The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19971210AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION December 10, 1997 REGULAR MEETING SISTER CITIES ROOM 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of Oct. Sth, 1997 minutes. II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS A. Maxwell Aley's red house by the entrance to William's Woods-is there support for including it on the Inventory and landmark designation? B. HPC holiday potluck dinner on December 13, 6 p.m. at the Hirsch's, 1590 Silver King Drive C. Reminder: The next meeting will be December 17. D. We need a volunteer for the Downtown Enhancements and Pedestrian Plan Committee. They meet once or twice a month on a Tuesday, 12-2 P.m. IV. NEW BUSINESS 5:10 A. 1080 Power Plant Road- minor 0/1 5:30 B. Trustee Townhomes- vested rights, PH -dq'66# 6 195 7 - 17 - T V. OLD BUSINESS 5:35 A. 234 W. Francis- lightwell and temporary relocation '- 5% Â·1jj bit 56, 3â‚¬' l .~ 4.-1.. 5-4< 6 , ~ i c. n' to :- VI. WORKSESSIONS 6:00 A. Tf4*eale-*,Fen#e ':20 B. Marcel Breuer house (74 Northstar Drive) C. 1998 goals 7:00 V. ADJOURN PROJECT MONITORING ger Moyer 303 E. Main, Kuhn 420 E. Main (not active) ISIS (not active) 939 E. Cooper (not active) Susan Dodington 712 W. Francis (stalled) 918 E. Cooper, Davis 132 W. Main, McCloskey Meadows. Trustee and Tennis townhomes 525 W. Hallam (not active) -Ijq - #,3 -4, a Olu- - 7 Melanie Roschko 918 E. Cooper, Davis ISIS (not active) 706 W. Main (not active) 210 S. Galena, Elk's building plaza 414 E. Hyman, Aspen Cooking School Suzannah Reid 303 E. Main, Kuhn 702 W. Main, Pearson 218 N. Monarch, Zucker Mark Onorofski 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis Mary Hirsch Meadows, Trustee and Tennis townhomes 525 W. Hallam (not active) Gilbert Sanchez 420 E. Main Galena Plaza (not active) 820 E. Cooper (not active) 514 E. Hyman, Mason Morse bldg. 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis Jeffrey Halferty 939 E. Cooper (not active) 132 W. Main, McCloskey 234 W. Francis, Mullin .. eidi Friedland 130 S. Galena, City Hall CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires February 12, 1998 0 Walnut (Greenwood), expires March 22, 1998 4 N. First Street (Ernemann), expires March 26, 1998 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1998 514 N. Third Street (Ringsby), expires 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24, 1998 \C ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 0 Chair-person Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Roger Moyer, Mark Onorofski, Gilbert Sanchez, Mary Hirsch, Melanie Roschko, Heidi Friedland and Jeffrey Halferty. Susan Dodington was excused. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS Roger stated that a technical pamphlet on restorations should be created as a reference tool for the public. Mary suggested that HPC sponsor workshops on restorations. The commission discussed letter of credits and fines etc. for off-site relocation's. The Assistant City Attorney willlook into a code revision. Mary suggested a worksession on color, i.e. when is it a requirement etc. 400 E. MAIN - MINOR DEVELOPMENT 0 Amy Guthrie relayed to the board that the building is an existing commercial building and the proposal is to close offthe entry and make it a weatherized entry area. The building is a modern building. Kim Raymond presented and stated that a glass store front type door would be incorporated into the design to close off the ramp area for an airlock. There would still be enough space for wheel chairs to get into the elevator. The door would match existing features. Heidi was seated. MOTION: Mary moved to approve the minor development for 400 E. Main with the condition that the door match the existing features already existing on the building; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. 114 NEALE AVE. (17 QUEEN) LOT SPLIT AMENDMENT - PH - CONCEPTUAL 0 Exhibit I - affidavit 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 Jeffrey seated. Chair-persons Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Amy Guthrie stated that the applicant wishes to change the division of the lot split and make it more equitable. Glenn Rappaport presented for the owner, Joel Ehrenkrantz. Two variances were requested, a side yard variance on the east side for an addition and a side yard variance for a garage. The side yard variance on the east side for an addition is within the setback. The discussion will be a variance on the garage. Essentially the lot line adjustment has to do with creating a lot about 7,000 s4. ft. sectioning offa lot that is 14,161 sq. ft. and the FAR area that would be allowed on the 7,000 sq. ft. lot would be between 2,045 sq. ft. and 2,145 sq. ft. FAR. There is a 100 foot negotiation. The remaining FAR for the new house to be constructed below would be between 3,744 sq. ft. and 3,644 sq. ft. FAR. For clarification Roger stated the request is for an addition with no variances and a garage that would require a variance. Chair-person Suzannah Reid stated that there were no comments from the public, public hearing closed. MOTION: Roger moved to approve an historic landmark lot split for 114 Neale Ave. with the following conditions: 1) The property shall be subdivided into one parcel of 7,000 sq. ft. with an assigned FAR of 2,145 sq. ft. and an second parcel of 14,160 sq. ft. with a maximum FAR of 3,644 sq. ft. 2) A subdivision plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(d), must be filed. 3) A subdivision exemption agreement and plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e) shall befiled. Motion second by Gilbert. All in favor, motion carried. Chair-person Suzannah Reid opened the conceptual public hearing. No public comments. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 MOTION: Roger moved to table the public hearing and Conceptual Development for 114 Neale Ave. to October 22, 1997; second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carried. ASPEN MEADOWS TENNIS TOWNHOMES - AMENDMENT TO FINAL Three exhibits. Gilbert stepped down. Jeffrey seated. Amy Guthrie, planner relayed to the HPC that these are new town homes to be built across from the tennis courts. There are six units which are reminiscent of the lodge institutional buildings at the Aspen Meadows. Staff has some concerns with the windows on the west side of the building, i.e. glazing and the landscape plan. The landscape plan should suite the historic condition at the Meadows. Jan Derrington from Charles Cunniffe's office and Sam Korn, developer presented. Jan explained the vegetation. On the street side there is an earth berm and the existing trees along the street will be preserved. Three to five feet high shrubs will be planted. Anyone walking along or riding along the street will not see much of the buildings at all. Square wire mesh will be used for the top of the railings. An earth-tone color scheme is proposed. The proposed stucco color is straw. The windows will be clad and doors natural wood. The roof fascia and balcony railings would be a weathered copper look. The site plan indicates the grading of the carports. The fence is a code requirement and the shrubs would come up to the top of the fence. For color 1000 narcissus, jonquils and daffodil bulbs will be added. The board was concerned that the landscape elevation does not indicate all the species. Another concern is the vegetation in the area after the bulbs are done blooming. The proposal is a wood mulch. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 The Board also had a concern with the glazing on the west facade. Jan Derrington stated that there are not many residents that are close to the units. There will be some sort of shading devices on the units and air conditioning will be installed. A glass coating is proposed for the windows. Amy stated that the color change and cohesiveness should be incorporated in these units to coincide with the Meadows theme. The complex is gray and white and the proposal is taupe and brown. Jan stated that they felt the color change would match with the natural foliage. The white and gray colors are in the campus which is screened from view. In summary, Amy stated that the project has improved immensely but it is not in keeping with the campus as Herbert Bayer' s colors were meant to be different with the bright colors and also the landscaping is lined up in orderly rows. The proposal is stepping away from the campus idea. Jan stated the plantings are very simple, aspen and juniper trees. Roger suggested as a compromise that the east side be a different color, gray tone and all the other sides the earth tones. Melanie felt that the landscaping could be simplified to tie in with the existing plantings. Other members felt that this project should not be confused with the Meadows and should be a natural feeling and not structured. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve the tennis townhomes as submitted finding that materials are compatible with the campus and the design of the windows on the west are compatible and the landscape plan is acceptable, second by Mary. Discussion: Mary suggested that the applicant look at the color selection with Staff and monitor. Melanie requested a revised detailed landscape plan. 0 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 Jan Derrington commented that he is willing to look at the color selection and work with Staff and monitor to come to a compromises that will be agreeable to all parties. 234 W. FRANCIS - PUBLIC HEARING Gilbert was seated. Jeffrey did not vote on this item. Amy Guthrie, planner stated that this building is on the national register of historic places plus being a local landmark. The back of the house has a carriage house that is not historic and the applicant desires to change it back to a garage, add some dormers and change windows. Staff has no concern with those changes. There is a wing that runs between the garage toward the back of the house that is partly old construction and partly not. An open breezeway will be constructed in the new part of the wing. On the historic house the proposal is to add an octagonal kitchen on the north east corner. It is one story and does not damage the architectural Â· integrity of the building. It is somewhat of an ornate element and the house is a simple detailed house. There is also a proposal to extend a dormer and Staff is not in support as the dormer is original and visible from the street. It is too much of an alteration. The smalllean-to will be returned to its original state, a shed roof. Scott Lindeau, architect for the project remarked that the existing historic dormer is proposed to be extended out five feet which is in the attic space on the least visible side, the north. A dormer proposed is to be added to the guest property. In response to the octagonal kitchen if it was squared off you would loose the views too much. It is also dark and the ceilings are low so the proposal to do the octagonal adds more light to the eating space. The majority of the board had no problems with the proposal. The octagonal kitchen is a fun new element. There were reservations about the stair tower proportions and how it pops out from the building. From the 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 plans it looks like the stair could be moved back so that the dormer could 0 line up. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the proposal for the minor development, partial demolition of 234 W. Francis St. with the condition that the applicant look at revising the rear stair dormer so that the wall aligns with the building wall below and that more research be done on the slope of the original roof on the rear addition ofthe house to be approved by stajf and monitor, second by Roger. Discussion: Gilbert recommended that the extension beyond the building wall be eliminated. VOTE: Passed 4 - 3. Yes vote: Gilbert, Roger, Mark, Suzannah. No vote: Mary, Melanie, Heidi. Those members who voted no felt that there were too many changes to this important house. 334 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Amy Guthrie, planner relayed to the board that this house is on the register and a local landmark. Ten years ago the owner, Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters got an approval for a remodel but the addition was never built. The extensions are now expired. The public notices are not completed so the meeting will be a worksession. Phase I was the remodel of the carriage house that took place a few years ago. Phase II involves additions to the historic house and a garage which faces Third Street. The garage placement is in conflict with ordinance #30, which requires garages to be placed on the alley; however, they have always pulled their cars into the existing space which is a paved uncovered driveway. In order for them to add a garage it would have to be isolated in the corner due to the vegetation on the alley. The garage proposed is a one stall garage. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location. The addition is a glass sunroom or green house that is quite visible from the street. It is a one story element. There is a one story addition to the back of the historic house that was there in 1893 and 0 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 the old approval allowed them to demolish that addition and allowed them 0 to construct an addition with a second story. Staff is opposed to the demolition of the one story addition. Staff feels the addition on the north elevation should be incorporated in the design to the back ofthe house. The board needs to give direction regarding the addition. Structurally it might not hold a second floor. Marta said they would retain the side door and side window so the look will be retained. She also stated that structurally individuals do not want to take on this massive project. The house is half electric and half gas. The board felt that a site visit was necessary. MOTION: Suzannah moved to adjourn, second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 0 Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 7 yuaXE. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 Chair-person Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Roger Moyer, Mark Onorofski, Gilbert Sanchez, Mary Hirsch, Melanie Roschko, Heidi Friedland and Jeffrey Halferty. Susan Dodington was excused. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS Roger stated that a technical pamphlet on restorations should be created as a reference tool for the public. Mary suggested that HPC sponsor workshops on restorations. The commission discussed letter of credits and fines etc. for off-site relocation's. The Assistant City Attorney willlook into a code revision. Mary suggested a worksession on color, i.e. when is it a requirement etc. 400 E. MAIN - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy Guthrie relayed to the board that the building is an existing commercial building and the proposal is to close offthe entry and make it a weatherized entry area. The building is a modern building. Kim Raymond presented and stated that a glass store front type door would be incorporated into the design to close offthe ramp area for an airlock. There would still be enough space for wheel chairs to get into the elevator. The door would match existing features. Heidi was seated. MOTION: Mary moved to approve the minor development for 400 E. Main with the condition that the door match the existing features already existing on the building; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. 114 NEALE AVE. (17 QUEEN) LOT SPLIT AMENDMENT - PH - CONCEPTUAL Exhibit I - affidavit 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 Jeffrey seated. Chair-persons Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Amy Guthrie stated that the applicant wishes to change the division of the lot split and make it more equitable. Glenn Rappaport presented for the owner, Joel Ehrenkrantz. Twovariances were requested, a side yard variance on the east side for an addition and a side yard variance for a garage. The side yard variance on the east side for an addition is within the setback. The discussion will be a variance on the garage. Essentially the lot line adjustment has to do with creating a lot about 7,000 sq. ft. sectioning offa lot that is 14,161 sq. ft. andthe FAR area that would be allowed on the 7,000 sq. ft. lot would be between 2,045 sq. ft. and 2,145 sq. ft. FAR. There is a 100 foot negotiation. The remaining FAR for the new house to be constructed below would be between 3,744 sq. ft. and 3,644 sq. ft. FAR. For clarification Roger stated the request is for an addition with no variances and a garage that would require a variance. Chair-person Suzannah Reid stated that there were no comments from the public, public hearing closed. MOTION: Roger moved to approve an historic landmark lot split for 114 Neale Ave. with the following conditions: 1) The property shall be subdivided into one parcel of 7,000 sq. ft. with an assigned FAR of 2,145 sq. ft. and an second parcel of 14,160 sq. ft. with a maximum FAR of 3,644 sq. ft. 2) A subdivision plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(d), must be filed. 3) A subdivision exemption agreement and plat as described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e) shall befiled. Motion second by Gilbert. All in favor, motion carried. Chair-person Suzannah Reid opened the conceptual public hearing. No public comments. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8, 1997 0 MOTION: Roger moved to table the public hearing and Conceptual Development for 114 Neale Ave. to October 22, 1997; second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carried. ASPEN MEADOWS TENNIS TOWNHOMES - AMENDMENT TO FINAL Three exhibits. Gilbert stepped down. Jeffrey seated. Amy Guthrie, planner relayed to the HPC that these are new town homes to be built across from the tennis courts. There are six units which are reminiscent of the lodge institutional buildings at the Aspen Meadows. Staff has some concerns with the windows on the west side of the building, i.e. glazing and the landscape plan. The landscape plan should suite the historic condition at the Meadows. Jan Derrington from Charles Cunniffe's office and Sam Korn, developer 0 presented. Jan explained the vegetation. On the street side there is an earth berm and the existing trees along the street will be preserved. Three to five feet high shrubs will be planted. Anyone walking along or riding along the street will not see much of the buildings at all. Square wire mesh will be used for the top ofthe railings. An earth-tone color scheme is proposed. The proposed stucco color is straw. The windows will be clad and doors natural wood. The roof fascia and balcony railings would be a weathered copper look. The site plan indicates the grading ofthe carports. The fence is a code requirement and the shrubs would come up to the top of the fence. For color 1000 narcissus, jonquils and daffodil bulbs will be added. The board was concerned that the landscape elevation does not indicate all the species. Another concern is the vegetation in the area after the bulbs are done blooming. The proposal is a wood mulch. 0 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 The Board also had a concern with the glazing on the west facade. Jan Derrington stated that there are not many residents that are close to the units. There will be some sort of shading devices on the units and air conditioning will be installed. A glass coating is proposed for the windows. Amy stated that the color change and cohesiveness should be incorporated in these units to coincide with the Meadows theme. The complex is gray and white and the proposal is taupe and brown. Jan stated that they felt the color change would match with the natural foliage. The white and gray colors are in the campus which is screened from view. In summary, Amy stated that the project has improved immensely but it is not in keeping with the campus as Herbert Bayer's colors were meant to be different with the bright colors and also the landscaping is lined up in orderly rows. The proposal is stepping away from the campus idea. Jan stated the plantings are very simple, aspen and juniper trees. Roger suggested as a compromise that the east side be a different color, gray tone and all the other sides the earth tones. Melanie felt that the landscaping could be simplified to tie in with the existing plantings. Other members felt that this project should not be confused with the Meadows and should be a natural feeling and not structured. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve the tennis townhomes as submitted finding that materials are compatible with the campus and the design of the windows on the west are compatible and the landscape plan is acceptable, second by Mary. Discussion: Mary suggested that the applicant look at the color selection with Staff and monitor. Melanie requested a revised detailed landscape plan. 4 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8, 1997 Jan Derrington commented that he is willing to look at the color selection and work with Staff and monitor to come to a compromises that will be agreeable to all parties. 234 W. FRANCIS - PUBLIC HEARING Gilbert was seated. Jeffrey did not vote on this item. Amy Guthrie, planner stated that this building is on the national register of historic places plus being a local landmark. The back of the house has a carriage house that is not historic and the applicant desires to change it back to a garage, add some dormers and change windows. Staff has no concern with those changes. There is a wing that runs between the garage toward the back of the house that is partly old construction and partly not. An open breezeway will be constructed in the new part ofthe wing. On the historic house the proposal is to add an octagonal kitchen on the north east corner. It is one story and does not damage the architectural Â· integrity of the building. It is somewhat of an ornate element and the house is a simple detailed house. There is also a proposal to extend a dormer and Staff is not in support as the dormer is original and visible from the street. It is too much of an alteration. The small lean-to will be returned to its original state, a shed roof. Scott Lindeau, architect for the project remarked that the existing historic dormer is proposed to be extended out five feet which is in the attic space on the least visible side, the north. A dormer proposed is to be added to the guest property. In response to the octagonal kitchen if it was squared off you would loose the views too much. It is also dark and the ceilings are low so the proposal to do the octagonal adds more light to the eating space. The majority of the board had no problems with the proposal. The octagonal kitchen is a fun new element. There were reservations about the stair tower proportions and how it pops out from the building. From the 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8, 1997 plans it looks like the stair could be moved back so that the dormer could line up. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the proposal for the minor development, partial demolition of 234 W. Francis St. with the condition that the applicant look at revising the rear stair dormer so that the wall aligns with the building wall below and that more research be done on the slope ofthe original roof on the rear addition ofthe house to be approved by stalf and monitor, second by Roger. Discussion: Gilbert recommended that the extension beyond the building wall be eliminated. VOTE: Passed 4 - 3. Yes vote: Gilbert, Roger, Mark, Suzannah. No vote: Mary, Melanie, Heidi. Those members who voted no felt that there were too many changes to this important house. 334 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL - PUBLIC HEARING Amy Guthrie, planner relayed to the board that this house is on the register and a local landmark. Ten years ago the owner, Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters got an approval for a remodel but the addition was never built. The extensions are now expired. The public notices are not completed so the meeting will be a worksession. Phase I was the remodel ofthe carriage house that took place a few years ago. Phase II involves additions to the historic house and a garage which faces Third Street. The garage placement is in conflict with ordinance #30, which requires garages to be placed on the alley; however, they have always pulled their cars into the existing space which is a paved uncovered driveway. In order for them to add a garage it would have to be isolated in the corner due to the vegetation on the alley. The garage proposed is a one stall garage. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location. The addition is a glass sunroom or green house Â· that is quite visible from the street. It is a one story element. There is a one story addition to the back ofthe historic house that was there in 1893 and 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8. 1997 0 the old approval allowed them to demolish that addition and allowed them to construct an addition with a second story. Staff is opposed to the demolition of the one story addition. Staff feels the addition on the north elevation should be incorporated in the design to the back of the house. The board needs to give direction regarding the addition. Structurally it might not hold a second floor. Marta said they would retain the side door and side window so the look will be retained. She also stated that structurally individuals do not want to take on this massive project. The house is half electric and half gas. The board felt that a site visit was necessary. MOTION: Suzannah moved to adjourn, second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 0 Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director 6/ Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning DirectofhÂ©rf FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 1080 Power Plant Road, City Shop-minor review DATE: December 10, 1997 SUMMARY: City Shop, located below the Castle Creek Bridge, is used by the Streets Department for their offices and equipment. The building was originally a hydroelectric power plant and is a designated landmark as well as being listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The structures were restored and added onto in 1995 and the project received an HPC award. The applicant requests HPC approval to build a shelter over fuel tanks which are currently completely exposed to the weather, which creates an inconvenient. and potentially dangerous situation. APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Streets Department. LOCATION: 1080 Power Plant Road. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to build a shelter over an open vault where fuel tanks are located. The tanks are on the south side of the building and cannot be relocated without having to address substantial building and fire code regulations that have been adopted since the tanks were initially installed. The shelter has a gable roof and will be open on all sides. The roof will be corrugated metal to match that on the rest of the City Shop. Staff finds the shelter will not have any significant impacts on the historic structure. No demolition is caused, the materials are compatible and the openness of the shelter means that the historic structure is not unnecessarily obstructed from view. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal does not affect the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the fuel tank shelter as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the fuel tank shelter at 1080 Power Plant Road as proposed." 0 December 3, 1997 ASPEN CITY SHOP FUEL TANK ROOF DESCRIPTION The proposed roof cover is for two large existing "above ground" fuel tanks located in an existing concrete structure at the Aspen City Shop. Currently, rain and snow create standing water and ice in the concrete enclosure which is a rust problem for the fuel piping, as well as a safety hazard for personnel accessing the tanks for refueling, etc. Due to space constraints at the site and revised Fire Code requirements, relocating the fueling area is not a viable alternative. The current situation poses safety issues which a roof cover would alleviate. In a recent meeting with Stephan Kanipe (Aspen Building Department) and Ed Van Walraven (Aspen Fire Department) the current configuration of the roof cover came about as a mutually agreed upon solution to satisfy Building and Fire Codes. The open wood-framed gable roofed structure will allow for emergency fire access. It will have with corrugated metal siding and roofing in order to be compatible with the other existing buildings at the site. 0 0 1. 4 1, i .,1.61 4 . r 'Â· ~" , 'JI~'~i' c_l!! !,1. --- ~ 1 1 Â· 1 , 74 Â· , *0 E t. 11 j 111~1 1 -1-:1 W 71 11 Lilli (I~I-' 1 1 1 1 %11 11. 011!1 'lili 1 . 1 1 ?11~11, 10'...4- -- .. i 2 N H 4 1 . 91 8.~ti Â· ji-/'1.-,-:,ite. 1, Â£ ." 21: ..1 1 e M ~ 13- 4&*Ci:t- ..F==t Ir ....1.1.10'Â¥,5 -,7 . ~ 11 41 1* #11 18 1 3 21 1 .11 . 4 \C 8 1 I ld:, i:'. 4%11 0 1 ~44if 41 11 h Â· ' Ihir lilli' Al .....,1- ..'ll. 1.1 121* I .... 94 . '11 1 ..1 1;.1. 1.-4.:,J, I:.f ./ ;1 11.1 â€¢~ % t. 1 lit . . lk.W.T.,1 11111.-i 2.31.-1. ~ 4.i.*1 -~416 1!Â£ p -Â· L 441 . 4 * Ir J 4'i ~, T 2 . Â¢,f"-' ,>5 .'43--2---42, & 4.",3 .4-04 2 '11'111 1 - ~ 0 /4 - *. 5,0,436 --ir'-1-3 : 1 ' ' V ~~.li~-~Â·Â·1. Pill-' ' FloÂ¢5~ . 1 111 .11,111]11. 4 1 T,-/ 9,-Â· :,2,%./-4- i:1 -' Â· ' . 1.1 ..2 -111,1 1/1.1,1,1 1 1 ./ 1 1'Â· i /' Â·Â· i i ~ , 1 19 1 1. lili 1 1 . 11 0~1 ..4 4.*11. L t.j e 4 2 . 1 . , ~~ 1,111~111 11 11 11;1.1; 1. 1.- Illik--:.-3:t,;ti,;141ltÂ©,4'ie i 1.11- I. V f ''T 1, d 7/l P I lA ~41,21...81$4*1 il :' 1 J 4,111 1,% 1 1 1 - WL' 11:' | ' - ~ '*8! 1 '.4 , r Ig - J |JI ' ''~ ~1,1111 1.11,1.1,1 11. 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1,1 11111 111' 11 .. 1 /A l 111 .L 1-~ /111 17.1 17 1,0.1.1 +11 .f ;:.'ly- t.. D t. Ad 35 :,' *i.fim Â¥Ld-Jk:91 :i '2,0,4 1 Il-=..44,7.' -161191 44 1 0.114 0. 1 1,411'Eli *.,rc' 1 &&/I--..ir -44-9-1Â®4#2**4 . 11 ..1 'llm al RJ' <1,1)11..!1 1,111'L'!1:11'ill~.1 1;1~.::i~~'Â· '''i.11~ lili:1: ~1 1~ :.~- ., 111 , i~.1,,:~_ 6 2 0449!Ill' 40.14 1 11 11 11,11.1111'll .1,1.1,1.11. lip l. 1 1 'J 1 1 1..,1.111111 1 1111,11 1111,11,1..:1 1 1,~1~@Ill~I ~111 i 1 1 1 1 . 11.1 ,"tiv-/*03-4~ ;4; -1 3111:111 6 lili 4 .W 1 i k b' 148" ' ~~~t-', 0,/.'~1~yy 04* 1 Jill 1 111 .2 .-11 .1.1 11!.1 .' 1 .11~~Ill * 1 1 1 11 . &*%# .1.1.1,2 'A]~11.11 ..11~1 11:till,1 11-6---t'If-,7//////~ rae 0 , 1 6%, 4 IN' 1 41 #MEÂ·,4,...~ I 44....â€ž.:*,6:.'-Â·fitÂ·f:â€¢ || '1 'ril I ' il ~ ./ r Y. ' It 1 4 1 - .Ay 1,1. 1 ' 1 1 14. 1 ,t ~ %.1 0 0 39VHOIS >INVi lan=I DNI1SIX3 dOHS AllO NEIdSV 1/ 1 1 -- <4 1 . . A Â· - - -UX.-9 f I \i / 9 11/k 1 - 00 \ 4 t \ 64 7, Â« C & 7 FEINA 46*,r < t MAINTENANCE SHOPS ki.=*Ric "e /1 ETEÂ© , A' t'~, g.1.- fool i . *.1. "~ BUILDING FOOTPRINT - >\\ 1?/i (5:Z,&2'Cc'~FAH ~C'Unrewve.I=PEE + . \ 7 \. , 9,4 \'A 4- ,-6 , , 1, 'L - \ 45'. n. 1 . I , I â€¢ A -Wcwta i %A X \ 11 .1 , IR' 116â€¢ -~A- /1\ Â· th Â¢ F 1 4,0 4 1 4..... -I. i *A Ap f / 0 ,+law 5 \ apÂ»7- 6 ADM INISTRAP oN /V#7-RANsmar,ai \.=25 . 1 illi covEKe ..i: ' 4 ./ly Aou-ovEr CUKO i % 7. - Â· 1 2&&808.-. r SpRM- 0 4 . 47 i rl l 4 /00' S PAA'N 1 + , rs lic- 025 +4 -rt=3 FRA/,4,16â‚¬ 1+ \ ~ 4116-# -- , 4 Â· . H.c. 5.-- 01' . Â£ mi '1!r .. . Â» 1 ; . 2. g â€¢ +' \ CURD - â€ž17_ A..Ne T. \ 9 / FOR BLEVAEr,ONS . CON;Â£8706; f 4 11 / 1 / d 7bp op QN# art.) 9/ PE WALK, ... : ~~~ * 9 / CON Fb*â‚¬8 la p# MEN: VALLaÂ·y VANS. / 6 0 / 90#677*s PLAN. 9 18 -3~f r 4, / W "Â£ 6 5//f .r NEW , I . 11. 11/. 41.- / '7 / 1 Pbe t 11 . 3 ~-1*ADU FAILK,NG ~ ~ 1--1 1 111 11 4 â€¢ 4 1 1 *Â»*4*NU*.%*r , 0 '.:. fil.I' . 1 444.1 111 , il I N - =-I-/7 1 4 h y HEATED STo RAGE- it . ELÂ· 100' \..7 -:- 1 .. 1 7- : /4. \\ 12'A. I . m . , 8'.1; I 4, 1.. New leoF.\\ i ijilill,1 6 . /A il 0 A m 92,0, , 7- D-, 4 , 10 - 1 4. " .1 . h h , - I \ *4860,me / I ~ â€¢ ji PISTZ#<842 â‚¬*e. , 2 11 if 4*~I~ A,â€¢BAs w. .. 4 20' 120 1 11 4/ A r / 4 .44 4 POP. 414 . 1 4 ' i % 1, '1 I ... 1 4 94 :,1 4,4 ~1 /4 4 FUEL- " 1/el- 9, SUâ€ž e . VAl/4- 1 . LANGS - e 4 4 444 /4 lin I * CoWER.Gil. Â· h ' 4 1 2%* 1 IN n p- : ALS- 3 Ir 6"VEL_ k / AgeA 1 , 4% 't f NJ \ 1 00" . .0- Irc#4~ ~ ..- 1 20=..h,... hk.lai 1 7- LU /47 -' N. 1 .]j-I 1 \ CR EE AC# 1 .. . 4 *' - I . . 1 , Â· 11 .2 1 1* 4. a .. . 4 . . l \ AL 1 46- . 70 . / . i / M ' ' 1 M 1 I. , - . 635.777,;:Tr-i--.~--Â·i.L=-1Tx.--il r,~rfim ASH.*N>e, p =610â€¢â€¢/ /: . , I.,ay 1 1 - 67?IÂ·li~-7-1774---:;,z~*li' ~ ,....4.-4 1 1 4... v . Ht#-8 I , . I - . 14. 7 ) 9 W 23- G "t , . 20 3-6*1 2 ic'2" ~ -- 4.-24 -M -4 -11,. 11 - IL N - n -11Â· 11Â· .9 - 81* 1 l . ' C r M' I p 1 -0 r-----1/ 1 =1 9 r 1 - 1 1 * 5-3 E r 5 11! Z &-- -rph .-' .. f -E~---1 ' . , FT 25 I . L_i. -* 1 31 11 11 Il 11 11 11 li li It 11 fal . le . Sk 4g if Al# 91 I iT 26* 6 Ull S Q< 1 a 1 15 lilli -1 -1 - - -- - ~4 ff I . ======= Z 11 1 1 V 1_ _ 2Â·Â£= . PROJECT: SCALE. Pu = 1 1- o U DATE: 12-/2/9-1 ASPEN OPry *lap - Fugh VAuwr jeoop DWN BY: SOS DRAWING NO. PROJECT NO. GIBSON & RENO . ARCHITECTS "'t. 210 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, STE 202 . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1 ON-A~ latal *old 1- '0119 A-La043 NollÂ¥h No llf/\2 2 H.lfloe 52LG to" i -1Â¥wn.Uilt 4,l-ape *-12 i CREE. VENT- 1Â¥_ 8, MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning DirectdA'\ 4,2, -4\4%, FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer ~ RE: Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes, Vested Rights, Resolution # ~, Series of 1997 DATE: December 10, 1997 SUMMARY: On September 24, 1997, HPC granted final approval for an addition and modifications to the seven original Trustee Townhomes (Units 2-9). The Townhomes are located at the Aspen Meadows and are listed on the historic inventory. All land use approvals are granted vested rights for 18 months. This period may be extended to three years by the review body which grants final approval of the project, in this case HPC. Vested rights protect the developer from any changes in the land use code that may affect their project. If a building permit is not applied for during the vested rights period, the approval expires and the project must be reviewed again. The applicant requests HPC approval for a three year period of vested rights. APPLICANT: Trustee Townhomes At-The-Meadows Condominium Association. STAFF COMMENTS: Section 26.52.080 establishes the procedure whereby vested rights may be granted for a period of three years from the date of a development proposal's final approval. There are no standards which must be met for approval of the request. Staff recommends that the 3 year vested rights period be granted finding that the project has received the approval of the Historic Preservation Commission and that allowing the owners three years to apply for a building permit is not in any way detrimental to the public interest. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC adopt the attached Resolution. Standard language as to the terms of the vested rights is included in the resolution as conditions of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # ~, Series of 1997." EXHIBITS: Resolution # ~ Series of 1997 A. Approved final drawings of the project. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVAIION COMMISSION APPROVING VESTED RIGHTS tt 7 FOR THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS LOCATED AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS, ASPEN, COLORADO WIIEREAS the applicant, the Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association has requested three years vested rights status for units 2-9 of the Trustee Townhomes, a property which is listed on the historic inventory; and WIIEREAS as part of the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area review, HPC was given authority to review any alterations to certain areas of the Meadows, including the Trustee Townhomes; and WHEREAS, the HPC did grant final approval for alterations to the Trustee Townhomes on September 24, 1997; and WHEREAS, the applicant requests three years vested rights status for said approval; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated December 10, 1997, recommended vested rights be approved as requested; and WHEREAS a public hearing, which was legally noticed, was held at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on December 10, 1997, at which the Commission considered and approved the vested rights request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That vested rights shall be granted for Units 2-9 of the Trustee Townhomes, located at the Aspen Meadows, Aspen, Colorado, with the following conditions: 1. The rights granted by this site specific development plan shall remain vested for a period of three (3) years from September 24, 1997. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded by this Code shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. 2. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; except that the period oftime permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication provided for in Section 26.52.080(D). 3. Zoning that is not part of the site specific development plan approved hereby shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. 4. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. 5. The establishment of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site development approval, the applicant shall abide by any and all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1997. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk - 2,9344760* U 4. d:MMe - f "lm-be \\ tme--4 0*<-< i 1 - PeÂ»81 i i 9000 r\. = /1 rk,%'5511 1 Liw 0 -- -l It 1/ -6666&,0* .- ------ , 41 1. 1 dr-0 2(*S 1\ ~ t==0\ 0 i\\ 4 -N+23*- ADPEN ,t tl MIS80,$ 1 Keep Bcul,Ne :â€žâ‚¬ -- ----- OWNHOM/5 22#1 7 \P"G. , Wi NÂ¢2>~ CU,ser p MEOK Ffofheix' - 0 - CRA*62:3 l 1. - Â«1 t*AL IF Mlabl Â£ 0 12&44/6&4-7/J: PlA,d __ 464ZB*rl- 0.----' 1 141'61*00" 1 .I. 9 Â· 14 91 - */1-./.-/--...........*..'......lillil- + I .'-1 I *1 - 1 - -P - -1.~ CueÂ¥9128>f - P.. re. 94X V rl '7- <15* 7.T- Ah ANONÂ« Â»04 4: 104.02401< .204Â¢441' .3 -5 2-4Â«>~2 ;34<.*9 1 .. 40 "1Â°te i tr--- - -*. -'.0 / , '11- - 11 - 1 Â¢ I ./ 4- - c 11_IU r lt- f --â€ž1~ ..., ' .. , 42' cat.1:*1â‚¬Â» 1 1 1 . I _E V 1 1 . . i -. ... .0. Lul_-11 1 ,Â· 11 6,2-43,12*â‚¬- .. 2 -1 -11-1 0 - 6 -LI . -1 1 1 \ 1 .L . 1 420Â«162@5 OF- feqa-t- t2zgS 1 1 4' io' 4 1,1 01 1 0 503*7 ~0#r 'k< . 0 ,{124:-+M .'' . 1 1 1 , Gil-11 .er 1 -. : 3 I i ' . -71' - . 0 I. - + HT fÂ¢e ~ ; .DIAND -*Pir+1 8490* 1 1 1 . - . 1 1 , . , 8,2 'r 1 . 1 . 6.91. 0 1 0 '' I - -1 ~ 1 - ~ 9 /1 4 1 5. 11 . 1 6 f 00 , ...... ... r . 1, 4 4 1 0 0 D '' I J . LUL--_1-4 1 -4 4 . r . 4 -t r . ~' *| 4- 4 4 41 a Zil eq~11 iwo aNÂ®rE 1 mden,14> t:taA l-DWEA- Of[ZONAL- 3 *61.Pb eamE *La/Â«lcd r . 1 O 51 lot ta , r- 8- a -- - 0 . 494,8,%4 . . I - WNur T- 1 . 6 0 0 0 5 1- - 1l - L -- 1 I Ft\11{1 1 25 i. I .1 It i 1 1-lilij-1 1 1 :11 1. I OFRdWL. . lit{[i' VENfluck~ : :4,%. 1 --*'A..#-,--37-1 AL: 1 1. 11 ,t' f W.4:;bw* 1.; tliji 01 :Â® 21 Â· ,Â· 1~ ~~~ . f ED<leNP S#/Cil ' 'i 4 f t. f :t':11$ 1 1 1 i E i , 1 % C ~ I ' 1 1}12) 14 WFd,5 91 MOF- , (:' 1 f , i ') illt .1 f tit}ifi IJ.1 illit H t ' i I 1 i i i t f Ill 1 6 1 : r) :ni; 411 lilli.!fi '1111!11,3....,11 i &'Fts~il ~1'9& 'itti:, UNTr 0-D nE *1401NAL- . 1- li .11'1 ..b /0 Jil . oFT#ck VEgrICOL elaNG' ~COM EUMERL.R\â‚¬84 - 1 0 11 41 101 i ---- .... I - L 1 - - r ... 1 6. Â¢,0 . 1 r $ ' *0 00 Ofirl:21*404Â£74 W,.titA*V 'Tril.L- 1 j %#C .. 13 41:0390 ~4- . . 4 . 4 I-. . . . .. 4 . . . i . .. .... .3 - _ - 11 0 0 0 . ... 0 Cat. ce.9,2 11Â£25 .... ... 0 0 . 1 0 ... . ..., I . . .. . 1 8, #UN 100~1 ELEW&1cd ~ - 1 1~ -E-4 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Difecto~ Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Direct(~ri ~,3,] ~ FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer ~ RE: 234 W. Francis Street- temporary relocation and lightwell DATE: December 10, 1997 SUMMARY: HPC recently approved a renovation of this structure, which included changes to the garage area and a new kitchen addition. The applicant wishes to excavate a basement below the existing structure, which requires HPC approval for temporary relocation. In addition, lightwells are proposed for light and egress from the basement space. APPLICANT: Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects. 0 LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: No temporary relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, established pursuant to Section 26.76.090, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay District, shall be permitted unless the temporary relocation is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(F). F. Standards for review of temporary relocation. No approval for temporary relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the standards of Section 26.72.020(D)(3) and (4) have been met. 3. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts ofthe relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: A letter has been submitted by Patillo Associates Engineers to verify the structures suitability for relocation. 0 4. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance ofthe physical relocation. Response: The building is to be raised approximately 6 feet vertically from its present location. It will be supported there on I-beams while the basement is excavated. Staff recommends that a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond be provided in the amount of $30,000 to guarantee the safe replacement of the building onto the new foundation. The applicant shall provide information as to the current appearance of the foundation. This appearance must be retained or recreated when the building is set back in place. Please note that the applicant intends to separate the building walls from the floor plate and construct a new floor. Again, trim boards or any other features in this area must be retained and put back in place. As a general comment, the applicant must be aware that no exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. ORDINANCE 30 Lightwells: All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street facing side(s) of a building must be entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building facade which is closest to the street. Response: The applicant has provided site plans which indicate two possible solutions to meet the light and egress requirements for the basement. One scenario shows the lightwell on the west side of the building, adjacent to 2nd Street. This location requires a variance from the Ordinance 30 standard stated above. The second alternative shows two smaller lightwells on the east side of the building, which do not require a variance and will not be easily visible from Francis Street. Staff recommends this plan be approved. /'- 1 RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve < (3 ' the temporary relocation of 234 W. Francis Street and lightwells with the following conditions: 4 411 -S; flu 1. A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond in the amount of $30,000 is to be provided prior to building permit to ensure the safe relocation of the building back onto the new foundation. 0 2. The required lightwells are to be on the east side of the house as presented by the applicant. 3. The applicant shall provide information as to the current appearance of the foundation. This appearance must be retained or recreated when the building is set back in place. Trim boards or any other features in this area must be retained and put back in place. 4. No exterior materials on any part of the historic structure may be removed without the prior approval of HPC, excepting those areas that were approved for remodeling on October 8, 1997. 5. All conditions ofthe October 8,1997 minor development approval must be met. 0 0 1 4 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM i 1. Project name MOLUNS RENO*<RON 0 2. Projecp location 20#' W&57- '984/0:10 :065%E;r~ 01* 4 4 Â¢A 1 1 &10Â«- 118 7 +Opew 60 (indicate street address, lof'and block number or metes and bounds description) | 3. Present zoning /0*. 4 Lot size 92'de 92Â· /97 1 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Zi:W,~Ac#V MUU-INS . 4644 poÂ«OAK 8*# DRIVEE ) 40/TE 14* 1.leu*ToN 7)( 115- btl-1.461t 6. Representative's name, address. and phone number 66*0'00**EX 14000 *MOME> Un MIOUND-Ava, N#d4-60 Â»14 911-4AM- 44 ! 7. Type of application (check all that apply): ! Conditional Use Conceptuai SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review -__ Final SPA Final HPC .- 8Ozl0 Greenline _ Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD v~- Relocation HPC 1 Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark 1- GIVIQS allotment GMQS exemption . Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization - - Design Review 0 Lot SpliVLot Line Â· Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedtopms, any previous approvals granted to the propeg)9/0 mot)- F~WINE'10Qbt,M*+ t) 4~lioitÂ·Mt.FK ) 4 NL PANkla- REA'WENZe 4 60"9% PrÂ· 1 1 8}1 00,Q.1,46% 110UNa 9. Descn ption of development application zÂ»V*;â‚¬6520224/ dÂ¥=:/10%/,0'ZEM*3*EM/' uNDEA- HIEN f auell/691Roauve> ARRUIR)A)611EM#OANÂ«4) ~atnOd- #60Â¢MTON (M**m**44 U Reti) Â©F 12Â»9nkle Alm#1 0{U smucrv 10. Have you completed and attached the foHowing? , Attachment 1- Land use application form i Attachment 2- Dimensional requiremerits form Re:sponse to Attachment 3 1 -- Re'sponse to Attachments 4 and 5 i .2 1 1 1 PATTILLO ASSOCIATFS ENGINEERS, INC. STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS 715 Grand Avenue â€¢ P.O. Box 751 (970) 945-9695 â€¢ fax (970} 945-4921 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 c-mail: rpattil!*paengrs com December 3.1997 Studio B Architects 555 North Mill Street Aspen. CO 81Â¢ 11 re. Residence at 234 West Francis Avenue Aspen, Colorado To Whom It May Concern: It is the prof'ess; onal opinion ofthe undersigned that with reasonable care and adequate bracing, the original nineteenth century two-story portion of the residence located at 234 West Francis may be successililly moved from its present foundation and moved again at a later date to a proposed reconstructed foundation at its present location. Moreover, the proposed interior renovations will result in improved structural integrity and performance for both the substructure and the framed portions ofthe building shell to support current code-required snow, earth, and floor live loads This office was previously involved with a similar renovation project for the adjacent Carriage House in 1993. The temporary relocation of that building was successful, even though its original structure was in poor condition. We are available to assist the owner and contractor with the review of the bracing plans and with observation ser/ices during the move. Sincerely, ANTHEM' pf'4,0 lA _ :~%*69% 4# 0. V .6.,2 9 1 .., V : 2 Robert'M. Patt LIc, P.E, Mt 16794 3*1 5.-34 9. o r r. 4, L; e 9. ~ 41'WONA-# # .-4 tÂ«- OP RMP/Nk *'*'/'Â·2'CH,aguz. 0 Â»T I Â¢ i<*1 /6 0 40 1 1*0 + 8 architects 2 December, 1997 Attachment 4, Submission Requirement 1: Overview: Temporary Historical House Relocation Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. City of Aspen, Colorado The existing historic house was constructed in 1888 and is connected to a later-built, non-historic breezeway and garage. We are proposing to lift the original structure vertically approxi- mately six feet in order to excavate a new basement level. During the excavation, the house shall stay in this position on site. We are consulting and plan on working with Bailey House Movers, who have performed several successful projects of this nature in the City of Aspen. They are planning to separate the existing walls from the existing main floor. They will then place temporary beams and ledgers (exhibits A and B) in appropriate positions to lift the re- maining structure. The original defective floor will then be removed. 0 After the structure is lifted, supports will then be constructed, with the approval of a structural engineer, to facilitate the construction of a new, poured-in-place, concrete foundation. The tem- porary supports will then be removed in a prescribed manner to lower the house onto the new foundation in a position identical to the original. The exterior wood siding shall be placed 6-8 inches from grade per code with little of the new concrete foundation showing. 0 555 n mill st. asnen co 81611 970Â·920Â·9428 fax 970Â·920Â·7822 6 ' 2*4 4tj joet(072) Ey-/sr,Nl 4/ Ew fr, pj OXÂ£/ 5-17117 , 1 ./ steÂ°122,4 /2 e 1 2>" n'lic.e-al- *cvt 669ond 4 ~3 7- 404tk- 2 la-1 601-ri f \ f & Euen.1 vrud 1 2 /0/ 2 L.Le'604 B 6(.,20Â£.1 dud /1 ~ 11 \ / -- --- ---1 ----- --77 '16.1 4, 't E~ 964Â£>Â©DA222 8 / I ,56*#02 1 1 t - .-- le" S-TREk-, 3-'~64-ph -, ~ 24 -- . ----- 7 SCA LE 64679 82(g F. joj~ 1~~. i.*w 4,6 *1006 : , =2 49,39 r--ammi--1 1 Del 0-0â€ž 'lliMÂ»fÂ»11_11 -' Ir . ' , . 1 . . - -39#~02 -1%3 /4*M=:*7 4< 29*94*L - z<z---9*9#*11Â£ -&+2&9**5, . ' ..... t . 4 - . I . .. ' ... . I . . .- . . /--r -\1 - - - 9 ,. -r. n - - c---â‚¬e)*E* 6.40,81. ,-- < F., 1 1 / Fi / 1.~in,P. :$4Â£62* ~0471----*--- - - 14.. IL . 9 A W .1 31:mlillyll - -l _tÂ©EDUE V#*1455(eFÂ¢â‚¬_ 6-1 0% V /11 WBEL- ---- . Arr v- 1 \l 7,1 7*#*225-6 N.e Â¥ Nal A /1,24 4 1 /1 t. - N 1 K \ T--- . .. 3 1 V, 71 -/1. lim . . I r 0 0 LE--1--19 - I .4 k /*0Â»4299 /92/KAS faa#247*yj tÂ£,06~ . 4 flooRJ FE>UNEÂ»fo 0/1 Â£*rAI L MOLU 09 Ras. C. 2 4;9<- t- ~~ ~ t 4. . 5 I te . .. i S â€ž 7 5,1 j R *\ , 1 . .t ..... 1: . Â· Â·Â· ./1 2 . 1 -.:! 1 - CO .1 . . /. i 19Â·. 4 1 . V/ '0 ; ./ I I .; I. 94 ; -1 , Â· Â·*f " . 'â‚¬9 3,4 t: '2 ' J I ..' ... I 1 i . '1 1, . 9 7-/4 , & 1 J. . ....=f 1 1 9 6 015 :~ .Si f ., x>jpxx~x>c>xxx &.~04Â» \\9\\ \\> y... .\4\\ \-~Â·.i< 4>41\~\0.\ '%1\Â·,acc,31 :: Â·Â·Â· Â· .. . 0 1 r .1 -. & p.. ' t:.. Â·Â· . I.!.. .. e +, , ... ' i i J , . ~ 71 , , , .. 1 /.. 4 . e . . , 0 1: \ / 1 1.- .. lism D 11 \4 + T . , :. 1 11-H 2 i Â· *4 . . 4 0 0,0.1 (1. . . 1. .4, I Â· 1:.Â·-, il :Fi ' â€¢ 17 . 1. 1 ; . . 7 , '... I *, .... 3' .* ,4 w. i , Â· 1 1 4,1'.; . 1 - Â· Â·~~ 11Â· ~Â·" ~Â·â€¢---â€¢61â€¢~Â· 9 Â·, Â· i' , | . 9Â· '~ â€¢'~'~~ 1 2"(r ' .. . 6: 1 , u/ -,,Â·i . --4 , .. . r----Â· , 1 1 ..2 r ~' ~ '~ ' * -Â· Â·r 44'.6.~**fit . n.. ., 2,4 . . 4. a . /1. , i .,1 . Â· f ./ 11,:.1.0, I e .1,Â£ A .L . / 1" ,-- 1, 0) / 51 4 K'.11 4% 't .3 , L 1.1Â»9-'r'* IKIkiX-R'~ax \\\I' 1 1 / :.. 1 Â· Jf " Â· 1 . . l 12 ./ I . . 0.1 0 1 1, t,Â· I ...1Â· . ,,. 4 LE 1 1 ., - 1 . '11. 1 $ . .L 11:.. .4 1 t . 0. 1 t P /.4. , 1-1 I , 1 1 V 1, . V'' .1 . , , -- ' ... ~+.1/ I Y.e .11 'b Â·A_K .Â·e ..1 , 4 ' ' i - it '44,7/'.,1--. ' . Â· c.\19 4, 1 .., , Â· Â· â€¢ 1 / V ..r# ... Â¢ .1 1 . . ..-tw + , . ...0 V ' , 1 - . 2. :*re.. , I El ;2 4:.3 f e., I . 7 / , . 4 6.. 1 - C 't C> , d + 1 :' I. : ..1 ; i . 1.4 ya 1 1 1 6.- ri ty. .. .+ 2 +21 1-4 *>Â«17 1-- ' 9 f<f" !~7- -mir ~.F,(459.70,124.1, AÂ·G,'7 .**4 Â·J' ; 4 & 1. . ./LO '0 4,g: .ji. 1 I -'I ' .r, R .. w 4 1 Â·-2 -l-- 1 P .2 2 - . i , I. 4./. .4 .f 4 .3.~I - 13. / . 46 1 1 - 1Â¥Jt, A,64 1 0 ALLEY (20' R.O.W.1 --222=--___ 009' ' ~;+4 .AA ' 4/0/0K$//- ~/4/'~/'~2./*~,4~4: Â· . d 2.:,11.4 'fill d -' . aÂ» PÂ·? 122Â·1'Ff:.3--; -Il. I. 1% IJ C 4Ed/' Â· 22.2' B L O OK 48 --- N N I. C 1. LOT K LOT L LOT M . ..0, 1.14 1 Temporary Historical House Relocation - Mullins Residence 234 West Francis St. I City of Aspen, Colorado l2.I' -~~- The area shown crosshatched represents the location of CE. I. the existing, historical, wooc framed, two-story house. 1 .... This structure will be lifted vertically approximately six 0 -,I17 feet. Temporary supports will then be constructed to ' facilitate the construction of a new, poured-in-place, Q | concrete foundation. The temporary supports will then be removed in a prescribed manner to lower the house onto r, ar | the new foundation in a position identical to the original, 1 41' 0-il 1 - I OVERHANG kia 20.50 W cl Â· O - - to 1 11/2 STORY FRAME e 1.r o Z i A . Â« 1,41 ~ II ~ li Blillil lil I i L \. . . FLAGSTONE./ ~ P W/BASEMENT < WALK 1 111 00 1 \CONB. 1 sra,P 2.8 t 4 al//tlf/lII~4ll:1/1Â»- DECK 1 u_.1 1 DI 30.00' 30.00' 3 .00, N. 75Â°09' 114 W. 90.06 b % x - FENCE N 4 I n 56+UE- 1 ==1-0 ... (A 14 - 1 // \\ EDGE OF ROAD --* FRANCI S STREET (74.72 R.O.Wl 7#16 19*N INQ> 16 k */ OF A ikeyloAJ OP k 0Â»W) 06 Refj*93*)17065 AN IMPROJE,45+1-1-- 40RNef â€¢j) 1*61Â«PHY 19( St*ver' rvoweA 492-1- t. *214< 6#ABL- 1 F L.S. D>get) }109 ~ 1191l- SITE/RELOCATION PLAN: Mullins Residence, 234 West Francis, Aspen, CO - -tuX 100.00' rn,830!S 100 ....... 1 --- 4 ':218Â£ bve A,46 A,-94 t-- 9 ~cotut41 h*We- /3 -17 I da ird di// -+t l#lf, -UMm,0,+ ijrf- Â»14K i 88/4 1 . le//2-#e:$4 '4*21. AL#ve . I -..0.32,3* 40 Vok 01220Â¢&9-â€¢74 ~ . r Ils.An=.2-*4Â· 1 ' _ I / lek Â·:Â·.. A 225/- -- &*t- /. lili - - I. ... Vr AL* . . - - _f U U I d.==2 - - : 1-41 , .:. -.,r . r Â·,4 â€¢UN' -~' - .. +" ,/- ' 1.1 7.-$/'I-Â· 14. Y. .' - 34 , 'U-Â· .bp. , -Z*42Â«_ _- 1 - -IE 1425 1 - 1 1 1 - .Ii Â·..... R# ' A . 1, 1 -- 1 . 911. g -1 - 4- I -Ip. -- ~ift ; I ' ..4 -i . 1 ~ 1 il.- M. i 27 0 V - t . :41 ... - 7 --*.3 $ : 816 23.5 --11-~ 0 -64 : : : 1 , 1 '.1,4 *k + 1 - 3 4/4 - rh~ 3 /7/b#*40 404 Loo.700 . Â« Ly,-21, : ./2- / e . 1 H YET,1 / ' 4=* 1 r ~ 5Z'823%* . - - . 1 â‚¬SEr , ra j C.-9049 / 2,LE 7&9*El& 1Â« & (Lot. 1.COÂ¢rtohÂ» i f./ , 4*: - /3 A If- b It - U ..2 ..9/ it 21 0. i (10 85 044100#~ -1 iiI, 1 r * J v - '5611~0504 . 1- 1. it , â‚¬ 'D I ~tf -~ T{ . * 14*0 90,/2 4091,25 ~1Â«-- 1145 PM,mod b 1 74 *3 1 41 MDVe. terweeA Â£ 9 --- ~ .pÂ©*Ped.< zestiv,%2 0 ,Â£2*2*,2 ARMA f ,$2. 1 1,4 E R 41L Sle#( WAU. A/%202 2/0 Â»f. 4 1 1 1 i le 7- _-2 1 /le**5+0,=44 I \12 4\ 4 ..DE 1i A-, 71 Â· - 1 g 3 M 1 I 1 44 - 0 1-1 - 11 1. 7--rs*83_2*ii.* - p -1, 00'-Ap:4-44*,re.%. *, r Â· "tri ,1 1:-â€¢Â· -;- 47.--39 .MÂ» ",-2:1--:74-.3/ r j~.,1 : ~ 1==Uy C - =*4 Â· - 3 2, U*17W#U- 106+FIEEO NEAEL '. RIEQUIRet, A-PC- Af.*7+4- Â»i:sepÂ¢*~r " 1. 1 1.- a ma ,;*tiA+90 1.1 (13**EMENT P*A @*cieeos 1 000 41, 77105'21=aâ‚¬% L l./6047*0U+ NREE= REAUIRÂ»Â©h -. - 2'ff 0 , . ,. i .4 Â«1 'eNA i "T LÂ·~1â„¢Â·,-1k Vt' ik.'R/' \13.4 YA n':,4 '141 , Nom \ Aby 45771 ** air 3,1 f-;~3~32533Â¢i <f;}lfÂ©'*9BriT9=1,-':-1.2:*~332~2.:.~,v-.fÂ·if~ff~DZOE#W~A.~.W.Af*,~ '11,44' F.11 -19" rs' ,"r Al. -*'-; 48 1- f ! S, 19,4. .,SI e , 1.2 . r :97.9 Â»,A , 4 -: tii 1 ] 1 0---2-U 1 \ 1,4.; IÂ·M 11 'de 7 f, e m 1 1&442' -~*=m 0â€¢29.rÂ·*.Â·*Ai~pr------ L -#.v*.*-*** v : -- - g .*11 4 / 1 :P A bÂ· _#fLF'ki Jti. rh I 1 1, 0,/1/*v,&49/ 1 ZE'E*~A& *4;*AN*lf.'%436$44244*#iM***Aci~'-2.9+ -4'b:Â· Â·Â·-9,9 1.-2-4+47 Â·564; h'Â·I: 8 4, ,Â· . ~-:c -10 c ) 4)11' - Iii 1 Â·ri~ 1 1 9 1-: - - - - -' p-1/ =r- 1 li --- Â·- -Â· ~ g tt 2% 1 1=*24 A 1\ * 1 81 -li 'it 1 P 111 ::1 ':,ft E3 1A #1 i,-4 1 *91 Y .0, P i Fe T.â€¢ 4-9-9,17* F.21 " 0 Â£ - - 0--- - rl 94 - 1 ., 1 14 -=:IMP r , *41/ -1-1- r I. 1 1 4 4 L W# E , 1 1 .. 7.4/T Bil-# 4 3~13 i; 511 3 1 4..94 't , .1 1 *tUL. ' ' t.,2 1 f '. S .74 Zil Â¢ I 1 - I - g 'Il - 1 ' ir' 4 Ail ..Â¢: flti p j 1111 ' KÂ¥ *4 4.--44 1: 1.-RFEPX*=4=% r ( 4.3 ' 4 ' U Â· 4 i 1 1 M l it' 4 4 1,k 4.f F k f 8, 1 ,0 i 1 1, -MIT- Ii,73'reÂ»r,Va.11.l ~ -,A,;,r- -4 46 . 6 t///H'. 4/ T,i M i . . Â·- Â· . 3 ~ .{4*} . ...- TZVWK*#544*~449,~Â· .6:,p:, ifi!.~:"~4 Â·J -':47'1**0Â·:A#2.' -1.ort:':~ r,~77:422Â©1'%449 'Â·l & 4.-Â·r'Â·5'Â·Â·Â·ff.,*44.49.444â€žArk,77Â· '1-C; 1 ,.,,3.:1:9,--,47,<61*Â»'17--Wht.fle.,;li-45 ..47.4, ,-, A;,132*02:ayil . 14- - (<awer)9 -rlaNU-tfen EiDÂ¢NÂ»tu d 700-12 _LugwÂ» 14,<V GLG i --, 2 Z*â‚¬ ,Â»ws MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directo(if Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Directot 1~fi] FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Marcel Breuer house- worksession DATE: December 10, 1997 Earlier this year, a demolition application was submitted to the Building Department for a house which is located in the County, at the Northstar Preserve. The house was built in 1949 for James Smith and was designed by Marcel Breuer, an internationally famous architect. Attached is a brief background on the house and information on Breuer's career. The house was not included on Pitkin.County's Historic Inventory. Although the house is eligible for the State Register of Historic Places, and possibly the National Register, the County found that they were unable to prevent the issuance of a demolition permit for a number of reasons. The new owner of the property has no interest in restoring the house. Staff has worked through their attorney to make an agreement that the house may be relocated. The Aspen Meadows has been identified as a possible receiving site because of the natural relationship between the Bayer architecture and the modernist Breuer home. At this time, staff is seeking initial feedback from HPC for this new location. An amendment to the Meadows Specially Area will have to be taken to City Council and require a public hearing and HPC's support for the relocation may be important to their decision. 06-18-97 05:43 PM FROM SADA TO +970 920 5439 POl WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS INC 412 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN CO 81 8 11 Amy Arnidon Historic Preservation Committee 130 S Galena St Aspen, CO fx 920.5439 RE: Smith Residence, North Star Preserve, Aspen, CO Client: James Smith, Under - Secretary to Admiral of Navy under Eisenhower administration G3-61) was a resident of Washington, DC and summered in Aspen. Later, he and his family moved to Aspen full time. Arch itect: Marcel Breuer Year Built: 1949 Site: 700 + acres Nonh Star preserve -- Aspen, CO. Program: Single family vacation home with Staff quarters. Later a full time residence -- 1. Smith, his wife, two daughters, and a son. One ofthe daughters, Sandra Smith, currently resides in Missouri Heights, but is not sympathetic to preservation given the recent sale of the property. 0 Structural system: walls: Masonry bearing wall, concrete frame. floors: Cantilevered concrete slab with radiant floor heal. Comments: 1. Art early example of radiant floor heat - floors are massive and finished in field stone. 2, A series of insensitive alterations Include: a. filling in a breezeway/ entrance that connected the driveway side of the house with the Preserve side to the east. b. a 'colonial' bay window and office addition to the south. c. Glass walls filled in with solid wall panels in the living room and kitchen. d. deck reconfiguration and incompatible handrails. 3. A great example of Brewer's 'long house' concept developed successfully in numerous residential projects in the east A skylight system, completely hidden from the exterior, manipulates daylight in a dramatic and practical way through the ceiling plane. Best wi5hes and Good luckl, 41/L 0 Willisâ€ž C 970 920 1727 - NCAR8 - AIA FX 970 820 4461 ~ 920 5439 PAGE:01 286 BREUER, MARCEL ouâ€¢ name, but failed to enhance the family reputa- thâ‚¬ *rtisf Chaft ziny orher influcneÂ¢ including the tion. Brettingham's Royal Academy classmate 'Stijl.' ... His preoccupation has 1}WayS been JOHN SOAME,urored him in Iraly to nagreat avail structural &114 I don't remember him co have becn In succession to WILLIAM BLACKBURN Bretting- under inyone's spell for 1080" (Gropium to Peter ham'a practice confisted chiefly of provincial kils. Blake, January 10.1949). Betwem 1928 and 1931, He also did 50mc minor alteracions. Biwer worked as an archirect in Berlin. One house Pl**RE DE LA RufF)NEARS DU PREY commission in '00'iâ‚¬5baden was for a wealthy Inan- uacturer, Harnisehmacher, for whom Gropius WORKS had already designed a house, in the course of *1709, DownpacriekJail, Couniy Down, Ireland. 1790, which he had introdw,cd Brever. This was fol- Temple of Concord, Audky End, England. * 1791- 1794, lowed by a (bur-year period of travel and $rudy in Counry Jail. Northampron, England. '1793-1794, France, Spain, Morocco. Swimerland, Germany, County)ail Reading, Eng]ind- Hungary, md Greece, rerminaring in 1935 when Gropius iuankied for Breuer co come to England BIBLIOGRAPHY where he worked as 3 designer foI Isokon Lami- BorrON, AMâ„¢UK T. (ed;[or) 1927 716, Po,y,mt q Sir nated Furniture and Bubscqucnrly as an arrihitÂ¢c! in 12*â€¢ Sâ€¢=2 London: Si,John S~mna Museum Pub]J- partnceshIp with FRANC!8 R. S. YoRKE. In 1937 cations. BRUTT1ATLHAM. WArrlia 1*. 'The Bmfin~;112.m Bre:~Rer followed GIopitis r(3 1~ University co Family of Norfolk." tgarrA=m:*7 6, nos. 3 8: 4:51- assist him as a research asiocilize in the Master's 55 dass. Breue, became an associate profeNsorin 1938 DU PREY, PlaRRE OB LA RUFFINIALE 1977 Jobs and remaincd in thar position until ]947. Hisedu. Sgiene'J .4rrbin,tur./ Ed#Cation 173340, Ncw York: cational phdosophy was Similar co Gropius's Garland. own-thfic of developing each individual srudents own potential and of experimenting wirh many differeni solurions. Their srudenrs became promi- ncn, in arthice,ruir and planning eduacion ind BREUER, MARCEL practice; among them aft EDWARD L, BARNES, Marcel lajos Breuer (1902-1981), a doccor'& son, I. M. PEI, ELIOT NOYES, EDUARDO CATALANO, was a narive of Ptcs, Hungary, where he aircuded Charles Burchard, HARRY SE] DLER, Archux Davis, J, school. From 1920- 1924, he was a student in the Frederic Day, EN{11.10 DuHABT, Lowis Bry, John furnirute design workshop ai the Weimar Bau- Hart<ness, Ernest J. Kump, Samuel Hurst, and haus. When the Bauhaus moved w Dessau, be John C. Parkin benme 1 "young mascer" in che same studio, fe The two archicects were in private pncrite toÂ· maining there unti] 1928. 1Â£ was during this time gerber until 1941 when an incident in a faculty at the Bauhaus fhac he designed his famous steel meeting lcd to che end of their collaboncive work, mbe chair which he named, after his friend Kan- but noic of their ron,munication nor of Gropius's 1-L K dinsky, rhe Wassily chair. Though Breuer became supporr of Brener. When the UNESCO commic- impacient with the program of the Bauhaus and mt to select archirects for the new Paris headquar- later disclaimed its inlluence. WArrn GROPIUS cers building *rempted evcry arcihe on behif of mcalled: "[ believe char the pfrliminisy course of LE COUUSIER, himself a facmbet of the commitÂ· the Bauhsus cuiriculum (Iruen and Albe,s) and tee, Gropius, also a member. persuaded it ro sco:pc the subMequcnr expeticrices in the workshop had Bre,xer, BEANARD ZEHRFUSÂ£ and PIn LUIGI mote ro do with Breuefs finding himsclfas a cres- NEWL Gropius wroce about Breuer: "His out- Bne:,er. .4.M",619/""Mall'll.agil/mill"ll"Rom/3/4.* fe@*6~-44;A.F.: a.,6. %7*Ur '9-.4 -, 4/INAMEF i Brely Holde. New C.maam, Comzediaa. G9<<rt,/1.2 'iâ€¢â€¢~ * 1,~272.ff~ 71'/.I//R#//tr-:.-*lrm}-r'32.'tikir#*.n*'#a,/~91/...#13",i5#644"6,2,v:.1 . I947 ,Â· 44 $#,1113-1~13 .Al UE ./ 91., ?Â·, Â·, 4Â·,â€¢ irm:JBJU)UZEWI[&11ild.;2â€¢,- .Â· /~~lgliliC.Ill#*42* ' Â¥ '04. #ry< 0 -7?* ..u ---30<~MMWO- Post-Ir FELE Note 7671 'F,=L!&* 94* 1 JUN-25 97 11:17 FROM:PATRON ACCBUNTS ~11ZEZ__ _ TO:+970 920 5431 PAGE:02 BRIDGEMAN, CHARLES 287 atanding qualicy was his completely unbiased Â£10-125 in Gyorgy Kcpcs (cdiror), The .41#46 mind and the independence and boldness with 0*â€¢. New York: Biwiller. wbich he attacked technical and adthetic prob. MircHCOCK, H. R. 1938 2Wa,wipt Birrer awd,beAmer, lems" (letter co Peter Blake, Janule, 10, 1949). gn *aay,@s in Aditam,n. Cambridge, Miss.: Lines credired fo Brewer gre &id ro dmciibc hiE M.I.17. Pest Jow. CEANS'roN (odittic) 1962 M.f 81.Ir approach co design: B#Ungâ„¢nd Pmjet#, 1921-861. New Yotk: P[*gil Color, which you can hear with um: PAPACHRESTOU, TIC:AN 1970 M.:mt B,Fuer.Â· N= Sounds zo see with,yes; fluiWing, and P,+w. New Yock: Pcagger The void you touch with your elbows; The tage of aptice on your fongue; The fiagranet of dimensions; The jake of stone, BRIDGEMAN, CHARLES In 1973, the Merfopolitan Museum of Arc in 01*des Bridgeman (?-1738) isiley figure in [he New Yotic held its Arsr one-man architecture evolution of che English landscipe garden show; it was on Brcuer's work. His work in [hit ,;hich-as le jay,Â§Â» anglais, de, mglische Ganeâ€¢, or c,hibirion m,ged fem chaies to counny houses i/,iddi#f inghs,-wns to sweep eighteenthÂ·cenÂ· thal appear co grow our of Ehe ground, to huge cory Europe As ,ucb. Bridgeman played a crucial monolirhs and reflecced Brewer's diversifted ability role in the fransition from thegeomerric layouri of in bo[h precise detoiling and massive buildings the late 16005 and early 1700$ to the hter designs which had become in,reasingly Nculptural. Con- of WILLIAM KENT and LANCELOr ("Capabllirf') trast 11so marked Breuer's week in rhe use of mace- Bao,ew. Bridgeman's chiefolkial poit was as coyal garÂ· cials, for eximple, glaa against rough slant. dener co George II and Queen Caroline from 1728 REGINALD R, ISAACS to 1738, in which he was successor zo HENRY WORKS WIsE, who had held che posicion under Queen 193 1-1932, Harnischmacher Mouse. Weisbaden, Ger- Artne. While he was involved between 1726 and many. 1938. Haggerry HousÂ¢ (wigh Wairer Groplus>, 1738 with che royal gardens and parks mr Hampron CÂ©hasser, Mas. 1942, Detknsc Housing Development evith Gropius), New Kensingron, Pa. 1945, Geller Court, Kensington, Hyde 14rk, and Richmond, Hou,e, Lawrence. N.Y. 1947. Breuer House, New CaÂ· Bridgeman simulcancoudy worked for pnvace pae naan, Conn, 1949. Clark Houje, Orange, Conn. 1950. :cons it such bousem as Blenheim. Eatbug. Coe,pers,ive Dormicory, Vallar College, PoughkmpÂ« Wimpole, Marbk Hill, Ind Stove in Bud:ing- N.Y. 1950-1952, Airs Center, Samh Lamence College, hamshire. Scowe w= the scat of Richaid Thmple, : Bronxville N.Y. 1953-1957, De Bijenkorf Departincnt lint vistouni of Cobhsm, and the most celcbrited Store (with A. Eliash R.ocalam, Netherlands 1953- landscape of the day. Numerous poems and guide- 1958, UNESCO S:cremfist Building and Confercng: books attesr to les glories. and in 1733-1734 M:111 (with Pin Lulcl NEavr and BaNARD Znx- Bridgeman commissioned Jacques Rigaud and fuss). Pds, 1954-1962, Annunciacion Paory, Dickens, Bcnlard Balor, co prepate theirsumptuoum meriesof Biarnarek, N. DalÂ¢. 1937-1958, Van Loer HcadquarterS. vicwa of Srowe, which were published in 1739. Amstclvcen. Netherlands. 1963-1964 Whitney Mu- Whereas Bridgeman's royal wotk was essencially Rum of American Ari (wich H. Smich), New York Formil in ch:*ratter, Scowe was much more adven. 15)63-1967. Juques Koerier House, Lago Maggiofc, Switzedand, 1963-l960, United St#(5 DeparTment of ~;~;;~ and incorponred a judicious Use of walks, ' Housing and Urb,rl kwelopmenE Headquarte,s (mth , regular and irregular planting. waterscapx H. Beckhaed), Wahington 1967-1970* Cleveland Arr and numerous :emples. many of" then, embodying Museum (with Smiwh), Ohio. 1973, Minisrry of piÂ· hiâ€¢orical, political, md mychological rhemes. nince Building, The Hague. Such ideas musr have scemmcd, in part ac bi from Lord Cobham, but they also reflect Bridge- BIBLIOGRAPHY man's own friendahip and collaboration wirh ar- ARGAN, GIUUO CARLO 1957 Mal:01 0,men Degg= chitects such as JOHN VANBRUGH, JAMSS GIBBS, A16,/iale<aWmet,sm, Mitan: Gerlicil~ *nd Kenr, writers such as Alexander Pope and /Â· BLAKE, PETER 1949 M.11182 Brepey, /11&,te# -d De- Matthew Prior, and pninrers such as john Woor- 1 *gn#, New Yock: The Architeccural Record and the ron and Philip Mercier. Through them and also Mulicum of brodern Arc. Exhibition catalogue. . BARUER, MARCEL 1953 Sun und 14.*w.- nbe Abib chrough hia membership in tha exclusive Saine pâ‚¬,+In AditeÂ«. Edized by Perer Blake. Ncw York; Lula:'s Club ofarrists co which he was el<ted in i Dodd. ' 1726, Bridgeman would bc converiant wirh the 1. Baung. MARCEL 1962-1963 -Les bues & Parchi- progreasiverhinking of the day. Similarly, on hor. rectute." Adit#min,fb=er etÂ»,aim# 9:6-29. ciculmal matters, rhe gardener and writee 5- BREUER, MARC,6 1966 "Genesia of Daign." Pige; PHEN SWITZER mus, have been influenriaL *41-44 91,6. t.f ~.7- -01 LU*21%4~ 0117"ne.IÂ· 2 ra"J4 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 1998 HPC goals DATE: December 10,1997 At the end of each year, HPC usually has a general discussion of the past 12 months and makes a list of programs or tasks that they would like to give some emphasis to in the coming year, and also any problems or new ideas that they would like to address. Attached is last year's list. Unfortunately, there has not been much progress made, so the Commission may want to use this list as a starting point and decide if there is still interest in the same goals, and also discuss how the goals will be accomplished. For instance, some projects should be assigned to staff and some might best be addressed by setting up a sub-committee to work on them or by assigning time on each HPC agenda. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: HPC priorities for 1997 DATE: November 18, 1996 At their November 13th meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission addressed goals for the coming year. Priorities are: â€¢ More communication with City Council. An annual meeting between HPC and CC (as well as P&Z) is important to the board. â€¢ Amendments to Ordinance #30 should be brought forward. â€¢ We should look for ways to improve public relations. â€¢ We should address legal issues that have come up in recent cases (610 W. Hallam, 935 E. Hyman). â€¢ The Entrance to Aspen and conversion of smalllodges to other uses are ongoing issues that will be of concern to HPC â€¢ Should there be a more intense design review for new construction surrounding historic landmarks (beyond what is required by Ordinance #30)? â€¢. The Commission feels that our regulations are not being enforced or we do not have enough authority to enforce. Maybe we should take a closer look at contractor licensing procedures. â€¢ There is a concern that existing buildings are being covered in synthetic stucco, making them "generic." â€¢ A suggestion was made that an intern create a history of HPC; a record of gains and losses including slides and photographs. This could be a useful public education piece and could also be used to train new board members. â€¢ A suggestion was made that instead of, or in addition to, the award certificate given to outstanding projects during "Historic Preservation Week," a marker should also be placed at the project, maybe in the shape of an aspen leaf. â€¢ A suggestion was made that historic landmarks should have more relief from having to provide affordable housing on-site, since it requires more bulk to be added on. â€¢ Main Street should be studied further as a possible location for local serving businesses. A study like the DEPP committee is doing for the Commercial Core should be undertaken. â€¢ Are there some businesses that could be located off of the alleys downtown to add vitality?