HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.19931207
~
p,/--;:!
AGE N D A
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
December 7, 1993, Tuesday
4:30 P.M.
2nd Floor Meeting Room
ci ty Hall
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
I. COMMENTS
commissioners
Planning Staff
Public
II. MINUTES
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. The Gap Conditional Use Review for a Satellite Dish,
Kim Johnson
B. Hufty Conditional Use Review for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit, Kim Johnson
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. Transierra Stream Margin Review, Kim Johnson
B. BCS Change in Use & Conditional Use Review, Leslie
Lamont (continued to December 21)
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Kraut AH Subdivision Resolution, Leslie Lamont
IV. ADJOURN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commi-csion
FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Administrative Assistant
RE: Upcoming Agendas
DATE: December 7, 1993
Regular Meeting - December 21
Office Zone District Commercial GMQS:
Cap's Auto (ML)
Stapleton (LL)
Snyder Pond Worksession (KJ/ML)
BCS Change in Use & Conditional Use Review (LL)
Regular Meeting - January 4
Billings Property Residential GMQS, Subdivision, PUD & GMQS
Exemption (ML)
Aspen Club Lodge Rezoning to CL/CL Text Amendments (KJ)
Regular Meeting - January 18
R.O. Text Amendments (LL/CH)
a.nex
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: The Gap Conditional Use for Satellite Dish Antenna -
Public Hearing
DATE: - December 7, 1993-
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of The Gap
Conditional Use for a 47" roof mounted satellite dish antenna
with one condition.
APPLICANT: The Gap, Inc.
LOCATION: 204 S. Galena, Lots A,B & C, Block 94
ZONING: CC (Commercial Core)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use for
a 47 inch (1.2 meter) satellite dish antenna which is already
mounted on the roof of The Gap building. The applicant has
submitted roof plans and elevation drawings. See Attachment "A".
PROCESS: The Planning Commission shall make a determination on the
Conditional Use for the satellite dish antenna.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) - The HPC looked at the dish
antenna and does not require review.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Zoning Officer issued a red tag for the dish
which was placed on the roof -in late October. In order to resolve
the red tag, a conditional use approval must be obtained.
Conditional Use Review Criteria: The Commission has the authority
to review and approve development applications for conditional uses
pursuant to the standards of Section 7-304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: The AACP dos not specifically address satellite dishes.
The CC zone district does not apply any special requirements on
these antennae.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the imm®diate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: This communications antenna is typical for commercial
business for the surrounding commercial area.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the' proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: The 47" diameter dish is not visible from the street and
does not impact any surrounding properties any more than standard
roof top mechanical equipment.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: *Not applicable.
E . The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: No requirements for dish antennas are set forth in the
AACP or any other zoning regulations. Appropriate building permits
may be required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of The Gap
Conditional Use for a 1.2 meter roof mounted satellite dish antenna
with the following condition:
1. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
2
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve a Conditional Use for a
1.2 meter satellite dish antenna on the roof of The Gap building
located at 204 S. Galena with the condition recommended in the
Planning Office memo dated 12/7/93."
Exhibits:
"A" - Roof Plan
3
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHILT r APPROVED r
19 BY RESOLUTION
�A71C.TTridom Standalone Site Survey Form Page 3(9-q
Sediou 6: Drawing of Satellite, Antenna, and Cable Point of Entry Locations.
The following items must be shown with symbols and requested information. Label each option.
`^ Antenna Location With Line Of Sight _ _CD.. _ Line Amplifier Location
O and Distance From Two Walls With Location Described
Building Diag am — _ _ External Power Supply Location
With Location Described
N
Cable Path With Distances
Magnetic North
® Penetration
A-�--� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w lT czrAoa14L
��
.....ter
S'T '�N
. Antenna Height Above Ground Level: Option.l 2'� ft. Option 2 ft.
x
onn ,ram
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Hufty Conditional Use for an Attached Accessory Dwelling
Unit - Public Hearing
DATE: December 7, 1993
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Hufty
Conditional Use for a 586 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling
unit to be created within a new residence with conditions.
APPLICANT: Page Lee Hufty, represented by Dick Fallin
LOCATION: 704 W. Hallam (Lots R & S, Block 16 Townsite of Aspen)
ZONING: R-6
APPLICANT'S REQUEST:' The applicant requests Conditional Use for
the construction of a basement level one bedroom accessory dwelling
unit within a proposed 3,240 s.f. residence in accordance with
Ordinance 1 requirements. The 6,000 s.f. site is currently
occupied by a single family dwelling which will be demolished.
Because the ADU is not 100% above grade the applicant is not
eligible for,an FAR bonus for the property. The applicant has
submitted floor plan, elevation, and site drawings for the proposed
ADU. See Exhibit "A".
PROCESS: The Planning Commission shall make a determination on the
Conditional Use for the accessory dwelling unit.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: (complete referral memos are attached as
Exhibit "B".
Housing: The proposed unit must meet the requirements of. Section
24-5-510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. It shall be between 300 and
700 square feet of net livable area, deed restricted to resident
occupancy, and have minimum lease periods of 6 months. The deed
restriction shall be approved by the Housing Office, recorded with
the County Clerk, and proof of recordation forwarded to the Housing
Office prior to issuance of any building permits for the site.
Engineering: A curb, gutter and sidewalk agreement must be signed
prior to the issuance of any building permit. A trash area
convenient to the alley must be shown on the building permit plans.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission has the authority to review and
approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to
the standards of Section 7-304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: This proposed unit will allow the property to house
local employees in a residential area, which complies with the
zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling is compatible with the principal
dwellings and other residential uses in the surrounding
neighborhood. Staff does not recommend a parking space for the ADU
because of the location of the parcel and the availability of four
on -site parking spaces.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: As Engineering mentioned, a trash storage area must be
identified on the building plans for the parcel. Also, existing
vegetation in the right-of-way may need to be altered for public
pedestrian access in the future. The ADU has direct access to
Hallam Ave. via a covered stairway/entry. No other significant
neighborhood impacts are anticipated.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: All public facilities are already in place for the
existing home and neighborhood.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
RESPONSE: The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions
for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof
of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office and Housing
Office prior to issuance of any building permits.
2
I/
F. The proposed conditional 'use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
for.provision of affordable housing units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Hufty.
Conditional Use for a 586 s. f . basement level one bedroom accessory
dwelling unit with the following conditions:
1. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restriction to the
Aspen/Pitkin County Housing office for approval. The
accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the
Housing Office, the Owner shall record the deed restriction
with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the
recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must
be forwarded to the Planning Office.
3. A curb, gutter and sidewalk agreement must be signed prior to
the issuance of any building permit.
4. A trash area convenient to the alley must be shown on the
building permit plans.
5. The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design
considerations of development within the public rights -of -
way, Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain
permits for any work or development, including landscaping
within public rights -of -way, from City Streets Department.
6. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the. Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move approve a Conditional Use for a 586
s.f. basement level one bedroom accessory dwelling unit within the
proposed Hufty residence at 704 W. Hallam Avenue with the
conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 12/7/93."
Exhibits:
"A" - Proposed Site Plan, Floorplan, and Elevations
"B" - Referral Memos
3
3
PLANNING & ZONING COMMSSION
EXHIBIT r APPROVED
19 BY RESOLUTION
.Z
LAicF—
•� Q Q Q . - �It
�
Q Q �.,. L Q •
,• - ` � ` Y
j VICINITY MAP'Q
�• HUFTY RESIDENCE
?� 704 W. HALLAM STREET �p ,
ASPEN, COLORADO , _
IN
IV
I�y r'
tio -TV
no C-94U'!t+hc. 5 '15 (I e, roo.o
f'W�1�6 hSPO� —
� t
U ^� It ,
P"T
• o
LA r
ri''P' 211-760 / ( � � 7;' o��' I i' W goo. o ' �•
�Y'( vwN uM
/3"
IWO
rA
P7
�dfbl
- T,%).
mo
(� �+ 6'�
Tf-
L-ow
�o
1
51
5" R o,
i
1
o ii
I EGZU1FMT,+ V=ro
j T
44
-
ic
r —1
ue
To �.T
w 4 HGLWr.�,
- - - - - - -- --- --- - - - - ----I
N i
i
I iO'-8l° //1,•
LOX
> I,
�,. 0, UP
fo VOK
fStvO+JMELjEa I
vJ Eat
'i G� /-G�
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT , APPROVED r
1.9 BY RESOL:"m TPN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, City Planner
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing
DATE: November 16, 1993
RE: HUFTY CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT; PARCEL ID NO. 2735-124-27-007
The applicant states that he is demolishing a 2,766 square foot
home and replacing with a 3,240 square foot home. The applicant
must mitigate for 474 square feet, or build an accessory dwelling
unit. According to the 1993 Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Guidelines, if the applicant chooses the cash -in -lieu route, the
applicant would have to mitigate for 474 square feet X $14.17 =
$6,716.58. The applicant chooses to mitigate by constructing a 586
square foot accessory dwelling unit.
The proposed attached accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Chapter
24, Section 5-510, of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, will be
approved for this mitigation.
Accessory dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of allowable floor
area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area. The unit shall be
deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be
limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months in duration. Owners of the principal residence
shall have the right to place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the
accessory dwelling unit.
The accessory dwelling unit is shown to be 586 square feet,
contains one bedroom, a living/dining area, a bathroom and kitchen,
and a separate entrance. These are all acceptable to the Housing
Office.
The floor area requirement that needs to be addressed for.the deed
restriction is for net liveable square feet as defined by the
Housing Office below:
Net Liveable Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and is measured interior wall to
Interior wall, including all interior partitions including, but not limited to, habitable basements and
interior storage areas, closets and laundry area Exclusions include, but are not limited to,
uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or
detached), patios, decks and porches.
Prior to building permit approval, a signed and recorded Deed
.Restriction must be completed. This process could take from three
to four days. The Housing Office must have the recorded book and
page number prior to building permit approval. This form can be
obtained from the Housing Office.
\Word\referral\hufty.adu
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
Thru: Bob Gish, Public Works Director
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer
Date: November 23, 1993
Re: Hufty Conditional Use for Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter - As required in Sections 19-98 through 19-100 of the
Municipal Code, the applicant must sign and execute an agreement to construct sidewalk,
curb and gutter at such time in the future as deemed appropriate by the City. The
Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway Plan is not completely clear about designated pedestrian
corridor development in the West End, however at a minimum, a pedestrian usable space
in the public right-of-way off of the vehicular pavement is desired to be maintained. In
the future, curb and gutter may need to be constructed in the West End to mitigate storm
runoff problems in the neighborhood.
Note that there is extensive existing vegetation in the public right-of-way which
precludes pedestrian use of the space. Policy has not been established as of this writing
which would require improvement of the pedestrian space between the property line and
the pavement, however the applicant is advised that a usable pedestrian space is desireable
and may be required in the future. Providing the space could include pruning existing
vegetation up. In any event, no additional landscaping in the right-of-way may be installed
which would further obstruct this portion of the public right-of-way.
2. Parkin - The on -site parking spaces are adequate in number and function as indicated
on the development plan.
3. Trash Storage - The application states that "trash . . . -is contained within a trash
enclosure built into the garage." The trash enclosure is not indicated on the development
plan and must be indicated on the final building permit plans. The revised development
plan indicates the ADU trash enclosure located on Hallam Street. I phoned BFI, and
they pick up trash in the alley at this location. The trash enclosures for both the ADU
and the primary residence should be served from the alley.
\10
i
4. Permit to Construct Driveway - The design of the driveway appears to meet the
requirements of Section 19-101, however:
Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -
of -way, we advise the applicant as follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design
considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department
(920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets
department (920-5130).
A permit is needed from the City Streets Department, approved by Public Works, to
construct the driveway.
cc: Dick Fallin
Baker Fallin Associates, Inc.
1280 Ute Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
M93.273
Page Lee Hufty
340 Island Road
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Transierra Stream Margin Review
DATE: December 7, 1993
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of this Stream
Margin Review with conditions.
APPLICANT: Transierra Corporation, represented by Kim Weil
LOCATION: 1410 Red Butte Drive (Lot 7, Block 1, Red Butte
Subdivision). The parcel is 37,812 s.f. and is zoned R-30.
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL: The owner plans *to expand the existing,
single family residence. The location of the home and expansion
require stream margin review. An accessory dwelling unit was
approved for this home in 1993. The revised plan relocates the ADU
in the structure but staff has determined that the change does not
require additional review by the Planning Commission. Please refer
to the application text and drawings, Exhibit "A". A more detailed
site plan will be presented by the project architect at the P&Z
meeting.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Referral memos are attached as Exhibit "B".
Engineering states that more specific information is required
regarding soils erosion protection into the river.
The Parks Department requires tree removal permits for any trees
over 6" in diameter. Also, trees should be protected from digging
or soil placement within the dripline. A ten foot fisherman's
easement along the river's edge is requested.
The Housing office supports the changes to the ADU because a larger
unit is created in a better location on the property.
STAFF COMMENTS: Any proposed development within 100' of the high
water line or within a flood hazard area must receive Stream Margin
approval. Stream Margin applications are reviewed by the Planning
.and Zoning Commission according to the standards set forth in
Section 24-7-504 of the Aspen Municipal Code.
1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is
in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base
flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This
shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a
professional engineer registered to practice in the State of
Colorado which shows that the.base flood elevation will not
iq
be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation
techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood
elevation increase caused by the development.
response: Per Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer Engineers, the flood plain
is below the area of construction, so the base flood elevation will
not be affected.
2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan
map is dedicated for public use.
response: No trail is identified for this side of the river.
However, the Parks Department and the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan
recommend voluntary dedication of a fisherman's easement along the
edge of the high water line of the river.
3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are
implemented in the proposed plan. for development, to the
greatest extent practicable.
response: The applicant will take all practical measures to
minimize disturbance to the land. The mature trees along the crest
of the bank will remain undisturbed. Parks and Planning recommend
that existing vegetation be protected against excavation and soil
fill. A condition requiring barricades around the driplines has
been included for approval. The backyard will otherwise remain
basically as it is now.
4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that
produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
response: The slope will remain undisturbed. The applicant must
provide detailed erosion control methods at building permit time.
ENgineering and Planning will review these methods.
5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development
reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes
of the river, stream or other tributary.
response: Erosion control methods will be made to limit pollution
during construction per approvals of building permit plans. No
changes will be made to the water course.
6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation
Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course,
and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
response: Not applicable as the water course will not be changed.
7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered
2
2
or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs,
successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying
capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
response: Same as no.6.
8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits
relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain.
response: Not applicable.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of
the Transierra Stream Margin Review with one condition:
Prior to the issuance of any building permits:
1. Specific information is required regarding soils erosion
protection into the river.
2. The Parks Department requires tree removal permits for any.
trees over 6" in diameter.
3. Existing trees in the rear yard shall be protected from
excavation or soil placement within the dripline by means of
protection barricades. These shall be identified and detailed on
the building permit site plan/landscape plan.
4. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of
approval,unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
Attachments: "A" — Site Plan
"B" - Referral Comments
3
Q ION
EXHIBIT _ , APPROVED ,
19 BY RESOLUTION
605 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE 3031925-4755
FACSIMILE 3031920-2950
October 15, 1993
Kim Johnson
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: TRANSIERRA RESIDENCE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND AMENDMENT
TO ADU APPROVAL
Dear Kim,
Transierra Corporation, the owner of the house located at 1410 Red Butte Drive, is
planning to remodel and expand the existing structure. Due to revisions made to
the design of the addition, the location of this ADU has changed from the original
scheme to a more advantageous position on the southwest side of the house.
Also, the location of the addition to the existing residence will necessitate a stream
margin review for the property, which we will show is in full compliance with the
review standards for development in the stream margin.
During our hearing for the original ADU approval there were some concerns
expressed about the availability of natural light and about access to the unit being
limited due to snow buildup. Our new location provides not only abundant natural
light, but also an easier and more direct access into the unit. In addition, the new
location provides more privacy from the main residence than the previous scheme
and the possibility of a separate yard space to the west. We have also had more
flexibility in the arrangement of the interior and have been able to better utilize the
available floor area to make a one bedroom apartment rather. than a studio as
originally proposed.
TRANSIERRA RESIDENCE
10/15/93
The majority of the remaining addition will be located along the northwest side of
the existing house, in line with existing construction. We will be adding a basement
in this area as well as renovating the two existing bedrooms on the main floor and
the master bedroom above. We will also be expanding the area of the existing
Dining Room toward the property line to the east and infilling the existing gravel
court between the Garage and the Dining Area. Some additional area will be added
to the southwest side of the Garage as well. In none of these additions will we be
building closer to the river, nor will we be affecting either the bank, the existing
vegetation, or the natural water course. We feel that for these reasons and
because of the improvement to the aesthetics of the existing house that will result
from our revised scheme, our stream margin development application should be
approved.
Please review the enclosed information and feel free to call if you have any
questions. We would appreciate your scheduling a planning and zoning review for
us as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Kim Weil
Project Manager
93131015.Itr
t)
605 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE 3031925-4755
FACSIMILE 3031920-2950
TRANSIERRA RESIDENCE
DEVELOPMENT IN THE STREAM MARGIN
A. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development in the special flood
hazard area will not increase the base flood elevation of the parcel.
RESPONSE: Please see enclosed analysis by Dean Gordon of Schmueser,
Gordon, Meyer.
B. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
map is dedicated for public use.
RESPONSE: No such trails exist on the property.
C. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway plan are implemented
to the greatest extent practicable.
RESPONSE: The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway plan are
being implemented in that we have made no changes to the natural
topography or vegetation along the river bank.
D. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce
erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
RESPONSE: No vegetation will be removed along the stream bank, and no
new grading will occur along the bank.
E. To the greatest extent practicable the proposed development reduces
pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river.
RESPONSE: In order to offset any possible effects of excavation and
construction, we will try to block runoff from going directly in to the river with
haybales or whatever means necessary to avoid soil pollution of the river.
�0
TRANSIERRA RESIDENCE
DEVELOPMENT IN THE STREAM MARGIN
F. Written notice is given to the Colorado water conservation board prior to any
alteration or relocation of a water course.
RESPONSE: No alteration or relocation of the water course is proposed.
G. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated
that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
RESPONSE: No alteration or relocation of the water course is proposed.
H. Copies are provided of all federal and state permits relating to work within
the one hundred year flood plain.
RESPONSE: No work is proposed within the one hundred year flood plain.
93131015.res
2
'Ap ISO __. •� , , ,.. ; ' .
go
7 > c _cl
,
o
Qb
49
?/
o >,\ j'.
CID
r rCP
• � � is � /� � _ � � t '�/' `/y/ / / •
cr
Ir
rs
ry lot
Yr
go
cp
le
lee t
�• '� �/ r �s,i' Jam• t r u' r' �' :.' .�,•'.� +
r / /! • o�/' o � - � � to � � W f F .. . - �:.
L � •fi • 1
to i 0 1 l r
►.. i y ) q i \, • dam' ,,'
C� _... . ' : is J ,
At �-
�'� \'y�o/ ice/ ��\ \
lu
I
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT -
ESOL
19 BY RESOLUTION
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
Thru: Bob Gish Public Works Director
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer C
Date: November 19, 1993
Re: Transierra Stream Margin Review
Having reviewed the above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the
following comments:
1. In the application, Response E, the language is not acceptable. The statement must
be affirmative. That is, construction techniques must provide for preventing storm runoff
from soils exposed by excavation from entering the Roaring Fork River.
2. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -
of -way, we advise the applicant as follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design
considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department
(920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets
department (920-5130).
cc: Kim Weil, Bill Poss & Associates
605 E. Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Transierra Corporation
c/o Graham & James
525 University, 14th .Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Attn: R. Patterson
M93.269
-10 Kim Johnson
CC Rebecca Baker
From: Rebecca Baker
Postmark: Nov 26,93
MESSAGE DISPLAY
4:39 PM
CC George Robinson
Subject: Transierr.a Residence Stream Margin Review
Message:
I have reviewed the stream margin application for the Transierra
Residence. In reference to criteria B and C, regarding trails and
Roaring Fork Greenway plans, we would request a ten foot fishermans
easement along the rivers edge. Additionally, if any trees are
proposed to be removed by this development, the applicant must apply
for a tree removal permit. There should be no digging within the
drip line of any trees and no stock piling of dirt or debris around
the base of trees. The applicant may wish to contact the Army Corp of
Engineers if there is a possibility of sediment going in the river.
i' • -'3F1
TO: Kim Johnson,.City Planner
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE: November 15, 1993
RE: TRANSIERRA CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNIT (MODIFIED SINCE APPROVED ON MARCH 16, 1993;
1410 RED BUTTE DRIVE
Parcel ID No. 2735-013-02-009
After reviewing the above -referenced application, the Housing
Office approves the proposed attached accessory dwelling unit as
this is a better location than the first approval and a larger
sized unit.
Prior to building permit approval, floor plans showing the exact
net liveable square footage and footprint of the accessory dwelling
unit will have to be submitted to the Housing Office. The floor
area requirement is for net liveable square footage as defined by
the Housing Office below:
Net Liveable Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and is measured interior wall to
interior wall, including all interior partitions including, but not limited to, habitable basements and
Interior storage areas, closets and laundry area. Exclusions include, but are not limited to,
uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or
detached), patios, decks and porches.
Also prior to building permit
Restriction must be completed
could take from three to four
the recorded book and page
approval. A copy of this dee
Housing Office.
\word\referral\transier.ref
approval, a signed and recorded Deed
Recording of the deed restriction
days. The Housing Office must have
number prior to building permit
d restriction can be obtained in the
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Richard A. Fallin, hereby certify that on November 24, 1993 a Public Notice
poster was attached to the subject property at 704 W. Hallam Street, Aspen,
Colorado, proclaiming the Public Hearing for the Conditional Use Review
before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission to be held
December 7, 1993.
Richard A: Fallin
SUTHERLAND FALLIN, INC.
Attachments: Photo
S UTH, ERLMD FALL INo UN C.
Qrtw-e
Swllierl an,J,
Pres;Jent
• Rieha,,J Fallin,
Vice President •
David FaniiLra,
Asaov; acre
Arckicetiire
&- Ptaam;ng •
rwt) Ute
Avenue • 13pe n.
Cal raclo 81b11 •
303/925-42'2 0
P.Lx 303/�➢2��-s���
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
November 22, 1993
I, Toni McWilliams, hereby certify that on November 22, 1993 a copy of the
attached notice of public hearing was mailed to the attached list of adjacent
property owners.
Of
I AFX� X4��
Toni McWilliams
Office Manager
Raker Fallin Associates, Inc.
Attachments
SUTHERLANDo F
Bruce Sutherland, President ) Richard Faflin, Vice President David Panieo, Associate
Notice of Public Notice Hearing mailed on 11/22/93 to:
United States Forest Service
806 W. Hallam
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(goverment agency)
i
I�
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
November 22, 1993
I, Toni McWilliams, hereby certify that on November 23, 1993 a copy of the
attached notice of public hearing was mailed to the attached list of adjacent
property owners.
Toni McWilliams
Office Manager
Raker Fallin Associates, Inc.
Attachments
SUTHERLANDc) FALL IN) �NC.
Bruce
SnnghenD a nJ, President ° Riclhla rJ
Min,
Vice PreaJent °
DavJ PaII1 ico, ABoo C°IlQ3 to
Au°CCahnQcQ°impe
& Ha nunnng 11 R280 Ule Avenue °
ABpe n,
`l olora & m llll °
303/925-4252 ° MX 303/925-2 39
Gail Garofani
39 Palmerston St
Watson's Bay 2030
Sydney, Australia
Robert D. and Renee N. Ritchie
701 W. Francis St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Mile High Holding Co.
1991 E. Alameda, #9
Denver, CO 80209
June Simmons
Neena B. Bixby
1455 Green Ridge Dr.
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Patrick J. Keelty
729 W. Francis St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Richard Gold
300 St. Pierre Road
Los Angeles, CA 90024
David Zimman
126 Pine Drive
Fairfax, CA 94930
James P. Iglehart
610 W. Hallam
Aspen, CO 81611
Nina Coulter Ware
34 Clermont Lane
St. Louis, MO 63124
Gerd M. Zeller
Box 37
Aspen, CO 81612
Richard and Delores A. Hutcheson
% 7540 N. Del Mar Ave.
Fresno, CA 93711
George Vicenzi
Box 2238
Aspen, CO 81612
Douglas J. and Susan L. McPherson
Box 4412
Aspen, CO 81612
Dennis F. Ratner
2815 Hartland Rd
Falls Church, VA 22043
Michael Lawrence Flynn
Ann Bennett Flynn
721 W. Francis
Aspen, CO 81611
Linda K. Gordman
10777 North 60th St
Omaha, NE 68152
Helen R. Scales
Patrick Curry
626 West Francis St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Christopher H. and Leslie M. Smith
Box 130
Snowmass, CO 81654
Michael D. and Patricia P. Kerber
104 W. Cooper Ave, # 1 A
Aspen, CO 81611
Michael P. and Anne Tierney
Box 2391
Aspen, CO 81612
Terry L. Hale
104 W. Cooper Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
TBD Associates, Ltd.
c/o Spencer F. Schiffer
215 S. Monarch St., Ste. 201
Aspen, CO 81611
Jay Weinberg
111 N.E. 1st Street
Miami, FL 33132
Mary Lou Sabatasso
225 North 6th St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Matthew B. Kellner
4140 Whispering Oaks Lane
Danville, CA 94526
Arthur S. Lazarus
Katrina D. Hempel
c/o Lazarus Communities, Inc.
Suite 405, 1575 San Ignacio Avenue
Coral Gables, FL 33146
Joseph Bellina
The Delia Malone Bellina Trust
8772 Quarter Lake Rd.
Baton J Rouge, LA 70809
Heather H. Tharp
Box 1293
Aspen, CO
Red Mountain Holdings, Inc.
c/o Hodge, Scholnik and Swan
1901 N.W. 62nd St., Suite 415
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
Wava Turner
Box 973
Aspen, CO 81612
William G. and Carolyn W. Kane
621 W. Francis St. #A
Aspen, CO 81611
Elizabeth Armstrong
Patricia Ann Ferril
621 W. Francis Unit B
Aspen, CO 81611
John E. and Nancy M. Thorpe
615 West Francis
Aspen, CO 81611
Linda McCausland
Box 1584
Aspen, CO 81612
Anne J. Austin
601 West Francis St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Elizabeth Wilson
� 1225 Marion Apt. #4
Denver, CO 80218
Lillian A. Baker
634 W. Hallam
Aspen, CO 81611
First Baptist Church
726 W. Francis St.
Aspen, CO 81611
US Forest Service -t NI, � � a � i
01
806 ai llam St. J�
Aspen, CO 81611 4ep
Aspen Historic Society
620 W. Bleeker St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Wendy S. Frazier and John Paul Dejoria
104 West Cooper
Aspen, CO 81611
The Jay N. Weinberg Trust
111 N.E. First St., Suite 600
Miami, FL 33132
GAP
November 29, 1993
4lrt•
Ms. Kim Johnson j l DEC
The City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611---a..��
THE GAP, INC. Dear Ms. Johnson:
900 CHERRY AV
This letter is to notify you, and the City of Aspen that The
SAN BRUNO Gap, Inc. mailed letters, via certified return receipt
CA94066 requested, to all property owners within 300 feet of our lot
TELEPHONE (Lot A, B, & C of block 94 City & Town of Aspen) on November
415 952 4400 22, 1993. A list of the property owners that received the
FAX Public Hearing Notification are attached.
415 952 4069 If you have any questions, please call me at 415-259-7140.
- Yours Truly,
Jenn Pais
Telecom Analyst
The Gap, Inc.
I
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER - SAINT MARY'S
ROTHERBER, ET AL - C/O
1200 17TH ST, 28TH FLOOR
DENVER, CO 80202
MOUNTAIN RESORT TRUST
C/O REESE HENRY & COMPANY
400 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, CO 81611
MOUNTAIN RESORT TRUST
C/O REESE HENRY & COMPANY
400 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, CO 81611
COX, JAMES E.
COX, ANTHONY
200 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, CO 81611
DINGILIAN, DIRKRAN A. S.
160 WEST 225 STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10463
517 EAST HYMAN LIMITED
A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
517 EAST HYMAN
ASPEN,, CO 81611
ARCADES ASSOCIATES, LTD'.
CLARK SMYTH CO., THE - C/O
200 E. MAIN STREET
ASPEN, CO 81611
MASON & MASON, INC.
514 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
B. P. O. ELKS LODGE NO. 224
ASPEN ELKS LODGE #224
210 S. GALENA ST SUITE 21
ASPEN, CO 81611
WALTON, W. R.
P.O. BOX 665
ASPEN, CO 81612
BOGARET FAMILY TRUST
P.O. BOX 1166
ASPEN, CO 81612
PITKIN COUNTY BANK 60% AND
GLENROY PARTNERS & EXELCEDAR INC 20% EA.
534 EAST HYMAN AVE.
ASPEN, CO 81611
SDJ ASSOCIATES, LTD.
520 E. D U RANT AVE; SUITE 207
ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN PLAZA COMPANY
BOX 1709
ASPEN, CO 81612
MAURICE BERIRO
517 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
WILLIAM W WHEELER
INGRID J WHEELEER
3241 WEST DRY CREK RD
HELDSBURG, CA 95448
JEAN PIERRE ODIER
P.O. BOX 88
ASPEN, CO 81612
HARLEY A II BALDWIN
205 SOUTH GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
RANSOM B. JR. WOODS
JUSTINE F. WOODS
P.O. BOX 12288
ASPEN, CO 816-12
LOMA ALTA CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 8105
DALLAS, TX 75205
LOMA ALTA CORPORATION
6210 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
DALLAS, TX 75206
DUVIKE INC.
A COLORADO GENERAL PARN ERSH IP
BOX 2238
ASPEN, CO 81612
KAN DYCOM, INC.
P.O. BOX 1135
MAMMOTH LAKE, CA 93546
HARLEY A. II BALDWIN
THE BRAND BUILDING
205 S. GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SABBATINI SPORT, INC.
A COLORADO CORPORATION
230 SOUTH MILL ST.
ASPEN, CO 81611
RYANCO PARTNERS LTD. NO. XVI
ATTN: PAT SMITH
715 W. MAIN ST.
ASPEN, CO 81611
ALH HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
37 HARLSTON GREEN
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
M & W ASSOCIATES
A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
205 SOUTH MILL STREET
ASPEN, CO 81611
GARY G. & LESLIE J. TROYER
601 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
ALPINE BANK, ASPEN
A COLORADO BANKING CORPORATION
600 EAST HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
MARGARET A CON N ERS
WARREN J & CLAU DE M CON N ERS
534 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
5x "14
A,AS
j
L
4"qc-Tm