HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.19930713
,.....,...^'<.-
'-
..
...
A G E.N D A
==================================================================
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
July 13, 1993, Tuesday
4:30 P.M.
City Council Chambers
City Hall
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
I. COMMENTS
Commissioners
Planning Staff
Public
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. East Cooper Affordable Housing Project Special
Review, Kim Johnson
III. ADJO~
A G E. N D A
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
July 13, 1993, Tuesday
4:30 P.M.
City Council -Chambers
City Hall -
I. COMMENTS
Commissioners
Planning Staff
Public
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. East Cooper Affordable Housing Project Special
Review, Kim Johnson
ADJOUR�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: East Cooper Affordable Housing Project - Special Review
for Increased Height in an AH Zone District
DATE: July 13, 1993
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Special Review
for an increase in height from 25' to 30' the townhome parcel (Lot
8) of this approved AH subdivision. The Final PUD/Subdivision
application originally included this Special Review request, but
staff inadvertently omitted it from its presentations to the
Commission.
The designs and elevations of the buildings have not changed since
the Commission reviewed the East Cooper Final PUD, Subdivision,
Rezoning, and other reviews on March 16 and 30, and April 20, 1993.
APPLICANT: C&G Mustard Seed, Craig Glendenning, represented by Tom
Stevens, The Stevens Group, Inc.
LOCATION: The East Cooper parcel is 2.35 acres located on Highway
82, about one-half mile east of the Cooper Street Bridge. Lot 8
is the 37,374 s.f. townhome parcel on the lower portion of the
proposed subdivision, adjacent to Highway 82.
ZONING: The zoning of the parcel is AH (Affordable Housing) PUD.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The project seeks Special Review as permitted
by the AH zone district to increase the allowable building heights
by 51, from 25' to 301.
The awareness of the height issue became apparent when the Zoning
plans check revealed that the structures were taller in places than
25' (to midpoint of roof) as allowed in the AH zone. You may
recall that the site had been excavated decades ago for a gravel
pit, and the "original natural grade" of a portion of Lot 8 was the
subject of discussion.
When the project architect was called to discuss the heights, he
pointed out that the Final development application requested the
Special Review, and the applicants believed throughout the process
that this element was part of official reviews. Planning staff
joined the discussions and it was determined that although the
original grade of the property was resolved by Building Department
and Planning staff as requested, the actual Special Review was not
1
incorporated into staff memos or final approval documents
(resolutions or ordinances). Exhibit "C" is the section from the
Final development application which discusses height and requests
the Special Review.
It should be noted that the sizes of the buildings, their designs
and positions on the site do not change because of the Special
Review request. Please refer to Exhibit "A" for sketches of the
original gravel pit area and building elevations as shown in the
Final PUD/Subdivision Application. Exhibit "B" .is the information
dated July 1, 1993 submitted to clarify this Special Review
hearing.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Planning Office believes that the Special
Review should be approved because the request was originally
contained in .the final development application and the fact that
the building sizes and site layout has not change from the approved
plan. The Commission has already approved Special Reviews for
parking, open space and FAR for this project. A separate P&Z
resolution will be composed by staff documenting this specific
height approval. The Planning Office will also process an
insubtantial PUD amendment to complete the official record.
Due to the tight timeframe for this project to obtain a building
permit, staff appreciates P&Z's willingness to hear this Special
Review request on short notice.
Special Review for Increased Height on an AH zoned parcel: Lot 8
of the proposed East Cooper AH Subdivision is 37,374 s.f. Per the
AH dimensional requirements, building heights are limited to 25'
to the mid point of the roof, with 5' additional to the roof ridge
or peak. The code allows height to be increased to 30' (mid point)
by Special Review. Sections 7-404.A.1 and 2 read:
Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed
development are subject to Special Review, - the development
application shall only be approved if the following conditions
are met.
1. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open
space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development
- are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances
the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with
the purposes of the underlying Zone District.
response: The Final PUD Plan which was reviewed by the Commission
on March 16, 30 and April 20, 1993 and approved by City Council on
April 26, 1993 does not change as a result of this requested height
increase. During its earlier reviews, the Commission liked the
Plan and made comments supporting the layout, size and livability
of the deed restricted multi -family units. Considering that this
Special Review approval is basically a technical approval required
t
for building permit, staff finds that the increased height is
consistent with the purposes of the AH zone district, -the original
Final Subdivision/PUD approval, and is therefore compatible with
the surrounding land uses .
2. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will
not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate
those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of
shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the
neighborhood or blocking of a designated viewplane.
response: No adverse impacts or changes to the vicinity will*
result from the height increase because the buildings are the same
as approved by the P&Z and City Council in March and April of this
year. Viewplanes specifically are not affected by the height
increase.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of
Special Review for the height increase to 30' for Lot 8 of the East
Cooper Affordable Housing Subdivision. No conditions of approval
are recommended.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Special Review for a height
increase from 25' to 30' Lot 8 of the East Cooper Affordable
Housing Subdivision as allowed by dimensional requirements of the
AH (Affordable Housing) zone district, pursuant to the criteria in
Section 24-7-404 of the Aspen Municipal Code."
Exhibit "A" - Sketch of Gravel Pit Location and Building Elevation
Examples from Final PUD/Subdivision Application
"B" - July 1, 1993 Information from Tom Stevens regarding
the height increase request
"C" - Excerpt from the Final Application regarding height
3
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT , APPROVED r
19 BY RESOLUTION •
����� ��r �L�1/•�T� one
Yup/sub.
N �eucw�,enrr ,4P�1��-hDN