Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20180117 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING January 17, 2018 4:30 PM City Council Meeting Room 130 S Galena Street, Aspen I. 12:00 SITE VISITS A. None. II. 4:30 INTRODUCTION A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes C. Public Comments D. Commissioner member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificate of No Negative Effect issued I. Submit public notice for agenda items J. Call-up reports K. HPC typical proceedings III. OLD BUSINESS A. None IV. 4:40 NEW BUSINESS A. Aspen Pedestrian Mall Project – HPC Review of the Three Design Alternatives V. 7:00 ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR, 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM, NEW BUSINESS Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation (5 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Applicant presentation (20 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes) Applicant Rebuttal Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes) HPC discussion (15 minutes) Motion (5 minutes) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\460961A3-BAE9- 4DA3-9967-121A998F6222\13204.doc 1/10/2018 HPC PROJECT MONITORS- projects in bold are under construction Nora Berko 1102 Waters 417/421 W. Hallam 602 E. Hyman 61 Meadows Road 210 S. First 530 W. Hallam ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bob Blaich Lot 2, 202 Monarch Subdivision 232 E. Bleeker 609 W. Smuggler 209 E. Bleeker 300 E. Hyman, Crystal Palace 128 E. Main, Sardy House ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gretchen Greenwood 28 Smuggler Grove 135 E. Cooper 1280 Ute 211 E. Hallam 124 W. Hallam 411 E. Hyman 300 E. Hyman, Crystal Palace 101 W. Main, Molly Gibson Lodge 201 E. Main ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Willis Pember 229 W. Smuggler 305/307 S. Mill 534 E. Cooper Jeff Halferty 540 E. Main and Holden-Marolt 980 Gibson 845 Meadows, Aspen Meadows Reception Center 232 E. Main 541 Race Alley 310/330 E. Main (Hotel Jerome) 201 E. Hyman 208 E. Main Roger Moyer 517 E. Hyman (Little Annie’s) 500 W. Main 406 S. Mill 223 E. Hallam __________________________________ Richard Lai 122 W. Main ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Scott Kendrick Need to assign: 333 W. Bleeker 134 W. Hopkins 517 E. Hopkins 422/434 E. Cooper 529-535 E. Cooper, Stein Building 420 E. Hyman 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 301 Lake 208 E. Main 122 W. Main P1 II.F. Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historical Preservation Commission (HPC) FROM: Tim Thompson, CoA, Project Manager Darla Callaway, Design Workshop, Associate THRU: Jack Wheeler, Capital Asset Manager DATE OF MEMO: January 9th, 2018 MEETING DATE: January 17th, 2018 RE: Aspen Pedestrian Mall Project – HPC Review of the Three Design Alternatives REQUEST OF HPC: Discuss the conceptual design alternatives for the Aspen Pedestrian Mall Redevelopment Project and provide an opportunity for the commission to comment. Each alternative will be discussed by the design team in detail. The design team will also share a phase 2 community outreach update and findings. The HPC commission is not being asked to select one alternative, but is encouraged to weigh in on the parts of the alternatives which they like. The feedback will be used by the design team to develop a preferred conceptual design which will be a synthesis of different parts from each of the alternatives. PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTION: Previous, a presentation was made to HPC about the project inventory, analysis, design criteria, and previous community outreach. DISCUSSION AND HISTORY: The Aspen Pedestrian Mall surface is more than forty years old, and some of the underground infrastructure has not been upgraded in sixty years. Not only are the bricks reaching the end of their lives, but the surface is uneven and is not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. Most of the mall trees are reaching maturity, and their size and confined growing space creates challenges for their health. The goals of the Pedestrian Mall Redevelopment Project are: · Maintain historical integrity and character of the Malls while upgrading infrastructure and access. · Explore innovative ways to improve the storm water infrastructure systems to further protect the Roaring Fork watershed. · Replace aging utilities to serve customer needs for the next 50 years. · Retain the Malls as an urban park with a strong forestry program that promotes best practices for the continued health of the urban forest. · Increase mall accessibility to meet modern code. · Engage the public and business owners to explore the best ways to enhance the Mall experience. Aspen Pedestrian Mall Redevelopment Project includes Hyman, Mill, Cooper and Galena streets. Significant utility upgrades are necessary to anticipate the next 50 years in downtown Aspen. P2 IV.A. Page 2 of 2 The project’s scope emphasizes achieving those utility upgrades while preserving the underlying character, historic integrity, and businesses within the Mall for future generations. The project will be implemented in five phases, each involving public input. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit I – Design Workshop Design Alternatives Book dated 11/10/17 1. Hyperlink: Design Alternative Book – 11_10_17 Exhibit II – Updated Combined Outreach Data Dated 01/08/18 P3 IV.A. 123 PUBLIC OUTREACH SUMMARY | PHASE 2P4IV.A. 124P5 IV.A. 125 The following pages are a record of all outreach efforts in Phase II (Partnering Session II, Stakeholder Session II, Community Open House II, and the Online Survey II). COMMUNITY INPUT TO DATE P6IV.A. 126 COMBINED RESULTS 1. What best describes you?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2. Which of the stated project goals do you feel are top priorities?(Rank your top three) (Priority Ranking) 3. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 1 – Stay the Course”?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 4. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 2 – Community Activate”? (Select all that apply) 5. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 3 – Capturing Potential”? (Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 6. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Sister Cities Plaza?(Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9 33 68 74 82 82 88 99 None Treatment of Sister Cities Plaza Playground –Imagination Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Community Table/Water Table Connection to Durant Avenue Movable Adirondack or Swinging Chairs along Wagner Park 16 61 63 74 75 77 106 110 116 None Art Plaza Flexible Playground Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Misting Fountain Realigned Shade Trees on South/North Mill Street Relocation of Restroom Connection to Durant Street – Urban Plaza Shade Pavilion 10 26 33 109 None Alt 2 –Sister Cities Bands with Maintained Circle Alt 1 –Sister Cities Bands Integrated in Historic Node Alt 3 –Sister Cities Bands in Misting Fountain/ Event Area 1 2 4 5 31 31 37 111 112 I attend school in Aspen Other I am a seasonal resident of Aspen I own a secondary home in Aspen I am a business owner/ manager in Aspen I visit/recreate in Aspen I am a resident of Roaring Fork Valley (not Aspen) I work in Aspen I am a primary resident of Aspen 25 30 70 91 101 105 114 Address ADA accessibility Improve stormwater quality Encourage retail and restaurant activity Encourage pedestrian activity Maintain park-like character Upgrade utilities to meet future needs Maintain historic character 8 41 63 65 66 78 86 124 None Redesigned Sister Cities Plaza Removal of Firepit Restored trees in South Mill area Connection to Durant Avenue Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Playground - Nature-Inspired Expanded edge/seating along Wagner Park P7IV.A. 127 COMBINED RESULTS 7. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of South Mill Street?(Select only one) (Multiple 8. Which strategy do you like most for its connection to Durant Avenue? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9. Which strategy do you like the most for its connection to Ki Davis Fountain? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 10. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of the Hyman/Galena intersection? (Select only one) 11. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Galena Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 12. Which strategy to you like most for its alignment of the Cooper/Galena intersection? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 5 30 44 98 None of the above Curb lines stays as is (30’ crossing) Modify west curb only (25’ crossing) Modify west/east curbs (20’ crossing) 6 44 50 76 None Alt 1 –Maintain Tree Bosque Alt 3 –A Plaza for Temporary, Rotating Art Alt 2 –Community Table/Water Table under Trees 0 31 33 101 None of the above Curb lines stays as is with crosswalk Curb lines stay as is with change of material East curbline expands to narrow travel lane 6 38 41 92 None Alternative 1 –Casual Seating Alternative 2 –Multi- Purpose/Flexible Games Area Alternative 3 –Relocated Restroom 8 18 57 98 None Alternative 1 –Sidewalk Connection Alternative 2 –Garden/Flower Display Alternative 3 –Urban Plaza 9 24 36 108 None Alternative 1 –Repaired, Raised Water Alternative 3 –Cascading Water Alternative 2 –Rebuilt Edges for Seating P8IV.A. 128 COMBINED RESULTS 13. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of outdoor dining? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 15. In terms of safety and accessibility, what is your opinion of the snowmelted surfaces shown in Alternative Three? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 11 48 49 69 None Alternative 1 –Storefront and Middle Aisle Alternative 2 –Middle Aisle Only Alternative 3 –Along Ditches 38 120 Snowmelt is acceptable Snowmelt is not acceptable 14. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of bike storage on the mall? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 8 30 40 60 None Alternative 1 –Off the Mall (-4 parking spaces) Alternative 2 –On the Mall + Durant Bike Shelter Alternative 3 –Off the Mall + Durant Bike Storage (-4 spaces) 16. In reference to Alternative 3, how supportive would you be to change of the Wagner Node to strengthen the physical and visual connection to Wagner Park? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2 10 16 30 52 65 I don’t know Oppose Neutral Strongly Support Support Strongly Oppose P9IV.A. 129P10IV.A. 130P11 IV.A. 131 PARTNERING SESSION II As part of the internal Partnering Workshop, Design Workshop led a discussion about critical pieces of the project, followed by a series of critical consensus questions. Subsequent pages are a record of these questions and responses. P12IV.A. 132 1. What best describes you?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2. Which of the stated project goals do you feel are top priorities?(Rank your top three) (Priority Ranking) 3. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 1 – Stay the Course”?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 4. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 2 – Community Activate”? (Select all that apply) 5. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 3 – Capturing Potential”? (Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 6. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Sister Cities Plaza?(Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 0 4 5 8 9 9 11 12 12 None Treatment of Sister Cities Plaza Playground –Imagination Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Realigned shade trees in South Mill area Connection to Durant Avenue Community Table/Water Table Movable Adirondack or Swinging Chairs along Wagner Park Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk 0 3 4 10 None Alt 2 –Sister Cities Bands with Maintained Circle Alt 1 –Sister Cities Bands Integrated in Historic Node Alt 3 –Sister Cities Bands in Misting Fountain/ Event Area 0 7 8 8 9 9 10 11 13 None Realigned Shade Trees on South/North Mill Street Flexible Playground Misting Fountain Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Art Plaza Relocation of Restroom Shade Pavilion Connection to Durant Street – Urban Plaza PARTNERING SESSION II 0 0 0 0 1 4 6 9 16 I am a seasonal resident of Aspen I own a secondary home in Aspen I attend school in Aspen Other I am a business owner/ manager in Aspen I am a primary resident of Aspen I visit/recreate in Aspen I am a resident of Roaring Fork Valley (not Aspen) I work in Aspen 3 5 6 8 8 9 10 Improve stormwater quality Encourage retail and restaurant activity Address ADA accessibility Encourage pedestrian activity Maintain park-like character Upgrade utilities to meet future needs Maintain historic character 0 7 8 8 9 10 11 15 None Redesigned Sister Cities Plaza Restored trees in South Mill area Connection to Durant Avenue Playground - Nature-Inspired Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Removal of Firepit Expanded edge/seating along Wagner Park P13IV.A. 133 7. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of South Mill Street?(Select only one) (Multiple 8. Which strategy do you like most for its connection to Durant Avenue? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9. Which strategy do you like the most for its connection to Ki Davis Fountain? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 10. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of the Hyman/Galena intersection? (Select only one) 11. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Galena Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 12. Which strategy to you like most for its alignment of the Cooper/Galena intersection? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 0 1 4 12 None of the above Curb lines stays as is (30’ crossing) Modify west curb only (25’ crossing) Modify west/east curbs (20’ crossing) 0 3 4 10 None Alt 1 –Maintain Tree Bosque Alt 3 –A Plaza for Temporary, Rotating Art Alt 2 –Community Table/Water Table under Trees 0 1 4 11 None of the above Curb lines stays as is with crosswalk Curb lines stay as is with change of material East curbline expands to narrow travel lane 0.00% 17.65% 23.53% 58.82% None Alternative 2 –Multi- Purpose/Flexible Games Area Alternative 1 –Casual Seating Alternative 3 –Relocated Restroom 0 0 5 12 Alternative 1 –Sidewalk Connection None Alternative 2 –Garden/Flower Display Alternative 3 –Urban Plaza 0 3 6 7 None Alternative 1 –Repaired, Raised Water Alternative 2 –Rebuilt Edges for Seating Alternative 3 –Cascading Water PARTNERING SESSION II P14IV.A. 134 13. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of outdoor dining? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 15. Which presented alternative would you most support overall?(Select only one) (Multiple Choice) PARTNERING SESSION II 0 3 7 8 None Alternative 2 –Middle Aisle Only Alternative 1 –Storefront and Middle Aisle Alternative 3 –Along Ditches 0 1 1 1 6 8 I don’t know Neutral Oppose Strongly Oppose Strongly Support Support 0 2 4 11 None Alt 2 –“Community Activate” Alt 1 –“Stay the Course” Alt 3 –“Capturing Potential” 14. In reference to Alternative 3, how supportive would you be to change of the Wagner Node to strengthen the physical and visual connection to Wagner Park? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice)P15IV.A. 135P16IV.A. 136P17 IV.A. 137 STAKEHOLDER SESSION II As part of the Stakeholder Session, Design Workshop led a discussion about critical pieces of the project, followed by a series of critical consensus questions. Subsequent pages are a record of these questions and responses. P18IV.A. 138 STAKEHOLDER SESSION II 1. What best describes you?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2. Which of the stated project goals do you feel are top priorities?(Rank your top three) (Priority Ranking) 3. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 1 – Stay the Course”?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 4. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 2 – Community Activate”? (Select all that apply) 5. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 3 – Capturing Potential”? (Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 6. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Sister Cities Plaza?(Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 2 3 8 9 11 11 12 13 16 None Treatment of Sister Cities Plaza Fire Feature Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Movable Adirondack or Swinging Chairs along Wagner Park Community Table/Water Table Playground –Imagination Connection to Durant Avenue 2 3 7 7 9 9 14 14 17 None Flexible Playground Misting Fountain Art Plaza Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Realigned Shade Trees on South/North Mill Street Shade Pavilion Connection to Durant Street – Urban Plaza Relocation of Restroom 1 3 4 15 None Alt 1 –Sister Cities Bands Integrated in Historic Node Alt 2 –Sister Cities Bands with Maintained Circle Alt 3 –Sister Cities Bands in Misting Fountain/ Event Area 0 0 0 1 3 8 11 13 20 I am a seasonal resident of Aspen I own a secondary home in Aspen I attend school in Aspen Other I visit/recreate in Aspen I am a resident of Roaring Fork Valley (not Aspen) I am a business owner/ manager in Aspen I am a primary resident of Aspen I work in Aspen 4 6 10 11 11 12 14 Address ADA accessibility Improve stormwater quality Maintain park-like character Upgrade utilities to meet future needs Encourage pedestrian activity Encourage retail and restaurant activity Maintain historic character 2 6 7 8 8 10 10 19 None Removal of Firepit Restored trees in South Mill area Connection to Durant Avenue Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Playground - Nature-Inspired Redesigned Sister Cities Plaza Expanded edge/seating along Wagner Park P19IV.A. 139 STAKEHOLDER SESSION II 7. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of South Mill Street?(Select only one) (Multiple 8. Which strategy do you like most for its connection to Durant Avenue? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9. Which strategy do you like the most for its connection to Ki Davis Fountain? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 10. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of the Hyman/Galena intersection? (Select only one) 11. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Galena Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 12. Which strategy to you like most for its alignment of the Cooper/Galena intersection? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 0 1 6 15 None of the above Curb lines stays as is (30’ crossing) Modify west curb only (25’ crossing) Modify west/east curbs (20’ crossing) 0 2 8 11 None Alt 1 –Maintain Tree Bosque Alt 3 –A Plaza for Temporary, Rotating Art Alt 2 –Community Table/Water Table under Trees 0 1 2 11 None of the above Curb lines stays as is with crosswalk Curb lines stay as is with change of material East curbline expands to narrow travel lane 1 1 8 11 Alternative 1 –Casual Seating None Alternative 2 –Multi- Purpose/Flexible Games Area Alternative 3 –Relocated Restroom 3 4 8 9 None Alternative 1 –Sidewalk Connection Alternative 2 –Garden/Flower Display Alternative 3 –Urban Plaza 1 2 3 16 None Alternative 1 –Repaired, Raised Water Alternative 3 –Cascading Water Alternative 2 –Rebuilt Edges for Seating P20IV.A. 140 14. In terms of safety and accessibility, what is your opinion of the snowmelted surfaces shown in Alternative Three? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 1 5 7 8 None Alternative 2 –Middle Aisle Only Alternative 1 –Storefront and Middle Aisle Alternative 3 –Along Ditches 3 20 Snowmelt is not acceptable Snowmelt is acceptable 13. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of outdoor dining? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) STAKEHOLDER SESSION II 0 1 1 3 8 10 I don’t know Oppose Strongly Oppose Neutral Support Strongly Support 15. In reference to Alternative 3, how supportive would you be to change of the Wagner Node to strengthen the physical and visual connection to Wagner Park? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response)P21IV.A. 141P22IV.A. 142P23 IV.A. 143 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE II As part of the Community Open House, Design Workshop led a discussion about critical pieces of the project, followed by a series of critical consensus questions. Subsequent pages are a record of these questions and responses. P24IV.A. 144 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE II 1. What best describes you?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2. Which of the stated project goals do you feel are top priorities?(Rank your top three) (Priority Ranking) 3. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 1 – Stay the Course”?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 4. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 2 – Community Activate”? (Select all that apply) 5. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 3 – Capturing Potential”? (Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 6. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Sister Cities Plaza?(Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 0 6 7 13 14 15 16 16 18 None Treatment of Sister Cities Plaza Playground –Imagination Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Connection to Durant Avenue Movable Adirondack or Swinging Chairs along Wagner Park Realigned shade trees in South Mill area Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Community Table/Water Table 1 7 11 14 15 16 17 18 20 None Flexible Playground Art Plaza Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Realigned Shade Trees on South/North Mill Street Shade Pavilion Relocation of Restroom Misting Fountain Connection to Durant Street – Urban Plaza 0 2 5 21 None Alt 2 –Sister Cities Bands with Maintained Circle Alt 1 –Sister Cities Bands Integrated in Historic Node Alt 3 –Sister Cities Bands in Misting Fountain/ Event Area 0 0 1 1 3 6 9 13 17 I am a seasonal resident of Aspen I own a secondary home in Aspen I attend school in Aspen Other I visit/recreate in Aspen I am a business owner/ manager in Aspen I am a resident of Roaring Fork Valley (not Aspen) I work in Aspen I am a primary resident of Aspen 1 6 9 13 15 16 23 Address ADA accessibility Improve stormwater quality Encourage retail and restaurant activity Encourage pedestrian activity Maintain park-like character Upgrade utilities to meet future needs Maintain historic character 2 8 11 12 13 14 16 19 None Redesigned Sister Cities Plaza Removal of Firepit Playground - Nature-Inspired Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Connection to Durant Avenue Restored trees in South Mill area Expanded edge/seating along Wagner Park P25IV.A. 145 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE II 7. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of South Mill Street?(Select only one) (Multiple 8. Which strategy do you like most for its connection to Durant Avenue? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9. Which strategy do you like the most for its connection to Ki Davis Fountain? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 10. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of the Hyman/Galena intersection? (Select only one) 11. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Galena Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 12. Which strategy to you like most for its alignment of the Cooper/Galena intersection? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 1 1 5 20 Curb lines stays as is (30’ crossing) None of the above Modify west curb only (25’ crossing) Modify west/east curbs (20’ crossing) 0 2 6 18 None Alt 1 –Maintain Tree Bosque Alt 3 –A Plaza for Temporary, Rotating Art Alt 2 –Community Table/Water Table under Trees 0 1 3 22 None of the above Curb lines stays as is with crosswalk Curb lines stay as is with change of material East curbline expands to narrow travel lane 1 3 8 16 None Alternative 1 –Casual Seating Alternative 2 –Multi- Purpose/Flexible Games Area Alternative 3 –Relocated Restroom 0 1 14 14 None Alternative 1 –Sidewalk Connection Alternative 2 –Garden/Flower Display Alternative 3 –Urban Plaza 1 3 8 16 None Alternative 1 –Repaired, Raised Water Alternative 3 –Cascading Water Alternative 2 –Rebuilt Edges for Seating P26IV.A. 146 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE II 13. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of outdoor dining? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 15. In terms of safety and accessibility, what is your opinion of the snowmelted surfaces shown in Alternative Three? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 1 4 8 14 None Alternative 2 –Middle Aisle Only Alternative 1 –Storefront and Middle Aisle Alternative 3 –Along Ditches 1 4 8 13 None Alternative 1 –Off the Mall (-4 parking spaces) Alternative 2 –On the Mall + Durant Bike Shelter Alternative 3 –Off the Mall + Durant Bike Storage (-4 spaces) 30.77% 69.23% Snowmelt is not acceptable Snowmelt is acceptable 14. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of bike storage on the mall? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 0 1 2 3 5 14 Strongly Oppose I don’t know Oppose Neutral Support Strongly Support 16. In reference to Alternative 3, how supportive would you be to change of the Wagner Node to strengthen the physical and visual connection to Wagner Park? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response)P27IV.A. 147P28IV.A. 148P29 IV.A. 149 ONLINE SURVEY II As part of our online outreach, we made a suite of videos explaining the contents of each alternative, followed by a series of critical consensus questions connected directly to the videos. Subsequent pages are a record of these questions and responses. P30IV.A. 150 ONLINE SURVEY II 1. What best describes you?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 2. Which of the stated project goals do you feel are top priorities?(Rank your top three) (Priority Ranking) 3. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 1 – Stay the Course”?(Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 4. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 2 – Community Activate”? (Select all that apply) 5. Which elements do you like in “Alternative 3 – Capturing Potential”? (Select all that apply) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response) 6. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Sister Cities Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 7 20 40 41 43 47 49 61 None Treatment of Sister Cities Plaza Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Community Table/Water Table Playground –Imagination Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Connection to Durant Avenue Movable Adirondack or Swinging Chairs along Wagner… 13 34 42 44 46 52 62 63 75 None Art Plaza Flexible Games Area (i.e. Bocce, Bowling) Flexible Playground Realigned Shade Trees on South/North Mill Street Misting Fountain Relocation of Restroom Connection to Durant Street – Urban Plaza Shade Pavilion 10 17 21 63 None Alt 2 –Sister Cities Bands with Maintained Circle Alt 1 –Sister Cities Bands Integrated in Historic Node Alt 3 –Sister Cities Bands in Misting Fountain/ Event Area 0 0 4 5 19 23 24 63 78 I attend school in Aspen Other I own a secondary home in Aspen I am a seasonal resident of Aspen I am a resident of Roaring Fork Valley (not Aspen) I visit/recreate in Aspen I am a business owner/ manager in Aspen I work in Aspen I am a primary resident of Aspen 14 15 44 59 67 68 69 Address ADA accessibility Improve stormwater quality Encourage retail and restaurant activity Encourage pedestrian activity Maintain historic character Maintain park-like character Upgrade utilities to meet future needs 4 16 35 39 41 47 55 71 None Redesigned Sister Cities Plaza Removal of Firepit Connection to Durant Avenue Restored trees in South Mill area Reconstruction of Visitor Kiosk Playground - Nature-Inspired Expanded edge/seating along Wagner Park P31IV.A. 151 ONLINE SURVEY II 7. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of South Mill Street?(Select only one) (Multiple 8. Which strategy do you like most for its connection to Durant Avenue? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9. Which strategy do you like the most for its connection to Ki Davis Fountain? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 10. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of the Hyman/Galena intersection? (Select only one) 11. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of Galena Plaza? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 12. Which strategy to you like most for its alignment of the Cooper/Galena intersection? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 4 27 29 51 None of the above Curb lines stays as is (30’ crossing) Modify west curb only (25’ crossing) Modify west/east curbs (20’ crossing) 6 32 37 37 None Alt 3 –A Plaza for Temporary, Rotating Art Alt 2 –Community Table/Water Table under Trees Alt 1 –Maintain Tree Bosque 2 24 28 57 None of the above Curb lines stay as is with change of material Curb lines stays as is with crosswalk East curbline expands to narrow travel lane 4 23 30 54 None Alternative 2 –Multi- Purpose/Flexible Games Area Alternative 1 –Casual Seating Alternative 3 –Relocated Restroom 5 13 30 63 None Alternative 1 –Sidewalk Connection Alternative 2 –Garden/Flower Display Alternative 3 –Urban Plaza 7 16 19 69 None Alternative 1 –Repaired, Raised Water Alternative 3 –Cascading Water Alternative 2 –Rebuilt Edges for Seating P32IV.A. 152 ONLINE SURVEY II 13. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of outdoor dining? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 15. In terms of safety and accessibility, what is your opinion of the snowmelted surfaces shown in Alternative Three? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 9 26 37 39 None Alternative 1 –Storefront and Middle Aisle Alternative 2 –Middle Aisle Only Alternative 3 –Along Ditches 8 16 38 49 None Alternative 1 –Off the Mall (- 4 parking spaces) Alternative 2 –On the Mall + Durant Bike Shelter Alternative 3 –Off the Mall + Durant Bike Storage (-4 spaces) 27 82 Snowmelt is not acceptable Snowmelt is acceptable 14. Which strategy do you like most for its treatment of bike storage on the mall? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) 2 6 9 14 31 49 I don’t know Oppose Neutral Strongly Oppose Support Strongly Support 16. In reference to Alternative 3, how supportive would you be to change of the Wagner Node to strengthen the physical and visual connection to Wagner Park? (Select only one) (Multiple Choice) (Multiple Choice - Multiple Response)P33IV.A. 153P34IV.A. 154 STAY UP TO DATE: WWW.ASPENPEDESTRIANMALL.COM QUESTIONS? CALL/TEXT: 970.618.1457 EMAIL: INFO@ASPENPEDESTRIANMALL.COM KATHLEEN WANATOWICZ BUSINESS PROGRAM COORDINATOR P: 970.618.5114 E: KATHLEEN@PRSTUDIOCO.COMP35 IV.A.