HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Oden Lot Split.0046-04
THE CITY OF AsPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
0046.2004.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-07-2-13-001
PROJECT ADDRESS 1 LOT ODEN LOT SPLIT
PLANNER
JAMES
LINDT
CASE DESCRIPTION TOP OF SLOPE DETERMINATION - LOT ONE STREAM MARGIN
REPRESENTATIVE CARLIE SIEMEL 925-5050
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/8/200
CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll
"""""'--~'-'-'._._._-"-'
...-
.
"'....
..
~ ~- ~
:: Pl'tnnl<; _ ~ x
FIe
,Moin
~F)Oids
?
I ~ eo..-. ,<;Q
Fee S"""""l! I 8elicm I Roulino!:!bto!y ..
P,,,,.Tl<"
Mot,.. II LOT ODEN LOT SPliT
Ciy IASPEN
POiiiiiiI~:'
~
_ # 1000002004.ASLU
ApIIS"'.1
S'ol.rco-::J
.
,.._.~--"
----------.-.-.--,.-
Zip 181611
-~
~
B
I8J
104.... 1'....1 ~ Roulino Q......j"'"
Ploiect 1 ~ SI.... lpending
D=iption TOP OF SLOPE DETERMINATION. LOT ONE STREAM MARGIN RE\IIEW
Clock IR(I'~'ll 0"1"10
pemillo:1 311~
Applied 10710912OO41...J
Aoo<<>ved I .9
I-I .9
FmI I 1...J
E.....' 107lO4noo; 1...J
..,
Submiled ICAAUE SIEMEL 325-5050
r V_on the web?
iii
iii
(!)
,
I!J
Last N......ISTARODOJ ROBERTF 50 ~ Fnt N......I
F'hc:M
r BOX 1121
PEN CO BI612
p
Last N......ISTARODOJ ROBERTF5O ~ F'~N....I
"",,-I (',.....ttl~
~BOX1121
':;f PEN CO 81612
E.... the proiect.....
~
.
r, Recoot 1 or1
.,...."
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested
property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third
anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Bob and Paula Stardoi. PO Box 1121. Aspen. CO 81612
Property Owner's Name, Maifing Address and telephone number
Lot 1. of the Oden Lot Split
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Stream Margin Review Approval Establishing Top of Slope from Hunter Creek
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 31. Series of2004. 10/5/04
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
October 16. 2004
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
October 17. 2007
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension. reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 16th day of October, 2004, by the City of Aspen Community
Development Director..
'__'"~._~'-n'_,_,~___._____~.__ __'~~"~____~_,___",~_,"",,
,"'"
,
.....-
,
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval ofa site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Lot 1 of the Oden Lot Split, by resolution of the Planning
and Zoning Commission numbered 31, Series of 2004 on October 5, 2004. The
Applicant received stream margin review approval to establish Hunter Creek's top of
slope on the property as the elevation of 7,870 feet above sea level. For further
information contact Joyce Allgaier, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090.
s/ City of Aspen
Publish in The Aspen Times on October 16, 2004
......
Resolution No. 31
(SERIES OF 2004)
Itpp vaIJeiJ
5~()
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW IDENTIFYING HUNTER
CREEK'S TOP OF SLOPE ON LOT 1 OF THE ODEN LOT SPLIT, CITY OF
ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-072-13-001
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Bob and Paula Starodoj, requesting Stream Margin Review approval to identify
Hunter Creek's top of slope as being the elevation of 7,870 feet above sea level on the
property described as Lot 1 of the Oden Lot Split; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is a 30,891 square foot vacant parcel
located in the R-15A Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined
by the Land Use Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the
Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land
Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of
the Steam Margin Review finding that establishing Hunter Creek's top of slope at an
elevation of 7,870 feet above sea level on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split is appropriate
based on the Land Use Code's definition of Top of Slope; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed
public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves with conditions, the
Stream Margin Review request to establish Hunter Creek's top of slope as the elevation
of7,870 feet above sea level on Lot I, of the Oden Lot Split, by a vote of five to zero (5-
0); and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this
Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
.......
"
". ..,..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review
request to establish Hunter Creek's top of slope as the elevation of 7,870 feet above sea
level on Lot I, of the Oden Lot Split, with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall apply for another stream margin review to construct a
residence on the subject site since this stream margin review approval simply
establishes Hunter Creek's top of slope as it relates to the development of the
subject site.
2. The Applicant shall record an amended plat at the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office that reconfigures the building envelope on the subject
parcel in a manner that would make the north and west sides of the building
envelope follow Hunter Creek's top of slope as established herein.
3. As a condition of any future stream margin review application on this site, the
Applicant shall be required to erect silt fence and construction fencing at the
top of slope determined herein.
Section 2
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 3
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 4
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby
incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if
fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
,--
,
"
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on October 5, 2004.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
JasmineTygre, Chair
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
-.
'-"
To:
MEMORANDUM
" .;'
I'll>
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
.J.A
Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director
THRU:
FROM:
James Lindt, Planner CSl--
RE:
\( .~ N
..,...--;- ---
)t( A~foJe&) ,5- ()
No p LA-~ I L (_
Co \0 \f\{ ~ t{t)
Lot 1, Oden Lot Split Stream Margin Review- Public Hearing
DATE:
October 5, 2004
Applicant: Bob and Paula Starodoj
Zonin!!:: R-15A (Moderate-Density Residential)
Lot Size: 30,891 Square Feet
Current Land Use: Vacant Parcel
Proposed Land Use: Single-Family Residence
Request Summarv: The Applicant is requesting a
Stream Margin Review Approval to establish the
river's top-of-slope from HWlter Creek as it
relates to the vacant parcel (Lot 1, of the Oden Lot
Split) located adjacent to II 0 Red Mountain
Road.
BACKGROUNP:
The Applicant is proposing to establish Hunter Creek's top of slope on the vacant parcel
adjacent to the property addressed as 110 Red Mountain Road in preparation for developing a
single-family residence on the vacant site. It is necessary to establish the river's top of slope
because the Stream Margin Top of Slope Map prepared by Sopris Engineering and adopted
by the City of Aspen only establishes the Roaring Fork River's top of slope and not the top of
slope of Hunter Creek as is relevant to the subject site. That being the case, the Applicant has
hired a professionally licensed surveyor, Jim Reser of Alpine Surveys, Inc. to give his
professional opinion as to where Hunter Creek's top of slope is located. Pursuant to Land
Use Code Section 26.435, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the Planning and Zoning
Commission has the authority to determine whether the top of slope proposed by the'
Applicant is appropriate after considering a recommendation from the Community
Development Department.
o
'J
STAFF COMMENTS:
This stream margin review request is somewhat different than the majority of the stream
margin reviews in which the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered in the past
because the Applicant is not proposing a specific residence design, but rather is simply trying
to determine where Hunter Creek's top of slope is. The Applicant contends that Hunter
Creek's top of slope on the subject property is located where the Applicant's surveyor, Jim
Reser has identified it to be located. Reser identified that it was his opinion that the top of
slope from Hunter Creek is located adjacent to the elevation of 7870 feet above sea level as is
indicated on the survey below.
In reviewing the top of slope proposed by Reser, Staff feels that the proposed top of slope is
appropriately identified given the definition of "Top of Slope" in the City Land Use Code.
The Land Use Code's definition of "Top of Slope" is as follows:
Top of Slope: A line generally running parallel to a stream or river from which
development must be setback and delineates the bank of the river or stream or other
riparian area as determined by the City Engineer.
Staff believes that the proposed top of slope is appropriate given that it clearly delineates the
portion of the site that contains native vegetation from the portion of the site that contains
non-native bluegrass. Additionally, the proposed top of slope closely corresponds with the
transition of the topography on the lot from a steep. incline progressing upward from Hunter
Creek to a flat bench area on the southern portion of the property as can be seen on the photo
of the survey included previously.
Code amendments were approved to the stream margin review section of the land use code in
2001. These code amendments adopted a map created by Sopris Engineering that established
the Roaring Fork River's top of slope throughout the majority of town with the idea being
that the Stream Margin Review Standards were objective in nature and individual proposals
could be reviewed administratively once a top of slope was identified on their sites.
Therefore, Staff believes that once the top of slope is identified and approved on this site, the
2
c
~
-
-...I
Applicant could come back with a specific residence design for an administrative stream
margin review to verify the residence's compliance with the stream margin review standards
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040(C), Stream Margin Review Standards.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In reviewing the proposal, Staff finds the proposed top of slope from Hunter Creek to be
appropriate. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this
Stream Margin Review application with the conditions proposed in the attached resolution.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: (!, I
"1 move to approve Resolution No.~, Series of 2004, approving with conditions, a stream
margin review establishing Hunter Creek's top of slope on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split as
proposed by the application."
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Application
Exhibit C -- Referral Comments
3
o
-
'J
Resolution No.:E)f
(SERIES OF 2004)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW IDENTIFYING HUNTER CREEK'S
TOP OF SLOPE ON LOT 1 OF THE ODEN LOT SPLIT, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-072-13-001
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Bob and Paula Starodoj, requesting Stream Margin Review approval to identify Hunter
Creek's top of slope as being the elevation of 7,870 feet above sea level on the property
described as Lot 1 of the Oden Lot Split; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is a 30,891 square foot vacant parcel located in
the R-15A Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land
Use Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the
Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use
Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam
Margin Review finding that establishing Hunter Creek's top of slope at an elevation of 7,870
feet above sea level on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split is appropriate based on the Land Use
Code's definition of Top of Slope'; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as
identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public
hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves with conditions, the
Stream Margin Review request to establish Hunter Creek's top of slope as the elevation of
7,870 feet above sea level on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split, by a vote of to L
- ~; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this
Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
c
:>
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review request to
establish Hunter Creek's top of slope as the elevation of 7,870 feet above sea level on Lot 1,
of the Oden Lot Split, with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall apply for another stream margin review to construct a
residence on the subject site since this stream margin review approval simply
establishes Hunter Creek's top of slope as it relates to the development of the
subject site.
2. The Applicant shall record an amended plat at the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office that reconfigures the building envelope on the subject parcel in
a manner that would make the north and west sides of the building envelope
follow Hunter Creek's top of slope as established herein.
3. As a condition of any future stream margin review application on this site, the
Applicant shall be required to erect silt fence and construction fencing at the top
of slope determined herein.
Section 2
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 3
, If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
Section 4
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless
amended by an authorized entity.
5
o
""'"
...../
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on September 7, 2004.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
6
c
~
-'
EXHIBIT A
REvIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
A. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS
The proposed development is located within an environmentally sensitive area described as a
Stream Margin and is subject to Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be
permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a
determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below:
1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood
Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for
development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a
professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows
that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to,
proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood
elevation increase caused by the development.
Staff Findinl!
This application is simply requesting to establish the top of slope of Hunter Creek on the
subject property. That being said, the top of slope from which all development is required to
be setback fifteen (15) feet is proposed to be established well away from the 100-year
floodplain. Staff finds this standard to be met.
2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/RecreationJOpen
Spaceffrails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in
the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of
historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public
use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water
boundaries of the river COurse shall be granted to the greatest extent possible via a
recorded "Fisherman's Easement."
Staff Findin~
Staff finds that this proposal will not be in conflict with the AACP or the Roaring Fork
Greenway Plan because the entire scope of work will be required to be confined outside of
the native riparian area as defined by the fifteen (15) foot setback from the river's top-of-
slope as is being established through this review. There is no development currently
proposed that would negatively impact the native riparian area of Hunter Creek. Staff finds
this criterion to be met.
3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill)
made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall
be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant
to Section 26.435.040(F)(1).
c
"""'.
/
Staff Finding
Staff is requiring the Applicant to amend the existing building envelope by recording a plat
that will provide a new building envelope in which the north and west boundaries will be
consistent with the top of slope as proposed. Additionally, no development will be allowed
within fifteen (15) feet of the proposed top of slope and outside the corresponding northern
and western building envelope boundaries after being reestablished on the plat mentioned
above. Staff finds this criterion to be met
4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of
the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during
construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to
prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained
outside of the designated building envelope.
Staff Finding
The proposal is not to construct anything on the site, it is simply to define Hunter Creek's top
of slope for future construction, A subsequent stream margin review will be conducted for
any construction or development to occur on this site. During the stream margin review to
review the construction of a residence on the property, Staff will review construction
techniques and require the Applicant to meet the stream margin review standards that are set
forth in Land Use Code Section 26.435.040, Stream Margin Review. That being the case,
Staff will ensure that this standard be met.
5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any
alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice is submitted to
the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any manner. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
6. A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated, that
applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the
flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
Staff Finding
The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any manner. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work
within the one-hundred-year floodplain.
Staff Finding
There is no development proposed within the one hundred year floodplain. Moreover, the
proposed top of slope will fall considerably outside of the one hundred year floodplain. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting within
fifteen (15) feet back of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most
8
c :)
restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank
stability. New p1antings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the
designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as
approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development
applications. The top of slope and 100 year flood plain elevation of the Roaring
Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the
Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering
Department.
Staff Findinl!:
The Applicant has not proposed to develop the site as of yet. This application is simply
intended to define Hunter Creek's top of slope for future development on the site. A future
stream margin review will be required to develop the site with a single-family residence and
as part of said stream margin review, Staff will require the structure to be setback at least
fifteen (15) feet from the top of slope established in this review. Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not
exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from
ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the
Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section
26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020, as shown
in Figure "A".
Staff Findinl!:
A future stream margin review to review the proposed residence on this site will ensure that
the development is setback fifteen (15) feet from the top of slope and that it meets the
progressive forty-five (45) degree height limit from the top of slope. Staff finds this criterion
not to be applicable to this appliclltion.
10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river
or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. A
lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications.
Staff Findinl!:
The Applicant is not proposing to develop the site as part of this stream margin review. Staff
finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones.
Staff Findinl!:
The Applicant's surveyor has not indicated that there are any wetlands on the property and
Staff feels that the top-of-slope has been accurately identified. Staff finds this criterion to be
met.
9
--~---,--t~--,-- ,
,.....
,,-
"'""'\
, '"
Exl'l11oif- \~y
'JCi'-flp, J ot)lt AS LL{'
LAND USE APPLICATION
ApPLICANT:
Location:
gob "5I-o-ctJoj
LoT ( o~ lLl/\ Lot- Sf. (, ~T
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
2-7"37 - (J-q-z. -/-"':, - eo I
Name:
ParcelID # (REQUIRED)
REPRESENTATIVE:
Address:
Phone #:
Cat.-('\~-<- <5:,}I-e,^^-'<-
'70 ( 1f\f\ <>- ....01.0 '-"" ",~c.Q
f) v ,'IJ-"<
Name:
2S-
5'D S-D
PROJECT:
Address:
I'~ ,c.i ~(Of-"-
~A LAA. tMa lA0J'V\
J. Q..1 2( """ ,\~Q.-{
P-f\) ~ 'f'JA /
(
co"'-
- Lo l () I^. "<--
Name:
Phone #:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptual PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Devt.
0 Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Development
0 Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Devt.
0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (&SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition
0 GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision 0 Historic Designation
~ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes 0 Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
0 Lot Split 0 Temporary Use 0 Other:
0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Text/Map Amendment
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
PROPOSAL:
I
(description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
!R-QJQf<,\,,-~ T"-'f ~'f 5(~~
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 14 q:;-
o Pre-Application Conference Summary
o Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement
o Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
o Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
RETAIN FOR PERMANENT REC(R)
o
1"""'\
V
6-25-2004
Dear Sirs;
Weare requesting that the legal top of slope line be changed to coincide with the
actual top of slope as indicated on the accompanying survey, and that the building
envelope be adjusted to reflect this change.
As is shown on the survey, the actual top of slope coincides with the edge of the
lawn area, which has historically been in it's present location and condition, No changes
in vegetation or use are being considered in this sensitive area.
We feel that this proposal meets both the letter and the spirit of the various
ordinances in place designed to protect the streams and their environs from damage due
to development.
Thank You,
Bob Starodoj
r"'
,-
~
''''';
1, There will be no development in any Special Flood Hazard Area,
2. The Parks/Recreation/Open SpacerrraiIs Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway
Plan will be followed in any development. There are no areas of historic public use or
access. A "Fisherman's Easement" exists and is indicated on the accompanying survey,
3. No vegetation will be disturbed outside of the building envelope.
4, The development will not pollute or interfere with the stream in any way. Any
increased drainage will be accommodated within the building envelope.
5. There will be no alteration to any watercourse,
6. See #5,
7. There will be no work done within the 100 -year floodplain.
8, There will be no development within the 15 foot setback from the top of slope. It
should be noted that the existing lawn extends to the actual top of slope, as indicated on
the accompanying survey. This lawn will be maintained in its' current state. A landscape
plan will be submitted with the development application. The 100-year floodplain is
indicated on the accompanying survey, as well as the actual top of slope as determined
by the surveyor.
9, Any development will meet the height and setback requirements as required (15 foot
setback, no part of the development above a line rising at a 45 degree angle from the top
of slope).
10. A lighting plan will be submitted with the development application. All exterior
lighting shall be downcast, and will comply with Section 26.575.150.
II. Riparian zones are located wholly within the 100-year floodplain, There are no
wetlands on the property.
-
-
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
970 925 2688
'"'"
...,,~
7.7.04
86-160
To whom it may concern:
Regarding my job number 86-160 , executed this date, the notation "top of slope and
edge of mowed lawn" was added because the edge of the lawn is, in my opinion, the
top of the slope to the creek.
Brian Flynn, 04:41 PM 8/217.1lQ4 , Oden Lot Split
/",\
'. ,I
Page 1 of 1
S2<hlkJlt \)C (/
X-Sender: brianf@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:4 1:22 -0600
To.: james1@ci.aspen.co.us
From: Brian Flynn <brianf@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Oden Lot Split
X-MaiIScanner-Information: Please contact the 1SP for more information
X-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean
Parks Department Comments and Requirements:
1) The Parks Department agrees that the Top of Slope is the edge of the manicured lawn.
2) The Parks Department will require any future development to design and plan around the protection
of the native vegetation located on the hill side. This protection would include a silt fence and
construction fencing located at the top of slope. No storage of materials or disturbance will be allowed
out side of these two fences.
Brian Flynn, Parks & Open Space Coordinator
130 South Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-60 I I (P) 970-920-5128(F)
Printed for James Lindt <jameslraJci.aspen.co.us>
~ n rH10A
OCT-22-2003 WED 09:05 AM
FAX NO.
-~
/-- ....,
--k' ~~i!l 00(\-
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
A2'rermcnt for PaYment of City nf A$Dtn Development AODJication. Fecs
ST~ ro~oJ
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and
30b
(hereinafter APPLICANt') AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. .;c ,APPLlCAll/,\ has ,ubmiltold to CITY an application for
o \ SlOf)..Iol- l4:\j 1/ <~f',<\ o;l~ 'I
!"\7
,
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees tllOt City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Serie. of
2000) establishes a [ee stl1lCLure for Land Use application. and the payment of all processing fees i. a
condition precedent to a detel'minatiOIl of application eonlpleteness.
3.' APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the propOSed
ptnject. it is not possible at this time to lIScertain the full extenl of the costs involved in processins tho
application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the partie. that APPLICANT
make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafLet permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on
a monthly basis. APPI.ICANT agreeS additional costs may accrue following their hearings anUlor
approvals. APPLICANT .gree. he will be benefited by re!aining groater cash liquidity and will make
.ddirion.l p.yments upon notification by the CITY when they are nece..ary as costs are incurred. CITY
.grees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering i15 full costs to process
APPLICANT'S application. '
4. CITY and APPLICANT furlher .~'I'ee that it is impracticable for CITY Slaff to complete
processing or present sufficient i11fol'mation to the Planning Commission and/ot City Council to enable the
PI.nning Coaunission and/or City Cuuncil to "",ke legaUy required findings for projec, cunsideration,
unless current billings are paid in full prior to decisiun.
5. Therefore, APPLICAN'f agrees that in consideration of the CITY'. waiver of its right to
collect lull fees prior 1'0 . ~eterminolion of application compleleness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial
deposit in the amount of S I 7...1'70 which i6 for ,0 hoors of Community Development staff
time, and if actual recorded COSts excced the initial deposir, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly
billings to CITY to reirnbtirse the CrN for the processing of ihe application mentioned above, incluuing
post approval review.t a rato of $205.00 per planner hour OVet the initial deposit Such periodic p.ymenlS
shan be made within 30 days of the biUing dare. APPLICANT further a!:fees that failure to pay such
accrued cOSIS shan be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits bc issued
until .1I co.ts associaled with case processing have been paid.
CI'fY OF ASPEN
APPLICANT
By: &b
Date: (~
Sl"<.V'oJOJ_
-L-. (, - C; '-t
By:
JoUeAnn Wood.
Community Developmellt Director
Billing Address ,.nd Telephone Number:
Reauired
f.O,f)",'/.-,
A<;f"'~ Co
1\ 2. (
'D 1 \,( 2-
I::\support\form~\agrpay.s.doc
6/05/03
q'2,)
"'J'1'fi
P. 05
...~.,",-
OCT-22-2003 WED 09:06 AN ~~
,* f~ If OLA{
FAX NQ,r
p, 08
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: /"01:i11 (j bfvJ /or Spll 7-
Applicant; Boh 't P/tu~A '<;71l~Ot:lOJ
Locatioo;loo Fe b lVt, 'R D
Zone District: 'P. u h.
Lot Si~e:
Lot Area:
2.'1'5"32-
?- ~, \ '?,. "\
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and Sleep slopes, Please refer to the
dcfmition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code,)
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Exisling;
&isting:
Exisling;
.c?
r'~
~
Proposed;
Proposed;
Proposed;
(]!)
I
if
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS: 9)"'", ? 'LV€..
, '
Floor Area: Existing; V Allowable; "3 ,"i b <; Proposed: 1["-('1 ~,,~\, ~" "~'!
/
Principal bldg. hcight: Exisling; Allowable; Proposed;
Access. bldg. height: Exisling: Allowable: Proposed;
On-Site parking: Existing; Required; Proposed;
% Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed:
% Open Space: Exisling; Required; Proposed;
Front Setback:. Existing: Required: Proposed:
Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Combined FIR; Exisling: Required: Proposed;
Side Setback: Exisling; Required: Proposed;
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Combined Sides: Exisling; Required: Proposed:
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
to (:: v.. z.....
Variations requested:
,.,._..
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
970 925 2688
7.7.04
86-160
To whom it may concern:
Regarding my job number 86-160 , executed this date, the notation "top of slope and
edge of mowed lawn" was added because the edge of the lawn is, in my opinion, the
top of the slope to the creek.
J
r-.<~
6-25-2004
Dear Sirs;
Weare requesting that the legal top of slope line be changed to coincide with the
actual top of slope as indicated on the accompanying survey, and that the building
envelope be adjusted to reflect this change,
As is shown on the survey, the actual top of slope coincides with the edge of the
lawn area, which has historically been in it's present location and condition. No changes
in vegetation or use are being considered in this sensitive area.
We feel that this proposal meets both the letter and the spirit of the various
ordinances in place designed to protect the streams and their environs from damage due
to development.
Thank You,
Bob Starodoj
Parcel Detail
"""'
~~.
Page lof3
Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
AssessorfI'<<lll$wer Pro,pertv Search I Assessor Subset QueQ' I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Rec~QIl Search
Basic Building Characteristics I Tax hlforma1ion
Sales Detail t ValueDetai1 I sidentialf. tDetail I Land Detail
! Tax Area
001
OWner Name and Address
[STARODOJ ROBERT F & PAULA A
[PO BOX 1121
[ASPEN, CO 81612
Legal Description
ISUB:ODEN SPLIT LOT: 1 DESC: SECOND
IAMENDED
Location
PhysieaJAddreu: 120 RED MOUNTAIN RD ASPEN
Subdivisilln:IODEN SPLIT
LaIld Acres: 10.602
t Land...S4Ft;W----------------- ."."'-------.-
Property Tax Valuation Information
I
I
Land: I
Improvements: I
TlItal: I
ActualVlllue 'r-Assessed Value
1,750,000 I 507,500
01 0
1,750,0001 507,500
http://www,pitkinassessor,orglassessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=RO 12746
06/23/2004
NO, 2697
P 2
JUN, 23. 200~jf 5.:...~31.~~"PITKIN COUNTY Tl.~~EOFA$PB'O
, \/'.tRETT PAID ,. "'Rl:TT PAID
OATE ~~ NO. DA"'!'lEf' NO. \~~ l'
0,- 1<1..-o~ '-\,\- - )~~\'l \2-\'4'<,~ <-\.~
~
J?
!
s
-
!!!!
-
~
~
GI
cn_
s:
r--
....
Reco1'dcd at
il.cocptian
RECORDll'lO REQUESTED BY'
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Rob... P. ODd Paula ^. S.....doj
c/o Broob A. PCbII'SOD, Esq.
~_ 8< peocnon, P.C,
315 Sut Hyman A.VCDU8
^"Pen, Colondo 8\611
ll'~JlIIJJ'II".i:;~~~.!:,~ kr
o~
-
\ '\...
G'ltNKRAL W.tlU ANTV DEED
THIS DEED is IIIlIde tbiJ J8.-. day of December, 2002 betWec:n ODEN & COMPANY, A
PARTNERSHIP ~ "arautor") and ROBEllT F. STARODOJ and PAllLA A. STARODOJ.
al JolDt teaaatl (h.........- ''GraDlCCI''), ..,booc l"llal addrcH il PO Box 1121. A_Do Colored<> 81612.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration oflbe sum ofTen Dollars ($10,00) and
other good OIld valuable eonsidenJllon, the receipt and sufficiency of whiob il heRby aeknowladaed. has
granted. bargained, sold,. md conveyed, and by theM _eo", d..... _r. ....t..in, sell. convey and conAr=,
unto the: GraDtees~ as joint tenanl5. not as renlU1ts in C01I'101OD. their heir., suoceuon III1d ..igns forever. all
the real ~ "'gether with improvements, if OIly, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin. SUIte
of Colorado, dcson'bec1 as follows:
Second Anlended Lot I, according to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin
Review and Lot Line Adjultmcnt recorded December 10. 2002 in Plat Book 63 at Page 68
as Reception No, 475907, County of Pitkin, Stale of Colored<>.
TOGETHER with all and aiDgular the hereditaments ....d appu_ dJerero belongiJlg or in
anywise appa1aining, and the revcniOl1 and reversions, remaincleo' and remaindcn, rents. I........ and profits
tbcrc:of. and all the ostate, right, title, lnt......r. claim and demand whatsoever of tho Grantor, lrither in law or
equity, of, in and to the abova b....gained premises, with the herediraments and app_..
TO HA Vlt A:ND TO HOLD the laid premisel above barpill.ed and described. with the
appUl1enancoo, unto the GranteeS, their heir., _....... and IISIign.o fat"""""' And the Grantor for luelf, its
suecesson and IIS8igns, doea covenant, grant, bargain and qrec to and with the Grantee., their heirs,
.uee........ IlDd .....Igns. that at the time of the coMaling and delivery oflh.... presents, It i. _Useized oCthe
premiselfi .bow conveyed,. baa &Ooc:I~ .urea perfect. absolule and indefeasible estate of inheriamce~ in law. in
f... simple. and has aood riabt, full power and lawtUI authority to granr. bargain, sell Nld oonvey the same
in manner and form as aforeoaid,. and that lbc lame i. free and 01..... from all former and othar gnbrtlo,
baTPins~ salea, liens. InXca, 85&eBsmenm. eDcumbrancos and rcStricticm8 of whatever kind 01' nature
whatsoever, excCpt the folloWing exceptions: GenenU taxel for 2002. due and payable in 2003. and those
exceptions listed on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated berein by this reference, All documents are
recorded in the records of Pitkin County, Colorado.
The Grantor lball and will WARRANT AND FOREVltltDEFEND the above bargaincdprcmises
in the quiot and peaceable poue..ioD oCthe Grantees. their hein... luccenou and astians. aeaift8t all and
every pcrson or persons lawfUlly claiming the ..,hole or any part thereof. TIle singular nUll1ber shall inclwie
tbe plural. the plural the singular IlDd the use of lU\Y a- sball be applicable to all gende.'o,
IN WITNESS WIlEIlEOF, the o..ntor has ......cuted this General W.......ry Deed on the date set
_ above.
ODEN& COMPANY,A
PARTNl'lRSHIP
By:
Jt., ~ vf.$~
Robert R. OdeD. M.D.. Partner
(Notary Aclatowledstnent to Follow on Next Page)
,JUN 23.1004 5'.03PM .-PITKIN COUNTY TlTlE
. .-
/""~
NO. 2697 P. 3
'..J'
STATE OF COLORADO
)
) ss.
ll'.'.IL~JIIIJI~UIII'II..~~~~,!::2.A
cOUNTY OF PlTKlN )
The foregoiDll iDa~ was aclalowled&ed and sworn to before me this J3.. day ofDecembcr,
2002 by llabcrt R. Odcn, ParIIIcr of Odcn & company, . Partnership,
WIrNESS my hand and official seaL
My commission expires:
/llY'OlIoh
NotaQI P"blic
t5nm65~
..........................,..,..
..'''~
~~~. .~~
_ ~~..V,.li1'"
_~- "'a
--s, $
~ ~
-:-*, OFettI!':.O..,~
,,,,,.......,,..
-.I~
.... -....,.-
2
~."
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
. " I
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: .51-Ct v"'CJ 0;
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
, Aspen, CO
,200_
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS.
COllnty of Pitkin )
I,-~ t V\ l(Z.~; l-~ ",I\, ~ r (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
~
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at leas1;,fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto,
l
_ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of
, ,200_, to and including the date and time ofth~ublic
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.'
l
_ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the-information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipaL government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto,
(continued on next page)
-..
,"^'
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of tlle proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledgedQefore me this 7>- day
o~. ,200~, by ::s; ~..:$ L.I~
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires: tf / -;;J.Y 0+
~ ~/ ~ )
Notary Public '----""
I'UIIUC
RE: STARDOJ STREAM
NOTICE IS
hearing Will be held on ay. October 5, 200.
at a meeting to- begin 4;30 p.m. before the As
pen Planning and Zoo Commission, Sister ell
Ie$Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, tt
consider an appbUon submitted by Bob Stardo
requesting streU'l margin review approval to de
termlne the ~er ~'s lop of &lope on th,
property IepUy ~bed aa Lot I, of the Odel
Lot Split.
For furtber Informatloh. contact James Undt a
the Ctty of Aspen Community Development DE
partment, 130 S. Galena St", Aspen, CO, (970) 92{]
5)02,lameslGcl,aspen,co.us.
s/Jasmlne Tygre, Chal
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commlsslo,
Pub1bhed In The T n.... o. Sept~be, .
2004, (1878)
A TT ACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAlL
.,
~
-""
.
A IT ACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
Lot
1
lot- Srl,'t ,Aspeo,CO
DJ""
,
O<:t.
s
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
.200-':1
STATEOFCOWRAOO )
) ss.
Coaaty or Pitkia )
I, C e... y 11-0'" S I''''' VV\ <L. ) (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
I Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing, A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
j Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the & day of
5 "'1' 1'",,,, b~~ , 200--=t, to and including the date and time of the public
. ( hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304,060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code, At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S, mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
,..."
"
.
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
tIt::~~
Signature
The fore oing "Affidavit of Noti'f7 _was ~~ befor~ thiso?~y
of OO..Jby tJ)E H.~
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
t.t, CoimiSSIOO Expires 09/2012007
ATTACHMENTS:
COPYOFmEPUBUCATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
L YETH MARIAN N/SW WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST ODEN & CO
GUARANTY TRUSTEES 110 N WACKER DR STE 330 PO BOX 660
3/44219 WHITMAN HOUSTON
TX 77027 CHICAGO IL 60606 ASPEN CO 81612
JME LEVINS LLC STARODOJ ROBERT F & PAULA FRIEDBERG MARC S 50% INT
A
5433 RIDGEWAY AVE PO BOX 1121 PO BOX 8747
WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612
PITKIN COUNTY ODEN ENTERPRISE SODEN PITKIN COUNTY
NANCY C/O
530 E MAIN ST STE 302 PO BOX 660 530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611
BONDS MICHAEL STEPHEN & BIELFIELD LAURENCE H KIRCH MARK
ELAINE JOHNSON 311 INDEPENDENCE PL A4121NDEPENDENCE PL
310 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611
ASPEN CO 81611
HAGGERTY BEATRICE DECAMPO RICHARD L & PITKIN COUNTY
SUSAN
M308 INDEPENDENCE CT K309 INDEPENDENCE PL 530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611
BRUNSWOLD KIRK WLANE ROARING FORK I LLCC/O
TAMMIE BEKLIK ROY A BURT BOWEN
A413 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 7640 BOWEN & BOWEN
ASPEN CO 816/1 ASPEN CO 81612 445 S FRONTAGE RDBURR
RIDGE IL 60527
ROARING FORK I LLCC/O PITKIN COUNTY FRANKLIN DAVID MICHAEL &
BURT BOWEN MICHELLE
BOWEN & BOWEN 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 207 INDEPENDENCE PL
445 S FRONTAGE RDBURR ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611
RIDGE IL 60527
IRELAND MICHAEL SLADDIN MICHAEL DAVID BUESCH THOMAS
C515 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 205 INDEPENDENCE PL A206 INDEPENDENCE PL
ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 8161/
ASPEN PITKIN EMP HSG GOSHORN MARCIA HOLMSTEDT MONlKA
INCC/O MICHAEL VERNON CPA L5l6 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 1141
100 ELK RUN DR STE 103 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612
BASALT CO 81621
GARZOLI DIANNE HALL JO-ANN MCCLINTON MICHELE
Ll04 INDEPENDENCE PL 103 INDEPENDENCE PL 618 INDEPENDENCE PL
ASPEN CO 816/1 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: STARDOJ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 at
a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Bob Stardoj
requesting stream margin review approval to determine the Hunter Creek's top of slope on the
property legally described as Lot I, of the Oden Lot Split. For further information, contact James
Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO,
(970) 920-5102, jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us.
s/Jasmine TVl!re. Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on September 4, 2004
-~-------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
City of Aspen Account
;
~,
PUBLIC NOTICE .f. ~~
RE: ST ARDOJ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW <90.; . <<',c () ~,L..
~0~ -Y. / <?/J~ '<?
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, OcUJ9~~, 2Vfl1tat
a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m, before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission;'~~r~ Cities
Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Ba~ardoj
requesting stream margin review approval to determine the Hunter Creek's top of slope 6;1 the
property legally described as Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split. For fllrther information, contact James
Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO,
(970) 920-5102, jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us.
"i
s/Jasmine Tygre, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on September 4, 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
City of Aspen Account
~l uJ;.'~<C'I,V I It.
tv Lt:/1 '4~iJ ~Q.ov\~_
'1;'\-0 r Re {,~_Iot
-7'>,\,
)-vt "
~""~~I i1>u pr.c~- vr
~o~