The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.1989121314 \ n d 341( . >fl JI AGENDA i tri o , HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE December 13, 1989 REGULAR MEETING SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM City Hall 5:00 I. Roll call II. Committee Member & Staff Comments III. Public Comment IV. OLD BUSINESS 5:10 A. Conceptual Development - Public Hearing Continued Wheeler-Stallard House, Carriage House Addition 620 W. Bleeker,9/7~ 5:30 V. NEW BUSINESS J A. Mihor Development - Hotel Jerome exterior lighting 5:45 B./ Minor Development n -Carnevale Restaurant stairway o canopy . UM../. 6:00 C. Goals for the 90's session: Please review your copy of the Historic Preservation Element of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan (see Roxanne if you need an extra copy). Bring this and your goals to the meeting. 6:45 D. Inventory Re-evaluation Assignments E. Communications: Project Monitoring Committee Member Comments ADJOURN by 7:00 p.m. 'fF- A) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Conceptual Development Review - Public Hearing Continued, Wheeler-Stallard House, 620 W. Bleeker Date: December 13, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant has revised the plans for the carriage house addition and is requesting HPC's conceptual approval. An FAR variation on 140.5 sq. ft. is also requested. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: On October 18, 1989, the HPC reviewed the proposal to add restrooms and storage space in the form of an addition to the Historical Society's Wheeler-Stallard Carriage House. The Committee found the design incompatible with the parcel, and unanimously voted to table action, allowing the applicant time to restudy the proposal. STAFF'S COMMENTS: The revised proposal more accurately reflects the Committee's previous review comments. The overall size of the restrooms and storage space has been significantly reduced, and the roof form redesigned, creating more of a "T" cross gable. The south elevation indicates three four-panel doors, two of which access the storage space, one accesses the common hallway serving the restrooms. The size of the restrooms has also been reduced. <-) Two alternatives have been submitted for the east elevation. - C -Alternative "A" indicates three one-over-one double hung windows, which are compatible, and help to break up the wall. They would' be operable, however, the applicant stated they would "probably be frosted glass for privacy". Alternative "B" indicates no windows, and a sandstone veneer base, similar to the main house. Staff feels the window approach in Alternative "A" is more compatible, and recommends it for approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Conceptual Development approval and an FAR variation of 140.5 ft., for the addition to the Wheeler-Stallard Carriage House, with the following conditions to be met at Final Development Review: 1. Exact materials shall be Â·represented 2. Landscaping plans, including walkway materials, shall \ be submitted 'memo.hpc.620wb.2 CHARLES CUNNIFFE &ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 520 EAST HYMAN SUITE 301, ASPEN, CO 81611 303/925-5590 CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, A.I.A. CARRIAGE ADDITION HOUSE PROPOSAL The Stallard Carriage House Museum was constructed in 1976 to provide museum display space and house the archives of the Aspen Historical Society. As the popularity and use of the Stallard House, the Carriage House Museum, and the Society grounds have increased, a number of glaring inadequacies have surfaced. Among them are the lack of public restrooms, the lack of storage for miscellaneous equipment, and a lack of handicapped access and bathroom facilities. We are proposing to eliminate the problem by the addition of men's and women's restrooms and a handicap bathroom meeting the required building codes on the east side of the Carriage House with a small store room wrapping around the south side of the Carriage House. Currently, the only inside bathroom is located downstairs in the Carriage House. The use of this bathroom by the public jeopardizes the security of the Historical Society's archives which are stored on that floor and is not accessible to the handicapped. Further public toilets have been provided in the form of portable toilets as illustrated on Plate 6 or the photographic section. We believe the addition is a definite improvement while also providing storage for miscellaneous items currently stored under tarps against the building. The past few years have provided increases in the number of weddings, meetings, community benefits, garden events, and visitors to the Stallard House grounds. We have taken these increases into account, as well as minimum public restroom requirements in coming up with our plan for this addition. The new addition would mirror the West Elevation of the Carriage House. With either windows or a wainscot treatment reminiscent of the main residence establishing this as a distinct addition. Exterior materials wpuld match the existing Carriage House. The proposed addition would be screened from the streets by existing planting and fences as illustrated by the photos on page one of the photographic section. Paved walkways and a handicap ramp would provide increased access to the facilities and a grant has been applied for in order to fund the walkway improvements. Conversations with a landscape architect indicate that the pine tree adjacent to the proposed addition would be unaffected by the construction or, if it seems to suffer, could be easily moved back several feet. We also feel that this proposed addition would clean up the view experienced by the residents of the Victorian cottage on the corner lot of this block, the only people who must constantly look at the Carriage House from their property. 0 I . 2... 0 - 'f 6- -- 9 -- -E n 4 . Itt .. L I , I ..4 Nt=r./.*... 1 In '9710 0 i - r.1+ANP[gAr--7 #-1-81 -" 4 AMr - r \5 --2->12)1061%71--+ tr : A t\VN rÂ« L==IiI & 04-ijld 221Â£3 0 -4-*44 444#F#*7JUMâ€¢ 94*44 3-4,3*â€¢e~-Â¥43*,w I - F . L./19) Â»MAN-p'int-F (~1-.p#;17 PAR IC 1,1 NFS *.-, PAÂ»-1 - 41 - Oll '1 , 4 1 2 -.9 362. PR_ 2: 0 15 f. 11) Â«ALE; 111 = 101 -C) fÂ»Ft>Se[7 Fl-O,9 P. FLAN 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1% .r}442Â«\ . h + \ ' 69< - Al I Â«AN. f* 1 913Â« ivtÂ¥*tÂ«19 / 1 1 -*gatpol / i -21-/ J -7 1 8 1 -/ '- lilli EE EE >TALLAIQU~ d:Al~~FLI 46*1 CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS ft=,U#p MubTE-U H P.O. BOX 3534. ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 i\| 67'_19/01-51 1 -sl &4 _231 ials. 1111 El ~ ~ '11\\ d l\\ 11 \1\ ~3 .4,44~418121101 1 11 c\/4532532/7/ / a A**4*deÂ«// ' 2 90/ 1 \ 1 10 2 I ' 'illilijl 97-4 LLAKP LARIA]AA F CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCH[TECTS H G Ul'5* 1.1 UAT LI M P.O BOX 3534, ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 v Â° +ID 99*18 91 II It 111 3 it--_ -7 -- ==:X. -t -- 1 17- - - 4-- - . C-[1Ptu b\\ 3 -- Â»OLLED A. trk...4' / - tk*,Ar-23â€¢56,7 1 - - .11**47,/ - Avil -1 -- -1 - - 1/ ==U / - 11' 1 1 r - I lai lilli lili i';i 9-TAL-LA12:ty .5-ASS.'Â»Ae CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHFTECTS t|QU'90- 1/|L[50 Lit'I P O. BOX 3534. ASPEN COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 El Q)9944 N o 13-v,/vÂ©% 2-4 431 II 0655-526/ECE BNOKÂ·633131 ZI9!8 (XMIO-lCD -NBdSV 'DESE XOR -Od o aN1O7O0 ' [19 J 94 LHM1erILH 3,5hOH &1031.IH:)21Â¥/Sal.VIDOSSV 9 ELJ=IINNnD S3121Â¥1-13 1 -bvt-3-ZIV-7 Crzivll'â‚¬19 4 0 0 4-1- . Â£ /11'fbi, - . Al/ .10 7 f L - 7~_ h ,-' 1-vj 5 Ip -1 L ~3 w U --e 11 -8 1 Z 0% - *i:i:i:12*/FÂ· 4 3 5 - / 01 42:.:..:6. 3 , -- itt 33Â£;i;illl-L 13' .- 4374/ 4 -=-zi--/11 2 - . - 9- [f 1 - bri ~ .ruÂ£_~ : r JEz==1, - ---*- -50/4 i ~f i BO 1 K 0- , 6 69- 453 L\.I , .1 I. K .A"Ji 1- 42 - O.1 Â» 11<0 < I kle ' D . 4.-0,9 0 4 , 0 /0 - .. p <f ~~ rf 1*~~~~~~1 U A.Jj 0,44#02 * 4<1,9r2do . S.bC *11 k.kr .>Elluor LE Reor-2 ./J~ 0 .- r .r - Â· -Â£---*.*I--./.-I#*..I=Â£...m./.1.-ID.--.*.-I).7-----pl..;.-.A--*.I . , N MW pi*Â» %00 1,~lr' to. 1 r--- f - h 2 41 21144 -TD MATOIL,1 5-7- 1 EP T- 1 t46>r rK 01706 0- P MÂ»T ELIEVATI O 14 1*DA 1.-C: 1/ell 1,-011 _~_ , GRM:IRAL r.........#a...-2..1 6 6 10 15 20 26 7 Â¥ 1 92#1%30 DZ 01 31 01 0 ) 12 4(ID E ho- 11 1,94 calÂ»'74 plolly/<El-1â‚¬I Hlrlos d-33<24 62332 --- - 1--- ~l it//J - - -alll 2- ........ **1/ 1 9 - . 0655-526/EOE 3NIOHd3131 ZI9!8 OCV30-103 'N3dSV *SE >(08 Od O dÂ¥*21 (710 C >Irl 94 >1 W &1031.JHDEV/SHIVIDOSSV Â¥ addINNnE) 53-1.hIVH 39'%/ 122,03 C['39 ~1_<g- '1 i I -1 1 i \ 6 7 111 1\ 0 1 5 = 7 rNÂ©. I E-1--3 or-.RAZ+0, , -'-0 ~rkÂ».i I . 0 --1 A 11 35,4.2/1~ 1 11 1 06..iJ/,01' -I1 ~- fir 1-1 1 Fi 0 r = p 1 0 IL t ''i 1-1 1 11 1 1 '-1 1 1 1; 1 1. 21 1 t lilli 1!: 1 1 lili i F Â·11 11 lit: 1 'til 1 1 1 1 1 '1 .s-TALLARD C.AirR) AA E CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHFTECTS 14oulSE MutE.14 M Asre-N, 601-DKA. pO P.O. BOX 3534. ~PEN. COLORADO 8,612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 .i. f - -44- -- 1 I. -- a.--- -- 1- -- 00 -1] ELI 00 1- 00 - - -U' - ty - 2 IT NE] En 3 R] -1 LEI ] a 3 0 0 A J F'Ra poSED> hNES:T EUE.VATI ON 11-011 PeeRSAL Â° - Â» ~, . 5 lt1 Ill S.C)3111Â·Â·DUV/SHIVIDOSSV Â¥ REINNnE) S3-IHVHJ 0655-526/EOE 3NO-03-131 2!9!8 COVNO-103 'N3d99/ DESE XO8 Od O + (91=149 Ei*"trz~ Ctlt CHARLES CUNNIFFE &ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 520 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 301, /\SPEN, CO 81611 303/925-5590 CHARLES L CUNNIFFE, A.I.A. STALLARD CARRIAGE HOUSE PROPOSED BATHROOM ADDITION Request for F.A.R. Variance R-6 Zoning District within which the Stallard House lies allows 6298.0 sq. ft. The existing square footage of the Carriage House & Main House as estimated from exterior dimensions = 6,026 sq. ft. Proposed F.A.R. with 412.5 sq. ft. addition = 6,438.5 sq. ft. Proposed = 6438.5 sq. ft. Allowed = 6298.0 sq. ft. Variance in Sq. Footage Requested = 140.5 sq. ft. c:\wp50\work\8613.FAR SITE COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Existing Structure Lot Area - 53,658 s.f. Zone - Historic Landmark within R-6 Allowable Site Coverage of 20% = 10,731.6 s.f. Site Coverage Existing House and Carriage House = 3,225 s.f. Existing Porches and Breezeway = 675 s.f. Less exemption for 15% of allowable = 2,414.6 s.f. Net countable porch area = 0 s.f. Total countable site coverage = 3,225 s.f. SITE COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Proposed Structure Lot Area - 53,658 s.f. Zone - Historic Landmark within R-6 Allowable Site Coverage of 20% = 10,731.6 s.f. Site Coverage of Existing House, Carriage House = 3,225.0 s.f. Proposed Carriage House Addition = 412.5 s.f. Porches and Breezeways (Net) 0 s.f. Total Countable Site Coverage = 3,637.5 s.f. FAR CALCULATIONS Lot Area - 53,658 s.f. Zone - Historic landmark within R-6 .Allowable FAR = 6,298 s.f. Allowable extension for non- conforming landmarks (9-103 (c) (2)) = 500 s.f. Must be ok'd by H.P.C. 6,798 s.f. FAR of existing structures: Main.House: Lower Level = 1,975 s.f. Upper Level = 1,343 s.f. Attic Level = 770 s.f. Porches over 3 ft. = 688 s.f. ' Subtotal 4,776 s.f. Carriage House: Lower Level = 1,250 s.f. Total existing square footage 6,026 s.f. FAR CALCULATIONS Proposed Bathroom and Storage Addition 412.5 s.f. to Carriage House Existing Square Footage 6,026 s.f. Total Proposed Square Footage 6438.5 s.f. _M- 43 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Hotel Jerome Lighting Plan - Minor Development Date: December 13, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant has submitted a proposal for significant exterior lighting of the National Register Hotel Jerome, and is requesting HPC's approval of the proposal. Following a previous review and discussion of an exterior lighting proposal by the Hotel, the managers/applicant selected Gibson & Reno, Architects, to assist them in proper lighting design. DISCUSSION: The proposal includes the addition of incandescent lighting both down from the top cornice line, and up from the first floor cornice. These additional external lights are intended to supplement the existing lighting, and fill in those dark expanses of wall. The east, west and south elevations all receive the additional lighting. It appears that the proposal is minimalist, and compatible to the historic landmark. Architectural elements will be featured in "warm" incandescent light, which promotes the structure. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC approve the Minor Development proposal for exterior lighting of the Hotel Jerome, subject to the condition that the Committee review and approve the lighting fixtures to be used. The applicant shall bring an example to the meeting. memo.hpc.320em L 6- GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS November 17, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: HOTEL JEROME EXTERIOR LIGHTING Gentlemen: We propose to Improve the exterior lighting as follows: 1. Addition of incandescent downlight wallwashers at the cornice line along both east and west sides of the building, and, 2. Addition of incandescent uplight floodlights to be placed along the lower cornice line directed upwards to light the brick piers along the south side of the building. Discussion: The exterior lighting which exists is limited to three areas--- 1) signage lighting at the porch, 2) two small corner up/downlight floods, and 3) incandescent cove lighting along the parapet along the east and south sides. The existing parapet cove lighting creates a very inter- esting nightime effect in which the parapet seems to "float" above the building. This parapet lighting will remain and will not be disturbed. However below the parapetare largeemansâ‚¬s of dark un-illuminated wall areas. The proposed additional incandescents will serve to highlight the natural,brick of these presently un-illum- inated walls with warm incandescent lighting. The down- light wall washets along the east and west sides will highlight the areas below the cornice, and the uplight floods along the south will highlight the brick piers at the 2nd and 3rd storey levels. The goal of the added lighting is to supplement the interesting existing lighting, to highlight the inter- esting color and texture of the brick, and to enliven an important historic structure at Aspen's main inter- section. sifcjr ely , </ / lulpl) U //, fy_~ /'David F. Gibson, AIA DFG/ppr Enc. 418 E. COOPEA AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925 5968 a 1 ' r 7-1 1, A â€ž ~1 E-1 ." A â€¢ "A. - .A. 31 " 4- El 1 1 1 0--- -- --1 1 1 H - 2-1 1- _ - - -11 i 1 /f==4 01 0 -=L-0 0--0 (3- - ---.C , 0 CJL,LIP-28-9- 1 - -, 2] U _1 _ ~ 1 140â„¢..:rkâ€¢018 * 13 '--T-1 Lj 21 EN 12-3 -6 3 3 U . E M=0 85 i=-i=- catiu- t#* = - 4- 1 Id ,, r-19'[Il~Il'li -,6.dll 9**HEEEL ~ -I /- NOTES: EAST ELEVATION â€¢'A" Incandescent downlight wall#asher with porcelain reflector to be placed at upper cornice line. (Appleton # LPR-25AN or equalÂ·.) -B- Incandescent uplight floods to be placed at lower cornice line directed upwards to light brick piers. (Progress *5202 or equal.) * All eposed conduit/boxes to be painted to match brick. 1 1 - 1 L JU--1 121 L=43.04 ==ir-1 r-.L -=1 f JIL & Arn,J ~21[h LTJ 14 7 L- 1 111 i' 22 -_--di !' 1 1-. -- *___~ /0-_23_-Â¢2- Ip-L [2[311 IFigi~tÂ©'g 1[30 {1-1 ~O-- Al@* B Mil==41Â»IL" 8-ULIÂ·B- C]|E] Â·8. =I] a _ ]1 LI-Un -LE]~1.8.16*Elnd po,cl:.) v u Ll E jitdic-Ukr~' nnrv il-IN.~~,2>413+2-122?S' 0=. 122 61 1 11! It, 1 1 lili 1 --5 1 1 9 --1, 1 :il''i r===1 1. 1 - r I -1 11 P-- - 3 1----li 1 1 -.11 1-1 L_23.-0 3/2222 ' 10 0 9 -FOL-J 1 141 , 1 . SOUTH ELEVATION 1 1 1 , 6661 1 4=1 -11 A n .1 A. "A" - " A - -=s==2.- 3- LLE 8 - 2 -3 L[ tz=1 1:=1. 2~1 6-= al : -- 4-21 BL-2 0 9 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 00 0 ! Z=53. Z=h . 0 -8 1 -1 -L] LJ 3 1-3. O 2 1 9 23 ,~1 Ji,6 -Ell 1 21 IE==1. 1-1 21 1-~ii jil" Ill : li i: 1 ~--r Â£ 1 271 1 R=> 'HaTEI- cremoM= 1 -Â· -h. 212.21 .3 (21 /13 4-2 1-2 23 -- LJ L] 3 ~ 3 0 2 1)01 1-31 E 0-1 E-1 1 11 1 11 1 =64 1=11 VVEST ELEVATION ~ TALE I 11 /fÂ« 9 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Minor Development - 430 E. Hyman Ave., Carnevale Restaurant, Stairway canopy Date: December 13, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting HPC approval for the - installation of a stair awning/canopy and lighting for the courtyard entrance to the (lower level) Carnevale Restaurant. Earlier this year, the HPC reviewed an application for the lower level storefront remodel, and the stairway canopy was discussed briefly at that time. This proposal formalizes the request for approval for the canopy and lighting. STAFF COMMENTS: Referral comments from the Zoning Officer have not been received at the time of memo preparation. This proposal may constitute an increase in FAR, possibly requiring additional Planning Office/P&Z approvals. The awning style proposed may be described as a "key hole" enclosure, leading from the sidewalk level down to the lower level landing, turning left and continuing down to the restaurant entry door. The purpose for the awning is to prevent snow from making the stairway impassable, which staff finds reasonable. Staff finds this awning design incompatible with traditional awning styles in the Commercial Core Historic District, and recommends a simpler version be designed. An arched top, possibly with straight roll up sides, is preferred. The results would be the same, the overall cost would be less, and the design more compatible, in our opinion. Low-voltage lighting is proposed along the railing, hidden below the top handrail, which staff finds generally appropriate. ALTERNATIVES: Staff's recommendation (below) to deny application approval may be countered with a negotiated revision between the HPC and the applicant at this meeting. One alternative may be to assign a project monitor, or simply have staff sign off on revised plans, per HPC design standards, when they are submitted. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC deny the Minor Development application for the stairway canopy for 430 E. Hyman. A revised application may be submitted, with an actual material sample, for future HPC review, or staff signoff. memo.hpc.430eh 09 -23(91 Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL- CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER PHONE (303) 927Â·4262 DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 923-3428 December 4, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission Aspen, Colorado Amended Application: Minor Historic Development Woods Building/Carnevale Restaurant 430 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 We request that our application for the courtyard remodel, submitted March 6, 1989, be amended as follows: Stair lighting and canvas canopy - we are asking for approval for a steel frame/canvas entry canopy to be installed the full length of the stairway leading down into the courtyard of the Woods Building/Carnevale Restaurant. Please refer to the enclosed drawings for details. A model will be presented at the HPC meeting for members' clarification. The purpose of the canopy is to provide winter weather protection for patrons of the restaurant. The canopy will be employed only in the winter; the entire assembly is being designed by American Awning Company of Denver to be completely removable so that the courtyard will remain open in the summer to provide outside dining 1 space. The present wood stairs become dangerously icy even with regular snow removal, and ice-melting salts cause floor cleaning problems within the restaurant. Stair lighting will be with low voltage string lights attached to the underside of the stair rails (both sides), providing an indirect light source to safely illuminate the steps. All lighting, canvas and metal framework are completely within the courtyard and do not encroach on any public right-of-way. Resgedâ‚¬~ull*Aubmitted, 41 1 3442Â»h Robert L. Walker/ Project Manager P.O BOX 12369 â€¢ ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 . \If, Al - U ..1 11 1293*Ad Â· E :ifÂ«Â»4Â·Â«44230*~*2*,14:ZM,#4Â£2*.-74~-564253/le/:r / I. I.'-I-.I.---1.. < . ~-+43?fAN LU:, -.'674,9,:@P.Â«.eÂ«:%Â·AR,for.43*f Â»i-9 - 1 /~ ExiST, <10 hic. â‚¬,TAIes-p - 1 ~ PA > CE>=/er, Mroo o f Desks - 1 C 2*19'7. CONC- 4 0664 3 -/-1 4 , /1/ 1 1 1/ 7 1-/ 44 1 j )4,1 - 1 ~~1 5>V,732â‚¬A,vab . .l , / . , A ivA~ 1 1 -l A j E><2/97-. M/0007 7 , / i Â«7:4/2'5 -0 .-/ 1 -i V 24 /6/6'679 l 2,4"--.-1 1 9.- d 2 --..- 6/NE OF CANOPM â‚¬NT R.-1 2>6/97-, CONC . SLAD 9 ~ 4~ New W ALL 7 9 n I , 41 1 -4 '-4 1-r- . i,M - I I 4 1 4 % A ,.. ''ji: ,. 1~. .1 . . ; t= 4-01â‚¬.,2 2:p,=,= 6%-1-97-, .._ ~~ .q , U. I 2 57Â·.i'-2Â· Â·' ' ' - 4 ' 71 , y f.,$ i-z ~V' : '( . 4; i - .... I 1 ...1 51 1 4 4 .I -/ 'A -7=VW AY NYWAH Â«710 J M li'111.ili . 1 - I *i Vig'/9 0111 t JA 1- 1 ~1 ~ 1 4 4 1 , 1 3 92 1 A v.42Â£94 1.-4 7 1 4.Irj i Le NE fit- D Pr. 7 0.- CI_ : . 1 -- - ..dy 11 4 1 1 1 1 Â·1 1 ' ' 1 11,1 , f-' b (,1 & Adu- 196414- 7-0 M B. 5 0 9~-LL~' 1 1 1 --- - "&1(881::tri, iON (Tlm) : ~ , 04% lf)' " ikwAr- hukrl. fll/A j - 1 'i''' 1 1 1 1 Â· il:'It Â· /1 - i . -3\1 1 1 . J -4 1 1/1 1 1 . 1 1\! : 1 4 ' 4, !' , 1 7; 731-; 0 1 . 1 \-4; 1 29,79'61 ' ..._ 1 ~4 - Ir- ,))14 0- 11 1 i r. Â·Â· 0 ,3 45 4 1 2 1 iii 1 < i \ 1 1 '- Il ! ii /11:i , , Ij'' . -- 1 1'. 1 . ~.t-'*.1- . - . '~ 1 . 1.1 ..It 1 , 1 #,1 1 1 1 i' 1. iii ]Ii I/; 1 1 i : ; 1 : i t Iii ; 1 , 1 1 1 , 11. 1 li '' ' ' '11,1 i CoN 1-l hin,. 97-2J FfG , 1 ... <4 1 - aoub r:'47:48,6 LAsh,hk ,~:; 1 -1 1 . 1,1 11 ,1 { 1 1 'f,-1 1,- 1 1: i 1 f--4 2% W [1 TU- 4-- SUP/04-1-1 1 E rirri (74 h * 6/ 4 lili 1 , 1 10 , 1 . 1 1 1 i ' 71 nli tric./Fitb.1 ........ 1 1 . , - t. ! 1 1- i ; Ili i 11; Or 1 11 lh--Tz/El; 24 #p~/.A=y-L- .9 . 1 t I : .i le ' ; -1 '44 - 11 1 1 1 - i. '.4 1 .tri 1 1 , 71 - J f2.11! 1 1 Â· .@1 i i. li i ,(, , Â· Ch .Â· 1 . 1 . 1 , - . I lili ./4.11 , 14/ I ::ii ' 1 . . ..11 1 1 . 1 t , Ii, ! 1 0: $ 1 1 1 Â· 4-. 2 1.1 1 5 1 1 1 i ~ , , , , l./.46. (,f 'EY /477/1/6 h.4.4.0.Kh 1 1 1 1. 1 1 . --1 11 ; 1 1 1 1 t. 1 : ~ ~Eâ‚¬,A<~-'~ ~~ 4 / - U 1 . 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 i ' .. . 1 ! ' 1 , 1, Th!# d**tgn li thi *$<cru-thi propertf bf ArMErld&-fi AWnlrit CC A Divisto-ri bf .1 Colorado Sto,1, Inc, and cannot be reproduced, manufactured or fabrkated i elther In wholo or In part without thoir written consent (Bas)43--017?49 1il 0 4 41 sy . t-, >-i Ain.f. . tlll li_ Â· Â· '' ' 1 SMAN_ 111 l W 2-9 1, 11 CONSENT TO BUILDING PLANS Pursuant to that certain Lease Agreement dated July 1, 1978, and the Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated January 3, 1989 (hereinafter collectively the "Lease"), by and between Ransom B. Woods, Jr. ("Landlord") and Toro's of Aspen, Inc., which Lease was subsequently assigned to Thomas J. Hoffmaster who in turn subleased the premises to TH-LR, Inc., a Colorado corporation, any tenant is required to secure the prior written approval of any tenant improvements constructed by tenant or any subtenant. In compliance with such provisions, TH-LR, Inc. , has presented to the Landlord and Hoffmaster the following Plans for tenant improvements: 1. Proposed courtyard additions; 0.*Nopy 2. Proposed courtyard wall-South (bar) elevation; 3. Proposed courtyard wall-West (entrance) wall; and 4. Proposed existing courtyard/entry plan. Landlord Mnd Hoffmaster hereby consent to construction of the tenant improvements contemplated by the above building plans subject to the following: 1. That a permit for construction of such tenant improvements is obtained by TH-LR, Inc., from the City of Aspen. 2. That a licensed contractor be hired by TH-LR, Inc., to supervise the work and to complete such tenant improve- ments. 3. That all building codes and requirements to the City of Aspen will be complied with in regard to construction of such tenant improvements. 4. That TH-LR, Inc., will assume all liability for such tenant improvements and that it will provide liability and workmens' compensation insurance regarding the construction of such tenant improvements. 5. That TH-LR, Inc., will assume all cost and that it will hold Landlord and Hoffmaster harmless from any mechanic's or materialmens' liens regarding the construction of the tenant improvements. Dated: March 6, 1989. fÂ»---9 \t XIC- ~Ransom B. Woods, Jr:, Landlord 1 - r C- I t J 21 5.210 Thomas J. Eldf fij~~tâ‚¬F MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Goals for the '90's Date: December 13, 1989 SUMMARY: Aspen's Historic Preservation program has become an increasingly important element in this community since it was first formalized in 1972. As we look forward to the future, we can evaluate past successes to help guide us in setting goals for the next decade. All indicators dictate an increase in the level of technical expertise and community education necessary to strengthen the preservation program. We must incorporate historic preservation into other community goals, and be aware of how our goals and actions effect the overall community. It is clear that the program can not be effective if it operates on the periphery. With these things in mind, it is now time to re-evaluate the 1986 Historic Preservation Element of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, analyze successes and failures and set new goals. As your roadmap, the HP Element provides an excellent foundation to formulate your thoughts and outline new goals for 1990 and beyond. Staff prepared a number of goals (and some objectives), which was included in your November 8 packet. Please review these, and outline your thoughts accordingly. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC establish a set of short-term, mid-term and long range goals, to be accomplished within the next five years, and direct staff to prepare a Resolution for adoption at the January 10, 1990 HPC meeting. memo.hpc.goals.2 L CY. 0 43 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Inventory Re-Evaluation - Assignments Date: December 13, 1989 We will begin our field work for the Inventory Re-Evaluation in January. The following will happen to every historic resource: 1. Photographed - black and white 2. Documented in writing as to extent of changes since last inventory evaluation on new form 3. Context, landscaping, and secondary structures/outbuildings will be noted and described 4. Significant interiors noted where possible 5. Resource will be categorized in one of the following categories: a) Significant b) Contributing c) Supporting d) Non-contributing (new structures in historic districts) Staff will work on-site with each of you, following in-office orientation meetings, to be scheduled. The goal is to have the re-evaluation completed prior to June, with neighborhood/public meetings held in late spring. The final evaluation results will be mapped and recorded, and presented to Council for formal adoption at a public hearing. ### The city has been divided up and assigned as follows: (A map is attached for reference) West End: Bill Poss, Don Erdman East End: Georgeann Waggaman, Les Holst Main Street: Joe Krabacher, Charles Cunniffe Commercial Core: Chris Durakis Shadow Mountain: Glenn Rappaport (continued) West End Study area: Will include Aspen Institute/Riding Ring area, Hallam Lake and the Rio Grande Right-of-Way Existing Resources: Approximately 120 Proposed district boundaries: North of Main, including the original Aspen Townsite and Hallam's Addition boundaries, from west of 8th St. to boundary of Hallam Lake, proceeding southeast to Mill. East End Study area: Will include entire "East End" and East Aspen Townsite, Smuggler Mountain, Oklahoma Flats (from Mill Street east), south to the Mountain, including Ute Cemetery, Durant Mine and Highway 82 resources within the City. Existing Resources: 52 Main Street Historic District Study area: Existing District Boundaries, plus one block west Existing Resources: 34 Commercial Core Historic District Study Area: Existing District Boundaries Existing Resources: 39 Shadow Mountain Study Area: Includes all area north of Main (mountain base, etc.), from the Holden-Marolt Site east to the Gondola Existing Resources: 21 Note: All other fringe historic resources, i.e. Castle Creek Power Plant, Red Butte Cemetery, will be evaluated by this assigned committee member. Total Number of Historic Resources: Approximately 266 2 \,ULA.--1 -, \ ...1/ ..... \ Arc 7--- \ FIGURE 111.2 .t___~_jl 98~ INV E~TO~Y Idit H~TOFTIC ES AND STRUCTURES : ' LEGEND -0- '1986 UPD~ E , 1409 - 4 ~ EAS:&211Qaa!.51[wgiw[Za designated m ASPEN, COLOR* O - - ' not yet designated o 9.1------ ~tu-f//l/1 4-1/ El=Uint-21Â£uctll[29 -, designated â€¢ PREPARED BY THE ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING FFICE @-se not yet designated a . Notable Structureil ,00 800 designated e - not yet designated O 1 ~~~ ~~ ' ~ 0 200 400 ' (52ntributing_Strucipes 0 EXISING.ilitailia,BICIS 0 *iff Â· 0 2. conÂ·rnercial core 11@IPâ‚¬*DISTE*GIS MiDER CONSIDERATION 5.community church 3.west bleeker/hallam street 4.hallam lake 6.lift 1 b -â€¢ 00 . . . ...u %324ttli\to,Ii . X-\ - .: * __ i i I b r n--: 2 . \\ -m . / --1-- 9--1 I / 3*1Eti \ b --ac- if t-Juilll [i_i~krh~r ll< $ 1 L_J Ull.~+-1 J -4*-1 1-* 1- - I: 7~4 4-'MT\ 2-5. 0.- ) jit}111]1,L..1,ii,kh NIWL lil~INL Et-~H JEiti-91. '.- / \4 . . 2-Af initlit>â€¢ER{EVIM]Â§Â¢, T1. ~,~-3 '[Ok,443 L . *30, i - Tfule 1 p- 0\ h , ff If[~[[2 Emifi~2: .f{1ill [Inilit [1~~02iâ‚¬ ~Cf@[Il Â®il]E=1-114~~ 4E]Tri~~i Â·-' Of ~ ---1 -1 - /-1- fi . -j qÂ« 1 ~* Â·..ju [Ii*!E @@-E J]-2.121] [1Â¤TIED II]W'_]I Jili]IB tfIT]E~[Vinil]1[ING] Â·' -7 -7 -aME . <. 7#.44 11 itt \\.,2 11~~, i rh.... ~ 2222== ,\ 4%41 .1.8 tÂ» -7Â· 'Cl 1 .- --- L - e - 911 -[}112 -ft 21]lqjj:[H:11]FF [[Nlilil~[]fiP{BI [iftim [8]21J [!14[-5 1&%[m [Ullt j i. J"- - -- 1 r -- .1 732.9 - ./2- 11 _122 [Hill,bli] f [13[1] JI!111'tE-FITfinÂ»t}3118. [f[[WIN 11[13- _LE 1111** [HIWILNN~liÂ· n . -Ar. n .T ~ 3%117.1.1 1.1-' : 1i Till'Hil -91- f i- 11 +1 11 1 ~ i T , 116 [TIO[ll- -4 ' IF i ~; ,! 1 6 1. j [li~ 1 11 O ' tri . .... 4 -Um] [MiL]Fij] 4-: ~15 2. in] I Â·,f[[1 [Ii{-1 I,i FLIT, " 1 7ai# 42*Eptitwii]-ti~ nti/7 - . n . f ..in ' . Iti..-' . -ii - 9, . i:t:1 1 -----_._1 - .- . 2.Gili] [[EI[iiI WII!10' 11[Il]1}411911 -Im-lf[Till Illillilll IN It - 11 OU h, Â«111111[I i E-Imt['1 [il-WI[[Ii E D-38 1 1*4101Â· -ii. litt}]il] 1-fWi[J] ~Of-Wilf' [Il]J,11{N ITTLYM I E5#I]flE]fl] [!112}11] [[[ 81.EN' 6 // -mLEY[[[fl [HESH]NJ.!CliNEIM[L tl]I[[[Ill EliC yE.!B [EN* Wilift-Nt Hill 1-IN [Ilnitill [liti]111] II]111[ID. 1 I Â«' <+Iwit] 11[1] [Jign 11] i[[[Wit[] [EVIDi Hw IN [lf#?IN.t?illi-rill IllUTO]I [I]fill]. Â£11233*i~-ni[} F Â«6*C[Â©lill] : [118,21111 .Inllifill _----] Illi]Eia M]]112 EÂ®].[[Hilitil.[1140]; [tiwm]- 19 901 [NPR mliHip [Elillili ! litil] 1911Â® DIE[Il [-11-El[[0 [El TIINE[-f â€¢ f' A ) Shal/91('8:0 Elli{I-[[[111-19! [i[TE; -_ li~nwi-~t~-Chefi ft[0111] HIWIN]~ [IllU[liji [[!~lffill-WH- 4(f:- __ C_ Ifil}UE,--ilÂ®Mi- VÂ®-i!111111] [1]Witi [flUTI i tilij;Ilitt [IligHZ Hil#titi~31~WliII 1 Ad-Ab [ L- HIÂ·HÂ·GLB [ME- .1 . - 1.-il-[- 1}F[*- - ..1... .4 .. 1111111111111111 Prm IÂ·:Â·iÂ·TiÂ·11'931 -[IHH{Â·FÂ· [[,l~EP R'_ 7 1 Pfui] -i [-Â·-'t Â·- 3 - 1,11111Â· p . M ili t-- Frim] 2 - r 1 F :22 14/ /-41 l '0Â·1112.\j-1 - I - *47. 4 N /W >Â·\ i / .. 1 . (AREAs i 33 [i,HA [Rt' i- ftll I rtbbl. [1-L#j 'Â· 1 ([hil] fit- ~ 4 1-__ 1 hc-1 4 y / 1,11â‚¬111/ 1 1 1 Ill.19 I -- . - --- R~ . . MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Boulder's Landmark Commission Review Evaluation Date: December 13, 1989 Attached is a copy of Boulder's recent community outreach effort. The Mapleton Hill Design Review Evaluation was sent to all historic property owners who have gone through a review since the district was formed in 1982. The purpose was to evaluate ways to improve the process and the Review Board's image in the community. Results indicated varied opinion, generally middle of the road. I bring this to your attention for information only, and as " food for thought" for future community outreach, particularly within the context of developing the West End Historic Overlay next year. !98-04 Ad-OLL MAPLETON HILL DESIGN REVIEW EVALUATION Since 1982, the City of Boulder Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board has been reviewing exterior alterations to buildings in the Mapleton Hill Historic District. The Landmarks Board design mview committee reviewed your request for a landmark alteration certificate. We would like to know how you felt about the review process. If you have had more than one alteration reviewed, use this questionaire to express the general impression you have from all of your reviews. Below are a few short questions. Your candid responses, which are completely anonymous, will help future applicants receive the best service possible. For each item, please circle the response that best describes your opinion. Strongly Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Aoree Agree Nor Disagree Disagree 1. The design review committee offered helpful suggestions. 1 2 3 4 5 2. Response from the design review committee about my proposal came too late. 1 2 3 4 5 3. Revisions, if requested by the design review committee, were reasonable. 1 2 2 4 5 4. The design review committee seemed to make its decisions based on personal prefers nces. 1 2 3 4 5 5. The design guidelines were helpful to me in designing my project 1 2 3 4 6. If you had to choose one primaiy role the design review committee seemed to play in dealing with your project, would you say it was: 1. Helpful 2. Neutral 3. Adversarial 7. If you encountered problems during your review, what role did the city planner usually take with those problems? 1. He or she created the problems 2. He or she was neutral 3. He or she solved the problems 8. Were there specific design requirements for your project that you felt were unreasonable? If so, what were they? Very Satisfied NeitheI Dissatisfied Very Satisfied Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied 9. Taken altogether, how did you feel about your experience with the Landmarks Board design review process? 1 2 3 4 5 10. If you could change three things about the design review process, what would they be? 1. 2. 3. Thank you. Please mail your completed questionnaire in the enclosed pre-addressed reply envelope. No stamp is required. LM-DRC-SVY PRESERVATION /blÂ®,_ ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT=i- - L ALERT CONGRESS WINDS UP SESSION AND BENCHES REHAB CREDIT CHANGE All lobbyists dread the late night sessions preceding adjournment. This week confirmed our worst fears as we saw our preservation "victories" compromised and dumped. * The sequester of funds will continue until February 1, 1990, meaning that federal programs a 5% reduction in appropriated funds through that date. This includes the Historic Preservation Fund (up $2 million this year) for the states and National Trust. In a word, the "hard fought for" increases are almost "sequestered away" ! * The lifting of the income caps for rehab has bit the dust. The injustice of it all is that the caps have been lifted for low-income housing as part of their extender package. * The extension of the low-income housing credits program (previously scheduled to expire on December 31, 1989) is based on $ not time, allowing the program to run for 75% of its FY 1990 allocation. In a nutshell, low-income housing groups will be back next year seeking a more permanent - "not just a band-aid" extension. Preservation Action will be there, also. We are angry about the manipulation that took place into the wee hours, leaving us stranded with a rehab credit THAT WE HAVE PROVEN REALLY DOESN'T WORK!! The strategy for next year: MORE CITY LEADERS RESOLUTIONS AND LOBBYING BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR THE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION TAX ACT!! (Is your city on Preservation Action's roster???) BETTER GRASSROOTS LOBBYING FROM THE MINUTE CONGRESS RETURNS UNTIL WE SUCCEED IN GETTING THE ESSENTIAL CHANGES (Are you part of Preservation Action's lobbying network?) GETTING CONGRESS TO TREAT THE REHAB CREDIT FAIRLY (Low income housing and rehab should be working together to solve our nation's urban problems without preference being given to the syndicator's of one over the other.) JOIN PRESERVATION ACTION AND HELP US "RIGHT THE WRONG" OF CONGRESS ' ACTION ON THE RErIAB CREDITS NEXT YEAR! 1350 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 401 Washington, D.C, 20036 202-659-0915 PRESERVATION ACTION LOCAL PRESERVATIONISTS What is Preservation Action? Preservation Action (PA) is the only national grassroots lobby organized exclusively for historic preservation issues. Through its network of board members, regional vice presidents, state lobbying coordinators, and individual members, PA works to influence the course of federal historic preservation legislation. Coordination of this network is provided by a knowledgeable, experienced Washington staff. PA works closely with the National Trust for Ilistoric Preservation, the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, and ot.her national groups concerned with historic preservation. Funded and governed solely by its membership, PA is an independent advocate for liistoric preservation issues. How does Preservation Action work? Preservation Action's staff maintains up-to-the-minute information oil all aspects of federal historic preservation legislation. The Board of Directors utilizes this information to make policy and Strategy decisions. The nationwide grassroots network then lobbies Congress to enact PA's legislative priorities. PA's network is not a "paper" network...it is a dedicated, effective group of activists who have a proven track-record of success with Congress. The network produces results, i.e., 3000 telephone calls to Representatives on the day prior to committee hearings on the rehabilitation tax credits. The staffs knowledge of Congressional decision-makers and the involved, issue-oriented membership combine to form one of the most effective citizen lobbies in Washington. What does Preservation Action do? Preservation Action, founded in 1974, has a long record of success in lobbying for 0 1 11 .r â€¢â€¢ - i 1-(Clenti j 'Sgis la[1011 ana 1 Unalrig i or Ills LOI-le preservation. , PA played an integral role in the 1980 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act and in improved tax incentives for historic rehabilitation. PA has received over 80 resolutions from over 50 cities calling for change to the passive loss rule for historic rehab. PA has fought successfully for federal funding of historic preservation after Presidential budgets consistently allocated zero dollars. During the summer of 1988, PA led the successful cliarge for tlie third battle of Manassas to Stop mall development on the edge of the battlefield. Most recently, PA spearheaded a dramatic lobbying campaign to earn support for Wyclie Fowler's (D-GA) amendment to increase tile Historic Presen,ation Fund level in the Senate. PA's lobbying strength stems from a constituent network structured to respond quickly to action on Capitol Hill. Often against incredible odds, as in the Manassas battle and Fowler Amendment, dedicated and efficient grassroots lobbying by PA's network of local preservationists earned results. PA works on a limited budget Contributed by its members and Board and has proven that lobbying "the grassroots way" can earn big victories iii Washington. Become Active iii Preservation, Join Preservation Action! MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES: Benetactor $1,000 Contributor $100 Patron 500 Member 35 Fellow 250 Student 10 NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP DAYTIME TELEPHONE (H) Make check payable to: Preservation Action, 1350 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20036 FRESERVATION ACT]ON i anonÂ·profit, tâ€¢xexempt, 501(c*4) organintlon. Charitable orginizations mzy contribute up to 5% ortheirtotal revenue, without jeopardizing their own 501(c)(3) tax-exempt itltu. I:Â·evelopers, architectt, preservation professionals, and other per,ons eng,ged in for-profit preservation.related nctivitie, rruy oblain a federal tar deduction for contiburions, 2 businem expense. Non-business related contribution, from individuals, however, ate not deductible fo'r federal income tax purposes. HPC GOALS (DRAFT) Fall, 1989 Proposed revisions to the Historic Preservation Element of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan (not prioritized): 1. Update Historic Preservation Element of Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan a. Goals sessions for re-evaluation should be held yearly 2. Continue to fund advance Planning projects for historic preservation and related programs: i.e. Main Street Historic District Study Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway Plan Holden-Marolt Preservation Plan Cottage Infill program 3. Continue to update Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures 4. Continue to update and fund printing costs of Guidelines, brochure and HP Element of the Comp Plan. 5. Continue to staff preservation program with qualified preservationist/planner and continue to fund a minimum of one full-time position within the Planning Office a. Obtain intern assistance yearly b. Develop smooth administration system of project files and photographs 6. Continue to maintain status of CLG and apply for grant funding whenever available 7. Continue to seek educational/training resources for staff, HPC and community 8. Continue and strengthen high profile of preservation program in community through the promotion and marketing of special events, educational and training resources i.e. Videotape historic districts and West End Develop slide presentation with written narrative 9) Continue to develop working committees on HPC, combining efforts with AHT & AHS a) Education/outreach b) Public relations/special events c) Special planning projects d) Graphics 10) Continue to evaluate the Preservation Incentives program: a) Consider additional dimensional flexibility (height, site coverage, FAR for porches) b) Purchase Development Rights program c) Transfer Development Rights program 11) Seek grants and special funding for: a) bricks and mortar work b) design work 12) Continue to assist and support the Aspen Historic Trust to Target problem buildings: go after with monetary and design assistance, i.e. Armory Hall, the Isis, Pioneer Park, miner's cottages, etc. 13) Continue to identify and designate important historic and architectural resources - 14) Strengthen communication with the public Hold neighborhood meetings Use Preservation Week as general meeting/tool Invite and encourage participation Data input all historic properties and owners names Develop system for updating information Mail outs to these people minimum 2X year (newsletter?) 15) Simplify Process and length of meetings Sub-Committee/Advisory Committee to handle minor development issues - take before HPC under consent agenda format Maintain Monitor system 16) Continue to involve elected officials and government department heads/staff in historic preservation process Regularly have liaisons from Council, P&Z, Planning, Zoning and Building attend HPC meetings hpc.goals