The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19930526AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE May 26, 1993 REGULAR MEETING SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll call II. Committee and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. OLD BUSINESS 5:15 A. Final Significant Development - City Shop 3*Â·~RL'1Â«-43-u . 1080 Power Plant Road V. NEW BUSINESS =5 d - 4-; A 36, 5:55 A. Minor Development - Popcorn Wagon 6:10 B. Minor Development - Bellina Residence ./4,Sod/*(eo 0/1 716 W. Francis 6:30 C. Minor Development - Aspen Historic Trust, 7/ A:41# Pioneer Park Fence - 442 W. Bleekero 0 1 3=-1. 6 k-- vÂ·LÂ·' * >4 64- b (,1-/Pl / 3(. 6,"- . 6:45 D. Minor Development - 700 W. Francis RopÂ»- j VI. COMMUNICATIONS A. Project Monitoring B. Sub-Committee Reports C. Neighborhood Character Guidelines D. Ordinance on Pioneer Park Lot 1&2 E. Red Brick update ongoing F. Attachment: Letter from Gretchen Greenwood regarding 120 W. Francis 7:00 VII. ADJOURN HPC PROJECT MONITORING HPC Member Name Prolect/Committee Bill Poss 413 E. Hyman County Courthouse Highway Entrance Design Committee Character Committee-AACP 601 W. Hallam (app. liaison) HP Element-Community Plan Aspen Historic Trust-Board Member 534 E. Hyman (P.C. Bank) CCLC Liaison 214 W. Bleeker St. Mary's Church 533 E. Main PPRG 715 W. Smuggler Ann Miller 700 W. Francis Donnelley Erdman The Meadows (Chair-Sub Comm) 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) Collins Block/Alley Wheeler-Stallard House 700 W. Francis 624 E. Hopkins Leslie Holst Holden/Marolt Museum (alt.) In-Town School Sites Committee Aspen Historic Trust-Chairman 824 E. Cooper 210 S. Mill 303 E. .Main Alt Joe Krabacher 801 E. Hyman AHS Ski Museum Aspen Historic Trust-Vice Chairman 612 W. Main 309 E. Hopkins (Lily Reid) Jake Vickery The Meadows (alternate) In-Town School Sites Committee 205 S. Mill Larry Yaw 716 W. Francis 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer-alt.) 204 S. Galena (Sportstalker) City Hall 627 W. Main (residential-Jim Kempner) 232 E. Hallam Roger Moyer CCLC Liaison 334 W. Hallam Aspen Historical Society 409 E. Hopkins 303 E. Main 311 W. North Farfalla lights outside 210 Lake Avenue (alternate) 232 E. Hallam 513 W. Bleeker Karen Day Rubey Transit Center 334 W. Hallam (alternate) Cottage Infill Program 134 E. Bleeker 435 W. Main Swiss Chalet 311 W. North artha Madsen 620 W. Hallam (alternate) 100 Park Ave. (alternate) 214 W. Bleeker (alternate) Linda Smisek 134 E. Bleeker 210 Lake Avenue A + A-Q - -V 44 ~ C *b ~i>-,2.~j 6(241Â»j. . fli j g 2. c At,/i - r- b job ~(vot f)(,1 (-/t/)4 30-k -*~287~4<J U J 71- 4 MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: City Shop, Final Development Approval Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Final Significant Development approval for the City Shop Complex, which is to include renovation of the historic power plant building (eligible for listing on the National Register and designated as an Aspen Historic Landmark), construction of an administration building, a maintenance facility, a cold storage building; and street, parking and landscaping improvements for the site. APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Streets Department, represented by Dave Gibson, Gibson and Reno Architects, 418 E. Cooper Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611. LOCATION: A metes and bounds parcel located at 1080 Power Plant Road, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is zoned Public PUD. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplement provided by the applicant. (Note: This supplement does not reflect the increased FAR as a result of the new bays on the maintenance building.) The applicant must verify the new FAR figure for the Zoning Plan check within the building permit application. Sites which have a PUD overlay shall have dimensional requirements established through PUD Review. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: City Shop received Conceptual Development approval with conditions on May 12, 1993 and became an Aspen Historic Landmark on April ,27, 1992. ADDITIONAL COMMISSION REVIEWS: The applicant must receive final PUD approval and GMQS exemption from City Council (scheduled for 5/24 and 6/14.) The P&Z approved Stream Margin Review, Conditional Use and Special Review for Parking on May 4, 1993. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All four Development Review Standards and conditions set at Conceptual Approval must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval. Attached are the applicant's response to the Conceptual Approval conditions, description of design changes, revised drawings and information on building materials selected. Also attached are those conditions set by the HPC on May 12, 1993. REVIEW STANDARDS: Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations defines the four standards for Development Review. All four of these standards must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval for the proposal. Development Review Standards 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor areas, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: Staff finds that the proposed development is appropriate to the character of the historic structure and represents the highest goals of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The new buildings play off the industrial style of the historic building, but are distinctly different from it and are themselves extremely interesting visually. Minor alterations proposed for the new buildings not objectionable. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Neighboring parcels are residential development. The landscaping plan provides a buffer between the different land uses. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development stabilizes and preserves this important cultural resource. The historic building is clearly the centerpiece of the site. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The applicant has made significant effort to choose high quality new building materials and agrees to retain as much original building material as is possible. As per the conditions of the Conceptual Approval, the applicant has requested and been provided with information to write specifications appropriate to the construction and repair work necessary for this project. The chosen contractor should have experience in restoration work and the architect and project monitor and HPO should make a special effort to inspect work frequently. Architect and/or contractor should contact the HPO before removing any historic materials not specified in the drawings submitted for Final Significant Development Review. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Grant Final Development approval, with or without conditions to be approved by staff and the project monitor prior to the issuance of a building permit, finding that all of the conditions of Conceptual have been met, and finding that the Development Review standards have been met. 2) Table action, finding that additional information is required in order for the Design Review Standards to be met. (specific recommendations should be offered.) 3) Deny Final Development approval, finding that certain conditions of Conceptual Development approval have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: Finding that the conditions of Conceptual approval have been met, staff recommends Final Development approval be granted for the City Shop project as submitted. Additional Comments: hp.cityshop2 11; Project Nane di, \ 4-4 9.1 47 0-, [-2 2.) Proj eat Location A MA <51 A-uus c -7 11/ 41 LO'67 L, i 1 j 31 2*re.al ~ 0 Â©cil=Â£Â£1 at '09,0 Vow.g-Â« -17\ 6"44-- 12>Or> r-l ~Uln,"3, bÂ» b.6- #Ai2_Â£CE., Cofo vÂ»=:G (indicate street address,' lot & block nmbek, legal description where appropriate) 3) present zoning FL \0 1 4 0/, El .7 9 4) Int Size . 547 0 Liz--01 Â· -64- . 5) Applicant's Name, Address & phone # 6 1 4--7 6 0- /5\92Â» E' 6/4,1 14yeN--3 / l-Ve,pa-v-4--wau.fr !7>n b. 6712(12-,vu=, , /Â»)pal,1 / 073 941 (QI 4 1 1 \ 6) IZepresentative's Name. Address & Ilnne # 1323 Â»Â· 0- 6~ dosiD 0 7 61 L lose t 1 r 2-7.Yn ri 11-Â·644 0 AvÂ·r,LA-e-cbs 449% 13 , 6Â©,o paÂ·j, L45*w,i j 60 81*11 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conoeptual SPA - Conoeptial I{istoric Dev. - Special Review Final SPA _,L Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenli ne 1-/ Conceptual PUD Minor IIistoric Dev. - Stream Margin Final POD - Historic Demlition - Mountain yiew Plane Subdivision Historic Designatirn - Condominiumization - 1â„¢ct/Map Amendmer][t - GM@S Allatinent Iot Split/Iot line - GEOS Egvption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (nunber and type of existing- structures; apprnodmate sq. ft.; number of bedrocus; any previous approvals granted to the property). On,2. h Igluir,i.,c.' fU--vi,) c.-t~-1vhsÂ· i Af=iur# -AvÂ· t.... Â·utit/t -1--Â£1Â·v-ic.1, vir-p.Â£7_ . 61 4 w.2-4, d.e-c . j 9) Description of Development Application /-2/.1/, *J 21,4-10 un 04 -100(ne lill-Â·10 71<Â» rov./0-w- E\CilÂ·bvi-j CoulsÂ·tri/G-10 wi 0 -0 n. n A.r~ W , Vâ€žS 4-V A ~-10 1/1 ~9 0 1 ~4 l lA CA a. Uu/1 4 \ lat-ehe/t/lc,â‚¬-/ -fau \ AN .3 CAA St-Dv'f~~1, \Ou t \'11 1 l-la% '' :D 01<r~ S lÂ·~--ED I U-~A p v-Ove/Lai G,u'Â¥4, 10) Have you attached the followirg? Ikq?onse to Attad-~nent 2, Mininum Subrnission Cxilzerrts Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Coatents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application L '~ GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ AACHITECTS DAVID F GIBSON. Ala AUGUST G FRENO, Ala SCOTT C SMITH, AIA 5-20-93 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO Attn: Miss Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: ASPEN CITY SHOP FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Dear Amy and Commission, This plan is submitted in conformance with the Conceptual Approval granted by H.P.C. on 5/12/93. The following new representations are herein made: 1. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF 5/12/93 We agree to abide by, and incorporate into the plans and Specifications all conditions of the Conceptual Approval. Most notably, a supplier and fabricator of heavy-gauge Corten steel has been found for the exterior roof and wall material. 2. REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING Guidelines of the National Trust for Historic Preservation will be followed, in the restoring of the old brick work, as applicable. The old wood windows, where intact will be restored; where demolished will be rebuilt to the same design. 3. WOOD PANEL DOORS The existing wood panel doors in the Historic Building will be restained and restored. The new wood panel doors will be of a similar style and rail design, and will be constructed of clear fir, 1 3/4" thick. 4. NEW BRICK BUILDING A matching common brick and matching quartzite sills will be employed, with integrally- colored mortar. 5. NEW WINDOW AND DOOR SYSTEMS A metal door/window system as manufactured by the Kawneer company will be used, with baked enamel matching color sash and frames; Series 6200T and 8425T for windows; Series Tri- Fab. 451 T for building entries; or equal. 6. OVERHEAD DOOR SYSTEMS A heavy gauge, flush steel door overhead sectional with an insulated core and motorized operator will be used, as manufactured by RAYNOR; Series "Tri-Core," TC, or equal. At the front of the Historic Building, 1" boards will be applied to the surface to create 418 E COOPEFR AVENIUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 City Shop Page 2 the design shown on the elevation drawing. 7. DESIGN CHANGES Since Conceptual Approval was granted, minor changes to the floor plan and elevations have been made to the new buildings, including: Another enuy door at the northeast corner of the Administration Building, and 45 degree bays at the rear of the Maintenance Building to give additional floor space. No changes to the Historic Building treatment, as presented at Conceptual, are proposed. I look forward to meeting with the Commission on Wednesday, May 26 to discuss the final Development Plans. Â§*0rely, ~~~ 1 i i -1 0 David F. Gibson Encl: Revised Drawings Product Literature r,1 character unless you detail it to let people know it is the old roof. Dave: I feel it is so banged up that it will not be appropriate. Les: It is in bad shape. Karen: Possibly we could recycle the old roof for future use. Joe: We have not had a lot of residential projects that we have allowed tin roofs on. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC approve the conceptual development plan as proposed on this date for the City Shop complex with the following conditions to be presented and discussed at final: l) Cleaning of brick to meet the national guideline standards and whatever other information you find. 2) Pataching of brick and morter to meet national guideline standards and to include possible use of a consolidant if deem necessary. 3) Rehab of existing windows if possible and no windows to be discarded without a written consent of staff and two monitors. 4) Application of brick sealant after completion of project if sealer meets federal guidelines and is recommended. Amy: Generally a sealant is nto approved because it keeps the moisture from coming back out. Roger: This is to be researched to find out if it can be recommended. 5) Roof be as historically appropriate as possible with materials to be discussed abd submitted at final. Second by Joe. 6) That the applicant being the City seak a way to keep the metal roof in storage for future use in the community. All in favor, motion carries. SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of cle.ar, fully-lab.eled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"317" format. LIN 2Â£.FiALF OF APPLICANT: 471 06Â©N Â¢ RAND ARCH fUG=CIS> C.rE-1 oF ASAE- ADDRESS: A-48 6. Coope-E. Ave ,Â· ASADÂ« G 8(en ZONE DISTRICT: 748Lic LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 94,0LL\Â· 97â‚¬ EXISTING FAR: , 15 ALLOWABLE FAR: N.4. ; PROPOSED FAR: Â· 54- ... EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commerdal): N.A. PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): N.A EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: .15 PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: .81 f EXISTING % OFOPEN SPACE (Commercial): /1 90 t PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): 14% EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal BIda.: 6 1 f Accessory Bldo: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldo.: 36 / / Accessory Bldo: 1 45 7 PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: N.A. EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: N.A. PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: N.A Â· EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: N.A SETBACKS: ( 562 9/72 PLâ€¢4N) EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: Front: , 55 Front: * Rear: Rear: O Rear: Side: Side: D Side: Combined Front/Rear: Combined Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIEW ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Only: character comoatibilitv findina must be made by HiÂ©: 1 FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial) 1 Side: Height (Collage Infill Only) Combined FrtjRr: Site Coverage (Collage Infill Only): 4 Citg aÂ¥,0 1 .A en 130 ~reet Asp~ 611 April 15, 1993 Mr. William Poss Chairman, Historical Preservation Commission Aspen, Colorado Dear Bill, Please accept this letter as authorization for Gibson & Reno Architects, wider contract with tile City of Aspen for Phase II of the City Shop Master Plan, to make preselitations to tile HPC oil behalf of the City of Aspen. Sincerek - /--4 [ 27_ j ' / Jack Reid Superintendent of Streets City of Aspen 130 S. Gatena St. Aspen, CO. 81611 Tel (303) 920-5130 Fax. (303) 920-5132 cc Bill Efting, Assistant City Manager John Worcester, Assistant City Attorney (~ recycled paper 1 Exhibit C Ust of Property Owners Within 300'* H. Montgomery and Paula Loud 1 Johnnie Mae Alderfer P.O. Box 10880 3020 Middlebelt Road . 4 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Orchard Lake, Michigan 48323 Â©114 Kirk and Petra Gregory Ann Mass P.O. Box 10055 400 West Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dona Stuart Robert Camp/Cynthia Cudee P.O. Box 11733 P.O. Box 692 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Clarence Blackwell Sarah R. Gulick Werner 1 P.O, Box 3244 510 Cemetery Lane 4 Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Aspen, Colorado 81611 James E. Gerbaz/Cherie G. Oates George and Connie Alaaser P.O. Box 72 931 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 8167, Crystal Palace Corporation Joseph and Anneliese CeS-132 P.O. Box 32 200 Patterson Aspen. Colorado 81612 San Antonio, Texas 5-9229 Cad R. and Catherine M. Bergman George Brennan F.0. Box 1365 1441 Avacado Aspen, Colorado 81612 Newport Beach, Ca!23-2 --_- )---- Katie Skiff 920\Vest Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 This list was copied from a list prepared by Aspen Title Jamts-w- -2.-arickessed envelopes have also been submitted as part of this acctic~:r- - i hereby swear the following Public Notice was mal 144 -- --- 2-7-1 29, 199-3. ' . 431 C J'>312CS 8/2.9Â·./93 .- ff 23/ /9-j/. - ---u-ubÂ» 3.-- - 4. '... . ...1- . ,--- 1:,6 '28&4. #t" . ~~:f~04*~; i. .1 - - .em..0 b . Â«1~. J. - ~ r.7 At.*9,1,1, AW"ff&~ 4% 41 - "! 9.inial"Ve.Flf/lip'/h# i ./ilililililtililli/ilimilillillilli~e*lilip#'#"An'Em tiv /*4 , Â¢:744 4 *~~~~*16~'~~~~~~ME#-, 1~~~f li, i - .a= .t ~ 300* i f 4* rryÂ®%: veÂ·., A . :' a:GNiE~lm I: Â·Â·,0. ~ 9~-,4/ij~&~~Pl:m. ., . Â·;344 ) 3*4*~ Â«--.taiiw , q:~-1,#If**s.##i ~1*9#*00'40 . 'Mi.'a~I--gum,qufli# - . **2K4,#F~)~ ~~~~~~~~~~~;~~;i, 1~~~Ig~;~~, , MÂ·:1!40MY.W' - 0 6.4 ' ,14,04,4-,4,4,~.81 a./.... 4 .. FI........i-- 1 '. B.'4 ,&#48\m#alq:~,~- .-- =r 74.6 '9~3*-*42~ fihillilixilli~~1fs...fijarliellillilill~'lin~x'w/vtil<i~~iggilsitilidllifwimmifililil..revt .?Se?:14- 'L#~~ 44~*,C-. * NJU 'k -2- fr/, - C .le . - I - %. Im ~m"min, lull, /49'~750 [3Â«7Â« 11/1,44\\ 1 2920 ~ 0Â«--2 1~ .99 500 'â€¢f,T i' '1 , i - ' â€¢78839 7, \ t .% . . 1- \1< 1\<ir (,T--)//'.,-hl , 4j-. 1.~~.~.~f#1';49 4 Iii \ 4 12 -5.-;64 : FWL*#.-Â« t_ 3i /1 13 *9-, 73828. UL r / -7/- 1 -1 L-1111 .,l 1/ l.}:/4, p\Â©\Y , \ 1:'j r :1:.1: L,Â·l .i" 1 l i ..4Â£1.0 , h.,/ 1 1 1 ~8808 - Â«tg . 1 Â£ h N ' 10}/''V<Pit, F.1.--3 ~,0-- / J .--9 11 \ , k 1\ / , L \1 y. h ~ifi~- 4,;4-4/jil.K-- 2 1 1 \ il . \\ i'11 11 - i lilli ' SrREET ~ 4 M.i. <1 i \'\\\A \% ) , ~41 /./fÂ«-1/1 r-1 /''I,- Â«~~ ~ ,~ 41 ..95. 1 1 ff,vi 4 j% \(\ \ -.b , $ C . Â·~ t. o * L 6 L.26.3. 14 1 dJ; ~ ~;.~ tr !1. %: . U 1 211-4*7 11 ..- ) 1. r----h./F//TK. : . ~L * z J .70923 7 , Al . --r : , - 1 /-1 . <k \ 1 ~J <, 11441.1.1:14/\\ ,/ 4-k_broL--7-1 %11\ - b . , 3 1..99.00 \ , -1 \ 1,;- 14.2 7<- -7 1Â« 1 1 .1,1 -1& f *- Â· v /1 1 - /4 ,/..Â£4-or-.Phywr'. UÂ·Â·Â·i .7_-j-,w ~ , .709,4 . m : 2 \19 ~' -7 1 L --1 L /1.41 \\ 11 *th \ 7 \A 14 1 H 1 4 ,Â»f'- td,p,0 2 ~- J IL -3(_- 90,< A _ ~ ~ If .,1 - 2/ % -\2\ C, -V ./ 1411Â£111'ID,4.1 3 If 4- 4(,r--44-n / ..0 â‚¬ r-I o M 0- \ h ''-I / .2 7903 5 -4 / i '1(\94 :Â· --- 4 : \:r VffidA/~~ill~140 -1 Â·-2- 4t~t_~__ji ~33 m m b 'n '. 1 I q q 1111[.1 1 e 'll ID\. L.. 0 '1 A g' o .*--4 5 i.1 ~ 1 -0 *41(11 Pht--Â«11 -13144 / / / , 0 1 m -"0 '~446 4<1~*,111 .: 1 \ -1 /11 11 d#%43*4623.- 9 0911~~( * 1 -9 1 . 1 -7-1 \B l\\ --I -1 j I _1-1 % 41.=. ..th . C rt .;~~1'1413\721 4.JHM E.. :,. dill-71 2--3 /n'Â« 95~0 -~ ~ --. ... .7834 8 t, INAWÂ¢4) ef _1LF.tlli~-y 1 ,2:.Â«/f \30.2 ------==-i Jet \ ' , MALLAM// ~ STREET V.W~' --23 f., . b '90'.4 .'.0,5 790. 1 1 nor b ig66 5.-- - -- //.--3mw#\ ;Â©t .efÂ° ~Â«~0-p Â· 1 ,ff/~-- u f \ A 4/ .-a 1 1/1 #tr Jiti 49 ( --, 4 -'. ( 094 31%\ P...1.0 H 6 7 ~.1 1,/ ,\1 f '- /7 1 2 [D .6 1 4 44\4 1\ m,1\ ' - P 0 ~ --- 1\~\Â¢~2 ~ ~dn#B I .1 \\\4(\<t TI#W/r--f--f,t" \,\3jtl\\ 1 fit --1 [7- f \14 2/ 1% . i 46,1/ 4 1- 1 )%-1 \ \ ....0 , C . -/1 1 0*4737 1 1 [3 4 3 3 4\\4 11 4 2&41 COâ€žl /TER# 2 PEET 11 / h /4 f / Cooper Aerial Survey Co - - _t il \ ?\/iÂ»\\ 4 9'*%0411 4. 1.-/ 3924&9fkÂ«fl ff' -am, -n ~ ~~ ~ 4 ,.1 L t~lt- /\%~.3 . , ' : _L_-7- 1 -_... 34\1 ut lit -- ...._.1.- . I Ny{- -1~1.14 Cty 0/ Aspen TUCSON, ARIZONA bar'"p. 8 -5: fer i -iT â‚¬ - ASPEN, COLORADO CO*.0 8, Â£ 11 5 I STER[O./.TOGIA./.liC I"/003 9' PMOTOGRAPHY - '-16.74 15 Â§ 4 SHEE T J -| | ..0, 1 Dtrinh ; k...3/.0 :- . I"- . 0 -N 6I - -#- .: - '*.--.9 p.*/* -' r - ': ---' j& -'-'q7.- L, , '11 11- - 1 1 W I. I - li 4.- % 1 1 -~-- =--1-=- + 1 1 ... 1 .:0.. + ... . 1 1 - I. %& I i % . . ..1 t /1 / 1 - - +1 1 11 1 1 . -- Ter 1 14 -6. 1 1 *4* *~ i '24 ~U~ /-~4 + 11 -11, 1. -- "/ 0 I - 1.- 4 . -1. - 4. + + + 11 1.- :...1: * IX / -0-%,1~ ~Timâ€¢-. - -i ' / 6 /4 ' 1 - 2 - 1 . + 4 1. 1 - 11 - 1 4. I + I i 14-1 1 1 1 ..1 .-1 . 41 1 + I , 1/ 4 , t- - 11 - 4 14 - 1 4. t. â‚¬1 . 4 1 1 1 -4 + I r. 7 - + .i~ - . 7* fil - -1 1 11 0,4 .4 > ..111+ - 1 -1 - . . . I '.1 1 4 1 Â· 1 1 4,6 -1 1 . + -1 1 - 1 1 - h -- i . 1 4. /1 ' 1 1.1 4.4. 4. 7 73'. t +1 4 -- -./ -4 + - r- ' SI . . 4 1.- - 11+ \,W - .+ + Existing Site Co --tions Â£** '*@%?1*Â»*deÂ· 4 3,5. -f -1' , '11 1:' - 1 1 ..4.- I 1 1 t'\ .- *I l . 1 .. . I - '1 ' ''' ./ C ' , 1 1,"#,1 - 'J> %1 , . 1 1 1 1 1 1 42 1 I '' 1 * I I. 1 1, ; 1-27/A + 9//"A Â«Â·Â·~Â·- -.s ./ . 4 '4,// 11 1 1 11 . / -*94 \ t :v// ilrx - - % 1,1 , , j 1< * i. : 1. FÂ»*f.A 1 7~ \~ ,_100-AM FLOOD -1-LINE,NOM / 1,87 FE.M.A. FruDY PANEL *wv ,/ :. 2 , Â· 'ic, 325. I , 1 ; 1,â€¢11 . 1 % . 11, Â·-6 ; 1 8% 0 11. e ; G...... ....1.. C '1 '' 0 , ' 1 / i '1\ SE' '' .' ' ./ 24303 . ' I,\\ , 1 ' 1 1 '4 t. j '' 1'' : .Ft , 1 --- 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 't ; 1 't 9 I, ...Â»,3 0/ BE..'.16- 05// 65 ,~PErl CD Ay'Er, AZI>Vrl 1. 1 1 % 1 -= , I // . 1 ---â„¢1 ''. \ ,% 111 SURVEYORB CERTIFICATE 1 1 ; 1, ,Â·i ' 3 I '''I //CITY 5HOP //, 1 -~ CERn- 7,0, D- MAP ~CUR*Im- Ot,~LT, A N-/rÂ¥ MADE 6*â‚¬*A i 1 / i .rorr ..... f 21 6 3 H * VIsel Or! APRIL I. iro OF AIR,CT- 0, L.-0 31Â·TUAVED in THE 4 'r : I '' ,#\ 1. 2, i li U :. 1 1 1 M OF 3â‚¬CJ,0, i:,T OS,R-%.OF-T~â‚¬- 6" M, PITK. COUHâ„¢. 60....00. eer,Â£. rloRE F,Al' DESCRI ./0 /3 FOU// DEe,Mr,Irle ,â€¢r ,â€¢pole,Â·r w,le,U rkÂ·E Â¥Â·Â£3, 7. C,t-,EM C,= 5~0 *CT-of, ,1 61-es 1 1 ...... 375- Ir.0-6 al' FEET, ~ 1 t ; 420 2/ //2 TrEr,CE M ir- FOO'EL "k '0.EE'r, T~Â·EPâ‚¬.2 M /7.Â¥"OC~ W 1- 70 FEET. - U- .2 -- h : 1 â„¢ErCE / 7.- 10 Z.W Â£ 19 Ftc ...r oa - 8 3 7/ cor-,Â·rN'ir- i.M K..... 3>,- CÂ·~i '' ~ T....3 0.-I'ID'.. ......... n. PorIT OF B.... ~"~â€¢,0~.- 0" 3Â£4'2. T OA 4.. * ' r,1, 01- 5Â·100Â·r -c.Kt aur* c.irrr 5,-- AND r--T-AL. 0,â€¢~a.â€¢6â‚¬ waâ€¢E Fa,ro TO M ' Â£ 1041,710 el,-ly ....1 TH' 6,-OARY UNE.3 0 Thâ‚¬ Al.NE o.,CM'KI .nuÂ· *râ€¢ , FROâ€¢EKrfÂ· nÂ·E W= K-1510,13 1 .â€¢LL el,LC*rles. 1,Â·-RC,Â·,EMEMTS, '~. , ' --) i ' 2.25/ME..C:5, /16,1.-CFÂ·-/ 1/ E..... IR ./.9.1 7-U r-â‚¬ %/ ./.O/.Ill/,3 1.1 200) 0Â¥OR OrÂ·1 T,â‚¬5Â£ PRErâ€¢11~5 A,U: A.SU.R,IU. 3,10,.71 , C<STLE ./. .act-2 - , , â€ž.y_ ;.Â·n 14 .M./EN I . .. ... , CREEK BRIDGE , I. I *-' 1 TDPO ... C.,rÂ¥ OF ASPE,1 MR,AL ..P Â¥ al *S TAG ' NETâ€¢ 1 , ; i ,-5 24303 ..LE 1% iTT- - ~r 1 / 1 Â» I ASPEN CITY SHOP 1 Alplne Suveys, k. ~ ; 7 X: Joble '9-41 ')0 n CITY bHOP PEÂ©PER-TY 00/ CITY OF /2/EM p..Â¢ 01,1.. 1= rio OM CA5TLE CREEK .co./Â·,Drot EXISTING CONDITIONS -- Â¤=c=rn....Â·rr-r-,Tr-r-r-1 'it *19Â§1Â§1 3 1 2Â«Â©222Â«1--.-- ------2-PAUJr-71 7.Il-=21-- -=CL --' Â·---L~BEEE'EB-Â·rt- U'#L -- flgial!10 11 4 EL==tr... ir lin ir- r I --:m/"749F=4 L.=1- -LLLE I -1 L- 1 ' OIl-..tur.ted brick ~ Non.matching brick Conor-t- ~lock Addition EAST ELEVATION 20 Ft. I El I. = m. =1 E!=t -El. 0 -3#5#f- 2 3-3iti=-= --.-.-- - 12:- 4--2 L.=ekÂ«...La.ga~~PE' -- --- I- 0 4 0 . 2 1=17 ---- W 11 -. a --29 --- -=-- _ - 0 1 --- 4 --- 3 - ./r HISTORIC STRUCTURE Nonr,1 ILIVATION - OLI) POVVER PLANT/CITY SHOP -=*~ 3..... .adOC' 8, 1/401/Ad..0 W.,9 00'~i0103 k , 0020 ------- I- - --- -- el' 7800' - -- - -----il#. - 481 1 - - 7/ 3 A--L- 0 111111111111 1 111111 r -9481-~~C_LE_ _ _ ./' n L-- '0'' - -- -7 ./ 00 0 / 0. 054#> -- = 4 d C .< 46'.. ; 1 .-r. 2 = ; Al f 38'- -F - ====EU- I - / O.// 7 C ./1 2 - . -- 0 / =27fc ~ l *2*=diI E=@ â‚¬ . 2 / ,/ h t\ 0 - -; ErECEL 2224EkS,W 0 tEES*ae =E= 5, 9 2 ///f , / N 1 1 - a~/ F--~ c-- . /1 y / 1 5] 2 / 4 O / 64/ I .i>- -- fjbÂ« ~ / z / 4 6-4 C / ,,2/, f -37 1\\ -N\ 2 L I Or m . J' i '11 /1 - 1- ~ 1~21 :~ i 4-/yf - ~ ASPEN CITY SHOP Joe No: AEVISION: CAT E : 4/29/19 C.ECIED: , SCALE: *'' I /1 - GIBSON & RENO.Â· ARCHITECTS ./PEN. COLOAA.0 . ...1, 0 COPÂ¥/.MI 1922,2 4,m [ANT COCCE' AVENUE m.-1 381'152-%'iz r.4 ~=1 08 09 1? f t. i: mi 9 MA U r-En r -- r -m r---1 r -- E--1 r - - -3 F-- 7 : 9: L-1 11 1 11 Il I 1 1 2 rj 1 =.Â·1&34 on.... 4..d.-1 1 7--| I z.... K.kho~ | ....... 11 8.-1 g ..../C.M.A. 1 0, W -r--1 11....r 1.Uâ€ž'. 1 -9- L -1 1 1 1 , ~ 0-1 1 1 1 1 -1 i o A I. 1171 *ov.1.[DeÂ·*.kam 1 J L___~ ._4 li -1 Lub./.orn.....or -gr 'hop .: 3-11 L__ 1--1 2-] [-- L- 7 â‚¬ p â€¢uk Y â€¢ 21-1 0â€¢ 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 -t 6 U 0 ~ 7 -1 [-- -1 Z.. r --- 9.",2 WzÂ· -r-lf .1:94 01 ~1 1 1 .1 r.=71 11\\\ Â« EL - Roou. :1 11 UP" Motor h w ~ I. 4 I 45_1 000 // . i._ =hom f Or-d~rt iowl 1.Ump I 01 .A,+Ht,Hk dn. 11 1 1 i-_2 L _2 7== r-F ---If ~ 1.1 11 ...vy ....1.- PIt 11 1 r - d F -3 r-- 1 11 11 1 11-/ 0. 1 .hop , ~| ~ MAINTENANCE SHOPS ..br...lon Stor/9. Motor -./.1, 1 40- â€¢râ€¢ YARD \ 7 1 n i ......1 1......1 I to.der H-wy ....Ir . ..t 1 1 1 1 ~3KIrr~.3 -HeATED ST~AGI 1 1 L- 'muf~E- /"35/0..7 - \ 1 I E--1-4224-1 r-J IF-2-1 F--' --1 f \ 0 / 1.0.... 4 1,JU.1.2.L .1.m 44 I ~ Light r~pal,Â· 1 F#*I;1 A--7 . , p.r* I ,+A-1 0 11 V.* 11 1 ....p. x ~ 1,11., 1 1 11 11 11 , dum. 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 ~~_ EM/1////n.-/tar./0 .MiL ~ ..rking L____---1 2-4 L_-1 L--1 V -1 m ' ,=~V J~ 0 1- -- r--1 r--1 IF ' f 1*Mwork ar- 0 I .... PUMP. 3 1 1 I -- / 1 h, 5 /1 u-h 1*21-1 + 3-111~><D41*1 t:zial > 'tor~ge i / Fl 0 A..1.t - ....P.1 .1-4Â»41*7# + 0 L L__ L --1 / -1 DIr-otor Â£1_ 80++0iw.++4+I,H -' Â·1. 4 2 C -- --TLE.1-4 HAI--7,7.A-wil:7-9#~-I.t,-L I.. 2/J r 111 a 11 0 =r-/.r V~ork/ T-/ree. 1 m fll.. ~Â£Â·'U t /~C aA I * .$/ ,â€¢b.4 #e,Â«: c>i..0,-0./. ...Er .... 1.- ~ '72' W.* â€¢*s, t- #724,2,4. WAâ€¢.9 .L..7 - FLOOR PLAN .0.0 714--~-9----0 O 10 20 30 ft. hâ€¢K>talli - - A. 1118 ~ ZE T .. LE@ -1 95'ZE w i WilaIN :1 EAST ELEVATION gill 20./. pr=o~gurrF[~~ 11 11111111111~ le 111 11 1 111 1 1 lili 1 1 11 Ihi 1111111111111111111111111111,111111111'111' ~111 11,112111 11,1111 111 1* 1 1 1111111 1 11,11 1,~1~11111111 n [ '1~Ll'111[~' ''111 11'|JA~3I|~1~11~11 4-' 1" 1 1'11 4111" 0 Ir#Eckl-L i riri-Trl li[[f.WL Il]Jilillp-y,- _ u- 1 1 -- -1 111, L!7 :2 ILI- i - -- - I 1 -1- m LE - m 0 00 E 11 UE no SHEET ./1 ... NORTH ELEVATION HISTORIC STRUCTURE -m HEATED STORAGE BUILDING -*~ *110 NadSV ' 0 .. ="========:===:= -Bege-Ill--lill---il--'.1-mill--Ile--0--I- El-dwwn------- 2:UN=m*=mmmm*Immeimmll~llmmullmallimimim~milm=Â®mamillmmEmmmmim,mi.*.ll -- ------ ---------6--------------------4---Ii------ Z 0 CO - 1 m - I - = V Â· ONEEI 9 hilly<F,=I-22==EÂ»===â‚¬*34 14 U ii 9 8 8 jilll : : NEF~--EE~EE-EEÂ·z========EE-======~~~Â·-1~========1 lili 11,11111111111 1,11111 lilli 1111 1 11 1 '~ |''~||~'~ ~~|'~'|~ |~|~|||~~|||~~~~|~~||~~d'~10.49 ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~1 i'111111'ill' 1~11111 lili 111~11111111111 ~ ~111'111~111111~~~~11111111~ ~1~11~~~~111111~1111' 11' lilli 11111 tlip. '1~41414'11111111111'11!11 11 lili ~1 ~11111 lilli% ~ 11 0%1 li lli'11'il SOUTH ELEVATION lili'111 1 1 111 11 11 EAST ELEVATION , 4 r, I a 1 IP'111111 1111111%1111~ 1 ~11 41 11 1,1 111 lili. 11.- . 1.4 1.- 0 1 I L - 11 1 1 lili k. lili 1 1 9 11] .55-1 :6*h - - 11 , NORTH ELEVATION B . 2 CIO . a 11 lu . a, 0 n - 4 WEST ELEVATION ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ~ /88.-/2/ EXX XI. BA' ladOO' ls,/ e Â«fflf-1-1 ~fir[ 11 [[ [[ [ li din 1 11 111 - 11 lilli lilli ~ 111 lili-------- -d~ LUL_JL__IÂ·L-' ~,~ |CJITOCIl l '~ cz~uum--~~ -01-- '~1 ~*~'~'~~~ ~~~,~'~~'~ '~i'~ T7 -- 1 1 -1 [ SOUTH ELEVATION TUU--L_~ T I 0 10 20 30 Ft. Il 1 1.-~ Pi/Lil.!~ 1 1" 11,1'~11, ' 111'11"I'~' 41 I'Â· 111' 111 lill i'I'+ 1 91'mmil:Na@MMMAIIIWPII#F3&ij lf- '~I,11191-mt'I'- ~~'#14111-1'i[P-fl- 'TI'll-~1 ilr~ 111~1!~11~ jl~1-~~-~~| < EHEREBEEI lili i 111EBEBEREBI It IEREHEE EE]1-4 111 'Ll-1111 1 1 1 11111 lilli 1111 1111,111,11'hl,111'11~1111 --Ell-]11[1 4-1-||hi| ,-LI ._It.._.' 16.-L EAST ELEVATION MAINTENANCE BUILD , lili 1 1.1 -IL=11=1133.- NORTH ELEVATION i iliiummitijiilmimiliiliillillilinuituiliilmill,TmmrmmnmnImmil ---1---]~Immill'11,111,~~~amimmli I'll'11.1==Jil 1- 1-1~ 111--1 11 ~ ' Ini- 11'll 1 -,1]11~1'Illi -11~1- jj' Iii , 11 1@IEHEEEÂ® Â· 1 1 IEBIEREEIE I ~ 1 11 mmEBEB 11 11[- 111 11 1 1 1 VIL 1?1~11 111 -1(111 .r' 1 11 111111, 1191,hi 1 ~.11 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 "111,1 1111~1 ' 1~~'l~-'.,XL- 1.1 11 lili ,11 1 1 1 111 ---- I.------- ----- r VVEST ELEVATION MAINTENANCE al NG r r. Â®9 ~-Bu; i[=Immwimmmillinlmm Â·~~~ iii-El[.1~ Pi 1: Â· IiI ,1'1!il Â·,1'111;,11 ' i Â·11,:-,lili 114. ! . _ 1!Â· 9-111.1.11 11.11!111 :11!111'11'Â· Â·4 -I,: ~12. 1 Ii:,!.1.11' 1 1: 1 : lillial 1 :11: Ck i 'i!!p 11 111 1 5 1 #,2 It . +Lf ml M A P Â·-- - 1 9 i 8% U i 1 CE][EL.H--lr--It--lILi Ii:'I 8 5. 8#MI; 1% EAST ELEVATION pan-_~ A-1 Fil- O 10 .0 30 Ft 1 ~ 11,11il'i lili. Ii,i!' 11' : 1|||I'Â£~0001 1 SOUTH ELEVATION â€¢ Â·16.--==~U~~-4--W - NORTH ELEVATION n 0 r- m I I 02210 LILILILI EJEUE! i 1~ > 1- --I----~WAM.- mt Â«Nk 0 lilli - 1' :I:Il- .hld'PI' Gfiliql~ 1111'i.11111~111~1111.11,11111 ~Illlili 1,11 1 1111 -,111.1 r,111 ' '1,1.1' !~li'iliN JU~~b il,11~1111'Irl Iw'il'IiI'l'1111~11 'w:l il li 4 2 0 11 1 1 1, 11 l'01Â§1.,1.1'pl'11'1111~11111 Irl .-1'' i a 11 0 _ 0 -___ m a~EET /Â£: 1,/ WIST ELIVATION _23' COVERED STORAGE BUILDING -4 INOISIA; 4 1%000 M,e Â· ~ STANDARD HOUSE DOORS__~ The Mark of Value Panels: 1/' patiels or warranted Mmi- n,ited Innerbond 7/8" panels, 1/4" flat The mark of a Mastermark panels are plywood. Models 82,108 and Standard House Door is quality and 182 available only with W" plywood. value. Each Standard House door is See Warranties. styled after a popular design for Stiles: 4Wic," (7'/ic," on 3'6" doors). beauty and utility, and put together Rails: I,p: 4%" (64" on 7'0" doors) Bottom: 94" (114" on 7'0" doors) with the same dedication to crafts- Glazing: Approved clear safety glazing manship we give every door we materials meeting ANSI Z 97.1 and build. Consumer Product Safety (limmission Product Description Federal StÂ·andard on architectural glazing materials. Species:90uelas fir 06 Western hernlock. Grade: Selected or standard grade. Standard Sizes: Thickness: 14",422Â· Widths: 2'6", 2'8", or 3'0". Designs 44, 55,66,82, and 88 av:iilable in other widths. Heights: 6'8", 7'0" 108 0 117 0 118 18/ 318H 418 618 e f Uy t ~El--LE~ 02=3 /1 d a [1 11 1, 11 )44 44 55 / 82 66 14- 88 1 4" Kawneer Heavy CommerciaLine Windows There is a Heavy Commercial grade window engineered for high performance in new construction and replacement applications. And, it's from Kawneer. Model 8425 T-Single Hung, Double Hung and Fixed. Meets up to AAMA HC 50 Rating. 0 Extra Heavy Block & Tackle Balances Side-Loaded Take Out Sash Universal Features l~1 Painted and Anodized 1 Finishes Available ji ' Thermal Design for Optimum..- Energy Savings Interior and Exterior Pile Vent Weatherstripping High Performance Architectural Grade Model 8425 T-Horizontal Sliding and Fixed. 1" Insulating Glass-Clear D.S.B. ' Meets AAMA HC 45 Rating. Pick-Proof Cam Action Rail Lock Aluminum Screens (Optional) Â· . Various Configurations Available (ox, xo, oxo) 02, Stainless Steel Ball : Bearing Rollers 4 Kawneer CommerciaLine Windows IModels 5200 and 62001- are economical commercial-grade windows for new construction. Model 5200 & 6200T Model 5200 & 6200T Projected. Casement. Meets up to AAMA C 60 Rating. Meets up to AAMA C 60 Rating. Inswing or Inswing or outswing. outswing. Anderberg four 1 ~ Anderbergfour bar hinges. bar hinges. Truth die cast Truth die cast - cam handles. cam handles. Double weatherstripped vents. Double weatherstripped -9 vents. Universal Features. Thermal or non-thermal frame design. Equal or unequal leg sections. Projected. M.&T. frame joinery. Casement. C.E.S. vent joinery. Model 5200 & 6200T Various glazing infills accepted. Model 5200 & 6200T Top-hinged. Fixed. Painted finish-white or bronze Meets up to AAMA C 40 Rating. Meets up to AAMA C 60 Rating. (optional finishes available). Inswing Aluminum screens (optional). Economical, only 1.I""' Cost-effective. Anderberg four Multiple bar hinges. configurations. Truth key Mulls or stacks operated with vents. security locks. Uniform Double sightline weatherstripped vents. 1 -4 I Top-Hinged. Fixed. '' 411 471 20 . . -/.r ' tr 4(7*%* 1, 4 111154 1,0 - 4 ...6<4 4 1.,1 , ~1 p A . 4 Â£ 9 /4 .AX . B ' ~ ~Â·; 7-' 'A . ? 2 1 1 1 . Â·Â·s*ji;i. j.Â· - ,4 -4 Fi,;.i - - f V J 4 -1 4 - i .li.'r- .1 -- ' 2.1 - . .1 6 .-. 114. Â· 4402.: 3~f JI, tÂ¢ 24% - , I.- I 6 le , 1 Â» a 7- 12 ...U ir ; 1 L ,Â· 0=20' A. 61 31 14 .:i . I ' ?1 . 7' 4 . Ial'.2 Â¢ 1 1 5 ' i ' 6-2.- v s.Â· 3. , ~~~: i 'i ... 1 1 1 ./' -. Â· Â·St, . j - t'f 4 44 ; 0 4 ''44 *A 7 / T. *44 . 7, A 7 - . 24& 1.-i 4. , 4.4 , 41 , W . 2 in 4 A# 7./ . .1 , - f . -<1 N .- -4.r 4 ; -1 e -'i râ€¢~ h.â€¢ ' 3. 4-X 2 14' '1 *9 '*4& ' I '$ /. ' .J'ti: j i $ . lir UL- -1 , 9 - 411 ' 21Â£ 3 0--t 11- -1Â· - A One Clinton Exchange, Syracuse, New York. TRI FAB Il M Architect Dal Pos Associates, Syracuse, N.Y Trifabllâ„¢similar to Illustration 400/430/431 Appealing Aesthetics/High Performance The 'rrifab 11 systems accept Kawneer's the product to the job condition, Tri lab 11 Tti fab 11 â„¢ by Kawneer offers three VHM (Ventilating Horizontal Mullion) framing systems are totally compatible framing systems with common design for natural ventilation without changing with all Kawneer stock and custom themes in the Tri fab llâ„¢ 400, 'frifab Iiâ„¢ exterior appearance. entrances, as well as many other framing 450 and Tritab 11 â„¢ 451. Rugged, yet systems. beautiful, these framing systems meet Design Flexibility/System Integration Trifab 11 has common gaskets ancl the highest standards of quality and Because we offer theltirab !1400 accessories, as well as interchangeable performance. Expansion mullions and or 450 for 0*"glazing and the 451 for I" extrusions. This allows for an easier water deftectors at horizontal points glazing, a choice is always available. installation and minimal inventory. Thus ensure positive internal water drainage. There's a built-in capability for filting time and overhead are saved. The Designer's Element. - + 9#tkIN ~*4.6. 10 451T ENTRANCE FRAMING SCALE 3" = 1'-0" 451T FRAMING INCORPORATING KAWNEER"190" DOORS AND TRIFAB 451 I[DOOR FRAMES NOTE: OTHER TYPES OF KAWNEER DOORS MAY BE USED WITH THIS FRAMING SYSTEM. SEE ENTRANCE DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 6 7 (452?, 451-026 1 239 1 U L *,= INSER~ 0*. E-I 0 1 10 1 11 n 2 ==0-10 4-- -5 -8 9 - 0 T 4 4 1 064 *22, 1 451-501 451-501 or or 451-019 451'-019 3 3 TRANSOM AREA FOR BOTH DOUBLE OR SINGLE ACTING DOORS - - WITH GLASS SURROUND. JAMBS ABOVE TRANSOM BAR ARE ROUTED OUT TO ACCEPT GLASS HOLDING INSERT WITH OR ELEVATIONS ARE NUMBER KEYED TO DETAILS WITHOUT STEEL REINFORCING. SINGLE ACTING DOUBLE ACTING / 02-224/ t Illillillillilll 111}111111111 Ul j \'112L:l422,1 - 22 452-101 No?- 1 451-502 451-503 r 1 r , 1 41/2" 10 10 - (114.3) - 9 9 2 |%2=*91 450-022 rtj!112Ellby-1 450-022 0.--ACE21219ps 09 02 ~ 451-501 451-501 tvok 451-502 -2 451-503 -6- . 1 . 9 4 5 M V SINGLE ACTING DOOR (50.8)-4 #2" A A (TYR) -1~ 4%; 8 451-oig Li 3 3 - \\1 431 IP 4 1 E~ S.3.>\\1 ~ Et *A 111'- /1 1--* 69 139 / ~ 69-140 1 lll1lllll]l}l llllll llllll Ina SINGLE ACTING DOOR DOUBLE ACTING DOOR DOUBLE ACTING DOOR WITH TRANSOM WITH TRANSOM THO IN US A, JUNE (c,KAWNEER COMPANY, INC 1991 4\ 111311,41 Maximum Thennal Emciency Full 3" thick 1, 45/1 1 lf?#0 r 1 Full 3" thick 4Â«19 laÂ»-L Panel & Section Schedule 16 gauge end Baked on 1- 0-L ...1 -m' vinyl thermal stile with finish paint 34 Door Width No. Panels Door Height No. Sections .1 break Insulated glass 00 /., Up to 9'-2" 2 Up to 8'-2" 4 (1=7-~1~ 14 gaugeend -~ 9'-3" to 12'-2" 3 8'-3" to 10'-2" 5 Insulated glass stile with vinyl thermal 12'-3" to 16'-2 4 10'-3" to 12'-2" 6 break .~_-_11 lf= - 8aked on 26 gauge 16'-3" to 20'-2" 5 12'-3" to 14'-2" 7 - 1 \*NON paint finish stucco embossed --Â·Â·-~1 re-.~r___~*_~~ galvanized skins m O,20 gauge smooth *==min 20'-3" to 24'Â·2" 6 14'-3" to 16'-2" 8 ' galvan,zed skins 24'-3" to 28'-2" 7 16'-3" to 18'-2" 9 Mechanical interlock Mechanical Interlock . with thermal break 28'-3" to 32'-2" 8 18'-3"to 20'-2" 10 =-4-1- : and jointseal wIth thermal break : and jollit Dcal 20'-3" to 227 11 28 gauge 22'-3" to 24'-2" 12 stuccoembossed galvanized 24'0 thick ~.~~.~,~,46*MI~ ' (...**#;.I=IIN steel skins expanded polystyrene Vision Ute Schedule : Combination step core plate/lift handle 24"x 8" Full View* Door Max. Utes Max. Lites Combination step Width Per Section Per Section p late/lift handle 24" thick expanded polystyrene Up to 7'-11" 1 1 core 8'-0" to 11'-11" 2 2 Vinyl weatherseal iii extruded aluminum 12'-0"to 15'-11" 3 3 ~~< Vinyl weatherseal in extruded aluminum retalner 16'-0" to 19'-11" 4 4 retainer 20'-0" to 23'-11" 5 5 24'-0" to 27'-11" 6 Series TC & TC-20 28'-0" to 31'-11" 7 Series TC-Il ' *24" High sections only. Maximum 14'-2" wide & 14'-0" high. Specifications Doors shall be steel sectional overhead type Tri-Coreâ„¢ complete weatherstripping system to reduce air Lock-Exterior Locking-Five pin tumbler cylinder Series as manufactured by Raynor Garage Doors. in filtration. Top of door provided with EPDM rub- with night latch and steel bar engaging track. ber sealing strips. (TC Series only; optional on Interior Locking-Interior dead bolt is provided TC and TC-20 Door Sections-Sections shall Series TC-II). Bottom of door to have flexible with hole to receive padlock. be 3" thick roll formed from commercial quality hot U-shaped vinyl seal encased in extruded alumi- dip galvanized steel per ASTM A-525 and A-526. num retainer to conform to irregularities in floor. Wind Load-Series TC doors designed to with- Door sections constructed of 26 gauge interior and Optional jamb seal to be EPDM rubber blade type stand 20 lbs. per sq. ft. (Contact factory for exterior skins (TC-20 constructed of 20 gauge attached to track angle mounting with rigid vinyl specific wind load requirements on Series TC-II.) smooth (non-stucco) exterior and standard 26 gauge snap-on extrusion. Weatherstripping to be replace- Deflection of door in horizontal position to be interior skins), mechanically interlocked and pres- able without removal of track, angle mounting, or maximum 1/120th of door width. Series TC is sure bonded to a 2%" thick expanded polystyrene door hardware. Maximum air leakage per foot of available to meet Dade County, Florida code spec- core. Interior and exterior skins to be separated by a continuous dual durometer vinyl extrusion to form door perimeter( floor, jamb, and header) shall not ifications. Contact Raynor Engineering for details. exceed .81 CFM @ 25 M.RH. No air leakage shall Glazing-Lite inserts to be 24" x 8" thermal an effective thermal break and a complete weather- tight seal along section joint. Thermal break extru be detected between section joints when tested type, 96" insulated glass. Glass unit to be encased sion to be held in place by means of a mechanical in accordance with ASTM E-283. in one piece vulcanized EPDM rubber frame. Avail- interlock. End stiles to be minimum 14 gauge, sepa- Tracks-Galvanized track 2" or 3" depending able in DSB, >6" acrylic, 7 " clearwire and 366" rated from exterior skin with vinyl thermal break. clear glass. on doorsize.Tracks to have Graduated Sealâ„¢ for weathertight closing.Tracks to be bracket Framing-Door jambs and mounting pads to be TC-11 Door Sections-Sections shall be 3" thick, roll formed from commercial quality galvanized steel. mounted or continuous angle mounted and fully furnished byotherthan door installer. Door sections constructed of 28 gauge interior and adjustable for sealing doorto jamb. Continuous exterior skins mechanically interlocked and pressure angle size to be not less than 2516" x 5" x 342" InsulatingValue-Section set shall have overall bonded to a 2%" thick expanded polystyrene core. on 2" and 37" x 6" x >6" on 3" track. Horizontal installed U-value of .12 as tested in accordance Interior and exterlor skins to be separated by a track to be adequately reinforced with continu- with ASTM C-236. continuous dual durometer vinyl extrusion to form ousangle. an effective thermal break and a complete weather- Tri-Core, TC-11, TC-20 Five Year Delamination Hardware-All hinges and brackets made from and TWenty Year Insulation LImited Warranties- tight seal along section joint. Thermal break extru- sion to be held in place by mechanical interlock. End galvanized steel.Track rollers shall have ten 14" In addition to the Raynor one year limited warranty, stiles to be minimum 16 gauge, separated from diameter hardened steel balls per roller (2") exterior skin with vinyl thermal break. (Series TC),seven %" diameter steel balls (TC-II) and subject to the conditions and I,mltations, stated In that warranty, doors shall be free from delamina- and ten Mo" diameter hardened steel balls per Finish-Exterior and Interior of door signs pre-coated roller (3"). lion of the expanded polystyrene insulation and its j prior to roll forming with a two coat process of baked exterior and interior skins for five years from installa- * on polyester enamel finish over epoxy primer. ( Series Spring Counterbalance-Heavy duty oil tem- tion date. The expanded polystyrene will maintain TC in white, brown or sepia brown: TC-II in white or pered wire torsion springs on continuous ball Its R-value for twenty years from installation date brown: TC-20 white only.) bearing cross header shaft. Galvanized aircraft as tested in accordance with ASTM C-236. type lifting cables with minimum safety factor Weatherstripping-Door can be furnished with of 5 to 1. 6 Raynor Garage Doors Member of National Association of Garage Door Manufacturers -rTFIT.C,=cjd"Filkt:RM,1,9- 1:41 -4,117~9'lls/*pum' 4Â¢11140*Milimmgm'.u , 1=21.-U.16--4 1_32 Maximum Thermal Performance Air Infiltration Data Tri-Coreâ„¢ design and manufacture has been developed over years of research and development. The integral thermal break and insulating core eliminates any metal Perimeter Seal to metal contact between the exterior and interior sup Per Foot Door Perimeter faces to provide a sectional overhead door with maximum 0,1-ea~NrIE,2 thermal performance: g.16Â·'-1,-:ihiwit 3..m...m Section Only U-Value-.088 R-Value-11.36 50 'll//-/milimil"""lim"'lls"ap*~7 Section Set U-Value-.12 R-Value-8.333 71 fflmEJIFygyi[EmE!57 The weatherstripping system incorporated at the floor, 40 .---- 7- 1.~L ~L.ll,Gt~1~- JUF'13:ili il-pirl'*~riM=,4~ ';FFEIT':71*r jamb, header, and along the section joint has been developed to reduce air Infiltration to a minimum. Door Perimeter-Maximum air leakage of door perim- eteris not more than .81 CFM per footat 25 MPH i =_-Ii? .1'~--21,Cl' 1,1Eiq0~Flri?iFEErrif- wind velocity. Section Joints No air leakage shall be detected * between section joints when tested in accordance Â·â‚¬ 20476:Fr]~Emm~liml with ASTM E-283. % 10 '211111[fimme&0*427 *Note to Architects and Specifiers: , All'll'llift Raynor urges architects and specifiers to compare 0 0.5 10 1.5 2.0 2.5 installed, tested "R" and "U" values instead of calcu- lated section only values when selecting thermal break Maximum Air Leakage Rate-CFM products. Tested, installed values realistically represent inservice product performance for end users. Special Features :if4Â§441 Â·. Â·Â· Â·Â·; ~..Â· .*i :ttiti:q~#i-:+4 &04,1-,4-1\\ .-:...P: ~ Ursk O Ful13" Thickness-The interior and exteriorskins of *AblitÂ· i I I .... :P/..:-*' 1. the TRI-COREâ„¢ door are mechanically interlocked by *Â·'889*1 . . *Â·44:â€¢,Â·,i:..i . RAYNOR's exclusive ROLL-LOCKâ„¢ process and pressure I<*40~ ~.2.Â·.-.Â·Â·,i Â·~. I*~1*0 IfjÂ®.:1~ bonded toanexpandedpolystyrenecoretoforma full Â·' 1 2 /--Fl 3"thick section. *- '1.,4 ' I ..0 : .4,9 0 Thermal Break/Section Joint Seal-The interior r-.3,- -, Â·:-d' * ' ~~Â·C , Â·--14. and exterior skins are separated alongtheirlength byan 4%*i. 0-OL...... *92..0.42 Â»-4 -95 4.3. ...... Clt integraldualdurometer vinyl thermal break/section NR*323 j - 3~'Â·- :<.i'@64.-'Â· . . -7:279- joint seal held in place by means of the mechanical interlock. 0 Roor Seal-The bottom seal isaflexible, U-type -- vinyl encased in an extruded aluminum retainer and is designed to seal the door along the floor ~,~~~~2~ - .'Â·~.2-Â·~Â·I ~*{i*f j*Â·â‚¬***=j] ~3-T=4,4-Â·- 1,~7 g Jamb Seal-An EPDM rubberbladeisattached toa eitteâ‚¬(9. .............. ....{{,Mt:.. ."144â‚¬Reir#% dzÂ»11-4' :I~.- Â·t~' rigid vinyl snap-on extrusion and mounted tothe track Â·th .PX.-2.Â·-<-tilMjiLL/lit//ilt-7,3. J angle mounting to form an effective seal along the sides 7:3/ , of the doorwhen closed. (optional) Â¤ Header Seal-An EPDM rubber sealing strip held n f'6Â·,\ - 2 place by a galvanized steel retainer is fastened to the ?9*5*4~u=wri;: 4*grin ............... . ~ -,n top of the door to seal the door along the header when I k '.rÂ·.lÂ·%)fiÂ·7-4Â©r': UN Lh=11 6';Â·~Â·36Â·A. : Â· ' ~~ ~~41 :- ~11*) closed. (optional on series TCII) s-piÂ·r:;.u.Â·Â·Â·iÂ·*Mli - 114Â·35*3.- Â· ' Â¤ Insulated Utes-Lite inserts are 24" x 8" or 24 x 13 for.9,6..L **0.-.t )3 42.-2,522 -4 , 4-, -1- 1 @ , L Thermal type, %" insulated glass sealed in place by a -, one piece vulcanized EPDM rubber frame. (24 x 13 avail- Â¤43I*14%44*%.i:?67.Ff Â¤ I -- ' 0 -47 z' 12 4+72 able in 24" high section only) O Full View Ute Frames-Extruded PVC lite frames are ~ ~- t available in sizes 36" x 14" or 42" x 14" depending on 3Â»43.-Â·,AffÂ·~ff':Â·4'.1 4' ~2'k.)3>2.titiÂ·Â·...Â·~ 13.1~4.-1 ~~ ~~ ' door width. Doors are supplied ready for field glazing of f*-42-4404-'.34*E(*2~ 3---4Â·2Â·4:~Vi.1 4# 56" thick insulated glass. (available in 24" high section 11 - BUHMel,-1- --6~~- I ' - Section Finish-Exterior and interior skins are a . ar i pebble grain texture, and are pre-coated prior to roll- #24;9â€¢; imi' t:Il-11 -:.1 .l~-- -1.+-. :-J * f# 14119/ 14 ; 1 = f 111% forming with a baked-on polyester enamel finish in white, _.:M brown, or sepia over an epoxy primer. 12:11 ..... t..r , .1 51iw !11.-23% ick~'.~,5 '** 1.-,4 1 -14*t. I.4134,1.....4 143 JES*1:.1, ..,fitv. ~ 43:432Â·.'51 07 .42. %1 4% //PR#Wri 249~*. Â¤<:' .'42*itÂ·2*(FÂ»Nw White TOI! only) Brown Serna brown 7 (Series TC and (Series TC orÂ·~1~~ CERTIFICATE OF MAILING RE.. Ully 5AY b FINAL H-Fo DEVELopMEut Avtâ‚¬lt I hereby certify that on this l l fL day of MQ , 1993 , a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Pub]/ic Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the Public Notice. By: Michelle White Administrative Secretary frm.mailing Public Notice RE: 1080 Power Plant Road - City Shop Final Development NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 26, 1993, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen Streets Department, 1080 Power Plant Road, Aspen, CO. The Applicants are requesting Final Development approval for the City Shop complex including renovation of the existing building and the addition of a cold storage shed, maintenance shop building, and an administrative building. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5090. s/William J. Poss, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee f>'-rk}A (3 0 4-0.Ty K)ct/20 NAst ovt Der M o. 30 1 003 Exhibit C Ust of Property Owners Within 300'* Johnnie Mae Alderfer H. Montgomery and Paula Loud P.O. Box 10880 3020 Middlebelt Road Aspen, Colorado 81612 Orchard Lake, Michigan 4.8323 Kirk and Petra Gregory Ann Mass P.O. Box 10055 400 West Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dona Stuart Robert Camp/Cynthia Curlee P.O. Box 11733 P.O. Box 692 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Clarence Blackwell Sarah R. Gulick Werner P.O. Box 3244 510 Cemetery Lane Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Aspen, Colorado 81611 James E. Gerbaz/Cherie G. Oates George and Connie Madsen P.O. Box 72 931 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Crystal Palace Corporation Joseph and Anneliese Cosniac P.O. Box 32 200 Patterson Aspen, Colorado 81612 San Antonio, Texas 78209 P.O. Box 1365 1441 Avacado Carl R. and Catherine M. Bergman George Brennan Aspen, Colorado 81612 Newport Beach, California 92660 Katie Skiff 920 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 * This list was copied from a list prepared by Aspen Title Company; preiaddressed envelopes have also been submitted as part of this application. I hereby swear the following Public Notice was mailed out April 29, 1993. \ 9 A f INA tÂ·'tv (.3Â·'>~'J1133.i'&04 - 77 /1-fr (fijo o LLzv- Conceptual Development - 1080 Power Plant Road City Shop Amy: I feel this is a really good design and I asked you to consider the Secretary of Interior Standards because the design guidelines do not address industrial buildings. This is also eligible for the National Register and a very important property in Aspen. Dave pointed out to me that there is oil staining on the brick and there have been some repairs over the years of patching the building which are inappropriate. This would be a benefit top the historic building. The new buildings are extremely compatible and an improvement to the site. My only comment on the design is that if you look at the site plan the cold storage shed overlaps but does not connect the historic building and I wondered if Dave could explain why that occurred. Dave Gibson, architect: Affidavit of mailing presented to Amy Amidon. Amy: The notices were incorrect and the attorney has adivsed is that the final development will be a public hearing. The neighbors did receive their notice and they knew that it was today. It was just not in the newspaper in time. Dave: The historic building is the theme in the centerpiece for the whole complex. We want it to stand forth as a prominent element and take design que's from it. We pick up on the brick wit the administration building. The best materials are on the street level and are of a smaller scale. The area in question is where the two buildings slide by each other. They do not structurally attach. We tried a notch but it was dark and did not do what we intended it to do. The existing building is over a 100 years old and has had wear. On the east side we have oil staining with goes all the way through the brick. There is no possibility of cleaning it and I would propose that it get removed. There is non- matching brick that was added in in different locations on the front and on the north side we have a 40 foot long concrete addition. On the south side it has been the least touched. A couple concrete sheds were tacked on and we propose to remove those. The bank is deteriorating and bolders were going through the windows. The windows are now bolted shut. Our goal is to restore the dignity and the thythm of the elevations. On the west side is where the bank is and we would lengthen the window into a door and slide the other building buy it. On the south side we would restore the windows. There is a new corrugated metal roof. Our first choice would be core-ten. It is a hard material to install and we are researching the material now. Amy: The reason why I questioned the overlap was because it covered the historic building. Roger: What is the material of the new brick. Dave: It is concrete three feet up then metal. Roger: In the past we have doccumented with photographs. Karen: Explain corten. Dave: It is a material that rusts and keeps rusting and drips on the ground and after a time it gets weak. It is hard to acquire that amount but it lasts 50 years and has a good finish. Roger: At the moment there is no insulation on the existing roof. Could you remove the existing roof and put a new roof on and insulate and apply the old roof on it. Dave: Wouldn't we want the roofs to all match. Don: Because of the deteriorates they are starting to stop making it. Dave: I have not exhausted my research yet. Amy: Would there be a problem with rusting of the roof so close to the creek? Dave: There is onsite drainage and contained in the courtyard. Joe: I would like to see the research on the roof to justify the cost factors. I would like to see something that would last. Don: Coreten last 40 to 50 years. Dave: We also want to go to an extra heavy gauge. Les: This is a great project and everyone is satisfied including the neighbors. Dave: There will not be enough brick so we will have to match some. There are massive areas on the north side. Roger: The oil can be cleaned and in patching the brick if you cannot find brick to match there is something called a consolidant which is like puddy. It is tinted. T The morter should be the original or that the morter is softer than traditional morter. I know on the Lily Reid they used modern morter not a soft morter and what happens the brick deteriorates around it and more rapidly. Most masons ignore it. But that has to be part of the approval. Any existing windows have to have the approval of two monitors. If the brick is approved by the Federal Guidelines it has to be sealed becasue we had the brick on the Hotel Jerome tested at a lab and it is probably the same and the mixture is such that it is self destructing. Roof of existing is done to maintai the integrity if not reuse that roof over a membrane. Bill: When we restore roofs it is not so that they retain their 100 yeasr old age to them. It should be a good quality roof that would last. I feel putting on the old metal will be out of 1 + 9-4 MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Popcorn Wagon, Minor Development Review Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC Minor Development approval to replace an existing wood fence trash enclosure with a new stucco finished concrete masonry unit trash enclosure. APPLICANT: Jack Stanford, represented by Scott Smith of Gibson and Reno Architects. LOCATION: 305 S. Mill Street, Block 82, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplement provided by the applicant. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H", Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Attached are the applicant's response to the Review Standards, description of the proposed project, drawings and supporting letter from the local trash hauler. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: There are no historic structures on this site, but several Aspen Landmarks are across the street from the trash receptacle. The materials proposed for the new receptacle are more in character with the existing surroundings than is the current wooden trash fence. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds that the proposed development is not larger than what exists now, is a visual improvement over the existing structure, and does not adversely affect the character of the neighborhood. The architect should consider some sort of a covering or roof structure over the receptacle, as surrounding buildings, namely the Wheeler, have a bird's eye view into the trash bins. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds no new affect on the cultural value of adjacent historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development is freestanding and does not directly impact the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve Minor Development after discussion of the desirability of a cover for the receptacle. Additional Comments: hp.popcorn ATINZHMENr 1 Â· c , .. IAND USE-APPIICAEON FORM ~~~~ 1) Project Name Â·. POPCORN WAGON Â· ~ .r project nxation #)% South Mill Stic e-= (indicate street address, lot & block ninber, legal description,here apprqnate) CC 4) Iot Size 3) Present Zoning 5) Applicant's Name, Aikiress Ec Ftxne # Jack Stanford , 855 .Chaffield Road, Aspen, CO 925-7726 6) Representativels Name, Address & Ihone # Gibson & Reno Afchi fprÂ·fc: 418 East Cooper, Aspen, CO 925-5968 7 ) Typd of Agelioatirn (please check all thateuply): 4 Conceptial Hiâ‚¬=torie Dev. Ocnditinial Use - Conceptual SPA - /0' INT,al Hi storic Dev. SpeciE,1 Beview Final SPA - 8040 Grealirn Congeptlal F[ID . P~-2< ~ Minor Histnric Dev. 1 Stream Margin - -- Final mi) ---il- Hi =Inric Dawlition Mountain ~iew Plane _; Sdodivisign Â· - Historic Designatirn Cor,hninillmi,gltiÂ£n Â· Tad/Map Amendment Â· - GROS Mlotment Iot Split/Ist line Â· QUR E~amption Adjustment '" Descriptic,1 of Evigting Uses Â· (Ilinber and'Â· type of ecisting structures; ~ ammxinate sq. ft.; Inober of bedrocms; anor Previous approvals granted to the property) 0- The existing use consists of a walk-up restaurant, approximately 55 s.f. in size. 9) Description of Devel.CEneit Application Replacement of ansexisting wood fence trash enclosure with a concrete masonry unit with stucco finish fence trash endlosure. 10) Have you attached the following? x ResPonse to Attadm,mt 2, Minimm Sdimission Contents x / Reg?onse to N=t:admpnt 3, Specific Suhnission Contents x ResPcnse to Attadment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 11. lili. 0--- GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS DAVID F. GBSON. AIA AUGUSTG FIEND, Ala SCOTT C. SMITA, Ala May 6, 1993 Ms. Kim Johnson Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: PROPOSED POPCORN WAGON FENCE WASH ENCLOSURE 305 SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN, CO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT Dear Kim: Enclosed is a submission for Historic Preservation Commission, Minor Development review related to the proposed replacement of the Popcorn Wagon's track enclosure fence. Included in the submission are twelve copies of each of the following: 1. Land-Use Application Form 2. Supplement to Historic Preservation Development Application Form 3. Description of Minimum Contents for All Development Applications 4. Description of Specific Contents for Minor Development 5. Review Standards 6. Proposed design drawings 7. Trash Company Letter As the owner would like to construct this project before the summer season begins, we would appreciate being scheduled for the earliest Historic Preservation Commission Meeting. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Since94~ ours, 1 -- Scott C. Smith, AIA 418 E. COOPEA AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81 611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 ./. It / SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Â· IMPORTANT Three sets of clear.fullnlabeled drawings must be submitted in.a format no larger than 11"xl T, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 112170 forinat. APPLICANT: Jack Stanford ADDRESS: 855 Chatfield Road, Aspen, CO ZONE DISTRICT: CC LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): n/a EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: n/a . PROPOSED FAR: none EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): n/a none_ PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: n/a PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: n /a EXSTING %0FOPEN SPACE (Commerdal): n/a- w - PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): n /a EXISDNG MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldo.: n/a 1 Accessor, 8*. PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Blda.: n/a / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: -0- -0- EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: :-0- PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: -0- EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: -0- This application is for a trash area fence. SETBACKS: EXISTING: . ALLOWABLE: . PROPOSED: 4' 6 " Front: n/a Front: none Front: , n /a Rear: n/a Rear: none Rear: Side: n/a Side: none Side: -V- Combined Front/Rear: n/a Combined Fri/Rr: none ' . Combined Front/Rear: n/a EXISTING NONCONFORMITIEW ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for landmarks Only: character compatibility finding must be made by HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): REVIEW STANDARDS: DEVELOPMENT IN THE HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT A. The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overly District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks, extend into minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, III'C shall find such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and There are no designated historic structures located on the parcel where the trash enclosure fence is being proposed. The Wheeler Opera House is located across the street from the proposed trash enclosure fence. In fact, the proposal is to upgrade the existing trash enclosure fence with higher quality materials for both visual and practical reasons. The proposal development will reflect a small scale (pedestrian) type screen. B. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the . neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and The neighborhood consists of commercial type buildings all being constructed out of hard surface materials such as brick. concrete masonry units, stone, etc. The proposed development is compatible with these characteristics in that the materials and scale are consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood. C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and There are no historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development, however, the Wheeler Opera House is located across the street. The proposed development does not detract from the cultural value of the designated historic structure. In fact, the proposed development enhances the designated historic structure by screening a service area that has been in the current location for many years. The proposed development with its small scale quality materials, and care to detailing (in the gates) will enhance the pedestrian experience. D. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the Architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. The proposed development does not diminish or detract from the Architectural integrity of tile Wheeler Opera House in that it's character is simple, one of quality materials, small scale, an attention to detaihng. The proposed development takes on a "Quiet" characteristic relative to adjacent structures. , 1 11 It 1 City of Aspen -- i l: 1 11 111 11, 11 i HA~ ANHA AI- IH I I COMMERCIAL CORE 1#-2 (n , 1 1 1 M. HOPKINS AVE. ' IL HISTORIC OVERLAY 1 -= 1 F FL 2 DISTRICT IZ HYMAN AVE. LU Z 10 -1 -JI l 1/ 1 1 2 T e .H - 1 Il I. 1 1 L- -J~ WAGNER \-9] 2Â® 1 1 [1-- ,-0 AVE. PARK 11111~ i IL i ~~~~ POPCORN WAGON 1 1 -- DURANT- -AV 7 _305 BOUTH MILL STREET 1! 11 1; C PK'S INC. P.O. BOX 4775 ASPEN, CO 81612 GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS 418 EAST COOPER AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 ATTENTION: HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE THIS LETTER WILL AUTHORIZE GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS TO REPRESENT PK'S INC. INTEREST IN SUBMITTING ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROPERTY AT 301 SOUTH MILL STREET, ASPEN COLORADO. SINCERELY YOURS, 949 AL JOHN J. STANFORD, VICE PRESIDENT tig Pak'M Services, Inc. RO. Box 187 Basalt, CO 81621 927-8078 May 3, 1993 Mr. Stanford RE: POPCORN WAGON 305 S. MILL Dear Mr. Stanford, The plans that Mr. August Reno had me look at for the trash compactor enclosed should work very wall. There should be enough room for 2-3 yard containers, 3-90 gallon recycling containers, and the grease trap dumpster. There is one addition you should consider and that would be to put a 7' high roof over the dumpater area to hinder the view to the folk= at the Wheeler Opera House. Thi8 would also help keep the mhow out of the area and make for easier dumping in the winter time. If you have any gestions please feel freâ€¢ to give me a call at any time. Thank-You. sincerely fbelncer Boothe, v.p . 91.t, I Excellence . * u â‚¬ 01,eyu-t_Â« 9 . May 10,'1993 Ms. Kim Johnson Pitkin County/City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena, Aspen, CO. 81611 Dear Ms. Johnson: This letter will certify that the property located at 305 South MillipAspent-Colorado; Â·known as the Aspen Commercial Condom- iniums, is owned by the Trust Estate of Robert Barnard, Dr. Wil- liam L..Comcowich, Trustee: a charitable remainder Trust to Stanford University. It. is, further,-"acknowledged that parcel "A" of said property is leased to Â·PK' sÂ·Inc., dba. The Popcorn Wagon under that certain Assignment of Lease dated January 1, 1993. Under the terms of said. Lease,Â°PK's:Inc. has the right to final approval of the Les- sor. Should you need further information, please contact Mr. John J. Stanford,Â·:Vice'!President, PK's, Inc., P.O. Box 4775, Aspen, Col- orado, 81611,"telephone (303) 925-7726. r Sincere , , 1 .U' Estate of Robert Barnard Dr. William L. Comcowich, Trustee 420 W. Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 copy to: August Reno, Gibson & Reno Architects wlc: sa -g, Aspen Dental Arts Building 420 W. Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 303-925-7730 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The project consists of replacing an existing wood trash enclosure fence with a concrete masonry unit trash area enclosure fence with an exterior stucco finish. The size of proposed enclosure will be approximately the same size footprint wise (13'-0" x 12'-6"). The height of the proposed enclosure will be 6'-0". On top of the concrete masonry unit/stucco wall will be a cut sandstone cap. Architectural ornamented steel gates will allow access to the trash enclosure on the North side. 1'11111 3. PLANTER < -FI11itt440*timi/lj/fiill/l//ltiilli<. ,/Hilit, lilli Â£ 4.40"It/~~,~j ~j~~~~< "' /Y/ *Â«licitilill l e EN 04.4 ip h 03 14/&6& \ . * 2 .4,# \ -.- V/,7 -a: PEHA, 8 e><A WOOD Plat.|CH -FMAS-1 127â‚¬LÂ»LÂ· 4 EXG. PATIO ; 'i} lilli lilli illillitiÂ· r *Li / \ ,522*34 4 Â¥21Â»x / \ IMA 1 12Â« / TRASH AREA /N - - /71 11 Ntll//fM/Ulilp.X j .- 44/HhiL L<4..\ 1l f , 4210 9Â·rmeL Pht uu,,~ f - r -42 + Irl 4- EXG. PLANTER E-Xe, PLANTEÂ£ 12 19-2 1 V . I + 3 2 \â‚¬Â·8 ' Sytd TriETZ C 571-62 MASE <2>Arr, NE.1 #41= MES:#-1 1 34" Ftol.>'ST>~ l x.1 Al LA-1 014 Er:PAR C Dsl-OF14 -TE) t. -L 59 /420.1 11-13 l1 0 Â¢2Â»53. MAX)ht Rry : 1-1012Â·12Â»41Â»L. PNENE VENyl CALL,p" P. 011 N Oria : At- 6-,*re J il i Fl LL LONO. 14~' il- Iyet' ilyÂ¢' 1'-1$" 1)Â£ i'.1#31: i ille 11.-Ihil 24,' U 14 1 75 4/~9 -, t:%73 11 2? LL EQ, 1]. EQ,., 1 Â· * 4 RE IN 1(41 /. , -1 ffb,~' A r----392'7 le CON-n NUOU,5 6/Erer ISA U r-- .~, BEEL. ~~~/~7 317r- :LOEP ->/ ts -- LNEt<LS, Ir -*1 / 1 Set Et)/ // IND, PINISHED, <C 4 I NTEPÂ· , lr. -X- h .ALL - A Ry \\\ Age \ 'Ft>te- #9- d=>F- I A i - .- <0 Câ€¢K'; 1~.IG, 4 1 6 GATE. bETAIL *411 z Il 01/ â‚¬ N 1 . .'.1 Â· Â· ~ -'=5111 'f P 1-/ I t:LUT 2,12+4 El Dall=, ./SANCE,#,1: El-': 1 :.. ... 1 St;/14-DÂ·-1 12:TN C STLCOD AtPR. E>'~SE CEDâ‚¬T, STE-, NF=cacc.-.UÂ·4<9 1: 1 / WtE>9-1 ; att (1 .31 --- r--r r -,l./ST>'9649 r //. 1 h.1 A;LA-n OtÂ·4 5%4 R.4{3> .AE>le*Â·I 'vEÂ·Â· 1,/'.. j//'' . D...1-1.-Ete.t<:I>k_ 53-1 tJÂ¥1- CLOUDFL TO bib. 93-e LEMIEEO TNWH 2 141 64 -73 C>,/ 14r--1 1 -re<ST 7/ / 20% 2*1..Opt -TY e e 0" 4945. MAR>.i Pry LACTS -----965 9/1 :Â«-:=.Z.I--* 1 1-1-E--11=--r .1 !401:4 2.6:*4-TÂ»l- VENErt CALL;/ -1/ 1/ MorE= : .47 6,Â·,ATE 64-,94 Â·r /. Fl LL UP,NO. 445244 12>/ 01 N 1 75 4/~ 6*45;U 1- 4 1 Â· 40 4 RE th F. R>Â«S / 2 1 00'HmtÂ·JUD'.,+L-4< OVENr \004 Lut') 1 i: / 1. j 1 , 1 7/1 , / 01 / / C -/ 1 1 / I 4 1.. / -1 j. 1 /4. Â» f. 1 i 4/\ 4 1 1 2 / / 1/, , -i 1 . 40 ./ Re'-TEE 1 71-X\CE.E 2 44' Al x ! 0 2 , -, . ./ . re -tl- 1 i c,4< E>Â·d E t3 99.-AEB 2 4 /' &. drept.41-1 N vt-1_39Â·â€¢217 &>Â·/E- BZ, . \.0 .0 . *.. i .Ct.Fc . - -l 4 . . .. 7 SECTION 11 0 /PZ =1-0 2, - 6,1 e,NTH eric sna cco g73 / 757 x / es.u-r gr>Â·Â·le (5497- N\% \ h.\ *i-.r* ~ L D = -4 - 1 -t Lt -' --1-U_ Â·. i -1- nÂ» *0 5-rEEL . . l. 1 -1 n - , IfI --,- tri re FILLED Â· Wi Â»4 CD. S. . 1 1>= + ir=.3 - 1/I -Â· -6. J. 6.2.- C - . 1 11 / 4 53155122 ~ NORTH ELEVATION. 3WEST ELEVATION D Oplake 0+11 =1 11,52 1 V+4 = A LO 11 , s.ykni=/.Tld. 911-0>0 - w ~ 20Â·45 .LAFÂ« / -.1 % F 5 \6.:1 - j~ 'S.J. -> i 11 , . i 11 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 5 EAST ELEVATION Â· MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 716 W. Francis, Minor Development Review Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Minor Development approval for an ornamental iron fence to be installed along the property line, except for an area on the north side of the lot. This parcel is an Aspen Historic Landmark. APPLICANT: Dr. and Mrs. Joseph Bellina, represented by contractor, Ben Sauber. LOCATION: 716 W. Francis, Lots N and O and the West 15 feet of Lot P, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplements provided by the applicant. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: The HPC gave Final Significant Development approval to this parcel on 6/26/91. At that time, the development called for a wooden fence to be built only along the west lot line. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All four Development Review Standards must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval. Please find attached a site plan indicating the location of the proposed fence and an elevation of the proposed iron fence. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements... Response: Staff finds that the design of this fence is appropriate to the style of the historic building. It also helps to define the edge between this historic development and adjacent new development. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Iron fences do not appear to be typical for this particular block, but are common throughout the West End and Aspen in general. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The fence is removable and does not adversely affect the value of this parcel as an Aspen Landmark. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The fence must not attach in any way to the historic structure. Its design does make it appear to be contemporary to the structure, which it is not. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: hp.716.w.f. - .--- -A.* I.---6 'L ILA ' .1. LAND USE APPLICNTION FOIL 1) Project Maine Bellina Residence 2) Proj ect Location 716 West Francis St., Lots N&0 and the West 15 feet of Lot P, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen. (indicate street andress, lot & block number, legal descripticn where apprcpriate) 3 ) Present Zoning R-6 4) Lot Size 7500 sq.ft. 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & Phone # Joseph & Delia Bellina Suite 810, Onh Galleria Blvd., Metairie, LA. 70001 (504) 861-4903 6) , Representativel s Name, Address & Phone # CindereTla Norris 925-5590 Charles Cunniffe & Associates 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO. 81611 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): conditional use Concentual SPA oonceptual'Ilistoric DEV.. Special Review Final SPA -7 1 Final Hi.storic Dev. S/1 4 /4 3. /La- A 8040 Greenline - Conceptual roD X Minor Ilistoric Dev. Stream *lrgin .Final ED ' Â· Historic Demilition Maintain yiew Plane Subdivision Historic,Designatian Oondcminiumization __1_ Uhxt/Map AnEximent Â· . GOS Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line Â· Exemotion 4. AdjUStment 8) Descri.ption of Existing Uses (number and type of exi.sting structures; approod.mate sq. ft. ; n.mber of bedmcms; any previals approvals granted vto the property). 1 Residence, Approximately 2878 sq.ft. of existing F.A.R., 4 existing bedrooms 9) Description of Development Applicatian ATterati.onsÂ·and Addition to 2 story residence including 2 car garage and an accessory dwelling unit. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minimml Submission Oxhrrts Response. to Attach=lt 3 2 Specific Submiss icn Ccatents Response to Attachment. 4, Review Standards for Your Application lillil : 12 '93 16:42 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.001 1/+f vt I / 1 1 OMEGA INSTITUTE OF HEALTH - LEADING A REVOLUTION IN WOMEN'S HEALTH CARE Joseph H. Bellina. M.D. Ph. D. April 12, 1993 To Whom it May Concern: Dear Sirs: In the application for historic designation as requested in Attachment 2, #1 we authorize Delia Bellina to act as representative during this process. We can be reached at 303-920- 9624 or 1-800-535-4177 or through the mail at P.O. Box 7861, Aspen, Colorado 81612. Sincerely, - ~ 4902 11 --) Delia Bellina f \ CJP#_4 il /-22//tit--h ----><\-- *seph- ellinal- DB/JB:mw SUITE 810 â€¢ ONE GALLERIA BLVD. â€¢ METAIRIE. LA 70001 â€¢ i 504} 839-4990 m APR 12 '93 16:45 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.004 SCHEDULE A ORDER NO.:-00018045 POLICY NO.: O-9941-599603 DATE OF POLICY: March 05, 1991 at 13:00 P.M. AMOUNT OF-INSURANCE: 3 590,-000.00 1. NAME 'OF .'INSURED: t ... JOSEPH H. BELLINA 2. Â·THE :ESTATE ORÂ·'INTEREST:IN THEÂ· LAND WHICH IS.COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: Fee Simple 3. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: JOSEPH H. BELLINA 1 Â· THE LAND .REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, .COUNTY OF PITKIN, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: -. Lots -Ng'and 0, and' the West .15,Â·.,feet:cof :.Lot Pr~ 'v CITY:AND TOWNSITE <OFÂ·Â·:ASPENÂ·.-- ,- u. .u & . .: f 'f T -Â· %'Â· 7~ Â·Â·â‚¬ 3Â· 2' Â·4 ': r :4 . Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. 602 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 303-925-3577 . EuriER'liby' L-d-Q&#J V--7- STERART TITLE SIGNATURE GUARANTY COMPANY APR 12 '93 16:46 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.005 SCHEDULE B POLICY NO.: o-9941-599603 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE (AND THE~ COMPANY WILL NOT PAY Â·.COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF: 1.' RIGHTS Â·OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. - - 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. Â·. Â·: 3. ,DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES WOULD DISCLOSE AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOTÂ·SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR .TITLE TO WATER. 6. ANY.AND.ALL UNPAID.TAXES.AND ASSESSMENTS AND ANY UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. 7. Â·.THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERALâ€žOR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION .OR OTHER DISTRICÂ©OR INCLUSIONS. IN-ANY WATER SERyICE -OR STREET a IMPROVEMENT AREA. -:. 8. Exceptiohs.and rese]Evations as set forth in the Act authorizing tlid -isguance af the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page '216 as Reception No. 60156. 9. Possessory rights outside the fence and encroachments of sheds and house overhang, as- shown on the survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, dated February 11, 1991, as Job No. 21038. 10. A Deed of Trust dated March 2, 1991, executed by Joseph H. Bellina and Delia G. Bellina, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to secure an indebtedness of $600,000.00, in favor of Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company, recorded March 5, 1991 in Book 641 at Page 33 as Reception No. 330765. STEM ART TITLE OVAQANTY COMPANY 39C F *4 PROJECT DATA r 9 T LOORING ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS N & O, AND THE WEST 15' OF Le A BLOCK 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY SSION CLASS 2 ZONE: R-6 i LOT SIZE: 7500 SQ.FT. EL ALLOWABLE F.A.R.: 3450 SQ.FT. i PROPOSED AREA LDES LOWER LEVEL 624 SQ.FT. MAIN LEVEL 1452 SQ.FT. UPPER LEVEL 608 SQ.FT. A.D.U. 520 SQ.FT. DER 1 TOTAL 2642.4 SQ.FT. VE )M ' GARAGE (EXEMPT) 500 SQ.FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE 4875 SQ.FT. ACTUAL SITE COVERAGE 3137 SQ.FT. USE NOTED )ING CODE ~ ELD ]S TIL.E GLAZING CALCULATIC rABRIC i ALLOWABLE GLAZING HEATED FLOOR AREA: 3942 FACTOR: .125 TOTAL ALLOWABLE: 492.7 ACTUAL GLAZING: NORTH ELEVATION: f r.117 C m FLEVATION: 136 -7-62\ , 0 C 11/ f/\ j 60 0 71 00 0 1 U 12 11 -/F x 7894.8 S MUGGI~E R 0 0 rrÂ«n /--v--~Â»-h 04040Â«70 4 1 < ITI - _ 41 Z Vtl IL-I -1 - X . -_lin~a-~ --*~ [itÂ«L ~ \9 U C ~00 4-â€ž 6 7/,1 /1 0 i- ,Â».r -24 /~4 - ~j--~i (f- 1 \Lf . 37- 1 01 1Â» 11 11 -* i_ -2 L--11 xul C 0 Oil 0 ~ x 7901.3 - ~003~ F RANCIS x 7901.8 1 - fi *7903.3 4-- 11 0 1 0 W. FRANCIS ST. SMUGGLER BLOCK S TE PLAN EXHIBIT E- 10 MAR 25 '93 11:43 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.001 L_J I 0400\4/ Ur'LITIES 1 C- A 97.3 Et4CROACHMENT ~ ~ 2 l S ~5.09 1 1 1 4~ O 97 . 8 12 Lt 1 U /41 1 0 PARK;NG / / 7 -- / DECK / / 98.3 2 OVERHANG EXTENDS !>:1 / UTILITIES AREA 7.500 ./- S. F ~- - - / r 95.3 SHED IS --==--c__ _I N HOLE AUDITION 1 0 ~ I97 . 1,1 jl j Â· A U f . /. i i i \ r r.\--- \4 1 , ' --- -4. 1 -- 11 , Ityp/, , GAS U 81 1 lu i I i i 1 11 I i If 1 Â· 1 1 g i 1 0 1 0 1 41 f k I f , 'V j f - 1 j -/1 1 ; ..)--- l 12 f i 1 -- Â«41 0 1 1 <of i 2.. '01/ 4 1 Â£44 f r-- 99 - -;- ,/ ' i iq f j i 1 :P 1 / ! f IIi, 1 . li 1 24798 =Ma / 0.- 19 1 Ill Qi 1 11 i l 4 1 1 A 1 11 f /99,7 o e A--4 , It , 1 ~ ~~ 1 1/- .77 * ' -_ 1 l___. j QK-_--,33-3i, 1 - D... Ofici< I r.1-431 '0\ / 1 *4-91 i J..All. 1 -#hlf 1 7909 1 1 * 4.00-) Phi) f 12} 1.11 y i 11 Â·:ilth T 61â€¢v" 9184,99.2 L--1 99.6 EOGE.OF. FAWEMENI. - r -2-220' -b-,ICITY - 99.7 .'42 HORIZ 0 99.7 & / to -w . 09'11 L * /1 2 F- 8/197 2444. r R /41 nd C its . --- NGS --------~6SET 9-K TBM ioo O 7- r- 1 ..) 1 P? C- r-- -_ 090'/ S / MAR 25 '93 11:43 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.002 3?4. , - e '.% . h ~,f ~,;Ci-, 1 -./4 T 444- 8.24 - i * "ax. . BUILDING PERM!T / TOPOGAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT N.0 AND TME WEST ?St OF LOT P, BLOCK IS. CITY AND TOWNSITâ‚¬ OF ASPEN. PlTKiN COUNTY COLORADO. PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEER'S INC. 210 S. *LENA ST P.0- BOX 2Ses ASPEN. COLORADO 0!512 (303) 925-36[6 DATE J08 NO. - 21038 -' L MAR 25 '93 11:44 FROM OMEGA INSTITUTE PAGE.00 -- 99.6 EOGE..OF...PAk EMENT. 0 99.7 0 99.7 1 /1 / r-- -- --3- 750 94 s /.sT J~42 '/.f.Â·s l 2 - 1,â‚¬ARN~~5 --- -- ----- ..â€¢pET P- K TBM 100 1 .., t.-i !\[ Ch 1 1/ Vl 1 . - -1 : b c. -i - r-- CERT IFI CAT ION â€¢ : M HOWORT H >11-REEIT CERT 1 fY T HAT TH ? f. SUk'.rEY WAS PLOTTED FROM FIELD NOTES OF A St.RVEY Â·:DE R * SUPERVISION. D,â€¢,TGO THIS, 1' _DAY OC -fl=84 195,1 ' - 4,93.95*2444 r- 1 510NED: ,+U *T=Â£10 ff <3*y~ 0~~~ #0Â·IN M HOWORTH P L. 5. 2 59Â·1 T --2 9:047 4//7/ , ''3.1. LA.V.U..40% '/; TO Cel-02,Â£,0 :Aâ€¢ YQU MiST Ce-15,d N.rf LE*AL ICT!*N HAuco :roN â€¢Â«r DEFECT IN lit= 5/vEY ""'Â·Â·Â·'CUt~'8'1~," Â·wo: voipS *CTER Â¥09 #1â€¢2 91Â¥COVER 51/CK LÂ·Erect. IN MD EVENT- ),47 -Y AcT ,{W BASED 1,Â·661 zâ‚¬Â·N IN TH!5 3~~nEY 94â‚¬ C-â‚¬*EO WORÂ¢ r,Im TEN Â¥Â·E,C ffteâ€¢ T,â€¢: PATE OF THâ‚¬ Uit:/CArtoN 'tâ€¢toN. ' f KI~kN:+WilÂ¥ F IiI . 1 6 6 1 41 8.4.3Â¢ill F.Kil, . ' ' 1% 4. Iii 1 .4 & Â· i 0 0 %"1 1 4.*ivi#TFrilkUI L % 1 f i 1 1 1 1.0 1 1 4,1 . 2 . !'Â· '.4.:'41,74. l.â‚¬.ei~~ 44 ./..C .4, '44 :;; i'Â·;.~~~_~Â·~ -ftÂ·~. ~2'.3~ ~0'~~i~'~:'~~~31-~~- tÂ¢---7 ~kj s~ ,is,.1.49 -:t 'Jt.4\ 4' 1- ' 0 1* ,*~11â‚¬ ~~ . 4 .*W. h 4,-6-t/-?. . 4 .- r.. ./D,1-71 -- ..0,=-p Design Nos. 1-R and 2-R . Meets with considerable favor among those with preference for a curve motif. 90. 'til ..' 4 DESIGN'' ' ' SIZE OF Â·1 MATCHING HEIGHT OF Â· .END, CORNER'A NUMBER PICKETS - 5 'h, GATES ~ FENCE WHEN SET \ L .0 GATE POSTS 1-R 3/8"Rd. No. 2 Single-No. 11 Double 397"-42"-48'7 , I ' No. 2 2-R 42" Rd. No. 2 Single-No. 11 Double 37"-42"- 8" No. 2 Â£1 4 7e-= ez_ s, 2 6< 4 D ' H. a,4 flu- Ar- an vf- 4 7 G C /60 - 4 Ul . 4-6 5,2 1 1 -' iiI -.. - ..1 .... 6 4 lift Â· = 11 1 1* 3 4: * 4 , --V , 4 ,; tf ir .Â· p s -Â· 9 - 3 - 3: 2 : 1% : . r' :. b -1 tiM .'d . 4 1 133 g '3 -f ; 2- P ~ N k . o?b miÂ·. 0- 2 -1.1 f j 4 3 1 .. . }1Â·Y'0~-_123*zy'ls .1 /0.~:*r-, ;, 9:.1 A. 5 .0 k;, 1," ..., D #'. * 5 \,1 9,1 392. FL,_ . al,7 Tte-..1 .... Ill- .- 7.. --7.-- -- -- I , ... ==. 1 4 - a ' - -, Â·,Â· (22> 9-:h'. Design':Nos.'9-R and Â·10-R,-k,#3*.'r,1 13 8:-11 13 ~Â·1, .0.1 t~\49.Â·Â·.- Â·V , \.7/ /Combines the safety 0/ the type of fence shown above with the brnamental'note of the center picket and picket tolitstyJe "K". IL S.â€¢cl /4#4 / DESIGNÂ·".'.'C' SIA OF- ~ MATCHING HEIGHT OF C \1 . , END, CORNERJAND ~ NUMBER , DrCKETS ) GATES FENCE WHEN SEP-14' Â·' Â·~j. ~(.; GATE ' PO,HS r I / 00 I .C} - 'f. - 7 9-~a. 42*,Â· .-39' Rd No. 2 Single-No.' 11 Double 371#%4Ft~A, -'-,4 No. 2 10-R 14" Rd. Â·'.'t -'g No. 2 Single-No. 11 Double 37"142'1-48" -1. 1% .Â· 1,al>0% 42,1 No. 242 Ub' -3- *.1 p o'Y 1 1 (oo _ py''*' -/a &Â¢42 . M %/ ./ I. i tiav 1 ; 9 :C' D. A.- . ? re. I .0 3 Ue . TJ 4 1, prt<<~~~ / 1 .1 1,Â¢.0 4 1 r 2. CL 4 l lo L-LJ . 1--~U- A-,CL ~~1Â» , -4 f - 3/3 ff )- 30 f 4 6. 97/6 4-2 3/4.8 U , 4. tr . 0 0 , \ Str ,~ .L -Il.,%,fi Â«: Alley Block 15 1 1 / rreP' * f.89 \ P le>le' rroper~ Line 1/61 16 0. I. <El: :0 0 0% .0 Â· '' tpo Â°d Â·Vi aol- \ 3 000 0 , Q ... 1 / 04 , Grav"el:Parking â€¢ 4 \ 14 :. ./ 4-&06 - 12 0 ./0 Proposed Ever '#.. 41,9. I â€¢9 .0. .01 2-~ LIght Well .11 1Â· Dn Light Well 1 Proposed Perenn / Proposed Addition 4 1 . ... X! Ill '7'j!ill'llk 1 0.~11(i !.t 'h--4 ' it~ Wood Deck j 0 i ' Residence 40)A -' - 1 - O 1-~Â·r~~ KE7tb 4 6 Â© Â·Â·r=r Existing ,- . 67 vul/' Open Lawn 9 4.C.,ajp 1 U -) . - 0 r.- h . O I.9 - ... I.--- 5 Â»14.-ft 1 /9 .Â£, \N? 1 0 0 9. i 1 e.. -0- Ptld \ co 3Â°b I I o - 7. o <b rv> 1.6 I .N> K %2:: s 0 41 '96 1 . 1 0 t)~) . , 0 ..4 4 4 d= 26 A 0. O = ey r.nâ€¢ Fc ~,r) - 4 0,0,4 0 60 Â¢72. An 0 9.0 . 26- Or//1.--r,L- 4 . G r.*4 . MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Aspen Historic Trust/Pioneer Park fence Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Minor Development approval for construction of an ornamental iron fence between the public park and private land on the Pioneer Park estate. APPLICANT: Aspen Historic Trust, represented by the City of Aspen. LOCATION: 442 W. Bleeker Street, Lots K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R and S and portions of Lots A,B and C, Block 36, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The fence is to lie between lots Q and R. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplements provided by the applicant. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: The HPC gave Final Significant Development approval to this parcel on 12/09/92. A portion of this parcel has been designated an Aspen Landmark and the designation process for the remainder of the parcel, including those lots affected by the proposed fence is underway. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: With Landmark designation for lots Q,R and S pending, all four Design Review Standards must be met for the HPC to grant approval. Please find attached a site plan and elevation of the proposed iron fence. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: An historic iron fence runs along the perimeter of this property. The proposed custom made fence is meant to reflect the style, rhythm, materials and craftsmanship of the original fence, but is less ornate. The height of the new fence is dictated by the wishes of the owners of 442 W. Bleeker. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The large park-like grounds of this estate define the character of this portion of the West End. While the fence divides the estate, it is not a solid wall and will not have an overwhelming visual impact on the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Installation of this fence is a necessary result of the plan to preserve this intact estate, an Aspen Landmark of great significance to this community. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed fence is removable, does not attach to the historic structure and will cause very minimal damage where it meets the historic fence. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: hp.trustfence 1 IAND USE APPIICATION 132â„¢ 1) Project Name jet ov< eâ€¢v V.,A-Â·,/ 04Â«~aA/44.~s\~~ r I c./.--Fv-usb- Project Incation 42\-2-- 9-1 . 93:\-2.Â£le'v- 2 1 .D *16 L , L.- i t-1 , h-1 1 0 7, A , 12-, s .Â»nA po,4100& of la-\-5. 4,81 *(G .E\04.~Â·Â·~2&62 (indibate *tndet address, tot & block nunber, legal 'description44]ere--r- C O W ul L Aâ‚¬ O-6 appmpriate) Â»<lv a-1.1 3) Present Zoning 11 --62 4) Int size Lots 2-45 2 4030 sql G 5) Applicant's Nane, Address & Bigne # As~ev,- f--4 4--Ov L c/ -TIUS-\-- 17.0 Â· \fle, 9 ' 1-79.4- Asre*n ,, 42.3 93 lut// 6) Representative 's Name, Address & Ehone # 014-7 0.6 A~ r e +01 1 - 130 5 6) co'L'Â®e j AÂ«~762/'ll , 00 9 1 lol .1 gypd of Application {please dieck all uzt apply): .4 . CÂ©nditional Use - Oonceptual SPA Concept~l Historic Dev. Special Aeview Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Ocnceptual ED Min~r Historic Dev. . 1 Higtaric Demilition Stream Margin - - - Final ED Molmtain View Plane___ Subdixdsion Historic Desigintirn uorâ€¢ir,ninitimi zatirn- TA,et/*,p Anieiijnient . (203 Allotment Iot Â®lit/Int line - (2133 Elemption Adjust:ment 8) Descrip; ine of Existing Uses Â· (Inmher anifÂ·type of existing structures; approorim,te sq. ft; râ€¢11*er of bedroams; any previals approvals granted to the preperty). 2,%/ A C-1-1.21 1 3 1-0 -i -4,1 J ltv u al-u v en & vi U u<z:1 I I~~~j 41 62,AvÂ·oavÂ£-4 A.ng,-,0 houset 2/ ll<-Av'dhO LA/1 41,11 4 CAN-- 0â‚¬4/ 244 â‚¬/ , 41<5) vi s ~ S +1 L-1 1 0 61 - C 3 \ 3 <<J 9) Description of Developnent Application S ) 4, \+ I -2&5 59, 4 8 -6- tr.loft . 1 H< 4-0 \\ a_-\-10 ,- MG 74A a e v.%~-i.Â»~,Â·e>nÂ·ka..1 i i" O M r 211 ~ b Bt-vÂ·.j ,2-OLÂ·t.1 1 6 4-6 63 4 2 / 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attadimerit 2, Minimmi Silinission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submissian Contents I Response to Attadment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 1 Ill 11 11:'t'tâ€¢ler at - #3544O 1 02/26/93 16:17 Rec 115.00 BE 704 PG 770 Reception No. Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 Gif -8 - WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 21+A d.tof re-An.A /7 19 93 , between ARTHUR H. STROMBERG and FREDNA C. STROMBERG of the * County of PITKIN , State of Colorado, grantor, and THE CITY OF ASPEN, a Municipal 'rcorporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of COLORADO , grantee: whose legal address is 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 WITNESSETH, That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/100THS ($400,000.00) DOLLARS, the receipt and su fficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained. sold and conveyed. and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all of the real property, together with improvements. if any, situate, lying and being in the County of PITKIN and State of Colorado, described as follows: an undivided 59.26% interest in and to the real property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, also known by street and number as: a portion of 400 W. Bleeker Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises. with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances,unto the grantee, its successors and ass forever. And the grantor, fur himself, his heirs and personal representatives, does covenant. grant. bargain and agree to and with the grantee,its succe. 4, and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents. he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfe < absolute and indefeasible estateof inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right. full powerand law ful authority to grant, bargain, se!1 and convey 2 +D the same in mannerand form asaforesaid, and that the sameare free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, ul 6 9-I encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except for and subject to the Exceptions to u. CE W Title described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. O U. *% 2 U 8 ~ i~. Thegranlorshalland will WARRANT ANDFOREVERDEFENDtheabove-bargained premises inthe quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, I,] 0 -Its successors and assigns. againstall andeverypersonorpersonslawfullyclaimingthe wholeorany part thereof. 4 Thesingularnumbershallincludetheplural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to /11 genders. -~ 2NlyITNESS WHERW(k, The grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above, 4/ A ALL *-1/YUAAL, / 4Â« C&%A,E W..,10.3 0.. 4tlkoÂ·,*00!~~h.9 t:-B ARTHUR H. SoR@?Â·*ERG d/ FREDNA C. STROMBERG Z [17 4 Al k 2 E LU AB#I O [1, f >46.4 C STATE OF COLORADO, 1 SS E-1 04 - County of PITKIN }-1 E [4 0 O 81 6-Inf X Kn- . Bq Â¤ 7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2.5- 473 daysi 74 -h' L-, 19 93 by Arthur H. Stomberg and Fredna C. Stromberg. My commission expires 2-0'~Â· t.,1 94 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Cle.........FC. ./ 1413,- / 4 2. . e L A- - <00'ary Public . t 1 : 1 *1 f in Denver, insert "City and." O h . . L %'*.......... . I â€¢"Illt No. 952. Rev. 3-85. WARRANTY DEED (to Col~br*~(~~/nt,Photographic Record 3-37 14% 1.-, Bradford Publishing. 5825 W. 6{h Ave.. Lakewood. CO 802,4 - (303) 233-6900 1Â·11 t 'L ~ 3361 1 (1.12, ~3 #354401 02/26/93 16:17 Rec $15.00 BK 704 PG 771 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, SECOND AMENDED WEAVER SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded on Te bruct ru A., 1993 in Plat Book *3 at page 42 under Reception No. 3%4- 35?F , also known as and being more fully described as follows: LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 36, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO #354401 02/26/93 16:17 Rec 1,1.5.00 BE 704 PG 772 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 EXHIBIT "B" EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE 1. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 549 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 2. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions, assessments and all matters as set forth in covenants recorded in Book 420 at Page 443. 3. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for Pioneer Park Condominiums recorded in Book 420 at Page 445 and Amendment thereto recorded October 16, 1992 in Book 691 at page 600. 4. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded August 24, 1987 in Plat Book 20 at Page 1 and on Plat of Pioneer Park Condominiums recorded January 28, 1986 in Plat Book 15 at Page 57. 5. Terms, conditions, reservations, restrictions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for Amended Weaver Subdivision recorded in Book 544 at Page 408. 6. Terms, conditions, restrictions, reservations, provisions and obligations as set forth in Ordinance No. 7, according to Section 24-9-7 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen for Designation of Historic Structures for The City of Aspen, recorded March 24, 1982 in Book 423 at Page 985. 7. Terms, conditions, restrictions, reservations, provisions and obligations as set forth in Encroachment Agreement recorded October 16, 1992 in Book 691 at Page 604. , 8. Reservations, provisions and other matters as set forth in Quit Claim Deed recorded October 16, 1992 in Book 691 at Page 608. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded January 11, 1993 in Book 700 at Page 170 as Resolution No. 92-227. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded TEbruerq 24 1993 in Book 709 at Page ~*5~. Park 19 7; 13 44Â· ./ 4 \. i %* */--------- 9 LT:C' m V- 0. 5 -1 (h 6/04 k 1 th --- - *4/*9 /a Ot) C 06 "4. 1 6 H.,r,Â¢.r 4 1 2-5 4%'/ b 1%t 9,11 1 / %1i "ele . Tent 1 I / Â«064. 6 ~4 94 A G#06*::~ i L 6$ K ' 1 4* i 6 1444* 1 Ric# St Smuggler *trt Rd Aspen A Â£ cfÂ¢VJ ./ St 4 n i y. Â¥ 2/ .4 R * t '14 4 4 4 " Ck-*m ' Râ€¢9â€¢.te, A Hoet>lial 1%, 0 I f.1.1 , 8, B 4. 0 4 00 :Z hi 6 3<Art~ St t 4 ..pa ANâ€¢(0 W.st-, 1 15 1 + Cn. Ad 9 9 -h â€¢t un,1 \691-21-- 46.-13-9 010 (7201 0 -2-1 tog --- -t9339 ---319-99979- run-q~~~ --. - --f.- -Al M - --I- I--h 2$=f-LIC-I-'1 221:-/-72 -2-3--*Â·--17==2L==~/litrQUÂ·Â·.Â·..â„¢ M .**1..---L-- ---#-v--- -~ - t --, .. -TlÂ·-Fr~- " Sin=zulu---lu- 4 171 7. 0, fqi U 1 1 1 '.4 -39%'4313 ! 1 â‚¬29 4 ri 023(\ 3 Ma N_/1 1-3â€¢HAFaa . u , 1 E ; i j 0 : 9. '' ; ~ '--29(10+3 1 1 A . i 1 Â©Twist>ea l 1 U. ' 4 1 1 i 1 1 1,1 i | 1 zi, 1 B - 1 1-- 1 1 L-- l -U i a VI j '11 HPC members, An elevation of the proposed iron fence will be delivered to you prior to the meeting of May 26. I would like to recheck the measurements I took of the historic fence. Amy Amidon ~~00'' A FÂ·43@ &44-2 741Â¥M ASPEN Â· PITKIN PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT May 21, 1993 To Whom It May Concern, We authorize the City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, Coloradb, 81611> (303) 920-5199, owners of a portion of 400 W. Bleeker. Street, Lots R and S, Block 36, Townsite of Aspen to represent our interests in the Minor Historic Development of the above mentioned property. Sincerely, fl 4-- 21461;s;z The Aspen Historic Trust P.O. Box 1754 Aspen, Colorado 81612 130 SOUTIi GALENA STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· PHONE 303.920.5090 Â· Fix 303.920.5197 Pruited on readed paper I t A392.id A (570#ile,' -EKL)'EFE/ P\O/qui-E--# PAULk<_ FLkkLED FFUDEDâ‚¬~84-3 6-leiv./ lâ‚¬Al L - Â·--- EM i â‚¬51 1 1~f Col * ~ \ 41.2 4 2-134.Xu - - ;, 4 1 4 4 4 6 4 42 3--4 + 4 4 A & 4 4 +L+.4 ,a 3 1 &4141 1 4 4 4/ 1 * 4 A A A ~.1 6 Al A .1 21 14 11 zl h ~ A; th A 9 4 2 :14 1 A T 1 ----- 5 , ~ i b 1 . 1 11 4244 a'lA .1 -1 24 4- 1 11 -1--9 11 1 / 1 1 J 3- 4 0 11 1 -- , , 1 7 ' 411= ~ ~ Pi , b * ~ . T- ~~. ~- / -2- 1 :9 i I \ 0,01 - - _ - --- _- 4 - \ 00, Olt -- 10 MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 700 W. Francis Street, Minor Development Review Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Minor Development approval for the installation of a fence along the south, east and west lot lines of this parcel, which is an Aspen Historic Landmark. APPLICANT: Doug and Susan McPherson. LOCATION: 700 W. Francis Street, Block 15, Lots R and S, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the attached supplements. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: HPC approved Significant Development on 04/08/92, and approved Landmarking on 12/18/91. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All four Development Review Standards must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval. Please find attached a site plan indicating the location of the proposed fence, an elevation of the proposed wood fence and the applicant's response to design criteria. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: Staff finds that the design of this fence is in keeping with the character of this Historic Landmark, and that of the surrounding parcels. The design and scale of the fence comply with the Design Guidelines. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Simple wooden fences of a similar design are found throughout the West End and Aspen. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The fence is removable, and does not adversely affect the value of this parcel as an Aspen Historic Landmark. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The fence does not attach in any way to the historic structure. At the front of the lot it is three and a half feet high with widely spaced pickets, and becomes six feet high with the pickets much closer together to the rear of the lot. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: hp.70Ow.f. 7\TlyÂ£1IMENr 1 Â· X . IAND USE APPIICATION FORY 1) Project Name SADOO E)(ldfiC .0{C-16~62-IAN project Incation 900 to . GZAN Cl G 94 Â· BLOCK (9 6-6 +9 9* S ASPEN / UC) 9( 6(I (indicate street address, lot & block mmber, legal description Wiere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning E- (0 4) Iot Size 6000 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Bione # [>006 + 909143 &1(FtiG,Â¢223-N PÂ© 4 (309 44 FL Â£696,4 63 999/170 6) Representative' s Name, Address & Fhone # lypd of Application (please dieck all that quply): - . 4 Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA conoeptnal Hi =toria Dev. Final Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA >~ ~[inar Hi c:tacic Dev. FE kKE 8040 Greenline angeptual FIJI) - . Hi=toric Dawlition Stream Margin Â· Â· Ii-I.-* Final FOD - }buntain View Plane Subdivisicn - Histacic Designation Conlominilnni-zation Ted/Map Arrherâ€¢lme,It . (298 Allotment Iot Split,/Int Iine (NOS E,oalption Adjustment Desdr;-+471 of Existing Uses Â· (Ilmber and - type of ecisting structures; approodmate sq. ft.; number of bedrocms; any previous approvals granted to the property). 54-<941 46 S(KjGLE_ FACU/ 69 9(Cte-fz-( 4-N 9) Description of Develgnent Application FE fOCE 10) Have you attached the following? Respcxise to Attadlment 2, Mininmt Su]mission Contents Response to Attadmalt 3, Specific Suhnission 00[Itents Response to Attadnnent 4, Review Standards for Yar Application 1 -1 1 1 13 0334662 07/17/91 15:33 Rec $10.00 BE 651 PG 772 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $40.38 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO - 1 I :111 E- MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO (Space above this line for recorder's use) ADMINISTRATOR WITH WILL ANNEXED'S DEED TRUST SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., as Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of MARCIA S. GROVER, also known as MARCIA S. WILLIAMS and MARCIA SHERMAN, deceased, Los Angeles County, California, Superior Court Case No. NCP 13556 G, pursuant to the full authority granted to it under .the Independent Administration of Estates Act, California Probate Code Section 10400 et seq., hereby conveys to DOUGLAS J. L. McPHERSON and SUSAN MePHERSON, without any representation, A warranty, or covenant of any kind, express or implied, all right, title, interest, and estate of the decedent at the time of death and all right, title, and interest that the estate may have subsequently acquired by operation of law or otherwise in the real property situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, legally described as follows: PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES Exhibit B DATE REP. NO. REP. - NO;5- l_:~JI- M-Â·EL LSi (Â£39 U334662 07/17/91 15:33 Rec: $10.00 Bl< 651 PG 773 1 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $40.38 LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN DATED: xiAL\/ /1 1 /99, l TRUST SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. ... /Â·103-Jt':- '41. 1 BY: ,/2Â·1 8 --1~ --ffÂ·Of ' .....Â·4': \\. Vice. President , ~ i.4-0 '47 1Â·93 .9 3 C.):a. : : te i D'Â· 1 ;1 1 I., ' t Â¥. '' 2 ,~~ . Ch Â£ O 1 1 1 5 0 0 -DÂ· 2Â· 1 4 3. BY: -6,-4 2 --,4---,u.A....:....Â·Â·.:A. AD?,istant Secretary. 1,164.0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. ~ COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) , 1991, before me, the undersigned, a On Notary Public of the State of California, personally appeared 1 #16Â£ 4 4 e--c h x~floo/-3 , Vice President of TRUST SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., and Yuki Ju 1,1/6)AGA , Assistant Secretary of TRUST SERVICES AMERICA, INC., personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that each of them executed the same in his or her authorized capacity, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -............... <1 1 Â£91Â«Â·.th OFFICIAL SEAL j *483 OSCAR F. 'MENA : NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA . / CULL- -- LOS ANGELES COUNTY , PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN . NOTARY PUBLIC -- CALIFORNIA/ i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 1, 1994 p PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES i Exhibit B 6 :- t,, Inte region 01 mullen ti,suicv â€ž *I diligently, (c) Whenever the Compouy f detente os required or permitted by Ihe provisium u. ..... , - -Â·Â·Â·. n.v liliaation to final determination b a cou,lof competen} luit,- ~screlion, eal from any age suslumt.u 20 app SCHEDULE A UNDEN NO . : 00018457 POLICY NO.: 0-9981-75554 DATE OF POLICY: July 17, 1.991 at 15:33 P.M. AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: S 403,750.00 1. NAME OF INSURED: DOUGLAS J. MCPHERSON AND SUSAN L. MCPHERSON 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: Fee Simple 3. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED 'IN: . DOUGLAS J. MCPHERSON AND SUSAN L. MCPHERSON 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF PITKIN, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lots R AND S, Block 15, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Fil Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. 602 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 303-925-3577 1 4-43147 Exhibit B 3 AUTHOIYIZED SIGNATURE 55'1'ICWART TITLE 1 fl 'I I " Â· Pall< 7 GO j #TSS<3 ,N \ 19 4\-9 0\ 1 /5 4- 39 A,ou*,0/1 â€¢1â€¢wor S \ - 1 . 4Â»*30-- 0.1-3 Z-%-Jec, Snow 43. i\ 1 . et i f - 4%4 /1 Aselt slor- 4 - \ 4 E.vE) ik )1 101 UnG// /2 \\ 2 1 tu f Tent : 82 < ~ ~ B Â·al \ i. t.n 4 m Lake 1 .Gokt Coutse ./6/ 4 â‚¬. 45 444 1 f RÂ»c, St 4 4 41, Siv-â€¢eglic Mti Rd Aspen 1 Creek Rd *. 0 "' St e n \~ Â¢ ela 4 4 Pk 65 ~ar 4~40 il Â· /,07- d ~ *Wospital ~ 4 2 V, * R.9.4, St B.E k 44 f 4 Mall 4 4 L.,1-Or Â£4 . : 2 67 6 9 0 -/4 /4 / W.*VI.. 1 4 ~Â£* 1 \1- 1 44, Ad F h 1 i 1 qi 9/ 2 -tterJ 1, -_ ~ 1-*145Â«ff....1 . - f...1 . p: 44 4, ' . ~.4 ' 4,i .- 6 r.4:3 Â· E. ZONING REQUIREMENTS: Lot Size: 6,000 Square Feet Existing F.A.R.: 1,870 Square Feet Existing Outbuilding F.A.R.: 427 Square Feet Maximum Allowable F.A.R.: 3,240 Square Feet Proposed Total F.A.R.: 3,235 Square Feet Allowable Site Coverage: 40% or 2,400 Square Feet Proposed Site Coverage: 2,395 Square Feet Required Parking: 3 Spaces Proposed Parking: 3 Spaces Maximum Height-Main Building: 25' (At Median Pitch) Maximum Height-Rear Building: 12' (At Median Pitch) R Proposed Height-Main Building: 17'- 0" (At Median Height) di Proposed Height-Rear Building: 12' (At Median Height) MAIN HOUSE: Front Yard Setback Requirement: 101- 0" Proposed Front Yard Setback: 13'- 6" Rear Yard Setback Requirement: 10'- 0" Total Front and Rear Yard Setback: 30'- 011 Proposed Rear Yard Setback: 12'- 3" Total Front and Rear Yard Setback: 251- 9â€ž West Side Yard Setback Requirement: 5 Feet Proposed West Side Yard Setback: Varies from 2-1/2feet along garage west wall to 8'- 1" to 8'- 10" East Side Yard Setback Requirement: 5 Feet Minimum ~ (Total 15 Feet) Proposed East Side Yard Setback: Varies from 11'- 0" to 24'- 0" SHED: N Proposed Setback for Shed: p Front Yard Setback: 87'- 6" Rear Yard Setback: 6" East Yard Setback: 6 t, West Yard Setback: 39'- 6" 13 L t 0/AÂ° 9 Rec- , AA Dol.)6 + El)â‚¬,A N Mc-A-tqzÂ¢ a-nj 4 2% 1 190 20.130* 4411 4496+31 Co. 900 03, 6%9AM-ls /60094 Re .1 PENCE Fe-51- 900 (.O , FA-A~-Aj C< C Ate (0Â»j C 20 2-{ 6 f 1 BbonK 19 Le>+ Rt-S Ate(:1Â·N CO C -liAD (1- Â·Att A-CH<513 A FIC+UGa- OF 19+R LA-NS-O GCA-dll PLA-AJ 601-2_ TA-61- FRCIP(-1â‚¬3+ (11 *(444 4 06-90(2.(PT<070 06 rR+(3_ Plc_UL++ E-(Â»3 ce l lÂ»-0-0 LD Ll kE_ To (3 01 L CP , M 9 9\2â‚¬590 (Â»iD FEM Ce a>tu PL (h- 5 006Â·t- l.1 TH rl RPC- Gb LO (1.Ll te ts_4) te.(RD>COJ-,Â¥u-Lp EL~i-~ 51-ate UitlcE k,u -kiz H PC '9 1_kq $\A.1*~,~4~ 0.6 Af (219 81 [ 01 q rz - @90+6 - M -ke v Che #311_1 * &Â» 4 boÂ·Â«1 ,feu_ca,g ai-~t 9,-to-ck (U-a_ feiue-Â£.a agle aD-UyÂ»--eol ie 14- ~DLA' 0-K U *a5Le-22_ . Eau_a-e-~ 423 lu- ftlyÂ» 01Â«e_ FEEL.,Â£~Q~ (h.11.EACIC. rlizi) h.(2_ 71~~~l~51Â©- ~~~ca 1-0 kalle THIE FBAic-(3- 1 PFUypo 66- 6% up,(29 %(14(061[2 To EG,tuc B C A+ 11-la FOLL,Â·OUS){ I'66> LCDCATc (3-k3% (1\5 111-6. boe-â‚¬+ 0Â«0 lÂ· 6+ALLPTZ-O 616) C)4,6. 04.866 UMAL 2 - LEE Men) SE 1 3 4 HALL A-tu\ 3 96 Ll--0-Lu 13 Ble_EL ScliDO L (11 Pve--13 4. PA D-(2 KE Pl,efruz-4 9 A-+ 136,Eek-6062 + luej-k.57Â¥62 at 6- Pufh-,ut bluu-GE - A ~lk_) Co-6143 CURÂ· 27 L (9-5-Ulll *= CU.6-kyAi2 C M oUQU 8? -AN-Ru20~0 18.7 1 1 45 1 . 5% d , 712+1 r'r,D ~,616 't r %2 bb-5 - 4 11 5 0/ 11 j -Â£_ /. Â· Vii 16,11 pg'-Irl I, 1. i ,- 113 ~Cli.J.JEL/1 - U 6 0- 7.- 1 1 .- - -c . ...4 F. - \ -~--'t-1 /7 Le--4 i 1 %_221_1/ lu 1 1* Ce, . \ ~'L/â‚¬-M17 -467 4-*JITI--7.:Ti,B - -'r~ ELOCI-la 3*_ -/ 6 |/b - 1 LE. i r- l,v L 1 C, - â€¢INT'-1 01 1/1-3 I F I.- 4,> ' I-o':4 4 ~ ..J f r 4, 48 --1 , Iffl] f /1 3*4 1 0- L L Ilf all,H-, 1 4 1 -1 0- \*0 4 4, ,$7Â¥}94 F/0-1-Â·le/1 Â«+10/,Â·rahlf I \9'J)/76- 1110/140 41â‚¬12-1-18 - i #veqw< 3\31 0% g 922 6 T> K 7 C-* f EllÂ· _ _ cr.- 1 1 , / Un Â· -- - - 9.- - -- 0 L- 6 i / ' - gr-TIT- t=Ul Fy 1-r fill FFÂ·:r rÂ· ~ 6-1, lifirivi o w -- 0 / wv / // L., 6 0 0 .& d 10'l/2â‚¬3-~~ rf 1 2 *t 4 9,-1 y FU+VE &44 r,ro Â£Â·Â£--41Â£ 4lptalÂ·Â·P-l,f , ----R-0941 '5/*-1-16'Ir/'NG. Â¢f t r.j ,â€žN D 2 1 .. t--70% loT I hi Â£>. Lect-TION "F rE Ne- F. To , 4 H h~ 'r-lt 121 Â· , F , . , Ferv- 1 N I 111 J.U , 1 6 A-+Ed'' i. i.>1-LL 42'/11{(41666]LE 42.4 IIIGH FEL)(12 439.-GA+13 16, Be cot<,9112 (30â‚¬CUD ~ 1 oF 11 . A luh F(CKS_+4 5 1-2- Obt - f 01--05 1 1,2,3-514. ; 3 J , c-*Â«-Ort~ , 700 lo FRA-har' le cit '\Ac Ptl E 'ficwd REâ‚¬ *263 C E 8-00â‚¬ cr- pavE,ut-Nl- k A 4 THE U HI 69# FRAJCCE (13(L L. 136 -1 'llte- f,APE ONLY THE Of'ACE Â· 124 3 GEL)(-â‚¬ 1 : p[ Ct< el â‚¬ 51%U BalÂ·loe[3 63 1-1-ie FICK(31-+S ciin It 1 1, '41 11 1 1 1.. 1 1 ' 1,3(LL (32 24Â£ JI ' - -n MAY 1 2 ~ ~1 GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOCIATES, INC. /'~~~,~~,~ ARCHITECTUREÂ·INTERIOR DESIGNÂ·PLANNING May 12, 1993 Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 120 Francis Street Dear Amy: The relocation of the existing victorian residence located at 120 Francis Street necessitated the demolition of an additional 100 square feet. This area of the house was an addition located on the west side of the existing victorian. It was not part of the original structure and was probably built in the 1970's. This is evidenced by the fact that the ceiling in the addition is three feet lower than the original ten foot ceiling. On the exterior, the roof of the addition was built to fit under the existing eave and the windows are of a contemporary design. The foundation under this addition was constructed of bricks laid in sand and the joists bearing on sand, were beginning to rot. There is no question that this was not part of the original house. It has been, and is our intention, to maintain this addition on the building. Unfortunately, the contractor, acting on his own behalf, determined that this structure could not withstand being moved with the rest of the house. For the reasons listed above, he demolished the building based on the existing conditions and limitations of the addition, without my approval or the approval of the owner. For the record, the following calculations are submitted on our building permit for the total amount of demolition on the property (the change from our original permit is 100 square feet additional demolition): 201 N. MILL, STE. 207 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TEL: 303/925-4502 Â· FAX: 303/925-7490 Amy Amidon May 12, 1993 Page 2 Existing F.A.R. Main Level 2318 Sq. Ft. Upper Level 709 Sq. Ft. Garage 716 Sq. Ft. Total 3743 Sq. Ft. Demolition: Main Level 1027 Sq. Ft. Upper Level 709 Sq. Ft. w/ Projection 100 Sq. Ft. Total 1836 Sq. Ft. Total % of Demolition: 49% We have posted a $100,000.00 bond with the City of Aspen, in addition to documented photographs and drawings of this addition. It is our intention to reconstruct the addition as represented on the plans. Sincerely, 9 4 1 1 /3,1 J u 1 \UlluN. LA-11(k----> Gpatchen Gree*w#od Architect 6/ GTG:kb SENTUY: 11-10-93 ; 9:30 ;CRL ASSOCIATES, INC. -3039205197 ;# 1/ 2 m Associates, Inc. Consultants, Researchers and Inbbyists FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET Office: (303) 592-5451 Fax: (3031 592-5460 DATE: November 10, 1993 TIME: 9:30 A. M. TO: Aspen City Clerk's Office PROM: Craig Goudy, Cellular One NUMBER OF PAGES 2 INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL SHEET COMMENTS Please call (303)592-5450 if this transmittal is not clear. 1625 Broadway Suite 2450 Denver, CO 80202 '|R|L SENT VY: 11-10-93 ; 9:30 ;CRL ASSOCIATES, INC.-â€¢3039205197 ;# 2/ 2 1001 16th Street, Sui,c C.1 Dcnver, Colorado 80265 Tel: 303.973-3060 November 10, 1993 CELLULARONE' City of Aspen IMAGINE NO LIMJTS~ City Clerk's Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Kathy Dear Kathy: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to make a presentation to the recipient of our Cellular For The Community Program at your City Council meeting scheduled on December 6, 1993 at 5:00 P. M. The Cellular For The Community Program, now in its second year, is an integral part of Cellular One' s expanding public safety programs in Colorado. The program exemplifies how critical a communications tool like cellular is for alerting police, fire and rescue personnel of emergency situations. This program allows non-profit organizations in Colorado to request free use of cellular phones and unlimited local airtime for a two-year period as a communications tool to increase the effectiveness Of their community programs. Examples of participating organizations include neighborhood crime watch groups, victim's assistance programs and anti-domestic violence programs. This year's recipient in your community is Response. As you are aware, this program provides crisis intervention to victims of violent crime twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Cellular One's service Will be used by on-call victim advocates to communicate with other advocates, officers on the scene, dispatchers or to coordinate any other services needed. Once again, thank you for allowing us to heighten the awareness of our program by presenting our award to your City Council and members of your community. sinc9ly, f) A . A -CErpora e ~omm~tications