The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.apz.19930622 . AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 22, 1993, Tuesday 4:30 P.M. 2nd Floor Meeting Room City Hall I. COMMENTS Commissioners Planning Staff Public II. MINUTES III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Alciatore Conditional Use Review, Kim Johnson B. pioneer Park Historic Designation, Amy Amidon IV. ADJOURN Election of Chair and Vice-Chair \ , A G E N D A ASPEN PLANNING -AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 22, 1993, Tuesday 4:30 P.M. 2nd Floor Meeting Room City Hall I. COMMENTS Commissioners Planning Staff Public II. MINUTES III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Alciatore Conditional Use Review, Kim Johnson B. Pioneer Park Historic Designation, Any Amidon IV. ADJOURN Election of Chair and Vice -Chair TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Administrative Assistant RE: Upcoming Agendas DATE: June 22, 1993 Regular Meeting - July 6 No items yet Regular Meeting - July 20 Condominiumization Regulations Amendment (FK) a.nex MF,MORANDUM Zoning Commission planning and TO: Accessory Kim Johnson P planr„er for an Attached FROM: onal Use Cond It i Hear ing Al iatoreUnit - Public _ RE: Dwelling 2 1993 =-__- - 'atone June 2 ' - the Alci , • .--.�_ --�- of l g It DATE__-�-- approval dwelling unit ends in Of f ice recomm accessory The planning 302 s . f . attaSUNKAP-ched Y• for a Condit i°nal•Uns. with condltlo and NancY Alclatore ock 14• APpLIC�� GUY er, Lots N and 0, B 730 W • Smuggl I,OCATION: Residential Conditional Use R-6 Medium Density requests n � : req � � new residence ZONIN The applicant unit within a n 1 REQUEST: dwelling in Ordinance ppLICANT S an accessory mitigation requirements studio accessory A buildmitig floor of approval t° the housing vacant- on the second suant t° Site is carte ana will Exhibit put 990• The 302 s.f• licati°n information► Series 1 .t will be to app dwelling unit please refer the structure imam housing All , Exhibit "8�� unit meets therified by zoning FERR.AL COGENT o• osed 3 O1.5 s . f • e must be v � t occupancy RE in The proposed r p e net 1 ivable , s 1 z The res 1 ag n Of f iCe and Hous g the building plans* the Hou to th uidelines bu it the of roved by ' es forwarded o f any g subm be cop must approve with 1 upon the issuance less staff p e County Clerk, to deed reStr ithl th Office prior tenancies wl and planningnot be leased for recorded Office The unit may Housing ermits. building six months • _______"_-- and than _-- review n has the authority pursuant to TS: The Commltlo s for condition STAFF COMMEN t applica approve devel(of 7-304: goalst p Section the purposeS► the standards °f with rehenslVe plan consistent en Area Comp which it is 1 s the Asp conditional use e Zone District in A. The es and stand o f °th objectiv the intent to house and with located. ertY PI to be • t will allow the po A. . S with the d unit whlc This propose residential area,. RESPONSE employees in a Plan• emp local s en Area Community zoning and Asp B. The conditional character of use is developmentconsistent Of and sumn'edlate vicinit and compatible mound. Y °f the le with Of thepliment y uses and Parcel the Parcel lapro act v towsies , or enhance prop°Sed for prop for develo mein the immediate e mixture RESPONSE, p nt• vicinity residential The accessory Y not ial uses in rY dwelling use the Alciatoreisible surroundin is compatible shown reSidenCe, a distinct g neighborhood, with the other Staff unit from The unit ADU. S n the. application wishes to the exterior well looking � drawings point out that Of the g into the y . large windows create Privac the windows roof deck for unit, and also are placed in y Problems be remove the ADU, from the main for the b d from Staff the stairWel stairwell least SeVe the plans altogether that these outward onto the roof deck, n feet above the gether or two window finished changed so that the sets floor level of the A Y are C. The location, s DU or the proposed 12e,, design includin conditionaand operating circulat 9 visual impactsimuse minimizcharacteristics pacts adverse of vibratio parkin on Pedestri Of ns and odor o surrounding Service an and vehicular RESPONSE: undin deliver ar 9 Properties. Y, noise, the PropoSedhres d eSSOrY unit w• site idenCe ill be completely bedroom No parking s ace Four Parkin contained g spaces accessory dwelling required by code will be within contain three g unit. Provided on - doorway bedrooms, The for a studio second Onto a deck The pro oSe Principal °r one- nd floor and stairway P d ADU will residence reComfiended Of the , and have will COnditio main home. an interior access exterior identified n of As per access into the requiring on buildingapproval re past P&Z confer The g compliance with Permit Plans as that the concerns a the has pro U.B.C. Chapter 35 that dwelling be °f posed ADU s exterior snow breaks and for sound ing unit stairs. gutters in attenuation. ion. NO Other significant impactsvicinity D. are antici There gated, Conditional public fac• . water use includin facilities and ' Y medical waste,bu not limitedrvlCeS to efiergenc Serve the drainage systems servicesParks , police to roads, potable RESPONSE: ystems, and ' hospital and protection schools, decal PONSE; sere' , and net All public utilit1es ices, 5hborhood. are in place for the E• The proposed incremental commits home incremental Condit' need for tuPply affordable Conditional use. increased employees housin g to meet the generated by the 2 RESPONSE: The proposed deed restricted unit will satisfy the Ordinance 1 requirements for a new single family residence. The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office prior to issuance of any building permits. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and any other applicable conditional use standards. NOTE: As this accessory dwelling unit is 100% above grade, the main structure is eligible for floor area bonus per Ordinance 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Alciatore Conditional Use for a 302 s.f. studio accessory dwelling unit with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 3. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 4. During building permit plans review, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall make the final determination that the unit meets the minimum size requirement of 300 s.f. net liveable as defined in the housing guidelines. The ADU cannot be less than 300 s.f. net liveable. 5. The two window sets between the. main stairwell and the ADU and its roof deck shall be removed from the plans or changed so that they are at least seven feet above the finished floor level of the ADU or roof deck. 3 6. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the Zoning Office shall inspect the ADU for compliance with approved plans and conditions. 7. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and .Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Conditional Use for a 302 s.f. attached accessory dwelling unit for the Alciatore residence at 730 W. Smuggler with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 6/22/93." Exhibits: "A" - Application Information "B" - Housing Referral Memo 4 /�Y-3 \ - - - a� �._.j4.j ..a. :wP •.irl��}—' ``t- Sly NEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Landmark Designation (public hearing): 442 W. Bleeker Date: June 22, 1993 APPLICANTS' REQUEST: Applicants request Landmark Designation for the parcel known as 442 W. Bleeker and a portion of 400 W. Bleeker'; also known as Lots K-S and portions of Lots A-C. 442 W. Bleeker was designated an Aspen Landmark by City Council through Ordinance 71 1982, but the ordinance did not contain a legal description of the property. The proposed designation is intended to address the entire parcel which comprises the historic Pioneer Park estate. APPLICANTS: Arthur and Freddy Stromberg as owners of Lots K,L,M,N,O,P and Q and portions of A,B and C, and the City of Aspen as owner of Lots R and S. The City of Aspen is representing the Strombergs in this request. LOCATION: 442 W. Bleeker Street, Block 36, Lots K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S and portions of A,B and C, townsite of Aspen, Colorado. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark Designation is a three -step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearings), then first and second reading (public hearing at final reading) of a Landmark Designation'Ordinance by Council. OTHER BOARD ACTION: The HPC unanimously recommended Landmark Designation of this parcel at its meeting of June 9, 1993. LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS Section 7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines the six standards for local Landmark Designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least one of the following standards: A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado or the United States. Response: Staff finds that this standard is met. Henry Webber, builder of Pioneer Park, served in several political roles, including Mayor of'Aspen. The PaepkeIs had a large influence on the cultural history of Aspen. B. Architectural Importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: This estate is unique in that only two examples of Second Empire architecture and few masonry historic houses exist in Aspen. C. Architectural Importance: The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of- a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: Pioneer Park is a relatively unmodified example of the Second Empire style, popular in the U.S. f rom the late 18 5 0 ' s through the 18 8 0' s . A mansard roof , dormers, brackets beneath the eaves and Italianate window detailing define the architectural style of this residence. D. Architectural Importance: The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: No evidence exists to connect the design of this estate to any particular architect. E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: Staff finds that the massing, scale and style of this house, along with the large, open lot and mature trees are critical to the character of the West End, an area rich in Victorian era homes. F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: This estate has long been noted as a highly significant historic resource for Aspen, and a visual landmark in the West End. Local citizens recently confirmed their affection for this property by raising funds to preserve the estate and to create a public park. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Landmark Designation for all of Pioneer Park, 442 W. Bleeker Street, Block 36, Lots K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and portions of A, B and C, finding that Designation Standards A,B,C and E have been met. Additional Comments: THE CITY OF ASPEN OFFICE OF THE MAYOR June 2, 1993 Re: 442 W. Bleeker Street, Aspen, Colorado Members of the Historic Preservation Committee, The City of Aspen wishes to declare its support for Landmark Designation of Pioneer Park, at 442 W. Bleeker Street. The Pots which comprise the estate are owned in part by Arthur -and Freddy 'Stromberg (Lots L,M,N,O,P and Q and portions of A,B and C) and in part by the City of Aspen (Lots R and S) , but will be designated as one Landmark, in order to preserve the character of the parcel as a single, intact historic estate. Sin. erely, Jo Bennett Mayor of Aspen 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303.920.5199 • FAx 303.920.5119 Pnni d m rnrrkd paper PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 442 W. BLEEKER STREET - PIONEER PARK HISTORIC DESIGNATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that'a public hearing will be held on Tuesday June 22, 1993, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen, 1.30 South Galena Street, Aspen and Arthur & Freddie Stromberg, 145 Bridge Road, Hillsborough, GA 94010 requesting Historic Designation of the entire Pioneer Park parcel including the Stromberg property at 442 W. Bleeker Street and the public park. The property is described as Lots K. L, M, N, O, P, Q, R and S and portions of Lots A. B and C, Block 36, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. sLJasmine Tygre, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 1993 City of Aspen Account CERTIFICATE OF MAILING RE: I hereby certify that on this 1< day of ,�, 199 a true and correct copy of the attached Notice oaf Public Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the Public Notice. By: Michelle White Administrative Secretary frm.mailing