Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.19940413
4.4 } AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE April 13, 1994 REGULAR MEETING SISTER CITY MEETING ROOM SECOND FLOOR CITY HALL 5:00 I. Committee and Staff Comments Approval of February 23 and March 9, 1994 minutes. II. Public Comments III. OLD BUSINESS 5:15 A. 300 W. Main Street- Minor'ON- (2 0 3 4- 1 0 927 IV. NEW BUSINESS 5:30 A-:-939--Er€ooper-Avenue==._Worksess-ion #f< 6:00 B. 610 W. Hallam Street- Partial Demolition#U~v A, tr-llit: 6:30 C. 520 E. Durant Street (Chanel) - Minorl/16'q -'3kti 6:50 D. The Meadows- Referral 7:10 VI. A. Project Monitoring B. Neighborhood Character Guidelines- ongoing C. Red Brick update- ongoing D. Main Street 7:20 VII. ADJOURN t HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Project/Committee Add Conceptual date to all projects when approved Project Monitor for County Courthouse? Joe Krabacher 801 E. Hyman AHS Ski Museum Aspen Historic Trust-Vice Chairman 612 W. Main 309 E. Hopkins (Lily Reid) 617 W. Main 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Highway Entrance Design Committee Donnelley Erdman The Meadows (Chair-Sub Comm) 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) Collins Block/Alley Wheeler-Stallard House 624 E. Hopkins 304 E. Hopkins 234 W. Francis Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Museum (alt.) In-Town School Sites Committee Aspen Historic Trust-Chairman 824 E. Cooper 210 S. Mill 303 E. .Main Alt 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) City Shop - 1080 Power Plant Road 506 E. Main - elevator Jake Vickery The Meadows (alternate) In-Town School Sites Committee 205 S. Mill Larry Yaw 716 W. Francis 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer-alt.) 204 S. Galena (Sportstalker) City Hall 627 W. Main (residential-Jim Kempner) 232 E. Hallam ACES City Shop 1080 Power Plant Road St. Mary's Church windows Roger Moyer CCLC Liaison 334 W. Hallam Aspen Historical Society 409 E. Hopkins 303 E. Main r b 311 W. North Farfalla lights outside 210 Lake Avenue (alternate) Marolt Museum Karen Day Rubey Transit Center 334 W. Hallam (alternate) Cottage Infill Program 134 E. Bleeker 435 W. Main Swiss Chalet 311 W. North 304 E. Hopkins 121 S. Galena Martha Madsen 620 W. Hallam (alternate) 100 Park Ave. (alternate) 214 W. Bleeker (alternate) 132 W. Main 520 E. Cooper Unit 406 Linda Smisek 134 E. Bleeker 210 Lake Avenue 305 Mill St. Tom Williams WAIC- 13 0 0 .G A\*RA Scott Samborski 702 W. Main - Stape - Conceptual Development approved Sept 8, 1993 300 West Main Street Fence Detail McDonald 925-8743 4' 4' 1<-,1 3/4* dia. dato A /-7 rn/-7 /-nnn/-1/--\nonnn 30 4' 11 . 1 weat end -10* concr* wall sidewmlk Iid" 4.-Allrirl -4-6.1-6-1 1- 1€ >1 <"1< 4* x 4* 1 -LEC- «v MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 300 W. Main Street, McDonald- Minor Development DATE: April 5, 1994 SUMMARY: Due to the particular location of this house, the owners would like to construct a fence which will block out some of the pollution and dust from Main Street. The fence that the McDonald's are requesting is made of wood and will be bolted onto the back of the existing retaining wall. An encroachment license must be issued by the City. All four structures on this block of Main Street, including the log cabin, are Aspen Landmarks. APPLICANT: Scott and Caroline McDonald, owners. LOCATION: 300 W. Main Street, Lots Q, R and S, Block 44, City and Townsite of Aspen. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer, reviewed this project and stated that it is a long standing City policy not to allow a fence to be taller than 42" within 30' of a street corner. This is to avoid blocking a driver's view of other traffic and pedestrians. The McDonald's have requested a 4' high fence, which is 70' long, so either the fence can run 4' high for 40' and then dip to 42" for 30' or it should all be 42" high. Staff recommends that the fence be 42" high for its entire length to avoid an odd transition. REVIEW PROCESS AND STAFF EVALUATION: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels·when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark.... Response: The type of stockade fence that is proposed is generally allowed to the rear of a parcel, but fences in front of historic structures should be more open in character. HPC has indicated that they are willing to make an exception to this principle in order to offer the f r homeowners some protection from pollution. The McDonald's had previously proposed that the fence be built of 2" wide cedar boards, which they felt would weather and make the f ence " f ade out. " This material was also meant to be in character with the log cabin, however, given the location of the new fence it will have a much greater visual connection to the Smith Elisha house and carriage house than it will to the log cabin. It is important that the new fence not detract from the character of the Smith Elisha house, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore, staff and HPC have found that the fence should not be "rustic" but should be made of sawn wood pickets. At the February 9 meeting, HPC expressed concern that the proposed fence was a long, unbroken plane and that the 2" pickets were too small a scale for that length of fence and for Main Street. The committee recommended that the applicants use a different material, like 1"x6" pickets with a chamfered top, and that posts be placed at a regular interval. There was also discussion about how the ends of the fence would be treated. The applicant has submitted a detail showing how the fence will attach to the retaining wall and a picture of the fence as it will appear along Main Street. A detailed elevation of the fence will be presented at the meeting. Staff agrees that a 1"x6" sawn wood picket is an appropriate dimension. Posts (6"x6") should be used to break up the length of the wall, and could have some sort of decorative "finial, " like the new fence at 706 W. Main Street. Staff also recommends that the fence wrap around the west and east sides of the property for at least three feet, rather than end abruptly on Main Street. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The fence will be 42-48" above the grade of the sidewalk, a height which is in character with other fences along Main Street. Because this will be a stockade fence, every effort should be made to soften it in the ways described under Standard 1. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This house is difficult to see from Main 1 7 Street, because of several large trees in the yard. A fence in this location will further obscure views of the addition and the main house from the south, but will not impact the main view of the historic resource, which faces N. 2nd Street. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The fence does not directly affect the architectural integrity of any historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application with the following conditions: 1) That the fence be constructed of 1"x6" pickets, preferably with a chamfered top. 2) That 6"x6" posts, preferably with some sort of detailing, be placed at a regular interval along the length of the fence. 3) That the fence be 42" high. 4) That the fence wrap around the west and east sides of the property for at least 3'. Additional Comments: 300 WEST MAIN FENCE ATTACHMENT TO RETAINING WALL Mc Donald 925-8743 1/2"X3" lag bolt -1/89(1.5")<7" bar stock twisted 90 degrees - - 3/8"X2.5"wedge anchor A 114- sidewalk ...../..../...../...................Il....Il... <€<44<€€<€€€€€€<€<4€«€«€«««<€€€€<€€€€««€<€€ %%%2%222%%%::%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%::ZZ::%%::%%2%%::%%%%%%%% 2 B==== .................................../....../..../.. ..........lilli.........lili......./.../.......... 3/8"X6" ................,I...........................,I. ..............................'..'.............. wedge anchor ............../.....Il......................../.. ..........."I'.....................,I'......'., 35555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555' ........."I'..........................'.,I,-'' ....,1-''I'.......'...................'.....'.. .......... .................'..........................'... .......... ...............................'....'. ''',-",-'.'',-'',-'','','',-'',-'','','',-'', §%%%%%>fiffifi:Eff:i:i:Eff:ififfififfiffiff:Effififififf ..»>:>:»>F:>:»»»P>:»>:>:»»:>P»»»»>PPL I........................../....... , }3}333* i 33§32%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ... 55555555555555555555555555555555555 ''' .i..........lili...../........../.I §§§§.§§§~:E:~~3:3333333333.33.333333.33333.33.333333?3333 .... <:.<:.«««:.<:.<:..0-.<:<:<:.««<«:.«<<:«<:.«. -- -lili......./............I-------.....-I.... 3% 3 3.*93333*3.EE***3%992999%29%999299%9%3%22%23%92%2: I..........lili......................./.....I €<4<€44€«€«««««<€«€€«««««€«<6<€«i . 222%222%23%3333333335333%33%33333333%22%2222%22% NOTE: 4"X4" post spacing along the retaining wall shall be at 6' intervals. Horizontal fence supports shall be two 2"X4"'s. 49<4" ~> approx.20" ..... .... .... 22222%- retaining wall ........ ..... ..... .... .... I 300 West Main Street Fence Detail McDonald 925-8743 40 4' 1+-,1 3/4* dia. dato 3.~ ~ 4' 1. 1 111 1 1111/1, lili lilli 1 1, wd Ind *10* concrate wall .Idewalk.Id. 4-Aend- 9~ _3(__ - K >1 SIX 4* x 4* .. .,..1 1.:.........'**4'Lfs,k: 4 :*ji.1.- >€1 61~42 -~1--=i-~t~~~-=----:~~ ~--1 ~- -- ~- -~ j--= --.-:41~jik I~-tfffifff-?Logifi~91-I~:~-1-~j- t ~-~-f---f~~it i- -- -- '·~•0~.; :1·~]:/,i'~1'.@·2 'i~*Uilt@Ni, . '174% .... ··::....... 4'. .. 74%9. ...... #Thb,£1 9*.4 M/ZA'Ovri;;·*CO.46.....?24/..rt.~ :.. 4..., 11, , : - .4 -Ili r·gfEER:428..de , A ·7' ~d J -'74: ...·1 4.· ,= :·~ ..y. f .. . 'h... .t .f i · :'' ). -I -I * ... .D:~is.. ...... :=>I '' ... .t :... ... I %· pt. . * 4 lEri V ..C 4 I • I , + -*.I I • ' i, · r~•• . ' A. . , ' · 1 ! i- . I . i 1 44 h.,1 ...... 1 •i'~~~,·i;irti .5, 1, !.!1 .f, 14 -M .1 't 50 , ..Ii 1 ·· . - ~ Lila ' 6 .7-2 .... , 4 ----·r'f•-r-~'ll ·I »M- JI I 1(mlf(IllmH~,111141111444**44*J'*M:*4" ·h.dtir·.·i:··. -,M:0·.·>:c.···· · ··· ··.·t -..:.-'.> ......1.... 11 - 1. 1, **¢i#i**uN~¢~i~,·w'p,~!1i9!?!iM~ .:2*·..i':'1·.·).-...- -·i.3 · ~, ·-: ;·~ ~··~<'2·~ . ~~i<~ j '. -*.L. 7vl -I f~ 0 D, al. ..· rk. · · · ' 41*Et , i. : , . . 0, :,13.~224 4f '4/7/R), Iv lf ' '44 '' **1194 414t ···.1 4 ·· · ~·: # · · · . t • ' ,* -S#El#AM@ ~·.i. 9 *P I.* :+ ,2,4422* · k 1 / ~4/ , 40 : · · ... · , I ... . . · . . ...4, ...: . . .' :iv *44&., t *: :15 irritteatil€*:5*364 it .it t, ·;<.· ici·~ ...~ti: -.·~· *: ~ ·· A.,:·lk'L VIAA:.~**20.~ : . ./f.::I'.'I /- I ./. 'fli ''I' I'.2*.''''I- ·· I '-I . ~ 1 11" 1 1.11 .7 42.1...4,4#.- . %. 4 ·--4-'-:1:·i'*,/,;.~.44#-/ 1 14**6:.7 0 - P' 4 4:6 01. . · F# -·- 1 ..lijl~l itiii Jill 111.11!lill.Imillill.~111111111111111.111111 119*{832:318262+1-229*E*33·I ro-9-'.·.4**Affim39ry#%(;TY.?f :,27:~~·' 836 1216%m.Etber©flutti,Okilit~. , *e MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 610 W. Hallam Street, Partial Demolition DATE: April 5, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for partial demolition of the historic residence at 610 W. Hallam Street. This Victorian structure was built in 1888, and has been listed on the Inventory since 1980. Previously rated a "2," or supporting historic resource, the site was upgraded to a contributing resource in 1992. (Contributing means that the resource has maintained its historical or architectural integrity.) The house has had some minor alterations, including demolition of the original porch, addition of a new porch on the lean-to and replacement of some original historic materials. However, the existing footprint 6f the house has been the same since at least 1904. An historic outbuilding also exists on the site, but has not been addressed by the applicant. HPC has review authority over any demolition of that structure as well. APPLICANT: Jim Iglehart, owner, represented by Gibson and Reno. LOCATION: 610 W. Hallam Street, 22.5 feet of Lot P and all of Lot Q, Block 22, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, established pursuant to section 7-709, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay District shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 7-602(C). The applicant prop®sks te demelish 46% of the existing residential structure. This fits within the Land Use Code's definition of partial demolition. HPC's role is to determine whether or not the portions of the building proposed for demolition can be sacrificed without compromising the character of the resource. It is not within the Board's power to review the design of the building addition, other than to offer comments. Standards for Review of Partial Demolition 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the 1 f 4 renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. Response: The existing rear lean-to does not appear (from the applicant's representation) to be strong enough to support a second story. The house is 21' from the rear yard setback and must be a minimum of 16' in order to meet the standard of a 30' combined front and rear yard setback. This does not provide the applicant with enough space to attach a new addition onto the lean-to. Because the lean-to is considered important to the historic significance of this structure, staff cannot support its demolition. Staff does support demolition of the existing enclosed porch as the original porch is already gone. (see attached photo) In order to allow the applicant the ability to expand the existing structure and to take advantage of the remaining FAR, staff recommends Landmark Designation for this site. Through this designation, HPC could allow some expansion into the side yard and especially the rear yard. From Staff's calculations, the applicant could then construct a two story addition, and gain at least another 1000 sq. ft. There is of course also the possibility of constructing additional space below grade. (Note: This scenario assumes that HPC would approve demolition of the existing outbuilding.) 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic importance of the structure or structures located on the parcel. Response: Staff finds that the historic importance of this structure is compromised by the proposed demolition. B. Impacts on the architectural integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel. Response: The applicant represents that the existing lean-to is in a deteriorated state, and that it is not economically feasible to restore it to a liveable state. Staff has not made an on-site inspection of the structure, and HPC should consider the hardship implied by requiring the applicant to maintain this portion of the house. However, structures in a similar or far more deteriorated condition have been preserved throughout Aspen. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the applicant's request for demolition of the existing enclosed porch, but deny the + request to demolish the rear portion of the building, finding that the standards for partial demolition are not met. Staff also recommends that the applicant request Landmark Designation. This program was established to achieve the preservation goals of the City of Aspen while offering some bonuses and incentives to the property owner. f, Additional Comments: . , €,7* r z. v A %4.. I 'r. . +44 422-143..., 44,29:·~:iti>i:f :~'.~~'~l~t 224«ff«~ ~~ ~.· · · · 3. -~911 ~:.. , 11. .6.223.4 Jit . . A -7.. .-- :41,13,1 rf-S~ F ---*1<,--·' ¢ 4 51:1~,b,=:2.1 - I *1'211933255:~Ellf F" 7 - '- -<2~ I uz>.14:t· 1 1 .. 1 Utily 4/36.·5'- Nt N 1 1 1.1 Thtiks>,:.,sib. p :).1 .rt: 202~.'digic#;re -72.:. 1.111 '45$4;ga=> - . ..re . J al- \ 11 0. I , 4944 44:1 9. W , .r:kr/ 5. , 43*4**.if I ·n T · 1 · 1 i u :i .¥1*Nk' .,1 .. '. r ..I- 1, i i e 1 IAND USE APPLICATION FORM Project Name Iglehart Residence Project Location 610 W. Hallam 22.5 ft. of Lot P all of Lot Q, Block 22 (indicate street address, lot & block rnImber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning R-6 4) Lot Size 5250 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & Phone # Jim Iglehart 610 W. Hallam, Aspen 925-5990 6) Representativels Name, Address & Phone #Gibson&Reno 210 E. Hyman, Aspen 925-5968 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Partial demolition Conditional Use Conceptial SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptlal FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final FUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Condaniniumization Text/Map Amer™ent - (20 Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line Exemption Adj ustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any previous aFprovals granted to the pmperty). Personal residence / Single~·family, 2 bedroom 9) Description of Develogart AA?lication Remove rear portion of residence to satisfy safety concerns & remodel into new areas. Have you attached the following? Response to Attadmiant 2, Mininum Sulmiss ion Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x 17" format. APPLICANT: Jim Iglehart 610 W. Hallam ADDRESS: ZONE DISTRICT: LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 5250 sq.ft. EXISTING FAR: 1072 3020 sq.ft. ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSED FAR: bl/A EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): N / A PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): N/A EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: N/A PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 11/A EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): N/A PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): N/A EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldg.: / AccessorY BIda: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: princioal Bldg,; / Accessorv Bldgi PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 46% EXISTING NUMBEROF BEDROOMS: 2 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 14/A EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 11/A ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 14/A SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Side: Side: Side: Combined Front/Rear: Combined Frt/Rr: Combined FronURear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ None ENCROACHMENTS: None VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks OnlY: character compatibility finding must be made by HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Collage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): L 6--- GIBSON & RENO · ARCHITECTS DAVID F. GIBSON. AIA AUGUST G.RENO. AIA SCOTT C SMITH. AIA April 6, 1994 Gibson & Reno Architects, located at 210 E. Hyman Ave. #202, Aspen, Colorado 81611 are hereby authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, James Iglehart, on the proposed partial demolition of the residence located at 610 West Hallam, Aspen, Colorado. Vvc P ---- C ----<f di James Igl~art Date ~~ 418 E. COOPER AVENUE • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 303/925-5968 • FAX 303/925-5993 L 6-=- GIBSON & RENO · ARCHITECTS DAVID F GIBSON. AIA AUGUST G RENO. Ala SCOTT C SMIT/.Ala April 6, 1994 Historic Preservation Committee 130 S. Gelena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: PARTIAL DEMOLITION The following is a letter for the partial demolition to the existing residence located at 610 W. Hallam, Aspen, Colorado. Having investigated the current existing conditions of the residence the following deficiencies were observed. 1. Exterior bearing walls framed with 2 x 4 studs. In most areas no insulation exists. 2. Roof framed with 2x4 joists at 36" on center. Insulation is minimum in ceiling and roof. 3. Floor framed with 2x6 joists at 36" on center. 4. Sub-flooring consists of deteriorating 3/4" x 6" planking. 5. Foundation made from stone river rock with no mortar. 6. There is noticeable settlement occurring throughout the residence, in excess of 2" in the bathroom tub. In order to bring the existing portion of the residence being demolished up to a suitable level would not be economically feasible, a complete rebuilding from the foundation up would need to occur. Thank you for your time in reviewing this material. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, - Augush-R~o Gibson & Reno Architects 418 E. COOPER AVENUE • ASPEN, COLOAADO el 611 • 303/925-5968 • FAX 303/9255993 C Park 1. 19 \ AN 0 Hunter 24 8 \ '44,71 4 Silver KIn 2 9 0 -5- \ %1 94 Magnifico Rd 9 00% 46 1$ e w % ~ ci 4 Mountain View Dr ke- e Snow 0,49'd 9369 e Rd O-ell g< 4444 fl Snow unny Ct or '04,0 To B salt sierra 6, 9.< 96 Salvation 4 9% 01 la. 0 4. - 44 Aspen 54<5,1 2 1 , 2 Hunter 0 0 2 Institute -4 2 ted 3 1 r-\ 80#06// b 2 2 - . 0 0 0 2% 4 0 -O S r 2 Tent ~ 0 ao 5 c 82 · · Gillespie St \ L·Ae 0 SI pe rI St ,< 0 Y Hallam 4 GoN Course 7 0- frh t 9 0i e CO & Smu *1. 10 4 U F 'er t VIne St ts• 4 0 1 S RaceS: e Smuggler Min Rd Aspen ¢5 •S~ Maroon Creek Rd _- 44 If L 9~ pk 1 16, 4 0#,4 R o r e. ain St 65 -4 ay st 9/4 0 5 -2 13 0 4 n 82 m e - O 1 4 y a U 4 2 Ho , d> D % J 2 Hospital * 2 - 06 m /744 0 # -008, f e 4 4. 0 2 se ent st To path 5 C C k b ,090 15 Maroon Lake 43'* r f #52 * 4 f 2 Jua St' 4 4 L· Mall C Aer 40 4 40 em 1 t- PO Larkspur Ln Hin , 44 St Ad L;Ulant V Summit t 0 21 # 2 1.-4 4/ #00 %00 2 - 0 4 4 9 As,]en G¥ Rivers 0 West,lew ~ & 1 44'Sed t. d 14 D D. 1 4 4.49 94_ 47f Dr o 1 Crystal Lake Rd VICINITY MAP 1 9 82 111% ~ 3~ 19 Goruds Gondola Laurel Dr L0 Mt Laurel Dr Mt Laurel ALLEX ilill';l lili 1 1 /j'illi 'illitilil i. jill I 0 0 0 0 To 56 122 MoVED ~ 1 1» ' 12>< 19 1 1 NO i&60 \\14 BPS{ PENCE //~ it, 1 9»/f -1 3 2 0 $2.50 A".e. -fo EME R.EMOVED = 493:5,9. Fl...# €11<AiL 26 /42/·,1 5-,1 7664.Fi HALLAM PE@<SEUTABE OF PE·.Moli'nokl: 04<29,; i - .E><l PTI P.46 SIT E P LANI 111 =lo'-011 PROJECT TITLE SCALE 116 1 6.01 OATE 9,10,¢11 IGLEHART RESIDENCE 610 VVest. Hallam DWI BY: DRAWING I. L .444 - GESON & RENO · ARCHITECTS Asper J Colorado PAOJECT NO 4113 E COOf™A AVENUE , ASPEN COLOAA 00 8.83" ¢:till / geoke·\ 2 22>Xn-{1 \ to / 1/ \ / X. 112 M FalovED I / \ . ~ K 1 Ts r# 8,4\ \ 1 1 LIVING ®It , FF--1 l\/ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~C To Be @E=MIc:VE D f j 1 .Ir--1 flo Ve= i. 611 ~><t,s,-rik19 FLOOR VL414 PROJECT TITLED SCALE c L.0 11 DATE· IGLEHART RESIC)ENCE 610 VVest Hallam 1/ El j: 1, /O,11 DWN BY· »R DRAWING K. L - GIBSON a RENO · ARCHTECTS Aspen, Colorado PACIECT NO. /1.9 E CUcj./. ./Fliul • ASPEN /0-0//Do 81/11 1! M ' k 12 BE: 22-FIA/EC) 7---% - / .7-7 - - - 12 66 RefloveD 1 11 L : soUTH B L EVA-ZE 014 NoRT'H ELEVATION VS; 1 L 011 V» 1 ' 621 To De F-eviovED «SE«« tr ! 2 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 - WIEST ELEVATION l/bll .110 11, - -12 ee ge,·lovec> ' -To BE 0-EMoveD / 1 9 h I t f« s 1-9 1 --2 L -1.- 8,4 91- E LE 7/HT loNi 1/8 ' = 1'·o N ©>41 9 T I N 9 EXTE F<lor. E L El/,4 f 1 0 % 6 PROJECT TITLE SCALE VF"e 5101I 1 DATE. 4 ro ·11 IGLEHART RESIDENCE 610 West Hallam oWN BY DRAWING K L Aspen, Colorado PAOJECT NO. -1 GIBSON a RENO · ARCHTECTS I. E .30'll' AV~/,UE .SPEN IC)LOGIA[X) ele. 11]1 4 k lili 11 \ d 411 1 4 N 11 -1 / '7 l h .._-1 Elii 1 1,1 1 11 111 1 L '1 -m" -9 ~iijjijiitii/imlihillilill//i//ijilmillij/ijillilillilillillilli/lilil-lIli-llillilillilt. - SOUTH ELE VAT I ONI PROJECT TITLE, SCALE - l/b.!I : 14©11 DATE IGLEHART RESIDENCE 610 West Hallam 4 86),9 1 i 0,¥N BY' DRAWUNO %, >4&9 - L_ Aspen. Colorado PANECT NO C4 <2 GIBSON & FRENO · ARCHITECTS filll /43 E COOPe. AVENUE , ASPEN ......00 'le. ag#154 : 4. -1 . I.A. + e 3% *AD:B:IM:liaammt:/216)/60'll#*/1/.7=# 32 . , ./.1-,I .. - '#11:f, .... ./..9,44Lvff.49% " - °i?p.'if-7~ 3 1 -11 1 . - -,470.'€695.v.. ~./Mil i f „ 4'. 1~.4*.1*&05,1 I'. . °..t<.sl~a,--2.- , I,-1<41'.. p &._,· 'pei•t,/·5biW#1:20:+1~4# $ 7: I. .... £#''f.·. 4 '/ . · - .--.1. ....,. ' . ./tz!:., A . . P ' „. ....../-, 5:& Ii.?; F, . 0 ./. st*=311:.# 4 1/5~V"tu:/INE I I r. ... I . . 4 I . p ,ht,.l'~~tj ~ P,~b~ ~. rr ...·. A ./. -46/671& :4 4-11. , ;*§,4,4.. 1.tr·. bp,)01.-*302;.<t-::~~.t. : . %..4 1"1''VIZ~lit #.1- I.' 0 . .- 44 . . 4 , . ,·59· · - ..: . -··:. h r~.1.14 - .:.·4,2.4 tlt; 1. '~ t¢ ....iskX¢ 5..,<Cf::19.,0.*4r·.·r~r 4*%204-~'fl::4~, . - *. 6 '. 11.*H 2 . ' ; ..3,"·· *·'.'./.6..1,£,/rz·€*r 1.= 4 75148*PA- * -4 al.' ..1 I '. -4....-· i.; -.'·Qui 2 tfg'ti 4 . - -,1.4/./A ( . . 61 . lia. 5 .---- -·41' A w, 1 ~-41 . . .1 IL' & '·0'P 0, , * vl.....1 l,15 ; ¢41,4.f. - 4 • i I .:1,2,:61 48:k.:,9/4.1 - hi=- 9 . 94 1 h. r.¥r-,15,6. 1, t . 1 -7-0 4 9---= 4 · 1· i" t· 41 +·ft, '. 't· .YTA'i.'1'*' · r ,.. .' .+ r 1 . . . .. E. ,-7· , I 74//PB. . 1 - I . 14, 7 1. a *. 4.1..%:a·:,-'f.%22.f:'$:Vi;422:t G.,=[.4:'..t*.2*9: ... :~* 1-~ f ...1.6-*t'.;-:.,<'I~::~If,vqtieittti-,..4.4*'Av~~45~r~:6*~~.'~.4~*r*691*Gr =:·~~- '.:,i: .- fUf, ~ ~,·fil -: :fl.*44«F·CA**4.~·..7-?Z€k.J:t>·1* ,>·.ry*~:- ~21.7•' ... A-':242*..t ~ , 1 , 7 r -9.• D 4%. VI li ·/ , 12 4&,cuff o , 0 + , 4 " 71 ·f. 14. '4'.' ..9 f.'41,jet.* fetif ' 4, -t.&9. , r-, 2 C.- I .al.. I ./ ...'/*... Rw:.Mt·.wu,· 446..4,2 , I .... ..4-V.:· .,4.-4 f. 43,4 f P: 1% P. 4..91 4, v .". 4~2'2' .:f-'·~:>'.:444:*. t,,5. ~ 4044·t,-3 I . .3- *Y59,4.-2-,t-.*z·k.... ~ . · 4 A<,8 ~.2,/ I~:~ . ~~~ 4, r ...' ... 1-1. 4~ - . 'Wil.Ii·24;3,42~ 9 4':-3 · i.·6 .r. .1 ·~ I ....4 ... 1 , 4 ' 022'K K.Fi:FF-MU' 2,7cimi -A- ' 1 ••==5-•a 1,224, ,' 2 1 4..d......"Ir...>21 ' '. ...., m.. ~ 6 [*Eflltil 1 1 1.1 - b ..b,--=-=„.4 •·· ; I · 1.·' ..·, ' 9 - 2 4 +1,11/ . . i. t':1 . *3 P -':. 4 . -4. ,---0.-0.-- = ..r:,4... 1,/. -·-..•i<f-···r' 2...s}g :Ytil, e. '~#pe · , f. .12. , ., J. . : -1 Wag~,7 r'~48\\%46 t i #41· I J ·•3/4 : 'VAA,qj,1€40:; $1/ · · ·. 7 .....1 *' 'f.;illikililip *Ir'i//4,1, t. ... ..... ' I . ... , 'f . , .. . . - 14&39/2 ... ..4, 4 pi ..t'.652 .. -. j .1. · ~<2 ..62 ··~·Ii'i*lihi*~ :th/#4 · j.¥-2'*U- · .~.)/2.6:1.1?34.% ~$,6.1• 4·::4 · t.1(40('Et~ -b· · · f...i. f 159),.;. ~~- ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~|fr,4 .... · '. 5122{P,12»4£25 . 21'· % til il'/%' f. P 10 Er, I ·· ; 1&433.#. 3@01.1,~ .1.n'' I g ....-r -- " : · Azk'.2*'* . 4:j . I #19. · .#4#530&2' 4,5,22: i'1114 00*01 .., '- ,.. 1-77.' 24-55'37 -0 ' i~it- tri I Emut wa ' 11 8 .· ,•2 I.I . 4 · . 4*£ lit 4.4 4 ·. -.-:. 22-. 132<ke- 4 ~ ft- T.I, t.,~ 4, · 2 ~·4· . I. , 015*2094. R , : f, : · ~,74*#Wilitilliff· 4,+ - 3- .:17. " rv*p. 1 4 P 4\ . 2 , 4 7' '. t .7·.-114:~Sit:1 1*'."*8301**k . ~~~ / -111. L e• 4,2 . 1/4 --bal-- i~121?imdr~224311, 1 P I . 1 , 4 11/0,611""illailill"IIIJF 9 . 4414-1 , ::'ar.. \92*'ht.364:»'· -1 ., : y. ' gA 1../.;L:-2~: 4.:. "'UL T + 14.€4:'.et*gt ..1 3.. ?- f ti?,i.'Sixia/Me,K---t!,; I....6.· S '3,164 .bl ./9 I -7.. 4. =~,9 .............U*» · t ... lift 14.:,m 7 . -· '44·.h. ff·If, I ··t ,-·, . n-·F-·11{j.ji:·aimni;1:68*il*;91""~ 2.1.3...1. \\ 13 ,·· 4.ugiit-'~g:za•mg¥:12.4-~,/Er,Im' p.i f.i.ft- .:~.4·0 ~ · *: ...··4/9 .... /V. 1.01 -4 i. I d ..Ji'it:4.dt#ist:fktt:#Mit:jitilij~>r- I i· -- ,-; ~ 6:r:i~--.-- - 9:~·14::...tor· I'l-. - %11~ /11..,. T:9~:t'ttiii*> .. tjas/ 4 6 - ~ :~•cd*2*jc==357:r T.R'ev,' a ' ' - .-.. A-vqp. , 1· "..54.-1 04': . '1-,9,4 .*44:~34*' 7 0.-,41 . 140> ' . . ..r . . t-' p..,-u ,·-· ~ »1_.S~ f.:1 I 42#./. M f f. . ..i.·. -·1;.~il~- U-064.C· I .....0. ...?24:127*,fa~ %,1 14.4 4. '•t 57717;. 12 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 520 E. Durant Street (Chanel), Minor Development Date: April 5, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to lower the windowsill heights on the storefront windows for the new Chanel store. New windows and new double doors are to be installed. This building was built in 1980 and lies within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Chanel, Inc., represented by Brand and Allen Architects (San Francisco). LOCATION: 520 E. Durant Avenue, Lots L-S, Block 96, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H,I' Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: While the half of the block which faces Cooper Avenue contains several historic structures, there are no other historic resources in the area of the Ajax Mountain building. All of the storefronts on this building appear to be the same. Staff finds that the changes proposed for the Chanel store will not have an impact on the overall unity of the building design. Staff does recommend that any future requests to enlarge windows of other shops be made to use the same dimensions as Chanel, so that there is not a wide variety of window sizes. The new windows will have the same frame and mullion details as the existing windows. The door on Chanel is to be clear glass, whereas all other doors on the building are wooden with a piece of glass. r. , 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds that this proposal will have no impact on the historic district. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This proposal has no impact on the cultural value of a historic resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not directly impact any historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application with the condition that if any other shop wishes to increase the size of their store windows in the future, that they are of the same dimensions as the windows at Chanel. Additional Comments: MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: The Meadows, referral comments on new addition DATE: April 13, 1994 - - An application for the "Meadows Final SPA Amendment and GMQS =- _ _ Exemption" has been submitted_to the Planning Department and - referred to HPC for comments. During the Master Plan and SPA -9 -9 review process, HPC was very involved in design review of the -27 == = residential structures, academic buildings and music buildings. The Meadows area has no historic designation, but was recognized early in the process as having historic significance to Aspen through its association with designers Herbert Bayer and Fritz Benedict, as well as the importance of the cultural activities which take place on this campus. Attached are plans for construction of an additional seminar room. The room is proposed in order to meet ADA requirements and also to allow the Institute to upgrade their audio-visual facilities. Two new plaza areas are also proposed. (Additional information is needed to evaluate this feature.) At the time of the SPA review, it was anticipated that there might be some expansion of the existing buildings in the future. The proposed new building is almost identical to the existing structure, but distinguishes itself slightly by the use of concrete block and a few different windows. Staff finds that this sort of near replication may be appropriate in this case, but recommends that more distinction be made between the new and old buildings through building materials. The project architect will attend Wednesday's meeting. HPC may approve the design at that time or ask for additional information to be presented at the next meeting. Because the site does not have an historic overlay, the usual significant development review procedures have not been followed. 1 1 - 1 TI {E ASPEN MEADOWS FINALS.PA DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND - RED 1 BUTT /42 FINAL SUBD[VISION PLAT CEMET AR• 1 / i ' AN€R l -1 11 1 / 9:LLESPI 27 82 1 / m CITY OF ASPEN / VICINITY MAP 1 11 N.T.S. 1 '. THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STAUCTUAAL ENGINEERS January 24,1994 - City of Aspen i 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attention: ' Leslie Lamont RE: Aspen Institute Meadows SPA Amendment Seminar Building Legal Description: Lot 1 ofa subdivision located in the North 1 /2 of Section 12 and the South 1 /2 of Section 1, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, State of Colorado. Dear Leslie: The primary purpose for the remodeling is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and to upgrade the electrical system to present day codes along with providing a more energy efficient mechanical system. The following is a description of the proposed addition to the remodeling of the existing Academic Facilities, for your review and approval. The new addition will be a block and steel structure, in keeping with the existing architecture, designed by Herbert Bayer. The new eighteen hundred square foot addition will house a seminar room and a state of the art audio visual room to serve the existing as well as the new. The addition will be built in the existing campus profile and will not adversely affect existing visual, pedestrian, access, noise or trash service conditions. Parking is provided on site and impact to existing traffic patterns will be minimal. Public services in place will be adequate to handle all new construction proposed. We trust that the enclosed information meets your requirements, but if there is any further information required, please contact this office. Siocerely yours, 41 C.--7-~>« ~- Jam~s M. Cook, Project Architect TH~DORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC JMC/nw 93166 Ll 23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82 P O. BOX 1640 BASALT COLORADO 8 1621 (2303] 927·3167 . 1, 0 ASPEN INSTIT-UTE MEADOWS SPA AMENDMENT SEMINAR BUILDING The following information is supplied in response to items addressed in the "Land Use Regulation". When the Aspen Institute examined remodeling the existing seminar facilities to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and to upgrade the seminar facilities so that they could accommodate current teleconferencing technology, it was discovered that a significant portion of the existing seminar buildings would be used in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. In addition, it was determined that the existing structures did not lend themselves to an efficient upgrade. : Therefore, the best approach was to add a new building. The current seminar building square footage is 5,120 SF. The new building would increase that by 2410 SF. This will enable the bathrooms to comply with the ADA, and to create efficient use of space. We will also have one seminar facility that has the l current technology necessary for today's seminars. The new square footage will not result in g increased capacity. The current number of.participants that use the seminar buildings will remain the same, it will, however, be more efficient. Everyone will have seats, and it will function and flow better. There will also be an upgrade of the mechanical and electrical systems of the existing buildings to comply with the current National Electric Code, and provide a more energy-efficient mechanical system. Review Standards for Development 1. Campus SPA was approved in 1991 after extensive review. There are no new uses or major expansion contemplated. 2. Existing public utilities and roads do exist to service the existing building with no increased impacts n as a result of this amendment. 3. No slope, instability, mud flow, or other hazards exist that would adversely affect this project. Il The new construction will be built on a gravel terrace adjacent to the existing structure, located no closer to the Mver than the existing structure. 4. The new construction will be tucked into the recess formed by the existing building and will match 1 the massing and materials, so as to minimize the impact to the existing building. 5. This project is in compliance with the "Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan" in that it is promoting and ' encouraging the cultural and educational community by promoting the intellectual arts. 6. There will be no expenditure of public money required. 7. There will be no development on slopes in excess of 20%. 8. Project is exempt from GMQ's allotments. Development Schedule: Construction is scheduled to begin the fall of this year with completion no later than June 1995. 11 ' 1 I ) \ 1 / A. / 1 1 1 \ / / 1/ it 1--// 1 1. C " tjA »ODU NER ADA BATHS 1. 2, 14% 11 4.2/2 - ' --#$ ) A -& .4.- \ J SEMINAR Vt 0247 - - /// '22>X '. '07 t I. 1 j//2.Jk<knli~<* . .%'. 1 1 - A 1 »th . 3- ...1~ s,*PI. '4*37;. .:4\·/C ,/ .' *1 < lh·. /41 1 1-~944 6 / 1- AU 14// 1- .i -- . 4% k 2 34 / ./ .. . :- 7--.- ~1\4,911 -'i ,0. 42- Fl bL'f-3 ... 0 E-z... I.LIT/o . ir ·u. V : , V J-CD 9»/ --~ ./ 4 \ 79 · /:.. S Se Z -1 - 1/64\\/ ...C EMINAR : -*00 .FACILITY I I. 0.- - INEST -# '~ EAST \ e SEMINAR \\ SEMINAR 5\\\~\\ <~i.../...../.- *&61,/17/24-- \ a \ i. / 1 31 1 2>051-INe h - r TERR/CE - Aa 1· 11 \9 -a S 2 h~ g» -------- ----- / 16 PAEPCKE AUDITORIUM - \1~ 4 11 Utilities and Surveying: ·. "0, -177.9 5. - rY-N leonard Rice Consulting Watef Engineefl InC ?X~-7,800.-----*...1. r , Grir,diay Bridge to) w n.-,00.0 -,- h. .0. 6.0. 11.1, .-01.... 1 21-211-1422-21-57 21« /111 ~ field localld-/ Property Une• ..d ..u location• 're •hown for Likultranve F.rpo- Inly. Njpfonsibility of Oil}ers Sbccu S-2 .od S.3. For accurate localions refer to the Frial Subdivilioc Plat 17---797-/ - 3-*--; ra 1 5/ LEGEND h«1- 73 )70 -- Existing Vegetation \ •7...5 CKD Deciduous Trees 1 1-1,6,;Q.7+4"k--..,#1"J<e*i. watkIZZ --- «te fi (14 CCD Shrubs €,)(f; Evergreen Trees - ··.. .3 , Beter, *68 ' .4 . - //, 1 1 -1 ~ Manicured Landscape \ \k -- -*\ h.' \ 1.1 3-.-// 1 / (f-j ~ 947 f New Planting Q Cottonwood 'btes - ¢21 Aspen Trees ·- 11 1 ..094 , : 99-4.-,3 - -~-13\-1 1%»« 2 2-12... i-* 1 - Evergreen Trees (Spruce, Pine, etc.) 9 1 38 / C I, -1.- CO Shrubs -- E~ Bluegrass TurU Manicured Landscape / (1 r-\U /1 Fril Sceded Native Grass and Sage 6/077/X \ -1 \ 70870• h«, Eidng Servic, Road 1 P _, 0~ ~ .!4&64 Tr- 1 \ E- Ar-\ r Scale: 1"=59-0- 13 trrt Z 1\ -'F ~590.. \\ ..610 r 1/ i %(.J -Ch -- 61 /~ 1\. rh.» 4, ~ _~1 - - ~4 9 /1 , , I./ -4 / . 706.22 tn Paepcke ~-0 «4 -11 1 2 Date: December 6; 199- Auditon . -- €*Ee=» < - Existing pa~ed pmling a;66 ,1 ~ 7~1 1&2EP{ PLANTING rk- I il shee, TItle: -- 91 spacel-,/ :/ 0 1 \:\ \\ - , . t -,-U. PLAN 31 1% ~ · ft - . ,. , ~, . .WO- i 33£1 3'.'430t 2 4%24·9 1 AREA 3 ·y·*,434 »* 4 0 0 r. \ \A , [ke,g ·=,ton L- 11 3 €#44.74* .r-'---AL -r' /1 - Sheet Referente plan Sheet No. , iii / 1 \ 11 11 - M - " 7-Y. 0...0. ) 8\ m.4.225-¥ : 9. 5 1 - 1 ROOM NAME AREA 1 EXISTS PEST SEMINAR 1785 1 2 ELSTS EAST SEMINAR 71b 1 3 NORTH SEMINAR 1755 4 MECHANICAL 166 5 E>JSTS CIRCULATION 2045 6 PANTRY 11 7 STORAGE 142 8 COAT AFEA 14+ q MENS BATH 260 10 PNOMEN '5 BATH 260 11 AV ROOM 206 12 COURTN'ARD / /\. E WL -441»c\ TOTAL Sa. FT. =362 ESTIMATED ~STRUCTION ; i.la.QQQ i ~ 4 ~ JA 7 0 i CLAA 10.01 2 11 1 9 , 1 / 1 - k 6 12 I - -. -. - . I 5 1 1 I 1 It 1 1; /'/ 1 / i 2 C \ //, / / '' / / . I . / / 1%1 · 'it 1 -11 j 1 1 1 L...1-6~k; 1.JUIJ- ilili'ili':1,1,1111 l' 11 11 1 1 1 r.+ 01 Tr~'72 -A 174 -T-1-1 1 LIEGE lilli 111'Il 111'111 ' 4- - --1 .5 I -- 1 INt : i .4 f , i '- im, 1 4 %m 6 / A-»-4 - ll1l'I'1I11II11111III1lIl11iII1t --11 + 11111111111111 1 : I li NEFN ENSTINS · . A NORTH ELEVATION O 1/81=1'-0" 1 - - 1 EVA 8074 1 1=/4 078 r~1 1 1 1 14-, + it , , ... : '11 1 VV# 1 M~ lilli 11 I 111 II1IiIII"J]]Ijj]1II II!III 1 '53%881 1 1111111111111111111! 1111111 1 111111 1I111I11I1II11I111II ,11I1II '*¥0 1 111111111111111111 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ef« 1 111111111111111 1 i mil 3 OE Ill'lli'll:'il/'I'/'i'~'il''I':/Iliillii- *tttkt ' =1 1 »A 1 If**4 4 1 i 9 1/ii[il,( IlliLI:1'1)1iji)1)li)''Ii,Ii/1'11"i' ~44444£T- 00001 /4 ,""' '' 'Ill'Iii' ''ll''ll''I'' 4/ill'i,111 111 1 " 61 lilli Iii 11111111!1111 EXISTING NEFN .. »EST ELEVATION O 1/611= 1'-O" =1 *f . 4 11 11164 / i 1I .' I i of 'I~ Iii 411 -= d 6 : =1111'11 '21'iIi'111'1111%1:Mit'i "'i''ili'iii 'J'11111111111,111 1 1 1 -1 1 1 L wn . ; 11 ~ 2, + + 1/+ 1 . 11 1 1 r'h, 41 1 .1 1 - 14 LV + ~1 + i -= 3 +~~3 ~ 1 ~A~ |~~~~~~~ ~l'!1~11~~1111'~It't~t~1~ l~1~1~~~1~1~~~t~t~ 1 .Il l' 1 il l 1 1 I l l l=vill/111'11'11'lll 111111111111111111 4 : 11 IM] 11111111 111'111--4 lili 1 1 1 1 111111111 1-111]L lit 0 1 1 1 : 1= =1111111 11111111111111111%,0,2 1/111|1111111111' lilli'11!111,11'11 4 - 1 -1 11 . 1 I .j, 1 1 11 01- 1 11 #34111 1111!111 le;Wa@282111111!ill Illttlill 4 - ·· " : Pi rfll *2*0&*11 11111!11 111'11111 1 NEFY EXISTING E>OSTING NER I . . SOUTH ELEVATION 0 1/g= 140" CHANEL #,30 9 9 3 0 9 3 j 1/ ASPEN, COLORADO 4.5.94 e .Trovirrr'?n ·. ·· 422*6 -' '9 1 1 - Ah.·, r . *-et - I . i. U .4 1 '. , - -9,4 - 1@al \ li 7 g Z.Y. na - . -Ak - .9.-,==-0 £ a, 2;Al t'.1 4 .- -1 - I -ly·-Gith*-2-'c- - . /2 02//0/8 - 1 AP.U..'.- . '4 , \~2~&0 4' ... Wk/'am*y I r 1 1 -2 1 >2--1 - a ah.,Walij-' 6 00- 3 . -- - --. -../ =.·- · -1- . k. r . -= -,35;A. .21 92.06 W- . 1 = -§~77,4.Imfile //f--Ilde¥/%$*97-IWL .*4*Asaff#*5\4;2 6 11 15~6•A -1/1<6~,P9 #25::t. m-JJ~.~ ~U.04 kiREFA _ _- --- -----. - - @ - ,=-4 31 - 19 1 0 1.1**eil Ellim --49 41 --i„ UU --- - -- - - 1 -/91 ... E C../.al. DURANT AVE- ' 3 1 . 'C_ H 7.=gl 1 -90: F#,£,1 1@@it i= 2 1 ©:9 fl 1 - L:=n=s..-1 L==g,-----_kr '16£ -2=-7-EJ 2 2 - ~~~ COOPE' AVEL IlliliM i ·<-4 5 1 1 1 - 1~ 9. e - £ COOPEMA•E --- 22-=32 E 20-2 0 -- - r.__ b , 1 .,1,1 CHANEL ~ ~ ~~ 4 L 9-7 .. r li-h ¢ LEASE SPACE i. i 204 - 1 h 4 , i#*A~ ----E-- ~22¥EEC~ -- : f :WAVE A 4 0,1 7- r - -- --'b le~=AME 24~------ --*--- r-- r I , 0 0 /for!~ 94 Imel 9%08 noon 5 080 /(9 ri 00€y @Elbt»SWAL~9:~rd 196fK.,1 & d. '47 r..3.1 liOn S . Irren-i b 0000~ 7~ ~ 81|~ I52 *91 [10 I~ ~22 ~ Fa-n ~ - -- - 1 1.-1 - A ..1 .- 0 EMAW ST 1 DURANT AVELE -i=r-- --- *FEal *30*=LJ 7 I=IMN jewy aux#Efu la 1 1 e E-3-· ..<#/. ~ - :Elm'*TIO#5'54 <%1.LE:AriMMI/7.44 ---3- 712,11- 1/1/E :' AKU~~ *iEa-T~pE F5+1mbi3k#fliA::166; ......... Ill Fl SITE LOCATION ' 1~d&&1.<22%186 , -t~-a•AEi~ 1-<) 520 EAST DURANT 1«ASPENE 'Ab# f 0. 901/ -- r 1 -0--% PROJECT ADDRESS OWNER ARCHITECT CHANEL BOUTIQUE 520 EAST DURANT CHANEL, INC. ARCHITECTURE ET DECORATION ASPEN, CO 81611 5 EAST 57TH STREET CHRISTIAN GALLION NEW YORK, NY 10022 71 AVENUE MARCEAU OCCUPANCY USE 75116 PARIS, FRANCE GENERAL CONTRACTOR B-2 BRAND+ALLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION CHRIS HARRELSON, ERIC BRAND BUILDING CODE 418 EAST COOPER STREET 900 NORTH POINT STREET, SUrrE 400 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109 1988 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CrrY OF ASPEN AMENDMENTS + 0 0 9.92 *e 9 2 ~6 - 9 1 10.-0. 2'-4" 4'-1' 3' r . . . I I I . I . 1 3040 CM 11.12 139.1 CPI 93.98 CM CM 2'-0" 4 4 I * E-- F r 1./ 1 1 0 11 1 4 - 1 -111-1.- 1 T.: : d 1 1 1 1= 1 . 1. 9 1 ....................... 1 4 r=71 1 H I 1% - q m - i - N 13Arl H]ddn ~ MEZZANINE 1333!19 hl31NnH Rot 0 130'- FA HEAD 126'-11" ~ ;L- 11 1. " 4 1--------0------------0 , 1. t SIU 122'-4' ~ \ A r•I MEZZANINE :: · 120'-0' 4 - 9 I ' I -li · i : 0 0 .. 7.4 ... - - 1]„:¤11 rv.1 6 4 110'-1 *P l.~Z~ rl SOUTH ELEVATION (DURANT AVENUE) -) IN' • I'-00 u - / 9772 / :771 2 1 1, 1 11 1 1 /7 1 11 h:li -8- 1 1! 1 1, 1 l. 1 ..210 - 1 1...\ \ 1 11 10404- - - / /7 j F.I I 1 I|[i><io- m~u 03><t ~4 23?4 /, lili 'fi>7 L.- /1 I - NEW PULLION ~ SMALL VITRINE PARTIAL PLAN 3/B'•1'-V *4 4 0 WINDOWS WITH PROPOSED LOWERED SILL. MULLION SIZE AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING WIDTH 1 1 EXISTING WIDTH , ~~_I »E 1 TO REMAIN 1 i TO REMAN 11111111I1II11111111I111I11III1/I]IlI1,111111!1111 / '11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill lili 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 lili 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1IIlIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!llillII 'l!Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!lllllllll lllllllll!llIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 1 1 lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111,1.111111111111.1 1 1 1,1,1,1,111,1.lili.. LINE OF EXISTING HEAD 111 111 111 1 HEIGHT TO REMAIN 111 1 1 1 ~- WALLCOVERING :1~ I 111 lili lll 111 'Ill m =) 111 ll] 111 'Ill 111 111 111 111 /1,1 1, 111 1 '1 1 £ Aft.43 4 1 5 Ij Ill e 1 1 111 111 9 1 '¥ l,44. 111 ||| A 111- 111 , - f,tl 9 Illill *1 LINE OF EXISTING SIU- 1 1 1- - - -- 111 Ill - 111 Ill J llI I[1 - 111 111 - lili 1lj LINE OF PROPOSED SIU- 1 0 /,1 11 1 i l i ' i 17"111111111" "," "" "'1"1"V'7'9'9"l"I"~'l'2'7'9""'1" ~" 'i" 7'9'9"1"1' i ""," 1119111 ~T-~-I-11111 Ill' 1111111 lili l ili 111111 -4\ -- ---- A = UPPER LEVEL ~ • / 110'-4 1 ./. DURANT AVENUE ELEVATION SECTION I 3/3*•1'-00 3/851'-0' 1.1 F ----------------- 0 //4\ / / 6 -Es / 0 9 m SMALL VITRINE a.4443 a % 13 t¢ r¥> i -1 1 L 1 111 111.1711 I iti WINTER STREET 3/8':1'-00 V .A r 07==El #// ' 1 -ill --1-IT-l -1-1 -1-1- 1-1- 1-1-[lill -1 - i I i . Illllllllllllllllllll 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 lilli 1, lllIlllllllllllllllll 'llllllllllllllllltlll' lilli'1111!1111"lili 1 -1 < EXISTING DOOR FRAME TO REMAIN WITH NEW STEEL FRAMED CLEAR GLAZED DOOR W/ NEW CRYSTAL DOOR HANDLES 00 4 FER E = . = . UPPER LEVEL % 110,-0, ~ CORNER ENTRY 3/80•1'-0' 6