The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19971008 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION October 8, 1997 REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll call II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS IV. NEW BUSINESS A. 400 E. Main - Minor Development d /2 7 - e 5:15 B. 114 Neale - (17 Queen) - Lot Split - Public Hearing - Conceptual 1 Conceptual to be tabled to Oct. 22, 1997 . lil kle,t-- P- / 1-7 k. bEr 5:50 C. Aspen Meadows TÂ©nnis Townhomes - Amendment to Final A 1- B A . 6,1-5 1 6:30 D. 234 W. Francis - Minor Development l/- 3 -7/45 2 9 X 7:10 E. 334 W. Hallam - Conceptual - Public Hearing 8:00 F. Aley worksession 8:30 V. ADJOURN OJECT MONITORING Roger Moyer 303 E. Main (permit to be issued soon) 420 E. Main (not active) ISIS 939 E. Cooper 426 E. Hyman- Curious George (under permit) Susan Dodington 616 W. Main (complete) 316 E. Hopkins - Howling Wolf (complete) 712 W. Francis (stalled) 918 E. Cooper (under permit) 132 W. Main Asia (door and windows, skylights) Meadows 525 W. Hallam Melanie Roschko 918 E. Cooper (temporarily covered by Susan and Mary) ISIS 123 W. Francis (covered by Suzannah and Mark) 706 W. Main (not active) 210 S. Galena - Elk's building Suzannah Reid 320 Lake Ave. (active?) 303 E. Main (permit to be issued soon) 702 W. Main (approval expired) 315 E. Hyman Benjamin's (trellis not completed) 411 E. Main - Cantina 218 N. Monarch - Half house Mark Onorofski 426 E. Hyman (under permit) 123 W. Francis (under permit) 517 E. Hopkins (project abandoned?) 1008 E. Hopkins Mary Hirsch Meadows (permit to be issued soon) 918 E. Cooper (under permit) - lbert Sanchez 420 E. Main Galena Plaza (not active) 820 E. Cooper (not active) 411 E. Main - Cantina 514 E. Hyman - Mason Morse bldg. 1008 E. Hopkins /~rey Halferty 939 E. Cooper 325 E. Main - Baang Cafe 715 W. Main (roof material) 132 W. MainfAsia) Â£~2~-9 LlÂ° Y> LE -9 -- L -1 - Heidi Friedland 130 S. Galena CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 939 E. Cooper (Langley), expires November 9, 1997 - Unit E 520 Walnut (Greenwood), expires March 22, 1998 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1998 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24, 1998 0 la 1IA. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 400 E. Main Street- minor DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to add an exterior door to create an airlock entry vestibule in a non-historic building within the Main Street Historic District. APPLICANT: Lewis Schainuck, represented by Kim Raymond. LOCATION: 400 E. Main Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 0 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The building is on the southeast corner of Main Street and Mill Street. The retail spaces on the first floor share an entry corridor which is open to the weather. They wish to install a door to make an airlock entry. The door should match those used on the rest of the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The change will not affect the character of the neighborhood. 0 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract 0 from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not detract from the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal does not affect the architectural character of integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific 0 recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development proposal with the condition that the door match those used on the rest of the building. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to approve the minor development proposal with the condition that the door match those used on the rest of the building." 0 1-24,91 0- f 81*| L.. *MEL-vff,2.41.6. Aleu 'broME FpeNT'~ goop ,1 U J R ti,1 li r , fÂ»'044 k , 4 -t~3 54- i , D...$/1 'VION j L) Aft.A 9 19.-fiNG, gle,/ASP 9*4 0. 1. 3 0- petÂ«I L "bfke- I 2 faFFLAL Fl/Cop fLAN ' 4622 8, r/Al H /4- 1/ 11 Affâ‚¬:4 60 Horia : bled, ALÂ»6/ 'Â«lofÂ·% Ff-0 Nt-t~ POOF- 0 TO f'F-012:61~ dc)MIMIC>I'Â·4 4Â·fkoe FrOA i.-1 EA-$10 1'. 7 - 2.e . ~1 -Ir- - , 1. it 1 ill ill 4-UÂ¢-U.U.U f - 46\1 69,4-6 900'L 12/ Fl)(00 1/ WIN tyou Athove. -il C 101-EVA.t F il I 1 0.6.1080â‚¬. 1 I - -- - rf . 1 'ff " i J - 1 , HANDEAF f"a.*1f7 i/.' PHN Lib| 41~ ApÂ»L U 96'r glevA rto 14 1/411 too 0. rÂ«1Â·Nt 2<11*1+ ,/1*Fu, N B, MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 114 Neale Street, Historic Landmark Lot Split DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant has received HPC approval for a historic landmark lot split. and wishes to revise the approval. The property is 21,161 sq.ft. It was approved to be divided into one parcel of 6,000 sq. ft. which would contain the historic house and one parcel of 15, 161 sq. ft. on which a new house will be built in the future. Per Ordinance #41, Series of 1996, which extended the historic landmark lot split provision to the R15A zone district (including 114 Neale Street) the FAR which would have been allowed for a duplex on the original parcel may be divided between the historic building and new house. The approval had provided 1,200 square feet for the historic house and 4,089 square feet for the new house. The applicant now wishes to make the northern parcel, which contains the historic house, 0 larger. Its size will be approximately 7,000 square feet with an allowed FAR of 2,145 square feet. The southern parcel will be approximately 14,160 square feet with an allowed FAR of approximately 3,644 square feet. This request includes a 500 square foot FAR bonus previously granted to the property. The applicant is still developing plans for a remodel of the existing house. Input from HPC will be sought at this meeting. Plans have not been developed at this time for a new residence on the southern site. In the future it will be brought to HPC as a significant development review. APPLICANT: Joel Ehrenkrantz, represented by Jake Vickery. LOCATION: 17 Queen Street. ZONING: R15-A REVIEW STANDARDS: The Historic Landmark Lot Split shall meet the requirements of Section 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5), Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), and Section 26.72.010(G). 0 Section 26.88.030(A)(2). Subdivision Exemptions. Lot Split. The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met. a. The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the city council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Response: The lot has not been subdivided previously. b. No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.040(A)(1)(c). Response: Two lots are created, both of which conform to the requirements of the R- 15A zone district. An Accessory Dwelling Unit or cash-in-lieu payment will be required for the new residence. c. The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions. of this chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)(a); and Response: No previous lot split exemption was granted. d. A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. Response: The filing of said subdivision plat shall be a condition of this approval. e. Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Response: The filing of said subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be a condition of this approval. f. In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. Response: No dwelling units will be demolished. 0 g. Maximum potential buildout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family horne. Response: The applicant represents that a total of two units will be created. Section 26.88.030(A)(5). Historic Landmark Lot Split. The following standards must be met: a. The original parcel shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet in size and be located in the R-6 zone district or a minimum of 13,000 square feet and be located in the R-15A zone district. Response: The parcel is larger than 13,000 square feet and is located in the R-15A zone district. b. The total FAR for both residences shall not exceed the floor area allowed for a duplex on the original parcel. The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the Subdivision Exemption Plat. Response: The duplex FAR. which would have been allowed for the fathering parcel, 0 which in this case is 5,289 square feet plus a possible FAR bonus from HPC, will be divided between the new parcels. The applicant represents that 2,145 sq.ft. will be allocated to the 7,000 square foot lot containing the historic landmark, including the FAR bonus of 500 square feet. The new lot will contain a single family residence which may be up to 3,644 square feet. c. The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. HPC variances and bonuses are only permitted on the parcel that contains a historic structure. Response: The historic house has already received a setback variance and parking space variance. An FAR bonus has been requested. Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), GMQS Exemption by the Community Development Director, Historic Landmark Lot Split. The construction of a new single-family dwelling on a lot created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be exempted from residential Growth Management allocations and shall not be deducted from the pool of annual development allotments or from the metro 0 area development ceilings. Response: An exemption by the Community Development Director will be processed following approval of this application. Section 26.72.010(G), Historic Landmark Lot Split. The development of all lots created pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be reviewed by HPC at a public hearing. Response: This meeting is a noticed public hearing. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve the application with conditions. Recommended motion: "I move to table the Conceptual review for 114 Neale Street to October 22, 1997. I move to approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 17 Queen Street with the following conditions: 1. The property shall be subdivided into one parcel of 7,000 square feet with an assigned FAR of 2,145 square feet, and a second parcel of 14,160 square feet, with a maximum FAR of 3,644 square feet. 2. A subdivision plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(d), must be filed. 3. A subdivision exemption agreement and plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e) shall be filed." .. ... ic fi .- .. V . I -- NEALE ST 1- -1 . 0 - . KING &8' , . // //1 Â¢ E, c 44 - i ' I , 1 \ S -- t.L--1 D . 1 ..\ t i '4 1 , \ i i " 4 --1.. .- , 1 . ; , 1.N .06 " --\ 1,1 - _31_-f /0 -Â·Â· + 9" ~ ,-AO ~ ~ 0, 14410 4/, \ .Fi 'ple'.f.: +41 14 5 i - 1 0 mt\17 1 3 ., c##t -- - A'' . . 1 .r , /3 0 1 4. IANg, '6Â¥ 111.74&* D 3 .i, *4*f,5,# (1-<. *. to / 3 15,128 81 011 f/ -'. 1.11 1.0 11 // \ 64Â¢ 110 ,. 0 E 1 Â» / U 1,\ 6/0,/ ,. .. I N 31 74=7*i.0 e 0 3.\ ~NE AFIEA Â¢y Gee %64%,3- 0 . 11$44 *60$ ,*M, tt' JEEN ~ 4 -/ 19&/MA. 7 *0 * -ANV-T. 170 61-n# Ar* 19 PME Â« n, ~ eli 161 - 940 = .2.,piti. Â£) 63 C TRETTIN PROPERTY , PROPOSED HISTORIC LOT SPLIT - 1-3 M ASPEN, COLORADO CONCEMUAL SITE PLAN - 0 7-19-98 00 JAKE VICKERÂ¥ ARCHTIECTS 0 . 100 SOUTH SPRING STREET 03 9.5-ka I =.4, ' ASPEN, CO 81811 070 925-3680 .. 4 *4/ 7 'e.Â¥ 86-26-97 TRETTIN RODENBUSH ID=131839951 8 P.82 JAN 07 04:21PM ARCH]555-3 T . t 4 -0 = 0 1 v. In t â€¢ .c~~ET. i "E" 0 i 3,1 K j, NR9. â€¢'f-Â°* li r . 3/.- , rgix, 4 .47~ 0 1,6 , 0 \\(42*32222.,$~ -h \2 -4. 2-j -7- 1/ -wk -22:236?L E<*#m i~*A,i 43 9 42 44*41 IN i 22 0. 41)_. . 40> i \ 4\34>L:.: . 24085 1 \ 0./00 zltbo, 54.41' i\ *0 N 65â€¢ r..C# % A -0 %, 10 \ 4 1 - -3... \4 \\ -4, P i \ i \ -- 1 4 0 9 \ - \ 4 1 /1 , 1 i-7_ _. d 1' 1 r--a-7-6 4.# 1 % ..... 4/ f I 605* f r ~ i 4.+ flAN#tfor / 2 Â·51 10.1 \ , \3 1 PA' , >re)00:%3 + / 16 \\*10 2/ / /'*141- L.-. --1 h I / .C L.L. il \ ) 0,= 70".1--17 /1 C 1Â·'1\ 1 J h \\ =27. / . . / 1 / 1 6/- )07$.B< 777 t g \\ I - . " 7 . I ..1 \\ L U - - -2 h % en. 1/ \ \\ \ \01 i .Â¢ 1- ~ --- g - 156'2948.1 72.95' \ \h . \11 --f' 1 u-) l / 4 \ e ty ' \ / 01 , 6 ..,0. 11 0 0-1000 \\\ \ i fc 1\ \I f ly!*b ; l\.\\ .\ 1 2 / 0 - >-e a \ .0902 \9\ \ 0 32 - , A f i \\ 1 , -I . 1% \\ - I-* 1 + \ \\ f T \ \ \ 0 ~ - \\ \ N \ 1 \40 1 1 I \ 11 1 A. hl ~ IRE, .,2..-- -r' -- S 1 1-J<20 -*.0:4.4--*/4 \ 1 .. e mi . I. County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION 0 State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060 (E) 34% a \LOKEEY , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (ID of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the~ day of ~Ef>T, 199~which is *) days prior to the public hearing date of /99 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the '2% day of Â¢6677- , 1992 (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. C Sign*re (Attach photograph here) . 1 ~kn~*EM?~i~is â‚¬ 714 day L.juu '19gi~by- 1 IIAKE \/1 CA<Mf WHNESS MY HAND AND OFFICTAL SEAL My commission expires: 4l-'7199- JABRE L.or}4#4 Notaly fublj# 1 LjQ~ Arfiu Â»>*iÂ· 1 -*-20/AAA No~y Public's Sign~AB' , 9 8 N ,ACKJa j ~ U ~ 1 ~1-THIAN *;j~ EXHIBIT 1 4. 1 - -â€¢â€¢" 0 - 1 /0-9-47 .q*42::907 m _~EL~ RAQ, Aer -Re 1 et PUBLIC NOTICE RE: JOEL EHRENKRANZ~ HI'C CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN t~at a public hearing will be held on Qeber,8,1227, ata meeting to begin at 5201pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the Sister Cities meeting room, basement ofCity Hallâ€ž130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Coloddo, to consider an application submitted by Joel EhrenkrAz requesung HP( Conc hal a eroval and arevisionto their historic landmark lot split approval.'The proposal is to subdivide the existing property into one lot ofapp?62816idifY;000 square feet with an aljowed loRarea of 2,145- Ille feet, md a lot of approximately 14,160*luare feet with an allowedjkor arg-of 3,@iÂ¥me-!Ret. This request includes d 500 squarifoot area bonusprevioUy grant41 to the property. The applicant also proposes to construct a garage ofapproximately 300 square feet onthe north side ofthe existing. square house, including a variance request Qf 9 feet on the rear yard setback.jkg*lition-of Epfxiniately6300-squarefeet-0-2929EONMeÂ®*kpfuie-house,quinng a5footrear yant.3#El@*-EiFce. The property is-located at 114 Neale Street. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at thEKspen/ Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, CO. (970) 920-5096. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 20, 1997. City ofAspen Account 17 Queen - 1wners L 24-Dec-96 Parcel Number Schedule Number Owner Name 1 Owner Name 2 Address City State Zip 2737-182-01-005 015609 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC YUSEM JEFF C/O 215 S MONARCH ST STE 101 ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-01-004 015608 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC YUSEM JEFF C/O 215 S MONARCH ST STE 101 ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-073-00-037 004116 734 ASSOCIATES A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERS 121 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-02-001 000032 ARMSTRONG, AMBER TRUST 4403 KAHALA AVE HONOLULU, HI 96816- 2737-182-05-016 010523 BARNES JONATHAN A 265 RIVERSIDE DR BASALT CO 81621- 2737-182-01-007 015611 BELLIS ARTHUR P 455 ADDISON PARK LN IBOCA RATON FL 33432- 2737-182-01-003 015607 BELLIS ARTHUR P 455 ADDISON PARK LN , BOCA RATON FL 33432- 2737-182-05-001 010508 BLAINE, BARBARA J. 417 WINCHESTER ,GLENDALE CA 91201- 2737-182-01-006 015610 BLATT ROBERT 10925 REED HARTMAN HWY STE 2 CINCINNATI OH 45242- 2737-182-01-010 015614 BLATT ROBERT 10925 REED PARK HWY STE 200 CINCINNATI OH 45242- 2737-182-03-018 008092 BRODIN, MAURICE T. BRODIN, PAULA I. PO BOX 3795 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-074-53-004 014804 C L ASTOR & CO A PARTNERSHIP 981 KING ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-05-008 010515 CAMPBELL, JOHN E. PO BOX 10591 'ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-05-009 010516 CHASE SARAH K . 900 E HOPKINS AVE #9 ,ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-01-851 014788 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-05-004 010511 CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES I OHIO CORPORATION PO BOX 51 'AKRON OH 44309- 2737-073-79-002 014807 CRAIG, GAIL -1/2 INT. STANGER, ROBERT A. -1/2 INT. 851 GIBSON AVE UNIT B ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-074-53-001 014801 CURTIS JAMES L CURTIS & ASSOCIATES -C/O 300 E HYMAN AVE 2ND FL ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-074-00-025 004293 DE CRAY MARCELLA TRUSTEE OF THE MARCELLA DE CR 30 COMMONWEALTH AVE iSAN FRANCISCO CA 94118- |2737-182-02-007 000387 DIAMOND, PHILIP E. , 350 STEUART STREET 6TH FLOOR'SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105- 2737-182-03-022 008095 GOLDMAN, JEROME K. 1803 CALIFORNIA AVE SANTA MONICA CA 90403- 2737-182-03-017 008087 HALL, CHARLES E. PO BOX 10122 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-074-14-002 009099 HATANAKA HOWARD H 980 KING ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-073-00-860 014758 HERRON PARK CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-01-009 015613 HESSION RICHARD HESSION JOCELYN 1000 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-074-00-023 005384 ISAAC THOMAS D REVOCABLE TRUS 975 KING ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-02-012 000733 JENSEN JUDY A TRUST PO BOX 1081 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-05-014 010521 JOHNSON, CARROLL Ill TENNESSEE TRAVEL - C/O BOX 8116 105 PUBLIC SQUARE GALLATIN TN 37066- 2737-182-02-003 001173 JOHNSON, SALLYANNE C. PO BOX 5050 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-074-00-022 004268 KAPPELI ERNST PO BOX 1962 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-074-53-851 014805 KING STREET DEDICATION CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST 'ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-074-14-001 009098 LANG DONALD WILLIAM KASABACH JACQUELYN A PO BOX 4166 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-074-53-002 014802 LAWRENCE LARRY LAWRENCE MARA 6309 HARTLEY DR ILA JOLLA CA 92037- 12737-074-00-021 004259 LEWIS THOMAS E 7 BARRACUDA LN KEY LARGO FL 33037- 2737-182-03-004 005534 UNDNER, JULIA A. PO BOX 2191 IASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-05-003 010510 LOESCHEN, LEE A. LOESCHEN, LINDA A. 0602 W SOPRIS CREEK BASALT CO 81621- 2737-074-90-001 010646 LOEWENSTERN CAROL 251 S GARFIELD #A DENVER CO 80209- 2737-182-02-009 000291 LOO, MONA BETH 3939 VILLA COSTERA MALIBU CA 90265- 2737-074-00-019 004308 MAPLE CHARLES A MAPLE BRYCE M 927 GIBSON AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-073-49-001 008721 MARSHALL ANN PO BOX 10894 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-02-008 000536 MARTEN, MARY M. PO BOX 8984 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-03-021 008090 MASINI, ERMANNO TRUST MASINI, ALDA TRUST 830 E HOPKINS #201 ASPEN CO 81611- +1 Parcel Number S -ule Number Owner Name 1 Owner Name 2 Address City State Zi- 2737-182-05-00 MEGA, VIVIAN BAUTSCH, MARY 4771 S XENIA ST DENVER CO 80 2737-074-00-00 2 MICKEY JAMES MICKEY MARLENE 931 GIBSON AVE ASPEN CO 81 2737-073-50-851 014327 NEWBURY PARK CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-05-005 010512 NEWELL GEORGE S PO BOX 2179 IBOULDER CO 80306- 2737-182-03-020 008089 NIXON THOMAS J 11766 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1610 LOS ANGELES CA 90025- 2737-182-02-004 001002 NORTON, MELINDA S. 3740 CENTER WAY 'FAIRFAX VA 22033- 2737-182-05-011 010518 NUDELL KAREN 3870 AVENIDA DEL SOL STUDIO CITY CA 91604- 2737-182-03-016 008093 0 CONNELL, SARA G. 151 CRANDON BLVD #137 KEY BISCAYNE FL 33149- 2737-073-53-001 009191 OWEN KENNETH AND JANE TRUST PO BOX 88 CHAPMAN RANCH TX 78347- 2737-182-05-006 010513 OXFORD, PEGGY MCCAFFERTY PO BOX 4556 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-02-013 001313 P. L. AND A., INC. A NEBRASKA CORPORATION 9727 SPRING STREET OMAHA NE 68124 2737-182-05-015 010522 PAUL, CAROLYN A. TRUSTEE OF TRUST A, PAUL TRUST 2415 MORENA BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92110- 2737-074-00-024 004238 PEPPER TOM INTERNATIONAL S A PANAMANIAN C 977 QUEEN ST ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-On-00-033 004377 PETERSON ANNE BYARD ANNE PETERSON RICHARDS BYARD 35 LOCUST MILL VALLEY CA 94941- 2737-182-05-013 010520 RESTAINO, THOMAS AND BECKER, JANICE 72 ALDER AVE SAN ANSELMO CA 94960- 2737-182-01-008 015612 RISSANEN JOUKO J 2660 PEACHTREE RD NW #24-E ATLANTA GA 30305- 2737-On-00-047 004237 RIVER HOUSE LLC COLORADO LTD LIABILITY COMPAN 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-02-006 000821 ROTH JOSEPH R 1564 NE QUAYSIDE TER MIAMI FL 33138- 2737-182-02-011 001194 SHAFFRAN, STANLEY R. SHAFFRAN, KANDI LYN 0164 LUPINE DR ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-05-007 010514 SHAW, BARBARA ANNE 11138 AQUA VISTA ST #22 NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 91602-3119 2737-073-53-002 009192 SHOAF JEFFREY S PO BOX 3123 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-182-Solo 010517 SKIKOL, OHIO GEN. PARTNERSHIP SMITH, E.G.-C/O 900 E HOPKINS AVE #10 ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-02-010 000607 STEELE, JULIANNE B. 5000 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD DES MOINES IA 50312- 2737-182-01-002 004843 STUART DEVELOPMENT OF ASPEN L WRIGHT GARY A C/O 201 N MILL ST STE 106 ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-074-00-020 004124 SUNNYBROOK COLORADO INC EDWARDS JOSEPH E 111 502 MAIN ST STE 201 CARBONDALE CO 81623- 2737-182-02-005 000295 TAYLOR JIM PO BOX 10205 iASPEN CO 81612- 2737-073-00-038 004489 TRETTIN HENRY TRETTIN LANA 1299 OCEAN AVE C/O GOODFRIEN SANTA MONICA CA 90401- 2737-073-52-853 014174 TRUEMAN LOT 3 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. GALENA ST. ASPEN, CO 81611- 2737-on-49-002 008720 VARE EDWIN C VARE DARLENE DE SEDLE 22 WILDROSE AVE GUILFORD CT 06437- 2737-182-05-012 010519 VICENZI, GEORGE A. PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612- 2737-073-00-039 005537 WEISMAND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE WEISMAN ENTERPRISES C/O 2626 W LAKE AVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55416- 2737-073-79-001 014806 WHIPPLE RALPH U WHIPPLE LYNNE C AS JT TENANTS 855 GIBSON AVE ASPEN CO 81611- 2737-182-03-019 008094 WILSON, DAVID S. ROUTE 5 BOX 305 MONETA VA 24121- 2737-182-02-002 000570 WOLFSON, ROBERT L. JR. TRUST UNDER WILL 2345 GRAND BLVD KANSAS CITY MO 64108-2684 2737-182-03-015 008088 WOODS GEORGE B TRUST WOODS GEORGE B AS TRUSTEE PO BOX 1046 ASPEN CO 81612-1046 2737-182-03-023 008091 WOODS, ELIZABETH A. TRUST WOODS, ELIZABETH A. AS TRUSTEE 2234 GULFSHORE BLVD N APT I-1 NAPLES FL 33940- lic 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Tennis Townhomes- Amendment to Final DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: The Aspen Meadows SPA, including construction of seven new townhouse units, known as the Tennis Townhomes was approved by City Council in 1990. Because portions of the Meadows campus are included on the historic inventory, HPC was asked to review the design of the townhomes. The approved drawings, by David Finholm, along with minutes from that review are attached. This project has never been constructed and in 1996, a new owner brought forward a revised plan to build six units instead of seven and to alter the architecture of the new units. The Tennis Townhomes were originally drawn from the architecture of the historic Trustee Townhomes. The revised proposal was more reminiscent of the lodge buildings, and was approved by HPC with the e condition that more overhanging elements and a landscape plan be provided (see attached minutes.) At this time another owner has brought forward a finalized design which is somewhat different from the 1996 approval in terms of design and materials. Staff recommends final approval of the proposed design with conditions. This project retains vested rights from 1991 and is therefore not subject to Ordinance #30. APPLICANT: David Gitlitz and Sam Kom, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects. LOCATION: Aspen Meadows, across from the tennis courts. ZONING: RMF-SPA Significant Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 0 1 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The new buildings will be an important and significant new element of the Meadows Campus. They are adjacent to the restaurant building, which is historic and are part of the entry into the area. Their visibility from the street will be somewhat limited due to the dropping grade and earthbermed garages which will be closer to the street. Staff finds that the architecture is compatible with the Bauhaus style of the other buildings. A more detailed landscape plan is still in development and will need HPC approval. The landscaping must be consistent with the Bayer plan, since Bayer's landscape design is considered important to the historic significance of the Meadows. Material samples will be provided at the HPC meeting. In general the materials used on the rest of the campus are modest and this building should maintain that condition. One concern with the design is the amount of glazing on the west facade. This was brought out as an issue with the Trustee Townhomes as well. Although the amount of glazing is similar to what was approved originally, the original design had more overhanging elements and solid walls on decks than this design does. The architect must address this issue at HPC. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The design is reminiscent ofthe historic lodge buildings on the campus. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development is distinctly new (does not replicate the old buildings) and does not detract from the historic significance of the original buildings. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 2 Â© Response: The proposed development does not directly impact any ofthe historic structures. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC grant final approval for the Tennis Townhomes after finding that the proposed materials are compatible with the campus, that the design of the windows on the west facade will not cause an unacceptable amount of light spillage when viewed from a distance, and after finding that the proposed landscape plan is consistent with the Meadows campus. 0 0 3 Septernber 29.1997 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Minor Amendment to SPA Final Approval Aspen Meadows Tennis Townhomes Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy: The Tennis Townhomes were originally proposed as seven (7) contiguous units that were offset on each other from Southeast to northwest to follow the natural topography of the site. This configuration allowed for reasonably good utilization of solar orientation and views but appeared rather monolithic in its massing. The current amended proposal is similar to the one approved by HPC on April 24,1996 in that it is now six (6) units that are linked at the lower (below grade) level, but divided into pairs with ten (10) foot entry corridors between. This breaks up the mass of the complex visually and allows for views to Maroon Creek from Meadows Road. It also provides the opportunity for greater utilization of solar and view orientation. The original SPA approval for 17,500 SF of FAR for seven (7) units will be divided by the proposed six (6) units for an average of 2,916 SF. This was noted and approved in the April 24, 1996 review by HPC. The current proposal is similar in size, massing, materials and character to the previously approved concept. The units will have side entries as before and all of the interior spaces are in the same relationship to each other. The principal materials will still be cut stone or precast stone panels around the entry element, stucco (EIFS) panels for the majority of the siding and as much glass (insulating panes in clad wood sash) as is compatible with the Energy Code, for light and views. From the feedback received at our work session with HPC on September 24,1997, we are proposing that the flat roof and entry porch facades be clad with a patinaed copper material which will also be utilized for all exposed flashing. We will present a palette of all proposed materials, textures and colors at the formal review. The detailing will be compatible with and reminiscent of the Herbert Bayer designed buildings in the neighborhood. The parking lot will be the same configuration as previously approved, with sod covered roofs and earth berms to the east which will completely hide the cars from view of pedestrian and vehicular traffic along Meadows Road. These berms and sod covered roofs will be heavily landscaped, as will the areas around the access walkways, entry corridors and patios throughout the project. From the east, the units will appear as one-story buildings since the site ~ is being excavated to below street level so the parking structures are mostly below the existing grade. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 970/925-5590 FAX 970/925-5076 We believe the proposed SPA amendment is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the original approval and conforms to all of the representations made during conceptual review as well as all conditions of subsequent reviews and work sessions. It will be a compatible and aesthetically pleasing addition to the Aspen Meadows complex and respectful of the Herbert Bayer legacy. r 1 A 1 -0 LVL Jar~er Derrington AIA ~ P~ect Architect ~ 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24, 1996 <~~ TENNIS TOWNHOMES, ASPEN MEADOWS Amy stated as part of the SPA area for the campus HPC was given some element of design review over aspects of the project. The trustee townhomes as well as the tennis townhomes were reviewed. There is a potential developer who would like to purchase the property and build townhomes and they have a slightly different design. Stan Mathis, architect for proj ect stated that the original proposal had seven townhouse units and the proposal represents the elimination of one of those units. The setback has not change but ten feet will be placed between the three duplex units so we have a less massive program. The square footage of the unit that was eliminated is then divided into each of the six units so that we maintain the same allowable FAR that was specified in the SPA. The units have been shortened by 18 feet and they have been pulled back from where they were originally located. The underground parking still remains. The difference in the proposals is that the entrance will be on the side ofthe units. The original proposal had the doors facing the driveway. 0 Since we are changing what was previously approved we have to fall under ordinance #30 which dictates that if we don't have a doorway directly from the street we have to have a porch of at least 50 sqft. at the front and side of the house. Bayer's architecture had huge cantilever structures and on the east side it extends out five feet to form the porch but ties in with the Bauhaus program. The drawings show vertical siding but it could also be stucco. Bayer is symmetrical in the design and in order to understand it one must be symmetrical. We are pulling back the homes from the stream side. The buildings are stepped on the site plan. This proposal is less bulk, less mass and we meet most ofthe items in ordinance 30. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Roger stated that the buildings have been shortened and the height has not been increased because of the removal of the gabled roof. He also asked if they were on a streetÂ® 0 Stan stated no and that they were set back further than the existing proposal. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24,1996 Jake stated that the agenda states that the application is an amendment to final but there are substantial changes from conceptual. Amy stated that the determination from the Community Development Director was that this would not be a public hearing. It is an amendment from a project. Stan stated that they are seeking an amendment ofthe SPA that the P&Z can grant that will allow the applicant to go forward but in the last meeting of P&Z they wanted the HPC to review what was proposed to make sure we are going in the direction that HPC deems appropriate. Amy stated that she was unclear about the street facade elevation. Stan stated that it was unclear as to whether there was a porch at all. Stan stated that he was trying to pick up elements of Bayer that he might have done in the design. He also stated that ordinance 30 is a Building Dept. check list issue. He also stated he needs a statement from HPC that they are not that far of as to what was previously approved. Amy stated that if the Board could make a referral comment that was appropriate but that they still have to come back to HPC with material and present the items that are within question. Sven stated that he finds the bulk and mass favorable and the reassemblage ofFAR on the site and the rectangularity overall references appropriate. He also stated that he has concerns with materials shown. He has concerns about the mechanical etc. and where are they on the roof. The roof should be as clean as the building forms. Roger stated that the over approach in the design is compatible with Herbert Bayer. We would need a full description of materials and a good discussion of that and that the roof element is clean. He also stated that he felt Ord. #30 is not applicable to the Hebert Bayer design. Roger favored the spacing between the buildings and this building does not sit on the street and in that regard Ord. #30 would not apply. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24, 1996 0 Martha stated that in broad terms she has no problem with the presentation. She also feels that the HPC should reapprove the materials. Jake stated that the solution proposed is less consistent with what was initially proposed. It is too far from the original design in terms of massing and the way the columns and doors are handled. There are a lot of large roof overhangs. In some ways the old design was a good solution because it stepped down the hill. The stepping helps the WL. The WL doesn't have the kind of overhang visions articulated between the units. There seems to be a lot of glass. Sven stated if you look at the conceptual approval you now have a different type of space. Give an interpretation of usable balconies that are more sheltered. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC encourage P&Z to accept the overall mass and scale of the amendment to final finding that it is fitting 0 within the Herbert Bayer design. HPC requests that the applicant come back and we look at landscaping, materials, and possibly some redesign of porches before we grant any final. Regarding the HPC support of Ord. #30 a better functionality of porches and decks meets the requirement of Ord. #30, second Martha. Motion passes 3-1. Roger stepped down. 426 E. Hyman - Conceptual Development David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney stated that HPC no longer has four members present and in order to get approval a positive vote of all three members must occur or the applicant can request continuation until the next hearing. George Lathan, applicant decided to proceed. At the last meeting it was recommended that we redesign the front due to the elimination of the stairway. 0 5 Historic Preservation Committee 0 Minutes of February 13, 1991 ASPEN MEADOWS, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ONLY CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT - PUBLIC HEARING Perry Harvey: I would ask the HPC to make a finding that we can make our final SPA submission prior to receiving final HPC approval on the Meadows Projects because we are on a time line. I know you haven't seen the rehearsal or academic portion. It is stated on the Master Plan that HPC has the right to work with us. It is not stated in the code. Joe Wells: The application for the conceptual on the academic, MAA is complete and I will try to get it to you before the end of the week. Gideon Kaufman, attorney: This is a risk with us as you will be reviewing and this enables us to move forward. Roxanne: We feel it is very important to have HPC input prior to submitting their final SPA. We had said that we didn't have to have final review if the Board felt comfortable enough at conceptual. Remember you are only seeing 1/3 of the application today. Bill: Is there a way to review the academic, MAA for conceptual 0 in order ford them not to have a delay. Perry: You will review the residential tonight. You will have the conceptual on the academic etc. prior to going to P&Z so the input will be available. Roxanne: Allow them to submit for SPA final with the condition that our review for conceptual and comment get to the planning office in ample time to be attached to the P&Z memo. Gideon: Can we meet with the sub-committee next week. Roxanne: The earliest that the HPC could see the academic would be March 13th. Perry: We are in this bind because the Master Plan stated that we had to have HPC conceptual and final approval before we submitted. This Council wanted to finalize the approval before the elections. Bill: We have a meeting on the 27th. and could not the sub- committee report back to us at that time and then we will have at least reviewed it. 0 3 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 13, 1991 Roxanne: The Board is saying go ahead and let them submit and then the sub-committee can report back. STRAW POL* Bill Poss did a straw pole as to how many committee members are in support of allowing our sub-committee on the Meadows to work in conjunction with the applicant concerning their SPA approval specifically towards the rehearsal facility and academic buildings; chalet/lodge portion. Allowing them to work with us and report back to the Board on the 27th of Feb. Perry: This is authorization to go ahead and submit the SPA without conceptual and final. Bill: Yes. All favored except Les. REVIEW PROCESS Less stepped down. Trustee Townhomes Roxanne: You are looking at conceptual development approval for the trustee townhomes, tennis townhomes and an advisory review for the four single family home sites. Concerns focused on specific materials, details and landscaping. The earth covered parking spaces were found to be appropriate. The tennis _-4 townhomes were received positively in the way of massing, scale and general design. There was concern of the stepping of the units. We are recommending approval Of conceptual with conditions as stated in the memo dated Feb. 13, 1991 to be met at final. Perry: There are currently 8 trustee units 1700 sq. ft. and with the remodeled they will be 2500 sq. ft., three bedroom units. The units step down and we will maintain that step down in the new units to create the same visual integrity. The bedroom additions are on the west looking into the hill. We have attempted to take the parking and push it over into the hillside so that when you look down at the units you will see a landscape courtyard which will soften all of the units and create a nicer entryway. The materials are the same. We will maintain the horizontal beams that connect the units. We intend to use wood shingles in a straight cut pattern so the materials echo on the new and the ,' renovated. Renovations are primarily to the interiors and the ' only major change is opening up the car port to create a landscaped area. 4 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 13, 1991 Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. --~i Tennis Townhomes Perry: There are 7 tennis townhomes and they are stepped. It is about 150 to 155 ft. setback to the road. There is covered parking and we have perceived the 1 1/2 stories. The project will extend to where the swimming pool is currently at the Meadows. The vegetation will act as a buffer. We want to reflect what is going on in the trustee houses but not duplicate it. Our original plan was to have the cars parked in front of the units but in the spirit of getting rid of the automobile impact on the site we tucked them in to reduce visual impact. Charles: One condition would be that the model be updated to reflect the parking scheme so we can see that physically. Perry: We had talked about the roofing as to whether it should be the same but we are open for discussion. Jake: My only concern is that the roof will be visible if it is not set up, a big surface of something. Bill Poss opened the public hearing on the tennis townhomes. COMMITTEE COMMENTS Glenn: I was in support of the asphalt shingles for the roofs vs the wood. On the trustee townhomes at the sub-committee worksession with the architect we discussed an idea of wrapping the shingles around the base to add another line to break up the large end walls. I was in favor of the solid walls on the end as opposed to opening them. Roger: The worksession went well and we also discussed the thickness of the roof and stepping it back because that was a major element to the entire roof scheme. One of the major issues for final is to present an updated model to reflect the parking scheme. Perry: Regarding (i) the single family homes we don't intend to design those homes. They will be sold as single family home sites. The consensus was that these home should not be part of the campus but that they should be part of the west end. They don't relate to anything existing. Bill: The Committee agrees with you that it should~not relate to the international style but should relate to the west end. I thought that you were going to provide a narrative that we would 5 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 13, 1991 review. Perry: I have no problem with that but this talks about a palette of materials and compatible massing. When I read that I interpreted it to be compatible with the campus so I need a clarification. Charles: At the worksession we talked about somehow stepping those houses down, so it gradually goes up instead of an end wall. It is compatibility to the west end. Chairman Bill Poss closed the public hearing. Les reseated. MOTION: Charles made the motion that HPC grant conceptual development approval for the Residential portion of the Meadows property with the following conditions: a) Further study be given to the Tennis Townhomes to reduce their visual impact and provide a massing model to show the parking and landscaping proposed. b) Detailed preservation plan for the Trustee townhomes materials and architectural features with the idea of a subtle compatible design difference be created to the new Trustee Townhomes to discern between the original and new. c) Trustee Townhome carport remodeling, detailed drawing showing that. How you plan to extend the roofs of the townhomes. d) Further study of the design articulation, materials and texture of all end walls; Tennis Townhomes. e) Massing model revised to show the covered parking. f) Material representation: Exact materials representation shall be made at Final, including major materials, windows, balcony, railings, decorative features etc. g) A palette of materials, textures and colors shall be prepared by the participating architects and submitted for HPC approval at Final. h) Recommendation from applicant for compatible massing, scale, height, setbacks, materials ,bor the four single family home sites and design' covenants for HPC consideration. This could be in the form of a narrative or an outline as to how the lots would be controlled to compatibility to the west end. 6 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of February 13, 1991 i) Detailed site and landscape plan indicating new and existing vegetation and tree location and removal. Roger second the motion; All in favor, motion carries. 620 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT - PUBLIC HEARING Charles stepped down. Roxanne: They are asking for landmark designation, conceptual development and on-site relocation, partial demolition and a parking variations. They are including a deed restricted accessory dwelling unit within the structure which we applaud. The subject cottage is a one story building around 1890 that has a number of additions to it that in my opinion contain no historic integrity. The integrity of the additions to the cottage is their small scale and they do not overwhelm the cottage. We are recommending landmark designation finding that it meets standards E & F. Regarding Standard #1 our concerns are that the addition is overwhelming to the small scale cottage and also the preservation of the cottage. We find that there is no transition between the cottage and the addition. We are recommending a transition or massing study. They are asking for a reduction of three parking spaces and five are required on the site. We are recommending a variation of no more than two spaces so that one space would be provided in the rear portion of the site. The fenestration pattern is a concern. Under Standard #2, is it consistent with the character of the neighborhood: The HPC needs to look at whether the relocation of the cottage upsets the pattern and rhythm of the setbacks of the facade and streetscape. Standard #3 deals with the cultural value and I feel the cultural value is the small scale and perhaps it is compromises somewhat. I am concerned about the massing and it needs restudied. Regarding the demolition standards: Are the removal of the additions required for the renovation of the historic resource and does it impact the architectural integrity. There are a few Relocation Standards that have not been met and the HPC needs to determine that the new front yard setback of the relocated cottage meets standard #2. I am recommending a two part action: landmark designation and the second one would be tabling action to a date certain so that they do not have to re-notice to allow the applicant more time to study massing, scale, height, fenestration and the transition area of the new construction in relationship to the cottdge. Revised drawings need to be submitted to the Plannind office two weeks prior to the continued date of the public hearing. 7 I P ~333 ~ September 29,1997 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Minor Amendment to SPA Final Approval Aspen Meadows Tennis Townhomes Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy: The Tennis Townhomes were originally proposed as seven (7) contiguous units that were offset on each other from Southeast to northwest to follow the natural topography of the site. This configuration allowed for reasonably good utilization of solar orientation and views but appeared rather monolithic in its massing. The current amended proposal is similar to the one approved by HPC on April 24,1996 in that it is now six (6) units that are linked at the lower (below grade) level, but divided into pairs with ten (10) foot entry corridors between. This breaks up the mass of the complex visually and allows for views to Maroon Creek from 0 Meadows Road. It also provides the opportunity for greater utilization of solar and view orientation. The original SPA approval for 17,500 SF of FAR for seven (7) units will be divided by the proposed six (6) units for an average of 2,916 SF. This was noted and approved in the April 24, 1996 review by HPC. The current proposal is similar in size, massing, materials and character to the previously approved concept. The units will have side entries as before and all of the interior spaces are in the same relationship to each other. The principal materials will still be cut stone or precast stone panels around the entry element, stucco (EIFS) panels for the majority of the siding and as much glass (insulating panes in clad wood sash) as is compatible with the Energy Code, for light and views. From the feedback received at our work session with HPC on September 24, 1997, we are proposing that the flat roof and entry porch facades be clad with a patinaed copper material which will also be utilized for all exposed flashing. We will present a palette of all proposed materials, textures and colors at the formal review. The detailing will be compatible with and reminiscent of the Herbert Bayer designed buildings in the neighborhood. The parking lot will be the same configuration as previously approved, with sod covered roofs and earth berms to the east which will completely hide the cars from view of pedestrian and vehicular traffic along Meadows Road. These berms and sod covered roofs will be heavily landscaped, as will the areas around the access walkways, entry corridors and patios throughout the project. From the east, the units will appear as one-story buildings since the site ~~ is being excavated to below street level so the parking structures are mostly below the existing grade. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 970/925-5590 FAX 970/925-5076 f We believe the proposed SPA amendment is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ~ original approval and conforms to all of the representations made during conceptual review as well as all conditions of subsequent reviews and work sessions. It will be a compatible and aesthetically pleasing addition to the Aspen Meadows complex and respectful of the Herbert Bayer legacy. >em,ly, C j Al- -iOA- U 07 Jarier Derrington kIA / Pr ect Architect 0 0 , 1. R 0 1 4 -A- , - .Irr.... FEE - -- - A j :PH"54 iull.J- Itiv.' 3%@a W r- t JI P iÂ». - 0 mt . -.- - 1 - liqi 44/2,9/,4 ./IL'~5 1 2 /111-15.11!11 f 1111 2 1,- 1/1,11 'FI4494"4:,6,%'i~j'I ' 7 1 g ..11!111.2.-11 - 11 --Ill.......,='111111:'.111 <'I/'1 ... - 4671% .2 1- *W. r 1 - ..1. *112Â£-- '/ - 'Mii,eemiÂ· 1 -17,1 7 1971.1, 1 11.1,#imit I. r l..' 21,i:~!Ii,mil@ .# Uili,-_ I MABE , b - 4*'AME.1 - i. ag=* 13} i 1 -/- 3 â‚¬1 5... . S- 1- 1 1 AU,26 4*1 E- 1 u'll. Ilt#'4'tiIA"I i: All~ 1. 111!h '18,1.-mn.~di' i.i,~,1!hilii,i -Â·' 11-â€¢=â€¢-Il-â€¢â€¢r.-=.1,1 ilim~'E- 151.11111â„¢ &'n _111"li~.BL 1-~â€ž..1 Aimp",4!ii' "110...:1= 9:|413*ul.u 6.lumil.1111= In""11 â€ž . <, "'millmÂ·Â·~!~,all~!1 F"'i,A '2~~,d/*1*+10iq 1 ' < *I .0.,1,1' '09].11[ .* I ~ lumt 'J' FiM'~Ili;*"I '( 1 11-1.1 .=*R ,, HM"' r ~1 *'"2 *IU!'!~,i-'110~11 ~| .g.,1/. Ii. '11.Ill- 4 11& R = 1.1 *ab lilli ' -/.I-~1111~L; lur ~1 ibw I IM/*4/AD 4 ta".1~1"*111'gi SE.W #FF,%. I *Rej , 11...... '91,1 .,1.111 -- - I -- i;~Â·p . .1 0, !!@ 11. fri . 1 4 El IM .1 11110 - - *,9 1 I''4' ~~~,â€ž~ 1 :'ll I 11,0:141 1 1.01" 1,6.A 1 +â€ž.11'411 1,1 INE,0,1 I.#,151 â€ž =4' 1* i #I - 1! I ':;."4!22:;~:21~:2't:,~Wk 1 41$ i.!qi,i.-111 It - 'L 'Ihille'll,Ig,â€ž5 /,~, r . 1,1 /1,1'gal.1=[ 4'lil~I'l 1111,11Â®1=@01 2,11111,1 -1/11161,1.-1 E L~ 111111..~.~M!'.! 291!11!lf!11 di,~2:,1111111 '1,1'will - 11'Tii,i,~964%8. 1 r =hlk':0â€žâ€žCUIL t,#'ile 11. 11111/ UNal ........'/|9*|~"'1||IE l mil liliE ~ i,1, .1111 = 1711,11*9 4.1~ 11 i -i:i,iÂ®riwi.4,:F, , IN':7. r. ,â€žâ€ž2â€ž - / . --.~- 3-.,-62---r' . Â« i--////~~#Fi42$ L J:1040'NE 9, 6 261,Id'â€¢"11 r- I 11 1.1.1 -11.111?1111!h,til. -1#11, Il,!1111'lillil ~|*494' ~.~60'5!'~i~till.1.111'h,ill: ,; i ' '' '!illi'@Ilil,~â€¢ i.*111%1.'11'RIE'"Il!5 -. - '34 5% 9 . .1 I %2 .8/ - 4 29/3/1*/* :>| 3,1,6 S E= I CIA Ctrm O 4 / 9 93,4 -J - -1* I. "' V'' * ' , ''44 4 .144 V I V ONINNÂ¥ld ONV1 ONV 3Hn1331IHOEIV I ONI 631VIOOSSV ONV IN1OHNId OIAVO ' SMOCIVBM 3HI HO=I SBEOHNMO.L OBSOdeHd 41 1.' I , '7. .... - ... â€¢ :14 445 , 4 . i . -30.. Â· 3.*4'1'~Â·,1.. 11Bigi;'62: * ''5 tf.2%~9.-f - 4.3,2,41:7 1. D'',h,141':1.4.6 '' . ,I,r ' r . . ' ..t..4,1. 1 7 ' JANIata-,24=21.-26- -:=70hic -- ' : ,~'>3-4*22 * -2-1.Ufff.7-FoÂ·.;wh Â·. i:,4.~5;~~t~ , -1 ~ ,-th~fitÂ¢* * rit , '. 4:Wrf,..43.i' ~i .c.44, L, f..., 4 . 4-1 - 43- 1* rit . 4- 2 3... . , 0,6,09.W. 1,4 1.'~t.~~ 4- . * . *MI 3 r 4 -: 47 .,~ . r' j'. ':.~/ ,1 A 44 1 rek * 7.20 /16/M&,r.. 4 :Â·4|3 .1 :7|| '| :~Â· <' - ; a. i.4 /1.. R - 3/OUNt & 1 9 .b ' r'. . O < Â¥15 4 i r.Â¥ 4-1 %9 - 7 2,4., 1 -' 1 0 6 86' 4 1 - .. - f U. 6 1 tu: , ,< ~ -0.:r S 4 ~ ' 2 21 ,;36 ..6, 1 C<. , 1 -16. d 11.1.91 . * rl. f. .' ,- I ' ' 1,1 '9 1 'N k k '24:. Â· , --2 . 44 '.1 - 1 , 6 . : f , . 1 49$ 01.., 0 . #. -.11, ' - - .- . 4nV42% .(Ma . :E/VAIr.Â·:'Â·-t r...v. '9 - r.. C ~-*32 ...e.,- - . :. 14' ....., Â· ~H; . , : 44. I 1 irl* /,bil~ ... b In iiin= ,-- ; -Ii.:.Ii Â·14,1-47.5,7-:, 4., P.~, L. 2.. th:ti? ,~:, *...1 .1. : .... 11*i ,; 3.:I T/r .' 1- :b, 11'. %09* , - ./: .F I 1= 1 1- 'y.-~ ~'~~, ,;. ~I, ~%~ Â·' ~~ ~~ '~ ~ '-_,-5~ . , .35~ ~ ~~95ff~ 430' * SEZ r:~14 1 I. SA.- 41$*A.4 - 4 41-# 1 . : 1 :-'4&62 1 *:f*90,6.- 4:g'.e: 9,34* 2.33,Â·.tÂ·'3 -,2 .A~V-,Â· h a.z,%. . ' ':, 3-.. '..?'--,;.%., .#. 'f'k.'19: 30 = 241... '1~11.t': 1%.,7.1 , . -4 , '. 1?. I .ft' ''..ft./{<~.~~.::,9.,vi--~41 f '' , *r 1 %. I. TE,-44 - 'Â·r 4&4 = 1 .5 -1, ~'Â¢?~.~7,1 ; i 2-' ?,rÂ· .4 ,1 : 3 u I :4.Ok'41 Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 7-34- Â£ . ~ .-~"-TA'344 , 4 1 1 1 4- 3Â·, re'.,:,-Â»3~--220 4.- . 4.2.,lEii:- ~ ~-' t.{ft =4295â‚¬11 -- - ,# 14> Â·, " 1414%â€¢1.} 4 9 1 ,/ill --/...,- ..22 +7 + 14 , I - 1*am.44. 4594 L 4.- . _ ~ % ' - 5 .iiI E-,46'; i, k f --1 i: wab V-j ft 2 31- 4 â€¢ P. '12 : ' . 1 t ' UJ 0 :E 9 11 1 I . ,. ~ * 1 1 % I .. 0441% -. I '1:-0 9 ' i ./. ,. UT - - - I , "6 '.14.9 - I .. . - ."h@linlyÂ·... , 'Al .,1 -< *. A - 4 9;0 *17 ' .-I â‚¬941 * . trifru?,-1.rti,i:,DhÂ¢*IN,yJffi~RA ; 7| ~i J -1 1 , 1 - 1,tr ,-6 1. %'. 1 t.lt.t'.1.' , imr.Â§ :. 1 ..444 "~ ?j.-}bi9Â£0,3.3 ''3:4.-1 t ':.11.-'litif'" 4 44'' %4.1 0& - Ap,sk~AÂ·r,~52Â·9<~Â·Â·,j7-414' F;Â·* . >Â»>ir, ..:*91#, Â·,ma.#49... ~.pÂ·-Q -'*49;~~Â·~7>.j .... w. :6- Li# 4. ; 1:7:i .,0.2,1>:'' =4- t. ... eetÂ·,, 2 t.'414'~I I ' .0 ~ . ...4 'f . b 06 U. :tbltio,3>37744:Ii, * :.Â·.3,Â·4-~ Â«449 5.4.-. r'~f Â·~2. I - I . :- 4, 4.-; 4 .1 B 4 - A ,31â€¢ @tÂ·-f T i. 1Â£69,19,': P,-'- ': i,~'Â·,-, .,3-fic.i,<9*4(+. Pe:. - 9-13*tif Â¥ I, 1 '' --'.g.Â»Â·C j 91Â»bÂ«:40. - 4 -, 4 'lA ,/0 7 '.1, 41 e f44*04% <f" '' t> , -4 2 U '- w ' ' + 3, 4 '142 - - .- 1.0Â»333ffo-(Jias, 4,0 669*:RAN: , ...'. Fl , 34,1 k 'af""41' 9.A.' .4 . 4 , ..r . 11~~ 4,1,P< A 1 /,y~ 41,2 ..1 ' -2 0$4 , 64> 41 p#01.1 #).1* ' ... I. , 6 .0 1 0Â· 1, It ./C / th r.. â€¢' Â¥ , 1 Â¥ 41 ': r. 1 '1 ' 4 .' 1 ' ' 7.79 4 : P 442:It:AE- _ - 1 3.. .1 6 1 ... , '1 04Â¢ l,Ai'R.42. *~, -Â·b#)<. il, aVOB SM NOIJLyA313 1SÂ¥3 l' I Y~ (,v 1 14, A i i (; li ....1 1 1 p -- ./1 1,1 A V 1 uy . 1 1 .99 Â·Â·7 4&1. 3 1 1 2 ft/ti 61; i.1212â€¢,e,*2 1 111[.111 , 1 - 11 1 It 8'f//;',1 t ip) .'.I 11 1 1 1 lili 11.1 1 ; 3 1 1 -- 1 11 11 3 gAL, . lili 1 ! - -- - fl 1 3 1 124?f: Â·4' 'ti.0 ~n 11 11 1 1 r * i.Â£~ i ,@*4''j tlt-1~ 2 1 0 i i i I tb .1 9 1 1 -- r --1-7] 11 = 1 1 1T,Trl 1 - 1 1 11 1%,1 : t.t 0 1 - 1 J ~m~Ila#11--3 ' i- +~ i i .--1.-' f- ----<.. 6 $ 1 / gr~ 1 1 -- 2913 4 M 1 4 4. it, 1 li I'l,1 - li] r -1 f. 1 ' li> ,Â·129 .41 111 - rd~/21 '0. (:. 1 - i i '44* 11 Libmi95//4 65 -- Ii'* 111~Il , 1/423 1.1 -1 .- ifY~16941, 8,6 ju 1 1- -~ ]WQ dll*.IllIm~ I '5 ' 11 - -1 3 1 4 . ':*'48â€ž. ' mill ' ' i -24:.4 /,144.14 .~ElTtfm*.=K - C T. - 21*29 ~1 ~~1 ~ fl.Wiw,+1.lik - 1.1.7.,}11,1[ /JrEn 1 Â¥r 9% -1 ~26%29 11 le I '=ing== ... --#- 0/A1 i rE==CS /=i= 7=- -Mital-7 1 joi&=3=wrâ‚¬1 - , ~ 2942~ m -- 1-- f limÂ£-Im-ft~=- 1- -r- - = 44'. 131 S --- - - -~ 11 41 4:: , .'} Cn - - - j7, 17>.%1,9. 4 kp 0 rn 44$ 9 1, - . ~Al,1/ *.&%11 -1- 1 t,~0411 _ o - e~â€¢.-ri----37-â€¢ IE=111'k nak !!=*1 m - -/.L Newild - 1 -ilw~J'$101111/8 11-9 1 =#11'911Â£.Elm!11!1 =211Â· 3> 4 1,3 + . M#9111*:1111=,L-h=IrM-Jl li AFFi .â€ž IL<4*Â£fti 0 L 1 V.(9 Z Â· - tâ€¢wr 'b.4, 4 -49% fi 'll 1 0 2 ,$,re O lid '23 6 Â· ..O . 9 : PROPOSED TOWNHOMES FOR THE MEADOWS DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1 ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A, 7 1 A 1 1 1 31022 0 'Â£ . n. 041> , i W v 'frly ..i~ It Ath; , 'i~# i ~ie, 11% H'ri ~â€¢ ,~ 444, ~J'~'.~ 1 bÂ£['J~. :,~;~;, â€¢' c 31. 9 ? U ' 1: 1,42 /32./.::: t - 9 i Â£ 1'4 40.~ .' 4 1 3 "8.9 4' t..%*i Â¢*.tr42;"tic,0~Â·4 ". '.-%~~..*~.,'444,44,. ' 5:9 1 â‚¬'411 V..:>EAR. Â·. Â· i OVE.LAÂ¥ t.bo 4, â€¢ Er' 24 . * , - OVERLAY . *.2 '.9 .t. 1 .j ttifil.(004 A ) 4 1 I {(5402 Â· 1 9 1_> i .., 99Â· t.$:.Â· t.'41'20. i. c; a , 41.4-<,1... . . ' ...,li.,4.1.-91{4241.[4, 1.-1..Â· ..... r.: t:,70"2':E.Y..:2711,T'*9013.,Â·:j; e . 4,Â· .2, Â·. 2 .....:1.0:.2.r:%:'~l,---tis:k . bs Â·Â· .. 4 litÂ·,9 , ..: I ... ':..19.4.0.1 I , Evr ' 1 A. " + :.8. P.,r YÂ· /3 b. ~ j Â· I .-:Â·Â· ~Â· 7 U & U â€¢V . 1-MÂ·. Â·~Â·~. Â·.. w'.*44,6. : -' . 1:>S ... 5~95.- h N ..3 I. 9.LÂ·Â· ' , â€¢ 93 5 61 4> Â¥-1 .. N.i?... ; t., .4 Â· Â· Â· u 6 1 D2% * U/*3.#Â·sÂ·,.:.41Â·i:Â·J. :5;3432?40*93, : - . 1.- a. :40. A ..91 + ..'411 p 19:.t '.:PA::- .3 -4 - : 7 - .. Â· ' -- -- .113 1 + : 1 U -111]01 40\---- , .,94#'3 - 09Â»35..14 --4- F OUno[ 1.4---3 L OU-- 0 3 ... b li p '1) / y. r< b. + tr .t:ft; ' i 1/~21[3 ~ to y :.'f .AI.2.4, ti.... -~-8/4. i 3 1 .+41 y. ...64 1, 1 U Cul - #~101 1 * . .547,1.4; - * 31 f-ilip 41 . I % ~p l-]L- AU-!02@~.3 1- - 1 . 3 uo E--) 1 n Yntrn f.... / Wg...0 'I . 41:KI. .: h - 1.:21 &~'. ~,.f. Â·M ..E'::. . 0 U 00 - 03[~i?Oft/6-jl) -:Â· ziÂ«000 Ijol_1 j--~Â«-9 ; 390#-/ L-- 1 L._J CZED L__3 1 1.. 1 ,*9 + .'ic' .I'4*>A Â· 1 1 #15. I t:/2 .: - : './.5..i-:-/--$1. 100~90' _ 0[34100 tf CO)03 Ul-10 000 , n..... ~ â€ž : . , ZOOC ocm =p 11'00 001 0 0 1... 7 420,0 [32 0 2]0 You --naCE(il Cd 00 ' 4 *5 ,Â· i A [3 O -C, ~j[I]El(3~fi- 10 2Â·*4-: ~~: 3.Â·<- dOREwdl,Bic] 01 Â»7Â·. /9~~'2 LLJO\IOBUODcj{\ OCT-1 e50 doldo O CO /21...1 ; , $ .1 9..~ 4 1Â¢ il ;2 ~Nt<**Mri .p.~i;t#i[~rh Â·,trpjb .. d.k I . *- PROPOSED TOWNHOMES FOR THE MEADOWS DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC. I ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A.I.A .. UQU (1110 ~Z39,Cd =j , CIO 000[100 0E . OVERLAVL60 ;H,,1 OVERLAY -- ~1 -l*Â»3 I P 0 P +1 ____--ril . -70-1_-1 za =3 - a Aft tÂ»> A.6 =1 m 14. m . 4 \ 1 ~~F /1 Aia -3 / 0 4.3 --- mian 4.=an 4-/~1 %123[2906@2 : Ake\\ UnE](Jo coo KIED Und 000_000 0' Â·Â· VEPF If] [lh . i{ i 1\ c \ 1Â«} I b (/ L J:l j 1 .F# * c.' -. 1 / 41-2 1 Â·Â·Â· 523' \3 Â£10-j I - li' ji f j --- -J 1 -- l -f -1 \ 1\ i L 47 ; 3 1<06-d L / th ll,LE) * 11*19 03711%1.30 4>HEE}UNCEPon U 491 3130 Eli]Flujt_- =7 43(0929 U JU E--1 _-ji Cl CZED .- [fjooc] eact'Cat-, 11-4. 1 [*00@14- 4 01 29 01/02 09rif-J ;09 7 f - 1,<24<W-1 I -)i--_10 E Â·: 4 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES FOR THE MEADOWS DAVID FINHOLM AND ASSOCIATES INC I ARCHITECTURE AND LAND PLANNING A I.A. ... _PA Ilf,Ir.;HÂ·14 A.'.1'lt,It Ini~111"IJ HIff/2 , ~ 00000D 02 0 L L O NOI1Â¥A313 HlnOS / , - - - I . .#/ - -- - ' .-/ / 0000 1 - 7 .Â·rF* 429.1 -* -- . 7835 .. . i.- #.. i . C , /. / 1 ' MINIMUM, -.. 8 .. -- - -- -\ 7840- - . . 9000 ExisTINh poot \ -- lo ============= / . -5 ZA 7845 - ---- - --- .N j J 97 1 - U - 9 4 0 7850 ' 'r-7 '11 ~ i r . . 1 . . 1 A lilli 1 -----1 m - - -3 1 - r- h / . &22 9.. 9-1 .... / // W 2 Â· - - 785 -1= -. Â· - it. = 7 - ,/ 1, - 1 .. -1--- 1 V tv r -4 I - Â· Â· .i . ---: . -r L.,2- i#196* " *Wa#, 1, / ~ 1 r 7860 - 1 - &225>14/_-t 1482&=F- 1 .- OPOSED L ~ r : -1,\----==-,r,4,6ir e ' 1 TREES , Â·- /,0 0 ANEERZim- 1 4 1 1 . 1 f ...PA - 4-Ul ...2=02*Wi Â·Â· \ / \ DUMPSTER , '\ 1 1 6177h -7 ,-9 - 1 ..4: --1 b ' *.I -- 1 1- Cut 7 44Â«, ,\ \ k .-t ~ Â·24%1, ~p \ . 1 ELEVATION 7856 . A " ADOCTIONAL PARKING - _ . 7666 --- ---f<53~ 13 4_-1,1,TFT ~12 2-2 (6 SPACES) 1 . .Y * 1 -- a ---1 \\ - -r- - 1- i 3-6 3 10 \ 11 - ~ 12 -1 I --*.1 - -- r- 4--- - .-. i5t6\ 2 \ 1 --- , .. .-%641Â·- --6-~L~~'1 #174 1 t i il \ -1 1 41.\\ 3b'~ 4 \ t--EIT_fft37 PAR~ING ~- 1 i - . . L,r EXISTING FE ..0. 1 '# - --/19 , It 1 Â· i Mil 6-1-- , . ..49 9~s, lit 2-6- - .39 0 - 19..1 . 1...4-4./ .. *------ I-.1 , , - -Ieee- --- -9/.21, 1 - - - 4 01 -1 - ----- 1 * . - , . ---/ J r -' A-- / \\ - - *----~ *-- - \\ J .- 4 A & -- ORAWNBâ€¢ AF.Â· 5,ONS \\ PROPOSED 3' GRAVEL WALKING PATH - , r ~ 6,9 .:i (LOCATED N THE FELOASCLOSE TOEXISTING TREES 1 AS POSSIBLS - lit , ... EXISTING ELE_-1-~ ff 4% 0 \ 1STING TREE SITE PLAN NORTH 1 4-' / + -- O.3 EXISTING ROAD 1 1 BIKE TRAIL IN ROAD-SIGNED ' 35 12 5 4 10 20 50~ 40 . N . A N 3H1 HOA SBNOHNMO.I. aaSOdOWd V'I'V UNINNV1d ONV1 ONV 3!:In1031IHOEIV I *ONI 631VIOOSSV ONV IN1OHNId OIAVa XI TING TREES 42% r. . $ f-'24 TA 'Mt -1 -. b 4 e 1'..1 .. I-* - :2 'Di .* 1 . 91 k ~Â· 1 310 7 - P c 6,42 â‚¬ 6 90 . 3* 4 Q U.k 'r .1 *e: 3 - *9- Â·-0,-. NEW TREES 7 EXISTING TREES *AJ. 44\ 9. 3' WIDE WALKING PATH 1 ~~ ..70, - C % A-+ . z - Sle 1 -~al 2Â« ----Il-# /4% 2$*pr- taÂ¢2, g --f- _5;~iI~ 4 ..... 9 .........Â¥, 944-! &<4793 1â€¢-4-4-~21Â· EARTH BERM 1 T 61 0 1 <Ay-- -=1 1 COVERED PARKING . râ‚¬- EXISTING ROAD 4 1 1_ 1 I t 4 1, 4, - 6.1 #411. im f# * . it . --- - 7 12-,A-'. EXISTING GRADE . I /----- -- 'f-=C- 5 - 1 -r, D ~4.44:i 11 .-. Ciaa-0 - ~ -er - 7-34: - .4.4( 8 -*#9:.04:.'+ ' tâ€¢ 2. 3.4.9.54*1120: 4/4 IRCY,>'..2 &=. 1 . 4 0 ! t:l L/5/ 4,â‚¬4 '.....4 E -- , 9.-, .... 0 =fref 7-2.E'/~ 56 2 /2 210/4, Â«342=3*=7-16 4 - - .-=:0 -:-- Ny -- 'u....5- 4- r '14:-.-7-7:**RE , ...Fi. 4.- ..1.6.' i.:.Â«t, 0-422Â£2* ... ., ~ .2 (-34{4-2-2,& Â·~2--~.97 -7,*AUN*f--1 .... -- 9 %.,4.11,4.954 I - Ef-:>4~ d*129*U~il%&2 029#ff).F:46:0'157-. .L- .~ 3~i1:5%9:: ~XAL,>Di-9;142&4 e.â‚¬69413*443'29- e -re, 1 - -5 4:>!44:7,1 , *363% 4 . Â£21 - - 0 2.1 .:-U. I.jolit.3@22 3%,i#:f< t ,/ 2845 1 3 -â€¢73 '-1 1:.-~, 'C -' 1. -'r.Q~%~ZEF#~~.-ffj.X....lff Â«Qktt;~4 ~ 96- Â·.49 2~ ' . 4 : mt:11?* 14 re'l .rÂ· . Â©' 24 + - 9 . / - =94$7 6-0 ,â€¢ 3 - Scut'*+ , w r- Ab-*YAFL 4.$ . - Il I -:,: .AntÂ»11>fÂ¢â‚¬3 i#94*Â·:.firittoltic p I. I -' . - - v ' p - â€¢ .7 .1- - .:h â€¢35'I Â·r . â€ž1. 4-/1 - 0 4 4 1.- Ar 4 , . - I ,/ I * ' 9 - 1 .:'# ... ' .. -t ' -I.- I , . I ./ I* . I -4 . r ....1.-p I'*. 1 . . e i' -3.*:uN~ 443:11,2*Wy*44*5.%%8%49*2~- ptj.:ru:;- :-. ..,~i.Â«9232 <:r "~ ~ -- ~ ~ I "tri. . 4 ... - :4:42 - .4 . , -- -<31:32.,AÂ«49.2424*fÂ·.~Â· 1-fly..7 97-0-2,0Â»-14~IE, i*i - 1 -- 32.472**t.-1 *f:ri-ic:li iM'05*:~~F-9.-8 ~1 - 1-'I~' . - ./.4,1 ' 4 .. . . -,/li-~inA C > .29%&- 1, I - 6 t . , ret-:2423,2-13#34%%-34~ P 'll I ..2 .- e. -1. .. .Â·-4 . i.Â»,1 342Â» s.Â·4 44.,Vt % 9 -t . . - Â·- A 1,SNEr. /.Al Al- . 11Â© I I .Q . I. I â€ž k - 1 . - 94 4 - 2 ..... -3031:.2-:-' : .>7%:29 -1. , :---.Â·//i~ ..9.t.A.U--.. ..ki~~y/Â·â€¢,92*...waw, - - 4636(<-92232.44.43Â§*449*i~*33 f 29293*1,-,~,~ ~~~&..,,-:44&Trf*kâ‚¬2429~,Ut-*-; - kfi~jâ‚¬6 --4.jff ~T r :/J /jI~,1 -:4-.:. - - - I .*.f79-~-f;3694*6tfi.22995**Ftit'FOÂ·-0*i~:393;33:-1/Â£5 + ..2.-'-~r/- I :mt'#e~'#~ . 3-7<:429 :7296 #+ - 1 Â· Â· . ..1,111./.1/.. . . I Â¥ 2 Â¥=118 e. 10/1-,-kft:. :.-i:*B- . kit ' -4 1, 9 '1%= ...4 - I a ./ - - & â€ž I 4 + d /91 .%.Ct- 15 ' Vtâ‚¬/4-2 14,42,-iâ‚¬UÂ·,a. 87,â€¢i;. IkÂ¥. 9/ 71.' -,rfl~~47Â«13 -bri -Â· ..' t Â·4-1.FÂ¥*6#V L..,4., 1.1~:/0::-,1-. 1, . I i. . 2 - 4 -4.2. 040~f-0' 3-tt~~,~.:3-i: tei r.' . Me. ...t -, 04. '.rp ? . 1, 4-<~ ~~~r/ . I â€¢ '~h*'6 44.1 0. . . i ...i - . . -4 4. .k... # .' â€¢ . f J â€¢ ru' â€¢â€¢ -- ita~ - Â· --Â· - -= - . ...9 3*C . . 24 - I /6 y.. - , ' A ' . ./ -1. I .1 -3 .. -- .... -1- . .1, . . . A . 4 I . 2443<-- -211; ' ' 1 .94 f ... I. - r 1 i I. I - 1.l '. I - 3:FJf>1-44~FtÂ·,:3â‚¬7<hat-:63;9:"RiIâ‚¬?-Ft. pei.26--. . Ta, * efil 't/: . 4 /*. 1 - 1 ' 1 ' evt/â€¢ - , I -4. ..â„¢ '- . , , co. ...1-te' tp' â€¢p '11,- '97+k. -72=:WÂ·NP ' ,,- 4 7 1 - .9 *.f. 110*/Â£- qr:1 ,-ft~f--~-i-<:-Â·i:7~-452412/.4-1-itâ‚¬~5'J-3kÂ·;-in-Li-R+F~.: :2 -'-Â·2-1 .AM/6Â£617,4fS21 -1 fal ##1:I,2-t -- - I . 't- 6. 11 ..2.4 -'.1 i --44 -i:ft.Â·. 01-~. Â· b ONS . 1 W , ./0 . I . .1 ~ 3 : :2_%382#//7,Â».. Ai.21?1-.4*aa,49-4-m-tÂ©I -1-.4# , 1.. AE -- 0:fâ‚¬ 2 , -2.*#i,5 , -: I Â£5.42 .., ap-Â¥ 2~1*Â· .,Al-T:!E ---X .."J.Z - - 11 , - - ' -- i~ ..4 _ 0~3- Â»m- # . - ' - *FÂ· i - 3 -- 6- .'-tll.!.,WI 41. T, 1 - ., . th . - 1 ...# 1-7 0.3..I- J.~1 SECTION - .- . ./I T -9. . . . . 42 -4 . i - *fi. Â·13'1:4.7.,3 : 7 -- :.7 -9;â€¢k-;2 2.2 - Â» ., 6 . : / 4- i 3.11 . ~ Â·â€¢~-2 -*;~2~ -it~ â€¢ ~t A- . f - - >' Ztnwi?*&*~ tÂ» Â·A.,1 :7 :.'u,=:1:, - :. 02Â·7:. &:-2, .' 3. 01 5 10 20 50 4:r/frier#5--734~~/~1/~1/~ 'r,itualÂ«40*/4*E'p-i.-4,-. 4 ~-< ~44 :-*.3%9>-5493,1 :e- ... Lel:-1.,Bg.-j'.,4 2 & -7.I .-- -%,Â· ' .- / ), r/:r- - f :;~ ' 91' . *<frilj V I V UNINNÂ¥ld ONV1 ONV 3Hn1331IHOEIV I ONI S31VIOOSSV ONV IN1OHNIzl DIAVO SMOCIVaW 3H1 HO=I SEIWOHNM01 03SOdOUd C VI HI AÂ¥ . r'~SRIBIT 9-6,9 . 'OLIP te.,16,KE Al.6 -CabTZ>K,FrION tRANTIN#,9 KetsibizATIS -PrANT I,-146 Mb Ivert,W 61*gueÂ· 15*1*U 419\166&1'1Pb- Mtâ€¢1 4-'0 .-' --.. W..Â»e,(/'Â»Â»r~ 0:- t>tignh]4 4\ope 14% 'Plt.866VIU: 04 LA'r80,1- + 20141 Câ‚¬Nt>mbkie. 4- 6,iccup R,rert,Fe Â«Gf - ser 71*Of 1116 -R.log.lb HANT,Wt FDA- vAÂ¢.1817<. C 1 â€¢ p J. Ago* rr,Orvâ€¢*60 APPe.D./Al- , 1 1 I a e evf*0' 1.0 ZUKJ, 25=- M#frUI a<liFrl U# 444Â£.Vfb VAE.1 en e* . 1 4 28625Â¥*TM) N . - / 6,( - = Ctuot.Â·u:ve MOD,-Ve - ,~, If 30 lhAiu,liÂ»JO.5,185 .-. OV&*Ale, 4AM-li 3 K*661> All DISTVE.666 AKeM, 4)mt 11 14# ALPâ€¢JE, An~LAW<*HaÂ¢- AL,WI~dtÂ« 5 I 'MiTPM Cr,(PIC'.4 L. 32=p K ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR : ASPEN MEADOWS TENNIS TOWNHOMES PLAN DATE- 10/2/1997 1 G,W:,4, M\X - MIWIMUM '50 LÂ¥/. SE:â‚¬:D . -M I 01 1 -1 f i ARCHITECTÂ· CHARLES CUNNIFFE LANDSCAPE DESIGN BY: BILL CHALLIS SCALE: 1-= 10' Mwf - - D ~ MOUNTAIN SPRINGS TREES ' CARBONDALE, CO. Alk A %6*4 17{Â·irD;16*bl,(601*5rm/a-100 -12) 9se -Ke,ivicat> c.1,., 1-21- -1 970-963-0640 1 PLANTING SCHEDULE -13 0'tl~Ih*1, CDWI>mOJ. QTY SIZE TYPE BOTANICAL 01 =F:-7- 6 55 114"-4"BB ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES i - , 1 6' BB COLORADO SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS 1 1 4 8' TaB " -- I It " 3 10' BB 1 4 12' BB 3 14' BB 12&,rID . - -- < 0 3 16'BB 1 0 f 18' BB 1 54 4' - 5' RED TWIG DOGWOOD CORNUS STOLINIFERA M 172 5 GALLON BUFFALO JUNIPER JUNIPERUS "BUFFALO" 125 5 GALLON ASSORTED NATIVE SHRUBS SEE PLAN 1 -11 18 5 GALLON POTENTILLA"GOLD DROP POTENTILLA FRUmCOSA 1000 NATURALIZING NARCISSUS BULBS #1 QUALITY ~ 1 -le 1 3-AL L - 00 r# 0 - i ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO MEET OR EXCEED AAN STANDARDS FOR BALL SIZES -- _j = -44 . i, =if 1 1 lic - -- -- - '/ 0 0 - A --1 01'b k 1 1 7---1=9-1 21. & 1'./ e ..< --. lÂ°Â° Mpes j 1 4\" .-- 2 1,0 11- llc \\ \9/ 64,05 i p>\ 10 , 4 9 +A===11 . 00 0 . 31 1.r 0 1 1 -- . Mpe] 0 4-/0 0-Rhygly> . 0 4"314 7 0 1 0 ef 0 -0 ./ 0 4' .- e Y < < r.-V, . 9 1 .240* i /6/ ty - t 44 0 11649 M*K| 4 - 0 00 00 92* 0 g . N li A - Au,m .40-rIGG,Â¢ CO 6,4,-rnANK YS)ht,Pt&1 r . 2 - '/1 \ 1 - ,-..1 -[Ik#440.-fle.1 06'ek' 2 i .-,0 . Â»5*255 . e...t,=24- "M M... 6<m~.O .: - ~~.... , 1-- 00 2, .23 4-0 d 0 -3.. ST <3 0 'PEC"Ne 110VbÂ» '54, to 0 -Rayrwt4 CIZE,WOOD t351 414 lilt.51' 1 0: 0 % 0 ..\111/6./. 6 -g 1 : 5248 4/1 like r .**a, -J 0 4 1 0 0\ /\0 1 1 7-ep-rÂ¥/Mt=*Woop 37 \0/ \0 E f,r:*=~~ti*4 11' 9$00-034 T)06. WOOD 0 0 It' 01 0 0 1 v a e 8 0- 30 -5- \B 'eofe,1.0 9'JAIPÂ¢Ft. - 0 \/0 0 : 0 / 423 -- /.\ / 44- . 3 . * e%4<r - , 3: 10'/ / 41 91% 1 5411,441\11177/4 , - "1. , NATOCAUSE; 8606â€¢ . 4 9100*/ **PEN Â¥â€¢tr[+t 1 /4 0 4. . 92/t <.- 5, <ac P 45' 9-4 , .0-l-Â° . 2 bu- r.,4/ 41Â« Ah 1 4/164 Am*\)67 1 .0 2=F O --*Â° 00 p .41"A,4114 6. te 4047% 49\ 39/4Â» 1 42492 *O1Wte, 67 - , 0'n 9 =60 1 Cks 0Â¥4 I fr F â‚¬41"114Â«/7Â»/, / . ..5 Ill eâ€¢UL. Co \/ <'~" 1~FF Â·*DÂ£5~~1~~~~~ ~~ 15'Ul'.9.b // Sk \4 77 - / _.NEDE&1=J'Â©Â·416'TY'#<f , 4 b.'475 Â» 1 5 Ct-/2 124\4 -L .t y %_4 - top 1 .,\,1.0,6~ a 11000-5 6Â£50 -ch â€¢p - 94,61 ~ Ac "dt ,\4~~a - -*-- A * ir ' \ 94,71 Al~ l'uj~*L#Z~t~ lili - - /9-4. 06 // - -2 8-&449- wmvcw-,â‚¬ -34/97 ---) / -0- -- -- - 06 -N -5 - ... -04 434&03 aaer,gl / 0 0 00 600 1 00 0 04 ID r. rv -- e -. o page/4 --- / '-I - -1 --3/-*4-444- RAWnk*t Â»0Â» 1315,6 2>6" 6*Wht M,PEN (32#086 Wm.KAG,q fk>165 614" 1&Â»t>11*ser /~~/ Elf 16,11144 *D 0 / a -â€ž.-I.-*' - ove:â€¢,t â€¢60'VA]*#ptd 61%81' 68ort:ter# Le:198Â£.1, . CorÂ¥Â®Cret> NE:Â¥:- 49,rrf:,tr\65 'FAS,ZIC ARD I e 0 AMOD CAK.P. /CM:.O,0,-ue. < 0 0 64<en,te -- 4PgAVE:C> WrrA !*6:W&610,Â¢\ CAQI, De:Ae PBR. 1Db Nor 768Â· yA,5Â£1 4 \â€¢Itt,-6 El,LFÂ» Mia Â»hyrab Alk P-lrIA 60&12> 88: Z PNerb *Dil- 13 1 IM:E COMPDâ‚¬ M PROVI Dâ‚¬1> - -'--- 1 '61 1Â«60 96. 1 \ 14' Weldinedâ€ž Weldinesh; PRODUCT DETAILS GAUGE* MESH PANEL SIZE #/SF .236 2" X 2" 1.84 teriaUGauges: 1.13 .185 2" X 2" lain Steel-Gauges Greater 3" X 3Â° Please .76 than .156 .156 2" X 1" 1.18 Plain Steel-Copper Washed 2" X 2" .80 9. 9 Finish available gauges: .156 and .122 1"X 1" .96 2" X 1" - .73 lighter 2" X 2" .49 Hot Dipped Galvanized-Smooth 3" X 1/2" *a 13> ~ le. ~1 1 .9 !- n : 1,1 1.02 Finish 30 X 1" 94 1# 17Â· ..: 24 1*:.G .65 .097 1"X 1" .60 Â· 20 X 1' 1Â¥. 024 cd eb 1970 r. .45 Stainless Steel Type 304 by spe- 20 X 2" LA Â»i j g u, u 43 01 *0m U Â© < .30 cial order g 3" X 1/20 .70 3' X 1" .43 Standard Panels or Cut-to-size *Gauges shown are for plain steel. Hot dip galvanizing can increase the wire diameter thick- (Edge condition be clarified for any cut-to- ness by 3-4 thousands of an inch. Please see diagram on page 11 for panel information, size or non-standard panel order.) dimensions of mesh, etc. 7 - Â·5'i.~' --- --_, I I _311-1 Fl , r /1 1 - IP- -11:1 11:-1/0~' 1 1 '; 1 1 1- P. 34, 4#-~"~Ake.va 1 '13>.1 e... N:â‚¬1''L :lill:lizz/46:X&AE,Â£$2*21&9;liweinjij/till'll"lil d - 9--If V I -= Il-2-4 *1 jir. 1 k ..1 -171- '1 - 11.- r.lr ) ----.IN - 1 1, 10- 1 - - - KI -~ czc~ ~ L'i:-ill _i; Ir E - 31 - 1 L 1 EXHIBIT .1 1 1-J- 1 2.-'rE=- 1 1 11 r- ~Im!-1- -Â·- 4 4-,IM - 1 1./ 0 1.1 -I 11,Ii*~1 85*,imp-?EOM!2,' 1~~7, , ..8..--i-........... it- #1 441*#$#31 453/ - IST- * pÂ«j ~*4~%31*i~jkkip~i a 'IMLA ~ lilli 2,/1 .111 1,11~ r 1 lil ~.-1:ttli --+ 7 1 1(' fiI_911:1>; *tgeig'pI+E-1 r-.' -=. Â·lw'&/ 1 % 1. B.; 1 *:14,1 .911 Â£ 3, frur''tr â€žA.t, * 4 6, ~jik~ it=:11# fl' 11'nyMmIT ,â€ž#IM -15[F ri -17~1.11 1 1 1% ;I . '11 1, 11 - T ... 6 . 1 1:41,1,1.1 1.14.1 Il'F'll #11 : 'ril.1,~'I[Il-'3~Ilil,@Il|11'TI'~fr [UL.~ *EmEIi i 1.- 1 4< Arrr' n ~-11' ,[I 2]IFlirfr~Tr i~'1-'It rri- 1 f -:L -1 -41-16.16 , 661= -Emill] 1 1,1-' ---.Blpill///3 r 1411._ li 7-1 - e=q! Â©* 2*@r 1.1 1 - ce, 1,1% *Er,4- 1 01-1 r - -- I :~ ~ -#Â«Rfi~~46.*:~~zx : ../2 I ..-.. I' ' 1 â€¢ u 11 42' 1 1 01,1 .g~t~ '' 1 L .1 - M*iUMI i , , r-,i ' Im 1n- . ' .51.-- . IMIT-Â·E;'2 1114i i Le-1 -i'~ " i. 1=-,di=, i Â·;~*MI/ji.~ 1 -'k- -r- Tzi ./= _-_.73- fit: 0 2,&12*Al HAA.*r - r. 1-t I= - :T- 1 -1 - - 73711 4321 1~4,~ . Rk .*1 kÂ«Â«1 . 141 1 1 t ./- . 1,=a , -1Ep# #W-0 477 Welded mesh stair panel inserts provide safety. . \ .r#-dom.IN# -1 * -1 #i Weldmesh ks easily fabricatet . --7 : into lockers and cage kq *4 i i I.,1 . ,-1 Itt. , 1-11-, -1Â¥) 41 - h 0 -L rL 4 1- 11 11 f.31 a I. ./ Weldmesh fencing allows high visibiliw without sacdficing strength. 1 0 WIRE CLOTH 800-23743820 ~ IVE=NICHOLS CO. Â©iggs -='ll"#Mt,41#-n =4@TIOW 19'21 64 ~ 64' I Â¢ f .A 6' 27 5' 5, 02.7 * 17 51 61 2-7 * 27~ 27' 5 '' w. 0,/:.. C A / // - 1 - ~ IF>~0_ -730 2 / - 1.-Â»106CAPED "" 1 0\ / --- _ PEOIC_ i Câ€¢OrIC-, pÂ»eTTO UNDS | C l- / r , 050 4 -1 d Lit,lropo-M.>TALIC ACH *L,+IQSC+PINCH -----O Â£%19 TIA 4 - 75504, %-L POOL 5,9 2 IF, 1-0 Â®E AAA F,Â·.t r, 1,4 F-tt..Ap v,-0 *Hovy rÂ·eke / 1 - h 1-l- VeD,CTPTÂ»Â·1 OL T-â€¢57/r,C 7%- L.thi 5 - - aull-C,144 / 7630 1 Te 6% FIWTWrED ' -- --- a / -i----.---*- , 1 , C 1--1 / L ./- L,41Â·+POCAPE~K) hAE,A ~ < ~ 'f-Y*r410~- / ~ C C 232STI- I - -7 -4 /* k CONO. FAT'[0 14rÂ·+Ckk- i P E-CÂ«... 1 - c 4- j n.vt- RA-riD S -Ui h ik U PEOIL 1 * 0 7640-4 - _ .-- , 0 4/7 6,1 TY P.Kkip OEr'r, r Ell<LE 11*11.-- CookE>. c - --4-. 1 1 1 a t LANDÂ©CAPEP AAE,~ - -ti ' /./ 2 24,6 T--MP, A UN [74'G | - 04(6, â€¢DUPEWAL-1,4 IL , 1 1 W C.Â·21-60, PATI 0 1Â»1,1>Ele- -~ 280%- ___. ~__- 173 UNIT *5 / i 3 \I , P Ela-ic - ' - . 1 1 Â· FLANTE'2. < 10 /9 % r FLANTES- 77'KT - - . r--- n E 1 1 1 i 1 7 869 - 4 -1- -il-- -i--*- 1 1 1 1 i -0 -1-1 U U I ' Â·Â· ~ A 7,685, IffÂ£41â‚¬04/2!44~1T 1 1 FLAIÂ·4-1-/14 ---Â¢- ' - 1 e - 1 UNIT- *8 - 1 A -/ 1 1 1 ' --1 - 4 FLANTURL 54,4,56/1.le,wr f 1 i 58 ki~ - - --~ .1- - r .6 ----- PLANTEP- / 1 \ LIN IT *2 =5.1 - S 7#0 \ /.11> ---4 riru--1 - -.\ J -- N LL 1 I ZE UN IT# I ' 1649/ LIC,~f *. - C ~ _12.EQUIRED ~ -- ~ j '-- -_ < I.AHIPSCAFE/2 AAEA -- i . , SETâ‚¬,AC..~ 4 64 :1 1 1/ 56,Ke>5/LIC.HT ' ' - \. C f , 0 .\ 1 -__ CONG. 9172&*ALK, 4 \ --- 1 Ill / FLANTE A \ > , 5 A . 017*</B AA.11-0 nal )ry 4/- F LA INTEM- 6 .--Â· 1 / /59 091 - in m L.Abl 996608(7 H FLE# 7 - i ~ \ ~~ ~ CheLE ti 1 MCIERS -- -T-------1 ~ \ i -- 4 -----_1%'9-JE~1 \ ~,1 ~0 /1,2 VAH/-11;ANf,Ftle/V#rm- ' | F'ED<7 3 6*F&46/ Ul* 1Â·fr z R#ITE IL --= -9 - . - 10 / A 8976 -- / 4\\ 1 IN 911 ' 62211215 Â¥4/4,TU CLO FIN, 0. 11 1 1 - -f~ 1 1 '3(0,6' - W __lk J / ,/1\ 775 /vÂ»TcÂ·H F>611 LE,1 446 I / / \ : 2 EK:iliE* / LÂ·Â» tiv- < STP<11<619 -- 2-gd---- -_ -_ AMY)406?tp +42-5, 191__-_*- ' *DULDE.ge - . 0 Ii--1 r /1. r----9---f- -1_~Ll---~ - 1 6.91.-- -~ r. ---- 30 0 A~OFFAL-T 01*IVE.VÂ«+ 4 g.*11:,TI hlo cON'reu A. 05 <--------~ FARAN * PAVIN# 5 FE.*.FE. __~ 1 %142. 539/:fi.115*.2 For -Â£ \\ i ple/1-1 ils://uz~zz=I-11 / 0 // --t---- f~ff-7 41331, - ---%Â»_fl <fl 1 -- M O - L-===1 0 // - 6 -icÂ« - 0 16--- ---1 - Â·A'' ./1*f-1 65m0hITA.112- 0 --- 1 0 - - 1-- - - -1- \ 1 / 0 1 1 64 -- Il Â£3,4 / z 1 fli \ C. L.U ------- ti------ - H # -Njv* 2991 DAL- , ' il M 94) . / 0 - - - 7 \Y //-23..\43\J ' \ FT]A# 00# Â£ RE 9 7,Â»\ 44, I R ' 41 7 I - - i u-- 1,1 --.-66 -\ 4 *F"re' 1 - emt-412 FYLON 4 0 - DE .E.E. E. - - A) ~2, 160\ \1 / \ 1 - 0- 1 - T ?19 \ \ 1 \\ 80 ---r /Â«1 1 1 li I 64 1 17 66 0 E?t I ST 1 N 4 ~TREES To ---~ --- 1 i , 1 DENT- t PlcATI ON; il ~ 41 60 61 40 r-- -1 I ~ 1 Â© 3 0 LD I KIA 1 1 (Stiva EXHIBIT 1 2*==*<'M='*-- 1 61 \ \ \ ~~~ 91* '.1 1 I --4 1 @Alt:Â»~~e rER oiÂ« evercle I # 1 1 \*1 1 I -----1 1 1 Â·nÂ·+ OVEREO PARKING 1 2- 63 , 1 <~1 tATIL-IÂ«~0Â«~EGIJÂ¥.Â« Â«~444--t=(42</3Â»0-- 9 \ \ 1 103 Co / 0 --- - 21/// 1/9/ / 11 /O -097~ \ fc :-un Ap#L/:10~--,/ 1 r 1- \\ /-73Â»~ 2\4-- 4 1 l , / -* 449056+Prop Am-eÂ·~ ----- â‚¬\------ C-* 1 57 1 r46 1 RA/6, AT I O N D i 7,3 , 1 / 1 '-- - STX,KED DOULDERE,+ _ -+- --- ---- . -- Ar- - i .. - / - - < - P 12. D e r 12-T Â¥ LINE 1 1-AH IS>SCAPEA 1- -_ _- , , DRAWING Al~EA / *.MI-*-. -&---1- -----N 94- V 71 - 041 - " 9* ~ erre FLAH \\ - -g 0- .4-- .\ ~ 34 4(*vel, WALKÂ·lk.ICÂ¢ \ \ - 1 97+ ELLAP, NAY(|TY .C zl-k-- - - --72 $ -< -/ A g \ C -14- X , ~ FABILS DEFÂ¥,1 .- C.*167-1 NA -r-?45)6 -10 e>E / --- 9-@ //:4/.., PROTEOTED * FREE.,512Â·VEP Â·j - 40-2,-r- , -Ut - CURe CulT Cur,6 6 /1\\ JOB NO. 9742 qu -rTEA, 2-r-0, FE'Q- DATE 9 /150/ 17 e c i rr e ple 1 F i c.+ T I O '-11; ~ ~~25~ N / GO 1 i if -- / SHEET NO. 1 60 N\E A 13) O%6/ 6 12.OAP SITE PLAN / 9 SCALE: 111= 101 A1.1 f Gpl' SHEET OF C COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Sl)31IHDMV 33=!INNAD 531MVHD SHINOHNMO1 SINN31 ZOS-5Zfr0Z6 :xÂ¥:1 * 065S-SZ6/t)Z6 :3131 * [19[il OD 'NildSÂ¥ * [0Â£ 31IAS * '3/\V NVWAH 1%Â¥3 029 4/UL-O Â·Ill Zic/tal U.J =1Ulal l I Ill * j/\V UUVMU ILJJ 1 UCC - CIViI IN N3dsv 11*741-4 . =..' b 2, A â€ž 4. '24- Ite,rl</1Â·kÂ·jÂ«t'' lae:1Â·ril:.1 ./p'Â·Â·Â·f. *7*>* 2 9.2 Li)Â·r:..2-4..1 .Â·'9Â·Jal-. ;5Â·tÂ·Â· 4 1 i A t j ADJACENT DUFI.EX - 4 t I 49 Al V A:Â·Â·t Â·\. ~.;24â‚¬~ Â· ~ CA .. .. ... .. . .. D .... .. . :... - .. . . 0 - .. 00 8 .. D. . D D, 1 . . .A .31*. Â·IF > -te.ji . I :t. 9...4/. â€¢. ~ 1 -1 : .4/< .1 42[~ . . 44 Â· 7...... 7 C /4.11 4 i 63 4. 3 U k 4/ ,/ I 0.1 - 1 9.6-3 i ::. CA Â·* A .,f F. DECK 1,& / liu- -1 1 I DECK '/ i b 1 , V 1 toi-- 9 10 1 1 16 06 1 3 - m W v U LU I ' 0 40/ -7- LIVING ROOM ~ 12 m :94 A = 14= - i /*1 O Ch e - %0 * , LIVING ROOM -1/ . L- FOWDEK W O '4 , 1! rl FL-ANTEK 7--'t _.2 2=4'1 U.1 +647 -Â· q F A . 0 3, -Li * 1--T e ' 1< 1 \ ~f- , DJNjNG ROOM ~ ~ FOWDEK E--4 % flÂ·*-21 - f.' C A - qu r-7. 1 f '~ 7 - IC c k j - 31 '1 - 1 - i ~ ~ | ll:=-- FOYER lf-lll 6 3 -- 0 _1-> i 1 11 1 . i # DINING ROOM 41 _ - - 1-7 ' 1 0 1 1 . i 11 r -up I /3 - -- FOYEK 4. 4 i |di----' -Â· 4 7 4 1 <1 1 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1 -- 1 1 DN 4-1 1 : J L 3 1 .44 LT - 1 ADJACEM < PUFLEX ~,r' ~~ | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. V -1 L-_- ./ 7 V /'/94 . - 0 KITCI IEN/BREAKFAST O ' 1 .-w Â· O ..j ' 4 9 V ft / \ 1 1 1 1----1 1 1 // 0, 1 0 - 4.1 X Z \\ - \ FANTRY 1 LU I KITCHENBREAKFAST 1 1,- 01 11 - -- 1 -~ I f i, . j ! .. ,-r=U Â¥ , flic , , L FANTRY / < 1 61 UGHTWELL BELOW' ~ ~ 1, .-Â£=31 + 1 CD ' WALKWAY lili 4 'J '~ fr... 1 1 LIGHTNE[ 1- BELOW + DRAWING MAIN LEVEL PLAN 6 1 1 WALKWAY - 1 1 i ~--. - -- JOB NO. 9742 2-,f ~ DATE 10-1-97 47 $ H Â· . SHEET NO. , I /-1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN ' 0 f . E 1 ~2) :.33.0 0/ I ; i :LY'.,7 Rk... ).24*; ICY-Gl . 27'4 27'-1 ' 1 SHEET OF carÂ¥12]GHT OLARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 4 F '7Â£.m V 33=!INNAD S31MVHD S3 INOHNAAOJL SINN31 13 1131 * '3AV OCKHO-100 3 0ZZ S/V\OaV31N N3dSV r e ... 0 6.1,fi~ f . 1 .t.E : 4-Â·0: ''4* I. ' . ~Â«....2:2...1~~~~~f~ 'I~r~. . 1 . i. 1~4 9 .. .. . M *Â·. Â·.' Mit ' * t ... 1 2.6 54=' A -I. I CA :,6.' Â·./ .OP . g. DECK BELOW i t 1- 1/2 - DECK BELOW ROOF 4 U E DECK .0 . ROOF --30-~-3 CX m 4 DECK -- LU ' â‚¬ MASER DATH -- ' -- tt 14=* 1 2 -- Ali 1 U Iii / U MABTEK 1 1 - -- MATH 11 h_J- 1/ 1 MASTER BEDROOM i d Ill' 07* 661 ~ SHOWER ~I 0 11 - -11 7/ \ 40 1 *= E Z 1 \J In--i // U MASTER DEDROOM RR BHOWER I WATER 9 LO M 1 - CLOSET A / 1 - -1 LE.1 - 1 \k..... - .4 , 1 W.I.C. 1 9 I. 4 WATER r - - - - 1 D CLOSET ~ 1 1 1 E- 1 1 - U CO N A .. r1 - 6 / , 7- 1 U U U.-- ---'. 1 1 ,1 A W.I.C. 1 1 -m 0 1 Irp J 0 L__k - - - 1 X--- .-- 9KYLIGHT 0 -1 O J 1 1 0 A F - E-/ - d 1 \ U p -1 9 9 - -- 1 A U 1 1 if n ' --------1-.-0/ - 1 11 -9 - ADJACENT :*-0 ~Â£ . DUPLEX BEDROOM / j SKYLIGHT - - . 1 1 1 6. - *. BATH - A 0-0--4 1 ~ - ic f .. N / BEDROOM i 3 - - 1 / 6 Â· ,r BAL-CONY , f . f:W ir . I - t. ' ~ DRAWING BALCONY .- UPPER LEVEL PLAN JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-1-97 SHEET NO. - -, UPPER LEVEL PLAN . 6 1 I ht.., 43, 49 A2.3 ty' -2 74., E.4 - 3.40 -e k Uch . 1%. - ' .: ,/ 5 SHEET OF . 0- 61% - 1 ...4. A .%4Â· /4 k - , Â· 4. ellap Â·6 -4. 24. Â¢ COPYRIGH! 0Â·LARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS .t-*WI,~ T . 20 4. & I. 9205â‚¬60Â£6 :XV:I * 06 SZ6026 :3131 * 11919 00 'NBdSÂ¥ * LOE 311 SAAOCIV3 W N3dSV Z956-VZO0Z6 :XV:1 * Z6 :3131 * SWE,19 00 '3al3nl-1 SBINOHN/V\01 SINN31 1 Â· . r. CA 4 41 Il 11 !! 1 12_-1-_1_11'-Â·-,p~ h 1 11__IL__1__LIC--r .1 1 4~11 11 !! I !! 11 11 P--~ j, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 + . 1 1 -- 1 1 1 11 i )11 11 1 111 11 -- 1 - 1 1 1 --3 - 0-qlk - - I ~ 0 04 2 11 U 12-1-0 - --3-4~ - C ~==1 .. 6 ili~~i[I'*tilligil~ UPPER BEDROOM /L ItUNNTÂ¢Nt#+Le â€¢:, m# 6 , i ~ Â· Â· ~ 1 Â· Â· ELÂ· 110'-f 1 1 -- . -- 1.1 1- ~ 1 , 11 11. --- 1 40 -0 4 . =Â« 1 4 ru = = U L l . ' ~ ~ ~ | | ~ ~ | ENTRY LEVEL /~A 'Cor--=i~ 1 I j ' EL.= /00/-O, .P 1--~10=7 ' F-1 1 r-/Ir tÂ£ 1 ' -i iVERR l ' Ir=-titâ‚¬111 1 F=E=Â¥= i 1 Stril i t449 i (4 7=-11 LU 1 11 4 4 11 1 11 lul 111 P 1 11 111 111 01 1 li ill ini E I 1 11 lili IN 1 1~ Im lit 11 1 L14>44=21 1 L L=t=Â£=-11 1 |~-j|il-:~_~~~ _r~ L_ i~~=)~_3~~_Ul 1 L--- LOWER LEVEL* ~ *Â¤ EL= 87'-4 2% Z 0 38 4 Ed LIlli DRAWING EAST ELEVADON JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-1-97 - EAST ELEVATION SHEET NO. (1) - 78" - 1'-0" A3.1 SHEET OF (c arYR]GHT OIARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Sl-3311HDMV 33:!INNAD S3121VHZ) 9Z0S-SZ60Â£6 :XY:I * 0659â‚¬Z60Z6 :31ELL . 119[8 00 'NilSÂ¥ * 10â‚¬ 31.InS * 3AV NVWAH 15Â¥3 08 =7=0 064/VLO Â·AVO * Ot,t-OU/ULD Â·3 I 1.L * HUN.ti UJ jUILII I I Ijl * 3/\V UUVa limimilii:1111*mimm C CA ' %21 ./. j (4 2 2 U :4 4 E fs .1 iftf U f LU LL. LL 52* Z D j 1 1 j U 1 1 lili 1 1 1 1 -431 , LU -1 1,12- MASTER BEDROOM - ~. UPPER BEDROOM /b, EL= 112'-r E L.= 110'-4 L) Z -0 ~ ~ ENTRY LEVEL ~ UVING LEVEL EL= 100'-O EL.= 98'41 I i 1 11 DEPKOOM #1 W.I.C. ~ STORAGE ~ ~ (OFTIOINAL A.D.U.) & il-<-4 LU LOWER LEVEL ~ EL= 87'-4 0 U 0 O 2 5 0 0 U Z LA.J ' CL 41 ~ 4 .t' 4 1 44<W DRAWING SOUTH ELEVATION 2 id pB NO. _ 9742 03 1.A DATE 10-1-97 . 1 - SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET NO. C 1 ) 4~ - 78,1 - 11-oIl tÂ¢&3 A3.2 9 '71213 It SHEET OF . I = c )COPYRIGHT CHARLES aJNNIFFE ARCHITECTS '40.?1 P.~AFF.Fle * 0655-5Zfrt)Z6 :3-131 * L[%9 OD 'NldEV * LOâ‚¬ 3.UnS * BAV NVWAH 1593 OES S/V\OGV31N N3dSV 6 * gEZE--800Z6 :Illl * SEMe CD '3aINnTllf * '3AV OCIÂ¥301003 0ZZ Himmimmifignii-- I'llilimillimillii/N-illiwilli-liallilill.lid.lilli-l 2.2_01375.-'./1*/I ,Â·.2:,1625#,AR.: :-12"'/fat > 1 7 -3-:>2 Â·-r U ' 042't ' '+ 1.1:4* t. 44 lu (4 2 1- EU U LU 5.4. Q< % D U LLI ..J " UPPER BEDROOM Cj < -Ed-ij677----,3.- Z UVING LEVEL rL LOWER LEVEL/'~ C 0 0 U Lu ~ DRAWING __ ___- ~ WEST ELEVATION ~ JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-4-97 EVATION SHEET NO. A3.3 SHEET OF 4 ar,Riaft CHARLES (UNNIFFE ARCH[TECTS d .Â· 2.4. Â· Â·.- -- .. -SZ60Â£6 :XÂ¥3 * 0655-SZ6026 00 NMSÂ¥ * toE 31105 0 3/W NYWAH EVE OZS SMC)C]V31N N3dSV 47 0--al./ULD Â·Avit * Mt.Lt-756#ULD Â·1 Ill * lit,Wi UJ :IUMI I I Ill * 3/\V UUVMU IUJ 3 UCC SBINOHNMO1 SINN31 99941 ~0Â·94*Â© - ~~~~ ~~~ ............/..1//1../....1.......1/.1/.1/.1./1/. -1*-1-I---i-=i-Lir-I-I~- .~.~.~~~.~r,.1.~.E~,~=~.~.~~.1., ..1...1.-11.1.1...1.1.1.11.1.1...1. .....m-..1....Ill....1.11.1.1.11.1.. .i.1.1.1.1.11.-1...1.1.11...1.11. ....../b=~~'~'-1 im...ill.Im....milillillirmilli -1-1-li'-1-1. .1........1-1..... =1=1-'ll/~li~. .1-1-1- ......................................... --.-hiEEREEREFFKT 0~Â®imqmFiimiliT :;!':Hil';~~~'ili:E!!H.iii.!1!:im:=m::::: :â€¢::::;:â€¢::m:w :'--':=1:04::ii~r.41.E mimnimmi!81!iH.:EEHEak,ENHEE: :5:Er:;inii!~ii!#Hilli@;;::HiE!!iliHiâ€¢==: ....................... ................................................. ~~ ....................... t.......1:......d, Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·::::!Emi. ~litri!!ii,!i.:.::.:.:::.::tic~ I ~i:im:immi:jii;i=i:ii.:a:::.:2: :::==:::=:=::=:=:=B!!:,::.::.:.u:::: . . imillmlimmm;mlilimiii .11.1.l.1..1.I.l.I..1.l.I.1.I.1.1.1.11. .11.1.I.1.l.1.1.I.1..1..1.1.1.1.1.1.11. .11.I.1.I.1.1.1.I.l.11.1.1.I-l.. .11.1..~..1.1.Ili<,Ii...1.1.11. -1.1.1.....1.1.11.1.1..... .11.-1.1.11.1~illj.llil.1.11.1.1.Ill. .1.1.1.1.1..1.1..1.1.1...1.1. . g===== -N:WiN:Eli:!Ii#.'P:â€¢:i:i~ ................milm!!!335!EiHE..4.ii!~ -F::~:!F=:=i:ii~m -:â€ž,-â€ž ..... :.iR.:;:immismimigi.iimion:-milm ~memee=miESHEHEHHEE 253!EEin.SEEEmi mimmimi...m :inimi CE!:!:9!ii:!1!Rim!!i!!lit!!:â€¢i........... ~iiÂ®!!813!11!Wi!!ii|!i!@m~!immii i:Eli;;;~....1...~..:i:.i!!i.:s~..~.~&5~..~~: ~.;...'.2::.:.-.......:EE:.!:32!!!2!7::3...: Â®mi#mmwmmwmummm ..... ....... .ZE'.miSEE:.EEE2212:55;Zi Mi;Nimiii:... --- mil -m==/Hil."2/1111 -1. -- 14~~ . -/~Imm .1.1.lai 34*. 1 L th 31'... lk?/1 I-7....:.11 . L ... . " ..:7=Tr....:fz.-I - 52 - Â·64 r.k .r CA ..1:. 00 LU Z U LU LL LL .-7)1 1 I C -1 I ~/ r 4-- 1 1 1 1 -PAT INAED COPPER FAOA /1 1 Ill 1 1 4 X 4"WIRE LATTICE 'U 1- - 1 , 1 - liZ - STONE PANELS ~~ ///// 4-- - LU , ====23 - , ---) STUCCO 9 ====21 11: rÂ«444 Z U 71 1 E------1--- -- - . ./1 UPPER BEDROOM P. - . f EL= 110-4' 1 , ( '-' .1~///////////~/ 1 1 , /- 4%% ENTRY LEVEL ~ ELÂ· 100-1 0 I r--------- 1 0 1 LL=-2.ILL=-21[L==rl' 1 1 2-22222 r & I lf- - ll'F- - -Ilip-- 11 1 -1 111 lili 1111 111 I gr- 3- -11'K--11 1 0 11 A 11 1 0 1 11 illl lili 1 1 III lili lili 11 1 H 1 11 lili lili I lili lili 11 1 Z I L=JIL=JIL=JI I Lu 0- L---------- -----------2 LOWER LEVEL-~ EL= 87'-4* DRAWING EAST ELEVADON %.I JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-1-97 /~1 EAST ELEVATION SHEET NO. (1) A3.lb '23 9 ..7 4 L..~ .If,-L garYRIGHT CH,RLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS SHEET OF 3..7 -- 42Â· 44' t.,-t:*IN/Ad/* i.....:-' 1 441-. ' ..44;6 .0.-:2.â‚¬ Â· 9205-9026 :XÂ¥3 * 0655-5ZGDZ6 :3131 * LL9[8 0 0 'NldSÂ¥ * [0Â£ 3.UnS * '3AV NVINAH 1573 OZE SAAOaV31N N3dSV Z966-9ZL/0ZG :)<V:l * 9â‚¬ZE-814026 :3131 * 5Etlit OD 'Balpinl-131 * 3AV OC]VHO1O0 3 0ZE S3INOHNMO1 SINN31 , 1./ Â·6 ... . .1 ,.2 -4. ; 4.4.7. -Â·de 4.-}4Â·-~I . ' 4 3 1.26'.,4.-irl . 1 4 U St'.9..- .1 I Â·Â·"sÂ·'*-v . '1 15;' 42' 1 - . 4% CA (4 2 A b LLI E PATINAED COPPER FACIA U SKYUGHT Ill 1 - - STONE PANELS kl 1 1/ LL / ---7 STucco f X fWIRE LATTICE q~ -7 C 1 111$11 !11]111!i,111,1 I il!I,ll/1!IllIV! !11111!Ilill Il'111 1 :1111/1 r~MASTER BEDROOM 1 4 -f 9~ EL.= I/2'-r , 1 , I ~ UPPER BEDROOM /h EL= 110'-4Â» =Z=====1 1\ I r - f [2-2---71 -;L Ir-i -7- =r- - !11111 lili 1 111111 1 11 !! lillitlilli lili AY" lilli!Â£ 111 1!Ili! ilill/!11,/Il 11[Ill/1 Ill 111111!Ir--1 11111111111111111 1,1 ' // Ii'~Ii'li Ilil/11: 11/ - --*- - .-- ENTRY LEVEL ~ 1111,glillill!*11 'Ill'Ill I/1 -2___-~ ./ - .....i /h LIVING LEVEL Ilit|111||lili||19 0 E1111 1 Ili EL= 100 -C â€žI 1!1iI !111111 i!1 11,11111 III I . ..9.1 ~7 EL= 98'-ta Z-1 1 Â· 7.22Â°*it 1 1 1 1 1 I.---4= 1 1 BEDROOM #1 W. I.C. STORAGE (OFTIOINAL A.D.U.) 1 \ 1 1 L-= C~LONER LENEL '4) EL= 87'-4 ... I L.11 L--1 1.21 DRAWING SOUTH ELEVATION w *42 4-323. &4. JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-1-97 7.: 2 .4.1,). C. 2 Â·42: '. :.. (1) (.Â·-rfÂ¢ffaÂ·r.Â·tlth.Â·. - SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET NO. 'V I 74" - 1'-O" - 4- #;?3:36*, . t.: Â· -. A3.2b It 1,4 1 (k'COPYRIGHT CHARLES CU,NIFFE ARCHITECT5 SHEET OF 16/0Z6:XY:I * 0655-5Â©40Z6 :3131 . 1[919 0 3 'NBdSÂ¥ * LOS 31lrIS . '3AV NVWAH .LSÂ¥3 0ZS SAAO(]VEIW N3dSV 9 6-WCZ/ULb Â·XV:1 * kit,Lt-W CZ/ULb Â·3 131 * btrl.W UJ dU1211 1 1 131 * =IAV UUVMU IUJ 3 UCC UUVEIU IUJ N:ldbY d INNAD S312!VHD S3IAIOHNMO1 SINN31 0010]n r' I 0,1 .. ..9.f ..1,44 .5.47 - 7. .C:ly;rE.Â· 22. * I.* 1611Â·Â· 1 .....2. M..9.. ~ ~~ 1 L ~_____ PAT/NAED COPPER FACIA 4" X 4' WIRE LATT/CE UPPERBEDROOM EL- 110'-4* STONE PANELS STUCCO - . LNING LEVEL EL- 98'-IC' LOWER LEVEL/L - DRAWING WEST ELEVATION JOB NO. 9742 DATE 10-1-97 1 - WEST ELEVATION SHEET NO. (1- 1 - 2, '/4" - 1'-0" 1 i A3.3b 1 1 , ;:9Â·W r H! 1-4.Am/S C + '4' 11' ' AR S1331IHOMV 33:lINNFID 531>IVHD S3!NOHNMO1 SINN31 3/VUJUVJFN INJUJV 12 D, 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis- minor, partial demolition, Ordinance #30 DATE: October 8,1997 SUMMARY: This structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a local landmark. It is under contract to a new owner who wishes to remodel. On-site, there is a single family house and a voluntary ADU, in the small house on the east. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullens, represented by Studio B. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K,L, and M, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. 0 PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HI'C may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: A map of the property as it appeared in 1904, as well as the National Register Nomination for the site are attached. The applicant intends to remove a 0 living unit in the rear of the house, which is not historic construction, and convert the area to a garage. Skylights and new windows on the west will also be added in this area. A new skylight is proposed for the ADU (house on east). Early in the houses' history, an addition was made to the back of it. This addition was later extended to link the house and rear unit (garage) together. The applicant proposes to remove the recent construction so that there is a breezeway between the historic house and garage. The historic rear addition is proposed to be converted into a shed roof instead of a gable roof. A new kitchen is to be added at the southeast corner of the old house, and a new double hung window is proposed on the east side ofthe old house. Finally, the applicant proposes to extend an existing dormer on the north side of the house out by 5 feet to accommodate a new staircase. In terms of the garage and breezeway, which are not historic construction, staff is in favor of the proposed changes. In terms of the ADU, staff finds that the shed dormer is not visible from the street and therefore may be approved. On the historic house, staff finds that the addition of the window on the east is acceptable. It must match the dimensions of the existing double hung windows, but will be distinguishable as new. Staff finds that the kitchen addition is not particularly compatible architecturally, since the historic house is very simple in form. An octagonal room like this would be more typical of ornate Victorian architecture. It's visibility from the street may be limited, making this an area where flexibility may be allowed. There are two aspects of the proposal which staff finds require more study; the extension of the dormer and the change in the roof slope over the historic rear addition. Staff finds that alterations to the features of the historic building should be very limited. The dormer is proposed to be altered as part of a relocation of the interior staircase. Staff finds that this change may be accommodated on the inside in a different manner and that the corner location of this site makes the dormer alteration too visible. Additionally, the window in the proposed dormer is oversized and carries an FAR penalty unless waived by HPC. In terms of the roof over the rear addition, staff recommends the applicant locate a historic photo of the building or make some investigation of the framing in that area before a final approval is given for the change. The historic roof form should be retained or reconstructed if it is not as it appears today. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The house is part of a residential area, where numerous Victorians have been remodeled. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal involves alterations to the building, but will not reduce it's importance to the history of Aspen. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff has indicated the areas of concern related to architectural character and integrity of the building. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance ofthe parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to demolish part of a non-historic addition between the house and garage. An area of the house will be removed on the first floor to make the kitchen addition. Staff finds both of these actions are acceptable and necessary to renovating the building. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: As stated, most of the demolition is non-historic construction. The removal of fabric to make an addition is limited to areas of the building not visible to the public. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The addition is reviewed in depth above. Ordinance #30 The following standard of Ordinance #30 requires a variance from HPC, related to the new window in the dormer. Folume. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential, a determination shall be made as to its interior plate heights. All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than ten (10) feet, shall be counted as two (2) square feet for each one (1) square foot of floor area. Exterior expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor, and circular, semi circular or non-orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (15) feet above the level of the finished floor. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposal for minor development and partial demolition at 234 W. Francis Street, with the condition that the applicant eliminate the extension of the rear dormer and that more research must be done on the 0 slope of the original roof on the rear addition of the house, to be approved by staff and monitor." 0 0 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name MVWINS 9(6Â£71Â»eN* 9040\1 rru u 2. Project location 23â€¢* W 99'T- FieW c{ 5 Pr~ kr tea (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 8.-4 4. Lot size 1,000 9 F. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Porr f 6-wAV /MVM,1/4 BANCDW DOS V (PA'> BeK Ill k 000â‚¬ Te,06 16 04 1 2-10 354 0774 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9,â€¢790- 0 Wpaw,tu 9Â¥u Pto m Aâ€¢Â¢544 1 162'M 9 5 14. M I to 911 Affâ€¢w Co. 9Â£4 14 930 14,2,6 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD px Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUM a p Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Spli#Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Ekier-INY- 49 aoâ€¢ SF- Per.,peiv-ce w 1 TH- perÂ»umpe (4'00 f.f, 6-v *4-r- CO.rrAFe . B<$0#(3- 01)vse w< 4 9 1k;Â»wwS AND GumÂ·r- ce #Noe- 4 'â„¢D. 9. Description of development application &711--te 4 OF- T 86 fe *vrodierd A MueÂ·VA Â¢ 1Â»0- 09- N*144 #"Vie 46,Â·I~rÂ»rvAr rpl#- 4' 64046â‚¬ 4 1'*46.- 420 *115- ae'ld-1,9/rt_; 6*40% t,rDArf A- p*91*6#- Tâ€¢ 9*- 66*1<65 4~ G+â‚¬tr c.Â·*-Ase- ND #*MI, A- 09$1- 1.8- W ltâ€¢[DOW . 10. Have you completed and attached the following? rf Attachment 1 - Land use application form J Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4-,Response to Attachment 3 .* Response to Attachment 4 11111111 ATTACHMENT2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant V. N t 6.Ne,4 M V 61,1,44 Address: 2,5 4 1. 647- f=Alwel f ST~empr- Zone district: A- 6 Lot size: 1 00,2 56 Existing FAR: 41 te Ff; Allowable FAR: 3460 Â¥F Proposed FAR: 3 1 1 0 FA Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 37% Proposed % of site coverage: 4 614 Existing % of open space: 4& Proposed % of open space: W~er .000,61,Vlt~D Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 24 Accesorv blda: Il Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 1.F Accessorv blda: 11 Proposed % of demolition: IN,mote 0- *6,4 blnte N 'f <0Â¥0 -Ar IPPer. Existing number of bedrooms: G Proposed number of bedrooms: 4 Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 On-site parking spaces required: 1.- â„¢79 05â‚¬D tu #644 G-ANDâ‚¬F Setbacks Existing: , Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 1,8 ) 0610#Nit' Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Fronurear: 20 Front/rear: FronUrear: Side: Side: W Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 0<lif744 Cof,/Di nows: Nze'r- BeW3- (MANDet> ee*APP #N}- WT-M * > 0 e -- MN-1 xorrg Variations requested: / (HPC has the abilRy to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) STUDIOâ€ž architects 30 September 1997 Community Development Department The City of Aspen 130 South galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom it May Concern, We have asked our architect, Scott Lindenau of Studio B Architects to act as our representative in the application and approval process regarding out project at 234 West Francis Street in Aspen. Thank you. Sincerely, 0 w.*Acv4Vt v MA vih Don and/or Gwen Mullins, Owners 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 81611 970-920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 0 7.. < N4*4â€¢* 4 44 '4 0 ,00.0044 9 VIr, Dr 4- 8 4 3' 0.10 1 4 * . ASPEN 14 f b 0 01% 3 4 .6. COLORADO I ./ .1 F4* 9 4 : 01 8 4*4 82 70 8 ap 1 Silver King Dr 2 R= St 0. Q 3 N Spria:St 4 Cotto,-od Ln 5 Alax Aw 6 Oak La Mâ€¢fo'* 7 Maple La 4 5 1 Midland Park M 4 9 Maloolk La Â¥*/ i 0 6 10 Smug~ Oron a i 1 Ardmorr cl 12 Rivenide Ave 13 D.le Ave 14 Midiand Ave + 1 15 Mayfle-r Cl 4 1 Fy .ASE#y 'â€¢deab:P- 4 . of 3 4 , tw W 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 9 ./ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 82 MOAD CLAS*ACAT,ON / 1 1 1 1 1 /1 1 1 -- 0.1/0- 1/2 MILE 1 1 0 - 1 1 811 1- 1 1 0 1/2 KiLOMETER 1 1 01995 Phooe Directoric, Ce. Inc. Vicinity Map 0 4. 40 STUDIO" architects 30 September 1997 Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 234 West Francis Street, Mullins Residence RenovatioWAttachment 4. The proposed minor addition and renovation of the existing residence located at 234 West Francis Street is well within the square footage limits, height limitations, and does not effect the existing setback conditions. The same materials shall be used for the kitchen addition to the north that is contained by the existing architecture. These include clapboard siding, cedar shake roofing with copper flashing, and identical window and door trim. Similar mullion patterns shall be used in the new windows as in the existing. A new roof is proposed on the existing house of the same mate]ial due to the deteriorating condition. The original garage shall be returned to use as a garage accessed at the alley with two new shed dormers proposed at the upper level. Development at the historic main house is contained at the north or least visible facade and is limited to the kitchen turret. An additional window at the lower level east elevation is proposed in the dining room. The difficulty with the existing windows lies in the fact that they are single glazed and lie 10" above the finished upper level floor. Code requires 1'-6" and needs to be tempered glass. The existing small dormer in the attic is proposed to be pushed out 5 feet to accommodate the new stair up to the upper level A shed dormer is also requested at the existing north roof of the guest cottage. Again, this is the least visible facade. All elements and details shall readily complement and accentuate the existing historic residence, and shall visibly complement the West End neighborhood standards. Please see the attached architectural package. 555 n. mill st. aspen co. 816'11 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 2.* A 4 , r W 94*P.*,3 i.a'L.... 0*~... ~ ~ pr 7 0, l ES ST. C W. Pipe f. ---- ' 4 r. â€¢- ==== - ==Â«Uf 134 0 - =., s= 202 2. el C'* 51.'.,t2.28 23# 5 l l - 9-1 ts *h '6 8 #1211 . -8 'r Ill 1% CD 0 .D i $ 1 . 10 - s 4 *kk 1* ..1 ; A'><2@:~ R n. FD><30 - 1. ..1 1 -73 1 1 L-N- *b 0 co - 1,= & Ch 75' .03 3,<44 0 (3 L=-2~ o I 04 1 0 -1 5 1. 0 P,/\4.~A N \ r \ -- ===W=.=FRAN{-ES= ======= =Â£=_2~ 6========44 pipe 134 0 - .74 510 - 516 522 526 3 11 b -1 2.~ 11 1- t-1 L -- 49 |*-1*192#i i 1--ir -2-z-1 - /1 - 9( Uj'C: 7 :t o Li- 11 11 9 -1 11 l,=11 0 11 -4 9 % k k k 4 9--9 3><k. N'- Q U 0-1. 4 , /\1 11,6 -Il .I.--7 p. â€¢9 . out#oll=.>4<41. 0,3 0 11 11 1/ 16 \1 U- 41 4 91 Z 0 0 â‚¬1,4 41~.,~.f. C.'E rb, 1 4 11 A 4.. - (31 r.4 2ND rip r 7 2 7. Description 157 < J idition Check one Check one aexcellent Bla deteriorated Illa unaltered 3_ original site Ar- good n/a ruins X altered nla moved date IMafair Illa unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The 1888 Davis Waite House isÂ· a large two story dwelling with a rectangular plan, hipped roof and a front gable ell. Sited on a corner, the house is constructed of wood frame faced in clapboard. There are several mature cottonwoods along the side street and in front. There is a low wooden picket fence around the street sides of the four lots. To the east of the house is a small, one story build- ing with a gable roof and faced with clapboard which is said to be one of the early log cabins under the clapboard exterior, which was probablv put on in the 1890s. (photo #8, aa, 8b) .The building is contributing. The Waite House is a vernacular Queen Anne design with little ornament Â·except in the gable, which is faced with fish scale shingles and has bargeboards. The front porch, on the west side of the ell, is small and projects out from the front of the house. There is a one story enclosed vestibule with a flat roof behind the porch, which may be a later addition with the porch rebuilt in the front. The porch roof is also flat supported by heavy turned posts with decorative J brackets at the top. The windows are one-over-one, double hung wood sash and for the I most part, are tall and narrow single windows or in pairs. The first oor window in the front and the one on the west side are double the dth of the single windows. At the rear of the house on the alley is a two story, wood frame and clapboard house with a broad gable roof constructed in 1956.* In 1959, a one story gable roof-addition was put onto the rear of the house connecting it with the 1956 building, (photo #8a) All of the buildings are painted a dark red color with white trim and black accents. The Waite House is a designated local landmark. * This building is non-contributing. j 4 4043/ p. E--.7:~44,*6* .:74 .4,M'7*~M"~ ' L...J L-J L.-j L.-U 1. 155- 8. Significance . riod Areas of Significance-Check and justify below i prehistoric ]26. archeology-prehistoric BLEbommunity planning DZ@ landscape architecture.Ala religion : 1 1 1400-1499 Bla archeology-historic nta conservation Illa law n/a science ' niza 1500-1599 nia agriculture n/a economics Il/a literature n/a sculpture B nla 1600-1699 .1. architecture nyla education Illa military n/a social/ Illa. 1700-1799 n/*_ art nia engineering Illa music humanitarian 1 -X_ 1800-1899 rl,~a. commerce nla exploration settlement Illa philosophy n/a theater 190& 1900- 0,-a. communications nta industry x_ politics/government ~ transportation D/.gl invention i n/a other (specify) : Specific dates 1888 Builder/Architect Not known 0 0 Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The Waite House is significant for its association with Davis H. Waite, an g Aspen attorney and newspaper publisher who was elected governor of Colorado in 1893. Waite lived here before and after his storny two year term as governor, - until his death in 1900. It is the residence most associated with Waite in the state. The small building just east of the Waite House is important in Aspen' s architectural development. Originally a pioneer log cabin, it was later covered with clapboards as the town developed beyond a mere mining camp. The Waite House itself is an example of the large, plain vernacular dwellings typical of the late g 1880s and early 1890s that were build of local materials. It is one of the best preserved houses of this type in Aspen. BACKGROUND Davis Hanson Waite, born in Janestawn, New York on April 9, 1825, came to Â· adville, Colorado in 1879 where he practiced law before moving to Aspen in 1881. ite was elected Justice of the Peace in 1881 and was also appointed the first superintendent of schools in Aspen. 1 In 1882, Waite and his son started the Ashcroft Journal in the mining carre of Ashcroft. Waite bought the Aspen Tires in 1883, but sold it to B. Clark Wheeler, who later became Waite's son-in-law. Waite and Wneeler Elso established a law practice together. 2 In 1885, Waite #r married Mrs. Celia O. Malty of Sanquoit, New Fork, a second marriage for both. . j Waite, a labor sympathizer and Populist, advocated free silver and other fl radical reforms. He founded the Aspen Union Era in 1891, a weekly newspaper. In : 1 - 1892, the Populist Party nominated Davis Waite for Governor of Colorado and he was inaugurated on January 10, 189 3. IÂ·hen Waite took office, the price of silver was declining and the business climate was economically unsound. By July, the situation was bleak as the economy crashed in Colorado with the derronitorization - of silver. Waite spoke to a large crowd asserbled to discuss the deteriorating .1 conditions. In his speech Waite earned the nickname, "Bloody Bridles Waite" from : 1 a phrase taken out o f context: "It is infinitely better that blood should flow to our :. G horses' bridles rather than our national liberties should be destroyed. " It was during Governor Waite's term that the bill for women's sufferage in Colorado was enacted into law, raking Colorado the seoond state in the union to ~ do so. For the most part, however, Governor Kaite's term was stormy, marked by labor and political unrest, unexployment and economic depression. The miners strike at Cripple Creek which was settled in 189 4, gave a victory to the new union, J the Western Federation of Miners, and proved a political set back to Waite and the pulist Party. The "City Hall War" in March 1894, added further miseries to iite's term. When he tried to dismiss two merrbers of the Denver Fire and Police )ard, they barricaded themselves in the Denver City Hall and re fused to leave. Waite called out the armed militia and Federal troops to surround City Hall. Thousands of Denver citizens turned out to watch the action--which never materialized as Waite decided to let the courts decide the matter. 3 - - ---=-rrr~.-0-9 3 NPS Form 1 C-900Â·a OMB No. 2024-00~9 0.82) Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior -= 2 - i-'eft- - --_ -(4~34524 National Park Service iM*'- ~~1~fÂ¢4Â»43 0% fj~ c 6 m 17~.3---IT.--,0,-t@*1-Jâ‚¬24~ - . 4 -r -9 1 -1 F -14-<.151 National Register of Historic Places i= --2 Q. Ur-- U %13 Inventory-Nomination Form I- d 1 Continuation sheet Significance-Waite House Item number 8 Page 2 Davis Waite's bid for re-election was unsuccessful and he returned to Aspen where he died of a heart attack in November 1900 while helping his wife prepare Thanksgiving dinner. Mrs. Waite died in 1937 and both are buried at Red Butte Cemetery in Aspen. 4 In the late 1940s the house was the home of Gerbert Bayer, noted artist and industrial designer, who care to Aspen in 1946 to work with Walter Paepcke. In 1953, the house was owned by R. O. Anderson, who is still the owner. Anderson served as the chairman of the board of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Footnotes 1. Robert F. Bartlett, "Aspen: The Mining Conmunity", 1250 Brand Book (Denver: The Westerners, Vol. VI, 1950), p. 144-145. Aspen Times, April 8, 1882, p. 2. - 2. Andrew P. Buesch and Mannel Hahnn, "Aspen over the Divide-Its Past and Present't, The Westerners Brand Book. (Chicago: Vol. VIII, May 1951), p. 19. Aspen Times, May 19, 1883, n.p.; January 12, 1884, p. 1. Len Shoemaker, Pioneers of the Roaring +Fork (Denver: Sage Books, 1975) p. 77. 3. IeRoy R. Hafen, editor, Colorado and Its *People (New Your: Lewis Historical Publishing Co., 1948), Vol. I, p. 465. Carl Ubbelohde, Maxine Benson, Duane A. Smith, A Colorado History (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Co., 19721, pp. 224-225; 228-332. . 4. Aspep Times, January 14, 1937, n. p. Shoemaker, p. 11. f~4~ -iÂ»..~ . m"Ptl?:t:.- elfill.Â·7 Â·.; 0.Â·.. ~ 1 7 -- 1 t - *'%327% erÂ·12.- ... 3 - 6;AkÂ¥*16 , . g 4... :..Â·*:iegi:,?+R ; .,ti' i.Â·: r.. 4 $ Â·M .t r Â· 4 -.V,4 - -9.- 14 , I ~36' Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review r-=m~n 30 September 1997 :t '4:9.- . ' 49 â‚¬Ll .H :?. r Studio B Architects v' I~ ..~ 8,2... 555 North Mill Street Â·.70 ,Â·,4 Aspen, Colorado 1 I i Â£ 1 4 = 7- .-4.- a 1. ir Â£ I .' f 2. & . ... Â· I '42, 2 < r 1 1 t. 1 L 1 i 64 1 1 Li ' Â· 4%},r :1. i :.1111: . 4 1 i . 1 * 1;: ========== ./ . g . ; . , 4. I , j vi , 1 if i * 11\ -4 â‚¬ r. 4 ?4 . 4 4 9 ' Â» . A ti / 1% 234 L -1,1 - 4 - 19-j It- f I N / U 1 \11 ili..Â· / -1 11 + / rt f '1 14#i \ Â« Iii !./ 1 94.- 4 e i i. Â» N/ N{ i ../. 4 1 t 1 1 ~V --2~ - - i 1 FLAr) 1 1 .' 1 1 i 1 , t- i. ' I Mullins Residence -- 234 West Francis Street f ~ Aspen, Colorado 42#- - ~6 j ~52 /VeR: ~_52,~24/4 Schematic Design Package/HPC r .W ...4 4-624. u Review . 24.*/4...P:K 30 September 1997 . 41Â· 2-ar,? Â· 7 SIN , . 1 *- - 1 1- 1 1.... . IK'ti~ .y~~ lilli lit 11! 1 lK , I!*11'5- 1 ) 4%049.... 2, 7-: . ' 1 -1 i li - ' 11 4 A - jiliii i- 1 17 r . . â€¢ r E-2._'-L-Il ' 9 4.4 Â©32 1 ..04 8 1- Ik- tax V 43 ,/.1 --rÂ«\\ .... 4 .. 4~-4 k , A- i -'.0 i 1 i - iÂ·t ..t 9.4 ALL . 4 i ; ..t . -. 6 7941}f 3 Â· - . UL t' *.. ic. - i' .~ Â·Â· ~ %142.J,Bil. Â·Â·' '-.4 8 1 - 9 . il//1 4 i 1'.4 - 1 1.1 L - - - - - I fli'I; 41 4.11, A 1Â£lili-flill-1, . 9 1 - .f':.P : 411~0 j 11?1; Ili ( ~~~\~ k. :/.4 .1 I dOil i Â»< I I 4 ' i..'{'iii] , 2 p. .. (fil!'7; . .% â€ž *. I , . 1 1 1/ Ii' i N.0 \ 1 f V F 11.'11 . 1 1 il!lili i i:i ' .., ,. . ' --- 4 6 2 0-H 9 - - 4 r- e- 6 5 er- , Icsâ€ž, 7 . Â¥+0 9 0 480 4 \ f i 1 -*- -0 #.-0 Â¥ i \Ir \0-0 Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 Â· i. prle ., A.N. .Â· 2.: 4 1 ' //3: 1 . " 2 - . .24110-2.6 - :I 1- 1-~. 4. #. i lf/ 1 t it =i-/1/ -114.- 1~ ....4--z-,4 Il 1. ...~L i , ~ ' TI " I b ' - - -- - -- ---+.+---11. 1 . . . -- '' .1-/*--/--1 . / .1 1- - - - 1 - Â¢i;p. li : 11, :it r .1 1 ------- Â¢ 1. b.,117#Ori i l,Iv/M> - it .- -MT -,1 1 -4- 1 5 1 1 1 9059 411'v# 1 -7 11 - - i , ~ . ' f i. 11 7,9 1 " V . 1 1 Â·- Â·Â·pi--d : 1 1 1 - /J 4 1-' f p 1/ , 1 11 tÂ· 1 42, t- TVO 1 - 1 , . U . /2 1 1 - 01'*Â¢ f,- i ' \- 02%,f , ..1 2 1 - , . 1 . . i - (/11.2, Pr' - . . : ~ti Â·..~ 3 i. 00 - 1 1 -0 Â· Â® F lH 13/ -11 1 U 4 9 i , R X /6 , . 2 .Â·2~ 1.77â‚¬ 1 1 1 M 9 1, : *. 1 /44 -'- * . 1,2 + 3 4. f - f P Pinttle ill , g,Ffrf ----- I 1 1 1 Â· br Â· opi-, --- 1 . 94@- U.:----,--.-Â¥. -'., - .- i, . j â€ž *.1 / , .i 1% 4 12 1. PrÂ«.H . ... I 1!1 1Â· 1 - 1 In ' 64 03 437 4_ Ilt--~(t- - Â· tt . 1 - 9 4 Â¤W 57*f 4--9 V P 0 ~4.-s,Â£9 j...7t ~ L 1 77 - lili . lt{. -" 1 Â·-111- 1 1 ..1 I Ill 1 . . It - I r---- Â· - 1 11 1 4 1 11 r 1 11 0 11 . 1.1 :Â·Â¥9 84(,H " MT,1Â¢Â£.11/limf : Â· I IN 01 1- 1 1.- 5 1 1 5%1; .5,fi,f ~ .1 jj 1 4/ 1.1. 1... - - r 1 1 - - f I .47 1 - . 2 . 24' 4 941,6 . a -.' 2Â·7fâ€¢**4*.'i.9.itÂ·er:W'W:~kâ€¢-V*964Â¢Â·M U...14'-~N ,.."r- -t &I- E k C â‚¬ ft M + l,#w-gg. , f-V e k , Â·Â·yi I - \42 0-\- 0 , Mullins Residence Y + D 234 West Francis Street ~Aspen, Colorado ' 1 Schematic Design Package/HPC 19 Review \ 30 September 1997 . f - 70 :.r-,Â·r, wr-'Â·-Â· El' . /4..:. I I .10Â· ka2 24#*. . l- | 1... 4/ t 1, - 4 . - t , 9 .9 A . + J Â· U - 11 . 1 -t 1 1 1 d . 11 1 3+Z ; 4 . 9% , 1 1 Â·I Â· r. 1.1/ Â·Â· Â»AerM 1 r .4--0,64.T I, em)000 M : 1 e â‚¬ t 1 i 1 5 1 F -t Â·b, ~ - - i 411-11. :Iii J, - I. ' . 1 - 411 -1 -If :F N, 1 - ' 2~-:1 -1.i--34 1 tv 14. 1 e- - --C tit<*0~ r 3 4 - , ./ 1 2--4 - *Â·~ ht~ . 1 4. , . , .[ i / 1 't \ - , , 4â€ž'..4 1 Of'*/Kyl ' ~ .*11 1. 1 1 - t 1. 1 2 ~ .1 1 \C't *dÂ·! 4 19 L 4 4 4 =- . : . i i 1 1% 0 ; 2Â¢WMf ' f 1 1 --, ~61.0Â« . . - Litil 5 .1 1 - *4.1 A .* 9| 1 i 11 1 1 ...I--I.- .. , FA . I 1 1 - 1 4 - ... 1 . 1 Up *A 6 - . 1. . I k /'- 1 . . , .. ".-. I--Â·i. Â· h GÂ» Â· - . 0 - li. :.1 1 ' M -* tr~ . . - -1 .1 V . I. Â· ' :t 1 f r /. q Â» (0~0 M 1 3 1-41=12 CUWÂ¥ , 1 . 1 41Tt1 ---Il---I -------- 9--- --/4- , 1 . I J \ 1 3+ 4 i'. 11 1 *-1 .4 i i i Â· , 1 Â· ~t k 1 -- H ...1 -It i . I - I Â· 1,4 -- O b .0 .4 . U. l.11 f*)Ele, PLCÂ«, /4 9- 6'8 04, 9-'6 1 , lili Â¢) 6*141.1 M & . .7 - P CÂ» h V . Â·- '. -9,4...... .. s # . . . . 1 .-1. u . v.*-. . ' A ./9 l Mullins Residence 1Â¢Avt 234 West Francis Street 9 .. ~ Aspen, Colorado . Schematic Design Package/HPC 0 41 4. Review 30 September 1997 , 19#PE 002.. . , itt %4Â·Â· OtÂ«ft,.PA , 44 6%.5 5 44 3 2' U iÂ· :... <. Â·Â· i . I Â·'---) .2 ,'.6/..i'-t.fh{ , .. 2% $'r Â· f- 1 . 49.â€¢ f - .t. - 1 .... / 1 7 . _! 1 + 4,11 ~ 4/ li 31.- 1 ..1.11 . r-- L- R--7-~---- - . 1- 5 2 1 ~ Â»-il---#--A ~---Â·---Â·Â·Â·--------------t- - 1 1 1. i. 1 F~.tf. -- ' 1 -==ZE=ZE===23 L--1 . - 15Â· 441 : ,1574Â£ Â·4. -7-â€¢4â€¢71 S . 1 1 4 0 ---- tf , 232332223 - 1 r~- --1---4 1 - - 41 - '' 'I. A'Â· - IZEZZIZZIZINIZE] 1-_--'-i -*4 : 'r 3 - . 1 t-----=----4 1 ... -1 L. ..1 r=Z=ZE====1 7 Â·. Â· . - M p - F ..Â· eâ€¢ m==I==22=[ 11 [--- - F==uzzÂ© ~_ 1 - *====1 4 4' 1-. 1 .t . , - 4 g~>Â»77,4/Â» EA:2Â£:/tÂ« Â»*22\ 7709 -f - 41Â¢-9 O. J T. : I. 2 r- ''-Â· r Â·Â· :1.44. Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado . Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 4. 1 30 September 1997 - " 1 7..1 1 - A-1.1.1 A . $./--- /. ' - *,f i>Â· Â·Â·.* 4.\ \\\ 1 1 \.0\ 9 \\.1 \00\ , 1 1 1 - i 1 4 1 , ' --'ll ---Il- *-- I ./ . I'...----*. j. &* * t \ ~ (1323_.-ir-i--6 -- . . .. -- . - r-' - .. F-- . \\ i-i 1 11 A----I-----t. 11 B 1.--1- 11' , 1 1 r---1.- lili & EL+-,9, I- 1 $. -Pill-* 11 I k------2.- ] I H ~-7 7-----7-1 ~ /47! 1-Â» 1 . 11 li L.232-EU -111 ta I.-/-*-I--/-- -11 +-4 ,-._-â€ž_-1--4 1 M Â» I k---~7Â»--~ --- r / t--- .V -# Ip- I ... - 1 r--1 1 1 fi ~ 4-=Â£ 1 t=J i - -I Â·Â· L.- - f ill 3 I' L' 1 . 1 d : - tr==4 1 - j lit 1 171171 11- , .â€ž- _...-_-_-_ --* _ --____-r : 111 f - T . . h - - ,. Â·Â· ~ - ~1.411111.LIZ~ -Eli-1 .- ....... -1 . -- - L- --------.-....,-.,--.,-.*---,------- -- .------- --.-=--.---4.------,- -- . 4 4 -Â·-1 i !' i It 11 I t# 1 ! 141 -4 I U.4- a=* ~ t- -----11 L.-------- Fk=*==%#*= - B.-.---I-'*~--'*'--.-.--9----- -S----.--*y-'--*.-------t-.=A --=O--= -- ..~-.-' --- Vi p A 3</617AA:+ Wa~ 67- ~770,9 :- ' 1 + -.- I --- - Â· A Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 I } 1 7-1- 6 '. 1 41: ; ~ ~1 --rÂ·-- 2 + 7-1- 1 -f-.,-1-4- .tin- 1 . --.-1.....1- -I'. . t -- 1 -2.-2102-- 1 -1--4. - .- \ \ . I P---1 4-1-- r' 1Â· 1 - .1.1 tte,Â¥4 -7 4 4 l i>--4- i 1 2.-Â· =pr. 1 -- iffÂ· ~ fl{ - c_ 1 jj ' ~ '.VI 4. t.. .1 *, 11Â»7 1 1. 1 .1 11 - J i â€¢ 4- ~ul_,~-Ls_-LA-*4_w--.. ~\4 ' . - -- 1-7 1 .1--1 1 - l.___.1 __cocr~.-ts- --::a :. ti _ -~LV "2--,4.'----~~~~--.-.----+1- -- ----1-----*----*--- --. 4---- -i-~.-Ul<_ ~1 ! w-.*.-<. -.-. -ry 1 ---/-4--7 ----4----7-.La---- 12 .1--+---------,- --- Â·Â·Â·------'-.- . ---Â·Â·-'Â· .T*-'. -- â€ž.... ...--........~ .... ... ---- L---~+_- I. 1 1 Â«4(755 77//26 bleÂ«91 Â« A Â»*~9* 75*/3,/1/ -Â¢ , f f . D.. C Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 - /3 3 i 1- 111 1 1 1 I - .'. 1 1 i l.' --241--4 .Pt..1 :' \ Nt-1.... - 4 , - , --- 1.-3 r li 1 ' 2/4\ /1 r \\2\ 1 /// \\ \4 % 7/ I \\3 t - 4 1- 1 1 - 1 . 1 1~, 1 4 f . it 'Â· ..4 \ \\. r #t-7--9 1 4, i 1 /1 ' . i t- .i \\6 11 L----_-4 It 11 1 \3\.- 1 /5.4/ %., ~V. '1 1, \ , --4 , r----'--------+--*---*-*--*--4---ir--+-v.4- 1 4 4 \ h. %.,~ 11 Â¤----4 1 , 1 . --v . ~ 1 , - . / : -t--- -: 1 11 1 . 31. '11 . h.. :t: , 36 31.t, 03 . \L. If It 1 4 6/ 1; 1'= 1. 1 , 1 1 5 1 }i ... f /1 Â·11 1 T U - I.- -Â· , + ----- ' .--/ 1- - ~ 1 " \24 1 --r-~.....- .....2--4.-, \Â» -4 3-F=R i ---7~== -1------Ill-/--.-- r- 4- i Li - , i -/1 - t. -- . 11 1 .1 t---=- 11 1,-- t#Â· . --_._-__-- -____-__4.l i, 7----.-------- - ---- ... ----1 11-----11 E------1 i1 1-- El , #I---111. 1.11\319 -~, . -7 11~ ' 1 i_z=z=~z=zzium ~1 11EIZIEZZI_q 1 , i P ' Â· Rk ----------------------1---+-,=-----7.-------m.-- 1 ilt. 017 1 / 1 -,pÂ·t- 1--r--r. --3-----'-7----- ----- 1----7-1- 1 il ~%.,1..>ix} 17- 4-~11-- -1.-Â»---+LIlli -1.... . P _w-~--4 2111 li lit 2 C I ~17,---Â·Â·-4,lk--8%--4 1- 41 i Â·'--4- F 1 '1 . . $ A-=-,4Â¢ - -----Â·Â· +_-__--2.--.._--=---~------*Â·--*I---*-.-*---0'rÂ·Â·-----~Â·---Â·---Â·-------Â·Â·-/---.-.----*-*---1--*Il-----------Â· .. -1 , 1 - lie 6 0" ', ..4 L t .. 2,- Mullins Residence . 4 * 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 40 - % 1 449. Schematic Design Package/HPC Review ~ I. 30 September 1997 -, f 1, 1 - fof I CÂ· A r. 1.. 4 - 26 1 -I f /2 4 A t / / .222Â»1 li U -- i Â· 11 1 \ - t -'1!~A. LI - .:1 1. 92. /.---.....C..f-73--for.-11 Ut-Â·Â·- ~Â·Â· Â·~ 4 -1 1 6><U : ri -LTF~===ir r---; 0.-~ Â·Â·Â·---=j /-1 -___ 1 C 1{ li ..C- --- ...'; ---,-.:- 1 111. 4.1 ~ 1-- - . 4 . - 11 Fil,- Â·11~LIT_utl .0 ~ Or . , 4 Â¢ r Â¢ 1 1- Un .-I - kt - t--*'--- ------ -- 1 -7---:-- -- 1 4% 4 *.-.-.--4 r ~~_*~ 1 1 . - 1.frrt/trit p..... I--1- I-Ii--/ ---.-. j . . 1 - - 4,2--2 fdE 3-U-~ -- --ig.--1-*-Ij r 1 . ' .~ - 1 .. 1, , 1 ~- - ~-~- M .D 72Â»S~ 02*21-39>4 778>-,Vi / 474*wi'*c@*1461* 01*W~EE 4 ) '*07/ 0*2~2164770// / 0,Â«44 //1.<25*11 rm, i./ /42- Al.-/1, C--e r t. rl j r , I 4,1/1 674 -, 7-- t.. *-5@â‚¬' - Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 1 Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 Y '. .. .. C. h. e , J.>/ -1-1 I ~ i . i I , 4 1... ~ ~ ~Â· 2Â·tÂ· â‚¬ U . E 1'3 v ' ---z *- -v.*.*.~*. f 4/- 7 - - ---.- '--'.0.-Il- -.~-- I. t - --- S 4 j ' ~ ~ r-- , Ill. 1 1 ~Â· Â· - i. 7 t . .-- , r --* - f f 7--7 j wr - AL.-9 --=1-1 1 2 1 M i 1 T L I' 11 -1 11 ; 111 12 -I-1Â»1 - 2--i i. . 1 11 tÂ»3 | 1 I liL _.Â· 11 E-*-11 1 i 11-7--m-- 1 1 11 E-Zi==- 1 IE ili- - 1 ~7.----4-Â·-Â·Â·-4==Ii==wi,I=i=ei,IiI,=,0= T-Â·-~Â·-*4- 1, . 71 2Â£1-*. . I >, - ---I.-----4--M.....1.--,-----,-e- 1* -â‚¬, 5% 1 41- i M#- , CY 1 4T 1 tr!+ Â·4 > .~t i Z ' . ~ ~ *5*411-a VAT/ 0/ 7 ; 6141<#A~BE j litf -44Â». /0,e,.ji*~-.r .~-Â»,-0 ~~~0421 97:65$/Â·,g -,0 Â£Â«3~-*1/~~zfI~~tri ~~d~~;~Siâ‚¬Â·ty~~. - 7 f/. -4 Mullins Residence ~ ~ 1Â·C Â· ~4 - ./ 234 West Francis Street ; Â·i.Â·,Â·4~ Â·' i Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 . .1 i â‚¬ .t I. 1 4 ... I ...'/ 11 Â¢ \\ -1- - 1 pw I , : i U ,Â· , .[1 1 - 44.70469 nÂ¢W 1 .. 1 i \N \ rit>d #Â· / Â· t- - - -3 - 1 1 1 A.-7-7. x 6. :[ . FOr. ,~4#Me,i f<2211 1 ' . "1 Â£ t41- elit. 1\ 0Â¥, w b. r? \ 44 -fr, 4 /4 4-- yf Â»v tti,t f Â·rt -1 91 M ! rt, P 7. 4 - .,i . fÂ·f ~\ --- i III.,4 loop I v.vi i . e 2-0 . 44. 1 / 016- , Un f#,3*Â« - 1 + 1-----4 6'Virs 54,2 4- -1 I Â«4 1 90'Â¥6 .0 i Xy// .. 1- . . .9 . 1 -1.-1-~ 1 4 1/ . L.J , f, a _ 4. â‚¬-601 It . 1-111 11.4 J , 1 -3- 1 I 1 /1 p#wooe. \ 9, 971 PRplir ; 1 21' 44 ---- 1 l Â«Be~*Hee.%. 4 - .. 1- De#0 - '11./. 1 11....1 0 040*41*Â»4,9 -4 3 t 4 - 44*04<.-1 P . -Ii- ....*.. il--- 4/ 4 /1- 1 CLED- , .1 - i 1 ",%016 â‚¬13 - I .1 4*WAK ' 41 ; ,-4--1. i , - I - 'i I -I . 4904# r v .hÂ« , 4 1, . 1 4 4 h . 14!49 , . 7 ' I 1 ./40 1 7. A ' -1 ~ - .8#vit-,041:94 9 + Â· 711 ~ pr '5#M teÂ¢*:/ 1---,0-â€ž .....:,r.. - 02.lip '110 1, 1 11. ft , 34. p.,P"4,41/â‚¬ -:â‚¬ 1 1 i.: -00000 4 . 41(Ill 1 ./ 14! . 1 - -- . 1 1 (0* 58*6 =2- f. i .5).. e *,... '' i T. -,~ 406Â¢4 (, / . .1 2 1 f ,...,ci i '2;.' 5Â¢00Â·4 2 ~ . . \-,i 1- " . L - 64461 L... r 1 1 -- I 7 \ \ /7 \ fE- --7 1 1 : 1 1.-S . - ~-*â€¢&$~--0â€¢em~-â€¢--a k c--. i 1 . .1 - , Ji r . i \ 1 9== . r Fl ftÂ· ~Â· L . ...21 1 1. , k1 .. . /--aL-2/ t.. 1 . â‚¬ 11- 12" 1 4.5 *' I tt + 4 ,- 9 0Â¥ 44 69 -9 6 41â‚¬37 6 9- f , E- Â¥- 6 k Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 b... 'lf. / 1-7~, '. . \\4 4. 1. j / 1\1 9 . th \ 1 / 1 1. . / '''' lili.. ,>Cf 4 Vt f /71 -L 1 i I f'.- 1 1 F. + . J... 01 , . i . T / i Â· -*' 1~-374*-UpE.39 --~-3 - -Y"De--0 1- - i 051, ...2. Â¥ 2~ i . ~ ~ - <42 i . , . A. 1" ... 4, I Â£ t= -- - l<,// f. ,~ 11. 1 b i .......0 .. .1 '. r I I. / 11 1 1 - E evitÂ·!r'* 1,1 W'<716* to.(71'Fe/91 ,{ *...F 1 - 5%11 #D*4454 .1 (4' x 1116" - 7 4 ./ , A i.-u Â· 1 'f r. - . 1 . 1-% ,-- 4=* 1 . '' W 4 p 4 -2 1* . 90Â» f '\ -V *Ut~Â·TO u,/ .... . 2 .\. 1 41 . I . 1 LL --Itt 400Â·/F~ 1 . ./1 , A /1 L G" *M I fs}38,4 -/ 2 = 1.\\31 - 1 .4.4..94144?fi 1 i , 11- .1--LL_ll_1 /-.44 e .,....' . - - 1-3 -1. ' f { 1.- i 1 1 6 4 40 1 , \ <-3 Z J ; 14844 m*41 k ' - i "F,< Af ' . ' \ , C 2 ,/ , W r ,+ 15,0 L 1-1 460 6 1 FL.60 - J. t 17Â»ve#:) 1 Â· f 1-7 7 - L r r . Gy/#867 0 41*1 - . --..I.I- *-Ill -20* \ " 1 4.- . 0 . .1 . .tillr i. i ; 4\<P i #M ...1 1 7 - 0 - 0 1 1 4, 9Â¥674 4 1----# 9:Â· / a I ill 4 4 f,trit- ./ 9/**fle t 42,,64./. I ~ - 4%*it'6? , 1' 4 â‚¬L//0,A/0 ~ - - 1 4 r B irt# - h./r -rÂ¢ 1 11 1, - .~44 -? \5 1 4,% 1>2 . I 1.' .11 ip I : rt- t . .i. 2 1 p i 01 f Ct] i <Ti - - i V .2 4 1- - - - 9.. -<4 i-- t- 70' , ' I 1 .1314 1 1 - H . 1/2 1) /1,1 V Â¥ 7 5 112 1, B W r 4. te OvtÂ»:62 ' '<~5" -3- *7:. -:-1.Â· F'.4.- -Â·.irÂ· neÂ· Â· I '~4' -'Â· Â· ~ ,@fk tÂ· 4.9 - Â·-,e-Â·..t ~ .......7Â·Â·2.- Â· f 9.1.34}'lial'.34 i: 0 ..~-Â·y...) Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review *04 30 September 1997 //.*.1 ../ 4'orÂ·Â» c . f t- 9.1 t )'-'ll--lk ' : i> . .=~ C. .A-,1.- - 1, . 1; -./.-*.~I.*'././*irâ€¢ --/ Â».-- 2 /Â· 4 '1 2 -~*~t ........ -i- ---. 1 . &4421/ 1 1 f th 111 lili ,-Â¢ 11 1 H \ hi Hi , 11 11 11 - 11: 111 111 1 1 - . , f ; 33 11 11 -4 ,4 9 'r #- ..1 1-1-6 - tiâ€ž-0 L I , t . " 111 4 11 .1 ' , ITT---71 ':* 111 ..il; 1-Â·lit ipi 1%' IiÂ·., J 1, r-+ 11F 311 . . -1 1 4 1 ,Â· 1â„¢1 i .i i i ft +P==i )".4-2--44d i t.Â·Â· , 1 , It , 0,3 i - 11.411 I ftill 12 -k -U r---7*.IrÂ·tz - 1 :i ro-- ded 6Â·*430 POAL : 4 r-t--1 1% 'F- 1 - 1 -t 1 1/, -M o W - .r H F --if-- -Is -4 6- ~V A T L 1 --FO-- '.Wr \ -0 :.I *2 Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 0 0.9 4- 1 / 4 J -1. r 141 4 > i -i f . r 7-'- O, 1 - li &-.*I-.I-' -J . 4 . /. , -+1..'4FLi: 1..12~- / 4\1 1?4214.-1.47,...41- iÂ·Â· , Â· , Â·Â·' 71-1-j-FI . i i 1 3 : 24 1 4 . -4 11 : 21 flut " 5.-Lk ' . Â£/1-/1/0*3/ 4 r 49â‚¬EA#5 - .ti~ . .MiiÂ· ,--7-#~ . f / . ' 42-4-4 -LE--LL=L- ---11M 900,404 4,1 - 4 1 N Â· .M k I. t-/ -1 41* Off>tri#, f . 1.-1-1. - Â»-4Â·4Â·u.3.4 . i =7.7-,--7 jf 86,4 WitÂ·<Pow -- -1~.2---:. 211*4--/33.- 2 izf' ./. ; 1 r ...V.. .. '~ 1 6 4 .- .~' ...../ 1 ... -1-u__2_1 it .1 , 1 - t 1.- --- - -----4 '' i 1 1 4 44.-A t=ZE,1 2,/ Â·,-1' r - ; I. 4'.. I I ..' ---*.-19~==-tk-Â·Â·-Â·i -EzzzIZZE! * 1 .1 .-- 1 1- - -1 =. . 1.=L.--=.=#:.1. I / 1--'.....--â€ž...--r........~ - y -111 1 t ./.*-.~M*-'-I--I -Â· ... A 'i - .. - 1- A 1 4 - Â»---w. -1 1 ,--' 1 -4 , - -- 2 - 4-t- Rew Wttl ! - - r] 0 1 - 1 -1 --- -.,-1-- 7 1 4 Â· . . . 1 - 1 1 1 1 th -i----Â·- e ' ** 7 1 ~ .-.- ~~~Â·~â€¢.~â€¢Â·.Â·'Â· ~-6.... - - 1 7 4.~ -i 1 1-7 1 A 2.; 1 -In~- --1 - 11 -/ f I A '-.. -I-- \ . 4,2 't I â€¢ * I. 4 / 4-, - 1 i ... 4 y '. . 1 1 1 - 1 1 f | f-Â»----~-14.889. W *5&-- t>@t/PL- -~ 17 ~., 1 1 1 1 - *- - I- A -- - -- -- - - -.......*-- -~ -4- 1 . f & o. 1 0-4 8- 9 4 \ro . Mullins Residence , -,\ 234 West Francis Street - Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC ~ ?1.4..,1 > , I. Review 30 September 1997 . t.. i.Â·41.* -t I 1.4. I Ati 1: hu -,9 +j.. 2 3.-. .1- 1 , / n. T-125 04Â¢le k *p,>P 90'14 M 141 PANE Z %,AÂ©5~4 >lt â‚¬-9, '. 2 7 f 44 . -r -r 11 U & 11 1 HI c. 2.'MOW FN+40'FO 5212891 0, 20{U* -19 2 11 4 1-t -- 9 7 f .9 4Â£14 -' 11 IL . 11 Il=r-1_dr ... i l illi N 1 1. 4, Â·Â·-Â· ----Â·------,- 4 4184$ f B#Ftft, To 1 It AVMM WX 14ft* Trp -- - ' - IT" 1 ''~ ,+*'- I- /-. , MOW \flrt* 98 .. - -- Â¥ I . P .4- I 411- - lit: 18 + 4 --v.--7391 kÂ·" 0 -Â·Â·*- r-grit-"--!111- ---11{ 4 , L u.-: it-----Â·---i........u..__t -J- .f q"11.-# L , Â· r--- -- ~ *L 1111 If t- 1 ~ ,- -4 1 5EE--r~i-LE-3.-'223 i --4- 32-11 [2.*: 77/ --9--+--I- 4 ' t.-- ...1...'...1... 2- 1 ---4---*-1 t---4 t---f----41 / 1 t- ,--6.-*. ' , -./ -: 2 I /1 /lk r 'f.Uâ€ž- 1 16~2 : %; 1. â‚¬ I J , 4. Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street i. Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC '* k. Review . 2 J I 4 2 30 September 1997 ... Â·:..,... .r 44 h . f. . 1: ~ 04 00 -- 3,1- .h-1-T - 9 ..43-4â‚¬ T I Â·re........ 4.- I . -4 /. 'W I *r 44Â« 00Â¢41(*4 . f i. C L u......... - A.2 - . 7 - - t. Â·s '007,Â·I k 1 /72Â« - I...#-*:~~,/11 -Â«\ 9 --2- 111*94 kt,Trli#rf: u-..-.i-. I--- --I-IHI . : 1///*MP[1144 -1 1. ......'.- .....~9.--1--- -Â· r,r,-*. TA,#ibr)-- -1 vt}-Â£1.44 ---' -- + flow 0##4404 6 . 5*t## . , 1 1 1 , '. . ; _1.- Â·,7:)...r - 1- k i <, - 6-"-'-y// r .1 + c .11 '6, , 4 1- 1 + i 22 1 ./ I. irl. 2 . i /Ofl f N* I , I 4--1 1 [ r- - . 1 It {,6, , 4 N I Â¥ 0 - /1 - 1 #1 ~. /0/9/ 1,1 :.{, 1. 16 1 'f,K. 1 1.. \ 11 1 Hea , or#,eD - -- \\\ i r 1 11 1 .Yf_*H?W - .1 1 \\%4 -1-2 ,. / I /5 E 11 -- .8 ./ 46 k j f f. It 1 4.11 j Â» . - . 1 . 1. f: 22 , e / -7 ; f.i lit L. . 15 i K . 5 r , . . -1./1 /. h . 1.lilli 1 L P/ - U 1,1- . , 4 4 ' .4 t- 1 ...... - ..~.4-.---4- -1 . I 4./ 2_1 .St . - - 1 . 1 . *-1 11 K . \\\\ -4, . \Â» . I ' . 1 4. --. - .. 4. , ..1 1 . .J 1 1. -- Â· ~i i i~ fi Â·-' r 9 ,? ),i l k f it .. . 1 6 - Of,H :i .2 1 Â¢ 'F 1 1 1 . 1 - 1- .1* 1 11 . , 2 , 0./ . Â£ 1 4 1 /1 1 , I , .1 4 1 , i ~*-f-11-----f-- it ,- . i 1 1 'f ---I-I- -.-*I-jp---f'-I -/ . ' ~~ 4 ~~ ~ 1 - . .44 41 - I 8 1 :' 1 h i-- f go , 0 4 i D & A '7 fr - 6 -= 4 6 V . MT i * 0 M ' ' c . ...... I i a I \ 491.-47 . 1- - -- ----I- '-Il--- .*-...I-I .--- ...,-I#--*-- 1---------- ------.- --6---.-. ..-..-.i-l ............. 1 i - t.er--394 . Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado , Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 "' i 1 . 4. 1 Â· 1Â·t. Â· Â·, U . 1 . . 1. 0 k T i ni t'ww WANUGR. i P PÂ·, ,--,i Pir- r :,- 11 6, 71 1 1 f I - './... f 1 1 1 \ 1 L , L - i : t. - rÂ·-Â·i . \ 1 . .1. , , ..1 Â· r f * . . 1../.4 4.4 - . . Â¥ i ' 10 1,: 4 .---.-2.-'.- -,1 4- 1. 94. .9 E it 4 . I...1 .4.---*... 0.- 4. r ' P . - t :1 , ~1. * IiI , , . - 1 -_- ?, S O ? 019 -5 9Â»- -- ... rt 0- 0 ...Ir *Ff- 7. 22 .4-2 --?E A-- A i t- o i :'l .. I 1 . 6 3 .A' '3 - 9 2'1906--. 31/.3Â£9-1 Â¥A =<Le f,~14.â‚¬~ a 9*8*313Â¥' .. .- Â· Â·Â· ...tÂ·.hÂ·Â·% Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 4 -- Â»21 /7 1 \N iii Â¥ i 'I ill ./. 14 f *. ,.]r 1\Â© 11 t h. lil H l' 1 / li $. 1. lill . 4 -Iq .-*2- i li 1/t . R - - 1-1 ~ .+ 4 1 -- -2 - - --71 1 1 ~31 f 41 - 1 / 8 1, h -17- 7 R li , /1 - *- ------1-1 - --,0-4.-v -~r H -915-3.t---6.2 .4 1 T 1-0 Ff 1 A- D p - O -4 5 4 4 .. I.- 11 - Mullins Residence 234 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado Schematic Design Package/HPC Review 30 September 1997 $ 7 .. tlti~,if ~lf'idl'AffÂ©fe*t} 24;11: 1:1. UÂ· ..>' P#1/4//7,14 146'93*:,Ati.,4 . ' Â§@fil:46Â¢,329/.94(41 -1 :, 1 ..40{ ACMEâ‚¬&'141~1 ..<3:,I,kj~~ . At 5:/MEY.tia<)4%6024-:H, (N..4. fyÂ»14Â»3%691: fi L,,f,;1*#~1~1444.I*v~1*144(~4 , 9,43856%***FuLgf,4/494148.09114~ < 7*j:Â·-: i 9/i<jimm:%431*ma*.M/A -34*4/MVWMMVIFLAC~MEEL . 41-0 -1 - , 4 63:12~ Ef' 1(,7.-*G J \11 ##fr-~15f*"4921< i.?: 4 1 -,-v#4<f&Ve: L ; A ' // .4. 341 44*J.4700- Ph%35/975 ' --41,-, -4-3. 9- -2/-31-29 ~1265- i EJ 4 . ...... tiv, 0.14 - -'. ~ _.-24~3 4.~lil ' 3, 590# 231.-: fES(;32-7:1~*5,<L - . - - - --I- 3-~39{ 3 3 -*-f N' Es.-*lai~.~~<i. ff-6.-i f ff-Ya.2#-f . '' - -52=4 + - ,Â·rut*Â§-2.:i~Ifi il k- , -; 94 72(61 1 3Â»*Da. - . 9 -9..#i ' Â·49. i : fli .1.' K L; bla,~I--A . ,Â£, Â· ,~ Fru~@11~~lge)44 li Ell: : C r~.22% ~ u}:Â·Ri;-#2~1.24: ~ c i Â¥ 1 34 242 941Â· a '- -- v *O.'t 'E' /6:2~~/2 J U Â· e 4 ' Ij t,Â·0~Â·T@E'Uu..f,11'ilhAE,il,1,1,1- ilililit~~21*,vifilli,Af111,2,1,AÂ·Â·w TE:%1*[:ifivi:' -fÂ»fi . -# 1 Iril,L,l lUU,Ij UJU]-Millill..li!W,Ill?29<fmmill,111Â®Illi*'1 I * MR"*U#&-S'l 'ex u } ' , - k. r-' - r. - . E. 4.1. - 4 /09 9 / 1. T r . /3 /0 1 . r DIN ; D! t=z '- 4 r I 1 . * 4 I .~4' , 1 , . . '.,5 1 7 - '' 4 4 ~'~4~z=Ill 5256, trz* i. ~, 44 : 'llc I. 4/ 114 e ' : '.4:, 2 ti'/3.4"2.2:2:1. 7 -' -1 '- Ji t.3.-4&,22,1, c.,r-/' M t j - -/ 2 - */ ~ - ( ' .%1 ,.' 3': 21' ....,10 7, 5 44.I:Â· .., , R .P . , r ..11.fpe,+MA -. . I :..... i I RF. ' ./. â€ž , 40 .742. I.A. I 1, - t*/ I'l . Â«4 t' I I I . . 0 3 I . Â· .. 4 .. I -'..L .... - . . 4. , 3.-7 '9632* w i: * ..rh..19,11144.-fri I I Â£ , Â£ r 4 4.Â§95 h. ~r - V. 4 I , f t44' 19>/ ' *. Y.'trne k. ' i ' I I 7 */ P .44.- ' . . 9 -: f..- " ' ./ ..ltd 41 .. 4 4>SyN,. an *Al * 46' 77 . :: 1 ,-. : ' ..1-j't ..., I . ./ 1 , I 'r Â£4%.Ch. :. , ..t ~8. :4 4.-) ' . ep> ' - -- iliil. 1, 4' Â»~44#7*r7SeR :. - *9#*Pr ~t 1-65-4 'L , 64.61 * ,&, 61*11,4,71-r.~4..~,f '~~~re.Ad{29 1 .jÂ¥-4243%41.29-147(, ,-~it.?,{ 3314'1?4~t't~Uf 11~,-- ,,ft? p; 7~:-f?il?*'+~~ y.*Â»Me PETE"64.2* - M #*4*1(1*J +T) :tv B c.all}H; b (D,) it. Â·ta j , 1 + ..' . . ... 1:* 4, 7 I .4.9 7 I 41-' f.1*1-*464*12*,2Â£$6;id.blt,ewrs''Sti?4&3:#*4*@P l'.1:1%1 - f' ..4 Â« ,"U 3 0 '4 Â£ ....' 1.1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 334 W. Hallam Street- Conceptual, partial demolition, Ordinance #30, Public Hearing DATE: October 8, 1997 SUMMARY: This home, the Eugene Wilder House, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is a local landmark. The applicant received final approval for a renovation and addition to the property in 1988, but has not completed the project. Several extensions in development approvals have been granted, but have now lapsed, causing the applicant to return to HPC to repeat the review process. Ofthe approved project, only the renovation of the carriage house is completed. The remainder of the proposal includes demolition of an existing addition to the building, construction of a new addition and carport between the house and carriage house, and the addition of a sunroom on the east side. As approved in 1988 the project received a 500 square foot FAR. bonus, which is requested again. The applicant has submitted the drawings which were checked by the building department in 1995. These drawings include notes which may make the drawings more difficult for you to read. I apologize for this situation. APPLICANT: Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters, owners. LOCATION: 334 W. Hallam Street, Lots K,L,M, Block 42, City and Townsite ofAspen. ZONING: R-6 Significant Development PROJECT SIJMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development involving historic landmarks, or within an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: A map of the site in 1904 and the nomination form for the National Register are attached as background on the structure. The proposal involves two primary actions; the demolition and replacement of the rear addition to the house and the addition of a sunroom on the east. From maps of the house, it appears that the one story gable roof area at the rear of the two story house is original or was constructed by 1893. In the 1960's, a two story addition was constructed across the back of this house and on top of the one story area. Although the HPC previously approved demolition of the entire rear portion of the building, staff does not support that decision. As a policy, HPC has been requiring all original or historically significant portions of any building to be preserved. Staff finds that the one story gable must be retained intact, without alterations. This will require some restudy of the new construction that can be added in the southeast corner ofthe house. North of the proposed added living space, the applicant proposes a carport. Currently, there is a driveway and pull in parking in that area. Ordinance #30 now requires that garages be accessed from the alley, unless waived by a Commission. Staff finds that it would be preferable to have the garage for this property off of the alley, but trees in the back of the site would require the garage to be rather isolated from the house, which may not be acceptable to the owner. In lieu of that, they do have the right to continue to use the driveway as uncovered parking on the west. Staff recommends that III?C allow the garage on the west as previously approved. The applicant should determine whether they wish to have the ability to drive through the garage and provide a second parking space in the yard area, or whether the garage can be pushed towards the east so that the second required space is available in front ofthe garage. (Please not that 4 spaces were required in 1988, but only two on-site parking spaces are required now.) In terms of the sunroom addition, staff has concerns with the architectural compatibility of that addition, given its high visibility from the street. This should be discussed by HPC. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. 2 Response: The project is located in a neighborhood where many Victorian houses have been remodeled for continued use. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed demolition of the rear addition may have some impact on the historic significance of the house as a representation of residential architecture of the late 1800's. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff has identified concerns with the demolition and with the compatibility of the sunroom addition. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance ofthat parcel. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance ofthe parcel. Response: The one story gable roof addition at the rear of the house is original or was built by 1893 according to historic maps. Its demolition is not required nor appropriate as part of a renovation of the house. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. 3 0 Response: Demolition of the addition destroys part of the importance of the house by eliminating something that shows an evolution of the building or is part of its original architectural character. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The new addition must be restudied to retain the one story gable on the rear of the house. Ordinance #30 The proposal is in conflict with two areas of Ordinance #30, lightwells and garages. Garages: 1. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley or private road entering at the rear or side of the dwelling unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations up to two hundred fifty (250) square feetper dwelling unit if it is located on said alley or road; 2. All portions of a garage, carport or storage area parallel to the street shall be recessed behind the front facade a minimum often (10) feet. 1.All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street facing side(s) of a building must be entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion ofthe building facade which is closest to the street. Staff recommends that HPC waive these standards based on the provision of Ordinance #30 that allows a project that was designed prior to Ordinance #30 and therefore has spent substantial monies and reliance on previous regulations, to be approved. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 0 4 Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC table the application with the following direction: 1. Restudy the rear portion of the house to retain the one story gable addition. 2. Restudy the architectural compatibility ofthe sunroom addition. 3. HPC must grant the following variances from Ordinance #30: garages and lightwells in order for the project to proceed. 4. The applicant received a site coverage variance from BOA for the project in 1993. This must be reapproved. If the variance can be limited to 5% over the allowed site coverage, it may be approved by HPC after public notice. 5. Public notice will be required at final review for vested rights. This can be combined with a notice for site coverage variance. 0 0 5 \Â«-Al L V -r--1- MEMORANDUM 0 To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Final Development Review, 334 W. Hallam St. Date: June 14, 1988 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting HPC's final development review approval for the partial demolition, alterations, addition and carriage house renovation to the property at 334 W. Hallam St. BACKGROUND: on March 8, 1988, HPC passed a motion granting conceptual development approval, based upon the recommendations presented by Staff, adding the condition that no changes be made to the windows on the south, east and west elevations of the original structure. Specifically, the conditions approved on March 8 included restudying the greenhouse/sunspace addition to limit its size and scale in relation to the original historic strudture, and that the large cottonwood in the east side-yard be retained, or a landscape plan be presented showing transplantation if it is demonstrated the tree cannot be saved. 0 Also at that March 8 meeting, HPC recommended historic landmark designation. On April 6, 1988, the applicant returned to HPC requeiting an amendment to the original conceptual approval regarding the sunspace design and attachment. HPC approved the applicant's request to create the necessary access into the sunspace from the original structure's living room by creating a doorway out of a window opening, thus altering the original structure. HPC also approved the revised sunspace design which was more rectangular and simple in design over the previous arched style. OTHER COMMITTEE ACTION: On May 3, P&Z recommended historic landmark designation, and Council approved the designation ordinance on first reading on May 9. Council's second reading occurs June 13. The applicant is requesting the $2,000 designation incentive grant which the property is eligible for due to its " 5" rating. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Each element of this development plan is reviewed,below: CARRIAGE HOUSE: Primarily, the treatment of the historic carriage house's renovation has been a sensitive issue. This 0 project comes very close to being considered a demolition. As stated in previous memos, 334 W. Hallam St. is considered eligible for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and the entire site's treatment is critical to its future listing. With that in mind, staff obtained an opinion from the State Historic Preservation Officer with regard to demolition definition in this case. Her opinion echoes staff's in that although nearly all of the original historic fabric must be replaced due to its dilapidated state, the structural members are sound and will remain in place to receive the new materials. Therefore, it remains defined as a partial demolition and reconstruction. The Planning Office continues to stress the importance of sensitivity in foundation underpinning and other renovation work. The applicant has verbally stated the possible need to lift the carriage house up on-site to pour the new foundation. This activity is not recommended by staff due to the obvious risks, and other methods for foundation underpinning and shoring should be researched. Aspen is losing historic outbuildings annually, and (to coin a phrase): "Once they're gone, that's itt" The Carriage house plans remain similar to those approved at Conceptual review. It will be a two-bedroom dwelling unit, with a 4' expansion added to the east facade, carrying through the same lines as the existing structure. The applicant states the design "retains its appearance as a secondary building to the main structure". In staff's opinion, it goes to the farthest extreme of keeping its "carriage house" feel. However, in support of the project the revised design plans do show much simplified elevations in comparison to the previously submitted conceptual plans. The small west elevation porch is simple, however, it does encroach into the setback, requiring HPC to grant a variation in their motion finding such encroachment to be more compatible with the historic structure. The west elevation reflects a second story tri-parte arched window, definitely a contemporary design element and appearing quite dominant. Other elevations show simple fenestration, using double hung windows and some divisions. The gable peak height remains identical to the existing height. The renovation and enlargement of the Carriage House is considered Phase 1, scheduled to occur this summer, allowing the owners to occupy it while the main historic home is receiving its new addition and restoration. Materials are called out in that section. PARKING: As required in code, one parking space must be provided on-site per each NEW bedroom created. The current site contains two spaces for the existing house, which have served this four-bedroom home for years however, two additional spaces for the two bedrooms created in the renovated carriage house must still be provided. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan (Option B) showing such parking allocation, however, two of the four spaces proposed encroach into the city's right of way. The applicant is currently addressing this issue with the City's 2 Historic Places, and the entire site's treatment is critical to its future listing. With that in mind, staff obtained an opinion from the State Historic Preservation Officer with regard to demolition definition in this case. Her opinion echoes staff's in that although nearly all of the original historic fabric must be replaced due to its dilapidated state, the structural members are sound and will remain in place to receive the new materials. Therefore, it remains defined as a partial demolition and reconstruction. The Planning Office continues to stress the importance of sensitivity in foundation underpinning and other renovation work. The applicant has verbally stated the possible need to lift the carriage house up on-site to pour the new foundation. This activity is not recommended by staff due to the obvious risks, and other methods for foundation underpinning and shoring should be researched. Aspen is losing historic outbuildings annually, and (to coin a phrase): "Once they're gone, that's it!" The Carriage house plans remain similar to those approved at Conceptual review. It will be a two-bedroom dwelling unit, with a 4' expansion added to the east facade, carrying through the same lines as the existing structure. The applicant states the design "retains its appearance as a secondary building to the main structure". In staff's opinion, it goes to the farthest extreme of keeping its "carriage house" feel. However, in support of the project the revised design plans do show much simplified elevations in comparison to the previously submitted conceptual plans. The small west elevation porch is simple, however, it does encroach into the setback, requiring HPC to grant a variation in their motion finding such encroachment to be more compatible with the historic structure. The west elevation reflects a second story tri-parte arched window, definitely a contemporary design element and appearing quite dominant. Other elevations show simple fenestration, using double hung windows and some divisions. The gable peak height remains identical to the existing height. The renovation and enlargement of the Carriage House is considered Phase 1, scheduled to occur this summer, allowing the owners to occupy it while the main historic home is receiving its new addition and restoration. Materials are called out in that section. PARKING: As required in code, one parking space must be provided on-site per each NEW bedroom created. The current site contains two spaces for the existing house, which have served this four-bedroom home for years however, two additional spaces for the two bedrooms created in the renovated carriage house must still be provided. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan (Option B) showing such parking allocation, however, two of the four spaces proposed encroach into the city's right of way. The applicant is currently addressing this issue with the City's 2 Engineering department, stating the precedent for on-site right- of-way parking has been set for years in the West End. The applicant has the bption of appearing before P&Z in special review to request a reduction in required parking, or appear before Council with a request for an encroachment license. The original conceptual plans approved by HPC included one parking space inside the carriage house/garage, accessed off 3rd St. This plan has been amended, as the owners prefer to utilize the carriage house totally as an additional dwelling unit, not as a storage space for "modern carriages". It is staff's recommendation that the applicant pursue the Council/right-of-way encroachment review procedure, which will provide the four spaces on site. Although P&Z is the review body for parking issues, HPC's purview for review is linked to its affects on the historic character, integrity and aesthetics of the site or historic structure on such site. For HPC information only, the Engineering department has brought to staff's attention the necessary curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements required by property owners along 3rd Street when any development is permitted. These required improvements are due to 3rd Street serving as a major route to the Music Tent. The parking/curb cut issue is also connected with these improvements. The applicant is aware of the required improvements. MAIN STRUCTURE AND ADDITION: No changes from conceptual development approval and subsequent amendment are proposed with regard to main historic structure and the addition, considered Phase 2 by the applicant. The letter submitted by the engineer regarding structural stability states the historic main home is very sound and that the partial demolition and new addition will not undermine its integrity. The rear addition, replacing the earlier one which will be removed, steps back slightly from the original house on the east elevation. The sunspace links both old and new, with access into it from both areas. The sunspace will be custom built very similarly to the example of the attached photo. The east side yard fence remains, mostly screening the sunspace from Hallam Street. THE WEST (3rd St.) ELEVATION plans show a projecting bay window in the center of the second floor. Although the overall size of this bay window has not been reduced as briefly discussed as a desired possible option by HPC, at appears tucked under the overhang and less dominant. Staff's concerns were, and still are, competing south and west facades, the south being the primary and historic facade, setting the character for the remainder of the house, addition, attached garage and carriage house. Currently, the 3rd Street (west) elevation reads plainer, with no fancy detailing or projections. The only breaks in the elevation are the vertical double hung windows, allowing the Hallam Street (main) facade to shine as the home's focal 3 Â¢ I point. Staff is concerned that new attention-getting details on the 3rd St. elevation will dilute the importance of the historic facade. To offset the new detailing the doors and fenestration remain simple and unchanged from conceptual, very nicely and compatibly designed, in staff's opinion. The garage is a one car structure, and staff finds no reference to door materials, which should be determined by HPC at this final review. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): The previously submitted FAR calculations did not include the basement under the new addition. The following table describes the new calculations: Lot size: 9,000 sq. ft. Allowable FAR: 4,080 sq. ft. Main structure with addition 2,749 sq. ft. Basement under addition 251 sq. ft. Garage 310 sq. ft. Carriage House, both floors 1,270 sq. ft. Total FAR: 4,580 sq. ft. This is exactly 500 sq. ft. over the allowed limit, which HPC may approve finding such variation in FAR more compatible with the historic structure. Staff recommends HPC approve the FAR variation and include such finding in the motion. By adaptively us int; the carriage house as a dwelling unit, the FAR is increased. PHASE 2 RESTORATION: As stated in previous memos, this home is of particular importance to the overall historic character of the West End. It appears on the cover the Historic Preservation Element, its locale on such a prominent corner makes an iritportant statement in the historic West End, its original owner, Eugene Wilder, was of particular importance in Aspen's early development, its special design elements are unique in Aspen AND it is eligible for individual listing on the National Register. The Planning Office is excited to see such a comprehensive plan of renovation, adaptive use, new addition and restoration all wrapped up in one project. The Planning Office recommends that every effort be made to preserve and carefully restore those details that make this property a true Aspen historic landmark, exemplary of Aspen's history. MATERIALS: A complete listing of the major materials to be used is attached. In summary, the new siding on both the main and carriage house will match the existing, which is 1X4 clapboard and will be painted. The existing clapboard siding on the historic home is in very good shape for being nearly 100 years old, and will be repaired and repainted as suggested in the National Park Service' s "Preservation Briefs". Existing historic wood windows will also be repaired and repainted using technical information and guidance from "Preservation Briefs". Roofing materials will be wood shingle on both the carriage house and 4 . point. Staff is concerned that new attention-getting details on the 3rd St. elevation will dilute the importance of the historic facade. To offset the new detailing the doors and fenestration remain simple and unchanged from conceptual, very nicely and compatibly designed, in staff's opinion. The garage is a one car structure, and staff finds no reference to door materials, which should be determined by HPC at this final review. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): The previously submitted FAR calculations did not include the basement under the new addition. The following table describes the new calculations: Lot size: 9,000 sq. ft. Allowable FAR: 4,080 sq. ft. Main structure with addition 2,749 sq. ft. Basement under addition 251 sq. ft. Garage 310 sq. ft. Carriage House, both floors 1,270 sq. ft. Total FAR: 4,580 sq. ft. This is exactly 500 sq. ft. over the allowed limit, which HPC may approve finding such variation in FAR more compatible with the historic structure. Staff recommends HPC approve the FAR variation and include such finding in the motion. By adaptively usint the carriage house as a dwelling unit, the FAR is increased. PHASE 2 Â· RESTORATION: As stated in previous memos, this home is of particular importance to the overall historic character of the West End. It appears on the cover the Historic Preservation Element, its locale on such a prominent corner makes an irhportant statement in the historic West End, its original owner, Eugene Wilder, was of particular importance in Aspen's early development, its special design elements are unique in Aspen AND it is eligible for individual listing on the National Register. The Planning Office is excited to See such a comprehensive plan of renovation, adaptive use, new addition and restoration all wrapped up in one project. The Planning Office recommends that every effort be made to preserve and carefully restore those details that make this property a true Aspen historic landmark, exemplary of Aspen's history. MATERIALS: A complete listing of the major materials to be used is attached. In summary, the new siding on both the main and - carriage house will match the existing, which is lx4 clapboard and will be painted. The existing clapboard siding on the historic home is in very good shape for being nearly 100 years old, and will be repaired and repainted as suggested in the National Park Service' s "Preservation Briefs". Existing historic wood windows will also be repaired and repainted using technical information and guidance from "Preservation Briefs'l. Roofing materials will be wood shingle on both the carriage house and .. 4 main structure. Windows are all traditional wood casement-type and double hung as the plans reflect. These materials are of high quality and acceptable to staff. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the partial demolition and final development of 334 West Hallam Street, granting the following variations: 1. The encroachment of the new porch of the carriage house into the required setback is found to be more compatible to the historic structure, and that 2. The FAR limit has been exceeded by 500 sq. ft., due to the adaptive renovation of the historic carriage house, which HPC finds to be more compatible with the historic structure. The Planning Office also recommends that the carriage house not be listed up for foundation repair or replacement purposes, and remain situated on the site. hpc. Ynemo . 33 4WHF 5 IN:11 .. 605 EAST MAIN smEET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 . . ---- June 8, 1988 Ms. Roxanne Elfin Planning Office City of Aspen ' 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Parking 334 West Hallam Avenue Block 42, Lots K, L and M City of Aspen Dear Roxanne: 0 The enclosed site plan is a revision to the one we submitted to your office on May 27th. We have revised the drive to incorporate parking for the main house and carriage house. We believe there is, realistically, only a need for three parking spaces. However, our plan does meet the code by providing one space for the existing use of the house and one space for each new bedroom, totalling four parking spaces on the site. Some of the parking overhangs into the City right-of-way. We have looked at other properties in the West End, and this type of parking is commonly seen. We are utilizing this historic precedent in the site plan we are presenting to you. If you have any questions regar,ding this, please give me a call. Parricia Harris Project Manager 0 PH:dem Enclosure 0 71/ 1 0 Â£ avA -A M= Â¥,7----*-1~- 2.01 gm '47 31 605 EAST MAIN STREET - - --- --- ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 MATERIALS: 334 WEST HALLAM AVENUE We are matching the materials that are existing on the main residential structure and carriage house. There are: NEW (As Required) Narrow (lx4) Horizontal Clapboard Wood Siding NEW (As Required) Wood Trim to Match Existing Existing Clapboard Siding - Repainted and Repaired as in Preservation Tech Notes, Exterior Woodwork, Number 1, National Park Service, May, 1986. xisting Wood Trim - Repainted and repaired as uggested in PRESERVATION BRIEFS. Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork, National Park Service, September, 1982. New Traditional Wood Double-Hung Windows in Carriage House and Addition to Main House. New Wood Casement Windows on Lower Level of the Carriage House and Addition to Main House. Existing Wood Windows in Main house will be repaired and repainted as outlined in PRESERVATION BRIEFS, Number 9, The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Technical Preservation Service, 1981. Both the Carriage House and Main House will be re- roofed with wood machine-cut shingles to more accurately represent the Victoria Era than the existing wood shakes. The new sunspace on the Main House will be custom built and will be similar to the sunspace addition shown on the enclosed photo (without the high spike" trim). All new exterior doors on the Carriage House wi J 1 be wood, traditional four-panel doors. Ul f11 All Pa=.41 .0, 13,1 M -770 M . b ..' m VA .11 0 Dfa 94 J [3Â·/ Wdi'/44%-i,/4/r-7.-29/ . 605 EAST MAIN STREET - ASPEN. COLORAOO81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 MATERIALS: 334 WEST HALLAM AVENUE We are matching the materials that are existing on the main residential structure and carriage house. There are: NEW (As Required) Narrow (lx4) Horizontal Clapboard Wood Siding NEW (As Required) Wood Trim to Match Existing Existing Clapboard Siding - Repainted and Repaired as in Preservation Tech Notes, Exterior Woodwork, Number 1, National Park Service, May, 1986. Existing Wood Trim - Repainted and repaired as suggested in PRESERVATION BRIEFS, Exterion Paint 0 Problems on Historic Woodwork, National Park Service, September, 1982. New Traditional Wood Double-Hung Windows in Carriage House and Addition to Main House. New Wood Casement Windows on Lower Level of the Carriage House and Addition to Main House. Existing Wood Windows in Main house will be repaired and repainted as outlined in PRESERVATION BRIEFS, Number 9, The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows, U. S. Dept. of the Interior, Technical Preservation Service, 1981. Both the Carriage House and Main House will be re- rooted with wood machine-cut shingles to more accurately represent the Victoria Era than the existing wood shakes. The new sunspace on the Main House will be custom built and will be similar to the sunspace addition shown on the enclosed photo (without the high "spike" trim). 0 All new exterior doors on the Carriage House will be wood, traditional four-panel doors. Scale 14" = 1' 0" (1:48) 2 1 TABLE OF SIZES - TRADITIONAL TD UNITS 1' 91/."(540) 2'11&"(641) 2'51/4" (743) 2'9 y. "(845)4 '-3'11/4"(946)-4 +-3'594"(1048)Â·4 6-3'9'/4"{1 149)-1 5 ~~;0"{448) 1'948"1549) 2'134"(651) 2'548"(752)4 H2'9%"(8543 -4 ~ 3' 1%" (956) -4 1- 3' 534" (1 0571 - 83/4" (52712' 034" (629} 2' 43/4 " (730) 2' 83/." (8322)1 1-3' 03/4 " (933)-4 1-3' 434" (1 035)-1 Â»3' 83,1" (1 137)-1 (406) 20" (508) 24" (6101 28" (711] 4 '- 32" {813) -4 H 36" (914) -1 " 40" (1 016) -4 3111 ~~ - - Z :.:~ -1=~5 283434TD 323434TD WINDOW OPENING DIMENSIONS To determine window openings for single _ units in typical installations, add 14" (13 mm) to frame width and %" (19 mm) to ~ frame height. To determine window openings for multiple 3 window groupings, add 16" (13 mm) to com- bined frame widths and 91" (19 mm) to com- bined frame heights, plus space required for mullion reinforcement, if any. Note: Clad window opening dimension applies to frame or masonry construction. 323636TD 363636TD TABLE OF SIZES - FIXED UNITS ~~ 516" (1 359)-4 -5' 516â€ž 0 664) - , "ll 3461 - - 5'5"(1 651) - - 4'5"(1 346) - -5'5"(1 651)- ~L :':" (1 295) - - 5'3"(1 6001 - - 4' 3" 0 295) - - 5' 3" (1 6001 - -4'SM" 0 359)-4 -5' 51/2" (1 664.--4 48" 0 219) - - 60" (1 524) - k- 48" (1 219) - - 60" 0 524) - HM 1 L THE L 2 f - -: C to 0. tnY S 4845TD TTIT * till , 4861TD HTT 8 2 -- 4849TD 6049TD ~ i. 06 & In -- 4869TD* 11 iâ€¢ /4 -- - 1-1 1 1 ill - _ e_ 1 4857TD 6057TD* a= S I Note: When units are furnished with insulating -/ 2 -I- glass, glass is 1/4" (6 mm) larger in width and C&CÂ¤ height than size shown. Iii *Double glazing panel and Slimsh.de not available. i.1 L 6' 6 34" (2 000) - F---- 6' 23/ 0 899) (1 880) k-~ 5 1 (1 8261 " (1 5941 - --4 Â»- Â· 4' 64" (1 391) #-- 4' 2%" (1 289) 4, 4~0 11 {:7:6)-IJ 2 4;lt;3) Â» 4'2"(1 27 57 (1 448) - Â» 2 3, 0 114# 1) {Z65 1) {008 1) u 94 0 1 ,5 - (24:i,1/, (1 899) 5' 6%" (1 695) Lit.'Illilli. ill .1!-tillicÂ·CI:., C 1'13:. 11:14 1'Â·illi.,11:4 .,1.:Â·.1 Â·,, 2~ . m - 1 0 -9 - 9 .. I. 83.41 1-1&. .. - - - .. + I ....' V . - .-/ I - F . - , gi 3 L 7 1 #... ./.-- ..I- . . ; a. , , ' 3 31 12.j . ~-III. 1 - - J.--4 -44,~-* 1 3 11'38;W#*.f: , - 1 -1, V. , 4 .iky Â·7 .giteffemift..1./-/.- 6/.Ii,Â£0Tif/En.71/61,4f*t..q -- ~ '- mlifill, ..C.. . ./.. ..1 1 -1 . i....1 e min f ' maari - U. .1 l, ~i ' 4/ i .1 .1 : Mlia i gl 47*20.0 . -=izE f . 11 1 .i 1 - /0 J- 1/21 | 41 9 191 - 1 â‚¬",Â¢ 4,â€¢21:i'.96=:'Ci).825Â£ grjÂ·Â¥32412:111 9're prp,Lf/,=2. 1.1-3--43: .:24â‚¬: 4Â£~*~ -,Â»liu~;li~03-gwu- .i-32, .. .4 ..' 90&,A#R=Ma,elt.==:A=; 32~Â· -02 a..32Dict - Â· 7: 4 i :W. UCI......... . .-- I.*I--I - Â· lili - + ~e<*~~#r~~:*~*=fi.c,&43*#.=â‚¬.,9--0.- 12.. '. 0, .. . 4. - 1.6 ...'.46 ..4 4 .--, LT.1 1 1 mitpe~Weeig 4 U 17Â·i ~* ji~ #~ v ium ,Â·"- ~R harmonisingtheconstruction materials with rhose of theexisting #!64 '124 gaim l,building, the impact of a new addition can bereduced sothatit.U,Fears k:?~ 11~ 4~ _tobepart of the whole.This stone farmhouse in Buckinghamshireisthree Â£99atif<:116 ~~2~ hundred years older than the conservatory, which makes a light and ~ sympathetiegarde!1 rO<)nl \Vith ~~ieu~s ~)vcr tlicgarden aiid ficidsbCV()~L~. 9 .. I. 41&~ 1 - -- - .- ler= yr - I ' .... 8 ;Â£4 -<! .'.Il r ..... '41 - - ?1 ~ Ifity d 4 -145<39 - ..+7 ..10.f,; .2 7 E. + ... 49' 189 .,/'.11/ 12-â€ž- 764251 -Â·-Â· Â£1 /6/4 -: ia' - .. 2 14''i , "' 44>2 "- 0,- - - . .. 4% -Â· r . : t ,_=r g-.--i .., .a -- Atts . . An<ky---Li-4-1 - -4-0*1 - - 0 *532 ,3-~ + --+ nv"fi.vi'Â£2:Z=,fil#*29-92<(5*-13<-222.<92.2 -L.6,-.. 1 1 - ,, .. ... . - .. 1.1 n 711.1 mt = 1. 1/ t- e. . -11/ . E V al# 1 .. t -- 4 3 t-t ... -*'-/c--'---J A--AL.-/4/26-b-J~J~' p ~ 4<42 /45379.9. ...... :1. I '*.4 4 1,Â·min,-17;1=:'t:Littig 335?6.U'.#~Al)C{?3:Â·w..62212'33 ~3US;*23*2#Jf rdi *:43-,.6 : -~A#,6 1. t. 1% . ~LC - 0 . p)'Â· , L. 0 .... I Â· - , 1 .I...5.'ll~-Q.==. I..':..W I I -4 râ€¢Â¥â€¢â€¢42,-ild/'&-~*it . . ' -'1)*r-.- ./ . U ' ..1- L r4 6 1 1 I 4*:824 EYâ€¢ ,â€¢- D v harmonisint; che construction materials with those of theexisting D'building, cheimpact of a new addition can he reduced so that it.Ippe.irs . 1-014 2 _to be parrof the whole. This stone farmhouse in Buckinghams hireis three b~ht#.-~ 328 hundred yearsolder th.in the conservatory, which makes a litihranu sympathetic garden room with views over die garden and fields b evond. 9. 51Â·:. 9-3 e.'hft:./.32339 1 1*73 1 605 EAST MAIN STREET - ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 May 27, 1988 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Planning Office City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Historic Designation and Conceptual Plan Approval 334 West Hallam Avenue Block 42, Lots K, L and M City of Aspen - Dear Roxanne: The purpose of this letter is to gain final Historic Preservation Committee approval for the above-referenced property. Our program is as follows: z 1. Obtain historic designation for the property. 2. a. Obtain permission to demolish portions of the main residential structure. b. Obtain permission to demolish portions of the carriage house. 3. a. Obtain approval for the final development plan (addition, enlargement and restoration) of the house. b. Obtain approval for the final dekelopment of the carriage house (enlargement and restoration). 21'444&6.-il .- I#td Ms. Roxanne Eflin 'f' .* ; May 27, 1988 Page two The following outline addresses all the considerations for this review process: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS - Re: 24-9.3(a) (1) Historical Importance The principal residence is associated with Eugene Wilder, who came to Aspen in the 1880's and was associated with the Aspen Lumber Company, one of the pioneer lumber companies in Aspen. The house was undoubtedly constructed from local lumber, and might have been built by the Aspen Lumber Company. (2) Architectural Importance Architecturally, the house is significant in that Â·it reflects traditional Aspen character and the Victorian style prevalent when it was built. The stained glass bay window facing West Hallam Avenue is unique to this; 0 architectural style. We find no evidence of architectural importance in the Â·, carriage house. (3) Neighborhood Character The prominence of the site (Third and Hallam) and structure is important to maintairling the neighborhood and community character (the neighborhood consists of several other Victorian houses of similar scale). We will demolish portions of the main house and will conform to the STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF DEMOLITION, Re: Ord. 11, Sec. 24-9.5(b)4-6. (4) Impact to the Neighborhood The part of the house planned for demolition is in the middle portion of the property and at the rear of the house away from Hallam Avenue. Because of this location, the demolition will have minimum impact on the character of the neighborhood. #rti#ini j :1 1 g ta"- 17>:43 Â· .*1 - 9, Ms. Roxanne Eflin ~0 - 14-.201 May 27, 1988 Page two The following outline addresses all the considerations for this review process: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS - Re: 24-9.3(a) (1) Historical Importance The principal residence is associated with Eugene Wilder, who came to Aspen in the 1880's and was associated with the Aspen Lumber Company, one of the pioneer lumber companies in Aspen. The house was undoubtedly constructed from local lumber, and might have been built by the Aspen Lumber Company. (2) Architectural Importance Architecturally, the house is significant in that Â·it reflects traditional Aspen character and the Victorian style prevalent when it was built. The stained glass bay window facing West Hallam Avenue is unique to this; architectural style. We find no evidence of architectural importance in the Â·~ carriage house. (3) Neighborhood Character The prominence of the site (Third and Hallam) and structure is important to maintairling the neighborhood and community character (the neighborhood consists of several other Victorian houses of similar scale). . We will demolish portions of the main house and will conform to the STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF DEMOLITION, Re: Ord. 11, Sec. 24-9.5(b)4-6. (4) Impact to the Neighborhood The part of the house planned for demolition is in the middle portion of the property and at the rear of the house away from Hallam Avenue. Because of this location, the demolition will have minimum impact on the character of the neighborhood. .-- *2&-*8494&*1*0 4 *Arbawkar, 71 1 I t... 9 91 1 631 * '.taa 1.9 eâ€¢ 4 =aa 9 16~ Q41 0 7. Ms. Roxanne Eflin May 27, 1988 Page three -- Lailia~ (5) Impact to the Historical Importance That portion planned for demolition has little historic importance in that it is an addition to the original house which changed the angle of the original roof slope. The demarcation between the old gable (with fish scale shingles) and recent construction is clearly visible on the east elevation. We will also remove the carport between the house and carriage house. This is newer construction and has- no historical value. (6) Impact on Architectural Integrity The demolition plan has little or no impact on the architectural integrity of the structure because those portions of the house with the greatest historic significance will temain undisturbed. We propose to extensively renovate the carriage house (see letter from our office dated April 14, 1988). We will demolish the east wall of this structure to add 3'-04 onto the yard side of the house, and conform to the STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF DEMOLITION, RE: Ord. 11, Sec. 24-9.5(b)4-6. Regarding our proposed addition to the main house, we refer to the CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS, Section 24-9.4(d)(1). (i) Compatibility The addition to the house is compatible in. character to the (propo:Bed> historic designated structure through,itÂ·s similar proportions, roof slopes, and the materials used in construction; i.e., narrow clapboard siding, wood roof shingles, and corner boards. 1 94<91.in/'-I A / 1 1 .Al I =a At~'-7 02" 4. 8 r. 1 41 -*, 1 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Â¥a, *'. ' V May 27, 1988 4/4 1 ...1 4 Page four (ii) Consistency with Neighborhood Character We are also reflecting the character of the neighborhood by matching the style of the (proposed) historic designated structure and surrounding houses; i.e., we are proposing that the roof slopes with gabled ends match those of the existing structure, and the windows on this proposed addition be of similar type and size to match those of the existing structure and keep with the character of the neighborhood. The design of the addition is subtle and does not overpower the house or those neighboring structures. (iii)Enhancement of Cultural Value This development enhances the cultural value of the (proposed) designated historic structure; i.e., we are maintaining and restoring the original portion of the building, which is important in demonstrating the lifestyle of Aspen's families during the silver mining era. The addition we are proposing is demonstrative of2 the lifestyle of today's Aspen families, yet shows Â· respect to and complements the former historic era. (iv) Enhancement of Architectural Integrity The restoration and addition to 334 West Hallam generally enhances the architectural integrity of the house. We are setting the new exterior walls back approximately 18" from the existing east and west facades. We are also keeping the ridge lines lower on the addition so that it reads with less emphasis as you get further back on the property. These will all complement, yet allow for, the prominent identity of the (proposed) historic designated structure. . , ; =.13*:vet%*S. 0,2 , C. 14 01111 1/ 74,1 4 Ms. Roxanne Eflin /4,- lita May 27, 1988 1 - - Page four (ii) Consistency with Neighborhood Character We are also reflecting the character of the neighborhood by matching the style of the (proposed) historic designated structure and surrounding houses; i.e., we are proposing that the roof slopes with gabled ends match those of the existing structure, and the windows on this proposed addition be of similar type and size to match those of the existing structure and keep with the character of the neighborhood. The design of the addition is subtle and does not overpower the house or those neighboring structures. (iii)Enhancement of Cultural Value ~ This development enhances the cultural value of the (proposed) designated historic structure; i.e., we are maintaining and restoring the original portion of the building, which is important in demonstrating the 0 lifestyle of Aspen's families during the silver mining era. The addition we are proposing is demonstrative ofl the lifestyle of today's Aspen families, yet shows.Â· respect to and complements the former historic era. (iv) Enhancement of Architectural Integrity The restoration and addition to 334 West Hallam generally enhances the architectural integrity of the house. We are setting the new exterior walls back approxiinately 18" from the existing east and west facades. We are also keeping the ridge lines lower on the addition so that it reads with less emphasis as you get further back on the property. These will all complement, yet allow for, the prominent identity of the (proposed) historic designated structure. 0 . 21 Bâ€¢7 w la 0 01, 1 . /61 1/3/1 0 FNT Ms. Roxanne Eflin May 27, 1988 Page five With respect to the DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INVOLVING (PROPOSED) HISTORIC LANDMARKS, Sec. 24-9.4(d)(1), we address the following in our development of the carriage house: (i) Compatibility The renovated carriage house is compatible in character with the existing house located on the parcel as well as other houses on adjacent parcels. It will maintain the same slopes, gabled ends, wooden clapboard siding, and corner boards. (ii) Consistency With Neighborhood Character The renovated carriage house is in keeping with the neighborhood character. There are several renovated carriage houses in this older neighborhood. 0 *(iii)Enhancement of CulturalÂ·.Value The renovated structure will function as a residence. This does not detract from the cultural value of the proposed historic designated structure, but rather, enhances it as a more functional building, while maintaining its historic lines. (iv) Enhancement of Architectural Integrity The develJpment of the carriage house does not detract from the architectural value of the (proposed) historic property, but complements it and keeps with the style of the house. It does this through the use of similar materialsÂ·(wood shingle roof, narrow clapboard siding). The ridge height of the proposed renovation is the same as the existing structure. If there are any questions, pl ease give me a call. Sincerpl'(, airicia Harris 0 Project Manager PH:dem Enclosures m Y.A f r,. u )0. / 2 U h CS ,râ€¢ , 0771- igt,i ir'#MI Icic,T),9.- - 1. 3 , - I Fi~ *_ i... 11 0 4 l l ty 4-el : T,p EMOMY. i PHASE ONE -7,; CÂ»Bq'% .029,4 ! I f 1. . _26*-=. _344*cg, C EMOVE I -..J :. - 4.7 T it*WOOHSTFÂ·UCLON ..,-4- --... ex,re GA'Eft*191- -At i i --A g i i 6-1- 4 Sw' 941Â«6 E / 1 1 1 -0 1 - - --'-4 1 P .1 ---4 -1--1- q\1 '12\ % %1 _919:-r'/A i . - 1 1* -gl.i Â· ~ -L ~ 4 8 'I . 41 1 ,-- 1 4 , O 41\. !4 . 1 2 1% 1.\11 111 1 I 0- 1 i3 *er I -- 1 ta l tal 1 4 0 -i-- J 0:Â·iÂ· PHASE TWO , l 1 WOOP-1-=- 4 911100 1 1 -1 1 C n n I . 11 9 - ...4/ -,-1 1 1 <~--31 cl C r V , A==Â» 1 i 71-4 L 229-14--1 =* 'oLsÂ¥;TMof " f LIK A 8 0/.1 11/4014- 09' 11" talla,0,0, s -r-. T14 l Ap -5.2 E EF /4144;tia e â‚¬ 1.2 ' NA Â¥-6 6 r.. V py / u vi ;~~~ ~ , 01*4|42 fbkp ta ' i t.1- /91$~*\ .ri,_ 1' 1 1 ~ ct ll ..9 1. 0 1 '<*...' -.lit; 1 la Â·Â·- PHASE ONE W 3 -1- 1 ../1 1 1 1 11 -4 11 L -.- 6.941[1 1 4-1 -i + ftic:.w colibll#*Sioh 2 EMOVE Â· 1 \Â· 1.1*'i .:,16 /2 - 5, -]- -- , f Ex!5,fe C.Alzft,11;*22-1.~ li i ./5,4 : 4.-1.--6Â¥w GAMAff / *.-fÂ· 7L ' 1 ]1 1.1 Ella, 991/K i , t h-: . 01 { 0 -1-411 L-__. fl i , 41 \ 1 4 . __--I-_-- 31 , , 3 / 1 % 4 - Q '\ i. 1 vi 'va I. i 9- 1./ 1 .1 j , 2~ _Ff}/Pir i m i --------- 4- 2 10 1 1... . 71\ 1 1 4 | 4:Â·J PHASE TWO <: 1 .- W 00 0 -P- 1 1 c,Hip . 1 1 li 1- . '1Â»-1 1 - 1 54-DD-73$1 , 0 'riV 10,9.31.54614 1. ~\ 4 \ - -- .---- O- I Ac.Ala.., s -u. 74 1 Kg._ I .8 toop. 8 / Â·lYNCaYELK< >7% 'Â° Â°,i . r 1 1 i 7 / . 5-. -/:, -it, 0,/:. *.0 '4$.,4, $ 41-,~' 4.-<A/$'hjt , 7 ....14 . 21.4. ', US .... r -0 a. . 1 . .. r. I .: I...~ . 1 . 17 , r~ /vn Ch '4 . 6-~~.<12-= 14Â·r 19-> 4 .4 .//' 10 5/ 18 CC+4(3. mo . 89 * : ~ . 1~ 0. 0 ' 11 10' DIA. 2-*/.1.......Ill// 1 , woo[)' a,Det , p CITYOF/\Of'[14 1 0 corroNv.0009 0. - N.OCK 49 i j F .: -, I , I 1 . . r./ . 4 9 1 . 241* C.W. ,.[/ /.i~ Mf .. 4 : k .../.*.4"4#5~ h- V . to . ' ~10[)'F-19MEL 0 ~ 2 ' IOOH Â·Â·tr 90 10 Ct- .."j . . - , I . . I . 1 1 i hi ;- +1:i<j.**, 3â€ž ~ 2 - â€žf<2:i.:. - - ./1- ; <7- h, % 40 3 0 7.Â¥3;4 , DASPENS, 4'-*00 04. ... 2 43| i~ 0 .5; 97_ __--_..1 ~ ~ 1/B'PIACRABAPPLE.Â·' - ! 1 , tez. ti'AL-'--441---4- i rn /11 ...1 .4--- 4:: 1 e'GrfEAP '. Â· '7 : * CÂ» 4 10'PIA *PRUCE -7 ~,'j ., m : 1 2.../1 1<12'97 E .. ... 1., I 0 16.2 -11 A. rr.,1 7.-h /0/-' ; 13 l' C . a.t , i, 7 . 0 : ..~ O n 2,4.0~ c w. n Â£) 0,7 N 70.(*)1 7,9 â‚¬00'2 Â· i 240 P-. C. VVÂ· f 11.1 9 : 1.OK' c.w. 3 i~ 3 /4,illrt- 5-3- 10 0 0 14'CALA. C.W. Uv' UL 0 L -2 c 3 -) 1 L PS,El HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 possible curling. The other concern was shifting the garage over where it might possibly be seen from the E. Hopkins side of the street. I took pictures and you probably wouldn't see the garage at all just the tree on the side of it. Roxanne: You are demolishing the back addition that has two bedrooms. Gary: Yes. Bill: You are demolishing the shed entirely. Gary: Yes. Nick: On a on site view you can see the definition between the new building and the addition. Gary: The addition is masked by the two maple trees in front as well as the pine tree. Bill: We have certain issues that need to be looked at: the front porch, the garage which is being relocated, materials and the second story dormer on the front facade. Augie: On the front porch is there any access. Gary: On the side. MOTION: Bill made the motion to approve the applicatioil that meets the criterior in the HPC's conceptual development approval and recommends approval of the partial demolition and final development application for 113 E. Hopkins Avenue. Nick second. All approved. Motion carries. Georgeann didn't vote. FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-334 W. HALLAM AVE. Bill stepped down. Roxanne: 334 W. Hallam is before us for final development review for the partial demolition, the alterations, the addition and the carriage house renovation. On March 8th HPC passed the conceptual development approval and on April 6th the applicant returned requesting an amendment to the original plan which HPC approved. It went last night before City Council and has received its final designation on second reading and the $2,000 incentive grant was awarded since the property was rated #5. Primarily the issues we are dealing with are the carriage house. It becomes very close to being a demolition however in reviewing it with the state historic preservation officer she agrees that it is a partial demolition and a reconstruction. The plans 5 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 0 remain very similar to those that were already approved. It is a two bedroom dwelling with a four ft. expansion to the east. It does have a small west elevation porch, very simple; however, it does encroach slightly into the setback and that does requireÂ·HPC to grant a variation in the motion that such encroachment is more compatible with the historic structure. The gable peak height remains identical to the existing height. The lines of the four foot extension are exactly identical to the carriage house. They intend to keep the structural members in place and remove all the exterior fabric and replace. It was my original recommendation that they try to incorporate as much as they could into the new. I am not sure they can do that at all as it is in sad shape. The materials will match what is there. With regard to parking it is required in code that for each new bedroom that is created that one new parking space must be provided on site. The current site contains two spaces that have served the existing four bedroom home, those are fine. We need to make sure two additional spaces are provided for the two new parking spaces. The applicant submitted a revised site plan option B in your packet which shows the two spaces are encroaching into the City's right-of-way. This is a touchy issue with regard to the Engineering Dept. in that they are not OK with just signing off on that even finding that the preservation issues connected with the carriage house make it OK for that to happen and 3rd street is sited for sidewalk and gutter because it is a major route into the music tent area. Therefore any development that goes on along 3rd ~ street is required to have that upgrade going on. There are several site issues that the applicant is dealing with separate from us and they are going to be taking it through an encroachment license through Council and that is recommended through the Eng. Dept. That is not in our preview to review. The alignment of the carriage house does not change and neither does the garage that connects the two. It is a matter of whether they go before P&Z, pay a fee and go through an application and request a reduction in parking or whether they provide the parking which is certainly our recommendation on site but encroach into the right-of-way. They are dealing with that right now. The main structure and the addition, no changes from the conceptual development approval and the amendment have been proposed. The main house restoration facades are considered phase #2. The owners plan to occupy the carriage house while the renovation of the new structure is taking place which includes a basement which they will be excavating under the new addition, the demolition of the 1960's addition and then adding on. We have received the structural letter that states that the main building is very sound and that in their opinion there will be no undermining of the structures stability with regard to the addition. The allowable floor area is another issue. The calculations of the entire project have been recalculated by the ~ applicant. It shows that it is exactly 500 sq. ft. over the 6 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 remain very similar to those that were already approved. It is a two bedroom dwelling with a four ft. expansion to the east. It does have a small west elevation porch, very simple; however, it does encroach slightly into the setback and that does require HPC to grant a variation in the motion that such encroachment is more compatible with the historic structure. The gable peak height remains identical to the existing height. The lines of the four foot extension are exactly identical to the carriage house. They intend to keep the structural members in place and remove all the exterior fabric and replace. It was my original recommendation that they try to incorporate as much as they could into the new. I am not sure they can do that at all as it is in sad shape. The materials will match what is there. With regard to parking it is required in code that for each new bedroom that is created that one new parking space must be provided on site. The current site contains two spaces that have served the existing four bedroom home, those are fine. We need to make sure two additional spaces are provided for the two new parking spaces. The applicant submitted a revised site plan option B in your packet which shows the two spaces are encroaching into the City's right-of-way. This is a touchy issue with regard to the Engineering Dept. in that they are not OK with just signing off on that even finding that the preservation issues connected with the carriage house make it OK for that to happen and 3rd street is sited for sidewalk and gutter because it is a major route into the music ~ tent area. Therefore any development that goes on along 3rd ~ street is required to have that upgrade going on. There are several site issues that the applicant is dealing with separate from us and they are going to be taking it throu4h an encroachment license through Council and that is recommended through the Eng. Dept. That is not in our preview to review. The alignment of the carriage house does not change and neither does the garage that connects the two. It is a matter of whether they go before P&Z, pay a fee and go through an application and request a reduction in parking or whether they provide the parking which is certainly our recommendation on site but encroach into the right-of-way. They are dealing with that right now. The main structure and the addition, no changes from the conceptual development approval and the amendment have been proposed. The main house restoration facades are considered phase #2. The owners plan to occupy the carriage house while the renovation of the new structure is taking place which includes a basement which they will be excavating under the new addition, the demolition of the 1960's addition and then adding on. We have received the structural letter that states that the main building is very sound and that in their opinion there will be no undermining of the structures stability with regard to the addition. The allowable floor area is another issue. The calculations of the entire project have been recalculated by the AIIA applicant. It shows that it is exactly 500 sq. ft. over the 6 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 allowed limit of FAR which HPC may approve a variation finding that the FAR is more compatible with the historic structure due to the renovation of the carriage house into a dwelling unit. We are trying to preserve carriage houses as much as we possibly can and therefore by increasing the square footage it throws us over the FAR. That needs to be included in the motion. They have a Phase II restoration. We strongly recommend that every effort be made to preserve and carefully restore those details that make this property a true historic Aspen landmark. The materials will match the new siding and will be painted. The existing siding is in very good shape and will be repaired and painted as suggested. The wood windows will also be repaired and repainted. The roofing materials will be roof shingles on both the carriage house and the main structure. The windows are wood casement and double hung. We recommend approval granting the following variations: the encroachment of the new porch of the carriage house into the required setback has been found to be more compatible to the historic structure and that the FAR limit has been exceeded by 500 sq. ft. due to the adapted renovation of the carriage house which HPC finds to be more compatible with the historic structure. We also recommend that the carriage house not be lifted up for foundation repair or replacement purposes but remain situated on the site. There was a possibility of that going on. We are concerned that it will not withstand any kind of major lifting. Trish Harris: With regards to the foundation we have talked with the owners today and they are saying they would prefer that there be a basement under the carriage house. As long aa they were going to pour a four foot foundation wall they felt they should just go ahead and do a basement. In order to do that we would have to move the house and the structural engineer said it could withstand some movement. You could keep this separate from the final approvement if you find that necessary. Roxanne: You are already up to the limit on FAR; how many more square feet would you be adding. Trish: A lot of the additional square footage was in the sun space are and we would try to trim that down that area and put some storage in there but it would be underground so I don't think we have to count that as it would be totally subterranean. Bill D.: The basement would be exempt from floor area ratio as it is 100% below grade. It adds to the impact and must be used for storage. The entrance would have to be through an inside stairway. Trish: We are adding a basement under the main house. 7 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 Georgeann: Roxanne is concerned about the moving of the ~ carriage house. Trish: As far as moving it the structural engineer thinks it should be moved anyway. We are digging a four foot trench to put in the wall and he feels it should be moved because it would be very hard to dig under the house even the four feet and to pour the cement. We thought of moving it to the rear yard. Bill D.: If you can move this house and put in a new foundation then why shouldn't it be moved out of the setbacks. The reason for allowing setbacks is because things cannot be moved. Roxanne: I would have a problem with HPC approving something like this without a clear site plan and how it works. Georgeann: The historic designation is on the whole parcel. Charles: We discussed before adding 4 feet to the carriage house and HPC approved that. Looking at the site plan I thought the sun space was to be moved back further. Roxanne: The applicant argued that the sun space had to be that way and we approved it. Charles: Before the sun space was not flexible and now it is? If it is a trade off between the sunspace and the carriage space ~ as I understand it, the sun space is flexible so that. the carriage space can work. If they are willing to do that then we should consider that the sun space is not a dead issue. Georgeann: We would be more inclined to give them the basement if they would keep the sun space small. The client said originally that it would be a major hardship for them without the sun space. Trish: I got this dropped on me before the meeting and I do agree that the sun space is very important to them. I have not discussed this with the clients. The sun space and the 4 ft. were already approved. Georgeann: This issue now is final and the basement under the carriage house. The concern of Roxanne's is moving the carriage house. Roxanne: If we are resetting the carriage house all the issues change and perhaps we should table this until we know what the clients want. Trish: I would rather you not table it. ~ 8 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 Georgeann: Roxanne is concerned about the moving of the carriage house. Trish: As far as moving it the structural engineer thinks it should be moved anyway. We are digging a four foot trench to put in the wall and he feels it should be moved because it would be very hard to dig under the house even the four feet and to pour the cement. We thought of moving it to the rear yard. Bill D.: If you can move this house and put in a new foundation then why shouldn't it be moved out of the setbacks. The reason for allowing setbacks is because things cannot be moved. Roxanne: I would have a problem with HPC approving something like this without a clear site plan and how it works. Georgeann: The historic designation is on the whole parcel. Charles: We discussed before adding 4 feet to the carriage house and HPC approved that. Looking at the site plan I thought the sun space was to be moved back further. Roxanne: The applicant argued that the sun space had to be that way and we approved it. Charles: Before the sun space was not flexible and now it is? If it is a trade off between the sunspace and the carriage space as I understand it, the sun space is flexible so that, the carriage space can work. If they are willing to do that then we should consider that the sun space is not a dead issue. Georgeann: We would be more inclined to give them the basement if they would keep the sun space small. The client said originally that it would be a major hardship for them without the sun space. Trish: I got this dropped on me before the meeting and I do agree that the sun space is very important to them. I have not discussed this with the clients. The sun space and the 4 ft. were already approved. Georgeann: This issue now is final and the basement under the carriage house. The concern of Roxanne's is moving the carriage house. Roxanne: If we ate resetting the carriage house all the issues change and perhaps we should table this until we know what the clients want. Trish: I would rather you not table it. 8 - HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 Roxanne: Final means stamped approval. Georgeann: Then she would have to come back to us completely for the new basement if they want it. Roxanne: If in fact they are going to move this structure that is considered demolition and that goes through a public hearing process. Bill D.: They are going for variances because they say this is where things have to be because they can't be moved. Now they are saying they can move it. How many considerations should they get. Should we deal with the fact that it can be moved. Nick: You are going to move it to put the foundation in then move it back. Charles: That was the idea. Bill D.: The point is if they are going to move it off then they could put it back somewhere else behind the setbacks. Georgeann: If you have to put a foundation under a wood building I have seen them in a lot of cases jack the building up and pour a foundation beneath. Is that more or less hard on the building then it would be to move it. Jacking it up has to be hard on the building also. Charles: You have to jack it up to move it horizontally. Georgeann: So the shock to the building is 70% to jack it up and 30% moving it over. Augie: You could under pin it. Trish: There is under pining and that is a possibility. It is much more costly but is feasible to under pin one side at a time to pour the four foot wall. Charles: They could take the siding off and jack up the frame. Trish: We presented it to you before that it was going to be a skeleton. Nick: The vertical 2 by 4's can be saved but the siding is in bad shape. Augie: If what I hear happens we are going to maybe have a ~ skeleton, move it, allow them to change the length of the 9 HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 building, change it by adding dormers etc. so do we really have a ~ structure that is historically renovated or do we have some new building? Roxanne: It is reconstruction. Georgeann: This sounds like the ramifications are complicated. Roxanne: If it is moved it is considered demolition. Georgeann: Possibly we should approve the plans as presented from conceptual and if they want to alter the carriage house for whatever reason then they would have to come back to us. Roxanne: You could approve it as is and if anything is altered they couldn't get a building permit anyway. Georgeann: In Roxanne's memo why are we giving then an encroachment on the new porch. Trish: Because there is a different entrance, it is an entrance porch. The way it is now is on the south side next to the existing car port. Georgeann: If she didn't extend out beyond the existing building line why would she need more of an encroachment. Why ~ wouldn't it be just grandfathered in. Bill D.: There is a five ft. setback minimum and is probibly 7 on this lot. The house is already encroaching into the setbacks, the carriage house by a couple of feet. You cannot increase an encroachment without a variance. Georgeann: We decided that it was more compatible. Georgeann: We are inclined to give them approval as is without moving the carriage house. We would also need a motion that would incorporate the encroachment of the new porch into the required setback and eliminate the FAR. MOTION: -Â·Augie made the motion that HPC approve the partial demolition and final development of 334 W. Hallam St. granting the following variations: 1. The encroachment of the new porch of the carriage house into the required setback is found to be more compatible to the historic structure. 2. The applicant meets the required parking requirements and should be reviewed by the Eng. Dept. 10 - HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 building, change it by adding dormers etc. so do we really have a structure that is historically renovated or do we have some new building? Roxanne: It is reconstruction. Georgeann: This sounds like the ramifications are complicated. Roxanne: If it is moved it is considered demolition. Georgeann: Possibly we should approve the plans as presented from conceptual and if they want to alter the carriage house for whatever reason then they would have to come back to us. Roxanne: You could approve it as is and if anything is altered they couldn't get a building permit anyway. Georgeann: In Roxanne's memo why are we giving then an encroachment on the new porch. Trish: Because there is a different entrance, it is an entrance porch. The way it is now is on the south side next to the existing car port. Georgeann: If she didn't extend out beyond the existing building line why would she need more of an encroachment. Why wouldn't it be just grandfathered in. Bill D.: There is a five ft. setback minimum and is probibly 7 on this lot. The house is already encroaching into the setbacks, the carriage house by a couple of feet. You cannot increase an encroachment without a variance. Georgeann: We decided that it was more compatible. Georgeann: We are inclined to give them approval as is without moving the carriage house. We would also need a motion that would incorporate the encroachment of the new porch into the required setback and eliminate the FAR. MOTION: -Augie made the motion that HPC approve the partial demolition and final development of 334 W. Hallam St. granting the following variations: 1. The encroachment of the new porch of the carriage house into the required setback is found to be more compatible to the historic structure. 2. The applicant meets the required parking requirements and should.be reviewed by the Eng. Dept. 10 - HPC. MINUTES June 14, 1988 0 3. That the carriage house not be lifted up for foundation repair or replacement purposes and remain situated on site and if it is moved or lifted up then the applicant is required to come back for further approval. Nick second the motion. All favored. Motion carries. FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-212 W. HOPKINS Charles stepped down. Roxanne: No changes have been presented from the revised conceptual. He did reduce the height of the building and it came up 5 3/4 inches almost to 22 ft. It is still lower and staff finds that the additional inches are not a negative. Jan Derrington: The shingles are charcoal gray and match the shingles that are there. They will be using Marvin windows with a factory baked on white finish. Windows will be single glazed with storm panel on the inside. All the others that don't have true divided lights are 3/4 inch insulating glass. Bill: I have no problems with anything. Bill: Roxanne is the application in order and do you feel 0 comfortable that you have all the back up material. Roxanne: Yes. Bill: I will entertain a motion that recommends final development approval of 212 W. Hopkins finding the setback variation to be more compatible. MOTION: Nick, I so move. Georgeann second the motion. Motion carries. FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-516 E. HYMAN AVE. Bill stepped down. Roxanne: This is for the final development review of 516 E. Hyman, the mouse house bldg. phase I and phase II. This includes the entire demolition of the building and includes the redevelopment of a commercial building, a one story of 2,250 sq. ft. for the first floor which is considered phase I and Phase II which is subject to GMP allocation is 2250 sq. ft. It is my recommendation that if a motion be made that it include an approval for Phase I and an approval for Phase II which includes 0 11 . r t'Al, #44' 1 I =533â‚¬=a~Er-- -=~44-:&224 Â·-2 - .... .40. *HIN,u â€¢ - 1../. 2,- - r -- 90 8 ----]NAE< . RA/,041 w feÂ¢,4 0 N AD. 41#Ile, -I--1.-- - l._1 -. Â·-- WDO TIGH 0~0 3% Â·-7 1.1~ UL,bl. - - 42%24:41. - CÂ£AM â€¢1" I.-- .... f 1 1 i -- Ljl -DOCI u - _ 0 0000 - - -'- - .HO-nv. . 11 - .- I .- Â«0000 -L I - Ne. Cot... pa Pop'.,4 1 -- - 0 ELIZII 0 - e - . -- --- --- , 0 SOUTH ~EAST 5ish &1 6 j.-1 1-1 . 1.1.*owl,Â·,1 rL.;84 ----- h. ~30:Â· 22- 2 Â·. + --I 1 le-'-Of- 0 - --------- ifil . Uk?*064 R.'W,0 L----111 311---- -- HA" 44=/* . - ..~~+ tr-4 --1411>1 - -Wom TRIM-- --- .- . .- -.. ~~ ZEUE~ M --- ---- -- - - 22-.---Ar-F~ L=!1 * -- -__-----==z-EL-71LJI Ep Â· 'lkyoh I' 0/ P~RTH. 7 1]19'AL- f#Ushn Al 3 5 9 w ,-1# 7 -1 kn 4 009 0 N. 3ED 300 3/0 3, --1 0-3 0 82 . 1, WZ Â£41 3 12 -, 0 0 02 4 9 IE- 0 -' 1'1 L 8 -Ill/; + / 01 -*- 0 0 -5-- vr--3 ' IT- 79 e ., 1 \/Di 01/ 4 11 . 0 4 4-,0 1.71 M 0 -M V I D :' r 7121 11 -:01, 1 01 # 42 Â£ _- r-7 (01@4 . 1 4 1'\ C L---1 0 1 9 171 Br 31 P 4 \6 4 21 9 Ir-11}/,.& 1: [4 / R H 11 -2 - 9 % ,-Il l 11 Â· S 301 11 11 11 - 2 i k N .240 11 4 300 11 4 11 m 17-32" 1 K # 11 d #$90. 11 11 28 11 0 1 11 1 t M ( 14 1FI; 1 . N D 0 . 11 1~ 71 / !1 %11 % # R, ~ ' -1 6. 0 11 Fr '12 11 %01 & 1 0 t . 75* ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPUCATION FORM 1. Project name C..\Acu~Â£045ka-/ P.-hAS Lets k L. AM 2. Project location 354 1.0.4-W'law' A/ne k' 42. ~.+Be Al 1 Â£-0 9- 161 j (indicate street address, lot Ind block numberormetes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning ~ -U. 4. Lot size 9 r ec)c2 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number. ma,<61 clnEcov sk,A. 6 Fla.rd<-- PEJU -h-4 9 2-s- 2 -z--7-2- c.&(AA,Â»40 Â»pu. 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Aill Asss ~ ('Acukk. 92,5- 476-5. 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA )< Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA .-I Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Finai PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision - Text/Map Amend. - Historic Landmari GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demc/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee - Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, acoroximate sq. ft, number of bedrooms. any previous approvals granted to the property) wla,:34 +I-el,4.6 cu,,ok 00uvvioff 10(ADuu- , 4580 s.6.11, 3 0 R. AUU. li *Aft 2 5 2- CaA~uag-L wj#-S,e- ' 43-PC- *All._B f'eoud- 9"~ol j vi A:,<101 ear: ad 1 341,1 buil Klib eAMALB l.pe Al- i 6%,uu04? ILX- au.66Â£eedlM J.Ff rÂ·Yful: 9. Descnption or develooment application lot 4 i $38 Y.1 nad- uwt .Â£*,d-Gr -2*fe , ev,in itc ~?3~44*0124 0 ave you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1 - Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 11% llc lilli1111 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant m 01/,ta- C.(A,146wsk.. 4 0*at Pdu~ Address: . 9,45 '4 Le Â· 4-411./la,~, , hew - CA Plu / Zone district: R- Co Lot size: 04 002, Existing FAR: - Allowable FAR 4,590 (u,/ 4-i Pe. 6be 570 42Â· bow,Uj Proposed FAR: J 1 jgBO Existing net leasable (commercal): Proposed net leasable (commercial): --- Exisring % of site coverage: Prcposed 96 of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Prccosed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Princioai bidc: 24 ' Accescrv tide: Prccosed max. height Princical bidc: 36/ Accesscrv bida: Pcoosed % of demolition: Existing number of bectrocms: mO.COto#U:* - .4 Prcccsed number of bedrcorns: 018. r i. Lbe ##AL- 03 Existing on-site parking spaces: Crl-site parking spaces required: Setacks Existing: Minimum required: Prooosed:/.cuv<c- lustow: 41 FrOnt. 210' Fronr 10' Front: L led,1- p,wEr Rear: 7 LO' Rear: LD' Â£ Rear Comoined Combined Combined Fron#rear: 736' Front/rear: 30' Front/rear: Side: 7 10' S ide: 10' S ide: Side: > 10, Side: 20' Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: >30' -- Sides: 30 ' Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 4 ear. f Variations requested:-,Appli UAT- Bkâ‚¬Â©DBO /liÂ£:Te,041,1 uy,+6- FAR 'be ni~&-,1> St:>6.~r . 1 0-!PC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, 1 FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.fl. site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the Fbi R-15, RMF, CC, and O i zone districts) 1 1 - ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATIONS CONT. ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS LEGEND i DRAWING INDEX t . i , ~ PERMIT NO. p.34 6 A PLAM i:la.tic I.,minate RBL rubble wine YOL tolerance (TOF OF v :'663 'c . SURVEY 4GI. O' NEW OR REQUIRED PO1NT ELEVATION BUILDING SECTION Sh.MHOLS l.'SED .45 ABHR[VIATION'$ BUR |)Ulit 1,11 .14 Ing DIAM (0> cit,imetri PL Pllite SFGL ~alrly glabt T&6 Ic,ngue and grove f REFERENCE DRAWING NUMIER AO.1 GENERAL REFERENCE OWNER mU TAL,~h>AN,/94 4 I angle 8BD bull,Â·tin tx lard DIM (lini,Â·09(,fl PG P;.He gl,15% Scti .chedule TOS top nt %1,11) ce,it<Â·rline CAB w 1)11'tÂ·t DIA (1,9%Â·,her PWD Ph'wood SCN 4( reel TO.91't,C,L- top 01.teel Al.0 SITE PLAN C CAD i.winuum DIV dion PT ix>int SNT WAI,Â·Int To IAI 1(}t) {)( w,711 7\ WALL SECTION OR ELEVATION A2.1 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN ADDRESS r.3-3y/~9, kiWUBL#, =-r- EXISTING CONTOURS ~~Â£17 REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER (1 9..v C-Pl C.irpel (ed' DR (1(}(,f PVC 1'*34Â·vinyl chloride STG waling TB towel b. r ,/+v ELEVATION NOTED ON HIGH Slot N A2.2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Â· 1 perpendic ulai CSMT c.iqi,(Â·nl DA d' i.ble.,linK Pâ‚¬ por~ elatn enamet SEC .ection TR trank-1 NEW CONTOURS A2.3 UPPER FLOOR PLAN r11 DETAIL ..-.. 84 plat<.Cl C.)41 Iron DH double hung PIC pu.1-teribioned concrete SSK wrvice vok T IfiÂ·,Id .416- ELEVATION NOTED ON HIGH SIDE REF-NCE DRAWING NUMBER A2.4 ROOF PLAN 'LOT BLOCK .-- 6 ")/111{1 C 1 p c i.,IdÂ·In pla/(Â· (or Â· rule DTA ile,vtÂ·tall,iric hor Pei round' pe' cubic. foot Sli TH #W "h/nK TYP hpx.11 A].1 NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS 4.43 csr c 3,1 .to,ie DIS (lovel.1.1 anchor .10{ PF 1 pound. txÂ·r linral tont SHT Sheet uc unflt'Ic .[ -~_ TD-l TEST BORING rEx A3.2 SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS SUBD PSÂ¥ 1.Mul. per .qu,we loot SC 3,Â·11 ),1.M UNF ~ Xe~ INTERIOR ELEVATION A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS (-8 cal<11 11,1.1,1 DS (linvr,%1),ilit ,inlin,UicÂ·(1 ABBREVIA IN)9; CK (all [ing) c Juli (in# D Ar,â€žn PSI p 'unck per ,(tuare in, h SH .bull .1.Â·ling UR l. %./1 - Â· -I~ --- LEVEL LINE C.>11'1 A5.1 WALL SECTIONS ABV .0{he (-l(, ceiling DRS (ir,Iii,IN i.ird FCC twvt .'/1 ( (HH /Â·It' sM) ~hore 1{1). lingl VI 1 Â·t<)11~11(Â·All i AFF aliove linished floor CHT DT Iii.un Ide PFS ;)rtâ€¢t,11)11( alâ‚¬' ((1 I SIM .nular VB , .11 *,r b.irri~Â·f A6.1 LOWER LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A6.2 UPPER LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ' ASC .,hove wibended cell,ng C EM Ce'll'll t>WR (ir.iner PFN 94,11(w,hed SKL 4.. light VAR 1,un- a /TA PROJECT NORTH 'Ec ac . O%< PCPt Cement pi.i.1- 4 orl|Andl DWC (Ir.n,Ing VINDOW TYPE ~~~00,/ USED ON PLOT SITE Pil ONLYI A7.2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS PRÂ¥ Dwtorined 51 'IcÂ·r f. VNR ( ~ ~ IMAGNETIC NORTH ARROW A7.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS ROOMS 4 1'14'(â€¢' ACFt a< C (95 1100/ C M .linit.Â·MN DE (Irinking lount.,in PIC prtÂ·.tri'wÂ·rl Â£(inc rele SC .,1,(1 < '~re VRM \ f./.< /4|1' . AP Gil 'i mil DVÂ¢ dtiminH,ter rit.ZO --- PL 0,(,tkÂ·Th line SP vit.nili,iont VFRT wrl,0 1 - DOOR NUMBER A7.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS _ - AC CT Â£ er,w ple [F '101 h t,ke UT--- cl 41.11 r, 111*â€¢ S .) 121 VG "'ft!01 gf.,In 43<~ COLUMN REFERENCE GRIDS ( 9 ) (IF MORE THAN ONE DOOR PERBOOM AB.1 DETAILS , .. SUB LETTERS â€¢RE USED) ACPL .C.it'.ti, al pla.trr C Nt T (ear/' ..m mic) E N.t RBT fal 'bet rebate 514- .2.ur, VIN ,"1.1 j DASH AND DOT LINC -.. - ACT .,<41~ 1'01 tile C}194) chalktw.,;d Fl EC UkÂ·(in' 1.11, RA{) fa,!lut, 5PK .INÂ·ak(Â·r VAT und ..|HÂ·~10. tile \ CENTER LINES FLOOR LINES IN -. 1 h.1.(, C AIR ,(rv 1,< plabllc ' CHAM 'hamle, IP clear,ral p.wtelbo,i,d R[ r,iiI lin,<) *7 gPL 141 1,11 VH 4 Irl\ . ~ EXTERIOR EL/. 11:ONS, PROJECTED LINES . I J AD[) .MitliÂ·ri,lum (R c 'imil,Ill,11 1,)1,11(Â· 1 f LrC t'l'.1'It ...,1.1 ' ,){ '1(Â·r R,116 ( DASH AND DOUSLE DOT LINE - 1,1'I-,11Â¢Â·1 ((}ful'Hhir SPiC 4%Â·{ 11:,,Ilitin W W und l.i!)11< Â· PROPERTY LINE. BOUNDARY LINES ADH adhew, CIR , Ift 14. 4 i hÂ·..unon 11[f 1,4414'n-Â· 5(2 '<A". VT ;im! hle DOTTED LINE- 4- AL)1 .4.wÂ·n! CIRC , I"/1//Â·f/'I' /' 1 tv 44\.11,1, Rfl .'1|(" : ft't|1 11*Â·Â¢â€¢) 1,/1 5ST .1.linliÂ·â€ž 41,Â·rl V.' SC T ..11...1 / At)JT .]dil'.1.,1,!, r 'P i le.'f Â·,In, C: 1.% " emtâ€¢,0.â€ž, I REIR Â· .â€¢/11<t'r...' iTt) .!.1,~(1./d M T \% , --------------------1-Â· HIDDEN LINE AC,6 aggriÂ·g,,rtÂ· Cli INL , 11( 1'19* 4't J Rtt, 1 "\41Â·.ItÂ·r bTA V.,11,/1 'A H -111 1,~11'K BRE" lINE --- ---Ii :.a ill AC air widilioning (m column 11 RE â€žÂ·imort e 1,11 11,14 ST qiÂ·(Â·1 ',V' C -,Uer ( Ii>NCI A 1 Yllf,11 I Â· 10 BREAK OFF PARTS OF DRAwINGS 05:=an E 0 0 0 0. ALT alt{Â·niate (-()MB 8,11>in,*in H)P 1.11 l!,1 )'iltÂ·nt k P re,ntâ€žraÂ·,1 c â€žnuctiÂ· p,IX, STO WP .....ft)..,1.4: GLAZING CALCULATIONS 4, a. C U) m AL aluminum C O,411' T , iwn"ar 1,14Â·nt EM , .(.,1.~1'Jr REV .Â·./.i.' S{) .to,in dia,A WR u .ik r r,Â·Bâ€žâ€¢11,Â·111 . O * c, ANC anchor an, horage C OMPO , 014". Min k tinÂ·li)(170 EQT ,+hill'I.]tt~ RES 4 .!Ill,111 STR ..< 1~,1,11 WS -.1 'IN 'top G.50Â£10 AB anchor Init COMP CompreÂ·.5 {edi. rin). fit,1,Â·1 EXC A ,, RET rtÂ·turn SC T vmwWtIAY tile W'W, w,1,11,1 -re 1.'br,( MATERIAL INDICATIONS ANO[) .noil, ",1 CONC (Ill /11 tx,1 (Â·.}'.",V RA .Â·lurn ,/. VA .4Â·,uhÂ·d W ,.u I. i WINDOW SQ FT GLAZING QUANTITY TOTAL SQ rr APX at,prournate C ,Â·1 lJ â€žint itÂ·le 111,14*,rf) init EX (, ('/1.11.K RVS St,%1 vnmâ€žÂ·1,3 11< .111 WHB .ihtÂ·,Â·1 humpt* . A 7.3 1 7.3 8 5.3 3 15.9 9 M O 00 E g Â§ i 2 i ARCH architi'< ; 4//1 1 OX LintÂ·(lion EYMP t..p,inded miÂ·1.11 pl,,4- REV It".1%1,}l~ 1/: r,Â·~ i~.tÂ·,1 SYN ..4/.1, W ./'111; .,<ItÂ· i AD arra cl 'tu C ONST ((111.[Â·~i~ tion FB â€ž1).iâ€¢iâ€¢,Â·.in lit,It 12,1 â€žRhÂ·hand 5;5 YAN' U 1 N n. nfli.,4 Acoustic Tile Ill C 8.3 15 124.5 2ZZ.. Awl'(112 (-(j. Icâ€ž,1,1, 1 1â€žr, 1 \T R fl.tâ€¢, 116 t.k'11;, w VI brick: E 8.9 1 8.9 : 0~Eu "I,/,ill),1/ {H ((]1,1.IUU EXP ROW 'fle,0 1,1 TKBI) i,u klvi,,ul w'(1 I. D 10.0 5 50.0 E. c m 3 Â¤' 322 AT j,phall [billÂ· ( 11 ((inti.,il limit hne I XS ,Â·,11,1 41,â€ž1~g R\T 1,\ cl Tfl 11Â·1~Â·1):11,1~(Â· W O ' F 8.3 2 16.6 Â® 3 >= O 0 A Ul O autoinatic /1T ((int:"l ic,Int CH t.ictÂ· tir,c k RD mi, clw,jin TV it,In nion WD V.(M>d -XENEZE G 15.3 1 15.3 ,- 204 ..f Â£2E2= BP Ii.ick. PI.wiÂ·' ledÂ· (1'R , f~|,1,1.f ,()C 1,Ic l. 11 t ( 11 Ir ,(.14 R F H râ€žiiI lutch TE lee., c 011,1 W4 wic)(1 t}.1.e Firebrick ,1!lilli!!1!li. Â·Â·~ H 3.6 2 7.2 BSMT 1),thell}le,1t CG (,IlÂ·r gullrd f()1 MitÂ· 01 tini'h TZ ItÂ·r r,t//I M.1 .tnkin g tint :25 ">01'ng BRG bearing CORR c i n &,iw ted Fâ‚¬)Al 1.1 (Â· 4,1 [:1.l\(JFIT; rt)~iril THK thit k (le-) Wl in juiht iron Face I 2.2 2 4.4 ]Il Ill, BPt 1*,aring pl.te (TR ( ')/1,[tÂ·f FC,S I.lt t' ()I 'll)til RO mul:h,~pering Tli R thriÂ·>hi,kl J 1.1 2 2.2 BIT bed prit â‚¬11 u,unter'|.1.11:ng fF 1.,c [t,ri lint.1, RE rl,1)1),4 1)ab/ TPTN h)1411),"r'111(}n Ceramic 1-1 le 5% 5 3 2/1 (<tivt, K 0.5 2 1.0 BM benc h ma,k (01:All) CS criunler.â€ž,4 FAS RBT r.,1,bef Ille TPD tâ€ž,let p.itier di<i)en.er L 20.0 7 140.0 BEL l)el(r.I CTSK couriter.unk .( re~ FN 1.1 I n 1.,r -_ _ _ _--0 -- Concrete: M 23.3 4 93.2 #Â¢T between CRS coune (s) FBI 44'rt)/ard ADDITIONAL ABBREVIATIONS BVL beveled CRC, cum grain f (; t , hergla#$ - BIT bitu now, CFT (ubic fo,it FIN 41>h (ed) Cast-inÂ·-place Â· 4 Â· 5 8.0 1 8.0 : DOORS . BLK block CÂ¥[) cul),2 >ard FIE tin,Owd iloor elf'unon Â· M bottom of 6 7.6 1 7.6 BLKG blocking [)PR per FFL 11,1.hed 11"cif line DO[ - bottom of footing 11 20.1 1 20.1 Â· t. Pref_ ar.t BD 1,oard [)P (lanip,Hoofing FA fift'.11,ir#1' I.A. a,4 . 12 18.1 1 18.1 BS both wle, Dl dead lood ;BRK 11.- 1// k , {1. holir ' E *F'N expansion Lightweight 18.1 ' B\v both wayj DEM drmol!%11, demolition FF lire iÂ·.ting,i i.her tor Of column 14 7.8 1 7.8 homirn DMT Amountable HC . 13 18.1 1 '19/ c'.tingsâ€¢her c .,4â€žflht bric k ()EP Apa'.IÂ·{1 ;HS tire how .lation TO CON[: top of cÂ·oric-rute Car . 8R/ 1)ron ze [)Tl Ipt lirepl,ke 1 OF top of footing detail. TOJ top of Joi st ' El SturtÂ·.2 0 t,;11-Ii 112!ilt TOTAL SQ.FT. GLAZING = 566.2 - 1 .Et,Hadle!- , 8 l[)(; bu Ming MAG d .0:inal I p IN.proof UBC Uniform Build],lg Code /:<fltv -7;7377727 Â¥ 'A,uy,Â»20"-i\e/ Â· TOTAL SO. FT. ENCLOSED HEATED AREA = 5278 FRC LICÂ·10'01,1.int c lidling HC hoH â€ž, uu,r, Mâ€¢.1 11 inpilit)Finâ‚¬Â· .... --=-=-- =i----- PA t~ .WJ. 566.2 = 10.73% OF 5278 VA 1 FRI (:~CÂ·,el.irtial,1 11,M 11{.11â€ž" M.1.11 All ! 91,1.11 FLG fla.lung HK 4~i,ik M MN) râ„¢,1.,1 flon, 4Â·i king F/+*15 {Ialhc.1 r .ic hunc w ron HOR 6.7<,1~1.,1 MUR O,etal lu'llâ€¢,t I.sulat.Or: Fl'WS flaihiÂ·ad vaic>d .c rew 118 hn. 11,1,11 AlRI) rn,1.~1 mui diÂ·i k,ng Ft X Aer,I,p HV. H 4,1 u.,to Iii at,Â·r AlilIR MI'~ 11'/ .1.,1,1 , 'Â·Â· ' i â€¢E!t _36(1)1.It,/ifIC ZONING INFORMATION , \ 1 1 Â·,) fl \J }2 . FLR 111,1)r I â€ži,Â·: IN(IN In{ In,Â·i.,Itil 41 nitiliÂ·~ C. -- 1 ./. ....'.r - Fl(.0 fl<,cll c IiÂ·.Illâ€žlit 1/(! /711,[ItÂ·/1 11143 M 41 1-1.1;111:tÂ·IiÂ·r l. -';C-:777 Â·'/ . -- PROJECT LOCA"ION - ID 111 â€ž, flf,/. Ill -01,11Â· 111.,1â€žtÂ·ItÂ·r At,% k mil.~ i,i L 334 W h LLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO ip\ 11{./ 1,1.,1, 1 104 1,1'r,i MIN m ..'ll' -77.77- 1/V r,1;IFâ€žr Ft lfR !!u'"1Â·j,{Â·it Inull.MI'4~ (11'It'11' MIR FIT 11,1.4 1, ":11 1\41 .hul.,tinK 11" UN .il, , !'.TH IL' LEGAL DESCk. YTION FTC. Ii.,1,vil: 1\1 1111'.'lf'. Vt()1) lilli'.!.4, E.Â· 1 r :.1.1 -cÂ· 1 LOTS K.L, AND M BLOCK 42 . 14,8 .89 1. FRC, 11,10.11 11 k ./.Â· 1..i k All t) Inphhng '*hi For Â·,Â·Â·atÂ·,,rene ~PAr-,di.M LOCATED <IN THE R6 ZONE IN I) ttitll,(1Â·,1..:' I % 1.~1 .AtÂ·//44' 11' MR 1,~"I> :"l'.;11~1 CITY OF ASPEN /1/4 *4. IR hantÂ· Â·d ling: IN\ 1,11,4 RT h i.:1: I tÂ·,1 1111':' .:\....S .1 4 â€ž61 1 1 e it IRA ir,Ji,ia 11,4 M,Â·..Â·bl i and associates LOT AREAS FJ lull.in K All '11 ./i!, â€žÂ·i Fluor ir,9 111'. 90.02' X 100' = 9002 SQ.FT. L 180 lurn,dwd In othrn 11 rinl Nt nailat':.Â· FUR tiIiiÂ·,! i,u:Â· 11 NAT -./ Flil 'Ual" 1 8Â»1 41 441-9 1 DUPLEX IS A PERMITTED USE WITH 6000 ' if 605 EAST MAIN STREET SQ.FT. op LOT AREA 4. ASDEN, COLORADO 81611 C, A g. 0+ C.luet AC 1,1 Ki'tÂ·Â·4 4. ( elicÂ·,11 1,1.,%11 r NK .-1---4. Ire.Â· ~:, 1.,7.L':1 6/ g.11\,m.,(.fl APL k,t k i,!.ii' NR( Mivid.JÂ· t'(P, l I. 4,141'i 6.1 4â€¢ilum/ed Iron kIT kii'hi u M Mt ./ *SETBACKS , ,:,4 >TtL: .4.-~ (303):925-4755 f.? galviwed :ree KO in.(:./ hui ."I... Il' , -/3 V C.KT g;/.4,1 q,D ~~~~~~~ -' FRONT AND REAR ARE 10 ' MINIMUM EACH WITH '1 --'.Â· .-Â·17:r .0, CSS gal.Â·.minÂ·d .te, 1 chiÂ·,01 1 8/ label N ..+1 1 V-0/ A COMBTNED TOTAL OF AT LEAST 30'. SIDE .:C , 1 a NT<% n, 2 ....0, ~' . YARDS MUST BE 10' MINIMUM EACH WITH A ., ' COMBINED TOTAL OF AT I,EAST 30'. GI- 0- 141.WIng 1 8 lag hok ()H% .1 1 4, 1 Issue: CLB Al,,bÂ·. 111,1 k 1 1 %1 1,1,11,Â·1,1!, c! (A t., 1 1 -111., 9,28. Cm... GLI Al,rd liber 1 01\ 1.1,11,1': (11) "1' 1, Scale , St; UL-t . --1 I 00*PL EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT= 24' t 14-.11 Fri'-MiT S.ut.MT' 2- Gr,M U gl.wed (ImiÂ·tiÂ· m.1Â·.(IN, lin,1Â· 1 11 4-!1 1,.1 /1 op<, ,7 .. ,> Sheet> MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 25 ' OST KI./,(1~1Â·,~tii,.Itil,Â· l Iâ€¢Â·,:il ()1 â€ž;. .....1~â€ž,~ ~ NEW CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT PROJECT ABOVE CH LY.iIi h.,i 11 4,1,1 ("i' t,i,11,1.1, , Pl aster: * EXISTING STRUCTURE - 6,Â·169 3. petuâ€¢.111- St/K'Ali~'L CD graili . gr.,ding IC lIeR -,111,1,1 ()1,11 oppoÂ·.,i,Â· h.ind = 1 4'%-ir 1*mutr 8/3,w ll.L (,RN c.inde It, 11Â£1,11"w ' (11'i 1,1,11)'" ..Ift.1{ f Sand, Cemerh , FOR DUPLEX i **FAR ALLOWABLE- w...1 "V 60*ftÂ·,ght 01 1 - 4,080 SQ.FT. 4- 9.2 60. Fr C F g.,u'.7 t,~ tÂ· |'Ah!,4.,44 1 mr, i fek () 8,4 1$ luilhs .,it in.1( hine . ren Grout with --1 i Metal Lath CT grâ‚¬,Ul IMS 11 11,(,41,11,(, OHU S '11././ '.'..1 g 'l, ACTUAL FAR= 4 5 2 Â£'SQ.FT. GPL LI .1 Gypsum Wall ~1 ~.21 4 SPACES PROVIDED C'PT *41.411111 Ill' 1 PT 14 ,.. ;,iii 11! Fi l i'.'. Roar a ------ PARKING REQUIRED 1 SPACE/BEDROOM -APPROVED~ HH h.ind!,re '18 in,/ 1,In, 4/,M PH pal' 6.1, Rock & Stone: / , f HBO hardIii aid MI ..,11<...1,!, 1,â€¢,Â·i Pit) p.,1,1 .m. 1 '11~1,1.1~ , , 969&01!49 ill .-4 *NOTES -RECEIVED Ht)\V h,a;4.*., r.Â· Al,1 St.une, Grave,1, 94449*4 CITY COUNCIL GRANTED AN ENCROACHMENT 'Ludude P IN . 9/1/182/gati"*1....Yr L 9 Dl- L- I MN __1.St LICENSE FOR THE TWO PARKING SPACES ALONG JUL 0 3 1997 HUT) h,,1,4,4,00'E Al I R , 1,//:'.1.' 1,1 , 1' \R t.l'Â·Â· I Por C il-, 9. 1- i t 1 HJT head :,1,111 Al K H 11â€¢.tft}Â·i I'k Da. THIRD STREET TO BE LOCATED IN THE SETBACK HDR 14Â·,1{1('r '41 14 ".'.' I'tl[) ,Wi,. 4*d * =+46/1 ~~~ .3 48' 2 7Â£2/jÂ·~10 i. ri,int4 uu; de S t. .1 Â· i i. V e r o e' - ta ON SEPTEMBER 7, 1988. ASPEN / Ptl KIN CO"Ut INITY DEVELOPMENT liT (, h('aillig At(') fll.NI'!'. fll~, FE" PIN 1),1/41 .1, m#UnNED 11\AC he.1 ing $ 1'11*,I.,ling Al Tl nottÂ·fl.11 L>i P\ 1).ne- id'. i,flr M jr o le THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE PORCH O - r. Arr n ". ... - W >-4/ air Â£â€žr-1,111,<ining 41AX Ii,,4,74#rn PVMT 1)..C:.4.1 --1------- CARRIAGE HOUSE INTO THE SIDE YARD SEBAÂ·13]~ U Pdf.Ht 2,-06.Â· D r- . ....1 1-0* HO hr.inÂ· dul %1[ lIt flllÂ·( 11.init (Ah PE[) t..,1.'lilli H T height MC râ„¢,da iniÂ· 01>inel PER; pen,â€¢mitÂ· (d, 1 Stone Veneer. - , . RECEIVED APPROVAL FORM HPC ON 4Um Cut . 4, Â·Â· 1988. DEPICT THE GENERAL NAUIRE OF THE WORK â„¢E CONTRAC ---NOTE:-TmZ set 01 approved RE PURPO5E V THIS ORâ€¢WI G 15 O Ir TO GRAPHICALLY :A htÂ·,.,4.,nal Mit) nâ€ž {111111 PERI ~)(41,141â‚¬.f SELECTK FABRICATION PROCESSES AW TECHNIQUES Of TOIR IS FESPONSÂ®lf FCA CONFillk D-ENSIONS AND 1â€žgh eAA, ,uenK,h (em â€žr MBR ni,41,1*Â·r PLAS 1)1.ilkÂ·r 4.71* Wood: CONSTRUCTION l HE AACHITECT SHAN dE NOTIFIE[ OF AN, , * *AN INCREASE IN THE ALLOWABLE FAR CIr_Ap 4 6 11 e- / .... . 0 ''1)1Att~ tkit. 4 VARIATICÂ»~ FAOU THI DIMENSIONS A#~ CONDMOd SHOWN BY THIS DRAWâ€¢6 SQ.FT. WAS GRANTED BY HPC ON JUNE 14, W~. ... ~â€¢LÂ·:t,~~~,;ig plans required to be on job at F 191 sh - - all times durin construction Asp*,u. 4 ,#1:'WKin F'7* ............................... mits Sep d for H FE h F'IFC w'\ l.-rs '- arate per GENERAL Blocking --,-Â· ?,u, r , i /\ C f ID. :.r Â·-' Fx r t' 1 ) C 'C '.i.1 ";tÂ·err-upted -â€ž.. are require REFERENCE electrical, plumbing, 6 14 .- . FAA,- 00' Â·f, c.Â·-Al T (\ 7 AP'12 1/ 3'AL- 1 ' te Â· 10 FULA. 2 1...f:... 7 FlÂ·y"doDd: _ or mechanical work. 1 2 5,2 1 1 e Ab#=-1 ,-,t , , 4 Â· 1 1 V FLT-Glb Flet-ITS cr<D 'RFOSC. Ne 1 -1991 Approval of these plans by Building . Â»Cl:. -1 Dept. is for work on private property. preD gr AM VET Mr:,Â·31- - 22424 Aa JUD - .1 -5 17 15 6(TE- Couti,1/16,1 VA#21/ NICE- ~172,1- S,f~ Design approvals for proposed work (including landscaping) in the public Scale: 1 1 - . right-of-way must be received from ' (56; 64' City Engineering (920-5088) and Parks /tr-â€¢fr. L. L . d y Dept. (920-5120). Permit for work in , public right-of-way must be obtained 01 . from Streets Dept. (920.5130). P.- Â·le!0410 Bu !n 04% A 7'4 ' b' t Dr . <pA *b 334 4"~ 00 .9 WEST of' efr HALLAM ASPEN e 4.0 COLORADO >D 'f, J 906Â¢06 ( WILLIAM JOHN POSS 9LOCAL- 4-2 & ASSOCIATES - 0\TY oF heeâ‚¬\4 ARCHITECTURE G 605 E. MAIN STREET PLANNING < ASPEN, CO ~ 614Â° 50,44 94 100.00 303 925 4755 i f 7, A Et. fube -9 * .A % A . < 3 Ex. st+FP s 11 4 6*. 2 1. 9 g 1 1 , . 1 4,?6 i f . Â¥ I 9. ' I 0 r @* 3 K' 9 7 + 14 ,\\ 1 1-E*** i - ,--r-ne--Â·tâ€¢Â·=Â· nnzz:LE=_24 ... -E-r 1 1//, 1 --/1/4 3 f , / \A \ I , ! )' 49# 0610200,1 80*11-~Crl . 00. 1 f-- 1 \ . I 21 1 1 --0 01.1 it 4 '-- - 0 EK. ; , N Â· 14 1 gli 000 # -; 1 3 y 1- 1~-4 1 - m -, I Â¢ u J A . 0 \ r I d IF\. 1 , E-l- W. 1-1- t_ . i 00 1 ,+ 0 1 F- C.,1 1 I. 1 0 1 1 / . U -- 0 HEW APPITION 1 08 i! MAIN| 1400â‚¬265 1 (5)<.141 ING, ~ r.- 4 Â· ==b cr-- 7- i R HA IN HooÂ¢76 PHASE 2 I. j Af)Wt:12- U 1 \ 1 V. 4.-- 1 $ ~F 1 '/ 1 1 Ft,8 1 1 -1- / Elle#War Â» -- -- I t) 1 El i / Z *TofÂ« 1 i 4.--k!.9'I *VÂ»P< E-L-â‚¬>0 _ j 4 11 1 P Â¢562 - esp Red i CAF~ j 0 il PHASE1 r ~ 414 -_ - ~ PHASE 2 f / .1-4. ~ 4- y'-1 /1 '17'-~Ir J ~ ~ 0 1.j / ' ~ I 0 .....-4.. Lid.: 0 Â·....L 1 . I al 1 1 I................... 4 - -1 3 & ' ''rÂ·â€¢7. â€¢rge./.'ll.:fr./19â€¢=- \ \ 11 ') 9 1 -Ff < I .,4 \ 7 issue: Pga~F, 9 4 F 1 --710 1 IF-\ ....*._11...... / 11 2211 " 1 cb 1 (043 9-~011 -=3 ---* 6Â·ItÂ·Â¢11 7RM 11- Sceâ€¢{T 'L /i / 11 ,\ , 1 ill ' / 9 6Â· EÂ· 9.4 F'{3114Â« fr sv8MT 1 , H 14 00' 49' e 100.00 6Â·23'94 Pa~z.(lr 864*171 L. \4\ i , 3 8 - - --i--1 ------ -0/ \\/ l 4 4-,-ex. - -1 -1 1/ - - ' In-r'Ak,/6~1, -1 !1 ' 1- j \/ RECEIVED 11 / / lili ' / 11 i I \ JUL 0 3 1997 111 / --71 ASPEN/POKIN CO AMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Â£ MA,wrAt.1 6' w ioe PEPUTAA,1 s fACEÂ· T141 43 eT12*RT THE PURPOSE OF THIS OR,KUG AS 0,1Â¥ TO GRAPHICALLY TOR G PES,068& OUÂ»FÂ¥-O 001,150,5. NÂ© DEPICT THE GE}ERAL NATU,E Of nE WOIX THE CONTRIC SELECTIO FABREAION PROCESSES AW TIC-QUES OF CONSTFIUCTIOI THE ARCHITECT SM,41 0â‚¬ NOTFED OF ANY VARIATIONS FAO, THE DIWENSOIS AM) CO/Â©f[10,6 SHOWN 89 11+IS DRAWâ€¢18 I , 7\lA hA 1 *ju- 811-E ---i .,, 1 fiaL<va 1 -\ TORTH 1 PLAN Hare:,501** 3482 FOA Title PIAN TAMEN FAFfl '3012.40/ * BS-*2 3,Â©1 Â·88 89 Auf>'Ible *014*,1 146. 1 Scale: *" -810 Al.0 1 2 Q :45'. YA i: r, ..4 /0 ''r b 2 .- 1,1 0 4 - Rvi 44 .4 Pr:r i 4.2,3, z- *2.... '4 Â¢ .........................1 26' 1- 7 >* t PHASE 1 CARRAIGE HOUSE /0~ (COMPLETED) / 134 . 6- -Jt----.--1--1 --- l.. b .- - : ~1 rc====72[- - - 01 .-/ - : 0 /4 < i P \ 4 3 \ 3,1 c#-4- A 1 *1 +TOO . eli-â‚¬ Elft. -5 *N;* - r,921 :-rt 9' i i' 8 4 i '' 2 X 6 o JTL.BT Polm l...ALL -- -- , . r 21 t \006'PHNe .1 2 +.Â·- 19 412 1 L.7- 26< 1 1 .1 , 18 . 41 LORy//e,ki, 5 7.257. , 41.1. 22 it .. 2, a 6,/9 F A. F-ItCÂ· r J ! 1-/ 4 Â· -4/--'~4 PHASE ONE S-~er-EM ReÂ« till 11 -/11 Scale: 1 5 1 '6 -'L ORD 93.â‚¬>194-0 4 -4(44 A21 Building LAD ..........................................................m.. =9112 334 \NEST HALLAM ASPEN ' COLORADO WILLIAM JOHN POSE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING - 605 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO ' 303 925 4755 A - itc . 4 I . ''. .. . r , . ... I . .- . 1 0 - lAil - .. i /~IA '4 1,- p -0 - , 1 01 ./,1 . . @1 . .. I .. . - ANÂ¥~98*442:~I'l 1 4. li":8264-,4:i#i:immiN**Ale,i, I. : 0=:Etts'.. 2.041{Â¥~ 4 .Ir , M~Aqi,9212&312*,79#ff , 1 epla#B#%6~*%Â·fe)*41~1-Lud#T<Mft,~ ' .,jee<359Â·*5!2'.95'. f.#f*. waa,G Â·,mwÂ·=AN.4 Â»443'.W"e#.:*14*w rÂ® D v ~.- 20Â¥4*9,2*.ES'y A - A . :. 0 . 1? 4 4 - . , D - 4, ........I--'ll... I. I ,. 4 4 W- 1 a b -,57 ~~~~rr=Jr.. . . 5 I. .. 0 . F 0 . . A - , I . 1.11. 4, A , . - - I .4 . I .:5 I .. .: 0 - 0 - . - 6 . - - I - - / - 0 .... - I . 1 1. ... C .. . 1; 0 2. : . :A I ... . A .A 0 0 . . FHASE CARRAIGE (COMPLE I . ff ' 2 1 , i F. ' f . 14 L le) ~ 0/0%0â‚¬14- 1 Â·' ' ~ Â·*Y~ ' THE PURPOSE OF â„¢IS DRA-015011Â¥ TO QI-â‚¬Ally 1 [ \L /4, -45* 1.1?1 1[= , 1 ' - '94 (-0~Kf, 9920.Â£- 7'tle , 4 Jul 0 3 1997 L â€¢ DEPICT 4 GE,ERAL NAntmE Of DE Â¥g]Al 11â‚¬ COW,AL TOR E FESPOI,SEE F(19 Col,11,10 01*NSIC,6. AlÂ® 1~ i -4- 1 SELECTIG FABFICATION PECESSES NE TEO,nOCES OF ASPEN/P~TKW VAA,4,10,8 molf nâ‚¬ 0,ENSIONS - ColÂ«*rIZE SHOWNgYâ„¢EDMWIO. 4 - eve 99 - Q 47 1,- ? 1 3*- LOWER Gluâ€¢' r:r +Le 1, . 3 -- C. 2 7. 6/fl-AN i p LEVEL , s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONSâ„¢UCT10* THE ARCWTECT SNUL ZE#011*0 OP ~NY -A WORTH 1 9 - FLOOR +HASE ONE 1- 7/ PLAN PHASE)Twd MA,PR HOL-leE 4 .. lt-1.TU-~fk#trIZ5~*FFi,@4 E,Â«ri kt<60Â©4/ kew â‚¬EE-Tpe i â€¢ .â€¢ â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢:â€¢Iâ€¢â€¢ li .Immil ..I-* m.â€¢maâ€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢mâ€¢.mâ€¢ ,r<*Â¥Â§Â¥i-95*3?*:=e3P*fayS*:+.ii.4PM+8'~~7%..~..'.~..~.~53%7~~. ~*~%iMMMKf -tiN-': 12: O:-7i~f~P,~--r : 6.Â§ I 6 6-C e.re- Â¥Â« ~Ea _ DEC 5 1995 7 1141-.M CO-*,41]Y DEVELOPMENT 1SPENP' A2.2 e "288 WH 11 Au jr*IN 009â‚¬ 1. 334 \A/EST , HALLAM - I ASPEN COLORADO . 91 I /-Â® m :re, . Wlt.LIAM JOHN POSS y 1/.1 V .1,- PLANNING ..01 & Acc'.-6-â€¢â€¢Aler=.2 ARCHITECTURE G 605 E. MAIN ST-FREEET ASPEN, CO A . 303 925 4755 .. I I , ./ . - , I . . I . I . S / - .. t ''A. 0 -0 . - I. I , I . ./ , e - . il . I - &# 9 es -4. . I 1 M-/ ' al m . .t' 5 A, A **4,46 + 6.,- . 1 . 'a .- .. '*Ak..2.0.TD*~?413/4 r Â· . , . . #71*22*1#0*3ft#*, -, i - r. I . i 0 1 1 io-'V9edi.:41:444*64.4/'*ex , 61.1*221â‚¬ewa=~:2 . , '4*if=il.!'11=~Lopit.4.3, I , 1 . B I . ,. / 0 ' 0 % 0 ' ' / N , 4 f - '' 4 > -- r 0 . 9 . 0 - 0 ./ A B . .. 0 * 1 - 0 . & I . "-....ji *-- 0 . 00 b. i I .. 1- 1 - 1 5, 1/ / .... 1 . I 71 /7 D .. -- e . 0 4 . i 0 .. 0 - . 6 6 - . 1 4 Be -. 0 . . - Â· I , r ..: ri Z -A. A 8 0 I - , - Sm . D Â· -/ 4 4 7 1 - 1 .. I. , 1. Â· ~,Â·Â· Â·:-Il Â· i 1 r 4. .. ' r.: --r---- - --- _- 4, WEST 848 t ... L .R:; . . .. 3 . I. .. . ............I PHASE 1 CARRIAGE HOUSE ,1 (COMPLETED> r Chi ./ N ./ 1 : . . 91 1 . 'r 1 8:M AND> SE,~KER FRE\NLRB.- .... ~ ~ *~â„¢0 . 910-4 BY THIS OMAWNG m ty - - '~ '' ~0 4 - COMMUNITY DEViLU'--uâ€ž. SliS+<~VIC> WAT-SOM # 1 1 -----1.,Â·-MKIN 0-HIES- MUSIC- '1 1. I '41 9 . , , 1 .. - * â€ž0 1. UPPER m %40 , *f, ..2... r ., ' 6/FLAI>1. \320* LEVEL . . , 20''z,4.1 1. R) , 1 . 1 ..... I : *MKatdN1 . 4--~012.7-ft/// FLOOR PLAN iPHASM TWO 1' CA!24144> Hi>JU> : i. D 1. - M 1.1 , Al A p..4 NAOLEE - ' .....................................+ J F ~~~~*~,~-~2~~em~__.-~f =4.4- 1.ry---'-E'-~~T.FRC-yTTt~%~33I~"~Tr?Tc_f'~711Â·~~~r~RTLI-I"--- '--'-~-i~,2il-_~-_i ------~.-Ti~--. ~~-----~~-- --3-~------ -~7 -I J_ -~~_i~------=' 4 .. ..~ .. . ~_,~~~~~~ 96],c'W}fR'100 sCe,e: /4 '.Â· t{-01 4 - J f~I/-2.,MW,-NZ-giFI MAY 7 19% 101 ... 0 1 I : Oujâ€¢Ct:7:9 LAD A2.3 - I ' 4. r ... ..... ....M. . . ... ...... .............. A , e V e . 9 . . .. I . 3Â¢ 1 : 4 52 4-1 I. ; 71 rk t' 4 - .0 i a . I. ' 04 . 4 1 B 1 1 . 4 - . .4 . 0 - d- h .1 0? 1 3,$Â·-â€¢Â· Ir~ . Â·-, 7..2 ..e .- 1 50 , ./1.- I. L . * CD . ..... '9 . . w , e ~ Â·Â·'kt g; ~.~ 14. .., 4 - .. . 621' . I , * , I . '4~ I lid ' 4, i . , di - . -" .1,1.. . 1 4 " . I , 0 1 . Cl ./. I 4 I. A :1 0" I ./ ./ - C ;fr e I, . I il; _ m 7 0 - .// 4 :., 4 . 4 1 Baliff.. I -I ,. 1 % . i Â· 7 1 - ., I - 'e l i r. i a . . I. , 4 4. I I . P . 5 7 j -pry ./Â·- ----Â·,1/i, A 9. .- ,... ...... 5 9 - 4.4 1,4 . 1 - ..... i , . ' /1. ... .. .di . , â‚¬4 --- - I I . i - - . . R j '. -. 1 .,#.,0... i ' Alt . 0 , % I O 5 ' 1 1. . . 92Â¢ . ' 7,$7 334 \A/EST HALLAM 4.- \2'F ASPEN 4 k : 6 COLORADO Â· ~--Â·SU k' 1=:2Ck:>M .IbE.1.=:>14 - 1 - WILLIAM JOHN POSS A & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE & Â»U kIT-E,12 >/1 BrAL CAP' PLANNING Fl-ASH I k.1 4* U~ ~.A CO 605 E. MAIN STREET ch.<APLT IJAU- Â·61-Dre ASPEN CO p RA I kl C>kITO L-AT 303 9Â¢25 4755 / "woof SECTION ~ 01-. '40 4 1- ' \@ 21 /2%, i 1 /44 4: i i-1 i li ' 'Ul 1 2 Â·'yVCr2, st-'Stc-+4 r.t; 5 ALL,AJ 97- 't Â· 8 11 1 , 1 AE 1â‚¬37. EX 1 1.17-4 4.'fE V \> - --. 4 . --- 7 r- f - --- P #'Â»j e 54 661- i 1 ROOfelktor /4 1 1 0 2*YM'621 ,- A f *l-Â£2F'& 1/ D . AN .1 i! FER POP 4 ' ' i A l-0 91241 K.1 1 M: -1 1,9 / 40. ' 1 , 4 ,4 2 -\ i 6-1,42.-l--<ip *21.E '...C; Ad =R- \Ki 4 j / - - - 11 L- -4 ftitter-lot%\ .. 1 fN 1 1 1 AA Jy gial-C' t.,4 OVE - M +4 Ak, 3 71Â»/ i - - ryÂ¢f !,d 14 t>,2.411 li . 10} 11 . 1. 1 1 1/ F-71. Ir . --EX 1 ' TI Al Or 04 1 M k! Eff ) 1 01 k 1 13 y $ 1 -,-I--- i. t. 3. 111 1, Z .\ 11 , . 4. -6 E- Â«AÂ»le,_Le Â·.-/ ...... .... '4 1 4 1: 2Â·KILTIA..+ 06'l'Â·1 ~~9 f t 1 1 0.- 10-315,1 ' r 1 - EHeer WOOP i 2-%6Â«>Â·rE M SLOPE -P--- -- - 1 1 t { Ex |Â«E I wts- ,// FEr'- F:GÂ¥:,21Â¢,-7Â·D 1212* ITU. d:Â«KIR+AcE>rE. 4 0,39Â£ 1 1 - , UKOOF 41 6-7-r .6 -0 1 4, ' 1 Â· 6.14,11 F,FilMIT Sul'Mil 4 Ag'. - '' 6-irlb 8,9,#AM ir S,Ieâ€¢Art Z . McsÂ»F OVEA icÂ») le, E.up i.4 M 6 Â· IÂ· ftS- PM*t f &11%11fit 1 * 5.5.Fi.446 â‚¬4>09 12,EL.OU,1 1 , i 1.v 1 F OVÂ¥Â«-m-44/ SCOPAEZE> < 94 Unoc_, ScE-<L, i Sacâ€¢.-3 i Nal-99---_ 1 2%1'7,4* FKcA=of 662Â·>r'ELS AF?A RECEIVED DEPICT ni GFFERAL NATURE OF DE WOFI<. THE CONT,UC DIE PURPOSE OF rHES DRAWNG S Oh&Â¥ TO GRIPRICALLY 46*36167 -RD BE- 1/I'2. ALL TOR S RESPONSGLE FOA CQ-AWING DIAE#NSÂ©%. AND NE.14 1241.-,P 61,--Of'Ed:> Sit Al-L- SEUCTING F A8A,CA TO,1 PROCESSES AM YECHMQUES OF rlÂ«re-Ht EK tari h.16* - PLAT Â£ JUL 0 3 1997 CONSTRUCTIN THE ,ACH,rECT SIUL de NonFED 0/ AMY VAR,lTIONS FBOU THE DIMENSjONS AU) 009*)1710+6 SHOWN BÂ¥ 11*S ORAWNG Ll kIEâ‚¬p HAVE repEâ‚¬K-1 =PETE...2}11 LIEÂ·P ASPEN /PITKIN Ad Ort 61,4 N , 1=,1 025r Â£ H C.-1 C=r~ 1 7-0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. AgE rE'f.,17(Â· NOEN-T- U POI'ki E.>c 19>T~lk,14@r 12276% S w.-c->'=' ELL , ROOF PLAN 2- BEFIC'VIE- IRUCÂ·;'MING; MIA:T E.P.X ALÂ·L ME. 1461 -rc> ~ THEÂ· AC>u-' P FPCO K. Ar 140 E x 12,1 k.1,14 er v..loru: LE. 01Â«19 FREPL-AC,6. W VTÂ·H !-C.,c 4.7 *H ! hdo, Les ., .7 F=>P 6'< 3,E-rl.. ~ 0 971[31192~231 8 112091- _ F MAY 7 1996 jul Building LAD >40- i.o.,3. Scale: A2.4 f 4.41 0 .1 - AN P ki'*fv t NA r '1894 9#2-'% 2:4424*, 70' 492iv-*Â·Â« b 1 - , 1 1 i 1 1 1 61,=2912 â‚¬*1 I k,IC.LE BCOF â‚¬3Â»9-re>rl - ..- ... -4 - FAIK4;E/5' RANCY OUrr 'Jck:Pt52 594 ILIC:Grl-Et 15*I NTE,0 UCE>P *t<L i A -r=-1 H Al Nfer) 120013> el 131 kId* FAI Er'rE-0 1.|ex'P W INISPOIJ 5 AN tz> 1' 12.\ H I '2_'15> Fl_.CXPâ‚¬- le - I T 11 0 - cAl 47647 k[CES>P PRVME 1-3 Grl_ALÂ·-IMC-,r -3-15*T-BH .tr 11! ' 'Al kre.D 126,07 bul-- 4\ 4* -4 - '5. F.: 131Â·- _ 5- 52,t _ L T F . 4 Â·1. j vo- 5 1.-" : PA i k -7 6>7 4 4,012 raÂ»JE-uÂ© Aki ES> -7-12 1,4 Al~ift.2 'Ada--20 1700125 --- ... - ... .... . - 1 ru FAI hi TE,7 61 6.Al-7 19 C..0 L ult-1 A.1â‚¬=. L_ 6.62146(CrTE-0 +Ep!-A ;5 -Â·-- -Â·- - --- A 04--W=*LE *LAB EL Ch z (Otc) -1 11 3 1-79/ PHASE 1 CARRIAGE HOUSE -(COMPLETED) 1 3 : i*42. ij g ,/25 ':f:f. *MTKu__ _ 1.1.1 4,0.<4.43: 4 - Ut n" -. I. 1 .,Â·. 1 240. FIN FL.COR TIEL.a/309'31 1/41 1 9 .~-70245#F--:0.::.:*:Af~.2.ILLY .--Â· Â· r ]72 .3 69,+ Â· , : r - 11 11 â€ž 11 ' ' 1 M AY 7 1996 1 ~ â‚¬ /-N . Â· .Â·Â· Â·*'Â·'~';4 *Â·04/.. 1 :. ..:. 1 Â».. fÂ·4?~1~,i~~tÂ¢~~4:,.: 1 - ' F if 11 1. -- 3.?J 1 ..'13 1 -1 41 4 1 L Vt##Ta~i 1 , 1 THE PURPOSE QF THIS DRAW.0 6011.Y TOGRAMÂ©UY ~_ _ ~ Building LAD SELECTING D-CATION PIOCESSES A.,E) TECNÂ¢*le OF DEPICT l, E Ge,ERAL NATURE OF THE WOOK THE 00*ORAC 1....usept:p -r,714 -- -1 1, Â¢l-----I 11 .1 1 TORIS**Ot-EFORCO~*BIODWENSION&AlÂ® ' / 1 1 Â»-- --1 - L _--11 P 1 1 ./ VAFDATIONS FAOM THE DII,IENSIONS APE) CO,Â®1~)16 - 2----1L, - - I h SHOWN BV IHIS ORAÂ¥#M. 1 3 - 1*J hi T E.><Â·1Â·55-r I L[C,- WEX, 19 -i-- I ~ DQfil) I 6-5 -27-- 7 - , 1 1 . i Â· 1 - i g -3 1 4<6 - 1 ! 1 ; 7 1 1 191- FIN =72.10K NORTH Â£List_fl'>l. flÂ·4*R_ . t- * -.I - 1 -_LL-- EL TIV 00-0' 1 1 =*. --1 -ff EL-EV. i OO l- 0 ' .r/-d,-\'.lkMT i.,4 - - .-4- WESf 1 / 1 '-X JERIOR Ail NTED UCES'e el-t,-44 ,/i /1 11 / 1 Ne.kl CAJOAPT v (A.'.--4.-- eg,orIC NIAL Ove.C+I Â¢:AIP ~,f STilt<lit91Â£9 L, , i /6 Elder' 4 1 Fes>21# tsÂ¥<rld,Li -042-Â·Â·1 >'4 -<6..Gff\...f...~ :74.J-1Â·':13Â·.;Â·2297*;:~ ::1.4(C Ck:012- OE E A21 4- 4-/9,32 - 1.--Â·-4 :-4 + 11 Flt]'18*t ; C v 1 ' l*LiA'Atidhf ' .*. 2 -r :...j.2+jÂ¢41,2- 2 ~:,.43(Â·i,0,.. 349'~35-jAFiI:.1~i.,Â·ffÂ·:443 4 Â»4 ATE.r) 10.,1000 COL-Ul KI NG | ' l 1 1 , ' Â« 895 \ Â·'Â· -~~~Â·Â·Â·:14:- ~Â·Â·~,rÂ·tÂ·Â·>16'. .'.....I84â‚¬4~j.t:'jot-Â·21. FANTEÂ» WCOP -54- - , e t /-1 <WEST ELEVATION 1 - 1 1 GC 5 14 1 1 11-.1.011 1 - ~,1 ' Scale: 74-i ' Cokk:>12.2:TE 61-Ae> 1 -i '. ATA..~5.9-*F~dfix?L t.<C.,44 '. ! i <-- Â·- -- 6:,S>KId,z.CreÂ· FRE>UE.IrÂ»<~10,%1 - > 1 1 Nd-SPENJf~ ' -1 1 Â£ E'â‚¬,EMIâ‚¬-k.7 51,Â·p--77#- - 1 rl FALÂ·EMENT ZE'C -' " - - - 1 21-SV- .- '~90~- ,~ 1 t. 11,4, . ..6, ; 11~Â·' Â·~ ~ 1, 'I.'# #--.1- ~BLEU 231- 69 #- .4~.~'"~~3; ~~~- 7- *:2"~'~- ~'| ~ ----- A31 4 _ _ _ . . %~41.- te , 1 1 I ) Cal 0 .A'.1 .-,k'.,1 pr -C - aa 334 + 9 9 V\./ES1- HALLAM ASPEN COLORADO 0 1 .. D . . WILLIAM JOHN pOSS Â£ ASSOCIATED v - ARCHITECTUAE G Pl.ANNING 605 E. Al.AIN STREET ASPEN, CO 303 925 4755 a- I , . - A , . '1 - P 1 .. L . - .. . ' 0 - 8960-1 44. /*3499,8 . *#1#49*i:*TwtoÂ·...... 0 .. 7/ **Muit*,9 i. -. . I . --:. . 4 f. . .... . -. 1 I ./ .' ... .. e . , 0. .. 1 Â· 9 1 - PHASE 1 , Het ' MIE:TAL- PLA6141 kIGrep ~ CARRIAGE HOUSE 1 (COMPLETED) -re, 4% eoreap ,(466â€¢UP'95~ ....r - T /\ / WAY BEYOND 9~ rz.-~~ 2~~~34Â· 1 1/ k / 7/ N MAI kiT EX 1671 44- PA N C>f ~ ; ~95~'0~~ CUT KICZ:PIS;' d,H 11Â·46â€¢,LEES - 7- 37,-- 7 7 1 -' ,- . â€ž---- / V ' icid' I I -~9&~Â» AÂ·:Â»Ull W ELÂ·p 124:,'-4.36:J' ~ -- , A-# â€ž4.- I. \3.2 - 1 - 1/; 4/ IKE.PLA,sE ExIS,Tlk!4. _._._ - -._.jyl~..y~rlÂ¢Â¢uzzy ...~- . .Firl.5 1,-27' B \\Â§44/ W i.r 4 w Ski wÂ¢300 ' ' ' ' , 1., , 14,v.- . il ..I j . , '..' Â·:514!LIGrLE, 2.43dP F 6-... % 4/ . \A \4 i.*reTEM ! . , 1 , ,-_144 Â» ., .. - ,. 9 . 0 . W f. 41,1 ir/1,/. ./,is ' .. 4 45'l l 9 .,DoÂ·.,-, FAJ Arr / i 1 - . 1-~- - 6-1~~.~ -Â·,1 ~Ir ' . I ., D . ..1-* , ' ./54 i.. f. 6 , f . - r ' E X 1 â‚¬3T 1 1.1 6, ~T--4- -611571 fAMp_-tj - r*~--.--s------=-DEL-r,=,2Â£&-SE-r-- 1 -- , U , + 2 f ' -- -1/ P rl==- ,--- - 4 I â‚¬- 02-- r .--,------ -+ I . . . 9 '' .1. --*---* - ------ - - - - - TIKI M Â»413> 6.11 N C>cok.16 I . 4 11 1 114 1 ir 1 E--- -1 J FAI NT Ex lÂ«TILI<Dr 6.10-â‚¬>tp R ' 1 4 FAI # r EY I efr l klar 62 Orj L i < 4 - -- 1 1-- ' DIP 1 416r . 1 1 1 1. f ...0 , -- Ir- 1 0 1 .'. f ~*fiÂ·.-7 ~: '43,> '1,4 -~t- 4 o. .t, .4 % 4.Â·~ 9 ~I " ' I ~ I 1 2. 'i :: Y h -4 - Ew'ST'416'r Kll Kirk)k,i'E=â€¢ 1 1 //E?\ 17 - TE, REMAILI . . 7. 1- 11 L.- - -- , Â«JUV---- =- 11 t . d/ . - + 1. r - 1 21Â·P' 41 61. Fi.02' 12. ' ,>7 / , i ali 4-1. -----1 i.3 - iÂ»-Â«Â»f~4~4<-------- --- - =- . -0\- 1 tsle Flk'- 20002- , ~ ' E.uG,0 6 ---Tiar- 9*u 94Â«1\ 0 El=.9 1 HO L,4 n r~> , \ 1 ,1 1 --- 1 '1 - %4 1 +Tl 7= 14 I .....1, ' 24 '' 1/.- 4 2. -1 1 , , <{*t..f ~241,4. % 1-/ 11 - 11 I . 1 11 29' ty , ..2 Â£ [Â·*4 k.1~rECP k!=st:PEP FRAFIEP I. I.1 I f . 11 -11-F - '110 WI,r- 1 1 , OrÂ·LA 2. i ktor eÂ·fef-T E>31 , ' - 1 :4:**WA,v. . .0-Â«--v il!7\JI 1 , '4' 'j , - F-7 1 111-, 1/1 1 ~4697 '' ; ~ _~ IA. 1 14 1 1 <ti:*2~ 1 1 1 1 11 Â«/1 1]L~, 1: 9, 11/ 1 1 . .././. # ' I , 1 1 -Ill -- 1 -1 11 1 1 11/ F</.P I .'./ . - -- 1,3.- 1 i. - /.1 A.17 -FRI M i : t , <,14, / 1]1 4 /-- Fkl A-reÂ·12 kilart,7 Z-7'~41 E.L.6 r , 1 . 40 4 - 11 0 1 1 - *.- -.*.--- IL --2-....4-- *-1 1 , Â¢ 1-. 1 12-*54---4041 .*A 1 OP .39 4-- -A<aÂ·, U -1 _ - -___ - A, Irri rN. Flek,K I 11 . 1 1 - - --- t A % 72Â¥ L A C * ~ - - -L~.**, Et-E v 1Â£*-t Ft -6 V. r. ! 2 00 - O'' T - I :*T F : 14 - Mi-.ap= Â£4 1 / 1 4 : 1 ' | | ' L | E -ENÂ· = -14, r. 23" 1 - 1 1 I g.k' I , A.* 1 RK' 4; a><iert-. N.lbr = < Id 0)012 6Â£2 L- U N,1 K.10 2.4Â»3. , I -4 1 -i , .1 1 3 SOUTH ELEVATION I- ~ .,2~. A 4 1 e . -- 6 951 Â· d=CAN,12.ere FOU kIPÂ»ric,kl .04 .1-1 -2 -1. 4/ 1.1 4 E 4 v , 4 1 .1 4. 4.4 2.3 ' -2., r Z Â©X 4 ,foi 0% FKÂ· tpare â€ž- -1 u .*-.f CARRIAGE HOUSE 9-9 PHASE 1 / F -7 EL' 1367 '- 8>71'' 1 (COMPLETED) 44-r>Â«72 I l El 5, PA 1 17'.Pr a BE.A.ALâ‚¬ 62* terrl #Sr 14 11"H r E LE /.- - 1262 1 3 9 - 411 ' Â· 146%202 01-1 1 NE, 1.-6 Rocp Fi *fe-T E-11 -9 --- - , - 1 0-36.6 +17 1 < ,~MÂ»2% Fl-14- 2601' 40~0#5~ t , / /6 4/ /\.13Â« Waup rÂ»Â»â€¢Pil- i , E LEÂ¥ 124 - '16,58" 4\ / \ //ANN . ---- /00â‚¬~ --- - -- - f__. NEÂ»| 61Â£5ty.2 614 49,55 r 2 2 3 1 - . -IKV.li'' / I eÂ»rr E-* 16-7-1 K.14* 8\4 01' 45Â·LIT ---- -- - ..1.- -- .. t /5,2 / .3Â« I AM' 1" /25 \01 414,7/M Â· ~ IssueÂ· 1.1 ce o :SH 1 4(Grl--E> 5 /1 1/ t . /, / r // 1 1 , 62 1-1 ,- 117 4-AE,C--1* t \ 1 -1- 5,2- 54?) /2891346:rt -*9 *5 1- lu: W# l 0.4 52 -rue iM 1 V. 1 . - 1>\11 IE E y I aTI 6 16 14Â« 9 1 12. I Id 7Tfit-rfIC---1.--\11 -1- -*%21:5*wiÂ»= 450[3> 6,4 :442Â£6 . Ft: , I - b 'll,11 85Â¢14(T 8,08*1'T-L 14/1 t J f 14 KiÂ·TEÂ·!3) FANC>r' O...1 P=Z==-==â‚¬-7â‚¬5.-Â· - 79=Â·au.2 0--A' 1 ..4 '212'12=4 , N . V.\\ - - . 1 - -- --- ~-- ~ 6 Â·ZY,$ FtyÂ»,11'r- av-TIL 1 -- .4--- F b F ----4- 7,7, < 1 -- r- -1.--il 1.- P.1 47 eo .2 05- . . 10./.'pl~*-*19!- , ' 7-- -- .. - 1 --- / cm Â· 0 6. 141,4.170 AG Â».'417 TZI M 14 - -6 - . E):1517% 17 Roologe-- --- ----- 'f 1111 111 1 I d It 1 .- . g - -- 1 - /46.17 , ~ 12.- 515- ~~ PERMITSUBMT'L 110 -111 ..\ T ---1- 11111 4) /.... 3\1 RT EKIâ‚¬21-IN* 14021:2 â‚¬91'31<;r > - --4 - - -- ---4 --~ - -- --*.- ---- < ~\ ' --1 *./.$ I.--I- I . I , I \4 PLATE .4 1 --- # -- 1 - . . - - qi Ill ///4 .' W , I. % \7 1 4 .. . , - I . l 1 , Iii .0 0/ . jil , i . t: ....... I. .t'' O,Â· , RECEIVED * I - 1 --- ---- . / F I W P ,_goci , L. - 3 L- - ..4 . , , -- -- 1- - 1 : 14 111, 1 11- ' 2 . - - ; *1 111 /4 1, 1 1 11 *4 I 1,1 2 1.5 1~ 1.91 - '' '~ , Col -, 1 ELSV.~ 110 - crl/4- r 6--. ----- 1 \:4.--=14 11 / 1 5 -' ./ 11 /-...1 '4( V.' 0- 11 If . 1-~ ~ JUL 0 3 1997 1, : \ b :1 (4),v, IM, 7 lg>I~ I 1 \ - .'4 - 401'nON -,t ---i. ~ . ELE.V. 101'- 1 '/AASPEN 1 / j .AMI (12 1 119 1/ 11 O '4 41'1 -41' tÂ« , - , 2 -- 1. -- 11 2Mp FIN Fl--COR , I , * 14,2 1=1 4 - el:â‚¬9* 1 r-12 *~~~~ ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT_J, *~ El.-2~/. i &0 L 6- â‚¬' A. 1 -,1,1 Â¥AAIATÂ©HS FRON THE DaÂ£MSIONE *0*)mONS 4- - r,Â·,1---*)6 I. -i>- -1 '15 -*1 1-J-,5 ~,11 :c,k' '- #r I.' I'll 11.- -11 ' '' ' 1/ - c), 94 k - -1 '' r @9 2-*-7-n-=25 -- - -, 1 -4.--* ....--- Â· 1 THEPURPOSEOF TIRSDRAW,OISONLYTOGI#PHOUY upt ' ' 4 Af/.1, â€ž 1 - - . 11 0 1 FAINTE,52 /62:7 12 FRAMEP il/,Â£ IN'/, ,>..litÂ«,1 < N d & 11 F-t - li / /~0< *33%EmEl. DEPICT â„¢E GENERAL NATURE OF TIE WOFI( DIE CONTRAO ''P , 4 CkÂ·Aâ‚¬-: h.!C;r 6~re-rel - --- -- - - - - -- -- 2___ T ----*ff-1 5 . *in[Vi vit,3, 1} /~ti- L7) 1 : ri a) 2. 6 ; j ~-i - lp'~ M tr 7 1996 SHOWN m THIS DRAWNG ---11 / 41 1 ) d L - -L- _â„¢-#/lig' Building LAD - i 1 5 4 i''I,1 J'/ 1~ Yjell , ~,~ i i. - -,1 ' 6 ~9 ~~~4-*4Ly 1=2Â» .4&~ ~.t---A ~ f_24 J~:--13 R.'14 1 Â· 1. 6 + 9 -9 u . 0 1 ,$ ,- , b ..2. 2 ,~ , .....L . 3= III . 1 -, 7: 1 ' I . SOUTH a-*19 EF'' -lite -23,1-0.11#Y -fl'Lr.= - 16'.11[ 'lit-r 11 11- -2 r 4, ' 1 - EAS~ .-n 4 1 +T P i ki. F- ~.-ztep -2- ~"-=-- - ~-4 k - )11 k 4-=-4 1, 16 -1~ 1 09- FIN PL_;22* I I '. -- -WM.t - -.--*---B -i &-Ii 3-- --'-I.,-I--- 1 3 2.-EV. = 52,1-2 -- c>Â· I 1--~Ii:.,-- --~ 1 i E.Lii-VY ICD' - 00 1'- 1 1 1 r- 1 . 1 1 ---1 --*.,6........,1- ....1 , -00 18Â»â€ž44 - i i i 2,1 , ' 1 | M"qrS,t, 1.u 67019 ./. 2 i 1 24-' ' - r ELEVATION -*i269 -*7-= i . P,Â»12_ AND , 201 . A t==CU-='='.-1 EXIERIOR.. TZ.! MI \ AZ,- f ... . A,~ u -= r- 1 - --11 ~ .-6 94 w Â·rEO ki ct:72 / l - >_ . g - . - - -,- - --i 1.-3-_ - _ Ie.*ACKAOrE SLAU, / - 4. -4 , I- - I EL-ED\~trat,72& --- - -* ill , PuÂ»Er ~ 4 - #1 Scale: ,,Bil ~.;-65 . - '24.8=42- arre FOLIWIAATIOK.1 i - - | <~ - --- ~ ~ rixes:2 - c k - . 6 1 155*/259gibid#67=2=. 1.-APPEk- -~\,t-' 11Â£ , , 1, . , 1 G . V\ 1 , , 1 1 441,2 T 1% 1 H , 1 -â€¢ 1 0. \ F\_ A , - f,, 1 1 1 1 )-1 \11 4 ~ DEC 5 1995 j BET-ENG' 6,(,ST. L!4HTWELL, 1 1 1 1 1 1 - / POW N S'-601: 129 h,<MPriXTE.' , ~ COâ€¢**UNI TY ~ A3.2 : , 4 1 '07--'-1.3/ l,â€¢da@El Wth,1,22,6/ 47*,ILL 44' <'Â· \ Â·.0 ~ DEVELOPMENT ~ 1 1 -1 1 - N , 7.V, 1 r - : AFFLes A.ve62ADE 3*ALggljf~ (4 ) EAST ELEVATION ' . . 44 2 ' F 1 - - - 1--- - v.- - - -1 , , 1 /294*'7.., -456*f.~~fut*G>,j.4 r~{343.Zi#~9**Â·*9#.14)4~,~ikit:fâ‚¬ ~ Â·: -../ I . I ./.- , 2 1 415 ......... t~L:~/-3 L . i ' ~ Â·Â·a 334 + . 1 -AP:* -' :' . - 4 ' ~ ..t / , .. 41 - WEST 5 %7Â·4: 1. 1, f.5:55, ,./.1/ . - ./. '1Â·.Â· , 1 HALLAM V ' J.gi ./4. .:> . 1 ASPEN COLORADO 1 .i ' I. G. , 1 18 . 0 1 ALLEY WI:L:=121%72%098 12% - 605 E MAIN STREET 1.-4 41 r Â· ARCHITECTURE G PLANNING O FOWER RZE 12 .-1- . -I - -Itt 1 I . I 6[T .r..6 -7000" r I' 8602 acr ASPEN, CO U O 303 925 4755 1 Â£ .'~-1.95' 1 B . .1 '6.6 1 190 I / , /,7,9 1 /1 4 0 11" [MA CEABATPLE, 12-' Â·59<640 ' ~~~ , / 0 0... '9-' 0/A. <sÂ«~ 1 TWO 5TORY 12' *FRE,NE) 1 , U J, 40 1 ./ 14 I 0 .. 9 41 N 1 F ' . --- 1 Â£5 75' i~ / 1 255-0 .. / , - 1 50 JO LO De n .,4,3 ' / GF J ZI â€¢-1 1 -IJ./ Â· W#r, :11.4 . LAW \L-L, i dA,,50 Of- BEARING: FOUND C ITY MONUMEN,7 NORTH'*TOT /--n . n 4 , -,3 .4 1 1 CXJK>4_Fc tlent< 9,3, TED dOUT,1-9 A.LE'T COP.7 .EF eco. 4,2 <3 /rn - 6 f 1 1 *?84 *.1 I td . 1 1 10Â· /1 ' 1(*el 0 - 14 , -OURVE,YOK,3 CERTrICNE -:9: i 4 1 4 1 , 64 ' -4 74 \5- 119' - 1 Â·' li i O / 1 11'.lub F REICK, te[ReY CE..Rhfa Tl-1,â‚¬[-Ch OCIE)bER 12, / 0. 2 1 433 1-/ 200 DIA 81.021< 49 1 . 10.1,", A St'MAT' VAE> 41,ADE. L'tutirK 417 DUE-'Ey&!501 Or- IND f..10 0 ( mer; Clidef,t\U: ~ ~ ~. CorTONV,*DOCS 0 Â· t CITIfy- 635_EN 1 CIPT'Cr,6,2~~~~tvt FITK.rÂ·. 0.70:-t .Ti alÂ©Sto ~ : i , .V 1 L L. C, h '-1 Â£ '.4/ , , 1 i 1 TH: n,..C C. 1TCK 1 "34--t-, -HAâ€¢~:6 * I N Ir-,F A. r-1 â€¢-6.t- n./r 3 C. 12\, AKXY''fin.'.f-- O.Â»JV\GE .ALFI t-D:'RP ID' R LIC .WED [t~T-,KE.L) 4 / r 9 1 ' 6. 4. 1,1,- Ct k I .-- r-n ~ r f- rk- â€¢F A FaÂ·r'\ f -4 1 / ' v.' :r 1,1. Irlt- 1.01.-U' 42't,*.7 - 1,1 ,.- , .-1. EL 1-CCM.,ZU[-3 PTVFJ'EK.IN i W 2,4 "PiA. C.W. . 701.:'. 051 L.Ir\: >dE-Nit EADE--NIEND. R!Â»33Â·y.:A.Y' It- b j : 5. a .~ + 1 - t.1 0 KL rk , ,â€¢ i â€¢ 4-, 6 r i.1< Â·.fN y. - #46~AM....~' . ~~<1-~ ' f v L A KV ', F> A.KE .ir FLY , 4 t :V. i , TWO OTCRY f :<' O 1 0 *fr I I ' .... Â·2 2 9 WOOD FRAME , . .9 1 Cori Poljoc li C ' 1 0 r . 62 <-' ir ' i ' 1 1 . 1 1 02 ., 1 <41/1 1 rr h ' I I .1,3 . 1. a . --- I - =49.-, , 1 1 1 V 6,#1 4. )1 1.. 1 '.11.~;'.-iÂ·'29 ~--~11 ~ r.- 1* 0 1 1 6 841'ENS, 4" -10" IMA 0 4 1, ' ),t, 5% 1 k.; I ------~ 1 < 1/bâ‚¬:~BA.E.~,1 ,1,1 . 1% 1 . 1 28 2, ,-n r- h LK:Â«z__ 14442_ _.,_Ai ' 1 4 5 .94 1 ' R 30 :4 / v le"Pe. *FRUCE ' -;3 ' 009Â£,EAP, '., ,",f~ ! 4 5; 1 1 1% c 5 ~ 50 "LE_' 1] ' ' 1 1 4 t. )t, ...4 Â·1Â·Â« .... 4.34 16.2' , .,14 1 $ 4 0 -4 13' 1 1 1 1 1 1 =2=~u '.-i-w. c ' ' ..' .4 fic-Th.// 71 . - 64 0 1 - ( 2*11 91A. c W. 0 1 1 1 7.* ~ 4 4 -01-4 ,."W, 90.09 t ,Di.-1 ''.'' ' , . try,2 1 OURVEYOKS CEATIFIC,Â«TE F 1: -L 24 0 PA. c.- ~ I-, PANCE-L F. M'K.E.hIZIE, HERE.15,1 CERIT-Ir'f THAT Tr-119 Issue: , O VMY ACCUKâ‚¬-EL'f DEFICTD & SUKÂ«EM FEATORhle-13> a : 24'03. c w ~ E :24" 7/4 c. 14/ g UNDEK MN SUPERVISION ON MARCH IS, (985, OF -78 OF AfEN, COLONÂ»DO. LOTO K, L. AM, 131.-OCK 4-2, C/TN ,AND TOWN DITC . '10 -th-6 2 9 M.-Y.mt rc /4_r/NE 50)*VE>fe, IKE. 159 Â· OANIEL. r M'KINIZE , :r, IVIA<CH 31/ 11 06 L. 9 20/51 MALLAM BTREET RECEIVED JUL 0 3 1997 THE PURPOSE OF IES ORAWING 6 ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE WON. THE CO,m~CÂ· ASPEN / PITKIN TOR & RESPONSSE FOR CO,/IaÂ«NG ONENSIONS AND SELECTIG FABRICATION PIOCESSES AND TEC-DUE S OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCT*ON THE AACHITECT SHAll 6E NOTIFIED 0; ANY VINAÂ»6 FRON THE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN BY THIS ORAWNG SURVEY M .P R ID : r CITY MON Scale: 3 1 1 4 BLOCK 431 CITY J ,45904 2 1 1 1 ' 1 IN r & Nol ICE kco,d,ng to Colotado Ww you mutcommence ony legzl :ct,Â· - , TRIOD MArd/\OCMENT EUKV[YED I-t J E TITLE ~ Â» NO. 65-~ Cl 1 tipon iny defectin this sur,2, wthln sU years Efler mars,dnÂ¢oâ€¢et sut, , i In no q,ent. may any Knon based upon iny defect in Fht: 31,m b, 0--1. RE). 50X 1-730 | DAMUTED i P T t. ' to 9 )Â· 7 -7 h . 2.5 IMPRO/EMENT- CURVEY CLIENT. FT>59 mele * 4 1&0 Imm *0 8* 4 0Â» -#Mt# 0. h./1 ADPEN ((10900 BIG I Ft-VIOIC+15 I 2 T f 3 Â· M Be f"r p.e_ 203)Â· 095 '2Gfe - LITIO K., L, AA, r.1.1 V,F ,,9 , , Â·,rÂ·. . 'r A, rirr â€¢ -,1&42.14&* Â· --/- r./ .-I .-I - FLOOR AR BASEMENT Carriage house Garage Main House LOINER LEVEL Carriage house 6arage Main House UPPER LEVEL Carriage house Plain House TOTAL F.A.R. .................. .-PHASE 1 iqARRAIGE.HOUSE, L(COM~.gIED): - . . 1 1\ 1 .1 0 . . i . 0 i t5, iIi 4 . 1 li / u- ic 1 /2% /0 JTWT FMR f WSâ€¢14; . - I' C 'T[*lÂ¢PIÂ¢GNO - I- 3:232. - 94: -,!1 1,/Â¢r )2; I il . 2 / 1 1, t. /02 -- / : ru.rl I r i 0 /7- 4 0 F S L. I -4 i ~~PHASE ONE u 1 W -6/ A .Â£W -V - 44.W PA. .3 C 1 -0 - /Al 2 -0 7 - 1.0 5.r. 1 1 1.....01.. . ..V .8 - .. 320 s.Â¥. 1466.7 s.f. MAI M HOUSE ... *. 2 16*=.IEL-4--1-42#34. .~0,6.~1 i,Â·.D,..6,6-,Iltlll ~ 1;-'-'-'- 06'2â€¢419"I"'~f//5-/~dabb:JA .+7,-6-7*111. .E-i~-4 -. , I.,/1&â€ž.-,A 1./.*Il-'.k.=LII_.:6~-6â€¢ahL_..I*%I=--1/-/.1.-I'JI.U.â€¢LI-+ 111/ 1 * 1 - -- - - ..6 1 Seale, 4'L j'- 01' *466 r 6,7 t- ,tzâ‚¬, C n,AE- 'A 4.--VA-%13 CALCULATIONS r.lin -./ . ..... c . .*M .1#7 ' 4~..~..14 ' FLVES T Â·4 34{:,444 4. ..7 'V . I k 2-211 i ? A i'Â·2,~.,4 A.SPE N 'ret-..... f 0 , CUL C A.AU L A - 4 r-'/Aâ€¢â€¢4 f 7...P . 0 Uvtl-!.11 'IN, '10"N glote# 6 A.'SUCIAn=7; , 1.1 /' il râ‚¬/pe t :.1. Â· - A. .b 4 . - + iÂ· . . 4 .. .. 4 2,.:...t , .. C - .. k . ... .. 1 t ... e , ~1 .h.4 .. I - , .9 4 f 1 I. . p Â· Â·Â·Â· .' Â· 5 1 i,Â· .. .' 4 4 I #Il'# 0 n 4 -â„¢ 4.01 - 4 e F -Â·4 L ' 0 0 -- .,5- . I .Â· 621 - 1,1 2 2 2.8 -:Â·/4' ...0 Â·, 'A .7Â·': : Â· f. li47. 0 Â¥ .. . ' 11 . I .. - tâ„¢' ~'1f,#im~V 1 +G- i e e ' '* .4-0 .. A v , a . I. - A via\< 1Â»â€¢ 11 491*7 *76 /// /~/ --#--9Â®1 .. BSm e 0-7 0 . I. . I ...0 .. , e . ..9 ... Â£ :1 1 044 + , I. 1 1 -- /622 I te ,... - - . 0 1 8 , , ..... â€ž r.- , A , ' .- ... ... . 2 - I '11 LA / . U- ". A 0 - .. , . - e - 0 I , .. 1 -- e I . .. e - . . 21 . 1 ... . 1 6 9 .. .. 0 0. . . .. .... :A A-. 2. .. . A A. il.11 ' . A a -- . - . - I V. 4 . k W. -,3 22'A f , .7 Z , ji .i Fl.41 ~. . 1 1 _11 "' "I' '-...........:-IÂ·Â·PW~'V-~.t. '''I... . . ""llilli..'.'.'......'' '-'''''I'''' ' ' ' 1 1 lili 1 1 11 r- r ...1...... 111 -- - 1 11 . i. .- Â·- ' ..4 4.;4,1.. 45 :45. t. t~-y.41.Â·4- 2 ' - 11 4% H.4 141.1-AM 91 ille'l, 31-94'7-6 Â£ 0> , 27'-1 â€¢' 214,1/- ::.:.> *X I'l U .. Â§* 49,Â¢MEâ€¢. '12 ..1.-,%11' I ..... :iii? /621 28? Col.C:m:ACCSÂ·Jz Ney ..... Â· 1. t:=:=: :.:.:4 11. .1 ../. ti:Ii 514 Â« 1 7 4.- H /1-14 41-14 2114 -t-'14', p'-dâ‚¬1Â·J. 4,Â»'4" , t'-':t' 31 Bit 44" 44' 7,8 1 " <ib~ Ty-- I 391' Af <3> fibi 1 13*> 11,(2> 113. Â·X E>:3 Â· - Ii<01 ~ 1 lt' 44 43 9/4, --- - -- <:9 44)' ZE GARAGE - LOMER LEVEL p - 201-44" X BLe'l - 112.1 s.f. ~ - 27'-4" X 10'-0~11 - 2-17.8 s.f. ill~ 1 +1--0 LOWER 7 FLAhI rf':01 LEVEL 11 r 21,~ 11 +66 22 U ... E - 4'-7" X 6'-OIl - 2-1.5 s.f. 1744.5 s.f. i']1 4--/--~ FLOOR . [*1 - 16'-O" X 20'-0" - 320 s.f. F .- 5'-6" X 14'-6" - 761.8 s.f. ~~~~~~~6 4 PLAN . 320 S.P. * 1 345.8 5.f. - MAIN HOLIee ...'ES ........................... /*~"F'7' PE Â¥ 1 - Mal MÂ¥ -, 9-Â¥I' i, 'r rr.-1.,â€ž-'.'.,â„¢.,â€ž1....,â€ž.4.F'..1.Â¥11,4-V , - --+Â·': '*'r'Â·Â·Â·,Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-i,-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·-~Â·.- Â·Â·4 , â€ž.p,.4...,,-, .r.,-.â€ž7.,~'â€¢I-'â€¢'I"Â·Â·â€ž.:.,xâ€¢rÂ·â€¢F-,.:6â€žprpyâ€¢,Â·,-â€ž.,rirlp,~98Â·--r -- -r .... ,-rry-r---F"In-9171-1-'i- ,-r.---"-Â¥1--rr-r,- , Scales 320 Â· 1< 0 , fi~ tr 44 FAR=:a ~i CALCULATIONS 4 4 - O 10188 WILLIAM JOHN POSS ~ . - -. ~ Acnk Im~A ty.JI~ e e . I , I. I \r - 0 e & 92, ..4 .- Â®0 ..../ e P, , ... . 4 . -- I. . - 4 + I . I ... . 6 . . I . I G e ' . e e 1 - 1 . -l 1 , of '00Â£ i t,30Â·. '. -0 - , I ... P. 1 - e . 1.41 442 : 21 Â»h 4, ... f '* e ... t .' - 4, F . . . 4 . I t. - I . 1 1, 9 00 :It .4 7~ " %43 . -, 0 4 I I . . .. a 1 4 ...0 - 'e t~~~44=~~~1 . ... D If, 0, I.'UL-='Illoililll~/Ia9009'W 61 4 1 --...-1 1 0 , e , 4 . 1 ..I .~......11../....ImmiN........ dll .. If . C . 4 -. . ... , G ... - ' 0 -le. ~~ A 4 0 0 t ' lai ./ .0 - a e .. .1 - - . I e. . :>6 . ~ . , ,. - I e , I :. A . ,.... 6 9 - - A. .. E e -. 0 A. 6 . . I 1 -0- ... 0 -A . G. . 1 .. - 1 0. .... ...... - I . 0 0.0 . 41 , . 1 . & 0 0 . 1 . - z.. ut.. . ................. I PHASE 1 . CARRIAGE HOUSE f r . (COMPLETED) m. 1 12 1 1 l : Ri 00 1 35 5-1 t ''1 1 : 1 1 re= 1 1 1. ! 1 1 f> 11 \ :1 1 / Di / p , - - - - - --- VA-nommollneD.,EM,0,15,~CoIinee Â»ID SPEAKER PREWIREÂ· jr SEE VAVIC> 9/AT-SOM 9 1 DÂ«Â»11Â¥ De;ORRIM 1 MAIN Ct-Rp.FT MUSIC. ~ - I'-O" X BLe" - 6.5 s.f. ASPEN / POKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 14% UPPER M' L . &24. GARAGE - UPPER LEVEL Â· 2'-2 U x 5'-74" - 12.1 s.f. - 4 20'Â·3'44 I r ) Â® - 5 (1'-59*(2'-6'9 - 1.6 S.f. V Pukk r.9 LEVEL ~- - 20'-39' X 31'-515" - 635 s.f. Â© - 5 (1'-39*(2'-6 ") - 1.6 s.f. 4-~>TE/ FLOOR iPHASE ~014 635 s.f. ~ . 1565.61 5.f. MIA I hI Houee iPWASE TWO' PLAN CA ALIAGE. H-004â€¢G -~ scalÂ®, A"- ile ..2 6 n?Aa bi# -QD GALCULATÂ©NS e. 11 P.Wit "AU IAUN f'Aete ...mm....-.............. ............................ .. 0- 32 -i,2 ( v. L. P. i ; ti f--2-1'-0 16 HALL-AÂ·91 - 4 Â¥ ASS'EN Â¢f.23 -539#00 Â· -- Â·< i.rfi 1 4 0 e V a . i.2,/1 -1 #AM .,0.4-e nossÂ· G ASSOC'r.'Er, r.,-.1 5 '2-Â·Â¢i yiÂ·' f. '.i,jt /,~ - â‚¬4 -, ..'Â·,;. Â«NNi.NG E..tÂ·~", ''' Â·ziÂ·1 t- 2 'IVÂ·:,0 4 4 '....1,1 . G Gee eeee :1; :4 . <31*:5 Â· >Wf -51Â· 1; 4.; i "::.31-Â· . .. 4 1 .. 8-- . e ... - h,rwe,11 1 Â·Â·61 A- U 1 Â·226* .1'014 . . 3 el I , - ,, , -: 1,11.-4......... Flil .. . I. f Â·Â·Â· 5 -4~ .'1 , 0 -1 0 0 1,1. 1.1 ... . .. . 1 illi; 'Â·Â· ti?~ ~39'NrE , I : 1 , '" , I . .- 4 2 1 4 . .. , . --- ... $ 1, " .0 ' - 1 0 - 0 2 ,- 4 < , 04#~4&~ ' r. 1 1 0 9 9 1.IM79-#ay .. . 1 . Ps/#66*65&7%â€¢/ I x / '' A.... f~~~~;ari~ '' , ; 't. 1'1~44*5%Â·5*W '. 27- e 0 0 i '4 - 9 14.10â‚¬ 4 1, t.. a. f . 0 9 . . I , 4111 4 . I . , r, i. .. . .. 4. 4,7 An. $ .4 0 . . -. A. I. . - . I A -- - I 0 . 0 .0 . 1 -.2 . :. , 1 . i /. 0 8 .... I . . 9 - ... . . A. 0, ... . e -. e el ... .... P . ... . . . 1 0 0 ... - - . 1 P- I: a 0 ... .:. . 1 1. . . 6. . ..: D / 1 P :-A- r , '. ~. Â· ./ k Â·Â· . A -+ . A A \My N. ..-.. . 49 I ..4, 4 L 77â‚¬ i.. . SITE COVEIR,;4(SE CALCULATIONS SUklf:2.c-1 IML.0~3 SITE COVERAeE SUMMARY ~ Â¥ I 44.- - . 1 Â· .4 - 45' X 3' - 13.51 Â· ' * / ACTUAL - 3277.40 s.f. / 22.25' X 3325' 739.81' \ ALLORABLE - 3105.00 st F 22.75' X 18.5' - 420.87' 1 9-*76-0 ferAL. CAP' / -.. - Pl.6941 6461 4-> 41 02 - Co / .- I . -. ...4:' Building (2100.00) s.t. pe 15' X 3.5' - 52.50' i.: 1.~-priJAikJZ#6 ~ Â£33 109 / AECT 16-43 Porch/Overhan 22' X 8.15' - 1 42.50' ' Tv / / 6' x I' 6.00' F , / Exemption (40~00) s.f. / 1 / . - 47.5' X 23.25' - 1941.87' 15' X 2.25' - 2Â¢125' 1 I - - - - -- 1 VARIANCE SRANTED - I-12.40 s.f. - 3.-15' X 2.5' 37' i .Â», / \ 1Â©Â° i / 2-_"b 5/27/43 8' X 13.75' - 110.00' I , .O / / \ .TA , 'r A 14' X 23' 322.00' 1 4 D,\ i / ' // 3.5' X 6' 21.00' -i\ 1 1 i / \1 41 U~ \ 4+ 1-\< Ix i / i 1 1/ : 2.5' X I.75' %2 - Ila' / / I , 1/ : - 1 ---r r.~6- I '- / 0 // 25' X 5.75' - . 14.31' 01 1 -1 1 1 4\ \/ i/ C'' V C '2- 71. - , u-, -LS -O.-1 / 2.5' X 1.13' %2 2.13' 9 1/\ / > \/ 1 * AfiC. l / XJ â€¢ 3277.40 5.1. 2 -aE/ H E-Al . Ex #11 :T. 2% 1 t,T- - V T\/ 44 2 :/ ~ ~ ~_ - 9 J /,\ BUILDINS ENVELOPE CALCULATIONS 2,64450 si J Ut 0 6< STEÂ·A ".1/ / ~ H;'-ri.Â· c. / i 5 el:'t VE\A A / - Fo,, 0,+ 116 Ji ' Â· I f 4 F,6% Poor \ / 1 / 9 542.1 N 7, 1 -f,3 - 49~' , I f , 1 \ , 'ex , r.i J/ i ~ 14.-00 it _1 4 --/ ~ ' % / I \ 1 /\ , / \6/ 1/, 1 Z-1 i. i / i / j / Aj 100 \ / 7 /\ 4 / - ft (Srb. 2 ,~ i. I / 27 5 9 - / r.0 \/ i \ / / ,.1 \ // \ / - / f. 1 / . 40 1 / 1 1<\ 1< / EX Â· .-I / *7 0 Of Gol.0410 ~VE-6- 0. .0.-4 ,-A.> 1 / / 7/ I \ 4 1 \ / I M 8*~Â·f !4, 44 -1- " / 0 72 .9% / -bl-,_C- ..I V \ / VeRSED 26" i / 11'- / / 1 / r-, f I f \//1 4 / / 1 , 0- I < I \ / ./ J | ' '-' ti.Â·*, 5T, 6.1 C. .Le I rl kt 8.- , c / \ / 0 / t. ) 1 N . /0-/,/ : / \ ./\1 / 31 / i . p/* I / \ /11 \ i V 1 - , \ I / / \ t.c E/P ~5/ > Ct /f + / 11 . i / / 7 0 00 I t i 0- 10-~, , r ' 264*Kett . [--91 2*'D-Â»1-â‚¬ - '15 6. '| JUN 14 E95 â‚¬>el/PT Roop - U 0 11 / 1/1 - 6.f,-0~ M 1 0 1/ ... 7-- - F L~/tat'r' -ru 19$1-1 M . \ 1 Issue: 11 LIA=-i=-10/42,6 0- 0 -'b E , $ < , ----Â»4--- ---- 2 /pl Â¥- / 01 2 l4'fl MEI MIT- 13Â»:,fâ€¢11 L / ---7- 4 . /. -- 3-14-013 SITE GOVERAGE ..,i 9 - - 1 / \ ----- .1 0 H, - 4 / . ..4... -*'..0 -- Puas, F OVES'A FPO'20-14 8 ruc.2 3 6.25'137 PrkÂ»KIT- Sy*14#L- / 1 1 4 , 6 Â·ly P#*tvt (r 6~M)#r'L, ..r --- i . 0-- ---JL , ..i ..3â‚¬ I . -- / I 1 , , GrAPAC>râ‚¬. ReÂ·.0 P BE.L.Â£:'64 / I / .1 i /1 ... \ 1 I '04 / RECEIVED Mhz' / >40,7-eÂ© 1 6*1-17:12, 202=c,â€¢ 5-12'4-5 440 JUL 0 3 1997 '14 ' JfPS .t (C' Â·Â·1- 6AAâ€¢Wi S 04.r 10 -.Pâ€¢,LAL'. i (.4 4.1 1,4 C. 1,â‚¬ â€¢0~ Â·, A: 1,4 C.r 1,~ I/* t Â·4 Â·1*7// 4134.-~ HE:7 -Tzp ELE- 1 ~12. -*- 1 -./XÂ·<31 ASPEN i Pi I KIN 'Ul :964 -;â€¢'. 4.1 hÂ», 6,>4; $â€¢WÂ·k,L.â€¢tâ€¢.fÂ·O., Arri 52 ,t U 44 + 460â‚¬ AT UN FR.).Â»SE 5 Aâ€¢,O ltE.~lhd! 5 Uf 46.1-4 PAL Â·-JA 66(3"E-S Â£-r i A,., -- COMMI ]NITY DEVELOPMENT ..11... 94-â€ž:2 1/ *Crill.1 4.12 0 .34.0.>f 4â€¢. EX lf..56 kh:* . FLA-r E .-1-,25<-r-=1--1 .......Â£./.t //*./.4 AlÂ· Co../Al 6.-d' '*g'UL &/~ -734.. 4 . 12,;CO E H C.lost ,-0 Ll AJE-> hiÂ©Â·/t. 12.02â‚¬.MU :PED'70-U-F,1, CES> AFAE, iÂ·-9 -7. I '...'' 3,5,4 - 4 P C.' h., ROOF PLAN 2-,< 1 -er h..i k Cth..2, P 6-c> w E.- . L BE-Ko'Vrl- ix, -Â·'rilkl<Dr MAr[- 6-W>+1Â«-- - f : 7 .4 u 7-0 -51 62- AnÂ· C- 7042- A- AÂ·- 11-'L EX: -_r , k.1 51 UT 2.-l,sT.1,2.( A-9 5 h 62 -> L.Â·06Â«6 - r-re k.(-- c Â»' Or 1 43. E PUL/Â·: 6Â«Â· .-c '. C -0 Scale: 40 - 4 6/- 1 FAR= 48 SITE COVERAGE ~ OZIrAL-Immrnuoul> TELIDYNE MOT 1,3929. I ' J ~ '' .: Â· . .'i. 'r. . . / I . .L. Fl . 7,1 : ~5,1.:) - ALLEY bLOCK 42 24: . 19-1 f'63 â‚¬ STALEY ~'~ - '- c - er- I-)fr.h t? C C.AIDLE TV, -TELE . 0 / f F. LE,1 rUDGSTALS ' 2 < 41 . 1 5[3 1.tbAL,// Fu%.CAP 7 5 79-07' 11' E 90.02' LS 24603 0 r -- W ' - '' I ----- I.--*---- I.---- -.-.-i--*#*- -- -*--i---.f# -------P-.-- ------ ErÂ·*LLÂ£Â·SEP 1741SH A~4 FCUMO Â· R.E-be w FLAS CAP 4 48 Ij_ . --~- 8 4 41 L S. 11514 4. O 145,A Ff'LE ' b.- 1 >,4 - 4 .Â· .r eDAIC,1 VAL.K- , 12 - O <Leeâ€¢AFFLE O ' 0 12 0 19,0 h CoaarI=r-1 / 1 J I= XCED / -TWO STOR.Y (=1 1 + WOOD FRAME / , E-\ , 3:t... 1 3" tiOUDE / a / - 1 1 l / .3/6 / 1 1 b KCOF O +4 C T Y' . _.*_ J 1 / T i HOT # \ ; i -rue e ,/' h. L T 4-Â·- 6 14 A V C L 0&\VE f .7-1' i 77 /* I r UDW tip) Ig t ' X . r . Job ; / 'f -7 /. r 2 11 1 r.1 1 . \ f _. -l 1 .1 le 1 ' c.or-Â·ICAE--TE r 1 + 08 10 0. -1 2 - 20) BA 0 8 ~Â°or, 6,Ll '5â€¢91 1 16 j 10 3 / f .0-r Tori *c.005 0 . F, 1 I 36 1 DIA , dITCÂ¥Â·1 - .~ ~' ,/ WCOO -f lar /.. / /4//1 4. l. , I. , I r / / ,/ /,//1 1 90' / , ' 1 1 24 - ON 00 1 TOMWOCO / L - h...7 2 ~ . ~ Ge. 18 -' : : .1 1 1 -=242 3 9 ': / TWO 5TORY / -, .,A--3k C sâ„¢2Â£ T ' 3 . iCI>- 6 / WOOD FRAME 1 2 2 41 r Z /01 1 ! / ,/ HouaL / i ./ -1 & 1 I ... ..1 4 \../... 30 \ *,000 ..:I 1 / // Stro Â· 91 1 4 ... / I . 4 W 1.6 50 -10 t-Â© F 1 k ' r <\ f .:i . ./ / / 1 , 20..LE- .14.101 19.3_. 1/ 1 ItAZ>IS OF Or/\Altib FOUND rlONU Yl[-r'I-15 Â» ShOWN I 3 fi r.& ' 00 / U le 'I , 1 COVLIK.00 . C At SMOWN DATUM FLAPIC '- ASSUrl[-r) IOO O'AT C.Ily rlorturl Enl 1 4 Abrf-rls, 4 O& ./ /1 / 8 1 WOOD FOKCLH & L 0 / i : 1 1 .-(I-i Â£ - 5, 1.4 A U.Ae>ArfIL ./ / ~ SUAVE,YON, 5 CLATIFICATE: xaT..4 1 /' "204 ' i 11- '1 -- - I-- - t SUR.VIT MAL)[. UnD[-IL, MY bal'[AV\5101-1 ON J/\1-10.Â«T 24 1,0 r 22 ! ;re,4. ~ ~ + OF- 1 (315 5.. L ,, MI. bl-CELK. 42 , CiTY Of /lbf'Ltl, COLDFAPO. J. ba' 3' 5,Â· 7 -~" Â£! Gov Otto ve'0013 1 P 1. Ft)MCH 1 JUN 1 4 895 ~ Â·Â· 1 \ .1. \ CG, L 191, 1 1 1 '62' . .:2....1 ..1- h.. 1 / . I. t. /- ..- , V iD 'A 1 Â·Â·Â· (<-1 2-- .i.~1 ~~'Â¥~x\,r E + 2,/ ~AkEN,riff>'' .S 1 6..r n 10 1 NCIDO Â» LE)1 6- 1 2 ' LOT L ' 4 1.01 11 Fourlo Â·14-lial w/ ft-AS Crt ; i LS 1/64 O 0 . -h 90.02' f ' 6~515 OF 8EAR.ING / FU->f-ID : aTT MoriurIENT M 75*01' li" W I.LlvAT ION 6 A5tbutl Er/, 100 O f T. 1 2 ' ~ ' 2.1, r L.Â¢ i 0 24. CAA bl' AL. r'HNE 5UIU/EYS, IPIC- 2,4' DIA <.OTTOMWOCO Co [ToÂ·1Â¥V'00,0 JAPILIAM 54 1110 L 5 I . l. j - 7*.#. 41 .- I ' ...2 > W' 1 - .... 1 Irl r A bt-C)[ E..LE-V,â‚¬1 ION Al FLCOA OF DOILT-,Irle 10 7 L L " U, t.64- 0. .TRZE I JUL 0 3 1997 SURVEYOR'5 CERTIFICATE ASPEN / el f KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 HEREE,Â¥ CERTIFY THAT ON JUNE 16, 1173, A VISUAL INSPECT ION WAS> PERFORMED UNDER MY 8 b --rn---- 9 1 51 . 1 1 KILA[Or CE.LTIFY -Triâ€¢J It-~15 MAF AECUMATELY DEF'1015 A P 0 0 14" O 44 cor TOriwODO SUPERVISION OF THE ABOVE [DESCRIBED PROPERTT 17.0 '00.5 MaLLAM.â€ž,-D.-r M.[El Â£ STAU 7 NO CHANGES .VERE FOUND EXCEPT AS SHOWN ,01 B i- STAUT LEfr #FCA ,* + AND NOTED HERBON . ALFINE SURVEYS, INC er' 9Â·Â·it#tÂ¥ Ic=.u ':A '1~ L 91 i ziA]&4 ; ~3 JE: JUNE 23, Ill 3 L r- ~> 8 L u.1 r- *.. 1.0 D 02 1 r lu 4 AA 1Â·/ RECEIVED 4./1 J .) 1 G'\1 E.5 4;*I--~/ *t 1:91 3$9'. NOTICE AL.coicing 10 Coloiaâ‚¬10 taâ€¢ yoli must CommenCe an, It:Qal a<!fon based Alpine Surveys, Inc. Drafted I 51 10 LK- Igon any defect ,/ th,3 survey v.,lh,n thrue 'ear, afle, you lift, d:scover such d.leci Surveyed i 24 10 CL Revisions 0 23 93 UPDATE Title Job No 88 - 40 3 0 . 7.21 no over,1 ma i an, achor, b.bed u,>ciâ€¢ an, deleci in this suiveâ€ž Ce ivinrninced LOT5 4 , L, Â¢ rl -- 15LCCM- 42 Client %65 4 460,0 Ihdn lin y...5 tiom the clair 01 1,Ir c.ri,lic.lion Sh,wn hefoon Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 CIT T Of 'Ad>FEM Â·303 925 2688 F 60â€¢.Â·A, Â·Â·Â·f _"F_Et""~-- -- - -- i, - I ce./ CAIUMMI-- FU//1/L -2--- - 5 !4- 90' 41 W