Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.19761012RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves The regular meeting of the Historical Preservation Committee was held on October 12th, 1976, at 1:00 in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. Those members present were Florence Glidden, Gaard Moses, Norm Burns, and Larry Groen. Also present was John Stanford of the Planning Office. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the September 28th meeting were not available, and will be submitted at the next meeting. Old Business Draft Resolution Fisher Residence request for Historic Designation Project Review-Pre-App. Sporthaus Linder Groen stated that there was scheduled a joint public hearing with the P & Z to discuss the designation of the Shoenberg and Therese David Residences on Tuesday the 19th at 5:00 in the evening. Also to be discussed are the amendments to the guidelines, which Stanford asked to be discussed at the next meeting. The Reso- lution for the Fisher residence was discussed. When the HPC has a request for Historic Designation from the owner, it is a very combersome procedure to go through, as it requires first a resolution from the HPC, then it requires a public hearing for preliminary approval by the P & Z, followed by the public hearing and recommendation to Council. The Council has to have two readings of the Ordinance and a public hearing. From an administrative standpoint this is very cumbersome. Therefore, there is a draft of a change to the zoning code historic section which would streamline this procedure whereby a recommendation ~_ from the HPC would go directly to Council and would bypass the P & Z. This would be specifically for in- ividual request for the historic designation. Stanford stated that he would like to see the Fisher Residence be the first to be acted on by the HPC in the new procedure. This amendment would require two 15 day public notices. The HPC is concerned about this time lapse, as the application has been pending for the Fisher residence for some time now. This application could then ride along with the zoning change, as both have to go to P & Z. Stanford asked if this could be added to the agenda. Burns so moved, seconded by Ms. Glidden, all in favor, motion carried. Stanford went over the contents of the packet includ- ing the documentation substantiating historical aspect of the Fisher Residence, and the fact that this is the home of Harold Ross, founder of the New Yorker Mag- azine. The Planning Office recommends HPC approval of this application. Ms. Glidden so moved, seconded by Burns, all in favor, motion carried. Groen asked if after this is finally approved, a copy of the request and the committee's action might be sent to the New Yorker Magazine. This was gen- erally accepted. The subject of a plaque showing this designation was discussed, but it was felt that these would not last. Moses stated that the plaques could possibly be fastened with expanding bolts for an estimated cost of $100. Stanford voluntered to check into this. This is a proposal to enclose the balcony of Amelia's. Pre-application review Little Victorian's Commercial Core Historic District Expansion a beauty shop over the Sporthaus Linder. They want to enclose this with a lean-to type structure out of glass to create a greenhouse atmosphere. The Planning Office does not feel that this interferes with the architectural integrity of the building. The depth of the balcony presently is 3'6". Groen asked if this would become commercially usable space, or will hair dryers or chairs or other type of business equipment be placed in that area. Joseph Zanin ,representing Amelias, stated that they were only trying to solve the roof problem, not enlarge the business area. Stanford stated that he felt this would improve the looks of the building, and the building itself is not an historic building. The concern is the lighting inside this extension. Groen asked if this was approved, would it be likley that this committee would be confronted with restaurant applications to do similar. He doesn't want to see glassed in balconies all over town. The drawings are only preliminary, and the committee would like to see something more detailed, such as electrical wiring drawings and all. Groen asked if any of the members would require an on-site inspection prior to approval or action, this was declined. The glass will be openable, about 4" on the top and ridge. Stanford asked if the committee wanted to grant pre-application approval or approval with public hearing. Groen relayed that the Planning Office had requested that the gla~be clear or tinted, nor reflective material and that the metal frame work be bronze or corten steel- rather that silver or aluminum. The only neighbors that will be effected are Tom Mix and the Wheeler. Groen feels that this is really a major change in the building facade. Burns feels that this necessitates a public hearing and feels that some of the adjacent people may object to this change. They discussed how this was going to correct the water drainage problem off of the flat roof. Burns moved that this go for final application approval after public hearing, seconded by Ms. Glidden. All in favor, motion carried. Michael Horn represented the application, and went over the proposed changes with the committee. There is a stairway that comes up to a railing on the back, north east side of the building, and the application is to extend out over the back into a deck. This would be accessible through the Second floor. Horn also stated that he wanted to paint these buildings, and he was informed that the Planning Office could offer suggestions and has a book of authentic Victorian colors. Horn also suggested possibly building a deck of a small type where there are double glass doors on the second floor that open into nothing and this would have a cover over it. The committee could see no problem with this. Burns moved to give pre-application and final approval of the deck on the north-east corner of the building and railing. Ms. Glidden seconded,all in favor, motion carried. Stanford stated that the present district lines are largely an area which contains the largest amount of concentrated buildings in the area, and corresponded closely with the commercial core. There are areas adjacent to the commercial core tha~ contribute to the RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting Historical Preservation Committee Oct.12, 1976 COMMITTEE COMMENTS Hickory House overall Victorian character. There is a possibility to expand the commercial core Historic District. ~h~s would be in areas where there is a character and his- toric structures exist. There are very fragile areas that are a block out of the commercial core area. When the first commercial core district was done, Stanford stated that they did not extend beyond that area because it was felt this would weaken their case. However, at this time it is believed that if it is not extended there are some areas that would come under demolition. Hyman and Hopkins streets, east of Hunter are one of the areas in question, and the area of the backhalf of the Jerome. Also, Stanford stated that it would be necessary to make some type of inventory of the structures that would need protection. Ms. Glidden asked if there would be a letter to council asking for this. HPC would have to make the commitment that it felt this was in the comm- unities interest to pursue this extension of designation. This would be contigious withthe present area. Even though they would be different districts, the basic guidelines would be the same. Stanford stated that he would have further information on this by~/the next meeting. Groen feels that Council should be very sympathetic towards this project, but Burns feels that P & Z would be the obstacle to overcome. Groen asked what the status is of the project to be built next to the Hickory House. Stanford stated that they have received their building permit, and is now seeking financing. He does not know if this includes the demolition permit, but it does hinge partially on the Smith's selling their house. A demolition permit cannot be issued by the building inspector until it comes before HPC, unless it has already been issued. Groen would like to find out the status of this. Groen asked about the Herron Apartments on Main Street across from the Floradora, and wanted to know what is being done with the porch in the front. Stanford stated that they were replacing rotten timbers, and it will be replaced exactly as before. Groen asked if horse corrals were allowed on Bleeker Street. Burns stated that there is a horse corral behind the Nugget Lodge. This should be investigated. Groen thanked the HPC Committee for keeping things going while he and Norm were out of town. Burns stated that when the meeting on Arthur's was held it was understood that Shoenberg and Therese David's was on the agenda that evening also, but Stanford stated that this had been published for expediency sake. The public hearing was postponed to this coming meeting, Tuesday, Oct. 19th. Arthur's The progress of Arthur's was questioned. Burns stated that it was his understanding that Arthurs, in order to meet their parking requirements, were negotiating with Aspen Reservations for space. Burns asked if it would be appropriate to ask at the Public Hearing that approval be granted without those extra two spaces. This could possibly cause problems when the full staff of Aspen Reservations returns for the winter. Ms. Glidden moved to adjourn. The next meeting will be the 26th, however there is a joint meeting on the 19th with P & Z All in favor, motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 2:20. Ellen L. Atkins, Secretary