The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1360 Tiehack Rd.0037.2004.ASLU1360 Tiehack Rd Final PUD - t 2735-142-04-004 Case 0037.2004.ASLU I 47 -9 1 6, , - P 4 7 1 a?-7 3914 9 -09.00/ City o f Aspen Community Development Dept. CASE NUMBER 0037.2004.ASLU PARCELID# 2735-142-04-004 CASE NAME Final PUD PROJECT ADDRESS 1360 Tiehack Rd PLANNER Scott Woodford CASE DESCRIPTION Final PUD REPRESENTATIVE Bob Bowden DATE OF FINAL ACTION 06/02/04 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Staff Approval BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 07/26/04 BY D DRISCOLL |El 4 , -/* 1- ./ 4*!I'llillk, ijailillillill"illill, * t +1 '.1.11- -W-:M~JIJI-jl File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Tab Help m m 19 â€¢ill miâ€¢ 14 4 Â§@Clic.'~,7 Sub Permits i Valuation i Public Comment M .in ~ Routing Status i Arch/Eng ~ Pacels ~ Custom Fields ] Fee# 1 Fee Summary ~ Actkns ] Routing Mistory ~ Con(ition; t Peimm # 0037.2004 ASLU ciddies, i1380 'TIEHACK RD >1 Apt/Sute J CRy |ASPEN State /6 3 Zip 181611 Peinlit Wormation Â· Â· ht :te, Permit ~ Routing Queue :aslu Applied . 06/03/2004 21 F 'cled 1 SiatiM ipend,ng Apploved [ ~ ~" " ~ 3 23 i'*Sc{Â©ton FINAL PUD Final i 23 11.,brnitted 608 B0WD~948.7000 Clock jiutlrjii~g Days ~--6 Expires )05/29/2005 -3 r Visible on the web? Permit ID: 1 30896 , Ov,rier ! act Name LW DEVELOPMENT INC .gj Fist Name } 533 E HOPKINS AVE ~ASPEN CO 81611 Phone Ownef l:Apphcant? r r 04â€¢cant i.astflamejBOWDEN DEVELOPMENT -gj Flf:iN,me| PO BOX 1470 ]ASPEN CO 81612 Phone 19701 5442000 Cust # 22508 L illt; ! C..A, &, 4--3 .-*' W ~ ~ ~ Record 2 of 2 -* I ...,P P l 4 kÂ«ove] â‚¬8 0 1/ 63 0% 91 14 e oeol.Â». 9- 99% 9 /9 9 6 m Â®-9 & E e % El MEMORANDUM To: Bob Bowden Frorn: James Lindt, Planner Date: June 2,2004 Re: Lot 4 Maroon Creek Club Building Envelope Adjustment Plat- Community Development Department's Comments on Draft Plat Please make the following changes to the draft plat: 1. Amend title to read as follows: "First Amended Plat of Lot 4, Maroon Creek Club Subdivision/PUD". 2. Include Vicinity Map. 1 Include the following purpose statement on the plat: "The purpose of this plat is to amend the designated building and development envelopes on Lot 9 of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision and PUD. 4. Include signature blocks for the Community Development Director, Community Development Engineer, Title Company, Owner's Certificate, and a County Clerk and Recorder' s Acceptance Certificate. 5. Remove the notations that indicate parcel to be added (removed) and replace with notation that indicates building envelope and activity envelope area to be added (removed). 6. Obtain all signatures with the exception of the City Community Development Director, Community Development Engineer, and the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to submitting two (2) mylar copies to the Community Development Department for recording. A recording fee of $11 payable to the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder is due at the time of plat submittal. Additionally, a plat review fee of $546 (payable to the City of Aspen) is due for review of the amendment request. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: \-6X 4 /Â¥*â‚¬002 ce-GUS L et--U e LL-L / Location: 1 4 00 -Tl Oil/k-C *2-0 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQU[RED) ,--7 /:.4 ~1Â· - Â¥Â·Â·Â·y.7-.- ~ ,22- 0-if (--1 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ~yae, \3Ow) crI Address: W><- 1 4~90 f /%'<>FE-13 (C 616/2- Phone #: 10 ~Â»1- Looo (04) ~1-8 ..' (62\\ 3 PROJECT: Name: Address: Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. 2 Special Review ,E[ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ~ Final Historic Development U Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. El GMQS Allotment 1 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) E Historic Demolition U GMQS Exemption j Subdivision El Historic Designation ~ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes El Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split E Temporary Use C Other: U Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ADJU>FE (E\~ a_or mukij- t Â¥*AL'\3 ltÂ«, UjVUXÂ©VE -1/, trce Ue\,XT-G Dilk\Klk E. Alf) hi R.. Cof D-FI-\04 414 Cop,Tribps .Ac> lh\DiCK-FED Ok Fl-prE SDIC W Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 7 rrV El Pre-Application Conference Summary ~1 Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ~1 Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be fol(led and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S app[ication. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of appligtion completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 9'472, which is for 2 - ' hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual W recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Mailing Address: *Cf'\ 90 M*aj Le <5\ 4 0 - g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 REâ„¢N FOR PER~NENT RECORD liv, j.t U 7 L L/j LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON L KAUFMAN' BROOKE A, PETERSON HAL S. DISHLER " KAUFMAN, PETERSON & DISHLER, P.C. OF COUNSEL PATRICK D. MCALLISTER 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE (970) 925-8166 TELEPHONE - ALSOADMITTED IN MARYLAND SUITE 305 FACSIMILE Â·Â· ALSO ADMITTED IN TEXAS (970) 925-1000 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 May 5,2004 By Facsimile to: 544-2002 Bob Bowden LW Development P.O. Box 1470 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Re: Lot 4, Maroon Creek Club, Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; also known as 1360 Tiehack Road, Aspen, Colorado (Lot 4); Compliance with Site and Architectural Review Committee Approval (Approval)and Design Guidelines forMaroon Creek Club Subdivision (Design Guidelines); Site Visit on May 4,2004 Dear Bob ; As you know, our firm is counsel to the Maroon Creek Club Master Association (Association). This letter was prepared at your request regarding a pending sale of Lot 4. Pursuant to the meeting between you, as representative ofLW Development, Gary Albert, President of the Association, Andy Hecht, as both a legal representative of the contract purchaser of Lot 4 and as a SARC member and myself, this letter constitutes the response ofthe Association to the requests thatyou have made for supplemental approval regarding the modification of building envelopes, variances from the Approval for Lot 4; and conditions for subsequent review and Approval of landscaping conditions: <' 1. ) Building and Development Envelope Modifications. The proposed ~ modifications to the Building and Development Envelopes from the existing ,><~ description of same (as shown on the Final Subdivision Plat & PUD for Maroon Creek Club recorded in Plat Book 33 at Page 4) to the descriptions 4 /' L. V V I V 1 I I'lili , 1 V I lili 1 1,1 1 L..1 1 . 1, V V " . 4 U 11 L L 1, FIV, 3903 t. 3/ 3 Bob Bowden LW Development May 5,2004 Page 2 < shown on the Improvement Survey Plat prepared by Tuttle Surveying < Services on March 25,2004 for Lot 4 is APPROVED, subject to: a, the further modification of the Building Envelope described in 2. below; b. the prior approval by the City of Aspen, Community Development and Building Departments of the Building and Development Envelopes set out in this paragraph 1. and in paragraph 2. below (with evidence of same to be provided to SARC); and LÂ£ the compliance of the installation of all _ail~~cond-itioning'l equipment with the new applicable AssociationGuidelines, - 2. Retaining Wall at western boundary of Lot 4. The existing retaining wall at the western boundary of Lot 4, though not stIictly in compliance with the Approval for Lot 4 and the Design Guidelines is APPROVED AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARI*ICE, subject to: a. the modification of the Building Envelope to incorporate the -~ retaining wall-without increasing the overall size of the Building Envelope; and b. the prior approval by the City of Aspen, Community Development and Building Departments of the location ofthe retaining wall (with evidence of same to be provided to SARC). 3, Anodized Metal Roof Trim (Brown). The use of anodized brown metal roof trim, though not in compliance with the Approval for Lot 4 and the Design Guidelines, is APPROVED AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE, subject to PAYMENT OF A FINE OF $500.00. 4. Entrance Chandelier and Down Lighting. The installation of a Chandelier which was not included in the Approval and is in violation of the Design Guidelines, is DENIED and the Chandelier must be removed. The use of down lighting that was not part of the Approval and does not strictly comply Bob Bowden LW Development May 5,2004 Page 3 with the Design Guidelines is APPROVED AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARTAI\ICE. 5. Incomplete Landscaping, All incomplete landscaping, excluding the retaining wall described in paragraph 2. above (and resolved in that paragraph), must be: a. timely completed in accordance with the requirements of the Master Declaration of Covenants for Maroon Creek Club (recorded in Book 733 at page 599), the Approval, the Design Guidelines and applicable portions of the letter from William Lukes + Associates dated April 30,2004; b. inspected and approved by William Lukes + Associates; c. in compliance with all City of Aspen requirements contained in the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City and completed as specified therein by June 30,2004. Proof that the City has inspected and approved the completion of said requirements will be provided to SARC; and d. assured to be completed by the immediate renewal of the Letter of Creditin the amountof $ 100,000.00 to secure the performance of the Landscaping under the Maroon Creek Club Construction Guaranty. 6. Gravel Driveway, The use of a gravel access driveway has also been APPROVED AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE. Sincerely, Kaufman, Peterson & Dishler, P,C. A Professional Corporation By: 0 -. Hal S. Dishler 1 L 1% WV. /1/JILLI\ ivul 7%07 r, 3/ D . Bob Bowden LW Development May 4 2004 Page 4 PC: Gary Albert Andy Hecht, Esq. Bill Lukes 7\04=4*:=\ N -F- ' N ... \\ . f 1- i X --.I 11 1 1 -~ -*# k. 1 1.1.1 1.~ I..% ,..Â· SHOWN,Â·'C '4.216> -112Â· . ;.6' . LANDSGAME, /645 I.:-'.1.14 OES NOT ' 0 -h.:-re 0.49:,7 44 .:.':4 Na ANTITY, -*- f.-2 I 1.-Â·. '644'*.- 74Â¢41 2 . 41Â«f \ 0.-9 11 I.1 1. 1 1 --- , 6:3:: l >el NSTALL 10" TI~flit ete;.>Â·4 : . 1 ~~.. . .. *-# 6.--i.' tii:. /9. RATED NYLOPLAST DRA 'i**~ diP,- 1 - 1 .1:1.1:~1 - %-- 3.#i \1 '~ . 1/ ' '-OR ENGINEER APPROVED *4-9 'If'.tiF.1 \\ 4' t 19-Â· di .17. . *f' 3 9 EQUAL AND 8" ADS-N12 I.Ze:j.9, DRM N PIPE O 1.,O% MIN. , 1-1 I J tiff*f t>fy - ~' C 41 . 0 -'711 Jtfltruic'- t-2.1i.Â·hff-j :.44 .4** %6 + 1,11 . : 12 1.''I '. ' F f 411#x 904* j INSTALL HYDRO-BLANKET M-BFM ,Â· \ 2!.:.11 - . . 09 7, WITH APPROPRIIAT% NATIVE #EED - ; - ' - i 4,2 4,1 1-1 ft. i' ' 4 MIXTURE ON ALL DI STURBED i yv ....rÂ».. AS<ki '1; :Ilix'. 1, r.c.. ., I ./ 4, r..12'. . liE . I../ SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1. *./,-4,42 42 EXISTING INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S /7 1 WALLS AND lit , I , RETAINING --. RECOMMENDATIONS. t' , 1-" .,3, . 4 '- Â·-r filÂ· 44 11/ :E. 2 ta 4, WATER FEATURE -* ~mt ...1 4 3/1,1. .f ,413 a.*- - ~~| ~~~|* 44 h - Af' rox... 44 4, 1.-4- .t:.: -P., ''.'.'.' ---- 44* ..4 / : . 67#.; 1 1- 1 $*91,0 4 , 11 1 4 52/I 1- RADA d.e .Pit -- .3 -' 16 -. ' 1, t 7 4 . 4 / 1 6- r IPE ' - Â·'-1 -i 1.- ' I ' 24. '4' I 41 ' 4.. . . ,,4 ~~ , , 0 ~ .SNOW MECT . *PARKING '(BY OJ'HERS) ' Â·-iÂ·F,,' '-~>- ~,'~Â·~.. F.1 11.ASPHALTÂ·~OR~'SNOW,i -~, ,~~... . i,:,i~~-~ ' ' 1 1 4 ' I, , ~ < 0 ~ 6t - Nf"biet 1441 1 1 1...1 1,1117 â‚¬ 11 11 - - 1 - 11- . . I 11 ' ./ .1-,' F ~2. ' 1, , ,./ AREAS WITH SLOPES SHALLOWER ' AN* ~ REVEGETATE ALL DISTURBED ~~ h , Fil.. i.>t\ 4 r 4.#p THAN 3:1 WITH AN APPROPRIATE 1 'P ~BUILDINGENVELOPE 21..~1 -:-~ ~ _ *Ak HYDROMULCH AND NATIVE SEED - grill.:'. ' ' : "/1M MIXTURE \ AB' trl>2 - 06)/2. \ I:Â·:31.44Â·vaÂ·. --ill-- 3*57-Â· \ 92 --I-- l-Ex I STING t BOULDER WALL Â·Â· INSTALL 12" TRAFFIC RATED ,i>i- -_pEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE O NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL AT LOW POINT AND EXTEND 8" ADS-N12 TO DAYLIGHT. Â·INSTALL NYLOPLAST DRAIN AND DRAIN HAND PLACE 3'x8' OF 12Â» NOMINAL ANGULAR RIPRAP AT OUTLET. BASIN OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL AT LOW POINTS AND EXTEND 8Â» INSTALL HYDRO-BLANKET M-BFM ADS-N12 0 1.0% MIN. TO THE OUTLET WITH APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEED POINT OF THE EXISTING ROOF AND MIXTURE ON ALL DISTURBED FOUNDATION DRAINS. HAND PLACE SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1. 3'x8' OF 9Â» NOMINAL ANGULAR INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RIPRAP AT OUTLET. RECOMMENDATIONS. PROPERTY BOUNDARY ,AVE 30518 F-10" OR -2443 Â· i DUCT I L ~ IRON GE -2490 -us.com TYPICAL-~ AREA GRASSED \ Dity Chart 4 6 12" Â·1 <4*1.41 0 ~ f,, /T.OBSOIL,'~ Â· . //~ f'' Â· MIN. Â· le AC 150/5320-58, 1970, /9 lations will necessarily , 1> conditions such that a Â·t .AA A 0,+Atv inr.tor of 551 PROPERTY BOUNDARY ~ r Z -, ' i :-7- t . F-44414.2 *.- -,0. - 1229 . f __DEVELOYMEr DLL-Â·7 ---0- 18 NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN' -2 Â·~,__f-EXISTING BEU-44~N --#EES~_-_, 4-1 \-INSTALL 12" TRAFFIETRA APPROVED EQUAL AT 1-0Â¥ 26 - i.00Â·-r-Â·. ,~ j '~ EXTEND 8" ADS-I412 TO DA ANGULAR RIPRAP AT OUT 1- .-/ HAND PLACE 3'xa' OF 1 't 1 .~~ -INSTALL NYLOPLAST DRAIN AND DRAIN BASIN OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL 1 1 AT LOW POINTS AND EXTEND 8Â» INSTALL HYDRO-BLANKET M-BFM ADS-N12 0 1.0% MIN. TO THE OUTLET WITH APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEED t :1:1 Â·'i Le INSTALL 10" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN POINT OF THE EXISTING ROOF AND MIXTURE ON ALL DISTURBED OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL AT LOW FOUNDATION DRAINS. HAND PLACE SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1. 4. 21Â· I j POINT AND EXTEND 8" ADS-N12 0 1.0 3'xS' OF 9" NOMINAL ANGULAR I NSTALL PER MANUFACTURER' S 8 % MIN. TO THE OUTLET POINT OF THE RIPRAP AT OUTLET. RECOMMENDATIONS. . EXISTING FOUNDATION DRAINS. HAND PLACE 5'x8' OF 12" NOMINAL ~ :P.. ANGULAR R I PRAP AT OUTLET. EXTEND Â· Â· 2 SWALE FLOWLINE TO RIPRAP. PROPERTY BOUNDARY f# td.W 3130 VERONA AVE ; 1 .,.b.. PHN (770) 932-2443 : Â£4,1.3,71,~'~~::4 . 4243} BUFORD, GA 30518 ' t t.u. , â€¢ EfynÂ©]PI[alot www.nyloplast-us.com FAX (770) 932-2490 . 1 ...1 -. .... 43*314Â¢42 ' . 9 k W q., flifi '<2*#': i. - 16*. Nyloplast Standard Grate Inlet Capacity Chart -' 9.9 . yeti r t ~ ~1'.1.. le 9.,4. 34., y. ia ., -'r 7.4/ is based on eduations from the FAA Airport Drainage AC 150/5320-58, 1970, ..G:....: Certain assumptions have been mode and no two installations will necessarily TER & 2 k- 4 Uet Â· 4 - the same way. Safety factors should change with site conditions such that a .&: 54.-2 4 w.Â·.j 4%*41 ictor 1.25 should be used for an inlet in pavement, and a safety factor of 2-92 , 1 1 1 -1 11 ' Id be used in turf areas. ..4:>'. t.* y ,&/2.-tA . e' 1-':.. J.Ai. Nyloplast Standard Grates 8", 10", 12", 15", 18", 24" and 30" . *5 7:32.. Basin Outlet Flow Rate "Â· ' 4',6,4 -4 . : Pipe Size CFS * . 7, . 44/04:041- B : 2.4.44. -p...~.:193 .t}21~, *: ii:-,fifto' :/.~''a..r~. ~.Â·:*e _ , . - 0 - 229.-4,~mm#.0- 4 1-7 f. cte 4" Â·Â· .4>:Â·~)343{~ilit N. . --1 '...1.,1.1.'.4-901'K 3 ..J 4 &Â£.Al. , -t'.#-i=m# |~ 'i '2*A'll O'.: ' - 211.44 . f % Ve 'W 1. / 1. 4% 8 / 41'fl L rein-nar?:24 24" Grate , Â·114;00:' -tkÂ·;4Â·~â€ž - .-1,!~ OP, 9 0,1 &_12> - , 0... 1%~ 11 - 20 n 6 63 4 . ,â‚¬2Â¢123,4. * 1 1 f fits ,33:=-:.It'.11.:j...Cb.k~ .. , , i.*eg.DE.1.0 . Â· 79/7 :41' A 1 03 Z .Â· f*,52*42 2Â·.4. ...1 -.-ift ./ A r 2- i , #VI Â·; --; 3 5- 2-r~: $ 32 :6 â€¢- ' 1 15. r#Â£Â£4.,f~19:.. " Imm - -E-R ...:*4-:4:westÂ·:Â· 2Â·.n ., :.~ 1 *Â·â€¢~ f ~ u--sc.r - &-- Â· -~~ayÂ·,r Â·- r , a ..7 4 U:. C. - 15 .*4 t...4440.1 -Â§13-- ~ 12" Grate 1. C~ , I . 4 *â‚¬,44:,i" 26.821 - 431*th Â·311~ fi:-7.-Â·. r --;1*Â·Nimi#* t.. 10" Grate 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 * Maximum flow capacity before drain basin beg~%. -tiF-9/"51'.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Head, Feet Calculation based on an average pipe slope of ..=~ ll. , 13 1 1 1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE LOdATION OF KNOWN UNDERGROUND UT ILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UT ILITY MAPS, CONSTRUCTION/DESIGN PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES, AND ACTUAL FIELD 1 LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH BEFORE WORK BEGINS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXCAVATION FOR RETAINING WALLS, UTILITY TRENCHES, ROADWAYS, BUILDING STRUCTURES & z 12" r10" OR 12" DRAINAGE SHALL MEET OSHA REQUIREMENTS. LU l DUCTILE 09 \TE ~ IRON GRATE 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNING ENTITY'S RULES AND < REGULATIONS. Â·CONCRETE ,-TYPICAL TYP I CAL-1 ~CONCRETE r-TYPICAL POUR RING / CONCRETE 8" AREA / CONCRETE 8" CONSTRUCTION AND TRENCH BACKFILL UNDER THE SAME, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. GRASSED \ POUR RING 4. 95% STANDARD PROCTOR IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROADWAY, DRIVEWAY, SLABS ON GRADE SUBGRADE ~/ AREA -~MIN. 1 ~/ AREA E-MIN. 5. ALL UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE 42 dp 4 4 ' ' THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ... f. TOPSO+LA , ./ DAMAGES TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. k- , MIN.:\f,1 t . ... 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE AREA WITHIN THE STREET OUU. -- 77>~>0-1 NLET AND OUTLET i.. . RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA ''.1-1.----1 1.-1-7.-; ADAPTERS, 4" OR -749.- Â·Â·- -777,4-OUTLET ADAPTER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER INVOLVED. ANY DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY BY 0,2 ~< 2/9.-,7 8" ADS-N12 PER PLAN THE CONTRACTOR OUTSIDE THESE LIMITS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER WILL I ' -/. P. .. 4 ADS-N12 PER PLAN BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 1 i:-Â·-,Â·.. ,Â·:Â· ,~,-:-7.~- ~-~~~ 4" OR 8" ADS-N12 7. GRADE ALL DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING STRUCTURES IN ALL DIRECTIONS. DO NOT ALLOW WATER TO ~~-~~~ R PLAN - 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP TWO FULL SETS OF CONTRACT DRAWINGS MARKED UP-TO OR 8" ADS-N12 -11 Â·1 -1 1 -2E;9#/11 PER PLAN POND ON SITE. 444 4.--AlÂ·U INDICATE ALL AS-BUILT CONDITIONS. THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. WHERE PRACTICAL, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO TIES FROM PHYSICAL CLASS 6 ABC COMPACTED TO 95% --CLASS 6 ABC MONUMENTS TO SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES. COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR 9. SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND BASE PLAN INFORMATION PROVIDED BY TUTTLE SURVEY SERVICES AND BOB 2_'_z 'ain -r STANDARD PROCTOR BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT. THE DRIVEWAY, RETAINING WALLS, BUILDING, ROOF AND FOUNDATION DRAINS WERE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR BUILDING, RETAINING WALL, ACCESS DRIVE, AND ROOF/FOUNDATION DRAIN DESIGNED BY OTHERS AND IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF THIS DESIGN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL )rain Basin Nyloplast 10" & 12" Drain INFORMATION. BOUNDARIES UNLIMITED INC. CANNOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR DAMAGES INCURRED BY STRUCTURAL, GRADING OR DRAINAGE DESIGNS PERFORMED BY OTHERS. - 10. ALL PRODUCT INFORMATION SHOWN OR ATTACHED IS AS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THE Not to Scale FILE N CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND COMPLYING WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL MATERIALS WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO PROPER 1360 TI SEAL I NG OF MATING SURFACES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE DELIVERED PRODUCTS AND THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ATTACHED INFORMATION INCLUDES HYDRO-BLANKET M-BFM SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL STABILIZATION. 11. STORM DRAIN PIPES TO BE INSTALLED WITH 1% MINIMUM SLOPE TOWARDS RIPRAP AREAS. HEAT TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL ROOF DRAIN PIPES, DOWNSPOUTS, AND STORM DRAIN PIPES NOT PROTECTED BY THE SNOW MELT SURFACE. 00Â¥Eloloo OVOW NOVHBU 09CL .r- LEGEND 4"CD 4"SD - 4"0 ADS-N12 DRAIN PIPE ~ I - 8"SD .,2 JO 8"0 ADS-N12 DRAIN PIPE ! 4 G -G ADDITIONAL ROOF GUTTER > SWALE/FLOWLINE J , DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW (FLOW AT 2% MINIMUM) 1 % M DRAIN I NLET/BASIN f DIRECT CONCENTRATED SHALLOW SURFACE FLOWS TO DRAIN INLETS, DRAIN BASINS OR RIP RAP AREAS AS SHOWN. i t GRAPHIC SCALE t 1~ 40 3% 1 72> D Â¢ 0 0 1.. 4 ( IN FEET ) 0 L..1 1 inch = 20 ft. C.)C <A .1 CD 00 - 3- Nx 'C--* Bmt 9. \1 ' (0.0 2 (ly 0 E '1% W J UT - 711' e i PS; i g.g f i .C . <' I 'U , , 1 . r 01.- & 8 -O I ms g@ H CD 1- \ l 1 - 414111 i ' Â· 11 - "32 9... f 344\ . li , 1. 1- 1. 1.- / UJ , -11 './ - .1 - .- I.Â£.1 f 18 NOISIA]M 31Va 'ON M 170/LE/t, r 31Â¥0 LO-89:3113 ~~'9+602.6 .elel . Ela Hyd ~ >10 . .. 0. .. De m 0 45: \ Northeasterly Corner Q ~ /*14/ Lot 4 Improvement Survey Plat i/1 0. \\ 34%% 9 Lot 4, Mocroon Creek Club (18 shown on the 0 / 00 g f x /0 Final Sub division P lat & P. U.D. for Maro on Cre ek C lub 1 \ %\ / 9 0-</ / 3 Recorded November 15, 1993 in Plat Book 33 at Page 4 1 \ iii 1 County of Pitkin, State of Colorado 1 r 3%\// /1 i 0 7 9 iff r //ll 5\ 1 -4 Ck- NE T\\\\ m. i /0. \ ~ e 'i Q 4 Vm 88 1 . m / \- 111 81 i \ 4 . %//. 3 1,1 1 l Â£1& 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 6-Ili~ W m /7/iii / . 4 W / k Ch -- 1 inch = 20 ft iii I - to m 1 w m / fe 0 01 13 1 f t. iii I /0 L 0 1 -~ - - a indicctes found monument as described Legend ariel Notes: 6/1 1 k indicates #5 rebar with red plastic cap L.S. #33638 to be set or as described hereon 1% - & indicates set spike with wood loth 12 f 200 1/. 2 - Bearings cre based upon a P.K. Nail found at the northerly angle point and a - j subject Lot 4 using a bearing of N8948'19"W between the two described monuments. #5 rebar with a plastic cop L.S. #20133 found at the northeasterly corner both of /9 1 1 V34 1 Q m 'If f / 1 0 ~ \ - This survey does not represent a title search by this 1\ tÂ» /27 1 C; surveyor to determine ownership or to discover 1 b easements or other encumbrances of record. All ' I 1 0 Northwesterly Corner O 0 Wormation pertaining to ownersh,p, easements or other Lot 4 N90'00'00"W ;' 4 v ~ Proposed Development Line ~\ c encumbrances of record has been taken from a title JJ 41 1 insurance commitment issued by Pitkin County Title, /nc. RAA 256.13' - k 1 dated March 8,2004 as Case No, PCT18786L N/ / 1 Dhi i I ' 1 L - This property is subject to apparent eosements for existing utilities, trails and ditches. / 1 0 12141 1 \ - The property shown on this plot may be subject to the following United States Patents /4/~ 20 1 0 regarding ore removal; Book 55 at Page 191' (/tem 7 of said Title Commitment) 0 / L - 777/s property is subject to reservations, restrictions, covenants and h N / . i Entire Lot eosements of record or in place or as shown on the above mentioned plat. 170Â»J A: / m (Item 8 of said Title Commitment) 1 2- I .Pl 4/ CL Lot b - Tnis property is subject to reservations, restrictions, covenants, terms, conditions, 11; 1 obligations, provisions, eosements and or assessments found in the documents , / \ N8948'19"W listed in Items 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 25 of said Title Commitment 1/'44 'Vo A / \ 0 \68.61' __Buildinginvelope Line O' 64~ /\~10' Trail Easement 7 - This property is subject to an ovigation easement recorded in Book 730 at Page 690. W Found P.K. Nail\h J 1 Found #5 (Item 12 of said Title Commitment) C O /4/, / -Rec. No. 439411 1 774 1.2 : Of ION # 1 3319Â»,4%,1 ~ ti \Ch So\ Rebar with Item 22 Title Commitment / 37 :..... 7 3/ 11/2" Disk w~I Red Plastic - This property is subject to a Holy Cross Trench, Conduit and Voult Agreement recorded 00,Â» 9, b / 2- --< 4 -+a \Li ull 6?09 0049.44 \-- A \ +. /3/4?7 L.S. #3363~1i ~ 4 Cap L.S.20133 in Book 755 at Page 55. (Item 14 of said Title Commitment) E -.AL 3281 - -. 4/he / 1 - According to the above-mentioned Final Plat (Plat Book 33 at Page 4) rights are reserved / Water 4@> / Or - -- / I-4' ColaeÂ«-5 | 7-h 1 N lo. 01 I for permanent and perpetud non-exclusive easements and rights to relocate the same Â¢ /7 / 66 1/1. 609 0<6 4 Feature 2: 6/ Â¢ t /i rot , under, over and across this property with the exception of the building envelope. > r*V+ AR IT 7 1 4 - Building and development envelopes ore as shown on the above- mentioned Final Plat. i -, e / 1 2- 9 0 / /ler -1 0 5,AgrÂ© 11 L.S. #33638 r---4 0 0 de- .. r j. 0/ 4 Column 7 /1-> \ 11/2" Disk (Envelopes are not dimensioned on said Final Plat.) Lot 4 Â«4/02 14 (tu 21 ---- -\ ~4%4/.4,884 l// Column --- 72 43' Lot 5 21>9 1 'h Face of 1 -.4 0 1 2%* E . Upper Wall 1 0 4 37 0 4-2 3,/ /..11.5.9 .01 0 /141 / % 11 0 /t~9 '~ 1 \ . 0<e- m r ~2 +i 111 ' BE Y 1 AW. p L 04 /4 mf f --- fy Â«Â«--0 V 1?; fi i (Parcel to De j added) 0 0 ~~Â«406,~ 31 1 Got 2.0. ' \ 23*64 471 ex .(1 4.~ column<â‚¬X /- , le. 0 1 2 Surveyor s Cert/Wcate.Â· / .Nk -J er / \ 29 - / A- r { 1 ) Â¢ , f <Â©_2.- 1r U. & 21% 2 1 % 45 m N, 1 ' 11/2" Disk 1 1 BE X1 4#/Wi / tÂ»- 151 .WIDGe -3:02' \I L.S. #335-38 i \ 4 Jeffrey Allen Tuttle, being a Registered Land Surveyor in the iii 1 1 \ 1 State of Colorado. do hereby certify to Scott Martin and Pitkin County 14 1 4 41 Title, Inc. that this improvement survey was made under my supervision 6 Iii I 5?12 1 / 1 #5 Rebar With O and is true and correct to the best of my belief and knowledge. 1 ilt (Parcel to be Ve,noved) 0*7,9&0 11 ~ oF ~04%~ 19# â‚¬-21. Q\4- IM 1 5 0 | 1 4 further certify that the improvements on the above described L . do / 1 Fl 4 11.1 w 9 1 4 0/ 1 0 *A .14, \2 -/ ~ . Column L.S. #33638 Red Plastic Cap parcel on this date, March 22. 2004, except utility connections AY 0 11 jA ~ 20, 1 230' Witness Corner 3 7/ 6,40 alv yi>- , 1 1 shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described ore entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as k. viri 9 i ~ %13 1 Ea L.I i I .4 . c.*#Mi42f&, 4.4 4 -i224,3j ,â‚¬ ~~ 1 v 35 N90'00'00"W 1 \ Lot'#4 premises by improvements on any adjoining premises except os â€ž r. --eu~2. -001*9 ~000~ 256.13' 11 indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of *f h any easement crossing or burdening any part of said parcel, 1 /// e.v, 0% 1 1 0\ i except os noted. envelope fif <'/ 1 Â»327 O -N *7 9 0 1: \ 9 -9 i.8 1: h S. ' *D' c... Lvi., , *- e 1 00 0 7* 1 0 0 Concrete ~6 C j -- . -- aft f E L :/ h<\ 6 1 : r- , Jeffrey Allen Tuttle L.S. 33638 Date 1 1/1 61 i 3/ Â·â‚¬1 -1 - 1% *tk / 1/ 014\\ H 01 11 f 2/N 0/ - L f 0 \ beve.lopment A --1.< H; r~ , i Apa,cel to 8, added) 1 ~ C Al-4 9 6. \ 1 e 0 1. / /2,685.1 sq. ft f li , - -/~ 2 0. 062 0:v-es , r,,7 m / I 0 /Â» 7 j1O' Trail Easement Â»1 Rec. No. 439411 lij Â· M - Proposed Development Line Ni ----" Electric Meter Southwesterly Corner M ts 4 ,/Box ~ N90'00'00"E 483.11' #5 Rebar With Lot 4 #5 Rebar With (Item 22 Ff -1~tle 'Commitment) Red Plastic Cap Red Plastic Cap ID Property Line / Electric Vault A N90'00'00"W A L.S. #33638 L.S. #33638 483.11' 195' Witness Corner~ ~ ill tti 1 0 0-Telephone & Television Risers Notict: TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES -ee 1360 Tie hack Road Drawn by: JT According to Cotorado Mw, you must commence any kgail action based upon any defect in 226 Heather Lane Date: 03/25/04 1/2 thts survey wit/Un three years Wter yoU Improvement Sunjey Plat first discover such defect. In no event may Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 any legal action based upon any defect .2 this survey be commenced more than ten years (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-900-4 Aspen, Colorado 81611 f'Ve: work\mcc4\mcc*imp /9 x from the date of the certifâ‚¬cation shown + TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES Aereon b cjtuttle@rof.net C Wi ....... 01@AGO P C: \work\2004\maroon\lot4.dwg Mon May 24 15: 55: 36 2004 S02'2303"W