The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19940126J AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE January 26, 199;0~ REGULAR MEETING SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of Dec. 8, 1993 minutes. II. Committee and Staff Comments III. Public Comments 4 ila A-Drk N, /4 Â£00 >(Â£ 3,3 / 3- 3- 6/1 n,u- t\NdÂ©d--- c) r o-n 9,99-9/n auj n ' Aj-5 8. IV. OLD BUSINESS 5:15 A. 220 W. Main Street- European Flower Market Conceptual Development (PH)- con't. from Jan. 1200 33: JAKÂ£- 5:45 B. 107 Juan Street- Worksession 6:15 C. 205 S. Mill Street- Final Development:)r-PE- /09Â«04- V. NEW BUSINESS 6:35 A. 520 E. Durant, Ajax Mountain Building- awnings 6:45 B. 1994 HPC Goals 7:00 VI. A. Project Monitoring B. Neighborhood Character Guidelines- ongoing C. Red Brick update- ongoing D. Amendment to Guidelines (rooftop equipment) E. Demolition F. Upcoming Meetings 7:15 VII. Adjourn ed l 3224 A-kcLA 5 -2.- 3 up. \69/LAÂ·Â·Â·--,Â·Â·c_-a 0/ , 5. i-fe vA- 0 Â£1 di. --~4â€ž C.-'Il CLU-.COL E> <38 I , re-1 1 zit -uu'l / '/ ; 9, s HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Proiect/Committee Add Conceptual date to all projects when approved Bill Poss CCLC & PPRG 413 E. Hyman County Courthouse Highway Entrance Design Committee Character Committee-AACP 601 W. Hallam (app. liaison) HP Element-Community Plan Aspen Historic Trust-Board Member 214 W. Bleeker St. Mary's Church 533 E. Main Donnelley Erdman The Meadows (Chair-Sub Comm) 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) Collins Block/Alley Wheeler-Stallard House 624 E. Hopkins 304 E. Hopkins 234 W. Francis Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Museum (alt.) In-Town School Sites Committee Aspen Historic Trust-Chairman 824 E. Cooper 210 S. Mill 303 E. .Main Alt 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Joe Krabacher 801 E. Hyman AHS Ski Museum Aspen Historic Trust-Vice Chairman 612 W. Main 309 E. Hopkins (Lily Reid) 617 W. Main 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Jake Vickery The Meadows (alternate) In-Town School Sites Committee 205 S. Mill Larry Yaw 716 W. Francis 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer-alt.) 204 S. Galena (Sportstalker) City Hall 627 W. Main (residential-Jim Kempner) 232 E. Hallam ACES Roger Moyer CCLC Liaison 334 W. Hallam Aspen Historical Society 409 E. Hopkins 303 E. Main 311 W. North Farfalla lights outside 210 Lake Avenue (alternate) Karen Day Rubey Transit Center 334 W. Hallam (alternate) Cottage Infill Program 134 E. Bleeker 435 W. Main Swiss Chalet 311 W. North 304 E. Hopkins 121 S. Galena Martha Madsen 620 W. Hallam (alternate) 100 Park Ave. (alternate) 214 W. Bleeker (alternate) 132 W. Main 520 E. Cooper Unit 406 Linda Smisek 134 E. Bleeker 210 Lake Avenue 305 Mill St. 702 W. Main - Stape - Conceptual Development approved Sept 8, 1993 Ik) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 107 Juan Street- Worksession DATE: January 26, 1994 SUMMARY: HPC members made a site visit to 107 Juan Street, and have seen conceptual plans for developing affordable housing on this property. Now that the Housing Department has selected Gibson and Reno as their project architects they are returning to HPC with a fully developed design. They have asked for comments in a worksession format at this meeting, and will formally request on- site relocation of the historic resource in a public hearing on February 23rd. (partial demolition of the rear lean-to may also be involved.) As part of their review of a relocation, HPC may evaluate the proposed development plan which necessitates moving an historic structure. The Board's review of the new structures on this site should be specifically directed towards their relationship to the historic resource. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff supports on-site relocation of the Victorian and the construction of an appropriate porch. The proposed porch does seem to be in character with the house, but the building should be examined to see if there is any evidence of an original porches' appearance. Staff is not completely in favor of the second story addition to the lean-to. It seems that the lean- to would have to be reconstructed in order to support another story, and there would be a negative impact on the historic character of this structure. Staff is also concerned with the height of the new structures. Topography and the need for an underground garage have caused these buildings to be much higher than the historic house. A model will be provided at the worksession, and the housing department intends to put up story poles in February. The new buildings (at least the one next to the Victorian) should relate more to the one story height of the historic resource, by using porches or some other way to step the massing down. Entering the site through a small gateway is a good way to relate to the scale of the house and to the street. Windows on the new structure should be about twice as tall as they are wide. Native building materials are preferred, including wood clapboards, wood shingles and stone. 7 / / ,-- b 1 C Â«44---- 2 4- EN . -- em 4,60 - Â£ 6Â§%1 --- - -- f / 2 2 :a / 9 I 1 lu ~,4 5/ U 0-UAN 67-â‚¬667 0, , â‚¬ \ i I p'- --1 1 , , 4* L 1/2/ .*. -0 - ---- - -7948- - ---- / / / 5' 6,0.Â»- 1 - 0 - 9 : " Â¥ W - I.U. 4/1 -- ./.I' I. I 0 0/ I .4 1 1 1.-1-p-*"50, - - ,C=t=31Â· 4 --- ~I pl /" 13.3--I. -- , ' re-*77'~ - *~4Â·Â»662 /1 /fin- / --4 +74 ---1 -- 11 '9941 1 *.-Â¥ 1 +8 t=: .~I<\ \ 14.1'kÂ¥ \\1 - 1 L--117- r,f / -.to - co.-â€¢140-12LJ \1 - - -14/ LOT 6 1 1 / / LOT 1 1 1 - .\ 1 1 1111:11 mil 111111|11|11|1 4 6 1 Â£ =--1 1-L L ' 4. - / 93= 0 0 illA 1 119 2 1 0 1 - '14/ 1 . ~1 z. Bl Â£ 0 - - - -31 1.14 2 - . Ul - 0 11 - .. 1 7956%----- -f~~ ~ ! 20 ~ 4 ~ LOT 5 LOT 2 1 ~ <~ 5.z ~ < LOT 4 | 1 LOT 3 r-Â« 1/ j 0 111 M 1 \\\ \\4\\ U f ,:m - - Ill -- - I ..1 Ae'l-m: 9- *,2 r--- - )2. 58 ti: IN - , 10' \\ -Ii - - 98 - - -/ 7,20 , , - 2, 1.4 - -6- / -1'FIRST LEVEL/SITE PLAN --- 795=0% - 4 , 1!11 \ 4\62 9 - \ -- - 62,- JO M --- - -- I--- -- - 9--- #-% 'r ~ -- - 0-112046Â· 9 - / -- -14, 97/ --- --I---- - Wr ~~--- -i--~ - - I/6/- ::NO-@1Â£ ....AV /@~00/ 'Gv/ .......1= 1 ./00 0 .... ' 0......0 N F-+ U-= 4--1 T -- --1 i -MMT- - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rmÂ·r, -\ M 111111 i O 14 2 e t. 10 1 4 3 k flu j 4(1 11 1 -4 4 1 111 1% f -1 41Â· 1 1 41 C ') I + I W L- 2 7 1 U.1 4 -4 i /44* el , ' ' 40 thi_ 72' 00 - eâ€¢ JUAN STREET HOUSING E/0, JOINO: 1%80 AE'SION: /1//7 /4, DATE: /2/2,/98 107 JUAN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO SCALE >* 5, ' C,â€¢ECKED: ~ GIBSON & FIENO - ARCHITECTS 41I CAET COXâ„¢El AVENUE Â·rEL-2-0-i -m=z ASOEN COLOAACOC] Â· 8181' O.....04/ lel . , JUAN' NV7d BE)Vt, Ii L I , . P .me . P Â· 4 I I r- F r f 1~-- - -- r_-1,/7 , '' A r ; 70 1 4/ 2 1 44 91 r 0 F 41/\: 2 f WLÂ»~~1 6 .U = 1 ICS NO: .EV1/ION JUAN STREET HOUSING coAT E i C.ECKEO SCALE' - 303,92/58/3 f- GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS ASPEN COLOf~AOO ...,1 0 COPY.... 19__ TEL/m,44#: /1/ EAST Cooll' AVENUE 303.925-5988 . 28' 2- r Â¢ 4 5 a. -1 h 1 t -t 44 1 ? w 6 1 T 1 1 . 1 1 t t; 4 1 ~---- 2 ~ " 0-49=- 4 1 -,< 1 ., ~1--0 1 I mi 0 h 1112 > 4-2 w [LOIIi . 3% 4 E Ir- ---- 4 4-94 1: M VAI -7-1 1 Â·% pr K i-2 4 5 0 11 i I3 EL_-11 4 iIi 1 G i 4% 2 7 -13 XI --1--1 u m r __ ._Liitt.~~~j , --7. . ir,1 - ' ///7 \ - , 1-jt--leaz=fÂ»----Â« -- ti'Â·/- fri~ F c .i, * '' 10 29. 3 ' 17 7 4 E lu 1 : LU ' zy .r fi -1 - F 1 c g If ily 1- 14242-25 3 2 4 ' l - 11 11_11*412 _i W: 1 -- 4 i M W - -- 3-5 .=== OU :17 1 ' -7 -1- .IR r--Lh 1-fl~li lili'1111 1 110 ' 12 14 - - tiv 111' 1 24 4 i X -41 02=f 1 1 017 rÂ·lt i f-----~ i.~i , ll LiI 7,14~ --, 1 S C , 4*/11 1 1 8 4 It- AE t. 614 1 1-14 1 -7 1 6 - ---9.- + 1 ---- --- h '--- 7 /0 \ r , //// . t ----4 J / 1 - . 1Â·, I -i 8 ... 8. , ./6 1 1 -- 1 -- - --% / 5'-4 Â·-4__ a'___- * 1/ $ 7 4 a NO .g>*> JUAN STREET HOUSING 'EvlsION: 1 DATE '167 / " 107 JUAN STREET ASPE N, COLORADO SCALE. 4-p=- 1 CHECK.0 ~=~ GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS 418 .AST COOPEA AVENUE â„¢Le-&U: EM= ASPENI. COLORADO â€¢ 81811 O COPY'IGHT .11 Zâ‚¬19/ I .V â€¢647=rv) PICAL -Â»'.9/â‚¬/ 79*33Â¢9 .6 +Ud : .Lak ,,V, RE--af\' It 4\411 k, It 41 \1 0 ., G '0, 2, a. 3 't 't '2 11 41 ji th A,i,~<A ~------~-- - r %-r M I 34 +24*;~ L.-M,K 1 1111111 Ellilli 3 / r i ,-7~Â« i Â·1 le U 11 71 1 I. 11 11 11 11 r 11 111 IF==P=91 ~,iâ€žÂ·~~ , lili i -JE eb m 1=1=11' -4-1." L 1 r @1.11,1 11 m m Â«Ill 1111'lili 1 1 i f -m 0 L niff'Â« 2 h Â·Â·Â· -- -- L'W f -9 Ft P? P~ / 9 I I 2 :1 2 9 3; 2 2, 1 rn m 1 JOI NO: 123* AwSION: c. 6. /93 ~ ~~~ 107 JUAN STREET ASPEN, COLORAMO JUAN STREET HOUSING DATE: */ 4. 0/AVVN : -9 CHECKED: SCALE: ~ GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS ASPEN. COLOAACX] ele'll o cop...4...2. - MAX: 303/ 825.5883 418 CABT COO~A AVENUE TELEPIONE: 303/925-5988 6 'FA 9- I 3 2- 7175 48 4 t .N / tw' a=,aÂ· Wi I Â£*2&=Ans.~. 4 i*il *- . , It,~ ' 8-Friff :: â€¢*: 4 900&11 - el .- -]04 /1 1 2 111 1 1 - L. 7Â·T90' U=ap- 1- - -â€ž 1 1. WEST ELEVATION 4-' - L. I. 4.~r,Â· _ _ --E lili ' mE E L AZER E -E IEN 1- * P4Â£ 111 111 a,-77,a' 111 1- "' p Nujul i TE i " -11111111 . f Â£-W-6+ Ar ...0. 111 0 1-2 0 4 .40 1 -_1 r A.. lf.' Z, SOUTH ELEVATION 4 , J0 1 r SHEET I NOiSdAhe SNISnoW L,]11 0.... DaVWO-100 'NadSV ./ 'll. -1 7 0 i 4 ..22:~i -- 55 . 1-~ - 5 1 W 18 . f - ii N .2 8 4 11 fle J 88 - 1 -- 5-No open- .3.65 .2 6/ 0.. 58 - - -7-11 - 4 -11 1.=la L-/ 1 8:4/8 .f t ..lum .4 I,\ Iii Il full ji-J I =z ~*" Ill ILLÂ© U _Â»zit [21] --1*5 pCZEd M. teDâ€¢J-1. M Ill I I.*t - Â»- r 1ST FLOORâ„¢-AN /~2\ -2!.O FLOOR PLAN lEO -con=14 ."4-0-uN- - i./.' -7- 70& 6 4 3 LIE] 13 -3 .34 L----k - 1 1 :/-6-----..29.-W~-------- - 1 -- - 5 r-"1 I=~9.11=14====1 -- m r 3-- -73/7.' f J - 0.- 1 -- - 11= 1Â«HEÂ« - r 222 31Â«7714 im - 1- 111 4 - - - Lot 1 W 1~â€¢-7- 9 r SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1- 2 m. . J 2, 414 11 J0 lr 0Â¤VÂ¥0700 'NadSÂ¥ .9.1-LS ?? 1 Â§8 ==GyÂ«BÂ»Â« fA 391:FIER *apÂ«===Â»?% W At/ 1 1 :7 - . '5361 68 ag: 9 &8 -314 -.In~# 3-9/1/1-- -1 ---1 1 ~11 -Â» ....4 95:89 :z 9836: .4 3 -- 1- 9-1 - 14 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION O 5 10 20' 0 2&. 01- I:. 1- a 111 1- , Ul m [I 1-2 Inj. 21 4 All JO 1 r $ 1)40!t,Adco b 'J | :NOSI'll 00980-100 'Na .. 1Â£ dj MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 205 S. Mill Street, Final Development Review for an addition on the north facade DATE: January 26, 1994 SUMMARY: HPC granted Conceptual Development approval for this project on February 10, 1993 with two conditions; that the wall opening on the west be a door and that the addition use details to reflect the verticallity of the building. (see attached minutes) The committee also supported keeping the westernmost stairway in place. The applicant has responded to those conditions and requests Final Development approval. The size of the proposed addition has been reduced from about 875 sq. ft. to 760 sq. ft. APPLICANT: M&W Properties, represented by Larry Yaw, architect. LOCATION: 205 S. Mill Street, Lots D-J, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. ADDITIONAL REVIEWS: The applicant intends to apply for a GMQS exemption for the addition of this space and will request special review for cash in lieu of open space. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: All four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code must be met in order for HPC to grant approval for the proposal. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The proposed addition will greatly improve the buildings' relationship to the street and pedestrians by bringing the store front windows in line with those on the new Katie Reid structure. Staff agrees with the applicant's characterization of this portion of the Mill Street plaza building as a "no man' s land" and a "grand staircase." By grounding this side of the building and therefore reducing its perceived scale, more focus will be put on neighboring historic resources, such as the Katie Reid building and the three Victorians on the ' opposite side of the street. The applicant has responded to HPC's direction to keep the north-south pathway open. Staff finds that this is a benefit to the project, but in this current configuration the stairway seems chopped off or slightly awkward. Perhaps the stairs could be straight, like the ones on the other side of the addition, or chamfered into the building like the eastern entrance. The stairs will be an important visual transition from the new low windows back up to the higher ones on the existing building. By drawing on the building materials of Chanin's restaurant, the proposal creates what looks like a new structure along the block and breaks up the long mass. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal is in character with commercial development throughout the core. The windows are larger than most, but respond to the scale of this building. The applicant should consider making the awnings slightly longer to match the size of the windows. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not detract from the cultural value of the surrounding historic resources. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal does not directly affect any historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Final Development proposal as submitted, finding that the Development Review Standards have been met. 2) Approve the Final Development proposal with conditions, to be met prior to issuance of building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant time to revise the I . proposal in order to meet the Development Review Standards. (specific suggestions should be offered) 4) Deny Final Development approval, finding that the Development Review Standards have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Final Development proposal with some resolution of the westernmost staircase and the awnings. Additional Comments: . Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 10, 1993 Bill: That helps us understand why you took that approach. Jake: If we find that the mansard roof is a better plan we can give a FAR variation to accommodate that calculation. Straw Poll on proposed roof shape and height as presented; five members in favor. Two opposed. Wayne: Some glazing is important. MOTION: Joe made the motion to grant conceptual approval for 232 E. Hallam and that the applicant be directed to restudy the windows and possibly look at the height of the addition; second by Roger. Les: A revision would be the only way I would vote for this. To me this addition is not soft and needs more work. It is too abrupt and too much visually. Joe: There is one group that likes it to relate to the old and one group that likes simplicity and to have it relate to the new and this is something in between that doesn't seem to fit. You need to sell this to us. Motion withdrawn. Jake: The job is to relate to the historical resource not relate to the old addition. I am clear on that. Pull out details on the historical structure that you like and simplify and bring them into the new addition that you are doing. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant conceptual development approval for 496 sq. feet to the Vigoda addition of 232 E. Hallam with the condition that the applicant restudy the fenestration (windows) on the north elevation; second by Jake. Jake: I would like to add restudy of the roof form (mansard roof). Roger: I feel that is included in the motion. Chairman Bill Poss called the question: Carried 5 to 2 - Opposed were Les and Don. Linda didn't vote. Wayne: I may do a model of just the addition for the next meeting. 205 S. MILL - MILL ST. PLAZA - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Roxanne: The applicant is requesting an addition of around 875 sq. feet. A facade addition to the Mill St. plaza. This parcel is not designated but is located within the Commercial Core Historic 5 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 10, 1993 District. A pre-ap was held with the HPC at your last meeting. This is similar as the last presentation of addition something on to an addition that does not meet the standards. The first standard is character and compatibility to the adjacent parcel. The Mill St. Plaza is surrounded by six landmarks particularly the Katie Reid. The proposed addition is a ground level addition that project out 10 feet closer to the street edge. We find that is appropriate to have pedestrian traffic close to the sidewalk. The east elevation of the Mill St. Plaza meets the standards, the north elevation is very problematic and those were the issues that were dealt with. In regard to proportion, store front, pedestrian interaction, how the cross walk connection works, stairway, detailing, materials all those issues. We recommend a massing model be presented so you can see clearly how this will work. Because of these issues we find that Standard number 1 has not been met. Standard number 2 is character compatibility within the neighborhood which is the entire commercial core district and we also have a concern here particularly the pedestrian/ cross flow traffic and the elimination of the stairs which has entirely changed the way the entire building is working from the north. Also how the storefront windows work. The guidelines are listed beside the memo as a check list as to what works and what doesn't and why. Other concerns are listed in the memo. Standard number 3 deals with the cultural value and that standard can go either way. Enhances or detracts from the cultural value of particularly the Katie Reid project. Standard number 4 deals with architectural integrity of the designated landmark. Our recommendation is to table and continue to a date certain to.allow the applicant time to restudy per direction of the HPC. Larry Yaw, architect: This is an addition of around 875 sq. ft. The north side of the building is problematic in its present state as it has no street level entry. The display levels windows are eye level or above them and the existing stair is not an invitation to enter (too grand). The open space is not inviting. With that addition we intend to mitigate all those negatives and get a better relationship with the Katie Reid building. At the heart of the character of the building what can we intensify upon and make it a stronger personality. We did that and one of the major steps was to take the slate that is the exterior material for the building above and we brought it down into a significantly into this building so the entire facade would have the slate. There are awnings proposed. We took the dark red/brown material down into the building. Joe: What treatment are you doing on the window? Larry: We are enlarging and making bigger windows but the material will be the same as the existing brick. 6 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 10, 1993 Roger: Are both entrances on the Hopkins Street side airlocked? Larry: Yes. Roger: How far out are the three windows going to be bayed? Larry: Four inches, like a relief sculpture to break up the hard edge. Roger: There was talk about a kickplate under the windows? Larry: I do not consider it to be an important detail under a window within a brick wall. Larry: Kickplates are to protect something. Roger: Do you feel the proportions of the windows to the scale of the building is right on? Larry: Close enough to right on because in our research generally the windows on the lower floors were dominantly glass, historic reference. Roger: Is there room for benches? Larry: Around the project there is but not on sidewalk. Don: Is the area on the north west going to be reversible to an entrance in case of multiple tenancy? Larry: Yes, depending on who will be in there. Right now we may not have a door there and just put in a window. Roger: Would you mind having a door even though the north west is not an entrance, similar to the GAP? Larry: I have no problem with that but will discuss with owners. Roger: You don't show any lighting on the outside? Larry: There is low illumination up/down lights. CLARIFICATIONS Karen: The elimination of the north south mid-block crossing, would you explain that. Larry: The stairs are eliminated and I do not feel people use that 7 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 10, 1993 area at all. Leslie Lamont, Planner: It is a great way to connect midblock to the Wheeler etc. In the definition of open space it talks about mid-block pedestrian loops. Bill: This is a zoning issue and was it a previous application GMQS application or what? Leslie: I have not gotten an application from the applicant and when I do will review all the files. Larry: We cannot afford to solve all the problems of this building with this little addition. Bill: If this is an historic element then we would review it but if it is a P&Z issue then they should review it. Sunny Vann: Our position would be that it is still a mid-block connection and we are prepared to argue that at P&Z and at the time we will be requesting to be exempt from the open space which is being eliminated by this addition. You should act on the application based on the architecture. This whole project is premised on the elimination of that entrance and maintaining the other stairwell which is 50 feet away and is an L turn. We would ask that you review it based on the submittal. If the Board feels closing the open space in front of the building is problematic that is an appropriate comment. Roxanne: Character compatibility within the district means a lot of things. If the Board feels this is an important thing that deals with the character of the community and how this building contributes to character then you do need to address it. This is a design consideration. COMMENTS Jake: I support this move. I feel the problems that Larry outlined are true. That open space is a no mans land and is useless as it is on the north side. I am in favor and like the differentiation of using slate and establishing its own statement but relating to the overall structure around it. Roger: I believe this project meets all the guidelines. I also like the use of the materials and solves the solution for the owner and the building. It softens and works well. I would request that the west entrance which is not an entrance but could be is in fact an entrance and always would be and the reason for that is that I would like to see the ability to pass through that area. 8 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 10, 1993 Don: I have to take this as an addition to an existing building. I feel Larry has handled it very well and agree with Roger that the two entrances should serve as entrances. They definitely should be doors. Bringing it out to the sidewalk is a benefit. Karen: What you have done is an improvement. From a compatibility standard I feel the arched awning is much stronger as it links the second part of the building to the first part. I also feel the massing is long and plain in comparison with the massing of the adjacent building. I feel the building would be more compatible if the plane were broken up more in whatever way. I also agree that the windows should be brought down. I also liked the second stairway and it is too bad it has to go. Joe: I also feel that it meets the standards with respect to the adjacent properties in my opinion; by bringing out the building you encourage people to walk down the street. I also feel there should be the two entries. Les: I feel you are going in the right direction but personally would like to see a restudy of the massing windows. I feel the length should be broken up. Linda: I agree with most of the comments made and feel it is compatible with the mother building. I am pleased with bringing it out to enhance the flow. Bill: I agree with the committee members and feel this is a remodel of an existing building. I had a few problems with the corner entrances because historically we only allow corner entrances on corners and this is mid-block but the committee is in support. I would rather have seen corner windows and a central entrance. By bringing the building out it strengthens the street alignment. The clipping of the corners allow the architect to soften it as we go back to the Lily Reid on the west end and open his entrance to the mini mall where the stairs occur. The materials are a good choice. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant conceptual development for the 875 sq. feet plus or minus facade to the Mill Street Plaza building 205 S. Mill with the following two conditions: 1) The west entry is in fact an entry with a door. 2) Either through use of materials or brick a restudy is done to show the verticality of the building; second by Donnelley. All in favor, motion carries. Karen didn't vote. 9 COTTLE ! GRAYBEAL January 12, 1994 YAW ARCHITECTS LTD Ms. Amy Amidon Historic Planning Committee Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Mill Street Plaza Addition Final Development Plan Dear Ms. Amidon, Enclosed please find submission documentation for HPC Final Review of the Mill Street Plaza addition. As discussed at our meeting on 11 January the architectural design is consistent with our conceptual review submission except we have reduced the addition scope by approximately 115 sq. ft. to permit partial use of the existing Hopkins Street steps for pedestrian access to the interior court retail shops of the project as suggested by HPC at Conceptual Review. As discussed at the Conceptual HPC presentation the design of the addition responds to and accomplishes the following objectives. a. The portion of the existing Hopkins Street facade to be added to has retail display windows at or above eye level. The addition brings the windows down to pedestrian level thus enhancing the "connectedness" of the retail activity to the street scape. b. The sidewalk space contiguous to the existing building is currently 23 feet : in width, creating somewhat of a "no mans land" in the sense of pedestrian scaled space. The addition (10 feet deep) would create a sidewalk space (13 feet building to curb) consistent with the sidewalk scale characteristic of other downtown Aspen areas. C. Using materials derived from the restaurant addition above, the new facade JOHN COTTLE, AL\ has been made to differ somewhat form adjacent facades, creating a street DOUG GRAYBEAL, ALA : scape diversity and a sense of more than a single building along the 1 ORRY YAW, ALA 1 MARK HEN-CHORN. AIA Hopkins Street block facade(s). 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ~ d. Chamfered corners of the addition create a mergence with the existing EN, COLORADO 81611 NE {303) 925-2867 building. The facade length (45') returns to the existing building to permit ) 925-3736 easy pedestrian awareness and recognition of the Historic Katie Reed victorian at the west end of the block. P O BOX I [122 624 MOUNTAIN VILLAGE BLVD TELLURIDE, COLORADO 81435 PHONE 1303) 723-303 (FAX) 728-3236 I Ms. Amy Amidon January 12,1994 Page Two e. In response to an HPC comment at conceptual review the facade proportions and fenestration have been altered to create a more vertical emphasis. f. In response to an HPC comment at conceptual review an entry point to the building courtyard was maintained at the west end of the addition using a portion of the existing steps. MATERIALS a. Field Brick - To match the variegated "tawny brick" color of the existing building. b. Accent Materials - 8"x8" red/brown slate to match the existing 12"xl 2" field slate in the restaurant addition above. c. Cornice Detail - To match existing detail. d. Awnings - To match color of the existing awnings. e. Signaqe - To match existing detail on awning skin and as permitted by city sign code on window surfaces. I am enclosing two sets of drawings including both the conceptual and final development documents for your review. Please schedule our final development plan meeting with HPC at the earliest available agenda time. As always, please call me if you have any questions or require clarification. Very truly youl, 1 1 Al WL-UlQA UU" A 1 Larry Yaw g LY/Ihs:mspa CC: M&W Properties Sunny Vann mfil - . U - L ., - 2 0 .4 11* 1 - -- '44' v b .1-- 1, -< /1;.' ./ W . 1 & 1 - . U I ... U , i 43..1.32 ho.2., Â·f. 01 4..\ - - 1 , ArÂ·. 2." 7 1 I - 13 . 1 .... 1 1 ..4 4, . I . . I , &41 -t e== , :f ' 1 . 24 , '~ I 1- I lit\\7 1 ~-1- .- ~ ,:-9 :.~#Wi'St.,4:\ \ :U, / , r. , 2.'i. 0Â·04'9'.1.2 46 ,7, . . .. .~..... ...,+1.et'. %. ~. ..T. ''1 . + 1.4 ' , , , ... , r 1/ 1. =+ - rrn-,Tr,6 6_11 It , I. 1 1, 1 1 r, r 4 11 U.J. li}*BI*THNMENIi!*R,vMEMEn YAW;nit Â· f ' - u- 1 . 4 :I:. 54 1 . - '5' .*2.43..J-Â·: -~iÂ· . 1 : .. . , , ,Â·F/.*- 44#'1.~1,- ' / â€¢ . 1 I Vet *24Â·Â· 71* . 1 , u 11 . --1-__ .11â‚¬ X ix,Â·INQI.EASART.NE - 2 1 1 .414 W . 1 . 9 +I:.... -9. L !6 . , 1 . , -L:-: :j r.":Â·Â·c,~14~-4-6.~G' - M J - Â£ ' fi .rh\' -\-1 Â· c I LA - . . Â· . .,tÂ·.r,r.':Â· tag,@R.t:Rp.Â· X De 91 f~--9-Nli -~- \\ .\'.14\, ~ >tilq XM.0---4-- - 34~\~.'Â¢44.-1\11\ '\. 4 \,19,4.. A ... 49-69*,NE==1' ../9.129/bkik'.1. I .V. d. - -.44-W*:. , , .....11\ 1.\\ \\\ _1-- . 2**Ret,f-i. ' 4'Â«giB.y,Â·, ,/2 1 - . {060?*34,..1 ~ 4,/.# q94/ ' - J u i 4 591 671 IT-11, 11 1 1. r!. 1 1 U-: Fl 'U 'r- P .1 1..:im,~9Â£6&0~ ~i ~ ~ +4~~ t-,023+6 -,W ' ... 1 J LE.. I - - - - ----- f . f : 1 1/ 4.%9 4,5 :4-~ 6. .7 -4 V Z \ / -338314-fs?#.Â· 2 i. a -.~f.41(*) ?tfte , - - } 7 0 . ..~ 0 0 f i -- i J Fi *' S,-13*':.DyÂ» 2 5 / ,1 ' 4 4 . - 6 -- U. . I ......4..A, CÂ· 22 i G ' Â· m --7 r-t, :- t v.-, ./ - 0 El 1 Alle : EXISTING LEASABLE SPA 1 LI-- OPEN TO BELOW I ~EXISTING LEASAE DN \ 1 ./.I:\ 1 . 1 I k-1 L. L-1 1 1 / EXISTING LEASABLE SPACE 1 -9 1 0 F-- - - T T II! Y-h -1 - 1 /1 1 1 0 0 0 -4 EXISTING LEASABLE SPACE n 31Â©F F 7 ~7 1,2 L I-Â»-- C. 1 P = 1 7 W-~-f--i--1-41-1 UP 7 1, DN 1 1 1 41_ - --- -23 0 0 0+--~ ...-- ~ 1-----01 t 01 ' 1 UP / r - . .If - O 0 . 0 0 ' 0 01 ' '00 ' - 5 1 - 7 . ' I. 1 , i -1 1 9 r- . . 'r_-4 I I I ~1 X A 9 b 1 k --R 1 1 1 Â· n n T1 MH- -1 - p 1 El -1 1 1 -:. 3555==3313Â» 1 - i 6% 11 31 1 -_ |'11 + U ! 1 ---' =3-==31 = ~fl -1 1 . 22- r-r---F-1 1 1 1 0 7.-1 r Il ; - ~ ~ ~ - 04= -r : b 11 1. - | i , I I k Â·t L 1 1 E lili 1 I 0 41 Ef-*-T f Il ! 1 j ' ' '11 1 1 r EXISTING HOPKINS. STREET ELEVATION -, 8 1 - F tri-i, ,; - ti e r 1 1 NEili~Â£~3EH]*E~ia~Ha~limui~~~Â£mmumnmHIIHH~H!*EUm i c----il K-z:-al ./ -- -Â· -- -1 t. -==A==- - -Ir=Pe==-L%i=~#i- *. W===IUU'/'0 11â‚¬ a r; 11 1====46==...===-41=WHU====6======-6==.1,111,----1....JL.Lll 116--L.....D....13=2~:EEE:91 ' Perfas,gr--t--Ili~zil~-BIA~ 2 - â€ž~*ILUIIN~UIILLi=]IL_7 - *n-BTESFREET'PIA22-4-35*EriNG NEW CONSPRUCTION ' EUPITEI'9*JIEDINQ HOPKINS STREETE EÂ®EVATION ./111 Ill-- - il - El#AL1-+Allâ‚¬ _J 111 ~#-- ~ull~- -----p--6- / 1, I - r-1 ~ ' 17 f--1 1 . 1 / 1 1 t= 1 1 LUL' 11 u 4 \ , i - - 1 ' I --- + 2 |.l 4 - 1 . - - -1- - - EL - 4 f /77 V - it -I + - EX'*T] 1,6 - i - I i Â· f t 1- f tti . , i - 4 u X 5,- dyÂ¢ s 2,-7. â‚¬) O 41 2- - 27'-4-" c Â©'-60 + 2.36. Ue #1 ~ i - - : of >c. Ul '- 6" = ) 86. 6 5 41 4-69.61.41 - E 2- t C . U. -1 -Â· /1 -- t J J El . . 0. 0 - f-' 1 : 1 t ON \ , - --1 ./1 9 11 4 ' ': 2, 1 4, 14 &'---* 1 1 Â·Â· UP"-1--~-~Â·~~ -~~t~~ ~~~r 1 4-1 1 1 - lili -1-1 1 - J \t ! i 1 111. 11,1 /- ' . f. + i ' i i , â€ž ...., 1 - 1 \11 ,-4 1' + 1 \ 1 1 _'*-9~'.vi -#T*-#eitjrre 1 1 -4 1 41- - 11 - 1 -4*4 1 -6 1 *11-t.4. 11 1 1 1 -1 + -11 '1 / --1. . >9 - f 1.#*.r + â‚¬17 -14 91 1 111'1 1 + 1 - 1 , /1 + i , -*%*444*1/1 , ~ , 4 Â· / 1 Â· , 4 11 .1,1-77440/~I , - I 11 -4.4 1 =1 1 Iii 1 1 + 1.1.: 1 1 '114/ 11 1 11 1 ILl 1 111 1 1 1\ 4. -1-1 \ 1 1 11'lf !1-",Â«-1-- lili 1. 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1*,114%4%- 1 11 . 1 1 41 Â· i , i , i -i_ \1 11. , 1 / "iT UP 1 - ni / 1\ -1 1TV 0.05 Vt : L.L~ Lr . - . 1'- if? 4 2/1.j N - -- . it: NOIIA - /1,11'lililli.1:;:,11111'111!11. |4||||Ii|'NII,Jiitillillilll -1 01171777771777TTTTFTTIT[TTITnT" L~-rr--29~-I . ----..-I....Â·-----JT- -a--1.4 luilHON -01- 1-1 -- 11 1% 1144.1 67[TIHil [. 1 -1-i- i _*. .-Â· I- . __--- _ _-- - .- . _. -_.i . _ ._. ., _ :~,;= f_. .Â· -1 .1 1 1 ...4 1 r I )- it-ff Â·I 1 1 .-2 [O-0 0[3 -r~' ~- - 00 02 0- - i ~_.- -Lfil_-FULL-~Uz--~ __!illjl~ Â·Â·Â·A -4 111 0 't'1'1 Al 1/i'~ <'1' 1'' 1 ? 2 -1--- --i--1,-1-7.-t -1- +-0-1--Â·t-i-- ,-4-4---4-Â·--t--411.- 4-1-1- 1 , 1 : E. 2..... ..; ...1-"- ilf:T--1]li,h'il!Â·!ji-f,= 4-Â·:1|1~~lilli~~illin!111!Illu.'lili} TUIT[b #ill HI!!1111141&'~~1111 11111111,71. b==-1--1- =-- i , 11 4 i j - ----~ 1 1 1 . i L _0 U-1 // 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ; L f I f - - 1 ij, 1 j : '1 lilli.,1 ili 11 : .. i = ' Design Quality and Historic - mailf#~~&'Ill Preservation 1992 1993 Mid-Term Short-Term 1993 1995 O1. Develop a historic preservation program in O 7. Study which areas in the downtown core the County. Begin by developing standards, could be developed in order to attract social expanded guidelines and incentives. activity in specific places (i.e. people magnets at intersections or ends of corridors ~0~2. Provide planning staff assistance to and and corners). encourage neighborhoods not located within historic districts to develop their own set of ~58. Investigate programs for enhancement of Character Guidelines to assist new alleyscapes, both cominercial and residential. development fit within the context of that neighborhood's character. 9 Amend Historic Preservation Guidelines to /0/. 199 + 1 63 9'~436:~0.0-65) encourage compatible roof-top activities in 614. Continue review of public projects through the commercial districts. the Public Projects Review Group (PPRG); 1 19+ expand the PPRG to include a wider 9 10. Amend the City Code to require review o f discipline o f design professionals. alterations and additions to all historic resources identified on the Aspen Inventory O 4. Encourage front porches by amending the of Historic Sites and Structures. Aspen Land Use Regulations to exempt front 83 -F- -up i SougE:dor-1 porches from FAR and site coverage gFil. Develop a Neighborhood Office zone calculations, and reduce total allowable district for portions of the Main Street FAR's accordingly. Historic District, to encourage locally owned businesses to locate here and provide )34. Retain the red brick school building for year-round vitality to this area. public use and preserve its open space; r991* a. Purchase for public use; )~12. Review the appropriateness of current floor b. Rezone to public. area ratio allowances in the Residential-6 (R-6) zone district. El 6. Support and enhance the continued 4794-- 1996 educational use of the yellow brick school ~~13. Study the Hunter Street corridor for and if no longer viable as an education increased buildout with aesthetic quality as center. it relates to the historic district and the O a. Do a comprehensive study for the gondola. yellow brick school to determine its ~~79 y ;i ultimate appropriate function, use and - character contributions to the , community. 55 ..1(-29Â¢44*4*&~'MS'A 9 - 3*) 7 f . ..1.10 j, .., MEMORANDUM *I #I TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ip f :4.-4 4 FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer 1 X.,4-0 're.: 13 RE: 1994 Goals r V .. DATE: January 12, 1994 Attached are the AACP goals for "Design Quality and Historic Preservation." I have indicated which of the goals are accomplished or in progress at this time. Obviously there have been a number of successes. This committee has annually established its priorities at the beginning of each year and forwarded those to Council. Please consider the goals which you think will be important to HPC in the coming year, and we will discuss them as a group. - r h MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer CC: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer RE: 520 E. Durant, Ajax Mountain Building, awnings DATE: January 26, 1994 SUMMARY: Several awnings have been installed on this building recently, without HPC approval. The awnings are for Pizza Hut, Ross Andrews- Designer Goldsmith and Ajax Ski Shop. The first awnings installed on the Ajax Mountain building were for the Polo store, and all subsequent awnings were to be blue with gold lettering. Pizza Hut has put up a blue awning with white lettering on the skirt. Ross Andrews' awning is blue with gold lettering, but is the only one on the building which has large lettering on the face (slope) rather than on the skirt of the awning. Ajax Ski Shop's awning is in violation of the sign code because the logo on it is too large. An existing awning has been replaced by the Essence Natural Perfume shop. That awning is consistent with earlier HPC approvals and was approved by staff. There has been a longstanding problem with the amount of signage on this building. The property manager has submitted a plan to Bill Drueding, and a number of existing signs will be removed. Awnings will still be allowed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the skirt on the Pizza Hut awning be redone with gold letters. Staff finds that the awning at Ross Andrews' shop is not in character with the other awnings on the building and recommends the lettering be placed on the skirt. The awning at Ajax Ski Shop may be approved on the condition that the logo be made to conform to the sign code. The awning on Essence Natural Perfume may be formally approved by HPC at this time. These approvals are conditioned on payment of HPC Minor Development application fees and sign permit fees. In the future, only awnings which are blue with gold lettering and which are approved by HPC before installation will be allowed. Any future sign applications will conform to the plan submitted to the Zoning Department. el '$'-n..."./.'Il-.--'ll.'I-/.,I"PI'-""I-"'I'--I'll'll'I-- I I F 1 ,>+FE~5*4- 62.- -FI ,Â·44- 2 2 1.433& 6.-C...8, 2.-95- -- 21"39:/19/Imlill/"Ili,19:11'1'll'llilll"zillililmililillillil -,-1.'f- isi 'w K i .41 + , ,. - ./: " y 1 (f, 0 fillillillillililillillill .:0~ I %; J t J j i., f e .i , 4 0 1/1 4+4,4 1 -ar V'..4. k (/3 01 , 1 .."IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT'.-4#~ 0 4. 97,4 -3 4 5 c 1+4 'm r t. 4 02 4 .9 Â· J" D 0 -e-- *,â‚¬17 6. 6 i ..~,LA ., m, < 1- I ... 4 J. *,0 -fc 5 2 râ€¢ l, 'e . ... 1,Â·,t 11 : I. & ...limmill \ . 1, \\ 41 26.091 7-4 i A Â·C - -4 '40- V. + 0 -Â· 7* 0 IF..1 t..'.,4 r9* *1 -le j I./1.'Iri-,------12Uj- r./. - te a 1 ilill ./ ' l 2.- Â· 0, Â· *,4 11â€¢1.44 1,-I..:i.,Ati.,zWU/R . , 4 . 4, - .4 4 .., 5 - C 0, 1 - /-+ &41:21.- I---a h ./- 20 1 7 , F ' 1. . i~joili *il 514 '..*fÂ·,fÂ·Â·: - i ..1 7..' e - !1'L..LI.L.2 f 3'.-fi:Â£4111 < 202< 4#1<#44 "3~4,.#: s ~ ~ ~I. '- , tm .Â¥\ ; i ~ . 1:.8 h 9 * ..Â¢ * -2.2/2 ~:(.17114,4-141>â€¢ , 21-~ 'r + * . I.Â¢ 6 25'.0- 'Â·~11Â», 11 i . = ri-- - ._ 5-1 4-1992- Â·-94-4 -7- - -1 1%3-0-_Urr~EÂ·i-nÂ·--Â·~-Â·113[---1-câ„¢ 72.3 < 1 -- -1- ... - . -1- -. 11 --I- -- I 1 ---2-L - 13-4 1-k--. ' 27 -1 -2 / "1 -~ ~,filli~ f /6 cig Jv-- tlef J 51 35/ti ti~ ' ~\ ---- 4. 1 Ek#4-- _i.LE_~lf,'-1~i 13.~ li~jc:*Â¢MY M s 0--9Â«a:.AL- r- . 1 . 1- --1 4-r- â€ž - 1 . P main st, EuROPEAN FLOWER MARKET propose 21 0 5 10 2 0 feetÂ· ple-JE or rzeer ---- FA eve' U D '/ 1 1. LET-1 $ 2 - 70Â« 1 1 k -=t.1 4 ,--Â» Â» /4 14; / !2 I - 'Z.-LI-=1 ...1..=-_.I' ,Itt. u.r-- Â« EURO P E A N FLOW ER IM ARI<E T north 1/8 "=1'-0" 41;I.'11.. 1 i 2 3'Â· 6 " i, fli i'?, 41iit':~1!1 , .4 12===Er=====.-==---- .-=21=.-Z--1.----=-3~Xzuz------~--~ -r--+I----1 d ii il f 1 j' 2 , b lu i! 3 -1 i; !1 * 2 -~ rk-FI 11 ;1 liFI:fi.EJ{'r~' @ ~~~, 'YEFA---STLPT~-;J-3&&*=1- 311=--322=$-irri=rirs-Tr--- i 11 li :i Ji q !.: El i[ 1 1: 2, -1 1 2 1 . 1 La==4 7-!P-7 4 1 , 1 1 1---- I---*.-I.-,-.-.----P'. -1 4 , ' -9 23 in i--1%24 IL.--2 ir -=--~%~VI -- .-' r-=1- - -9 Lj L__1 ---1 -1 -1 - RET------.gL-Il---IILE~--- r- ----FI.al 1 2 mui 1. %_..._._.-#<--=----==-= ------~-----ft-51--2- ----2-*----~#--------1--UL~3-33~----z--------;= -- F- -.- == 1 C Â£1 1 - -1.-.- U. L 1 1 -- 1 4--#.- $--=LI--r--/-3237Â»r--rn- 11 4Â»14 1 -- 1 1 k=-fll 1 T. ..C-'-T..1 1 -- -- 7 --1-=743-14-414==2= L.._1 -31-2.. . 1 7==--+---6+4z -----------k~--------*7=-Iâ‚¬===2==-2== ---1--=-=== =--in-za--_=-z:ti--'{iÂ·i'. 1 i EUROPEAN- FLOWER MARKET-- ........1 _ ~ _9* e s L -_-_.1-1--3 I-- -Il _--Plr-0--p-0-_s e di 5.6 ---1.3.-31-9-222-- -___12-_ ., Â·t *r.:Â·St.C Â·Â·C: 7-- 4 Â· . + . 2 3'.6 1111:Itit-40_-0 I~ .1 2 A D L ~ h i i 'f i h (.; 4,-A-----Â·JI_ 1:J-11-.---1~3~--t.72-i...L=n-=--2=-t----I.Ii..i=*-Â·-* ' --2--11161111* 11 J h i: i 11 :} 8 iÂ· ' t 11 H li Ii- 1~ 11 - k- -4 . ------.-.------ -. =.--.::=i==.=.:i=== --'-29--1Jjil~~=~.. ..27-37 ~~i,j, 1~ : ~~ i; up )j ,~ ! . 1, ]~ 1 !: ~ !. ~~ -- - .1~~!H.lili:'il.!1111 3-JoitftifftliÂ»frif=74439*r~~1~ A= 1 11 4-==11 ' 4 -=W---dIFI=721!=====A----_-- =21 -It 'F== -1.-- 1 - 4Wr=--Â«1 -_ 14Â»4_il --- ~lijl J'ifili Â£ f -Â«=-====-=Â· -== -9-x------*------- ==1 -- -- - - 1 --- i N-- - ---- - -- ,11 1 ~I Â· PJ~~~386~Â«f lu ; -- - J 11 P - 1 't-~-- ---1 1.------ 11 - -r=- Efte7~~7~~~-,1-If-- 132_."~~=1 -=-Â·=--a=.7 C.-1-, =====--7-=I=-- I L:=-321=--Il j 11 11- - ..Lt-J=:-Z-..jWul--il~i.--.=O.8 1, ... I , _--- I.=1 J..1.â€ž,~....I-r.~-. .-Â·. - .-- Â· , E UR.0 PEAN_. FL.0 W.E R._MAR K_E_T.. -- ' , 1. I. alley 1 1 1./ // 91. f48Â·14'NGÂ· B u E t~ i f A S 1, 1 KI & 1-6.1. U - -- .- --4 0 1 1 //---\\ 4 1 g E OF - 1 ,/ 421; --4 ' i le,ovt Â¥ 1 - .t=: }~ M '546 f A i mi FT 9'rb F. A 612 . R M E G R. 14% 4 i i les f f i . '1 -\\ \ 4 , 1 . 1 dn U-p- \ -2 H + 1 1 . -3 0frioe- O IFF'GE 16 K 17 ~ M x 169 1 81.0 965 10 t 7 1? 1 1 ./ li M 11 -- OffIce : 14*20 1 MBE Â£*000 1 - -- F z#e 9/152. 1.80# # 1 1 li u i IM i i. 'Ill 1 1 11 1 11**EÂ»16'p#MIL-wr-FE~&~BRBME.irrÂ· '' m lilli 11 ys- C -d-n- 1 1 1 14<1 1 ll 1 11 --Â·--- --- 1.-0 p.2, 3 i CE,-umg L b 6*'rE !!1 1 'up ife j) r 2 1,1 -4 -33!*Ea l *EMEEriaÂ»*~ i, ! 1 1, 1 ) m ain st. EUROPEAN F LOWE R IM A R K ET lst f [ou f._R.-1.9 9 0 5 10 ' 20 feet alley I I.,/4.w.'P-,â€¢,ar #)-r-I:. --7,AÂ· '.--.4-LK--.--%~~ =-Â·4-)3221*NM===42,9*4 MirÂ·- -7 ! ~~Rr===== t P 90 G 3 it'Es-re I d Â·re D 1 1 1 ker 69 0 ,/1 -- -1 1 ----1- LIE C- r r 1 0/0. 1 , Â¥~XMMep ld.t:'f?'*A .:111'$>.f.'.n .~te .. :f 14 i. pg#'til Wh:Uâ€¢ 4*'f'':*~* r:1<444,494%**M~90,6.Fra 1 2 : 1 ' i i r + 1 4# M ch J T-*,w 11, '16~Alj UL-11 $1 ' t 1 . i r =%72?*:743914'.'92*F;F*E<.Â·a.Â»Â·b ..... Â£ I 4 offIce i 14 XIâ‚¬ 2, 516 0 + 11 I 1- 1 hi # e, F ROOF 6 1 16 15 ] 1 8 h' C ROAD #Med-T ': m 11 x 29 1 1 0 91-04 406 0 f U g OFFICE 41 16 K/9 M 2 65 0 1 1 1 91 1 11"1 004) 10 5 Ft- 2 0 - E -1-1 -- ~70Â·7.IL!1- 1 main st. 1 1 EUROPEAN FLOWER MAI<KE T ...7 - 9 ..Turr--=.Â·r--:.i#.i.-il.:- 2 nd f loorp_ 1 a n C-- -- // 0%/f -1'13;AFFEÂ¥.Tilt.'37Â¥;EW*)9?tÂ¥(Â·1 0 5 10, 20feet 00*-1 62