Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19920407 "- ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING , ZONING COMMISSION APRIL. 7. 1992 Chairlady Jasmine Tygre called meeting to order at 4:30pm. Answering roll call were David Brown. Tim Mooney. Sara Garton, Bruce Kerr, Richard Compton and Jasmine Tygre. Roger Hunt was excused. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS There were none. STAFF COMMENTS There were none. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. MINUTES Leslie to fill in blanks on page 29. Tim made a motion to approve minutes of March 17, 1992. Richard seconded the motion with all in favor. 134 EAST BLEEKER LANDMARK DESIGNATION Jasmine opened the public hearing. Roxanne made presentation as attached in record. After brief discussion: Jasmine asked for public comment. There was none. MOTION Sara: I move to recommend landmark designation for 134 East Bleeker finding that designation D, E and F have been met. Tim seconded the motion with all in favor. Jasmine closed the public portion of the hearing. MOSES SUBDIVISION AND 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW Jasmine opened the public hearing. Leslie made presentation as attached in record. I have some changes. The first condition of approval--I have added the word "allowable" after garage. "Shall be no greater than 5,OOOsqft. The height shall be 25 feet". Jasmine: Did you want to take out 500sqft garage? PZM4.7.92 Leslie: Right. To be allowable floor area. And then I would eliminate condition #2. And in it's place a condition to read "Prior to issuance of any building permit the applicant shall-- A. Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicants shall submit a letter or report prepared by an engineer registered to practice in the state of Colorado, which letter or report shall respond to each of the issues itemized in criteria #1 and #2 of the 8040 Greenline Review standards. New condition #3 will read: Prior to final inspection the applicant shall submit a letter or report to the Engineering Dept. prepared by an engineer registered to practice in the state of Colorado, which shall confirm that the recommendations relative to 8040 Greenline criteria #1 and #2 were followed during construction. We are not eliminating the original #3. All the numbers will be changed. And then condition #9--o1d #9--No vegetation shall be removed from the slope--that is as required by condition #10--o1d #10. #13 and #14 are requirements by Fire Marshal. And #15--The applicant shall work with the public agencies to ensure that proper utilities are supplied to the new home and all public improvements-- #1. The final plat and subdivision agreement shall be filed within 180 days of city Council approval. Then #2b--Notes shall refer to Deed ___' Book____, Page____ indication the restrictions against any further development on Lots 2A, 2B, or additional lot area for floor area, bedrooms, and density purposes on existing Alps buildings or the tennis courts lot and land conveyed by the owner with Lot 2 Moses Lot split. And finally letter i--The USFS tract, if conveyed to Mitchell, Bornefeld, or their heirs, shall be deeded against future development. There were no questions from members of the Commission at this time. Jasmine then asked for comments from the public. Alan Richman, representative for applicant: 2 PZM4.7.92 "I WILL BE BRIEF." After discussion which then lasted an hour: Jasmine asked for public comment: George Gleason: I think this is a very generous offer. We live right across from the tennis courts on ute Avenue. And the land which is just south is probably one of the few places in Aspen that still looks like it did in 1961. There are trees and bushes and willows and stream going through there and it looks just like it did then. Gaard Moses: I want to echo what George just said. I believe that It is a very complicated issue. There was no further public comment and Jasmine closed the public portion of the hearing. After further discussion: MOTION David: I would like to move that we recommend approval of the 8040 Greenline with conditions #1 through '15 as recommended by the staff. However with the new condition #2 to be deleted and condition #15 amended to read "The applicant shall work with the public agencies to insure that the proper facilities are supplied to the new home in a proportionate share and that all public improvements costs be pro-rated to the users. Jasmine: So now what happened to condition #2? Delete completely? David: I proposed that the new condition #2 be deleted completely. Go with the original #2. Tim seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Tim, yes, David, yes, Sara, yes, RiChard, no, Bruce, no, Jasmine, no. MOTION Sara: I recommend approval of the Moses Lot #2 8040 Greenline Review with the following conditions #1 through #15 with condition #2 to read "Prior to final building inspection the applicant shall provide a letter from a registered professional engineer that all applicable geotechnical concerns of the Lampiris letter submitted with this application have been complied with during construction". This letter shall be accepted by the City Engineer. Condition '15 3 PZM4.7.92 shall read as David amended. David seconded the motion. Someone asked a question here. Sara: To meet Nick's conditions. And drop the Chen letter altogether so that doesn't apply to this lot. Someone asked a question. Sara: Right. Not prior to the building permit. Roll call vote: Tim, yes, David, yes, Sara, yes, Richard, no, Bruce, no, Jasmine, yes. Motion carried. SUBDIVISION There was no further discussion. Richard: I move to recommend to Council subdivision approval for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split with conditions 1 through 3 as recommended and amended by the Planning staff. (attached in record) Tim seconded the motion with all in favor. LOUSHIN CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT Jasmine opened the public hearing. Kim made presentation as attached in record. Jasmine asked for public comment. There was none. Jasmine asked if the applicant had any problem with the conditions. David Forrest: None at all. Tim: What about the parking? There was an answer but not audible. MOTION Tim: I move to approve Conditional Uses for two attached accessory dwelling units within the proposed Loushin Duplex at 904 E. Cooper, with the four conditions recommended in Planning Office memo dated 4/7/92. (attached in record) 4 PZM4.7.92 Richard seconded the motion with all in favor. Jasmine closed the public hearing. MENDENHALL STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Kim made presentation as attached in record. Sunny would like to change in #1 the word "disturbance" to "destruction". The reason being that there will be some cleaning up of the site. The owners will want to remove that disturbed vegetation. And then add in the last sentence--"Revegetation is required for any disturbed soil on the site--and additional planting shall be permitted after destruction". This will allow replacement of destroyed vegetation. #6--add to the end "In the event that permits are required." #8--In the second line the sentence starting "A barricade shall be erected--because of the formation of the slope. He wants to scratch that entire sentence and replace it with language that states "The Engineering Dept shall be satisfied regarding methods of preventing debris from falling down the slope". Jasmine: So we would have '10 which would say something like "The compliance with Ord '1, the structure will be deed restricted to resident occupancy". Kim read--Deed restriction to resident occupancy on Lot 3 shall be .filed prior to issuance of any building permits. This must be forwarded to the Planning Office. MOTION Tim: I move to approve the Stream Margin Review for the Mendenhall parcel on Red Butte Drive with the conditions presented as listed in the April 7, 1992 Planning Office memo specifically including a building envelope for the existing residence on the Lot 2 and a new residence and building envelope on Lot 3 with the amended #10. Richard seconded the motion with all in favor. GOODING GMOS EXEMPTION FOR CHANGE IN USE Kim made presentation as attached in record. MOTION David: I would like to move to approve the Change-in-Use from two office condominium units to one two-bedroom freemarket residential 5 PZM4.7.92 condominium for the Gooding units 201 and 20 in the Park Central West Condominiums with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 4/7/92. (attached in record) Richard seconded the motion with all in favor. Meeting was then adjourned. Time/ s 6:45pm. e M. Carney, city Depu Clerk 6