The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19910123(04 -ry/Â»~ AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE JANUARY 23, 1991 REGULAR MEETING FIRST FLOOR MEETING ROOM 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of December 19, 1990 and Jan. 9, 1991 minutes. II. Committee Member & Staff Comments III. Public Comment IV. OLD BUSINESS l<?Li / 5:10 A. Vested Rights Resolution/Continued Public Hearing: 801 E. Hyman 0.340 h h J 4 b < 11 ,<L 5:15 B. Minor Development/Insubstantial Modification: Lane Parcel building, 204 S. Mill St.-unn- 1 I.i il,1 0 I<1_ 5:30 C. Conceptual Development Extension: 612 W. Main St. Â£ C luk k,Â·i - /jc A- cÂ« 5:35 D. Final Development: 17 Queen St., Landmark Designation o f parcel - c \ \444 5 - & 11.17. -- V. NEW BUSINESS None 6:30 VI. WORKSESSION CALL -4 fu- A. Sportstalker revisions 83,5 -4 97 6 6:45 VII. COMMUNICATIONS WORKSESSION: Jan. 31, 3:00 - 5:00 Reviewing Interiors of State Tax Credits Lane Ittelson and James Stratis, State Historical Society WORKSHOP: Jan. 31, 7:00 - 9:00 p.m., Hotel Jerome State Rehabilitation Tax Credit Staff followup on Goals setting worksession Project Monitoring: MEADOWS 8:00 VIII.ADJOURN -IE13 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 801 E. Hyman Ave.: Approval of Vest Rights Resolution (Public Hearing) _ )'lfi /1 llC f Date: January ~, 1991 Attached is the Resolution granting Vested Rights for the Final Development approval for 801 E. Hyman Ave. The HPC approved the Final Development plans with conditions on December 12, 1990. The conditions were as follows: 1) that upon demolition {or relocation off the parcel} the parcel shall be left in a "finished" condition, 2) that the existing structures remain on the parcel as long as possible {prior to demolition}, and 3) Any changes to the Final Development plans as approved by the HPC shall be submitted for review and approval by the HPC (prior to the issuance of a building permit or change order). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC approve the Resolution granting Vested Rights for the Final Development proposal with conditions for the demolition and new construction at 801 E. Hyman Avenue. memo.hpc.801eh.reso 1 RESOLUTION NO. / (Series of 1991) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE VESTING THE SITE SPECIFIC FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH CONDITIONS FOR 801 EAST HYMAN AVENUE WHEREAS, John Elmore has submitted Final Development plans to the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee for approval of the site specific development plan and demolition at 801 East Hyman Avenue, Lots A and B, Block 111, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee finds that the Final Development proposal constitutes the site specific development plan for the property, and; WHEREAS, John Elmore has requested that the development rights for said property, as defined and approved with conditions by the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the site specific development plans, be vested pursuant to Section 6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee desires to vest development rights in the 801 East Hyman Avenue site specific development plans with conditions pursuant to Section 6- 207 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen for a period of three (3) years from the effective date hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee of the City of 0 3 Resolution No. 91- Page 2 Aspen, as a consequence of its approval of the site specific development plan, and pursuant to Section 6-207 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby vests development rights in 801 East Hyman Avenue, Lots A and B, Block 111, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, for a period of three (3) years from the effective date hereof. The following conditions to the Final Development approval are hereby made a part of this Resolution: 1) Upon demolition (or relocation of the existing structures off the parcel), the parcel shall be left in a "finished" condition 2) The existing structures shall remain on the parcel as long as possible (prior to demolition) 3) Any changes to the Final Development plans as approved by the HPC shall be submitted for review and approval (prior to the issuance of a building permit or change order) Failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Section 2 The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; except that the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of this resolution following its adoption. 2 Ll Resolution No. 91- Page 3 Section 3 Zoning that is not part of the site specific development plans approved hereby shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. Section 4 Nothing in this approval shall exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. Section 5 The establishment of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulations by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site specific development approval, the applicants shall abide by any and all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. Section 6 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or 3 Resolution No. 91- Page 4 portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 7 Nothing in this resolution shall be construed to affect any right, duty or liability under any ordinance in effect prior to the effective date of this resolution, and the same shall be continued and concluded under such prior ordinances. APPROVED by the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee at its regular meeting on January 9, 1991. BV William J. Poss, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Assistant City Clerk hpcreso.801eh 4 6 December 17, 1990 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Committee 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Roxanne, I would like to request vesting rights for the approvals given on my property located at 801 E. Hyman at your meeting last Wednesday, December 12, 1990. Please let me know if there is anything further I need to do. Thank you for assistance in this matter. Sincerely, _2-3 Elmore II PUBLIC NOTICE RE: HPC APPROVAL OF VESTED RIGHTS OF SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 801 EAST HYMAN AVENUE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 9, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider the approval of a Resolution allowing vested rights for the Final site specific development plan including demolition of existing structures at 801 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, Lots A and B, Block 111, Townsite and City of Aspen, Colorado. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on December 20, 1990 City of Aspen account pub.notice.vesting.801eh lE-B) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Minor Development/Insubstantial Modification to a previously approved plan: 204 S. Mill St., the Lane Parcel Date: January 23, 1991 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: HPC approval for the south elevation window design, and minor building material changes due to technical considerations (UBC requirements). SUMMARY and BACKGROUND: The HPC granted Final Development approval for the Lane Parcel building some time ago. A number of non-HPC related issues had to be resolved before a building permit could be applied for. The owner is now preparing to submit for a building permit, and has found that a few changes are necessary due to technical considerations related to the UBC. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The south elevation windows are being changed from casement to double hungs, a design solution which staff finds preferable to the previously approved plans. Although extremely regimented, the revised fenestration is simple and appears compatible with the historic district. (Narrow, vertical double hung windows). The other modification proposed is the elimination of the steel structural beam, replaced with brick soldier course pattern. This pattern is carried through to the window lintels. Staff finds this solution compatible to the district. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may wish to approve this proposal with conditions, to be approved of by staff and the project monitor, table action to allow the applicant additional time for restudy, or deny the proposal finding that it is does not meet the Development Review Standards for compatibility within the historic district. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development approval for the Insubstantial Modification to the previously approved plan at 204 S. Mill St., the Lane Parcel, as proposed. memo.hpc.Lane.mod 143 14 DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS Ms. Roxanne Eflin Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 Januaru 10. 1991 RE: 1-enestration Change< - Lane Bullalng. 204 South Mill Street. Asc,en. Colorado Dear Roxanne ana Members or the Historic Preservation t.... omal rte E.9 9 pt E. reprÂ· e senÂ·C- .2 1 1'Â·ves 1-- Or Mr. Marie -1 A. Baldwin. IT] . 9.Â· are requesting approval forÂ· n, 1. nci Â·r cha noes -to t'he ac:>proved des.]c n of the above ..._ rplf' prenced Fko tect. 1. Change approved easement and fixed glass fenestration to a .1. 1 o o !...l b 1. e hunci w ino O w l...1 n :Its. This change was created by Builalng Code requi'red change s to the affordable housing unit and a desire to simplifu tne design. 2. Ch,ang e approved exposed st' e e j. s p a nor-Â·eis to " E c)].aerÂ· coursed' brick. IhiÂ· . change is necess arg in or aer to fireprosf the Struccural stee.A heade'rs abcnive openings. A copy of the previously approveo ej.evations and the revisecl elevations are included with this letter. Y o u r n e 1 P i n t n i o matter ].s. grÂ· eal' ly apprecla,-ecl. Roo Dyer, A. R.A. Dger & Associates. Architects RD/dv 415 E. Hyman Avenue Suite 205 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 MEMBER SOCIETY OF AMERICAN REGISTERED ARCHITECTS 303/920-1309 FAX .'.11 ...0/1 lilli F.0 1 -1 ./.2 - â‚¬ -1-6 - r-1 - r ' j.LY r g- , ~.â‚¬ 4 M 14 09 ' A 9 1 r -1 - .,Mle-"m q --1. -- - 0 - - - Cr I 1 1 ET.-f_-1-,1-L,_t-11â‚¬~C 07 2 # ya caoad.V) - ----- - 1-9.6.-# 0 H .WIC<10,4 9+ 9-1- ./.- . -I 1 1 i l. r FÂ®11 iiiill:lili prly" j I 1 11 So ' - 1 1- r 8'.O,4 ... . P 1 1 11 caÂ·41 -Â· fu'2' L 'Â· : F : 1 ~ i i 11 1.14 i 1 1 11 ~ 1 ~:11 - 111 , tEL FI ill_i 1 14-=4 jil i ; i 1 11 '1 1 F JiLGi=Lu.1.- -- 1 ! 111 1 li L.1 '4 In - \1/'11 M Ill/' L - 1 lu~ 4444 --1 If :1 1 1 1 1-{ 1 11 1 1-1 i ~ it -11 :li Â» 111! 11 1 - =2==4 , 15 li 1 , r . 1 1,= 111; I 11 1,1 *1 -,b : 1 ~1 2 t W Ill it;1, ~ ~ ' iti ::i :th r !?1 1 7,1 ' 1,1 1 1 1 111 ~1 ~ i 111,1 111Â£fil:'11-1 1 0 21Â· 1,1 . 14,1 1 1 1.1. 11 :4 1-il' ..1 411 d .-- 1 1 . 11 - 1 ,0 If 1 11 ,.:iri / / E.fl''- ~ ' 2 8 1 f -:r 121.-P. 11 1 1 . li imli;IMill! 61.1:4Â· li jÂ· 822 11 i 1 111,1 1 . .1 .1'rl'' . I . 1 1 1 16,6 i,i ; li 6 96; i U v F 6- 1 1 /94 It 1. 1 1 1 .1 ..1/ 4 ) . 1, 1 -- , 1 1 *f ,| ff'-f--~i'111# .1 /0|31! h :. Â¢ C - ttrTIT[T --1 , ( 4 4 11 11 ~ -1 1 u lili 1 j ; b i 11 di j i J; 61 1 41, 45 t~1~ 1 1 1 i, ''f 1 . 1 3 1 ... 4_7~ I 1 1 - 1. :dj ... -I#.. 11 , 41- rd..1 -6 -4 ( -2 ,2 11 19 cra-/0-aa.&4) --- I "8 -11=114/1 31 (099033) plal_1_VAN 73 +Fl noe r--___________________-____ =- -r,-1-1 -NH r<=32 771--7 cloÂ·-twgr, 81 ---~ 1,0-1.221 1 1 -- -77 -;'#.*.~i..-- U-- 7 -P -3.-9 0 11- - --1- *--i.Ii- - -- .r. , - -- r./0.' risw, -4 rfÂ·GL,/7 ra..p Cg*' ~Ildl glt,â€¢*1 2 2,41) 191,64 -Â»arlâ€¢â‚¬72-141*9 ~. ,;111111111~1111111~1Â· c, il d:"IÂ· Ilililll|lilli|:ill ill'!111,1111~1111 1,ill' 11!lili 1111,11111;Â·111!1 11111:111!11111111111111'ill'!Â·ill'll!11,11 11'ilill' 111111'i,11.1.111~!1 11111'Ill I 11.111'.1 ill:.11~11111 â€¢Â»12 -, 1.01 f *1 1/16 ..011- 7- 4-7 - 7- 6*mod M 1M 2 'ail-/ -2-ark" 7,r:,9 21=10=,I - _ - "4 -1471 1 11 . 1 :;It I -- 4,1-' Â»g); 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 11 21-,Lal ~ 01-1 ,*-16 2'U- - ---~ ~~ 2-1 201&4779 MO-.22/v - Â» ' A Ky r N L!_1, V 419;K Â·yo. Ply'wo ~ 1227 '-- 7" 1.0 t/&-le? * - i le'- 5, *'LÂ»K- (AJEL- â€¢#rk) -7,19.y'w m -- - . 1 1.1 0 221. 1,1Â»1 11'llilf,!~11 -4/â€¢CEISU UALL. 2'F 1...4 11 P Ut. 1 +4 04%â‚¬<05//Jit 0 -- j ' ft 1,%21.--0 11 1 - 1 - //1 fHP. 1-bu-1- . 41 01Â©Ft} 8 Lla va-1 old. (t=vse D) 1/4,11=- I L..25211 /1-\ Vefic, 4 47' ,Â·/' C L.SUPC -W K.-ru+ 12â€¢614.t) -2 1 - 03- _ I _ Le-zf- :0 66 Â«-ACESP G.< 0141.Ee 4 Â·~76,Â«ILP lad- =Â£414-1-Tter- * 2 1 4.- 6 4 51=ets. ,â€¢m:~,~tfink bE- #r...3Â£45,7*EQ EÂ« A-'t.~ 1--1 - ~~46.Â·54*E- -6 4.OLot -r-0 ,â€¢-rs,wcp Â·eâ€¢Â·r 124FrrECT-+ 41. fo.) 1 - 849-F E-LE-VATIO14 145461- E LEVATION (BEN ,Â·sen) 11 -0 0 (EEÂ«PE:>EDj . 1/4.,1 =T= 1 1.-0, 1 v MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Conceptual Development second extension: 612 W. Main Date: January 23, 1991 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: A retroactive six-month extension for the Conceptual Development approval for 612 W. Main. This will make the second and final time an extension has been requested for this project. SUMMARY and BACKGROUND: Conceptual Development approvals are valid for up to twelve months from the date the HPC has taken action. 612 W. Main received Conceptual Development approval on June 12, 1989, and as of this date, the applicant is still not prepared to submit for Final approval. A six-month extension was granted on June 11, 1990, which expired December 13, 1990. The applicant is now requesting a second (and final) extension retroactive from the date of the expiration to June 12, 1991. Staff has discussed with the city attorney, who feels a one-time retroactive conceptual development extension for a project of this nature is not unreasonable. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Code requires HPC approval for an extension of a Conceptual Development approval. The language is not specific in the length of the extension or the number of times an extension may be granted. Staff recommends this be clarified in a future code-clarification amendment. No changes are proposed to the conceptual development plan. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may wish to not extend this Conceptual Development application, and require, instead, that a new application be submitted and public hearing held. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant a final Conceptual Development retroactive extension for the proposal at 612 W. Main St. to June 12, 1991, which is a period of six (6) months from the date of the previous expiration, December 13, 1990. memo.hpc.612wm.ext 1% DYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MS. Roxanne Eflin Aspen Historical Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 Januarw 10, 1991 RE: 612 W. Main Street, Aspen, Coloraco 81611 Dear Roxanne and Members of the Asmen Historical Preservation Committee. Dger & Associates. Architects submits this letter as representatives of Mr. William A. Levin. Owner of the above referenced Propertu. On June 13. 1990 your Committee granted a si' month extension ror ti-ie concepti,ial development approval granted this Project June 14, 1989. This extension expired December 13. 1990 witnout a s it b miss lon for fin.al de've, 1. opment- a tr; rn, poval. L) Ll r 1 rl 9 the approval extension per lod our client was nor able to devote the time necessary 'co complete this Pro,lect. Our client now wishes to complete the development of thls ProJect with a construction start time of Mag, 1991â€ž Witn this in mind, we are requesting an additional ,- 9 .: month extension of the conceptual approval to run f'rom December 13. 1990 through June 12, 1991. We request tnis extension renewal to reauce the time necessarw to complete the approval process so as not to delay our desired spring construction start. Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated. 21Â«__ Rod Dyer, 4 ..R. A. Dyer & Associates, Architects cc: William A. Levin, Sandy Arcara, Walters Lonstruction 60. MU/av 17 415 E. Hyman Avenue Suite 205 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-7149 MEMBER Â· SOCIETY OF AMERICAN REGISTERED ARCHITECTS 303/920-1309 FAX 1Â£ Dj MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 17 Queen Street - On-site Relocation and Redevelopment -PUB*i:e-*Gari-ng--Cont-inued Ra &41 Aliqjoj.>,91 Â£941--4 Date: NeÂ¥=mbere 92Sesal 3 A-A 'j )))99 1 - APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Final Development approval for the on-site relocation, partial demolition, rear addition and repair to the historic cottage located at 17 Queen Street, as well as variations for FAR (500 sq. ft.), sideyard setback and parking (3 spaces). The Final Development application concerns only the landmark designation portion of the larger parcel. A phased Final Development application has been approved by the HPC and the city attorney, in order to accomplish the preservation of the deteriorated structure. A covenant will be placed on the remaining portion of this parcel, requiring HPC review and approval over the new construction at any time in the future. The applicant is not prepared to have these final elevations compl eted, however, wishes to proceed with the relocation/restoration/addition of the historic cottage to occupy as her personal dwelling. BACKGROUND: On September 27, 1989, the HPC reviewed an application for demolition and redevelopment for the structure at 17 Queen Street. At that meeting, the applicant amended their request for demolition of the historic cottage, preferring instead to examine an on-site relocation plan. The HPC tabled action until October 25, to allow the applicant time to revise the proposal and report back to the committee on what action they will be requesting. At the continued public hearing on October 25, the applicant requested action be tabled one additional time, to November 29, to allow the architect additional time to develop the revised proposal. The HPC voted unanimously to continue the hearing to November 29, 1989. Conceptual Development approval (with conditions) was granted on November 29, 1989, and extended six months on November 14, 1990 to May 27, 1991. The conceptual development conditions were approved as follows: 1) Detailed elevations, site, floor and landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved, calling out all materials 2. Detailed preservation plan for the cottage be submitted /rh and approved. All original materials shall be preserved where possible; restoration shall only occur when material is found to be too badly deteriorated. Documentary photographs and measured drawing shall be submitted. All elements and materials to be repaired, replaced, removed, restored or preserved are to be discussed. Removal of porch and chimney shall be carefully done; porch columns shall be preserved, (as well as other details as noted above); porch shall be restored. Foundation information shall be submitted. 3. Relocation time frame and physical move details shall be clarified. Excavation plan and general information shall be included. Staff recommends the applicant consider relocating at least one outbuilding to cluster with the cottage to strengthen context. 4. All other site improvements, such as fencing, shall be addressed and detailed. 5. A massing model shall be submitted for Committee review and approval. 6. On-site parking shall be clarified, as well as garage/drive orientation and egress. 7. All variations shall be specifically requested in writing. 8. Posting bond for the relocation as described in Section 7-602 (D) (4 ) . 4,16 Â·,Â»*Â«-:c. r_ f ,Â«1)4,/ r It should be noted that Final Development approval cannot be granted until all Landmark Designation conditions have been met. To date, staff has not received a survey and legal description of the portion of the parcel designated as "H", Historic Overlay. This survey and legal description is required, which the applicant's attorney is aware of. We find that the following Conceptual Development approval conditions have not been met, which is required prior to Final Development approval: 1) Survey and legal description as described above 2) Floor plans of the proposed development 3) Documentary photos submitted (these have been taken) 4) Narrative on landscape plan (what is being lost/moved/preserved?), and fencing 5) Massing model (required for meeting) 6) On-site parking clarification (a variation for all parking has been requested) 7) Clarification on exact amount of setback variation 2 request 8) Relocation bond posted with the Engineering Department STAFF DISCUSSION: The Development Review Standards are found in Section 7-601(D). The applicable Guidelines are found in Section VI. Residential Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on page 47. The Relocation Standards are found in Section 7- 602(D). Standard 1. The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels with the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: Staff finds the preservation plan sufficient. Our concern focuses on the proposed rear addition, which is juxtaposed from the cottage. The architect has taken a contemporary approach to this addition, so that its construction date could never be confused with the date of the historic cottage. There is also a valid argument regarding topographic relationships with the placement of this addition. This philosophy generally meets the Guidelines for additions, however, not when character compatibility is sacrificed. Please consider the many alternatives to this siting. The materials will match, but the windows on the north and east elevations are mostly square and of a different character than that found throughout the cottage. The HPC should consider this based on compatibility with the historic resource. The addition has a conical-type roof with pointed cone-shaped skylight, a very contemporary feature. While generally screen from view by the original portion of the cottage, this element should also be carefully considered for compatibility. An application for landmark designation has been submitted by the applicant at this time. The new foundation is proposed to have a stone facing. On the one hand, this feature grounds the cottage and gives it more prominence on the parcel. On the other hand, it is a heavy- looking material in comparison of the delicate nature of the cottage. This element may need more study. Variations: We find that the request for a setback variation is valid. Due to the problem of "what is the front yard/what is the side yard?", we find that the siting of the cottage and therefore, setbacks are more compatible in character with the historic landmark. We are unclear on the exact footage request, and require this be clarified at this meeting. 3 1O The parking variation is another matter. Staff feels that granting a full variation of three cars is not appropriate, as the cottage is not proposed to be deed restricted as an affordable dwelling unit, and at least one car will belong to the parcel. While we are not particularly interested in carving in a parking space on the landmarked parcel, we feel space somewhere on the parcel must be reserved for this dwelling unit. The alternative is to require at least one of these three spaces be incorporated within the parking plan for the remaining portion of this parcel, and include this detail in the covenant. Therefore, we recommend a parking variation of only two spaces, with the third designed as described above. As discussed by the HPC in the past, when relocation or demolition occurs on a parcel, all disturbed land area shall be left in a "finished condition", i.e. smooth and level. Standard 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: We find this application meets this standard, and are very pleased to see the preservation of this cottage. Standard 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: We find that the preservation and renovation of the cottage will greatly enhance the cultural value of the parcel, and commend the applicant for their interest in this project. Standard 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff's discussion of the design of the new addition occurs under Standard #1 above. Our concerns also center on whether the design enhances or detracts from the architectural integrity of the cottage. We are not convinced that the angled siting, roof and window forms are the most compatible solution, and are recommending restudy. Undoubtedly the massing model, accurately indicating topographic changes, will assist the HPC and staff in this decision. All final development applications require the presentation of major building material representation to the HPC. We have not seen material samples yet, and require the following to be clarified at this meeting: 4 1\ 1) Porch roof material (standing seam or corrugated metal?) 2) Percentage of original chimney brick to be salvaged and reused 3) Original windows shall remain and be repaired; interior storm windows shall be used in these areas ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may choose to approve the Final Development application as presented or with conditions to be approved by Staff and the project monitor prior to the issuance of a building permit, table action pending further study, or deny the application, finding that the Standards have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC table Final Development approval until the following conditions have been met by the applicant, submitted to the Planning Office and approved by the full HPC: 1) Survey and legal description as described above 2) Floor plans of the proposed development 3) Documentary photos submitted (these have been taken) 4) Narrative on landscape plan clarifying what is being lost/moved/preserved; fencing shall be included 5) Massing model 6) Clarification on exact amount of setback variation being requested 7) Relocation bond posted with the Engineering Department 8) Restudy of the new addition: siting, roof form, skylight, fenestration 9) Discussion on the final condition of the lot being disturbed by the relocation 10) Outbuilding/shed demolition clarification memo.hpc.17qs.fd Comments: 5 3 4 3~RE[1Tkl- -m'mCHMENT 1 LAND USE APPIZCATION FUN 1) ProjeCt Name TRETTTN-MTNER ' E COTTACE RET,OCATTON :) Project Locatian 17 Queen Street, Aspen, CO 81611. Lecally described as Parcel I of the Boundarv Agreement Plat thereof reco<ded in Plat Book 13,@ Page 35 of (indicate street addres, lot & block number, legal description where the Records of a~rcpriate) Pitkin County. 3) Present Zcning R15-A 4) Lot Size 21,161 sq.ft. 5) Arrl irmet's Name, Mfress & Phone # Henry and Lana Trettin P.O. Box 6149, Snowmass Village, CO. 81615 303-923-2171 6) Representative's NmIE, Address & alane # Theodore K Guv Associates PC P.C. Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 303-927-3167 7) Type of Nplicatirn (plâ€žcA check all that apply): . Conditional Use Cohceptual SPA Canceptual Historic Lev. Strri al Review Final SEA X Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Ocncestlial P[ID Minor Historic Dev. stze= Mrgin - Final FUD - Historic De:nlition axmtain Via, Plar~ ~ Subdixisian - Historic Designation Condiminil=i.zaticn _ Ted=/Map Anendo,ent ./--- (2** Allotment Ict Spliqlat Idin - GOS Exmption Adj ust=ent 8) Description of Existing Uses (nuaber and type of existing stnrturas; arproxinate sq. ft.; n=ber of bedrocms; any previous approvals granted to the property). Original residence, 589 sq.ft., one bedroom. Proposed: 3 Bedroom, 1298 sq.ft. w/full basement. Conceptual Historical Development Plan approved November 29, 1989. 9 ) Pâ€¢*:,-ription of Develcgnerrt Application Relocate existing Miner's Cottage 120' North on the property. Add basement bedrooms and upper level addition. Refer to attached letter & illustrations 0) Have you at:taÂ£bed tk following? X Response to Attachment 2, Minimm Submission Oorrtents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Su]Iissian Contents X Respcnse to AttactmErt 4, Review Standards for Your Alpplicaticn j3 1111111 RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 3 Refer to the Final Development Plan, Section 1, "Conformation to Conceptual Review." RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 4 Refer to the Final Development Plan, Section V, "New Development." 3-l< THEODOAE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN To : Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Aspen City Council 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 From : Theodore K Guy - Theodore K Guy Associates PC Date : January 11, 1991 Re : 17 Queen Street - On Site Relocation and Redevelopment, Public Hearing LOCATION: 17 Queen St., Aspen, Colorado, described as Parcel 1 , of the boundary agreement plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 35, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. ZONING: R-15 A (Moderate Density Residential) RATING: "4" AGE OF STRUCTURE: c. 1891 APPLICANT: Henry and Lana Trettin, owner; represented by Theodore K Guy Associates PC. HPC MONITOR: Glen Rappapon APPLICANT's REQUEST: Final Development approval for the on-site relocation of the historic cottage. The Final Development Plan is in addition to the Conceptual Development submittal. SITE, AREA AND BULK CHARACTERISTICS: Lot size: 21,161 sq.ft. Minimum Lot size: 15,000 sq.ft. Existing FAR (dwelling unit) 1,000 sq.ft. Proposed sq.ft. Entry Level 812 sq. ft. Lower Level 486 sq.ft Sub Grade Exempt. 263 sq.ft. Sub-Total 223 sq.ft. Total 1,035 sq. ft. Allowable sq.ft. Single Family 4,866 sq.ft. H.P.C. FAR Bonus 500 sq.ft. Sub-Total 5,366 sq.ft. Garage Exemption 500 sq.ft./unit Existing height: 18 sq.ft. Proposed height: 18 sq.ft Allowable maximum height: 25 sq.ft. Open Space Requirement: none Set Backs: Front Yard 25'-0" Queen Street Side Yard 16'-8" Neal Avenue Side/Rear 10'-0" 13 23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82 P O BOX 1640 BASALT. COLORADO 61621 (303] 927<3167 Final Development Plan November 26, 1990 Page 2 PROBLEM DISCUSSION: 1. CONFORMATION TO CONCEPTUAL REVIEW The Final Development Plan deals with the relocation, restoration, and additions to the miner's cottage as described in the Conceptual Plan. In order to speed up relocation and restoration of the cottage before any further deterioration of the structure occurs, the Final Development Plan does not deal with the new residence as its design is not completed and may not be for some time. 11. TIME FRAME 1. Immediately upon acceptance of this proposal those portions of the building that are not to be relocated shall be demolished. The section to be relocated shall be stripped bare to the structure and following the Engineer's advice, the building shall be reinforced. This includes the roof structure, as it is the Architect's belief that the first heavy snow shall collapse the roof. The old shingles and decking should be removed, the rafters reinforced and a new decking applied. 2. Weather permitting, the new foundation shall be excavated and built this Winter. 3. Upon completion of the foundation the cottage shall be relocated and then weatherproofed to withstand the Winter. 4. Restoration shall commence in the Spring of 1991. 111. STRUCTURAL RELOCATION DETAILS 1. The Builder shall open sections for the observation of the frame condition. 2. The Engineer shall then detail required reinforcement work. 3. The Builder is to demolish the east kitchen unit, north storage unit, and the two porch elements and deck to the south of the building. The north grade will need to be excavated down to 18 inches below the floor level, for approximately 4 foot width. The mover will need access to all sides of the T shape. 4. The Builder is to perform reinforcing work as detailed by the Engineer. This may include adding studs to the interior of all walls, and sheathing completely with 1/2 inch plywood panels. Depending on findings, this plywood sheathing may be added directly to the interior walls without added studs. A tight screw pattern will be required. Also, interior cross bracing sill be required to make the dwelling rigid. It is also anticipated that wood rot will be found at the north end of floor joists. If found, floor sheathing will need to be removed at those areas and floor joists reinforced with spliced 2X or microlam lumber. Stiff rim joists or added beams at the interior base of walls will be required. It is advised that the existing masonry chimney be dismantled. 5. A new foundation, located by the owner's Architect and designed by the Owner's Engineer, will need to be constructed by the Builder. The site will need to be cut down north of the well, at the road, to allow access on to the site without interference from the overhead power lines. The overhead line is presently 18' - 0" from grade where it crosses the property to the west of the relocation site. Final Development Plan November 26, 1990 Page 3 6. The mover will then knock access holes in the foundation to place steel beams just inside and parallel to foundation walls. The crawlspace may be so shallow as to require hand digging to place these steel beams. Seasonal impact on the mover's work needs to be understood. Snow and frozen ground will interfere with this work. Sheltered areas such as the north side will hold snow and frost after the rest of the site has lost surface snow. Flexibility for timing will be required. 7. Structure will be lifted with five beams spanning north to south. Two additional beams will be placed below these, and spanning east to west. The structure will be moved west onto the road, north up the hill, and east onto the new foundation. 8. Infrastructure Connections. The sewer will connect with the sewer line on Neal Avenue. The water line will connect with the water line on King Street. The electrical will connect to the riser pole to the north of the site at King Street and shall be buried. IV. PRESERVATION PLAN The original cottage is T' shaped in plan. The main body of the "T" plan that is facing Neal Avenue is in fair condition and most of the original exterior materials can be saved. The wing section is in very poor condition with additions applied to all sides and in some cases all exterior materials removed. We shall therefore deal with these sections in separate parts. A. BODY OF'T' PLAN/NEAL AVENUE SECTION 1. FRONT PORCH. The front porch shall be dismantled and reassembled at the new location. The original columns shall be saved and restored with wood epoxy and paint. All the ornamental bracing in fair condition shall be restored and reused. Broken and missing braces shall be duplicated to match the original. Side railings, headers, trim, soffit, and roof framing shall be duplicated to match the original. Examples of these materials shall be saved as patterns for reconstruction. New roof decking and metal roof shall be applied. 2. NEAL AVENUE/WEST ELEVATION. The siding shall be left in place and repainted. Bottom 1 x 10 trim shall be replaced to match original. Window/door trim and facia shall be replaced to match original. Windows should be replaced with new thermal windows that closely match the original or interior storm windows can be added to the existing windows. The front door shall be restored, repainted and reused. 3. KING STREET/NORTH ELEVATION - GABLE END. All exterior materials shall be left in place and repainted. A window shall be added that matches the existing windows in detailing. Final Development Plan November 26, 1990 Page 4 4. SOUTH ELEVATION - GABLE END. All materials shall be left in place and repainted. Missing siding can be replaced from any good siding salvaged from the back wing section. Bottom lx8 trim shall be replaced to match original. The bay window shall be restored with wood epoxy and repainted. The bay window roof shall be reshingled with new wood shingles. 5. ROOF. The roof shall be stripped down to the sheathing and redecked. New wood shingles shall then be added. 6. CHIMNEY. The chimney shall be taken down and reassembled at the new location. The present interior wood support shall be replaced with masonry construction. B. BACK WING SECTION 1. SOUTH ELEVATION. The porch at the south entry shall be demolished. The siding is rotten and falling off. All siding shall be removed and any siding that is in usable condition shall be used to replace missing and broken pieces on the south gable end. New siding and trim to match existing shall be applied. Window and door trim shall be replaced to match existing. The west door is cracked, coming apart and has no distinctive antique features. It should be replaced with a new door and frame that closely resembles the original. The window should be replaced with a thermal window that closely matches the original or interior storm windows can be added to the existing window. 2. EAST ELEVATION. The kitchen addition built on the east end shall be demolished. The exposed siding is rotten and falling apart, it shall be replaced with new siding to match existing and painted. 3. NORTH ELEVATION. The storage room addition on the north side shall be demolished. All exterior siding and trim have been stripped from the original north wall and it is possible that the entire north wall has been changed and rebuilt since original construction. New siding and trim to match existing shall be applied. 4. ROOF. The roof shall be stripped down to the rafters decking and redecked. New wood shingles shall then be added. The original walls of the back wing section are of vertical 1 x 10 boards that are load bearing with 4 x 4 posts in the corners for added support. Slight pressure on these walls bow them in and out. These walls shall need to be completely sheathed on the interior with plywood and then studs applied to bring these walls up to a safe load bearing capacity. As the exterior materials have been removed or are in such poor condition they have to be replaced, it is the Architect's recommendation that this back wing section be demolished and rebuilt at the new site with modern construction techniques and materials to duplicate the original. V. NEW DEVELOPMENT The proposed addition does not detract from the architectural integrity of the designated historic structure. By placing the stairs to the back north side of the structure and bedroom addition at the southeast corner we are saving the integrity of the original "T' shape. The additional bedrooms are in a basement hidden from Neal Avenue by the topography. 3f Trettin Relocation November 26, 1990 Page 5 The exterior materials on the new addition will be compatible to those on the existing structure i.e.: Siding -lx6 cedar capped siding Trim -lx4 cedar Roof - Metal Roof Paint - Match that to be used on the original. Refer to attached sketches. Samples of new materials shall be brought to the meeting. VI. VARIANCE REQUESTS The Trettin's would like to be considered for the maximum grant and benefit package available for historically designated landmarks, including a 500 square foot F.A.R. bonus. In order to maintain the original character of the cottage we are requesting a variance to the to the yard setbacks and to waive the requirement for on site parking. The yard setback variance would require the 25' front yard setback to be off of Queen Street and the 2/3 (i.e. 16' - 8") sideyard setback off of Neal Avenue and a 10' backyard setback off of King Street. 90157 Final Dev. Plan-2 hoc 1 44 t 1 RUDD CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED 16311 Highway 82 â€¢ Carbondale, Colorado 81623 October 9, 1990 Aspen Pitkin County Planning Department Aspen Historical Society 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Roxanne Eflin Re: Trettin House Dear Ms. Eflin, Rudd Construction, Inc. will be the contractor moving Mr. & Mrs. Henry Trettins house located at 17 Queens Street, Aspen, Colorado. Mrs. Trettin asked that I write you in regards to how the moving process will take place. We will begin by demolishing non-historic areas of the house which are not set to be moved, brace and reinforce the house as required, slide timbers under the house at bearing points, then ; raise house. Care and additional bracing will be required throughout the operation. After the house is raised about two feet, axles will be attached to beams and the house will then be placed near its future location until the basement is completed, at which time it will be placed over the basement. An experienced mover will be on hand to assist us. Please accept our invitation for either you or your representatives to visit the job and review our progress. Also, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office at 963.1210. Sincerely, RUDD CONSTRUCTION INC 930*qj 0.14 Wayâ‚¬6 G, Rudd President Telephone 303/963-1210 lD 1 . \ -. - 1 , lil g- - I - .- (9 4-' /15 3,1 -t 1*i, 6 - 1 .1 - -32 f J '.-- -- --- Ill , 1 ,-70 1 :-.0 1 94 ----1.,1 2 1 -1 f 1 w 0 - , m I p) P - 1 -_ E- â‚¬ M ,. , , f -6 11. 4 k 4 ---- -- \ -1-6*JaD FLOr:.t cri 7 7EL.:00 -O --~-_~ _ -- i -- 1 -- - -- - /91 'I -a re J T. DECK 1 -L '.--1....6-... .... ...----- 1.---a---2-- 1- 1 1;; 2:. TEL.99 -9'/0 .-' 0 6 Ex1531.6 6â‚¬A DE- 1 r â‚¬ PMESSENT SITE (TYP) Ch NEAL AVE./WEST EL -, 'A TION C ~ 7 401/4" =IL 0. 'j 1 2.-.i 1- .f - - I --- - V- - - " -LIWE OF - / fE -2-- /36= -1 1 \L -- - <*-E *19. FORCH - - 11 'TS -3-1%-irIfi-w-IJF--Ir 7,2,3 - -- -- !~~6774 ---4 '9~- - - t 0 y=--= e --1 .. - -- Â·! ...... - ,Â£1'rlt--TE 6--- Q /lili 11 -1-Â·- 4 - -- -- Â· - =77-7 9.Y up 8 -. - ---- LA--- - -- 0 3 pl-:91DTJ[ )fl- t-- - I - -1- -- 9.6-7 - -~--- 0,1 - 6 /71 --- -1- , 1 u U - 4- CE:GIKIAL ST!319- j 22_-' Cw 0136-1 MAL STEP L E>UNING DECK C It>11.D- HAS Mâ‚¬.15/1 HAE Eâ‚¬20 HE} th/ED rOEHOVED 5 0 LA+L ~ 0;*16-g i 4 21-L 0=11 ~r---r- vy'. 4 rui-- \\ 2\.8 . .0- --- ....- 9 - UNE OF EITCHEN ~~----- - -- ADDIT OAI-VALL IS \ 1â‚¬) . 1Xil . 6 --I~ / CO/2 IZED IN THIS *13Â£4 \ 3 u / L v / 1 1 , aflj JIN'brilp FlooD ----- ] --% --771 ----- ------ - -- TELICÂ©-0 - _ _ _ 1 1 - .-'41 - 1-]ME OF EKIMILS RDECH - L 02.IGIKIAL. CO.212 ~ DEIGI UAL , TO M,E f<131 40./ED 1-4Â¥6 2Â£811 REI r,NED HAS REEL! 12- - ED ' i ~ ~'T| ,7, !k i,lti,, '4.t' 1.~1, :, :Â·,<1 f 4 .'&ta#6?U. 01â‚¬!kj L. Fi 19.; <Art,110*11%,V*f;411 ' '' 4 7 l' 1,Â· ,.gsâ€¢ 1 4% .' Litrt I - , J .1, 1 3 11;41':Ii.1,~4~201??Plf,1 1 " r. 1.. , .0. , Â·..1 ii, i:, For-th L 2,9--F $ --/9 - - ...... -- I - 4 H 4 -9 -------\ Apt 1 - .../... - - - - ...I- - t -- 11 -- / \ iri-.- -- ----------\-- i h V h - lo N 9- V) e O%1131 L JET 1 1-1 _ 1 - 41 -- 1 . --t - -. ....... ,- \4 11 1 02.GUAL 13002., 5:DING 4 Â¥ 4 MOST PWOBAELY THE 012Gtk'AL WALL 14A5 EliEN 12EHO/ED , , 1 4 1 ryÂ· f ' I k ,.2 1 1., 1 , I 1 1> I y: , .1 0 L ' r' . t . . 1 1 T 1;. , 1. 0 6 1 1 c- OL-FÂ¥ 4 313 U-5 131 '.Ge ./~EX- ----- -- --- -'r.1- LU =ri I /1222 5----r j 0 t 1 Of- 1 1 1 , --1 4 AL- -1 IL 4 -- --- 1 6- - -1 1 U<TPE-1:;2 -lf int,1.'337 1 -- t O 42 -- - - 1 Â« 1 1- , MI 1,.:, ' .3 )11)\ ' '2,~~'t~~ ~)i<~. IM~.:jyfj,/~~f~} 43/~ 0:~ pr' A,C f r.i'~i;;47.1 W.: --- ----- - L "'Â·~'-*6,4'#11.4. i'DIC, ilit>rmYtrs.12 , 1 // 't/ h.. .u,&*2, 7 â€¢P... d VÂ·, //5 ///22.1.ZI~ :!11't{,1?k.'i *r:zh, â€ž f|WAL '.â€¢~ki, .. ---'---r <'. H,. ~il,*.-/ '',14, ji.,1 -0. ..1,,1 .Luer . .f+Irr urrin'L.$1,44#4'fv,MA#h[ Mitttliw"#44:Wi 1447 1----Â·'--2 ---Â·Â·Â·- .~~,~r 4 +AE#/ 111:./ 4644.2 44;ik;Ii F':~i:,e? 914*~R#; j i ill ' - 1*0 , $i *.'* ;' Â·j '# 1~14 .t? *~ *~'~. il t. 7~ p 4 r*1 ' + 0*:.:444 4.,~ , ~ Lt affÂ·9 2Â·:'1 ; -+Â· ' --. *iti~Â·-6; t.â‚¬T: ECE>DATION Â·~-4 64 '--< r ,~i-!4--r Mt -p i . r ./. . ..1 1.--1 0-'~ j(f~,1-44% )-i.-4; ;4: *5 N i <i , 31:-Â· :-; :,. 5:-idit,~ .; *i;24 5':~t '. L -,Li .1 : , -' i ..,-:/. Â·,4-Â·:Â·Â· . .Â«. ,. ~... ~ .. ~ ~ ~~:36*12 â€¢ 61*Â·*41:p:,jWyN'fil fi{: 12':-'. 2 111 '144Gi V ..41'~ 1.1 Â·Â·: 1.1 Â·~1~.'.,3. C. 1.,Â·:v.. D. . i 2 444;5W 15 b w . 0 :-2,34.:T~: ../ 5-:f .:&-.Â£143914~*::9 .I 14/33 1%1.::~33--t i~j LL'E P- i: 1- 3 9 - :41.1 1 1 f . tÂ· ' -irle'/.91 1 , r. . /3,-t 111 ; . ......1 . . 1 J., f Â· .64.'14 grb'446.Â·.4.i, :FA.mt- 1. 4 . , f - ,.~eÂ¢*Ac*Â·rr..:: _ Â· Â·:iiIÂ· Â·. ----I ----- - fil \4 .- - #-.....~. .; 2 ~ ..- .-f 1,Â¥1*(*abof M)00 MWME. I Â· -- ---- - -- hk . .T :~ .~~ ' â€ž I *â€ž0:N. .ri,, . I. : ...~.,ir.k.Fr-,.*14,1- : . . ~ ~ | L.I . . -- 1 ;;it ,:.,tiiÂ·GIN iÂ·L: '11. '',.1 1 " -' F';'144'bih' ' r ' i,45,21%-11'q 1 2 1;1 '. 11=20 *t ~NE!;8:i;!!Bil:. 11''i~:j.,izi i':,k'â€žt~,~ Â®~!1:IÂ·liwII'll#!1:|Ii|i;!,1':!i 1 1) t L I El ' *. L ' ' 1 ...500 TRIM Â· ...7 ---U--C-ELJ-1 -1.- L LIT . 1 - r . 1- 1 . i , iti ~ ~i~ P.L: ..i. ~ . ]11[ENK]FiE ...1,2 .41:.L Â¢ . VOC)0 00(LOMT j- AN[El,4 -r--1 r nE= Â»_=2 - v. . 1 . 6.-i,! e,AL.Â·CO~ RLW#L /4/.- 1 ./ ''f Ci~ EÂ»<\OnNÂ¢k j J , r- r 1 9 PÂ»211- - .-- c._. - - 1 Â· ' 1 }... Â»009 elodia 1 1 - ' 4 . 11 1 1 . 4.4 r *.r .1 1 . 1=121 ./. 1 1~ - , 1 1 i-- J f 1 1 : e~-c>ge- MApEO V . VI. Ll A--2.-1-1 - ../ 1. f . PUT/1 le.L-Exg-NE,01\1 4 MlNER'S COTTAGE RESTORAT I-ON .ANDADDIT1ION Â·-1 17 QUEEN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO . 1 ' 1 - . i - . 1 ~ Â· ri-(11 9 Â¢JANUARY 91 -: : 11 1 P . - . :1 ...{14,1 th. Iritt,}4*Imbdi:; Â· :i 'i 7- 7 ./ r./ FÂ· r tli - â€¢ i -C L. 4. .* . Z 4,1 9912'' 4 4 # ' 'Â· ,~' 4...Â·;AW#p~ .. .1 ! 4:44 1.1 0- 5.4.91#' t - Â·f?Fgy: 'c=J 11 - ------------â„¢- -- ------ --- ~ -I> %%Â§%\. \\ --------- I \\ -. 41 f i 0 #Se--t LAD o o Â£ 6 <- 1 /0 I 4, %, "l i OF-4 h 1. i 1 ------ 1~ 6-QIâ€¢-Â£Â·c Â·-4,-5,1 " Y Â¥0 v# et-c k tyti's,-If 05. Ok! t '"-' -1.L . -. 41 -4.1 1 1 41 1 1 1 - 1 11--- Ll 7 , - ALLâ€¢-v Up*ar 11 -t. . 2 d ~ 1 =21- -â€ž+.-41 1 -1 4 7-1 ' - :19 f M # 01.D , ME' 1 1 1 i. i . - 1 1 1 . - -1 f $ Nt- : '2>A ' '' -Fl[19[ FIR -1 ; #-"-1-46.2 1 . i '.'' r I . 140Â¢-TH EL-EVATION 7 4 141:3 j .16 ...f:P. j L f & 4, 1 1, I 2 A .'4-.rili I '/ b iltill,'.': 51'.-2<3; it -le ,2 - 17 QUEEN STREET ASPEN, COLORADLD 1 7 ~ 4' j z Z.#' . 4 4. ' 1-/" ; I. -:' I 3 JANUARY 91 - I : , -,7 ' ,. - - A -- -- ... Â¥ 1 . -XiI\/ .. L' I . I . 9- _ , 1:JOCD-A -1'~9(LAA 1 /// __dll 1 -* i/(![M.ti.:,?cip'}-lt 12-~.,4,...D: ''1 11 ,: . . -'00* -;. , 1 + ./# n N -- - \\ , ' 1 2 -/# 57,7 11 h - / --2kv / A,6,4,-*4*5 Â£144*81~<kiliki~i:fzir-v-libtiâ€ž-1~tylÂ»*2&114#l*12~Ft1iti44444%1*4 *4244.ibittltiki#*UltitÂ®Â¢444*0Â»tt!>~-*=-r..=- ~---~ .-.,, - .r -~~~ Ij~/%*.1Â¥414!140!t/41*AMNAM P + â€¢ A Tr.Â·49.1'i. Mu,Â·Â·t :314!L;,f,!di' 121':: 0&14-3.~~F?PIR<*JU :L -' . ,- ~.. '45.1 ~~Fl glit.EFt!!Etifla,22 64; i ~Â· T.: - 5.~ 'P. ~-::~: ri:. 1 . :,1 1.- 2:. 1Â¢6~1-1-,-' 2.? 1- ..7, - ~f-:ifil[@t .5.>;f;:,~~;I.:~... ..1 :1,4.:'i~,~16 il-'??~i,t'Z,fÂ·ji~j?Â·E ~i ~; ~-1~ Â·t'-1 L.Â· â€¢ -. 4:4*Â· it , a--0. Â· ,Â·?. iltibi Â·*fti i;;Uh 0 .. 1, t' ' ' / -4 .'.- :r. :f~vt,1'W'i-IlitÂ«'1.1 .11.....1Â¥ 141; .:4., 11,Â· 47 Â· i . -: :1.1-- .L ....! 4:ki.1623:f ~~~,~~~ 14.-4. I . h . I 13;.Â·,2 1%,1,1 1,4.,:.,4...14-fr.(:i~Â·52,18*?.p~Â¢1&Â· J-- Â·.-Â·Â· -"p: 31Â·:. PiFY:*.2145*:teÂ¢45.4' :-=243 07-. 7Â·----- 1 7 14}.R}-ji#2{.05;,2~.., Â£31%4:. 94% 0Â·:; i; .} i>13,(i Iti 1:3 ~~~~ii&~dÂ·,11~Bg~ iglit*Â· 4 -~4-td: 1 7 ~.-:. . ~0-73~ : - . E64WJ~54='#4#t.*EÂ¥~;3{;:'Â·~;tÂ· ., . .-1 119., 12~l\DÂ«132 -aNUE, /92M --- - - -- - ---- =t441-- 44: 1 -2 1 ..1 1..,... 01/, 44.1.: f~. f .6.14â€¢,- 1 .:44Â·/ ' ... D.:-â€¢ ..D I..9.:~ A '7 .. . .:.11... ::=.:15.347;92;4(1:f'.til:~.54.-134:.::. g -Je,Ck u =ir" 33~ 17.. h If: .... i:tif'.Â¥C.3.-ft..4ff ..:Irylutiff. 22:Â·3~. 4:49 1--hA - An Â« 3 V . *futiyÂ· 3.-EFT'rÂ· Â«63-1.-,2:34 2.1.' r40\WorNOO=h 0-90'Â·,ig prfole /%94 -- . I -I r . in.4 . A 4 *jÂ¥Â·98- I . BOODI 1Â«22114 /â‚¬244 /X WÂ¥3*)06 lbODU O-et-*P.14-92 . Â· --- lilli 1Â·/ I . 1 1 -4 -I Ji 11 -- ----Â£1 Â· - 41 T 4 _- - - - 1 1 '-42 Ul -Ill- --- icird :Â·If 5 -,i.1-1;1:;11,11>.1 u '2/:11 =Acce irmly\Â¥-9 0024 - ./.--- I.-I.- 1 I. 2 ., U- a i'Â£ - .-4'~1 / - ;5~Â·Ct.,4' lt072" 2-5 i 27 ./1 / ..,11 lin P 1 1 r, 71! 27 : 1 1----- - 143 f . \ : i Â»f Â· 1. 1 , 3 1 g I D .1#1 - .r. D ;-;Â§â€¢t alt 1 +51 j'.,1,1 C ' 41 1 _â‚¬J 1 - 1 A I LO '24 4 'Â· - 4 -- i - 1 1 - , - Cio , - 1 P- 04 0 -- U t ,JI L &47 , 4 -- U 0 U 0 1 0- t 44-3 LLTJJ 64-n j #- 1: Â· P i 1 r lo 1 . 00 , - I.- 1- - ,- -:.- ~tild lb!_ - â‚¬LG 11 =1 - .\,4 - -----Â·--i- , 1 43 ' Or- i '-~ f . LI\ 1 i /1 10 - 15 1/ 14 1 20 1 i ... a.1 1 -1, C ho N ' I i i X: N.F. f 1"1 -. 9 Â· 1 4 . -=-f 49 - 4 9911 1 1 1 -- 0 - 1 In, - - F - 6 -- --- 2 0 t 7 91 / t\' ' --7 : 0 1 6, 10 >- 1 - --- -- - H , N . . - .1 .... --- - '. (9 1/% Â·]L , 9 0 p~-_.d.. f D - . -'â€¢r- - - | 2 1/ , . 1 -/9200 Fl-00!11 -- ,.. I.---- . -00 - 16 -i J , 9 1 151- 1 TEL.!00 -O L._ 4-- w 1 1 1 J-, T. DECK , 1 1 1 --- - - 43 1 7EL.99-9'a , 51 - , i 25 1 21-32 L_, EXISnk-6 61?AL 6 PME'bENT sIT i . r 1 1 1 .I 0 f 22 1 1 ~ i + 1-f' Â·Â· 1 1 , 1 , 1 - 1, i 311" 1 ./ , .... 1 1 1 ~ ' -64'40 ~ Z -446 | 310 64 4 4'- i 7.., : , f . d f I . 1 , 12'- 834' 941 Zzzl i , A. 4 20 -24 26 50 1 1 3211 1 VA 1 5 -174 /--44\ EXISTING FLOOR. PLAN 1-'63*1 4 L-~-/) 2 04'1= 1 to" / 'h. YE? 4\ 5 59 5.F. NOTE : .~.. IlEFEeS -ID PWO TOGEAPH.., 9- f ~ NEAL AVE./WEST E 0 |/41' c 1 Law -4't Â· â€¢ 1,3 L.' 1 -7<61.zJUL--Lip O. 9 THEBRAND 1 - JO .9/ **** January 23, 1991 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE City Hall Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear HPC: I have been to several meetings of the HPC on the Sport Stalker Building. I believe the applicant has not been listening to the commission or the community. 1) A stucco building is inappropriate to the commercial core of Aspen. There are a series of proud brick and block buildings in the downtown. Stucco buildings were meant to be temporary in Aspen. I love Sata Fe Territorial architecture but let's leave it in Santa Fe. The applicant has offered a series of cheap building techniques in a location that is not appropriate for them. Can we expect a three-story quonset hut a la the 10th Mountain Division next? It should be a brick and block building. Don't let an eyesore happen. 2) Three Stories is completely inappropriate. The building should be 20' maximum. Two ten-foot floors that are 9 foot clear should be fine. 3) If the SportStalker is going to add square footage to the property the best place to do it is on the parking lot. Structures in a Victorian downtown should be built lot to lot. The City Parking lot is one block away and is underused. The continuity of the pedestrian downtown is very important This addition is a bad piece of planning and design. They need to start over. Perhaps they need to have more than a leasehold interest in the land to be able to invest the money appropriate to the site. Sincerely, /1 4<1 Harley Baldwin HB/ws 205 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303.920.1800 FAX 303.9203602 1 lit, liv - ~Â»-,c< 1 4Â«0~ C-7 l 0Â«1 6.b< ~ 0==?9602-74' dtpÂ»L -_L___z==-- =-=-C , - - . - Oe-Â¥9\ -1 /7=-4\614 2... /Â«Â«9- 0 . 215 i El ~~. Â¢ m . -,OU - 144 6 -2 6 - - 1 V 2 1 J 1 C 912 2-217 9 f r.-1 -- VA ..1 $ A - 2,1 ./ M 4,1 P 1 w , milL 1 '0:A d o - -- -~-j 1 -k~L-44$flit-1 - - 11 1131 4 Ill,/ ilutut (6:ke:d 1 ,-4 - -7 ___ F i &-1:~ r----izzi : ~ Â·11 1 0 1 IM - . T----1 Â· It 1. 331- -6 - 13 - - t--- 1 4 1 - .- FEN CLE /7 co(,C: 0 053(3 j=2.-1.-46-i~~-24[2 KER bO I L ED' !\43; . CH E=42 06 6-1rgd) 0 1 .; - No FRTH ELEÂ»T*loth 1/14/11 FINAL INORFASWSSIONÂ· fdoN-[-i xlfirr-A * MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: WORKSESSION: Sportstalker revisions Date: January 23, 1991 The applicant has requested another study session with the HPC, to go over the revisions he is proposing to the Sportstalker building. FORMAL ACTION will not be taken at this meeting, which has been arranged for dialogue only. Please review the applicant's letter (attached) for an introductory discussion of the revisions. A presentation will be made at this meeting. C Welton Anderson & Associates Architects 14 January 1991 JAN 1 4 TO: Historic Preservation Committee RE: Sportstalker Employee Housing, Continued Study Session Please consider this memo and the accompanying drawings a request to continue the very productive study session we had on January 9, 1991. The comments were productive and I think gave us good direction to develop a simplified version of Scheme 2. We would like the opportunity to discuss all four elevations of Scheme 2 (simplified) with the Committee on the January 23rd meeting to develop a consensus before proceeding on to 4 inch scale Design Development drawings to be submitted for Final Development Review by the 1st of February in order to meet the deadline for the 13th of February. The drawings submitted are fairly self explanatory after the last meeting: A stucco or 'Dryvit' finish system painted to be compatable with the Landmarks in the neighborhood. The storefront is expanded with more windows separated by paired columns (either of metal or Dryvit) with a metal band above defining the separation between retail and residential uses. We hope to continue this constructive dialogue. Planning / Architecture / Interior Design Box 9946 / Aspen ,Colorado 81612/(303) 925- 4576 2% <2-% C.CO B N 11â‚¬*1 I i 1: .r-1. tr Â£ - 1--7. ~ I - 221 , - - t ]11_1 1 1 1=UL==41 : f If=/Lil 79- 9- - I A- r '----7 1 .' 1.4.. I | -- . 0 1. -_-I-=-A -al F 2- a E--3 j T I ~Ll---; t-~Â·~ f-liq,zJuL;EA .... 1 2-3. rp- rL -1 177 Ir--- ]IT[ 1 - ffix. U.t, 12, 11 -Inn - ,--4 i F 1 --- -'- I 6 1 . '1 r ,-L.1 F 11{/111 -4 Ptl . \1 -- , i ' I *, =-*---7 I 1 1Â£ '* --- - -- - 1 Â· 1 fZYI 19<JI> ~4 1 ,f/ . -l - ~ ~~Â»WAY?frp . ./-0- .="mi[ 111!r- , ul ' 44 ~ [ 1 1 ] 0 L-=1' a- 913-ri -l it 1 1 L I &, 1 1 i. 113 j R 4 ' V' 24 2~ L =1.1 , 1 ~ ,-1 M 1 P [1 - d 1 f itt Â£ . _dÂ· L:*---1---11 ~ ~ ')1~10 1--7 1 111 r p â€¢f ~ v i & -I . V t 0 Â£ 9 4 rtâ‚¬.\ / CO'Â·/E> CH E-116 Ott 61965) 230 prrSTAL I<EB LUILDI>-'- 191 - NORTH ELEÂ»TION Â· 1/14/11 .ll PINAL /WORIESESSION (CONTINUE[)3 I .Â·1 1 4 1 1 G I .r -t , ki y -A 4 In -0 1 C -' 11 1,1 11 1 fl 3 1 1 --~ 1 -1 70 Hl (fj n d A E- 0-1 u I F Ell- 1 ' f 111 1 1 1 1 1.-42==11- .1 ! d I ~111 1 . + 9-6 1. , , , 1 . -- -1 _- Ill , -1- < I. -,/ -/ . // , L_ - 1 Uj . / 1 L 1 1 - I t 1 - 1.2 - . t 11 1 1- dll -If J lili Il 0 -- l i 11 . I 11 - 1 , 234 tr f . Â· E---3 , 1 1/ A. L , / 111 1 11 r.- - - ;1' 11 1 +: . 1 . 1 . 1 1 i 1 L N 1 ]1 'j - 1 ' ' ' 1 4 . ' 1 0 rl / 1 0 / I . ' Ui 1.1 Â»==rl., 1-- 3 0 1 , A i . t :1 - 0 1 - j , - 11 - 1 9 ,/-' , i 1 1 4 4 1 . 1 t , .i t .-I - 7 . ./ . - dll- , ' ''i â€¢ ~ *t ~ 0 ti_ 1 r .0,1 .4. ' .' t - Al . ... D . 1. ,Â£...5 'A .... 'I. . 1 +5 .''I 2.J~~ i L...'..9 1 + . , . 4 2- * . - <aBON 1-2499 j - 40 127 Â»%:t - , 1-2 - 1 . . ' 1 1 , 1, . 1 1 1--1 91-u 0 0 F INISH- Â·74,0.12:t'' kit'-}-9 011;,Â·117.,1'. . ../f .4 1, ft, 4 ....1. . 1, ':Of f.h'llill{?~,'.M '1Â·;;~' if?'Â·-~~ rÂ· Â· rp-/ I ~ T-3 rf f;fll , Pti.18Â»Ml-+0*i - -1 ~ 1 IT---1 'rf 1 4,1Â£.la>4441 -1. -1 - 4/:rid , Â· /7~4Ifif.-,~ I 0 Â¥51:4 U- 27 --*---5.'16. 9.'M . - - -- -22-Â¥--2 -IM -- --- ....... V . . . Â·309-134, .- & 2 k 17.'4.- 4 '1FAâ€¢7 Â· ....' -' F---7 - r. 7 11 h .1, - ., :.00' 1 1 - P fr- - , /. -- - 4 61: v z !11 -0,1 : :,11,5 '.r-4;11=441 4,- - ':11/jr>,1 1 * uLXIEL /.dÂ·)2-Â· 4 71; tf t;'2~41 11Â»-7 Lti - .i ..:C., Ge ' + '*1:: Iki'Â·t. '1-1,~tif 1Â· *+ . p.i- ~~ wi ft:i--112-1 6* /4/*:? 4-6Â£ 9 : ' -in,/44Â¢'jiL. 229.0 . . - ~-- .1- 1 1 \ __ ~ ___ - <4:9**2% ft-#-.:~A vk~ i. h .\ . 2Â«effe\ , 6 . I. 1.-91%01 :/4â‚¬tÂ»p~~ 1 . i-- . * Il ' I .- SFDOBTUEÂ« LKER BU I L DI he . 1 . EAST ELEÂ»TI ON , 1/14/91 . t. . i ic -1 Â· it.9 -...â‚¬t 1. I. 1.:!4:.. 4 PEN,1714OUSE (SEMONCI) 1 . . 1 =6.----- . trtill.J , 1 , 1 1 '''I// . ' r r- 1Â·V\ L; 4 -~ 57-UEL o ' 1 F 1 >4 114~ T:==1 r.--14 , lt---1-'Ir--- , . 11 t..31.1 11 1 Â¥.41 J~ 11 1 A !1 ,}51;41; 41 Â· 11 11 ; t.4 11 Al, 1 . 11, ---- ----- ----' #-44-4-1 ... . t t.--~.1~EBE-1/ 4 LO i , 1 ,. ==I--~ .= 4-.'.-- -/1. , S 1 11 -1 - Ir...t-'j P.-1It-/-\1' 1 , 1--Â»72:11 1 1 \\ , . >Ft) RESTAL-KER E>UILDINe 41]714 ELE V.ATI ON , 14/ el