Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19850903 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REGULAR MEETING PLANNING A1I1Il Z OlllING COMIIISSIOlll SEPTEMBER 3. 1985 Chairman Welton Anderson called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. with Commissioners' Roger Hunt, Ramona Markalunas, and Jasmine Tygre present. COIIMISSIOlllBRS' COlIMBlIITS Hunt commented that the FAR in the residential zone is either too large or homes are being built not within their FA~. He suggested that the Commission should review this area aga1n. Markalunas suggested it could be reviewed with the Building Department along with how the FAR is calculated. MINUTES JUly 16. 1985: Tygre moved to table the minutes of July until the September 10, 1985 meeting; Hunt seconded. favor; motion carried. 16, 1985 All in PUBLIC HEARING MOORE BUILDING RBI OlllING Steve Burstein, planner, explained the applicants request to rezone the property from .0. Office to Commercial. Burstein said the building at 229 E. Main St. is not a historic structure but has a Historic overlay designation. There are 9 businesses in the brick building and the Gypsy Woman adjacent to the complex which currently conforms. Burstein said the property was rezoned from C-l to 0 in 1976 and since that rezoning many of the uses proposed and permitted have been non-conforming to the district. This has been a problem for the Building Department, Planning Office, the owner, and perspective tenants. Burstein said the applicant had not specified whether the CC or C-l zone was desired. Burstein thought C-l would be the most appropriate zone for the complex and explained 10 reasons for that opinion (outlined in the Planning Office memorandum dated Sept. 3, 1985). Anderson commented that this would create a single non-conforming lot in the .0. zone on the adjacent property. Burstein said the Planing Office recommends approval of rezoning for lots G,H, and I to C-l but feels Lot F should not be rezoned to C-l as this would move the Commercial zoning district in the westerly direction along Main St. and may encourage strip commercial development. Hunt said he did not think it was appropriate to create a 3 lot zone and questioned where the zone would stop. In addition Hunt thought the C-l zone could be a problem in the area 1 ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AlIID Z OlllING COIIMISSIOlll SEPTEMBER 3. 1985 and bulk requirements in that there would be no control. Anderson opened the public hearing for comments. There were no comments so the public hearing was closed. Tygre agreed with Hunt that this would be a 3 lot zone and with potential redevelopment the view plane could not be controlled. A big building could be put in there with the C-l zoning. Markalunas commented that the site had been historically commercial and asked what zoning would permit what is on the site currently. Anderson and Alan Richman, planning director, both replied that C-I zoning would be appropriate. Barry Edwards commented that this would not be spot zoning, there is a basis for it. Anderson felt that this would be creating a non-conforming lot and questioned if all options had been explored. Tygre suggested rezoning the property C-l with the condition that the "0" Office zone area and bulk requirements be met. Anderson explained to the applicant that this could not be approved with condi tions unless the appl icant agreed to those conditions. Mr. Moore agreed to the 0 zone area and bulk requirements. AC~ Motion: Hunt moved to recommend to City Council rezoning of Lots F, G, H, and I to C-I zoning and the applicant agreed to limit the size of the building to the "0" Office Zone FAR, area and bulk, and height requirements; Tygre seconded. All in favor; motion carried. OLD BUSIlIIBSS RESOLUTION - LITTLE lIIBLL COlllCEPTUAL SPA Resolution #85-18 recommending conceptual approval of the Little Nell base redevelopment SPA was reviewed. Tygre suggested adding to condition #14 the wording "and Planning Commission", in the third line, after Housing Authority. Richman said he would make the change. Anderson said the word "snowload" in condition .16 was awkward and sugge sted changing the wording to "snow shedding". Richman said he would make the change. Anderson al so thought the wording of condition #19 should be changed from "gateway to the project" to "gateway to the mountain". Richman again said he would make the change. 2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AlIID Z OlllING COMIIISSIOlll SEPTEMBER 3. 1985 With regard to condition .23 Markalunas thought it should be more clearly defined. She suggested rewording the condition to read: "using the land between the Copper Kettle and the Tip~le Lodge " rather than "behind the Tipple Lodge". The Commission had no problems with the change. Bill Kane, applicant, said they were happy with the Resolution but wanted to suggest a few changes. Mr. Kane said Whereas .3 indicates that Council will not address the question of future year allotments until after the scoring is done at the precise plan review stage. Hunt suggested a period in the statement in the sixth line following the words "mUlti-year allocation" to clarify the procedure. Richman said he would clarify the statement. Mr. Kane asked if condition .2 could include the wording "employee housing in the appropriate ratio on or off site". There were no obj ections. Mr. Kane also asked if the wording of condition .3 could be changed from "technical study of the parking needs of the facility to ~ the demands" to read "needs of the facil ity to address the demands". Barry Edwards, city attorney, and Alan Richman thought the wording should be left as written. It was decided to leave condition .3 as written. Mr. Kane said they would like to amend the last sentence of condition .22 to read: "drainage from Aspen Mountain as it affects the site and drainage from the development site itself". There were no objections. Motion: Hunt moved to adopt Resolution #85-18 as amended with intent for the Chairman to sign upon completion; Tygre seconded. All in favor; motion carried. NEW BUSIlIIBSS BEYER CONDOMINIUMIZATION Burstein explained the applicants request for condominiumization of a duplex located at 1335 Riverside Dr., creating two separate units. Burstein said the planning office recommends approval with 4 conditions (outlined in the planning office memorandum dated September 3, 1985). 3 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AlIID ZONING COIIMISSION SEPTEMBER 3. 1985 Motion: Hunt moved to recommend approval of condominiumization of the Beyer duplex subject to conditions 1 through 4 outlined in the Planning Office memorandum dated September 3, 1985; Tygre seconded. All in favor; motion carried. CITY FOOTBRIDGES STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Burstein explained the request to raise 3 footbridges to a minimum of two feet above the 100 year floodplain. The bridges included are the Smuggler footbridge, Hopkins St. footbridge, and the Upper Aspen Club footbridge. Burstein said the planning office recommends approval with 2 conditions, outlined in the planning office memorandum dated September 3, 1985. Anderson asked why these bridges were not done right in the first place. Chuck Roth, Assistant City Engineer, explained that this was a new design standard that was not in existence when the bridges were buil t. Ander son then asked if new bridges were going to be built or if the old bridges would be jacked up. Mr. Roth replied that the old bridges would be jacked up. Motion: Hunt moved to approve the Stream Margin review of the Smuggler footbridge, Hopkins St. footbridge, and the Upper Aspen Club footbr idge subj ect to the conditions outlined in the Planning Office memorandum dated September 3, 1985; Tygre seconded. All in favor; motion carried. Anderson adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. ~ l2Jib-\- Kim Wilhoit, Deputy City Clerk 4