HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19860408
RECORD OF ~PROCEBDINGS
REGULAR MEftlNG
PLARlHNG .1'1IIl ZORING COIIIIISSIOR
APRIL 8. 1986
Chairman Welton Anderson called the meeting to order at 5:00
P.M. with Commissioners Roger Hunt, Jasmine Tygre, Al Blomquist,
David White (arrived late), Mari Peyton (arrived late), Ramona
Markalunas (arrived late), and Jim Colombo (arrived late) present.
COIIIII SSIOHER · S COIIIIERTS
Motion:
Hunt moved to have the Planning Office draft a resolution forwarding
the Clean Air Advisory Board memorandum to City Council, indicating
this Commissions support; Tygre seconded. Blomquist abstained,
all others in favor; motion carried.
Steve Burstein, planner, said there was a request for the Commission
to sponsor a code amendment in order to allow housing as a
conditional use for non-historic structures and as a permitted use
in historic structures in the commercial core zone. Andy Hecht,
applicant for the Brand Building, said they would like to pursue
the idea of amending the zoning code because they feel it is a
city wide issue. Whether their case is granted first or the code
amendment this applicant is willing to pay the expense of studying
the issue and bringing it before this Commission. Mr. Hecht said
in historically designated buildings certain dispensations should
be made to encourage them to maintain their viability. Mr. Hecht
did not feel this would set a precedent that would create problems
for the City, and in new buildings or those without historic design-
ation the conditional use will give the City adequate protection.
Blomquist asked if there were any reasons this should not be
done. Mr. Burstein replied no.
Motion:
Blomquist moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission request
the staff to prepare a code amendment for sponsorship by this
Commission that would amend the zoning use tables for the CC zone
to allow dwelling units as dwelling units above the first floor
level as permitted uses in historic structures and as conditional
uses in other structures; Tygre seconded.
I
RECORD OFPROCEBDIRGS
REGm.ARMEE'l'IRG
PLARRllIIG AND ZONllIIG COIIIIISSIOR
APRIL 8;. 1986
Discussion:
Hunt said he thought this was going too far too fast. He was
convinced dwelling units may be a conditional use in a historic
building, however, he was not sure if that would be applicable to
the rest of the commercial core area, especially given the number
of historic buildings in the commercial core area. Hunt thought
the approach of studying the issue would be a better approach.
Whi te said he was a supporter of the idea that people like to
live in and around where they work. Several residential units
have been lost in the downtown area. This proposal would replace
some of those. Additionally, the vibrancy of downtown nightlife
in town is enhanced by the fact that people live downtown. White
added that he was talking about long term rental, not short term.
Blomquist amended his motion to say long term rental only; Tygre
agreed to amend her second.
Markalunas and Hunt opposed, Anderson abstained; all others in
favor; motion carried.
MllIU'l'ES
January 28.1986:
Tygre moved to approve the minutes of January 28, 1986; Peyton
seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
February 4. 1986:
Tygre moved to approve the minutes of February 4, 1986; Peyton
seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
March 11..1986:
Anderson corrected page 8 in the second to the last and last
paragraph, the FAR description should read 1.9 to I.
Tygre moved to approve the minutes of March II, 1986 as amended;
Peyton seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
2
REGULAR MEETING
RECORD ~OF PROCEBDI1IGS
PLARRllIIG AND ZORIRG COIIIIISSIOR
APRIL 8. 1986
PUBLIC BEARING
II1JBICIPAL CODE AMERDMEII'l
SECTIOR 24-3.2 PRRMY'ft'ED ANDHCORDI'.rIORAL USES
Steve Burstein, planner, said this code amendment was to the
public zoning district to allow maintenance buildings and employee
housing, for the employees of the public use, as a conditional
use within the public zone. The Planning Office initiated this
code amendment along with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
Districts application to put such facilities on North Mill St.
Burstein said they feel it is reasonable to try to make these 2
processes go through simultaneously. Burstein said the Planning
Office I s feeling is that maintenance facilities should be considered
a compatible use within the zoning district. Burstein said
employee housing also appears to be a compatible use. Burstein
said they recommend approval of these as conditional uses in
order to give this Commission the opportunity to review particulars.
Blomquist asked what the underlying intent was, what is planned.
Burstein said on principal he would like the Commission to hear
the application in full at the next meeting. The intent is to
put a maintenance shop, an office, and some employee housing
adjoining the existing office buildings.
Anderson asked if there wasn I t al ready employee housing in the
location. Burstein replied yes. Blomquist asked if there was
any reason why they have to have facilities in the city, other
than the fact that they have historically owned the land.
Blomquist thought the area should be reserved as a park. This
proposal would be development in the historic flood plane.
Burstein said he wanted to make a distinction between this
application for a municipal code amendment and the evaluation of
the SPA amendment which will come before the Commission at a
later meeting. Burstein asked that this be considered as a
general zoning district and use table question.
Anderson asked what other land was zoned Public. Burstein
replied City Hall, the County Court House, the Water Treatment
Plant, the Fire Station, and a small parcel on North Mill St.
Blomquist said the current work schedule has a section in the Master
Planning process for public facilities. There is no research
3
REGULAR . MEftlRG
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PLARRING AIIIl ZORING COMMlSSIOR
APRIL 8. 1986
indicating why this particular amendment is necessary or desirable
for sOlving the gamut of problems that are due for study within
the next few months. Blomquist thought this was jumping the gun
until the issue of whether every public parcel should have an SPA
etc. is deal t with. He would like to see the whole plan and
research before amending this section of the code. Burstein said
he viewed this omission as an obvious problem in need of correc-
tion.
Tygre said she thought alot of Blomquist's concerns could be
handled when applicant's came before the Commission to undergo
the conditional use procedure. Problems with public zones or
each individual use in a public zone are quite different and she
did not know if anything would be gained by lumping them all
together in a group study. Tygre thought having this as a
conditional use would give the Commission the opportunity to
review each case on an individual basis.
Hunt asked what the status of public zones actually being SPA
was, are they all handled under the SPA process. Burstein
replied yes, the area and bulk requirements are handled under the
SPA process, uses are still the underlying zone.
Anderson opened the public hearing. There were no comments,
therefore, the public hearing was closed.
MotioDl
Tygre moved to recommend that City Council amend Section 24-3.2
of the Municipal Code, the use table for the Public zone district,
to include as conditional uses maintenance buildings and employee
housing for employees of the pUblic use; Markalunas seconded.
Discussion:
Hunt said he agreed with Blomquist's argument, that the whole
picture should be looked at. Anderson agreed with Tygre.
Blomquist commented that the overall study was already schedUled
in the work program for some time this year. Secondly, there are
too many conditional uses. Blomquist urged a no vote.
White said he was confused and did not feel comfortable voting
ei ther way. Burstein said if you look at the intention of the
4
REGULAR MEftlNG
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PLARRIRG AND ZORING COMMISSION
APRIL 8. 1986
zone district, to provide for governmental and quasi-governmental
facilities for cultural, educational, civic, and other governmental
purposes it seems to excl ude maintenance shops in particular.
There is no where else in the code that they are specifically
allowed. White said he did not know if he was willing to give
these applicants an open door.
Peyton said she did not have a problem with maintenance shops but
does have a problem with employee housing.
Hunt said he thought the public should come under a complete SPA
and not have a preconception of what the underlying zoning is.
Every piece of public property is .unique. and how do you come up
with an underlying code for all of those different kinds of
public uses. Hunt thought the SPA process was a better way to
deal with this. Anderson commented that the SPA process did not
allow varying uses. Anderson said he would like to see Section
24-3.2 have added language so that the SPA would control the
determination of what are the accessory uses as opposed to coming
up with some accessory uses to fit in to one circumstance.
Anderson asked for
Blomquist
Markalunas
Tygre
Hunt
White
Peyton
Anderson
Tygre in favor, all
a roll call vote:
no
no
aye
no
no
no
no
others opposed; motion NOT carried.
Motion:
Hunt moved to have the Planning staff forge ahead, along the lines
discussed, with the SPA and a general enough underlying land use
so the public individual uses on a particular parcel can be
determined in the SPA process; Blomquist seconded. All in favor;
motion carried.
RESOLtl'l'IOR
FORWARlUNG SCORING OF smD1Y PARlt RBSIDEII'lIALGMP
Anderson read Resolution '86-4.
5
REGm.AR MEftlNG
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PLARRING AND ZONING COIIIIISSIORAPRIL~8. 1986
Motion:
Hunt moved to adopt Resolution '86-4; Peyton seconded.
Discussion:
Gideon Kaufman, applicants attorney, said condition 'l on page 2
of the resolution says two dry wells will be installed. Mr. Kaufman
found the language to be confusing. Mr. Kaufman said he would
rather see the language read -two dry wells will be installed,
one on the northwest corner and one on the center of the site- so
it is clear.
Mr. Kaufman said, regarding condition '3 on page 2, that their
commitment was for Colorado blue spruce trees 8 feet tall and the
condition says 9 feet tall. Markalunas asked if the condition
bound the developer to maintain those trees. Burstein said
code requires them to maintain the trees.
Mr. Kaufman said that he would like condition lIon page 3 in the
last sentence to say -applicable to subdivision exception-
because that section of the code talks about full subdivisions
and this is a subdivision exception. Some of the requirements
may not be applicable to a subdivision exception. Mr. Kaufman
said the applicant was willing to do what is required in a standard
subdivision exception but not a full subdivision.
Mr. Kaufman also had a problem with condition t3 on page 3. In
the first sentence it says -an improvements agreement and guarantee
shall be filed- and Mr. Kaufman felt it should say -shall be
submi tted-.
Finally, condition t3 page 4 says -landscaping on the site and
adjacent public right of way shown on the site plan and pursuant
to Article V, Chapter 19-. Mr. Kaufman said that particular
section talks about location, arrangement, and specie shall conform
to the adopted landscaping plan. In this GMP application the
applicant has committed to a certain type of trees, being Aspen and
Spruce. Mr. Kaufman said he did not want to have a situation
where someone comes in later and says they do not want Aspen
trees in this location etc. Mr. Kaufman said they did not have a
problem complying as long as it is understood that the species
have already been committed to. Mr. Kaufman suggested adding the
6
REGULAR MEftlNG
RECORDHOF-PROCEBDIRGS
PLARRING AND ZORING COIIIIISSIOR
APRIL 8;; 1986
language -however, applicant's commitment to tree species shall
conform to his GMP representations- to the end of the condition.
Hunt agreed to amend his motion to include the suggested amendments;
Peyton agreed to amend her second. All in favor; motion carried.
RESOL-u'.rIOR EXPRESSING IlftERBS'.r IR ARROBUS
Hunt moved to approve Resolution '86-5; White seconded. All in
favor; motion carried.
REW.BUSIlIESS
SIIUGGLElt~ MOBILE BOME PARK .SPAAMERDMEII'l
Tygre stepped down for conflict of interest. Steve Burstein,
planner, said there had been confusion with regard to the public
hearing requirements for this SPA amendment and notification was
not given. Therefore, this application will have to be tabled.
Brooke Peterson, applicant, said he would like to have the case
rescheduled as quickly as possible. Anderson asked if it could
be addressed at the upcoming May 6 meeting, the only alternative
being a special meeting. Mr. Peterson asked the Commission for a
special meeting at the end of April. Anderson asked Mr. Burstein
to reschedule this case on the first available meeting.
White asked the applicant if the Commission was making the system
more difficult. White said he felt the system had made it more
difficult for mobile home parks, costing more than it should.
Mr. Peterson said this was a unique situation. When the park was
purchased in 1981 the possibility of fee simple lots was discussed.
The consensus from the financing people was that they would
prefer it remain in single ownership with leases for a period of
time. Now they say there is little, if any, money available
for a single ownership leasehold type park, like exists, and
suggest the only vehicle to obtain financing would be to put the
mobile homes with the lots. Hunt said this was financing people
determining land use, which he was upset by. Peterson responded
that it was the intention of the people in the park to have
single family lots when they went through this process 4 years
ago. Now they have a 4 year track record which they did not have
at the time of the first application.
7
RECORD OFPROeEEDINGS
REGULAR MEftING . .PLA1IIRING l'1IIl ZORING COIIIIISSIOR
APRIL-it. -1986
Hunt said this application was asking the City to adopt sub-standard
lots, fee simple deeds, and sub-standard road service. Everything
is sub-standard. Hunt said that could be accepted with one
ownership, but not with 87 owners. Mr. Peterson said he did not
understand why because the common areas are going to remain in one
ownership, and the association will continue to govern the
affairs. Mr. Peterson also said he did not think any of the
roads in the park now were sub-standard. Hunt said the roads
were not up to standard width. Hunt added that granting this
request would just perpetuate sub-standards. Hunt said the park
was a good thing as a cooperative but he had trouble with 3700
sq.ft. lots, thinking that was not a positive thing for land
use. Further, there will be a certain amount of internal govern-
ing. Anderson said these were sub-standard lots by R-6 standards
but not by mobile home park (MHP) standards. Hunt agreed, adding
that he was willing to accept those standards with one ownership
of the mobile home park but not as fee simple lots. Blomquist
said at some point it has to be acknowledged that this mobile
home park is here to stay by prior action and that what has
happened there has been very beneficial and a credit to the
people living there. Blomquist said rather than worry about
what has happened in the past the Commission should be looking at
how to help more happen.
Mr. Peterson said the goal of the park has always been to have
owner occupied units, which will continue to be the goal.
Another goal has been to have people upgrade their units. One of
the problems is a reluctance on the part of lenders to deal with
one ownership when they would prefer to be dealing with a single
family lot. Peyton said she felt someone would much rather plant
a tree on land they own than on land that is cooperatively owned
by an association.
Motion:
Markalunas moved to table this application until the next available
meeting that can be properly noticed; Blomquist seconded. All in
favor; motion carried.
8
RECORD-OF-PROCEEDIRGS
REGULAR MEftIRG .. PLARRIRG ARDZORIRG emUflSSl1)IJ-- APItIL8;.-j:986
COIISBftAGBJIDA
PHYSICS IRS'lI1'Uft SPA A:MBBDIIER'.r
Burstein said this was a letter from Alan RiChman, planning
di rector, to Barbara Winsch, architect representing the Physics
Center, regarding property zoned SPA. The Planning Office
was trying to accomplish seeing this as a minor amendment, by the
letter of the law the planning director can not sign off on
increases in coverage of land in the SPA zone. The Planning
Office saw this as having very minor impacts and, therefore,
wanted to expedite the process. However, as the code is written
anything that is not literally a minor amendment must go through
the same application requirements as a precise SPA plan, therefore,
there is a public notification requirement.
Motion~
Hunt moved to affirm the letter of the Planning Director to
Barbara Winsch dated March 27, 1986; Blomquist seconded.
Discussion~:
Blomquist suggested including a finding that this letter describes
what in fact is a minor amendment, wi thin the authority of the
Planning Director. Hunt agreed to include that in his motion,
Blomquist agreed to amend his second.
Anderson said the question was whether this is actually a minor
amendment to the SPA or not. Burstein said literally it is not
because it increases the coverage of land area. Anderson said he
did not feel comfortable with a freewheeling interpretation of the
code. Hunt withdrew his motion, Blomquist withdrew his second.
Karen McLaughlin, City Attorney's office, asked if the Physics
Center was a non-profit organization. The reply was yes.
Ms. McLaughlin suggested that it would be possible to waive the
fee for the application since it is for a non-profit corporation.
Ms. McLaughlin read Section 24-8.26 which limits minor changes to
location, size and height in sitings, buildings and structures,
only if required by engineering or other circumstances not
foreseen at the time the final plan was approved. Ms. McLaughlin
said when overall coverage of structures is increased it is
9
_"'_'''.__'' ~'A
RECORDOF--PROCEBDIRGS
REGm.AR MEftIRG ~ PLARlIIRG AIIIl ZONING COIIIII-SSlOR- .. APRIL~8;. 1986
specifically not allowed, as far as an approval by the Planning
Director.
Motion:
Hunt moved to return the letter to the Planning Director and
instruct the Planning Office to proceed with an amendment to the
SPA, and recommending waiver of the fee as this is a non-prOfit
organization; Peyton seconded. All in favor; motion carried.
Anderson adjourned the meeting at 6:15 P.M.
.
10