The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19940913AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE September 13, 1994 REGULAR MEETING BOCC ROOM FIRST FLOOR COURT HOUSE 5:00 I. Committee and Staff Comments Approval of July 13th, 1994 minutes II. Public Comments III. OLD BUSINESS 5:15 A. 930 King Street- Partial Demolition - /)*-jk Kt. Ley + /jan rhion, 40 r, IV. NEW BUSINESS 5:45 A. 323 W. Main Street, Aspen Medical Center- Minor Er>-h <97<, A<6-1 5:55 B. 610 W. Hallam Street, Iglehart- Landmark DesignationA,yc-73* 2<- 6:05 C. Round II, Re-evaluation of the the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"- Public Hearing 7: 00 VI. PROJECT MONITORING dE; - ,ry,/l <i.-n ./C?) C/5/21 J 2'-C<_,~_<~~ /')''~C,Sid~~P-,tic Si:.664(,-4- 7:10 VII.ADJOURN SITE VISITS: Please site visit the following properties being evaluated for the Inventory on your own or meet at the side door of City Hall promptly at 12:00, Tuesday, September 13. Call to confirm if you will be there. East Aspen: 1031 E. Durant, 1020 E. Hyman, 990 E. Hyman, 824 E. Hyman Shadow Mountain: 101 E. Hopkins Smuggler Mountain: 230 N. Spring, 860 Gibson West End: 831 W. Bleeker, 305 W. Hallam, 401 North, 327 W. Hallam, 1 205 W. Bleeker a Lfo XLÂ« -4 HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Project/Committee Joe Krabacher 801 E. Hyman AHS Ski Museum Aspen Historic Trust-Vice Chairman 612 W. Main 309 E. Hopkins (Lily Reid) 617 W. Main 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Highway Entrance Design Committee Donnelley Erdman The Meadows (Chair-Sub Comm) 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) Collins Block/Alley Wheeler-Stallard House 624 E. Hopkins 304 E. Hopkins 234 W. Francis 204 S. Mill - Collins Block 220 W. Main - European Flower Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Museum (alt.) In-Town School Sites Committee Aspen Historic Trust-Chairman 824 E. Cooper 210 S. Mill 303 E. .Main Alt 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) City Shop - 1080 Power Plant Road 506 E. Main - elevator Jake Vickery The Meadows (alternate) In-Town School Sites Committee 205 S. Mill Larry Yaw 716 W. Francis 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer-alt.) 204 S. Galena (Sportstalker) City Hall 627 W. Main (residential-Jim Kempner) 232 E. Hallam ACES City Shop 1080 Power Plant Road St. Mary's Church windows Roger Moyer CCLC Liaison 334 W. Hallam Aspen Historical Society 409 E. Hopkins 303 E. Main - 311 W. North Farfalla lights outside 210 Lake Avenue (alternate) 3 Marolt Museum Karen Day Rubey Transit Center 334 W. Hallam (alternate) Cottage Infill Program 134 E. Bleeker 435 W. Main Swiss Chalet 311 W. North 304 E. Hopkins 121 S. Galena Martha Madsen 620 W. Hallam (alternate) 100 Park Ave. (alternate) 214 W. Bleeker (alternate) 132 W. Main 520 E. Cooper Unit 406 715 W. Smuggler Linda Smisek 134 E. Bleeker 210 Lake Avenue 305 Mill St. Tom Williams 130 S. Galena - City Hall 300 W. Main - fence McDonalds Scott Samborski 702 W. Main - Stape - Conceptual Development approved Sept 8, 1993 220 W. Main - European FLower Market Final April 20, 1994 . CUNNINGHAM INVESTMENT CO,. INC. SUITE 201 4 40 121 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-8803 September 9, 1994 Historic Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: No Problem Joe Property Additional Review by the Historic Preservation Committee Dear Committee: Please find enclosed the revised plans for the new structure on the property. We want to make it clear that we are submitting this material in the spirit of cooperation to the Historic Preservation Committee. Specific to the design plan, you should be aware that we have lowered the height of the structure approximately two feet as shown on the elevations. We have made significant changes to the vertical elevations, both in terms of windows and horizontal bands to further reduce the sense of mass and scale. We have further added additional porches both on the north side of the main house, and significantly to to the entry on the breezeway to further soften the relationship between the historic structure and new structure. We believe that virtually every Neighborhood Guideline for the East Side, as enumerated in your document guidelines, have been met. We are submitting the information related to the new structurd on a advisory review basis only for mass and scale of the new structure. While the Historic Committee clearly does not have the right to review this material (which has been stated to us by both the city attorney and city manager), we are making this material available to you. This material is submitted for your advisory review only and will not bind the applicant to any restrictions concerning the new structuret We are therefore submitting this material under the stipulation that your motion of the prior meeting be clarified to state that your review of the mass and scale of the new structure is advisory only in content and shall not bind the applicant. We want you be aware that our plans are the plans that we expect to build with and that we do not feel that; there will be any significant changes to design after this point. We Historic Preservation Committee September 9, 1994 Page 2 also want you to realize that your request for review of the new structure has cost us more than $5,000, many days of architectural effort and my time, in order to get submission as requested by you. We trust that you will accept this application and that the appropriate consideration will be made to the overall plan. Sincerely, I. McA. Cunningham, President Cunningham Investment Co., Inc. IMC:pjh 48 Â·ft cÂ«,i *K cc: Gibson Reno Architects 1 0.71 6 0 --6/,O W, tifk L u-~-=U--' '~ 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of September 1, 1994 Meeting was called to order by chairman Joe Krabacher with Jake Vickery, Les Holst, Roger Moyer, Tom Williams and Martha Madsen present. 930 KING STREET Mac Cunningham Roger: I would prefer to make a motion to where we approve the partial demolition and relocation with conditions and that the applicant accept those conditions and can proceed with the project. Personally I would rather deal with this applicant as I feel he can do a teriffic job and I have confidence in him. If we had a model we would understand completely. This is so close to working that it is not a big deal. I had to make it a big deal when I spoke before to get the point across that these things and falling through the cracks and Council has to do something and at the same time we cannot penalize the applicant because he has played by the rules. We are the ones that are putting all the time in it and are not winning. We need to take a forceful stand and try to make something work for Mac. Dave Gibson, architect: If you could set it up so that the monitor could review subsequent refinements. 1 Joe: Usually this is a one step application and if you have a condition who determines whether it has been fulfilled. Roger: Conditions are usually determine in cases like this by monitor and Staff. Joe withdrew his motion. MOTION: Joe made the motion, the same motion to include the approval of the partial demolition and relocation with the conditions that the same elements be restudied and approved by Staff and monitor. Martha: How can this be approved by just the Staff and monitor and so many other projects come in for more review. Jake: I am for having them come back to the committee. 1 Amy: It depends on what the approval means. Joe: Usually a significan development requires a conceptual and a final hearing before the HPC. This project because it is a partial demolition and relocation is just a one step process so technically there is only one hearing before the HPC. Jake: We actually have the ability to require anything we feel that is necessary. Joe: This is a one step process. Amy: I think it is extremely important on the historic house that the applicant work with Staff and monitor about the preservation of the existing materials and existing boards. Joe withdrew his motion. BIO'TION: Roger made the motion that the HPC grant partial demolition and reloction to 930 King Street as proposed by the applicant with the following conditions: a) That the applicant provide a detailed plan of renovation of the historic structure to include preservation of boards and reuse of materials on site taken from the other buildins and types of finish. b) That the driveway be taken from in front of the historic structure and moved within reasonable boundaries so to not implicate in front of the building. c) That the ligage from the historic structure to the main house be restudied and softened. d) That the applicant provide a model showing the new house in conjunction with the historic and I think that will really show that the mass and scale will really work. e) That the applicant deal with the verticality of the new structure that it is shown either through a breakup of large walls and positioning of siding and so on, that that is taken away and it becomes more of a residential type of home. f) That a restudy of the dormers be done and the massing to be Â· looked at but left at the discretion of the applicant as to how to deal with it. The restudy of the massing and dormers should be more consistent with what is in the neighborhood guidelines for residential areas. g) The project will be reviewed with monitor and Staff and brought back to the committee for final approval. Motion was second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Jake: The dormer on the south elevation, the north side of the west elevation and the north elevation are my concerns. Tom: The model does not need to be detailed just showing the mass. Les: The Board should work with the applicant and if they need a special meeting we can do one. . Mac: Everyone has a different interpretation of the guidelines and I am very concerned that we are the ginnie pig to this. I know what you want and I agree 100% and I do not like some of the structures that were done either. j . L NEAL AVENUE - -1- . -- - -THITF77-Â·----7-~--- r I '1:'3~'W \\\V -r.Ohe AMEA 11 'af"al 11 11 lilli r. 3 ' rha 1,1 b UN- 11 1 pi,#m, PROPOSED RESIDENCE OR P# 0 trn.111Â· 411 0,4.lu)11 5 1111 LU ' 1 *fÂ·pr CO 11,1 1111 0 lillit 2 /h ov--!Illill~~' - C j J i . 640#& HOUSE t' 1) - / ' rÂ·LX_ / 3...1--'==-7 11 1/4 -i ..' c. c -- -11:, (1 -1 1 + 1 11:1 G~~4 < .- 2 j! . 1 9 - . - 4 / 10 1.19 . - ; it:'i L./ Â· -1 00 f .... . 0 .1- 1 1 LD) A-8 1 GARAGE Mmome< i --\ 1 i . f L_i iqnMEP+E ~ ** U . n f / r i.3 ... ....4 0 ni lilli 111 . N *lili 8.3 f -I# I ~~rn e .~ . I . <-j isy ;0#* ID 16â€¢*arhLÂ· Â· 8,23 6.- ,\ 2,&*U.&/4 <Nf . Wi a,14 . 1 - >--)<--1 . -3=--14.46==11.=,1-~ 11,2- SITE PLAN 0 5 10 20 40 FT. 930 KING STREET Joe NO: ~4-2.6 REVISION: OAAVVN : ITT- ASPEN, COLORADO SCALE , Als 51-0/4,4 DATE: 1/1/94- CHECKED: AGg GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS ASPEN. COLORADO , 81611 0 COPYRIGHT 19_3Â£ die EAST COOPER AVENUE TELEAÂ·40~: ~;0~-~8 f 1-1 C<- % - -- 7 NOTES ON HISTORIC STRUCTURE 7 1. Reuse existing siding or provide new siding to match existing 2 Doors and windows to be of same â€žze and proportion to match exi,ling. ~ existing 3. All door and window trims to malch ---- , 4. Corner trim and fiscia tim to rnatch existing. 3. Replace wood shiogles as required to 6. Replace stone at chimncy as required match existing. - to match existing. SOUTH ELEVATION -, _13 E- ----1--- -1.,C=========================~.--1,~ WEST ELEVATION El--=E-- P5244/9-Immv.53Â£F. - =2.1/ NORTH ELEVATION r----1 1 1Â»liLLP #tp=L--= ilrll- 411 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS 0 5 10 20 930 KING STREET OAAWN : 47- 2.212.Qi_.222/-- AEVISIONÂ· REILE: M-7- ASPEN, COLORADO SCALE 6 6 I. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 O COPYA,GMT 19_21= /lB CAST COOPER AVENUE T-ELE-N ~;~~38 -El l#1~ CONNOR / TAPPUNE OFFICE REMOPEL ,~ THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PO ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENeINEERS ABBREVIATIONS MATERIALS SYMBOL LIBRARY SHEET INDEX COVER ~~~1112 AF.F. EARTH METAL /--1-- 015./. ...... St'TI~/ AC.T Ee_:7,â€¢e A LAâ‚¬rr râ€¢â€¢0~E P~~â€¢Â·*4 A=-1 METIC>â€¢ Al.0 INFORMATION SHEET S Â»/ *ho.+02 Al= Ry'El [77-1 ' 10577/2.5Â¤0 STEEL- 211 EXIST1Ne FLAQR P~S / Trl<OLm,I PMS /.ROHITEOWRAL ~RÂ£,41. . el -Drr,c_ Au'llin 01.2 EXIST,16 FLOOR: PLANS / DEMOLETON PLANS =96 11Â¤It=:1 An.1 RENOVATON PLANS emOTOÂ· FU O- loorws 6 INSULATION C-EER :S .62.2 RENOVATION FLÂ»IS CLO. IYMÂ»41 ,/-~L_-PETAL ...... AB.1 EXISTÂ»46 NORTH / Fâ‚¬ST E-EVATIONS / DEMOUTION THEODORE K GUY O -ho BATT DET.4- Mâ€¢A. j ~1._â€¢â€¢e=r r.,,- P_,4 21 V 63.2 5<5TNe SOUTH / EAST ELEVAnoNS / DEHOLmoN ASSOCIATES PC - 08: r.:::1 lili! ba.3 NORTH / reST ELZVATIONS , IXT/L ,. ,*,3.4 SOUTH / EAST ELEVATYPNS Vi.IVEL *160 . I MROATTEOTS NAD M.1 BUILDÂ»46 SECTIONS HASONRY FWISees , STRUCJURAL ENGINEERS EJAL UrrAL . El_Ev. C,l EL- f//1 1 * EK'MT i ,-~_Drrk M.â€¢Â·erâ€¢ EXTrRUS. EXT BUOCA 61-~-SUM DC*MKED R*neu tx... F.O. BOX 1640 MX 29&6"o' 23280 Hrer. 62 BASALT, Ca-DQASÂ© 51621 21, r"0,1 PHO'E (303) el-3161 3~EM,%â€¢U. 80-0 3~eNE ago. FLIOTER FAX (303) 427-4513 HT. KOOF 54.Or 5/=MAL +IC'Klzz E nimm Ide.-ATO. slot - TLE 22 m.rv './'%. tr rvAT.,4 Ly 00-0- 9%:T=*=TE 4 F7599 1Â·â‚¬5>.545;1 04 CENTER IEE ~Â· â€¢2â€¢WALT STONE .... EL.E FEEEZEEEâ‚¬EBEEE' :1,1,1'IJ,1),1/' *=3,Â·â€¢SCO CO~*DRET-C G.K-5 ea,RED MISC YOOD RE- recorts"ea 0 ==7 m. lf:ambl 02/m ~12'A lize, YNQA~r rthMS,4 OVERMIUMIHe 67_ *== m.-EV. hUâ€¢13â€¢=q 5121- t.erY r~â€¢ele.DR~,*4 STPS. wr. L /4.-2 t2 144_ T.M.H I* FLATE :kiI- ~ T.O. LEIÂ»E 17 Or â„¢â€¢LL Tar/6 42.,ev. 423*~= [mil .'...../'t.râ€¢ TIVICAL L'.)4.0. <NOR.-WI Vl; vexT. v'EXT/c.4- *20 Fgz=;09 Vl//1. r,kl CO/50â€¢16 #.9......ANT rt. PL*Ov Ill,<)/ -O r,rrw re eOCID 261: 521Â£!65 SITE / BUILDING DATA ------- ----------------- BUILEÂ»le OCCUPANCY *ROUP BROUP 5, DIVISION 2 MUAFU! fOQIÂ£%~ - UPPER LEVEL 1482 S.F. ATD LEYE 213 5.F. CONNOR - TADOUNE Â§ g OFFICE REMODEL 2222 LeD 1991 UPE 1991 5Â§- 323 Fâ‚¬ST MAIN STR.MET Neeth, CO..OUDO tim Joe . 44122 EX,4*t PRO CHECâ€¢<EI>. FÂ»RINTED: 02-31-44 21~L.Imt INFORMATION SHEET , Di ' 2 111 Al.0 I 3 CO~-rKÂ»IT T,foooN K evr ,asoc,â€¢Tes Fc. ~MEF & 03-103310 39 d-lAOHS SakilrIDN[ 11 1 1-1 1 Ill r 1 1 1 1......................... THEOPORE K GUY ..p-'1................... Â· . :1: ASSOCIATES pC - N ARGHTTECTS Â»10 STRUCTURAL ENGNEERS UNIT 3 ~ P.O. BOX 1640 23280 +4rrr. 22 O , I 9,6ALT, COLOUâ€¢30 eleal - P,40â‚¬ (BOB) â‚¬21-3161 :4 FAX (303) Cl-4813 i '........ . m.$...:. 1 r ~==41 i t, .r it ' --Dimmm : 11 1 1 PEÂ· tâ€¢P E .6'mâ€ž.....1 fel ~ REMOVE DOST,445 81,112 Â»ZIg , .1, 2,0 â€¢107 , i 'FL'~71~EE'~~ET"3.1,~b~.DI<KE'ir'KLE.,asj - 7 E- E--1. 1 Ft El__ -Â»'-3 3/m- /Im/nme //innllii-0.U..ULULiULU,-~LLUiugu.ulu . I------* f Â»:XEP%m$Mst .. E ..3 - fili i p * Â«1 - i "Â·REA UT FLOOK AS .. E.d5Tle ST//c/1/1 82104 i 4 / ATCH Â¢ RES ICI</ EX:5â„¢6 , FLOCK. nâ€¢415. 0 (21-Â»16 ~!hÂ·-31â€¢merls / 1L , WB-Tr 10 0-134â€¢46 TO iE' 1=*-Il : ~ .w),DI,10â€ž 0,4 : ::------ E-\ \ 4 M i UNT 1 : r - Â· Â· . i ~ 1 I#-40,1 eMING \ Â· \ 1 Shâ€¢-S A,C C.e' \J..0/09 ./../.- i / 1 Z85#JA El El / / ;*-- 262 KEâ€¢Â·!AFf/5 Â·Â· . : 1*jilr/'4'~ .: : u,pr -------.----------------- .,1 d 1 ] 1 0 00-= De-AL- ST.. -------.----------------- ~ ~ ~ CONNOR - TAPPUNE OFFICE REMODEL ' ' ' 923 VEST MAIN STR/=T 1 1 1 1 1 1 - COLORADO UPPER FLOOR PLAN LOFNER FLOOR PLAN A=\ JoE3. 44122 0 1/4-â€¢1'47 0 1/40â€¢1'.C 02-31-44 .. PEMOLIT1ON LEGE}O pEDÂ·401-mON NOUS _ EXSTNG FLOOR PLAN / IPEMOUTION FLAN e=:=== E,<STINS 7%112_ 1 ALL 6YPSUM BOARD *CO BATT TO REMAN INSU_A'nON I EXTE,*JOR,Â»L.LS TO BE REMOVED. l 2 OF'ENNES AT REMOvED reCO'e SHALL BE #dFU.ED viTH 2% YO. 5 FVâ‚¬-1- DOCX STUD F464.1- TO MATCH EKSTING 1 1: OR AWPOA TO eUe.IÂ»16 CONST&)CTOR ? E â€¢e,evâ‚¬z> RALLS TO BE FTNE+ED TO MATCH EASTIN6. 01.1 I Ken re*.1. c.orr~Â»,rr Dâ‚¬ODOME K 64Â¥ ASSÂ©<36kltS FC 1-I~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·0!==[k{I=E} nâ€ž,â€ž.-+I >............................... cm= ./---.--.- ........................ lit I - - THEODORE K GUÂ¥ ASSOCIATES PO ~ROâ‚¬EOTS MID STRUCTURAL ENG INBERS FLO. 13OX 1640 23280 â€¢Â·rrÂ¥. 82 BAeALT. COLOÂ»OPO 816:21 -ObE (309) â‚¬1-3161 : FAX COS) Cl-403 O 41 -- Msâ€¢IM Exenes t.Â£77 OTR.~Tlee ROLS I NATOHED IRJEe k 8-40*L Al PATOW i â€¢OSTORE EWST-he la- : 4 ---4,4 /1 1%////A 1 It-.\- .2/:/1/7/////A 1/ 1//*,161 4/j / fill/// Villl'll 40/ --11 Url/-//1ffIN--- Â· 26IZ 522252 \lilli lilill.\ I ------- 7 I l lil UJ I l 493~,4 ------- ------- ' . -I ./ .. . ------- ------- ' ' ' CONNOR - TAPEXINE OFFICE REMOPEL 523 FEST MAN STREET ke'51, CÂ£*-Da.KKD - 1 1 1 ATTIC, FLAN JOS â€¢Â· 44122 â€¢ 1/44 1'47 I,FOâ€¢1*t Oâ‚¬IXED: P. 02-31-44 2~[.Im.+ EXISTING FLOOR PLAN / DEMOUTION PLAN 1 1 31.2 COPâ€¢fnesâ€¢ MT T,ed,DORE K 6/r kle> PC i:i:lIE, - :i i:imii:i:, lEÂ·:- -::1Hnm:Nunmmnmm nA.L re 65 44*12 r 1 1 1 I â€¢- 0... nr'p.) L 1 e 'FE~r ' r A - THEODORE K GUÂ¥ - ~-: r. r. ' L ASSOCIATES PC. - OFFICE : ARGHTTECTS AND UNIT 3 OFFICE ; 4 ; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS f OFFICE 1 BATT NSUL./770* Â· ~ Ierld FLU : NIML_ PaÂ¥ ~ ' P.O. 190*1640 : 937220V4Y<. 81 â€¢ t BAVLT. COLORADO eleal :01=1~ . . 9 Fa (ace,â€¢cri-.8,8 9 Â®Ii a M... 1 , R tâ€ž,-JJ 2-1Lf> ..1 111111,1 /4 'LeN t?>6>-i .4 . - 'IlllIlll ~ , 21= PLO' ; L-- 4 -"-2 17 Y , dll ~ a. 1,1143 sm- : -1 41 2. *. - - f 157 .1.02_ 9-RPR.Ae= TIf/.I,/~Ille'l#...jvmizil.In i Il [~ IE giC,OR:K.~[â‚¬9.- j.) ' 1 1 , SECRE-THR\AL ' i . : i i -Â· GREk= '*mf \1 Ill i -- -HBATH-? -OÂ»7-~ - Â· Â· Â· -- - -~--~- 7 1 i n 11 Itdi I dj 13 - 0~ * F=-03"-~ 9 1 UNIT 2 $ CONFERENCE / i Ll b LIBRARY 4 6 1 .1 i g: 1 i .h 1 01 : 5. .li . r 1 , , 4 & il\\\2 =g=r.L-L 6/ il -@- 9 UNIT 1 k R 7, 1- 9/25Â· *20 Ploc~ 1,~4> \* IT 1 B- 9042-1Â· X i 1 / L 5-cÂ· 1 03Â·-1 i .. .ch= 3 4> 4> 11 ~ 1, '. /81 2&= 622â‚¬a 1~ OFFICE O-2 UFFER R ----- ---- ---------- 1 Ems* 111Â© (6.0.5.) w ------- -9 rt . . ----- - -0--------------- I I U Ily v UU - I. Of'346. Ct,r EDerÂ» 5-2*10 *PR , heD, FLA *----.----------/ r . IO NS 1 44. NO PV 1010 4 â€¢*Rs. ar'. +0â€¢ <5. Â£ 1.......=Ort MEUP VEâ€¢U-Â¥ St/70<T - - ----- Â·--- ----- - -- ---- --, 1su Â·ro,eÂ· Aâ€ž. ~ Chi /,0. Bet.Clt 7- CONNOR - TADDLINE 1 L 2.* . ~ i I Y~ OFFICE REMODEl- 1 1 38.4- , L 1/-4 1,-Â· 3, 24-1 10- 0-0 , 523 YEST MAN STRET 1 1 , Aaeâ€¢EN, Câ€¢OLD,RAPO 1 1 1 UPPER FLOOR PLAN / *CALâ€ž) LOYNER FLOOR PLAN AR - .# 1'< 0 v4'â€¢ r-O' JOS . 44m IPRAP+t DRD D. r,6452 06-310/4 RENOVATION NOTES rbi TTDON / MALL- t.feENIP GENERAL NOTES 2~L.Imt 1. ALL- EXTBUPR FW.1.5 TO BE 1 :30 ,Â·C,r,CALE t,G,-66 - C<Â»trACT .1-Of,TECT./.rÂ»â€¢6*2== COÂ»Â·C2MÂ»* gi= 9051Â»46 VULL R25'heULâ€¢JCD r,TH R-,1 BATT C~G~=â€¢154625 OR ..fe,~46 ~~c)~,â€¢~Ah,4 RENOVATION FL,41 ,4,A.~TOâ€¢l. :2 6<3Â»-tr r,TH ILL //PLOISLE BLA://96 ODGeS NO CO,/O-4 Drnâ€¢ MAIrM,AL *IO 90//miu >â‚¬ry reu- eckir.ert ...../.crui,8,5 .rt<Â£Â»..e,0,3-04 ' 2- kl- HEri ~4TE,KIONt MAL-1-5 0 3. ,Â£.1. 9..ee,sÂ». To â€¢Ace cp PR,-6 c..1,06,orzp ane-,se. CONFâ€¢50Â·CE ROOM. OMaces. 4 BATHROOM S+4AL-L BE SOUND - 2Â« STCS) rvÂ·11 FV 5/8- 6â€¢re. , r,Trâ€¢,OR nâ€¢LLÂ» 70 // 2- /3 6,6- el. 1Â»el# ICTES> Cne=/ft Rz==1 TO ,eULATEP rgTH R-11 BKIT A J Bz>. EA SCE - miL â€¢Ele,Â·rr ....ST..... C.'ll-*. *4SULATION 1,1 RALLS. V TO UOE'REPE OF CaJNS 5 Irrell, -AUS TO BE 2-4 AT Â·66Â· 04 *tlrUllOTS> OTM,-te_ e,Â·2X TO ent,CTABI/L C~-*â€¢**54 5. ALL }~91 6YP. 82. nALL A 2,ce> STUD NLL N 58 61â€¢. 5UKPAC23 SIOLL BE 5/8Â· THZ 42> 92. Ek SOS - Ful â€¢â‚¬194T e C,Or# ALL. 671Â©6. -016Tp, //0 M-Tâ„¢ti //fori .Â£*513 /IO R.~P'Trn, 1.P. V TO UOERSCX OF CELMS 1. c~.eST- I/Ce.e/ râ€¢ r//ell Reer--5 LA/ar. A. PROVIDE h[En *eULAT*46 B. HaL-PAL.L Pul-04> TK//'6 â€¢6â€¢4-4 M /06-14-2 /001/04<TE Ar, C/0*21- GLAZ,46 0 ALL EXaST#46 r,NED>Ore ,<-Ce*Â£Â»tb TO REMWN. A2.1 I ....Proee , Â·hese /.-....c.. 10 6,~.**A~rf re-â‚¬r Â·ne *se-,c WAn-2 C- 16,2 -*. â„¢/ CcÂ»â€¢râ„¢As.%. 6 --cÂ».564-2 mO~ CO-bÂ·-6 CÂ»-eNE*30 A.,O %=6 'AS~Â£Â·ATO, rROCCEes .O /-25, I. NSÂ¥~66â„¢,4 -ne - .AcwfusT AhÂ©,Oâ€¢ 1,â€¢16â€¢22â€¢ e.â€¢A:... 85 ,â€¢orâ€¢â€¢C=:p c- ,~aÂ· v-TIN r~cÂ»Â·1 rÂ»Â·e-O.6 (/ COOrkSÂ»Â·,e, e,<3Â»â€¢~ .4 THe C~ArÂ·*es. U. COMTitbCTO< TO r'9%/v've *MC/~ 1,â„¢ LBILROÂ»e OR *1'111O9v ea~,ALE,I 0.1 4 CorrlÂ»Irr - Twe,Pcx,et K 6"r ,asoc,â€¢Tes ro 20'-0 I/1- 1 1 1 0 1 THEODORE K SIM ASSOCIATES PO KEETS +MD ' ' SOUSTURAL E}4614EERS 0 - PO. 130* 1640 23280 Hâ€¢rf. 8 BheALT, COLOâ‚¬AÂ·00 81621 PHOhE (305) el-3161 FAX (303) 'Cn-485 X OFEN TO : 74 9 li 1 ------------------------- =440--------- STORAG= -MA>CM.-1 LIVE -OAD : 50 PDF) 2*10 x CONT. IE / T. *1Â»0 ~ Â£1101-0,mÂ· 2,<do â€¢ ie- c C - t----1------------------3 --------------).~324&------------- 2--------- v \1 ~ A~ Z22852 ..1-0.----- ------- ---------Il----0- OFâ€¢EN TO BELO/N CPENTO CONNOR - TADDLINE -- 0-~4179 ----0-- â€ž---------------1 OFFICE REMODEL - 523 YEST MAN STRZET XEE"DA. C.OUDFZbDO 44122 1 1 PR.,4.1 PRI/) 1 1 1 Câ€¢ED<EID: Fâ€¢RNTED. 06-31-94 2~L.Im.:2 ATTIC LEVEL PLAN REZNOVATION PLAN â€¢ VA'â€¢ r-0- con~*Mer 'n,/000/7 K -rÂ¥ OC~Te, PE THEODORE K <SUV ASSOCIATES PC NU:*ArrECTS RD STRUGWRAL ENG NEERS ~ _ rÂ»-0. BOX 1640 - 23280 We. 82 5~6ALT, COLORADO 81*21 PHO,E (309) el-316-1 i lulÂ·-10 1/4 â€¢/- FAX (303) el-4813 = e,CSâ„¢e MOC-,0 10 BE 4Â«9Â«U REMCV'C> / REFLACED .kI~J~-trg l 104-5 1/4- 1 1 TO, FLATE + â€¢ 1.-ON E.ve V -1920-51/4 r----7 - 1, 1 \ A LOPT , 1 SCSÂ·rDÂ·e ~â€¢hOOrt 0/mmet i 9 9923-1- i i TO DE gk,ReD - -----l ' A ,-â€¢m. M.Â£X~K , - - P1<B/08 CPENÂ»46 | , i~ 7f lb-3 8/B* / /9/4.-L /0,5 hE,4 1--*- , i i NEXM , 1 . 4 -< "00' 1'112-1 0 L Â¢=32 1 . : 26= =386= ! 111 Ill 11 11 11 1111 n 11 I' 611 (11 03|~ â€ž, i li 1p I.iI I ~ 6~ q' - ~ M K Y 7.0-05. ------- ----------------- L ~~ 6~,ED It;~ 1 I 7 7400Â·-2 5/5- --- 0 .Ii- ----------- 1 ' . \ ' CONNOR- TADDUNE 1 , ~ TO' 0/ SLAB OFFICE REMODEL - 523 reST HAN STRE!:T ~ef.ER, COLORK>O EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION EXISTINe PEST ELEVATION . 1/4-= 1 -O- JOB - 44122 DRAPâ€¢*t Â¥Â·14,rim Câ€¢â‚¬Câ€¢<ZE> r'RINTED 02,-31-44 2~I.Imt EXSTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS.1 c,orâ€¢flze.rt - T)â‚¬000â€¢:r K OVÂ¥ besoCIATED Pc rk, THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES FC Mao\FTESTs .440 STRUCTUFO,1- ENÂ¢91â€¢EERS 3 - 3 pa.BOX1AAO . 23280 *er. 82 - BAE>ALT, COi-OFUDO 51621 PHOE (303) e-1-316-1 | 1-(/ TDOE FAX (303) el-4813 ~.4~~mx 1=21:2~ A W STUP ..uL. n.le,4 TO - *TOW mosT,he stc,â€¢e. C empÂ·+ 1 ~49 -. Â»Skx MUZD N SW t-Ll_ Mie N TO MA Exalle ROO/'*46 TO BE ~ ,/ I. -,- 7-*.7)- ~5<N'CD & .2FL.hoED , I rxsâ„¢e en,sce i 1 , TCT' rLATE \\ # ..044 tsâ€¢vs ~ 7~24*-5 VI Â· . / ITCP PLATE pâ€¢ LI/â€¢â€¢EAVE , -2 -- - - [LI Il r----- r le'.6 1/4. _......Cm:rtÂ·gi::r :: 1 , 0,Â·r>â€¢,ws -**/VI.pt. :Z~e....T./$,/0 . 1 6---.----1=Z=~ : /---~=r{â€ž.beyt /0 1-PER FLOCX ----1---. ~--~ A 7-0 36- Aâ€¢ M. FIN!94 TO 11Â»-3 3/r- IiATow rxÂ»gle ecÂ».6 , 1 ' DTU CUD 1.----J p -' ~ 9412.1. VM-re~ F'LO~ . .\ rW.-1- ./.04 TO MATCM DISTÂ»46 ~ LC/â€¢â‚¬l FLOSI ==C 26= Szzlhtia 7 -,%27-5 1/2. d./. .--------- 1-0.e' Fl-ODR ---I- 7 'â€¢05-0 3.- 1 1 / 1 - r- - - - 1 , I , U ,Â©00 -CK ------- -------------I---- , I I ~oc,< 4 V - â€¢ ----"- --' d_ CONNOR-TAPIPUNE ~ TC- O- SL.*6 1 | w" -------------------------------- ---- -. OFFICE REMODEL . 1 7 180.4-4 1/4. 1 1 - BEFSl Cti.,/Ad,~DO EXISTINe SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTMSÂ· EAST ELEVATION 0 1/4-= 1Â·-7- 323 FEST MAN STREET Â»4.V â€¢ 1/4:1'-C JOB N. 44122 Â· ID/t~Â»t: 104/DRIP OEC~<:ED- FRINTEI> 08-arl-44 2~I-In.:t EXISTING EXTERIOR El.EVATIONS AS.2 COâ€¢1-ae'T 1/eâ‚¬X)Cle K 611Â·r /6/004/Tts /C THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC NoMmETS NAD STIUCTUI~L ENSHEERS - 3 - FLO. BOX 1640 23250 Â¥*mr. 52 5&6ALT, COLIXADO 81621 PHOhE (308) Cl-3167 A rc, Rl>el FAX (303) cl-4813 t,/91 Me,XfSLAeÂ® 9,4/KE ~ â€¢DO'F OVE~ X. le./.Cr RDO' r.-emt /v Eâ‚¬TUTRANq \ 1%; - TO 6<,PR,=~~~555 ~m==Â»%ZEM~ 1 1 TCP PLATE 1 1 + â€¢ Hew EAVE 7 1924Â·-5 V. 1 ' L ~ REPLACE EWSâ„¢16 SÂ»eLE /'IhED>OIN 61-*Z//6 66-AZÂ»e , TOP PLATE ,4 â€¢ LOY EAE ./ 1 -7920-5 1/4- Pbf -Mocy 1 i U-,Â·EX â€¢1.C,CX 1'16Â·-3 51 I "h*DIOÂ· ....1 ST.Rrwr 1-1~1 0 %9= 7 7-Me'-1- / 0 - PN,â‚¬>Cn /1,Z]he I BLAINS /V PCU= 4-h ~ 10'â€¢eR M.acq 7 -le-re 18. 12Â£5In Reâ€¢(ARKS â€ž=-711 1 r 1 11 ~ lili 8 11 Ill 11.1 6 11 &1 811 11 1 P.---i 1 1 1111 U " 111 lilli B It IIi 1 lin - -1 ---- 4 0 lis, . ------------- J 'C. 7. â„¢4.1/ 192:~- 19-2 -2 5/8- ----- .41.----1---------- 1- CONNOR - TADDUNE ,~ TCP Or tle OFFICE REMODEL -- --------- --- --- ---- ------- -- ------ ----- -- -- - ----- ---- 7 -0"4.4 1/4. ~ ~ 4 * - AE:BEA, C.OLOR.ADO NORTH -ELEVATION â€¢ 1/4-*1'-0 FNEST ELEVATION e 1/4Â· â€¢ 1Â·<r JOB . 44122 Â· DRAâ€¢,t XMB,RD C+â‚¬0<ED: FRMTS>. oeÂ»-81-44 2~I.Ililit EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 1 AS.3 c.0,â€¢*IT mâ‚¬ODOMr K 61,1 6ATes /C - THEODORE K eUY ASSOCIATES PC *3mETS ED STRUCTURAL 1946!NIEERS PO. BOX 1640 D- 2*10 *eâ€¢DERL MW) 23250 W#. 62 MELD VeRIPÂ·r DISTIÂ·er~ BASALT, COLOR-ADO 81621 FAOhE (309) Cl--3161 REFLACE E>CMD<5 | rAK (303) 421-4813 Sâ€¢â€¢61-5 r-Â·00â€¢N eLAZÂ»46 L ~ TOP IDSE 7 701Â·-101/4../- 22mren,OC" IN - - ROST F.-EN "/ EWTVT,Â·W.~ TO bÂ·-0 /1<Ovl EAVE ........irl-,9 , TOP M..ATE ; 21 â€¢ Bleâ€¢4 EAVE 7 ..4-5 1.4 = TS 5%5,6/16 * refl.DED 80<,/C/IT MDNMETAL ,â€¢R-â‚¬ X t> (3 FL,â€¢CeS1. E,a-T TO COLL....5. 5/4.O BOLTS. rÂ·ro' 1 Â· , 3/16- rELDED 8/R | BO_T TO WAVE 2- Â¢ 1 1/4 reâ€¢dileR 6RATDIS YV L 1 1/2 , 1 7/1. 04 FECE Cl COU,-04) lot -f 'en re râ€¢u-â‚¬ , 5/10 Fâ‚¬J.,PEr 8/9CIT r'.O... 4â€¢St=> rerr) ~ 1909-51/4 - j El W. 'RAIâ‚¬ ~ BEr, .,ETAL .41hDON POCJ~ re '*C>CD. FULL /LeS 5-** ,â‚¬,4 /0. PE'll 1 0.- ruoc. , emm. ,-|~M- i 1' . , I W."Hrl"r- ..M IÂ·ETIL - 7 -'916Â·-5 5/B. <-- I nâ€¢LI<rwr .1 1111:lilli 1 1 1 lilli., '111.11: 6 - IMU 12*10.6 1, , 1.-1-0.19_0(. 61-Al-Vn' 1 )/ / , 1 **24 i ru~ '"9-1 ,-1/TAL I J FIC 12<10Â·, 371<Bierâ‚¬ /2 rrpvAL_) FULL FIE}4 U 4-2* M-UM) h~. COâ€¢â€¢[. 0 950 1 BULT-1- COUÂ»*4 T.rr. ~ LOâ€¢eR FLOOR / L --\1.-Eae:, 7 -'Cr-5 '/3Â· 28= =:28/2 4#14#-9 1 2 :822:92 r.93Â»J ===46, 1 DOT. St--0715 01/ -------.-- -------------- 0 1Â· 4/ 11 k ------- .----------------0 A-= - % 1==24*k,Â£ 11===- M -Arv 1 -Vz C A35 CUP EA SCI . ~ LD'I/XFLOCK ------- -I----------il-- F - -2-11 /.2 (-1-- ------- ~~1/ f J \ - 1 ...I 1 4- COC. p pM , r% , .-0 : 1 -,0 1 11-' '' I - r- I 1 -0 . I i : .4- 1 -- CONNOR. - TADDLINE i A TO. C, SL,43 OFFICE REMODEL .. ~ 70444 1/4- , ~ 323 FE ST MAIN STREET PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION beent, C.OLOFUDO PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 0 1/4-â€¢ 1-O- 0 1/4-= 1.0 NOTEÂ· P.29'1 EXTEXC* MITAL STATUW' SIALL 13/ .09. 44122 5-25- rCE r.-Tw T /!See~ ,â€¢,0 11Â· 1/5,3 DR,q//4 KM/DZE> AT r-L.,Crwr Sâ€¢4*LL Be /2- Aee,E Mi.'Ji"Al' C.hELME;I> t,-F,CE 44â€¢*069- /40 VERT'Z.*L FOITS FRINTE> 08-81-44 154==1?6*4#*ikA rqâ„¢ 4Â· X 4- pâ‚¬..IPED STE=1 lez/ Em-T,IEEN. 21~L.Il]1:i EXTERJOR ELEVATIONS AS.4 . ~ 17â‚¬000-2 K el,Â¥ ASSOCAATES /O J /* I' - THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PO ,*oirmc,-re> 144Â© STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1 Tc. kBE P.O. BOX 1640 232eo â€¢rer. 82 X -- - -- f - -- I I f ZZLM#\3- 8/64!.T, COLORADO 81621 p,4<OhE (309) â‚¬71-301 r FAK (303) cal-42>13 . - 1 9.0.-5 - k --r. 490 \\ 1 52= ~ -it:21-01.. ' ~ -M27-5 1/4- ancrl Q=]= F F==== 0 0.08 _ 7 -â€¢ne.* 3. - t,PE !-888Â·r Â·. SERETAQUAL. 7=75= . . ' 00 00 00 . 1 4 1 - V--el MLOCI '12-1 :111111111 llllllllllllllllll STAR 5/0- ho, - 2 . i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 28= Sal,Â£!St 0 -- AT, oF 9,8 ------- ---------------- i *'W-41/4- 43 CONNOR-TADOUNE OFFICE REMODEL 923 FEST MAIN STREET BUILDING SECTION A BUILDING SECTION B 0 1/4-â€¢ 1-0- ASPE}4. SOLO'R.ADO Â¢ 1/4-/ 1-Cr 4410 PRA-t- PRIP Câ€¢Â·EC~â‚¬2 â€¢â€¢RNTEP. 8/31/94 2~LIII.:i BUILDING SECTIONS j A4.1 CO-'MI,/T Tâ‚¬000â€¢2 K Â®trr pescx.,eres po 19- 1 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 323 W. Main Street, Aspen Medical Center- Minor Date: September 13, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to replace and slightly modify windows on the north side of the structure, to add a window on the west side and to add an exterior exit stair on the east side of the building. Other work involved in this project involves repair or replacement of windows and the roof. This type of activity qualifies for staff sign off (no hpc review required). Staff has no objections to the proposed replacement of materials. This is not a historic structure, but it is located in the Main Street Historic District. APPLICANT: Stephen Connor and Paul Taddune. LOCATION: 323 W. Main Street, the east 9.5' of Lot B, all of Lot C and west 1/2 of Lot D, Block 45, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This proposal involves very minor changes to the exterior appearance of the structure. The proposed window changes improve the overall visual balance of the main facade. The staircase will not be easily visible from the street and is reguired for safety. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This proposal will have no impact on the character of the Main Street Historic District. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development has no impact on the cultural value of any designated historic structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development has no effect on the architectural integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny the request, finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the proposal as submitted. Additional Comments: 4 AT]:Aa]MENT 1 - IAND USE APPLICATICN FEe{ 1) Project Name . Aspen Medical Center Building Connor/Taddune Office Remodel 2) Project location 323 West Main Street, Aspen, CO; Aspen Medical Center Condomidiums, according to Plat filed April 1, 1981, in Plat Book 13 at .Page 21; the easterly ** Undicate street acklress, lot & block timber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning Office with historic. overlay 4) Iot Size 5) Applicant's Name, A&]ress & Micne # Towne Centre Properties Ltd. Liability Co. , TAD Properties Ltd. Liability Co., and J. Sterling Baxter, all comprising the Aspen Medical Center' Condominium Association, 323 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 6) Reparesentati~els Name, Address & Ihone # Stephen R. Connor and/or Paul J. Taddune, 600 E. Hopkins, Suite 301, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-9190 'Ypd of Application *lease check all that apply): . 4 . anditinial Use Conceptual SPA Conce*]al Historic Dev. Special Beview Final SEA -.Kinal Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - ai19eptinl POD ~~~nar Historic Dev. Stream Margin Â· Â· Final WD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisicn - Historic Designation Condcnini,=izationÂ· Ted;/Map Amenclment . (21)9 Allotinent Int Split/Iot Line (24@S E>oeuption Adjustment Desdrinti r.1 of Existing Uses Â· (Iniher and P type of eocisting structures; approximate sq. ft; n=ber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the prcperty). Office and.residential condominium uses .. 9) Description of Develginent Application Applicant seeks to replace and install windows, add a second access stairway, and repair roof to building code requirements, in connection with interior remodel of condominium units 4 and 5 z LO) Have you attached the following? Response to Attadlment 2, Minimmt Sulinission Ocntents Response to Attathment 3, Specific Su]=ission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application ** 9.5 feet of Lot B, all of Lot C and the westerly 1/2 of Lot D, Block 45, ~ City and Townsite of Aspen SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of Clan[,ju[Intabaled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11 x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 1 1"x17- format. Towne Centre Properties Ltd. Liability Co., TAD APPLICANT: Properties Ltd. Liability Co., and J. Sterling Bax r, all comprising the Aspen Medical Center Condominlut Assn. ADDRESS: 323 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 ZONE DISTRICT: "O" LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSED FAR: EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: PROPOSED % OF S[TE COVERAGE: EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commerdal): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldo: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Reac Rear. Side: Side: 5 Side: Combined FronURear: Combined Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Only: character comoalibility finding must be made bv HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrIJAr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): .r TAI)DUNE & GUEST ATTORNEYS AT LAW ALPINE BANK BUILDING 600 EAST HOPKINS, SUITE 301 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PAUL J. TADDUNE, RC. TELEPHONE (303) 925-9190 WILLIAM K. GUEST, RC. FACSIMILE (303) 925-9199 ANDREW H. BUSCHER September 7, 1994 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department ATTN: Ms. Amy Amidon, Historical Preservation Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Application for Minor Historic Development: Aspen Medical Center Building, 326 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Amy: Please accept this letter as an application to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for Minor Development pursuant to Section 7-601E of the Land Use Regulations of the City of Aspen. This application is submitted in connection with the remodel and repair of Units 4 and 5, Aspen Medical Center Condominiums, according to the plat filed April 1, 1981, in Plat Book 13 at Page 21. The applicants, Towne Centre Properties Ltd. Liability Co. and TAD Properties Ltd. Liability Co., have a contract with J. Sterling Baxter to purchase Units 4 and 5, as well as the remaining units of the project. After the closing, which will occur as soon as a building permit is issued, Towne Centre Properties Ltd. Liability Co., TAD Properties Ltd. Liability Co., and J. Sterling Baxter will comprise all members of the Aspen Medical Center Condominium Association. Submitted herewith are plans entitled "Connor-Taddune Office Remodel" prepared by Theodore K. Guy Associates, P.C., Architects and Structural Engineers, dated August 31, 1994, which depict the proposed remodel and repairs. In connection with the interior remodeling of Units 4 and 5, the plans call for the following: * The existing roof is in disrepair and will need to be removed and replaced (see Sheets A3.3 and A3.4). * On the south side, the current bank of windows are in disrepair and are in need of removal and replacement, City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission September 7, 1994 Page -2- the elongated window in the middle will be removed to accommodate a mechanical chase, and new windows will be installed to harmonize with existing windows (see Sheet A3.4) * On the east side, a stairway is proposed to provide a building code required second exit to the building. The stairway has been carefully designed to accommodate snow and ice conditions. The stairway will not encroach into the side yard setback. There will be no overhang so there will be no increase in FAR. Existing windows will be converted to doors (see Sheets A3.3 and A3.4). * The windows on the north side of the building are in disrepair and will be replaced and slightly modified (see Sheet A3.3). In connection with the removal and replacement of the windows, the sign standard on the front of the building will also be removed. * A new window will be added to the west side to provide light to the existing staircase and the existing single windows which are in disrepair will be replaced (See A3.4). The plans also provide a representation of the major building materials to be used for the remodel and repair, which are intended to be consistent with the current design of the building. As can be seen from the enclosed plans, the remodel and repair will enhance the character and appearance of the building. The remodel and repair will have no negative impact on the character of the neighborhood. A check in the amount of $105 as the application fee is enclosed. Thank you in advance for your attention and consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, TADDUNE & GUEST 0-1-0-Â« - -- -'h, C Paul J. Taddune City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission September 7, 1994 Page -3- The foregoing has been read and approved by the undersigned as Buyer and Seller of that Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Real Property executed as of the 5th day of August, 1994. SELLER: BUYER: TOWNE CENTRE PROPERTIES LTD. LIABILITY CO. r- 21 -v,4134'40Â« BY: ULÂ£6_--k-~Et--0,~ ~~,3. Sterling" Baxter / Stephen R. Connor y Ala,na 30L TAD PROPERTIES LTD. LIABILITY CO. Paul J. T'addune PJT:km Enclosure CC: J. Sterling Baxter Leonard M. Oates, Esq. J p\lt\histpres.906 1 8) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 610 W. Hallam Street, Iglehart, Landmark designation DATE: September 13, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests landmark designation of the property at 610 W. Hallam Street. This Victorian structure was built in 1888. It has been listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" since 1980, and was upgraded to a "contributing" status in the most recent inventory evaluation. ("Contributing" status means that the resource has maintained its historical or architectural integrity.) The applicant received HPC approval for demolition of the rear lean-to on April 13, 1994. At that time, Staff recommended Landmark Designation for the property, an action which is now being pursued. APPLICANT: Jim and Sandy Iglehart, represented by Bill Poss and Associates. LOCATION: 610 W. Hallam Street, Lot P and Q less 7.5' of Lot P, Block 22, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark Designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearings), and first and second reading of a Landmark Designation Ordinance by City Council. City Council holds a public hearing at second reading. LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS: Section 24-7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines the six standards for local Landmark Designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least one of the following standards: A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado of the United States. Response: This standard is not met. B. Architectural Importance: The structure or site 1 reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: The house has had minor alterations, including demolition of the original porch, addition of a new porch on the rear lean-to and replacement of some original historic materials, however, the existing footprint of the house has been the same since at least 1904. The house retains its original one story, cross-gabled form as well as decorative features such as fishscale shingles and a shallow-projecting bay window supported by scroll brackets. There is also still evidence that the house once had two entry doors off the porch, one which was the main entry and the other which entered the parlor and was used for special occasions only. C. Architectural Importance: The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: This standard is not met. D. Architectural Importance: The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: The architect or builder is unknown. E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: There are a number of historic structures adjacent to and surrounding this site. Two structures in this area have recently been removed from the historic inventory because the integrity of the sites was severely diminished through excessive alterations. It is very important to the West End, as well as the rest of Aspen's neighborhoods, that all structures which do have historic significance be preserved. F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or mites of historical or architectural importance. Response: This site is representative of the modest 2 scale, style and character of homes constructed during the mining era, this community's primary period of historic significance. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve Landmark Designation of Lots P and Q less 7.5' of Lot P, Block 22, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that standards B (architectural importance), E (neighborhood character) and F (community character) are met. Additional Comments: J 3 - \6->4 - 7 1 / .l ././ 0 7 3 - I 1 - P- f.h f t 1 1 r-< 1 FIGURE 111.2 : ./ 1980 Ir~,I~~TOY5-19$Â®R~C Â·ES AND STRUCTURES :Â· \- JEGENO Le- ~1986 UPD E <-7 EE'gNS,1/LS,8/2h/!R - ~ Â· d~*.rod . ret yet deigwl O e--S - -% , Ea:..1-21=Bal . , I de"10,41 ed I not yet di-~titid a - &.1*-*=4 0 ... r\\ , 96'loturna S'Yfil# 0 not yel desiâ€¢yumd O 9 h. z-- 0 u A-Vy \ ~9013911291&1022Â£88* 3.want bleek .....m street p s.co....ity Â¢Purch 1 / 4 ha~'tam Uk 0 U ' r.-1 6.nfl , 4, 4 1 1 1 1 ':* -~lej U1-',,~ :a;~~~t~~~~~~~r~~1~~ -Gzait 7 *$=11 BU d Ir'l -r'7:TTE] 1' - - -- - [LE~,1,[1 ~:,. --* 5:.2*, -3 - 1.1.- 1 .,1 BIRMEQ> 1 v\, .~L---14-:CÂ«''Of \ 41 r~~--,firi 01[il~,~ -iLLEW ll5112&! R!11.i 2.@[433 !1.21_1 UlbuÂ·-thl :ilii,I Il li'kliz 9. , 1 ---- m, IN.- iu.,1FICFT-"fjj5~1"[I]II[MIi oÂ¥~tifMIi!.6,3, 6.2 [EiÂ£I! Trwi]J : e.1.- . N irs.-*-%1 .29 E--Jip i:' [mIED![mooD j[[m.ue 2,-5-W ~.73.fiTiÂ®TI.ambul ge-ZE-4 88%7. CIE3.03.---6, -0--1-72 2 k.& {[[130 Mb' 1@[EE:&[Eliallm iEl[El i EfEPS]IO 1 [[Â®ID' [[[TZ2 1 [[[U[Im I ~tGrt@i[[[1 1-1 O=- - hm~LI[Ill[Im EiDÂ·[IN[[In *GiA 1133 E~D [2-1 52'--I-- ER-~ "Â·4Â·LEIE~ 52'EED,C-29,EEEÂ· 1Â£21 NI[[0 [I]%[ID :21IEÂ·lomIm m03-1*mk[IR~M ~=altiÂ®1 amiÂ®Imal-ERL mwI[n] ETATE [Â®[Ig (Ii]Im, 900/8 000/0 0,UMID [milÂ® KiEH.WW##Ure' -â„¢Ldâ‚¬*fo MUE EllI] i[IIM)D FWD-1 135) [EE[,5 ImmIl WEBi[IImI[D.Emtit . EE -3 -1([12[119]Ej] W208:OIMB|Q[**2211* li.21Â·2!k EmB Mnl NE Â®NI[I] EÂ® EÂ®bill.uidpinwilill Fle W Elf HAL-LUM *' 1 2] I K- X.â‚¬*4/ 9 / 1 Â»th.Ly De, le 9+ '~ NEl u11111 A- tr r--r-n i thi [BU hiE FIL Â»\4. /Â» %197 .... --42. fÂ¢; . 111.19 . -e- L d.Â«1 ill NOIK EXHIBIT 6 . W..F.*-7*4 ,â‚¬205, 47 4 : \9419Â»4 . .. -W-, , 1 / 1â€¢h--- â€¢- r.b.--lk â€¢-#Ii-Â¢/*NA:Â»I ===mi . 11 2 -1 4 i . %4%2'. . . ' I.., I.'. 1#<%/p *&9#0/ 4':~1,â€¢Â·Â· - . -04$10'. '. Â· .iâ€¢&Â·3;26ew.-Â·. 221-:C--Â·911~Ilpi,~â€¢~0~%~Evi . . . .,-'-14*1.,1~r51Â·,023*'41 ..1, . . Â·T .44 I le#/*N' 1 ' 4 . .../ P \/h . .1 + 222=-5, 14,4- ., '. ' Â·2 i ~â€ž,r./.'.: - 1 41 /' 4 4:<061, j ; 1 ...... I $ .. 4 ' 4ll='; . 1 1.1 '1. '.40" ' -" '-')' i '111(id;'~*'Â· ' & --4..'...'.... - . i. {1,4 ' Fj -i ;~* ~_~*' U Â·,4 *.*$~ I.,J].,rÂ·~Â·17-3'fill' . . - r . I . % : 4)'t ~ :1764Â£ 4 2 14.19 . --- 4Â¢ 4.9>. i :: I 'Â· 71 .1 3:22Â·4*k. rET--* 4 4 '- 'Â· Â· ef , %19Â£32~22:=.e-4J--Â· . ,:tit,~--0.,4- ::... ..2 jap~ 4Â· ..2-V, 1. ... 3 ,,z : 5~4#11*,6-= .f 1/....... ,; .44-.,â€¢'2 ~~I" ~ I./-= , Gâ€¢'~!E . .-0 - f >1 Â·~ F.*9,1,1 ?1~ 1111*04.9~ ..i#n :Aj-2Â· 0:Y,-. >- Â·: :nÂ¥Â·.Â· ,1 W-Lp .- I. ...v.,7 014.1 k'.1Â°.7â‚¬:.Â·~~.pw : Af. 4 .4 2.1 . - ..= 1 *f*f?Ily: ,;A..i,- - .; 22:2Â· ../"1.T: Â· i , 'Â·7~ 4 & '.-*jjr&'r,2- .*: - 43--' ~I- 2 1 ./. /0*.. 1 W. Â· 4 ... A.., A ./ 2,#Lt --*BEE 4.... 4%:3.- j. 4,1 1 L *M t/'' A . - -1 --- na,Â·ct-6~r:, Â·.,Â·mv ---Ill.-...............lilli........ : .. â€¢ 44' . Â· t - 2 9 . 1 A c r-4 t *'Â·42'~2Â· '*~~N t j.9 , 4 1 .Â· L Â·..0..rÂ· v:F:~---I.-I=-.-.*.Im--Elf.f I J - 4 7~255.E: Al Ff Â· ~ Â·35:~fr~ttil . ,#.~0*Eft? .1: 9 -....E,Ir> ravi?Ligh.,i~ ~l ". .9-.--mâ€ž... I36 4 - 420%41'+' 1 P.f f 1. p. a *- . 1. . . 43:...''y :ty 'N 6Â¢~ K,Â·., * r-' 2Â·ht, 34 , t. r 5,,d ir. .* 16, esÂ»Â· :: 44 F-It . ' . .6,6 ,.42 . 1 J, tki' ~ 1 4 .1 I . 14'i.,0.:4.r,74.1,.#&~*frh'* 1,-,AG t.>6121 0 - w, 7 ' .i: ./ . le 790' ' c .â€¢1, I Â· L. tr '57 0 9 /*IÂ¥*4 '16 -;$19*~Â·,Â·; . ' 02 ' ~ Â·~. ,. t ,,~4/4/8,Â·/ 1 I #Il .Â· - .,tr I ' Â¥ J r. ,Â· 1. , '33.92,Â«47~â€ž -2'*9. 4.34 . JtFJ-â€¢ SbY.&0~~- . /-2 . -.. 7 24'P , , -2 *19#IMI.Ilim~li/lill.ell/FI 1 - i~ ~_ '. .. 213/pr P 31- , 5-7. ; i'kE! 1 4 ..=- 16*.- % 4 --- -&. .4 .- 4 D ...... .4 .'-x 4. , Â·'Â«U: I. r.*=QueÂ«cnfe'llmillimi .bul'* 22 *.~,4 -'d '..t~ r ... Atâ€¢k'*' ;4*7-â€¢7 7 L . , Â· 1,2 ....:745.*11.4&11.2. AGA. ..5 Â·Â·~ 43:~ ..'$ 8 . V X;dilil , F I 4.. $ , , Â· 195) ,: '~ k : ~ Â·Â¢t :~ ~ if *ay,:!l? : Ap, .i,T. 9 3,46Â· '+ .,.... .., Â·49?'....4 ..49:*AN<<f J. - Â·f.5,4, f.(IN..~ki~ MY-.48 -- 4 t./I'll//91/ i. ... *Â·, ~'+'c.-,4~=-4pÂ·\ ~:~-~~,*. Â·*. S i' 0 Â· f . . r ' â€¢t'k.Â· , 7*9 r 7.1 20,"impm'q~"Jai .: g.Â· .Â·1 : f ts 6,4,1, 1 33= . . #3--- ' - dâ€¢U~~,A~b ~ iv. ' 0..1 , . 77, Y J . 6,â‚¬ 1 . 1.,2....~ ,~.4 -- I d ~ ':,4....W.0, Â· 1 /1 42'Ii- * .4- w - +3-Â· ' , 1 Â¢ 1#0 4 , 1 ., 2 e'. 1 ) p 77- 02 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 610 W. Hallam Street, Iglehart, Landmark designation DATE: September 13, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests landmark designation of the property at 610 W. Hallam Street. This Victorian structure was built in 1888. It has been listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" since 1980, and was upgraded to a "contributing" status in the most recent inventory evaluation. ("Contributing" status means that the resource has maintained its historical or architectural integrity.) The applicant received HPC approval for demolition of the rear lean-to on April 13, 1994. At that time, Staff recommended Landmark Designation for the property, an action which is now being pursued. APPLICANT: Jim and Sandy Iglehart, represented by Bill Poss and Associates. LOCATION: 610 W. Hallam Street, Lot P and Q less 7.5' of Lot P, Block 22, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark Designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearings), and first and second reading of a Landmark Designation Ordinance by City Council. City Council holds a public hearing at second reading. LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS: Section 24-7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines the six standards for local Landmark Designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least one of the following standards: A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado of the United States. Response: This standard is not met. B. Architectural Importance: The structure or site 1 reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: The house has had minor alterations, including demolition of the original porch, addition of a new porch on the rear lean-to and replacement of some original historic materials, however, the existing footprint of the house has been the same since at least 1904. The house retains its original one story, cross-gabled form as well as decorative features such as fishscale shingles and a shallow-projecting bay window supported by scroll brackets. There is also still evidence that the house once had two entry doors off the porch, one which was the main entry and the other which entered the parlor and was used for special occasions only. C. Architectural Importance: The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: This standard is not met. D. Architectural Importance: The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: The architect or builder is unknown. E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: There are a number of historic structures adjacent to and surrounding this site. Two structures in this area have recently been removed from the historic inventory because the integrity of the sites was severely diminished through excessive alterations. It is very important to the West End, as well as the rest of Aspen's neighborhoods, that all structures which do have historic significance be preserved. F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites oft historical or architectural importance. Response: This site is representative of the modest 2 . scale, style and character of homes constructed during the mining era, this community's primary period of historic significance. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve Landmark Designation of Lots P and Q less 7.5' of Lot P, Block 22, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that standards B (architectural importance), E (neighborhood character) and F (community character) are met. Additional Comments: 3 * 1+' \AL->1 11/Â·lÂ·~-/In-El Â· r)<f 11 *4*- -Â·Â· 40 - 7- B FIGURE 1162 - 1 1980 INVENTORY UE Hisemfc Sli~ES AND STRUCTUdES : ' -_ 6LGEND =e- 1 _i__11_--r , Â«.l not yet doÂ·,cnâ€¢tâ€¢d O ~1986 UPÂ° r E.,I+k/mL-2nt=Â£11 ASPEN.COL d"i,uted " 1. 1 Â»I---- 6*ininchul designited . nol yet desi,lated 4 . . t!211WLitntlcal C) .0. de strta led â€¢ not yet desi,uted O . I. -I ' G5KEYMm-SkM&[M 0 lj@IE..22aLte.22IBAInt 3.welt biee* er/hahm street . Â· 5.0â„¢Â·-ity ch,rch A \ : . 4.haltam takâ€¢ ,/9 1 e-1 _rn , 6.lift f t~.-- 11 3 7~kp r- o. 4 0991--644 X43- /..~ ely- 1-1~.{9- ~ a. 1 .--IZE*F~ Ul-'.-- ... , f ~L=1-1.wÂ· Jill||,Uâ€¢tÂ¢.11Â·- .'i 7-5 -1-1 11 .,1 1.!Â·'U Â·illil| 11 1,1,!'~~.}Â·~Â·/' ' - 4, -7<Ft.~ -'â‚¬- I 4*i~F:G :245 Ld - 10~13=911%3 ~- '9 -~|IA-TllimliDÂ·[II]I[IE [IHEt[Wie=lkE %23 Elii] ifi!Â¤ 1.231. (SEN L----- 1,Â·t= ~ Â®TRIT: ', ![Em jt[!111.re ditt~uj 11;;[319.1[ig[I.II[mid]*IG}. Â®NIE. Gi.atitiL----41'L - ... MDRO ~,piÂ®;emin:ml~ iiWEI,LE[M! *imIFID!{ingip'Emoit2Â®<tk[[1 I i:Za - 1- -[muim ENT].am]J [-Fi[[m i [E~% 9233 [RE# 1-U-1 d[EE' El]1; ELUB MFipTD-Am [Im[]11 Waid~'1 'm'â€žll lilill .1111111111 : lai 4!111Â· 11.l:62Â· '* 1I.JILL iFEE 14[8110 [[FTH[[1 [UI[!I& ImI[0#311#!iNFFFMfill 1111111111 I Ul li /Iii I ---- 23 Â·fl i wL.Wl)~1|G~[8' 0129!Elim,EfiB.312 [nu[Im [TE[Trl :c~~0TTRâ€¢ MWIm [[[20 [ii@imÂ·4[N[I[[1 [m[O (1141['lir~ ~uILE[m minimi.[1!GE-EE.II!11[III :mITTE Eft@ II[I[[B~, E[[III]] Mmm mIBIM {IE!111 [m[[Â®. 4 --- -Gum'Fl' Â®111111 T [II[E] Â· [1111111 1 mIIEDMI[fil@ mEE-[1Imi[Il [1]Elp F1O 1616â€¢M' fiÂ»* LUM I .Ve - 06 le 9+ . /1 . -- f> .. Ill- 19 .-e- . Tr'.:FIE:I-9-K?i-YUff,17-741~9~~lf~li~z.~.f-*.7--~,r~r'-~.9-.~p..'.F,17'.77.r'.:1.'r~,I-,v-<.6.1~.5~~..Â·p:Â·.1Â·>51.,h'.,Ity:.":Â·fÂ·.-~~ - . 6 ' . " .vw. 1 -.-p I. 1 4'â‚¬ J #1,4 EXHIBIT 6 m'' ./ \9*04*k- a . , + .Ii~ - - , . 22~ : 19 - I--*I . 1 .jÂ©0=14=~ . 41,1 '1911,2=,(ax -,1: P~: k tt: 1 . 7â„¢2Â»=~mwif~JÂ»11 .&"I- -5 h..4,1./ , d. fl 7 ClrI.J.*~~6'...â‚¬ I, ~~~ 1 '. 1,9 .% 1474=2114,1 -74 , - -:,9,36"r L'/ 9* . I ff.Â·5Â«, ~6"Jaif,4 \ I ALA' I. pmr,I-- 44 4 rmS-94#~, 32>7 '1-.Iwi;:'I*,~~4*#: ,+ . I . .A. 9.4 Â·- . 1 id' '11'.~ 1 kl.16. 4: . *U , . a. ~115 q i S Â· Â· 1%2%1. 44 ..41 1 -- f J - . A 1 . . . i.Â·'fi,/...r . I. . , , I#,<1,1.. , ~Â· 94.-0 ..3:'..rfr" 1 1Â· 41:14 ~ -1 lili I -'-'ll f i .41.0.1.Jj; 1 a.'16Â» 2 7 ' 3, ri.. ~Â·3Â»t:9*Â·1*19,7>2.72 3,~t-,1. *:4*'...t . . ./.I- I i: . 45Â· A , $942 A 1 I .. 44 .<Â» 2 7..4, .:.L .Ati:*~~ : 1. i' 1%$&4.<4*- 4. , #59.#4### aÂ£ 44 - h.-- FEL=42,'...ju .414; i.14~ : 4. ... 12:_*:M''ti'k_.~ .....4 . 21 *404* : ,/:Ar#; -- 7// U , 01-Â· Â· . /1/1,5- - -14-1 ... .6 .........0 .. . -, ~:07.4 2. .7%, :-731.'., I Â·L .. Â· 921 . ft 't K .~ 1 .,.4, 3.: t= ' .... 37 - 71 7. P .. 1 .4.0.V Ir~'.1.r ....meri~.5., & .6 4 â€¢-== :' Â·Â·-Â· . 1 r + - ~ r~.J~... I 21 -,11 R... WEE=Â£%#M,45 â€¢ Z /4 - M.Imm),t~E~Â©Vt,riiidE:ilt,1! 4 1 L :1 - J.. 1 ..,4.' 14@9,0 1 :~' Â·411. i~41 '- i - ~ ~; ;SM.1!1~161'1~%'@DA#Â·'u,Jl, 1, Â·,- Â· ~~. 1 ' * 14.'Â· 't .- tÂ©~- - 1, ? ,Â· D :. .1~. f li Â·I:Â·.. :890 /: OftÂ·.(4-.,Ar#:'.,172-rlâ€¢---1 9? t. f. -Â· et:,1,4 1 ts,%$5% . 7.ttif..driff Â· .44*4 . - -lu 49/: <Â·372'.*U,.Â·t.,8 , I.'/ . . C. 5 I. . , Â·Â· h . m~. i *71,*. i- - --. . / . --- ...4. - .. I ..... - 11 i 2\ m , * 1. 1*,*a,E04 -*-i.'=Â« - ' + I ' -;7.....Ii .,r:,c., *~//4/*#Ca.'Fa k . 1 ..6 -0- 4 .1 - . .4 ~12- .*1.6.&:N:Â· ..... 1. 7- i; 1 4-, erâ€¢â€¢Â· Â·Â·Â·/.- :;.- hi FINIal=I....I-1~4 '.*c,i:,30â‚¬, -64:'f - -. -- $ - hipÂ£(:T:./.2, i..}745.t,3,2--~:.141' .40.- M '41:1 ..442*4.1 1. 1 ,.... . 'Â· Â·Â·c 1,2:21 *1' 0 : ' - eÂ· /4..7/77 / 0.- ....J . 4-31 E:P fig . 4,;3; 2-2- . 94.1.3 Â· w. F .4 4 L. Â»%â€¢ $ 7 2 : 4: .:t .:411 419,42~. . .. Â·: .... ' Y '>'Â· Â·1 -i .:,A k :./ I I 1, . . '4 . 5 4 / 214:jU-~:r:atiti.j,Em#*.212*65.1,Â® ~ Â· - - .Â· Â·Â· -Â· - + 7 ''Â·;'Â·Â·'~~.~-AJ5n.+M,.U:â€¢htâ€¢!<W4016*14*/ilitWiN,4// 4 , .. 2.,6-'.... . 04&,;4Ct;1*4DQEP.Wri=-**=-1. ~Â· Â·9 ~ ' 44â€¢2Â·ff. ,?, tti// 91/--- ---- f/46.1 .4 iÂ¢.,A~; ~ Â·e - 'Â·Â·;Â· ~1. IP.<7 1~ 71,3r.kN~%** ~~~M, 11 '. I. . i. I 1 J. ./'-15zoÂ·Â· 44 .: 72 tle . R ill + - ~ Â· 43,-7' . 11' agfitif~*.~.3-~ .9 e ..**cr . M.â‚¬4 I., ' ' i/2 g MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Evaluation of properties proposed for inclusion on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures", Round II DATE: September 13, 1994 SUMMARY: Once every five years, HPC is required to re-evaluate all non-landmarked resources identified on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," in order to make the following determinations (see Section 7-709 of the Municipal Code, attached) : 1. Amend the classification Of any resource (significant, contributing or supporting) 2. Add any resources to the Inventory, which were previously omitted because of recent annexation, error or through contribution to community character which was not previously recognized. 3. Drop any resources from the Inventory which have lost their historic significance. NOTE: Both the Code and the rules and regulations of the Certified Local Government program, administered by the National Park Service and the Colorado Historical Society require a re-evaluation of the Inventory at least once every five years. PROCESS: The re-evaluation process is as follows: * 1. In 1990-91, a consultant team, staff and HPC completed the fieldwork, which involved filling out new Inventory forms and taking new black and white photos of each resource. 305 sites were surveyed. 2. A master list was compiled to record the status of each property during previous evaluations (1980, 1986 and 1991). Property owner names, parcel identification numbers and mailing addresses were researched and included on the Inventory forms, which were then entered onto the Database. 3. Those properties which had not been designated Landmarks were identified and targeted for evaluation by HPC and Council. Property owners were mailed a public notice and a notice was printed in the weekly Aspen Times. (This occurred in early 1992.) A cover letter was included with the public notice, explaining why the review was necessary and the implications, both positive and "negative" of being listed on the Inventory. Staff held one on one meetings with property owners who protested or wished to have more information. 4. At the time of the 1992 hearings, not all property owners were correctly identified and there were some errors in the public notices. Staff elected to break the process down into "Round I and Round II" in order to make the task a little easier. Round I was completed in May 1992. Roxanne Eflin (HPO) resigned before Round II could be undertaken. After a year and a half delay , the Planning Office is finally prepared to complete evaluation of the Inventory. (It is hoped that future evaluations can be wrapped up much more quickly.) 5. For the properties included in "Round II," Staff has followed the same noticing procedures described under point #3. Times for public inquiry were set up for August 31 from 1-3 p.m. and September 1 from 8:30-10 a.m. The purpose of these meetings was to discuss specific concerns of individual property owners, review the available preservation incentives and to discuss options if the owner wished to pursue removal of their property from the Inventory. 6. Tonight's meeting is a public hearing. HPC is not required to make their final decision on disputed properties at this meeting if they feel that additional information is needed. This is an opportunity to receive public input and the meeting must then be continued to a date certain (staff suggests October 12) when Staff will present for adoption the Resolution covering the committee's recommendations. 7. The Resolution which results from these meetings will be forwarded to City Council, who will make the final adoption of the re-evaluated Inventory by Ordinance. 8. Following final adoption, any necessary changes will be made to the GIS map of the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" which is on display in the Planning Office. BACKGROUND: In 1980, the Planning Department received a grant to hire two consultants (John Stanford and Vera Kirkpatrick) to survey Aspen' s historic resources and to establish the first comprehensive "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures." Over 275 sites were included and given a rating of "exceptional, excellent or notable. " No changes in legislation were proposed at that time. Two important actions occurred following the creation of the Inventory: the adoption of the first design guidelines and a concerted effort by City Council and the Planning Department to Landmark designate significant properties. In 1986, as a result of numerous demolitions and a movement to overlay the entire townsite as a "H" Historic Overlay District, a 1-5 (five being the most significant) numerical rating system was established. Non-landmark properties rated 1-3 required no HPC review and approval for demolition. Properties rated 4-5 did have HPC review. The numerical rating system proved to be too subjective and resulted in a number of losses as structures rated 1-3 were quickly demolished. It is also important to note that the establishment of the numerical system was simply a classification of properties already on the Inventory, it was not an in-depth re- evaluation of the town's historic resources. In 1989, the numerical system was retired, to be replaced again with three easily understood categories: significant, contributing and supporting. Also at that time Council expanded HPC's demolition review authority over the entire Inventory, including partial demolition and relocation. More incentives were also created for historic landmarks to offset the strengthened regulations. The existing classifications are defined as: Significant: Applies to all resources listed on, or eligible for listing on the National or State register of Historic Places. HPC must include the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation" in these reviews in addition to the local development review standards. Resources considered "significant" represent the top 15% of the Inventory. Contributing: These resources have maintained their historical or architectural integrity. Approximately 7 5% of the Inventory is included in this category. supporting: These resources have maintained some elements of their historic and architectural integrity and in general are "retrievable" with substantial effort. Generally, this applies to structures which have had unsympathetic additions or removal of original features. 10% of the Inventory falls into this category. PUBLIC INQUIRY: Staff received six inquiries related to "Round II." Requests for removal from the Inventory were received from Dick Volk and Denise Reich at 230 Spring Street, Frank Day at 1035 E. Durant Avenue (recommended by the consultants as a new addition to the Inventory) , Katie Skiff of 920 W. Hallam and Albert and Pearl Bishop at 101 E. Hopkins Avenue. Barbara Gameroffiof 990 E. Hyman called in support of the recommendation to delete her property from the Inventory (recommended by the consultants in 1991) and Warren Conner of 532 E. Hopkins called in support of his property remaining on the Inventory. TALLY: The City Clerk's office is in the process of confirming the number of designated Landmark's (these are not affected by the Inventory evaluations). At this time, the unofficial breakdown is as follows: Designated Landmarks: 128 Non-landmarks listed on the Inventory: 141 Total: 269 historic resources EVALUATION: The following sites included in "Round II" of the Inventory evaluation were recommended to be removed from the Inventory by the consultant team due to loss of integrity: 824 E. Hyman 327 W. Hallam ilv) 305 W. Hallam-/~**2 + Â¥4Â£ao __205 W. Bleeker -860 Gibson ) 4,4.,Jlr (16 U. , 19-2 940 lÂ¥,1,2-1,~ A.Â£2~-1-990 E. Hyman ' 1020 E. Hyman 831 W. Bleeker p01 E. Hyman ..370 3,2 #A iuy- Staff supports deletion of all of these properties except for 860 Gibson. 305 W. Hallam and 205 W. Bleeker should be carefully considered by the Committee. The following sites should also be thoroughly evaluated by HPC as the owner has requested removal from the Inventory: 230 N. Spring. ill,(Cul<LO 1--i</L' 7 101 E. Hopkins 6 Ae b - /~70 0-y, 4.--36-rÂ·Â·4 .1 Staff supmorts-deletion of -all but=1*3*==E.-Â«Durant. In addition, staff recommends the following deletions: aft 4-4 0 72/1,4 - 0Â»1/,22.-ELL,L 225 W. Smuggler (existing strJcture was built in 1970's) 401 North --Â·; 344~7 .-,1 Â»*~M.L..~fors,-7 C} The Inventory forms for these properties are attached to the packet. Staff's recommendation is to delete the properties as described above from the inventory as their integrity has been completely lost. Although they may have some elements of their original scale, these structures have been greatly altered. The Inventory must be an accurate reflection of the resources in Aspen which ought to be subject to historic preservation regulations. HPC should site visit each of these properties to confirm their support for this action. Staff has scheduled a group site visit from 12-lp.m. on Tuesday, September 13 (meet at the side entrance of City Hall.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC support the Round II Inventory evaluations as shown on the attached chart, with further discussion on 305 W. Hallam, 205 W. Bleeker and 860 Gibson. Additional Comments: \ Non-Designated Properties for re-evaluation September, 1994 Key: Significant: 121- Contributing:21 supporting: 0 Drop from Inventory: C) Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 94 1 A 406 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 532 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 633 W. Main Main Street 101 S. Monarch Main Street 221 W. Main Main Street 623 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 1031 E. Durant East Aspen Twnst. 1020 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 990 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 824 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 801 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1280 Ute Ave. Ute Avenue .ill-- ----- L~J 107 Juan St. Shadow Mountain 101 E. Hopkins Shadow Mountain D 000 105 E. Hallam West End (Church) 1 1 010181 0111 lili 01 441 430 1 *WW MAR 4 Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 94 314 Gillespie West End (H. Lake) / U ~ 330 Lake West End (H. Lake ) / O Â·0~1._ 330 Gillespie West End (H. Lake) / / .8 120 W. Francis West End (H. Lake) 000 240 Lake West End (H. Lake) 423 N. 2nd West End (H. Lake) / 515 Gillespie West End 401 North West End 129 W. Bleeker West End 205 W. Bleeker West End 305 W. Hallam West End 327 W. Hallam West End 629 W. Smuggler West End 610 W. Francis West End 920 W. Hallam West End 831 W. Bleeker West End 434 W. Smuggler West End 421 N. 5th West End 225 W. Smuggler West End 950 Matchless Smuggler Mtn. 930 King Smuggler Mtn. 390 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 230 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 165 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 860 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. 110 1 1 1 1010101 10101 1 810101 1 01 4 0101 JI-01 oi'DI-01~'dul -61~1~1-01 2[-3~ t~ all ~ij A~~ HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 1020.EH Photo Information: Township 10 South Range * West Section * USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: * Full Street Address: 1020 East Hyman Legal Description: Block 33 East Aspen Townsite city Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: East End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Duplex, residential Architectural Style: * Dimensions: L: 30 X W: 40 = Square Feet: Approximately 1,500 Number of Stories: 3 stories Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: On river; good trees Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Metal sidinq seam Walls: Horizontal siding Foundation / Basement: Lower level duplex Chimney(s): None Windows: 1980's Doors: Porches: None General Architectural Description: Was 1890's Victorian, totally lost in renovations in early 1980's; ret-renovated completely in 1990. No historical references remain. side gable end (not window) may be historic scale. General scale is good Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 1020.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: * Architect: * Original Use: * Builder: * Intermediate Use: * Construction Date: * 3 Actual 1 Estimate * Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Total exterior redo Additions and Date: 1970's and 1980's NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A_ B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1-1 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * Associated Contexts and Historical Information: * (use continuation sheets) Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin Countv Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 990.EH Photo Information: Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 18 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: 990 East Hyman Full Street Address: 990 East Hyman Legal Description: Lots R & S, Block 32 East Aspen Townsite City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: East End Owner: Private/State/Federal Private Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Modified Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 to 1-1/2 stories Building Plan (Footprint, Shape) : "U" shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: N/A Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Parallel and cross gable; asphalt shinqles Walls: Wood lap siding. ship lap with sunburst trim gable end Foundation / Basement: Concrete Chimney(s): Original brick chimnev near center; metal flue front east Windows: Poured single light casements; east 3-sided bav; simple qable end fixed diamond light at attic Doors: Original doors; 1/2 light wood panel, pair french doors on addition at rear Porches: Porch posts appear originnal; southeast entry shed with simple stick brackets General Architectural Description: Modified miner's cottage; street scale remains. Mostly new materials. Porch posts appear original; two recent (1980's) additions. Scale and roof pitches kept. Maior 2-storv addition to rear. Some original doors and windows were retained. 7' Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 990.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1886 Actual _ Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: New materials, windows, trim, and porch -- dates unknown Additions and Date: To the rear in the 1980's, a maior addition. 1-1/2 story west addition; 2-story addition with breezewav attachment at alley NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A_ B C D E - Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation El Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 1-1 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is " retrievable" with substantial ef fort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Integrity has been compromised due to substantial modifications Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. It is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and life style(s) of the average citizen of Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. The east section of this now condominiumized building still displays some typical characteristics of an Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottage. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Georgeann Waqqaman Date: September, 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 824.EH Photo Information: Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 18 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 824 East Hyman Legal Description: Lots P & O, Block 110 (31) East Aspen Townsite City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: East End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Modified cross qable cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Approximately 1.000 Number of Stories: 2 story with attic Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): "L" shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Large evergreen and deciduous trees on parcel; simp;le lawn setting; mature cottonwoods (2) front yard Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): 2nd story has totally altered scale and massinq For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Asphalt Walls: New wood lap siding Foundation / Basement: New basement - concrete Chimney(s): None Windows: Wood. appears that none are original Doors: Wood. appears that none are original Porches: Enclosed General Architectural Description: Cross gabled cottaqe with signi- ficant modifications; enclosed front'porch Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 825.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Additions and Date: Second floor addition; front porch addition (original porch enclosed); new wood lap siding. Onlv original feature remaining is the clipped corner right side -- 1989 - 1990 NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A_ B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation It Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register 1- Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. O Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Integrity has been compromised due to substan- tial modifications. Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it. nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. It is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and life stvle(s) of the average citizen of Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Georgeann Waqqaman Date: September. 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 101.EH Photo Information: ASP-M-18 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: None Full Street Address: 101 East Hopkins Legal Description: Lots A & B, Block 68 West Aspen Mountain city Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Shadow Mountain Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: 1,200 Number of Stories: 1-story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): T-shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross qabled with asymmetrical east-west gable terminating in shed roof on front; wood shakes Walls: Aluminum siding with decorative wood shingles at gable end Foundation / Basement: Stone basement Chimney(s): Brick Windows: Shallow-proiectinq bav with shed roof with one-over-one double hung window, supported bv scroll brackets at west side; small square casements; large picture windows on both north and west side of north/south qable Doors: Full liqht door with two 1/2 height side lights Porches: None General Architectural Description: 1-story Victorian Cottage with shed roof addition. Original fenestration, materials and detailing have been replaced or removed. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 101.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building's Style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Metal siding. roof shingles and window changes -- alter character significantly; dates unknown Additions and Date: 1st story shed addition on southeast side; date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 32 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Zl - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Glenn Rappaport Date: September 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 515.NT Photo Information: ASP-P-8 and 9 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Addie E. Bush Residence Full Street Address: 515 North Third C 40 I kle v +06 3 Legal Description: Lots 9 & 10; Block 33 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Cottage with extensive addition Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 and 2 stories Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular Landscaping or Special Setting Features: 3 large mature spruce front (east) yard; wrought iron fence around yard Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Simple gable new garage southeast corner For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: L-gable; asphalt shingles Walls: Clapboard Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Unknown Windows: All replacement double hung Doors: Wood Panel Porches: None General Architectural Description: Extensive multi-qabled addition on south and west sides. Typical characteristics of an Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottage: steep pitched qable roof trimmed out with horizontal clapboard sidinq with shingles in gable; long, narrow double-hung windows; wood-sawn brackets supporting bay window. Only gable end and bav window, both in the northeast corner, remain from the original building. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 515.NT FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: circa 1890 Actual X Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Replacement windows, clapboard, roofinq; dates unknown Additions and Date: Extensive one- and two-story addition to south side of main facade; garage; dates unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E .il.- Ill-- - -- Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1-1 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structurg/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: January 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 205.WB Photo Information: ASP-* Township 10 South Range * West Section * USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: * Full Street Address: 205 West Bleeker Legal Description: Lots H & I, Block 51 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: * Architectural Style: * Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: * Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: None Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): L-shaped shed-roof livestock shed with corugated fiberglass roof and vertical wood siding; approximately 350 square feet For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: L-qable with shed alteration to east side of front qable; asphalt shinqle; metal ball finials at gable end Walls: Clapboard Foundation / Basement: N/A Chimney(s): Red brick at gable intersection with corbeled top Windows: 2 horizontal rectangle picture windows; 1 diagonal shape picture window in qable end Doors: 4 panel Porches: N/A General Architectural Description: Victorian Miner's Cottage Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 205.WB FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: * 1 Actual 3 Estimate & Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Drastically altered windows, doors and roof (see front of this sheet) Additions and Date: * NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation 21 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * Associated Contexts and Historical Information: As a result of the drastic alterations to the original structure, this residence has been placed in the "Inventoried" category indicating it was built during Aspen's early mining era (1880-1890's). Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: * Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 305.WH Photo Information: Township 10 South Range * West Section * USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: * Full Street Address: 305 West Hallam Legal Description: * Hallam's Addition to the CitY of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Miner's Cottage Modified Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Mature cottonwood in the front Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Mansard/hipped stainless seam tvve corrugated metal, wood shed on west side Walls: Stucco Foundation / Basement: Block Chimney(s): Metal flue at shed Windows: One-over-one double hung replacements with shutters Doors: East side, wood panel Porches: None General Architectural Description: Scale is only distinquishable feature at this 'building. Materials and site have been significantly altered. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 305.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: *Residential Architect: *Unknown Original Use: *Residential Builder: *Unknown Intermediate Use: *Residential Construction Date: * 1 Actual * Estimate 1 Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Stucco, 1955; Metal roof, date unknown; Windows/Shutters. date unknown Additions and Date: * NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation - I Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 21 - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * Associated Contexts and Historical Information: * (use continuation sheets) Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 327.WH Photo Information: Township 10 South Range * West Section * USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: * Full Street Address: 327 West Hallam Legal Description: * Hallam's Addition to the Citv of Aspen city Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: N/A Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): N/A For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Simple qable with cross gable; asphalt shingles Walls: Stucco Foundation / Basement: Stone Chimney(s): Brick at east end of cross qable Windows: Fixed light north side bay (type "A". one-over-one double hung); new 3-sided bav and casements at rebuilt portions Doors: 1/2 light wood panel Porches: West side entry. wrapped posts General Architectural Description: Simple cottage nearly totally destroved by fire and rebuilt altering form and detail. only front bedroom remains original, per attached owners letter. Turned verge board and qable end (north). Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 327.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: *Residential Architect: *Unknown Original Use: *Residential Builder: *Unknown Intermediate Use: *Residential Construction Date: 1917? Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor ___ Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Window and porch altered, stucco; dates unknown Additions and Date: Rebuilt after fire, extended - 1970 NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 29 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Zl - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 230.NS Photo Information: ASP-S-19 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 230 North Spring Legal Description: Oklahoma Flats City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District/Neighborhood Name: Smuqqler Mountain/Oklahoma Flats Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Side faces Roaring Fork Creek; mature cottonwoods front (west and creekside); mature spruce to the north Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: L-qabled with extended side; shed at inside of south T; standing-seam-type corrugated metal; trub standing-seam metal Walls: Clapboard Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Ashlar stone at southwest slope of side gable; metal flue at rear Windows: Fixed 3-part picture window at front shed enclosure; hipped roof 3-sided easement bay at front qable end; contemporary casement Doors: Full light wood at south cross qable end under porch (original entry qone) Porches: Contemporary cross gable extension with exterior stone fireplace on clapboard-covered supports General Architectural Description: Simple L-qabled miner's cottage with substantial rhodifications to introduce a more contemporary character. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 860.GA FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building type MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Materials - metal roof. wood siding, metal easement windows and bav window -- all dates unknown Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1-1 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestvle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * CY or N) 1 Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner Lots 4-10, Block 4, Lakeview Addition; 101 Puppy Smith. Owner: Walter & Elizabeth Paepke Molny Condominiums; 1020 E. Hyman. Owner: Mickie Flanigan 1 & 2 and the S part of Lot 3, Block 1, and Lot 1 and the S M of Lot 2, Block 2, Oklahoma Flats Addition. Owner: Richard Volk Revocable Trust & Denise Reich Trust t 2, Turley; 330 Gillespie. Owner: Susan Horsey Lot 1, Volk Lot Split; 390 N. Spring. Owner: Eugene & Judith Seymour Lot 15, Wogan Lot Split; 240 Lake Ave. Owner: Jacqueline Wogan A public hearing shall be held on Tuesday, September 13, 1994 at 5:00 PM in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse, 506 E. Main St., Aspen. For further information, please contact Amy Amidon in the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 920-5096. s/Joseph Krabacher, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Published in The Aspen Times on August 26, 1994 City of Aspen Account Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 820 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. () () 6 824 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. Â·O 0 0 935 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. ~ ~ ~ 939 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 000 1012 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. C) C)_C) 811 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. O 0 819 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. O A 920 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. O 4 1022 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1 1 0 -0- ~R~ 1020 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 1031 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. O 0 D 1000 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. O 6 1006 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. O 6 1020 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. O A - A 303 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 305 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. - 4 307 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 918 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. O 0 ~~ 1031 E. Durant East Aspen Twnst. 4 ~ 623 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. a a 625 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 635 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 600 E. Bleeker East Aspen Twnst. 008 Durant Mine East Aspen Twnst. _El .O_ -A 10101010101 0101011111 'lolilololol 1 \1 Illololol Address/Name Area Status per year 80 86 92 635 W. Bleeker West End 006 Oot 522 W. Francis ' West End a 523 W. Francis West End 533 W. Francis West End 4 a 525 W. Hallam West End 533 W. Hallam West End a 120 N. 5th West End 434 W. Smuggler West End 515 N. 3rd West End 403 W. Hallam West End 421 W. Hallam West End 323 W. Hallam West End 229 W. Hallam West End 233 W. Hallam West End 213 W. Bleeker West End 217 W. Bleeker West End 233 W. Bleeker West End 121 W. Bleeker West End ~~ 129 W. Bleeker West End t 701 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 707 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 620 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 640 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. 10101010101010101010101010101010101 01010101 10101010101010101010101010101010101 Ololol 01 01 41 414101 41 410101 41 41 41 41 41 <11<11<11 Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 92 930 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. 006 920 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. OOA 9Â£- 390 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. -2 -2 ~< 230 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. O 100 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. O 101 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 165 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 106 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 520 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. 557 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. 930 King Smuggler Mtn. 925 King Smuggler Mtn. 935 King Smuggler Mtn. 980 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. 990 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. 720 Bay St. Smuggler Mtn. 000 Sheeley Bridge Smuggler Mtn. inventory.non.desig 1 0101 4 11 dololol 01 Old olololol ' 1 11 'lololol O I 01 01 4 010101 <1 41 4101 <110101 010101 i-- SEP - 91994 1010 69th St. Boulder, Co. 80303 September 9, 1994 Ms. Amy Amidon Historit Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Dear Amy: Thanks very much for seeing me yesterday relative to the potential historic designation of the log cabin located at 1007 E. Durant St. or other structures on the contiguous property owned by me and formerly owned by my mother, Mqrgaret B. Day. My understanding of the criteria for historic structures in Aspen is that they should be at least 50 years old or that if newer should have significant architectural value. This cabin nor any of the other adjacent structures meet either of these criteria classifications. As I told you the property was pur- chased circa 1960 by my parents from a man who I am told pur- chasid it circa 1950 and built the two log structures on the property in the early '50's. My parents subsequently built the other structures during thâ€¢ '60'8. An examination of thâ€¢ cabin you are considering designating "historic" bears out my understanding. It is built on poured concrete footings. Thi construction is of machine sawed 6x6 logs, square on 3 sides, natural on one. Between each log is a l x 4 sawn board. There are opening easement windows and framed in plate picture windows including a corner window. On the inside there is a built-in corner fireplace using a curved metal insert and brick trim. The Chimney is contermpor- ary brick. The rogf and upper part of the structure is conventional framed and the siding on each end il rough sawn board and batten. Theae are dhfinitely indications that the building was construdted cirea 1950. These are details obvious to my untr,ined eye. An architect, a contractor or another professional would undoubtedly find other contruction characteristics that would reaffirm my conclusion. I appreciate the sentimental interest in preserving buildings that are characteristic of the days oi Ispen's rebirth--circa 1950. But I strongly believe that it is neither within the legal bounds nor the spirit of Aspents currentry historical preservation ordinance to consider in any way that this cabin or other stractures on m y Durant St. property qualify for historic designationo L A .44,(,O 1-h \tÂ» B. D a443 vv i.,vi, 443-82+22 Ext. 121 -, . RICHARD W. VOLK 2807 BAMMEL LANE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2I March 18, 1994 --- -- Dear Amy, Thank you for gathering together the information for me concerning the designating of my jointly owned property at 230 north Spring Street as historical. It has been very enlightening for me to read and I think I understand why the error was made in 1980 when it was originally put on the list. At that time my brothers and sisters and I thought it was funny that a house that was essentially built by a 19 and 22 year old in 1955 would be historically significant to Aspen. I objected at that time and assumed that was the end of it. I thought for sure it had been deleted when I received the enclosed letter from my attorney in March of 1987. I think a bit of history as to my families involvement in this particular property and Oklahoma Flats generally might be helpful to you so you can understand my observations and conclusions. My mother Alice C. Volk and father Russell H. Volk and my brother Russell D. age 12, my sisters Dasa 4, and Denice 2, and myself 9, arrived in Aspen in August of 1945 for a family vacation. We stayed in the cabin that is now part of 230 North Spring, it consisted of three rooms and was about 400 square feet in size, it was owned by a close friend of my parents. At that time there were only three additional houses in Oklahoma Flats, a vacant cabin at 390 North Spring, about 21 feet by 21 feet or 441 square feet, Grandma Sandstrom's on Bay street and Albin Sandstrom's on the corner of Spring and Bay. These were all quite small, each well under 500 square feet in size. In October of 1945 my father purchased the cabin that is now 390 North Spring, and in May of 1954, 230 North Spring. From the Summer of 1946 on we spent most of our summers in Aspen and most Thanksgivings, Christmases, and spring vacations. In the summer of 1954 my father, myself and a local carpenter, Harry Williams added the room to the south of the original house at 230 North Spring. The new room was an area of about 10.5 by 22.5 feet or 236 square feet, almost the same size as the original house less the lean-to kitchen. We took off a small outside porch about 3 feet wide and 10 feet long in the process. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 230.NS FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: Late 1800's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building tvpe MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Front gable end bav window; standing seam-type metal roof - post 1980. Stone chimnev, pre 1980. Soffited eaves contemporary tram, pre 1980. Additions and Date: Extension of cross gable to contemporary covered porch, pre 1980; infill of shed porch area, date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Il - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and,Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 230.NS Photo Information: ASP-S-19 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 230 North Spring Legal Description: Oklahoma Flats City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District/Neighborhood Name: Smuggler Mountain/Oklahoma Flats Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Side faces Roaring Fork Creek; mature cottonwoods front (west and creekside); mature spruce to the north Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: L-qabled with extended side; shed at inside of south T; standing-seam-type corruqated metal; trub standing-seam metal Walls: Clapboard Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Ashlar stone at southwest slope of side gable; metal flue at rear Windows: Fixed 3-part picture window at front shed enclosure; hipped roof 3-sided easement bay at front qable end; contemporary casement Doors: Full liqht wood at south cross qable end under porch (original entry gone) Porches: Contemporary cross qable extension with exterior stone fireplace on clapboard-covered supports General Architectural Description: Simple L-gabled miner's cottage with substantial modifications to introduce a more contemporary character. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 860.GA Photo Information: ASP-S-11. 12 & 13 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 860 Gibson Avenue Legal Description: City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District/Neighborhood Name: Smuggler Mountain Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Miner's Cottage ? Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangle with rear shed extension Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Right up to heavily travelled road, yard enclosed bv vertical board wood fence; large mature spruce on west side and largest tree in vicinity Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): West yard. 70 square foot single qable shed with corrugated metal roof and rouqht cut log siding; far west yard. 30 square foot collapsing board and batten storage shed For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Side gable; standing-seam-type corrugated metal Walls: Shiplap horizontal siding Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): None Windows: Four over four double hunq original window at east gable end; replacement anodized metal casements; 4 sided bay with metal shed roof at southwest front Doors: 1/2 light over wood panel - new Porches: Entry shed across southeast 2/3 front supported on turned posts with decorative brackets; west qable end shed entry behind gate General Architectural Description: Simple side-qabled cottage with material and window modifications Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 860.GA FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1880's Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: Building tvpe MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Materials - metal roof, wood siding, metal casement windows and bay window -- all dates unknown Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B CDE Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial ef fort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner . PUBLIC NOTICE lie Hearings for the Re-Evaluation of the City of Aspen "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" - Round II TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all property owners that public hearings have been scheduled before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) to complete the review of the existing "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures". The properties listed below are subject to re-evaluation. Based upon Section 24-7-709 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the HPC will be evaluating all properties in the City of Aspen which were not included in Round I and which were originally constructed prior to 1910 which continue to have historic value, and such other structures identified by the HPC as being outstanding examples of more modern architecture. The HPC may add, delete or modify the listing of properties on the Inventory. All properties listed on the Inventory are subject to HPC review for demolition, partial demolition and/or relocation pursuant to Section 24-7-602A of the Municipal Code. City and Townsite of Aspen Lots M-P, and the E th of Lot M, Block 4; 920 W. Hallam. Owner: Katie Skiff Lots A-C, Block 12; 831 W. Bleeker. Owner: Herb & Marsha Klein Lot A and the Wth of Lot B, Block 21; 629 W. Smuggler. Owner: Maxwell Marolt Lots H & I, Block 21; 421 N. 5th. Owner: Charles L. Hall Lot Q, Block 21; 610 W. Francis. Owner: VEJ & AJD Partnership, LLC Lot A, Block 24; 633 W. Main. Owner: Richard Fleisher & I.F. Associates Lot Q, Block 31; 824 E. Hyman. Owner: Gregory Boelens & Mary Upton Lots K,L&W 15' of Lot M, Block 33, and Lots 11, 12 & W 15' of Lot 13, Block 33; 434 W. Smuggler. Owner: Katharine Thalberg Lots G-I, Block 41; 423 N. 2nd. Owner: Thomas Figge Lots A-C, Block 43; 327 W. Hallam. Owner: John & Ann Scheid Lots F-I, Block 43; 305 W. Hallam. Owner: VEJ & AJD Partnership, LLC Lots D & E, Block 48; 225 W. Smuggler. Owner: Cecil & Lorene Hernandez Lots H & I, Block 51; 205 W. Bleeker. Owner: O. Louis Wille Lots N-P, Block 55; 120 W. Francis. Owner: Jerald M. Barnett Lot B and Wth of Lot C, Block 58; 129 W. Bleeker. Owner: Robert & Sandra Brown ~ its B & C, E 25.28' of Lot B and N 8.22' of Lot C, Block 65; 105 E. Hallam. Owner: Donald Paul Krumm s A & B, Block 68; 101 E. Hopkins. Owner: Albert & Pearl Bishop s R & S, Block 71, on a portion of vacated Hallam St, and a portion of unplatted Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M.; 232 E. Hallam. Owner: Linda & Richard Roberts Lots D & E, Block 74; 221 E. Main. Owner: Katharine Thalberg Lots G-I, Block 74; 101 S. Monarch. Owner: James & Alberta Moore Lots L-N, Block 87; 406 E. Hopkins. Owner: Dominic Linza Lot R, Block 93; 532 E. Hopkins. Owner: Margaret Conner and Warren & Claude Conner Lots F & G, Block 99; 623 E. Hopkins. Owner: Bogaert Family Trust Metes & Bounds Parcels A tract in S 1/6 of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M.; 860 Gibson. Owner: Anne Byard Peterson To wit: Known as Robert Davey Improvements situate in the Hughes Addition to the Townsite and City of Aspen as follows: A tract of land situated in SM of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M.; 930 King. Owner: Joseph L. Candreia A parcel being part of Lot 1, Sunny Park; 165 N. Park. Owner: Dieter Bibbig A parcel in the NW w of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M.; Red Butte Cemetery. Owner: c/o Jane Stapleton Other 6th & Hallam Condominiums; 634 W. Hallam. Owner: Elizabeth Wilson & Lillian Baker Lot 1, 801 & 807 E. Hyman Subdivision Exemption; 801 E. Hyman. Owner: John Elmore Lot 16, Callahan Subdivision; 1280 Ute Avenue. Owner: Powderhouse Enterprises Lot 4A, Block 1, Dunn/Bishop Exemption; 950 Matchless. Owner: Charles O. Bishop Lots 3-6, Block 11, Eames Addition; 107 Juan. Owner: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Lots A-I, Block 40, East Aspen Addition; 1035 E. Durant. Owner: Frank & Margaret Day "asterly Tract, C.F. Murphy & Associates, Hallam Addition; 314 Gillespie. Owner: Bruce Berger s 8-10, Block 33, Hallam Addition; 401 North. Owner: Mason Phelps s 4-6, Block 99, Hallam Addition; 515 Gillespie. Owner: Neil & Pamela Beck ot 1, Hume Lot Split; 330 Lake Ave. Owner: James P. Hume Hyman Avenue Victorian; 990 E. Hyman. Owner: Barbara Gameroff, Anita Pierce & Joan Sparling Trust . Lots 4-10, Block 4, Lakeview Addition; 101 Puppy Smith. Owner: Walter & Elizabeth Paepke 'olny Condominiums; 1020 E. Hyman. Owner: Mickie Flanigan ts 1 & 2 and the S part of Lot 3, Block 1, and Lot 1 and the S 1/6 of Lot 2, Block 2, Oklahoma Flats Addition. Owner: Richard Volk Revocable Trust & Denise Reich Trust ot 2, Turley; 330 Gillespie. Owner: Susan Horsey Lot 1, Volk Lot Split; 390 N. Spring. Owner: Eugene & Judith Seymour Lot 15, Wogan Lot Split; 240 Lake Ave. Owner: Jacqueline Wogan A public hearing shall be held on Tuesday, September 13, 1994 at 5:00 PM in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse, 506 E. Main St., Aspen. For further information, please contact Amy Amidon in the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 920-5096. s/Joseph Krabacher, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ---------------- Published in The Aspen Times on August 26, 1994 City of Aspen Account A '=4 LAN<sÂ·Â« - i 19 L 4-96 i - EXHIBIT "A" tfÂ« ct- -â‚¬Â£> duo v~(-0~ -42.a,pA u,=9-41 0 L/rt Non-Designated Properties for re-evaluation QN v 04 March, 1992 - tl (4 /1/1 L/\0> Key: ntrignificant: O Contributing: A Supporting: () Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 432 E. Hyman commercial Core O 0 423 E. Hyman Commercial Core m m 530 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 0 ~ 532 E. Hopkins Commercial Core ~ 534 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 0 . 531 E. Cooper Commercial Core 6 529 E. Cooper Commercial core a 308 E. Hopkins Commercial Core O 314 E. Hyman Commercial Core () ~ 406 E. Hopkins Commercial Core 6 4 209 S. Galena Commercial Core 006 701 W. Main Main Street 709 W. Main Main Street 604 W. Main Main Street 616 W. Main Main Street 611 W. Main Main Street 518 W. Main Main Street 527 W. Main Main Street 205 W. Main Main Street 1 h< 101 S. Monarch Main Street I 227 E. Main Main Street O 1 101 0101 <11 <110101 110101010101<11010101 0 41131 41 41 41[]1 41 <11 41 4 4 4 41<11 41 4 <11 4 01 4 11 01 01 ololol <1 Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 92 820 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. () O LJ 824 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 22- -Q_ (2_ 935 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 000 939 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. 000 1012 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 811 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. _( 819 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. ~ 920 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 0 1022 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. . ~0~ 1020 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 0 1031 E. Hyman East Aspen Twnst. 0.2 _C 1000 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. ~ 1006 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. ~ 1020 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. ~ 303 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. - 305 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. - 307 S. Cleveland East Aspen Twnst. 918 E. Cooper East Aspen Twnst. <3~ 1031 E. Durant East Aspen Twnst. ~ 623 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 625 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 635 E. Hopkins East Aspen Twnst. 600 E. Bleeker East Aspen Twnst. Durant Mine East Aspen Twnst. 1 01010101 ol ol Ill 1 10111010101 0101 10101 <11 <11 0101 4| 4| 4 4| 4 4| 0| 4 4 4 4| 41 41 O1010111 1 101 'lololol 01 El Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 92 ~~ 1280 Ute Ave. Ute Avenue 004 1500 Ute Ave. Ute Avenue - -6 I- a Glory Hole Park Ute Avenue 124 E. Cooper Shadow Mountain 214 E. Hopkins Shadow Mountain ~<* 107 Juan St. Shadow Mountain 325 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 200 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 205 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain 214 W. Hyman Shadow Mountain 216 W. Hyman Shadow Mountain 311 S. 1st St. Shadow Mountain 135 W. Hopkins Shadow Mountain ~>4 101 E. Hopkins Shadow Mountain Midland Rgt of Way Shadow Mountain Red Butte Cemetery West End Rio Grande R-0-W West End 712 W. Francis West End 716 W. Hallam West End 117 N. 6th Wesâ‚¬ End 735 W. Bleeker West End 609 W. Smuggler West End ~~ 610 W. Francis West End 610 W. Hallam West End 1 1 01 01 11.0101 ololol ololol ol 01 mi 01010101010101 1 1 01 01 d ol ol 01 01 Ol ol ol ol ol 01 01 01 01 0101 01 01 01 1 4141<1141<1.1 4 41 41 414'01<11 <1141 <11 ol <11 <11 <1101 4 Address/Name Area Status per year 86 92 0 06 635 W. Bleeker West End 522 W. Francis West End O 4 523 W. Francis West End a 533 W. Francis West End 6 a 525 W. Hallam West End 533 W. Hallam West End a 120 N. 5th West End 434 W. Smuggler West End 515 N. 3rd West End . 403 W. Hallam West End 421 W. Hallam West End 323 W. Hallam West End 229 W. Hallam West End 233 W. Hallam West End 213 W. Bleeker West End 217 W. Bleeker West End 233 W. Bleeker West End 121 W. Bleeker West End ~ 129 W. Bleeker West End 701 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. ~ 707 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. ~ 620 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. ( 640 N. 3rd West End/Hallam Lk. ( 2 101 01 0101 01 01 olololololol ol ololol olol Oloi 0101 101 0101 01 ololololol ol ololololololol 4 41 41 41 01 41 41 olol 41 41 41 <11 - 41 <11<11<11 ... Address/Name Area Status per vear 80 86 92 240 Lake Ave. West End/Hallam Lk. ( Q Â£ 202 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. ~ ~ 8 ;< 225 W. Smuggler West End/Hallam Lk. _~_ _(_, A 229 W. Smuggler West End/Hallam Lk. _~_ _(_ A 126 W. Francis West End/Hallam Lk. ~ 123 W. Fiancis West End/Hallam Lk. ~ ~ A 124 W. Hallam West End/Hallam Lk. _~._ _~._ ~~~ ~~ 314 Gillespie West End/Hallam Lk. _~_ _~_ A 220 Puppy Smith West End/Hallam Lk. O 0 4 Aspen Brewery Ruins West End/Hallam Lk. - - ~ Triangle Park West End/Hallam Lk. ( ~ A 101 E. Hallam West End/Church 006 110 E. Bleeker West End/Church 134 E. Bleeker West End/Church 216 E. Hallam West End/Church 223 E. Hallam West End/Church 232 E. Bleeker West End/Church 227 E. Bleeker West End/Church 202 N. Monarch West End/Church 470 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. 00. '01010101010101 01010101010101 1 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11<1141 Y Richard W. Volk 2327 Mimosa Drive Houston, Texas 77019 September 12,1994 The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Historic Committee: I believe designating the property at 230 North Spring Street as a typical Victorian miner's cottage is misleading to the general public. The historical architectural building/structure form states under the section Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: "The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry." Under the General Architectural Description: "Simple L-gabled miner's cottage with substantial modification to introduce a more contemporary character." The boldness is my emphasis. Both the bold statement and the bold architectural description are misleading and in error. I think a bit of history as to my family's involvement in this particular property and Oklahoma Flats in general might be helpful to you so you can understand the basis of my ~ observations and conclusions. My mother Alice C. Volk and father Russell H. Volk and my brother Russell D. age 12, my sisters Dasa 4, and Denice 2, and I, 9, arrived in Aspen in August of 1945 for a family vacation. We stayed in the cabin that is now part of 230 North Spring. It consisted of three rooms, was about 400 square feet in size and was owned by a close friend of my parents. In 1945 there were only three additional houses in Oklahoma Flats, a vacant cabin at 390 North Spring, about 21 feet by 21 feet or 441 square feet, Grandma Sandstrom's at 720 Bay street and Albin Sandstrom's on the corner of Spring and Bay. These were all quite small, each well under 500 square feet in size. My father purchased the cabin that is now 390 Spring Street in October of 1945 and from that time until 1954 we spent our summers and many Thanksgivings, Christmases and Spring vacations in this house. My father purchased 230 North Spring Street in May of 1954. In the summer of 1954 my father, myself and a local carpenter, Harry Williams added the room to the south of the original house at 230 North Spring. The new room was an area of about 10.5 by 22.5 feet or 236 square feet, almost the same size as the original house less the lean-to kitchen. We took off a small outside porch about 3 feet wide and 10 feet long in the process. My older brother, Russell D. Volk returned from the Army in the spring of 1955 and in the summer and fall he and I with my fathers direction and design removed the small kitchen area to the east of the old cabin and added the "T" on the east part of the house. He was 22 and I was 19. This consists of an area 50 feet by 12.5 feet or 625 square feet which contains the porch, fireplace, living room, kitchen, bathroom, and a bedroom. The rooms in the old house were converted to a bedroom and combination laundry-bunkroom. The total old area was 12.6 feet by 22.5 feet or 284 square feet, which now occupies about 26% of the floor space, 23% of the outside walls, and 22% of the roofed area of the current house. See attached floor plan and pictures. I believe the person who originally inventoried the property in 1980 assumed that the "T" was part of the original structure and had been modified with contemporary windows. This was of course in error as to actual fact. His assumption must have been based upon the original windows in the front of the house, but even at that time there were a total of 22 windows around the house with only two being old. Now, there are none as the front windows were replaced with a bay window in the mid 80's. From my perspective and my brothers and sisters, we believe it is misleading to the general public to declare that the house at 230 North Spring illustrates the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen in the mining era. The house at 230 North Spring is two to three times the size of any of the homes in Oklahoma Flats that were left in 1945, and I think it is fair to assume the larger and better houses were the ones kept. Currently, the only part of the house as viewed from the outside that could be construed as being from the mining era is the front gabled wall, but this isn't any different than the north end of the 'T", a 1955 addition (see pictures enclosed). The general public will very seldom see the house from the front as Spring Street dead ends at the river. Most will see ' it from the Rio Grande Trail to the south across the river and from there the only thing they see from the old house is a portion of a metal roof. The house was deleted from the 1980 Aspen Inventory of Historical Sites and Structures by the City of Aspen Resolution No. 5, Series of 1987. I do not understand why or how it was reinstated in 1992. See attached letter dated March 11,1987 from Thomas J. Todd of Holland & Hart to me. I would appreciate your thoughtful consideration of the facts, our involvement in Oklahoma Flats for the past 49 years, our opinion that inferring that the structure at 230 North Spring Street illustrates the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen during the mining era is untrue and misleading. Also, the house has no observable historic structures. This property simply does not fit within the city's classification as a "supporting structure", which is a resource that has maintained some elements of their historic and architectural integrity and in general is "retrievable" with substantial effort. 1 f~U/UL Richard W. Volk 1 24.00' N 16'30'00" E (aÂ» 4,2.80' 140 -6 U ry 4:3*03, fj : \A 1-%. ds *N oit y . Z 20 EME.9 1 ~9' ~0 . 1 \\1-337tle::~c#te)rril. e GÂ».OIl \ -- rk----N k U UJ 14Â«10 1 1 1\ \6\ 1 S R N l . All:6 1,- 4 1 0- S 1 M\ VotpA k 3 4.00 1 I IE 0 ?i VI./0 <Mit V li - 01-11 1 \44* A 25.0, . / #*-8 5, - *<. 3 00*~00~4(4/ lizÂ·\ â€¢ \ \Â«1"41 1 /1 Ge'\ 12 5' L ..1 44.4 ' .Abig' -. 06 '9409 4 ., 2. 4Â»97.4,01:le 7 'Irl t:Al , 01(14450<24~~* *il ~ ~~~~~~ aS: 4 41: Sha~ 2 87 14 , v, 711 -1 1 , Â£ If -1-i ; r 3:19*Sfa/*"67>=:filk . , 34-- 3 1 :-iwe*F6 .~7 41161 1 - . 1).024.4 . 7/. 1 1 ;IN4 y.Â·--941=2~~ -De . tknt, \11"31 1#,1 ' . iNAL 11.Ji a 'p# 6,1 K' '? . . 1"I . c fÂ»,2.- W,;41*2 4%14.Al-c~21. Re 4.-dEL--4f 9 <jit, 1-6 1 - 1.*Ii~-1.L - 6/92/6-Fghad " - 1//i. Tril-/Ell li ~'fity ;2 :crÂ·i~*,:,~ fill/Ble/#*.8/535.,P %\ O\t #i. i: b 210< C.:Zirig. \19 . Â· lilea,5*Â¢11*44 ''1: 41A'~3*F:Art 1//R/61 J/P/#f, Li & :. Ne,0,/ 4/ -<' ~,4. ,#29, 6.1* 'â€¢ i~li, PIN.~My. R 1 /1!1*'g-..0/6:~ ...il.el 4 0*haw."INA: - -~ '- 4!l .Mia, i 7-94' -44>- ,..54 4 - Ils *,r-: 1 : . 1.7 4.- -. imel . -W . ... imi'll"FErail"li* 4 . lm#r# 0, dk. 41/,161 ~0 - .6,1 15;35*Li 21*Ur, 11- ....1 I Wrk. 4,111.Il/+91'-9 6 L 4: 4 4 4 4 ; 4,1 ./:. ''- ...6 . ... , 14 5: * , w:*t 4Â£,cht -, Zic â‚¬Câ„¢t>' TV . 1,Â·*" 11 2,-6 -: AM: ir,6-4 Â· i .: *,,7, 4-jÂ·: .;31 2.4... 1114'jt dy,i, ut,#e~I,1,4 Ii Â·,-m . - r.-2=21':Ateft :-0-â‚¬42GO+2&*at;~~I~*~~~~e- Y vy* 42 ' f .. 1'3, k. 1 1 AL,J. 1 ..7... -,1- 0.,rk, 12: ..I.4,1&744':lot "12. . ..ed .---, 1 14..i;: 1 .... I . I 2, . .2 Q . triM?1:E /61,51/*5/*. | IN r i: \ '* Ntâ€¢fr:Â·A/U 442: -. 1 t' 6 43 + . 1 10' i 4/744 ZE - 4.- . 15.4.< #< Â·#914 k.' .1, 7 - r.- 0 . 7 - A// '; 22-: Lbi. h ..1 - im... 7 , : N tu , 712. I. ' Â£ r ' gliti 7-Â· - 3,1111....r<r-,'-' 6-1~,I- e ct X.1 11 Z . V \ -r <, L 1 N , .S . .0-. / I. 1 - . .1 , . I. -- r- .1/Â·,869" 41#INh:i~lf ~L' -Q . 1, 1 . -Â· 9 4.1 4 * J HOLLAND & HART DENVER OFFICE WASHINGTON, O. C. OFFICE ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 2900 SUITE 1200 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET - 1875 EYE STREET, N. W DENVER, COLORADO 80202 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 600 EAST MAIN STREET TELEPHONE (303) 295-8000 TELEPHONE (202) 466-7340 TELECOPIER (303) 295-8201 - ASPEN. COLORADO Blell TELECOPIER {202)400-7384 TELEPHONE (303) 928-3476 MONTANA OFFICE WYOMING OFFICE SUITE .00 SUITE 500 175 NORTH 27TH STREET 2020 CAREY AVENUE BILLINGS, MONTANA 59101 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82001 TELEPHONE (406) 262-2166 TELEPHONE 13071 632-2160 TELECOPIER (406) 282-Ieee March 11, 1987 TELECOPIER (3071 778-8170 THOMAS J. TODD S. C.DENVER OFFICE SUITE 1250 7887 EAST BELLEVIEW AVENUE ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO BOW TELEPHONE (303} 741-1226 Mr. Richard Volk 550 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Re: Historic Designation of Oklahoma Flats House Dear Dick: Enclosed is a copy of City of Aspen Resolution No. 5, Series of 1987, which deletes your Oklahoma Flats house from the 1980 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and also deletes it from the Moratorium on Demolition. We will continue to watch the local newspaper reports of Historic Preservation Committee activities and will keep you informed of any developments that are of interest. Very truly yours, A.._91EZ__ Thomas J. T~d for HOLLAND & HART TJT/sg = Enclosures Address/Name Area Status per vear 86 930 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. 920 Matchless Dr. Smuggler Mtn. ~- 390 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. _() ~< 230 N. Spring Smuggler Mtn. _<) 100 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 00 101 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. O 165 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. _~ . 106 N. Park Smuggler Mtn. 520 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. - 557 Walnut Smuggler Mtn. - 930 King Smuggler Mtn. 0 0 3,- 1 925 King Smuggler Mtn. O 0 935 King Smuggler Mtn. 000 980 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. O 0 990 Gibson Smuggler Mtn. 0 0 -- 720 Bay St. Smuggler Mtn. O 0 Sheeley Bridge Smuggler Mtn. 000 inventory.non.desig 2 4 41 4101 101 4 41 <1101<1101 1 :ololololololol 1111 1 1 1 010101 Inventorv deletions due to demolitions: 110 N. Spring 718 E. Hopkins 720 E. Hopkins 624 E. Hopkins 816 E. Cooper 835 E. Cooper 515 N. 5th 501 W. Smuggler 639 N. 4th 170 N. Park 940 Matchless Drive 219 W. Hopkins 203 E. Hallam 222 E. Hallam inventory.non.desig --- - 1-- SEP -919* 1010 69th St. Boulder, Co. 80303 September 9, 1994 Ms. Amy Amidon Historit Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Dear Amy: Thanks very much for seeing me yesterday relative to the potential historic designation of the log cabin located at 1007 E. Durant St. or other structures on the contiguous property owned by me and formerly owned by my mother, Mqrgaret B. Day. My understanding of the criteria for historic structures in Aspen is that they should be at least 50 years old or that if newer should have significant architectural value. This cabin nor any of the other adjacent structures meet either of these criteria classifications. As I told you thâ€¢ property was pur- chased circa 1960 by my parents from a man who I am told pur- chased it circa 1950 and built the two log structures on the property in the early '50'8. My parents subsequently built the other structures during thâ€¢ '60'8. An examination of the cabin you are considering designating "historic" bears out my understanding. It is built on poured concrete footings. The construction is of machine sawed 6 x6 logs, square on 3 sides, natural on one. Between each log is a l x 4 sawn board. There are opening easement windows and framed in plate picture windows including a corner window. On the inside there is a built-in corner fireplace using a curved metal insert and brick trim. The Chimney is contermpor- ary brick. The rogf and upper part of thâ€¢ structure is conventional framed and the siding on each end is rough sawn board and batten. These are d*finitely indications that the building was construdted ciraa 1950. These are details obvious to my untriined eye. An architect, a contractor or another professional would undoubtedly find other contruction characteristics that would reaffirm my conclusion. I appreciate the sentimental interest in preserving buildings that are characteristic of the days 00 Ispen's rebirth--circa 1950. But I strongly believe that it is neither within the legal bounds nor the spirit of Aspen's currentry historical preservation ordinance to consider in any way that this cabin or other structures on m y Durant St. property qualify for historic designation. Brfiler ely, (5~~-Jj'~~~~~< 4126*f)~Wa (301 1 443-2122 ET+. 191 45+4/) -2.idok.,/ L~~24-2 )12* 7** 9-*2--71(@241 ed_tic.t, t,) 914 1,3 0 Uf 4 11 j A 94 231 uvell . , i Â«7 4.9. 1/3// A SEP -2 SN -0-ihi-4/ /)04- A-,26628 ~ .-39 9 733.9.4.1.-11 -NOU~~44.1,4-4LD jo ~ Â¢ U Â»Ja,O, tij A-43 8 lt~44 4 q -~- zt:~ ~ - Â«7~ 164 4138 I,lul 1Â£) 110-nu j uu.Gia Â£? 4Â¢; t; c . A ~ aÂ« 4 -1'uic-1.4i.3?4, *4LL~Lka Â·1 'jULDÂ»U><D: . 1-178 y) U 1}193,7 +90 10 - 1,14 jitÂ® th-L /542Â»utitultu-aL. wit ~ 11Â£4 116-1,114)11-lim lk/~Yll ki-4Â£ 1,)~~-;.111.Â·cL A t w 331 >14)12/>9 29 Rl-60 Â· 1 4.-4 14-tb 31 14044 -le' f_(1~~,4 911-11 -th.o 1-1 * jit-.14~- 20 2~Lid.Â£014-,Li 0 j/1/i -4?94774 4-f >22-,t \ kh~ 44222-ZE_,4* 144--/Ray. RICHARD W. VOLK 2807 BAMMEL LANE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 21 March 18, 1994 Dear Amy, Thank you for gathering together the information for me concerning the designating of my jointly owned property at 230 north Spring Street as historical. It has been very enlightening for me to read and I think I understand why the error was made in 1980 when it was originally put on the list. At that time my brothers and sisters and I thought it was funny that a house that was essentially built by a 19 and 22 year old in 1955 would be historically significant to Aspen. I objected at that time and assumed that was the end of it. I thought for sure it had been deleted when I received the enclosed letter from my attorney in March of 1987. I think a bit of history as to my families involvement in this particular property and Oklahoma Flats generally might be helpful to you so you can understand my observations and conclusions. My mother Alice C. Volk and father Russell H. Volk and my brother Russell D. age 12, my sisters Dasa 4, and Denice 2, and myself 9, arrived in Aspen in August of 1945 for a family vacation. We stayed in the cabin that is now part of 230 North Spring, it consisted of three rooms and was about 400 square feet in size, it was owned by a close friend of my parents. At that time there were only three additional houses in Oklahoma Flats, a vacant cabin at 390 North Spring, about 21 feet by 21 feet or 441 square feet, Grandma Sandstrom's on Bay street and Albin Sandstrom's on the corner of Spring and Bay. These were all quite small, each well under 500 square feet in size. In October of 1945 my father purchased the cabin that is now 390 North Spring, and in May of 1954, 230 North Spring. From the Summer of 1946 on we spent most of our summers in Aspen and most Thanksgivings, Christmases, and spring vacations. In the summer o f 1954 my father, mysel f and a local carpenter, Harry Williams added the room to the south of the original house at 230 North Spring. The new room was an area of about 10.5 by 22.5 feet or 236 square feet, almost the same size as the original house i less the lean-to kitchen. We took off a small outside porch about 3 feet wide and 10 feet long in the process. My older brother, Russell D. returned from the Army in the spring of 1955 and he and I removed the small kitchen area to the east of the old cabin and added the "T" on the east part of the house. He was 22 and I was 19. This consists of an area 50 feet by 12.5 feet or 625 square feet which contains the porch, fireplace, living room, kitchen, bathroom, and a bedroom. The rooms in the old house were converted to a bedroom and combination laundry-bunkroom. The total old area was 12.6 feet by 22.5 feet or 284 square feet, which now occupies about 26% of the floor space, 23% o f the outside walls, and 22% of the roofed area of the current house. The design of the addition was my father's, with my brother and I designing and constructing the fireplace when my father was unable to come for several weekends. My youngest sister Denice who was 12, was our helper during most of the summer. As I told you I would do, I looked for my father's accounting of the expenses at the time, but was unable to locate them - too many moves. I believe the person who originally inventoried the property in 1980 assumed that the "T" was part of the original structure and had been modified with contemporary windows. This was of course in error as to actual fact. His assumption must have been based upon the original windows in the front of the house, but even at that time there were a total of 22 windows around the house with only two being old. Now, there are none as the front windows were replaced with a bay window in the mid 80's. From my prospective I believe it is misleading to the general public to declare that the touse at 230 North Spring illustrates the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen in the mining era. The house at 230 North Spring is two to three times the size of any of the homes in Oklahoma Flats that were left in 1945, and I think it is fair to assume the larger and better houses were the ones kept. Currently, the only part of the house that could be construed as being from the mining era is the front gabled wall, but this isn't any different than the north end of the "T" 1955 addition (see pictures enclosed). The general public will very seldom see the house from the front as Spring Street dead ends at the river. Most will see it from the Rio Grande Trail to the south across the river and from there the only thing they would see is a metal roof. My sister Denice said she did receive the notice and did respond by letter. I am not sure why I didn't also receive a notice as it was my old business address that was used for the tax rolls, copy enclosed. Had I received the notice I would have responded with a letter like this. , I hope this will help in your deliberations and I look forward to a reply. Sincerely, U VE 9-5. I 60-ve as<<el 'Yovn 7614 4 St:iN~ You 41(-i n oft-J .5\(Ce.- Uke- CQ ED q'LÂ£Â£ 621