Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.19880524
AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE May 24, 1988 - Tuesday 2:30 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. First Floor Council Chambers City Hall REGULAR MEETING 2:30 I. Roll Call II. Approval of Minutes-May 10, 1988 III. Committee Member and Staff comments IV. Public Comments V. Monitoring Projects / VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Minor Development Review: Sculpture Garden 411 E. Hopkins- Ater ¢-U 4.-cg B. Conceptual Development Review Public Hearing: 212 W. Hopkins (,pprout,<3 C. Conceptual and Final Development Review Public Hearing: 513 W. Bleeker A??F N <t. /6 D. Final Development Review: 300 W. Main APfflat)4/3 VII. NEW BUSINESS A. -Minor Development: Awning-220 W. Main Ap?0006/3 B. Minor Development: Roaring Fork Building, 415 E. Hyman Avenue , e· Ga,y ikex) r f ye|DY»-· i3O0/<%462€· -paue-ni r~3 VIII.ADJOURN Ual€ /no A . PLEASE BRING PREVIOUS PACKETS FOR 212 W. HOPKINS AND 513 W. BLEEKER i t/ 3 (f AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE May 24, 1988 - Tuesday 2:30 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. First Floor Council Chambers City Hall REGULAR MEETING 2:30 I. Roll Call II. Approval of Minutes-May 10, 1988 III. Committee Member and Staff comments IV. Public Comments V. Monitoring Projects VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Minor Development Review: Sculpture Garden 411 E. Hopkins B. Conceptual Development Review Public Hearing: 212 W. Hopkins C. Conceptual and Final Development Review Public Hearing: 513 W. Bleeker D. Final Development Review: 300 W. Main VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Minor Development: Awning-220 W. Main B. Minor Development: Roaring Fork Building, 415 E. Hyman Avenue VIII.ADJOURN PLEASE BRING PREVIOUS PACKETS FOR 212 W. HOPKINS AND 513 W. BLEEKER MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: Misc. News and Views! (A brief FYI memo) Date: May 24, 1988 You may be interested in attending as a member of the public the Aspen Historical Society/P&Z work session scheduled for June 28 to discuss the Marolt Barn project, a potential Ranching Exhibit. A note of thanks: I'd like to personally thank each of you for your support and interest in National Historic Preservation Week. I felt the combination of the Mayoral Proclamation, Walking Tour, Preservation Awards and the Preservation Forum went a long way to promote our efforts in historic preservation in Aspen. The media and community response was positive, and I believe we have created a foundation for an annual preservation celebration in future years. Congratulations! Have you noticed the Aspen Community Church lately? The Daily News featured the renovation on the front page of the May 16 issue. The copper roof is on (looks good) and most of the shingles have been replaced on the upper level of the bell tower. The tower cap shingles are next. This is a good looking project! Post Mortem: 222 E. Hallam is gone. The front end loaders filled 20+ dump trucks. One nice aspect: Historic Aspenite himself, one Mr. Shady Lane, ("salvage specialist") was found removing the clapboard siding off the garage/shed at the rear of the site which next door neighbor Mona Frost requested be reused to build her a shed in the rear of her property. Shady said "I'll be building that, tool" SEMINAR: On May 25 (Wednesday), the Colorado Historical Society is sponsoring a one day historic preservation seminar focusing on the Section 106 compliance process for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) recipients, the Certified Local Government (CLG) program (of which Aspen is already) and other topics including rehabilitation tax credits. Location: Colorado Historic Museum, 1300 Broadway, Denver. Info? Call Kaaren Patterson at 866-3398 or me. I'll probably attend most of it, and will report back if anything pertains to us! PLEASE REMEMBER TO CONTACT KATHY STRICKLAND IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND ANY HPC MEETING, OR IF YOU KNOW YOU WON'T BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY FUTURE MEETING. THANK YOU. . 9-r. A MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office - RE: 411 E. Hopkins Ave., Minor Development Amendment Sculpture Garden and Dining Terrace DATE: May 24, 1988 LOCATION: 411 E. Hopkins Ave., Lots E & F, Block 88, Townsite and City of Aspen. Commercial Core Historic Overlay District. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of the modifications to the previously approved Sculpture Garden. The principle changes are in the Smuggler Land Office dining terrace located within the Sculpture Garden. The applicant also wishes to extend the length of the awning to cover the new terrace area. This application amends the previously HPC approved development activity which consisted of a minor curved stucco wait station located within the garden area. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: On February 9, 1988, HPC reviewed and approved a sculpture garden between the historic Brand Building and the Aspen Jewelry Store. The garden was to be separated from the street and sidewalk by a 5' tinted concrete wall containing a water element. The intent was to create a unique park-like public space designed to display works of modern sculpture art. The development would improve an existing eyesore vacant lot , yet still leave open space. Additionally, five new trees planted along the sidewalk would serve as a natural landscape buffer. Staff's review of the meeting minutes reflects no discussion of a potential wait station/dining terrace area. The development activity was highly praised by both staff and HPC and was approved unanimously. On March 22, 1988, the applicant returned to HPC with an amendment to the plan, which was approved. The amended plan consisted of a decrease in wall height from 5' to 4', a change in the entrance location and a modification of the overhead waterfall. Staff's memo did not call attention to the wait station, a minor almost temporary structure which was defined in the applicant's plans. Again, the meeting minutes do not reflect discussion of this element of the sculpture garden. On May 10, 1988, the applicant came before HPC, requesting review of the project be added to the agenda. HPC moved to approve adding the item, however, time did not allow this review. Also, staff reported the Planning Office had not had the opportunity to review the application and memo HPC. The item was tabled to this meeting. Page 2 - 411 E. Hopkins PROCEDURE FOR PROJECT REVIEW: The Planning Office determined this project was more than a minor amendment to the original plan and requested a full application for minor development review be submitted for HPC review. This is a one-step process, with approval based on the proposed development meeting the standards in Sec. 7-601(D) of the Municipal Code. Staff will be concentrating review comments on the wait station/dining terrace area, as HPC has already approved the amended sculpture garden and wall. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: STANDARD A: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development in adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. RESPONSE: As the applicant points out, the proposed development will hide from view that rear portion of the Brand Building which is " a hodgepodge of unsightly construction", which screening staff finds desirable to the overall sculpture garden effect. The Commercial Core Historic Overlay District contains many outdoor dining areas, however, this one is very unique in its "artistic" setting. The dining terrace is accessible from the sculpture garden yet is minimal in design. The proposal calls for the awning to be extended to the south 20', projecting 10' 3" from the Brand Building. The awning has existed along the west wall of the Brand Building serving the dining area for a few years: total length was 29', projecting approximately 9.5' from the building. Total new awning length is 49'. The awning covers approximately 230 sq. ft. The proposed color is dark pine green OR off-white, which may be preferred to allow more light under the extensive awning/canopy. A representative materials sample will be presented at this meeting. Staff's primary concerns regard the new wait station which has evolved from a minor curved stucco structure into a permanent bar/storage station with back wall. The bar itself measures 18' long, projecting 9' from the Brand Building. A 20'w x 12'h wall is proposed along the east side of the new awning for support, to screen the passageway into the kitchen area and provide service storage and a bar for the outside dining operation. The proposal introduces a new material for the service wall: 8" log siding which the applicant states is the same siding as the adjacent building to the west of the garden. The siding is to be painted white or stained a light color. The face of Page 3 - 411 E. Hopkins the bar itself would be covered with lx4 T&G beadboard wood siding painted to match the wall. The actual footprint of the construction under the awning is approximately 140 sq. ft. The applicant states that only the awning itself and the surface below the bartop are visible from the sculpture garden and the sidewalk. In staff's opinion, the applicant has not adequately addressed the visual issue of bar area protection from snow in the winter when the awning is removed. Also, the bar wall will be visible from the sidewalk, however, as it serves to block the "hodgepodge" of construction at the rear of the Brand Building, this may be preferred. In our opinion the proposed development is compatible in character with the adjacent buildings and is a pleasant addition to the public-oriented sculpture garden. The construction materials (canvas and wood) are compatible with the space and adjacent buildings. Staff is concerned that the overall appearance of a 12' high wall, 20' in length constructed Of 811 log siding presents a very dominant effect in an otherwise quiet element of the sculpture garden. STANDARD B: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The Commercial Core Historic Overlay District contains a number of outdoor dining areas. The Smuggler Land Office restaurant has served in this area for a number of years and the proposed development makes more permanent this dining area. The canvas and wood materials and simple construction are preferred over an elaborate structure which may detract from the historic architectural features of the adjacent Brand Building. STANDARD C: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. RESPONSE: The question lies: Does the proposed development negatively impact the aesthetic and cultural concept of the sculpture garden? Staff finds the development to be quite different in nature than what HPC previously approved. The dining and landscape features remain basically the same , yet the large permanence of the combination wall/ bar/extended awning may encroach visually into a "by-design" quiet artistic garden. on the other hand, the very activity of Page 4 - 411 E. Hopkins outdoor dining in a downtown setting is fun and may, in fact, assist in bringing attention to the sculpture garden area. STANDARD D: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. RESPONSE: Staff finds that the proposed development does not detract from the integrity of the adjacent Brand Building; the dining terrace/bar area is basic in design and does not compete with the primary facade or that of the sculpture garden wall. The landscaping proposed will definitely soften the development and enhance the entire block, in our opinion. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the minor development application for 411 E. Hopkins subject to HPC's approval of a visually acceptable winter covering for the bar area. HPC.memo.411EH bUDIZE.L-CUea -120 1<OXUI i.1 iC for placement on HPC agenda 5/4/88. REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING HPC APPROVAL APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address: Laura Donnelley 2350 McLain Flats Road Aspen, CO 81611 Proof of Ownership: On record w/submittal of 3/27/88 Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Owner's agent Property Address, Legal Description and Name: lots E & F Block 88 City of Aspen Type of Review (Minor or Significant): Minor Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected: additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: See attached Exhibit A 1 Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9. 4(d) (pertaining to compati- .bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure): See attached Exhibit A Any other City Appravals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: Possible planning dept. revi ew regardi ng 11,Re anrl hili 1 rling dept- rpwi pt,7 regarding service unit. SB.App Exhibit A Attachment to RPC Appliration submittod 5/4/88 To Roxanne Description of Proposed Development Activity This application requests a modification to the original application for a sculpture garden with adjoining Smuggler Land Office dining terrace which was presented to and approved by the HPC on 3/22/88. A curved, permanent service structure faced with stucco was part of the approved application. The restaurant presently is leasing space inside the Brand Building and adjoining , outside space for summer operation, The total areaof the new exterior restaurant terrace is smaller than the previously leased exterior space that has operated continuously as a restaurant for the last 3 years. -· . The restaurant owner, Tim Cottrell desires to extend the existing awning 20' to the south and adjacent to the Brand Building. A 20'w. x12'h. frame wall is proposed along the east side of the new awning to support the awning, screen the unsightly passageway into the kitchen area and provide service storage and bar for the outside dining operation. The awning covers an area of approximately 230sf. The actual footprint of construction under the awning is approximately 140sf. The awning itself would either be the same color as the existing adjacent awning or off-white so as to allow more daylight to penetrate into the space under the awning The back wall/storage/bar supporting the awning would be covered with the same siding--- painted or stained white or a light color--- used on the fascii of the store adjoining the west side of the Sculpture Garden. The face of the bar itself would be covered with lx4 TAG beadboard wood siding also painted white or a light color. It is important to note that only the awning itself and the surface below the barb)p are visible from the sculpture garden and sidewalk. The rest of the construction occurs deep under the awning and will be blocked by the existing awning and the bar. Effect of Proposed Development The new awning isan extension of the existing adjoining Smuggler awning. The service/storage/bar structure under the awning, although hidden by the awning, uses similar wood siding to the adjacent Furniture store building. The visual impact of this proposed modification is in all ways less than the curved stucco structure that has already received approval by the HPC. The proposed modification enhances the overall area in which it is to be constructed by blocking views of an elevation of the Brand Building that is an hodgepodge of unsightly construction. An existing eyesore will be replaced by a unified extention of an existing awning structure that was approved by the HPC before it was constructed. October 4, 1987 '• To whom it may concern, . Bill Lipsey will be acting in my behalf in several matters concerning improvements to .. the former Alpine Jewelers building and adj acent lots. Specifically, he will handle- details and the application to the His- torie Preservation Committee on October 13th. Respectfully, Laura Donnelley Laura Donnelley Box 589, Aspen, Colorado 81612 Phone: (303) 925-3287 HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW DENVER 600 EAST MAIN STREET TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476 DENVER TECH CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELECOPIER (303) 925-9367 COLORADO SPRINGS ASPEN BILLINGS BOISE CHEYENNE WASHINGTON, D.C. ARTHUR C. DAILY May 4, 1988 City of Aspen Planning Department Attn: Cindy Houben 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Cottrell Outdoor Restaurant Dear Cindy: As I discussed with you by phone earlier today, I represent Laura Donnelley, who is the record owner of Lots D, E and F (excepting the southerly 20 feet of Lots D and E), Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. See attached copies of Laura's deed and title policy. Roughly speaking, Lot D is occupied by the old Alpine Jewelers Building, Lot E is being developed by Laura as a sculpture garden, and Lot F is under negotiation for lease by Laura to Tim Cottrell (or his Smuggler Land Office operative com- pany) for the period June 15 to October 15, 1988 for his outdoor restaurant operation. While this lease has not yet been prepared or signed, I consider it highly unlikely that Laura and Tim will not reach an agreement on the essential business terms. The lease will pro- vide that the outdoor restaurant uses presently contemplated by Tim, including a bar, grill, service area, waitress station, patio and customer seating, and the sale of alcoholic beverages, are all permitted uses. For your information, I enclose a copy of the June 1, 1984 lease between Kurt Bresnitz (Laura's predecessor) as Landlord and Smuggler Land Office, Ltd. as Tenant, covering portions of Lots E and F as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" . Apparently this is the lease agreement under which Tim has operated during the past several summers. You might note the following points. Under Paragraph 6, the permitted uses have included "the operation of an outdoor restaurant", and "the sale of alcoholic beverages" . And under Exhibit "A", it seems that in the past Tim actually leased more space than he will be leasing this summer. i . HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of Aspen Planning Department May 4, 1988 Page 2 In closing, in Laura's absence I think it is fair to state that she wholeheartedly supports the outdoor restaurant activity planned by Tim for this summer, provided only that an acceptable lease is signed and that Tim comply with all applicable regula- tions and codes. Please give me a call if you feel I can be of any further assitance in this matter. Sincerely, /4/ / /// j -«*121-- Arthur C. Daily for HOLLAND & HART ACD/bsr Enclosure CC: Laura Donnelley William Lipsey (w/ encl) . r 1 0 125.1,0 , . Recepli,in N„. . &1(1 r /1 r ' Reouded :it „cluck 61.. DOUK J'll) InGE 47 HARRANTY DEED 29289 U Kult Bresnitz and Lotte Bresnitz (,1:111,4,11.1 rITI;IN CHI¥ REOORDER SILVIA DAVIS i nix,se i,diltess is 1650 Haiestake Dr. Aspen, CO 81611 1 44 Yttnty-¢+- . St:tte--uf- Sir M 2 49 fN '81 , lei Ille couS VIC'lation 01 and other va Luable , congirleration dollitt0 Ill luilld Fid. 1,Cle·by bell(s) :ind convey(s) to Laura Dowelley whose legal addiess is :2(369<5]U[.*ttiKI:Dttt>iMAKKKE P.O. BOX 589 Aspei 1, CO ;04;61)1x 81612 €ettitty-of- ,-rrn ct -Stric-r, F- the lollowing te:,1 pic,licily iii the CM#)' m Pilkin , :111(1 St:ile /,1 Cclic,rado, lu Wil: Lots D, E and F, Block 88, City and luwnsite of Aspen, IExcepting Unrefran the Southerly 20 feet of Lots D and E, Block 88, City and 3-twnsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin State of Colorado STAIE DOCUMENIARY lili ill , s[P 1 5 198 f :tlsu knowit by stieet and number as 406 E. Ibpkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 with :ill ils :Ililitttlet,imces, imd Killi:mt(s) the title h, the same. Alll,iect 12, general real estate taxes for 1987 ; and those reservations, exceptions, easements and restrictions set forth in Exliibit A attached hereto. - 2-4 Signed Ihis /6 (1:ty ul Septelnber . 8 87 3 . ----- %*-r.., - 11,11. KUY Eillip*ii-*E\- \ / . 0 \1 1-, / , ./...1-A.. 40 hk ' /3)14411./ 1 :~ .0\ :,-- - Lotte Bresiiitz 1- ''... 1 7 '41 t) \j . 1.4.- 0 7 .. 3 i A I i. ()1: COLORADU ."I'' .1 ''ft" i SS County 01 Pitkili 1 Ile linegoing ilistitillic lit was :le·knowledged bel'ute me in tile C('lilli> 01 Pitkill St:,te o[ Colontdo, this /...r- 41:ty (11 September . 1987 . by Kurt Brestiitz and Lotte Bresnitz. My comn,ission explics . Wime<7 my It:Ind :,Ed (,j'Rial seaL Vincent J. Hirmlit,/Notary Public t~«lelfi--- My Cominloplon explies 12/26/90. 001 E. Hopkins 4 q„'n '%'ie A•Den, Colornds 81611 < 1 17 Atlill. '11 in l)·11'·1, inscit "City :211(1. : No. 1197. !tri. 5-81. ir,71111 fr,IM lil i 1,19.41 1,imi th.„11,;,It 1'„11;:I,i"r 58'9 W (,Iii AU' . 1 :114·ni,14. C (1 Rfl,11 1 ./4 .11 f,/00 1 115 411,1 h 1"Al 'f i r 4 ' BooK 546 "AGE 48 EXHIBIT A TO WARRANTY DEED 1. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the Deed from the City of Aspen providing as follows; that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws; and subject to all the conditions, limitations and restrictions contained in Section 2386 of the Revised Statutes of the United States in Deed recorded ill Book 79 at Page 32. 2. Terms, conditions and agreements as contained in instrument recorded in Book 239 at Page 436. 3. Easement over the Southerly 7.0 feet of the Easterly 10.0 feet of Lot F, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, as set forth in Decree recorded June 20, 1979 in Book 371 at Page 85. I t . '.,1 ; 1 Igwyers Title Insurance Grporation National Headquarters - Ilichmond, Virginia Policy Number 85 - 00 - 882742 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, insures. as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding tile amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs. attorneys' fees and expenses which tile Company maY become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise tlian as stated thereiri; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land: or 4. Unmarketability of such title. IN WITNESS WHEREOF tile Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed, to be valid when Schedule A is countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. Imuyers 11tle Insu®pe (Drporation ble-Ad- e. 47 ae-Flo,ji- President Attest: Al©U 0 L Secretary. ' EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE following matters are expressly excluded from tile coverage of this policy: 21) Governmental police power. b) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation relating to environmental protection. :) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating r prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or ereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of mich the land is or was a part. 1) The effect of any violation of the matters excluded under (a), (b), or (c) above, unless notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting ,om a violation has been recorded at Date of Policy in those records in which under state statutes deeds, mortgages, lis pendens, liens or ther title encumbrances must be recorded in order to impart constructive notice to purchasers of tile land for value and without knowledge; *rovided, however, that without limitation, such records shall not be construed to include records in any of the offices of federal, state or ocal environmental protection, zoning, building, health or public safety authorities. lights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 'efects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant: (b) not nown to the Cornoany and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such laimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to he date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant: Cd) attaching or reated subsequent to Date of Policy: or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had aid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Iition of Terms dlowing terms when used in this policy mean: (c) The Company shall have the right at its own cost to institute and ,sured'0: the insured narned in Schedule A, and, subject to any without undue delay prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any r defenses the Company may have had against the named establish the title to the estate or interest as insured, and the Company other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to those who succeed to the interest of such insured byoperation 15 distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, Istributees, devise.es, survivors, personal representatives, next whether or not it shall be liable thereunder. and shall not thereby r corporate or fiduciary successors. concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. risured claimant'' an insured claiming loss or damage interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provision of this (d) Whenever the Company, shall have brought any action or Ier ,iowledge-: actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or policy, the Company may pursue any such litigation to final ·illich may be. imputed to an insured by reason of any public reserves tile right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly judgment or order. and": the land described, specifically or by reference in 'e A, and improvemerits affixed thereto which by law constitute prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the (e) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to perty: provided, however, the term ''land'' does not include any beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred insured hereunder shall secure to the Company the right to so hedule A, nor ally right, title. interest, estate or easement in appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the prosecute or provide defense in such action or proceeding, and· all i streets, roads. avenues. alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of Company, such insured shall give the Company all reasonable aid in name of such insured for such purpose. Whenever requested by the o and from the land is insured by this policy. any such action or proceeding, in effecting settlement, securing ,ortgage''· inortgage, deed or trust, trust deed, or other instrument. evidence, obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or defending such action iblic records'0: those records which by law impart constructive expense so incurred. or proceeding, and the Company shall reimburse such insured for any f matters relating to said land. inuation of Insurance after Conveyance of Title 4. Notice of Loss-Umitation of Action overage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy Conditions and Stipulations, a statement in writing of any loss or In addition to the notices required under paragraph 3(b) of these of an insured so long as such insured retains an estate or damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable under this policy in tile land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase shall be furnished to the Company within 90 days after such loss or nortgage given by a purchaser from such insured, or so long as damage shall have been determined and no right of action shall accrue sured shrill have liability by reason of covenanls of warranty to an insured claimant until 30 days after such statement shall have ,. such insured in any transfer or conveyance of such estate or been furnished. Failure to furnish such statement of loss or damage , provided, however, ttll5 policy shall not continue in force in shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to such 1 any purchaser from such insured of either said estate or loss or damage, or the indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage such insured. 5. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims rise and Pro•ecution of Actions-Notice of Claim to be The Company shall have the option to pay orottierwise settle for or in 1 an Insured Claimant the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against or to e Company, at its own cost and without undue delay, shall paying or tendering payment of the arnount of insurance under this terminate all liability and obligations of the Cornpany hereunder by for the defense of an insured in all litigation consisting of policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred or proceedings commenced against such insured or a defense up to the time of such payment or tender of payment, by the insured ed against an insured in an action to enforce a contract for a claimant and authorized by the Company. the estate or interest in said land. to the extent that such 1 is founded upon an alleged defect, lien, encumbrance, or itter insured against by this policy. e insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in 6. Determination and Payment of Loss 7 action or proceeding is begun or defense is interposed as set Ca) The liability of the Company under this policy shall in no case (a) above, (ii) in case knowledge shall come to an insured exceed the least of: 'er of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title (i) the actual loss of the insured claimant; or state or interest, as insured. and which might cause loss or (ii) the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A. for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (b) The Company will pay, in addition to any loss insured against by 'itle to the estate or interest, as insured. is rejected as this policy. all costs imposed upon an insured in litigation carried on by "table. If such prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, the Company for such insured, and all costs, attorneys' fees and to such insured alt liability of the Company shall cease and exoenses in litigation carried on by such insured with the written re In regard to the matter or matters for which such prompt authorization of the Company. r'•qulied. provided. however, that failure to notify shall in no {c) \A/heri liahilitv hat henn rlefin,intv fivorl in irrnirl-Ir,ra ~•,;,1, A.r, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS-CONTINUED ,tion of Liability 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement in Sliall arise or be maintainable under this policy (a) if the Whenever the Company shall have settled aclairn under this policy, all after having received notice of an alleged defect, lien or right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected byanyactof the Itice Inst,red agninst hereunder. by litigation or· otherwise, insured clairnant. The Cornpany shall be subrogated toand be entitled to Sll Cll defect, liert or encifiribrance or establishes the title. as all rights and remedies which such irisured claimant wot,Id linve had N,1111,1 a reason,111*e time after receipt of such notice: (b) in the against Cirly personor property inrest,ect tosucticirliintindthitlicilicy,lot 1,11(i ntion w 11 11 th er e has been a final determination by a court of been issued, and if requested by tile Comparly, such nist,red cloimant a lijrtsdiction. and disposition of ail appeals therefrom, adverse shall transfer to the Conipany all rights andreinedies aqairist any person p, as trisured. as providedin paragraph 3 hereof, or c) for liability or property necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation and ly assumed by an insured in settling any claim or suit without shall permit the Cornpany to use t liename of such insured claimant in any tien consent of the Company. transaction or litigation involving such rights or rernedies. I f the payment does not cover tile loss of such insured claimant. tile Cornparly stiall be tion of Liability subrogated to such rights and remedies in the proportion which said ,'inelits under mis policy. except payments made for costs, payment bears to the amount of said loss. If loss should result from any 4 fees nrld expenses. shall reduce tile amount of theinsurance act of such insured claimant, such act shall not void this policy, but the ~0 , No payment shall be niode without producing this policy for Company. in that event. shall be required to pay only that part of any j gent of such payment unless the policy be lost or destroyed, in losses insured against hereunder which shall exceed the arnount, if any, .e proof of such loss or destruction shall be furnished to the lost to the Cornpany be reason of the impairment of the right of on of tile Company. subrogation. oncumulative sly understood that the amount of insurance under this e reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any illing mther (al a mortgage shown or referred to in Schedule B 12. Liability Limited to this Policy luchisalienontheestateor imp.rest covered bythispolicy,cr (b) F herealterex ecuted by an insured which is achargeorlienon This instrument together with all endorsements and other instruments, e or Interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and the if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract , between the insured and the Company. so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy. The ' shall have the option to apply to the payment of any such whicti arises outof thestatusof thetitle totheestate or interest covered Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence. rand 's any arnot,nt lhatotherwise wouldbe payable hereunder to the iwner of the estate or interest covered by this policy and the hereby or any action asserting such clairn, shall be restricted to the o paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to said provisions and conditions and stipulations of tliis policy, Iwiler. No amendment of or endorsement tothis policycan be made exceptby writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the i irtion,nent validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. President. a Vice President, tile Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or 'and described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels .· not used asa single site. anda lossisestablished a ffectingone 1 saidparce Is but notall, theloss shallbecomputedandsettled rota basis as If the amoulit of insurance under this policy was rorata as tothe value on Date of Policy of eachseparateparcelto B. exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of 13. Notices, Where Sent :lless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to All notices required to be given tbe Conipolly and any statement iri h parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the writing required to be furnished the Cornpnny shall include tile number of of this policy and shown byan express st ateine nt hereinor by an this policy and shall be addressed to its Corporate Headquarters, 6630 Ment attached liefeto West Broad Street, Riclunond, Virginia, mailing address: P,O. Box 27567, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Igwyers Title Insurance Grporation National Ifeadquarters - Richmond, Virginia t..) '2 i' 1 Iii'U 1.0 4,0 i ·, 1,%1,1 , "{,1„'11, 1,Ve J . I 11 I It i. " I I POLICY ~ 3 County _6_ Rate Rule 9 Additional Chains $ S )0·-882742 A 097 1,250,000.00 2,407.00 01 09/15/87 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 yers litle Insurance Grporation OWNER'S POLICY Schedule A \SE NUMBER [)ATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN PO! ler NUMHEA / ON THIS SCHEDLI E MUSI 705-87 SEPTEMBER 15,1987 $1,250,000.00 AGREE WITH THE PREPAINTED 85-00-882742 - @ 2:50 P.M. ' NUMBERONTHECOVERSHEET ne of Insured DRA DON NELLE Y , estate or iriterest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: 1 FEE SIMPLE , estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: \UAR DONNELLEY , land referred to in this policy is described as follows: )TS D, E AND F, :,OCK 88, 'rY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, .CEPTING therefrom the Southerly 20 feet of Lots D and E, BLOCK 88, tty and Townsite of aspen, ')UNTY OF PITKIN, FATE OF COLORADO. CrK IN IdENT u.yfli/3-NC. Pitkin County Title, Inc. 11) ll T 601 E. Hopkins (303)925-1766 4*rep U Asoen. Colorado 81611 'u'it'·,;,•In.•tu,·~A~i~horiled Off.rei n, Ag.•i,i luued at ilocationi 1 A V . illuyers 'litle lusurance G- oration OWNER'S POLICY SE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY THE POUCY NUMBER SHOWN ON 1HIS SCHEDULE ~ POLICY NUMBER MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER .-705-87 SEPT. 15, 1987 ON THE COVER SHEET 85-00-882742 Schedule B his Policy does riot insure against loss or damage by reason of tlie following: Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any factswhichacorrectsurveyandinspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretoforeor herea fter furnished, imposedbylaw and not shown bythe public records. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Act authorizing tile issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Taxes for 1987 not yet due or payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the Deed from the City of Aspen providing as follows; that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws; and subject to all the conditions, limitations and restrictions contained in Section 2386 of the Revised Statutes of the United States in Deed recorded in Book 79 at Page 32. ' Terms, conditions and agreements as contained in instrument recorded in Book 239 at Page 436. i. Easement of the Southerly 7.0 feet of the easterly 10.0 feet of Lot F, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, as set forth in Decree recorded June 20, 1979 in Book 371 at Page 85. - EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3 and 4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. !,rv Fls nir Fv U• i.n . 1 -PRI 1 1.... :_ i, a . LEASE ; THIS LEASE made as of June 1, 1984 between KURT ,, BRESNITZ and LOTTE BRESNITZ, as Landlord, and SMUGGLER LAND , OFFICE, LTD., as Tenant. WITNESSET II: 1. Lease of Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant, and Tenant leases from Landlord, that portion of Lots E and /5 , Block 86 , City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto, herein called the Premises: 2. Term. This Lease shall commence June 1, 1984 and shall terminate on September 30, 1984. 3. Renewal Option. Provided Tonant is not in default under the provisions of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right and option to renew this Lease for four successive renewal terms upon the same provisions and at the same rent as provided for herein, as follows: First Renewal Term - June 1, 1985 to September 30, 1985 Second Renewal Term - June 1, 1986 to September 30, 1986 Third Renewal Term - June 1, 1987 to September 30, 1987 Fourth Renewal Term - June 1, 1988 to September 30, 1988 by giving written notice of the exercise of such option on or before April 1 of each such year. In the event such option is not so exercised by Tenant, then this Lease, and all future renewal options provided for herein, shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. 4. Enlargement of Term. Tenant may, at Tenant's option, enlarge the term of this Lease, or of any renewal term hereof, by including in such term the month of May (or any portion thereof) preceding such term and/or by including in such term the month of October (or any portion thereof) following such term. This option shall be exercisable by written notice given by Tenant to Landlord prior to any such enlargement of the term. 5. Rent. The rent for the term of this Lease shall be at the rate of $450.00 per month. The rent shall be payable in advance on or before tfhe first day of each month during such term. In the event Tenant shall enlarge the term of this Lease as provided for in Paragraph 4 above , the rent for the period of such enlhrgement shall be prorated; i.e., at the rate of $15.00 per day, and shall be payable in advance on or before the commencement of the period of : enlargement. 6. Use of Premises. Tenant shall use the Premises for the operation of an outdoor restaurant, including the. sale of alcoholic beverages, and for no other purpose without Landlord's prior written consent, and in connection therewith, Tenant shall comply with the rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Premises or over the business being conducted thereon. Tenant shall not permit anything to be done on the Premises tending to create a nuisance or to disturb adjoining property owners. 7. Acceptance of Premises. The Premises are in an unimproved condition and Tenant accepts the Premises in such condition. 8. Alterations and Improvements. Tenant shall have the right, at Tenant's sole cost, to install the following improvements to the Premises: (a) To construct a 9-1/2' X 29' patio along the east side of tile Premises and to install an awning over the patio. (b) To install flower beds and landscaping in the center of the Premises and construct a fence around the same. Tenant shall make no other alterations or improvements to the Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord. Tenant shall promptly pay for all alterations and improvements placed upon the Premises by Tenant and Tenant shall not cause or permit any mechanic's lien to be filed against the Premises by reason thereof. 9. Maintenance. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost, maintain the Premises in a neat and orderly condition and state of repair and in accordance with good housekeeping practices. Tenant shall further maintain the sidewalk adjacent to the Premises on a year-around basis, including, but not by way of limitation, the removal of snow and ice therefrom during the winter season. 10. Taxes. Landlord shall pay all real estate taxes lawfully assessed against the Premises. Tenant shall pay r all personal property taxes and other taxes lawfully assessed by reason of Tenant's use and occupancy of the Premises. 11. Utilities. The Premises are not presently serviced by any utilities. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost, furnish any utilities which may be used by Tenant upon or in connection with the Premises. - 12. Tenant's Personal Property. All personal property A' and trade fixtures placed upon the Premises by Tenant shall *0 \036' be at Tenant's sole risk, and Landlord shall not be liable ~ for damage to or loss of such personal property or trade fixtures from any cause whatsbever, except the acts or \0> 6,14 neglects of Landlord. \y.N" - 13. Indemnification of Landlord. Tenant shall save Landlord harmless from any liabilities for injury to any persons or damage to any property on or about the Premises from any cause whatsoever. Tenant shall procure, at Tenant's sole cost, public liability insurance for the benefit of Tenant and Landlord (with Landlord named as a co-insured) with limits of not less than $300,000.00 for injury or death to any one person and not less than $500,000.00 for injury to death of more than one person resulting from one occurrence, and of not less than $25,000.00 for damage to property. Tenant shall maintain such insurance in full force and effect during the term of this Lease and shall furnish Landlord with a copy of such insurance policies and a certificate evidencing the issuance thereof. 14. Signs. Tenant shall not place any signs upon the Premises except of such design and structure as may be permitted by Landlord and as may comply with all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant shall not assigh this Lease or sublet the Premises or any part thereof without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent Landlord may in Landlord's sole discretion either grant or withhold. The transfer of the ownership of 50% or more of the capital stock of Tenant (if Tenant is a corporation) or of 50% or more of the ownership interest in Tenant (if Tenant is a partnership or joint venture) shall be deemed an assignment of the Lease for purposes of this paragraph. 16. Landlord's Right of Termination. In the event that Landlord shall sell the Premises, or any part thereof, Landlord shall hhve the right to terminate this Lease by at least 15 days' advance written notice given to Tenant, and, in the event of such termination, this Lease and all renewal options provided for herein, shall become void and of no effect, and the parties shall be released from all liability hereunder accruing after the date of such termination. 17. Default. If Tenant shall default in the payment of rent when due, or if Tenant shall default in the performance of any other provisions of this Lease and shall not cure such other default within five days after written notice from Landlord specifying such default, or in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of Tenant, then in any of such events Landlord may terminate this Lease at any time thereafter by giving written notice of termination. Upon the termination of this Lease, Landlord may reenter the Premises and remove all persons and property therefrom, using all necessary force to do so, and may have such other remedies as may be provided for by law. In the event of any such default by Tenant, Landlord shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and all proceedings in connection therewith. 18. Surrender of Premises. Upon the termination of this Lease, by expiration of its term or otherwise, Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost, reriove all improvements placed upon the premises by Tenant and remove all of Tenant's personal property and trade fixtures, and surrender the Premises to Landlord in their original condition. If Tenant shall fail to so remove such improvements, personal property and trade fixtures and/or shall fail to so restore the Premises, then Landlord may do so and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for the cost thereof. 19. Notices. All notices required or authorized hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if either delivered personally or mailed by certified or registered mail to Landlord or to Tenant, as the case may be, at their respective addresses appearing on the signature page of this Lease, or to such other address as either party may so notify the other of in writing. 20. Quiet Enjoyment. Landlord covenants that upon : Tenant's paying the rent and performing and observing all of the terms and conditions on Tenant's part to be performed and observed, Tenant may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises. 21. Binding Effect. This Lease shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Landlord and Tenant and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 22. Option to Lease Additional Space. So long as this Lease is in full force and effect, and provided that Tenant is not in default under the provisions of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right and option to add to this Lease the additional space adjacent to the Premises, known as the existing patio space, as designated on Exhibit A. This option shall be exercisable by written notice given by Tenant to Landlord. If Tenant shall SO exercise this option, the rent for such additional space shall be at the rate of $200.00 per month. Except for such additional rent, the lease of such additional space shall in all respects be subject to, and governed by, the provisions of this Lease to the same effect as if such additional space were originally a part of the Premises leased hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have' executed this Lease as of the day and year first written above. LANDLORD TENANT SMUGGLFR LAND OFFICE, LTD. 1 *4..../1/' WIll 4.7 By ~f#k& Kull 1}4?~s~~-tz Its 0-<- O * Z li. ~~- 1 VJ \ /\0164 0*J- 1 0-1-e- 53/LUM/tZF And Lotte Bresnitz Its Landlord's Address: Tenant's Address: 1tl,14( 40 1 F UN#Allf / A El,t.· 4/ s E N? ka,g |Clnwe 71 r N o dliG,f &1110.0 47-« 6. 7/4/1 The undersigned, Tim Cottrell and James Bond, jointly and severally, individually 'guarantee performance of Tenant's obligations under the foregoing Lease. r ' C t*.AM 4,123-1*141 ~im) dottrell , Chne/4 7. James Bond - ~8 0 HANDCRAFTS - IMPORTS - WATCHES - UN UBUA L GIFTS ALPINE JEWELER KURT G. BRESNITZ TEL, WA 5-3292 P. O. BOX 70 ASPEN, COLO. PRoPERTy: -Mock 66 Gtpo{ AiQU Lot Et F txcef-1- lowderti 00-~ 4 GL E. 15% /39 '% CD o<eal ~ - .30 feet loth> 49_xes € 4 .CARDY 3141 FoRHER 4 -~ AL?INS -ZE WELER --38mt*BA <**-204?KING LpT PA+10 ' // )<- |r , ir X. 1-, Al-PINE ley€LEQ >f 78 0 1 [.26 IN 6- 2< j Ab. 1\\ 3 p N 2 422/ kx\§>< \ ' f k 'ron 1 5 es ' V 4 1 11\ - k X )6-** 4. 4 4--10<7< 4 - 7, Ck€ T .FeNCE g 1 D E \U Al= 44 ED<'A,6,t 4 t . ....... 4-doel r . * FAST ELEVATION V=" - t'-O. 1 3 1- 0. (8'-O/ lt,„ I 1 L/Ni op :2* AWN#NC, 1 -1 30 - - -- -- ---- P 0 0 ---+-0- 1 6 j ROCME:Fz·75 A 5202.,EL ·STEP wri r.pt STD ...OUNT CURTINDDlls , Nk/Move EX,37-0 ,-CLI UNDE As 'DE OP 8AA- \ 7-lic,Moto 57-me ./NDEAE,£72 64162 1 . ~ . ' -1-- i IN 1 .1. 1.11>74 Tr T h ~ ~~ ~~ ~ // '·· .f .1 6/ 41 94 --- - -- -- - --- ---- 3 iii ./ ./T; 1 1 1 lij r-.-71 11 1 1 1 1 i ~1' /C€<»et, ..3 49-2222 •22?*-=CF' 2 CO«,2-21 i 41| i~~ *#, ~ 4 1 1 7 - 5408.-TEN 2*157(4 A.UNiNG A.* te X 12*k. .// --4 /. ---- 1 - 1 ,<24(14 - /4 *€/g· ./ Fl'l % i ro TH,5 L.Ne C 1 11 hl DER 440 .1/ A 30 ' 0 + | 1 \ FLOOF- O/'U?/w-- . /FA ., -~~50/,u: Ajove OOT'70 11 1 ' (70 DAYWELL) - ,\J - / , lilli 1 1 \ ICE C,423 7- 1#£»M, ' I '. 1721-0-:Di-7 -731- / 1 39' W. A-,2** Ch lili 1/ -, 31 \ :J 1 ~ 1 --- . I .,1 I 4 i L -1 / .739/ /1,0-* *St,-u.K . 1 1. € ... .:.-? ;25)411 17 -4 , ; r . ·2/4, T.N.10'.,v. lu. .•"n Ul.EL'___ __-__34, '·, 9 i I ' 5·L G * 1 0, I , / 1 4 4 1 --/ EX 4"CS AWN,46/ / 1 3 i 40. , -\ )).-~ .i-~- ~-I \\ .-. FLERL.t:Set--t...6-2 ~-*....7 -1-it--t- , 1 1 4'.. 10\ DOT CA D 00 A f. 1 1 W#IO~SHeLF- 11 11 i IN f\1 -- t'-.I . BUS <LAA.7 S 11 \. ': 9 m 1 ; Ill \ - . 1 11 .- 4' + 0 64' £ BAA.A/4 ·-' j 1- - · w 1 11 - - A A/(4 'A 7.-0 8,€.A/. 8,145 . --/3 --- lilli ll! ~ FLOOIC P LAM i / W /LA" 1 _3 te..11-0. NOAr FXIST'<L, (61 ALF (5Lock_i 1 ; X 1/7 Sts' -42/ . These are a little hard to read but Bill Lipsey will bring large blue prints to meeting. 6> i -t- '1- 6 1 /0-4 j 1 -8 3016 .~ -~ tt,. 31,• I 416· *L,0 AL,• F \2 _1- /1-1 2 9. 4 -r- . 1 1 11. - --7--~~ -.* 5' CONC SLAS -_1 . ' - -0 A- ~ 0 7- -~ 1 0 T - - -1 c-EY/sr'<$ AIN11 thi S ' . 5,48.vA oor¥20 1. w \ 1 1- - 0-1- 1 1 Nae A wN-4 001 -- I-~ 8*Al:*Av,Ce Ag-/A ---' k It 1/ Il I - Fl---1 'i 4 / 1 1 100.001 (2 06*,091,1 N) V I. B MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: 212 West Hopkins Avenue, Conceptual Development Review and partial demolition, public hearing (continued) DATE: May 24, 1988 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTION: On March 22, 1988, HPC recommended historic landmark designation of 212 W. Hopkins with the condition that the front porch be restored or made transparent if still required by the owner as an air lock. On May 10, 1988, HPC reviewed and tabled conceptual development approval until this meeting based upon their concerns of the height of the new addition in relation to the existing structure. Direction was given to the applicant to restudy these aspects. The applicant has submitted revised plans reviewed below. OTHER COMMISSION ACTION: On May 17, P&Z reviewed and unanimously recommended historic landmark designation of 212 W. Hopkins, with the same conditions as HPC recommended. P&Z also approved the parking reduction from four spaces to two in special review. City Council will be reviewing on 1st reading the ordinance for historic landmark designation on June 13. The owner is requesting the $2,000 designation grant. SUMMARY: The revised proposal reflects a height reduction of three feet (3') over the original plan. The gable peaks now meet in the center of the addition (please refer to site plan for specifics). The revised plan also indicates a change in the fenestration, squaring the windows which were originally proposed as arched. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The revised reduction in height helps this project be more compatible by reducing the "looming" over effect of the original historic miner's cottage. The table below illustrates height comparisons to median point on pitched roof: Original historic structure: 14' Newer addition immediately behind original section: 18.5' Proposed new addition: 21.5' (maximum allowable: 25') This shows a step up transition between the original and proposed new addition, which helps blend new to old, in our opinion. No other major changes have been proposed. The partial demolition of the rear lean-to shed has been discussed in previous memos. (Please refer to memo dated March 22, 1988.) Fenestration: The Planning Office recommends simple divided lights in the south elevation upper floor. The proposed plan reflects undivided clear panes, which the applicant states offers a blend to the earlier addition. Staff, however, finds that these slanted clerestory windows vs. vertical undivided windows read differently and there should be a transition between the original double hung found in the historic structure to the new addition. One alternative may be to divide the side light and smaller windows, leaving the balcony doors solid glass. The proposal shows double hung upper floor windows on the north elevation, which should be repeated on the east and south. Front porch: Happily, the applicant's revised plans reflect a restored front porch with no transparent elements. This was preferred by both Staff and HPC in previous meetings and goes a long way in preserving the character of the original historic structure. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends-- conceptUal development approval of 212 W. Hopkins,/ finding the setback variation to be more compatible, AND subject to incorporating divided lights on both the east and south elevations. HPC.memo.212WH3 CHARLES CUNNIFFE & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS P.O. BOX 3534, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 TELEPHONE 303/925-5590 CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, A.IA May 12, 1988 Re: 212 West Hopkins Avenue Lots P & Q, Block 52 Aspen, Colorado SITE, AREA & BULK CHARACTERISTICS ZONING (R-6) Lot Area: 6,000 S.F. Existing House Floor Area: 2,205 S.F. Proposed Addition Floor Area: 687 S.F. (exempting 500 S.F. for garage) Proposed House Total Floor Area (FAR): 2,892 S.F. Maximum Allowed Floor Area (FAR): 3,240 S.F. 1 Proposed Site Coverage: 2,243 S.F. Allowable Site Coverage: 2,400 S.F. Proposed Height of Addition: 21.50 Ft. ** (at median point on pitched roof) Maximum Allowed Height: 25.00 Ft. (at median point of pitched roof) Total Front - Rear Yard Setbacks Proposed: 23.75 Ft. * Minimum Allowed Total Front - Rear Yard Setbacks: 30.00 Ft. Total Side Yards Proposed: 7.00 Ft. * Minimum Allowed Total Side Yard Setbacks: 10.00 Ft. * With regard to the encroachment at the rear and west side yard setbacks, we are utilizing the Variance Setback Incentive allowed with the (Proposed) Historic Designation. ** Revised per directive by HPC at Public Hearing May 10, 1988 fs.2 60,0 5.0 ' Rum' 1- Ble¢¥• e,Hve.Lere 5. (796=14 ALLEY Dul'D,NC.1,4 - H [12?/ Cit•.A.4% 2- 4- DEPRIAA V / ·· APP/710(-1 .2026140 6OJ PKOF L Ir] C. 11 70 '01' 11"W 4 1-1 0 Def £5»c-K + FLErQUI REY) c -- ,- /, H,P,¢. E><26«rl Grl -4)-100,1 i X 01 LA - <-Be=Wige.O f>KINMIBU- 10 ill th 0 *W1 421 1-1 A e ET W«• 87' i i:· ' '- ·· · F'#11 141' 4 !11 I·-1 "-- -tr-~-7i1. ~ . d Oug#.2->iT mori INA CAPE T '991-1 1 0:2 . . I . ·· -EEZE'.'lill,~I''i'' 1 1 1, : 1 1 0. L : Hcw plA·r . =....:-:==-·211.,l,gvt) r·, L.„t --9.-/ 1- ki D. 13. T -9.1 Roof n .' 0 €1+2·P----~754CE,=MITirmq i- ·* Elq:at>-Er-*fl, 25Eea·.te,i - --*:-27'-:.2:.:·..7 il .WI111.1.u.1.;4--0 .~ jill- 1 REVISED 1200 P FLAH FeR N.RC. PIREOTIVE AT ~ex'Gr FLA·r 'llcop -1 .. ' '4-·.m.A'M i F I -- 4.-,L PUBL-US ,+EAKI >16, ... . 1 11'11111111 1 ' '··r :·4'1, rill-Ii,it Ir '- - - - ~404% 11 AA»(lo,[1825 : (Two .9.TOK-f ) 1 1~ 1 1. '. ~ t 14 e.v/ pec,Ke - =Imit» 1 49« : I. ' iL)91. ctru/·.Aeiia« , ,.i ~7 ( ."f · ~~~ fL-,ax'A klwr " p.*46 2 1 g 001= .. Dec/le f i · axict AN¢:gcrcH- 1 CON e grogY,) 492[5 , 1-1 IHT= Se<9418.lue . 4 4 11-GJ »kcl< I UP:...; ; ' ; 1 Il: .41 ;'1 1 11'11.1,1 11,1 11..'01 1,11 1 'i d , :21 iii; 1 1 11,1111 11 . 'I :'' 9,i-£xta, p'Tomzp 1,1.- Ni :!:1 FOOF . -0 0/..r. 1 1 4/,ki f 6 4,<~ 0 )111 3 Hi ilIS'~- 13 \ 41114 11 FEd A----- An 1 11112,4 :·,1 1 T -i' 1,14 14:11'h.15 - - - -J ''3/(k,Vh,·, ,1-1,4)e.>< ieT IN 01 M -' -f--DETDAG}44 , 2 <* 0 1 · - a 43 35 i- due,St.HT zortirt,4 c:WDE ' FRONT + P.E.Ag Y>WW -0 589'19 po, O'Col·G> Ir·169 , 0 8 e E.T „.,S.}4 -3 474&]gil. x* Jr,~AA/'» ut , 2 Go.0 FRoF<l-Iric 8..,1.T.'~~~~~Li <C) 4 2..'.fri..''~ -W V. 1 . HopKIND AVEN LIS 6 I tt- CoLAN · 1 L 10 GEN ERAL NOT[10 1 1, It·IFORMATION OHO\Vhi ON T-H te el-rE PLAN 16 DA+CO ON A OUBVELY FADFAq;ao PDY' 'LIHEED IN 6 8.0 11.2 6/14/234 4- upp,<rso ¢1/'1'2/ 66, FOR 0-roe + q, BLOA< 62.,CITY ¢ TOWN€.1-rd oP AOF,(11, f ITAIH COUNrf,Cel-zo, 52,-f leo,O. IMPIC+TED 51'OT 41*,ps MLEVATIOND 100,2 7€op. UNE N 11-'50'41"E 74.2.5 ~ EN11 Wowd,O-GCN 9801-RANE; »dilq OUTU,JE. of- •cr. r G.€·-C CIA r·92-IraL- C.-4 :661-'U \ 4 1 L -- -- //, '49 1 , J U 1 dg, \ 1 i J \ .. . 9.11 1 1 " J -- -r' 17--- A ' .6047-21,43 06- Call.106, i.! 1 17~ 160€·,IC= /A 151-Elk- FEE•:R'ron . 1 0 -1- --- ..114 j .'iLl j . 6/-22322:02.2.0 1---*.-.-.- 1 1 1.j -R- Revot c· Corjcepr -4 2,11 E- 1 41 1 , 1- -'ij' 1 ----11 l_-_31 _ e 111 1 0 6 1 4 4 If 1 1 1 11 111 1 i 4 4 iT -7 3 IN. :b -1, -1. h 1,0 1 2 1 , ik Lilli 4 li b J. 1 11 j lit 4 '' 2-1 il i .Lii · ililliFillillill fljllillilijlli-jil!.,1 i r. f Ll,j 7-- 1 li~0:571 1 YESTIWLE *1 - - 1 N PE F ---~ - -. ~411 i m ! 2=====« ~ 1114 RESTbRE po* _ - 1. 11 1 , ir 1.f -~~ ---- ' ! 7 11 i : 1 - .1421 16-ju|10 - ;--111 1 1 -- ./---» "11 It! U la = 1 l' 11 1 ' i - 0.11 21 1 . 4111'L-4 914 i i, £ 1"~. 9+1.- -. -. 1 - EXISTI NIC, 1 NEW 1 . - /1 1 _EEvisED eou-1514 ELEVATION : '4"-=1-011 6 M IT}4#AL-L RED IC>E,JOE 5/11/88 -- 'Df :,49 \ a.2 . -2 , 0t L-1 13[ or= CE 'LI,16 \ I NO I 'DE MA· TE- L. P.i l. A ri t.- / /0 rit---"iz-Trf &34621./ I. 41-~t 4.7 j 11 ~::! 11 -\\ \ · . r.- .f t--------02~~ I r---71 1 - 111 - 31 f Ltrit OF c..ell.10 |106-*- - 1-44-4&2 4 --- -1. -~ IAS,PE M•%711(6.R. -~<'1 . _-- T- _-2 - - ------.-14=ut,L-=--=02 4--- 10 - . irm l - . 1 - 1.1 l 11 . 1, 4.1-:-a- 1 .11 1 1 SE»JO FLooACE ; - t j '1 t+MAO- kED*a» 2- . „2 2 ' .- / :s/ - - -- - .// 2:17=» -1-1-1 E-- 19-FE toi.,_.6 - 9~317__ =lif~..2.- 3-12 5 EL-Crjl -<, 1 .- EL,/OE i--- - i , ' r , 4 , -- ' 1 Et-1 i AL v - - -It-fip., - 1" . 11 . *==E=*1 Izi -- -- 4---t. 4 ~ - · NEW EX i #T j N & i 1 1 fl REVI SED NOgrA ELEVATION -5 4-=1-0 ' 9/1 1/88 SMITH GcALL, 12.591.DEN CE 1 -6 - 21,5 LGMERIAN -- -- - ~lk- h OCA -11-1 ta 2 01= B.C._r ,=1 r t·LE 7 1 ON 0,2.1 4"IAL re:u GE el- />241 , b A le P' '-r: 1 : L.;·C•:t/, F'»R G /i Al; 1 9-. ---------- - - .457 - // 123 1 H 9 -1 ~ - i -2._..®t _f.." I F~T. -t~ 1 .-J--LI,JE OF Ge 1 424 1 j ... i I i 4• i . 1 -- 44 - 0 ' - 0 : 1 1, . 00'. 2 Ill 44 ,; _11--1 ---17 -tr-1 ,/- 01! 23013 12 ·,9 91 11 6 i; ii 11 i 1 r" 1.1 1, i 11 J i I Q u.[L_iL 1 - Dvt,1 1-t: R E>~ Px A -: L. - 1==:14/ -- ~ EL. 109 Qj" :.6233,00., frl- ._ * f==g- r= ~ 1- 777 TV- 741 1 REmoVE EN•>TI,~ l: 1 zi . 1--1 .F==il -f=7 - VE€,T/*ULE . 00- -- -- ------------ ------ 11 14 04 - 1 < ~ 2- -_ / i!, i ~,1, 1 1 L -134;Ii,11'L 1- :1 1 1 I l ' 1 / 1 lili 11[ -. -~ 4 1 1 - -- I ~ 1-1-2.1 1-1.--g i ii===L L---- 1 '-I - 1 1. i -1 -' 42 5-ViDED e.pe 1- ELEVATION ; 74 =1-0 · 4 4 - /'ll , 1/ - . SMVT-14 6'ALL- P.en©EhkLE sfi-9'8 6 9-L- C MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: 513 W. Bleeker, Significant Development Review Conceptual and Final (Public Hearing, continued) DATE: May 24, 1988 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: On February 23, 1988, HPC reviewed the minor development application, which included alterations and minor variations from the prior approved plans. More recently, on May 10, 1988, HPC reviewed the significant development plan, tabling conceptual approval and the public hearing to this meeting. The committee's concerns primarily centered around the incompatibility in character of the proposed garage to the existing main structure and the carriage house, specifically in roof pitch. The committee also expressed concern regarding the continued expansion of buildings on this site and asked for total FAR calculations which are included in this memo. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The applicant has considered HPC's concerns regarding roof pitch and has responded with the attached letter. Specifically, three factors are addressed: 1) The breakfast porch is the closest portion of the house to the proposed garage and the idea is to make them more unified 2) The garage's low pitched roof allows for south light into the back yard and breakfast room and views of the mountain 3) Code limits the height of accessory buildings to 12 feet; the proposed garage is 12' at the median point of the pitched roof. Even in light of the height limitation, it remains staff's opinion that the combination of the garage setback of 75' from Bleeker St., tucked behind the house and partially screened from the street by vegetation make this an acceptable project. The garage's low profile does not create attention allowing the main structure to stand out, plus it is accessed off the alley. These elements prevent its high visibility in staff's opinion. The FAR calculations are as follows: Lot size: 7,500 sq.ft. Allowable FAR: 3,660 sq.ft. Existing FAR: 3,386 sq.ft. Garage addition(exempt): 486 sq.ft. Page 2 - 513 W. Bleeker RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of Conceptual Development for 513 W. Bleeker St. The Planning Office also recommends approval of Final Development provided the accurate representation of all major building materials be approved by HPC. Final Development approval shall also include a statement of how the plan conforms to the representations made during the conceptual review and responds to any conditions placed thereon. C Welton Anderson & Associates Architects Historic Preservation Committee 3--- City of Aspen MAY / 7 772 17 May 1988 RE: Garage for Barnett Residence, 513 W Bleeker Dear Committee Members: The design approach for the garage roof for the Barnett Residence is a result of three factors: First, the breakfast porch is the closest part of the house to the proposed garage and we wanted them to be visually compatable and unified. Secondly, a low pitch on the garage roof allows south light to the back yard and breakfast room and views out to Aspen Mountain over the roof while blocking views of buildings across the alley. Lastly, the code limits the height of accessory buildings to 12 feet. Again thank you for your consideration of this application. Sincerely, U) 2/24-J C. Welton Anderson, Architect Planning / Architecture / Interior Design Box 9946 / Aspen ,Colorado 81612/(303) 925- 4576 4-1.0. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: 300 W. Main, Final Review DATE: May 24, 1988 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting HPC's final review approval for the alterations and addition to the property at 300 W. Main St. BACKGROUND: On May 10, 1988, HPC moved to approve Resolution 88- 3 on May 10, 1988, granting conceptual development approval for 300 W. Main St. subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants shall adress in their Final Development Review submission further consideration of: a) Simplified south elevation upper floor dormer window and door fenestration b) Detailed plans for the size of panes in the true divided lights and all window trim c) Further study of the east dormer mass and scale 2. The applicants shall present in their Final Development plans an accurate representation of the siding materials including channel lap or logs, which height and joint are to match existing siding as accurately as possible, and actual roofing materials, including shingles or metal. 3. The applicants shall provide in their Final Development plans structural analysis of the house sufficient to assure that the proposed alterations Will not undermine the structure leading to major reconstruction or demolition. The applicants have presented in their final review application the required documentation required in Resolution 88-3. A discussion of each issue follows. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The applicants have addressed each area as stated above. Discussion of each follows: a. South Elevation: The applicants have submitted plans showing the change to the upper floor gable peak window as discussed in the last meeting. The window is triangular as opposed to square-ish. b. Divided lights and window trim: A catalogue sample of the Marvin windows to be used is enclosed. The panes are four over four and window trim will be very simple and narrow. c. East dormer: The applicants have further studied the east dormer and have presented a description of four options The McDonalds prefer the previously sumitted wider shed dormer, which provides the needed hear room and floor space for the bath and bedroom. This dormer was reduced somewhat from previous plans. A sketch is included for Consideration #1 - smaller dual shed dormers. Staff's concerns were echoed by HPC regarding the width, preferring a smaller dormer. The considerations are listed below: Consideration #1 presents two shed dormers, breaking up the large expanse. For the reasons of usable floor space in the bedroom and a logistically difficult matter of snow and ice removal, the applicant is rejecting this consideration, preferring the dormer as previously presented. Consideration #2 involved studying a gable end dormer similar to the south east elevation, which is unacceptable to the applicant due to floor space being significantly reduced and the aspect of trapped snow and ice dams forming. Consideration #3 simply studied the possibility of one dormer over the bedroom, none for the bath, which is also unacceptable to the applicant due to no natural light coming into the bath. Consideration #4 discusses reducing the shed dormer even more which reduces floor space in the bedroom. 2. Material representation: The applicant will present a roofing and siding example at this meeting. A complete description of the major building materials is attached. Please refer to "Option 8" - Skylights on the applicant's attached list. Staff recommends the applicant be more specific in their presentation with regard to skylight placement size and design. 3. Structural Anaylsis: The applicants have submitted their own structural analysis of the existing log house and state that the new addition is a stand alone structure independent of the log house. The existing log cabin interior and exterior walls are supported by continuous concrete foundation walls. ALTERNATIVES FOR HPC ACTION: Staff finds the final application complete with the exception of detailed representation of the skylights and their roof placement. HPC may approve the final development review with conditions, or table action giving direction to the applicant for further HPC review. The next HPC meeting is scheduled for June 14, one day following second reading of the historic designation ordinance by Council. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the final development for 300 W. Main subject to the applicant incorporating Consideration #4 - the further reduction of the shed dormer and HPC approving the skylights and their roof placement. HPC.memo.300WM3 COLLJ \.tte-1-€,-~ ORIGINAL 57/fULTURE : 1 : ; 41,--1 f > : Y > r·, Utl 1'. 7 ' D I ti k./ v,1 ~ 1 1 . 1 »:4• 'i 2 i U.. 71'FL 1 -I~,3 '=3 ~ '*, I FIZ~1.-.-,1 1 ' i I , 0 k 0 ~ 1 '' 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... '1 1 1_ P -=1. d 11 /1 - 1 I_ - . -i--4. M.... i . ~ 11-1 <-r-21~~- ~ f 1- ~z=.LL JEX// 1- ,4 r ''.,--F ~ 1; 1 - - - · 1 ' - 3- 3<4--i 1 1 ... --- 1-i L-;D.9 -4 -- 41% f H £ 1 4-2.0--- DAT UK M (,Ff:'j 1 IN£ J 1-6 1 2'l.5' ~,~ MAY / L - 52' -· -- - -·- L. *_- 4 -,2--p/_ -j 1 / 20 15.0 -- ¥ I 4 - _33¢UBLE L /11 1 V , LOAfc_. , /OUP.' 1-'17 .t 6 ll/·.1, 1 IDE CK \ 21' GAR.R.¥ 01-i :u:t- u--ADDIT/ON - ----- 1 ----·- EUNDiN(b L/AP-- (11 , \ - 2-41\I-fr,JIF · [1/1PROVEMENT €ut, 11 1 1 __ , __ . - - + - = -.- 4- -- - - - e./., e .11. t ..1 RETAIN,'NE. WAI/ '~'4 :1' f f.9 1.4 RAh}; // /2£ ill?tivt ' I b' ..1 . 1 .4 4 .-:f }4 *j# t#hiA@5 E r k 2/3 I .f,- tl .. 44 - 7.2 - / . - : , .4 - ..2 , .1.41 N , L ? 1.5 ' X /0 u 11 7 1 .$6 1 1 *41 -1. · 1 '4,4. , I /4< I I . ' I. . k . I '4 *, -1. B I.'.'...:. 4 9. 5, 9.<Y...... 4 '-:....Gall' ' 94¥07.' ·. Pn · p g.. .~,112%'R J :4.It..4 "~- ~ 11 b , /ta»· 7-' -m 2 fir- p.1, , 4 1 4 11 \ 1.1.1.1 - , 33. 8' 1 - -- < \432 f/ - f.< 1/./ At LE y 1 352 ,- 42 Note: All the attached submitted by applicant. THE FINAL PLAN CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS MADE DURING THE CONCEPTUAL REVIEW. 1.) RE-STUDY THE EAST SHED DORMER. REF. SHED DORMER 5/16/88 2.) SIMPLIFIED SOUTH ELEVATION UPPER FLOOR DORMER WINDOW. ADDITION OF TRIANGLE WINDOW VS.SQ. WINDOW. REF. SOUTH ELEVATION. 3.) DETAILED PLANS FOR SIZE OF PANES IN TRUE DIVIDED WINDOWS AND DOORS. REF. LIGHTS MARVIN WINDOW (EXAMPLE NOT NECESSAIRLY THE WINDOW TO BE USED). 4.) ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF SIDING MATERIAL. REF. MATERIAL LIST. 5.) STRUCJTURAL ANALYSIS TO ASSURE UNDERMINING WILL NOT OCCUR. REF. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. 5/16/88. -- CONSIDERATIONS ADDITION EAST ELEVATION SHED DORMER OPPOSITE THE EAST WALL IS THE HOUSE BATHROOM (1 OF 2) AND THE FORTH BEDROOM. CONSIDERATION -1- TWO SHED DORMERS. ONE FOR BATHROOM AND ONE FOR THE BEDROOM. ACCEPTABLE FOR THE BATHROOM, REJECTABLE FOR THE BEDROOM. REDUCES SIGNIFICANTLY USABLE SPACE. SPACE BETWEEN 2 DORMERS TOO DEEP OF A SLOT. REF. NORTH ELEVATION. CONSIDERATION -2- EXTENSION OF PITCHED ROOF. GABLE DORMER FOR BEDROOM, SKYLIGHT FOR BATHROOM. ACCEPTABLE FOR BEDROOM. REJECTABLE FOR BATHROOM, FLOOR SPACE REDUCED SIGNIFICANTLY. NORTH WALL OF LOG HOUSE (12) AND DEEP GABLE WALL PRODUCE CAVE EFFECT. SKYLIGHT HEIGHT ABOVE THE ROOF, AND LACK OF SUNLIGHT WOULD TRAP SNOW, Creo.-25 1 20£ Ci d rA . CONSIDERATION -3- SHED DORMER OVER BEDROOM. ACCEPTABLE FOR THE BEDROOM. REJECTABLE FOR THE BATHROOM , SAME REASONS AS CONSIDERATION 2. CONSIDERATION -4- REDUCING SHED DORMER WIDTH. ACCEPTABLE TO BATHROOM. REJECTABLE TO BEDROOM, REDUCES FLOOR SPACE 4- 6-~ s . c-L I . tr- t-f g -~r £ <S-£62 23 9-1/C 1 1 . 1 1 1 /1//4 ,/, b dj , 100./. 5-'CUC- 5 Ut===Lil'-~ 144 ; 1&4 ii fbdi L - J 6 -17- - -11 -I - ' L - C 1 -4 - " ; 11 t// ,it , /2 e 9 € 4/>, 1 9,/9/ lk,# 8 '· · trA e it,7,0 9 F 'E-_ -1 f 17 1 g i . 2 0 u,4 / 1 , /1- l U * -I- - .-I- I L Al C C k 6 -- IL , 1 1 A , 7 c k t.k . /4 / /*.<01 1, i'. 2€ 6/144 FA) b V,r W ////mu///im //4/1//~*7¥%<4/*41297133&I2./w~ S.QUTH_ELEMATION SECOND STORY TOP WINDOW CONSIDERATION OF THE TRIANGLE WINDOW INSTEAD OF THE SQUARE WINDOW FENESTRATION. ACCEPTABLE, AND WILL BE CHANGED i . MAJQR_BUILDIN.G_MATERIALS- 1.) ROOF METALI FABRAL. "GRANDRIB 3" COLOR 118 AVOCADO. 2.) SIDING 5/4" CHANNEL LAP: ROUGH SAWN NATIVE, COURSE WIDTH 9 13/16", EXPOSED CHANNEL 1 3/4" WIDE 5/8" DEEP. (STAIN WILL BE USED TO MATCH ORIGINAL WEATHERED LOGS.) 3.) TRIM: DOOR & WINDOW ROUGH SAWN NATIVE 1 1/2-2" THICK, 3"+ OR - 3\4" WIDE, RELIEF ABOVE CHANNEL LAP 1/4 - 1/2" 4.) WINDOWS: WOOD CONSTRUCTION DOUBLE HUNG MAJOR DIMENSIONS: + OR - 2" PER SCALE ELEVATION DWG.ELEV. F. WOOD MULLIONS, TRUE DIVIDED LIGHT: DIVISIONS PER REFERENCE ELEV. DWG. REV.F 5.) TERRACE DOORS: WOOD CONSTRUCTION MAJOR DIMENSION + OR = 2 1/2 PER SCALE ELEV. REV. F. TRUE DIVIDED LIGHTS, PER ELEV. DWG.REV.F 6.) DOORS: SOLID WOOD, PANNEL TYPE. 7.) GARAGE DOORS: 3 PANNEL: ROUGH SAWN PLYWOOD. 8.) OPTIONS 1- SKYLIGHTS MAY BE PLACED ANYWHERE ON FLAT ROOF SECTION. FABRAL RECOMMENDED FASTENER POSITION FOR ROOFING SCREW FASTENER POSITIONS NAIL FASTENER POSITIONS STRONGRIB TM 17•" OVERALL 37··7' OVERAI I I •TYP 36·' COVERAGE 1 36- COVERAGE ~ ~ ~1 1 - - - - - - EAVES AND ENDLAPS EAVES AND ENDLAPS - rNLe/~'1-_-„~~r -_ rg -~ ./ lv\=~_/tul_,„j~~v\-=LO . ..... ¥ INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS GRANDRIB 3 m 173&.·· OVIAA' 1 1 1 374/." OVERALL 1&" fllflal I , 1 -Ii 1 36" COVERAGE I TYP 17 192" TYP eat/2/ ---Jrd - - /F -7- - lil-- - AA 'u VU de V 1 ALL SUPPORTS EAVES AND ENDLAPS 1 54·· TYP A.7 - INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS FABRIB TM 1 1 1 ~~ 1 -34-1,~FV-1~-rV-~n./.9-UX.V-U., ..3<rj.~0-unj-/#.upb I i EAVES AND ENDLAPS EAVES AND ENDLAPS '---r -g'u,n~j-V~-LMVJV-L/V~LJ~ Liu~ INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS 25" X W CORRUGATED ..LY-f~/3'«Fn /-4-,-,-4---·. 4- - 11 ' V EAVES AND ENDLAPS EAVES AND ENDLAPS - ..../1~Nil-u~af~~a'xy·n#,··-·· ----.--·£-x-,-.glf-U-1.'.9 INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS NOTE: ILLUSTRATIONS SHOW CORRECT POSITIONS ONLY - SEE FABRAL'S RECOMMENDED FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR SELECTION OF FASTENERS AND POSITIONS FOR FASTENING SIDING. 3449 Hempland Road, Lancaster, PA 17601 Phone (717) 397-2741 Route 24 West, Gridley, IL 61744 Phone (309) 747-2937 FABRAL 308 Alabama Blvd., Jackson, GA 30233 Phone (404) 775-4484 P.O. Box 58, Rt. 70 Bypass, Idabel, OK 74745 Phone (405) 286-7521 Alcan Building Products A® T• Division of Alcan Aluminum Corporation ALCAN F-102 R8/86 - 4 lu T| f~&!mE#¥-401/902/1/7~1.flz~WZ<--1J,F= 1-- + ' 4/7/8.- -4 + . py-·~F~ 1 1 !11 i 111 1. :m- ... 7£163,3#*jf 444 1 e. I.k - .. i ..4 ~ 1 I I - . I._ 1 ··1 r-~-Pr+ - f - -1 4 1441. =- 4 4.*14 3 7-4 2 4£*&%1, t.... ~· . AR -t' J 103 RED 125 GOLD 118 AVOCADO t.-4.~ Ir..#: 15/FoinmeR,qualimetimmi/JE i&6 .fillill=. "ME€~ 229853*,7~-Cll»105212¥1#*aP./5,2 . .....e ..1-93,8*MdEFR#Flm . ".7 i k:*94 -- 102 WHITE 128 DARK BROWN 107 DARK BLUE 114 LIGHT GRAY t' 1 i.*ffs re .9,7 4 1- 115 CHARCOAL 104 GREEN 210 TAN Fabral's steel colors provide years of maintenance-free service to Fabral's Quality Control Department performs seven different tests any structure. Our strict quality control standards and painting pro- to each steel coil to guarantee that the painted product meets our cedures assures you of receiving a superior finish every time. Each high standards before manufacturing. Fabral's confidence in the steel coil is prepared for painting by an alkali cleaning, hot water longevity of the painted finish is demonstrated by an extensive rinsing, application of pre-treatment, Cold water rinsing, acid sealing warranty program. Complete details on the warranty are available rinsing and thorough drying. The epoxy coating, formulated to pro- from your nearest Fabral representative. vide corrosion resistance and to interact with thetopcoatis applied and oven cured. The exterior finish coat is applied and oven cured . _ to provide a durable, tough finish Fabral 3449 Hempland Road, FAB AL Route 24 West, Gridley, IL 61744 Lancaster, PA 17601 308 Alabama Blvd., Jackson, GA 30233 RAU-111 l.. Lit l.; ili l; 1- ! UULJ(-11 .*:4 4 P.O. Box 58, Rt. 70 Bypass, F-141-3/86 ™ Idabel, OK 74745 A Ir. F#207?i~k;'i',~,(,7,>1.:. 2 .Al. ttaleve*Abilawail;*11 743 11 4 L. - - 9, 1 40.'1400; 4..€44:6I~ ·3'41Md~:,ii·.$'32 4.·.~- *I=~ .1·. 1 4 4 4 * : 'ig*~1,1 Im?MWAMI a #-I , lag. 1, .49~ £ ·4 A ' I ' I ..'- I . ./.f ~ t ..'41..'.2'...',.'.0,1 .' .lf, 19 -9 , ¥:14 ---E~.7 1 4 ' - -,4 1 7 '4',i:¢iff f'.~*tt~lika*< 7~1,1 ~ i. 44· b,4 4....JSY. n. 4 .. ' ·2*mfy ·k·¢43*~r *UW'F-' n W %47.T .'··4 1 *.t ./ / . '. 11 41\~, . .1- I I - m * i - ' ' 3.6·025't, >AN. Jilt~Larir 4,//eff ./ ./I' .5.i:f' 624 , 1 , 't 1.111:,12 n. f: j .. 1 »491?Lul.»· ·· U'¢4 ' . . . 5.1 dit·14·2*1! ~i 2 * p' * 449.1 Wi kilf. 0-" . ..«If 1 9 k. * SY, ~ ; Mfi~i,<tliti.2 Ek/,~2,2#V·t,414 44' ft - ift.%. ti:R,t ·f~* n rt aF ha l N. :.14.2«jauit...26--:, -1~·r . 4.r,: 0 , 1,~t t, f ~042%~0~fj~14,~ ,. f. ··97/ ,~ 2* -34<1:·29<~I,· /ft f Y·it·,i Y .€ 2 4 .d I ./ . ~ ~. 4,9924*.Ikit. Pil-1'2~"f. li kl?/ji:; ~.· Ccri~ ~-t'..,.. ;\.' · *·'*0*-43.3~99.(.'.¥i';f.-i-:'2· , 4- 'L,%/,41,;4111'LM' . - v- - 1,1 411-t '1 ·4 HiP!!TIM'11 L-Ll ..1 ., 2 '~i'lli "titi[!;,~~13- ~ ~ 1 1- ului·Lud · /1 414iht I .1. . , »--' #-.·V. 6-A,Ji~j·>ri;~.·'ildlf~~ 3,6, . 3 574 4.4~401.... -2 .......1,1 -"t 4--*.-14.3 '11121'1'.4 '!:21,2!1:,11! f!,0,'. 1 ./ I "j' , 4 ' P,t·.49, =liti,t"," 1 4 . 2 imieigthi 11. , mm'ift.~ j -1 ' 1 ; A t.06, . ''. C fy *'®PM!-,Ibti ] 3 . . 0...44 67, r ...3..1 1*418 11 , .S r. t %5 UN U. r ./17##f,311 1 . ·A: 2.2. •PI//,Ii/j -"-'',.,3. ~ L~~, 4 [4.13 . . 44 .-Il.*.... - . 1. . ···-9..45.·272. ·:. 2.·044- f i 43 ~ . ..8 - . 'ki ...../ t -,VT N · 1 - MT···7 '.Uivi . w I U A.«i-. · · ¥f ;4:&.b f 69>JO¢924 ·.r f -->..4 1 1 4.49 3441=,te -+17#4'9:2-/ GE. /·tift * 14';. 4. 1, 1Jlll ~-, k * & 1.5':i--1 'E53( 2.-+ 1 14 1 34.>rf .i K 19 D. Er· ..,r % . IN. d V 1. 1 i A ./ 7 .., . 'lti L , ·. kI// /.5.:~: : .... : t.' 1421/·' . f 4 4···.- i ~4-4%.6 & ~ >0 142<3~· . ·_C LI U~ - · 1 0*li/9.9* 7, -- 91_.i *f:& '.€ f ·.-43*t 44;* N.i 1;f '*iii ~' ---,-, 5 - ' "' . t ej*0 · ;62 · -wr ' .~ AM .'' 4 11/ 1 4 ,# I STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR CABIN S ADDITION. LOG WALLS INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ARE -9X 12" DIA. 2 SIDED LOGS. - LOG WALLS INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ARE SUPPORTED BY CONTINUOUS CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS. NOTE: CODE FOR A 2 STORY STRUCTURE IS: FOOTER 7" DEEP X 15" WIDE. WALL WIDTH 8". 4 4 94 0 V V) W b.3 31 1- I. r-1-2-0 -0-Vi %420„4 fl - THE ADDITION IS A STAND ALONE STRUCTURE INDEPENDENT , STRUCTURALLY FROM THE LOG HOUSE. - FLAT ROOF OVER THE LOG HOUSE. ALL LOAD BEARING MEMBERS TRANSLATE DIRECTLY TO THE FOUNDATION. - LOG HOUSE WEST WALL. KITCHEN ACCESS TO ADDITION KITCHEN. ENLARGEMENT OF WINDOW. 8- CUTOUT ALLOWS HEADER HEIGHT > 6 LOGS (CONTINUOUS). NOTE: THIS LOG WALL SECTION NO LONGER IS ROOF BEARING. THE S ADDITION ADJACENT BEARING WALL RECEIVES ALL ROOF LOADS FOR . THIS SEGTION. - LOG HOUSE NORTH WALL. WHEEL CHAIR ACCESS DOOR CUT OUT, 3d DOOR CUT OUT ALLOWS HEADER HEIGHT > 6 LOGS (CONTINUOUS). REQUESTORS AND OWNERS: Scott and Caroline McDonald ADDRESS: 300 West Main St. Block 44, Lots Q,R,S. ZONE DESIGNATION: O Zone. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST: Restuarant in Historic Designated Structure. RESTUARANT PARTICULARS: Size: 1400 sq.ft. Seating: 50. Ear-93 Low/moderate cost family food. Bar: Yes Ambiance: Rustic Log interior. Operation: Possible 3 meals/day Public Access: Original structure Historical designate. Operated: By owners. VISUAL- IMPACT TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Minimal for the following reasons: Open space: Large open space ratio: 6100 sq. ft. for a 9000 sq. ft. parcel. Open space boarders 2nd and Main Street. Trees: Five existing large spruce trees shall remain. Living addition: Modest size (exterior areas): Owners living space: 1900 sq.ft. Owners garage: 387 sq.ft. Restaurant Area: 162 sq.ft. Addition roof lines: Addition roofline is offset from the original structures roof line to maintain the identity of the original structure.The addition roof elevation is 31" above the original structure(1910"above grade).This is low compared to the Elisha carriage house, 346" above the original structures grade. Addition Frontaqe: Main St.:21 ft.,2nd St.:18 ft. PUBLIC IMPACT: Pedestrian Circulation: Impact minimal. Ref.site plan. Vehicular Circulation: Impact minimal,some extra traffic from Main St. to 2nd. Parking: Impact minimal. - E xis ting s treet parking has low useage, potential, 8 spaces. - Possible additional 2nd St. off street parking spaces,ref.site -Proposed off-street parking: 7 spaces,ref.site plan. Trash: - Dumpster located off the alley in the garage. - BFI recommends 2 yd. dumpster,ref.site plan. Service Delivery: - Off alley, delivery chute to basement. - Off alley access to restaurant through garage. Noise: Minimal impact: - Slight addt-ion to Main St. traffic noise. - Log walls minimize sound transfer. Odors: Minimal impact. - Char-broiler supplied with electrostatic condenser, minimizing particle ladened smoke. PUBLIC FACILITIES: - Fire hydrant exist on the corner of 2nd and Main St. - Bus service. - Walking distance, within six blocks of downtown. - Restaurant public facilities per state and city codes. covering. They should not obscure important details. The awnings should also be aligned with other awnings on a building. Awnings or canopies made of aluminum, fiberglass and other rigid materials are not encouraged. Awnings that do not serve as useful sheltering from sun, rain, or snow are not encouraged." The applicant states: "The proposed awning over the entryway of the building is designed to enhance the appearance of the entryway and to promote a European style to the building." The building is a modest one story gable roof structure which does not stand out visually along that block of Main Street. Staff supports this development which will attract attention in a compatible way to this building, and enhances the character of the Main Street Historic Overlay District. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds the design elements of the awnings to be compatible with the storefront and the Guidelines as stated above. Historically, awnings were used extensively in commercial buildings. They served not only as a sheltering devise from adverse weather but for summer heat reduction and shading of intense sun which could potentially fade window display items. Awnings also served as a decorative element to the facade, and often times contained the name of the business as signage. No signs are proposed for these awnings however. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: It is staff's opinion that the storefront will be greatly enhanced with the addition of these awnings, which will go a long way to present a lively business atmosphere. There are no historic structures listed in the inventory along this particular block of 200 West Main. For reference, the adjacent business to the west is the Christmas Inn. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No exterior building changes are proposed in this application. The awnings are relatively small and do not visually impact the existing architecture. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the minor development of 220 W. Main St., finding the proposed VZTEL MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: 220 W. Main St., European Flower Market Minor Development (awnings) DATE: May 24, 1988 LOCATION: 220 W. Main St., E. 1/2 of Lot N, all of Lot O, Block 51, Townsite and City of Aspen. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for minor development involving the attachment of two awnings to the main facade of this property. The proposed two awnings will appear as one continuous awning mounted to the storefront on a framing system constructed of 1" tubing painted black. The awning dimensions are 15.3' in length, 2' in height and projecting 2' from the facade. A sample of the striped material to be used will be presented at this meeting. HISTORIC DESIGNATION STATUS: The building is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District, however, it is not listed as historic in the inventory. PROCEDURE FOR PROJECT REVIEW: This is a one-step process, with HPC approval based on the proposed development meeting the standards in Sec. 7-601(E). The application is for awnings only, with no other exterior changes proposed for the building. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark. Response: Staff finds the proposed development in keeping with recommendations stated in the Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines. Although the residential guidelines apply more specifically to development in the Main Street Historic Overlay District, the "Awnings" section specified in the guidelines under Commercial Buildings, Section E - Storefronts (Page 25) apply to this development and are discussed as follows: "Consider using awnings or canopies to provide color and depth to the facade. On many storefronts and upper story windows awnings are appropriate. These awnings should match the shape and width of the opening it is the 1*ASPENAWNING 00)[AR[Pal[Ey iii.Ak h May 5, 1988 Roxanne Eflin Historical Preservation Committee re: H.P.C. approval for awning proposal European Flower Market 220. W. Main, Aspen Roxanne, Enclosed please find the information you requested for the awning proposal for the European Flower Market located at 220 W. Main in Aspen. There are two seperate awnings proposed for the front of the store. These will be mounted on the building so that they are one continuous run of awnings. The frames are constructed of 1" tubing to be painted black. Fabric selection is of 100% acrylic fabric. A color swatch of the proposed fabric is enclosed. We will be making no changes on the front of the building except for the addition of the awnings. It is our goal to enhance the front of the building by the addition of the awnings. There will be no signage on the awnings. If you have any questions concerning this proposal or if you require any additional information please contact me as soon as possible. Looking forward to meeting you, Sincerely-i 024« Gary R&631 Aspen Awning Company Home [303] 963-2208 P.O. Box 8005 - Aspen, Colorado 81612 - Business [3OED 927-4331 development to be in keeping with the Guidelines and compatible with the standards for development in a Historic Overlay District. , APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address: THE ASPEN AWNING COMPANY P.O. BOX 8005 ASPEN, CO. 81612 '€ Proof of ownership: EuR.B.4 Ftcw-# MA-te 7 37,Jc- Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: CONTRACTED TO CONSTRUCT AND INSTALL STOREFRONT AWNING ON BUILDING TO ENHANCE APPEARANCE OF ENTRYWAY X' Property Address, Legal Description and Name: 25qj r t +- 1.r W , All « UT O 864< ST 1 3 400 M A JA-) 4 7 Type of Review (Minor or Significant): MINOR Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: TNETALLATTON OF STOREFRONT AWNING OVER WINDOW AND ENTRYWAY OF THE EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET. DIMENSIONS ARE: LENGTH 15'3„ Friz TrITT 2 1 0" PROJECTTON 2 1 0,1 . ACRYTITC FABRIC IN BLACK AND WHITE STD TDEA AF? F. Tn RE TTRFn. THERE TA TO RE NO STGNAGE ON THE AWNINGS THE ARFA OVER THE nOORWAY WTLL PROJECT OUT 4 10" THT€ FR AVE WTT.T. RE roNSTRTTCTED oF 1 1, TTIBING PAINTED BLACK. Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure): THE PROPOSED ANNING OVER THE ENTRYWAY OF THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO ENHANCE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ENTRYWAY AND TO PROMOTE A EUROPEAN STYLE TO THE BUILDING. THERE IS NO STRUCTURAL CHANGE OF THE BUILDING. b. Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: BUILDING PERMIT ONLY SB.APP f f t GENERAL WARRANTY DEED LISE B. SHECHTER a/k/a LISE B. BODEK, whose street address is 7 McSkimming Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611, for the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to the EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET, INC., a Colorado corporation, whose street address is 220 W. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, the following real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to wit: The East one-half of Lot N, all of Lot 0, Block 51, City and Townsite of Aspen also known by street and number as: 220 W. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, with all its appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same, subject to and except for general taxes for 1988 and thereafter payable in 1989 and thereafter; Reservations and exceptions as contained in Deed from The City of Aspen as follows: "Provided that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws." ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed this )'5 day of April, 1988. , , ---4 53 0 izi'ng- --*-t - --t- Lise B. Shechter a/k/a Lise B. Bodek STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) this l,5*~-The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of April, 1988, by Lise B. Shechter a/k/a Lise B. Bodek. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: lb-044--- (SEAL) Vincent J. Hloen•/Notary Public Notary Pub My Commission expires 12/26/90. Address: 801 E. Hopkins 0 3 Aspen, Colorado 81611 32.13 ASPEN AWNING COMPANY EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET 220 E. MAIN ASPEN, CO. PROPOSED AWNING DESIGN ON STOREFRONT PROPOSED FABRIC BLACK/WHITE STRIPE 3/4" 100% ACRYLIC FABRIC f 1 1 1 1 ~ 62<ilifijalli)1)11131JJ L} 1 111 j i\\\\\ 1111 j i \ ) \ 1 f j )1 <3 9 )113 ) i l ji jjj ) 'f )19 \ \ -j ) 1 -j-~i j j\-1-j -) rj'j-~il¥41% 6161\\,4*2~\ViSj --7.- ri =f . - ·· it' 1 1 j Vi .. t 1 An»i I 1 1 /74.~ 'l. F \ 1 1 /111 . 7 11 :··s>,9-20214mtll:Mn¥·K·e.*.-44;.1 1% 4 C..fi„,Int i /1.,1,00 1 -77 - 1./' T PROPOSED AWNING DESIGN EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET 220. E. MAIN ASPEN, COLORADO 4 ' 0 '·L--*-1 T-*-A 4 1 0" -£ ·tr.,0'46 "~tlig\A\«24 i 1 . _32, A.. m a 650' U€====A-- tl~111Rr'4~ 1119- CUTAWAY VIEW OF FRAME CONSTRUCTION 1" SQIJARE TTJB I NG f 9 213-- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation FROM: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office RE: 415 E. Hyman, Roaring Fork Building, Minor Development Review DATE: May 24, 1988 LOCATION: 415 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot E and part of Lot D, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen. (On the Hyman Avenue Mall) APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting minor development approval to remodel the first floor storefront, and main entrance area. Other changes include exterior lighting and window boxes. HISTORIC DESIGNATION STATUS: Located within the Commercial Core Historic Overlay District; the building was constructed in 1971- 72. PROCEDURE FOR PROJECT REVIEW: This is a one-step process, with HPC approval based on the proposed development meeting the standards in Section 7-601(D), reviewed below. The total area to be remodeled is under 250 sq.ft. PROJECT SUMMARY: HPC's review of the proposed storefront modifications is due to the applicant's desire to remodel the first floor from its most recent use as a restaurant into two retail spaces. The multi-level entry way will be remodeled slightly; the garden level windows remain the same. The existing aluminum and glass storefront system behind the brick facade will be replaced with oak and glass. Brass carriage lamps will replace the existing globe-type exterior lighting, and 6-8" high redwood and brass window boxes will be added to all exterior windows. The existing spotlights for signage illumination will be eliminated. The net interior area will be reduced by 18.75 sq.ft. Standard 1. The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. Response: Staff finds the proposed development to be compatible with the existing Roaring Fork Building and the adjacent Paragon Building. Many of the architectural details of the Roaring fork Building were "borrowed" from the Paragon, most specifically the brick detailing. The current first floor storefront will be improved with the changes proposed, in our opinion. The alignment of the oak support columns behind the brick facade pillars balances the storefront elevation, which is highly visible from the Hyman Avenue Mall. The plan calls for removal of the airlock entry and the existing aluminum storefront system which is currently recessed from the exterior brick pillars. The entire arched metal railing along the first floor will be removed and replaced with and oak railing, including simple turned posts in the section up the stairway first doorway area. Staff recommends this improvement and is pleased to see the blending of wood and brick on this storefront. An option of incorporating a minimum number of turned posts between the rails within the two brick archways furthest west may add continuity to the entire storefront, in staff's opinion. This could be accomplished without negatively impacting window display area for the business. Standard 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds the proposed development harmonious with neighboring structures in material compatibility. The immediate block of the Hyman Avenue Mall contains an abundance of typically historic-in-scale storefronts. The Roaring Fork Building is unique in that it is the only one in this block with a raised storefront and exposed garden level windows serving the basement business. By removing the existing aluminum window and door frames and replacing them with more compatible materials, the first floor storefront would reflect the character of the neighboring structures. These improvements are highly preferred. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposed development will enhance the building and the Mall for the reasons stated above. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The storefront changes along with the revised court-type entrance proposed and modifications recommended by staff for the railing will give more balance to this building's first floor. The other minor changes including the proposed exterior lighting and window boxes will enhance the entire facade. None of the major exterior architectural features will be changed. It is staff's opinion that the storefront renovation project would benefit greatly with improvements to the stucco course which appears as a fairly wide cream colored band just above the garden level windows. This is nearly eye level and is in need of some minor repair. An oak applique covering the stucco may blend well with the proposed development and adjacent storefronts. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office is pleased with the proposed project and recommends approval of the minor development of the Roaring Fork Building located at 415 E. Hyman Ave. with the following provisions: 1. The stucco course above the garden level windows be restored and repainted or replaced with compatible wood. 2. A minimum number of posts be included in the oak railing within the two most westerly archways to add visual continuity. HPC.MEMO.415EH ROD DYER AIR.A. ARCHITECT APR 27 Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - 103 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 April 27, 1988 Re: Remodel of the Roaring Fork Building, 415 E. Hyman Street, Aspen, Colorado. Dear Committee Members, Mr. Brian Ingham-Rhodes, the owner of 4/5 ths of the above referenced building (Basement through 3 rd Floor), wishes to remodel a portion of the first floor level of said building. The previous use of one hundred percent of the available retail/commercial space of this level has been for a restaurant, most recently "Le Bistro Des Amis". Mr. Rhodes would like to convert this to retail sales space similar to the original building design. Plans for this remodel, and an HPC application are included in this submission. Please advise our office if any additional information is necessary for this submittal. Thank you, Rod Dyer, K.R.A. Architect RO. Box 9029 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/925-7149 APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address: 15=I Aht 1 Weit-t-&~A - 12 401-Es 4-150 19. 149' M.&14 SUITE 204° A.e>peld 1 COLC){26% 8(9/1 proof of Ownership: Cof>9 05 -T-TTLFE I,·4~M=~152ACICLE A,T-T?&c*aID Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Property Address, Legal Description and Name: 4155 E. 1.4-C€MAkt 9~28813·.2,=glpER j Col-c)(2*aD 8 14, 1 \ 4.4*L K- 69 , 1-oTE 4-F=ra:F Ld-r :tX) Type of Review (Minor or Significant): 12 14012 Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: S FE AFET»~++ErD "128Ec42£ 9704 c>F 1~92(1*2~560 OE.vel€312'Al*417 " Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure) : -SEE Aillkl4-er) H ST*Tle NAE:N U OF EFfeCIEL" Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: 1» 1 u[Di ktCh. 'pet:»(2FhA Ehil- ¥=Ee-M [7 f:20 0- Cokl tq-(ZUCT-104. SB.APP 1 . Description of Development Activity Architectural Elements Effected: 1. The aluminum and glass storefront system behind the brick facade will be changed to oak and glass. 2. The modern aluminum and opal globe exterior lights will be changed to brass carriage lamps. The illumination levels will not be altered. 3. Building height will not be effected. 4. Window flower boxes will be added to all exterior windows except street level windows to basement. 5. Net building interior area will be reduced by 18.75 square feet. 6. Spot lights for sinage lighting will be removed. 7. Hew construction materials will be: Clear white oak for doors and window frames, stained. Clear 5/8" insulating glass. Clear white oak for hand and guard rails. Clear fir beadboard ceiling at entry to replace existing plywood and batten ceiling. Brass carriage lights. '11* A Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure and/or Character of the Neighborhood The -existing structure was built in 1971-72. Although it is not an historic building, much of the brick detailing was borrowed from the historic Paragon Building next door. Although the building is too new to be considered "historic" at this point-in-time, we feel that it is a modern structure,· built to compliment the historic character of the surrounding environment, and at some time in the future it may be considered historic in its' own right. The remodel we propose, will enhance the overall character of the building, and the neighborhood in general, by removing most of the obviously modern materials (aluminum window & door frames and aluminum exterior lights) and replacing them with materials more in keeping with neighboring buildings (wood and brass) . Mr. Rhodes is also the owner of a retail sales shop called "House of Traditions" which sells womens lace apparel of victorian design. He intends to move this shop into one of the new retail spaces created by this remodel. We feel that this will add to the victorian character of the building. #.1 . '/ MUI W l/Oth UNIT ANU 13 NUI A YAMI 2 Property 1¥Pe 6 i'fit!1Ium u bul,Hy-j!"31'Uilldld .OF.IHE POLICY. . , 3 Cponty 6 Rate flule 4 Additional Ct·'ins S. ./ 85 -- 1 4 5 , , 7 8 9 lawyers Title Insurance @rporation OWNER'S POL Schedule Ag 5.1 THE POLICY NUM8ER SHOWN L . PCT-1099-86 DECEMBER 31, 1986 $],050,000.00 ON THIS SCHEDULE MIST IA . . AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED . 85-00-67379] @ 4:40 P.M. NUMBERONTHE COVE ASH[EI ~ 1 Name of Insured. INTERNATIONAL LACE U.S.A., LTD., A COLORADO CORPORATION 2. The estate or interest In tho land described herein and which is coverod'by thin policy is IN FEE SIMPLE 3. T he estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Rotid¥34Wdln.--_u\\ INTERNATIONAL LACE U.S.A., LTD., A COLORADO An 4, The land referred to in thi5 policy Is described as fort 11 1 ~4~J~ 11~ , CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3, THE ROARING FORq 'CONDOMI , tai 1 h according to the Map thereof filed 8or re c·Ird 0*44~y 101, 1973 in Plat Book 4 at Page 355 as reception No. ]57 134 atfd an-de!irmll)¥n'lfdescribed in the Condominium Declaration for The Roaring Fork Cortdgn.filjim)1,-4 , r odlqi January 31, 1973 in Book 272 at Page 7 as Reception No. 1571331j- COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO , 4 I h PITKI~COUNT'~ yIT*/'I0'~~ 1 & 2/1 NA ko //-71 ( - 74#42, 07 fce,opu ASPEN, COLORADO. L./'~ ~0~Uu'lter,I@,natur~,Ku,„u<~h~f~~~1~~/1~1~ti~.tid unlos, thi cover *hoot ' lawed at (Location) policy 86 (Rev 2/79) ~ Form No 035-0-085·MOO/3 and Schedule B are attached. ALTA Owner's Poljcy Fern, 8 1970 (Rev. 10-17-70 and 1017-84) ORIGINAL Copyright 1969 ROD DYER A.R.A. ARCHITECT Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 103 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 April 27, 1988 Re: Remodel of the Roaring Fork Building, 415 E. Hyman Street, Aspen, Colorado. Dear Committee Members, Mr. Brian Ingham-Rhodes, the owner of 4/5 ths of the above referenced building (Basement through 3 rd Floor), wishes to remodel a portion of the first floor level of said building. The previous use of one hundred percent of the available retail/commercial space of this level has been for a restaurant, most recently "Le Bistro Des Amis". Mr. Rhodes would like to convert this to retail sales space similar to the original building design. Plans for this remodel, and an HPC application are included in this submission. Please advise our office if any additional information is necessary for this submittal. Thank you, 24 0~ - Rod Dyer, A.R.A. Architect RO. Box 9029 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/925-7149 APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant' s Name and Address : t>12 1AN 1 h\<31 4&,A - 12 40-n~S 4-15- e. 144' M.&,4 5-liTa 70+ 24,E:,pekl , COL-£XE,aCZ:) 8 (Co// Proof of Ownership : 6Qf®f OF -T-T TLFE 1,4-1 1 YACICE A,.rr~241¥2-C> Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Property Address, Legal Description and Name : 4- IEN 13. 1.-(ftvIA4 9[.126.613· 2-pe,4 , CouseAUD a 14,1 \ ('*l, K- ,2,9 , L.0-r e f Ber'° :F L.«- t)3 Type of Review (Minor or Significant): M "402 Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: SF:-E *Fr-r-AQ+-kED "FE€Ct:2[ 1:'80,4 c>F lazoF2356 0 13EVEE(£>F,A}FF 11 Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of,~ 1 1 the structure) : SEE wrT»214-er) STATE MENU OF EFFEECTY Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: 1» I LIC)\ 4~31. 'PE-~F*4~rbleh{T- ree-M (T- 1=*se COK\:5720©Tiok.(. SB.APP 1 . Description of Development Activity Architectural Elements Effected: 1. The aluminum and glass storefront system behind the brick facade will be changed to oak and glass. 2. The modern aluminum and opal globe exterior lights will be changed to brass carriage lamps. The illumination levels will not be altered. 3. Building height will not be effected. , - 4. Window flower boxes will be added to all exterior windows except street level windows to basement. 5. Net building interior area will be reduced by 18.75 square feet. 6. Spot lights for sinage lighting will be removed. 7. Hew construction materials will be: Clear white oak for doors and window frames, stained. Clear 5/8" insulating glass. Clear white oak for hand and guard rails. Clear fir beadboard ceiling at entry to replace existing plywood and batten ceiling. Brass carriage lights. 1 1 . Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure and/or Character of the Neighborhood The existing structure was built in 1971-72. Although it is not an historic building, much of the brick detailing was borrowed from the historic Paragon Building next door. Although the building is too new to be considered "historic" at this point-in-time, we feel that it is a modern structure, built to compliment the historic character of the surrounding environment, and at some time in the future it may be considered historic in its' own right. The remodel we propose, will enhance the overall character of the building, and the neighborhood in general, by removing most of the obviously modern materials (aluminum window & door frames and aluminum exterior lights) and replacing them with materials more in keeping with neighboring buildings (wood and brass). Mr. Rhodes is also the owner of a retail sales shop called "House of Traditions" which sells womens lace apparel of victorian design. He intends to move this shop into one of the new retail spaces created by this remodel. We feel that this will add to the victorian character of the building. , .h.r, ruklrubtb UNLI A.fil, 10 7,Ul A Man I .4 t.fopafty type O j'(tjtplum O Ourl/¥llp.„dittoll~ 'OF 1 H E POLICY. 3 County 0 R.to Rule fi Additional Chains ~ 4 . 0 8 ' 85- , '1 1 2 3 4 5 ''7 8 9 lAwyers 11tle Insurance @rporation OWNER'S POLICY Schedule Ae THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN 1 - PCT-]099-86 DECEMBER 31, 1986 $1,050,000.00 AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED ~ 85-00-67379] ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST & @ 4:40 P.M. NUMBERON THE COV[ASH[ET ~ 1 Name of Ins tired. INTERNATIONAL LACE U.S.A., LTD., A COLORADO CORPORATION 2. The estate or intereet In the land dogcribed herein and which is coverod'by this policy H IN FEE SIMPLE - 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of R.olid¥:*#115~A.:._.u>< 6. , rt INTERNATIONAL LACE U,S,A., LTD,, A.COLOR€E#11145*~ L 4. The land referred to in this policy is described an folf CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3, THE ROARING FORq CONDOMI!*UE gl' 1 !11 according to the Map thereo f filed gor '.rec]r dilly ]01, 1973 in Plat Book 4 at Page 355 as reception No. 157134 artd an-de~i n described in the Condominium Declaration for The Roaring Fork Condoull Em-Allfiqo q.dL January 31, 1973 in Book 272 at Page 7 as Reception No. 15713.58- 51~ 2--7--M @ 5% 1. 1,1- - COUNTY OF PITKIN, ,-STATE OF COLORADO. - PITKIN'COUNTM 'DITI,%~,/I~~~ 9 V A Pro "31 1 91/w »549" ASPEN, COLORADO. < ~06'bunter;,'natur~Autnuf,~6 Officer 01 Au-1 Imwod al (Loc.tion} Pol'-¥ 85 (Rev. 2/79) This Policy H invalid unless th, cover *hait Forin No. 035-0-085-000~3 and schedule B are attached. ALTA Owner'a Poljcy Forn, 8 1970 (Rev. 10·17.70 and 10 1 7-84) ORIGINAL Copynght 1969 ROD DYER A.R.A. ARCHITECT Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 103 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 April 27, 1988 Re: Remodel of the Roaring Fork Building, 415 E. Hyman Street, Aspen, Colorado. Dear Committee Members, International Lace USA,Ltd. the owner of 4/5 ths of the above referenced building (Basement through 3 rd Floor), wishes to remodel a portion of the first floor level of said building. The previous use of one hundred percent of the available retail/commercial space of this level has been for a restaurant, most recently "Le Bistro Des Amis". International Lace would like to convert this to retail sales space similar to the original building design. Plans for this remodel, and an HPC application are included in this submission. Please advise our office if any additional information is necessary for this submittal. Thank you, Rod Dyer, A.R.A. Architect PO. Box 9029 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/925-7149 iT · ·.· .... h- , I k I . 1, . 1 I.-1....... ' . 1 4 8. - . "' 447 ' 41&' > A 'J , . 7/,7 t'*flj pr~vt.' r.... , .t h. • rr , . 'j 1 ./ 4 ..xy .3 , 11. , .E t --f *2*I;~. r. . j 4 44.4. 4/4/ . - ent -· - · Ar -:i, :* 05 ·A:. . di./64< :4 60'·c.;4.41 ¥ : . 9 :,1 ™., 10, 4....i ..r i.p: 1. b. p I :05:11. I : 41.4 . *, e, i, 1 I 1 J 1* ht 3 I r ' 0 7/7 6. 1 1 h ' 42 - I a. 141~'M · 4 4,# 4:, :f 11*:'4.: t> #:5' 6 - . :A e I F .-4 I --,M.. I .3 '. 2.1 6% 4.. 5 5.j..Ik.Y. 'Tj~ 1 "· 4 /1•. .b„ 4 ~1 ..v-'c' : 1 . . 4..9 ta *r- - - ' r 9,%Fi * 14, t,[ 1 11~.1.e'. .': £ 1 4-1> *'9¥1 r .1 At-., 640...its*".4.1 3 + . ...11- '. ..le¥¢.: th , .·&,%99 .<:*, ·Gu' €729 44....../.IMM#*444. l 4 4 -1.482 1€r.5.- 3,7-I- /4 ..®b. A '.4 ... '. . D . .: D. ...... 0 0. : D . D I 111 1 1 4.1 4.- . i' APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address : |Nl~EW-t·LM-kIMAL- LACE USA, LTD. 416 8.144'MAN AVE. SUITE €¤20, ASFEEN, co.alut ~ Proof of Ownership: COF)<r' OF -D 7-L.E (KISUIZA f*LE Ar~r»»C+(ED Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Property Address, Legal Description and Name: 4-16 E. 144'MAN AVE. AiR34; Cou:,12&£x:> <15,LK- 89,1.-~f Eti~ FAIzTOF t.dT' [9, -fowNs{ 1-E) Type of Review (Minor or Significant) : MI KkDEL Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: €,66 All-Ac=+445© It .[DeE,ce I rrlokl <of: 82uNSED PEVELopMENT " Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure): II 69% AT-[20'-ED a erATE-MENT OF eFPECE .... Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: Ell LOI bta IDE-f~.*42·T~EMT- BEEM iT TIDE CIC))· tUT~BUCT(044 SB.APP Description of Development Activity Architectural Elements Effected: 1. The aluminum and glass storefront system behind the brick facade will be changed to oak and glass. 2. The modern aluminum and opal globe exterior lights will be changed to brass carriage lamps. The illumination levels will not be altered. 3. Building height will not be affected. 4. Window flower boxes will be added to exterior windows on the first, second and third floors. Street level windows to basement will not have flower boxes. 5. Net building interior area will be reduced by 18.75 square feet. 6. Spot lights for signage lighting will be removed. 7. New construction materials will be: Clear white oak for doors and window frames, stained. Clear 5/8" insulating glass. Clear white oak for hand and guard rails. Clear fir beadboard ceiling at entry to replace existing plywood and batten ceiling. Brass carriage lights. Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure and/or Character of the Neighborhood The existing structure was built in 1971-72. Although it is not an historic building, much of the brick detailing was borrowed from the historic Paragon building next door. Although the building is too new to be considered "historic" at this point- in-time, we feel that it is a modern structure, built to compliment the historic character of the surrounding environment, and at some time in the future it may be considered historic in its' own right. The remodel we propose, will enhance the overall character of the building, and the neighborhood in general, by removing most of the obviously modern materials (aluminium window & door frames, and aluminium exterior lights) and replacing them with materials more in keeping with the neighborhood (wood and brass). International Lace Ltd. is also the parent company of a retail sales shop known as "House of Traditions" which sells womens lace apparel of Victorian design. It is the owners intention to relocate this shop to one of the new retail spaces created by this remodel. We feel that this will add to the Victorian character of the building. 69*Wed*Me «c** gu DOING BUSINESS AS €j-Gu~ of dilubti»,76 AN ASSOCIATED COMPANY OF 484.™d *ace t»yaurn '01, Ettl SYDNEY N.S.W. AUSTRALIA ASPEN SQUARE 675 E COOPER AVE. ASPEN. CO 81611 PHONE (303)925-7496 MAY 1 1988 THIS LETTER IS TO CERTIFY THAT ROD DYER CAN REPRESENT INTERNATIONAL USA LTD WITH THE ASPEN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE 1 -7/\ 1 r~y_-4-' .C- .- £-12 --./*.0 t ,~ 3 N-1/\·(~--t« Cr--AY BRIAN INGHAM-RHODES PRESIDENT vt· 1 Mt rut Il, T '~ 3 County 8 110 HUI¢b 11 AOd,ttor)81 (;48'n. 1 0 1 85 -- 1 2,. 3 4 5 ' 7 8 9 lawyers Title Insurance @rpomtion OWNER'S POLICY Sohedule A THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN& - PCT-1099-86 DECEMBER 31, 1986 $1,050,000.00 ON THIS SCHEDULE MIKI ~ AGREE WITH THE PREPAINTED 1 85-00-67379] @ 4:40 P.M. NUMBER ON THE GOV[ ASH[E I ~ 1 Name ot Insured. INTERNATIONAL LACE U.S.A., LTD,, A COLORADO CORPORATION 2 The estate or interest in the land described herein and which i, covered'by thle policy 19 IN FEE SIMPLE 3 The estate or interest referred to herein 16 at Date of R.0114*Na¥Uafk...>X \ INTERNATIONAL LACE U,S,A., LTD., A COLORADO #®DOMfWIEON 7..r 4 The land referred to in this policy is described as fol¢,Oa CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3, THE ROARING FO COND I...; .1 1.11 according to the Map thereof filed r re rdlfandI'v 181, 1973 in Plat Book 4 at Page 355 as reception No. 157134 an~ an-de iq~glgnlidescribed in the Condominium Declaration for The Roaring Fork Condoinini qt-,T 1~00*ki January 31, 1973 in Book 272 at Page 7 88 Reception No. 15713-51-I- 1 --L- ~ M COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PITKIN'COUNT U[ T LB I 0 C *41 . ASPEN, COLORADO. l .,,·/- 60·ounte'1"turiholher,W[, Olker Di Aut,lit Immund al (Locition) i # Policy 86 (Rev 2/79) This Policy 16 invalid unlass th, cover *heit Form No 035-0 086·000~3 and Schedule B are attached. ALTA Owner's Policy form 8 1970 (fiev 1017·70 and 10 17 84) ORIGINAL Copyr,ght 1969 . 1 [-1 , - in ri n 1-1 n ri n in ]-1 n 1-[ nm ' 1-7 7 24604060 {42321~ 1 - , FEMovM MXISTIT-44 -- c?===a- - ---1 MA-1 14. +OFAL LIA++TS I - 1 1 9 051·40·As Gx $~ $==t \V '©lkE']+T- 1125 L~%---*$M---KI T~f~il~jl~Eilj% - )2»4 L 1 1-195 f.12=2*1 --- -1 - 1 -%*.1 ·r22r··11 @Tre i=3 r I= 1 Czzl' IZ=IL. 2= 1=3: 1-/ -IZ~i I tr Plo BTU ELEVATIOI-1 - EXIET PIA 01-" = 1'- 0" 00 10[Un 1 f All o & 8 f U m U '1 1 1-1 n 1-1 1-I n rl I-i n n 1--1 nU n r \»-7 'Hel-ALL 51 Ew 12¤.tXVGEDp,/~'~| '/ Fl-O»/ a.la Boxe·s h -/ 11 11481kLI- rIEW ANTIQUE ~12;ds.! ! f v -1 41*VEL dil-ASS '=Agete,13 LAMI'·'---. \1» 1 gnp Kh = C 2 4- ¥2All/ ==y L Hac,/96' 11+587*Wk•64 14 7 I==3 OAK 7*AM *4 2-12{HIT3 Ir--90. %Ti/(fv *Jr-13 >< E-•S EIEI exler· F»6<MA **rip - FIXED «LAss FIEFA~12 4 ~ir-·Ir ~f 2 42*'#T·'r-'<si :"_.__r I~ZEZI 1--101«TU ELEVAT 101-1 - AE V I sEP >~f " = #_O" - I - . - - - A*-lQVE EXISTI cal-Ass A- - 2% t.*¢44)*Z)»::7(2-2 - - Fs#ove a>< sT. war, 4 ~ 0---=--2~ cal,es Pc:k:32 4 \VALL- - C ses PEr-10. M 2 A -1 I r.n/-1-<-1 41/ 1 '1 - --k334=*,me« 1 h#* - A / MA' 1-1 Hel -4 M $:21/ ' * 42 14067-1-1- ELEVAT lori- 61-'747 - EX IST '19* 1- - 1- Ar 12151-16:'VE ti>-is-rINA ~ ' -- --/ 2%.11'H. 44 LABS - . •5-FPRE}=125 HT-ers. 4/ 'VVV~, 12*140»*5:EXIST-11-le - JE- \V.I. 12411.-'Hol - 1/ , 4 02 - 1 \VU ST E 1 -W VAT 101 - - 1 - -E N T S > r - E >4157 11 - 1 4 Vall' 4 11 -011 A 0 1 ;- -1 -1 1 4- '9€-\47 15§,11 C.LE»%2 iweUL-, 4:ML,•fes <Trf) 7-1/ i ; i ~ hk ' Tal-1 76'ZED : . /1 b /23 *1 1 CAL ) 4 IJ ZV&"i.#AQDD 51 1-lav g.* vil-,Icn*61 1 / I / 9 i .1- i -, 14*10 1 c:a l.l;•4213' 9 12»-Mi 1»109 /9 ,/. x-- 424 11-4 722 13 E " eet,scle·p er , ' - . OVAW-7 -h - , 0 -2 Hom--G·ELE«7104 - 297«Y - 9-6-vit-ED 4 11 = 11- o Il 11 ~ 71 11 , 1 / f / 4- C»Id T*z+115 -- 43: c|»42 TEMFEREP I 4- , 1 H*ULAT- 1 t.4,31 0~ LASS i **1~F *TUcco - _~ r AE,112 4 MEI»41-Ir Ti U EAST. 'ST.L.1=0 ivALL j tib' - ki 9 12 EHA It-1 9 j 1 1 94 +AH DRAI LS - 5 96,116 l,*42 4 / i 1 / - -MMIP 114€UL 40/ , -p 3 139\ 14 9 -1-_ MEW ON< UND L i \ -/w' \Irf- 2 1/ 1 \\ 4 qUA12121@Al LS ?1 1j 1-1 ,#4/ / T 11 4: 4 -11 , /4 \ Eke~ ELEVATION - El-ITMof- 1<EVIsEID 1//911 = 11* Oil 49 4 9414, TW ' '11 6.& ~ r 0 4/*4A, '-71)4110*0*iki ./Pr *71/>. 4 - /4? ./ I 1 ' 440'* 5 I 9. 4.... £. 06 4 41 1 Ii. r € 4 ' %76. - 52 96 , , , 9$21&252 - -0 . '14:·94% -*11» 3, .. '. . 4,~.....~6#10.~''ui'll,6,1 ¢45'231.- / /5 -/7?kdy-/fir . 4: j, 262444 - -> -110» - 111*112halli - Ill™* -·2/ ~Yl-~~04ef.< . ~ ~ 2--aw,515«. s . * 432?J~ 2 299*34 e I 7.r '42 945" 4,4,1 41€21.1 i.1~ 772-62©, 1 , 1,2 1 244,4*1-~ I 296 . .l• .# "1 . & .47¢ 1 ll.. 1 .1 t,1 . , , - ·*4 . - St I .1 + .1 ..d - -// I .f> /41 --L. 1 v *h . - I - , 1-1 - 0 46"U 1 -T~41 - 2 9*4*+- 1 I -- ·4 04.-- hi. - ¢ Vi -1 L .2,4 C .0 447-:fri.-- % *f, 3.:=<3 ¥V -- *, 4 .A j f' I./* - . /.4 - I--, -F -- 1 I + 11, .g./.-9--~ T 2 ---I--- ----.- -I./W 4- 0 ' 9 L; 14. -... - 6,4 -1,/-:=>4 , 6, 4 «41 ,, 01 -- .. · 1 , t, R ... i·· ~ 91 -1 - 1. M .- - 4 1 - $/ tai ./ 4, 4 , 4 di E*-01 . %-' -·' 14 lilli -/ /162 1 1%.- < 4, r. t .. € C 11 V . ir . rm O . 1,1 - , $,67 g 4 - I 9. J./.1*'*m~- .1. ..1 . L A. . -,0.4 - £ *-- Vt,t.:14. -i „ -I--=23~V,«t,eF-~4 I . . -- - . *filf. 1~ %'ll- . - I-/--. * . .*- - 4. ,--/7' ·140 D 33 " -7 ~~· V . *_ I -2/ - + --et>). '41.~ 74·*f f bgrf e-«fli< . 0 - w --- *simm<.*-.3 -=~~*ff=~I Yja. 1 344, - 2-·*t;ep '>: .--9 -1 .3- 7 -'.C.>3~** r- a ...L<-1 1-.r J.r /1, i -13~ES-~~3-IZ. ikAT1/ ' -2 1 6,92. 2145 ~5 9 .....· 4, iril- '4-f-, . .i.t ..... b 't · ?,F,\N,•'41~V AL ESTATE =-lil i~ - r- /9.....ILWV#q/ - . ././.. ../.. I.'a l- - r -,4: - <651:Im7....-r/.2 - -3 *6<-1/#1 r El////478;27rZ .r t, .7 ' 1 - $ .-+ f ..:-li. 1.14'"/.1~M.'-' '-. 1 21.D ./ · : Ir ·, • - t . /* 1 4. I - ~ '44 I. , -1~ 9. ~~~ 7 . . 4 + .~ r. . ' 4.-0-L # A I '. -' .. - I. . I . I J - ' = 6-= .- f"94//7~h/Vt 4 - J .... 1 -I... i M.Ill",90.-IL i...../..,I/./ A - . 4 . #4 . A /Kit. 0 1 ' ' :i 9 / 44- - J.C. 2 1 •A¥ 79. iii 1 47 - „ 4. i I :.1 I.L - M.7./77----,11-- 1 1 n · 1 r . 2. t....LWAWN -1 34 .1 ,=-.~-9/ ,~~~=2 -3 . .4 Z .6 9 7 ... .1 7 r# , i - i, , _ T i. ~ i f . m - .-f .-0 - il ~ ~,~,-4.-- ~,t ~ ! c- >1-2 [4fiff{;~ i U :r v r.-BA- i. 1% _r.14*/8--~:2 *ft - , 1 V ....3 1 62''. E 2 9"'2'#9~" CE=.. t - 2.~. * 4 06 Ast 1%1 - 1, 1-.7 --*f- - F . er-- I 16 '. .i. - ...1. 1/ ; - -- 1/'51:/11/5 d..Er - --f----t~-1-~- -,2 11 - 6.-2 1 . 1 - t- ar. -.lia~..~I --- 1.-1-l-- 1 r 3 . ...51 -- . r ., -/0, *.'...."&/. , 1........../. _r · * <· -#7 .22 J 4 -4 ~- €129. 4/ ill-/ I I Ily..1~ I .....,1.-2 -~ I ./1 3 1 442-- 4. , : ~. W. · .a 4 . i ./lit r . 1 ...L -4 , I 11 . f, k 0 1 k 1 ; 1, / 1 . I . 44 + ip -- 144 mi*IIEE 1&.1 , *U -,0 + .. I ¥ . . 12¥ - A f - 1-7 9 4.2,14,9:2, 'I . t -I tilln Allf-'D:::nill//liIJIIJL. - ; 21'*il/£'A ' 6.5.--/. - • 714;1 4 1. 4" 13, ..1 Y - -4 1 41- 1 - 0 ...B Z,29.29.AL f ' . 0~ 1 4 -U 4*41 a 4 h r . 0 4.6.,4,6.W l .. 4. 1 1 1 i. m k !14 1 0 Ell'YFF 1,62»431,1//VAn - b LOT r LI-aT g L LGT D ) .. , 1 1 ARCHITECT ROD DYER A.R.A. ALLEY 4 - - Box 9029 Aspen. Colorado 81612 303 925-7149 59.401 1 i·. 1 .. ~ AN INTERIOR HEMODEL FOR i INGHAM-RHODES MR. BRIAN 0 THE ROARING 4 - FORK BUILDING -1 ~. ~ 415 EAST HYMAN AVENUE M ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 4 2 - 4 6 F4 21 ti 1 0 2 14 . .. 2 * w 'sT- 1 Ne~ 9+X |ST-11-1# f»·12-fo »1 .*Ull-DI»14 «OARIHel rg>«K *UI LIDI HeI 1 ...t., 1 -0 I 0 L r O 'D / J. /1- ' ' .. 1 - ' REVISIONS m 43.46 r N , copyright of the Architect and shall - lEg PEI- 1 544 *42 1 LK- 41ALL -~ >h . All designs ideas arrangements ana plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permis sion Written diniensions shall take pre E. MYHAN ©TEREET M ALL cedence over scaled chiriension, and - - shall be verified at the jot, site Ally af mensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to coinmencernent of work PHOJECT NO 9 L 0 7 9 L A 1-4 ela !4" = 19011 2 DRAWN BY A- ~bvetz 3%27 LaT la' 4 A }poa-T-10 h-1 Or LOT 'D ; »Loalc. 89 CHECKED BY 81 >6~61=>E-1-4 -[29»·/ Se'TE. , rIT ©i p·4 616.3 Ast:PE- r-·4, 61:9 I.-09»..Do ISSUE DATE 16) blah SHEETTITLF i 4 5 1 Ta FLA14 4 . 1¥ k- Uj SHEET NO . Ul t / .0 A- 1 OF SHEETS a *LJILDIble~ ovE.~LAY * . 0. ROD DYER A.R.A ARCHITECT FI 15- ' Aspen Colorado 81612 Box 9029 i } »»6101-1 Pl-11 LPI Hal . 303 925-7149 V . A, REMOVE 12 b<1€0 \VALL i *:ecia 1 94 , 057 +4-ID in:a FIZAME COFF I POS. 1 - 45 I - ---1 ./-- < :-ur ®®1 .t® 1 0. · I 1 - F~m,/m/~ f///////////////. ~F//~~ilf/~25 ---1 f- 4 1 AN INTERIOR REMODEL F Iii 'i .; FOR MR. BRIAN U INGHAM-RHODES 4122~~ ~~,~ 0 lax*Ti 1-la i -1_ ELEVAT© g j Flal-|ov 6 ~ ' THE ROARING - 1 1 Il 1 1 L-1 FORK BUILDING r- F #)44TI Hal (LuttaIL ~1 . 1 \\ 0 74 1 y .*Movd i HpiU@-8-3- \ Mib WAU.46(-TIOHS - 2 4 1.Ir .' > 4 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 -2 "1 1 1 415 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ~~ J~ fr-- - 9 r orz c:»HAAE ex l.gr. i €13 $2:) Ht=T Bah/lov.: VO I ¤ I [1 -I:* ~ iII I I ·'Tguc~UIZAL 0 , 1 <44&14 ~ ~ 64>LUHH (5). 0 yeata**iga:m:*4,FwimiHmiv4 1 Ele·*TZ:212 M gal-Ic=#/8 / 124 Hovg F -. 04 9 - i ly r HT•¥(0 2// .....0 Lommy 8®~'In H£, .<14:T.11-116 7 (i>-0 77J- _ 4 0 -P0~61t # i 9 1 4 277*22*~4 # 3 « P - -~ ~ C \12£1-lovg 6%167: Ale- 0 ' . r, , 4-JLLTZ SH-T-[29 6-[2212*- PRQHT sgereMI IH ITS .O -1 ' .3 EHT'12-ITY p 1 r.1 1 Nal leas, f-1 \VArrl#644 @®® ..TN-1019 . orrice pimmue****02~ ® fy'..,1 . ''.1 1 " isMI ovw s,< 1 4-r' HI 01 V 3 ©®®@ 1 .L- MALL.QF€HT ers™HI · ~Z:057 ~ COM 126 TLY - 3 >t ! N:ruimmwwumunnk ·.~ M•Hova 1-LHWHal + 180 de- I PLUMBIHal FI XTUF:ree To AL-AJALL *r> $ PEI-OV ivALL, 051L 11-44 4 . 4/bA f Ldz:'IK. l-Gv,Gl- AAP 624 1751 A 1" · I .1 1 CAF: m I Al 73 I " 4 1 Jr , 081/ 1147 \-1 (5 4 4.4040'EA, W L-n HErl ' i t-r 1-+ - 1 1 7 X, 00 REVISIONS -- 4 .t FLoo Fc F LAH - :EX ISTI Ha/DEMOLITIOH ~ .4 0 = 11-0" s -1 £>Al¢F,4. Nor g : AN designs ideas arrangements ana ca,ICUIT »449 1411216&0 LEGEMD plans indicated by these drawings and . 0 . copyright of the Architect and ghall neither De used ort any other work nor t f G><le~. WALL of B.*TITI014 be used by any other person tor anv INIIZINAA+19 gatal,IT FEF eull,21+ Perr, . Use whatsoever without written permis sion Written dimens.ins shall lake pre- . a . 1 4==4 EX'*T. 1»FTITION T. 155 *24,EHovED cedence over scated dimensions anti .. *I- HEW .FAKT' T ION to me attention nt the Architect prior to ~ shall be ve lied at rhe Kit> bile Any.(1, inetision/1 discrepanc y sh,11* be brought ' comrnencement $ work I Ex lerl He STEEL coLUMN fEMa/5 5,< lap ble 941,1 W~B•*7ANC+BF* PROJECT NO PRfWAU.-#Fel€ZA< DRAWN BY AEre,EF '40* WAW- 8 H-1 7 88018 B. D-rEF< *' Fethake ColFI:8TN .c,fAW- L,fll,171' bIN# CHECKED BY fab#Ne C>#tuN@,~eA.:100 Pft:WN* ISSUE DAT E .0 0 - - Cd 'Vgoall,14*Pp*934 PI-1102•(04Ne/ . Cir) mae Fkq:evel,lve/4 -r•,0/Jilbmvrf:*ler• 1-C . f ' SHEET TITLE 9 ~J~22*m94%241~~O~1~%~f PEHOLITIor-1 F LAH . f 1 1 - SHE E T NO .. A-2 0 OF SHEETS it. .....-. '.'- S..k*%-/~:L, 2;4/ . ·96 ; 12344<1 »161 93>1~K l~UILD Hot amm*Rkk*%8*$$*63$*:x ***tu NN<ON©CON<ONX\\X H Ile ....... .. ROD DYER A.R.A. D , ARCHITECT Box 9029 Aspen. Colorado 81612 303 925-7149 0 3 - 7,+Rot-1 mui UPI Hal 4 3 Ch E 0% 14.T-1 Ha - A/o .1 ble\V \vdop --/ / , PH \\\1 *wor 4*»ae ~ HAH'13 12'•ll.,G ~ \ . 'PA 1 ~>142113012- 101 11 . 1 51 0 11 2 01,6,11 6 . 401-111 51,2 5 La" 91' 41.oil 4-0 M 92 sit rt" I ... .. . r < 2ur=t--« -- - · I L 1 0 . , 1 . --_ /j . I-- , C.. 1 i K AN INTERIOR REMODEL F ' 4% 1*~™12 r'*+Ims /29 /Alle»*tr' 1 11 -04- jE#Ve K -- ~ '0-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ go ,0 FOR 1 1 1 1! 041 1 91 J VI.val.Ass IN' 0 ~ ( i INGHAM-RHODES 11 11 11 MR. BRIAN 1 3 THE ROARING Ill_1 . , FORK BUILDING 91*..1' All- 'EX[E:SEP l: ~ r + .3 415 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 I *ATe.12 G)-rF:? le,P· (TYF) - £ 64'612 5*11 F=112€ 12'.TEP -1 12- 1 6@1¥R e p. - 1.LE·6 4 4 OBILIT-14 1 / . a e 101€:=21:2 - leELavArt) 12 I · Le 12>159 0 = 1 0 + -10 / \9112(p 1 '' /LI 1 » 1 , 1 0 i 3 €l 1 1100 8. 9:29124: r#hkle C>r:FIP.g. 91*EN , ~ . ~d// - 4060»·01 BLY 9/6[.£:4512 Mi lee 1 f» I . AHP FUS|#LE LIHK WAH.~~ F 2,°* 68 +40 up o fgH loqi -1 %44 242- 14014.. W 32%21' e,reel, LTU P5 \1/6/*1 ~ -HE w I HTE·~14>* 9*Lue errr) 96 1 82,4,480 &09/2,11 1 \ F I % 0,6:[EP £39719 }24:>· WA:=· g sl PE --- 1,1 *UHP ATTEHUATII-161 *LAH AET 1 WIAL,1, NEW Fla;F 1 6,1,009 CrfF? C I i ' 1 HeU»-FloH her\v·€GH e[UPS, th. -Ff ICE Af™™7 M FEAS 1 1 Fl Htsel I hi Al,01, Pf~ 1 tknag 35,1%%4* B k 1 105 'AP» 9'fareper 4 91-1010 A.IN#, 4€L#:~1£:N UterAIA, KIEW Fle¥· »IF J i 06 101' 6WHAE=. 0AA- ca¥¥lkW. AE#z #7 01'nohIAL OR *23, lili 4 11.0.6. PILVATE,l-6 fAR~-ION i, F*1514 *erl kle 6011,1&12,6141114 41011.NEL E_~·/090€[eFI~,1-At4171*ri-IFEAe APWITE¢2~ /41 »10 » p'FEE:frEP Dra·INET, (1'(P:~40* AFEAe AFFIr:T07 Pr RE#Ril-4714J) 1 1 1 1 0<TEAD E>< 1 9~11-le' Acrt ¢ coLE) \VATEF- , OF--I.- SUPTi,CAH'P \VASTZE 7 T' A N D v e l-I T 1- 1 H ES TO t-T 1 M Ew kt»45> '61 r-1 1. REVISIONS ~0 Flooft FLAN - KEVIEED ~Le }411 = 11-OIl All designs ideas arrangements ana • plant, Indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and - copyright of the Architect and shall i~se whalsoeve, wdhout written permis· neither be used oil any other work nor be used by any other person for any -TEM FE @ap - mor[+ -- L '7156 6:31-Expil (17© 7 cedence ove, scaled dimensions and sion Written dimensions shall take pre- 91 H 12>\v M»+4'd - .. -[~1464... \40:02 - 4 shall be verified at the job site Any di ' mensional discreparicy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to 1 -L k 41 rouT ewlets ~ ~ 5 ~£&*r conu-nericerient of wotk 7-te:S. - ~AF, 34 -4 '' pi~,-5LXtio,e WK' akd a<K: 9 -_- , AnMcH vit 880 la ty . 1-1 - 1 11. PHOJECT NO -nt I r-1 · 1%4 1 DRAWN BY ski I MI - 30 - 11 0 -717~ -,(*~ ~ CHECKED BY 41411 1 35- ~iff.1~. ¢*15 94"* 14116*K . ,4rrr--71- &€ Fxmle* jur====uit .SUMe> emeall,Z V ISSlJE DATE ¢: / / SILL 18»41, 4 -- 9|31 225 , - 2-5- cu,-4 -· JL__4-n -721 44 ~ X .31- '., 4 • i SHEET TITLE - i' rl-008. el.»1 4 f ( 94·"p< 41,4 " <0,6.~< ' o 1 MEVISEID -9 11- Do 44 rl*+E S HEET NO HI'TSM # irt- 1HE COPHERS : rf> 1-Fr \V I ARD\U :71<24 141g C© vv~F HULLI 04 DEBIL- 9 VEMI[ MULLION (081« 6*1-. (49©1* fETAIL -O 0 A- 4 0 i) 0 (V) 01 = i'-o~i C.-*') 3 4 = *'- O u 9 = 1 L o 11 -3 51,1-OIl ~ OF SH[ ETS -' 04*1»161 92'Prk 15UILDISet ....... .. D ARCHITECT ROD DYER A.R.A. ~ Box 9029 ~ ~ Aspen, Colorado 81612 i-1 .I . i --1 m 1-3 n 1-1 r.-1 N El n 1-I n ]-1 n I 303 925-7149 n U -EL E .2 Uum 47 W 1 , , , 1 , 1 -~~ I I »·-7*%32- Sti-·rae , 1 /f0=====h,f;;;===%% ~1 I lili 1.E~ A d<' r#,»1 T rFAH E . .1 $ AN INTERIOR REMODEL ~ _ P-VE#VE· a>< leT \VOUP 01 i FOR 1 11 '5*ta PW»-10- rl-£%42 PI-Al-1 1 1 + INGHAM-RHODES 9-7 Gi L#Ass 2125 12 4 VALL - , | MR. BRIAN 11 1 // 1 -- ~ THE ROARING 1 FORK BUILDING 1 /1/7/1/1 1.- - ' 415 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~3 12&1·lovE *,<1 ~J~j L -1195<44,-1 "-- -r- . 1 - .1 . .. 1. 1=' - - =SIJJ" - %Movt; SXIST- 1 *451 ~ - t- ~ *OFAL- 6141*15 - - 1 - 0 lor . k ==:-4*Mo,/t; 12* is. *==r,=SWAF=1 - 1=-TT FIT HoAT-1-1-ELEVAT Id)P-1- -61-ITAY- EX 167 ~HO b /0 1 | i *:=, --- a .11 1 1 1 11 F= -A 0 fi )/1 11 6 11-011 = ' t==C . -- #1=====-=--==..A - 3=f 1 ... f I · REVISIONS : p-|(MT·14 GLE»TIOH- EXISTI Pla 9*11 - 11 011 -1- 1 *. 12»16>VE *Xls-rl Nal plans indicated by these drawings and All designs. ideas. arrangements and 1 6 1.11H . 44 6499 --, 4 be used by any other person for any STORE·9125>H-rers. 4 specifications are the property and , copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor use whatsoever without written permis sion Written dimensions shall tdke pre- 11-1. cedence over scaled dimensions and mensional dtscrepancy shall bebrought 1*El·40~,€. a x i ·s T - I t-1 a - ~ ~ ~ ~ shall be verified at the job site Any di ~ 7 - to the attention of the Architect prior to - \V. I. 8411.-11-40~ -A . ~ commencement of work · PROJECT NO 1 , gal ~ 24 DRAWN BY 1-Kp t MOP 4 - CHECKED BY -- 4 xi- 9.p-re A ~ ' ISSUE DATE 9/5/88 C 1, · SHEET TITLE ELEvAT i aNS - .. 53 IST I r-1,3, i- - SHEET NO \VEST € LE VAT 1 0%[- ~ INT SY- E>41 57 11-14 O 0 - A-5 0 !/42. " = 1 1 -ON OF SHEETS I . - 1 Ill)~)Ilil[ Of ~~~ . D . . . - . ROD DYER A.R.A. . ARCHITECT ' 1 Box 9029 L I L Aspen, Colorado 81612 i- -1 n 1-1 1-1 n 01-1 r[ 1-1 1-1 1-1 T-1 1-1 E-T 303 925-7149 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 6 1 1 f i f 1 ---- ---7.--' 1 1 - 11 ~ - 1 1, . 11 1 1// JIL --- 1 -, 1., , /71 336f71 4 1 flA 'll,~13>/ 1~ .. /1- . 1,1 AN INTERIOR REMODEL i 1 // : fl~ IN€,1-LL, all-*496 Crf* - p =w 1 9 \ h FOR 71~11'512-E·p MR. BRIAN 9 49 - 1 1 // INGHAM-RHODES 1~ . \ - : THE ROARING 1 /,3.. | FORK BUILDING 1 t f , F 91 - C INTALL- Al E ~Pwcat~< :i 415 EAST HYMAN AVENUE -F 1% 1 4 1 y 4. LF / 7FLO#VES- igs 4 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 i 'c--p> 14*10 4 #u#421=> i :1 , f···kid \«62:Dtp 151 *v 44% »INED\*1- . 1 l/t; 4 - f 1 r- 12*11-6 Tb 13,5 1 eal,ECTEP 07 i / - i ) /9 f r - / C:)\V H 4,&12 . 1 E t- 1 ,r 1Hep·LI- 1-law ANTIQUE 12>1*66. _ u, 2 -- i at*EVEL- 4 1-494 ¢:241*0<36 LAMP¥ c % - - 1 . rr _ _ $ MI 0 0 1= $44 0,4 Id ( 9 0 UARP 1 *=1<All, 3 (18#,&,i#52L_. IN J = 94 :== 1 OAK r-*Nv14*,1 ~ -C===1. 1 1 ' --mil rlsivatz h ===r - 11 1 - f HORT-1-1-Ela\«-104 - 21471©r - 9-Evitan . 9=-1 m==== FC . 40= 4-01[ · -- p ~6 NE. : 9--7 4 - 1/4 1 *=2r /4*F *Au..4 \,~la 4 12~1 hIT LI~-~2 ta,~·snW* r-9 -„,<rt#610 4, 1,__-,- e>(14-6 FMt'AF».r-Ip 1 FIXED 46455 1 9 1 1. . 1 r 1 4= 0#41 7»+AE \ 2 465 63»42 -rEMVEREP .. 1 IN € : U LAT 1 H a~ 0,1 - A se 9 exieT: 5-1-ucco - _-9. - REVISIONS: T:~ ~ yer-\12- 4 46€m:ANT H O E-[-U E LE·VAT 10 g - 1~·E v I se p >411 = 11- 0 11 1 1 1 1 ' p- 1 ~ »34»UK. 14 U €>< 1 57· eTU(.co \VAL L \ TB' 12 Wh/IA 1 +1 f .1 3 0 % 1. 1 / ; All designs. Ideas. arrangements and 1-112»t «44 . 1+Al-IDRAI LS ~ I neither be used on any other work nor I plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the properly and copyright of the Architect and shall 1 \\\ 1 - [ * 1 -1 rt :, 1 He l - 1 L. : ~ ' . j be used by any other person for any cedence over scaled dimensions and I use whatsoever without written permis sion Written dimensions shall take pre- UND \11 4 shall be verified at the Job site Any 11· ~ .47\ .. / 7 ~' 162~ 1-164/ ty.® WAN D ' mensional discrepancy shall be brought *qUARPFAILS to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of work 4/1 -1 0» 9 MI 11 1 PROJECT NO . DRAWN BY 1 41 l 12. Pft#2 ~--- *·4 N ci--/ y CHECKED BY t.w + 9- 4 4- -- (l 1 00 1 i SHEET TITLE 6 1 R€v I 560 4 1 1 **781210 12 +4 4 ~ iBLE»VA-T-101-ls J ! SHEET NO .ff -2.457- -E LEVATIOH - *1-ITRY- REvISE© 0 0 d) 0 l/'9" = li- O'1 , OF SHEETS r 1 r EXPLORE B SELLERS 221 E. MAIN ASPEN ' ' Ayuj H\STOR\C PRESErdift'ji r,OMMrriEE f- CHAIRMAN ~p" 17 6-_. Dr.;r ~ ./ APPROVED l./ff CONDITIONS view of deck area that awning is to cover , i ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE PLANS MUS SUBMITTED FOR REAPPROVAL awning frame constructed of 1" square tubing painted -_ ..r¥€#30- ~ white to match exsisting f\\\\ \ color of deck rails < 1 --I...22)IrrilE.-\6 - 1 0 . \ 9~.1. r X., , i \\\ j \ I I I 1 \ X . 9% .= 1 1 1 . \ 9\ i tra \ h..4 .\ f i O '44\ 1-<34~,~ . B 4 '1 '\ 1<~ ~ .- I J. .gR.I.- i f, N. I 1~ p ·r) **9 EXPLORE BOO LLERS EREED 16'0" 221 E. MAIN, --SPEN 1 \.~ »2X 10' side view of -042 14' \ \9,/ 8' j awning frame -€21- : »41 1 IN --<ZE: \7« - i X - t side view of fabric and eye bolt top view ~ //1 \ i system used to retract fabric \ /// <9 F--r-cable 1/4" \/ cables V - eye bolt fabric - ~ washer top view of fabric on cables ~ retracted view cable , (4 I l \ / /1 49 f , t ' C, side view when fabric is extended ' u EXPLORE BOOKSELLERS 221 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN FABRIC . :,-*-CABLES a- 4. - \\3' FRAME APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address: Aspen Awning Company P.O. Box 8005, Aspen, CO 81612 Proof of Ownership: Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Contracted to install retractable awning over back deck area of Explore Booksellers Property Address, Legal Description and Name: 221 East Main Street, Aspen,·-CO 81611 Type of Review (Minor or Significant): Minor Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: Construction and installation of. one retractable awning on upper deck (back of house, not seen from Main Street) ' Size of awning: width 14'6" projection 16'6" Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure): Awning design as compatable with'-the victorian style of the house.- Colors enha-nde-rfie ti~im- 1-nd=-p Yclirf»MPH##Te -lof- 't·he --deck area. There is no architectural change or addition to the structure itself .·· T -' . 4 Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: None SB.APP