Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.19820511RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves H~s~oricPreservation Committee Regular Meeting May 11,1982 Work session with the HPC members for 11:30 this date. The Historic Preservation Committee held it regular meeting on Mayll,1982 in the C&uncil Chambers following the work session in the Mayor's Office. The Meeting was called to order at i:00P.M. Present were Bill Clark, Mona Frost, Terry End, Marjorie Brenner, Nick Pasquarella, Georgeann Waggaman, Colette Penne, Bill Drueding and Steve Marcus. The minutes were postpone f6r the members could go forward with the public hearing. Work Session The meeting was open for a Public Hearing for the final review of the Waterfall Hope Project by Jacob, Ball & Assoc. Bill Jameson took the floor for the portion of, Sculpture Garden. Bill Clark ask to put aside for a few minutes the public hearing to imform ail parties of the work session, and what came about. N_PC, modify rules and regulations proceedures and guidelines, so that the members are better able to deal with the assignments they have from the City, and the citizens from the City, and the applicates are fully prepared to come before this conm~ittee, and know what to expect. The preparation of a formal application form, which the committee currently does not have, will be given to applicates and a copy of guidelines to follow &~ proceed, to put on the form, and how to fill out the form out. The committee will also be revising the proceedures so applicates will know where the forms are to be filed, and how it will proceed from there, HPC will recommend changes to the City Council, also there will be a fee in consideration for applicate~ for applications to the HPC in most. but not all cases. The next work session the members will go over the guidelines which will be held at noon prior to the regular meeting. Waterfall Hope Project Opening back to the Public Hearing, Drake Jacobs, the artichect, for this project; who broughfin material and color samples for this committee to see; The brick sample is compatible to what is now on the building, a mall brick, the framing system dark bronze aluminum, lighting system, and clear glass. Ask for members comments, or any from the public sector, none, then Bill Clark asked to entertain a motion in respect to this application. Terry End made a motion to approve the plans of Waterfall Hope Project as presented. Nick Pasquarella seconded the Motion, all in favor, motion carried. End of Public Hearing. Bill Clark asked that the record show that the entire project as been approved, the changes in the facade of the building an also the garden and fence. Koch Lumber Co. relocation Next came the Koch Lumber Company relocation, by David Eisenstein, Attorney for the law office of Giedon Koffman their client asking for conceptual approval to relocate and rebuild the Koch Lumber Co. building at a strip of property where the refridgerator Car sits as you come out of the Post Office; A straight strip, as it goes into the Rio Grande trail, part of the Trueman, specially planned area, and was sold to their client, who wants to put in self storage ware houses, that require a GMP allocation, which will come up on the first of September. Meanwhile they are trying to obtain the Koch Lumber Co. building from the Historic Society, who have it dissembled, and in storage. Their client would like to errect this building in the front of this property, and behind which would be the storage units, if approved spoke Colette Penne. Bill Drueding ask if this project with Koch Lumber Co. to rebuild and to restore would be exert from GMP, and it was stated that the one advantage to the builder was only the building of the storage units would go through GMP. Asked of Nick Pasquarella if the Historic Society had any plans for the building, or what was being done? Nick Pasquarella said their where no plans as such or no one has approach them except for these people. More neogotiation will have to be made between the Historic~Society, and the grandson who is interested in the Koch , name. So the committee gave its conceptual approval on the p~$ to rebuild the Koch Lumber Co. building , and will come be£ore this committee again when it goes before P&Z and the GMP allotment. The discussion was closed. The choice of colors for the~Hairpower Co. at 316 E. Hopkins ( the Hutch) by Peter Rizzuto. Pictures of a Victorian pattern close to what they wanted the Hairpower to look like was passed around, and a fence in front of the Hairpower- the color chips. Iris as the basic color and the white an the other color for the gingerbread or fish scales would be the other two colors £or the trim of and Ask committee members for comment or suggestions. Nick Pasquarella made a motion to approve the choice of colors shown to this committee by the applicate. Georgeann Waggaman seconded the motion, all in favor, motion carried. The review of the changes for the Prospector Lodge for HBC Investments by Mark Danielsen. Mark Danielsen stated that the~ were about four changes, in respect to the Prospector, one was to move the lounge area from shown on the blue print, eleminating a window, the employee unit and moving that, internal changes only, enclosing the stairwell with a small opening as shown again on the blue print, now the plans ~re for a rectangler corner instead of a cut corner. Bill Clark stated that what the applicaate needs to do is show in the color, red/or something; the changes to be made or the way it was before the changes, one of the other. for the committee can see how it was orginally approved, and can clearly see the changes, Colette Penne said if these plans are approved HBC Investments will have to go through P&Z commission, because they are adding a bathroom in each unit, changing the employee unit from a large one rather to a small one. Removing the lobby where it was/and it becomes a idential to a lodge room on the plans, This has been turned over to the City Attorney and suggested to their contractor to turn it over to their attorney, so I"M assumming it will go back to P&Z, Colette Penne said. Bill Clark stated that it applies to any applicate of applications comming be£or~the HPC,with a complete set of plans £or a building and approval being given then, the committee is faced with a series o£ changes that takes up these members time and ~e public tim~and distorts a building or an improvement to a building/an~ the presentation being made. Last was the Swiss Chalet Project for HBC I~vestments by Mark Danielsen~on the substandual modification of the plans, such as moving the building back some 4 to 8 feet and eliminate 3 of the units of some 22, 23 hundred square feet of floor area,HBC has cut down on the mass and bulk of this building as shown on the model, and have wided the court yard some, to be 54 feet in all , to give more open space, discussion continued- Colette Penne asked if, because this project is connected to some other project where HBC got the employee housing allotment, so it got the commerical allotment for the other project, didn't you Mark Danielsen, have to build a 24 unit. Mark Danielsen, aswered by saying no- only 50% free market- 50% employee units, they were transfering 3 units up to the other site, is what HBC plans to do,,~ and still maintain the plans for under ground parking. Chuck Ross, commenting on/HPC functions, and the removal of the cabins on the project site, and what the committee duties are? Bill Clark said, that this committee had question and had doubts on the removal of the cabins to be replaced -3- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves by a more modern building. Our judisdication, as the chairman see it, strictly how the purposed use of,impacts the adjoining area, how it look in terms of overall char~E.~ ~ Aspen, and the impact of Surrounding buildings. Colette Penne asked the width of the project? And Mark Danielsen said 3 city lots ( 5 x18 = 90) The chair ask to ~ a motion for approval or dienial or some other Terry End made a motion for prepliminary approval of the Swiss Chalet project as shown this date May 11,1982 by Mark Danielsen. Mona Frost seconded the Motion,asked for a discussion, there was none. All in favor aye, naye Nick Pasquarella, Aye have it, 1 opposed. The Public Hearing is set for June 8, 1982. Meeting adjourned.