The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19871013HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Agenda Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, City Hall October 13, 1987 2:30 p.m. 2:30 p.m. I. Roll call and approval of September 22, 1987 minutes. II. Committee Member and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. Election of Officials 2:40 V. OLD BUSINESS A. Final Review: Gordon's Restaurant Expansion, Mill Street Station Bldg. 205 S. Mill Street Jake Vickery 3:00 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Minor Development Review: Aspen Ski Lodge, fence reconstruction and entry enclosure, 101 W. Main St. David Jones 3:20 B. Minor Development Review: Alpine Jewelry Building, front facade and brick wall alternations, 409 E. Hopkins St. Bill Lipsey 3:30 C. Request for Historic Designation: Jeannie Bascom's House, 215 W. Hallam Jim Colombo 4:00 VII. ADJOURN Kathleen J. Strickland HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Agenda Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, City Hall October 13, 1987 2:30 p.m. 2:30 p.m. I. Roll call and approval of September 22, 1987 1-EL lob--~ minutes. II. Committee Member and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. Election of Officials;0481â‚¬8 2:40 V. OLD BUSINESS . n Lk-. v 3-fA" A. Final Review:40'221on's Restaurant Expansion, Mill Street Station Bldg 205 S. Mill Street q~~id- iLL-<-2, e AL- Jake Vicke fy 50)/u #Â·Yi .1%d-k ~17:::REkbu..Q H 3:00 VI. NEW BUSINESS - 0 97 A. Minor Development Review: Aspen Ski Lodge, fence reconstruction and entry ~ , enclosure, 101 W. Main St.4..lgr a#62 ce ;Ali c yroÂ»j/Â·Â·Â·tz> David Jones 3:20 B. Minor Development Review: Alpine Jewelry Building, front facade and brick wall alternations, 409 E. Hopkins St. Bill Lipsey 3:30 C. Request for Historic Designation: Jeannie Bascom's House, 215 W. Hallam Jim Colombo 4:00 . VII. .,ADJOURN 11 - a em/'Lk,Of c, -*--iq~---=4~~dY A-~Â¢ Kathleen J. #trickland 10 ' 4 GORDON'S RESTAURANT EXPANSION FINAL REVIEW .....1 ASPEN SKI LODGE ........................8 ALPINE JEWELRY BUILDING ...................13 HISTORIC DESIGNATION OF JEANNIE BASCOM'S HOUSE ...14 17 VA MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Gordon's Expansion Final Review DATE: October 13, 1987 LOCATION: Mill Street Station, 205 S. Mill Street, Lots D through J, Block 81, Townsite and City of Aspen. ZONING: Commercial Core/Commercial Core Historic Overlay Dis- trict. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests HPC's final review approval of the enclosure of the second level deck, adding approximately 1,033 square feet, and construction Of a new exterior entry staircase. BACKGROUND: The Mill Street Station building was given commercial allocation in the 1980 GMP competition. At that time HPC approved the original project. On July 27, 1987 HPC reviewed the Gordon's Addition proposal and granted conceptual review approval subject to the condition that the applicant further address at final HPC review (1) transpar- ency of the addition and (2) setting back the addition from the Hopkins Street facade. On September 22, 1987 the Planning and Zoning Commission under- took GMP scoring of the project. The project received 26 points, exceeding the minimum threshold of 25.8 points. The project received "0" in the category of architectural design primarily because P&Z felt the staircase and vestibule were not compatible with the existing building. P&Z also reviewed the staircase on September 29 and approved design option #8 (hereto attached) as a condition of Special Review approval of bonus FAR. While some members of P&Z shared HPC's concerns for transparency and setbacks, no P&Z action was taken on those matters. City Council is scheduled to review a resolution allocating commercial GMP quota to the Gordon's project on October 12, 1987. Any action taken will be reported to you at your October 13 meeting. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: HPC was concerned at the July 27, 1987 meeting that the addition may upset the existing low scale of Mill Street Station as viewed from Hopkins Street and overwhelm the scale of small Victorians on the block and across the street. Comments in the 1980 application and in the P&Z's and Hpc's reviews and scoring of the architecture focused on these same aspects of compatibility. The applicant's presentation in 1987 has emphasized the concepts of transparency and setback from the existing masonry parapet to minimize impact on the street- scape. Staff believes that these qualities of design can be better realized. Refinements to the staircase design, in particular elimination of the vestibule and bracket supporting the vestibule, reduce some impact on Hopkins Street, in our opinion. However, only minor changes have occurred to the elevations regarding transparency and setbacks since conceptual HPC review. Less than 50% of the north elevation (Hopkins Street) wall is transparent. The south elevation is approximately 65% transparent. On the east eleva- tion, windows have been added and a glass door is specified; however, it remains approximately 3 1% transparent. The architect has argued that functional demands do not allow greater transpar- ency. We continue to believe that the initial concept of a "glass box" brought forth by the applicant is more appropriate with regard to the Hopkins Street elevation than the slate tile structure resulting form the current proposal. Some additional setback would occur through recessed and curved windows on the Hopkins Street elevation. Staff believes this will help reduce the sense of the addition looming over the structure; however, it could be improved. The applicant indi- cates that shifting the addition back on the deck is limited because of the need to work with the existing structural system and the need for internal floor width. While no analysis of the structural factor has been presented by the applicant, Stan Stevens of the Building Department stated on September 16, 1987 that he would anticipate the need for anew rafter supporting system for the deck to support the load of a new masonry wall. Consequently, it may be as easy structurally to set the addition back 2 feet as it would be for the proposed 8" setback. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC to table final review of the Gordon's Addition proposal with the direction to the applicant to revise the north and east elevations of the plans to increase transparency and further study setting back the structure from the east parapet. sb.gordonshpc 2 1-1'Ft<IHO 44Â· 4 , .~eâ€ž1 1<61 - 7 ~Will. f =A- .<04*Z :.Â«934\.~--- 394:x. Â·2 ..ffibllik: 44 1 = -- 4 P .4 47.-4 6- f / Sts~ ' 4 - 11028*' L.,râ€¢ D ., r 1 - - - --2. --. :1 - H - ELLY. 1/u.Â· J N. Â·Â·' 1- 40-1 i B. GLEVÂ· 4,6. 1 6 '. i, ~4*itil .'-9. , L,4 - -7.- 11-1-- Ill 6. BLEV. 414' 60 2-0 <'TH't C E-"VT. -600'-riot-1 A-6.ze,r -~;,~6 uE. ar'TIo N .&,u-,41-rgo--r& - 1 HARRY i- TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 210 S. GALENA ASPEN, CO 62 /1611 4, OCT 6 3092F2551 ' :T <rk: U A--- October 6, 1987 Attn: Steve Burstein Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office Fram: Jake Vickery Harr'y Teague Architects RE: HPC Final Review Gordon's Restaurant Addition Mill Street Station Building These comments supplement the original application letter submitted for the conceptual review, (attached). Materials proposed are as follows: 1. Roof: standing seam metal roofing similar to existing; medium grey. 2. Walls: glass - clear. solid area - slate, 12" x 12" pattern; dark grey with mica natural cleave. 3. Aluminum windows and frarres similar to existing - clear. 4. Stair & columns - steel, metalized with stainless. 5. Misc. Surfaces - painted black or dark grey. The following issues were refered for further study during the conceptual review by HPC: 1. Transparency - use of glass block. 2. Setback from existing parapet. The following is a response to these issues: 1. Transparency - All areas that can be glass~ have been glazed. Back bar, coat room, / toilet areas and shear walls (structural/ are solid due to use. Glass block was / ruled out because of the visibility of / objects behind - would be detractiv~ It also does not meet the energy co~ Cont. Pg. 2 Further it is not structural. A mica-ladened slate was selected for use in these areas to contrast with existing masonry. It has a slight sheen (from the mica) which will seem less solid, more glass-like. 2. Setback - The new wall has been setback to the inside of the existing parapet approx. 10" from face of brick. The window is further recessed and curved to emphasize this setback. A larger setback was ruled out because the bar would be less than 18 ' wide. This is too narrow for internal functions. Existing structure would not accept such loading without major modification. This entire portion of the building re- mains setback from the property line 8 feet. P & Z has addressed issues of architecture, height, setback, transparency, and rated their scoring accordingly. This is a small addition to a cantemporary building in a neighborhood with a mixture of architectural styles. The original building concept maintains a 112 story building height at the corner of Hopkins and Mill. It also sets back 8' on the north-west corner on Hopkins to align with the Berko building. This proposed addition attempts to maintain as far as practical the effect of these alignments and allow the original architecture to "read" in tact. I , APPLICATION FOR IIISTORIC PRINERVATION COMMITrEE REVIEW Name of Applicant: Gordon Naccarato, Owner of Gordon's Restaurant Authorization: See attached letter from Mill Street Plaza Associates Name & Location of Property: Gordon's Restaurant Mill Street Plaza Building Lots D through J, Block 81 Aspen Townsite Description of Proposal: Expansion of Gordon's Restaurant on first and second levels of existing building. 1. New entry/bar area (+750 sq.ft.) at second level deck used for outdoor dining. 2. Enclosing of existing entry stair and first level space (+250 sq.ft.) 3. New exterior entry stair in courtyard. List of Drawings Submitted: Site plan/roof plan North conceptual elevation Partial east conceptual elevation Partial west conceptual elevation Building Materials: Metal roof campatible with that on existing building. Glass in metal frames similar in character. Steel Stair. Colors: Colors fran the pallette for the existing building including charcoal grey, sienna, black and natural metal. Illumination: Exterior illumination campatible with present lighting scheme. Signage: Existing restaurant signage to be reorganized; no new signage presently anticipated. Effect of Proposal: In developing a design scheme for the project, the intention has been to use simple architectural forms with materials and colors campatible with the existing building. In order to maintain as much transparency as possible, a glass box is proposed above the existing masonry parapet which surrounds the deck. The vaulted roof form reflects the arched form chosen originally to define the entry ways into the shopping areas. Because of the addition's location away fran the per- imeter of the building, there is relatively little impact on the neighboring structures along Hopkins, which are themselves a variety of architectural styles ranging from victorian to contemporary. Identity: Commercial GMP approval. Identity: Commercial GMP approval. (9 0 8 - 4 4 - -- 41. STANDING Se*Fl MEfAL *OAKJG \ SYER. 6061;H;8 10/ 1,1,40,(*UZâ€¢D' 61*1KIL-659 <Tâ‚¬RfL- AL>lsÂ¢1 ~__~e-FANPING SEAAA jâ‚¬16.NDINE. SEAM Â· . . ~ 1 IMErÂ· eec>F- , - 61JTTEn . 4-V *tor --tlf . . .. .. A i Ld- 1 1 269*W//// 00 3 I 3 1 7 / Ul i / f . 1 iii 42 i 1---1-,-_1-__1-"__L-/-,-4-1 -1- . 1 :1. 1 -# 1 .- r 1- , 1 1 , u (Ak:Â·6::2Â£T . Z 4 . Or 1 644â‚¬S: BOTT GLAZ,D - 18(Frnâ€¢Â·16 : . - - i | . .i' lÂ·TWI .4 - 7Â·-- -*- - Â·-~Â·~ -- -~------~1*luuSCB.L- ' , 4 - --- i ~ 1 %~~E 11+Dul~71#6 &8'*. 1 .......4. 11, ..11 f - DzÂ·Â£, 516-rE -TILES Igm:BE .---0 t 4 ' Â· t--' I *OLUM'PLâ€¢ ter[:kâ€¢Zfo-- -4 -L_-1 -1-4 1 _ 2.-L_I 1 - 1.0: 7-~~1:242rl6=rÂ£Â·rs 149 DET*- 1Od L I MÂ·tul GL Â· P 19.52 QU* 1"11-5 _- Â«|Fix:=0 3,Â·Irr 1 1 i .iÂ· Â· i<k*K --' 99-Â» .1 1 .11 . - -1 .Flae H ! r , . . ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Itt, ft*ED UnrrÂ« /' 2-- 9- ' . 89Â« .p-/<10Â¥L- ireol. 61.- / 1- -r-7-t-r- -- ;*LL. 1162-0' ---------- ----- ------ -- ~c ~--- EMÂ«DHE butorie:7.-- i - Ll lerrer te'me f trial _-- - -i / r--1 1 3 ' r- - 9Â«4'je-1 - _ -~ WEOT Ed-EVATI -1-1 !40 - a 1 r- LF<E7~ i , , 1 15*ATÂ· 2 EMOVE ~ EL_ , H.brIQUAIL-*. a --- i r / i /77-9, %. 7-,0 . \ -1 520'/DrÂ» NAIN DEVEL- E. 104'-O' 4 , STEEL STA'le kl ~ ' METAL,Zely GrAIN(t95 STEEL FINIGH I - 1 1 1 --1 1 F 1 1 1 1. 1 11 , 4.-:NEÂ·Wh ' ' H--1 Noe-TA, ELF.vATior-1 . 74' .' 11>i U:,9 , 1 - . ..ch#4 6 1 Gl/J 4,nla -1 Namal M.":f.:09 1% Â¥N 37 40 0% O/Â·Z. 30-9 Â¥31 1 3 0 V w 4 5 6 Z , "g (4047) )0 0 0 0 Q Tstu STANDINO *AM MgrAL FofF Ikto , I ...A/.:.Â·.:.i 1 - S.-7 /Xh ...... ... 1. 5=L Col,0,4.1% Wi'MEGAUZeD' <TMAM/55 610*- PAJigU / ,-1Â·bTMÂ·401â„¢4 Z,E-6AA , / r \ WIA. e.c)09 F GLUSL k_-TANDING CEAAA AAErÂ· 042>11 Ih~IUME" END- op KzÂ»F- -:*::. 2 # 1111 -.***d--*-liT*.~- 1 Fl A. If\Â« A -- 2 i ''11 L. 6 1 C ~~~ /4 i Â¢ ' F .11 .. 1 ; 11' ,~'t ( * 3 Â£16#65 ull ALUM,â€¢JUM FIMAG Â· r . , 1 IL .. ~ It , L ,1 ' P Port LE; 111.SULATING I GLASS [h>FWAF; 8/(01Â·1Â£1 -' pit 1 !2', 1$ Â·LLÂ£-rE. "/6 ZerE I / 12*NO..33 ) FIVE-C> . 1 *----h>+--6 : 4 -1 TI LE.- 4Â»1 j-TIL;Â» -4 1 I ge,g:*lT -- - ~ ... 1 3. _ 1- 1 - -71 UNtÂ·1& + tut Fl.KED ~NIFÂ·b , ,-% 1 E.oc.AP , h r .6 {1 > - 46â€¢44*4 i ! h Â·Â· 8.Twacc I'STEEL EN-D,LY Il" 64) *[Ai ' TtLE r!, 1 ./ 0 L... ,1 | FO# OEÂ·ra I Lis -1 TÂ· oF ff , . 11 .\ 1 BLEYÂ· i 16 *" . - \ \ .--' / ti r.1-1 - - - - I. 0 - -- 4 -- 7 -miâ‚¬3 f _ 81(15nNG 5019 BLEÂ» 1 .- 1 1/. - li 1 -7/ *- 1 2 1 .Nl - 1 - *H 1 6 // 0 t -4 4 \ 3 1- - 12" 52 664-1-6 n 68 , 97 1 ' \* .1 I - 1-14/ ---112~.,Â·~ +TEELÂ· S>fler -1- b. . . 1 7.~4Â§44~ />.16.x. 6.1-u>*t---- ix - . 4. -' 162= 4/LS -/ > - 4 i . \4 , W Smt&5â„¢g_.iWj M. EW-rZED4 Sl*(FLESS -5765tfâ‚¬%44,F $ # .1 1/- I - 4+--17.---, 2- _1 :N47 2\2 \ .4./.- -21 ---4 - Â·: &21:%*'fro . . . 0 . 4 91. .-rs-,44 , 9 , 1 1 L 1 1 11\; 7 : 1 , 2 1 - -14 . NÂ· 71Â·y,Â«i W r- ft 0 , Â· A.Uj 4 --1.9.97- 1 FE.z~ 10.2.07 HF - 1 --1 J , t~6-ou_j_~3' 42:Â·. ' -; 2.01 -- b'IL F~ Ocr 9 re- ,C ) T- 4,F â‚¬Â·LAIL Â· (E'*v>i 3 1 E 1 - 1 ------~ fri.7 :L . VANN ASSOCIATES 0 Planning Consli|tants September 25, 1987 Mr. Steve Burstein Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Proposed Aspen Ski Lodge Improvements Dear Steve: Please consider this letter an application for Historic Preservation Commission review Of certain proposed improvements to the Aspen Ski Lodge, a condominium hotel located at 101 West Main Street in the City of Aspen, Colorado. The application is submitted pursuant to Section 24-9.4 of the Municipal Code by Mr. David Jones, the managing agent of the Aspen Ski Lodge Condominium Association. Permission for Vann Associates to process the application is contained in Mr. Jones's letter which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A copy of the deed evidencing the Applicant's ownership of the property is attached as Exhibit B. Proposed Improvements As the accompanying drawings illustrate, the Applicant wishes to reconstruct the existing wood fence which currently screens the Lodge's pool area from Main and Garmisch Streets, and to partially enclose the building's existing entryway. In addition, the Applicant proposes to reconstruct a portion of the existing sidewalk and to install additional landscaping. The proposed improvements are designed to increase the safety of arriving and departing guests, and to help reduce the adverse effect of excessive street noise on the Lodge's occupants. While approval of the proposed street- scape improvements falls within the jurisdiction of the City Engineer, the reconstruction of the fence is subject P.0 Box 8485 Â· Asperi Joloratll}Alt?k' - 303125 4958 I a Mr. Steve Burstein September 25, 1987 Page 2 to HPC review as a "Minor Development" activity in a H, Historic Overlay District. The building materials to be used in the fence will match those of the existing Lodge, and all improvements will comply with applicable zoning regulations. Review Requirements With respect to the specific review requirements of Section 24-9.4(d), the following comments are provided in support of the Applicant's request for HPC review and approval. 1. No designated historic structures are located on the Applicant's property. The existing Aspen Ski Lodge can be assumed to be compatible in character with adjacent historic structures as it was reviewed and approved by the HPC prior to construction. The Applicant believes that the proposed reconstruction of the existing fence will not significantly alter the appearance of the Lodge and, therefore, will not adversely affect the character of the Main Street Historic Overlay District. The additional , landscaping to be installed by the Applicant will not only reduce the impact of enclosing the existing Lodge ent- ranee, but will also enhance the overall streetscape of the District. 2. As noted above, the Aspen Ski Lodge has been previously deemed to be consistent with the character of the neighborhood, as evidenced by the Lodge's prior receipt of HPC approval. The proposed reconstruction of the existing fence should have no significant effect upon the Lodge or the surrounding District. 3. The Applicant believes that the proposed improve- ments Will have no impact upon the cultural value of neighboring historic structures or the District in general. In fact, the proposed streetscape improvements should significantly enhance the visual appearance of the neighborhood. 4. As the Aspen Ski Lodge is not a historic struc- ture, the proposed improvements will have no effect upon the architectural integrity of the Lodge or the District. . Mr. Steve Burstein September 25, 1987 Page 3 Based on the above, the Applicant believes that the proposed improvements are in compliance with the intent and requirements of Section 24-9.4 and, as such, will have no significant effect upon the Main Street Historic Overlay District. The Applicant, therefore, respectfully requests minor development approval for the proposed improvements to the Aspen Ski Lodge as depicted on the accompanying drawings. Should you have any questions regarding our application, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. As the Applicant wishes to commence construction as soon as possible, any assistance you can provide in expediting our request for approval would be sincerely appreciated. Very truly yours, VAN;~ ASSOCIATEL INC. h // nny V**, AICP V SV:jlr Attachments cc: David Jones f If Aspen . Imiwilimilmur'll:41/6/rot i Â·. /4 .-49.1 SkiIÂ»dge E:r T Vicibil' 0/.1 Â·~, . r.: ud~,-J.-irr*(.:.-,iÂ·:u-~y~, ' -~>3525-j~*.f,~t:Â·j~~SlF.Rk .r: t:~fti i..:1 Â·ti': 72 0 3;Â·i~tÂ·~ t, N f'~t iwib*% *..fÂ· ~'~i-9Â¥3% At~1Â·~Â·33~Y1.~t.lit-Â· 1 Â· *,4.493.Â·4): 4*JA*56124 1 - : ~3....39331..t'.1. i :...... Â¢ ' 2..?7':6:,f.%.4.2 3-31 September 14, 1987 Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department h ~>19Â«~:72 . .- 130 South Galena . Â·~ ..Â·/2.N..'6..~.t-f'.(:Â¢5:[2.J -'~,Â·:' ... Â·~ Â·, Â·-' >Â· Aspen, CO 81611 1: ....i; 3%--81312 ..4.: *.i.14 3.9.Â·.1.- Attn: To Whom It May Concern Â· - 'Â·' '. '.Â·Â·,8Â·--- 1 -f : t.:,9- t- Â·Â· :- Â· ~ . ' 44 - J. : '4-.4.kÂ·i.+-Â·,&:At.Â·.'.. 17.,IE,h . :;.Â· Subject: Agency - 532-~ Dear Folks: - I . -4% Please consider Vann Associates of Aspen as agent for the';f':.i#.2- 6-'. -:-0- Aspen Ski Lodge in the necessary activities/actions in t. i.t-- HPC and pertinent matters relating to capital and other .-451: improvements to our property. 32:.Â·4*1* ..... : IL..1 - Â·ji.46*j.~,f:...0 s. 4.1., 1. . Sinperely, A /1 a.1/\Mt -Â·~ 31-:1~3.-(341Â·itibt.~:-:4::4 .3-~~~2 lili.. Â·,~. 3. 43>t {i :99Â·; t: ff):.04Â·-:t David F. Joriew tr.'r - . ~ Â·' JOilf.fjlâ‚¬i'ff<Â·Up:F:fÂ«.~:.f >~ U 4, ./ Managing Age|n/, ASLCA General Mana*er, River Fork Mountain 'Â·- 94'. 2'/Â·&Â· *4#4#.:04-- 1 : .. 0 - Real Estate, Inc. . a..: t):24**ttd.62944 , . ~ -:j -~I-','4.ver'.:w~A'ji.-:typ.'â‚¬; 2.- '67 DFJ/lb Â· ' ~~ ~~~ :~'94.~."4%1,-4*<.w.â€žPA.'.-.~2.6''-~#::Et-I!6 Â· I. t 1 0,21493Â»13.4~' .- 1:..I.or...'.7.i:.i". .1 4 4.).1 9,%34-.Aip/EL '7942 #LE)#fATTimd*0 . $ . 'Wâ‚¬V -34*4411*â‚¬*P?34* 41 .1,8$0~ '. , '4-Â·*MA:'E~FFÂ»*1+26<:pk!34,3'.- ,Â¢4-7? fÂ«**MfEBIÂ·iÂ·. 711130-0--tz:--: ,.1,Â·d .:1621*~Wieaidir.1:~fi .*ieÂ¥.Â·: Â· , - -Â·- --Â·4â‚¬-4Â¢11~~~~~<i-~il~ 0.: ' 4:Â·4Â·",Â·.*-4:*:F*FÂ·t: 4:3*.ii - 5<573%524/4.:f ti-1 4.,j..0'.. . . .~',>"E'.'frq/: - . 1 '... 1. :.. . 101 West Main Street. Aspen. Colorado 81611 303/925-3434 ~ I '.?4~ i***/9 :4,(.8---9.-7.-ff t.:.9*13 V) - 1 V 9711. f .4 J.. 19,4* 41. 1 EXHIBIT B rn &' 1 < 8001( JUU PAGE285 CA) .. D.. . PUBLIC TRUSTEE'S DEED ..) 3 1-J ce 0 - 12 THIS DEED, Made February 26, 1987, between THOMAS CARL OKEN as the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, and J.P.W., a Colorado general partnership, Purchaser, WITNESSETH: ---------- WHEREAS, ASPEN SPORT FISHING CLUB, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership did, by Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated June 28, 1985, and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, on July 1, 1985, in Book 488 at Page 925, Reception No. 269342 convey to the Public Trustee in Trust the property hereinafter described to secure the payment of the indebtedness provided in said Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement; and WHEREAS, a violation was made in certain of the ~_ terms and covenants of said Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement as shown by the notice of election and demand for sale filed with the Public Trustee, a copy thereof being recorded in the office of said County Clerk and Recorder, the said property was advertised for sale at public auction at the place and in the manner provided by law and by said Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement, and a copy of the notice of sale was in apt time mailed to the persons required by statute, and said property was in pursuance of said notice sold to J.P.W., a Colorado general partnership for the sum hereinafter set forth and a certificate of purchase thereof was made and recorded and said property not having been redeemed from said sale; NOW, THEREFORE, the Public Trustee pursuant to the power and authority vested by law and by the said Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement as such Public Trustee and in consideration of the sum of $1,910,384.79 to the Public Trustee paid by the said Purchaser, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, conveys to the said Purchaser, its successors and assigns forever all the right, title and interest which the Public Trustee acquired pursuant to said Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement in and to the following described property situate in the County of Pitkin, Colorado, to wit: Condominium Units 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34, THE ASPEN SKI LODGE CONDOMINIUMS PITKI 1 286425 pook 530 pAGE 286 \ according to the Map thereof recorded December 30, 1980 in Plat Book 10 at Page 92 as Reception No. 229822 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for the Aspen Ski Lodge Condominiums recorded December 30, 1980 in Book 402 at Page 236 as Reception No. 229821, together with all the appurtenances, rents, issues, profits, fixtures, furniture and furnishings, all as more fully described and defined in the referenced Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement. This Public Trustee's Deed specifically includes, without limitation, all the furniture, furnishings and personal property enumerated in the U.C.C. Security Agreement and Financing Statement which was filed with the Colorado Secretary of State on July 18, 1985, Filing Number 817744; and filed with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder under Filing Number 09283; and recorded in the Pitkin County real property records on July 1, 1985 under Reception Number 269343, in accordance with Â§4-9-501, C.R.S. To Have and to Hold the same unto the said Purchaser, its successors and assigns forever. Executed the day and year first above writtqjit 44j,, 1 i , .1 Thomas Carl Oken Ul .- as Public Trustee of theW 1 ; , County of Pitkin, Coloradqyl.--Â·P.,6 4,Â· il 1.. U ..... By C -4 L..t.(. --Â·K . -ic-6 G~. Carol L. Foote, Deputy Public Trustee STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. .,- COUNTY OF PITKIN ) : 4. C The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ma this 4'03'%- day of February, 1987 by Carol L. Foote as the Deputy Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin, Colorado.: '., 4 .1./ Witness my hand and official seal. 5.... 7 , My commission expires: 9 --/- ... 0- , ; 1/ 1 '. V< Notary ~ublic Foreclosure13/FRCLS/st / -2- liu 2 9 /4 / ~0>, W V b Â® hz 4 .-214 . :-6 ~ 4 5 - a . >119,43([Q 313Â¥DNOD 3 a { AA 260. CODDI /Aâ€ž617,05,219 02 ./ 0.39 6 l 2DN2.4 N 3 000 M O/709 i i I & Wr '.: { L_ 2 - .7\ k=4 1, 4-3 3 U . '.4 9 0 1 -- f & . Â· tz- J ed e 416'k . 0 ,~.9 4. 1 . 9%42 + w i e ., k ./ A cr. 4.1 - /V Z /0 lu 5 CIO /'f -0 ZE .9 0 .1 S m,08->! P .: 1< ve IR o / e. U 2 544(LEA1 Â£6 V /17 =O r t .1> O L :.,1 lit 3 f 5 i 1 1\\\ N --11 0 1 Of 1%: * 1 1 ., 1 1-Â« Vt- 6-93 L 1 E; 1 3 h-- . 5NY+-4 ba.AO AOON *411:11:~.206>4412 ~-~_ _ ~-_-__~-_ - 4 _ 90 017 7 SNVH)3.40 hNONÂ¥9 .. 24 1 Â¢40 - Â· ,0Â·Â· Â·..t,.. 9.l.Â·3'469Â·. - U tor 1,49Â« 1 imwt di \19 23\\\\ . 1 , \N . i \ i \ \/' I . *31* - . 4 . \~ ..\\. %.-1 \ I. \ LLI \\\33., = 1 \ 1 ... + ff<4444Â«4 4*\ . i. . \\ \\ in \9\\Rvillillift 1 â‚¬444 k .\ I \ I \. 04 ./ 0 1 ->024./ - \ \1/\\ \ \ l\\ : N 01 I. \1 ' 41.Â» to 1 \ 7/ $94.,ri. ~Â·. \\ < 41 41 .~ \ h- :\IFI 1 \ : I. 1 \ 1 6.1 I : I k L 0 Z 1 Â«L' I.\1. \\\\ \ : i.:..'., 4'. '%.. ..... .,4.1 13'gâ‚¬ Â¢ ... ' ZFG ! 0 .0 4 v.41 -1 7 4 ,Â·41 t- 32 11 4,/ 3 Neo u . 4 i ':1 M-dMON Z O 6 1 .3 %-\\ 1 9 9..' 4 1~\ '.4.'.\%\, ....\\%\\\.1 \11. O 94/ /4 .4Â¢ :. Sir. Al/. ll.1 2 4 N c n - : .1: ...:TA,firjtz'Lizil.ti X 'f' Â·.'A.>~~~~~~ f',xm - E-2 \\\ A 'ty / 7 : 4 A-- X.-4 i Â»11 1:\49\-~ \\4 / 0*,'41F 2~j ~:r r,; we i fir tr ' p k U / 0 0-,L M-/0 4 5 r-, A\-fi\IrÂ«...9#2-~Â·..i*...#.fipt\42.Â« .: - 507/ -102Â»-,/' %2) 1 Â· <53FEE140 Â·Â·iÂ·14 j 4. g L.â‚¬ O--q' \..\ J 5/B . on:*2 21.r-4 -2-1 11>\ 2 1,//:libilifirs,I .%44.\ ./1 24 4, \ 5 \' A 0,0 4 C\Â»20:.4 Â§2 1. t'* -6/4~ 1 1 , . ..\. 1- M k.1 1 -c'> 2 Ifer 2~74 \ ' y Q B d -214\1. 9. Of REW -2 1.'6 . T- 1 ".- 1#'*1 1 LE- - 40 ..,5 0 *44 u NktÂ© \. \ \. b r. * 90 1 1 Be = 0 0 1 1 r , L . llâ‚¬+41 HALLWAM (G.C.E.) W.[3_ 1! 0 1 :if (fl) IM LE.... i F ~t''t ~ M ! 1 OCT 5,1 4 APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE De/JELQpMENT REVIEW Applicant's Name and Address: Laura Donnelley Box 589 Aspen CO 81612 Proof of Ownership: Statement of Applicant's Interest in Property if not owner: Laura Donnelley - owner Block 88, Lots D,E,F Property Address, Legal Description and Name: old Aspen Jewelrv niiilding Type of Review (Minor or Significant): minor Description of Proposed Development Activity, including but not limited to: architectural elements effected, additional square footage (if applicable), height, building materials and illumina- tion: Removal of brick piers in front of window and at sidewall. Removal of low brick wall at right side of exterior stair. Replacement w/steel handrail. New vertical wood fascia on canopies. Statement of the Effect of the Proposed Development on the Original Design of Structure (if applicable) and/or Character of the Neighborhood, and why the Proposed Development meets the Review Standards of Section 24-9.4(d) (pertaining to compati- bility in character of historic landmarks on the site, consis- tency with character of the neighborhood, and whether it enhances or detracts from the cultural value or architectural integrity of the structure): Are no adjoining structures. Not a historic building. The proposed alterations have no effect on the character of the neighborhood. Any other City Approvals needed by Applicant, such as encroach- ment licence, GMP or Special Review: No other approvals required. SB.APP --_ 4*' -~' ~ MM~FV'KronTSÂ·e-Â¥r~:17;*'~4'NÂ·M "''/ 1' '~~~~5 , .'f- 7 " - *.... Ut' .Â· a W, A Â· "-0Â·N i Â·Â·Â·.' tÂ·Â«.Â·Â·:C â€¢d , ft. NaÂ·*,Â»~,Anâ€¢~W,A.&,U*.Â·-4.4.â€¢~1; ;e A:-. â€¢u~ e â‚¬.4:;At41*4â€¢ AMA< .,< w .91*&4&,AA4-,â€¢i.4,'14â€¢.4,46â€¢UÂ·Â¢f dâ€¢b.z,bd4~4.â€¢0$:-Adâ€¢*94Â£Mi,UÂ®,Â·,AA Â·k : SIDING i 36 -421-56 3/16 BEVELED ~ ~- K ~ #6 u 56.734-94-//A 1 4,0 1 l r--\ CCLONIAL 44 L____----3 tEEZzsznn~-1-4 _-~-rw-BUNGALOW)~ ( 5/DING 1 -1- '/,6 54- 7'/4 974Â· 1194 -, /l 1-L 9/6 ~ DOLLY VARDEN j, 1- >- E------3 f SIDING \ 5/,6 1 1 542-744-994-/A I / 1_t_ 'h, ~ (THICK) DOLLY I ~AROEN 1 432 1 1 h 1- <32 t ~ SIDING L--1--;bz 1 1 506 14 .. 4 Â¥/6 1 1 /5 -C. b Lk- h L._L 1 _ _L , f. Â¢ ' /% 748 - E-A 53'8 1 718 / 9 1- Â«%*X- -.--- it & P- h h L 9 PE; - /94 7 52, 1 1-- 1- - -Le - 92 / 1 __ L 1 1 .-/ A Ip,nt jÂ·e WAFf; gul|din~ - ff,Qrieh beri':c,ls,-d,n~~ s firic/4 . 4 t .. Remove exes-T'Ch CLOCkrOWER ANO LOW AZASe,NgÂ¥ tvAL-L- . ~ 1 ur 1 4 1.-- . C ... 0 11 -4 -U.-1 -- . J - h C 1. .1 ~ ,. U. W. 1-74 - -41- -%*T- Â·: L , 1. I Â·Fit.j < % ... . ./ ..i .4,Â· pr 4,29' 1 Â·Â·, Â· Â·4-0,4945:?1~3't-:Â·filÂ·..'%~' 1 4,11.9.j.:3,-t'U'. 1 ?'..f,f ..... \/ *4'. 3.-:-:1,1.1-k.Â· 1 ; 92Â£4(.~444-'./1,4.0 . 1 Â·42- . 1 Â· . 4 .sÂ·,1.4. . -1 0~Ey$94*t< 61~jj --:4 6. 1 I.-i' 0. li>L- . w , ~ ..p,Â·I:~-0.-7-#r,i~%9,Â·Â·':*f-Â·41Â·,7,4 ~65 -h:ytÂ·f...4-.3 . I ; ~ Â·Â· tÂ· i.'7 51 .;/49,000vt - er/575 -33- . -' ifÂ·3 0~~:d:~*tl;+44544Â·JÂ·'Â·~~11*01-15.1 ;-; - t . .Â·Â·; 2*h :f *S*iti~Â·.14--44**i;.i.~7 kl'Pf-Â·1 . 1 . ...1 It: -- I 4 AL' 97-1 4.kiq7rj//REVQR*/1/67 0*1Ei!~.3{21 1 - 9 4.- ... . .......0 ' 11 -- 15. . . - R# 1-Fef:3 6*jht~e:iÂ«~rt; r : 92-- ' - lf: . 4 .4,1-,Â¥1.59'.21, h.ir - t': 9 97: 4Â·; Â·~ Â· .9 ~-FL 4-, ./1,10- . Ufar:# itkir. i ---f CANo'Y.-74.- ~- - 1 PÂ·91*47-4''I'- 4 1 't < : 1 1 4 , f 'f-4.0. 2 .. 7 . - 19 -2 . .2 2 3 - - 1 l AEW 30 0 1 997V Â£2:El 204 3.0. :,A: K: ~ l i 4 -Af:2 0-14 -D .1- 1 1 1 3 -;-;j-iÂ·09#i )~'42'Â· '7 / 1 1 vp # \ .:1 4 2-7 * ..; / , Â· ' :. fgh,~4.4, 2 4 .2 - 1 A.201 . , I f[:0- 4 2-. t . - . 20*ver _ Câ€¢46/0,#'r-Â«-- 1 1 jt-kitiiv,/:. At/flifFFIC 9 L it + I - _----_zz~zq__ - 1 - WEY bu,;1 4.AN/'*,494.-A\. 2%,1 4.1 , 32%41, -:~:11Â£k:, .... tÂ· ar Â· t.t "4 <:Â·..42 .. .; ' ' ' - D -14 1%. J 1 A-/. 94* 1< iÂ· I. -: Â·,- / 1: Â· Â· Â·14 %U &'. 1 -Â·:Â·~' 1 -Ar f ./ , Â·34-f.4'c- fi-7:.1, 4 . 1 ' . .. 1 - 2 7 1$ ::. ,- , 1 . I - 1 . . rr------- 1 - P .L O OK FLAN (1) - - 0*.Â·r....4#-f:.,~VT?*1':.e:Â· .:t>884,Â· d . i .* RE,wove Exrsrka MAporiAÂ¥ riSk . - L . 1. - 1.1 'A'. .1 1 8.406 C.92//V 5/47/6,9 N\. m -73 REMOVE ext :Th FASC/4- - ....1 1 1 .7 -1. 1 -4 r.- . '1-1 -- 1 11.11 r ----- 1 1 1 1 1 I r-4 1 ---U- 1 r -1 1 1 In='44 -- j ..... ----- 04%11\1 0 R. T 1-4 PLEV' . - , 1 I I '1 . 1 .. . . .. . 3 ..4 . - t'.4 . 7, ..7.45<91 . I :. 7. .. 924-71 l - . I . 1 - . N EN 31,4 . . Â· 0 .- */7,15 CoL. - -- 1.-: jj - 1. 3. - 4. 1- - 11313 1 =.7 -1 - 7 - \ th,â‚¬.Â£ EXt 5-4 - Col. <25 3:10.,9/95 -COL. I ' 4 i ... NEâ‚¬57-224. *544/0,Â©9/4-. . -;71,40 '36Â·_Ium#le, 70 mâ€¢1-04 9-= 14.1 , , - 1* e, , ~ 60.ry, 11, ,=b = . 11 b 7 4 11 // -t Â· 1 -20 -- . 1 -- ...k - y.â‚¬ =*' 1442*4-1 1*FÂ·9~'.-il ~ -.Â· -'- ' . . i ?948 cv.* . Â· n> 1. . ... Â»11* - .L. 9, 1 7- - - 44.-N, .9.- . -, E-A- 5 -T- E LE VtÂ¢ ! 1-;-i=-VI. 1 --i .1- - , t -1- c2 __ + , *1 Â·Â· - -- -/ - 12:YEL -_ - -J Â·:. f 4 . .b 1 9-/ C - COLOmBO OCT 5-37 ARCHITECTS CONTRACTORS PLANNERS BOX 1206 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 925-7806 DATE. OCTOBER 5, 1987 TO ALAN RICHMAN ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR g RE: APPLICATION FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF STRUCTURE AT 215 HALLAM ST ASPEN, COLORADO PROPERTY OWNER: JEANNIE BAG;COM PROPERTY ADDRESS: 215 HALLAM ST ASPEN, COLORADO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. BLOCK 50 (THE EAST 16.46 FT OF LOT E,5. ALL OF LOT F) ASPEN. CURRENT ZONING: R- 6 DESCRIPTION OF SITE & STRUCTURE- THE SITE AT 215 HALLAtl ST. IS A RELATIVELY FLAT LOT OF DIMENSIONS 45FT. BY 100 FT. GEE AREA MAP i NCLUDED) T i T CURE'ENT STRUCTURE 15 e. 24 i 4 ._,..:... 111-'Tric?!AN HOME. THE - .$ 7 11 ..1 C (i F-7 lt,1 1 ,-. 1 1--4~ 1 . OR IGINAL POR-TION OF THE HOUSE WHIC- H PS 1664 SC. FT, WAS Eli i LT i N 1887, AN ADDITION OF APPROX IMATELY 650 SO. FT WAS ADDED A ROUND THE 1960' S BY EDITOR AND OWNER OF THE ASPEN TIMES BILL DUNAWAY THE ADDITION WAS DONE i N A CONTEMPORARY 60'S STYLE. A CARPORT WAS, ALSO ADDED AT THAT TIME. r 215 HALLAM ET. APPLICATION PAGE TWO OWNER S INTENT- THE CURRENT OWNER'S INTENT ONS . 114 REGARDS TO THE PROF'ERTY, ARE TO REMOVE THE ATYPICAL ELEMENTS ADDED IN THE 19605 A[)DIT ION, INCLUDING THE CARPORT. THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WILL BE FULLY RE NOVATED, WITH FAITHFULL ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL FACADE DETAIL. AN ADDITION WOULD BE ADDED TO THE RENOVATED ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD BE CONTIGUOUS WITH THE ORIGINAL PORTION AND BLEND SPECIFICALLY WITH THE VICTORIAN STYLING. A GARAGE, DESIGNED IN VICTORIAN CONTEXT, APPROPRIATE IN SIZE AND STYLE TO THE HOME, WOULD BE LOCATED IN THE REAP CORNER OF THE PROPERT L WITH ACCESS OFF THE ALLEY. HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE: THE STRUCTURE WAS A PRINCIPAL HOME OF MANY INDIVIDUALS OF HISTORiC SIGNIFICANCE TO ASPEN, TO COLORADO AND TO THE UNITED STATES. THE OWNERS OF THIS HOME HAVE RICHLY CONTRIBUTED TO THE CULTURE, SOCi AL AND POLITICAL HISTORY Elf THE COMMUNITY OF ASPEN, THE STATE OF COLORADO AND THE UNITED STATES. A.R. SMITH PURCHASE THE HOME 1943 StlITH WAS A MINISTER FROM DENVER WHO OWNED A FOX AND MINK FARM EAST OF TO W N BY DIFFICULT CAMPGROUND. E.S. GOULD PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN 1945 AND TOGETHER WITH GROVER,BUILT AND RAN THE MESA STORE. AS ONE OF ASPEN MOST WELL KNOWN MERCHANTS WHO WAS FERSONALLY INVOLVE[) i N tlANY MINING C L A 1 M S, GO U L D W,A S R E K N O W N F O R " G R U B S T A K I N G " T H E M I N E R S F O R A PERCENTAGE OF iNTEREST IN THE i R MiNES. AT THE TH--]E OF JOI_ILDE DEATH, HE W ILLED THE PROPERTY TO HIS THREE DAUGHTERS: HELEN G. COLLINS, EDNA R. WILLIAMS, DOROTHY C. TiDWELL. HELEN HAS SINCE DIE[), EDNA AND DOROTHY LIVE IN CHICO, CALIFORNIA AND CARBONDALE. THE TWO SISTERS ARESTILLTHE OWNERS OFTHEFAMOUS CRYSTAL MILL. HERBERT BAYER PURCHASED THE PROPERTY AS HIS RESIDENCE IN 1948. P,11 1! L.i Mt 'ER IS THE FAMOUS BAUHAUS TRAINED ARCHITECT AND ARTIST. HE â€ž EIE CAME WORLD REKNOWN FOR BOTH HIS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS AND ART. DURING THE TIME OF HIS OWNERSHIP, MANY FAMOUS INDIVHJDAL FROM THE EARLY YEARS OF THE ASPEN liNSTITITUTE LIVED OR STAYED IN HIS NOME. HERBERTE WIFE,JOELLA IS FAKI BENEDICTE, sisTERL FAKI IS OF COURSE THE WIFE OF FAMOUS ASPEN ARCHITECT FRITZ BENEDICT 215 HALLAM ST. APPLICATION PAGE THREE CHESTER H. & NETA R. ANDERSON PURCHASED AND LIVED IN THE HOME IN 1950 CHESTER,WHO WAS KNOWN AS AND '111; , 111.Â·/AS; THE MANAGER OF MOUNTAIN UTILITIES COMPANY AND RAN ALL OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITIES IN THE VALLEY AS WELL AS THE SYDRO-ELECTRIC PLANT ON CASTLE CREEK HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR GE NERATING POWER DOWN VALLEY AS FAR AS CARBONDALE AND UP THJE FRYING PANY RIVER. FROM WHAT IS NOW THE CITY SHOE ANDERSON VÂ·/AS THE PRINCIPAL INDIVIDUAL G I V'EN CREDIT FOR GENERATING ELECTRICITY FOR THE MINES IN ASPEN-THUS GIVING ASPEN THE FIRST ELECTRICALLY CIPERATED MINES IN THE WORLD. NETA, HERSELF WORKED FOR MANY YEARS IN THE UTILITY OFFICE. TOGETHER ANDY AND NETA RAISED A FAMILY IN ASPEN. W M . R. & OL 1 V 1 A DUNAWAY PURCHASE AND LIVED IN THE HOME IN 1958. DUNAWAY PURCH ASE[) AND EiE CAME PUBLISHER OF THE ASPEN TIMES NEWSPAPER OVER THIPT Y YEARS AGO, AND OF COURSE IS STILL THE ACTIVE OWNER AND PUBLISHER OF THE ASPEN TIMES ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE THE STRUCTURE DOES REFLECT AN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE THAT IS TRADITIONAL IN ASPEN. AS A PRE-1900 VICTORIAN HOME. THE STRUCTURE Et-~1EODIES THE TRADITION AND DISTICTION THAT WAS AND IS ASPEN. IT IS NOT ONE OF THE LARI3ER OR GRANDER VICTORIANS OF ITS ERA, EiUT THAT FACT IN ITSELF, REPRESENTING THE UNDERSTATED ELEMENTS OF VICTORIAN DESIGN AND THE HUMEiLE, MODEST SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE MAKE THIS STRUCTURE DISTINCT TO THE CULTURE AND CLASS SYSTEM OF ASPEN. IT IS A HOME WHERE INDIVIDUALS WHO MADE SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS T O THE COMMUNITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO., THE UNITED STATED AND 91 DEED THE WORLD UVED-61_IT WHOM WERE OF COMMON WEALTH AND FINANCIAL STATUS. THIS STRUCTURE REPRESENTS THE DISTINCT, TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE ASPEN VICTORIAN INHABITED BY FINANCIALLY COMMON INDIVIDUALS, WHO WERE CULTURALY UNCOMMON AND RICH IN THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS THE HISTORY OF ASPEN AND FAR BEYOND. 215 HALLAM ST. APPLICATION PAGE FOUR NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER & COMMUNITY CHARACTER THE STRUCTURE IS PART OF THE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT WEST END NEIGHBOORHOOD. THE PRESERVATION OF THIS TYPE OF MODEST VICTORIAN ELEMENT IN THE WEST ENDIS ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVING THE TRUE CHARACTER OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS PREMIER NEIGHBORHOOD OF HISTORICAL AND COMMUNITY VALUE TO ASPEN WAS MADE UP NOT JUST OF THE GRAND AND LAVISH HOMES. IT WAS AND IS GIVEN SCALE AND ORDER BECAUSE OF THESE TYPES OF AIJTHENTICALLY COMMOM AND UNDERSTATED VICTORIANS. THEREFORE, THE PRESERVATION OF THIS HOME IS IMPORTANT FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD CHAR ACTER. ~Fl - r / ' ldJOF-1 4 / Fl Mel Â¥AeÂ·Â·41 141 --Â·ul-1-1Â»1 J / 1 R - ,~ %/3//. Th LAI iLL1~TT0~n '1414-1/W' 1 * < 1 -- 4/ / /@/119*144 1\ 14*7711 1 /&11,59 Jki /flo (4439(* ?' 4. 1 _.u~ax ee * 15 A /Â» e 4 ..4 //. /Â»c'10,/w4--.- --Â·CU , Il.1 1 1Â»246 /. / 7v \ â‚¬ @F- 48 4 G /2/ h'kligiÂ®/ 70 , \T 1>fâ€¢o, A--Â«Etoi *-1. 1 /w/ '/ 'i V /*/7esâ‚¬31 'e SHAW PW #9 17 4 , @@ .r-7*4.1 4/ / r,-*76.rup r /4./ * it/ /- 1 03 11.-j / /@/ /*Ofâ‚¬...4/ SUOGGLER ST JOINT VEN ,/16 Â·; P-N .CD'.99 8 0 9 /9Â» 4â‚¬67 \ p G - ?, :1 /26 / h /5)Pk - 1:14-- gfull,of~l-Mlic 1.1 7\G j r ..1 41#/ 45. /@n Av~/. / 41"iâ‚¬ / / \9 kil. / Wi i , CS Air Nl.9 /./1/ /1 1 4.1 Aw /~RTD) --24/~ PA/ 1 ~ 1-4347-4-1 F 1 1 \~Â¢- j r~9Â«67.-b / ///al p- -4 1 1 1 k*--lf317~*,/0, I+/ //-0 , 1% -4.U /.Ad V /@n -Â·41'' V~ i * il 4 1, 41 0--989.cJ .1/4 / 1 -lÂ®Prk.* LU-Lizfu' 1/@n -446/ 1/Â®/ len 0 :1 P S 277 *51372Â«47 --1 ' ~TAx OSTRICT 42014/11 '90 ,?42/ 44 /eme \Â«44 PA / 3 4 * 1.1 D 1 1 - t l AM.fe ~ 1 CFX FRANCIS STREET . tr : .- 11 ; / / /01.flE\1.4/7 , EKS)Ol,- 1! i 1 Â»uttut /1 1 3 *JQ * 3 ~ 0 23 A, Â«/ Lf / /4 /h>k -00 1 Â«6-44 MOB /*Rn 20 4;t,~; FAEN:@,~~l)[*ES U B / 14 44Â»~ coÂ£-7,0- L @h 4/1 1 + 1 / /Â®/ Th 0 / A.J,44 . f : 4 1 l.1-4 1 /@ 113&*ttgj 8 2/20 4, 7 i . 1 - 14 k P\,- 1-/01 %1 8 4 , -+41401Â» 1-1 1 4 . 0 COe 0 I * -~Â·*4 /--7Â« A.:Ng;/ .il, 50 N LU L / 7\L- 7 / le) /-1 laI 1 -1 111 181 T 44 C 4 8 @ .2% , C 4 i 2 1 - d. - 0 Â®2932 , ' 4 8 3.19 4-47 I O - 6 Â£'A~/ U hrh-- . EEP L N @ r.23.441 1 4.1 /Â®/ . S r , 4 4 0 .- C < 3 4 .2. 11 h 0 I * Sâ€¢ , . }11 k*A~ /@71*.1 1 /*hÂ·63&:Uc /-Al OW c:,94â€¢ ..: is// Fl&Y*127- /# @ /1/al /@/#*M@94-IN / /@/ 7-,-AO . Ullil Â»--7 Â® - --2-1.1 1 -Ad ThÂ·Â·(ikÂ«1.1-4 14... I 1 --0- Â·@ \10,"/ 1 . 2 1 /.,9/ / 4% i /Â®/ /.41 / 0/f-*N â„¢.41. e 2 11 'f A 43 li81*144 . / . ..8- -11.1 4 1 BLEEKER 4.-2/â€¢ i f-j/U / /@/ -iu.a_ r. i 2 @ 34 8 LU L P. 1 1 1Â®1 -lh *4 2 A. . 4 0 -*LU /@/32â‚¬544 l /4 hlk. 0 @ p 20 â€ž1 2 4 0 sTREET o. - 4 . t.74.-/ /// /07Â»J i,k i i // loi Pk * 4 W i I C 4 1 -4*UN+-2/ m 29&/>1/1 /// /* 2/ Â®@\50% 4, E 7 fcco, 2, r 0 .S . ?1/Â®/or\- 48<4 471/ / /gr-Al,trcqi'â€ž-2/ ~, / 74... f /,4.- 11 .1 - 4 ,~ / @ 4.-~7~12\ 9 I J. 10/3 ~i /t//7@rpÂ·>Â·25Â·j a 11 74...c Ill ADJOINING l 4 0 4 2737-073 w. r, A / 0 4.1.2 1-* hE /@/ Th Â· r: 0 . O . fr,1 -4.(-1 3-44 / 1 7\1 1 1 /419'-(Â·de/ PAL. / r r- 6 / / h.1 /4-11361 -t, 2 @, , . 44,4 ~i /Â®/ 1,6-1*.G / r/ . I 4 8 -Nil / i iw igh-PX'/i-tle i C /7$52.,4, 0 tit 1 411*I~0O 4444*b; CI -- a 49 4 , " Â©' i: 1 I STREET S B 1 /1.P '331 %.0'..0. i.1 1 -r-/-2 Ol./ 71/ r;434&l//17 - ~ s 1 , @ 6 r,/ .1 v, / J I â„¢4%247 Mo/ 5*us v* U/. /: / /4-- /0 n-Â·8,,044/ /9/* 4 $ e .. . 4 9.,3/77317)419 DILQI u /oi/7Â»9 8 41' 1411:1 1Â®1 41 , / 4/Lill 1 -1--. . Â»41OIll- 4 1@11 4143: M:kp 4 k / 7.%74< lÂ»,F+1421 fâ‚¬1-11 Â® 44 Â¥4(.6 / i â€¢/4 / . 3. 4 04.1 &0/4.J/44 4,44 / MI -7 C n...miÂ«Ja/ 1-t-a 1 1 N..21 046#d>/ -' r 4%48 , rt#-1 1 -7// '81 73Z-~. 1 1 --1- ill /,a rh.... -Â·-24~ h.l %â„¢Â»1- 4/ 1-74 - tet E . c =24 Z / A X.Â£4 /4 / 9 O A .W C- C . 1 . 1 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Request for Historic Designation of 215 W. Hallam Street DATE: October 8, 1987 LOCATION: 215 W. Hallam Street, Part of Lot E and all of Lot F, Block 50, Townsite and City of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Jeannie Bascom, owner of the house, requests HPC's recommendation in favor of historic designation. During the time this request would be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, the applicant would also like plans to be considered by HPC for renovation, removal of 1960's carport and addition, and to add a new addition and garage. The owner intends to make alterations to the original house that would adhere to the original facade details. f HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: "3" PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Standards for historic landmark designation are stated in Section 24-9.3(a) of the Municipal Code, as amended by Ordinance 11 (Series of 1987). The Planning Office has the following comments with regard to each standard. Standard: "(1) The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State or the United States" Response: The applicant has documented that several prominent persons have lived in this house since 1943. Staff is not certain that the house is commonly associated with those individ- uals, however it is certainly interesting that they had lived there. Additional research is being done by the applicant to find out more about historical association with the house. Standard: " (2) The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen char- acter." Response: The 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures states that this structure is of historic importance by illus- trating the family/home environment and lifestyle (s) of the silver mining era. HPC gave 215 W. Hallam an historic evaluation rating of "3", noting alterations and a large carport and addition on the east and south elevations. We note that the 1 house has wide aluminum siding and appears to have a new front porch. The windows all appear to be original, which is interes- ting in that they are the wider variety not common in 1880's vintage houses in Aspen. Several features of the house are the same as the house next door at 229 W. Hallam, including the general house plan, combination of gable end and hip roof forms, shed dormers, and gable-end shingles. The similarity in the two houses adds some degree of architectural distinction. The intentions of the owner as thus far discussed are to remove the aluminum siding, possibly add detailing if historic records can document what had been, and remove the carport/addition and replace with a smaller, more compatible addition. These alterat- ions would be discussed for HPC's approval during concept- ual and final development review. These plans should increase the historic significance of the house. Standard: "(3) The structure embodies the distinguishing charac- teristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen." Response: No evidence has been presented that the house meets this standard. Standard: " (4) The structure is a significant work of an archi- f tect whose work has influenced the character of Aspen." Response: No evidence has been presented that the house meets this standard. Standard: "(5) The structure is a significant component of a historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure is important for the maintenance of that neighbor- hood character." Response: As one of three structures on the block that has survived from the Mining Era, even though none are rated higher than "3", this structure has a positive contribution to the neighborhood character. While not a high style Victorian, it contributes to the West End's Mining Era character. Standard: "(6) The structure is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance." Response: As already noted above, 215 W. Hallam has some general community significance in its typical size, the location and architecture. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends to HPC to recom- mend historic landmark designation of the structure at 215 W. Hallam Street as requested on the condition that the applicant follows through with the general restoration plans thus far presented and to be considered at subsequent HPC development review. sb.bascom