HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.19921208
-i
AGE N D A
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
December 8, 1992, Tuesday
4:30 P.M.
2nd Floor Meeting Room
City Hall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I. COMMENTS
commissioners
Planning Staff
Public
II. MINUTES
.
III.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
~. 419 E. Hyman Conditional Use Review for a Satellite
Dish Antenna (KJ)
~ Aspen Body Building Center Conditional Use Review
for a Fitness Facility in the SCT Zone (KJ)
C. Oxley Conditional Use Review for an Accessory
Dwelling unit {LL)
D. Bell Mountain Lodge GMQS Scoring, special Review and
Text Amendment (KJ)
IV. ADJOURN
,_.--",
Ii.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Administrative Assistant
RE: Upcoming Agendas
DATE: December 8, 1992
No Meeting on December 22nd
Regular Meeting - January 5
L/TR Zone District Text Amendment for Commercial Parking - PH (KJ)
Snare Residential GMP Scoring - PH (KJ)
Block Conditional Use - PH (KJ)
Rio Grande Subdivision - PH (LL)
Rio Grande Conceptual SPA (LL)
Ritz PUD Amendment - PH (DM)
Regular Meeting - January 19
Co -Housing Subdivision, Stream Margin Review & Special Review - PH
(LL)
a.nex
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: 419 E. Hyman - Conditional Use for a Satellite Dish
Antenna - Public Hearing
DATE: December 8, 1992
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the 419 E.
Hyman Conditional Use for an existing roof -top satellite dish with
conditions. The dish was installed without a building permit. In
order to be able to issue a building permit a Conditional Use must
be approved.
APPLICANT: Ted Koutsoubos
LOCATION: 419 E. Hyman, Lots D and E, Block 89
ZONING: CC (Commercial Core)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use
approval to legitimize a roof -mounted dish antenna. According to
the applicant, the antenna was installed approximately three years
ago. For a sketch of the roof layout, refer to Attachment "A".
STAFF COMMENTS:
Historic Preservation Review: Per conversation with Historic
Preservation Officer Roxanne Eflin, prior to issuance of any
building permit the dish antenna must receive Historic Preservation
approval, probably via a staff level sign -off.
Conditional Use Review Criteria: The Commission has the authority
to review and approve development applications for conditional uses
pursuant to the following standards of Section 7-304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: This existing dish antenna is allowed in this zone if
the conditional use criteria specific to impacts are met. The
Comprehensive Plan is not specific to this request.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: The dish antenna is not visible from the street level.
The tenants in the building view this accessory use as a compliment
to their operations. Satellite links are not uncommon in office
and business applications.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: The applicant states that no complaints have been
received from neighbors or other parties regarding the dish
antenna. Staff is unaware of any complaints to the City regarding
the antenna. The roof top area is shielded from view below by a
parapet wall around the building perimeter. Review by the Historic
Preservation staff is required.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: Not Applicable.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
RESPONSE: Not Applicable.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: The Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan does not address this
specific issue. If found to have limited negative impacts through
the conditional use review, this request will comply with the CC
zone regulations within the Land Use Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the 419 E.
Hyman Conditional Use for a satellite dish antenna with the
following conditions:
1. All applicable building permits must be obtained within 60
days of this approval.
oil
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the dish,
the Applicant must receive appropriate Historic Preservation
approval.
3.. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve a Conditional Use for a
satellite dish antenna on the roof of 419 E. Hyman with the
conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 12/8/92."
Attachments:
"A" - Existing Roof Plan
3
Q L -,e �
04c#m*gr
K ( ��- *,--)
�I
I
1\
A#
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Aspen Body Building Center - Conditional Use for a
Fitness Facility in the SCI (Service/Commercial/
Industrial) Zone; (Public Hearing)
DATE: December 8, 1992
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval with conditions
of a Conditional Use for the Aspen Body Building Center to be
located in a SCI zone at 615 E. Bleeker St. The 2,400 s.f. space
is located on the second floor of the building, replacing a t-
shirt printing operation. Planning staff has determined that the
proposed use is similar to and consistent with "dance studio" and
"martial arts studio", which are listed as conditional uses in.the
SCI zone, and should be reviewed as a conditional use.
APPLICANT: Joe Vernier
LOCATION: 615 E. Bleeker St.
ZONING: SCI (Service/Commercial/Industrial)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use to
allow a 2,400 s.f. body building center at the above location. See
Exhibit "A" for site plan, floor plan and application text.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached as Exhibit
"B"
Engineering:
Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site
inspection, the engineering department has the following comments:
1. Parking - According to the land use code requirement, 3 spaces
per 1000 s.f. of net leasable area, the applicant is required
to supply seven parking spaces. The application references
having ten parking spaces available for the conditional use.
2. Trash - The trash area, and size of containers, for the
building must be depicted on the site plan.
3. Restroom Facilities - As a general comment if the facilities
indicated on the proposed floor layout do not exist, sewer and
water tap fees may be required.
,at
f
4. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way, we would advise the
applicant as follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering for
design considerations of development within public
rights -of -way and shall obtain permits for any work
or development, including landscaping, within public
rights -of -way from city streets department.
Recommended Conditions of Approval
1. Prior to approval the applicant must submit a site plan
depicting the trash area
Zoning: Parking in the alley at times is a problem. The applicant
should identify and sign the seven parking spaces dedicated to the
proposed conditional use.
----------------------------
STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission has the authority to review and
approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to
the standards of Section 7-304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: This proposed use (body building or weight training
center) is not specifically listed or defined as a use within the
Land Use Code. However, "martial arts" and "dance studio" uses are
listed as conditional uses in the SCI zone. These types of
businesses are very similar operationally to the requested "body
building center". Because of the similarity, staff believes that
the conditional use review criteria can be effectively utilized as
a review mechanism for this proposed use in this zone.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: According to the application, there are three other
similar uses in the E. Bleeker area: "Fitness Focus", a dance
studio, and a martial arts studio. Thus, the proposed use is
consistent with other nearby uses. In consideration of the
existing uses and his proposed use, Mr. Vernier envisions this
neighborhood as Aspen's "physical arts" area.
2
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: Parking is an important consideration along this section
of E. Bleeker St. Overflow parking into the alley occasionally
occurs during the daytime from the many businesses in this area.
The business will be open from lam to 10pm. In a conversation with
'the applicant, he stated that his anticipated peak hours will be
before 8am and after 5pm, which are fairly typical busy periods for
fitness facilities. This may perhaps lessen the parking congestion
during regular business hours. As mentioned in the referral
comments above, the proposed operation will require 7 parking
spaces for 2,400 s.f. of commercial use.
The applicant submitted a 7/9/92 survey of the property which did
not identify parking spaces. Utilizing the regulation 8.51x18'
parking space size, staff drew in 26 spaces which could
realistically be located on the parcel. Other uses within the
building include a print shop and auto repair shop on the lower
floor and a residence on the third floor. For purposes of this
review, these other uses require parking of approximately 7, 3.5,
and 3 spaces respectively (assuming a three bedroom residence),
totaling 13.5 spaces. The 7 spaces needed by the proposed use
would bring the total parking requirement to 20.5 (21) spaces. The
spaces for use of the proposed body building center patrons and
staff should be signed as such.
As mentioned in the Engineering comments, the applicant must
identify the trash service area on the site plan. This should be
accomplished prior to issuance of any building permit or business
license . ( in the event that a building permit is not necessary prior
to occupancy of the lease space).
There are no other adverse impacts anticipated for pedestrian or
traffic circulation, visual quality, noise, vibration, etc.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: All public facilities are all ready in place for the
existing commercial neighborhood.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need -for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
c
r
RESPONSE: According to the application, Joe Vernier and his wife
will operate the business with assistance from one other person.
The Verniers own a deed restricted townhome at Williams Woods.
The current tenant of the lease space is a t-shirt printing shop
which employs up to 6 persons, according to a conversation with Mr.
Vernier. The proposed use will apparently result in a net decrease
of employees. Since there appears to be no increase in employee
generation impacts with the requested use, a condition of approval
is proposed that places a limit of 6 employees for the Body
Building Center.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and any other applicable conditional use standards.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Aspen
Body Building Center Conditional Use at 615 E. Bleeker with the
following conditions:
1) The use shall employ no more than 6 full-time equivalent
employees.
2) Prior to approval of any building permit or business license,
the applicant must submit to Engineering and Planning a site
plan depicting the site's trash area.
3) Prior to issuance of any building permit or business license,
the applicant shall identify and sign the seven parking spaces
dedicated to the proposed conditional use.
4) All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve a Conditional Use for the
Aspen Body Building Center at 615 E. Bleeker Street, with the
conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 12/8/92."
Exhibits:
"A" - Site Plan, Floorplan, and Application Information
"B" - Referral Memo (Engineering)
4
ithletic Club
ly Chiropractic
Orthopedics
Reid, i Waldron.
party Management
37
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT reif
P , APPROVED
19 BY RESOLUTI-dN
THE PA770 BLDG. HYMAN AVE. LAYMAN AVE.The
y
My Marty Nan Allen, Sharkey. Braden Syz"y 10000 0 h A ()0 T9q
Hairstyling a McCormick Real Estate JE AnbW" Ltd. Elks Columbine Shop
Byrne -Getz Gallery The Christmas Shop _ The Beal ES. Lawrence LodRr The Eaprit B. Jammin' ,r 1 + 1 i 1 1 i 1 . + a
_ Curious Georgel "
Sandys Office Supply Pam Driscol Galle Carol Ann of All Worlds— Gall" Superstore Sulker • Aspen Ai
ry � Recobson As n The Upper
'Realty, Inc. c Drug Ltd. Mine Co. image .� �a
— Hard Cs
Abalone Ristorante Flack Ell Rock
Z CafE EJean Lutz Skincare Judy Pollock Del
call«y 2 39 Markn (upstairs) Footloose a F
38 The Fiower I Justinah Sushis~�CITY PLAZA eks Ling A
The Ranch Aspen Roserva s, Inc. Sport Stalker 4U C+
Home THE BRAND BLDG.
=1= Furnishings
_ Jean _
Robert's
Smiths Jane Smith
John Wyman ` Western Wear K Morocco impression* of Aspen DaniN Gr6misuz, Smuggler Gym COLLINS ALLEY of Aspen Fast Eddies— Aspen Antigun The Kids' Bazaar, Inc. Paris —Land Office, Ltd. OdleHats a Accessories Book a Oft Inc. MacMillan
HOPKINS AVE. Ash' Quick Color
Aspen City Hall
Headlines • �� IU
Full Service - • 1 1
Salon
47
n
St. May's Catholic Church
� I VVhI/ E 500's
Aspen Classic Properties, Inc. s / "�'��.
l/tktn CoatnryStMIN Homes, Inc.
Aspen Fire Dept. Fox I
i Ht:
Aspen Last �i .e
Jeweler
- s Palo Grow
4: Asso isies,
LOCALS QED
...w
CORNER Clean -Express
1
Kentucky Fried Chicken i Pour ' - Fran,-! --
Ca16 i Bakery
Htr� MAIN ST.
81
Hunrcr
— A,
Designs M
a
S67°17'
ioa 0p„E 12 66
Ln 1� r
61
n '
o
I„
3 I /
3
e
I
Z to
I IL ®7I' 1
12.863 SO FT
FOL
RE!
ASPHALT'
RIVE
1 -
'Hccosr[F�
GR El, 7e�5J2/ �. OR,
ROOF EL 7921.92 25' CONC. PA Te90.20 •AJ ROOF
40.1 0.0
W , ,
Z t— j 1.� ^ 4 7
1 /ig & 0
1
3 ( 7e95• LEC. ME?ER
cR. EL 7e93•[2 ROOF
R OOf E
ROOF EL.7921.92 T894,54 f— 0-06 Ei
1
_ I
y� 1
V, NE STORYWx
v �Z
W
W
h 75°09 I i WFOUN
107.67 / / 3.8 REBA
40 43 / .n
�G' S ELK
V Mp
�= t
All
�1 �r�
fyv
-gQkY&v,� U)\ �\-(\N -
�AEC�C--
ct)-� imc m
V) G-- C- k--k 1 -REAU-LEQ,,-
-1-Ac CkA-T
nuq
-------- ---- ----------�-�----
� N _ �ZSio��
At,
LCIE
-r) AIN
4� C7
p\1
C70,
NIA-T. t ON
`^ V��\_T ` '\
` ~_
--_____---'__'_ ____' ��
_T11-111- I I L�f "1 11)
-p<< _ �' ce
T-s ���_�I- s ��� y-ram«� � _sue -
to `��_c Z)I\q (zAc-q
<\C-6
_-
4
le, le- i t
OVA
so(alo INo m c 2
V c- m
14
A
c
v
�1�Nc�1rT,-71 —(z, ice- s�, � - -
L
-7- G� ��S_(_r- U.J �C� (--F- c)
-L)
p3
us c-
�C C ��' S S _
(Z7
---- ---� l_ � � plc ��_ � � � .� � U s-� r� ��
VA
- --��� �Z ���� _5 _vim_ (� �e►�� ��a I � -
n t k ev
On
i 5'.����� IDS ____ �. j�,r �
oc,
2-C
��t����uA vc-1����` 'camLRr(oh
ill �`� �,�,s�d��__�c�s�l+�-n�._�,��L(
5�'�-,� _�-z. -ram �n�+� � � �
6 C77
rf
T0: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning
RE: Oxley Conditional Use Review
DATE: December 8, 1992
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct a single family home
with an attached, 310 square foot (net liveable), accessory
dwelling unit. Staff recommends approval of conditional use for
an accessory dwelling unit.
APPLICANT: John'Oxley as represented by Sunny Vann
LOCATION:. 530 West Francis Street, Aspen
ZONING: R-6
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To provide an attached studio accessory
dwelling unit pursuant to Ordinance 1 requirements.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Having reviewed the above referenced
application, and having made a site inspection, the engineering
department has the following comments:
1. Site drainage - One of the considerations of a development
application for conditional use is that there are adequate
public facilities to service the use. One public facility
that is inadequate is the City street storm drainage system.
The new development plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site. Any increase to historic
storm run-off must be maintained on site.
2. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way, we would advise the
applicant as follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080)
for design considerations of development within public
rights -of -way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation
species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within public rights -
of -way from city streets department (920-5130).
3. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement dis-
tricts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing
improvements in the public right-of-way.
4. Parking - Parking requirements for this proposal are 1 parking
space per bedroom, there are four, and special review for the
accessory dwelling unit. The parking spaces as 4ndicated on
the site plan submitted with the application is acceptable.
5. Pedestrians should have a five foot unobstructed path in the
right-of-way, which must be indicated on the site plan. In
addition there are several large trees that exist near the
corner of West Francis and Fifth Street that should be pruned
so that there is seven feet clear height from the ground.
This will also improve vehicle site distance.
6. Curb and gutter - The pedestrian walkway and bike plan call
for rolled curb and gutter in the West End. The Engineering
Department is not requiring this to be installed at this time,
but will require the applicant to enter into a curb and gutter
installation agreement with the City of Aspen.
Recommended Conditions:
1. Prior to approval the applicant must submit a revised site
plan to the engineering department, depicting the following:
° drainage plan
° North Fifth Street, West Francis Street, the alley and
any proposed work in the public right-of-way.
2. The applicant will work with the Parks Department for pruning
of the trees.
3. The applicant will enter into a curb and gutter installation
agreement with the City of Aspen.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Conditional Use Review - Pursuant to Section 7-304 the criteria
for a conditional use review are as follows:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located; and
RESPONSE: The proposed accessory dwelling unit will be
approximately 310 square feet of net liveable below grade. The
unit will comply with the Housing Guidelines and the requirements
of Ordinance 1. The unit will be deed restricted as a resident
occupied unit for residents of Pitkin County. Provision of an
accessory dwelling unit is consistent with the City's policy to
encourage voluntary development of affordable housing in all
neighborhoods.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
2
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the
mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and
RESPONSE: The surrounding neighborhood is entirely residential
uses. The accessory dwelling unit is attached to the proposed
single-family residence and will not increase the mass or floor
area of the proposed home. The design of the house would be the
same if the accessory dwelling unit were not included.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and
RESPONSE: The attached accessory dwelling unit will have no
adverse effect upon surrounding properties. The proposed residence
will continue to appear as a single-family structure. Six parking
spaces are provided for on -site.
Although the Commission and staff have been concerned about
accessing adu's via mechanical rooms or storage rooms the room is
not included in the 310 square foot net liveable. Yet this storage
room will function as a mud room and storage for the adu providing
a beneficial space for the occupants of the adu.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve
the conditional' use including but not limited to roads,
potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire
protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical
services,'drainage systems, and schools; and
RESPONSE: Currently a single family residence occupies the site.
No new services are required to redevelop the site with a primary
residence and a 310 square foot accessory dwelling unit.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet
the incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use; and
RESPONSE: The proposal includes a studio accessory dwelling unit
for employees of Pitkin County. An increase in employees is not
expected by the provision of an accessory dwelling unit.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the'Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: The conditional use meets the requirements of the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan and other requirements of this chapter by
3
integrating a community housing need into the redevelopment of the
property.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use
for the attached accessory dwelling unit with the following
conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits:
1. the applicant shall, upon approval of the deed restriction by
the Housing Authority, record the deed restriction with the Pitkin
County Clerk, Recorders Office and Planning Department. The deed
restriction shall state that the accessory unit meets the housing
guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident
Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six
months or longer.
2. all representations that are made in the application and those
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
be complied with.
3. the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the
engineering department, depicting the following:
• drainage plan
• North Fifth Street, West Francis Street, the alley and
any proposed work in the public right-of-way.
4. the applicant shall work with the Parks Department for pruning
of the trees.
5. the applicant will enter into a curb and gutter installation
agreement with the City of Aspen.
6. the adu shall conform with UBC sound attenuation requirements.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the 310 square foot net
liveable accessory dwelling unit with the conditions as listed in
Planning Office memo dated December 8, 1992."
ATTACHMENTS: Site Plan
4
AXOM j�N 11Y.
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning
RE: Bell Mountain Lodge Expansion - 1992 Tourist
Accommodations Growth Management Scoring and Future GMP
Allocations, Text Amendment for Parking in the LP (Lodge
Preservation) Zone District, Special Review for Parking,
and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing for 22 New
Lodge Units
DATE: December 8, 1992
--------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Bell
Mountain Lodge Growth Management proposal for 22 lodge units and
Special Review for parking in the LP (lodge Preservation) zone
district. Planning also recommends approval of an amendment to the
parking requirements for the LP zone.
This memo brings forward the Planning office's recommendation for
scoring'of the Bell Mountain Lodge project. It is the only lodge
application submitted for allocation in the 1992 competition. The
project seeks future GMP allocations for 1993 and 1994 in addition
to the 1992 allotment. The Planning Office staff provides its
score to you as a consensus of the Office.
APPLICANT: Bell Mountain Lodge, Inc.
LOCATION: 720 E. Cooper Ave. (Lots K-P, and part of Lot Q, Block
105, Townsite of Aspen); the northeast corner of E. Cooper and S.
Spring St.
ZONING: LP (lodge Preservation)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Growth Management approval for 22 new lodge
units. The proposal requires all 10 units of the 1992 allotment
as well as future Growth Management Allocations for 1993 (10 units)
and 1994 (2 units) . The application also seeks approval for a code
amendment for parking requi.rements'in the LP (Lodge Preservation)
zone, Special Review for parking, and GMQS Exemption for on -site
employee dwelling units consisting of one 1-bedroom unit, one 2-
bedroom unit, and one 3-bedroom unit. Please refer to Exhibits "A"
and "B" for letters from Sunny Vann regarding the text amendment
and change to the employee housing configuration.
PROCESS: To structure the review process, the Planning Office
recommends that the "auxiliary" reviews for the project take place
first, followed by GMP scoring of the project. For your
information, we have included a table summarizing the staff's
recommended score.
The Planning Commissioner's shall individually score the project.
An average score will be calculated. The Commission may also
decide to accept staff's scoring of the project. If it is found
that the project meets or exceeds the minimum thresholds
established by the land use code, the project will be forwarded to
the City Council for allocation of development rights.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are contained as
Exhibit "C". A summary of highlight comments are as follows:
Engineering:
1. The amended parking garage layout is acceptable. Employee
parking should be dedicated within the proposed arrangement.
2. The site arrangement improves efficiency and circulation on -
site as well as on Cooper Ave., and adds one parking space along
Cooper Ave.
3. There are encroachments into the right-of-way by fences, sign,
and fountain. These must be removed or obtain an encroachment
license through the Engineering -Department. The sidewalk must be
5' minimum width on Spring St. and 8' along Cooper Ave. The
sidewalk clearance between the curb and the streetlight must be
improved. There shall be no valve boxes or manhole in the
sidewalks or curb/gutter.
4. The existing utility switch gear in the alley must be relocated
onto the subject parcel.
5. Alley improvements and the subsurface garage reduces traffic
conflicts with traffic on Cooper Ave. Alley design and resurfacing
shall be in accordance with City of Aspen, approved by the Streets
Superintendent.
6. Engineering takes no exception to the proposed text amendment
for parking in the LP zone.
Fire Marshal:
1. Automatic fire sprinkler and automatic fire alarm system is
required.
Sanitation District:
1. Adequate treatment and line capacity is available.
2. Detailed plans must be reviewed by the District. Fees will be
calculated at that time.
Environmental Health:
1. Replacement of the log fireplace with the gas log unit improves
air quality. The new unit must be registered and permitted prior
WE
e
It shall be considered sufficient evidence of service and public
facility availability if it can be demonstrated that sufficient
capacity is available in transportation, utilities, affordable
housing, parks/recreation facilities, police, fire, schools, and
hospital capacity.
Response: All basic infrastructure are in place for the
neighborhood. The increase of 22 units at once versus three years
is not an impact to the systems.
5) It can be demonstrated that granting allotments from future
years will be in support of the goal of community balance.
Response: There have been no GMP submissions or allocations for
the LP zone during the last several years, so the rate of
development in the small lodge category will not have been affected
in the long term. This project will be an enhancement of the small
lodge base in town, which is a goal of the LP zone district.
--------------------------------
Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval of the
Text Amendment for the LP zone parking regulations, Special Review
for Parking at the Bell Mountain Lodge, and GMQS Exemption for
affordable housing. Staff also recommends utilizing 10 future GMP
allotments from 1993 and 2 GMP allotments from 1994 for the Bell
Mountain Lodge project.
Recommended Motions: "I move to score the Bell Mountain Lodge
Expansion at total points and find that the required minimum
point thresholds have been net, and that future allocations from
the 1993 and 1994 Growth Management quotas be granted to this
proposal."
"I move to recommend to City Council approval of the Text Amendment
regarding parking requirements in the LP zone, and GMQS Exemption
for 7 employees within three affordable housing units as proposed
in the November 2, 1992 application amendment."
"I move to approve Special Review for the parking plan for the Bell
Mountain Lodge, effective upon City Council's approval of the Text
Amendment regarding parking in the Lodge Preservation zone."
Attachments:
Bell Mountain Lodge Application Booklet
Exhibits:
"A" - Letter from Sunny Vann (text amendment for parking)
"B" - Letter from Sunny Vann (parking and housing changes)
"C" - Complete Referral Memos
Scoring sheet reflecting Staff consensus for the Bell Mountain
Lodge expansion
10
categories to be eligible for an allocation. Comb tined minimum
threshold for categories 1-4 above is 45 points. This project was
scored at 56.25 by staff. Individual category thresholds have been
net as shown in the table above. Thus, staff scoring finds that
the Bell Mountain Lodge meets the minimum point thresholds required
by the land use regulations. Bonus Points may be given only by the
Commission.
Future Allocation: The Applicant seeks the full 10 unit allotment
for the 1992 GMP competition for the LP zone. Also requested is
10 units of the 1993 allotment and 2 units from the 1994 allotment.
A future allocation may be granted by the City Council if all of
the following standards can be demonstrated:
1) The quality of the proposed development substantially exceeds
that established minimum threshold for the scoring established in
Section 8-105.G.7, by receiving 67% of the points cumulatively
available at the time of its scoring by the Commission.
Response: Total available points in the six lodge scoring
categories is 105. 67% of 105 is 70.35 points. Staff scored the
project at 81.625 points, or 78% of total available points, thus
it meets this standard.
2) The site design of the proposed development makes construction
phasing infeasible. This requires but is not limited to a
demonstration that economies of scale will result from construction
occurring at once; the proposed development is intended as a single
building which cannot easily be constructed or operated in phases;
and that the public facility investments for the proposed
development such as roads, water and sewer facilities, must all be
installed at the initiation of the project, making phasing
economically unrealistic.
Response: As depicted in the drawings submitted, the new lodge
will be one structure built over an underground garage. One
construction phase is absolutely required due to this plan. All
infrastructure is in place, so this criteria is not pertinent.
3) The impacts of construction of the proposed development on the
surrounding neighborhood will be reduced by construction at one
time rather than phasing it over two or more construction period,
and such construction can be tolerated by the city.
Response: The Bell Mountain Lodge is across from City Market and
near several office, commercial and multi -family residential
structures. To spread construction over more than one time period
would be undesirable to the neighborhood in terms of noise,
traffic, and visual impacts.
4) The city is capable of absorbing the accelerated rate at which
impacts on its services and public facilities will be experienced.
��
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 419 EAST HYMA AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR A
SATELLITE DISH
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, December 8, 1992 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room,
City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, CO to consider an application
submitted by Ted Koutsoubos, 419 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO
requesting approval of a Conditional se Review for a satellite
dish to be located at 419 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO. For
further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen/Pitkin
Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, CO 920-5090
sliasmine Tygre, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
No.
No.
Foreclosure Certificate
Entries
Tax Certificate
$
Closing Fee
Recording Fees
Reports 8 HOURS @
$75 PER HOUR-
600.00
Cancellation Fee
_
Other
_
Less Credits
TOTAL d U E
600.00
__^_ _
CBRTIFIGATB OF MAILING
RE:
I hereby certify that on this 23rd. day of November 1992,
a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing..
was deposited in -the United States mail, first --class postage
prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the
aL%ached list of adjacent property owners.
By • G�
frm. mailing
0
4 ..
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, IT C.
601 E. HOPKINS, 3RD FLOOR
Vincent, J. Iiigens ASPEN, COLORADO 8161.1. Christina Davis
eE.;ident 303-925-1766 : 303-925••-6527 FAX Vise President
ADJACENT OWNER'S STATEMENT
P i_ t}' i� County unty Title, Inc. , a duly licensed Title :insurance �.c�ent in the
St3.t;e c7:� Colorado, hereby certifies the followinglist is a current list
of prc�perty owner's within 300 feet The Easterly porition of Lot D, Block
89 and all of Lot E, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen as obtained from
the most current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls.
W11--'ES ,k'1ND ADDRESSES BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lt---®ctrara---- as cs cu ap------------- ------ --------Kw.m.0 mam. Ol sa------OS .a .O psl is uo ca av to dm®O�
PLEASE REFER TO LIST ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
R
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
p
'die easterly Portion of Lot 7a lock 39, Clty and Tolvnsite of
't: bcg111- t11 at the nox•t:l1c :..,,rl.,y coma" ��� said �t ��
�isz�clit fC1-'W1 ��
,�, e 0 75° 09'l1" «' fl, distar: e of 13,40 t�eet, then" S 140
D �00,k 69 thence � e a distance of 51.. 0 feet, thence S `r5°09'1.1-" E a diel:ai1ce o
5� ag ��
_�, 0 f� et, then
ce 1 �° 50' 4' 0" NV a Cris <<,,uco of 4 q- 0 feet, thence S 7 1 ,ot T)
011.111 � 'st�.11cc of 0A ��0 f � at t,o the �c?uthc;a.stoxly corner of sE�ic, via.
r
lC a di n• the easterly ling of
)3lock 69, tborice In a ,n.or'th_e l� o `�'tection a1an�
:t./ot) ,Mack 08 to , polut o1 1)eg!nning,
and aII of Lot F, 1y106; 801 Ci^�
l ani, T ownsito of Aspen,
f ,
h
711 'Ni LINKED
ALL OF LOT E, BLOCK 96
�< CO
81611
a
q
AY7n _ .10P, ROBE ., L. ZUPANCI'3
N 66 OF LOT B, BLOCK K3
,. ,
1
{
ANDRE UL00
N 32' OF LOTS K AND L, AND
30 OF LOT M BLOCK 63
4 1612
;FFiTH
E 14' OF LOT C, BLOCK 89
r,
81611
LOTS A, B, C, AND D,
,,1 _,1317 LYITM"
BLOCK 95
co
8150
41' ART {rri >\i. LTD.
UNIT B-10t , TAM THUMB
707ADC _ ''_BAL PARTNERSHIP
r.'._.�'BTti,'�R '; I'� J Eco
( 6 1
,47 - - - ._ . A jOINT VENTURE
UNIT RB-1. ASPEN OF
_ R _ . _ .. F. 4fOC
` d
�t
y T 1.' `� A—S' 0C . A 1 i'0�
COMMON AREA r —
tl1P13
71101
S 34' OF LOTS A AND B.
BLOCK 89
cc
8`611
NC. 22--
Y
LOTS K, L AND M. BLOCK 9"
i e
a
(I
� Ifa� r Tf".f'
�,lES ENT
j CAI
CORPORATION
CORPORATION
r ��
LOTS G, R AND S, BLOCK E9
`
N
Co
81612
0
H
, ''r 0 ASSOCIATES
W 1S' OF LOT C, 800 89
1.7170 PARTNTR5HIP
co
215511
t
j punE E. CASON
UNITS 1 AND 2, RC:ARING
I
FORK CONDCS
.Q. sox 1117
IE . .. h!
Co
81612
QVIETINE nI SARTO"._O
UNIT R-22, ROARING FORK
ARMS
47 FIST PYTAN AVE.
`,-U
8 611
..Y Cc .,,,.J:� .,
WAGNER PARK
co
81511
... TY CF ASTEN
LOTS R-S, BLOCK 81
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE
..,,
1
_ . , FF EISHE \
UNIT ':C2. PARK PLACE CONDO
7 077 r. «�R AVE.
_
20
81511
.1 v
:7. A:" . ' LEEN' DENSON
UNITS 8-202 AND 6-201.
TI'UMS
-TOM
o
81657
Y
r Cry 'N
CAb'iJ
F_
PORTICN Or LOTS A, � AND
C, BLOCK 90
Co
81E'1
UNIT C-8, ASPENNOE
' , SUPPLY
CO
8'11
CO
81612
UNITS 101, 201-20 101-
304, DUVIKE CONDOS
OLT
UNIT C-1, ASPENHOF
7 1. "IN BROCK, EXECUTOR
1 Y 'ARM RCAC
72212
FOOTLO37F TOCCASIN MAKERS. INC,
UNIT A-201, TOM THUMB
R 0 UP A T I ON
0 'i I'LL ST
vV
81611
F 7 1 K A L I N 0 N E R
N 6V OF LOT A, BLOCK E9
_7 V'-
A --NUE S.E
t4A
W27
7 r
- . 3`,JILDING, LTD.
UNITS 104, GOLDEN HO!Vt'
:21717 101TED PWNERYIP
7.7. FIX 007
OUILDING combos
co
91612
LOTS N AND 0, BLOCK 81
Y: WOYAT? Ross
Co
8102
?!.l V20,
LOTS E, F, G. H AND I.
BLOCK 90
co
S1612
"NITS 1-16, 9RY'l,,D EUILDINGD
cc
81611,
�7.41 VWIN. 11,
THE N 80' OF LOTS A, S W
E TRW 77_TING
C. BLOCK 38
,"'I 77-v PnENA
co
8161!
7 1. 47
5 20' OF LOT E, AND S 251
77'. ViFNA STREET
\: CO
91611
JR. & MARTHA 9.
''IS WC744T 500
UNIT 402, ASPENHOF
"T72 VIT
VV ELAINE WOLF
S 70' OF LOT I BLOCK 9S
7: 177:1
70 WOLF FAMILY TRUST
77 77v
CA
9203
HILLIS
SMONMASS, INC.
UNIT C-201, TOM THUMB
17: ELIE
0171".
co
81657
07005ENCE
PARTNERSINDEPENDENCE PARS
UNITS 1-8. INDEPENCENCE
7/0 M I W
PR0ERTY
BUILDING
27 SOL'?
VIL STREET
4 V
co
81611
:07 E.
0,01
UNIT 406, ASPENHOF
472 2.
271% jR.
V lv?v:s 71ACE
GyThV127 LA 71101,
AN� ANTHOINY E. COX E 6' OF LOT 0, ALL OF
210 17VATE LIMITE�,
!LL STREET
7 CO 81511
YES 7. 1 DADE: UNIT C-7, ASPENROF
1177,co 81612
.2 4. 7A. & GARAGE AND PARK19G AREA
ASPENHOF
Es!
co 81612
003 AT,) LOTS M AND L, BLOCK SS
311 7. 27EYCE
'1 E13T 72PER AV7NUE
LOTS 9, E AND F, EVC5 93
(EXCEPT!NG S 20'OF LOTS
5 �Vll VA:N STREET D AND E, BLOCK 88)
AvTnco
050 PAY WI
t,`NIT 303, PARK P1ACE
t�
E
41 7077AVENUE
FL
334EO
r . R llL.:. ,ER
UNIT C-6, AS?ENHO
±N
37201
, VIN ,,,;.r, A, S.A.
N 25' OF LOTS R AND S,
,, 1 _ NAV1CATION CO. , INC.
BLOCK 88
LO '''', A T,A CORPORATION
LOT 0, BLOCK 88
01 1 t t ^ Ty
752C5
,
WO FIRST l , IVNA,L BANK OF CEVARICGE
. I. SOS 329
b r
o
�
81413
UNIT 304 . PARK PLACE CONDO
44
_ rn
t. w
S1611
1
V.
UNIT C-1. ROARING FORK
ARC'S
:. CO
80303
- - _ , INC.
Lr, N, 8LOCK 9
XAN AVE.
cc
01
OR:',,,.AWN 0C1/0152
UNITS 103. 203. 305, 306
X SECT 10N/A,,'1F O'HARE
AIRPnRIT
PAR,K PLACE
IL
60566
LOTS D. E, F, Gt H AND 1,
s r T ?n,,
E OCK 81
AS .
CO
81611
t
- + _"ORI r ES
80p
1✓B
UNIT A-301 . TOMTHUMB
,
i ..... .;iiiJWr ASS
51K DRIVE
,�:C CANON
UNIT 304,ASPENHOF
PE -El 2 r _ 5N AND'
UNIT C-301, TOM THUMB
+v 470 WK 92
r �.S, .,R.
UNIT 305, ASPENHOF
r s �TR,—E
'NITS C-2 AND C-3.
_ 'VCZ
ASPENHOF
'I. CITY
AZ
85493
10 jR.
S 75' OF LOT-7 R AND S.
BLOCK 88
co
8 iti
c
'1N1!3 '., 2, 3, 5, 7 AND 8, ,
RED ONION CONICS
_ AVE.
C.
81511
O,
VOW''
S 68' OF LOTS K D L
_ w , DATED 3--10--84
BLOCK 9
:3 5847
SIN FELIPE
-co
8011
ti' LLY, �
UNIT 322, ASPENHOF
V 1.�T!ON ,L
SANK
TN
37237
WN EWITY &
iNli' C 0
"070 7`�SRS. LTD.
I A I TH T T S'
81611,
UNIT 5, RED ONION CONDOS
UNIT 3, ROARING FOT�K CONDO
STEFAN T0211" UNIT 4, REO ONION CONDOS
177 N0714 92 57.
CC) 81611,
:190L KA4TZER
UNITS A-303
AND A-304.
TOM THUM9
CA
glia
77 A. 0W750BGS
UNITS R-17,
R-23, R-13,
R-25, R-28,
R-29, R-15,
"t FAS, F77AN AVE.
R-21, R-11,
R-14, R-21,
c 'C'
81611 R-16, R-27,
ROARING FORK
71NNE�STF EE REN7AQ,
UNIT 305. ASPENHOF
C !D Y. it S A . r-� . M 1 `- L E R
?too wry7y
DRIVE
71559 TN 37604
C>7717AL CCIPORATICI
7
l'? 1774 7:11 STREE.
co 81511
!-V :774W! DIVIDE COMPANY
�L?47� 07CRATION
127w 0L STREET
ch 81611
H40 CiNPANY
Si'.! 1 T E 1 �-�`Co
77470 PAR", EAST, CEENTURY CITY,
CA 90067
17 THREE
PARTNERSHIP
N
TN 37201
UNIT 301, PARK PLACE 00100
UNIT V!, PARK PLACE CONDC
UNITS 200-213. 300-313,
THE INDEPENDENCE SUILDING
UNIT 30 ASPENHOF
E 1
� f
triIT^N'pos
U475 R-12, C-2-A C-2_.9
R-1?, R `ARING FORK ARY-3
EAST Hy -Am AVE,
s
E
A,CON`RANY
UNIT C•-5 , ASPENNOS
W AIDE! RRINTI'G, ASPEN
c v+ 'ii R�1r
��vC
cc
301
1' SSE TP CO3NT R0j L ER
UNIT 301, A:SPENHOF
_ ' TN
36501
5 .. x P;E, . jR.
LOTS M AND N. BLOCK 00
P.O.
co
81612
_ .7115 ' __ .V,!'. IGN
UNITS A-101, A,..102, A-03,
_ .,_. _..,__ 75ER R_A:;
x'202 AND v ,w:, TCM THUMB
SNOWY131 CENTER
t ..r NV
1',.S38
-
. _. _' 177TE A"__'CIATE1. W.
CLOTS E. F AND G, BLOCK 32
.. 1. FLEIS .ER COMPANY
;.0
S'611
UNITS A,6 AND C, ASPEN =
q
NDOS
CO
3C11
nrE
UNIT 403 ASPENHOF