from the curve at the school complex to an intersection with Highway 82 approximately opposite the Municipal Golf Course. This would spread traffic more evenly than the current intersection. This option would include an intercept lot at the Pololak property to deal with school and the Highlands traffic. ¢0 Option #2 is to keep Maroon and Castle Creek roads connected. It would include a modern roundabout to merge the two roads, an intermodal center and a parking facility on the Moore Open Space built into berms to reduce its visual impact. "S" Curves and the Marolt Open Space: A Significant Difference From Other Alternatives * At the Cemetery Lane intersection an interchange would allow traffic movements in all directions without signals. ¢0 One lane of transit and one lane of vehicle traffic would proceed inbound along a route paralleling the rise in the land adjacent to Maroon Creek. ¢0 This alignment would create less of an impact existing open space while reducing traffic impacts on the S curves by 50 percent. ¢0 The transit track could be used as an additional ernergency access lane if it were paved with grass-filled masonry blocks. ¢* In the outbound direction, 2 lanes and a transit cotdor would be provided on the existing S curves. * The outbound lanes would merge into one lane before Cernetery Lane. Since this intersection wouldn't have a signal light, the merge would not result in a back up or delay. Main Street to the Central Core ¢0 The two directions of transit and general vehicle lanes would converge at 7th and Main Streets. © Along Main Street the LRT would be located in the median, with one vehicle lane and one parking lane. The LRT would go up to Monarch Street and make a loop on Main, Galena, and Durant (to Rubey Park). ¢* The proposed trolley could share the LRT track in a loop through the Central Core. f . Summary: The Key Points ¢0 Transit and roadway improvements would be developed at the same time. * Intermodal centers would provide convenient transfer points for the switch from private vehicles to transit. The trip would be fast and #equent. ¢0 The impact to the Marolt Open Space 8 sAght. ¢> Traffic impacts on the S Curve is reduced by 50 percent. What's next? ¢0 Cost estimates for the LRT. Staff will work to find fiscally responsible solutions using federal. state and local sources of funds for transit. * Additional conceptual development from meetings with interested citizens and official boards. © Refinement of details such as intersection designs. ¢0 Development of a phasing plan to address the timing of the intermodal centers, which do not need to be created all at once. and LRT extenions such as to Aspen Highlands. What can I cio? ¢> If you believe this concept offers a viable alternative for the Entrance-to-Aspen, let the Colorado Department of Transportation know your opinion during the Draft EIS comment period which will continue until mid-September. ¢0 Work with local officials to refine the concept. Bring your issues to the discussions so that refinements can be developed as early as possible. .k Direct Your Questions or Comments to: ¢0 Stan Clauson, Community Development Director, City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, CO 81611,920-5090. ¢0 Ralph Trapani, Project Manager, Colorado Department of ' Transportation Mount Sopris Project, 0020 Sunset Drive Unit #9, Basalt, CO 81621,927-9852. - 11/ .A bju:\\c:\mspub\alth.pub . .+ \\. Lac-'~ 7/7/f _-3 r'.''.'',1%,Ill* 0/ & L 8 5 P 01\\00 0 4 L/«/ \, 9 , VA\~0 U 46 'r,J 7.0 4/ UOI 0 CD 0 AU &,~ //f c> jlk€9 - 011 -n : 013 0% 9 >0 A - - =\/ U /O 9 \\9 /,00 <34 &\\ it« C \% p 0 k 0 -' ill 0 0 6,« 10€00 0 ch / i f , - 2 t h fr / e45/COV 4 lo. e 0 1 C 34- 0 1 9 :5: 9 430 1 9/9? 0 O /0 1 0 . m - 0 .. 0 0\ \ 1 1 %*STI Ne F ITctiet4 2-64 ¢ - 181#Plimlt ENA"T· ' ,-4- "ILT|Hel las·[Aul-NIT 1 ele# 41,45-4-->lu 1 El 9-1-oed; a El '1 ''~I~~ 14 L-1. U 4,8, i \-601*IN I 1 -2 - 1 -Ell.3.- 401,1,1.»Rp 401'MT -1 1 001% 4/'015 3. 1 4#Ne 'HIP t>(ISTINA / loclle fl/44 ~ ·46 11'To:;·: ZINaM patioTES WPLL To *6 122,101.191510 CH•14 ST'UCTUM/•L-) BE fliN•T#9 He,W JITI,l, el;TratTI·04. 4%34 6166 0#HSTFU€1014 wHS.1*TIHA •r *4 9TL'* W % 1 Hr· rife F+TEP 4-fe - PL#orl,14 Tril'ouqllouT 1• tet f/1rni, coliq,=re. Urrtt f°LY Urt·»HE Tor =·AT. _.*Tr|Lt:P FldrlIDINA 4 #1.EATF14't K-/41€ T' 16{1 pvtent' M 1,16·2*w LoHT12/•CTOFS. -- 'Flt'f '10,> *1451<1 614< 111 Fleup *111°0 11 rlorl FCOTTU19MT 1*r 4 rcE:;Trooll /*PITIolt apprees' 229 5. MILL )»FEW MioHZ, (110) 120 -11!1 56/te: '/40 - 1'-0 * P/•Te, AL,OtueT |I 3 1196 0. r 1,4 .. B>ls:r,Ha1 1<ITGMEH 2664.8 10,-0 i I I ------ 4 11.01, 1 h -re,„11•1111 5.Rrl: ' *.041 I I 1 - 1 [RuirTMENT 5*lePULM 1 fLLUS|Dlt RI _57*/*8 1 -F Ey»101 Hai MaT/.49#T Mil 1 -0 -- ·- Des,Mr-noN PIH:*SIONS -Prre 1 -34 A tirtiveltif- 1*7,• 14'W• H-!40 11» - 10- F - Lk11112~k £ Al- Isssdams =95 15 15»1- 'Slt+14 1-6' ¥ 150• 994.0 15,6,LE 18*00 84·L-la i 0 145 INH 94 0 • 16' x Hip 1,9 8-115 Ultle p PUPPIAnic,Telt le & 0We,· 944- 5/v-/912 051,2- FAIL -4--) DE . 1 6,12» 2 ~rt•4A ' ¢.PFIT~ - - - *"*,%652t~Li#2,1 Vt'; Ill- 2-® i 1 41= 1 i "fil - . 111:l 64141** (~,It (Mi mu,·rt,4,. N 4 u Ult U 2.U i $ RET,£441 IN -TrT,41 1 R-=New P.NHN,Y 'Ppll'ON 164.F. 2 11 + -- - - -#li. 4 H t 13=99 - I 14.,· 14"-j 'L *4 4489& k---tleu ,;u.iptuat ._ i.' 1 1 fl:EN,lt *01* euta-6 1 43¢: / coult-»Fo 112,1 -* a. f»".2~-[1 . 1-»N 1 •41*1' 11! 4*Nal twor· [I -=u. -4- k,•*PITWN 6 1 I 8 1 6/414=INe 747 Hui -0- 4,141)161 9'or 0 PErc P.-4 4 Slt,ELIMHTS 1 1 --L MEN rLOOIL rIFil + HoT»· mMW t:*H£,le; N.,9.1- To pe P!*t,IgHEP (N•N 97,21.kfT 1.42,•40 - IS5531 DcH•Tes 14:11 1.1/•61, .rotleT'20(TION. 11811 WALL ¢'01141'FUG·TI•H GON&~TINA or 204- 4-TUPS 14 ve I Hr. rilze P,Trp 4YE - FL#FINA TH/oubilloill To le hAI liTE:, cotexteTe W tilt *PfUMAT'9·14B -Tor co/·T. - PET/'1 bep 10.144•14 4 m.tc TILI* 6 FL,•NG T• 65 fl'ovlpet' M Lia:+44#10 doHTIZA:rfol29. 71112 11 r lori F[57!-1.1911T 316112 1114-68 - 1# *Wal •-14 93'b'int. UU,4106, i - 15/12 4 12£9'TFAMM ,A»11141 -*- F»- polE*s +10-r =•Uttr 1,0,4 Mal,ou al.ta /*Plens,; 9#19 96· MIU. 3/4SfEN Si.„16, (110) 1*0-li 11 - - 41/0** /4'RK Tout - 1419, S.K --verlrY rIA, t:,nt#Stolls lit hel.P trTE· /4.11*T lo, Illa 3-1 1 * Ill 1 1 . 11 1. 111 11 or.1 p 1 1 1 :1 - It .. 1 - + 1 ! : 1 .!1 1 i ! 1 + + + 1 ! li 1 - L-- U 1 11 1 11 it 1 1; ·! ! ; 11#4 /·MIIUmr - Ntil f'Eu-A 110*12 I ; i Fl-Ellat pupt'le *00(20 lid , 1 4 -Te'#%60M i 12LliTEE:!ZE--Hor-TH-REMIJEL_1 111 f i 1 : 11 127 14.0 -11-01 L 11 11 1 , i _~_ J . 26-He:H-62€EL . -1.0.-1.0,-01 ~ ~trille_·: 1 .7.~ ' ., ~.- 1 li Liz!: 41 ,9~Irkr[11414,71 I ..1 G~ 1 .lt., .JUiUUU11111111111 : 11 -1 :1 1 11 .1 1, 1 ; !11 t l i- i»-i-. 1-k-k-1 I i 1- E-1 ' I. 0 - 1+ lili i Mili 1 1 j ~-1 + 2, t--«I-4~ ® ~~ ~ - 1 1 +: · iii , r-7-~~1 1 ' · i!;! 'i 1 . 1 ---- . LoUS. 1-mvel-- 11 i -9. Pe 0 45 14Ckl IM'16•rs HEN FUL, W•op . lerfELIW• Wool:, 9 11,1641 mils-ri,16~ FRNal Silt:Mile! 19•012,2 4 lt4430*19 flt81141 361*71*14 *00*5 /-'1 1.log-81 Mi-Ev,TioN £ TFMJeolls 1-1.-v.5 4**TF im ¥,ou-·r) WO f tuh J.looD - /--\ Meg ELE>aTION - 111 60*IT#><T ME#01 0,119; 1*4 400% ~~~~-~-:-~i~~~.-~ SIP':ua,H-r; T~412*+ lerl FO IDE t1019 711<5ThUMNIT 1 15/9, 6 resTrooR /wiTioN leppi~f?GEL#057· HI l.i„ 16"11 1-E.*1-2170)-12:1113=__1 -*6 Nallr· 1 96.»LE· 1/0.- 1'-Du VEFIrY ··16 #10~56|Stoil= IN fIELD 1-·. -1 I i»TE: /4.;BUST 21 , I1~16 1 31 727 Illimmmul i E lillii 111 1 Ill CE 63 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer 2 RE: 205 S. Mill, Campo de Fiori- Minor DATE: September 13,1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to construct an small expansion in the area which is now a walkway past the restaurant and to install new sliding french doors in this area. i This building is not historic, but is located within the Commercial Core Historic 1 District. 1 ~ APPLICANT: €ampo de Fiori, represented by Alison Foto. LOCATION: 205 S. Mill Street, Lots D-J, Block 81,City and Townsite of Aspen. 111 PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards i found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant I approval. 1 i 1. ~ ' .Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark .... i Response: The proposed changes will not be visible from the street. 1 The addition will encroach into what is currently a courtyard area, I however, a similar remodeling has taken place in the adjacent restaurant (Cache Cache). This addition will have sliding french doors which will allow it to maintain an open feeling in good weather. All materials in the b new addition are to match those on the existing building. 11 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 1 11 - Response: The proposal will have no impact on the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: No historic structures are directly impacted by this proposal. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic structures are directly impacted by this proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 1 Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the minor development application as submitted. RECOMMENDED MOTION: N move to approve the minor development application for 205 S. Mill, Campo de Fiori, as submitted." ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: It 6. 1 1 TO: Amy Amidon HPC - Planning and Zoning 130 S. Galena - Aspen, CO. 81611 (970) 920-5096 FROM: Alison Foto P.O. Box 2222 Aspen, CO. 81611 (970) 920-9386 DATE: September 5,1995 RE: Campo de Fiori - Restaurant Expansion 205 South Mill, Aspen CO. Lots D-J, Block 81, Aspen Townsite 5 Dear Amy: We are submitting to you an application for the expansion and remodel of the Campo de Fiori Restaurant. ;t r At our pre-application meeting on August 21,1995 it was decided that this project was classified as a Minor Development. The purpose of the construction is to remodel an adjacent space to the existing, restaurant adding a necessary waiting area and bar with a handicapped accessible restroom. Also to the front of the restaurant an airlock set of entry doors and a slight , expansion of the dining room area will make this successful restaurant much more functional for the owners and the customers. The building at 205 South Mill lies in a Historic Overlay District. However; the Campo de Fiori restaurant is located in this building's lower courtyard which is not visible from the street, and it will have little impact on the Historic Overlay District. The proposed development is compatible in character, reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, it does not detract from the cultural value of the designated historic structures, and it does not diminish or detract from the architectural j integrity of a designated historic structure. Especially because of it's location in the lower courtyard where it can not be seen from the street level. The entry and added windows are French Doors with flower boxes in front and will add to the aesthetics of the existing courtyard giving it a European cafe feeling. The courtyard is used for dining and will become an extension of the restaurankluring the summer months. The only other materials that will be added is brick that will match the existing. Enclosed along with this letter you will find: Exhibit A - Application Form Exhibit B - Supplement to HPC Development Application Exhibit C - Letter from applicant authorizing representation Exhibit D - Disclosure of Ownership Exhibit E - Vicinity Map with street address and legal description Exhibit F - Description of building materials Exhibit G - Scale drawings of the proposed development Sincere~ ..7 f Aliso~Foto j j NECACHMENT 1 IAND USE' APPIi[CAmION ]30124 . I 4 p=ded= fame - C,AMPo lif. .Fi De i 2) Project Iocatim _906 J Mi GL. D- iT 1?>62 8 1 A€ PEN -7-6 ION 31 -T G (indicate At:reet address, 10€ & block Immber, legal description where apprripriate) 3) ' Tmesert Z,miDV d aH M 27281 m- 2 · 4) Iet sive ~ 8 > 0 00 *t. Fr. Sh keelicartis Em¥,0 Maress & 8¤8 4 GUZA156774 71,07£8 1'1 +1 ·MA-uumwl j AST'gw do. 924-78'to 6) Representatix,eus Name. Address & Ihone # AL,SoN FoTo " '20 0 Ok '2,-UUZ- AS PEN 00 ' 920 -93 8 cP 7) Fpe' of *plioatirn {please dieck all thet fpely): . . - Conditicnal Use - Conceptual SPA - Concep~,al Historic Dar. ®ecial B6iew u_ Final SBA ----- Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline congeptual FOD ..X Minor Histozic Dev. . 0.--- Stream Margin - · Final ED - Historic Demoliti£*1 laintain View Plane · - Histalic Designatim DULKUV.US.1.91 Cork•/ZAninmization. Text/M,P Anenchent . - GAUS Allotment Int 1¥lity*ot Iine Adjustment i=,ulption of Ekisting Uses · (Ieber aniA of cori=ting struch.ES- approocinate sq. ft.; nmber of bedrocms; anor previoos approvals grarted to the property) 1 ¢-70" 66 Roe,1 - 4 & & 9,· ft. MA Lkway (C.uu<Ap,4 3 *' 11 97··, d~r- ~t.. .. 9) Description of Devele,nent Application .+11 NOR D<11€101>M131* - CoN Ul=PJ# DN oF 468 dll:i 470 RAAE -io 15AK j REAT£.66+1 - Aild_il--i 69~ r# /0 6 J · F. EN 7-2 Y 1 10) Havg you attached the following? 4. Response to Attadmait 2, Minimum Slhnission Contents 4 Response to Attadmalt 3, Specific Slbnission Contents Response to Attadmient 4, Review Standards for Your Application alll . 1. 1 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in.a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11™17 format. a APPLICANT: 6/IMPo DE Fiwel , EulA meTH FLarjde ADDRESS: 904 4. HILL- ZONE DISTRICT: d 6 4,0 MeQ/A L 6 ILE LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): /6,00 0 JP. EXISTING FAR: D· G 90-0 4. /=. ALLOWABLE FAR: 30,000 dP· PROPOSED FAR: 1 4 ) 92,6 4. F. · OE• 84,•~e j EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): )4/01 0 0 F. PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): Ad ofo 4. 0. 610 e.La,-~ -e ) EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: N ta- PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE N IA- EXISTING% OFOPEN SPACE (Commercial): Abl r'3A,4669 6- PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): 14 IA EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Pmcioal Bl®.: A/,//1- I kcessory Gam - c PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldg: - PROPOSED % OF DEMOUTION: N }h EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: N ,/A PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: N /A EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: N / A ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 9: / A SETBACKS: EXISTING: I th ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Side: Side: Side: Combined Front/Rear: Combined FrVRr: Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIEW ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmatks Onlv: character compatibilitanding must be made bv HPC): FAR: f·.4 ~ r: Parking Spaces: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt/Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): ' 1 t. 194 11 Der , A A. A 4 '02 1 - (/C Yo I f t > . i 424 .. m T 217'~»Pri~ 44. ) 1\.--\ 9 2 i W Vi·~2*4 **"-424'4<13· \ -v~~ 8 4 "°7:7-=20 Lk 962G1~*/0=- li<1 \---~ Cteek 4- 9 + St'~Bunny Ct 0-- roe It / 40 S- 4 0 4 .040% <. 07 , 14 4043&00 \ 94 I /0 # 9 4. tz 4% 9 1 i cr i -45'gre:52 -1 A Not every street or road is 3 ·--Golf CGS@'34 named on maps or listed in ( 63 street guides. Constluction of - £ U VI•• s, § - U streets and roads may be in ,/- 4/7 4 0. 1 4 j. progress incertain areas. ~ -L iii / -*r'-~ Re•st f h Aspen i ~ MarOOn Creek Rd _ a : a %/ c*+24 4,: . 4 2>--4 Ar 4 W 4 fl* : + 2 -9 1 st ~4 4 & 9 '0/ 4 t 'cy' -0 14' 4 % 1 #H- :4. f) / - 0 /. .2.6 41 4.t- .. /To ..r e . Maroon Lake .4 : St 2 #9131 t.- - 0 #4-4 0 4 : .:. 3% 0 0.: 2 0 -1 0 6.1,9.*·t , T -i- 4..: ' p•M OJ ' C. 14~ .,p 4 V+$· 14 ,- :·u•., 9 .44,5. er, 'G 'lk l 4.*ok 1 t **51 9 965 4 .,1 C 1b Twin Lakesj Independen0Pass 5/<Fl Po 106 fi o'2' *Tfet-[ »t,12]599 1 9.0 e S, Mil,IL'' UER-8,1.--t:E42,pler #N -f -LaTS ly- J , 151,1£ . N , *GY#N - -roN +IgITE. %,u,•1 0, r T j- r It ..I *i • ' 1.3- f Campo de Fiori , f 5,7 , £444..i'•4'·+U ~4:IN ··•tutwu4 4• Exhibit F - Description of Building a Materials: f I ..r'.9 .B. 0. 1%!A.a .. - New bricks to matph existing in size and color. Pella wood windows to be painted in copper paint finish with patina. . 1/ I '1 li~, 6 - 1.4 96* - 9.< 0 -6 =ge> .... 1 1 -2-c) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 228 S. Mill Street, Sabbatini Building- Minor DATE: September 13, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to replace the original windows on the second floor of this 19th century commercial building with new wooden Marvin windows. The building (formerly Sabbatini sports) was built in 1890, is a local landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: bexter Williams, co-owner LOCATION: 228 S. Mill Street, the south 20' of Lots A,B,C, the west 5' of the south 20' of Lot D, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark .... Response: All of the windows on the second floor appear to be original. The windows have not been maintained, so the wood is very dry and the paint is peeled. The glass may have been replaced previously, as have the window sills on the south facade. Some of the glass is broken. There are several options for these windows, including: • Remove the windows, to strip, sand, and repair them. Replace glass where necessary and add weather-stripping (gaskets) along meeting rails. t I • Replace the existing glass with double paned glass if possible • Repair windows as described above, and add an interior storm window to match the existing windows so that it is not visible from the outside. • Replace the existing sash with the sash replacement kit by Marvin:. This , provides a new sash with double glazing and a new "track" while retaining the existing window casing and trim. • Replace the existing windows with new windows to match. A quick survey of the Commercial Core shows that some buildings, such as the Brand Building and the Elks Building, have replaced all of their original windows. The replacement windows change the character of the building somewhat, but are of an appropriate dimension. Other buildings, including the Aspen Block, the building which formerly housed Isberian rugs, and Planet Hollywood all retain their original windows in a restored condition. It is Staffs opinion that at least the two windows on the front facade and the window which is furthest west on the south facade should be retained and restored in a manner described above. These are the windows which are mos{ visible to the pedestrian. The remaining windows on the south facade could be replaced (preferably with the Marvin sash replacement kit), with care taken to make sure that the replacements match the dimensions of the existing windows as closely as possible. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This building retains much of its original character and detailing, therefore Staff finds that repairing the windows which are visible to the pubic is important to the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: Removing the original windows does not detract from the historical significance of the structure as a whole. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Removing the original windows does diminish the architectural integrity of the structure. This can be mitigated by retaining those windows which are visible to the public. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. • Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Develop'mer'It Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the applicant restore the existing two windows on the west facade and the westernmost window on the south facade, to include stripping, sanding and repair, and addition of weather- stripping. An interior storm window which is not easily visible from the outside, may be installed in these locations. The remaining windows may be replaced using either a sash replacement kit by Mafvin, or a new wood window, whichever provides a better match. RECOMMENDED MOTION: i move to approve restoration of the two windows on the west facade and the westernmost window on the south facade of 228 S. Mill Street. If an interior storm window is to be used, product information must be provided to Staff and monitor before ordering. More information about the existing rail dimensions and those of the proposed replacement window must be provided for review by Staff and monitor before ordering." ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: m'mCBMENT 1 · LAND USE APPIi[CATION Fam Project Name · 5 A- 8 8 A--13 At E-O 1 Uu 0 4- /// 2) Project kmtion 3-'1% S. M/LL- gue-Ic RE'-506"n.4 0-0' of ~ LoTE A-. 8.6 k)Esr-5 ' D FS. v-nt ao' ep. L#T- b- .. (indiatd street actiress, lot & block ninber, legal description Viere awrgriate) 0 0 4) -ick stia lit-la, 60( 3) Present Zcning 51 40icart'slame, loaress •caxxet ~61070-62- 4~u_/ 4,46 150 5. MILE- 925- loss 92-0-1/te 1 I 6) Bepmsentatim's Name, Mdress & Ihcne # 7) Fpd of Uplication (plmsed»ck all that gpply): ....„ .. - .4 Conditional Use Conceptual SPA . Ii-- 0,·~13al Histaric Dev. Special Review · Final SPA Finpl wigtoric Dev. 8040 Gralline Conceptual ED . 021_ Minor Histanic Dev. A Stream Margin Final ED --I.- Historic Demolition Historic Designaticn Mountain View Plane · Slbdivisicm --Il 02 ..~I. - Text;/Map Amendment . - GES Allotment Iat SpliwInt line ·__ QU; El=ption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses · 0=bar and D tgpe of existing strucblres; apprmdmate sq. ft; limber of bedrocms; anor previcus approvals granted to the property) 1 DNE 1 26 4-t' (1·°MNEUJ A-L BU' 14*W 8-. FIMT- FLao e. . RETA-1 L Std-oub FL#.2-- DF=Fle£ A-#ob 617/4#Fe . . .. 9) Description of Develciment Application 109-rA-l-LA71 0 Aj oF OELO GE.6-h- EL©DIL Woob.ag A-Ak- (Al,tri OG *F k)}Aboug A-Ob -Ek}14 . E-EPLMENEOT OF- CAS-104-6 A-Ob· 445#+24 k)#4-EAE 052£56 AUr. 10) Have yalattached the following? 0 Response to Attaciwvant 2, Minimm St*nission OCK,tents Response to Att:adment 3, Specific Sukinission Oontents Response to Attachnient 4, Review Standards far Your A*Lication lilli - /7 90 1- 1 'S ' /- 111 - 1 11 - Il -11 1 I. -. 9 B \0/ 8 0 - VariationU consists of a standard double hungwindowwith a round or ellipticaltransom mulled bit. Bothsashareoperable. The insideand outside both revealthecurved appearance. Standard half roundsareavailablein mathingsizestoMarvin'sdoublehungs. VariationB providesatrueround toplookwhichisachieved by bendingthe i frame, stops, sash andcasing Onlythe bottom sash isoperable. Thetopsash isstationarybutalb»sabuemdiusday/litopening. A /Z#/mdiusappearance . is evidenced on both the interiorand exterior. VariationU isperhapsthesimplestandmosteconomicalmethodof 4 FLEXIBILITY TO SUIT YOUR NEEDS achievingtheroundtopappearance. Itconsistsofastandard doublehung 1 window in which bothsash operate. Onlytheexteriorcasing iscurved. The i These six double hung variationsallow youtocustom- interiorappearssquare. ize a round top to suit a need for historical accuracy, VariationU consistsofaneyebrowradiusacrossthehead jambwithasash a construction preference oryour budget. top rail, blind stop,casingand daylightopeningtomatch. Atrueroundtop appearanceshowsonthe interiorand exterion Dependingonthe radius profile, thedouble hungtopsashcanopemte. Thetopsash mustbestationary if the distance from the Springlinetothetop of the head jamb exceedsone- thirdofthe ROwidth. VariationU isaunitthatiscompetitivelypriced. Itiscomprised ofadouble hung unitwithatopsashthatisdesignedtoprovidetheappearanceofaround top...simply bycreatinga radiusacrossthetoprail. The unique look is achievedwiththefull benefitofdoublehungperformanceandoperation. hi ' mi- VariationU providesaroundtopappearancefromtheexterior. Theinterioris astandard frameview. Astandard double hungwindow isemployed inthis variationgivingthebenefitoftwooperablesash. Ithasidenticalsightlineson the exterioras Variations2and 4. The Marvin E-Z Tilt Double Hung really does bend over backwards to please you. Not · ·. only is ita classic design that's functional forventilation and cleaning, it's flexible in sizes, - --J variations, possible assemblies i.1 ]:L~:lifl: il ii t:"-1 1-93' r-=T-9/777=ir--=N.M. 111~"F' and options. That flexibility makesthe E-Z Tilt Double Hung I 6 ./ 1 - 7 gim~~ur,~Ald:§0 great for any project. 15 -==1.. 4 7 & 3 ¢ & I illailliaL..f ..F~Vi-J.li. IUME 9 Y i . 29 ·- - 43 HOW TOGET BIG AND TOUGH AND STILL BE EASILY MOVEn - --\« The Magnum Double Hung is perfect for retrofittingor duplicatingtraditional styling in new construction. It is a - bigger, stronger double hungthatcan incorporate large ~ 13 IIi=.R-== glass areas and a wide range of glazing options. The Magnum Double Hung is builtto perform, even in the most severe weather conditions. f ~ Frames are made from heavy 11/8"stock ~ - .,rl ~ and sash area full 13/4" thick for stability Slot and ,..~ tenon jojnts provide -9*2112.0-0-526 superior strength. For comfortand energy / ~ efficienc* weatherstripping j O Heavycam/ockass{#assecu*. laWi19/1333'Fl isapplied atthe header / 0118"hamesand13/4"sashprovide ; ..al,4,149% p il 1, 1, ar ..m-=,-1./.didmirti check rail and bottom sash. / exceptional strength and durabi14 3/4" insulatingglass is ~ 0 Fourdoublecolispringsmakeoperating ~ ~ ~ standard Forsecurit* the / easy even in larger sizes. Magnum Double Hung ~ 0 Weatherstdppingisappliedatttle ..~ ~~ features a heavy, pick-resistant cam sash lock. top, middleand bottom for .~ comfortand energyefficiency. a Butthe Magnum Double Hung is still easily moved. . Sash are equipped with four double coil springs and block- U Standardjambdepthis 512". - and-tackle balances for easyoperation in any size. U Bothsashoperateand tilt in ~ For replacement projects where frames and trim are t foreasydeaningor still in good condition, there's the Magnum Tilt Pac. It ~ maintenance. includes two energy-efficientsash and all the hardware 1 ~ Sad Magnum Double u~4 ~ nmded toinstallthem. Soyou replaceonlythesash, not \ feature.exteriorallptum /the whole window. - \ chodi'*0625'mick)onsash, / For historic renovation projects, Marvin offers the ~ ~ framean**11*yorhighdurability U o OD €772/1 07. ~ and !p#maintenance. Claddingisavailable inyourchoiceofthreecolors: I Historic Magnum Double or Single Hung featuringsingle \ ~#7#e, pebb/egraya/0tq~. Coating meets AAMA 605.2-92 standards. glazing, narrow muntin bars and special profiles for brick 1 mould casingand flat casingto helpmeetdemanding EMENTSV5rEM landmark criteria. An optional energy panel is available to The Magnum - .1 1-,6„4- ( enhance energy efficiency. . illill,p-.JU Double Hung Replace- . 1 4/=all' TmPLE HUNG >.1.'u·11 ifil'·, merit Systemisideal for : P: - -, - fi·- ;. '34440 upgrading old double 4 1... . s ..1,244.4,~ 3- 22'44 hungs in masonry 2,242 - ~ . 2....icto.4.1 4.4 - *. . ·6.··Ji·: ..4 openings. You get --..- 9 ;/&0211 kt;1 11/ · Iwl --1~ i# replace the old sash. . ~ 4 ,#*fy///Il/,- t:.I ...1 111-: it;9.m.. --11-7- # ™~me~ 1= 7.1.VVI *.. =1.7-00 -91- - 1 > iM lilli 3.728,11 plus you gettough, low 1- 1 3*3 3. 24:1~ 2 : 9 aluminurn partsto 4 maikenance extruded .. I ·.' 0 - 9 $231 -*w.. 4*. 4 ~ 34.1 9 . . :~ LON-·24 cover up shabby I .4 -1~ 8"~ ~4~44.€:1.4.Dfi¢31 exterior sills, jambs and r-:1:-:<A-e:..~miUNDE»46 headers. You also getall the hardware needed to install the 977-tfiff#td~¢* 95 unit into the existing frames. The assembly iseasily put ir»Flittri;'001*aul.IJ ti. together and screwed into place from insidethe room. Existingframes, interior and exteriortrim remain Magnum Triple Hungs feature 7 13/16" jambs and undisturbed. The finished, upgraded exterior enhances three removable sash. Counter-balanced top and bottom , the appearance of the entire building. sash operate simultaneously forventilation. 31 111;'777€lt'.'.4-*,-1.:i:St~•lig/li~ ': Tly' 11' 1 7 11 .V 1.i ''ll, ut/,8 Ad-t K ' i.·i .... - li U.. ..Il·k, All'll// 0 W oOP €1SRD MAGNUM DOUBLE HUNG STANDARDS: ~i-·919**4* s . 209€*909~@%04~M • Insulatingglass a2069·I+~- * ~*3~i~'~'~5 -i~/494441*44Ash:4*40*641 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS • Bronze sash lock installed .Rgtitopg.r A¥§013-94 0 04(11 4-1% „1119 44'4 02•0&34?51,6 0,40 'iLl ~14- 41141 j FRai#Slz'. 2. !&04,**8-84 t,'etift'44'4unn;~-+2'4'¢i*%*f*4'4 0224332 4-~% 864 Scale: 1 th" = 1' • Beige jamb hardware sa94 OPE . -2 1984 4640,6 ilgE7) g'43-,1RJA391-0(*19141~*'4-2 0,»di-· 4<i,24-6 pan, 1 • 5 1/20(1401 jamb , Glass~Size #J~j'{91,~~:821,11,6_,AQ&33159,~{Wf?ifif~*19111#493~~~' 48~40£~2"C • 14 degree bevel on bottom sill 9 6 •Folding nailingfinwithdripcapfactoryinstalled 2 =11= .OPTIONS: . ..93..„11.....f: 937·. · 1-· J.,.·24·f::'.·%3 lo --.- '474. Li • Jamb extensions, factoryapplied _. __Il L ' • Factory installed clad brick mould easing - ./-'-Ill • Numinum drip cap CMDH3870 CMDH4270 CMDH4670 CMDH4870 CMDH5070 CMDH5470 2 ~ 2 • Rectangulargrilles 8 • Sash lift in statuary bronze, white or brass i 8 •White or brasssash lock 2 - • White jamb hardware 8 Zik f • Masonryclips 'C - 2 •Screen, aluminum surround in white, bronzeorgray ]MDH3878 CMDH4278 CMDH4678 CMDH4878 CMDH5078 CMDH5478 • Rectangulartransoms GLAZING OPTIONS: ~ -: 4-~.*93294'byte*€1'Pey*' j .1 . Northern or Southern Low Eglasswith orwithout Argon gas* • AuthenticdMded tites, insulatingglass Head Jamb & Sill • Bronze or gray glass - • Simulated divided lites with 7/8722) Or 11/8"091 munts CMDH3886 CMDH4286 CMDH4686 CMDH4886 CMDH5086 CM0H5486 • Tempered glass FINISH OPTIONS: ·44**4«fip€493/44333344*. rpwn,/1 \M--'R*=1 • Interior prime e,r- woob --~i=...=i- 47\11.-Ay ~..NMmEEm33'ad·in,·whitermedium-bFenze·er-pebblegray 1/I\§[&Bl *All standard onelite Northern and Southern Low Eglass units SZE automatically include Argon gas. DIVID{3894 CMDH4294 CMDH4694 CMDH4894 CMDH5094 CMDH5494 NOTE: Contactyourdistributor for MasonryOpeningon Clad 1 Vertical Multion Magnum Double Hungswith factory installed clad brick mould easing. \ - - - -- 1/4,1.ir-- Masonry Opening -~ 1/4, 36Im 48 xn 36,60 48:72 AD Unit Unit Uall Uall ke,- , ENERGY DATA 91" 71» 7- 11· Par -I-·ia.3 l. Factor FEctor Vt!26 Vitul CFIULin.Fi - ?bmit22&/1 Insulating Glass 0.49 0.49 2.04 2.04 .25 LMDH3810. :MDH42102 CMDH46102 CMDH48102 CMC}H50102 CMDH54102 , SV= i d Insulating Northern LowE 0.38 0.37 2.63 2.70 25 /Q~?*SnE·j Insulating Northern LowE w/Argon 0.35 0.33 2.86 303 25 1/2"4 - Rough Opening -· -- ....4 12 Insulating Southem Low E 0.38 0.37} 2.63 2.70 25 Jamb Insulating Southern Low E w/Argon 0.35 0.34 2.86 2.941 .25 Note: Combination (1'-4' airspace) CMDH38110 CMDH4211( CMDH46110 CMDH48110 CMDH50110 CMDH54110 Product U-Factorsand R-Va[uesaredetermined bycomputer NOTE: CALL NUMBERS REFER TO SASH OPENING. simulation usingWindowsV4.Oand Frame V3.0 software applications. U-Factor= Btu/h-ft2-F R-Value= 1/U-Value Marvin's Clad z E-Z Tlt is designed- & -- 3 P .. -- . . - -- : for low maintenance and durability Heavy extruded 9 1 aluminum (.055" :3 -1- .3 thick) with an AAMA .. 605.2-92 rated 4 coating provides L heavy resistance to ~ l. - the elements. The coating applied to Marvin's extruded .aluminum istypically 50% thickerthan the coatingapplied to roll form aluminum. This results in a higher degree B Framesare 11/16"thickatthejambs. Sillsare 1 9/32"thick Frameis of durabilit~ assembled usinga multiplestep-joint forgreaterrigidity, integrityand Fourexterior propersashoperation,yearafteryear. Standard jambwidthis49/16: finishes are standard ~ Sash are 130' thick with stotand tenoncomers forstrength. and include: white, U E-Z Tiltsareglazedtotheexterior. Aspeciallyformulated siliconeprovides g bahama brown, long-lasting pliancy foreasier reglazing. pebNe grayand medium Q Weatherstrippingattheheader,checkrailand bottom rail reduceair bronze. The interior is natural wood. infiltration. Choose Low Eglasswith Argontofurtherincreaseenergy savings. Otherglazingoptionsareavailable. Or, it can come primed from the factory U Dual-sealed insulatingglassis standard. vi"",NSWENT EASE OF OPERATION -i virtuallyeffortless. Jamb hardwareisavailable in standard beige, orwhite. U Spring-balanced block-and-tackle hardwaremakesopeningandclosing 'yk Marvin engineering has long been admired and followed in the cusroMIZE To sUIT industry The Flex-Hinge /~ 1~6 WUR NEEDS • shown here is another example of Marvin using Matching existing windows or creating a look can be difficult the latest technologyto ~fi'~~~'T ~- when the products available limit produce a better product b Marvin adopted the Flex- yourdesign. The flexibility ofthe e Ir#Pr Ir-t~/~. Hinge to replace the foam Made To Ordersystem allowsyou usually found behind the jamb liner The Flex-Hinge sup to purchase Marvin E-Z Tilt passes foam in the prevention ofairand water penetration. Double Hungs with various rail Moreover the Flex- heights and widths. You can Hinge, given its memory - also order double hungs that longevity, applies have sash of varying heights as 4 ri consistent pressure illustrated in this cottage style 1.-l againstthe sash. This double hung 88 results in consistent ease 011 of operation. No matter how thick d. yourwalls are, Marvin , U. ..1 2.1 '4 4%5</84 can provide jamb extensions b*uit. And we'll applythem atthe factory, Illg you time and money on the job site. E-]Ul_J 28 For options,;.details,.sizes and ener~ ri ..., infirniatioft?se#pages 844-87391·33 ri ·i ·. --i.··· n£tfll~ ~' ' ' 1- 4 j MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission , From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 132 W. Main- Setback variance and Minor review, PUBLIC HEARING Date: September 13, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for a front setback variance and to install a new metal staircase in the lightwell between the historic building (formerly Asia restaurant) and the new commercial building. 132 W. Main is a local historic landmark. APPLICANT: Steve and Lily Ko, represented by Dennis Green. LOCATION: 132 W. Main, Lots K,L,M,N and the west half of Lot O, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development within an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to section 5-510(B)(2). Response: HPC granted approval for lightwells on the east and west of the main entry on May 18, 1994. At that time, it was represented that the bottom of the lightwells would not be deeper than 30" below grade, therefore they were permissible in the setback. The applicant now wishes to make the lightwells deeper, therefore a setback variance of 3' is needed for the west lightwell. * The applicant has provided a basement floor plan, which shows that the proposed lightwell will be the only source of light for one of the offices. Staff recommends that HPC grant the variance for the west lightwell with the condition that the east lightwell (previously approved) not be constructed since that office space has sufficient light and egress from the east wall of the basement:.. The applicant also proposes a metal staircase in the existing lightwell between the historic structure and new structure. Product information about the staircase is attached. The site plan is somewhat difficult to read, but the proposal is to have a spiral staircase immediately to the east of the historic structure, which can be entered at grade and used to get to the basement of the new structure. The property owner finds that this would be more convenient. Staff recommends against approvald of the metal staircase, finding that there is already dignif icant clutter in the area of the lightwell, however, HPC will make a site visit to the property to determine whether the staircase will have any impact from the street. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is 4 consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Lightwells are needed to improve the quality of below grade space and are common along Main Street. Generally, they should be as unobtrusive as possible, therefore the applicant has been required in the previous approval to use a grate and to screen it with plantings. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The lightwell and stair will not have a significant effect on the importance of this historic landmark. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity j of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed stair would detract from the architectural character of the historic resource if it is easily visible from the street. One of HPC's design guidelines states that in new construction, exit stairs should be incorporated inside the building rather than outside of the structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Setback Variance and/or Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Setback Variance and/or Minor Develop'ment application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny the Setback Variance and/or Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the variance requested for ;the lightwell, and approve the staircase only if it is determined through the site visit that it will not negatively impact the character of the historic structure. The following conditions should apply: 1) The east lightwell will not be constructed. 2) The west lightwell shall be covered with a grate and shall be screened with plantings. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve a front yard setback variance of 3'0" for construction of a lightwell, and to approve the installation of the metal staircase as proposed at 132 W. Main. The east lightwell which was previously approved is not to be constructed, and the west lightwell shall be covered with a grate and screened with plantings." Additional Comments: J 4 11.11 »-A JAAL.L..L -A. - LAND USE APPLICATION ljURM ASIA RESTAURANT . 1) Project Name 2) Project Location 132 W. Main, Lots K, L, M, N and the west half of Lot 0 City and Townsite of Aspen (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning O-Office 4) Lot Size 13,5.00 sq.ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Steve & Lily Ko, 132 W. Main, Aspen, CO 81612 970-925-5433 6) Representative's Name, Address & Ehone # Dennis B. Green, 117 South Spring, #10- Aspen, CO 81611 925-1885:Brian Bush 24505 Hwy 82, BAsalt CO 927-9800 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): conditional Use Conceptual SPA C_---Lual Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SPA X Final Historic.Dev. (Amendment to Dev. Order) 8040 Greenline Conceptial POD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin f Final POD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Orixkniniunization Tancti/Map Amendment - GUS Allotment CMOS moaption Iat SplivInt Line - Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rnmber and type of eocisting. structures; apprcodmate sq. ft.; number of bedrorm=; any po:evious approval= grant-Ad to the property). Restaurant and offices; conditional use for Restaurant granted in 1976; historic designation of part of building in 1976; approval for renovations in 1990. 9) Description of Development Application Addition of window wells and staircase 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attadiment 2, Mininiml Suhnission Contents X Response to Attadiment 3, Specific Sitini=sion Contents X Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application lillill ATTACHMENT 2 Basic Submission Data 1. Letter of Consent by the Applicant for Dennis Green and Brian Bush to act as representatives of the Applicant is attached as Exhibit "A". 2. The project is located at 132 W. Main, Aspen, Colorado. The legal description of the property is Lots K, L, M, N, and the west half of Lot O, Block 58, City and Townsite of Aspen. 3. The Ownership Certificate is attached as Exhibit "B". 4. The Vicinity Map is attached as Exhibit "C". 5. This Application is for amendments to the approval for renovations to the restaurant building Oight wells) and for the addition of a metal stairway for the area between the restaurant and office buildings. J ATTACHMENT 4 Analysis of Review Standards Section 7-601 of the City's Land Use Code sets forth the review standards for development in the Historic Overlay District. This Application meets those standards because all of the requested changes involve insignificant changes to the prior approvals. The basic character of the buildings will not be changed and all of the amendments will continue to utilize the same style and materials as previously approved. The proposed development will remain compatible in character with adjacent and nearby buildings, will not detract from the cultural value of the structures or of those on adjacent parcels, and will enhance the architectural integrity of the structures in some respects and will not detract therefrom in any manner. I. Changes For Restaurant Building: The Applicant requests the addition of two light wells along the front of the existing building. The purpose of the light wells is to provide some natural illumination for the spaces in the basement levql of the building. The plans as approved already require landscaping for the front of the building. Thus, the light wells should be effectively shielded from view, certainly from view from those traveling by vehicle on Main Street. Basically, the light wells would be readily visible only by individuals already on the property. The Commission has already approved, in concept, the addition of these light wells. This Application is needed to allow the light wells to intrude slightly into the front yard setback of ten feet. This situation is the result of the location of the existing building towards the front of the property. The additional light wells are depicted on Exhibit "D". II. Changes For Area Between Buildings: The Applicant also requests the addition of a circular metal staircase to be located in the patio between the restaurant and office buildings. The purpose of this staircase is to provide access to the offices located in the basement of the buildings from the Main Street side of the property, in addition to the existing access from the alley at the rear of the property. Examples of the type of metal stairway being requested are depicted on Exhibit "E". ; :i o O. !1; --1 01 r-------mr---T------MI./ 1 9 | |-1+3~29- -eMP &1 WOCD -- DECK 4'-6---> , --0 F F F :r-· 6 -4 -4~ *# , . Ar *tit'- .\ 01 - A \\\\ 1 fr\\\\\\ 14*\94 . NfiI -I +4«40«\ ' 5*22,2 \>¢<~ r.re -1 4%£\96 \ 8 11 \4 Tf R.KE V fEr 1 0 n 1 \\ \30% \ \\5\\1 964 % 3\\ \ \ bl' \ 11* -14. 0 i \\ U 1 ;r~ 1 F. e .062442$, . <.44» u 4.0 P r \ \I.\ I 3~o-r»71139~4.-'.41 ' P«-t --P~ i 11.. : \\ \ 1 tr 1 -- --4 \\.\\\ [-- - \\ 1 2.9 1' 1 >79 - 911 1 i : . :\ 4 1 0 \\\N- x \1 99.\ I 1 :1 ipwr .. \~It:*..,le<\»*t 1-r D D \1\ \ Ft«ff»fi ~ 10 2 if.%-i.2 1%4~-l- r 4. -_Ii---ft::-,li·l E-*Mr. :1-J 4.Li~. F @ ------- - ~- a IMA•WHARY it .9 #'· c' C.5 . I. LA• J tl-- * i· m*32 t k#-|~ M ~~|~| dm /027 REm -t} W ~18/1 -T r [-1 1, 1. „. · Iii 1 t#*m'Nill.. .. t.- .· fj:¢*t-Yi~&30.419.1 - lI Vilb~,M,~~4*Milil~fl~,EEN:..\ 1/ G * . .5 3 1*ft/4ia463,£15*44* A,in - 1111:1....... W I. .. .'-' · 2. · W#GW.·r- =f --: ' *Ng?24!Wn . ··1·,·.:.·..:·..-·.-· ; 't.#'a·lutr:ft.-.w .*, _:..'4~.:311%*Mia 'Me'l-~3!Zm.:.ib.*:*f!41.9.th:*I..Mnt t'. ···.- 1 V '. .... t 1 1. .. 4- -_ . -r I - -.....1- - - --I.--- - - =F- /.'. It,#" 4. . - UIULLU. /1 .U 1.1 11. AUdli·¢.11L/*11.14.16; · -~. : ; , 06 1 - S 1493'49" W 100.00 058 4.g 491 -2 P ie'-ev . 162· 07 22/1),1 ' 20<0' . 5.6 f W" 1 23' 2 I. D . /0 69/-, G••'U'-2-4 62.-- liN 1 -PI,g~ 7 1 *-t, i r. -T;5 luet- -PC- 1%12 8 --3. 26 I I. I Rh . ··2 1 ··c Z ':35.5 EAA 1 - -.. - +<133-·1[* tt~. -...... i .. 1 1 ..fr:...4 - IiI 555» 1 : : Ill T , ..1 1. 91_[1=-I. . *--- -* ..--- *~~- 'I 2.1.1.Li Iii. f=Il!"M,li~~ ~ *.4. ~_ *- -- - -----= ---- ~. 1 6W ', 1 4,1 FF.60.0......e ~ ·3560• De la 36.1 : 1 -- i.ti .. . 'i it," I ·· 1:1 1: 1 1'' P /~1 (51+9 - ':'ul: f. t:- :Etj 2~ 5 :~ 18 . 1 , 11 K * 11 1 <*2 ., 5 QE ' 1,5 i i i LJ '; : a 'S : Ill L 54 1 ''S<. -4 :ii tj 46{7.5 0, 1: . 1 42-le: CA ... I ------ ........--0 -- I 1 ; i ' 2·1 ·· ':. C !4 1 1 1 ' .I--< '.---.- 4 + ·J --- I. -/ I ------I- , -····mr » 62 -3 .. -1; : ··'P ':i: ... 1 . , - fg L.ji !; 1.1-.5 3 0 1. 1 1,1 1 ..I- - --.- .- ' 1 r-, t: -_**-* 4-1 4-:P..11 A ! ~r.----*110----*-7! , : ;1 11,1 ~11 .2 · - A - t;!·: i i L. 11!1 H · i;il i. 1 21 .1 1 .1 i . ! , I I Lill=-22 Pil i: t_lii L.LL.-L .1, I Wi. 1- I il i. i 4--~ I M-4 L 11 F -i 1--·1 1. - ./ _ --- *-/ i r-3 1 It I ~i 1: 1: . 274 ; 75&4 11 11 1 234 , 9©91© . i: » 36 i i i! 1 2¢424 i i ~ !1 2 . --r·¢ tr- , 1 11 41 :11 ' $ i! ili 1.1 :i /1.1 1 F556! DLE, 'li t: 1. 1- : ,D ' 1: I .ta-##lit Hill-LF 1 1 rici: , i i: 20.1% 4 ~10 ;t ~ -igH'/81,1,--0- -*- ---7> 1 - 1 1 NEW SOUTH I --- - - - --- - - - - --- SCALE: 1 /4- = 1'-0- -14EW GAR,625 14/ FauNceo 8.Nd>r -CUT 511 NG,127 -TD ·M,4104 I. 0 1 r 1 1 '.*1,91",4:,;,·it·:44:~-t *· · - .ti , . ,'' 5: 24...,ue,,4 44%4.4t· ·,.4.:.·Mt'·t'.2 .744·,t·:*:·:-:¥,;*4a,et '~.UN · 444447- .~~·· J~7·1...r ~56' 3i..:.1?.IIr:~.~ ~'· • ··rd·9.~ 2, 11*:lift?*dff?*til#MIN/ '5:*BU :WUT(22.:).~FA44*,14.4,~~ 4 i - WZE?% 'Firo/4'12*6111.~ 3755·:tt*lpe41%'* - -31*12*· 1~~am~maws=.....=. "IR:tio.:.i, :'.0 03.2,11:e:,-i,:bo.lit;>*jif - bl„ , 7 .7.'13'. .1.:.833*26,44'b f , •*J. It·-~lirjll~ I ki- 9 ~* ' 104 ill'lilli- - 1 1.2.. ,061 .7.'49;.imm v MNA : i. i.1.<,1 : )434*,t': 34 j 91,Ir*JK '. i,Ler-.3 .9,4 ·· i: 1 1 : ,. i L s . 94....22. , 0.' T . 11 -JEli 411.14 -, ~ . · . .1 .,1 11*60 . .-Ir ' ·94,2..:~AC·€244«ufni : 4*11*"04% 1*%.**0: . e . 4 .. I 1221;l=.,ZE. , +· 1 . 1-1 111 T -4.LUIr-01 . 1 11.11 1 *932: 41--Al* ,:,IRM/L - . E '11 ', ' 1.U diq 11/ - Tread WS-3 The radial grating tread on this stair was '%,i-W+71 developed for outdoor use. Tht design it*494 . 028* ' ' . permits snow and water to pass through the . treads. Aesthetically the radiating grates **r?i e create an interesting interplay of light and shadow This tread is also available with non- 1,4 I./.* ' ' skid or diamond plate nosing . - , Shipping 9.r r *. All stairs are shipped knocked down and ~ mounted on pallets. Centerposts and railings are shipped separately, as are hardwood treads. Shipments are generally made via - - common carrier * 7.f} if t r · · 4 # 3 . 1. 'iii f : * f N : I. 1 € ¥6 2 .: \ - 1 . r, P F VEL . 7/4 i 8 ' ·'.'~ ; EtE(tr~~-- F_4 3 & Tr AO,4,4l*~.,·'i, ' 0 +1 $ 0 1 A ' 4 - 3 1 -(E-·faL, ~EZOIC -*,clt,W 4 . r€ U' P.:f b~#~=M-q-PI4·2~ 95'nt,r-Ap *#W 49 ./ #Ar U.• ..ili GE, 22 , ? ··2.. f.:4*tk¥: -00/4/&P' 1 4/ r-------------1 --11 ~4~ ~ 11 , 11 1 11 uP '1 ' 1 1 =3 11 Eezi it .t~ 11 1 in- libl .---------J ''01/ 11 1 1 d T 1 , 11 - 1 r•,•6* 1 i...4/ 81 < =9 U . 4 15 2 3*466 405•1 - r-1 WT•M¢,1 /1 9 0 1: I . L--- M D ' ' 1----91 T . 1! 11 1 »E U JO 0 D 0.. " i LI I, M e.,ir•&,1,4/ r, 1 1 1 13211.-- It 11 . / " A A * Fl 1 1 1 0:,3 4:93 0 rl 11 r 1 11 IN' I.'40 2 11 ' 1 J /£21. 11 '1 11 ' L J 11 - 1, / i -1 1, 11 4 1 1 11 1 I r-- -9 . 0--- FT-. 6--11 i E , ---------------------------- 881 UJ a.= n .. == =im====18:=*ED -KI - NEWWALLSAI®PARTmONS "z LOWER FLOOR PLAN J %-Ll-4.3-4 SDE.LIH)HV/531¥1]OSSV ¥ addINNID glkIVH) 0655-526/EOE 3NOHd3131 21918 OOVNOIOD 'N3dSV 'DESE XOG *OW M 11 a «©Pil 11 11 11 9~-LI lilli 2!MEL. 1 1 ref,40• /1.44 11 2 -ec: . 0 ~ ri - ME :1 U3 8 (51.1 Li' __ ' g j:27.- "" , 1 . 11 0 11 I / 21 ' 1 -/-".- 1 1 r,4.4. 11 It 'Al It r-*> r----- 11 ---- 11 ------ ------ 11 U k=--i -1 1. 1 1 U: It =====3 ££2£ £!1!hIL- r-1 12=£11. Ill r. ...- 9- 2 ------ 1 A=fr j 31 1 1 - 1 g 8~F~ / . 11 1 / - f · A Jils' W *131 1,4,461 Ill £92£ 00 k Iii ..4 3 (7======1· .. U.1 . 1/- 2 /1/7 NJ . 4,•f 4 :LJ 4 7 7, - -mil EX!5™OVALIJANDFARTITIONSTOREMAN EZ Z.Z.ZZ EXSTD«,VALLSANDPAR,mONSTOBERDIOVED ==== NEWWALLSANDPART!nONS A 4 r T 11 94 J GROUND FLOOR PLAN ~ %4_3-13-4 .--,1 5103.LIHOHV/511¥DOSSV ¥ addINNfI) 21HVHJ 0655-526/E0£ 3NOHd3131 21918 OCMOIC)) N)cISV 'DESE X08 'OW 1 1 3. 11-I- 1 4-0 1-1 9-91 -1_..L 1 - R 11.m 3 U. f El . P *ED F P 1 1 r li ' . e Ul 1 1 il ,. 0 88& E5& "EE Ni rip& I . CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS ASIA REEMODEL MAIN ST„ ASPEN. CO. ~ ~ PO BOX 3534. ASPEN COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 1 Exhibit L NV14 MOO1.!I aNOOXS ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9. 1995 second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. Les: I would rather see compliance of the previously approved plan. We have been asking for information on why the curb cut was not finished for the past two years. 132 W. MAIN Amy: About a year ago HPC granted approval for light wells on either side of the entryway. At the time it was stated' that the elements do not go beyond 30 inches below grade so one did not need a variance. How it turns out that it does need a setback variance. The public hearing will not be until our next meeting. We are bringing it up tonight to see how you feel about it. The applicant also wants to install a metal spiral staircase between the old building and the new office building. It would be entered at grade so I assume it would be visible from the street. I am recommending not approving the stairway as there are other ways to access the basement of the new building. I am not sure wanting light is enough reason to give a setback variance but on the other hand it is not a big variance being requested. Dennis Green, Attorney: I represent the applicants along with Brian Busch. The lightwell could be placed in the sunken patio and therefore would not have to go toward Main Street for the setback. Brian Busch: We could go with a straight shot staircase but it would come closer to Main Street that way. Dennis Green: The only access presently is off the alley and that is inconvenient for those parking in the front as they would have to walk around the back. There is access through the restaurant. Brian Busch: I had to give the restaurant the exclusive entrance so now the only way I can enter the office is from the alley and in trying to lease the office it is difficult. We would like to combine the two offices and end up with 1400 feet of leasable space. All the interested tenants want to enter off Main Street. Donnelley: I need to see the basement plan as we have no references. Melanie: Do you have offices in the basement? Brian Busch: There is one occupied and one vacant. Melanie: You are trying to connect the two buildings for what reason? Brian Busch: When I leased the restaurant we lost the interior 6 I , ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1995 space to enter these offices. Melanie: Why can't you use the staircase at the alley_ for the . entrance? Brian: I can but it is an alley entrance. Donnelley: This is a difficult presentation to understand. Amy: I feel we should do a site visit again before the public hearing. Les: When we were working on the project next to this building one of the conditions of the joining of the two old buildings and historic designation was that this parcel be left as a park. We went back through the records and a series of records got lost. I was assured that one of the conditions of approval was that nothing should be built on the existing parcel. We couldn't prove it and it was built. What is happening is that this is getting out of hand. A metal staircase is not acceptable. The building is too big and shadows over the historical building. Dennis Green: It only goes down and has no visual impact. Sven: If it is only going down and a site visit would do it. MOTION: Jake moved to table the minor development for 132 W. Main requiring that the applicant provide a basement floor plan in order to provide the use of the below grade space and the subsidy of the variance for the lightwell. I further recommend a site visit be set up prior to the public hearing. Regarding the stair I recommend tabling pending a site visit; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Roger: I see this as messy vitality and I do not have a problem with it between buildings. I was over there and you are going down into something. Amy: The public hearing is scheduled for Sept. 13th. 406 E. HOPKINS - LANDMARK - CONCEPTUAL PH Chairman Donnelley Erdman opened the public hearing. Amy: I am recommending landmark designation finding that standards A, B, D and E are met. Under conceptual we have looked at this twice in a worksessioni As far as the roof top development I hope the Board members had a chance to site visit it as the story polls are up. There was a request that the units be pulled in as much as possible and that the chimney mass be eliminated and that the 7 1 1 I-4-j MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 533 E. Main, St. Mary's Church- Minor Date: September 13, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to insert glazing in the upper two panels of the existing double doors at the northeast and northwest corners of the building, to add a screen door over the kitchen door on the west of the building, to add light fixtures on both sides of the west kitchen door, to add outlets on each side of the west kitchen door, to add intake air grills on the south and west elevations, to remove a meter box, and pipes from the south elevation, and to add an exhaust grill on the south elevation. This structure is listed a local landmark, is located within the Commercial Core Historic District and is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. APPLICANT: St. Mary's Church, Reverend Lawrence Solan, represented by Olsen and Kelley Architects. LOCATION: 533 E. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Section 7-601 has recently been amended through Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution 6, Series of 1995. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The church is in "Phase III" of their remodel, which involves interior changes to the first floor. j The new floor plan requires creating two new offices in the front corners of the building, under the staircases. These offices currently have no access to natural light, other than the existing double doors on the east and west ' f walls. The applicant proposed several alternatives at the August 9 meeting, including removing the existing 0 doors and glazing the openings, replacing the panels in the existing doors with glazing, and replacing the existing doors with ones to match, but with glazing where = there are panels. Staff recommended that the existing doors be retained as "shutters", and that the inside of the opening be glazed. HPC indicated that they wished to see the doors retained in some manner. The applicant's preferred solution is to retain the doors and glaze the upper two row's of paneling. Staff is still in favor of retaining the existing doors intact, primarily due to the high visibility of these doors and the fact that this proposal involves changes to the only three original doors in the building. Information is not yet available about the exact locations or dimensions of the proposed mechanical changes or the design of the light fixtures. The area where these elements are to be placed is not generally visible to the public, and these elements could be reviewedbby Staff and monitor. A drawing of the screen door to be placed on the west facade at the kitchen has been provided. Staff still recommends that, if possible, the existing wood doors should be made to swing out and the screen doors could 0 be on the inside so that they would not always be visible. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This block is the only city block in Aspen which contains all 19th century structures. It is very important to minimize changes as much as possible in order to preserve the character of this area, but the historic buildings must also function for their users. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The building is eligible for the National i Register. It is one of only two 19th century churches still left in Aspen, and although it has had some alterations, retains much of its original character and detailing. A special effort was made to retain this character in the recent addition, and the current 0 modifications must respect the existing character and integrity of the structure as well. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof._ Response: The mechanical changes needed at the back corner of the building can be accommodated without much impact to the character of the building. Changes to the doors should be minimal, or temporary, as would be the case if the existing doors were retained intact with glazing behind them and if the screen doors were placed inside the existing kitchen door. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application with the following conditions: 1) Doors #50 and #51 shall be retained. Operable windows or some form of glazing may be installed on the inside, with the existing doors made to open outward. 2) The screen door at the kitchen shall be placed on the inside of the existing doors. 3) Staff and monitor shall review the locations and sizes of all exterior mechanical equipment. Additional Comments: 1 , Olsen + Kelley Architects ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING P.O. BOX 10661 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 fSEP 07%5 1~ 970 - 920 - 9758 / 925 - 3409 i ·# COMMUNITY - 158%13.9003~~1~ I imat# TRANSMITTAL DATE: Sept. 8,1995 TO: Amy Amidon Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Deanna Olsen RE: St. Mary's Church Remodel - Phase Ill (HPC submittal for Sept. 12 hearing) Message ~ Response to Aug. 9 memo: 1) Elevation of doors #50 & #51 to show proposed changes to these doors (changes based upon HPC comments/suggestions at first hearing). 2) Elevation of screen door #49 at kitchen. 3) To be submitted at a later date: Rear Elevation showing proposed mechanical grilles, their sizes and materials, the description of existing mechanical equipment to be removed and an elevation of the new door to replace door #2 at the rear of the building will be submitted prior to the Sept. 12 th. hearing following revisions by the mechanical engineer. 0 21 1 Dr-1£>14. ip-f-F-1 illi T-7-P-*9. 1., -- ..4 -tr.--- ----~·d»aNTTTnlitH*z> : - i-~.:::'-i.--i ~-~,'Q<~S.>#ELU=M=M+44*l*4*7>*·,~ It 1. 1/:3%%*t\-1-b--~r // '<3642/ 7»/25 -1. 11 I-- -1.- 1 ---.-'----........... 1*40-rE.9 6,10*5, 0-Lif 14-,- 421-1-„, 1 &1.J-+1-4- --i - 43· · - 1 1 11 -11--1 -1* : --7--1-··. --i ~ .F -r77 -_x._- - ttl-GI- .1..1 . 1 --U=rb--I*&4-- rled n-Kejc> '94 \-4 94,7,*n -'-4.YM- -u\- 1- . ewet, 129 - I . 7'1* 1- - r -3 12#Fl.,400 \NQPP -. i- 1 - r-1. /1.+ i --14 - I..-7-m/- ri·~1~.IC-JE~te+1.- 150+1#104 -1/26 4~1 -Ef -1 --1--fi --1 !--1- -4. 1- 1,- j 1 i- Ae.9-kwhI 197 i #44# Lewk#, 1 1 J -TL.rI--t--ILT-1 1. 1 -1 1 + l- 1.- 1 f 1 - 1- .r 1. ---1.-1 21-2-JI~-L -~1* Li/ r * ' L . O : 7- uu--1.1- Nt- - 5 4 B.1-0- - ~~ *~I 1 -1 I-I~-~L- ~ ~ 31-ft-~LE 7_1 1 I 1 1. \'1%>152 ! - 21 1 -1 -1~1-1--[f - (FAI1-t~&~9~1- i l. -t. r. 1 2~. -1 Lr . ; Wdet:2 15244E4/ 1. 2 - 1)-6.1- u-4- 1 -1--t.- r ' -- - r J_ .1-0.3 fl --12~1 | r-i-71- 1 1--1-12-7- r[ * ~ 3 . t. il -'/- - n If- n / > k..1(-c b 1 3-j U b .1,1.3/r 1 7 5 11 H - . ; || ; t 'f' h n . : - R.F *4 1 (*0 +I Illl,Al~ 515 MAFT /9 00{40 19 1201*:01/ - f#466 IE 407·19 01*entl@]19*Architept• 1 f , . 4- .) 4 , I . 1 · ''0152¢fxl>~hlflitili ...<PX 1*·talul--1-L_UU.U /7WOXX= · -1- - ..... -- ----- ----- EX'*11 1]q AL,1,$ 44 94™1 1 4.!. 11.1 , I. 2 , + -.---. -&-.--I-. I- Ti I i.- -.- Fav Over' € 1, i - 211 1 · i _It *-~C.. 90[+9 k 194 i* 10 91612544' --- -- 127 HKEH 20&*4 -- - FrFT FEf:niP' Ffee4 2 lip 6114* / - MI:~:Wn#' 11---1~I~[.~ 1 01#14 / #/ 1 jill<-- . -- -/ -[FE]:17~a/44:MI - 1 t*22FZ- 4#,.r„,4*pe, - 1*~2*1. m(19['61 »F·»1 122212 *41 ((6 12?OF-*4) « HApfle QUIE* ICEFID Cril.0, - Fl-14·55 -IL 3/22' = 11/011 9,7,19 Olsen+Kelley Architects mex Fatra p 1 4 a .... · ' 9. W 4..i k i ·. 5 Fumex Fatrap fans are ideal for use 402,4 in commercial kitchens over grilles, •2 -1 " . ~ 4 - f t. ·19141 charcoal broilers, deep fat fryers, 1 XF 1 /, t:03?P steam tables, ranges, dishwashers ¥ =-t r » , I 1 44 and other appliances both gas fired ' , +. 1 - and electric. Fatraps provide a sure, - - steady exhaust and are construc- ' ' 1. ted to operate dependably under the severe conditions imposed by + this exhaust system service. Sturdy construction features include: , 1 a durable spun aluminum housing 9 , 1.1 with rolled exterior edges, prewired 1. 1 motors protected and out of the , *it@ #74,26411 airstream, a NEMA weatherproof ..Ar L -f' ~~te"t~4~.~,14 disconnect switch, built-in electrical . ~ 1,2'jt441:j 4 0 71 111 011·1 - -- + p 1 - - 1 7-311- 11 344'14-|3 :,1 conduit and an external grease drain. . . 1 1 + 1~ k -1. - 41 Fumex units comply with NFPA 96, IN Afh, ,~10 . - 1·1 i I 11 41 17'll 1. , 4 111 1-.LIZ , FF, and are listed with UL under power ventilators for restaurant applications 4 1 1% 14% (ULStd. 762, File No. MH10684) for ' 1 operation at 400° F. In addition, Fumex Fatrap units combine with Penn's Muffan or Cubex fans in one integrated unit called the Suplex. The Fumex handles the required pressure and air volume on the exhaust side while the Muffan or Cubex can be furnished with predeter- mined horsepowerand speed settings to perform the compatible make-up air function. The uniquemodulardesign ofthe Suplex meansjustone roof opening is needed for both exhaust and supply ducts. An insulated shield divides the base to separate exhaust and make-up air compartments and prevents heat transfer between hot exhaust air and fresh filtered air. A complete air-tight seal between hood and exhaust fan results. Penn Ventilatorcertifies thatthe Fumex Belt Drive Models as shown on pages 11,12, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,25,26,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 and 41 are licensed to ~ MTLIGS - It bear the AMCA Seal. The ratings shown are based on tests and procedures per- formed in accordance with AMCA Publication 211 and Publication 311 and comply with the requirements of the AMCA Certified Ratings Program. Penn Fumex exhausters carry the UL label. Check Underwriter's Laboratories Re- examination Service for specific units listed units. Penn FUMEX exhausters are also certified by the Canadian Standard Association. ~ 4- 1 . 1 Unensional Data BELT DRIVE MODELS FX8DFT - FX14BFT LEGEND 9 9 -D. 1 1 11 - 1. Motor Dome 10. Anti-Vibration Mounts 2. Motor Dome Cover 11. Grease Drain Spout 3. Windband Discharge 12. Conduit Guide 3~--311&=* Apron 13. Fan Shaft & Bearings- 11 4. Spun Inlet Venturi 14. V-Belt & Pulleys (*--c JM r® 5. Tri-Strut= Brace 15. Weather-Tight Junction Box with - f 6. Centrifugal Fan Wheel . Optional Disconnect Switch 16. Exterior Grease 7. Motor 1 8. Motor Support Plate Collection Pan 9. Cooling Tube & Gaskets BELT DRIVE MODELS FX16DFT - FX36DFT LEGEND | I ALI 1.Motor Dome 11. Anti-Vibration Mounts 2. Motor Dome Cover 12. Grease Drain Spout 3. Discharge Apron 13. Conduit Guide ttie~9 ' 4. Windband 14. Fan Shaft & Bearings 4 V -IX» 5. Spun Inlet Venturi 15. V-Belt & Pulleys 6. Tri-Strut™ Brace 16. Weather-Tight Junction Box with 7. Centrifugal Fan Wheel Optional Disconnect Switch 8. Motor 17. Exterior Grease 1 04 L_/ W \4 1 9. Motor Support Plate Collection Pan c. 1 10. Cooling Tube & Gaskets V-BELI-DRIVE DIMS MODELS 8 10 13 14 16 18 24 30 36 L DIA (inches) 35 35 35 35 39 39 46 53* 66 H (inches) 2834 28¥4 2834 28% 31 31 3414 3514 471* Et m. (inches) 2434 2434 2434 24% 2814 28* 33% 366 44'h X (inches) 534 534 534 534 61* 6% 7 6* - Ro sa (inches) 1614 1674 16,4 1616 20 20 25 28 36 L DIA (centimeters) 88.9 88.9 88.9 88.9 99.1 99.1 116.8 135.9 167.6 H (centimelers) 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 78.7 78.7 85.1 90.2 120.7 Et sal (cenumeters) 62.9 62.9 62.9 62.9 72.4 72.4 85.1 92.7 113.0 X (centimeters) 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 16.5 16.5 17.8 16.5 - Ro sa (centimeters) 41.3 41.3 41.3 41.3 50.8 50.8 63.5 71.1 91.4 MATERIAL GAUGES Base .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 .080 .080 .102 Venturi .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 Baffle .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 r~~~1 Discharge Apron .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 loll Windband .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .080 .080 Mtr. Hood .064 .064 .064 .064 ·064 .064 .080 .080 .080 Est Ship Weights 96 96 110 112 144 145 190 219 470 . All weights in pounds. $ Outside dimension of curb 'r. should be 114" less than the 'E' dimension. -- - - I. NEW / MAKId,0/GVE*~ ------ -------- *r 34/4 („141» %79 7,4 - -il-j9 1.*00. 6¥ 1~451,) ---- - ll 1 162- 9 - - 8*'14 briot __2 1 $ 4 - - --4 OF %,<er/al - *6912=De . 1 1 r. . I *rral of #€43 - -0/ - 4004 . . ,..... 11 %91*, 0¢11*%,4/ -I V¢,k 19-1* f# 1. 2% - - o evol DIAGATO 11.fty E,051. 61. #*rH FLE,1/1 89<U*LIer |*'9®| --- I -I#.-----i-*--------/1.'-I.-Il-I.- M» U WAIVff- -----732-773772_ M>¢ 042 R>(PO 1.Ww 'Al p= 111·po,Ke· 1 D,1 Ktr e MI« @„19 0,11 9 &91' Hep¢/ T-1 [-1 #pr# -- 6491-~ »lculf 13 lauv.12 ('A I 'lf 9 LI LI 2<C r 4-firr~ L ~ 272. p-642 id-11/ ---- MI«14 PFIcle 12' 1* fli.Be'lge. '1 5741 -*-I..I.-i-.-.Ill-*-*-*ill-I---i---1---I----.--*--I-- 00 - PF/61, 12, C It tlit - *. -I - 1%~C? exl,1-4 i- MATGA 04 tera, 4 iii ~ #TFFI, BAL.AN- - 11 11 1 - 00 11 il ..... 4 • t• - 0€eh'109 leif _~ , Nf0 +~\+1 -- 11 11 - ff'/67+44 mul B 12 Fept.#de, b¥ eral j NE*/ 9- ~614*1,-¥*12 12*12. %*r "111,43 PAO, 12:' » F=€+40vbp, F64|K. :*2212. . 5/:;12851.1 Olsen+Kelley Architects _*[; HApf.5 OptuNH -12:C+14* 8**~ S - 9'JTH 54~&0[*L_____-_ AROIITECTURE & PLANNING Pn 80% D64 ASPet OOLORADO 8160 (970) 920-9758 + (970) 925-3409 , 11 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Aspen Meadows Trustee Housing, Amendment DATE: September 13, 1995 , SUMMARY: The Trustee Townhomes were designed by Herbert Bayer and are to be included on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures." HPC granted final approval for renovation plans for the townhomes, owned by Savannah, Inc., on May 8, 1991 (minutes attached). At this time, the townhomes are being purchased by the Aspen Institute, who wish to scale back the renovation. Attached are plans for the townhomes, as existing, as approved in 1991, and as revised. Pleasd pay close attention to how the drawings are labeled Cexisting," "proposed," or revised) to avoid confusion. The applicant has provided a letter outlining the changes. In addition to those mentioned, Staff points out the following alterations: • The chimney has been eliminated from the west elevation and is replaced with glazing. • The existing staircases on the east elevation of the units are to be retained. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed revisions appear to retain more of the original fabric and character of the historic structures, and significantly decrease the mass of the buildings as viewed from the west, as well as eliminate the need for major excavation. The most significant changes which will be visible from the street are the expansion of the foyer area and the elimination of the :'floating roof that was to be laid over a trellis where the carport used to be. The trellis itself is still proposed. Staff supports the revisions as submitted. All representations regarding preservation of existing materials (attached) shall be adhered to. l 1 , STRYKER / BROWN ARCHITECTS,PC f 519% September 5, 1995 \ 40.%:~ 4 011* *' i},r 90 4 , fty€Vr Amy Amidon ~*As/PlT*<£,d Historic Preservation Officer Aspen Planning Department City Hall Aspen, Colorado 81611 re: Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes, Insubstantial Amendment Referral to Historic Preservation Committee Dear Amy: On behalf of my client, The Aspen Institute, I am submitting the enclosed plans describing proposed "minor" modifications to the approved plans for the Meadows Trustee Townhomes. As you know, the project is currently 8 townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer and owned by Savanah Limited Partnership. The approved plans i call for substantial expansions of the 8 existing units and building 3 additional units. The Aspen Institute is in the process of buying the project from Savanah. It is their hope to not add substantially to the 8 existing units. Instead they would like to modify the existing approved plans to delete the most intrusive Onto the landscape, and road impacts) part of the expansion, while renovating the 8 units substantially in conformance with the existing approvals. They would like to then like to build the 3 new units and the garages substantially as approved to match the 8 "lightly" renovated units. The finished project would be very much in keeping with the existing (HPC, SPA) approvals on the east entry side (facing the Meadows campus) and very similar, but smaller, than the approvals on the downhill side. The proposed changes to the approved plans are as follows (refer to the attached ,plans): j 1. Eliminate the 713 sf lower level addition (and deck above) on the 8 existing units. (drawing AO.1) This reduces the project by 5,704 sf of enclosed space. (713 sf x 8 units = 5,704 sf) 300 S. SPRING STREET, SUITE 300 ASPEN, COLORADO 8 1 6 1. 1 303·925·2254 925·2 258 (FAX) Ms. Amidon/ HI'C Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes, Insubstantial Amendment to SPA 9.5.95 page two 2. Build foyer/entry substantially similar to the approved plans only wider (similar to the existing plan by Ba)rer). This will add 57.5 sf to the foyer as approved (57.5 sf x 11 units = 632.5 sf). 3. Retain the existing "terrace" location. Install stairs down to grade and permit a garden/patio on the lower landscape area. 4. Eliminate the 10' x 22' addition to the main level. This deletes (220 sf x 8 units = 1,760 sf) 1,760 sf from the project. This is a net deletion of (-5,704sf +632.5 sf -1,760 sf = 6,831.5 sf from the project. 5. Install the appdved windows in the living room facing west with lower awning windows similar to Bayer's original. 6. Eliminate the fioating "roof" at the entry, allowing light to enter this dark area, and preventing snow/ice drainage problems. Retain the "trellis" exiting beams to recall the original carport. I hope that after reviewing these proposals, the HI?C will then be able to determine i these to be "minor amendments" that you can then be approved by the Planning Director. I look forward to meeting with the HPC on September 13. Sincerely, -5>Ut*av David P. Brown, AIA l 1 9 adows Trustee Townhomes posed Insubstantial Amendment to SPA 9.5.95 proposed revision to keep 8 existing Trustee Townhomes substantially as they are, while modifying the Entry to conform with the new 3 units. Area Calculations Meadows Trustees Based on approved SPA documents, Topographic Survey and final floor plans actual SF FAR sf Actual Sf if Modified as approved as approved for existing 8 units Upper Level (109'-0,9 578.40 578.40 578.40 same Main Level (100'-0'9 1188.00 1188.00 968.00 cut 220 sf Entry Level (104'-6'9 135.bo 135.00 192.50 add 57.5 sf for laundry/mud Lower Level (89'-0") 2 713.33 597.00 0.00 eliminate sub-total heated 2614.73 2498.40 1738.90 875.83 sf less each of 8 units=7,007 sf reduction Sub-Total 2498.40 1738.90 total FAR 2498.40 1738.90 basic FAR ALLOWED' 2500.00 2500.00 per S.P.A. agreement . . 1 DETAILED PRESERVATION PLAN FOR THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS End walls: Those that are now shingles - These walls will be kept as is except for new ones that will replace old worn o~lt ones. Balcony and rails: Will all be kept the same except for the removal of stairs. This is a change since preliminary approval to save the existing look and the trees. Windows: Will be kept as is except for new windows to be added. The trim and detailing will remain the same, except for the plywood panel at the bottom. This area is to be filled in with matching shingles. Roof fascia / existing: This is now metal flashing. This will be replaced Nith cedar trim / color to match shingles, railing, etc. New roof fascia: To extend over existing roof as shawn on drawing and new metal flashing to be installed. 0 New sidewall trim: (Where lx4T&G verticals and new roof join), This trim will match existing on the eight existing units. New fascia for entry roof and carport roof edge: Will be the same as existing carport but will drain and not drip everywhere as eXisting roofs do now. Sun screen devices: These will be built to match existing sun control. Side walls: The existing lx4T&G vertical wood siding which is now painted white, will be replace with new lx4T&G vertical siding painted white except the three new units. New entry door: To be style and rail with glass insert, painted. 1 1 13E 0 . .7 \14\~ 1 - \ \ , 4 ' 1 . I . 0 -: C, 4. - .. t . teR - t.. 7 r . . + 1 r , .1/.it. I 1.. . 1 1 . . I. 1 4. 1 -1 1 - 4 0 - . 4 PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING . . I . I . I. .. .r ..; 116 ./ - AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS 7800 . . .9 .... ASPEN COLORADO · , 1. . I . .4 T 7810 ll DAVID FINHOLM & ASSOCIATES ... 7830 . ARCHITECTURE & LAND PLANNING % /r 7.10 PO. BOX 2839 7820 ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 -15 303-925-5713 (FAX)303-920-4471 . , 1,1 -ti.„1 .9 - . I '4 .,.0...~maa/•51 ''Et . 0 5 % 0 . 17 7840 · . . R : . . . \ . . y. 4/ \ a . --. 0 0, 4 r RESTAURANT BUILDING I.\11 \ \ ...\ e. 6 . 1 \ . - i : Vt. \ »/ i,., %,141* 1 4. . .. ... t .... / 1 I . 1-\ . 0 . a ~14\ b -.- . l i,0 A. -- ' C .: h . ... -r Lf-h \ . 46 . . ' ~ . 78r )f 1. HEALIH CENTER F.3 :i , % L. 1 \ \ 0 .. . 7-r , . ' U) I ... 4 . n 4.1 \ 1 . - 1 3 L... df :'* ry// I -/9 4 ~I.~..466.~~*Lify . C 0 0 d i - NORTHE-EM lil -2/ 75 J ;u J. 4 %@*4 1 u 1 1 .' --- 1 N....14// Cor4*~™u'llioN 140,4 (44%646rk>t-4 - Nore/. I UN rl-* 1-9 Ur·trr* 4,0, „ *141•·16, */IMAIN '· //"61/· -,t•*r/,-1/P le//UP/0 •rre r.AN AND eL.avartoren 1»6 P/4/1,·Pal FW,NI ARUL C=Me= ELIMIN#TE $ UN~) PUS,34*tf;Ce ~wA Ned r-€r. 5%&/,8/2/~4 1 10'6470nold 1) M64'1 4.EMEL ?AN) 6406* 2 6402 AR *4•·r OP ·rl,/ M». .40,0.EMIWT I. ~~~;*,Ce•1•~*M *41·r,1 Mt ELIMINgE Wwgg UNEL *- 49*RE,33 04911&20 Lu¥44·rY fLAN* Al' ArrA/,ter> TO T 8246*161 dru'2> -IEFAE St=V#43.2-6.Ar..t'. .U.N~Y 4 VAIL.noit H,/ He,21/7 4%Ar·trep F. 401- 5 NA¥•IM' 5.,Age 10 32 AGREe p,% e.- eg:nrHP 4.' A... -r,+An .!:'lcm"L°'mviaw'rz: \. 4 Fk¢»41- 9/14, 6{n·M./ F.4 •4*12€* t , 4 WRMUM 4 0'-00'· 0,4 L.®'r C j ' 1 <--4 ae¢40 = ..4 UNrre UNn-9 u,*r 9 1 4.. 04 :' . 3-F y UNE 6 -''I f'tr ' UNrrt ~ *0 UNfrl -'-41!idAAMMR . . p *119.»41*01,1 : 18/0 LUU,% l./ 34.An 0/790*144,4 i A p / 1 j '1 · /'* f uirrhu- A-.#-~~*>41, , , · A / I /1 t . .... 41 -2 » 4 4 * '1 :6, . . A / / 4 f b2 ,4- 41!U jr\< , - Uxtrz. , ~,0 i , 0 ,- d 7090 .,wf ' -45 ... . - 4 4 .. ~ 78Af ihS<i:b...~ 1'1 Owths, PENCe Af .4 , mlim ' 4 - 4 - * $1946. \ 11'8 -12®taL_ 1 , .7.-*==*-f /--·-·.F.- 7040 .....\. 6'k, ' 34.4 4 1 -4-< 4 4 . th# - ~ ' ~t·\ -- - f w 108,4 4 85 7 10 00% \\ 1% % 4 It 14 1 \31 9 L \ ti (-8 / \0/ 4 \1 .\\/ 1 OWNER: SAVANAH UMITED PARTNERSHIP 815 SOUTH G•UNA Sner, Aspel CO '01611 -1--=«Rti ASPEN MEADOWS 1 .f *Nb»L 7»- TRUSTEE SITE PLAN ~ TOWNHOMES O 10% 9£>' . REMO DEL/ADDITION 1101-1211 MEADOWS TRUSTEE OFF OF MEADOWS ROAD ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NeNOISTE » 9,rA. 5.925- ..... .. ...u.,ww...2-0..12,2,u.le.1,62,4,0,>.2,21. 1<).i·.) ..,ai.1.J..t.:.Ulli A (if) M= C 9) E 1. RatiaM #*#9 Di Concrate Slab enttre laier bveL Alsoln *plt,slabsatEnby andne¥, 10 pollonol t.hing Room on Malnlovel Also stapted to bottom ot Plywood entire Master Bedroom Level ANMI -7 - 1 10(Apo \ t Npr Roof and Below ~ Uving Dining below 1 115718 match 0*Ong ·1 · | irian~ e.* handraN+36». Code anddesl#ullby 11/2*dia. Smoke Detector above door per guardran .86· Code. Rm Marni system per ROOF OVER Eed,Ic,181*Cormactor. Central BALCONY Command and nlollhing staeon as~Plan) ~~ ~~Ched**A . F S - 1 502. 6 MASTER SUITE calpet _ b 26'NEQIES 1. Radiant tubingbelow foordickng d Master -- ---- - , Sul!& Sweto . - vant Decomf/Gas indersice of ply*ood l egress window / #pd¥mit and Into,iorwags: on bottom I- +74 Nt#afon.2 x41 ~ 01%4'04. 4p'cal MASTE BATH ~~DO©15 03 'reN - top of tottet end dacclative *m ' · shower 2468 +740 l' rejpE/fs /. W..Deck. 1 Webackerbomd - -Str matm bench - 11 +W , FB?AN 4491?Ne afeD 4-4.-1 maMmds#ngpangmandmatetials 0 ~-1 Xmlwbalusts,851,04.Posts,600& ~~y tele,lodetais2+09,0*150,g BayerPIant. TYPICAL NEW UNIT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - SCALE: 1/4'= 1'-0" Emia-~8165/&~:022(*Wns*934. 9.50% .MEO , ee a 5=E il_f_-~1 0 *-* /91 4.23 - ,1 D ~ . 4 9 40 d g M -i .1 1 5* IP[ r? mz-i , F 142 3 05 5 1 1 ilb' Wi i - HZ m O 4% JE'QLII- /EE 1 ------------- 144.---~ V _ m n 4~2 k / - . t-1 t-1 ah. / 1 >z €/~ 1 © - lit 1 - 4*12 C 1 Z 1 1 +C +C MN @/4 1 <glesnz 1 1 1 -le i - :0 70 44 G @ee e e e $95 U. 98191136£ SfIZM~ 2*101'oc SUMINME Als ,/0/8 ,¥t ./.6 OVE Rt A¥ tbG - '1 4.t > 1 :I - 1- ~ ~ OVERLAY ;~-L , 3- 1. - -bIL' :-* ·:1,19< '2'443 ,fl., 4: ...).2. ·N · '-';lit#16 T: ~?·'«' ·'· '· )14 79*.2.6:.i.'<<,04'42-lf~.i~)L:{=c r ... f 'dp:, •"L 5 - 4 5,4 9 4 I 44*1' 1 + 1 1 r 'I ' -mfill\41W .' - T - 2 1&---- 0 01#[1114!. -1-4, 6-,0,11,1€F-,12~+14-0=-= 1 - - E - '.F¥/1114<GplM -- 1 Ct//4 1 **4..t<-- -- - - I --- - -- f I - - 'lilli, ....,1.1=- f••1· 14...111 ]I.] 2 11 1.1......1,1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 , .. 1 0 . I - 1 1 1 O Co , ....... .0 O - m • 11 +1. /111414141 4 62122- hi ] . , f . ; ' ,r-0 OJO 20 . 1 m -0 1 JOO r 2 - 4%91#*fL - ITI"' <0 /7.Ff.4/-/1 m . . ... I. i - "4 f A--0 1 . te * ASPEN MEAD WS . . I. I . 4 £ 7.4* 6z 0: PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 ·ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. . v . . I-..6-4 | PATIO | ® © @ ® Se .. 134 0 9-10· 0 17·2• i R.9• f UP · ·rfe 9'40* . 19·7 440 1 ==t--4 PATIO .. 1 2-=".4 - 1 01 1 1 8080 Iyer 1------------ ------- -----1 1 1 1 Eme / 1 I r) .X BEDROOM 3 Crawl Vents 1AddA#ema* I Below --4 .*c Ver *con#act dktdoofs. 8' Inplamoommt,waQ ·31/F 1'·4' oc M batts marble deck ~Craw /~T, i *..RATHSAA 1 l 2 -ki- 1/ deck CRAWL SPACE EF -~tra<m~~ 594it---7~ ~ 01/11-1--0---- W.REN- 1 1 up #994-4-41 ~r, J Il.LI pr.ao. 3 .lech- 11 1 -L 1 . ..Imel --CAA '11=dia. 110ybo Ir=.' Stora!5~2. - ~©~2~ A-/ i iiWIi VIA * L 21=AN-NQIEB L-----1 j517 1. RaantUIngliC=et@Stabonim Wa~ ota*cent towartevel. unit typical Alsob)*11*absatEnt,yand nav 10' poillonoILMng Roomon Maln Level. --- .-. AlsostaptedtobonomoIPI,woodentle I Master Bedroom Lct°!L I - . I BUMINNTE AF 0 *{fY ~ir> TYPICAL NEW UNIT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0* 7-61/2' • 5·11' ~. 40-r . 6%41/7 ··44:el. 2.N I % '. ~ .. . - ,/..2.......... ...:.ilf, V,7 0,-a~D '' 1.-7 - ftit #26 :A~/I- 4/9/:-~Ill'./i50!~" '' .:f . . I .: 9. 2440~ - , 4.3/ ¥ -iler ..: 9400,4\~f tv 1.m . 4 9, m. " h NW>» - , tit:. I. #1.092 344*49428 1:, 4 N *' - ... tle,at1$11141'llifillili:fililliliwilluill~Vili~illimilillo~ig 4*942.5.~:~4 434 W: 1*81,4't *72*84 l. f . .- r .L.J.2.14· .i ... ; .,Il :#LiA 'Y.Y/112 .e 7.: 4., 1- S. 22 K 4 · 2 ' :~.7 ... ··92r,A joif t. 6 34+ I .E Vt, / . .3. ~11*-1· ~~B~41114 - 04 i =ex- - f# te .. ; L 1. 1 :e #: :i,Fw 4. . , - F 47.T..3, 1- . ...39 h-~.8 ~m:,•~22*it~ € .%»fl . -,9/ 1,19. 4 'ff'[dow/ ry*-101... /6 ./iq:lit::Apir/'--:lililillillivillilliliMAeezielzmili/i.I.~ 1.-.-il'-b-- '~. 4 1 .//.=IR,0&- ™h\,24 .=- 1-~1.301 = 1*3.IIWI. r 1 -I--4/e )b-X- g=-- 1 -1 =LI ma : 93.4. 312 -- -= •*/IREE .--=1000:=Al l~/1 -allitasi/AM~%.-C-1 , .- ,#6461111| • K . A h 2.·, 5 . L . 2 . .*9 ·F -.J 1 . - 1 . ..,..0/ .......1 '7/INS¢ ..11.*6 .......I '4 402 ...................=. 1.... ..... . lilkillilia m» Am>- D:... 111* ":::,66-)----I----7*% ... P... 0 ...4 P..1 .....l t. 1 @ ,/.-f?~~ --la /5l- . 11...1 . Ear/;1~ .....l I . - 9e 0 .Aill//i--3:94;1(2"'Plr3~Ha3t9/1 .. >14 E/4*...44'.449 re. T-*~ ..... . .A ...„. ly. . -59,9. c.:.2/.·54 r¥/494 ../ At*&* ..:,07%3(€t>» t.'*le,C. 1, J :2~ :Aer .: i.*- -.-.x ..: '444» 1 ..... If -...1.' 44'.Al--I_,13 -5 : ·· ..,4.•·.-Ill·,O./.Ill.....04.•gw'I. i·~.8/01 10 ® 99® , 20·0· 9·10' 17.7 /. *09*¥% \Pozt 241 O-pm##%4 6 C 12£*- t€ EFUE€, RUMIAW[E 10'1*pc¥rre~-~ n - ~ \My i r/@ci w 4 k -44/0 'b:62'. V V u V i A-2 ELANNQIES WIndoll at end unit only 1. ~diantb~gliC©flce ~4, ,~~;~OTEONIABLEDACCESS: Subent,9 1-rle,al / Alsolitopingstabs at Entry 2¥*lhepond-Al Floomsm,dehe HealkWY GC 347 r- N kl and nu# 10 pottionot LIving ~ 1 /lmit #0,0 Bedroom lam (te,1702#E~Ke / /h Roomon Wn Level Gas Log A,Ance W 1 ' cortaglgedbrcor#e,*nforaccass nxid glass and *CutatIng,entB 1.-rti:~mi-~ „ -1. R¥arto pallelplan Uns unet im --31- 4 7,1- 1°ret. Sbreon •Of -_b 11 2 - / 8080* LIANG ROOM '00&0050 0 ----- N.=m=00 Calp,1 +BE. - b § I .0~~~~Nl. 1. 17-20 TERRACE = 1/96#~eel f NORTH WALL: Stone Pavers 1 hourasson*: asdescribedbelow_. WDropSIding e,de,forsulface k..ty-11 FA.1 e, g=dle=*b 11 epploved by Addi, Code Omdal: 134' ~ /woodnoolitvon M BAR-13 teads . 2.7 112• I 104,1 1/7 ~ Gt011@ On lisem ml!«ps wih 2 layers 1/4' rellecix (R10) WripexamBdoninterormilface 1 142 91@le,lk conmeverteWsabove/ 11**ru 4- 1 kcass Pang! 10 cm•1 1 ihar~1218 43£ · space ba~ Foyer //11/2'48.4. .1-- f 1 - I 1 canmeverbar endurilorty 3-~ j 436·--4 top d doset +74 eli @ 6.75·~~· - 1 -7 [r- -1 l 06 - I -2 "--!La. 02¤R n.11.44 , Woodstaps 9~ dra~1 @&·rK* hi +2§1 BRO 6.75%4' 7T 011046* 1ET 0105•14'-0 W.-M"Al= -----~-~a----=r=-4 t above - -1 1 }3070 1 5 1- ~V .-<D -9 2*_ KITCHEN t ! neatety#an / 1 88#41#ass . - 3= woodooor .. L~22-L-= U.-3 i f *02 ST@ 14 3/4' -~ ' 1% k X 1, beamabum/ rootabove~ 2 1. 7.-r . 5-2· . 2.8• t 1 19;ECA~AGZATi'curv I hose.bti 1 -1 11 - 4 1 $* + it 1- 1 1 STUDY/ DEN BEDROCM 1 carpet 2114 4MllAL·i ) detorative beam ablve 2 8>49&140 Planter Tene 1 8' c~n waU Landscape ; 2 X 4 10*,g lnskle .23' 1-.ill--I--- . -il---------Il.-- -1 - 1 , I. A. 9-0 te e i 1.Lmot and tremabove , pattdag i anid*Imt 54 • ¥·0' €97 .. TYPICAL NEW UNIT MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE· 1/8 = 1'-0" 9\E~£,7 L --MEfEE54*a) *W»S -z) <32 01 8401/4'perfoot~ 4/List OVIALAI SHEET OVERLA¥ \ 0 . • 4. mtitti mt\%\ . 1 E - it - , . · , . I . -•--'--·- .. ... 0 36 1- 1 111 91 - - 1--- [3@®1 -IL--_-_1__ 44232-=fit~~*i -£ _ I. __ 1 --=-I p""a/5"*ce' A :* 1 2,1 -4_ - 1 4 1 4,1 - ¢ - --1 - 5 - NE~------------------=------------~-~1433-4-----1-- @trt-------== =4--e ----t=---I-- F.-fs-= ff-Ft -- c i 17~- 0/ . 1 .. 1+ F -1 -7-- T-4-r- .. . . I , .. .. - /- . / /*. 1 . 0 1 1 t 4 t. . 114-W·l Lic F 4 i---0 11 -00 ' .'.':. 11 m-0 ,... ..1 :00 re 1 . 1 . mm . o m . i. . I .. ... ... ---·-1 1--7-2 -. I. . . 1 - - I .-1. I . I L -7r-...:. - . 7 61% ASPEN MEADOWS ' 0 - PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. I ARCHITECTURE.AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. . , .. f ·1*1-·· · I •:Z. • .. :..A 03 9 LO i ./ DAVID lal ·. t... iffip'~3%47:? . 0 #..tio "TE & . . , mil . - I .....4-----I------ . . ":':,<"~.".2.-,2 -#--- :41*,m~ '~'1'wm,1".".w:ar --3/&-------7 Il-- -- i, .1,1..·.·,..,1 r.. Iin ij I,in, 1,i i,n,1;11,1,11,1 i,in,1 iii i,i i i,i, .1..,nlili-I,„,11,1,Illi//'nl,11,„11 2:1 ., ~-i--* .. -Ii--lill---i---- - - ---- -El-;&04-i~siff- 09~~--1itrip»liU~ZI~Jil~~~~~~~~ -- 111'lim 11. N . 1~1 .2.4.-,„ '7,4„..............m imill ......"1'~= 69.4.6.6 -:,1-2...2.3 .V I.E. . 1? &741.grk 19&- 01*.L /1, ~0-ali:.dill:iir:illi : I ./.0/1,/10' %«,FIC 1Ii).:I Sagul.:ar,47:0312:f~:~~ 23:1419.1 H~~~Clillyit'I 22~ 1;:2#5;r31rz;;2,2-236'I -~ T ra JIT M 1 9//3 0**C ~. "e#:9"ti"1''6=:'degib,6-11~Id""'I®*,<4"m~ 1.1»1114*i{~~fl~n~9%/mn'Bmil~On&'1*ili . e'll 1.mis N E#l...11".111~ 2%2 0 III--m=----....1 - .- 414.J® 1. , ' . P~.!10]~ ......]11..'......1.,f..~11'5 .. $**/ S: -1.1.0.,1~1.1/.......&FE: Fl•ii=•Ii....•••-••Il-wil~.1 W.~~~,-8~~~~~ ...'..15.........10.'...ll.: p.!~ 1 . ;iii:11·:-. . .. ..~ .. .. .. A . 9.*te U...I 0. . ..... / JOHN \ E DAVID F,NHOLU p':=A .;=g.'COW 4/ U.771. 6?BJ *SED 249 - r 4 I ' 1 -11»Ged/*P-H:--1- 6 -Il.-I.=-*.I'--I-ni//.Im'll'i ===========~ 7----/*--- 3:I:ildl~5"N'IN . .TIAA#.-- 'b~,..,r.4 4%%* '0....--.I/:50(11' It::53/1/1/ - . :R=Ex: U~ . --hm' .· K..: .l. 'ee•--ee-"4~:i ~ ~ ~3 k ~611"IN///•1~ - /2~ _ , 115// ./ A..1 EmEEEEEEEmEE....milim--- ...... -- - EEmEEEmmEEEMI'll//al===~~==~~~gg . . fy<> A - : Al'll•.•Illiee,ee====ee== :4:/i ~~ ~ f~-,fift~--~ f .,- € --1./.1/"/F--i--Ii--Ii=-Ii.Ii --:11........1- .r - I . 2. ~~~~~~ >i· ~~ip-~ ~~=:i=~»~i~-~ ~=~=~~:ii-=i~ =-5 8% 9 C. p .,ill,00,;,V ; : iMil'Il iiluli , -0.0~': ..Ill• ...1 1Abi~Ful,111 f , Lp:,et " ikt... -' -.-:.;,-1 .I..M I....m...I 7.......1 .I~.40<.~.4. < 1.......11] 3'5&4-- ·ZAr ~ 8/1-1/1/lill/'ll ...m...... lilill 1..........1 0 l........., i =9· t:...11 ::~::....10'"'1 fil#~~9&4~2~~~.~-Ii 1& 17,..„m,-I: ~",,""I"",'"i ir„.„,=„7, ..„..Le~Li,=,...„,=.=-,-..,.2:.,,H.ki::~~4#=4 #„1,k~firi*- Mi;':am~:MA#imi" »5*/41*4*•'31¥¥f i 4.:~:., : ilit,•11•••101=:nimiN••11••mitmit••1:=m•m• tail•••••••immi•••••a••'•••m•• 11•••kN.:k'Dt }3il.,wr<,t 5 8=57••04#,4,la••••,•Eltil I|••m••m I g,ci.im..:mi::iliguii:ili:i:*:im:inii ili::imia:im•Il=••limillim.... milt..9>z El ./.51:.1'.1: I...a:ove!,!:1......1.Il 1.......1~ ····C+3*191:2 :/EXIC:~i e . 21 4:*rrit......mi'm I.'mi."I"I.Im'"'I"I= 'mmu"IB"a'-mi-'Imi"mi'=Imm' i,imp•E Nf 9:. 1, a#••Ma: I:.IT.,~M,In!'9......,I.. ........ ./MENEf-/ 0- 0 ..........: ..........2......... ......11.-~1............. Ill":26.A,22€211':P::6/19,.c 95716.li:ABif€:,11,1-1,111,1 lilimill,R 41@11$1 /, r..........1: .........11.1......... .......~ i.,Ull=•• 11£••-:,431:- 2'Sall*2,2,11 5 E• ji.ift;»Zaill:Imill~11* Ialialll ....„....1 : "Ill'"mil~illimill=,1 imal.Imil~ •11- :$44*3+22.•10.2.1:*19,17'>ina#lilimillill.1 Hall.mil . I EE' -i--.'-3-'.,1-' . :i'%>2~;1.=ing'=.li-'-1. ..........: 1"...m...!...........I 1...... IM...... Ii.Wier:·.e-:1.2 9--;:·4a.6: ~ Nala,-Iewis,Wilimmilia,al .......11 - .71'.1.....El u-all . 4 - .........1:4.................... ......1 ~Ii,mimi mi../t - 2.- ·-, L '01:t« 1 Ail,14,6.611„im!,Imi Nial„11 11... 1.....I ~lailli- 52'7/f~.-I'll'-1-1-i-I- ..........%:1........1...........1 ......1 limmimmil 'Rir:,4-4 - 1 >U -k; 9 1 -dal: I,AR,1,14,:,i,tillim••••••••01 11•11•N•• I . 7'Pf>-<2~'ll.im...il.ill ...ill"lue'll"'ll'll'llill,1.' I.Imill ........:1........1"I..N......... ...... ~ |PX,:~Iti~LY'#23 3 3 0 '69-Gir-'1 : 1,Ik:'21'.~.%9;FI,%%%7,",="F":'„,:~, i.=Im""'--~In=.....HI~~.,1....i-~ . r Ptfty€™S~/='-1-1. t....... m................. 1.....1 .......il.I.2- - 1••mi•,•••451„•ma,"-li•........5~-. 9424,/. ..5, .. -,• 1 .I•': Ii=•Ill"mialli""allil E~'M:51£: b...........1.'11.........1.M... ~ a 99-/i#-1-I'llill""I'll'llill'll'll'll//1,/Illillill"/6.1. -- N,im.....to.......1~,muill,INE :Iilimimillimililillim„Immilim-1~ jete. . P p .0•j, ~6 Al=01,Im"llI'lWNIE jU:-M =- f ...............................1 ~ 7..1.'"Rioel= 1......... : 11.......,,......Rm.........,...................M,6 .thE.idi ~QJ /..1 4.84-t: IN"All.mll~Iml~1~M l.'&*.IN;.1~'Illil"'ll"11"ill"ll".1.-Ill --ill-Iillillill--I- .. 14mm.....E:~ Il.........m,mAN,plm,wi-Im~::i:,i,m·,i·.in.u·.1·m'Ant:DjuirAN *32,~3953 11~NIA".%%~NAR#:i'- ,",I",;42~':,Iil; ...........1................1 - 10--6 , S~ti'idi,Veigm.1.m...6 "111=Ill"Imr:,i ,:~~:~~:!W: ~!.4 . -- I ---*--- 12'Flim':ili.'::/8.tir. 16€ig/~- M. ,,...............,.....,• il=.BE.-0:& se. .tu e -r" '7'41>8 liall,milill, :it:~2:~p: ':41:I!:l:&:6;: 1 ull 11•1111•llnlllIlililll*li'lll'll 1 1 "IIIII"iIII""II:'II"III"I .. In a.rn-Je}Egit::bj : ~::~M:,45~4:;f;:5~irl zie),iMI=IIIi,ac.fi~.~i:11'22*@Ek'~tti~ 5E~$$Z5~$$:41 ~ ~ 22!494*M"millit: 1•m"-"•-Ip,a- :-~:i"i:§5"4 J~1,~1~~~An~ ~~L~-~'0"~I'=I==-I'i'-Iilllm.-l-~.'~-l'~'.~.0"'~Ili'~aili~~d~~I~ ' 01.3 -/W:0"j' r##:Re,~Li,&55AM' 9-Tm-:,m-,M:m-„1_~ t.-!E~·7>,-r,3~330 ...... . -*efer- , 70-4~:au.39' ~(Spjr,0 Itilit 6=*-1».i-Ag.=hes*=A.Un'. 05-7%-:<62'4 'e.·*:9;*rt?03*v., <,MS'PU,426#mi% ,.~ .;.e.„. i f JOI!:4 \\ ' 1 i.( 95'.?.. p) 0 i *512,4.*C., % 44*467 . --,/~a..............H,1 r¥ r . L. .. . .--- - A. . e ..1 ..............- . -.t. ~EfEEmma~ L . ' , 44 -9 L ., --.- ~ 1 ~111 - ~,1 a =========== .........1- f 4 , . EEBEE~k D ·2551........1============= . . -r ¢ -I-* :«2§1......... - ........1--1- -1.1.=..MER"E~ 1, t -I....Il--- : ir:rill:inzi ---I.'-- 24. --------------------=----------944v 111. 4 .-1.I-~~ :itifi-&@***&72'aimm H~.3:-E.Eli=:F. .=~fi--Iri~¥~1&2=,&==t" Ca-|~hilim,-1 -n 'Jili:,.6 2..e: ~,6.65*Adit:.r: "5i-,1,;t~ 5 .!~i:~~i:i~i: :i~1 ./ - rf / ........11 Jill'll'll'll/ .......... .1.......1 141: Al 112111'illil.im:r -~te 1-1-* '61- Mil- 8.........1 .Ce:.4/.. .........1 J 1~ 1.......... 76 LF 0- «'~ :to:~~Q~~~U=~J~. =11 M:.::::i,1 1 -7,1 - |I ~ 27131* ..........1 -- 21......... :- /*Ill--I.-. - -94%94*2- 074€1': -1.1-1 I.......11 1.........2.....................1 1.......l. .........1 -'I -: Il........ili 9 Edi' V.W-'M *,MM'....W---WNE,Il'MI I............................... 1.......1. . ....81:t.-14,4N.NU~ 0 -im=00/,1,15 in#01005*0~:~IIIIII.I~FII~ ~,m~=II.m==I=.I~II.xI.I.II.EFE, ~j~:~~ELM.-r#i*~.=3--f<fu£152~~ am~EE= .. m...... 1.1,1, 9-':- 1 (44' 9 1- ' *.... .55:11.........1...........1 1......I. ........1 1......1, 4 nllill'.•,lit::-ir„-: f. L.......t: Illiminlle.1,14,Lldllalll•11 1=11•=IN~~11•••••••Iml Ill .....: r. ':..id. ,·.1, 7 --..1:X:. 1...........1..„......m= ....... lili 11....... .......--Ixiliky.. 1111:•/11.,·:I.-1 - , i ;': .-w: 1,1.milimt: mililli/411 :ra",•,•••11•, ....... ililli,I,--M I -••m•I•••• '11, . 1 0 I.....m1 ......... 1....1,----------Ill--I--I--li mii„,: c.*:g. y..,..,...a.: ,......a..,p,.ciI,Nimmi, 1.mit,ill Illill,I Ilimmimilinl Inwi,. 4 , ': , '.,2.-7 51.t k I.IMIn=maill.Ilimi='I" Ii..... 11....... ..... ---W . 1.. Rmmc,(Il:cC 94<i ,.:i" 4,21....,S ..,m.....Fiq......U.... ...RIEN. Il~ 1 111,0......... A* 50• , :. 1 3 /&:.495 1.-1 kg..................... I......1 ........1 1..../........................ ilinizilll :e 3.22 :At ·-2/',ammll*m :~Alll:Iak;NIA:Nmlmmaktmli Ililliial:l Flill ..........1 plart„,"'=Ing>ae 52-.-6 >>Agg<5 1....................1 ....... ........ ...E-...-.I.-I~ 8,4:'. 249 5.194 >Tigtlin'Imt:kk-ZIFIWI'Iid'illmillyl-1 lammllal IlllII 111 W....... IMHI-VT ·iN.- -CUG ........................~-2.1~ . .. Millit:;,:' .1-•.. / ' -1)9rtmllillal::3:Ile,flililmle,lillit,Illh,W,• ••m•li••l I ........1 111'.4 W :7$0 - . 21,:-g.. 31.........1........., ~i............................ '. 2€lillillilll:* Iqliligill) Illilg:fljillilll <|~~ ~h. IU~i*~Il~~~D•~~£~ .~ f'•4 -U-0.=Sill:>Ilill|IlIlI*Illilll/ 5 2 Ill|llll|Nlli~nlllli~milill I'lltll!'4"!!!!·61:·>..4 >.7, .. =-~Er~-1 ii:i i i:ii i.'£.L7 ' ..&.5-1--~ ............................ Mlltilke--11· 4 7/.C:-7.:Jd,2.-m<:Ijai:-.1.-m:1597 "Ilt'yll/.·:~ ·-=*1#-"3.· ,· mmuc·-0 0 .. .161~thil"602:~2~-44. mmi, *92152,(%-1--(52;:Illill'Ill'lielilill'll'llillf:4}1=22~ Illillillill'Millillill'll'll'IMI'le'lli ... 11111"1'w...-----i ---. ~~kll~ ............................1 ~ e '51.....11.1...................... 111111'--I--/I ====---"--1- .1..........................1 ---I'-.I.--'I- ... .. ------1~0,-i~,9.mw:t~,41%%..„.=.......*:„~:„-:5:ic Iltilit,-.~ * ............................ . 81... .. as 78.2 11~"I~,"1""*""I~~~ r~ lili .. : 4/MBMN'/11.iMT,·· -- - ..... 1 .. 1.VI:F - . . 0 . 0 0 0 I | r.':I: UF,3. ' 1 ·> ~ i., ~<97J-~'i-~7;: .'',24%* .Wa et D Atru .. .i · 1 .63.1:-Il.~./.Il : 0 -.I~....Ill-.Il-/~I~ ." i~.. ~.i.·~~:i~i~~~~~;.~~2~~~~ ~t ~~~.~¥~~U~~| M""liall'll- - V E:=E-:iE-:2~mEE.Eae':gEEE.- , 77· #ik, izggi-Ki::i"NA.~ . - 11----- -/=.I--ill|./81."IN=============I===1'll'l./dIL,"621'&,r<1£- 94-ill---ta : mi':Al.....,1- 5 ___.____== -5= E:11&"lin" E- . /9. 7 . ===E=========41¥ ........1 ========- --~ft'11.Et:Z:~- ---~~ ...........1 EEm=TREBEEE-.4.I..... ~~~~~~~~~~,„ ,~+ ~i·.~~1~ ·:~{·~:--~7~-:~~·~~~~~~~E~~~~~~~9~~~~~:·;EEE~tlll11~1%~IE'Ii~~~El~~~~Wi.it~::-~:~i:~~u:~ 'Alli..1„„Ii,H~:Ii„Ii,ii„„„„, :4::, ::*:,:: 5:B.........I ~ 2112-: h .1.=~~~t~111.~ -~~~~~i~~1~;.i~~~~~+~1~iw~...,1111...1...1- - 649'ill 1........1 1:t,rilllit 11!/%04:ii• ......... .1 111.......1- -../-*-'.- IM•i.858'll 1/11&..11'.M t."m"Im'Imill"011.1,1.1 1.111•Im - I i 'bill....... 9 1-1. i ... ................1 l..,.m...=.... ,.....l...1 ~.1 >1.:. 94.......1 - 9,11,1,11: "Ill••m,Il•INE=•EM•ll'll•Illm•ill"lilill'llill'llill,lti< i. Fll !~MUJJ~J j 4,11~1~U~~~2~~~~=-~I~l~I~E=~,re~~~9~I~I~U~~I•'•' I'llibrle€»».,Immiliti::im H•61•••1•••••••m•1•• 1••••••••••••••••••••m••lii... ti. i i~ ./.-'.-I----·.92 1 glililiallylll: Ilimmilll-Immilimillmlillimallill!Illm,•IlimlimmU,1,111,Illillil.3>-:1 2.240,M•UNLU: lill,illl,ll,111*,lilll,l Illl,Im, ...11.....1 : IL.........1.1, i A.....1 l..E.m.Im. . il,limvilili:9 1,amilill,Immlilmimmlmllinlailillimmilll*mlilimilimimilmill:Illb"II» L'' 7.0.*:alill It: Illilimllammllall:%22911• kiMMIMM• ..........4 mill'llmili"'11'111'milill•'Im'• i --1• IN••,•"••,A:- 51..... 11............ .'. ....... ...=~All. 1....Mm..2 .........2 1.11 ..... *4= BEFfr=='7=11 : 'IN'MA.:ImA.:,64f:,f, a.mi.:i.mmwi-=wilmt-, ~11...11...1:%....eiggi. 1......... •.1m.mm.1 ,"lim..,...61:t•xure=-Vt'tr••In•1••IE~#Lf,~Im..... 11.1.11....:<..../4 .„1 .........1 ..1..m... ..a..l...I Ill•:7'-44..F.>AL:.9.il· ·1-1,1....Ilitk: .,1.......m...,•....•--"...m•• ~~~~~~~Ilill Vt....E s I..... 1//1/•11*17 24*ME ', 4.Flizill.....W ' :<.1.1.111 1 111"'"110'Imt: k....:....~......... ........ 1 .......... HIEZ<·<.-1.-4'.9,0.7·7:4/Inte 1-9-1---==a------a= ........ ,+©12« :....Ile g.......1 1...,..342*i'.4.34:44,i ....1 l.... ...1...R 1...1.......... It......9 - Stl{¢r:'tkile,kwhe'll"llill<: 3....1... 1 1.1..,....4=#rt:PR#nzi,el/--*.,24 4=4......C:..... 12.vILLEA:*217; 1:,2:*.-immr, .- ,-"i---rvil)=r :, pl~Z~ -1 11.......2, - -- - lillill....... -.1-1 ....B 111"111.111,62 19 - . -- - ~ "1~"M"~IMk•£10 71.2 --,~ »»5•,0--- -1 1..E 1,11111&1110..2.-m_~ .......1 ,/Imil/~pl/"I/:ii:il:;972*25.6/Will'll'llillill'llill/,9//<Fr2t994<2Vt/~Diligi/1/11//1/lillimill adilip..m>'&i-ex'-1:c~k"mliI'll"IM 1--- 11_ U./.9/loutiollil/WVFYZ)/ly&/&50)'llw .p"jigne=~-~ --IRk.-2 - - --- Il~~~.~~~31(~ :Val 0,--I-- . ffilillilliff '6 t . ·i JLLIWI - .: ~~~.Lil, · 1:- , 1 4. dz..,0 , lili. m 0 1 1/r-if .. 0-r 1-! il . . iR. 0. 111-12 0 -9 69 9 '-- Wood shIngles / ' -* Adjacent building &27 l' 1-7.-3 1 |f - Timber _(LICEN NEL 1.-© 11-© +U.t=£11 1 -_ H I UN r15 Mndrail - - - - @ 36· 1 ~©- *07> mo, Ar - -Trellis =rt e e e ~11 1 180# ca~ AlfU-11¢ t>99 /0/21. ,emer =-7~Ti.~37-EE ett·thm:Mti- 11 ANNINe:05 M.,1. / .'L~~. 4--CExerING€POE- • ,1WF, rm/4W+P L 1 0 15 -0111£1117 »¢53 91'111»Alt) 1....... · 11,11 I 3 a f ~44~ -I. 1.- 6 0 - W1 '7 t, Vent f i 1 I '# l~, 1 ..d~'1- 5~-w. --0- Et-!HINNE *414 , WEST ELEVATION - p' 8 Ex,5177 'blstng r SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' , 70, 7 e I .... -, 1 k %G~ '~ _ ~ r.• l' .~· -4- . .1. ~' ~~· ~.iF·. .... 4.4 4 , - i f I . - . . 7 , I . p'..... $ I. r 1 4 . I 291 · - . 6111 4 /·.• 4. t.a- U ,€st i, ,, .. - -1 Ab°9 4 A . w - fi,9 Bit 1 -1 41 - 1 -6.. 1 11 ..i 1. I -r@69 1.A 1 1 0. R , W h _ 16 - - r 0 - ~14 MT' ,:,2 ..1, - ~ 49 D $ I -01 Arza ~*011~~ ~1 _ tlw~,r ' 40'.*r , 1,- - .4 A' - - 190 -49 6 9 v $ 5- f ~ z,-- 11-6 -2-1- .141 k -4 - -- ~01.- 12<ar- 244 2 /1. " - 6.-. ..1. '.,- .r'., * 4 A-*' 'S =F , .'*i - E _ , -- 14? ANNE?ha 0 06 z. , 4-1 -'41*7 - --- . .h--F-8 - -9 -= g/BW/$/294%9 - - 4 . J.C.. 042 l 'TOR, ti f 6-1 41,=tu 3- - 6 $ 441 -12.1..... , ' 41,74 7,- :IMI' i - -1 - =mt.=,=9 1 -- .F,=4 * »:4 4 4 1 i = -*3*V + Vt _=t- L L *14p~ -- -1 » A. i i -51 i. 1 - -uty--Il - L -Di.-*-4 -2.Fli ha j I € tk - -97 -3- 764:.rt * |~ -* I--2 - - JE : . 2 CO 141, 1. . . --- 1. , ~ - 14 -4. 24's *=. ~ ,~ '. Al. '0-C +I -2.55 1 '.4 r.¥.,13* J~ '~~0 r -1 - 26 E 1, 3 .1 42 -1,1 J f--r I ' 9. I - 1 2 € .7 - 4 =**~QL F - . ....,a -,a,XL - - C~1*0:-2:f, 4-yzid- --1 - 1-1 -7-15 --4- 444fri,-d .. %™r _ , 2 1*11~*3 +171-1 -,r £ t_ Mi _ - t T. i r 1-- I *·->-12 44 £ 5---70 1- -F#19/2/&/tri:JI- ...i-- -*lt- - :Em - - - 1 ... t 4 - .b 1/41/ * 4 -- 1 - € 42 87 -- . 1 LU + -- - - . a Vt///Wn • ~~ ~- -- r - 1-- 0 6 c L-4,2 - -AdiFILP*Nk .~ - 11& 5,444<#0*42*- ~il 1- - - iwim/0 I -,-= 4,96 Il.·- =-4 2 -7 U L.1 --u #hi#E GIl 1-11 1 - r -L _.a~i?•. C.C.--J~i : --1 ,- -,·r 412 4.- 1.1 1 , C.«I. 9 1 - - -Il/*3"1% 0) ick.- 942 0.- - .11# re.-1 - ///52////71 -- - •» /.4.*%, , 1,= 1 1 416 . , 99 : 21 p - - 4-u - l#.- 3* I I. .Ajr.» , -39 - 1 - ~0 4.ay//r- . #t 7 .0 - ' 24. 'i ~r' bf - 1, •a~k,,i ES- I-- P#~ - - 416.-1-1 4, -- I I .- . ~ - I rn& /'2' 1 1 -4-. 1 - 1 9, 4, *--re '4, 4 - 4* 4 Z 0 2 - i 22 rE , f - M*- _ 1 - . 2 42 445&1 - - -- te. 2- rk ATE - lf,A.. j- -- -- 1 12 1.9 REVINIONS . -LIZ *2¢ i /312, DRAWN 8¥ ~ _ 742« .. .·gy Z -:,r_ -' I; 6 & 1 ./' / *I . . _ t} tf• €41.U -- . -,0. 31 · p_ __ 1- .. n -1= .*n, 1 -4- - 1 -i-" - 1 . >eli 16, -.- 1 7 ~lll - - 1 01 r /4 .i 144-~'·---, ---_ - 0 -- 1 --2 --1.4 i . - 14-0 -It V ... . .F - - 1 - -4 - h 2.4 4 2 1. Cf , 'FRI T. * - Jit·y.-- I-f?44 + EXISTING - -5* - ~ Witti.% - SOUTH ELEVATION -1 -1 - -4- " 8 .... 24£2 -7, -- i -4 --* - C- ~ -0-z--73%:1.r··-- -t:~mI'*. -_ -144 2. Cla-f9 -+ - 1 -f: T '. . -:r -4 1 dik' . I 4 - . . . . - T - I r + 2 ,- */ + io-Ii _ - $ ie· I ~ ¥ 1 1-* VI"V ONINN¥ld ON¥1 ONV 3801031!HOEIV m 'ONI SalVIOOSSV ONV NlOHNI:I a.IAVO OVERLA. d.· . ' Nt·· SNISnOH 33 3SOdOWd SHEE' ' 1 titb ·lide·LUL , 21918 00¥80100 N:13¥V 61;86 xl)&1 l.41 . h VI V SNINNV-ld ON¥1 ONV 380103.LIHOEIV m ONI 931VIOOSSV ONV VUIOHNI=I DIAVO SNISAOH 33.LSRELL 0390dOEId . 0 SMOav31N N3dSV ...... 0 ..0 - 9 d :. j.~91.1~ bt49:?.1,94.- 1,1 E *tr ..4 P - f. . , ...71: ~39 ~.' 4 9: 1 ..49 , 4?11: I /0 .*44¢ 1 N*IR li 1, - z' 2 0 30 1 -3 CO e .91 4 1 0 - -Lr) I .2 1 , 1-9 -4 - 14| + - mo I £~. rji§t*;Up=22:,I=,;=~=~-==== -8 ' .I ' ' ~ ~ ,h-4 932 lf'.1 41»2 L-, ~=~~~~~~ - 02 Z- 4 ' ' · 6 4, t 1, 1 -11 44 f.:im• gip- 1--4*14 0 1 - 1"5 f. 117. , 4,~3, A . 11' 41 1 -11 .:'J f.,irt ~ '~ ~ s-'~-4= ' 4'~144,4 1 144: D 1.2-- ,4 4 : •i j ; _ I A. ---1 1 -,1-'.~I! , 7 +4'up,G', 5'5·24.'··= · 4 9:41 '1¥A;·23'.'. . :1·-44:A-·Ub:'ii ~ 1 1 + -r' 4 1 N'Ahip' ... -1 +11 111-1 -1 .*UL'21 . 1 .Tr 'f l •t an C 4- .41¢6 . 4 1 4 H 4.·~• 1 e -- I 7,#22~, ¢ ..F?54*33 - 0.- 424..4 i ·.W 52-,· . , ,: Cli,Iit :.t4*2%19¢f~~4 1, 1 i ' 4 -- ~- ako Flf --- 4, '.M'. 2..,-~:199'*JA*AZA; .--IM 21. EX~: -= 9- t. -$ - -4* 4440499«, --~~--- '+42Tfrr ,$44543;4~.ri:*r~:~.57411-{. ' 4% . f. 1 19 .. 1 -all#A::;:21'.7- ©gl 1./.Ar<?54*-'..:1...,Atgh':391 - . fi . t ~ 3,%., . 10 11-36.1 2. , :''Avt 4<9 Y:2,///////Ip.,2iA' ·-1,-1* . ·Im///i&#4··.>7~9 ==: 0 1,7*i:~-fi-.i. 2 t 0.~r.. & *( 114 9 I I. an' t-:&·4 t. 4-=z f ft ~0<**45«#83.€03%24&794 ff:REE·f· · it'44. w..4 p' 41·4 s ·· 4.10 b -I: =- 055.0 --: - r . iff)-29 _IL ,4 429%52<*aw·L-Rk>.~14-.. ··1./. ..s.. ·· i ..·-il ·.·Il•.·... - . MA:Z-2 =21 40 ~£*4-97*br T.:*6. : '4*,22;244.,4,9,7,':1%'*el .1. 7 .Abwk .,9 9>,/,_,-i'F'/k~'·. ,Ci,~f'™M.11**[44.fl:./ ... d h li.2.04&•*11·' 4 f. , I '1 .. . 1 P PE' ir - .91@ke. - 214*= 1.1..YA:*it#.*1*kf€*.1- . .1, , f - -4610.:01, 9I,/4-~...~p..m~~*~. 1 - I·*.¢;9· ~'Nj ·.am#/0%*bbl~.~•19* ....8,4.-1... 4* ·~-7 1.".biff- 4:·A'.4,9 2-e·,(:47.,f;'.3-.2'A,·46M*,2.1. ~ 3.-1-1""'RniA;'i»7:MU·fel¢'· 'b.ti.., -' 1- -- .~~ · 93*292(48#78*il.~I..2-, -,7 j 1, M.R.£11- t. .1,4, 4 , r.'' .14~ -4 $ . 42 91. .1, 4,121*:111 3 --1 1 . Sq 1 4 -1 49 + .- -rl-*Ill, - 9 11 1 1, 1. t M> 9:,2 *C.4 64 + 11 . 1 4$4 / 4 f<~49*3 1 , --lh k .€P '~ AV,™31AO -l >lt . ' I ''' ./ -'4 :33•S 02 84 M...6 8 / 241 0.:"'¥141 · 09'Aviel ]Ao O1IVA)-8Ln r»f 9,1.. I 0 A® 0 90% ® ® 12 2- -t- 12 ~erf313%wat_ 1 i A r= 26.< 6,1'rl.i-lw.4 Timber ll lllllIII - M ZE-11 1 r le e e bill'.1/1,1,1 m l1IllillllIIl11l B Li l li i 11111 11-1 IT $'IB SIS'ZIJill''t ~ 111111'jit 111 ~'Yu A tf 1'12,9 1,% A log'-o• tfutllt·0* .6 111111111!11,1111 111 i fIYb (' >13'11' 14%1 ,_r 'IE -I!1911'1111111111111 ¥ UPPER LEVEL. loi,vor~04 - gi~ -1&64LE-6!i-02, 104'€ 11/1,1/11001 1 'Fly litillilliI'll 1,I41111111/lt1,1.I11, dj FNTRY 1 FVA 13 @ 0 0 - 1111{1111111111-'-1 1 8 Extero Awl..~of.r1 / A. 1094 1 , T 1 (1*tr~ , 73 ¥ MAIN LEVEL. 9-, 1 1 1 - 11 111 1 11,1 1,11 1 1 1.Ll-1,1 1:1 . gmde ~ov Alelll*it€ ! Lj-·10 5*** =1 ' 1Nrit - ¥ LOWER LEVE / mon,6 .......memwIINHA,16=,11=11,=m=m=rnimim,miff*311,4,1.=11#1.~MIL,~ .-,fl#mt==111»Illk=Illt=111#1111=11112111Elltal,EllIEIJIE11121112111=11#411#411#411#111;91JH .~10#1IMI'Mt 'Et' IM'IM"Al'141'13"MI'k~'IM'IM"M"M"MI'MI'MI'M"MI' HI'l=11 1 M"IM!1911 1,"1311'MLI · SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/40= 1'-0' E --·.hi·,4,4)*4~k,aia*LU~/6'660,2„ua,00.*180 · .... ...2......4,4.• ... 3%4 , , 1 • 0 1 ¥. 2. fit I . 7 , -4 ... ...5.k,· ' narl ---- 4 403 133 3 0 969 34 4 7 . - -4 = n~-~i~~ ...11 6 Ak.,2, ~ 1 rG -EN> . 1+26 5 5.1-2.•·. . 6 - 9. 8*.A A 46% , . 1 42-8. [3 - 130 1,9 v- =-W - t. 909 & 4 - ·»c .... J 3-1- . 5 a '5. fit . . 4% 9 -'< 1 /T . 7 ·, 61 , 4,2 7 El 7 1. ~:ift'£,-/ ./20*5: & ./. . . 4. ' A 74':f . ..,.. r.' S..4. -·96, . 46 C 0 .,1:i , m g '. L '.240- •I -6 r. . I t¥' ...Alf.*-f.:i&~:·dyultt 9, ·. f. 49* : 442 -,4 . - - £* 1 €14 ..6 ' , 1 2 f ..337 f:Ff.E~-03Ei*~ ·~:·:,-;72?-Ek>k..4 .0) 4.Al. .4- s.' .....:; It·.·- -4 - 4 4 . 24#- * 3~4-4.-~4}1~~:62*49*~. .,4 - 4,9 - . 4 0 - . -LI 0 i 3.u-' - Z 3 .7 -%/ .4{·•· · . ~ _ I- L- '/*444..·1·'T .·R -.„, s- ,-'Ajk j,,t!*i*~ ~ ~~ - . 1 1 ...1 ...1.... ¥ .1 .21-1. Ch.£ 4 . F.5 35:, e W ~_ ~ I 117 2; 1, f 4 - 14 f...4~ "P..4.g:·p#DiA • 4 1- --1. I 1 I 9.- ., „ia,iok· ss..03 4.k -IL- 4 --El 11 Z . 1 LU 4,-12,- 1 + 1-. - r *t 64. - 1 -'k,€ i ·424-2.hicyli'~ -4*T "''~*AL /4.11 ; L .1 r M R..2&-A,462 -0 --1 - a.k „,.41':s.~-*fi~jj.ti~Jit<0'J~~.3.yr·.:~1+Z.F~..:.:7~.. ,, :£.89,&%)823*fi;'- ~4I- . ~~I -~ 4: - -,418 - 1 -U ·12,7 . I I TL'U £ .99 . < a - 1 t- . 4,5,· . < ·I · -, i.24,- jp. -.*6rk I I ./24.4 -2 ' DRAWN 8¥ "K. d · f'+9 . yo 44-dp 715 g*RI- -;~ 1 -, _ I .. . , .:P.«4 J... --W 14 9 ..2 ·,1 3:f ~ · 1 - . - Wil: .26„9 *7. - COX DATE t.,-- REVISIONS . 18* 4,· 3 .- t.j 4.1*,04)~~~.W2# Ililif:~'f~~~43413,,p--4.:~%SE;~--..#94,4 *.--.,.:** : :..i:6. ..4;£:...,..fi.. . .1 .43 . .4.:,- :%-.:~ :~Bj4 - - .*M72 :. :* r-7 24-~ F.7: EXISTING i €01*.P.*ffet-)3~33*ft*,~I~:.~'rf?3.3.- ~.297*~·~·,:-3(il...3>Y.,K, ..41%3~,-·.·.ec~~i;Pi·f?2<0 4~39'f·.> 2 0...1.." #provw~ . 41€4¥4 6.l...)~--(1~~* , NORTH ELEVATION . 4-0'.2. ·R-" -Ii·,42-{.ti,kir.:·:%1'·~~~ ~i.F':.54-96*1·· '·T:'3- .-.. · 1 0-i.:c: 4-1 3:20'*fc-·ers.'*.'i·- i 3*£.1:<· ~'AL°ff~:t.;"·' «.: J-· f:*.- ..·0'71.--N ·-41*74&9M.Ver'« ¤14.3- 4I ' I £ t. -I £.1:€4'·A,9 G 4.- . 4 %.2, : :44 11'hE 'V'I'V SNINNyld ON¥1 ONV 31:In1031IHOEIV m 'ONI 931VIOOSSV ONV 0110HNI=I DIAVO SnOH 3319081 03SOdO OVEALAILOG tan-~, · OVERLAY LOG SHEE' OVERLA¥ %, 0/94 '4* 017 Ilif F. dee .,0 0,3 '. A.4. .. P. '7 44 tr„ **, *va 3 *5961' %.t.·0. 0 --1 ZJ r U 2 6 00 <44:, . . bi V - 1 . i ASPEN MEADOWS z: PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING AVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. I .ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. I ~' '967&12, 4~2%7<#4 2' (~' ·i~*r ~ji*Q ~W N~31 H.L 0390dOW S OISIA H t cluo- ® 0 0 3 A 12 ¢ toe 111 1 11 LiLi77¥™b•,4. 24· , t,111111111111111111ill'liT![D MIN. ; ......00:p·rn 1-TT7# Il i 1 1#1 ll#lt i ll,lt l ll, r] i ll#Ii '1 I C 'i ~:11, R EL"IM,N ~L''l~Ir f.Ii# H :4':S:;il:u:*H:4':9::i- 1--UT v ~ 12 ilill,ilitililitilititilill /11.u_ I l.JI ] L I L#I l LI L/I l l.1 I t U l# 1111 : f l i l l l/f - 1 Il l.1 IllIttl|Illl!IlllII!IIIIIIUIIIILI I lilli 1 I lili I I lil i lill i I lili 11 Ifll I I Ill - - 11UI1111-11111!111111111111111UlllILI--7<--1 . ZI lu11111'1'llu LIUNLIWI:llfa .,- \1. 'i~"uii"""26'~4'Lun""~~ti nj~. !? 11 1)111,11111#111 11,111 "~" ·:':"r'·' lilli (1) l*%'tevEL -l~Ulll,ILJ,111114,111'11111 ,;21 1. ..~ 42|| u l ili 1 1 I I'll 1 lili It I.u-++++Fierrr~ 1 - me lil li Ill " Illi tlll Ill lillill lill I.1 - - - ~111~4~8;~~. 1 1.1~1 lilli I L11/111 111/1 I t.I I./1 '111 F lot ACMI141 I I lil ll I I Il ll I I ll l il i ll 1 \14$ 1 Id ~ 1.1,1.1.1.11.l #.1.1. t..1 lilli 111 '1~ 1"lilli I Ir,I r-41:·*Al'$£'U:,a:qfgar,Ar'!21!071 ILI I I LI LF Ill m Fy ~I) 8 UNS[*b 00% 9*S*®1"NMP?Bfrlir e e 0-- .1%*KQ* %66W.4444 11.111 lili 11' 1}1 1111111 lili lili 11 02=UN (15 #111 till 110'll'll, Il *ImiTIN*REEY reW*tgwaQ 111111'llill.1111111 1 1 11,111,1,111 0111111111 1 Mfituaton blanket II I U.10 I flyll Ilifill 1 1,Ilil L.I|#! [zE[r, j i i rn i r Pefl. draln *0 1 l i lli j 1 WriT-r Pr4'14| F '4--4· woon'm 1 ~~ 2 1~1~''' 14#~~ 1;~~i~i~ITII[d-11 4 .wooddlingle NORTH ELEVATION-T lr -- A)111# i ri-Nt• , rrTrn rn*#rn , , EXISTING GRADE ---4.- -1111.1,1 f ' HI 1 1 1.1 11 I f I. / Stonepaver SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0' --i-- Uj.U-J!.1 11.0 J.1 1 --0- -44496¥PT LOWER LEVEL ~ va 94 - 4':',·11~~4*44<. e: . ~ 4*S. 16 OVERLA'LOG- 1 44 2 00 17 4,«4 »iii j SMEE' - . 0% * OVERLAY % \ fil· d ' AL.£ f# 5.'1 - -- 40* -0 - - 4-944 6 0 € 4 , , 1 0. , , I e ..1 - i ...0 ' 1 1 - by ~ 0" - : '. "': -: -54rMEE,1 - a .8~~7- 01 - 0 E gil A 6,% :0,:-.18 lili!!!,ill,i,·.0,11 ,;;;~~N'I~;fl~~~ :11!-. :.·=;::/.·:1.1,e:·. P'•'11"'W•i;i ' 41 . , . 1 71': •ir•'linni-- 1 . . 4 '5; prK:Mii I - 0 , i ... ...m'i;'1~8192:,MN:·4,·. I · I , :/:' :.~.. I ,1.·!11!I,I,11,1,·lilli·'.Ill,il,Ir·15·· ... 1-W X %: ./.1:~;7;. . . 4 . - -241",21,1~~1~- ~1-4 - - I ·'lilli·:Ill·.··.1.Il~.1/1!1'1'1'1'1'11' 14: ,[M,E,i/8 il'.i:.,i:Ii,ii i ill'i:·:·:·: ? 1.'f ./.:S!!::.U'-5!!~i-,i:://···· 4 , Am:.'"./11'.,lilli,11%-· , .. .JI....1.,11/ • ' ' - .E:gia:i:,&*ii,m:idi#Mi 1®-4-14--1-6,4 in.. i 1_2' - 'At,im."61*61&"Ajill./.Mtii- 5~PES™ ttb'~2 ~ ' 4 ~~ r,um--r·c·~ L -Mi . , r,S: b S -29/ IZEFOMM/~tijaI~Mi.»~. ,:ri ·8'36 - -AJ 4 -2 .t r. 24:;%*9 jo@ . . r--ilm//1,-=Iff/Ma-/Ill'&1 ... 7:zarkih,4.33 10#.*gr - . , 6> \ 1. 6 -641 ,.. to £ 2/1 . I. E 02*=1040,9 ; to,1. 5 .. w -il:20 3 b 6. . ' 6 L- 1,6 Qsh M c.3.•31-32.u.*9 - h 1¥ »4"'-'tairr-2,4.- . J . .. -4 jff· blf·, ·AD 2 -A - :Ii}i,1, 67il:'.~W:/]1'KI:i:~ii-::- fin(jIi@; .. , If i - € IN...'90M!!I: .~~n I:. c.2: E: /'. / -5:/E~ii-'Mil:~i?N:~~i i. ':~i~i;ii:;i, E: , '- i '..99.1:mi.:'..:.:4.:.:.5.- ·tu.im ' i ·Niiall/!!!!Ulfil!!3 2 3.:.:i:.s:.:. .:fia!!! -- 1 ~ G.*83£*Bm*P:immi~~tt¥.14 . ; m-1<Ii!:iN'i: s:.HEF0~~~~' - - I?7*2923*';Priti././):'b=.f~532*232 - - 0 1 ~ *EfEE'Em=„5:71 ~ 'll=~8<$:;:~3 4//88'::· 11/;;i=i..,Ill' - IM -:r:11!Ill'll'111~ i. LE:.=:-:.!:1 1/ 1=.a, i ii=i.,tiwilli.j:'r·.i::6... - 6. ' 1.:i.i.;:;;Gilll!29!!11,2 : ':·.t - -- --- ./ tr#rfETi;FCAQGM - ' Ii- , 1 +T-E- rb k· ,»~L ' i~ 3 CD .:imi;i.Nim:Wilif ii i;.i!'!'!i..%0il·~ I .- . - 11 ASPEN MEADOWS '~~ W az .- :1 PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING 9 , , , , r DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. I ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. - . 1 4 lilli ] 1111 NOL[YA313 1 3 9NllSIX3 Mh*¥aljolv·.N.2 * ·,2 5. v.,u-.· ·-..*,: *.dRGiA#1%1£1&*&@264£2£d£ILWI<aw,6 . ' /469 IKA.* 1 ,- 03%,bor~ · 9 4 .. €1 . .63 ' 44 25*9 1 aeS 132 242 5- - rith · 1<8 1,- r469 r,35-- 9 td V r.':7 . C rdY' 1, , £ d fts .. 7 ' 4.F , 4 -Ap t . . I - ' F j R VISIONS DRAWN By PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION + . 1 1 - 1 ' 1.-. .......... ... 01 - 5 10 20 -,/ SMODV301 N3dSV SNISnOH 33180&11 0350dOEId 'VTV ONINNV1d aNV1 aNV 313 1031IHOEIV I '0 NI 931VIOOSSV ONV IN10HNI=I CIAVa OVERLA•tbG SHEET OVERLAY 0 0 0 - /Z1 99 94 * 1 ZN -2%. 2 X 10 - ® ==e====m 1 1,01*U Aul. 2 . .TE.2 -I-j=.» -1-- 1.1 - I 1 -»f -. E#,FweD -- ml-ilU-31JJUAUAA rk_ -1-1. 1, L Timber Ue - I Ill I retaMIng wall , RM: AYMAT/1TF Elsing grade * 10~-0, .-- -.~#E»NINe,69(m t ~ EAST ELEVATION 7~ JI SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0' AAE€ 1 \ v ¥ LOWERtEVEI~ r C MIN#BlE ta« ·UBWEL m - i f ' -- -~ ASPHAU SH;NGLE -I .--g~i- Il-- --- - -lill--I-) I- I--------i-*LI--1- -- WEN ROOF ___22~3*51~22=72203*E=.=*.------ - - -- ------- ----- -- STRUCTUm R-40 MIN - _- ____~ EnSTINGROOF STRUCTURE - METAL FLASHING 2*8 FASaA.PAINTED DETAIL SIMILAR .:'.1. I. ..64>\.> TO EXISTING -- 1 imh I. u ·4· ·5··:·I ti · .1.1...1. ./ 1:.!. :1 4\V\.:f.. I \\. 9.»:4 ...». - ...- +---- 1 h.3 0 0 -G- NEW FASCIA 2*12 PAINTED ' MATCHES SIZE ' 8,52·66 , OF EXISTING 114 TaG PAINTED METAL FLASHING ; 1*4 TSG FNNTED - FIXED GLASS BALCONY DETAILS 82.RBS TO MATCH EXISTING 2„12 PAINTED - 1 --- 1 , 11 1 DECIaNG & FLOOR 1 r~ '' ' JOISTS/BALCONY 1 ·' .NOT SHOWN FOR , 11 11 1 01, 0 . : -' r.' C!3 i t .. ©, - z GLASS ' DOOR FDED GLASS 1, ' ·, a 3 i i IWOOD & i 0 i 1 , I it i W WINDOW TRIM SIZES · Ill r : 11 1 . TO MATCH EXISTING · 1 11 U . 1 .. (C CEDAR SHINGLES 8-T.W. fi ;,! CO 1 . .. 1 . -........-. 0 NEW ENTRY BEYOND if' O 1.- I . 4 1: I DRAWN BY REVISIONS PARTIAL ELEVATION SHOWING NEW ENTRY and MATERIAL DETAIL RELATIONSHIPS ALL DRANWASS AT 3/451'-7 11 . 1 WALL SECTION thru ENTRY ROOF PLAN @ END WALL WALL SECTION thru END WALL , i 'Vl'V DNINN¥ld ON¥1 ONV 3WA1031IH0UV 'ONI 931VIOOSSV ONV ZI10HNI:I CIAVO SMOCIV3V,1 N3dSV OVERLAY tOG S"1E, OVERLA¥ ...,V. 1 + 1 -L 4 -1 Itic -4 - 4 9 » . .. It. y e ~1 1 . 4 + i '''t .%*Ali,< Ff & ~ ... 31 , I 4,111'.11111.1 . 1 . 22/ ///1 /~<~/ 11 .€~ ft. 4* . 7.1,· ~ . 14/:':»Sr. ./904 ' : 74. EAST ELEVATION FROM DRIVEWAY , 4. AW i 4 4 I : i il '' 4 . 13 61 r 1 1., «,2 VII lili 13*+ -4. : 9 ./. 42 .7: I f.. 045~-' Vjk. A ! »1:K€ 1,t 1 4:8*4% 2 394/ 68> 1 1 14!12. 1 & 4 'b ' 16 : 1 1 1/ · I lip r .41 1 ..$ I 4 . 1 f -1 --J 4 '. L 1. 4~ ·firy . ..2.5 1/r 6 f ..9 . If''t . 14*Ar.:4~ *f,-4«kqi-Nt--1....5....., , -9. 0 '4'' ~407 ' 3 . 4 +43 1 r . ~- · 1 U > 1.* 1-,P 1 e * 1- 7 41 ' ' .14.4. r .... 1 11 '1 > -. . . %, .1.>: 9 9 . 6 1 . ..4 : 2 - .& 1 - . 1 - 0 ¥ .... . 1 1. .1 4 1 0% . 1-11 1 1 lit 1 4.-31111~1'tr- 1 -'L_. -1 + 2,22 * 4#WI/71154 V . 1 .1/1 4- 1,4 1 1 ' 1 11 4 15 r'Yk --1 - 1 1 - . - 444* s . , J t.. ; 49·. 2.4~2 - I -- I - 1. S - P 32 ASPEN MEADO S 6 17 Z ... ' 0 1 PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING DAVID FINHOLM AN ASSOCIATES INC: I ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. ..5,4. 0 1%.t OVEAL•¥lbs . - SHEET OVERLAY ./ ' C , •. 4 '01111 - - - 1 4 J.*It 4 7./.'. 14Z ... - r. :2424> . 4 i • 1, I:y. imz 4.. t.j: Y 11 4 fimiN 0 +r, 1!*~ 1 . 11 ¢ 0 p 14 4 :i 1 1 ..1 1 . 1.- . 1 4 SOUTH ELEVATION / ...CU ./. .... :*1 484,6 1 - m - 1 1 + V 1.. 1 1 6 11. '# '/.1&'I'.'I:I'' I.'... '' *' 9 + 1 /02:44.-'.1 . . I ..../ SOUTH ELEVATION moo .' I. Off i S . . . a.tr . 4 1 . .1 . . .. . 95 ASPEN MEADOWS :I 1 PROPOSED TRUSTEE HOUSING i DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC: 1 ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A. • Z *f. F. : » SNOISI S„EE, - OVERLAY + ff/**R"fi-64%~#i#6*0&7 0.*I --~;--~4194i-4474* -*- - ..4.0,144-V.- 23't ~ - - . 12 1 SO + :AL, : - r 111 i lili J -1 * , 1 I+</f I . - WEST ELEVATION I I . ' 1 11 1 „ i 41?: 4,1. 11 1 IT.,110 . 1: 1 1/1.1 1 %1 1. 1.9.1, 1 1,9. P,yl, 1, 1, . 1 , , 1* 1 7, 1 6-112'lilli'11 1 , 1 I '-I........... ' 4 - I .7.-r 40, ' i $ • 0 1 1. , - I. - 1 - 5'J I / € 1 12 If I 6 .'9·: t.~*~ ' 4 *41/1, 1 t .24.. bEV+ - , ·· , f 6 pr ..0-, I . 24* '* + I 1 . I . . .1 44 a 44 V ... -R , : .-u 11.4..7...... 0 -- 1 2 11. I.- I I ./* '.'':.'. lilli , 14 4~"1 . . 1 0 ./ . 1./. '•v I i. * : , :7: 0 ,4. = .. a .... 1 A At,4 I. 4. , fEr*'1'6*' :49. , 3 + -- 0*71 19/416"Il/NI'll//1/MENBK#SI.ims/1*- . ciY I:1-43'"'Bm'%""awgy*ki"*.*AF" ..+1-„„w...~#19¢1 =-ifia · i . . 0 1 4.1 . ' :'..·i.4*8 '9: . - An//Igill./..m.........4#:&'. /.' · . <4.:;::/Awirb. - 4 1 - , '..4 1 Q. €· 1,' WEST ELEVATION t · 1 ./ 1:14 - 0.:440 . t il . 6 , U $ ..1 :' t 10111§1@F, -: 1 & 0.66102'. • AM ' -• 24 ///// i i f·PI+tz€k, 11~. 5. 4 fm -- + . - 1., av • * ---- it .* 1 9, Lwaimm "'mijUR#248&-eloig#43' 044% .:* .. .V , .1 L............/...£££.............Fiqutz*g. 4 ... , 7i ASPEN MEADOWS 5 . - 1 PROPOSEQ~RUSTEE HOUSING DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC.' 1 ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.LA. 'Met, ..'ll t,2 .... SNOISIA . .... Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of May 8, 1991 5) Fencing visible from the street shall be restudied and perhaps moved one or two feet back and look at an alternate ' solution of vegetation. The fence can be whatever on the west side. 6) 7' rear yard setback variation, finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with himensional requirements. 7) Parking reduction of one space, finding that the maximum number of parking spaces have been planned on site. The parking space in the front yard shall be eliminated and re- vegetated as proposed. Motion second by Glenn. All in favor, motion carries. Les Holst will be the project monitor on 214 W. Bleeker. i THE MEADOWS - RESIDENTIAL ONLY . Roxanne: I have reiterated the conditions of conceptual approval in the memo and have responded to them. The Planning Office is recommending approval of the meadows with conditions to be approved by Staff and the Meadows sub-committee of the issues that were not yet met for their final approval. 1) Detailed preservation plan needs clarified for the Trustee townhomes. 2) Palate of materials. 3) Amendments to the design. 4) dbvenants to more clearly define the massing, scale and articulation issues. 5) Clarification of the material treatment of the end walls and party walls and clarification of the tennis townhomes west elevation regarding correct scale of door and windows. 6) Clarification of tennis townhomes regarding balcony snow removal. Perry Harvey: Lets discuss the Tennis townhomes, Trustee and then the single family homes. Nickie and David Finholm presented materials and responded to all concerns of Staff as presented in the memo May 8, 1991 j(attached in records). Nickie: The snow removal of the Tennis townhomes will consist of 5 ..4 C Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of May 8, 1991 all internal drainage. The north/south wall is designed to be a rubble wall. The partition walls are done in the rubble also. The tennis townhome parking is the same design as the Trustee houses with the earth berm and use of natural soil. The curb of the berm is similar to Anderson Park. Natural vegetation will be incorporated. Bill: The Board is in approval of the Tennis townhomep. David: On the townhouses, three units were added. We have also created earth landscaping. We will remove all the stairs and keep the window detailing exactly like it is. The fascia is shingle. We would like to change the color of the roof asphalt singles which are silver color now to a darker color (cedar mix). Bill: Changing the color doesn't effect the historic nature of the structure. I would think the color selection is up to the applicant. David: There is room for two cars in the covered parking and one on the side. i' All the architecture is glass with sun control. Bill: The Board unaminously approved the Trustee homes. . Perry Harvey: I will discuss the single family homes. Regarding the covenants we will have a design review committee. This is an R15 zone. Council had requested that we lower the lots to 12, 000 sq. ft. We have created building envelopes that range from 61 to 64 hundred feet which is down to an R6 lot. After reduction of rear yard setbacks etc. we have created 30 foot combined side yard setbacks. This creates view planes of the Meadows as you come in. The homes are a little over 4000 sq. ft. and the accessory dwelling units are 500 sq. ft. We are.going to market' the lots. Roger: Do the covenants state that you can't build a linear box. Perry: It talks about creating movement. Bill: The City in their attempt to protect sage meadow is forcing them into a box which is going to create a design which is a box. In your architectural review committee you might force the buildings to be more irregular. The buildings along that area in the west end are less rigid and in your guidelines if you require that you get a little more interest and vitality and avoid the "wall". < Les: Who is the design review board for this project? 6 ..A / Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of May 8, 1991 Perry: Us as the developers with input from the Institute and the property owners and David and Nickie Finholm. Les: I would suggest that there be one member of the HPC on the Board. Bill: Board unaminously approved the single family homes and recommendations to Staff and to the applicant. Bill: Trees along the rear property line would be a help in reducing the massing and soften the area. Bill: All the conditions for final have been met. Bill: We have reviewed the palate of materials and color for the residential portion and a condition of this approval would be that the palate of materials and colors still need to be submitted for the meadows. MOTION: Glenn made the motion that we grark-final development approval for#the residential portion of the meadows as submitted; second by Roger. ·All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Les made the motion that the outline for the single family parcels is appropriate with the recommendations that were made to Staff during the meeting; second by Glenn. All in favor, motion carries. 601 W. HALLAM - DELETION FROM INVENTORY George Vicenzi: I received notice from Jed Caswall that the building permit is illegal and I feel it is alive and well. Staff was concerned about setting a precedent and I don't feel that is a problem because no one can ever equal the same situation that I have due to Ord. #17 is now in effect and would preclude anyone from getting a demo permit to any structure that you are interested in. Most of the house was built after 1910 and has no historic interest. It was moved to this site and was vacant up until 1960. George: I will not go* into facts as to why this house has no historic value. The main factor is that the old house which is the·gabled end, south side of the house is pre 1910 and does have minimal historic value (the bay window on the east side). The victorian porch was added by myself and I did the dining room in 1970. 70% of the building wasn't eveh constructed prior to 1910. j The part that was constructed before does not have historical value. It also has no historical value to the neighborhood l . because it was moved there in the 60's and on a vacant lot. This 7