The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19921209 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE December 9, 1992 REGULAR MEETING SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM CITY HALL 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of November 11th and Nov. 25, 1992 minutes. II. Committee and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. OLD BUSINESS A. None V. NEW BUSINESS A. Design Referrals: Airlocks 1) 308 S. Hunter- Silver City Grill 2) 609 E. Cooper - Poppycocks B. Minor Development - Pioneer Park O 30 5 -6 1\AA, b - N, Â¥2-\AVA<~ lE.l,Â·Â·,Â»-e rE-, VI. COMMUNICATIONS A. Christmas Party reminder - 360 Lake Ave. B. Project Monitoring Sub-Committee reports 6:00 VII. ADJOURN 918 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer ~[L_ Re: Design referral: Airlocks for Silver City Grill and Poppycocks Date: December 9, 1992 SUMMARY: Recently, the Planning and Zoning Office has received numerous requests for temporary airlocks projecting from the front entrance to restaurants. Our code lacks specific language dealing with these (i.e. their temporary nature and enforcement, expansion of FAR, encroachment into required open space, circulation problems, etc.) Therefore, in an effort to be consistent with all applications, the Planning Director has initiated a new policy, which involves the HPC playing a referral role in design review for all airlocks located outside historic districts (and not involving a landmark). The purpose of the temporary airlocks, which are usually canvas and plastic, is to provide a wind shield which is proposed to cut down on heat loss. Staff's position has been and remains as follows: air locks are most efficient if designed within the commercial space and should be an integral part of the overall interior program. Exterior airlocks should only be approved when deemed necessary from an energy efficiency standpoint, and when the design is compatible with the community character. The two referral requests attached are located outside the historic districts, and do not involve a historic resource. You are asked to review them using your normal design standards, however, your comments are referral only, and are not binding. Staff asks that any approved airlock design provide a substantial energy savings, and be confined to the immediate entry door, i.e. Pour La France and Main Street Bakery. The Planning Office will require every temporary airlock be taken down no later than April 15, and installed no earlier than October 15. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC provide referral comments to the Planning Office regarding the design of the two airlocks proposed. Additional comments: memo.hpc.airlocks --2122-21:221-11111Â£-M-1ZZZL'V- - j~ 3 rt, + L~ 530 E. Bleeker Street Aspen. Colo 81611 303-920-1111 -37 " A-- 1 - 47? Â» ./.- J (Â»4 48060 < u ~11>5Lt 7f 4 6%, 64Mrw 6,// f 1 * 4 4 < d ff 1 75- i 11 37 k 1 / 0 6-(AU d. S GO fl 1 4 4 4 2 , c. 21 .. 4 31 18% i. 1 V 1; 1 ID 1 139 1 6 . i 1 94 AL-C-4-46/9.~ 1 1 1 i i Iii ' -- 1 : 1 1 Â£ i i -11 1 1 1, 1 0 9 7/ - Juy i 0-> r i i i 3 1 1 3; 1 43 1 1 1 1 1 Â· , /04" : 21 1.1-1 6 1 i; 11 i .1 1 / ! 1 i ' . 1 , I 11 i 0 1 . Ill Â·Â· ' 1 5-f- c : 1 1, 11 1 1 1 ' f . 1 : 1 '1 1 1 /~ 4 â€¢ i 1 1 1 111 1, 1 Y 4 1 ' J 9%% ...3â‚¬i>FEÂ©-9:...2 i . -..:- . r 1 i , r 1 1 , -13 < 41 1 -4 1 .I r*ap./.-aij . 1 1 tfll 'Ill 6 4 .- rh- fi RI 62*72/,TA'ir '' Â· *7" Aâ€¢'A .MAA- f 1 . fezi>f.,62,4- 1 11 1 -*t- P J liÂ·31 1: ' 2%Mo,9,4 -Â·*+99Â·~*t -I -7-Truit i ~j - +1. 9, 2 .2 Â·Â·Â·Â·/ tif~ f 1 - **i-Â·' ~' 'Â·r.9..rt,1 ; I Â· . 5-402--=7 - -- 03-/MID~ - .~ ,- ~ =1<431 -- 6-1, 1 - .2 -66% I. - 11 4 . - -4, 1 21 1 1 ' 4 ~1 - 44 .- Â·1 - 1-3- 7pl , 6.1 i li :.1 1/ ' .:- ... p . }Â«LE-Ell=2% , 961 Illi~ c . 4.L=-r . -__1 2.-,1 3 -*7-litÂ·14 E- U 46 '.-4.3 -2-2-70- r .3-,~J,lic ~~*ff~ ,-/v 4--4 .....1.46:.4 , ..3. J .' _jjk.*Mffy. 7 1 Â· - 9. i 0/ ~ ' ~' vi,'r Â·~~. .~. ~ ~: .â€ž. 1 6 1 .: -tij -134 r, 1 ~ L 4 + - 1 I -4--t - L -, , p-id.' 1.Zf 1. .-, ~-I 4-17.14--h' ' --- - - 1 ' 1 1 --) 1 - 1 1-1 ' + . 1 11 1 1-2 -/ 1 - - ,-. Gir] uf 2- - -* - 3-4-- 6 / a V G#R -1- -+1,F y 1 2 - ID . . '-4 4 + 4. tr '6" i - u_ 611 .7-1 1.1 1,-1 1- , J 11 1 1 14,4 1-- 1 -1 ,-. -4 ...1. 4.1 4-i 1-1.-4.---1. ---RU--4 --4-~- I-------1-1-1-2-1 b y -el-140j* 4 1 Â· Clear i p*~12 - ---- L 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ; 1 1 11 ! ,1 -1-Itt 11 . 1 1 1 1 -1 1 , 1 3 ---- - T.J . 1 1 . . . 0 + 0 0 * de#A- l#whC- 4*p w, A--Â· l+FA- s,/t"d-- - I 3 feÂ£Â·a "Atar od- 15{(A j A y Â»-4 01 -0-el- cyâ„¢-t'0~ ~'~~ ~Ii i 1 .-Â· ' ' I U-7-. N LU 0 -_i--- 1. ]-i~ft+Alljl--f-1-] _|- i__i_' 22--trt-Ltit---~ -blit- W . *Â·Tr-V I I - I-'~.W. 1. 11 1 11' 1 1 111111 i--1-1 ,-, --99-i 1]14-! L':i ij -1-12-2-43__]-24_-_41-4-1-2- 6--- , lilli!~111~11111111 11 1 --4-7 lilli 1 111111';~ + Â¢1 1 34 41121 -'. [Â·~_ir_11_~~ + 1 - ~ - Ve-021/O B 51-rat#W- ld* ,AÂ® st~UUbd ~_*hÂ£ -4-2--i#42/t 12_14.4 - ' ~i , ' ~ ~ ~:~ ~'', 11 1 i ~-t-1~21.12.-~-U-U]~! 1~-1 ~ "l-+-1--filt--7-flf -i ._F- -i- 3--r --1--~-1 . i~~~~~~~~i'~11~ ~~~1~li~~~ 1- 11 1 1 13 13 -1-/1-i.-1. E 1. I-t ---1 1'~1~,1-!Â·3-, 1 1111 Regarding Silver City Bar & Grill 1) Letter of consent is coming from owner of building 2) Building presently has a sign on it that will be coming down and the awning will have Silver City Bar & Grille on the valance of the awning. The signage will be glued down first and then sewn on. 3) Dimensions of the lettering will be 6" and white in color. The style is PIÂ®but 4) The awning will be made of Sunbrella Fabric which is 100% acrylic. Enclosed is a sample of the fabric. This is the same fabric that was used on Mill Street Plaza. 5) The awning will be made of 3/4" round steel tube. It is the style as per drawing. The bottom wall suppoits have an eye end that is connected to a camel back hinge that allows it to pull up or collapse if the pin is taken out. See attached sheet with picture of eye end and camel back hinge. 6) Building frontage: 23' Lot frontage: at street - 49' / on alley - 75' Dimensions of other signs: Bahn Thai - 7' x 8" L.A. Salon - 2.5' x 6" Studio Who - 3' x 6" - - En[WN.,71.Jae.Al, i*34:*ff. Eye End - \ li Camel Back---=b This is the arm system that will be used on the awnings for The eye end attaches to the support bars and the camel back is attached to the wall. There is plenty of play in the eye end where it comes together with the camel back so that the bars can be lifted up very easily. The pin that holds them together can also be taken out in order to collapse. It is the same type system as you see on Smuggler's. If you have any questions, please call at 232-1612. 170 9- 1-6 j MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer k Re: Minor Development: Pioneer Park, Lot 1, Weaver Subdivision (442 W. Bleeker St.), revisions to Final vested plan Date: December 9, 1992 SUMMARY: The new owner of Pioneer Park, Arthur Stromberg, is seeking HPC's approval for alterations he desires to the rear portion of the structure. He also is seeking your approval for the new privacy fence setback along the front of the (revised) Lot 1. Due to the overall reduction in square footage and the nature of the proposed alterations, staff agreed to review this as a Minor Development application, as opposed to a two-step Significant Development review. Should you approve these plans at this meeting, all previously approved plans will be superseded. The applicant should immediately seek HPC's approval for a Resolution vesting the new site specific development plans. BACKGROUND: On May 29, 1991, at a special meeting of the HPC, the (Kaplan) Final Development approval was granted, with conditions. Since that time, the property was placed back on the market, and the HPC approved revised plans from proposed purchaser Bruce C. Berger. Mr. Berger did not close on the property, leaving it available for Arthur Stromberg to purchase. Charles Cunniffe and Associates has been retained by Mr. Stromberg to represent him in this revised application. DISCUSSION: Staff finds that the revisions are generally appropriate, and meet the Development Review Standards and Guidelines. Again, as you saw in the Berger revised plan, the Strombergs are doing less to the existing landmark than the previous Kaplan plan indicated. The following areas will be altered: 1) Partial demolition and new construction of the connector addition at the rear NW corner of the main structure. 2) Partial demolition and new construction Of the rear addition (north/alley elevation), which provides for an enclosed rear stairway 3) Addition of a dormer window to match the existing one, north elevation addition 4) New wood and brick pier privacy fence, 6' high, painted, south elevation PROJECT MONITOR: Don Erdman DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: These are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Regulations. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. Response: The Planning Office supports the applicant's request, finding it to meet this standard, with the exception of the rear addition. We ask that the HPC carefully review this aspect of the design, and be prepared to discuss it in depth at this meeting. As of memo preparation, staff is uncomfortable about its impact to the overall character of the landmark, and will discuss this with the HPC at the meeting. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: We find that the proposal meet this standard. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: We find that most aspects of this plan meet this standard, with the possible exception of the impact of the rear addition to the overall integrity of this National Register structure. We reserve further comments for the meeting in order to study this proposed addition in more depth. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: We find that the connector, window changes, rear dormer and fence design do not detract from the architectural integrity, but ask that the HPC carefully review the overall mass of the proposed rear addition, and its roof connection. Our concerns are in the distinction between old and new, and the effectiveness of the rear addition design to accomplish this goal. ALTERNATIVES: Approval as proposed, approval with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit, tabling to allow additional study time for the application, or denial finding that the standards have not been met. Should this revised plan be 2 approved, the applicant should immediately submit a request for site-specific vested rights approval via HPC Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development review subject to specific conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. memo.442wb.md.stromberg 3 I. 4 AT:cACBMENT 1 IAND USE APPIJCATICN FORM 1) Project Name Â· Pioneer Rark - 2) Project location 442 W. Bleeker St., Lots K.L.M.N,0 & P. and portiong nt Lots A,B & C, Block 36. (indicate street address, lot & block n=her, legal description,here awropriate) 3) Present Zoning R-6 4) Iot Size 20,602.5 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Nâ€¢ne * Arthur Stromberg (415) 342-4190 145 Bridge Road, Hillsbourgh, California 94010 6) BEpresentative's Name, Mdress & Ihone # Kevin MacLeod/Charles Cunniffe Architects, 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, Colorado 81611. 303/925-5590 9Ypd of 4plicaticn (please dieck all that gply): 4 Conditional Use Oonceptual SPA concep~al Histaric Delr. Special Review Final SPA Final Histaric Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptial POD . X Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Â·- Final IUD Historic Demolition }buntain View Plane Subdivisicn - Histaric Desigration axilrininiinni zatir,1 TextyMap An=xlment . -- QUS Allotment Iat Split/Iat Iine Adjustment Description of Existing Uses Â· (Ilmber ard P type of existing structures; apprcocinate sq. ft; amber of bedrooms; any pmvia= approvals granted to the property). Residential use with three (3) structures including three (3) bedroom main house, two (2) bedroom carriage house and four (4) car garage. consisting of -5,614.35 sq.ft: of F.A.'R. 9) Description of Develgment Applicaticn Development will inclurlp arirlitinn nf a rnnnecting link between the rarriagp house and main residence and new stairwell at rear of residene, addition of several windows and interior remodel. 10) Have you attached the follaling? Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Ocrrtents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attadmient 4, Review Standards for Your Application 8 1 l.lilli s November 11, 1992 /1 Ms. Roxanne Eflin c/o Aspen Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street ARCHITECTURE Aspen, Colorado 81611 PLANNING Re; Pioneer Park INTERIORS 442 W. Bleeker Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Roxanne, The majority of proposed construction at 442 S. Bleeker Street will be interior renovations and remodeling. We are proposing two minor additions to the rear of the residence. One which will add approximately fifty (50 sq.ft. of F.A.R. This addition will be located under an existing roof. The second addition is a back stair which extends the rear secondary mansard, adding approximately 170 sq.ft. This addition will help clean up the rear facade that is the result of a number of additions over the years. With the existing F.A.R. presently 1316 sq.ft. over the allowed F.A.R., these additions will be facilitated by the removal of some 227 sq.ft. of existing F.A.R. The addition will reduce our site coverage from 23% to 21%. We are also requesting the addition of a dormer window on the rear secondary mansard. This additional dormer completes the strong symmetrical core of the original structure. Other items that are incorporated in this development are a privacy fence from corners of the residence set back 32' from the property line and the existing iron fence. This privacy fence will run to the west property line, turn north and return at the carriage house replacing the existing fence. A new fence will be extended to the east property line. This privacy fence will be constructed of brick piers at approximately 16' - 0" O.C. with wood slats closely spaced between the piers. The fence will be 6' - 0" above grade and will be painted and stained to be compatible with the residence, unlike the existing condition. An iron fence that will be supplied by the Historic Trust will follow the east property line between Lots P & Q. It will start low to match the existing iron fence and increase in height to match the privacy fence height. All of the fences are necessary for liability reasons as well as privacy with the pool on site and adjacent public park. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 925-5076 The plat is in the process of being amended to adjust the property line between Lots 1 & 2. This will be a planning director sign off, but the amendment was not available at the time of this application. All site information was taken from outdated surveys. A current survey will be provided as soon as it is available. In response to the review standard on attachment 4, we feel that the proposed development is compatible with the historic structure on the parcel. By extending the rear mansard, the new stair well will clean up the rear facade which has been cluttered by previous additions. The stairwell, as with most other items associated with this development, is located to the rear of the structure and will have no impact on the architectural integrity of the structure, or it's cultural value. With the adjacent park being retained the appearance of this development will change little and therefore be consistent with the neighborhood character. All in all this development will benefit the community and preserve the historic structure for years to come. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding this development application. Sincerely, Kevin MacLeod Project Manager November 2, 1992 ~ PIONEER PARK ZONING REVIEW Zone R-6 Front Yard 15 ft. minimum Rear Yard 10 ft. minimum Total 30 ft. Side Yard 15 ft minimum 50 ft. total Site Coverage 20 % F.A.R. - 4020 sq.ft. for each 100 sq.ft. over 15,000 sq.ft. of lot area. Lot Area 20,602.5 sq.ft. Allowed F.A.R. 15,000 = 4,020 5,602 = 280 ~ Total Allowed F.A.R. = 4,300 Existing F.A.R. Carriage House 1,627.25 Main House 3,457.10 Garage Less 500 ft. 414.5 Overhangs 115.5 Total Existing F.A.R. 5,614.35 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17",OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11'b<17" format. APPLICANT: Arthur Stromberg ADDRESS: 442 W. Bleeker St. ZONE DISTRICT: . R - 6 LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 20.602.5 sa.ft. EXISTING FAR: 5,614 .35 sq.ft. 4,300 sq.ft. ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSE0 FAR: ...5,608.85 sq.ft. EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commerdal): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 4,748.65 sq.ft. 23.04 % PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 4.521.15 sq.ft. 21.94 % EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: Existing 25' /Accessory BlÂ®:Existing 20' PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PAncipal Bldg.: Proposed 25 ' /Accessory Bldg: Proposed 20' PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 227.5_sq.ft. 4.05 % EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 5 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 8 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 3 SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 26 Front: 15 Front: 26 Rear: C.H.0./M.H. 211 Rear: 10 Rear: C.H.0./M.H. 17 Side: 2/M. H. 70 Side: 15 Side: C.H.2 /M. H. 70 Combined Front/Rear: 47 Combined Frl/Rr: Rn Combined FronURear: 4 3 EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ Carriage house and garage non-conforming to ENCROACHMENTS: setbacks. VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibility findirla must be made bv HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrtlRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of November 11, 1992 Meeting was called to order by chairman Bill Poss with Don Erdman, Linda Smisek, Les Holst, Martha Madsen and Roger Moyer present. Absent were Joe Krabacher, Jake Vickery and Karen Day. STAFF AND COMMITTEE COMMENTS Roxanne: We have a threatened resource 332 W. Smuggler that is not on the inventory. It is a two story log cabin post war camp hale. Jean Siegel called and said it was available to be moved. EXTENSION OF PITKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE TEMPORARY ELEVATOR Roxanne: This is a two part application. The HPC approved a temporary lift that is on the west elevation of the courthouse. We gave them one year to get their financial act together so that they could do the elevator correctly on the interior. That one year deadline is past and they are asking for an extension. I am recommending an extension for another year as they have the money in reserve. Tom Newland, County Representative: We had $80,000 budgeted from this year and I am asking for another $100,000. We are half way through the budget process so it looks very good. We would like to start construction as early as January first. Roxanne: The second part of this is the relocation of the flag pole. Linda: The flag pole was put up in 1976, the Centennial of Colorado. Roxanne: Everyone remembers the flagpole being on the ground in front of the building to the left. If we cannot document that it is original or that it is not reversible I do not have a problem with it. If it is a safety issue we should at least acknowledge it and perhaps allow them to relocate it. Tom: I would like you to OK this and then I would come back with various alternatives. Out front again would work or possibly beside the Vietnam Memorial. Possibly also bringing it from the cupola to the roof. Bill: Make an application where you feel it should be located and then the Board will review it. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant a one year extension of the deadline for the temporary lift of the courthouse; second by Donnelley. All liln favor, motion carris. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of November 11, 1992 PUBLIC COMMENTS Sven Alstrom: I would like to be added to the agenda to discuss a pre-application for 531 E. Cooper. MOTION: Linda made the motion to add the pre-application for Le Chef's awning to the agenda; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. Sven: This will be an application on open space and growth management because it is an increase in net leasable area. What are the committee's feeling on fabric vs plastic. The back porch has a roof and it was suggested that we do some brick columns and infill that area with glass or plastic so you could see into the courtyard. Bill: How high is the fence? Sven: Six feet. We would construct a fence that would be compatible with the building and then an awning. It would be a sloping roof to the alley. This would be year round use and that is why we are going through growth management. Roxanne: Is this something that the Board would even consider? It is a national registered building also. Sven: My inclination is that we present it as a fence that is screening the patio. Doe the board want to see an awning or what? Don: The awning is the best way to go. Sven: The applicant will have to pay a fee to the Planning Office for an increase in net usable. Bill: You would need a design that looks like it is temporary. MOTION: Linda made the motion to adjourn; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of November 25, 1992 Meeting was called to order by chairman Bill Poss, with Don Erdman, Jake Vickery, Karen Day and Linda Smisek present. Excused were Joe Krabacher, Les Holst, Roger Moyer and Martha Madsen. MOTION: Don made the motion to approve the minutes of Oct. 21, 1992; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Don made the motion to approve the minutes of Oct. 28, 1992; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. VESTED RIGHTS RESOLUTION 316 E. HOPKINS - PUBLIC HEARING Bill Stepped down Don chaired the meeting Roxanne: The resolution is not attached so whomever makes the motion it should be revised to direct Staff to write the resolution. Don opened the public hearing, no comments from the public. MOTION: Don made the motion to direct Staff to prepare a vested rights resolution for 316 E. Hopkins; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. Don closed the public hearing. MINOR DEVELOPMENT - POUR LA FRANCE - 413 E. MAIN Roxanne: I find that the proposal meets the standards and it is a temporary airlock. A specific date should be included in the motion as to when the airlock should be removed. They originally had two recommendations, one was for a wood siding and the sides would be the same color and same wood paneling as the soffet area. I have recommended that it be all glass with wood trim. There will be a number of these applications coming in with plastic awnings and it is important that we set a good precedent. The code is really silent as to how we deal with these temporary structures. It is also an enforcement problem. Kerry Plemmons, manager: We have no intention of leaving it up during the spring or summer and will work with the board on appropriate dates for installation and removal. We would like to do a three panel bolted together so it would be like a wooden glassed framed panel. Linda: What about the maintenance when you are putting it up and taking it down. Kerry: We will probably have to paint it every year due to the attachments etc. Don: I do not feel a roof material is necessary and that it should be transparent just as the sides are. The awning will be staying up and the entire thing could be a transparent envelope. I would suggest plexiglass as opposed to exolite which is a poly carbonate that is a plastic that has two surfaces with webs between. It is used for skylights etc. and has insulating qualities. They do not need the insulation. MOTION: Jake made the motion that the HPC grant minor development approval for the temporary airlock, flatroof and suitable transparent material with wood trim to match the building at 413 E. Main St. This must be fully reversible and utilized only during the winter months for energy efficiency. To be removed by April 15 and not up before October 15th; second by Don. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Don made the motion to adjourn; second by Bill. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk FO U F-T+P SEYÂ»T N *4' 95 41" B 4-F- r, 0â€¢~50'41' 0- 1,0. 67' -r--11 3001 Â¥ 7 0 N - Fl q 1-4 . O r- 12 4 fi f Â·2 ? R 1-4--- t f -k - li f 12 4 121Â£='*9'83 30-01 -- - -- 4 --1 1 i 1 /Â« 0 . -4 9: 9. 1 t- 1 1 .1 . 4 1 1 - %3 E 3 1 8 1 -1 +12 -- -2. 9 0 . U , 11 5 1 9 NW IUM "Â»ce. t.-, ~ C 4 Ra' I lu , 1-- 1- 1 -G 1 9 J - 0 , 4 1 . 10- 'i 6- â‚¬ tz 3 ?1 O--, e . 0 d . 9- i 6 WÂ£01'Fr k# 10..01 r . I - 1 -n 1KoN r.=,c. . 1 â‚¬----n.....~--- 1 , 11--% ..~12 G-6 *1 Nf T ..1/ 8/ 2 LD CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS i PIONEER PARK 8 f BLEEKER STREET PO BOX 3534, ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 - ASPEN. COLORADO 1 0-416 -2 4,-$*14 ff- ---'-- /O 13>45 ON 133-S 31VO AEVISION .--1. til r- 3l f.--- - 1- j 1 8 -E -1 - -- 21 96 ar: 19 Ed' fN&A ./---/\ f 7.1 1 2- -.1 11 \/- ~4 -2 - TE 1 It- 11 1 1 Z 141 \ +1 91 4=1 " 1 7 1--1, - |- 1- - - 1 ' 1==44 1.-6 12 Â· R C 119 m i f i 2 72. - - 5 719 1 $ 1 F & 1 Izw , =3 0 f 1 1 24 L i 2 i L -- 11% 11 11 .1 111 T ~ : -l - 4.1 / Int,~ 1--B'grwri-- 1 -11 --1-4 1 11 md 1-- ..... ---41 '- --~|< Jlfi V 11 1 -f F< Se 1 -1 ==E== . 74 1 1 6-,- Â·8 -621& m/ 11 1 1//1 L r N i 4--r -t& 11 11 F, 4 11 1 11-4 5 u 1 4 3 ~-- 1 14& . r..7- 9 g -1 to ~ ' 1 , i 1 /1 1--11 r -r - r-- 1- 4 T L J -- - r- --Â· % 03 4 B 4 PIONEER PARK CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS BLEEKER STREET 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE SUITE 301, ASPEN CO 81611 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 ASPEN. COLORADO BOX 2863. 300 W COLORADO, TELLURIDE, CO 81435 TELEPHONE 303/728-3738 Â¥19 19,xe REVISION i -- F -EZI Â»11 BAIURQCM 1 117 1 L -2 F===11 ' 11 DOWN 1 =T-L 1 , 1 t=lf - fit 1.[11 --- U 1 1 11 - -7 1 11- . 1 11:lili 1 1 */ 1 1 P/MovE - 1-1 1 ' i Ext=T' I Fr~5=4 k li ' OCkESS 1.ki 1 1 1 -,1 1 BAI!=taQ~QA~ --r lili 1 ._ _ _ - - _ _ - _ 1Â© U q~{5 9 h=I-ili = =~1 - -r- â€ž - ' 6 -=44 It-- 1--7 1-- , -~ 1 L=z.0 091 9 11 i ll -IL U - c fe-109â‚¬ a.sâ‚¬[S BIDMOOM ' DOWN E- --1 121 1 1 1 m H o 1 1 < Ill 9 22=7/--9 , lid le--~-- Mept've 0 1 1 1 )/*g# CL B 0 . 1 3.1, - , - H 0 /0-1 121 M.93-40-/ - [ 1 --~ DEDBOQM ~ m 1 W J w i 1 alase-Â¢5 1 Il liu W J Q 11 I m 0 =- 11 1 1 4 111 REC)BQQM ---1 Il 2=J U-- Â· - 41 24- 1 11.RZE:,e e.'fI- OAAVVING 1=11 - - -- 1 1 1==If ~ 1 I. -100 NO r / NORTH DATE F> W f IF EXISTING CONDITION SHEE T NO UBEEELLEMEL S(SALE: 1/4--1â€¢-0- ALL C>â‚¬ Al Câ‚¬ SIGNS ~QÂ»*1.MEN. ANO PLANS INDâ‚¬*40 08 *-ESâ‚¬â€¢.0 0Â¥ 'â€¢ESâ‚¬ 0~,Aâ€¢râ„¢OS â€¢RE CÂ»,NED I. AND TME PROPâ‚¬*7' * C}AALÂ£5 CUNN-E & ASSOOATES ' AMCMITECT~ Aâ€¢OVE#â‚¬CAEâ€¢JECEâ€¢0*vâ‚¬CANOOEVELOPE'FOAUSEON ANO IN CO~~,I~~JOI WITIâ€¢ f â€¢E SPECIFIE' PMOJECT NONE O~ SUCI 3 IDEAS DESâ€¢GNES â€¢ARANGEâ€¢ENTS O~ PLANS Sâ€¢ALL BE USED . Oe 'SCL<SED . ANY PE'SON /1- m COAPORATOâ€¢ 0~00~ A.N. PuloosE -ATSOEVERÂ¥,IT)~UT b.E WAITTENPE-â€¢SS~NO~ C....S lilli. . ASSOOATES' AIC-/ECTS SIEET OF 1- 51131!HDUV/S31VIDOSSÂ¥ 2 3:I:IINNrD S31UVHJ ElE]NOId 8ELE-82Â£/EOE 3NOHd3131 SE148 CD '3OIN(11131 'OCJVN0101 M OOE '298 0655-566/EOE 3NOHd9131 11918 03 NjdSV '1OE 31105 3AN3AV NVINAH 15 8ELE-8ZL/EOE 3NOHJ3131 SEMB 01 '302#11131 'OC]VNO-103 /tA OOE 'E9832 ><De OC]VE!0100 -NadSV 0655-526/EOE 3NOHd3131 119!83 03 'NldSV 'IOE 31lf-IS 3nN3AV NVFVAH 1SV3 025 -LE]E]ELLS 83>{3318 S.1.33.LIHDUV/531VIDOSSV 9 333INNnD S31UVHD >18Vcl 2:1333NOId IÂ«-/- O 2=11 , I{=1 rÂ· 1 4 7/ 21 WI i f Z1 HAR B * -- U,11 - -11 IN )-14 mle 4\\4-1 01 ~ rÂ».-U --:111 71 6 [3(2--1- U U U Fl U L=-11121 C.1 L .~ 50 --ti-7]3 ~_ Elo 4- 1 -- 2 IC ' 2 1,1 - 21.1 ?II CÂ« 0--- 01 9 Im ILY )) r r m O m 1114 1 2Â¥E 5 - r' O Â· 1 1 0 4% Z r_Ep Z CU 1 1 2 . L 9 11'-.. ~ L ~ 1 4'll. 1114 ]11 11 1 4 --4\ 11.1 1 '111:lilli ..ill I 02 1 1- --l i -_1 -14 r-]P--1 j 1 1 7----4 - 0 1 2%11 1 ti *44:i:il LE] tiof l ny fÂ« 32 1*:1:,0 14:WiuM i /02/Sedz 9 **11/32/9 i'45?:3/ *biltil _ 12141:1Â§ " Ahnd Z I 01 101*1 lili lEi PIONEER PARK CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS i. 7 INN lll'N 1 011 8 BLEEKER STREET Illill'll 520 EAST 1-IYMAN AVENUE SUITE 301, ASPEN, CO BI611 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 ASPEN. COLORADO BOX 2863, 300 Vt COLORADO. TEL LURIDE, CO 81435 TELEPHONE 303/728-3738 '=2,1.li gAOkÂ·,All 17Â» IGNOO DNIJLSIX) Â¥' E.J.los ' 3..1/4 1.3 f li .i ...~ b..4 I -1-7 9 , a i /1 - 4 1 9 - 1 29 [223 -fal \ 1 6-=1 I F.1 3 - -1 - - . -I Z /*AA = IT L----- -' L~__1 1 - .>oâ‚¬*32 - / AP.FA Of= T FzEMovE WIA Ge>US P DerlouT'CH 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4-=1'-O- --1 0/1 0 7 1 4 It 65*ZE> 3 ac 1- L -3 f 1 1 1 49 == u.1 2 - '11, LU 5 1\ Z 0 1 0 6 11 U Ill' 1 1 - 1 Ill . 1 --4 . -0=-0 ------- 3 DRAWING 1 . f 11 FE.rÂ·lovâ‚¬. . râ‚¬pLAGE Doofh N PÂ·ZMOVE 57Â»1/5 1*it- JOe NO OATE EAST ELEVATION U ? F EXISTING CONDITION SHEET NO SCALE: 1/4-=1'-O-r ALLIOEAS OESION'*/ANGEMENTS'NOP~NSINO~ATE'OR REPAESENTED I Â¥â€¢ESE )41<S AME O.â€¢â„¢ED . AND THE ....EaTI OF IMAILES CUNNIFFE 8 +SOCIATES i ARCH,TEC'fl â€¢NOWEICAâ‚¬*rE[16'OLVED]ANOOEVELOP'El,001/0â‚¬ON * IN CON.;UNCT~ON WIT. TME SPECIAED PA~JECT NONâ‚¬ 0â€¢ SUCH - IDEAS OES,041 â€¢ARANGE~lâ‚¬NTSO~ ~ANS SHâ€¢Al BEUSE' 0Â¥ OAO,SC. OSED.ANIPEASON A-00~COAâ€¢C-re,FO~ANÂ¥ pulâ€¢pose w...vE' wiâ„¢ovT â„¢E vâ€¢,T-rE' PER. S.,0â€ž 0, C.â€¢ALE. C...FFE D I'....Es, I.C.,TEC. S-EET 5113.LIHDUV/S31VIDOSSV 9 3:IdINNnD S31ZJVHD r.l 1 8ELE-WAGE 3NOHd3131 SE#18 01 301801-131 'OCMIO10 AA 00â‚¬ /98E -, ..' ' L 0655-SE6/EOE BNOHdml 11918 01'NMV '10â‚¬ 31105 3nN3AV NERH 19Â¥3 *pavalo-100 'NEdE#v 1221:I-LS WEI)131318 90 0 9- m 4 m , W S.DELLIHOUV/S31Â¥DOSSV Â¥ 3=I:IINNrD S31UVHD >123Vd HE]E]NOId 1 8/6....8 ' 4-4 N m ili m It 2 4 Â· 11 3 9 6 Ili 1 1 0 1 D-~. iii 111 4 1 mill k t-? Â¥,3 JM/bGZ. j 1 4*1* 91'g i, T i -44't -Â·...vt 1 --1 Ll 1- 4 t -* 6- 1 1- 4 1- I 1 901 \ 1 , 6 - -1 6 1 1 - 3 1 1 O 67 1 1 10-01* 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 ~-k'-=~ 0 ~aj--~_~ LJI~ 1 1 1 ~7"# 72 12 + rÂ·= ' & 0 BE | I ) Al -h u I Â¢F 0 14 1 --- i I~_-1 - -- rl 1 - 1 Dll I 1 1. 4 1 6- & 1 i z 1 5 1 I / 0 eL 1 El h 1~J 13 3 1- l ff he OJ ' fi / Pri / 1 1- t.-- 1 ' 44.- F - - - - -- ------4 1 24 ~ 1-1 - . + E Â£ ~ 0 4 W td Z L 1 .4 W 4-11 ZIJ -4 A-*- _L_ L 1 0 Ip----4 1 11 - - 1 t------1 1 1 PIOLL'aaÂ¥ /YAWN - i ir,- 1 92.1 1 1 9 r 235 i 1 6 3 4 q I , L 7#---L ' 11Â£110 4 1 r-----0 -1 , 111 9:0 1 1 | L_--- -1 f 1 3W)Â¢ 4 9= 4 1 le,Q 0 Z 0 0 4-) 1 D- . 1. W 1 J > 1 . 1 w -1 1- 7 W 1 /. UJ 1 im 3 0 1 Uni --1 . -1 g 1 -- 1 1 2# 6 1. 11 . 1 RK 8, . 1, 125 -1 .. 1 '5 .. 9 -1 2-14 R ff Â·4 -~~~'- - 91-11 ~ ~ ~0 FÂ· 0 I. , ~.11114:.,â€ž~_~->1 -M;/1--zo~,â‚¬=- -'1 :3' 4 . .... .7-:4 - 1/1: 0, 2,%.40 -0:*' P.--'. . 0141....O Â£ 93-S . FE>,t 5-T.1-61 6-IALL 2~ . RE U 1--1,â€¢-LL IN, 4//4Â£4/ELL 1Â·z,1-t-ga t ; .o-. L =.P/, :aiv: ArÂ·_J ff Ro Py r k L 4 - Rl I 31 . 1, 0 P. ou m X1 < m ,4- Z / la 0 Â»1 3% ' 4 1/7 -1 i 10 r==11 rll= 7 A f / M v 3 . 1 . 1 - 19- 2 191' .- 0 4 11.-L L 2 1101- L PE r- 11 1 lu - -- 3 lt- 1 p 0, 9 2 n:4 At tr e. Im \11 1 91$1 -11 12 0 %4 tg 8 9 1 - 1 _I ;0 L_2 L CJ 0 1 , 4 - 1 1 g 1 4 9 _.,_.rit@La=ing,4 ; 1 9 PIONEER PARK CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS J 0 2 BLEEKER STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE SUITE 301, ASPEN CO 81611 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 BOX 2863. 300 W CO(.ORADO. TELLURIDE, CO 81435 TELEPHONE 303/728-3738 e>(JILDirÂ·Â·le, - ~ ca f 114 lili ------ ON 133-S A 1,1 1 1 1 Ei *o P Fl E i i f i - T 1 m 9 4m < m C lao 10 r==1 r== 0-t t A . -U * L L~L< 31 1 t - 07 ,-7-- -7 1 -: 2- i 2 7 1 J 11\ - - ri---1 . 3 L g ~CLEd' - --:dew Ar=>C>Imel_; 2 -L==4 1 9 ~ PIONEER PARK CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 0 BLEEKER STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 520 EAST HYMAN AENUE SUITE 301, ASPEN, CO 81611 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 DOX MA, 300 W COIDRADO, Trl I lJI?Inf, m DI435 Tri Ff'HONE ]OV72n-3718 =.4/ L :alv ON 1 33-S DNINAVIO - rÂ·1. VIS'UN PeÂ¢:0660 # $00'11 0,4 / KIEU W I ,-1 Q=>W 6.ecÂ».F:2~ SH I r-1 B LEJ 1 xo ~--1=41 11,11 1111/ 11 1 1111111'' lD"W-Tc-~ B~| s-IT .,>Â«oqcz--Â·r-r-)-- / C <2224 Â«Sm) 11 1 0 - /1 / - _ _f-JI<7%-% 7 OFFM LitÂ»el_ f - 11Â»3_ 7-5 - _ 171 15' -- --- r-,1 LEVEL ~ 1 t ~F '-7.-r ~ 11.11 - - lf- ' f ~Adj Â¢tz,let> - 1 %21 glsT: r'==1: N ep Â¢:eok-- VVEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4-=1'-0- , 99'0901:Â·tc> - Â»#D'TION t-1 1 ~ I Ill -- 7-1 - , a H h. / 111 . 4,-7 L'Fret LevEL ~ 42=Â«266*fA=*il52=3*= 1 I , 1, -1 ' =f - - 4 1 - 1 ---- - - -- , f i'('; i# . . Li, ,f 1 -- rÂ»10_ LeÂ·Â·st ~ DRAWING 1 C -r HEU Ct:t>Fi HIEU ,;Pic-k- JOB NO OATE S-EET A EAST ELEVATION W f cceâ€¢â€¢â€¢4â€¢râ€¢â€¢ câ€¢â€¢ALâ€¢â€¢col-â€¢,â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢0~.m,a.0..c. AL' IDEAS OESION....ANGE-NT, ANO ~LAN3 Â»OIC~TE' M SCALE: 1 /4-= 1'-O- -opâ‚¬'ll of Câ€¢AMLE3 Cu-f~E 6 ASSOCWES i AAC-TEcrs 8 IMmll I TIESE OM-â€¢GS â€¢â€¢E .*.0 - e.0 7- ANOWEIC-E. E.I.*VELOPEDâ€¢0~u. O,1 < IN copuuâ€¢CrION WITâ€¢ Twâ‚¬ SPEC#,10 -0.,ECT NONE O~ sueâ€¢ ICEAS DES'â€¢l â€¢Alâ€¢â€¢<EMEN. 0â€¢ ,LAâ€¢. 5,â€¢AL. SE ...0 04 OA 'SCLOSE' 10 AMI ./SON F-~ 004 CCI Aâ€¢.04 F001 ANÂ¥ P'JADOSE W.â€¢rSOEVER â€¢41â„¢OUT NE W.IrrEN-â€¢MISSION OF Câ€¢â€¢â€¢ALES 'UNNIF" -500/rES i.ACâ€¢liTECTS SHEET OF S1031!HOUV/glVIDOSSV Â¥ 3:I=IINNrD S31ZJVHD HEIEINOId S 2=13>1333-18 15,2 REVISION 1 //6\ 03 FJ 1 - 1 1 - Â« , <a* ==== ~*E* S? m 9/ ' - /\ 1 1 Z U ===== ED--01 -*-- \ 1 6-=1 . i El 3 -J - _ L_ i -1 - 08 2 L.L..1 - - - -- - 11 - - *t --I - 1 2 -- 22 ~ Rrk:vE Wi#rÂ»Us ~ ~ Id=Al)1 9 f M WEST ELEVATION g ew SCALE: 1 /4-=1'-0- r~392>p ml-0 - 4Â» 1 - Ill o W < - . f 11 1 ---F, , , , \4 El ~ m o 1 4 f 1 1 1 , 'ER 111 8 C z w w t]T~ 3 1 - -1 0 49--Â»Â»-fanfratr-44-Â·sc~I ~ 1- 9. 0 1 ill - --1 1 1 4 - .L -2 -- - 1 1 D 1- -7 -7---1 97~ 22 -L--T--- 2,1 1-7 DAMA/ING 1 1 - 1 T 4 -9 1 -E: 1 C Y jout kmutp[ RE.MavE â€¢ riplÂ»CE pooph FL M OVE ST>-1,40 JOS NO DATE . EAST ELEVATION U P 10 EXISTING CONDITION - SCALE: 1/4-=1â€¢-O-r AL' ioâ‚¬AS DESION' AA'INGâ‚¬6â€¢EN. AN'~LANS IC,â€¢rEDOM AEâ€¢9ESENTED . â„¢ESE De-WS AAE OWN. 0 8Â¥. A.NO â„¢â‚¬ 'AOPERTIOâ€¢ CHAILES 'UNNI'E ./.OCI.ES, A.IMITEC~ ANOWEPECAEÂ£.aeOLVEDAAOOEVELOPEOFORUSEON MÂ£ 5 INCON,JUNCAON WITH THE S*%ECT NONEOF SUCM 10â‚¬AS DE$,0.4/ AMRANGEâ€¢EN. ORPLANS SMALL SE USE' 8Â¥ O,ADISCLOSED TOINV-/SON 'CJACO~Om~nONK)RAN' â€¢vâ€¢POSE Wâ€¢â€¢TSOEVEA WITMOUT Tâ€¢E WA,T-rEN -El.1 SSION OF Câ€¢â€¢AALES CUNNIF~E A ASSOCIATES ~ AACMITECS SHEET OF 55-26/EOE 3NOH,13131 1 1918 01 'N3dSV LE-WL/EOE 3NOHd3131 SEâ€¢18 03 '3C]INnl 131 'OC]V@0103 m r.1 06SS-566/Â£0E 3NOHd3131 21918 OC]V210102) 'N3dSV 'DESE XO8 'Od OCIVUO1O3 'NEIdSV 4 -1 U laauls Ba>,3378 01 I lill I I I Â°Il r Sl)311HZ)HV/531Â¥IX)SSV Â¥ 3=I=IINNnD S3-IMVH) >11:1Vd HEIEINOId 1 .1 1 1 0 .... T -- 1 4 IN J - Wl< "4 0 V4 0 P -2 83 -0 u + Â·- Tr ...1 -T ' ~ 1 r 1 /1 /11 d Eld Y + 010 3 C-~ 3 Fit 5 1 9 ---- E 1 a . __1 0 4 -~ A 1 I 1 0 F Â£ 1 1 0~ 3 19 1 5.14-2111 11 5 u _fLUI INGÂ» Hl 3 ~ --- C_ ' nn 11 -# 1 --~E- L 1.44 1 1 4 gH 0 -- - -- 3. 03 + 1 1 --- --- -n 1, A 11 - UL - L.' "11 '11. :11 .1 :11 IL 1 3-1 111,111111.1-1 :r'111- -- -- --- Z@ 1-1 ; :111 11]l-1 i i' 1[ 1.- 14 1 + L I "03 1 lilli 1 1 1-- 0 -f J f NIJLVKGria ELEVATION 8-DINBJ 1-->Â·444 1Â£0