HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.19820323RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
Historical Preservation Committee Regular Meeting March 23,1982
The Historical Preservation Committee held its regular meeting March 23,1982,
in the Council Chambers. Bill Clark called the meeting to order, present were
Nick Pasquarella, Mona Frost, Marjorie Brenner, Terry End, Colette Penne,
and Bill Drueding.
Cit~ Rlaza~
Building
The meeting was open to Public Hearing; First was a Public
Hearing for the final design review of the City Plaza Building
by J.R. MC Carthy, Artichiet and with Jack Miller, Client-
Alan Richman.
They have summited anrecieved a Growth Management Allotment,
and conceptual approval from the BPC in th Fall of 1981.
There is not much change to the building, 35'4" will
be the new height of the building, the color and brick
color will be brought before the committee for approval
later. Bill Clark brought up that tinted glass is not
allowed in the guidelines of the HPC and how much glass
would be use in the building and sky line would have to
be with in the code allowance.
The open space around the building has increased a little
from the drawings by about 200 feet.
The Public Hearing was brought to a close.
The committee gave conditional approval upon comming back
with brick,color,glass verses metal roof and signage,
or any other lighting fixtures they might use. Nick Pasquarella
made the mation, Mona Frost seconded the motion, All in
favor, Motion carried.
Nest was th Public Hearing for the final design review
of facade changes to the existing Epicure Building by
Bill Pose. To come before this committee today was the issue
of the entrance on the corner, on Mill and Main to be
relocated on the side of Mill Street. To research corner
entrances at corners, Georgeann Waggaman and Bill
Pose went to the Historical Society and looked through
old photos. It was The Linclon Block orginially, and in
the 30's it became the wood Block and one photo
showed it was used for a !~garage, before the Epicure.
The sandstone step in front of the now existing entrance
is hoped to be moved to the otherside of the courtyard,
the other change will be brick peers to courtyard side.
The Public Hearing was brought to a close.
And a motion was put before the board by Terry End,
That the committee approve the changes in the Epicure
Building as purposed, subject to certain conditions
which follow, save the step ~ or stoop as name be; on the
propertyand if not practical, deliver it to the Historic
Society; also that they will deliver the electric Post or
so called Power line to the Historical Society; Remove
all external conduits; Remove the drain pipe;and any
signage or color that is not already there to come
back to this committee for approval. Nick Pasquarella
seconded the motion All in favor, motion carried.
Next on the agenda was the signage and facade changes at
St. Johns of Aspen in the Brand Building by Rita St John.
The minutes were read of the last meeting about concerning
St. John's. At this part of the meeting open with
Rita St. John discussing much of her previous stated
plans; Then was brought up the color of the awnings, and
Bill Clark stated that the committee did have jurisdiction
on coloT and that the tone of purple with the color she
.migh~ use for the awings would have to be taken into
consideration and a vote taken for approval. ~Rita St.
John said she had been told that this committee had no
control of color, and was not prepared to really
St. John's
New
Business
ready to dicuss at this time, color, and felt it should
not be an issue.
The committee had no problem with the Signage Rita St.
John'wants to use on the windows as given in previous
meeting, but wants to take paint, signage and the
wood trim and awnings ali in one meetingrather than take
each seperately in a number of meetings
Terry End made a motion to approve the sandblasting
her logo of 18St. Johns on the windows conditional
on Rita comming back with the color sample for her
woodwork on the building which will go with her purposed
burgundy color £or the awnings.
At that point Rita St. John said at this time she wanted
to withdraw her ideas before this board and come back
at a latter date for she did not feel it was fair, since
she was told that the committee had no control of color,
and since color did seem to be a issue here or the
combination of colors that she wanted to use. So Rita
St. John with drew her application before the HPC.
The priliminary review of the removal of the Swiss
Chalet cabins and the construction of a 24 unit employee
Housing Project, by Mark Danielsen for HBC Investments
Hans Catrup.
The location on the application is on the South side
of Main Street between 3rd and 4th.
This is a complete different design in c~mparison to the
Victorian look of 4 or 5 buildings that HBC decided
against, in hopes this would be a better plan.
Bill Clark asked, because of the difference in design
did the HBO Investments have to go through the GMP
process again.
Mark Danielsen then spoke up to say, that the GMP
gives scoring based on primarily technical aspects of
the project, none which include any design criteria, only
if the project is chan~ed in a substantial wa~ ie;
in an area which it relieved points, then they would of
had to go back and be rescored. In the p~rticual project
you see before you, you see a design change and do not have
go back to the G~.
And that~his coramittee can give its conceptual approval
because under the revised GMP process~which now~their
is no scoring as such. Before applicates had s~unmit
to the process and after if they are awarded the allotment
then HPC gives its £inal approval, Colette Penne saidl
she might be able to clear things up, When Mark Danielsen
came before with these purposal and recieved a residental
allotment under the GMP there was a moratorium on,
on Main Street; therefore a catch in the process, not
with a definiet design, they had to have the HPC saying
they would allow them conceptual approval to remove the
cabins, for a 24 unit employee project, and they needed
to hear that for they could go on to the GMP. The HPC
at that time directed Mark Danielsen an okay, and gave
him certain criteria that they must follow. If his
general design fits into that criteria its alright for
him, ~ark Danielsen to be before the HPC.
Bill Clark then stated that he felt they were taking
a chance,that HBC has not really gotten much from the
the HPC committee when they aame before and then HBC
went to the GMP because HPC could not ~egally g~e it
to you (HBC), HBC then got approval through the GMP
process on a plan that is different than the one now;
and now ask the HPC to approve the new plan.
Mark Danielsen, said , a brand new plan yes, but using
the old concept i~itially given, not as approval; as
guidance from the HPC. Mark Danielsen went on to say
the units are in two buildings, one being 2 units high
and contains 5 one bedroom units, the other building
is graduated from 1 to 3 stories in height and
contains 14 units above grade and 5 units below,
consisting of 24 units in all, parking is now located
under ground for 23 o£ the spaces accessable from the
alley.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
The project is spread out on the 7 lots an an open space
of 36 feet wider than the other plan has been given to
the space between the two buildings. The lowest point
of the project is at each side of the site.
The discussion went on with plans being shown to the
committee and Colette Penne brought up that since this
is complex in terms of levels that it might be good
for a site visit for Aril 13, at 2:15 at the site.
Marjorie Brenner then made a Motion to table this untill
the committee can do some research. Seconded by
Nick Pasquarella, All in favor, motion carried.
Review o£ replacement o£ the walk up window at the
Bank of Aspen with a automatic teller, by Drake Jacobs.
Bill Clark had to leave the meeting and Mona Frost
became acting chairperson, A Motion was made by Nick
Pasquarella as presented to the committee and seconded
by Terry End, Ail in favor Motion carried.
Members were reminded of the study secession to night
with City Council.
Meeting ddjourned.