The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19871222HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Agenda Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, City Hall December 22, 1987 2:30 p.m. 2:30 I. Roll Call and approval of Nov. 19, 24 and Dec. 8th minutes II. Committee Member and Staff Comments III. Monitoring Projects 2:50 IV. Public Comments V. OLD BUSINESS A. Amendment to Approved Plan: Roof top swamp coolers, Elli's Building 101 S. Mill Street John Cottle 3:10 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Demolition Review: 2 sheds in rear of 309 and 311 E. Main St. Carl Bergman 3:30 VII. SPECIAL PROJECTS A. Publication costs for Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines Georgeann Waggaman and Steve Burstein NOTE: Stallard House windows are likely to be a subject of Monitoring Projects. We mind you to please look at the new windows on the Sardy House annex compared to the old windows on the Sardy House. MERRY CHRISTMAS Kathy Strickland HPC Minutes Dec. 22, 1987 AMENDMENT TO ELLI'S ROOFTOP SWAMP COOLERS .....4 DEMOLITION REVIEW- 2 SHEDS IN REAR OF 309 AND 311 E. MAIN ST. .............. ......... . 20 23 Â¥. â‚¬, HAGMAN YAW 15 December 1987 ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Members of the HPC City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear HPC Members: This letter and its attachments provides you with the information we have gathered in regards to your concerns raised at the November 19 meeting. After much investigation and study, we have three options available for your review. Please be reminded that the coolers, ductwork, and building design were already in place before the Committee expressed an interest to review. To address the visual impact of the three evaporative coolers, we offer three alternatives for your review and comment. ( Please refer to the attached drawings): 1. Alternate #1: Option "A". Screen the three evaporative coolers as they exist with a wooden fence that will match the new siding and be painted light grey. This will visually screen the equipment from its predominant viewpoint along Main Street, east of the intersection. As it is under the viewplane, you cannot see the equipment from the front steps of the Hotel Jerome. Option "B" would be to build a parapet at the existing roof extending north and then stepping down. See elevation. 2. Alternate #2: Option "A". Relocate unit A to the high roof towards the southwest corner; relocate unit B to unit A location and relocate unit C to unit B location. Unit C duet work (approx. 32" H x 30" W) would extend east and then south to hook up into the existing chase duet work. New duet work would alsoextend north from the new unit A location until it turned down and penetration into a suitable chase space. Note that unit A location at the high roof is within the viewplane. An option "B" to this Alternate would be to relocate unit C further west and extend ductwork along the roof until it meets the existing penetration. ..=111!01.1- . Letter to Members of the HPC 15 December 1987 , A age Two C-~~ 3. ~Alternate #3: Relocates unit A to the High roof again . but moves unit B further to the West and unit C to 1-0 0 C would then go into the original unit B penetration. the original unit A location. Duct work form unit Thank you for these considerations. Very truly yours, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd , 4161 40*Hy#u Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager (John Cottle AIA Partner HH:aa Enclosures (f) -9 24:-; X . T + 1 A 1.- . I. 1 Â·E G i 1 1 :'.4/IJ;DC.fi .Â«CfD--IT /4,04/1 1- . 0..3,-- re i i =- ,~ -or i ---*,Evititknici Â·opOLL-- r- 1 11- 1 - /3. 75 - 1 arâ‚¬:29 0 l \C-80 Orr 1 i-Pglet:>ST 7 6%~6. i 1-- - -- 11 AlI */ Ophbn "A" Â£ L L 1 '6 ACDO'Al 11 4 11,5,1 NORTH LMAAN 6-h ., 6--- w ....- . 1/4": 1'-0" ' 33 6 4 . , ' r i fl /'12' I -- 3 ~IL_- 1 - - -_-L' k.-'T~ E,01Â· D.lE.liT ----- - f -- 'ity A. i 1 - -- 1 , + - 6. 11 Â·4%.3.3 1 22-6 5. de --- , 1.--1 1- ---- . -- - I r - 1 1 -.- --' -' r.. Â· 1--, . KiPT---------- Â· L_ - -- ---- -- - -. . 1 1 -- 1 , ----- - ... , I- S i i 1---- .it.__.6 -_. | ' ~1 r , , i 11- .. - r.~ 1; 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1- AP l - 11 -- 1 ---7 1 . 11 1 I L. 6-Eva-$4 â‚¬rt â‚¬*S 4- 40 / | i '~-Â· ~ 1 ! .5 5.1 1 rEl i 1 1 1 VEN I .--*i t I - 1, 1 L 11 1 01--- 4 i r , 90 - 0/z. 1 4.4-974- -7- ===El , fit.r 1, . / . r A Crag RATE * 1 - - * ~--1-- U--1 ---l.- - - 1---il. --- EAST IMILL ST.) ELEVATION 1 74 'F: 'I'2~11 ~k I ..4..... 1*4IA OTMEE"F il - 5,6, 9, L.-0 4,6, gLY-fo!4,fi'T (Thâ‚¬) || 6,L. l 131Â· 1,1. UT- tv:4,9 . COOLE,2- i 1 U 'PelrVA\.)0Â»rE Col.) 1 fl OIC- ViE\Olt,NEÂ· =J,<AKJ I 136)7/F.\ ~ 1(=pi-~br~'N i ;,P FI , edcUL.0/#43 NA itÂ·47,F~~) - pkEK>TA UM,ANT. EG/ *19 â‚¬*ep erÂ®gÂ¥ 06- vieN,c.Â»le builjl KeW / f \ ~fe "p-[ 56 rer, fklU- pard.pel- te I G.L. 5-0 *68 --' Wi~ mul- 1 1/474593) L_ ....1 4- . -1 L -3 f -1 \\ ,-cave R | - 1 - l o - .-/ 5,6. O..- --/ .-0 Ii.--Ill- - -. . f/Â¥09/7.0/0/Â·A<., 9: VEBTLAU CH&56 AFGA H laH Foop AL FEF+JATE 11: 1 (522 6160 ait-Ackled \ MOOF PLARi 5Ufple,Flevad dkdqfiÂ·) ,= ~ Oplirn " A" ALD[DITION TO eU_J 'O CyÂ»1 4 N' * - *4/1<1 1 OrMED?31- li 1 51 0, 4,6, 6r-#016 fl'F (rff) ~ |~6,L. |~ 1, 75 h Ur Ev:4.8 0 coolls,- 04:- -91#17 11,M+A,Jg -1 li .%\ pe~TAge.Ahrr Cal-)IR yL li i.4 7-,061 (1* : teÂ·ru6< ~ 1 DIG ViEVOR..4,16Â· \\ C.LE:'27*U ,â‚¬-A KIT ECO/P,\ 1 1 < ~ folto///43 ARÂ· it.47,R~ - k. r 1~$*Al#r eoll, #2 . 1 1 ~ 1. 4.<Aci ' \ \ 7 GL, ~#p-- 1~loute_ 11 . \Exh 17 11.11 - 114 18(1\[a:El EVA/20'I,#7/vE L-- 1-1" 431'AVA i J(A ) (D) l' i \ 1 K*--- ---- L Â°*ion" â‚¬ j -- ~ 84â‚¬VA-ID K --/ 1 Or--- .--I--./. .23 7 2 . ; (/0/?Avt,Ly ,/0 1. 3, VeÂ·~ TX:DALâ€¢ C,4456 /906,4 3 4Rt{M"A" A ok-vitwplant Arraf-FATE +R â‚¬- Â· ./ ...i I. ' MOOF PLAN 00+1 "All ALDE>)7-(ON TO 23(11'0 d /9" cp *04 " B" MAul Orf2637 TZ=- 5,0, 51 0, 4,6, GrfulaMT (TYM) 16,L, ~ 22 9Â·14- E /48 CODLE- OIL -11*39191.Ah.*2 Â¥2eDVA)1*+ST- C QUIF: -3 1 1-Â·0' 0'' 7'~Al - <0'~UU '.1 1 DIC- VENH/WE j ~ p,LE:'~T>'vij f-~ Lf ac;JA ) i / ~All,L//AB *42- itÂ·47,F~) - FECÂ·04(2,~444- EGN//9 06- VIerJPLANE: | 6,1-Â· 7 1 E---fâ‚¬docate- \\ 2-1 1@- 3 E- 3 EVAPSÂ» 7/â‚¬ \; Urf= /,-03= 3 13> ~ Â·~ (L ~ I .' I I 1 21:=>C.G/.2,1 t-iII _1 L -2 \ \\ 1- - / 0-0-0 -#*-*1 \\ 1 1 1~ Â«â‚¬VA-ID R -* 0 -- - --1 5, c, - 1 %0 .0,1< f-> --- / ~ CrtÂ©9.lu.21 3 1-~,Al' et ve:~nCAL Ct-96(: AFGA AL,le}ENATE * 3 SOOF 1->LAN AUG>17-CON TO ELU'O Carl R. Bergman Box 1365 Aspen, Colorado 81612 De c embe r 10, 1.987 Mr. Steve Burstein City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve: This letter is in regard to our phone conversation recently and in answer to Bill Drueding's letter concerning the "application" to request permission to demolish two (2) sheds located at 309 and 311 E. Main Street. You gave me the option of either the application or a letter explaining the situation. I feel the letter is the better way of explaining the event, so here goes: After purchasing the two lots containing the historic houses.with a designation of number "4" and after studying the material per- taining to these designations which was passed on to me in the course of the transaction, I was 100 per cent satisfied that abso- lutely nothing should be touched on the houses but that the out shacks on these lots were not included in these historic desig- nations. As we looked over the property, I felt that the shacks were dangerous, death traps, a health hazard and ready to collapse at any moment. I therefore removed the shacks and cleaned up the properties. When Bill Drueding informed me of the violations, I was stunned and am now following his directions fully. Although I did not follow the correct procedures beforehand, I assure you these violations were unintentional. Please consider this letter my application for approval (after the fact) to remove these shacks. Upon receiving this approval from the HPC, I will then obtain the necessary demolition permit from Bill Drueding so that all of the proper procedures will have been followed. Thank you for your help -in this matter. Sincerel~4- fit) ) Carl R. Bergman