The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19970319AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION March 19,1997 SPECIAL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of minutes. (none) II. Commissioner and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. CONTINUED BUSINESS A. 514 East Hyman Avenue - Mason and Morse Minor 0 V. ADJOURN 0 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION March 19, 1997 SPECIAL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of minutes. (none) II. Commissioner and Staff Comments III. Public Comments IV. CONTINUED BUSINESS A. 514 East Hyman Avenue - Mason and Morse Minor V. ADJOURN Ned 03/ 13.-\9-9- 514 E . UYNIAA MA5O/4 + MORSE EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION IN DEMO MAD 3112499- 14 60 8 G,De&* LE-re /Al Co Lom 60 LEGER 4 Af PUCMM t Al DEAu) /A,St *L j D RAw 1 46=4 Dâ‚¬Aid /A)@=#5 rn.ma 3 6 9 1 9-7 -IN Co turn 60 .Dr c.....:â€žj IN proprÂ»J C ( 91 (/k. &1 *UAA - Mi40* 4 1Â¥\De N 14 614 0 6 -0. -1 2 01 -4 0,93 - WITNESS LIST* %90 3Ua\91- AGENDA ITEM: 5 /4 E. HYMAd MAÂ®Al + HoRSE- M IdcA NAME OF WITNESS: 1. AMY A-"1 1 Dod Staff Person 2. J/Al Col__UMBO -~~ 3. 608 GeoRGG ~ 4. 24 <brARA-boy 5. SA/des- \4*-1 -Ddls en 6. 7. Unu, 0-itou-4- A.- 6 0~tavaÂ« 8. UL/712 9. hÂ«-r- 1.4 fjh<-,u- U Kbi J 10. L /At,u 99*'76Â£01.-f 11U AÂ·LÂ« PAg kt_o- 12. ~*4 ~Â« 13. 14. 15. 16. * Includes staff persons, but excludes staff attorney and board members. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directo~ THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director ' T FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 514 E. Hyman Avenue, Mason and Morse- Minor DATE: March 12, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to change materials on the exterior of the existing building. This building was built in 1980 and is within the Commercial Core Historic District. No new square footage will be added. APPLICANT: Mason and Morse, represented by Jim Columbo. LOCATION: 514 E. Hyman Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark.... Response: The proposal is to add sandstone details, wood corbels, a pediment, a tin :'ceiling," a new light fixture and sign, kickplates and a wood door, and to clad the existing metal windows with wood. It is a longstanding policy of HPC to discourage imitation or application of traditional Victorian architectural details on contemporary buildings, since this may misrepresent the development history and historic architecture of Aspen. The challenge for a designer working within a historic district is to create infill buildings which are compatible but not replicative of the historic resources. ~ EXHIBIT it _1- , The existing building does not repeat many of the patterns established in the surrounding historic structures, but in some ways fits more comfortably into the blockface than the more stylized building to the east. Staff does not support a Victorian approach to the design of the Mason and Morse building. There are certainlyother modifications that may be appropriate, for instance, the fabric awnings, which seem in some conflict with the architecture of the building could be replaced with a more solid element, and signage or lighting could be improved. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: In general, the surrounding buildings are compatible with, but not imitative of the Victorian commercial architecture. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: HPC does not support adding historic details to new buildings because it is thought to detract from the significance of the true historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic structures are directly impacted. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC deny the application as proposed finding that the development review standards are not met. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to deny the minor development application for 514 E. Hyman finding that the development review standards are not met." 0 0 . * MASON & MoRSE REAL ESTATE 925$23-3 March 3, 1997 Amy Amindon City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: Jim Colombo is authorized by myself, Robert A. George, president of Mason & Morse Real Estate Inc., to represent all Mason & Morse interests in reference to the historical preservation committee items as well as all planning and building department items for the City of Aspen. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Robert A. George~ President /seg EXHIBIT 1-3 12 514 EAST HYMAN AVENUE AspEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-7000 FACSIMILE: (970) 925-7027 COLOMBO INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 Historic Preservation Commission March 3, 1997 Amy Amidon -Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Mason & Morse Building Renovations Description of Proiect: The Mason & Morse building is located at 514 E. Hyman in the City of Aspen and is in the Commercial Core Zone District. The current structure was built in 1980 and replaced the Gargoyle Building. The Mason & Morse building is neighbored to the west by the Elks Building and to the east by 516 and 518 E. Hyman . The Ute City Banque building is across the street to the South at the corner of Galena and Hyman ave. The proposal is to complete a facade renovation to the builiding which would utilize materials and elements of historic use and character in the downtown Aspen area. The current structure is very urban in nature and style although it does utilize a common brick facade. It is our proposal to articulate this common brick facade with elements of sandstone, stone banding and wood and stone crown and corbels. The window elements are currently of metal storefront construction. We propose to wrap the metal elements with wood detailing to present a feature more similiar in nature to the important buildings of the area. We feel that our facade change will enhance the general appearance of the building as well as more closely conform to the characteristics and materials of the architecure and ambiance of the downtown area. The facade change proposal will creat an infilling of continuity along Hyman Ave in this area. It is our feeling that the entire streetscape will be improved. The front courtyard will become more pedestrian friendly and inviting and the building itself will become more interesting and appealing. Other structures in this Historic Overlay District will benefit from the infill continuity of the facade change. The proposal is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan of designated historic structures located on adjacent parcels. The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. EXHIBIT 1-1 13 S.FOUR!11St ~ MrO R!11 51. ~ 2 2.5 2 -f = . itr-tÂ·lk Y- 02 :002-: =- 4 4 - -----0.1 WA Â¥4~ 11 1 5:5 5 E p S.111!kD ST. Jill"R. SIR * frz22 -2 2 . 0. M 12Â»1Â· .7 ~ , W N s. stc, '10 ST m * 4. Sic IN!) ST / â‚¬ IN' m Stin e 0 5 1 % / 6 go 00 A it S. F ?SIS! 1% Â¥ H 'IRS' S. 1. 9 U Â¥ frA 32 1= m 28 bi~j S. GARMISCII ST u. N. OPMISCI SI. z k 1 /1'1 Nel 4 41& e I g M 2 - 1 2> r -- ~ SAsPINS, w 31 m \ u 4141,6 / '0-/ r- r- 1 31 1 7 S MOMARCH St N Mt-!IARCHSI. V * 9 , 1 4 il--41,J--L & -21 - . 1 1-- RID MOU1118111 It{) 1, 4 ..1 0, m 011 1 [ S Mill L .'ll. 1 1 BU + 2 4 1 12[ L mi /4 A~~SE 029Ts, -___e (Al IA St. 1 w.#4, 4* 0 ' 41 , -'M, 1 ~ 2 19 8 ~ utE AVE. S IluNIfist. 2/4 2 0 , ; 1 S SPRIN ST. * C fi. 1 ; 1 0- M Â· S. OR- MNAL El. gt 100.10 .Ill:"al W ..1 51. -ta liv 7Â¥l S. WEETIND L 5. Cll"FIANDU, i i / LMI'll e i 4 8 DI Â·flmnÂ· (Gr lim t Vt_, + 54 EN<* 3 /'ij VAND VF t . * ARDAMORE DR. ~ .. , e *M ~' **i M *Lii'ORE 9 - t g . :1 9 I , 9 ..... Ill ~n i d 4,4 60 NORTIMAY 0..11. 3-0 ,. -- 1 t i~@4 t t - . 1 ..1-1 11 0. O -<r ti . Â· :. CY*~.F ~ I Il cild#~PE:ji r'&12 a, 1% A t. .4 - 514 E. 1-1*IAN a AYMHell! 21Y1S 00Â¥30100 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. project name MA-903 f /402&13- 436126, 2. Project location 4 614 Â·*- 1--1 PIA-) L.01- h , 9(34 9 4 +8Â¥k) , w Lo 121%fli 3 (indicate street adldress, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning /70 4. Lot size 900 50 ,fr. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 144AnoÂ·~ Ht'r GE_ 4* St4-'E-. MYum..b 929 - FOOD 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 2--_ JUEr) lidgLNMh.rPfL.'i h.k. lEJ) 8. /,09!913(l 4 12â‚¬ --9*3 6 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD >C Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. HistoMc Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, qny previous approvals granted to the property) Â·lpÂ»-AL %150'r*'1~ 25Â¥0058 9. Description of development application FACA.f)15- (2-2,â„¢VAirlo o -rth E,emiloL. oF- Epet %1-1 n 4 9-rÂ¢-1 1 1-'rwe- 10. Have you completed and attached the following? K Attachment 1 - Land use application form $ Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Â» Response to Attachment 3 < Response to Attachment 4 llllllll 1/.. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ~ Application Package Contents Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Induded in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC 5. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC will base its decision 6. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process 7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items 0 listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. . - A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code.can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. 0 ATTACHMENT2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: MA-5 OM 4 MDAE- Address: 944 15 MYMMA Zone district: 6-0 Lot size: boo o â‚¬ek,91. Existing FAR: 4300 <64 ZET . Allowable FAR: 21*0 Sb> *11 Proposed FAR: 4600 96Â·*Fl-: Existing net leasable (commercial): . 2/4 Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: -ce te ew.,%Â£<f- Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: ~>'-2, Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: Accessorv blda: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: .U Proposed number of bedrooms: D- Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 On-site parking spaces required: 8- Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: , Front: _20 Front: 6 Front: 20 Rear: -er Rear: th Rear: 8- Combined , Combined = Combined t FronUrear: ZD Front/rear: 5 Front/rear: 20 Side: -6- Side: -5 Side: -e Side: -5 Side: -49, S ide: 0- Combined Combined Combined Sides: -0- Sides: 6 Sides: -5 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) 1>-7 ATTACHMENT3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information: 1. The applicanfs name, address, and telephone numberâ€ž contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur; consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages. judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the ownefs right to apply for the development review. 4. An 8 1/2" x11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. f U._49. Â· -1 J U i 4 Â· Ge: .64 : 4 ia 1 S UU v 1'1 4.1 1 . I uw Al. JUJU 4, U 1 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER Please find enclosed a commitment or commitments to issue Title Insurance. Please review the enclosed and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call us at the number listed below. TO: MASON & MORSE, INC. ATTENTION: BOB GEORGE DATE: February 25, 1997 OUR CASE NO.: PCT11564 SELLER: MASON & MORSE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION BUYER/BORROWER: ROFORMA LENDER: LEGAL: LOT N, BLK. 94, ASPEN COPIES TO: 1. .. 3. 4. SCHEDULE B'S DELIVERED TO: COMMENTS: THANKS BOB! 4 601 E. HOPKINS 970-925-1766 I 970-925-6527 FAX ASPEN, COLORADO 81611.1967 Feb,.2,5...199Â·7Â· "Â·,3:34?M PirKIN. COONTI LiTLE No, 5068 Pe 2/6 .. Commitment for Title Insurance Fidelity National litle Insurance Company A Stock Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE FIDELITY NATIONALTITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, herein calledthe Company, forvaluable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A. in favor oftheproposedinsured named in Schedule A, as owner ormortgagee of the estate orinterest covered herebyin the land described or referred to in Schedule A.upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to die provisions of 5chedu/es A and 8 and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in 5chedu/e A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary rothe ksuance ofsuch policy orpolicies oftitle insurance anda# liabilityand obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after che effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs. provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault ofthe Company. This Commitmentsha#not be validorbinding unti/countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. /N W/TNESS WHEREOF. the Company has causedthis Commitment to besignedandsealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as -Effective Date." Fidelity National TltleinsuranceCompany BY -02*flgf â‚¬ prevident 1~~__0,~ ATTEST Countersigned r ' 3.-2fV"-\ A- 1 ...01 (4"'8(-*2~*msu Secretary A~torispd Signature LP.J FORM 27Â·83Â·66 (9/96) Valid Only if Schedule A and B are Attached ALTA COMMITMENT Â· 1966 11,â€¢ cond,Uns elthl, - :requl,eth'"hep,emhtmaad,huse,b. paÂ¥08"1016,1..~.elthelie.me,*)~Themle'*80,~49) 'i""9*"Id undl ehed'li have h"n â€¢emINed m the "Nuln,a:,aL Feb. 25.Â·1997 3:34?M PiTKIN COUNTY TILLE NO. 5088 2. 3/6 FNT COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Effective Date: 02/03/97 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT11564 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ TED Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate:STANDARD PROFORMA (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: ~ Rate: Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE S~MPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in thi~ Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: MASON & MORSE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT N, BLOCK 94, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN ISSUING COMPANY: FIDEL~TY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT 080. 25. 1661 346ht (11610 uvuliI ilii.8 No. ouod r. 40 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQU~El TS The following are the requirement&~to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and dul~ 4iled for record to-wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE. f 8 0. 60.19601 3:JorM f i l A i & uvuil i 1 1. i i A.B AW. 0008 t. 0/0 . PNT SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS il'The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enchroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 66 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Deed of Trust from : MASON & MORSE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : ALPINE BANK, ASPEN Original Amount : $850,000.00 Dated : December 11, 1990 Recorded : December 13, 1990 in Book 635 at Page 943 Reception No. : 328758 This commitment is invalid unless Schedule E-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT11564 A and B are attached. 0 r . #e D. 60. 1381 3.Jorm 211*IN UjudiI ilibL NO. 0000 f. 0/6 .4. FNT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Ownerls Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT11564 A and B are attached. 0 0 0 1 . 1 I . '' \ . I. 2 4 ,/ ,1 F ,-1 ' 5 Ittll 4 ' t , \ 4.....%. /. . i \ / a ' + , . 11 .7 i . .21\ 3\\. , 1 â€¢ 1. t J ~ . 4-4*iÂ» \Â«2.7 Â«*. Â· 1 f , 1 .4 .--~ $4. . 1 . 7\ ' ..1 ... , 7 -/4 . I ... . d /1 2 ..4 , . - . A i' 1 .. 7,4 . - I , 0 . A A t . . , . 2- . I *, I i., . - - . I j . . 41 1 11111 It \ I - 1 0 4 - 1 :/4 lf 4,1 Â¢ Di/ .'0 03\- -9 ..' i i / , - 05 7/ 1 -2 j. \ // 1 ....+4 T , , 1 'ri .1 jill. I . , ' ' fl~ l'. (4 8 AL 4, 4 , 13? ,, I 0 . + i 1 - 4 'f' '' , . m' ,/ 1 1 I d 1 ./'' - f ''07 1- .1 t.' -Il \ ... . ' I. 4 \\ ' â‚¬ 11 , I'. r ...4 / Â·l / 1./ .... 0 - .. . 1 I , . I , j 'A , 1. j .t ' . . .-,* .,4. . I , * F? Â·61' 4.1 ~ ' 1 , ' 1 â€¢ V.... 6 6 11 , 1 t , , ,Â· 1 ..- 4 1 L . 1 . r ! j 1 1_.'- 1 i.14-1,14 9 , -411111 "", 1 . i i ,+ 111+ 1 1 ' I k I I pl - . %:CIm I '1 , . 1 A - ' 1, 1 . I 5333 ' , t â€¢ 10~ , 1_._i 4. . - L I 1 . 4. 4 1 b '44 . 1, 1 r,1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 . / M 189 . 3dA1 14 - .. 1 - 1 , 4 -1 - - -- t I - men 1 - 11Â· - 1 J GE= - . f '4 : f , 1 , , ' m . 1 4 1 1. 1 ' L /. EISHO MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ... ' t THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development P--4 V Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Direct FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer W RE: 514 E. Hyman Avenue, Mason and Morse- Minor DATE: March 19, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to change materials on the exterior of the existing building. This building was built in 1980 and is within the Commercial Core Historic District. No new square footage will be added. On March 12, HPC voted to continue discussion of this application. The applicant has submitted a revised drawing. APPLICANT: Mason and Morse, represented by Jim Columbo. LOCATION: 514 E. Hyman Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark .... Response: The proposal is to add sandstone trim and corbels, a pediment, a tin "ceiling," a new light fixture and sign, a . new door, a column, and to clad the existing metal windows with wood. Since the March 12 meeting, the applicant has submitted a revised design, and now proposes a smooth faced sandstone (limited split face stone will be used), a more stylized cornice, a different light fixture (not shown), and has added stone medallions inset into the brick facade. 0 Staff has had several discussions with the applicants, who feel that the approval of the two neo-Victorian structures to the east resulted in their building becoming an anomaly within the block, and who are in substantial disagreement with staffs position on the proposed project. Staff still finds that the architecture of the existing building does not easily allow it to be adapted to neo-Victorian or other more decorated styles. The suggestion has been made that abstract or contemporary details (for instance, wood or metal trellises or other projecting elements) could be used to soften the building if that is the goal of the project. Elements which support, rather than contrast with the existing building may able to add character to the facade and therefore strengthen its presence along that blockface. The design as proposed on March 19 is simplified from the original proposal, however staff believes that HPC would not find the eclectic nature of the design to be in compliance with the design standards, or compatible with the surrounding historic district, if this proposal were brought forward as a new structure to be built within the Commercial Core. As a middle ground, staff would recommend that elements which are not in significant conflict with the existing building, such as the awnings, smooth faced sandstone trim and medallions, relocation of the door, and a 0 new light fixture may be approved. The painted drywall soffits which currently exist may be replaced. with a higher quality material, although pressed tin may not be in keeping with the rest of the proposal if it is simplified further. Staff recommends that the sandstone pediment and frieze, and stone corbels be eliminated, because creating a centered element on the south facade works against the design characteristics of the existing building. The proposed column also is in conflict with the existing cantilevered area over the doorway. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The building is somewhat unique within the Commercial Core Historic District. Some other contemporary architecture, as well as neo-Victorian commercial architecture has been infilled around the historic structures. The modifications proposed by staff are intended to be consistent with the existing structure and the neighborhood. 0 . 0 Response: The development will not impact the historic significance of any surrounding historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic structures are directly impacted. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) 0 â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the following elements of the application: the awnings, smooth faced sandstone trim and medallions, relocation of the door, and a new light fixture. The painted drywall soffits which currently exist may be replaced with a higher quality material. Staff recommends that the sandstone pediment and frieze, and stone corbels be eliminated, because creating a centered element on the south facade works against the design characteristics of the existing building, as does the proposed column, and are in conflict with review standards 1 and 2. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to approve the awnings, smooth faced sandstone trim and medallions, relocation of the door, and a new light fixture proposed for 514 E. Hyman Avenue. The painted drywall soffits which currently exist may be replaced with a higher quality material. The sandstone pediment and frieze, and stone corbels are to be eliminated, because creating a centered element on the south facade works against the design characteristics of the existing building, as does the proposed column, and are in conflict with review standards 1 and 2." 0 COLOMAO INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 vl/ TEL. 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 ; ~7 /, + 4 1,1 A+IT- LE?kICâ‚¬14 - 40 640 B.- FA rt NA w lay; -::-- ~_I:.:..t. 0 1 PROFE>5* 57 1-1 44-kf- G FlakIT' MAÂ®N 4 Molte@- el,111Â»1 ki a- 0 44Ykt 9 COLOMBO INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 1 I m. ..9 34 .1 . 06: 41. 1.~ . r; 41 n 0%:/1 4. A. h.U ~Ef'~~ ' ' h.,n, 1 1 .1,1 ..' 7.. *ft ~ .. .r- f 1 b;REF FA'[1KIA COLOT<thl@ ANg 1 .Â·'Â· *. 1%-2 7 ... iÂ·rbk.. Â· '4L 4.1 14.r.:.=:t, i. 7.14'- Aa. ,â€¢b.,7 ' & 84 . 6 -:f...142 Â¥2255< 9340 â‚¬. Â· -Â·'-4.:FAil} Â·:px::V ,/ I /#$'. '1%1:41 *1 1 . 1 ..9 4/ r.'RE Ft**% ' ef -4â‚¬0'~Sf, â‚¬ fl-lit.1 1 Â·1 24:..': 4:*EkS'Â£ 4 ...uy.13> '92, 4 130 2,..3.~*-- tt, 4: ..i ,41*li. te.:"r Â· Â· 1.1 4.....1 :...0 - ti#â‚¬' ~Ply:Â· i .. .S.Vf ,; t.t . 0 Â·MM 'the.:tri MA6ON 4 Â»101&66 BUILPINLGr NiÂ· bÂ·A- 1D Â·it .:46 " .. DO .... :# LId < 2% CA LU 302 . ... SET TYPE SET NO - - . 1 ./ ./ , L. -*KitÂ» . N Ji.0 81,4 Â»te t' 3 j 341.1-- 4,/5:.11#Â»6 23/ Â»lf~;6 64-'ll - 4 - lit ' ":lt/:/7, e =h..277-,L 4- 5 -,ciz< C>--3*L ~1'1~--44#*2-fwj 1 -PS-_ \ i . r=g=:,1 & l-1 1 ---1 ' 7, 3 ~' - 31 --111- $/ -*:.5,;LN-22.ir- - -J - -1 --4 \\ =4- 4 /1 ' -Ii Ilti.reLy I F-2:- - -' rty -- , 1.1 u " ;/LiarÂ·- . 4 -- 1 illil ~7 / '' 544~5< ~1 ' I ' i Ita 12 1 Â« 1, /\ %! ~It .J L 1 4 L__ill-4- et 1 lilli 11 11 111 11 1!111119 : L ..U--ii I . ' lillil 4 1 1 18-1-1-, . 1 1 1 1TT'n,J 11 1 ,1 1 1 --t - 1,-1 \ 1\ . 4 - 1. I 1 2-4.i) - - ..=-3 1 <EE#46"LA,&.__ - 1 -- . 14 --- - I 1. 1=12 .-/ 1- 6 I! ----- -...=L......+ i. 111 -'6 ....:,5535*51> ; , , 1 --I.-I - - 4 -~1 1 1 0 -tjzz.9-11 1 -- =S=. V 1 03â‚¬fffÂ«- \ -- 4 --i r-Â· - +. - 1 F=.#.=.;=45-jii - 1 - 1 r , 74 i /,244#1214 -i 51-...-5 1 !:, d ~11 /2. -% ' t. --71 -r I-.I - 1 9.212Â».21 + / ,- 1 Â» 1 - -===n V. ----------- â€¢ ....rr i " 11 -66.6 r 1 :FA~ ~*.,x==- - -& 1-JÂ·*17"eL .--rask-13:~ ,. \0 = -4. y 1.- M -E.-11 3-r r -~MIJP~-=~- ~--6*JL ~ r , - le 4 5-4 1- Â¥j'I i ... 1:74 1 11 1 0 '1 -1 .1 -- 1 1. 1, 'lili -=Ir r . Â·1 1 11 1 b .- 1-32:-- u,4 \4 A-- 1, ./ 1 m 4 11 4 2. ~~ 4 i /1 . 3 1 \C 9 It' .. f + I '-. ' t L .. 11 - ' . . 8 -- El. 4 . - 1 - 4 \ 4 -7 -Â«.72â‚¬21-4- -h - / 1 1 e "1- r- ------ 11 ISSUE DATE -v e.,4 1 1 --/............ 1Â·~::m~arvi, Â· lin~ 1 1 4 - Efu r "i . To .---- . ' 4-1 , 6 / i Ek=Â· 39432 - , 1 . 1 . 1 -- .*1 " '' .. .:\ , 1 . ,-4./ I . I ' . 1 I . -7- i-.e~ M .A .,1-3 1 .-K ./ . I SHEET TITLE . *ANÂ®1. ... DATE DRAWN BY 6 REVImON RECORD - , NO. CHANGE DATE BÂ¥ 44.4 . COMMENTS SHEET NG . r ,. /, 1 . ..... ... aswow e