The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19931025, 4/ h AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1993 REGULAR MEETING SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of Sept. 22, 1993 minutes II. Committee and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. OLD BUSINESS A. CD: 834 W. Hallam - (continue to Dec. 8, 1993)-2-044-1-l-,njou- D E V. NEW BUSINESS ,~ r, d i T 3 5:15 A. Minor Development - 435 W. Main - L'Auberge'49 .~_ _ L i ,#dou D IC f 5:45 B. Minor Development - 228 S.Mill St. Nancy Heller Boutique Noc) 6,-a/' 1 142-uu---*'bi<L -43 6:00 C. Minor Development - 530 E. Main St. Court Housp Plaza <099,-) Â·- Mor A-\\A -0 14 -3> b\ONX.%-0 ,-2- ---:~~ 1-5.'ll VO)~3 -23> VI.. Project Monitoring A.--Add-cmm@p:beaÂ·*adate/ B. Sub-Committee Reports C. Neighborhood Character Guidelines E. Red Brick update ongoing 7:00 VII. ADJOURN HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Proiect/Committee Add Conceptual date to all projects when approved Bill Poss CCLC & PPRG 413 E. Hyman County Courthouse Highway Entrance Design Committee Character Committee-AACP 601 W. Hallam (app. liaison) HP Element-Community Plan Aspen Historic Trust-Board Member 214 W. Bleeker St. Mary's Church 533 E. Main Donnelley Erdman The Meadows (Chair-Sub Comm) 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) Collins Block/Alley Wheeler-Stallard House 624 E. Hopkins 304 E. Hopkins 234 W. Francis Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Museum (alt.) In-Town School Sites Committee Aspen Historic Trust-Chairman 824 E. Cooper 210 S. Mill 303 E. .Main Alt 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Joe Krabacher 801 E. Hyman AHS Ski Museum Aspen Historic Trust-Vice Chairman 612 W. Main 309 E. Hopkins (Lily Reid) 617 W. Main 312 S. Galena - MD (Planet Hollywood) Jake Vickery The Meadows (alternate) In-Town School Sites Committee 205 S. Mill Larry Yaw 716 W. Francis 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer-alt.) 204 S. Galena (Sportstalker) City Hall 627 W. Main (residential-Jim Kempner) 232 E. Hallam ACES Roger Moyer CCLC Liaison 334 W. Hallam Aspen Historical Society 409 E. Hopkins 303 E. Main 311 W. North Farfalla lights outside 210 Lake Avenue (alternate) Karen Day Rubey Transit Center 334 W. Hallam (alternate) Cottage Infill Program 134 E. Bleeker 435 W. Main Swiss Chalet 311 W. North 304 E. Hopkins 121 S. Galena Martha Madsen -falternate) -*al.ternate) -21 4 W.Bleeker-(-a-1-ternal@) 132 W. Main Linda Smisek 134 E. Bleeker 210 Lake Avenue 305 Mill St. 02 W. Main - Stape - Conceptual Development approved Sept 8, 1993 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of September 22, 1993 CLARIFICATION OF MOTION OF 835 W. MAIN - BERGER DESIGNATION ............................ A.C.E.S. 101 PUPPY SMITH STREET -PH RELOCATION .. 2 834 W. HALLAM - LANDMARK DESIGNATION - POPPIES BISTRO . 4 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of September 22, 1993 Meeting was called to order by chairman Bill Poss with Donnelley Erdman, Les Holst, Jake Vickery, Roger Moyer and Linda Smisek present. Joe Krabacher, Karen Day and Martha Madsen were excused. CLARIFICATION OF MOTION OF 835 W. MAIN - BERGER DESIGNATION Amy: At the last meeting the motion stated that it found at least one of the standards B, C, D, E, or F. The City Attorney stated that you need to make another motion and state which standards are met. He thought that motion might be a loop hole if anyone decided to take legal action. It only has to meet one standard. Jake: This is one of the first works that Fritz did as soon as he got out of school which would be significant. MOTION: Les amended the motion for clarification that HPC recommends to City Council designation of 835 W. Main, known as the Berger Annexation, City of Aspen finding that it meets criteria B, C,D, and F; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Les made the motion to approve the minutes of September 8, 1993 as amended; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. COMMITTEE AND STAFF COMMENTS Amy: On the Katie Reid building they want to put a bathroom in the building so they will need a vent and want it in the rear corner tucked in on the roof. I didn't have a problem as long as it was kept as small as possible. Roger: As long as it is the same color as the roof. Les: We are talking stack vent. Amy: Regarding the rock a new owner purchased the land and they are requesting to wait until spring to designate as he is involved with another project. Amy: The Mine Company building has an application in to pull off some of the barn wood that is on the staircase going up the building and they want to power wash' the wood and repaint. I didn't know if that was the right technique. Roger: Power washing wood is appropriate and the Mine Company building burnt down in the 60's and then was redone. Don: I talked to Dick Fallin as he is representing the Bergers regarding an encroachment to do with the existing structure which is being remodeled. They are going to the Board of Adjustment. What is our purview regarding review status in the West End for structures that are adjacent to historic resources. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of September 22, 1993 Amy: This is Bruce N. Berger and the entire lot is designated on the inventory so we have a house on the west portion and the new structure. They are proposing to tear down the structure and by code they can tear down 50% of the building. Until that point HPC has no review. A.C.E.S. 101 PUPPY SMITH STREET - PH RELOCATION Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. Affidavit of posting was entered into the records. Amy: This is an application to relocate an inventoried structure at 101 Puppy Smith Street and the applicant is the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. They are proposing to relocate on what is their own land and donate the building and a piece of property to the City as housing for the City Electric Employees. It must meet five standards. I feel the applicant needs to justify to us that it is absolutely not possible for them to incorporate the historic structure into their new development proposal. They will also have to provide bonds and structural engineer statements. Al Dietch, president of the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies: We have been studying for several years now what we are going to do with a piece of property that is located between the Given Institute on the west and the Post Office on the east and the Red Brick School located to the south. We have decided to use that area for urgently needed staff housing. We have increased our staff and have 16 members. The master plan includes annexing ACES into the city, about 26 acres. This particular property is in the city and that would join it all. That required us to go through a zoning process which we have applied for. The city has a need to house their electrician. They have a switching station between the post office and Puppy Smith Street. That facility is maned by the electrical Staff of the city and every once in a while their is a failure and it takes time to fix it as the electrician lives in Basalt. Over a series of meetings with the city we have asked that we enter into a trade with the city. On the maps that you have their is an employee house that is owned by the City and leased to ACES as employee housing. Our concept is that we would trade the property that is behind the switching station for the property that is across the street from the switching station. The property behind the switching station would be the area for the relocate of the structure and become a residence for the city electrician. We want to move that house as it is not in a location that we need in order to build a second house. The new faculty housing which are two two bedroom houses and the present house is located right between them. We would have to relocate the house in any event. There is a second structure behind the house 2 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of September 22, 1993 that we are proposing to demolish. It was originally a chicken coop and we have an employee living in it. The present house is called the professor's house and is 700 sq. ft. We are proposing two structures at 2,680 sq. ft. Amy: If the city has a need for housing for an electrician then why are they renting the building across the street to you for housing. What will the gardeners house be used for? Al: Storage. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Don: I feel it is very clear and the landuse does not impact any of the neighbors. I see no problem with the relocation of the historic resource because the majority of them have disappeared over time. It will actually be relocated closer to the other historic resource. Roger: I would concur. Les: I don't have a problem with moving the house but the proposed houses seem quite large to me. Jake: I feel this is a good concept and support it. Keeping houses in their original area provides a linkage to the past. Don: Allot was lost when Puppy Smith was lost, discontinguous and very sylvan. Puppy Smith Street became very rural. Amy: I would not want this building to stand in the way of greater good. I would like in some way to maintain the street pattern. I do feel we are making it easy for ACES not to incorporate this house into their design. If you did have to move it from that spot it could still be one of the professors houses but at the same time the City could put it to good use. The City has not accepted this deal yet. Al: Make it a condition of city approval. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC allow demolition of the old shed as requested by the applicant. That the HPC approves relocation on the condition that the City of Aspen accepts ACES's offer understanding that part of the relocation process must be met with a bond etc. That ACES shows in their plan either physically with signs or bulletin boards that at one point an historical community lived here and that could be worked out with Staff. That would be part of their responsibility of continued education. If the city does not accept the offer and ACES cannot find use for the 3 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of September 22, 1993 resource on its current site then you must come back to HPC with suggestions of alternate sites or attempt to integrate the historic building into their proposal; second by Donnelley. Les: This was a very difficult proposal to understand and I feel there was not enough research done in retaining the historical building on site. All in favor except Les, motion carries. Chairman Bill Poss closed the public hearing. Jake: Monitor for A.C.E.S. 834 W. HALLAM - LANDMARK DESIGNATION - POPPIES BISTRO Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. Amy: This is also know as Poppies Bistro Cafe and was constructed approximately 1889. I recommend approval of landmark designation finding that it meets standard B architectural style and community character. This is a non-conforming lot with a non-conforming use as a residential site. The Planning Director will have to make a code interpretation. Jake stepped down. MOTION: Don made the motion to continue the conceptual development until October 25, 1993; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Roger made the motion that the HPC recommends approval of the landmark designation of 834 W. Hallam Lots K and L lot 10 Hallam Addition, City of Aspen finding that standard B&F have been met; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Les made the motion to adjourn; second by Donnelley. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland Chief Deputy Clerk 4 , 151809 em m w mm i. r.1 ~27}. /thil Â£0;721Â» to lf) 29<~Tri 1 3 Nr1r7-*f=-~~-~~=~ cng#trk-11 1 ./ -- I--Ill - 1: \\ e. 0 1: 1. 23 1 If) A 51, t. ('otc, CA 9.1 ,- LE-La:.. %1?40;ti*.37 44 6-4-Â»Ch-k>' U /3/r '# 0Â£.Â· , ry L -N, I btt' mm Eli (U 4-1 1, 11 f ,, - 1-9 - \\ - - &414*iri~ ~ ,, : Â·,~ ,:cx*r, 111,1111111,1 't-* 0 'tit- =11 1 06-~/ m - 7-Tr , 4-5 y --41-0-1 p -Â· â€¢,D . ~M m 11111,11,11'LI 1,1 I 00 r . M M -- -. ?*0*Er- )7.- 10/x, 1/ // - i,13 -19Â©40)7yP4Â¢ n 1. (~523#1/.A- - 14' -1Â£*220* - 111 1 6 -1, '.95.'CZ 1- ~ / *W 0 . 1 ir'KeÂ¢%,L z _;- _ _ ti) , f <zi - P ~ -Ia.Zia'00=-Â·---Â·- r u 11 --~~~i*Â·Â·Â¥13=*Alr â€ž - 1 . _ I a U.0 > lili. - 1443 I-!5'., .,-1 mT - ---- 111 1 - ., (Uu.194, 'L - -- - 119 ~ 1, f 1. 41 Mf l, 12:191 7---- - :11,11 i,Age#M).. -- - 03 9 0 11 9$ i 1 - 5 I U F;-1 i:tAll t_ 1! 1~11~ 1 L3 0 - D 0 Â· ~ LM -Â£_ w uln - /1,14 - t . V 1 1 , ' lEi d .1 A 72 - .9 *-6- k-W U+LE.DE 1 : 11--- 1 111 L 42;r. lgÂ£,kvyst-p r ; 914-4 -62Â·- #2 - ..A =7- - 2-1.il, W R J [D 14 ZE t, 1 6) h / 5,4 . UJ lili 11 1111 Â« 4. 0,5 -- - 11 . 4 \./ lili 61% 0 7 11 , . - . r 8 M 1 - 1*1 -f J J .3-NA ' keri'j'4 . AM 04 2-LAJ-\ . 4 9' L --f-- 1 1 4 -91-. A.1-621 - - Who M- 0 - A| ~ 0 1 10 7 - r-Â» n -V - -1-0 --1 10 3491. y 11. 1 . - - 02-9.. 4 $ 4 -P 1 -..0 0 0 e 1~ \4%// . Ah- . - . C'-2 -- 2%6619 0 9 - - _ 1 ' â€ž ~ â€ž- - - m 4 1- W 4 _ < OU<IO W 7 0 000) D - lilli lili - 1-11 11 11'j'!11 lilli lili-- - . Â« _--- ---- 1 *-33_11--= _ _- ~ = f 1 1 Â£ It; 11 1 ' & 11 - CAUBERGE 1 11111!11 -i ph 1 3, it| ' n - ./ -ill'I :Ii,11;! 1 * Ill ''it.1,Â· ,).i Â·1 _ , 111 ,; p,IiÂ· 1Â·;1 1 ..2. - 1.1!'111- : -----Â·---- - -11---lip hi 1 1 ]11'1113E- 1 7 jr -in MA""49US'* . ---11 It lilli 1 ~111 ' 1 4- -----il 4 1 b Â·, 1 1 li i 11 1 1 11 . 1 '1 111 1 111 ------ . -- - ......1 4.11 11 ~.1 j 1 .1 1--7 3< Ullf 11,1 2 1 Ni --. 1 1 8 Â¢ A q XÂ« 11 11 1 1~ 1 1 1 --L t'll 11 3 4'#1!i h Il' il-v.til-jui~I 1 ' >< f-- - 2 - - 4 f-~1 - 0- - 0 00 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 111 = lai - 00 . rÂ»ilf-0 UgÂ¥ 5- 1 - 4 ' e. 9 jf '00 8 C Uk ~ j ~r 5 94 t, 9 + 312 I . 4 196\~ 1 / , 41, $ A /,119Â»4 0, # /24 2,4 2,50244.~ 0 34,1 \4954 34 /'441 1*jWgpaIA INWAA - Â°11Â¥Â·r :,1, m . 043 4 6, 49 1~ ~ :1 1 1, AL 1 Â¢ \. O 8/ ' 111 prÂ» 4/4 1 1' ' 1 1, Fltz:Z F4 3 1 I -:vi~ p-]I__d' ~I~ ~~3~ fil ~1 LIL[1 r bip# FUJ]illY,4 Â°171 11 1 11 X 111 1 1 1 1$1 1 i / C. 1 : i , . , Wl) ) 1 2.- , â‚¬ i.--â€ž-0.4 E..0-4--wN (ZE==IDA CUZZIZIR - 1=,hA*>**4* 6 Ill m 0Z MAIN STREET ELEVATION B *d . 111 . 101- 0, Ill ~ 0 04. 1 SE 11 1 94 0 0 0 11 - SHEET NO: Ll 80100 'NadSV _1__ 4- ' r MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 435 W. Main Street, L'Auberge- Minor Development DATE: October 27, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for a 250 sq. ft. addition to the main residence, a fence and landscaping. This lodge is located in the Main Street Historic District. APPLICANT: Audrey Haisfield, represented by Gibson and Reno Architects. LOCATION: 435 W. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in C j order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This property does not have individual historic designation, however it may acquire significance in coming years and is important to the effort to preserve small lodges in Aspen. L'Auberge is surrounded by Landmarked and Inventoried parcels, including the Mesa Store, Floradora building and several other Victorian residences. The proposed development will not be visible from Main Street (therefore no north elevation was supplied by the architect), and is of a similar design and materials to the existing structure. The landscaping plan appears to help define the parking areas and provide each cabin with a small open yard. A tall wooden fence will be built in a "u" shape to the rear of each pair of cabins. This fencing will not be easily visible from Main Street, especially as it is at the rear lot line. f ) 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The development is consistent with the scale and mixed use character of Main Street. Also, the location of the addition appears to protect the new bedrooms from street noise. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This plan does not detract from the cultural value of surrounding parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This development does not directly affect a designated historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: 1YrmandENL' 1 ... IAND USE' APPLICATION FCEN 1) Project Name Â· L 911-13> E-126.E project location Â·455- LD. NA-IN -061-2 04 6126/U 6-0. t- 0--râ‚¬ A - OX _ -07Â© L.Â£34.k Â·93 (indicate street address, -lot & block I=ber, legal description,here aa~priate) 3) Present Zoning Coa'f. 226272,4-2 0 4) Int Size 04, 9 8% 9 9. Â·i=-r . 5) Applitart's Name, Acklress & ]hxn # Au-De E-v - ,-641 572/E L--6 6=P- 01 L_+4 /-cz, ~ 4 3 9 uj . /9,4 V Al -ST-T . A Â£=:PE,uj Go. 6 / 4 1 1 -* 9 2 '5-1 8 29 1- 6) Represertati~'s Name, Address & Ehone # Ar/795, dp.â€¢t, ,Â¢ '52 GL,Uc) /4 ec H Als ie . coo'PEE Â»/6 STE 207- AÂ«PEA-1 4,0. 6141\ Fr 726-1â‚¬948 , gypd of Applitation (please dieck all that apply): 4 Conditional Use - Conceptinl SPA .-' 0019-ftin-1 Historic Dev. Final Historic Dev. Â®ecial 2Mhew Â· Final SPA - 4 8040 Gre~ine Ocogeptinl rOD . k Minor Historic Dev. . 1 Historic Demolition Stmam Margin Â· Â· Final ]?OD - murhin View Plane Â· Subdivisirn - Historic Designatirn cor-â€¢nininmi zatial o Teoct/Map Ameiximent . - 903 AllotmeKIt Iot SpliWInt line Â· QUS Emnptirn Mjustment Descripuion of Existing Uses Â· (Inaber ani f. type of existing structures; approlrim.te sq. ft; I,Trther of bedroans; any previous aa?rcval R granted to the property): E->696 lu eâ€¢ 0-0 +09 \<*T OF C=\ 0,0 E- 91-2/2->/ 6-*7Ti>I A-) 1 -1UET-4.) BEAJ /BO 9.9.'Pr-.Â·-N o 4 00.50- -PT-: ~ \ 9>k)4.CE, 076(52_V 7-inebrEAJ c-Â·E. -AP 1 -3> 457 1 8. Pr. 9) Description of Devele,uent Application a 4-0 'S 0. -1---E- 4-0 NO S -1- i 0 6. e p / HArm-*,rt laÂ»n Â» . ~ / MA s.rE ,2 CEO S â‚¬_7-5 -7-0 -7792 5/X/<66-Im- Slb/2,/ 2-6-S ;DE*-45-/2- 1 10) Have you attached the following? / Response to Attadmart 2, Minialm Slâ„¢ission Olltents 4- Response to Attadm*Nit 3, Specific Sohnission Contents ,/ Response to Attadment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 3 l lilll l.s GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ AlaCHITECTS DAVID F. GIBSON AUGUST G. RENO SCOTT C SMITH. October 6, 1993 Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Permission of Representation Dear Amy, Please consider this letter as a letter authorizing Gibson and Reno Architects at 418 E. Cooper Ave. in Aspen, Colorado, telephone number (303) 925-5968 to represent ALH Holding Company at 435 W. M ain Street, Aspen, Colorado telephone number (303) 925-8297, in the processing of an application for a Minor Historic Development of L'Auberge at 435 W. Main Street in Aspen, Colorado. Gibson and Reno Architects is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, (11 ~h-fi i. 1,3U~ 14%193 Audrey '*isfieldr Date' 1 418 E. COOPEA AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOAA[30 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 hm GIBSON a FIENIO â€¢ AlaCHITECTS [DAVID F. GIBSON. AIA AUGUST G RENO. AIA SCOTT C SMITH, AIA October 6, 1993 TO: Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Description of proposed addition The proposed addition for L'Auberge's one story residence consist of a master bathroom and a master closet equalling a total square footage of 250 sq. ft. As per the elevations, the addition is located on the west side of the existing structure - 4th Street. All materials and color will conform to the existing building. The new roof is but an extension of the existing one as indicated by the elevations. I made it a point, in the design of the addition, to compliment the residence so as not to detract from the exiting architectural integrity of the home. As a result, I find that the addition does not, in any way, create a blemish to the beauty of Main Street. Additionnaly, it is located out of view from Main Street minimizing any aesthetic scar to Main even while under construction. Regarding the lanscaped site plan, the design concept introduces a fence, no more than 6'-0" high, along the alley. The courtyards are designed to appear organic. Hence, the choice of trees, bushes, flagstone, and grass were selected. Please contact me for any questions or assistance regarding the project. Sincerely, z:jt.--Â£~'~39 - Alfred N. Beadleston 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOFRAC)0 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen .sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17- format. APPLICANT: L 'A ult E-,7 8 E ADDRESS: 43 5- w . MA i H Â·6-riz 2-El- 'A 9,17â‚¬/u 63 . ZONE DISTRICT: 6-0 P-rM E 12_c ; AL ro Fe- 1 60- LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 5- 99 7 Sa Â· - - EXISTING FAR: 1. 54 5- 43. ei- - ALLOWABLE FAR: . i 2-4 0 <9. PT , 1 PROPOSED FAR: 2- â‚¬-0 99. PT-- EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): N/A PROPOSED NET LEAS,ABLE (commercial): 6.1 1 A EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 2 2,%7 PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 7.6 - â‚¬Ot EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): Aj)A l PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): N)1\ EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldg.: Z 9- ~- o " / Acoessory Bldg: 4./54 PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldg: M /A PROPOSED % OF DEMOL[TION: 6/ i A EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 0 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: N/A ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: N /6 SETBACKS: EXISTING: , , ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: , Front: /. 5 Front: /0 Front: Rear: A\. 0, Rear: 15- / Rear: 33'- Side: B.B' Side: Side: 4.5-1 Combined Front/Rear: At. 6 Combined Frt/Rr: 1 5' Combined Front/Rear: 34.8' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Only: character comoatibilitv findina must be made bv HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Collage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only) 40~ \ Sno,1 Bunny Ct ~ U-- To: Basalt 5103/1 v ~ Aspen t 4 L DJ Institute - 3 4- 2 Hunfu Int @ 2 4 \ 1: -0 Atqn ) p & 0\ \ o - -\ 4-4% -1 1 9 V b ji ~ Musk--~ / l 3 .,Â· ) /0< i Tent / V /f ir W t Not all streets or roads are 82 0 0///,ip/â€¢ Sf \ Lake \% Y Hallam \4 Goâ€¢ Course =~ ~ named on maps. Construction P rls, 4 01 streets and roads may be In 0\ progress In certain areas. 2 s Â¥10 81 4 , , 8, 9-4 4 - & ~ 44 St % f 4 + S 4 4' 0 2 '44*, 4 M 4 Â·j Race St -Maroon Creek Rd \ 8, 446 .r , Smuggior Min Rd Aspen l. 4 J, 50 0 t ' 1 St 0 60'M & #07 -0 82 * - 2 2 244., 3 2 4 4/> d k k â‚¬ Hospital ' 0 - , ist p.th 4 i SITE . 44 40 4 Quwn St .*-37 / 4 e & e j . 3. To Maroon Lake 4 #3 C 44- *4/ Mall ' 1 W /â€¢ St 0 H//1 n \ '071:ZiGAd Ln 1 0 3 4 St #40 4, # V ) , 0 87 +6 mm/t \ b 9 14,4 4 9 / 1 1 + 54 1 f ...6 A.Pon Wistriew ; 54 of# & 5 1 a / , Or S ~A/p. Rd 4 . 1 0 90 / 000 + Cl) Crystal Lake Rd 10 - 9 i d 82 Aspen Music School ALPHA MAPS 140 tm tail 'Et\GLE i.17. Nit\PS To kes, To Asheroft Indep <ce Pass -\22.98 6fh Si 4 AV pur"" '41 1 7Ab) V O SOUTH ELEVATION .a 1/41. 1-0. J ADS' M-1.4 J t.,1.--145â€¢ ./E- trÂ»/- /./..44,6.4.4 12/ HAM 0 17 1 4,4 --- 1!* 0 *Â·/-'11-TIA -23 44/1/AU 7 EAST ELEVATION e) 1,4/ . 1'- 0' k- - 5~~tz:* L'- ~Â« L 03Â»fl 1 0.*. 6 4 : j , . 1 36.- %O. . 6 2 4:Â·Â·=-/.' -.i_i~. 2...6.vic/ 10.:,1-0. 9 ' f ~ .1/,r: 5/A 3 y.01Â£ ,-1/1,5.:1.l.- HIC,-rk , %1'%1 -r# wl,-L.. j'rÂ»*el,U., . 1 SECmeNaeRU_ADE,roc]N u... ~uÂ»Â«Â»f ' FYI 1 4 ' .1 1 23Â« /-% 1 0 3 - - Â»z - . ~. 4Â·it : 4:542 -1-/4 i 1 1 14 28 . 1 XNEST ELEVATION 1 :,4, . Ad Ipprrlow V.dinge ,=rriuÂ·Iarl.Â·r4.- ~~ | 1-0 FWTS...... 1-4 e *2344010 0 1240 1 I i It i 11 1 11 - 1 1 /43 1 ./4*j N 0 SOUTH ELEVATION -1 ' 1/41 . 11- 0. J buor-ne.7 J 6."â€¢'1'e. ertu.stâ€¢* _ 9. 1 1 Â· _27 1 1 1 1.1 - 71- ~-7 1 /1 1 11 \1 1 All .1 11 11 ./1 & 1. I -1 i ji 111 4.-e, :1 :' - 14 I _ 1 - 0 1 -MASTER BEDROOM h ]DEFK 1 Ill: 8,11'P),1 1 7. # .ft''LL."\. 1./--111Â£-C-,-i_.J'k~~_=421 1 r-t-1 i 1 1 -tq-rÂ·- -LrtÂ«_} 9--0' 1 -1 11 1 1-, i.i---1- : :41&*Mfirrif//FP- 2*...kit. CLOSET 1 â‚¬=3 V -1 4Â· n 1 Â®4-1- 1,1.-t-Ad 4 !41(!.41 ~. 1 .t Â· 333 - . r' 1 g. - Er=d-- ,â€¢ct:â€¢rrl.54Â·-1 FLOOR PLAN ADDITION r \, (a / r,0 1 - 1 1 4 +Rf?ht,1- Â·Â· rÂ«-1- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 228 S. Mill Street, Nancy Heller Boutique- Minor Development DATE: October 27, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for installation of an awning and an exterior entranceway along the alley. This structure is an Aspen Landmark. Built in 1890, it housed a clothing store and the Aspen Telephone Company. In later years, it was a grocery store and then one of Aspen's first ski shops (1940). APPLICANT: Hildegard Christian. LOCATION: 228 S. Mill Street (formerly known as 208 S. Mill Street), Lots A, B, C and D, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This structure is an Aspen Landmark and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District. The original storefront has been altered. A wooden signage area was constructed where there may have previously been clerestory windows. This wood "structure" is not in character with the building, but will stay in place and appears to be obscured by the new awning. The new entrance door will be located along the alley in a non-historic portion of the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Awnings are found throughout the District and are appropriate to commercial buildings. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development does not decrease the value of this structure as an Aspen Landmark. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The development affects areas of the building which are new or previously altered. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: ATÂ£ACHMENT 1 2737-0-1 5.-39-0/r LAND USE APPLICATION FOEM M 26 39 -13 ~101 -PLAedc'0=sse ~ Pi N 0,1 H E L. L p, e project Incation 62&2* ~~~f~ 97/77 31-8 4 (12Â» 2,02-9 5, r--1 6 i { j l-/544 A 4 80,4410c.,I~- pÂ·>,e -3-Â·:-,v;iÂ·, 1-e. af 0~419- (indicate stmet afreAs, lot~ & block Imnber, -legal)description uiere apprcpriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Ict Size 5) Applicant's Nacme, Address & Phone # UÂ©d (lthi4~< (Ul . 0.{0 [-0006 23 . 0,4 11.e~NI dn. -1304 92-3 3-6&49 6) Bepresentativels Name, Address & rhone # 7) UYPd of Applibatim (please dheck all that *Ly): ~ 4 Conditional Use - Concept,al SPA ,-' Oonce*lal Historic Dev. Special Iwiew - Final SPA Final Hif=toric Dev. 8040 Greenline Coneeptual IUD \/ Mi ner wi g=Inric Dev. 1. Stream Margin Â· Â· Final ]POD Histnric Dainlition Mountain 7iew Plane _i _ SubdivisiÂ£*1 - Historic Designation ocnhninilmization Â· Teod/Map Ammhant Â· - (RUS Al-lotment Iot Â®lit/Int line (209 E,oeuption Adjustment Description of Ekisting USes Â· (number and; type of existing StrUctures; approorimite sq. ft; râ€¢ mher of bedroans; any previas approvals granted to the property). E-XTE E-(00 'RETR.ACTABLE .AWN,NG 20><- 4 4:. 9) Description of Develognent Application CJ -03. KINA k,17 .TIN,Â·CH - IRED{-02 9 2>toj,%14)0 hipt#441 14(144 ~ C 0 RE)(1 - ~TL-00(19 ; GEN ER A 1- /~Al-N-7/N (1., 1238010 Er}opÂ·t~ ~707 NisTO/2,(tic 2 144\12\ 331 V }3< 10 6) - LOALL , OVT.S /DE ALLEN FN-7 MANÂ¢.12 DC.69 . No Si fl ti- C.-f- u R~A L U C (1 KL j N \/ 0 L\/ 6 -~D 10) Have you attached the following? Itspense to Attadment 2, Mininlm Sulnission Ocntents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Sulmission Contents Iapcme to Attadinient 4, Revie; Standards for Your Application lilli 1*eli HILDEGARD'S 'ASHION A C C [SS<) RIIS '(4,4 l 9 73 6 : M iNO a * EV E l.-Op 6 H E N-i-- O F '72 6-1-A l 1- a-02 E LOCATED OR : 019 6. H ;LL 43-/26 a.-7--, OWNER-. 136*-7-e a ZOil_LIA kfil. ..24/7 /en ~ 17~1/7~.' 76~Â»ft Â»f if>4*7 Â£2~I>,~ 1â‚¬ (1-0- - 4 4-010% ~1 ENER.A 1 AINT/NG . ! N STAL 1- kl 6 N -1- O r 1 E>G-6 (tiom- 3227-2.AC,-T-/1864_ Alt)/4;,NG (clo V Â«24 3 .BA CK_ too PI : ( N o-1--- N if 7-0 /2- ; (l m--3 Egge-1-- C-ROOM 334}SioN -IDALL , Ole/liiÂ£ ALLE \/ ENTE-ANCE- 31>002 - No Di--2 tiCTURA L (-202/<f i~N\/06-0/L- P 0 It O X 11540 AS P E N CO HI6t1 TELE PH ONIE Â£0; 92(~ 32i9 .. fl / \ - - 1 U CE=- -411 -A E-ELIZD==ib erzky- Ckt *922 252*32584' r. ' NANCY WELLER â€¢ 1 ! i - 17 1/ .. 7- - 1 t ~. 1 i plillÂ· Vt i g f.\ Y\\\ 3,757, bl 11 3 0 OCT-11-1993 15:27 FROM CREATIVE WOODWORKS TO 13039236189 P.01 .]06 - +Jo.~1* 1-leÂ¢L .4. 65 PPM' co. SHUT NO. . - m - 16REATIVE WOQDW#RKS i CALCULATED ~Y . DATI - 1- W.1-h l- OIL Ikil,54 CA' 1-7 4/ CHIGXID DY DATE SCALE '"414/, .'..4,/''R.,0., 1,4..1. .?...'. '14.L I ..1 4., D i -- 2.tz" , 1 2 0 .. .4 ... I , I * -A . 6 -A * ~ . j , Â· 8-- r ----01 ..4. 049Â£- .07:8 1 â€¢ . ... J 1 - . 1 , .- 1 . 1 . 64. Â· ; - .I , -01 - . se . , . e , . . 1 . 1 . A~ 1 T- AJLL__12 .. -- 1 - B i !I - 1-7 - -tor - Â·Â·811 44* 1 - 1 1.- 1 d " 4. ./ 1 1 ACTVMT,/ . 1 ~<~~Â·9 Y|| fÂ·Â·,pj 71. ~l' 90,11 i *rwr + LOCATI ON SURVE-7 ~ *fir-; PART OF LOT-5 AS, C Â¢ 52 BLK. 66 i125 + CITY ANA TOWN 5 ITE OF A*EN IN;6,- r BLOCK 88 //4 8 W I. ...1 30.09'- ~NORTH BLDG LINE Aae,Tr5 r71 AJACENT SLOG 34'Â· 1 .. I k 63':1.11 1 Z L.. -5488Ay-/-N_/ 3POR-T-6 . il Â¢50,7-H 20 2- OF -0r rs-4 00.- Â£07 C) k . I 2 3 (50(1.Â· 0 20' OF LL TA) (-104.7 â€¢. 2,3 or Â£07 87 r:p7-0027 2 4 .4 2 STORY NI 22/C< 8Ult-DING 19%~ FR~ME SUILDING 11% 1 h' , ! I rw .5009.-- -- 0 Iff 07' ' Ze, m- 2 5/2144' t. * '-RAME 57-AIRCASE .SL /.4, K O -' 01 1 do b 11 1 ~A 1 .. , 21* ! ' 2- -2'. ..2 Â¥ e34%5~ (0 107 30 .02 HlmOS Jo S 1SV/) kleZâ€¢U Po o /2 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 E. Main Street, Courthouse Plaza- Minor Development DATE: October 27, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to construct a 100 sq. ft. window well with a railing on the south side of the Courthouse Plaza building. APPLICANT: Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, represented by Tom Newland, Deputy Director of Public Works. LOCATION: 530 E. Main Street, Lots Q and R and the westerly 7.5 feet of Lot S, Block 92, City of Aspen; and Lots 11 and 12 and the westerly 7.5 feet of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Townsite, City of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. NOTE: An example of this type of window well can be seen across the street from the Weinerstube restaurant. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This parcel is located in the Main Street Historic District and is bordered by three Aspen Landmarks. Though the Plaza is not an historic structure, it is associated with the Pitkin County Courthouse and has a particularly important role in that the building forms an edge of the historic district. The proposed development will lie very close to the sidewalk and to Main Street. Staff finds that this window well is overly large (7 ' 5" semicircle) and deep (7' 9"). From the perspective of a pedestrian, the light well will have a great visual impact on this site. Staff feels that the radius of the semicircle should be decreased by approximately 2 ' 0" (or the equivalent of one less "terrace"). Staff also suggests that there may be some other facade of the building where the window well would be less prominent. The proposed railing is required for a window well and is an appropriate design. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Window wells can be found throughout the historic district, in new and old buildings, therefore staff finds that in general they are in character with the neighborhood. However, in its current dimension, the proposed window well may be a feature which is inconsistent with this neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development does not decrease the cultural value of any neighboring resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic resource is directly affected by this proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application with the condition that the applicant reduce the radius of the semicircular window well. Additional Comments: Pitkin County October 19, 1993 Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: COURTHOUSE PLAZA WINDOW WELL Dear Amy; Please accept this letter and enclosed inaterials as the complete application submission for Minor Development of Historic Resources. The Courthouse Plaza Building is located at 530 East Main Street and is within the boundaries of the designated Historic District Overlay within Aspen, Colorado. Pitkin County, who is the owner of the building, wishes to install and maintain a window well on the south (Main Street) side of the building. This project will provide sunlight and ventilation to the current tenants in this portion of lower level, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The applicant for this proposal is: The Board of Commissioners Pitkin County, Colorado 506 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-5150 The applicant' s representative is: Tom Newland Deputy Director of Public Works 530 East Main Street, Suite 301 Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-5200 The location of the project is as follows: A parcel of land located in the southwest quarter of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more fully described as follows: Lots Q and R and the westerly 7.5-feet of Lot S, Block 92, City of Aspen; and Lots 11 and 12 and the westerly 7.5-feet of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Townsite. Containing 6,750 square feet, more or less. Administration County Commissioners County Attorney Personnel and Finance Transportation 530 E. Main, 3rd Floor Suite B Suite I Suite F Facilities Aspen, CO 81611 506 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 76 Service Center Road (303) 920-5200 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 FAX 920-5198 (303) 920-5150 (303) 920-5190 (303) 920-5220 (303)920-5390 The street address of the project is: Pitkin County Courthouse Plaza Building 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attached for your review as Exhibit A please find a letter from the County Attorney's Office declaring ownership of the property and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for a development application. As summarized above, Pitl<in County wishes to place and mintain a window well to provide visual and ventilation improvements to the south side of the building's lower level (basement), The window well will be located on the south or Main Street side of the building (see Exhibit B for a site plan). The proposed improvement has been designed by a local architect and the owner's representative to blend in with the existing architecture and to highlight certain architectural aspects of the Pitkin County Courthouse, located immediately adjacent to and west of the Courthouse Plaza. Attached for your review as Exhibit C is the plans for the window well. The window well as designed is a curved semi-circle that uses the existing buttresses of the building for it' s beginning, end and center. The semi-circle has a radius of approximately 7.5- feet and takes up slightly under 100 square feet of lot space. The cross-section (sheet A-2) view shows how the well steps down to the basement level, providing three tiers for plantings. The well allows for the placement of two operable windows that are 6-feet-wide and 4.5-feet high. Being on the south side of the building, these windows will allow adequate access for daylight and natural ventilation, enhancing the working environment in the offices of the Housing Authority. As mentioned above, the window well will be designed to act as a three-tier planter for small shrubs and flowers. The well has been engineered to account for use as a planter with adequate drainage away from the building. For safety purposes, guard railing must be placed along the outside perimeter of the window well. The County proposes to place an ornamental railing similar to that found around the Courthouse (see Sheet A-3). The County feels that the proposed improvement has been designed to meet all of the review standards put forth by the City with regard to development within the Historic Overlay District. The design is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and does not diminish the architectural integrity of the adjacent historically designated structure. The window well is designed to be compatible with existing architectural attributes of this location, with existing building materials being utilized in it's construction. The curved semi-circle of the well will match the curved windows on the facade of the Courthouse Plaza, and the ornamental railing will accent the fencing of the historic County Courthouse located next door. Although the window well does decrease the available open space on the parcel from 30.5 % to 29 %, it will provide are for plantings. I hope the information supplied within this application is complete and suitable for your review. If there is further information required, or you have any further questions concerning this application, please contact me at the phone number listed above. *PITKIN C919Â¥ PUL- te p)~RS AGENCY fgm,Newland, Deputy Director ATma]MENT 1 IAND USE APF([ICA~Cti F[eM Project Mann . Courthouse Plaza Window We 11 Project IDcation 530 East Main Street, Asven. See attached letter for - legal description. (indicate stmet allress, lot & block nmber, legal description Wiere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning Commercial Core 4) Ict Size 6.750 sq .fr 5) Applicant's Name, AL#iress & Bxne # Pitkin Countv Board of Commissioners _ 506 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 920-5200 6) Representative's Name, 8,#ir,=ges: & Plwn * Tom Newland, 530 East Main Street,_ Suite 301, Aspen, CO 81611 920-5209 7) gypd of AEolisecticn (please checio all thact apply): Conditional Use Ocnceptual SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA - Final Histaric Dev. -t 8040 Gmenline - Conceptual PUD 1 Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Final FWD - Histaric Demoliticn *xintain View Plane Subdivisicn - Hist~ic Desigraticn Condaninil=ization Â· _ Teod;/Map Anaximent (2CS Allotment Iat Split/Iat Line GEOS Exemption Adjust=ment 8) Descriptirn of Existing Uses Â· (râ€¢mber and f type of existing structures; Upprzzizz=[te sq. ft.; Il]:nber of bedroccs; any previous approvals granted to uie property). Office space, approximately 16,000 square feet over 4 floors. No bedrooms. 9 ) Description of Develognent Application Placement of a 100 square foot window weel to prvide sunl ight- and ventilation to the lower level (basement) . ~ 10) Have you attached the following? X Resprnse to Attachment 2, Minininn Suhnission Ointents Respanse to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Oorrterrts Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards far Your Application SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fullylabeled drawings must be submitted ina format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 1 1~xlr format. APPLICANT: Pitkin County Board of Commissioners ADDRESS: 530 East Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611 ZONE DISTRICT: CC - Commercial Core LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 6,750 square feet EXISTING FAR: 2.3:1 ALLOWABLE FAR: 1.5:1 PROPOSED FAR: 2.3:1 EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): 16,000 sq.ft. PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): 16,000 sq.ft. EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 4.686 se.ft. PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 4,786 sq.ft. EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): 30.5% PROPOSED % OFOPEN SPACE (Commer.): 29.0% EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Blk: 32' / Accessorv Gdo: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldc.: 32' / Accessorv Bldo: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 0% EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 0 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 0 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 0 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 0 SETBACKS: EXISTING: none ALLOWABLE: none PROPOSED: none Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Side: Side: Side: Combined FronVRear: Combined .Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ none ENCROACHMENTS: none VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Only: character comoatibility findina must be made bv HPC): FAR: none Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: none Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FIt./Rr: Site Coverage (Collage Infill Only): Â·bli ' 'Â·'~ â€¢4 ' Exhibit A Letter of Ownership Pitkin Coun October 19, 1993 Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUILDING Dear Amy; This is to affirm that the Board of County Commissioners, Pitkin County, Colorado are the sole owners of the Courthouse Plaza Building, located at 530 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado. To the best of my knowledge, there are no mortgages, liens, judgments, contracts or agreements affecting the parcel. As owners the Board of County Commissioners have a demonstrated right to apply for the above mentioned Development Application. Sincerely, PITKIN COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE 21-22--<---- .-I John Ely, Assistant County Attorney Administration County Commissioners County Attorney Personnel and Finance Transportation 530 E. Main, 3rd Floor Suite B Suite I Suite F Facilities Aspen, CO 81611 506 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street 76 Service Center Road (303) 920-5200 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 FAX 920-5198 (303) 920-5150 (303) 920-5190 (303) 920-5220 (303)920-5390 .OD --CD'11 - 6-1 \2/ /3/T 54.- 1156- 5-Ci - 'FOFâ€¢ L' u 15, NAW 620,62-258.Evic.EL 7 6-GA, u.ree r.-c.... 64â€¢1* u_.. G GASij,jâ‚¬7<622.,1 11. i i 'b --1 10 .i 1.4 c 1% 7 1 i 7-17~6 4=t... al.. 1 1 ~ -El 1 SV fÂ· 4 - VAL..7 7 / ----f.PÂ· 1 . f 4 4-/ 63'.r--O- -rkz 4 2.2/vel- ir' 1 20<op=-Sâ€¢-Of>UD lt>UK*,L>& 1 13-- .911- .r6<15,---\ -2. ~ 21 CM- S.9 1 , 5-4 1 1 1 L. i 1 6 m /60 1 + f---\ ,-1% I Â¥ALL 9 /7 I. . - 1 1/ 1 1 I. --- . 2 - b. 1 .1 9-1 ' 2 1 11 KU :1 #2 11 1.1 5 c : Â· bil 1 % 2 ..3,4.1 +T I - I \ U . m - r -- 11% '4 1 11\/ 1. --7 1 1 KIA , yâ€¢1127 /7 f. r.,2.2 1 w ~ -- '6 H A /0 L) rl# *-- -I.-- 0 f 1 4 1 , 1 ~ TZJ < r.â€¢Â·Arre e M Ar ' . 1 4 p ti t -11 /1 Th /~ %& 1?1 0 ~-f,â€¢.1-â€¢2- ./152112--5,/I, 2Albse -411 c .~ -x'11 t. B 11 27 922- # 9 0 ..,71#LL,2 1 2 L EXIST"/<1 SIC'N~VAL-k. 12.UCSÂ·741> 7 4 7 Nin.4 =105*411<. Ve<-1,7.0 7-0 ---2 .,fÂ°BL.ue- -L... ilar,CTY L.,99. , 2 â‚¬140 0Â©. 9 5 03- *1 1Tt N c. T-Graw 5 1-0 Â¢U#U 4, t. '' " r 4 V-1 -1 ~EW 4. WATEA :561..-1 Â»1 71.-9 SITE PLAN 1/8. = 1-L'V-Z~ AnTE.1.- . U-Â·-2 Exhibit B Vicinity Map and Sitt, Plan Courthouse Plaza Building - I I ~~0'~ Â° 00 0 0 20 9 0 0 . U 0 0,2, 0 0 Q 0 0 0 9 0 09 e / 1231& 19 0 204 1 01 % . 1- ..4 6\ L 5 00'BING . 141 . ASPEN -- PoP 3,6 78 4 -1 \ \ \ GILLESPIE ST r 4 1 0 11.- a Of NO.r. PEARL C cr , 1/1.- 1. 0 I . , r r - 37 1 1 ..2 .. ..7* - 4 4 4 - 1 \ IN : I.J.:12 8 0 I 1 421* 1.0 .4 S. 1 14 0 : '. t 1 1 S. 1, 'P + -- 09% SILVER , 40. 0+ ,19 ep, C, ~ ST n ' J- . k k. A :14 4 40 411.2 pARK %. 1 -1 /'/ 2/ ' I k 84 ST 6, R Q 37 k n> :i, LE-J ' 4 4â€žOp/,NIS &. tte-} 1 r- 9 ST ir l . A ...% 9 4 --- 1 + n. .* BLEEK R h - UU . I ... ' 4 1 0/ I AVE i.A.. 1. 00 > 4 I .7% 74 .iÂ· PÂ·;4 ..4 E -4 91#b fid ~ 9 4 6 04-EN 6. for r - * + .57 . 97 li -.7 --. ' I ... I 44' I . ' 4 k. .. 4 ~-- 7 2 - 7..,1-3*a - , 1 - ..... t . . .O. 'll-I E '45. 43. 41 / ry' 0,4 C 4 8 .1 1 r .1 1 44< 8 2 ' <V 12 4 5 I'LIEIT I /1,/ 4 / 41 3/ . ' Â£ 33. I nx 0 V *0- NE-=9 0 â€ž------. 9>C'J f 1 00 1 , 0-2, 2. /4 5, * f i Â·,2 0 C. 2 t. 1 Â· GROVE ; CEHETARY // ic ' / D- /0Â®; 9 + %- n TE=Za ASPEN q .4 - mvERS z & 2 -r r . WESTVIEW DR 1 UTE â€¢ Â·a ROAING FORK ~ .2 CEMETARY ~ 4 : / \--, /0.5 4 / 1 pu ..>, e g 0.- 4 / \ A- ~~ <~HÂ·n-Â·AÂ· ft>:, 45 11.l ---- ~-1-i-- L "W.---#.1 , 1, t. ~ C 4~U-U ~ 2 - - -1.- ... 6 - :i 1 - .i V . 5. 4 4 \ I--Ill ' . \, j. 4 b i 4 I. 1 L 7 1 f 0 4 13' 1 1 7 1 1 \ReÂ®41 09 4 9 i < 9 < -- f 7 1 R.84 W ..,uno * 0.4 GARMISCH , - MONARCH -- GALINA -- Exhibit C Window Well Plans Courthouse Plaza Building , 1 .- 1/.1 - 0 I 7 41 gia- - -4- Â· ' - + . - #i.I --. i~ --1-*-. -- 1 --- -1 - \.4 x Â·,- 6 K. C.uAM . ' D<19-TIN & 15'U 1 1-01 1Â·4 4 come. c 01-1 9Â·-1 1 ; Al,r\C-- 4 ~ ~ .- ,# A.C"E, _:_c-fi-AIfift.-0-Â©lttIN;En.=.. - 41 -i-,-ti-14Â·91-~1-71] 1-lia<4.Y -- i Â£ ~22*1 FAI U 146- â‚¬ee ELEANITIobl 6 + 4.''IiI. .--,- L>~ . .- 11 1 1 --- ---- -- - -I.- P.' .'.< - =.AS-4 1 1,11 1'' , hyÂ»Â·vÂ·ax'gaj\Â»A l . 1 1 1 9 . . . :1919 t#r.1 2).im -11-GN.k Â· {1 4 i 'b. 7 .21 944..ff 14'.4 '1 1 , 329:Â».45(37- 101 1- \. 1 *14 4. 04-AL.2 1 - C â‚¬ N / 94, T -- FEFOS' 49*22 '.. 452>45.-4 ..... el.-1 :91 * 6 All*?f, - Â· nel,t NIA Po )01 9 J - ' 3,/N Â· ,b - â‚¬60.4, 4 ~::,14.7>,04,~<039.. câ‚¬-,2 %l 1 - 291 35* M Â£.Â·Â·Â· r | ... , 44 2,-:/5-9>'. t.f< 1, ' L.. D / ' m'll!4:t'fli ,-.ifful<4Â·> .f*-,A, 3 94Â£1 L +92} 1 *4117 .- --1-2:f: .IF FTÂ·r. EMO~-- 1 Â·. *t) 1~ 3.91 g. A<ie-revppi,-3 1 --ir -B Lp -L 1 1 r Tf cr F.11 Â· 216 L O" Â©ECT 1014 THFU N INCE:2 W NELL 4"=1'-oic AÂ·-2 23 JUN '95 5 eer '96 0,0, Le AUL 1 : . 1 , ...1 766 -1 42 4 1 1 {i-1â‚¬ St , 4 -4-9 1 1 1 1 le 3:-ig- I k3*1-, 1.-- 4'- ! M E .-- --T Â· 1, 8 rwy,Lga. '2 LoweA LEVE L 23 1 pla:712. EL, 10 1-01' 1~ 1 N -1.-3-t-.._ 1 L 6/4:L ! 6* --- ; rÂ·NEN *LIPING WING)ords. 7 5 -1 / PARLIC 5;44>NZE ,4.LUM. in _.2 EFâ‚¬,9 4Â· FOL, s El<.t E>> 1 3 60 UY 1 1 .- -r --1 '_2 " /= 1 8 1. 1 - &.60 0. ir-Of-:f~t--d 01 :i' _U,-1,9 -7 4 fal.1 - _---..8- _. --r -rr--r f. Â·T.. Â·'- IÂ».'.'.1-92-:11 /:24 -1 ':-: -1.â‚¬5314 Â¥-6*i..... 1 t.. r.'.121 ,4 I tir 4 - L- Fl.Â» N-TE B 6- 94 - 1 t . 'p. O i . . /. 4% 1 '- :4/.f 1 ... 1 1 '1 1, \ 1 , ~95,- SL~*T.co,g_ )4 . _ILLAMPE-1 L \ 9 BLE .Â· / ,/R_/mo.c. leoÂ·4 ; 1 413Â¥t. .. i Ar' 1 9 0 Ii, \' 1 ' Â£Â·Â·-7---Â· Fk-Â·a-ATEs-1~. 2~c[13/ , 2// '4 i w 1 ,0 , to,_00Â· ., 0.. 403 0." 614 , i 9-'0" Â·t / ,/ILâ„¢ 1,4, iR'.3-I. - 1-- 4 A : . A ). , y , L-<:L-- - -3 4 PE NAL-~c~> 1 \ i i 14. 11 1 -<* C~ f'VINT=LL - --e// - 1. . A 1 . It 1;' - 1 1 1 4 1 , -- - - 1.,..1.1 111 r.r - 1 /1 - 8*<1*TING; EN,1,5Â» 5, P.1, / 46 '- 4," i t Â®61 4 - ~~ FLAW - lAi 1 14 [70 W WE LL ~ A- i , . - . - ..te SEr '1 -- - - 1 :audill Laustafson . 1 P,O. BOX FF 234.E. HOPKINS ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 303-925-3383 -i- i. - C -4 -4. O---- 1 15,1..21 al"1 1 1 11? i = 4 Fl 1 , 8 11 i.. - ( C.Gi 4 C 1 + A 1 {t, C 1 t . 1 li.1 ' 1 2 I lit Ill C .11 -r- . 4- 0 Wi 1 -3. dil - f 68, 1 8, 4,0 - 1 - 1 1 1 =-t i -0 i 92 . r - Al : 1 --' L Â¥, f 1 - C-7- -7- t. 0- 0 t . 1 J .11 *9 1 1 Lit -4 1 - . 431 1 J -61 6 C 1 -/ 1 2 1 I C .- -0 1 0- 4-6 Ed K 1 (6 .sm::Plct,5, 1 1 4302 POI LVA-FE E