The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.17 Shady Lane.0104.2005.ASLU1/ .11(3 ./1 C.J 273707300010 Case 0104.2005.ASLU 1 6 . 4 ~ ( 1 1 11. A <i t)< z E-~ , ' .- 1 i I j E.Ji24 . 0. . pvT 1 \ 0 (i) ..4 || ...Iilc,1 00 0 332 -- ---1 Cdt & \\ P 92\ p o / 1 + a 00 ,C#04 0 G ~ ~1 0 24 2 2 07 9 N 0 .0 0- 9 \ 4 1 4 2/9 0 224 6 1 0(u Lm R7 A oof r 0 0090vey ~4-0 .0 77 ~ e ~ ~f nse e iy 0 / /13, 1 - 11 I\~00000000 2 \ U k. . I. Off y A' 07 -27 2 O 15 1 1 82 0 \bo 0 e Ch mâ‚¬ 2 1 07 -01 \ff 0 (11 Â©24 0 2 0 2 2 87 7 0 p r. .0 -5 ZA - ff U N 67 /77 8 -1 1 x ~2 1 + f teÂ°Â° g â‚¬ 4 m 0 Ve-1 223 iw 024 0 6 / 2 6 2 \ 3 / 11 0 -:000094 1/ *al 07 cd' N N 0 9 -1 2 I k. 07 07 6Â· G) N 0 0 N J L - - 33W -1 -1 -1 -7----------- - 1.> 00-Ar a - 9% â‚¬ ca 91 \9& 91 <Tri Eg W cy - 22 0;N rh , (77 70- .. I. ' I El? - STOLPER RESID 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, 1 lillillillillillillillilill | 120 East Main Streetâ€¢ Aspen, Colorado 81611 â€¢ 970-925-8354 Facsimile 970-920-1387 0 4 8 16 1:8 04-07-2006 8 '' .. .. 849.5 7847 -99 Z991 - 074. I~ Ill '~ All [ tu1111'I I~I|I~~~~|1Il~,Illl 0 - . . . I. 0 - 20 . -IIN-Ill - ... . Cluelimm5 " 4 0. / 1/9 4 4 4 0 2 .. . . .. ... .. ./.0 0 A ..Al t. ' .' 41' 0 ' pi.i 4,",401"Filt#.#Â·34* 49*r;7.,4*#p , , 91 , '15 : $4 #4 .. 1.4 4 i.(kiE(fl~~QUE:kit&;** c k:,42: 21 ~ . r i.-4,-+20 *94'.,. c 0 4,4/ -Â· it' 15 : , . ~E"m'*diw~ti~I~~1 ZITE~7%E.f"FiAIifi Mff~4Mt,~I ~~' .) 41Â¢>\~K~~ DC), lt~240Â¢.1~*Â·r44*Â¢Lf_â€ž; ~ -0 a..JU/87Â£;Amwil# . -*- - #gy'Mt - MINNE-~E~z--19/~1/~Ar/&14"r,'2*Ay,refr*...rbl- 5........9/Iminmmilillilli,#U,6,iR?C:Aai**1&1XVI'lliwiwill/Nelibilitillf.- EW~'/9/~sibhm/liallil / ' E-..M.--.4"*41./6,~1%Â§3*Mahy' 4,Zilopifild*fet'lail~LiW'L& -,1 1-1-1-v~.wil-= #'Imii A.*Jâ€¢/Im...1/ 11--I.--,1 %... 1 -I J.. : - . - -- -I------I..............................1111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 'llillil A A . .. . 1 . A ..AD . ..Al. ... DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning â€¢ Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning City of Aspen Community Development Dept. CASE NUMBER 0104.2005.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-07-3-00-010 PROJECT ADDRESS 17 SHADY LN PLANNER JAMES LINDT CASE DESCRIPTION STREAM MARGIN- FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE AND SHADY LAt REPRESENTATIVE GLENN HORN 925-6587 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/19/2006 12:( CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll JUL, 12.2006 8:26AM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NO. 7591 ? 4 Set company in HelpIAbout Examineg: Chuck Apostolik @18-9924 Unlimited Renewal Exam: Commercial 2003 IBC Examinee ID: 2 hour renewal Exam ID: 2006-07-12-081126 22) Stair tread: and rigews shall be of uniform gize and shape. Thu tolerance between the largest and smalleat:~prle or butween the largest and sndlleet trend shall not exaged _ inch in any flight of atairs. a .25 .375 C) .50 D) .625 pick one _IA . b 23) Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce :he landing ce 1086 chan on,-hal2 the required width. When fully open, the door ahall not project more than_ inched into a landing. A) 5 C) 9 D) 10 rick one ~ 24) Guards shall be provided whete appliances Chat require service are located within feet of a roof edge that i is located more than 30 inches above grade, A) 5 S 10 c } 15 D) 20 Pick one _ -3-. b 251 Tha long Gide of al, egress balcony th&11 be st lease--- neragnt open, and the open area above the guards shall be go diatributed as to minimize the accumulacion of smoke or toxic gased. A) 10 U ~ 25 50 DJ 75 Pick one L U ' Examp'(S .IdÂ»egisteO ffbN-'am 3931100 NlIN OCVNO iOD WELL:l 900Z -EL '102 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Callwinnie LLC and Michael Stolper, 600 W. Broadway, Ste 1225, San Diego, CA 92101 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 17 Shady Lane, Metes and Bounds Parcel, Parcel ID # 2737-073-00-010 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Residential Design Standard Variance from Fence Height, Approval to Relocate Shady Lane Written Description of the Site Specific Plan an(For Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 17, Series of 2006, Approved 4/19/06 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 30,2006 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) April 31,2009 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 30th day of April, 2006, by the City of Aspen Community Development Deputy Director. Joyce Allgaier, Communfty Development Deputy Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval o f a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 17 Shady Lane, by resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 17, Series of 2006 on April 19, 2006. The Applicant received approval of a residential design standards variance for a masonry wall along Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and approval to relocate Shady Lane. For further information contact Joyce Allgaier, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/ City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times on April 30,2006 Resolution No. 17A (SERIES OF 2006) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE FENCE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL OF UP TO SIX (6) FEET TALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO RED MOUNTAIN ROAD AT 17 SHADY LANE AND ALLOWING FOR THE RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN ./ COUNTY, COLORADO. ~~~/ Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the associated 01 stream margin review application on March 7 , 2006, pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, but did not grant the fence height variance or the relocation of Shady ,Â£. Lane and continued the public hearing to April 18th, 2006; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a revised fence height variance on April 7th 2006, asked the Commission to reconsideration the relocation of Shady Lane at the April 18th meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the residential design standard variance review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height residential design standard variance finding that the review standards are not met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, 1 ill'1111111111111 ill lili lill'11 Ill'11 Ill lili lili lili 05/19/2006 01 :57I 524238 Page: 1 of 4 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on April 18, 2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 17, Series of 2006, by a four to one (4- 1) vote, approving with conditions, a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and granting the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall (as shown on the wall plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 2006) along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and grants the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot (as shown on the relocation plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 2006) in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family ( residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Fence Permit The Applicant shall submit a fence permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Engineer and the City Zoning Officer prior to commencing construction on the fence. The fence permit application shall include a site improvement survey, a site plan indicting the location of the wall, and an elevation drawing of the wall. Section 3: Shady Lane Relocation The Applicant shall make arrangements to preserve vehicular access to the other houses served by Shady Lane during the relocation of the street. Prior to commencing the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Fire Marshall to ensure that the new turning radii are appropriate for emergency access. Additionally, prior to building permit submittal and prior to the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District as to whether the existing main sanitary sewer line below Shady Lane will need to be relocated at the Applicant' s expense. If it is determined by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District that the main sewer line needs to be relocated along with the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The Applicant shall apply for a line extension request and a collections system agreement from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District' s Board of Directors. 1Ilill lilli Ill i i lillill lilli 1111111 05/19/2006 01 :571 524238 Page: 2 of 4 JANICE K VOS CALDILL P.TKIN COLA ;Y CO R 21.00 D 0.00 2. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District for engineering fees, construction fees, observation fees, and fees to clean and televise the new main sewer line extension into the project. 3. The Applicant shall dedicate new sewer easements to for maintenance and access to the new main sewer line. 4. The Applicant shall obtain a letter of consent to move the road from all of the property owners that are served with vehicular access from the Shady Lane prior to applying for an access/infrastructure permit to relocate the road. The letters of consent shall be submitted to the City along with the access/infrastructure permit application. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent juisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 18,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: .DL OL. 3 14_ 3 GUkul..06Â« - City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ~/ 0 ATTEST: A- Tckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 11111111111 -11111111111111-1 05/19/2006 01 524238 Page: 3 of 4 JANILE K VOS CA_DILL FIIKIN ==JRTY C. R 21.00 D 0.00 M 11 F lu>. ~ 2317 9 h /47 7 r 1 9 -7 15 i 1 + F- 1 6 214% - 1 1 P i 94-----1<B~ f 6 2- / " + i' 1 1 NL / 1 t Id Â° 1. 1 -Li 1 0 i i Â«91234 - U 92â‚¬ff~ fl// P // C'szgiaÂ£jel) b I.. 60 2 S: -Â·80 --~El,Â·U 1 1 m I /1 32 V 1 -~firs- 1 //72 % 4 9 g~ff:.7 El)- 1 \ m.4 8.3.4 1 1 cp#%" .1 2 Gb Ul'H~: ---3"00004 9% 31 -4 1 22 & 2* // 8-4 01 - -- 21*1.1 _ Gg L m 2'2 . --- - - -@'m 2982 E 4 e 4 33 3 fl :. 6 /1 & 4 - ES : 0 ,- -4 0992 0, 14 / 00@ @00. 6.82 6: ff V 00 . 6 4 2 .. 1 - m u .CD fE ~ 75 - - oggl - ----~'2 3.22 \4 92 U #2 ~ - ~*22#+- 58 :k 6 .22'~.64 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD j 524238 Page: 4 of 4 05/19/2006 01 :571 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21.00 0 0.00 i 29 lf. + 1. s. 664 + *. C 4 -j In*/6#*44 - -4 .4 734~- 92-= A 41--a- 48: A + 1. 7875 ' Ty -11 e lt'r---__....~~ Lt'CA~ 4 '-11 1 , - . 1''e l ~~ 1 1Mnil-ii Utrip~,h~~ imp * 1.---1 it 11 U %, 1 I lili 111 I - 7855 1, VII ' ... ' . â‚¬ 1.11 I I 11111 - . 11 12LIL[_E, lilli-I il; 'll' L-,r "' -494â€žt l' ii~ . 7/50 - /45 :RESIDENCE WALL ELEVATION FROM RED MOUNTAIN ROAD E, ASPEN, COLORADO t:8 04-07-2006 L* 0991 / - 44' E'NV~~Q~OF+S Resolution No. 17 (SERIES OF 2006) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE FENCE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL OF UP TO SIX (6) FEET TALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO RED MOUNTAIN ROAD AT 17 SHADY LANE AND ALLOWING FOR THE RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the associated stream margin review application on March 7th, 2006, pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, but did not grant the fence height variance or the relocation of Shady Lane and continued the public hearing to April 18th, 2006; and, th WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a revised fence height variance on April 7 , 2006, asked the Commission to reconsideration the relocation of Shady Lane at the April 18th meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the residential design standard variance review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height residential design standard variance finding that the review standards are not met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered thedevelopment proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, 111111 lili 111111 ill 1111 lill'11111111 ill 111111111 05/19/2006 01 :57! 524238 Page: 1 of 4 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21 .00 D 0.00 WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on April 18, 2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 17, Series of 2006, by a four to one (4- 1) vote, approving with conditions, a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and granting the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. i NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall (as shown on the wall plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 2006) along the property line adj acent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and grants the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot (as shown on the relocation plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 2006) in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Fence Permit The Applicant shall submit a fence permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Engineer and the City Zoning Officer prior to commencing construction on the fence. The fence permit application shall include a site improvement survey, a site plan indicting the location of the wall, and an elevation drawing o f the wall. Section 3: Shadv Lane Relocation The Applicant shall make arrangements to preserve vehicular access to the other houses served by Shady Lane during the relocation of the street. Prior to commencing the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Fire Marshall to ensure that the new turning radii are appropriate for emergency access. Additionally, prior to building permit submittal and prior to the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District as to whether the existing main sanitary sewer line below Shady Lane will need to be relocated at the Applicant's expense. If it is determined by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District that the main sewer line needs to be relocated along with the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The Applicant shall apply for a line extension request and a collections system agreement from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's Board of Directors. lili 111111111111111111111111- lilli 05/19/2006 01 :571 524238 Page: 2 of 4 JANICE K VOS CALDILL FITKIN CDLN-Y CO R 21.00 D 0.00 2. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District for engineering fees, construction fees, observation fees, and fees to clean and televise the new main sewer line extension into the project. 3. The Applicant shall dedicate new sewer easements to for maintenance and access to the new main sewer line. 4. The Applicant shall obtain a letter o f consent to move the road from all o f the property owners that are served with vehicular access from the Shady Lane prior to applying for an access/infrastructure permit to relocate the road. The letters of consent shall be submitted to the City along with the access/infrastructure permit application. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereo f. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 18,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: f---1 ]9 8.m-7149 City Attdmey Jasmine Tygre, Chair ~/ 0 ATTEST: . A . C/ L ' A # 1&, c , 1ArT'-L . LA l Al,v~tug,U-,L--LLÂ®- <JACkie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 524238 1 lilli lilli 11 11111111 lill i Page: 3 of 4 05/19/2006 01 :57I JANICE K VOS CALDILL PITKIN C=JAFY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 H 7 / CM Â© i / h -1 la ,%4 6 & 4499 ~+ ~e~-----7 / fg // !1 + Ll 11 6 IE N /4 763\ . 1 11 1 3 Â»'2 4 4 00 30 -12/3 . .-41:lie j 1 #1 I I 11 11 -:ey,-61-m=1 . u , 1, ((*0 1 k~+L \ 6 22 4 22 1 4 1 053 \-01 gadw , /fy: 4.23 \El=.- 22 29 :B 86 N -21; 5,2 53 f .ff fk ~72 4 :/ 20 ID /40-/ 3,4 0 6,7 4. 33 1 11 % 4 1 1 1 8- 89 C 01/2 - - 2 - --- 1 -4Â» 1%-1 %1--------- -J--- -77 -----N #Sple /6 4 22 4 . 0 h \11 17 1 -2 1% 1% 4 h 22 29 #f ~ \ U -.4.20 . : , aL - 6,82 f.7. 6. 4 0 61 N / 03 21 N 0000 \ C 0982 U.0 40 03 CO Â»2.-'-~ ~132,J /1 / -13 -< - 0982'=L..........449(4:Pil 9 4 -733. 22.2 0 b - -0-3 -1 % 6 010 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD 1 524238 Page: 4 of 4 1 11111111111 111111111 lilli'111111111111 111111111111111 05/19/2006 01:57 a JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 2= - & 53 + + 1 ' t - \ N ... 1. f \Â· \; . â‚¬7 1 11 1 1-, U '1 1= Â· 1 9 / 11 - 1. 1 ' 1 1 : 1 '12-111-lul u Â·~ 7855 1 lili 1 11.4 !11 -41 1 11 1 1'- i"I I ' I-3 12,1!1!1 li[..1.11 Il' , LI~,irl' + 7850 -7845 t RESIDENCE WALL ELEVATION FROM RED MOUNTAIN ROAD E, ASPEN, COLORADO 120.-0â€¢-Sâ€¢-â€¢-,cÂ¤k........,-5,36, P.c....70Â·m-1.7 04-07-2008 1:8 1 52423- Page: 1 1 1-1 Um -:IL\\ ~11 11_IiI milii_Ii 05/ 19/2006 01 : 33 JAN.CE K VOS CALDILL PITKIN COLN-Y CO R 26.00 D 0.00 Resolution No. 12 (SERIES OF 2006) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND VARIANCES FROM THE BUILDING ORIENTATION AND WINDOW HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting Stream Margin Review, Special Review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation, fence height, garage entry width, and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant revised the design of the garage to setback one of the stalls to satisfy the garage entry width design standard, eliminating the need for the garage entry width variance; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is a 93,653 square foot lot located in the R- 30 Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the stream margin review standards, special review standards, and the residential design standard variance review standards; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the steam margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and building orientation residential design standards variance finding that the review standards have been met; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height and window height residential design standard variances finding that the review standards are not met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, approving with conditions,Â· stream margin review, special review to determine the river' s top of slope, and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane, Subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Building Permit The Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a building permit application prior to commencing construction activities. The building permit application shall contain the following: a. A copy o f the final P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation of removed trees, i f applicable. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be installed. f. A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be ill 111111111 lilli Ilili 1111 lilli 05/19/2006 01 Â·55I 524236 Page: 2 of 5 JAN.CE K VOS CALDILL P.-I KIN CON-Y CO R 26.00 D 0.00 parked in the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be shuttled in from the airport parking area. g. A Geotechnical Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer. This study shall include a detailed description o f the slope stabilization and erosion control techniques to be used during construction. ' h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on- site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. Silt fencing shall be incorporated into the erosion control plan as is described in Section 3 below. A 5-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will be no increase in the site's historic runoff as a result of the new residence. The Study shall also demonstrate that there will be no increase in the base flood elevation as a result o f the development. No clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. i. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. Section 3: Erosion Control The Applicant shall place vegetation protection fencing and silt fencing directly adjacent to the top of slope that meets the approval of the City of Aspen Parks Department. The Applicant shall provide a detailed tree protection fencing plan at the time of building permit submittal and have the City o f Aspen Parks Department inspect and approve o f the erected silt and tree protection fencing prior to commencing construction. Section 4: Tree Protection There shall be no excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree on the site. An excavation under the drip line permit shall accompany the tree removal permit required in Section 2 above. No over digging shall be allowed in the immediate areas adjacentÂ·to the large spruce tree located just north of the proposed residence and the large spruce tree located directly south of the proposed residence. Section 5: Riparian Restoration The Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to the City of Aspen Parks Department for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. The revised landscaping plan shall not include the following types of vegetation that were proposed in the original application: 111111111-11 lillil lilli 524236 Page: 3 of 5 05/19/2006 01:55I JANICE K VOS CALDILL PI I KIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 D 0.00 Planting Zone 1- Shall not include Ticklegrass, Beckman's Sloughgrass, Fringed Bromegrass, or New Mexican Checkermallow. Planting Zone 2- Shall not include Colorado Male Fern, Mountain Nine Bark, Ribes (Gooseberry), or Blue gama. Planting Zones 4 and 5- Shall not include Coral Carpet Sedum, Golden Stonecrop, Blue Spruce, Rosy Glow Sedums, Rubus, or Huckleberry. Planting Zone 7- Shall not include Common Treesquare, Hardstem Bulrush, Water Sedge, Beaked Sedge, Common Scouring Rush, or Streamside Alpine Bluebells. Section 6: Outdoor Lighting All outdoor lighting shall be downcast and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. Section 7: State and Federal Permits The Applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary state and federal permits for vegetation restoration and plantings within the 100-year flood plain. Section 8: Sanitary Sewer Requirements The old sewer line connection next to the Rio Grande Trail shall be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) personnel shall make a new tap and a new sanitary service line meeting the ACSD's standards shall be installed at the Applicant's expense. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit discharge of glycol to any portion of the public or private sanitary sewer system. Glycol storage areas shall be approved by the ACSD prior to installation. Section 9: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 10: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. 524236 05/19/2006 01:55! Page: 4 of 5 JANICE K VCS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 D 0.00 Section 11: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 7,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: 4:7<44 City AttomeF Jasmine Tygre, Chair l;/ O ATTEST: Â»Â«AU ~~ckie Lothidn, Deputy City Clerk 524236 05/19/2006 01 :53 Page: 5 of 5 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 0 0.00 Z Aâ‚¬,5 eul ked 0 0 0 0 STOLPER RESIDENCE 'Gt bs 41, r- 00- 0 0 -- -. -6 ro- 600. 4," 00000 ...00000.. S. 4 0 0 00000 0 0 6 0 -0000-0 0000 . STOLPER RESIDENCE 0 LEGEND - .. - EXISTING PROPERTY LINE i -â€¢ i.-= EXISTING EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AREA OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT ......... STOLPER RESIDENCE EXISTING SHADY LANE SITE CONDITIONS 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, CO m ru 1 DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscal, Architaclurn â€¢ Land Plannrna â€¢ LImian t*,sk~n â€¢ Tal,nsm Plannrq 120 Ea81 hn@hal â€¢ Aip,* Colan,di 81611 â€¢ 970.93-8364 Facsimile Â§70Â·~11387 NORTH 0 5 10 20 1:20 04-07-2006 952 HlÂ¥d El>118 unw- PyÂ»>8+4 10 \0+3- OR Â«09 I -I 4 STOLPER RESIDENCE ... â€¢1 r% .... 41, Lib' 8.De. . ~s~~~,p~s~ :~t ::: :~Jij: 04 P.- r \\4â‚¬ .16 r. 0 16 0-0 P. 0 bs 00 000 0 0 EXISTING EDGE ~ OF PAVEMENT ~ .. 00.0 0 PROPOSED EDGE ... / I OF PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT * 00- 0 STOLPER RESIDENCE LEGEND I . . I EXISTING PROPERTY LINE =.. =.. - EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SHADY LANE ~ PROPOSED SHADY LANE ////////A CLEAR VISION CONE 1 0 1 lx) EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED STOLPER RESIDENCE PROPOSED SHADY LANE ALIGNMENT 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, CO 8 El~, ~ 'DESIGN WORKSHOP ...........1[BCO'Bâ€¢ LInd.....â€¢ urn/n ./Inâ€¢ flur. m r.nn.g 120 Bail ME nSD- â€¢ Alp-1. Cciorade 81611 â€¢ 970Â·225.8364 Fac,limile 2*70Â·6~B1M7 1:20 04-07-2006 HlÂ¥6 3>1IEI 'ONOO - a . h esc Viw 44 4 /l /4 Â»23-34 01 A 0 / 0- t-0 #-42- - -- 1 #g '1%> N 1 24 0 6 2 04 0 . N Il ' f 40,604 1- 2 , 0 -2/ (9 //17 /73 bt 41 -*ff. 7 -1 7 4 P Cb 1 .:53 02 0 - 0 O 0 6 67.35 .â„¢ . 1 01 2.25 425 :F /...... -4 33 2 -~ -~ 0 O 2 Ill 0 9.0,52 89 5.12 03 9 0 2.2 07 ' ./09> 2 j 0~1~Iii 49 0 + + 27 b 2 0. Ch 20 3 ./ *9 4,+ /*W g 29 1 2 08 4 / h m 1 -4 1 02 \ - -- - =It- 11 / 9 0 9 0 Ki-- e- ) ~i- 00\ El\ -1 -d ~ _ - zggr--7 34/9,fiscripirc& 8 11. P S 0~ee *.- 22 042.65 07. . - 10 u. 1 22 1~ 00 e .. f F *F 6 61 27 0 0 0. Cb 4 .. \\\ 9 1-~ ,ggz ~--- <t 47 Y 4/ NI N - ' AL k M #14 4 0% , 5 #W @18:FR \ ZF.4 6,82 26.30 0994 Ch. 0 N / - 5 B 6, '4 -t,4 /:59\ 952/-$ =711 =F=======6*f:Â« f Â» - f# ff- - ** *- 11 -2 -_- r ff - - 0982 - --.23*j.30 93 - - 1-38 1: S #- 06 .4 - 0. . 6 0 6, -0 0 0 60 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD = --1- - - 9. 447-52~ - em . â€¢t I= -'~A . ~ 4 146 1*..s &10, .= .. :r 9 7/0 - = 1....A--2E~.4,err- - e * 41 1 1% $1 9 9 qr #91 ,.1, -1 r 7875 1â‚¬31 * .42. il.,6.7,-91&%..AUgRrild 7-*/M r. **w# f,7 -ir 'ete.#t, 31 4,is JikkA 5-*<4 11 4 4% 7941 2.6 ~1*F. E.,2 *4*'~ - 62#1 - - -EntbelÂ¥~~04* 04/42t. Laa:/1/ iisild,46Â£*AF twir Sims*/2/ i,4 7870 1-31>34 - ,1 -- ==~21~19~:30 el K...9,=, Ng 1 L.W..F- Wely k J. 4 I . 1/ & ..., 7865 ,-it> ,~.~~ 4-JA .,t ~* UPL*T A: --- * 41 92--16=NE,~ -AN-*r"44 f 7860 1 i 11 Ii. ~ 11 1 lili I ' '?i']~ Bukid,#Mili:.li~iprf/*m*61 r. - i -4-42â€ž '/ ?k, 3 [7111 - k AN- P 7855 11'' 'IlliT- 7845 STOLPER RESIDENCE WALL ELEVATION FROM RED MOUNTAIN ROAD 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, COLORADO ~ DESIGN WORKSHOP Lays=.=e 6-z'.-_1 â€¢ -ard PIa.in-g â€¢ 2'.2- _â‚¬51:- â€¢ 1-c.Osm Â·larn-G 120 E=Ma~ Street â€¢ Aspen,Colorâ„¢10 81611 â€¢ 970925Â·8354 Faill//970-82[11357 TU 16 1 04-07-2006 41.0 + 09%L -7850- *. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission JAA- THRU: Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: James Lindt, Senior Planner 3- A RE: 17 Shady Lane Residential Design Standard Variance from the Fence Height Requirement- Continued Public Hearing DATE: April 18, 2006 APPLICANT: Callwinnie LLC ZONING: R-30 (Low-Density Residential ~--Il.//"/'-- with a PUD Overlay) LOT SIZE: 93,653 square feet - EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Single-Family Residence -./.. REOUEST SUMMARY: ..ip< 36. The Applicant requested a variance from the fence height residential design standard in conjunction Photo Above: Picture ofvacant with the stream margin review that was approved by property as seen from Shady Lane. the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006. The fence height variance was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, but the Commission continued the public hearing to entertain a revised fence/wall design. Additionally, the Applicant would like the Commission to reconsider its decision not to allow for Shady Lane to be moved to the north as was proposed on March 7th. BACKGROUND: The Applicant received stream margin review approval and several variances from the residential design standards on March 7th, pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006 (attached as Exhibit "B"). However, the Applicant was not granted a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a wall along Red Mountain Road that exceeded the forty-two (42) inch height requirement for fences and walls that are located in front of the frontmost fa~ade of a residence. The majority of the Commissioners seemed to indicate that a fence or hedgerow of some sort is a good idea to stop snow from the snowplows on Red Mountain Road from being thrown onto the house and the property, but did not feel that the wall design being proposed was appropriate. The Commission expressed that they wanted to see a more detailed design of the wall and that the wall should have more breaks in it to allow for visual opportunities into the property from Red Mountain Road than the design that was presented on March 7th. The Commission also expressed that they were not in favor of pushing Shady Lane to the north as the Applicant had proposed due to the vegetation removal that would be required. STAFF COMMENTS: Fence/Wall Variance: The Applicant has responded to the Commission's comments by providing a wall design (attached as Exhibit "C") that has more breaks in it to allow for visual opportunities into the property from Red Mountain Road. The revised design also contains wall sections that undulate back and forth related to the property line to provide the above mentioned breaks. In evaluating the fence height variance request at the last meeting, Staff did not believe that the fence height variance request met the review standards for granting a variance from the residential design standards. In looking at the neighborhood context, Staff did not observe any six (6) foot tall fences or walls on either side of Red Mountain Road in the immediate area, with the exception of the fence that exists on this property. Additionally, Staff has traditionally taken the position on fence height variance requests that being next to a busy street does not constitute an unusual site-specific constraint. Staff has once again attached our staff findings as Exhibit "A". That said, Staff does believe that the revised wall design is consistent with the requests made of the Applicant during the previous meeting by the Commission. Staff has attached the proposed resolution that if passed, would allow for the approval of the fence height variance for the proposed wall design. Relocation of Shadv Lane: The Applicant has requested that the Commission reconsider the decision that was made at the previous hearing related to the Applicant's ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north of its current location. The Applicant has indicated that they have studied the possibility of moving the south side of the road into the easement without moving the north side of the road, but that it would reduce the width of Shady Lane beyond an acceptable level without moving the north side of the road. After consulting with the Fire Marshall, the Planning Staff agrees that the reduction in width related to moving the south edge of the road into the easement without moving the north edge of the road would cause an unsafe width. Therefore, the Applicant has amended their access plans (revised plans attached as Exhibit "C") to move the road approximately one foot to the north of it's current location and up to five (5) feet on the southern end of the property to get it back into the easement. The Parks Department has reviewed the amended proposal to relocate Shady Lane and believes that the revised proposal will not harm any significant vegetation on the north side of the road. That being the case, the Planning Staff does not feel that the proposed amendment to Shady Lane as revised will either help the safety of the road or create a loss in vegetation. Therefore, Staff is no longer recommending against the proposed shift in Shady Lane, finding that it is an insignificant change. The recommended motion and the proposed resolution (attached as Exhibit "E") refiect the Applicant's request for the fence height variance and the change in the location of Shady Lane. Approving the proposed resolution would grant permission for the Applicant to construct the masonry wall as proposed and to move Shady Lane as shown in Exhibit "C". If the Commission does not wish to grant the 2 change in location of Shady Lane, the Commission should strike Section 3 and all other references to the relocation of Shady Lane from the proposed resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION: (ALL MOTIONS ARE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE) "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2006, approving with conditions, a variance from the fence height residential design standard to allow for the construction of a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and allowing for the relocation of Shady Lane to the north as proposed." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Stream Margin Review Resolution Exhibit C -- Revised Wall Design and Plans for Shady Lane Relocation Exhibit D -- March 7~ Meeting Minutes Exhibit E -- Proposed Resolution 3 EXHIBIT A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES REVIEW REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a variance from the Residential Design Standards ifthe proposed application meets the following: a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The following are Staff's findings in regards to the variances being requested by the Applicant. Variance Requested Fences. Fences, hedgerows, and planter boxes shall not be more thanforly-two (42") high, measured from natural grade, in all areas forward of the front fagade of the house. Man-made berms are prohibited in the front yard set back. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: In conducting a windshield survey of the properties in the vicinity, Staff did not find any of the other properties having a fence that is over 42 inches in height. Therefore, Staff does not believe the application satisfies this standard. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff has traditionally taken the position on fence height variance requests that being next to a busy street does not constitute an unusual site-specific constraint. If being next to a busy street were considered a site-specific constraint for granting a fence height variance, there would likely be a lot of tall fences along Main Street. Staff does not find this standard to be satisfied. all;60 9 Resolution No. 12 (SERIES OF 2006) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND VARIANCES FROM THE BUILDING ORIENTATION AND WINDOW HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting Stream Margin Review, Special Review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation, fence height, garage entry width, and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant revised the design of the garage to setback one of the stalls to satisfy the garage entry width design standard, eliminating the need for the garage entry width variance; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is a 93,653 square foot lot located in the R- 30 Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the stream margin review standards, special review standards, and the residential design standard variance review standards; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the steam margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and building orientation residential design standards variance finding that the review standards have been met; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height and window height residential design standard variances finding that the review standards are not met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, approving with conditions, stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane, Subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Building Permit The Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a building permit application prior to commencing construction activities. The building permit application shall contain the following: a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal pennit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation ofremoved trees, if applicable. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be installed. Â£ A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be parked in the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be shuttled in from the airport parking area. g. A Geotechnical Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer. This study shall include a detailed description of the slope stabilization and erosion control techniques to be used during construction. h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on- site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. Silt fencing shall be incorporated into the erosion control plan as is described in Section 3 below. A 5-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will be no increase in the site's historic runoff as a result of the new residence. The Study shall also demonstrate that there will be no increase in the base flood elevation as a result of the development. No clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. i. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. Section 3: Erosion Control The Applicant shall place vegetation protection fencing and silt fencing directly adjacent to the top of slope that meets the approval of the City of Aspen Parks Department. The Applicant shall provide a detailed tree protection fencing plan at the time of building permit submittal and have the City of Aspen Parks Department inspect and approve o f the erected silt and tree protection fencing prior to commencing construction. Section 4: Tree Protection There shall be no excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree on the site. An excavation under the drip line permit shall accompany the tree removal permit required in Section 2 above. No over digging shall be allowed in the immediate areas adjacent to the large spruce tree located just north of the proposed residence and the large spruce tree located directly south of the proposed residence. Section 5: Riparian Restoration The Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to the City of Aspen Parks Department for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. The revised landscaping plan shall not include the following types of vegetation that were proposed in the original application: Planting Zone 1- Shall not include Ticklegrass, Beckman's Sloughgrass, Fringed Bromegrass, or New Mexican Checkermallow. Planting Zone 2- Shall not include Colorado Male Fern, Mountain Nine Bark, Ribes (Gooseberry), or Blue gama. Planting Zones 4 and 5- Shall not include Coral Carpet Sedum, Golden Stonecrop, Blue Spruce, Rosy Glow Sedums, Rubus, or Huckleberry. Planting Zone 7- Shall not include Common Treesquare, Hardstem Bulrush, Water Sedge, Beaked Sedge, Common Scouring Rush, or Streamside Alpine Bluebells. Section 6: Outdoor Lighting All outdoor lighting shall be downcast and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. Section 7: State and Federal Permits The Applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary state and federal permits for vegetation restoration and plantings within the 100-year flood plain. Section 8: Sanitarv Sewer Requirements The old sewer line connection next to the Rio Grande Trail shall be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) personnel shall make a new tap and a new sanitary service line meeting the ACSD's standards shall be installed at the Applicant's expense. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit discharge of glycol to any portion of the public or private sanitary sewer system. Glycol storage areas shall be approved by the ACSD prior to installation. Section 9: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 10: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 11: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the sa:me shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 7,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk (CI ./t VA 1 / \4, // Davis Horn*- PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING April 7, 2006 James Lindt City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review Dear James: Heather Henry will bring you copies of a revised plan for the Shady Lane relocation and the fence along Red Mountain Road. Thank you for organizing the Planning and Zoning Commission site visit next Tuesday at noon. The Shady Lane re-alignment and the proposed fence will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the April 18, 2005 meeting. The applicant requests the Commission to take any necessary procedural actions to consider and approve the revised Shady Lane plan. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks for your help Sincerely, _ _ _ DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED )1__to GLENN HORN AICP ALICE DAVIS AICP $ GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST.Â· SUITE 104Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â·970/925-6587Â·FAX: 970/925-5180 adavis@rof.net ghorn@rof.net : 46,1~1 l- Resolution No. 1-~- (SERIES OF 20065 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE FENCE HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL OF UP TO SIX (6) FEET TALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO RED MOUNTAIN ROAD AT 17 SHADY LANE AND ALLOWING FOR THE RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF SIIADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the associated stream margin review application on March 7th, 2006, pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, but did not grant the fence height variance or the relocation of Shady Lane and continued the public hearing to April 18th, 2006; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a revised fence height variance on April 7th, 2006, asked the Commission to reconsideration the relocation of Shady Lane at the April 18th meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the residential design standard variance review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height residential design standard variance finding that the review standards are not met; and, - - - WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on April 18, 2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. ~.~-y--Series of 2006, by a to L_-_3 vote, approving with conditions, a lvariance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and granting the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the fence height residential design standard to construct a masonry wall of up to six (6) feet tall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road at 17 Shady Lane and grants the ability to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately one foot (as shown on the relocation plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 2006) in conjunction with a stream margin review to construct a new single-family residence that was approved pursuant to Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Fence Permit The Applicant shall submit a fence permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Engineer and the City Zoning Officer prior to commencing construction on the fence. The fence permit application shall include a site improvement survey, a site plan indicting the location ofthe wall, and an elevation drawing ofthe wall. Section 3: Shady Lane Relocation The Applicant shall make arrangements to preserve vehicular access to the other houses served by Shady Lane during the relocation of the street. Prior to commencing the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Fire Marshall to ensure that the new turning radii are appropriate for emergency access. Additionally, prior to building permit submittal and prior to the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall consult with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District as to whether the existing main sanitary sewer line below Shady Lane will need to be relocated at the Applicant's expense. If it is determined by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District that the main sewer line needs to be relocated along with the relocation of Shady Lane, the Applicant shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The Applicant shall apply for a line extension request and a collections system agreement from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's Board of Directors. 2. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District for engineering fees, construction fees, observation fees, and fees to clean and televise the new main sewer line extension into the project. 3. The Applicant shall dedicate new sewer easements to for maintenance and access to the new main sewer line. 4. The Applicant shall obtain a letter o f consent to move the road from all of the property owners that are served with vehicular access from the Shady Lane prior to applying for an access/infrastructure permit to relocate the road. The letters of consent shall be submitted to the City along with the access/infrastructure permit application. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 18,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk JAMES UNDT ITY OF ASPEN OM DEV DEPT 130 S GALENA ST RET LIRN TO SENDER ASPEN CO 81611 HINES GERALD D C/O DUGDALE MARIAN ~ :Li 2800 POST OAK BL\J\3/ ~ V<NifiuMMONSG. HOUSTON, TX 770/6-100/ i Â¥ -- J 1/ 11111,1111411 1,1,1111,111â€ž111|ilâ€ž11â€ž1111,1â€ž111|Ii,11!,111 61611-196 KNÂ¥1#999* ~ PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 17 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.iii. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities Room, City IIall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, to review an application submitted by Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC, requesting approval of stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and residential design standard variances to construct a new single-fumily residence at 17 Shady Lane. The Applicants are requesting variances from the following residential design standards: Building Orientation, Fences, Garage Width, and Windows. The subject property is a metes and bounds parcel that is commonly known as 17 Shady Lane: Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010. For further information. contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 429- 2763, (or by email at jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the application should be sent to the above e-mail or physical address. Applicant: Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC c/o Davis Horn Inc, 215 S. Monarch Street, Suite 104, Aspen, CO 81611 s/Jasmine Tvere Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 184 2 sU. Shly, 1.42ME peletoho P,O.B,TRAÂ£I '12 .1 Â· ~~-~l ellÂ« -- Aut Ad ~ ~ 9(7/ob .. . v..." _- 1/\31 i ...Le .......... I./.<. lili /- PROPOSED O ~ PROPERTY LINE ...... 0935 EXISTING : ::.'.:'.'.'.:'.'. Jff-*#M PROPERTY LINE .. .......b'..\'. 0 STOLPER RESIDENCE .. . I ' I I ' I ' 3//tâ€¢ â€¢ â€¢ I./9 .5.T; '- e I. I ............00 L."â€¢ ... 0 . I. .................... .. . 0 O. .. ........1.U.......... b .......... I ..Al.......... Â·Â· 1 4 . X .Â·Â·Â·-Â·~Ar--i........ \ --16 VISION . . I. . CONE .......r................ ................. ................. ................. ...... ................ EXISTING EDGE 0 ............... - OF PAVEMENT 0 ............. ............... .......... ....... ..... PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT / MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT \ \ STOLPER RESIDENCE \ STOLPER RESIDENCE SHADY LANE REALIGNMENT 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, CO ER -U DESIGN WORKSHOP Lmdicao 6 ArchRBdurn â€¢ L and Plennrl â€¢ Utan Dasion â€¢ Tou~m Planning 120 Eail MainS,- â€¢ Anpen, Colorado 01â‚¬11 â€¢ 070Â·025-8364 Facalm,la 078#&1327 NORTH 0 5 10 20 1:20 02-27-2006 - -1 -M- .Â® _- . 6 [3 ' I lilli Ble Uj}t Record Navigate FQrm Reports Format Lab tieip 0 29 'P, . 9 Â¥ n ..1 1 Routing History ~ Conditions Sub Eermits 1 Yaluation ~ Pliblic Comment ~ Customef P,equest , Attachments 144% 3 'e Main i Routing Status | Arch/Eng ' Parcels Â· Custom Fields i Feel ~ Fee Summae ~ betions Permit Type ~ adu , A.pen: ,:,Â·j U:82004 Permit # '0104.2005.ASLU Ad:dress 117 SHADY LN 71 Mpt/Suite i StatelLO ,-1 Zip 181611 20 Peind information s.""'VWY*~---M .Wg--pF 1- M aste, Petrnit I Routing Queue laslu Applied 1,2/27/2005 Project Appioved I S tatus periding ' DescriptioniSTBEAM MARGIN Issued i FU / 1 'cxcr 1 7<374#k , Submit.ted GLENN HORN 925-6587 Clock :Runr~ing Days 9 0 E,pke: Â£ 6,4 L.- 4- \ F'~ Visible on the web? Pe,mit ID: 1 36844 Owner ~~~~ Last Name |CALLWINNIE LLC m Fnt Name,C/0 MICHAEL ~fOEPER 600 WBROADWAY ISTE 1225 Phone 1 ISAN DIEGO CA 92101Â·3355 9 Ownef ls:Applicant? Â§ Applicant 1 , Last Name 1CALLWINNIE LLC T~ FifsiName Rf,>6~MiEHEFE Â§70LPER !600\VEROADWAY $- -"â€ž-w--vmâ€ž~- â€žâ€žâ€žâ€ž.mow6-~.-.- 3 61 L i .=J vi ~< Phone 1 Cust # 126616 RAN DIEGO CA 92101Â·3355 1 = .CD â‚¬ r -1 rl - - LET _2 , L- 91 J I '1 4,500 4,000 0-4 3,500 3.000 - --&*3.-- 0 + 2,500 . 2,000 ~ 4500 -4 &84 1,000 - 12-ft tall Portal Average of High and Low End Restraint 500 ws # 12-ft tall Control Average of High and Low End Restraint 0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 Displacement (in.) Average Backbone curves comparing 12 ft portal frame with 12 ft control (IRC Section R602.10.5) Members of the Code Resource Development Committee were also Committee Action: Disapproved opposed to this change because they felt that the aspect ratio term used by itself was not appropriate for the IRC. To address these concerns it Committee Reason: The proposed code language is overly restrictive was agreed upon to include minimum wall segment widths and heights in that it contains requirements that are outside of the current scope of in a table format. Thus we propose the addition of the actual widths of the International Residential Code which are found in the International the vertical elements to Table R602.10.5 and Table R602.10.6. These Fire Code and the International Zoning Code. proposals eliminate the requirement forthe userto calculate width based on the aspect ratio. Assembly Action: None For the above reasons, we recommend that RB39 - 04/05 be approved. Individual Consideration Agenda This item is on the agenda for individual RB41-04/05 consideration because a public comment was R302 (New) submitted. Proposed Change as Submitted: Public Comment: Proponent: Anthony C. Apfelbeck, representing Florida Anthony C. Apfelbeck, Florida Fire Marshals & Fire Marshals and Inspectors Association Inspectors Association, requests Approval as Submitted. Add new text follows: Commenter's Reason: The committee's statement that the language is "overly restrictive" and "outside of the current scope" appears to be in SECTION R302 connict with the intent of the IRC and staffs code interpretations. The FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS following staff interpretation indicates that it is the intent of Section 508.1 of the IFC is to apply to one-and two-family dwellings constructed in accordance with the IRC. Therefore, the code provisions of the IFC, R302.1 Fire apparatus access. Fire apparatus access relating to siting of structures constructed in accordance with the IRC, shall be provided in accordance with Section 503 of the new code language, only create a reference where one is appropriate. are already applicable. The committee is not being asked to approve International Fire Code. The sole purpose of this code change would be to assist in communicating this language to builders, designers and owners so they (Renumber subsequent sections) are not surprised at a later date. Bibliography Reason: There is no reference within the IRC to the fire apparatus access requirements of section 503 contained within the IFC. This ICC Technical Staff interpretation to the 2003 IFC, Section 508.1, March creates the potential for a builder, owner or designer to overlook the IFC 7,2005. access requirements- Insertion of this language will ensure the requirements of this section are not missed in the design phase. 252 2005 ICC FINAL ACTION AGENDA Load (Ibf) DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order. hereinafter -Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders". and Section 26.308.010.'Vested Property Rights". of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement. or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain iii full force and effect. excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470. but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the e ffective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Callwinnie LLC and Michael Stolper. 600 W. Broadway. Ste 1225, San Diego. CA 92101 Property Owner s Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 17 Shady Lane. Metes and Bounds Parcel. Parcel ID # 2737-073-00-010 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Stream Margin Approval, Special Review Approval. Variances from Building Orientation. Window Height Rei Design Standards for new Single-familv Residence Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006. Approved 3/7/06 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 19.2006 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) March 20.2009 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 19th day of March, 2006, by the City of Aspen Community Development Deputy Director. - Joyce Allgal*. Communit*Development Deputy Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval o f a site specific development plan and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24. Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes. pertaining to tlie following described property: 17 Shady Lane. by resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 12. Series of 2006 on March 7,2006. The Applicant received approval of stream margin review, special review to establish the river' s top of slope. and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. For further information contact Joyce Allgaier. at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/ City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times on March 19.2006 - ~ Appyoved 6\f-- -b\l?fl Gb Resolution No. 12 (SERIES OF 2006) /A Â©â‚¬-rt\~-3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND VARIANCES FROM THE BUILDING ORIENTATION AND WINDOW HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-00-010 . WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting Stream Margin Review. Special Review to determine the rivers top of slope, and variances from the building orientation, fence height. garage entry width. and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane; and. WHEREAS, the Applicant revised the design of the garage to setback one of the stalls to satisfy the garage entry width design standard, eliminating the need for the garage entry width variance: and. WHEREAS, the Applicants property is a 93,653 square foot lot located in the R- 30 Zone District and iii an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code. and. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the stream margin review standards. special review standards. and the residential design standard variance review standards; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application. site visits. and the applicable Land Use Code standards. the Community Development Director recommended approval of the steam margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and building orientation residential design standards variance finding that the review standards have been met; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height and window height residential design standard variances finding that the review standards are not met: and. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein. has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director. and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public liearing: and. WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and tliat the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan. and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote. approving with conditions. stream liiargin review. special review to determine the river's top of slope. and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. and, WIIEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health. safety. and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review. special review to determine the river s top of slope, and variances from the building orientation and window height residential design standards to construct a new single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane. Subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Building Permit The Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a building permit application prior to commencing construction activities. The building permit application shall contain the following: a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the buildiiig permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation of removed trees. if applicable. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be installed. f. A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks. no other personal trucks are to be parked in the area around the site. The City encourages tliat site workers be shuttled iii from the airport parking area. g. A Geotechnical Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer. This study shall include a detailed description of the slope stabilization and erosion control techniques to be used during construction. h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Coloi-ado licensed Civil Engineer. which maintains sediment and debris on- site during and after construction. lf a ground recharge system is required. a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. Silt fencing shall be incorporated into the erosion coiitrol plan as is described in Section 3 below. A 5-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will be no increase iii the sites historic runoff as a result of the new residence. The Study shall also demonstrate that there wi [1 be no increase in the base tlood elevation as a result of the development. No clear water connections (roof, foundation perimeter. patio drains) are allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. i. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. Section 3: Erosion Control The Applicant shall place vegetation protection fencing and silt fencing directly adjacent to tlie top of slope that meets the approval of the City of Aspen Parks Department. Tile Applicant shall provide a detailed tree protection fencing plan at the time of building permit submittal and have the City of Aspen Parks Department inspect and approve o f the erected silt and tree protection fencing prior to commencing construction. Section 4: Tree Protection rhere shall be no excavation, storage of inaterials storage of construction backfill. storage of equipment. foot or vehicle trailic allowed within the drip line of any tree on the site. An excavation under the drip line permit shall accompany the tree removal permit required in Section 2 above. No over digging shall be allowed in the inimediate areas adjacent to the large spruce tree located just north of the proposed residence and the large spruce tree located directly south of the proposed residence. Section 5: Riparian Restoration Elle Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to the City of Aspen Parks [Department for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. The revised landscaping plan shall not include the following types of vegetation that were proposed in the original application: Planting Zone 1- Shall not include licklegrass, Beckman's Slolighgrass. Fringed Bromegrass. or New Mexican Checkermallow. Planting Zone 2- Shall not include Colorado Male Fern, Mountain Nine Bark. Ribes (Gooseberry).or Blue gama. Planting Zones 4 and 5- Shall not include Coral Carpet Sedurn, Golden Stonecrop. Blue Spitice. Rosy Glow Sedums, Nubus. or Huckleberry Planting Zone 7- Shall not include Common Treesquare. Hardstem Bulrush, Water Sedge Beaked Hedge. Common Seoul-ing Rush. or Streamside Alpine Bluebells. Section 6: Outdoor Lighting All outdoor lighting shall be downcast and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150. Outdoor Lighting. Section 7: State and Federal Permits The Applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary state and federal permits for vegetation restoration and plantings within the 100-year flood plain. Section 8: Sanitarv Sewer Requirements The old sewer line connection next to the Rio Grande Trail shall be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) personnel shall make a new tap and a new sanitary service line meeting the ACSD's standards shall be installed at the Applicant' s expense. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit discharge of glycol to any portion of the public or private sanitary sewer system. Glycol storage areas shall be approved by the ACS D prior to installation. Section 9: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the 01-dinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 10: If any section. subsection. sentence. clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional iii a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 11: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission. are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 7.2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre. Chair ATTEST: .lackie Lothian. Deputy City Clerk Eâ‚¬Ubsect 6avrdge Ent}RY Aibrze,\ ~9926 M 0--Es -/0Â© @n vdat = 2Â«17 Wavia |40â‚¬ 0 N Bedies& -1 - *MENE - - ---- OVENS - 1 , = - 11\, f - All \ 0- -9 i L~ *' ~93 r - - 1 ___- L -/2 --J 4% P \ fit A 9 9 O 9 r:, I ld 0 L- f = . 1 4/-61 Iii' E----3 / \Ilil 13 - Â©A~*2-7-vi; f 1 1 1 / 43\ /4 - 1 -== .Illl,1~11\ r ~~~~ ~Â«fj 1 f tplf-~ Li -c LL- 41 I.I.-- 11 - l& 7 O - 11 11 11 - Poss; Ale- ac#. 914;122 /0 17 Shady Lane Additional Condition P Ek Â«- 3 19/00 ARd Section 10:Change to Shady Lane Prescriptive Access Easement Approval to relocate Shady Lane as is described in Section 8 of this resolution shall be subject to first obtaining consent from the other property owners served by Shady L arie. Proof of consent from the other property owners served by Shady Lane shall be provided to the City of Aspen Community Development Department and the City Engineer prior to or in conjunction with applying for the necessary permits to relocate Shady Lane. 1 1, .'f:ki /9 Ah"i 4,4 . Â»,tiv:T - . 2., H .'.2-...5'.WP -,0... 0 9 1.- - +0 Xfijrt< 0"UL* imp -. '11.1,42121,/ /1 4:irlialit .*liniFTiL, i.'rille*'~ 1*. -,ril.410,I.-::'41* ti i. - P-/ Lf..' i, :, ar â€¢Â·L - . i i 1 1, -, 1,42.Â¥ t#ilt*i - 6.64 i - ' 1, 1 ' . 14 r . L ...r * 4 . --r- 6 E/yeÂ»'Â· /pi . 4, , J I '-4/......cr--7. M 1 '' 4 1 - t: 1 2 -m'.1 : 3,1 4 .,-4*# UP:/1' - .1. - T.:, 5,4;=*453:ka, .*i Â«924>ryÂ· . 6]R- /4/ $/ Il , , 1 ,> , 1. #pw '.1. F 0 ..,r. 2 '144.' r .. ..6 1 ...1 , i.=19169! * . 1 &* C) es â€¢ , ':fa .r . 6 â‚¬ 1'. ..13 97761/6- Bi"/,52/.*2,yic"/5/'p'UJ 4 W .7 4.9/<11 f- - . 9 * I . 401"lf 239/GA//32 -Â·aah.â€¢ f - -,44 5 44*li .-4 .. .. ./5, .9 #-e . 4. -- I ..... -d- .- .e Â£ I .. 44 Jit ,*~0 6. t. 4 r. . , -t Â¥;41G);SG,4 .11.,Ir'-iff,20# I jâ‚¬*7 N ttifk. ' jek ./34 1 1 Â»949 Â·_~ ;~Mph. B. 44 - f 'k , - 2, 4, . 4.-1 + , - Â»=.41,7 4 NZ:ZA ....... r.41't..33>- 6444 - 4 '. 1 7-.- r. Â¢ 91 -, b .V .' ~ric=2.g .11" 4 "/ I. tÂ¥-6 43 , fi -**7*,Â»4;ffÂ·~.~~~~~~~<~~~~~~ *1. tdÂ¢4Â¥DCk . ii.1 21,- 'f' =_fii 2/74'-7,21Â£/AAASJ' 'A1092 Ji - /1 1.1 -/ - f.- kob 5 Fin .,.- .-42*ti Â·Tr..:9- , .A ..- - 1 JOrtÂ» Â¥4Â¥*U. -< T 1*f " L. 1 .- .1. & . Mlaw:til " .-0-Â·. 8 .1, -*' ..: 7/9 -1 -â€¢~ 4 4,~Â¥7 V -*W : . 1 1 7 . h.dity.'.'.41 1='015..gzot#Bpl,GMZf#I- 21 41,1. 2 -' i 124:lt,ir '1. 44% , I --9 - .....1.7 1.,3 EW/#Â£ //A~i}~~ flit,t, 1~~ -9/284 CA a --- - 9 . .,46 ' l. tt': . 1 14.4-4,- ,* = ~ . 'Ad ' 01#tudrt/~L-i;c-<*BMN...m'*.pÂ·'03 ' 64:"40- 4 9;r> c. . - â€¢ 0 *i. 4/i<4 4 - L ..'*10' . Ssâ€¢E,FEN)Zietaa#11J L. ,0, te.% b. 4- i. trup a , 1 1 1 . 1 . , . e.04; 9 . r. 3 1 41:40 4*.1 ,, 3%2ektFAk*ji#tu~**Prdtfi~-4#-' 1, /j ,. 4 5, . ls'Kt./- -: 4. 4 ,!,/./, 4. 1/i; 6,4 - -- - ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ - ~~~~~'~~4~<~*6~4A~4Z434;/'-I-:~,~6~ EIifA#AME J:L-:T 66 . F 9 0 J . lc=... .. *= p. *2 - 1.2 - .-= . I -- ---- : : 16*-14-#>br W : Â·!6 - Â· e .. I. . ' ....5.90 , - ... Â£:9&2Â·*airr 6&4#9:Mor,GRER*212& ... . - =r- C L,410'46â€¢Â¥~2*glh~yi+0,11Â¢2 ---2....... 4, 4. . 42%3~67*=49~315%~~14, : 2 1 i .=. ..Ay 7 Â« Â·. , - ..0 :6, I Â¥2 - r . 342/ -- - -. --' -r, /1.4 17 4 . 9 4â‚¬ t 9 ~ ,Â·4 1 = . . I -3F, 'I - &/I.'... ; Â£/b.....lili... ./ ..1- . , 4 1-r il 6. *19.'# - .'*01' '. 94' 4 1. 1 .. 4 1 . p r . . .1 ~fr I 44@Ty#AF,1. 19 %648 - . - . 43/ . -- - *le -1 W fENS*t * '2--5 - .. i I ''t (,#,f: f I L.ll.h k.%.4. . , ,. - ,â€¢ p~,r Â· Ob b ~ â€¢- 9 - ' .- leN ~ .- $ 0,1 .i .+ . 5. 1 -fl - -- -f -* ft;<~2 < ~- k ...~Â« i ... 1 . 11 b 4& _ _ _ - il -- - -~ _ =a~-Â»=. 4.vic & 4-9, i z . i ' Â· .... Â·i 7 -41; 4 6,2Â£%, 9.,7 . .. 4. I. 6.46. 3.. 1 2. ..2- ~ p I h 4-1.99 d %~1 B Â·~3 1 ,. 4 =Â·.~~ . t. 1.-/ i 4 1 . LE'..2 12 -4-1 : ..1.,4 . - . 1 . ./ MOL. ' . - 14 . 0 - %, 1 ~ . .r ~94 1'24.hi-N . :t - al . , . Â¢ E- , 3 .. â€¢ , ..r -~ '4Â·. i - Â· 11 0 1 :'../. V' 1 - râ€¢ ... . U 1 . . 1 1 . I. . / I , Â· I ' '' . I .. Â· Â·. . a . - -- + - 1//,4/",10"I- w 1.~' 1 ' , -- 7 E .- A - - . E.LE-~ <- --#/.Ir- - -.Il = L ..Â£--//./fl/. - r - ' I - --- --- 1 . 1 ip- 2:L ~* - /1.- 11, ----- r -zl = -9 . -i--- E- 24> 2,4~ - - - e' 0 0 P..Se Ad 4 APP5- -2.,1 tdo OK 1 l Rfald \Alb C. MEMORANDUM - LO To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission f-6 4 0% THRU: .loyce Allgaier. Community Development Deputy Director ,~ ,s- FROM: James Lindt, Senior Planner UL- RE: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review, Special Review to establish River's Top of Slope, Residential Design Standard Variances - Public Hearing DATE: March 7.2006 APPLICANT: Callwinnie LLC ZONING: R-30 (Low-Density Residential with a PUD Overlay) U ' d '11 *t LOT SIZE: 93.653 square feet W 1*a T'ti ' I . il~Ei , 1,1 '7 '1 11/ 1 1 - FYISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE: 1 .1 4 1, 1 Ill~1 4 64.-1 4- 4 Single-Family Residence - -V#1 %0 :,<fi . REQUESTSUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting stream margin review Photo Above: Picture of vacant approval and residential design standard variances to property as seen from Shady Lane. construct a new single-family residence on the subject property. Special review approval is also requested to establish the river s top-of-slope as less restrictive than top-of-slope shown on the City's top-of-slope map. BACKGROUND: The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single-family residence at 17 Shady L ane and construct a new single-family residence. Given that the proposed development is located within 100 feet of the mean high water line of Roaring Fork River, the new residence requires stream margin review approval. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435, Environmentally Sensith,e Areas. the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions. or deny an application for development within 100 feet of the Roaring Fork River or its tributaries. Additionally. the Applicant has requested Special Review approval to establish the river' s top-of-slope on the property as being different than top-of-slope that was determined by Sopris Engineering on the adopted top-of-slope map as is within the Commissions jurisdiction after considering a recommendation from the City Engineer and the Community Development Staff. Finally. the Applicant requests several variances from the residential design standards. Specifically. the Applicant is requesting variances from the building orientation. fence height. garage width. and requirement for no windows between 9 and 12 feet above the first finished floor. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve. approve with conditions. or deny residential design standard variance requests based on the review criteria set forth iii Land Use Code Section 26.410.020(D), 1/ariances. In conjunction with constructing a new residence, the Applicant has proposed to move Shady Lane abollt ] () feet to the north of where it currently exists primarily to improve the safety of the intersection with Red Mountain Road. Additionally, the Applicant has proposed an extensive landscaping plan that includes some bank stabilization plantings beneath the river's toi>of-slope. STAFF COMMENTS: Stream Margin Review: As far as the stream margin and special review to establish the rive/s top-of-slope are concerned. Staff believes that the proposal meets the review standards. The City Engineer and the Community Development Eiigi11eer have both reviewed the proposed top-of-slope and have indicated that they concur with the Applicant' s engineer as to its location on the property. As you can see on the photo below. there appears to be a clear break in the bank sloping down to the river that corresponds with the location on the property that the Applicantk engineer has identified as the top-of-slope. 1 1 5!11 ill#J': 't' 3 , ..in 1 71.1% - 1 1 44f 11 \ - S 4 7 1 . 1 Â·4 Â· 4|1 | I lit 4 . 1 ' Top-of-Slope .- ' ' 1 1-,4 + 11 4 11 1 1 1,4 li li 1 1 -1 1 r 41- 1 1 - Proposed Development ' 41 1 4 it 1 1 j' 71 t 1. 1 Â¥ f 11' 11.-4 1 , 01 4 ,, : Ci/ t/5. 15 Foot h ' Setback :Â·t 'f Proposed Development- 15 ft :: back from Top-of-Slope - -4 f. 11 P.t 01,,ir . . - ---444-~ 1 r I - 1 IS .1 1" 1 I - , . 1< - Top-of-Slope j ''41.1 %,1 ,r' 2% *11 That saii the proposed development is setback more than fifteen (15) feet from he proposed top-of-slope aiid would meet the 45-degree progressive height limit that is required by the Stream Margin Review Standards. In looking at the proposed landscaping plan. the Parks Department has reviewed the bank stabilization plantings that the Applicant is proposing and have recommended several changes in the proposed species to be planted. Species not allowed to be planted as proposed are listed in the proposed resolution. Staff has also included a condition of approval iii the proposed resolution requiring tliat the Applicant submit a revised landscaping plan prior to building permit submittal. Staff has further proposed a condition of approval in the resolution 2 requiring that the Applicant apply for and obtain all necessary state and federal permits for planting within the 100-year flood plain. Relocation of Shady Lane: As was brief[y introduced in the background section of this memorandum, the Applicant has proposed to relocate Shady Lane to the north by approximately 10 feet because they feel that it would make the intersection of Shady Lane anct Red Mountain Road safer. However, in order to relocate Shady Lane. the Applicant needs consent from the other property owners that are served by Shady Lane. At the time that the Planning and Zoning Commission s packet was provided. the Applicant has not been able to provide proof of consent from the other property owners allowing for the relocation of Shady Lane. Staff will provide the Planning and Zonine Commission with an update at the public hearing on whether the Applicant has obtained consent from the other property owners that are served by Shady Lane. The Community Development Engineer has reviewed the proposal to relocate Shady Lane aiid has expressed that he feels that relocating the road will have a negligible impact on the safety of the intersection. That said. there has been some concern expressed about the trees that would be lost on the north side of the existing Shady Lane if the road were to be relocated as proposed. The Parks Department lias indicated that the trees that would be required to be removed are healthy and have recommended against moving Sliady Lane. If the Planning and Zoning Commission does not believe that the Shady Lane should be relocated, the Commission should direct Staff to strike Section 8 from the proposed resolution and replace it with language prohibiting the relocation of Shady Lane. free Removal and Construction Techniques: In order to construct the proposed development. the Applicant has proposed to remove several trees iii declining health that are located near the top of the river bank. The Applicant has also requested to reniove several healthy trees within the building area on tile site and near the intersection of Shady Lane with Red Mountain Road. The Parks Department has reviewed the proposal and is requiring that the Applicant obtain a tree removal permit prior to removing the trees. The Applicant shall also be required to mitigate for the healthv trees that are proposed to be removed by either paying a fee for their removal or providing new tree plantings on the site. Staff has included conditions of approval in the proposed resolution requiring that the Applicant obtain a tree removal permit and mitigate for the healthy ti-ees to be removed. In looking at the construction techniques to be used, Staff has proposed a condition of approval that would require the Applicant to provide silt fencing aiid construction fencing at the top-of-slope. Staff has further proposed a condition requiring that a representative from tlie City Parks Departmeiit be called to inspect the silt and construction fencing before any construction activities commence on the site. Building Orientation Variance: As was described in the background paragraph of this memorandum, the Applicant has requested several residential design standard variances. The first variance being requested is from the building orientation standard that would require both of the street facing facades to be parallel to the adjacent streets. The proposed design has a favade that is parallel to Shady Lane. but tile fagade facing Red Mountain Road is about 18 degrees from being parallel to the street. The Applicant has argued that it would be impractical to construct a residence that is parallel to both of the adjacent streets. given the angle at which the streets intersect. The application also puts forth that Shady Lane is the primary frontage road for this lot and that there is really no pedestrian relationship between Red Mountain Road and the property since the lot is considerably lower in elevation than Red Mountain Road. In reviewing the building orientation variance request. Staff agrees that it would create a design challenge to orient the residence to both of the adjacent roads in this case. Staff also concurs that there is very little pedestrian relationship between the lot and the adjacent Red Mountain Road because there is a considerable difference in grade between the parcel and Red Mountain Road. Staff believes that the building orientation variance request meets the applicable review staiidards for granting a variance. The majority of the residences in the immediate vicinity are not parallel to the street and Staff feels that the angle of the intersecting streets causes an unusual site-specific constraint as it relates to this variance request. Fen:ce Height Variance: The Applicant has also requested a variance from the residential design requirement that limits the height of fences and walls iii front of the front fagade of a residence to a maximum of 42 inches. The application requests a variance from this standard to construct a three (3) to six (6) foot tall concrete or masonry wall along the property line adjacent to Red Mountain Road to replace an existing six (6) foot tall wood fence. In the application, it is expressed that the wall would visually screen the property and provide privacy to the lot. In evaltiating the request. Staff understands the Applicant's desire for privacy and blockine the headlight glare from vehicles on Red Mountain Road by replacing the existing six (6) foot fence with a three (3) to six (6) foot tall wall. However, Staff does not believe that the fence height variance request meets the review standards for granting a variance from the residential design standards. In looking at the neighborhood context. Staff did not observe any six (6) foot tall fences on either side of Red Mountain Road in the immediate area. with the exception of the fence tliat exists on this property. Additionally. Staff has traditionally taken the position on felice height variance requests that being next to a busy street does not constitute an unusual site-specific constraint. If being next to a busy street were considered a site-specific constraint for granting a felice height variance. there would likely be a lot of tall fences along Main Street. Therefore. Staff does not support the fence height residential design standard request, finding that the request does not satisfy the review criteria for granting a variance. Garage Entrv Width Variance: The Applicant would like to construct a three (3) car garage with the front of all of the garage stalls being located in line with each other. The residential design standards allow the vehicular entry to a garage to be at most twenty-four (24) feet wide. The application suggests that a three-car garage is typical for many of the residences in the neighborhood and that the garage as it is proposed would 11Ot be a prominent feature ofthe streetscape. Staff does agree 4 that many of tile residences that are served by Shady Lane have three-car garages because they are located within the County and are not subject to the Citys residential design standards. Staff also concurs witli tlie Applicants argument that the garage doors will not be all that visible 120111 either Shady Lane or Red Mountain Road since it is proposed to be setback about 125 feet from Shady Lane. However, Staff believes that the Applicant could easily nieet this design standard by simply setting back one ofthe garage stalls from the other two garage stalls to better break up the appearance of the garage doors from Shady Lane. Windows Variance: Finally. the Applicant has requested a variance from the residential design standard that disal lows wiiidows between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the first finished floor on street facing facades. The applicatioii proposes windows in the nine (9) to twelve (12) foot zone on the fagade that faces Red Mountain Road. The Applicant has argued that this requirement is intended more for neighborhoods in which houses have a strong relationship to tile street. The application further puts forth that the subject parcel does not have a strong relationship to Red Mountain Road. Staff agrees with the Applicant=s contention that the subject parcel does not have a significant relationship with Red Mountain Road and that the west side of Red Mountain Road does not have considerable pedestrian traffic. However. Staff does not believe that granting a variance from this staiidard is necessarily consistent with the context of development iii tlie neighborhood. In conducting a windshield survey of the neighborhood. Staff did not see many residences in the immediate area tliat have windows on street facing facades that span in the no window zone. Additionally, Staff does not feel that there are unusual site-specific constraints on this lot that would dictate the need to have windows in the "no window' zone. Staff cannot support the variance request finding that tlie review standards have not been met by the proposal. STAFFREC OMNIENDATION: Staff feels that the proposal satisfies the stream margin review standards and complies with the variance review standards necessary for granting the building orientation variance that is requested. However. Staff does not believe that the variance review standards for granting approval of the fence height. garage width. and window height residential design standard variances are satisfied by the proposal. H the Planning and Zoning Commission agrees with Staff that the fence height, garage width, and window height variance requests do not meet the review standards, the Commission should strike the fence height, garage width, and window height variances from the motion below, thereby only approving the stream margin review, special review to establish the river's top-of-slope, and building orientation variance requests. Additionally, as was introduced eartier in this memorandum, the Planning and Zoning Commission should direct Staff to strike Section 8 in the resolution if the Commission does not believe that the Applicant should be able to relocate Shady Lane based on the Parks Department's concerns. 5 RECOMMENDED MOTION: (ALL MOTIONS ARE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE) "I move to approve Resolution No. 12, Series of 2006. approving with conditions, a stream 1 .1 . margin review. special review to esti012!UEnzat,.&02.4Â£la@=SIE~@@~26@s from the building orientation. fence--heiy10%~ windo711eight res~ential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Application Exhibit C -- Referral Comments M-*06 NoFGA A-Â»1 644 61/0 re #OfÂ© 9 1Â«/ h e Elhy 9-- 30 vt}~ae- 1 ,â‚¬,IA,~~-ry, *,) l(ittl--- 1/tflaMCE.,6 a lA Cll n RPO Ul/t Â£2 BSO . +12 6Â·Prl kâ‚¬,0- 5 82+ lolA. v j Â» vi S Actdy La M â‚¬ &5 A33-133 60 Al OVE. 1 _k_ plo~~ o d C( pf 00 deof 7 0 6 Resolution No. 13- (SERIES OF 2006) RESOLLTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND VARIANCES FROM THE BUILDING ORIENTATION, FENCE HEIGHT, GARAGE ENTRY WIDTH, AND WINDOW HEIGHT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 27374)73-00-010 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callwinnie LLC, requesting Stream Margin Review, Special Review to determine the river s top of slope. and variances from the building orientation. fence height. garage entry width. and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane: and. WHEREAS, the Applicant=s property is a 93.653 square foot lot located in the R-30 Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code: Lind. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the stream margin review standards, special review standards, and the residential design standard variance review standards; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application. site visits. and the applicable Land Use Code standards. the Community Development Director recommended approval of the steam margin review. special review to determine the river's top of slope, and building orientation variance finding that the review standards have been met: and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the fence height. garage entry width, and window height residential design standard variances finding that the review standards are not met; and. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein. has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing: and. WHEREAS, tile City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan: and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. Series of 2006, by a to (_--) vote. approving with conditions. a streaiii margin review. special review to determine the river's top of slope, and variances from the building orientation. fence height. garage entry width. and window height residential desien staiidards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Conimission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review, special review to determine the rivers top of slope, and variances from the building orientation. felice height. garage entry width. and window height residential design standards to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. Subject to the conditions contained herein. Section 2: Building Permit The Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a building permit application prior to commencing construction activities. The building permit application shall contain the following: a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sallitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation of removed trees. if applicable. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be installed. f. A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking. which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks. no other personal trucks are to be parked in the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be shuttled in from the airport parking area. 8 g. A Geoteclinical Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer. This study shall include a detailed description of the slope stabilization and erosion control techniques to be used during construction. h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer. which maintains sediment and debris on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required. a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. Silt fencing shall be incorporated into the erosion control plan as is described in Section 3 below. A 5-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will be no increase in the sites historic runoff as a result of the new residence. The Study shall also denionstrate that there will be no increase in the base flood elevation as a result of the development. No clear water connections (roof, foundation. perimeter. ratio drains) are allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. i. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating tliat the conditions of approval have been read and understood. Xection 3: Erosion Control The Applicant shall place vegetation protection fencing and silt fencing directly adjacent to the top of slope that meets the approval of the City of Aspen Parks Department. The Applicant shall provide a detailed tree protection fencing plan at the time of building permit submittal and have the City of Aspen Parks Department inspect and approve of the erected silt and tree protection fencing prior to commencing construction. Section 4: Tree Protection Fhere shall be no excavation. storage of materials, storage of construction backfill. storage of equipment. foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree on the site. An excavation under the drip liiie permit shall accompany the tree removal permit required in Section 2 above. No over digging shall be allowed in the immediate areas adjacent to the large spruce tree located.just north of the proposed residence and the large spruce tree located directly south of the proposed residence. Section 5: Riparian Restoration The Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to the City of Aspen Parks Department for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. The revised landscaping plan shall not include the following types of vegetation that were proposed in the original application: Planting Zone 1- Shall not include Ticklegrass, Beckmans Sloughgrass. Fringed Broniegrass. or New Mexican Checkerniallow. Planting Zone 2- Shall not include Colorado Male Fern, Mountain Nine Bark Ribes (Gooseberry). or Blue gama. 9 Planting Zones 4 and 5- Shall not include Coral Carpet Sedum. Golden Stonecrop. Blue Spruce. Rosy Glow Sedums, Rubus, or Huckleberry Planting Zone 7- Shall not include Common Treesquare. Hardstem Bulrush, Water Sedge. Beaked Sedge. Common Scouring Rush. or Streamside Alpine Bluebells. Section 6: Outdoor Lighting All outdoor lighting shall be downeast and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575,150, Outdoor Lighting. Section 7: State and Federal Permits The Applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary state and federal permits for vegetation restoration and plantings within the 100-year tlood plain. Section 8: Relocation of Shady Lane The Applicant shall make arrangements to preserve vehicular access to the other houses served by Shady Lane during the relocation of' the street. Prior to commencing the relocation of Shady Lane. the Applicant shall consult with the Fire Marshal to ensure that the new turning radii are appropriate for eniergency access. Additionally, prior to building permit submittal and prior to the relocation of Shady Lane. the Applicant shall consult with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District as to whether the existing main sanitary sewer line below Shady Lane will need to be relocated at the Applicant's expense. If it is determined by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District that the mai11 sewer line needs to be relocated along with the relocation of Shady Lane. the Applicant shall comply with the following requirenients: 1. The Applicant shall apply for a line extension request and a collections system agreement from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District s Board of Directors. 2. The Applicant shall deposit funds with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District for engineering fees, construction fees, observation fees, and fees to clean and televise the new main sewer line extension into the project. 3. The Applicant shall dedicate new sewer easements to for maintenance and access to the 11ew main sewer line. Nection 9: Sanitarv Sewer Requirements lhe old sewer line comiection next to the Rio Grande Trail shall be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) personnel shall make a new tap and a new sanitary service line meeting the ACSDs standards shall be installed at the Applicants expense. The glycol heating and snow inelt system must be designed to prohibit discharge of glycol to any portion of the public or private sanitary sewer system. Glycol storage areas shall be approved by the ACSD prior to installation. 10 Section 10: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending linder or by virtue ofthe ordinances repealed or aniended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 11: It anv section. subsection. sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 12: All niaterial representations and commitments made by the Applicant pin-suant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission. are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on March 7,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONINâ‚¬; COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian. Deputy City Clerk 11 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS The proposed development is located within an environmentally sensitive area described as a Stream Maruin anci is subject to Stream Margin Review Standards. No developinent shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: t. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed development will not increase the base flood elevation on the property in that the single-family structure is proposed well outside the special flood Ilazard area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted to the greatest extent possible via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement." Staff Finding Staff finds that this proposal will not be in conflict with the AACP or the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan because the proposed structure is to be confined outside of the native riparian area as defined by the fifteen ( 15) setback from the river's top-of-slope. Additionally. the bank restoration plan provides appropriate ground cover and vegetation. with the exceptions noted iii the proposed resolution. to prevent bank erosion, which is consistent with the stated AACP goal of enhancing the natural environment. Staff feels that the restoration plan is also consistent with the AACP intent statement to preserve, enhance. and restore the iiatural beauty of the environment. Staff finds this standard to be met. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Section 26.435.040(F)(1). Xtaff Finding I o Staffs knowledge. the subject property does not contain a previously established building envelope. Stall finds this review standard not to be applicable to the proposed application. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff Finding 1710 proposal does not interfere with or pollute the river and Staff has proposed conditions of approval that require the Applicant to place silt fencing above the river's top-of-slope to prevent sediment from niigrating to the river and the 100 year tloodplain. Additionally. the proposal will not affect the on-site drainage of the property because the construction is located well outside the 100 year tloodplain and the Applicant must provide a drainage plan as part of the building permit submittal that indicates that off-site drainage will not exceed historic rates. Stafffinds this standard to be met. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. Staff finds this standard to be met. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. Staff finds this standard to be met. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain. Staff Finding Staff has included a condition of approval requiring that the all necessary state and federal permits be obtained for tile proposed plantings and riverbank restoration that is to occur within the 1 00-year iloodplain. Stafftinds this standard to be met. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting within fifteen (15) feet back of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank 13 stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100 year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering 1)epartment. Staff Finding The Applicant has provided a landscape plan for review. The Parks Department has indicated that the Applicant is proposing appropriate riparian vegetation with the exception of the plant species prohibited in the resolution in their river bank restoration plan and Staff has included a condition of approval requiring that the Applicant obtain all necessary state aiid Federal permits for plantings within the 100-year floodplain. Staff finds this standard to be met if a revised landscaping plan acceptable to the Parks Department is submitted prior to building permit submittal. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020, as shown in Figure "A" Staff Finding A deck on the existing residence is already located within fifteen ( 15) feet of the rivers top of slope as was determined by Applicant's surveyor. However, the proposed addition is located approximately thirty (30) feet from the top-of-slope and meets the progressive height established from the rivers top-of-slope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing any new outdoor lighting. The existing outdoor lighting must be in compliance with the City of Aspen Outdoor Lighting Code. Staff finds this standard to be iii et. 11. There luis been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Staff Finding rhe Applicants surveyor has not indicated that there are any wetlands on the property and Staff feels that the top-of-slope has been accurately identified. Staff finds this standard to be illet. 14 FrilIBIT B RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES REVIEW REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a variance from the Residential Design Standards if the proposed application meets the following: A Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context iii which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. Iii evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship Of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, 1,) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The following are Staffs findings iii regards to the variances being requested by the Applicant. Variance Requested Buildinfr orientcition. The.from.facades ofall principal structures shall Yes. No. Yes. be parallel to the street. On corner lots, both street flicing lacades must be parallel to t:he &Â«9 p ~ tf //7 g Mir /1 intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the \ b*am Alcade ofall struclitres shaN be parallel to the icingent of the midpoint ofthe arc of the street. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context iii which tile development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. Iii evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the inimediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board .feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: Most of the other residences tliat are served by Shady Lane are not parallel to the street because they are located iii Pitkin County and are not subject to the City's Residential Design Standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. 15 Staff Finding: The proposed design has a lagade that is parallel to Shady Lane. but the fagade facing Red Mountain Road is about 18 degrees from being parallel to the street. The Applicant has argued that it would be impractical to construct a residence that is parallel to both of the adjacent streets. given the angle at which the streets intersect, The application also puts forth tliat Shady Lane is the primary frontage road for this lot and that there is really no pedestrian relationship between Red Mountain Road and the property since the lot is considerably lower iii elevation than Red Mountain Road. Staff finds this criterion to be met, Variance Requested Fences. Fences, hedverows, and planier boxes shall not be more than #,rly-two (42 ") high, measured from natural grade. in all areas fbrward of the tbont faqude of the house. Man-made berms are prohibited in the front yard set back. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context iii which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board .feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: Iii conducting a windshield survey of the properties in the vicinity, Staff did not find any of the other properties liaviiig a fence that is over 42 inches in height. Therefore. Staff does not believe the application satisfies this standard. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of .fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff has traditionally taken the position on fence height variance requests that being next to a busy street does not constitute an unusual site-specific constraint. If being next to a busy street were considered a site-specific constraint for granting a fence height variance there would likely be a lot of tall fences along Main Street. Staff does not find this standard to be satisfied. 16 Variance Requested Garage Entrv Width The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty-tbur (24).feet. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context iii which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board.feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: Staff agrees with the Applicant that many of the residences that are served by Shady Lane have three-car gai-ages because they are located within the County and are not subject to the Citys residential design standards. Staff also concurs witli the Applicants argument that the garage doors will not be overly visib[e from either Shady Lane or Red Mountain Road since it is proposed to be setback about 125 feet from Shady Lane. However. Staff believes that the Applicant could easily satisfy the design standard by setting back one of the garage stalls a couple of feet to better break up the visual appearance of the garage doors as seen from the north. Staff finds this criterion not to be met. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of .fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: There are no unusual site-specific constraints that would prevent the proposed residence from meeting the garage width residential design standard. Staff finds this criterion not to be met. Variance Requested Windows between 9' and 12 Street flicing windows shall not span Ihrough the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve Ret (12) above the finished first floor. For imerior staircases, this measurement will be made .from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt.trom this standard. a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. Iii evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, Staff Finding: Staff agrees with the Applicant=s contention that the subject parcel does not have a significant relationship with Red Mountain Road and that the west side of Red Mountain Road does not have considerable pedestrian traffic. However, Staff does not believe that granting a variance 17 from this standard is necessarily consistent with the context of development iii the neighborhood. Iii conducting a windshield survey of the neighborhood. Staff did not see many resideiices iii tlie immediate area that have windows on street facing facades that span iii the no window zone. Staff does not fiiid tllis criterion to be met. b) Be clearly necessary .for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff does not feel that there are unusual site-specific constraints on this lot that would dictate -1 -% the need to have windows in the "no window zone. Staff finds this criterion not to be met. 18 0,11 7 MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Alex Evonitz, Com. Dev. Engineer Date: January 18,2006 Re: Stream Margin Review and Design Standards Variance Parcel# 2737-073-00-010 Attendees; Alex Evonitz, Corn. Dev. Eng.: James Lindt, City Planning; Ed VanWalraven, Aspen Fire; Brian Flynn, Parks; Tom Bracewell, ACSD; Charles Cunniffe, CCA, Owner Representative; Geoff Lester, CCA: Jay Hammond, SGM: Glenn Horn, Davis Horn; Heather Henry, Design Workshop; Kristen Walsh, Design Workshop The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Stream Margin and Design Variances Request at their January 18,2006 meeting and has compiled the following comments: â€¢ Building Department- No Attendance; Fire Protection District - Ed VanWalraven; â€¢ The project must be sprinkled and have an alarm system. â€¢ In doing the realignment of the intersection, attention needs to be paid to the "hinge point" and make sure the radii are appropriate for emergency access. â€¢ COA water service should have enough pressure to provide fire service without a separate pump. Engineering Department - No Attendance; Housing Office - No Attendance: Zoning Officer - No Attendance: Environmental Health - No Attendance; Parking - No Attendance; â€¢ The Construction Management Plan (CMP) needs to include, material staging, parking lirnitations, car pool options and use of intercept lot at Brush Creek. Parks - Bryan Flynn; Page 2 of 5 January 18, 2006 17 Shady Lane â€¢ The City of Aspen is interested in obtaining a fisherman easement within the high water mark as outlined in the AACP an official Greenway Plan. The Property is bordered on both the up stream and down stream by public land. The fisherman's easement would greatly enhance the access to the river corridor, allowing fisherman to use the opposite side of the river away from the heavy uses like bikers, dogs and other trail users. â€¢ The City of Aspen requires more inforrnation on the partially abandoned Harris Bitch as denoted on the existing conditions site plan. Part of that information should be the identification of current water right holders. Any restoration work along the riparian corridor will be negated if a future ditch owner utilizes this ditch easernent and reactivates the ditch. Important to find out the possible future uses of this ditch. Please note this information on the plan set. â€¢ There are no detailed design standards submitted for the strearn rnargin protection barricades referenced in report. Provide a design for the location, means of installation, materials and how it will function preventing any residual run-off. â€¢ Some of the trees denoted on the report and site plan are in a declined condition. Pending approval, the tree removal permit will require the applicant's representative to set up an on-site meeting with the Parks Departrnent. â€¢ Tree Removal: An approved tree permit is required for tree rernovals. An approved tree permit requires a proposed landscape plan identifying trees for removal, sizes, represented drip lines and a means and schedule for rnitigation. Please contact the City Forester for more information 920- 5120. The tree permit must be approved prior to an approved excavation permit. â€¢ Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equiprnent, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree rernaining on site. This fence rnust be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to cornrnence. â€¢ Excavation: an excavation under the drip line permit will need to be approved along with the tree permit. Specific excavation techniques will be required for the foundation located adjacent to the large spruce trees. There will be no over digging allowed in these zones. â€¢ The applicant will need to contract with a tree service, and have thern on call in order to address all roots greater than 2 inches in diameter. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation under the drip line or next to the drip line. This can be accomplished by an experienced tree service cornpany or trained mernber of the contractor's tearn. â€¢ River Restoration Area General Comments â€¢ Riparian restoration is rnuch r-nore of a process than the planting of various plants within certain areas. It involves soil identification and management, Page 3 of 5 January 18,2006 17 Shady Lane studies of typical water flow (hydro geomorphology), baseline botanical studies on existing herbaceous vegetation, identification of approprjate planting times, identification of appropriate planting methods, supplemental temporary irrigation requirements, temporary erosion control requirernents, native seeding regirnes for various of disturbed soil within the project. Most of these iterns are missing within the proposed plan. We would require these above-mentioned items before any final approval could be given for the project._We remain cornrnitted to assisting the applicant in any way possible including technical expertise and direction in order to propel the project towards approval. â€¢ Plant Materials will need to be reviewed in greater detail and approved by the Parks Department. Provide detailed inforrnation for all zones identified. â€¢ Zone 1: o Ticklegrass, Beckrnan's Sloughgrass, Fringed Bromegrass and New jMexican Checkerrnallow are all found at lower elevations (Black Canyon of Gunnison) and are not appropriate for this plan. o Meadow Barley ? â€¢ Zone 2: â€¢ Colorado Male Fern is found at lower elevations (Black Canyon of Gunnison) and are not appropriate for this plan. â€¢ Mountain Nine Bark is not native to this area and not appropriate to this plan â€¢ Ribes (GoosebBerry) please be more specific, there are many different species and only a few native to this area. â€¢ Blue grarna not prevalent in higher elevations â€¢ Native Mountain Serviceberry could also include Amelanchier utahensis â€¢ Zone 4 and 5: â€¢ Coral Carpet Sedum, Golden Stonecrop, Blue Spruce and Rosy Glow Sedums are all to aggressive and have potential to adversely affect the stream margin. â€¢ Rubus (Wild raspberries) are to aggressive and have potential to adversely affecting the stream margin â€¢ Huckleberry is not native to area - â€¢ Zone 7: â€¢ Cornrnon Threesquare, Hardstern Bulrush, Water Sedge, Beaked Sedge, Cornrnon Scouring Rush and Streamside Alpine Bluebells are all found in wetland settings, subrnerged zones of still water at various depths. Although these plant rnaterials are found along some portions of the riparian corridor, the epherneral nature of the water precludes them in most areas. These plant materials would be extremely difficult to establish on this site. D. cespitosa is a rnuch rnore tolerant wetland grarnrnanoid which would be better to use in higher concentrations within this restoration plan. City staff will assist in a follow up meeting about each individual plant chosen and appropriate locations and strategies. â€¢ The Parks Departrnent is interested in the Historical values of the property located across Red Mountain Road. Parks would like to speak with the Page 4 of 5 January 18,2006 17 Shady Lane applicant on the possibilities of conservation of this area and possible benefits. â€¢ The Parks Departrnent is also interested in protecting the open space values of the property located across Shady Lane and would like to explore possible conservation opportunities available for the applicant. Water/Electric - No attendance: Community Development Engineer - Alex Evonitz; â€¢ A current survey needs to be submitted, or a letter for the original surveyor certifying the current validity of the drawing represented at this time. â€¢ In undertaking the traffic, analysis for site lines on the realignrnent of Shady Lane the engineer needs to make a conservative judgment regarding the design speed. This could be in a range of 10 mph to 20 mph over the posted speed limit. â€¢ It appears that a full basement is being proposed for this project. If that is the case, please confirm that appropriate rneasures address ground water conditions. Generally, the geo-tech engineer will provide those details. Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Torn Bracewell; â€¢ Before the district will commit to serve this application, we will need to see an irnprovernent survey showing all utilities including the sewer rnanholes on each side of the property, the utility easements, the location of existing Shady Lane, the proposed new location of Shady Lane, and all landscape features proposed for the northerly portion of the lot. The district can then deterrnine weather or not the district's main sewer line in this area will need to be relocated with the relocation of Shady Lane at the applicant's expense. â€¢ If it is deterrnined that the rnain sanitary sewer line needs to be relocated: 1 A "line extension request" and a "collection systern agreernent" are required. Both are ACSD Board of Director's action items at separate regularly scheduled monthly board meetings. 2. Applicant will be required to deposit funds with the district for engineering fees, construction fees, observation fees, and fees to clean and televise the new main sewer line extension into the project. 3. New easements dedicated to the district and recorded will be required for both naaintenance and access. â€¢ Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. â€¢ ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. â€¢ On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. â€¢ Old service line connection next to the Rio Grande Trail excavated and abandoned at the rmain sanitary sewer line according to ACSD requirements. District personnel will make a new tap, and a new sanitary service line r-nust be installed according to ACSD standards. â€¢ Below grade, developrnent may require installation of a pumping system. Page 5 of 5 January 18, 2006 17 Shady Lane â€¢ One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements will be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. â€¢ Perrnanent irnprovernents are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may irnpact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. â€¢ All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. â€¢ Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW or in easements above ASCD main sewer lines. â€¢ Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing systern (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection systern or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time frorn all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. â€¢ The glycol heating and snow melt systern must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. â€¢ Once the proposed utility plans and improvement survey have been subrnitted to the district for approval, the district will be able to comment in greater detail. Page 1 of 1 James Lindt From: Brian Flynn Sent: Wednesday, February 15,2006 3:22 PM To: James Lindt CC: Aaron Reed Subject: 17 Shady Lane James, Parks Department performed a site visit to evaluate the current condition of the trees located within the proposed driveway realignment. The City forester did not find any trees that are in decline, in poor health or mature in age. There are several trees that are not code conforming in size and several significant trees that are code size and will require full mitigation. The forester also commented that unless the new road is built with a vertical retaining wall the slope will impact roots zones of trees not located with in the 10 foot area. He felt that there was more significant loss of resource then would be gained from the site lines of the realignment. Aaron please add comments is necessary and forward to James. 2/15/2006 4 Davis Hornbc. PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING December 21, 2005 James Lindt Aspen Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Callwinnie LLC Stream Margin Review and Design Standard Variance 17 Shady Lane Dear James: Davis Horn Incorporated represent Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC (hereinafter referred to as the "applicant"), the owners of a property at the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road in Aspen. The address is 17 Shady Lane, Aspen, CO. (PID#2737-073-00-010). The Stolper family is seeking approval to build a new single family residence. This letter requests Stream Margin and Residential Design Review approval for the proposed residence pursuant to Sections 26.435.040 and 26.410 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. This letter describes the existing conditions on the subject property, the proposed development and demonstrates compliance with the applicable regulations in the land use code. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is located on the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road, the first left turn off Red Mountain Road after the Mill Street bridge. See the Vicinity Map in Attachment 1. The property is on the fringe o f the urban area with several large lot suburban homes adjacent and nearby including the Rowland, Hines, Duncan and Friedberg residences. The Common Grounds co-housing complex is across Red Mountain Road to the north and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District employee housing project is to the south across the Roaring Fork River. Attachment 2 shows the Existing Conditions of the subject site including a vegetation analysis. It depicts the existing topography, the 100 year floodplain, the mean high water line, the top of slope determined in 2001 and the 15 foot setback from this top of slope. The top of slope shown in Attachment 2 is based upon the City of Aspen definition for top o f slope in 2001 when this property was initially studied and evaluated for Stream Margin Review. This top of slope analysis was reviewed and approved in 2001 by the City of Aspen through the Engineering Department. It is based upon the drawing in Attachment 3 which was submitted to and approved by Richard Goulding, City of Aspen Project Engineer. Attachment 4 is Goulding's letter dated March 16,2001 approving the location of this top of slope. ALICE DAVIS, AICP 1 GLENN HORN, AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH SL Â· SUITE 104 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 970/925-6587 Â· FAX: 970/925-5180 ' New legislation for defining top of slope has been adopted since the 2001 determination for the subject property. Now the City of Aspen Land Use Regulations includes an adopted Stream Margin Map showing top of slope designations throughout the City. The new Code regulation also includes a process for appealing the top of slope as defined by the adopted Stream Margin Map. Since the City's Map is much less precise and since it shows the top of slope located across Shady Lane encompassing almost the entire subject property, we are providing the data from the previously approved designation and have completed further research and documentation which supports this original top of slope designation from 2001. The applicant will therefore also appeal the designation on the Stream Margin Map. Also shown on the Existing Conditions map is the 15 foot setback from the 2001 approved top of slope and the 100 foot setback from the high water line. The area within the 100 foot setback from the high water line is designated for Stream Margin Review. Attachment 5 is a slope analysis of the subject property. The drawing shows that of the total 93,653 square foot property, 26,870 square feet of the land contains slopes greater than 30% while 3,570 square feet of land contains slopes between 20% and 30%. The site is generally flat with the steeper areas on the peripheries of the property such as along the stream bank and the bank dropping down from Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The applicant proposes to build a new, one story single family residence designed to preserve, enhance and compliment the stream front location. Vegetation restoration in the riparian areas is also proposed. Please see the elevations o f the proposed home in Attachment 6, the Layout Plan in Attachment 7 and the Landscape Plan in Attachment 8. The Grading Plan is in Attachment 9. Site sections showing the progressive heights have been met are given in Attachment 10. In addition to the new home and landscaping, the applicant proposes to move Shady Lane north a short distance in order to improve safety and site distance along Red Mountain Road. There is a curve just north past the current intersection of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road and by pushing Shady Lane north by approximately 10 feet, the safety of the intersection is vastly improved. Shady Lane is an existing private road which provides access to five homes, including the subject property. This improvement will also allow a more appropriate one story home by providing a larger area suitable for development. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW This section of the application demonstrates compliance with the Stream Margin Review requirements, Section 26.435.040 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. Each of the standards appear in bold followed by the applicant's responses. -2- , Two letters from Jay Hammond P.E. of Schmueser Gordon and Meyer, Inc. found in Attachment 11 address these issues from an engineering perspective. 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. No proposed development will occur within the Special Flood Hazard Area, also referred to as the 100 year flood plain. The Existing Conditions map in Attachment 2 shows the Special Flood Hazard Area and Attachment 7 shows the layout of the proposed home, indicating that the home does not full within the Special Hazard Area. Please refer to the letter from Jay Hammond, P.E. of Schmueser Gordon and Meyer, Inc. to Nick Adeh, P.E. with the City of Aspen found in Attachment 11. The Flood Insurance Rate maps (FIRM) covering the subject parcel is found attached to Jay's letter. Although the requirements of development within the Special Flood Hazard Area do not apply, the lowest habitable floor elevation of the proposed structure is still two feet or more higher than the Base Flood Elevation on the adjacent river. The project proposes appropriate setbacks associated with the river bank top of slope and will not alter the river channel or floodplain in any way. Jay Hammond concludes in his letter that, subject to compliance with drainage, disturbance and landscaping provisions of the Stream Margin criteria, the project meets all the technical requirements or the FEMA standards and the City of Aspen Code provisions. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement"; The Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plans show the existing trail located across the Roaring Fork River from the subject as part of the Rio Grande trail system. Trails and public trail access are excellent in and around the subject property. This land use application is consistent with the recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan and proposed landscaping will be consistent with the Plan recommendations. A Fisherman's Easement should not be necessary as the Roaring Fork River is heavily used and easily accessed at several different points nearby. -3- 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to the issuance of any demolition excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; As shown on the Stream Margin Review Site Plan in Attachment 12, a Building Envelope and a Landscape Building Envelope have been identified. All buildings will be located within the Building Envelope and planting, grass and hardscape improvements will be located within the Landscape Envelope. Please refer to the Landscape Plan Planting Design Schedule in Attachment 8 for a detailed account of the plantings proposed by zone. The applicant will diligently protect the stream bank during construction. A barricade will be erected on the south side of the Building and Landscape envelopes as they are depicted in Attachment 12. The barricade protecting the stream bank shall not be removed until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project. No vegetation will be removed or damaged and no slope grade changes (cut or fill) will occur outside the two building envelopes. Zones "1" and "7" on the Schematic Planting Design in Attachment 8 are on the south side of the Building and Landscape Envelopes. Work in these zones will involve native wetland plant enhancement, will provide bank stabilization and will occur within the Restoration Envelope. There is no existing wetland vegetation within the Building Envelope. The Stream Margin Review Engineering Analysis by Jay Hammond in Attachment 11 states that, after reviewing the proposed project, no grade disturbance or vegetation removal will occur with the exception of permitted driveway and utility improvements, outside of the Building Envelope as required by the Code. Minimal disturbance will occur within the setback of the previously approved top of slope designation along the river to provide proper bank stabilization. No disturbance of any kind will occur within the top of slope. Some new riparian landscaping may be placed in the various setback areas. Hammond agrees that the top of slope as approved in 2001 appears to be a natural condition for the site and appropriately located. Attachment 2, the Existing Conditions map, shows trees on site, some of which are in decline and are a safety hazard. Aaron Reed ofthe City of Aspen Parks Department visited the subject site with the applicant's landscape architect in 2005 and observed the cottonwood trees on site and seemed to agree with their declining condition. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and or/sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated envelope; -4- The proposed development is adequately set back from the river to avoid interference with the natural changes of the river. During construction, the barricade on the south side of the Building Envelope will be utilized to protect the river bank and river during construction. Any increased on-site drainage will be accommodated onsite to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Any pools or hot tubs will not be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Jay Hammond, in his engineering analysis in Attachment 11, states that the proposed development will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river. No grading or construction is proposed within the river channel, Special Hazard Area or riverbank. The project will incorporate temporary drainage, erosion and sediment control during construction as well as permanent drainage features that maintain historic runoff conditions on the property. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; There will not be any alteration of the water course. Therefore, the applicant has not notified the Colorado Water Conservation Board. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; There is adequate room on the property to assure that the water course will not be altered or relocated by the applicant or heirs. All disturbance will be restricted to the designated envelopes, therefore a guarantee is not needed. Jay Hammond verifies this in his engineering analysis in Attachment 11. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year foodplain; No work or grading will be performed within the 100 year floodplain except for native wetland plant restoration and enhancement. The applicant will obtain any federal or state permits if any are required and copies will be provided. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of the slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of the slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes.); -5- No development other than native wetland plant restoration and enhancement will take place below the top of slope approved in 2001. Please refer to Attachment 14, an old survey of the subject property showing the top of slope approved by Richard Goulding of the City of Aspen Engineering Department in 2001 and the mean high water line. As mentioned previously, City regulations now include a Stream Margin Map which designates top of bank. This map is less site specific and precise than the site specific studies the applicant or previous owner has completed. The City's Stream Margin Map shows a top of slope location which is across Shady Lane. This designation would make the property largely undevelopable. Any wetland vegetation that may have existed above the 2001 top of slope was removed and significantly disturbed long ago, over 45 years ago, with the landscaping and development of the late 1950's house which was recently demolished by the previous owner. The applicant has completed further studies in addition to those completed in 2001 (report from Jay Hammond in Attachment 11 and Jonathan Lowsky in Attachment 16), supporting the previously approved top of slope as appropriate and verifying that there is no wetland vegetation in the area proposed for the relocation of Shady Lane. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of the slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of the slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes); Attachment 10 shows the required progressive height limit defined above and illustrates that the progressive height limit will be met. The proposed home, located outside the 15 foot setback from the previously approved top of slope, will not exceed the height delineated by the progressive height limit line. All new construction on the site will comply with this restriction. 10. A landscaping plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, fowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; Attachment 8, the Landscape Plan, shows the proposed vegetation to be planted in several different landscape zones. This Attachment includes a plant' s scientific name, common name, wetland status, height and other information on the various plants proposed. The Landscape Plan includes an inventory of existing species within the stream margin. Briefly described, Zone 1 includes bank wetland restoration below the top of slope and will remain the least disturbed during and after construction. All existing planting within this area should remain undisturbed except as indicated. Species located within this area are best suited to stabilize the bank and prevent erosion. -6- Two main areas of erosion and invasive species have been indicated on the vegetation - analysis and will be revegetated as indicated in Zone 7. Zone 2 includes the bank upland restoration above the top of slope This area is within the stream margin zone and includes the upper bank species. Areas of disturbance during construction will be revegetated with native species, mostly shrubs, in naturalized patterns. The intent is to allow areas within this zone to grow into a pre-construction state. Areas closest to the home will be replanted with predominantly meadow grasses and wildflowers to allow circulation around the house. Zone 3 consists of areas which were previously highly manicured lawn/yard space including turf grasses and have been limited to those spaces necessary only for limited outdoor enjoyment. Zone 4 is required for screening and privacy purposes. Tree species are predominantly spruce and fir and will provide a strong visual barrier to the surrounding roads. The understory of the areas in Zone 4 will serve as a transition zone between the stream margin areas and the groundcover in Zone 5. The understory is simply native flowers and grasses. Zone 5 surrounds the entrance to the house and most of the ornamental gardens. This area is generally outside of the stream margin. It is intended to be planted very simply with three to four plant species, including simple juniper hedges, carpet-like groundcovers and aspen trees which form a contrasting vertical element. Smaller garden areas such as directly outside the entry door and in the sunken garden area may incorporate other species in including ferns and sedums. Zone 6 is the boundary between the property line of the Stolperpler property and Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane. It is intended to be planted with native grass and limited wildflower species. The intent is to blend this area in with the more native habitat that exists along both roads. Zone 7 includes strictly riparian species that will be used to revegetate areas indicated in the existing conditions vegetation analysis as eroded or as areas of invasive species. These stream margin species will be placed in naturalized groupings to closely resemble the surrounding plant colonies and will only be utilized at the water's edge. Zone 8 includes the proposed roof area to be utilized as a green roof system. While ideally the entire roof may be a green roof structure, the area indicated as a green roof on the southeastern half of the roof structure would gain the most visual enjoyment both from within and outside of the property boundaries. From the upper lawn terrace, this area of the roof is most visible as well as from those traveling on Red Mountain Road from Aspen and those living in the adjacent units in the Hunter Creek Area. -7- A portion of the master bedroom wing could also be a green roof system so that the entire roof structure as viewed from the Rio Grande Trail presented as vegetated. This area has less impact, though, given the grade change between the roof and the Trail. This Landscape Planting Plan is found in atthe end of Attachment 8. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150; Exterior lighting will comply with this land use requirement. 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of the slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and Attachment 13 shows site sections prepared by Design Workshop, the project's landscape architect. These sections show the existing and proposed site vegetation below and above the top of slope. The proposed vegetation below the top of slope is the area at the top of the bank planned for native wetlands plantings intended to add to bank stability and some bank restoration at the water's edge. Attachment 13 shows the Special Flood Hazard Area (100 year food plain), the top of slope, the fifteen foot setback from the top of slope and the Fringe Zone. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Attachment 15 is a November 14,2001 report from Andrew Antipas of Ecological and Environmental Consulting Inc. He states in his report that the proposed improvements will not impact and will enhance and restore riparian vegetation or wetlands along the Roaring Fork River. Figure 1 in this report identifies the riparian zone. He observed no wetlands in the project area. The routine criteria as described in the Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Delineation Manual was utilized by Antipas in his investigation. This 1987 manual used the three parameters of vegetation, soils and hydrology to identify wetlands. Antipas states that there is a sharp topographic break which defines the top of bank in the project area and also defines where the landscape yard ends and where the riparian vegetation begins. Historically, Antipas notes, the building envelopes may have been in the riparian zone, but all that remains of this plant community are mature cottonwood trees. It appears that the cottonwoods were thinned with the construction of the existing house built in 1958 when the riparian vegetation was replaced with turf grass. This thinning and understory removal occurred throughout the flatter portions of the property. Antipas found the steep riverbank to be left undisturbed except for the construction and maintenance of the Harris irrigation ditch. -8- The construction of Red Mountain Road may have disturbed the north edge of the property as characterized by the uneven distribution of road fill. Jonathan Lowsky has completed a current report indicating that there is no wetland or riparian vegetation in the area where the road construction along Shady Lane is proposed. Please refer to Attachment 16 for this report. Residential Design Standards This section of the application addresses the Residential Design Standards in Section 26.410.040 ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. The owners' architect, Charles Cunniffe Architects, and landscape architects, Design Workshop Inc. (DWI) have discussed the proposed plans for the subject residence and landscaping with the Community Development Department in order to assure compliance with the Residential Design Standards. The proposed plans comply with all Design Standards except for four where variances are requested. These include 26.410.040 - (Al) Building Orientation, (A3) Fences, (C2e) Garage Facade and (D38) Windows. The applicant is therefore requesting variances for these four items. This Section addresses variances to the Residential Design Standards. Any appeal for a variance shall demonstrate that the variance would: (1) provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or (2) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The following addresses the four standards and demonstrates that the variance would accomplish one or both of the above. Al Building Orientation. On corner lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. The subj ect property is located at the intersection of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road, thus is it a corner lot. The house is oriented directly to Shady Lane, the primary frontage road for this lot. However, since Shady Lane intersects Red Mountain Road at an obtuse angle, the facade facing the secondary Red Mountain Road cannot be parallel and is off by approximately 18 degrees. Because of the impractical nature to build a home parallel to both streets, the fair decision would be to grant this variance, especially since the secondary Red Mountain Road is a non-pedestrian oriented street. -9- The existing design is parallel to Shady Lane and is as parallel as possible to Red Mountain Road. A3 Fences. Fences cannot be more than 42 inches high, in all areas forward of the front facade of the house. The applicant is requesting a variance from the 42 inch alternative front yard maximum fence height. This request is for the fence along Red Mountain Road. All other fences will meet this criteria. This fence is intended to be a wall type structure of a solid material of stone or concrete. The height will vary from three feet to six feet above natural grade (36" to 72"). The top of the fence will be level. It will start around 36 inches, below the 42 inch requirement, and will then follow the grade along Red Mountain Road as it rises, the top staying level, but the height above grade increasing up to approximately five or six feet. Gaps in the wall allow existing trees to remain and provide visual interest in the fence. There are several reasons for this request, discussed below. 1. There is an existing six foot fence installed by the previous owners for privacy and to shield the property from Red Mountain Road. This replaces that fence and it will be shorter as the existing fence is a consistent six feet for the majority of the property. 2. The fence will visually screen the property from cars and adjacent neighbors and provide an adequate level of privacy and will also provide a shield from car headlights into the house as they approach on Red Mountain Road from the north. The traffic noise and headlight buffer will be sufficient with the proposed fence, while still being shorter than the existing six foot fence. 3. The fence will provide protection to people and property from cars on Red Mountain Road, if the cars were to lose control, especially during winter driving conditions. This is extremely important as the site is at a low spot in Red Mountain Road in both directions. 4. The fence will provide necessary separation from the property and the road for resident children and domestic animals. There is inadequate space for other alternatives such as berming, (which are also prohibited in an alternative front yard) so a fence is the best way to accomplish this protection. The proposed fence design is superior to the existing six foot fence and has been designed considering the context in which the fence is proposed. In considering the busy Red Mountain Road and the relationship of the development to the Road and the neighborhood, this variance is well warranted. Given the busy traffic, the nature of the surrounding area and the fact that the existing fence is consistently higher, the applicant believes that a variance from the 42 inch fence requirement would be a reasonable and fair decision for the subject property. -10- CZe Garage Facade. The vehicular entrance of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty four feet. The applicant would like a three car garage, appropriate to the - size and scale of the proposed house and therefore a variance is needed from the 24 foot width maximum required for a garage. There will be individual, single stall garage doors as required in the guidelines. In addition, the garage is set well back from the "front" street of Shady Lane, thus it is not a dominant streetscape feature. The garage design will complement the overall house design. The intent of the standard is met, and the design has considered the context of the neighborhood. The three car garage is typical for homes in the neighborhood. D3a Windows. Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine and twelve feet above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. Due to the contemporary aesthetic of this riverfront home, the applicant is seeking a variance to waive the requirement for the traditional Victorian street facing window. This requirement is more applicable in the East and West End neighborhoods, and is not a critical factor for riverfront properties in the subject' s vicinity. This requirement is more appropriate for pedestrian neighborhoods and has little relevance based on Red Mountain Road being a non-pedestrian vehicular thoroughfare. After reviewing the intent of the Residential Design Standards, Site Design in "A", Garages in "C" and Building Elements in "D", the proposal falls reasonably within the intent of the standard and will meet the overall purpose of each of the standards addressed. The proposed home is not a grand mansion oversized for the lot, but rather a very comfortable, single story, inviting residence on a large lot (93,653 square feet) oriented toward its surroundings which provides the human scale and feel the Design Standards are intended to create. We therefore request approval for the four variances. Summary This letter and the attachments demonstrate compliance with the Aspen Land Use Regulations for Stream Margin Review and Residential Design Standard. The applicant is requesting approval for four variances from the Residential Design Standards. The following list of attachments are included with this letter. 1. Vicinity Map(8.5"xll"); 2, Existing Conditions Plan (with Vegetation Analysis) (11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 3. Drawing showing the top of slope approved in 2001 by Richard Goulding, City of Aspen Engineer; (11" x 17") -11- 4. Letter dated March 16, 2001 from Richard Goulding approving the location of the top of slope pursuant to the drawing in Attachment 3; 5. Slope analysis prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers (11" x 17"); 6. Elevations of the proposed home (11" x 17" and 24" x 36")); 7. Layout Plan (11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 8. Landscape Plan/Schematic Plant Design, ( 11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 9. Grading Plan (11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 10. Site Section showing the Progressive Height Limit (11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 11. Two letters from Jay Hammond P.C., engineer with SMG providing an engineering analysis of the subject property and proposed minor road relocation. 12. Stolper Stream Margin Review Site Plan (11" x17" and 24" x 36"); 13. Site Sections by Design Workshop Inc. (11" x 17" and 24" x 36"); 14. Survey of the subject property prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers, 2000 (11" x 17"); 15. Andy Antipas, Ecological and Environmental Consultant' s 2001 Report on the identification of the riparian and wetland areas on the subject property; 16. Jonathan Lowsky riparian report on the minor relocation of Shady Lane; 17. Agreement for Payment of Fees; 18. Authorization Letter from Callwinnie LLC (Michael Stolper), Property Owner; 19. Proof of ownership; 20. Pre-application conference summary sheet; and 21. List of property owners located within 300 feet of the subject for public notice; -12- Please contact Davis Horn Incorporated if anything needs to be clarified or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 171 H f X\_\Â« GLEMV HORN AICP Stolper -13- Stream Marginâ‚¬eview ATTACHMENT .1 November 13, 2001 Location Map :,2 i../--: /.. ' I ' 4Â¢ . /- (ikEF~It ''~:t '., 1- -+2>i zÂ· --2-*L-221*-1 ~~'~lÂ® 1 ., ; .t i. Riedfande'.9 d /3/61:f- â€ž4 2 - *- *~ v 5- F'- t- ; 0~~ .Tu*fi . ~.-~42--' -i'li...i'Â·tu.?445.... , .%t. ~ ~ -_.>.49*~4, ~i~ IR~:&rzl Envimjnmenta -. - + 4.iz:~3 ..14$ .1 1~ ~Â·4Â·~i' -+-=- 2~5Wdk#Â·~ 44-9~4~12.*.;a~~,~u-};-: '~ '3~**b'~: ft-67:4;,tit=.,J:t.~ '- r 7- .2".....r - - - 2&c * f tif. ~41;2.*fliME**vr,Â£*#.:ittl 8% 6 z. - ... W . . .' kit" /f-?Â»*. 4- 3 , 0.- k?>'90'i>Â·3#Ot - --* : .. '3Â§ 49,1 :re j , ... , 2.-44 40*â€žf . f t b :<~ ~ :.~ ~ f f f ~I:FAht*-52:f #<=*i.-,:2*..liÂ«3u-Â·1 -.1 - . 0-1-'~ J! r 2 -'=3:-7-5--*.1..-.*:.54:x.t~~#rk: 4.;taLL -6-Â·-f~.-:1-4 {Haft#,hst:ftiffi<**50144 1%*~Â·~/-9415--5~3it rm ~~< ~'~~ -Ek 4< R2*44i ki) 1 44< fi~~ff Â£84ktri t>-~ ~~i,4 . GIA Â· B: c 12: 2:~ fAWA&*fawrgi 11* 74*#9Â£ 40*tii-* 8224 40*4: 4, 44,1/ I /4 '-/:'0-. ~: 9.44/ES 21:{~ Â£:ts,:. Pt .15. -- yv H man Av . I . -':11'll~... I.# .02-' ' 1.U- , - - -2 i..:6Â·22., 4 1%'i 3.133Â·354Â· 414*.>4. .Â· *.=.....: . .... :.~:t.g p Â¢06* Ave ff ' 1 ~~ ; j * i Paegcke Park , e *6lw *4*~Mbumk :4~ 't't ~ ~i i~ *fs,4 : /- I. . ... 11- *'1 y tr~rtÂ·m c, O A 1@ @1@ @1@1Â®101Â®1Â® 1 -- I. 11 DESIGNWORKSHOP \ / , I Landâ€¢cipi Architectâ€¢re â€¢ Lind Planning 1 P.O.B.TRACT NO.1 \ '< \\l LEGEND \\\ Urban Delign . Tourlim Planning il.1 Ash,ville â€¢,Opel â€¢ Dcr-Â· Salt Late Ciop. / 2\ Santa Fe Â· S=lago â€¢ Phoelix â€¢ Lake Tahoe! t \ EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN \, L-77 \\\ 120 East Main Street 0 / OLD STONE . Aspen, Colorado 81611 / .C FOUNDATION ~ (970)-925-8354 1 1 / EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN l \ / Facsimile (970) 920-1387 -- \ C *5655 -Ir<M\- ---' Im A TREE IN DECLINE - TO BE REMOVED WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM \ \ 1 \ R -/ll' 0.- > j \ I. \ \ , L- h ~ < ~ TREE TO BE REMOVED C / .%>t // 0, 2 $ \ - Ill 'u / RPARMN VEGETAnOII / xi \ \ - : 0.02:" .0 /-3 -0/>CH \r- \ \ / 4 \ AREA . NEED OF RIPARMN 11,1 ' VEGETATION RESTORATION \ \ 0---= $9$43,944 pr. 444,0- I \ \ \ -2,<r---<52*5+B.. 'I il _LIZEnC..><----0 \ - .<321?14%0 -1/--00 --M-~--':ox__/___ = -7- -4-\--- -OM=HEAp 4134~4Le -0-â‚¬4 \ -=\ 1 /753 -0---,rL-------- 0- ,/\ \ - + -- ' - f = N %44 \ - 1 + -- - i \*i X L E- 7. -33. L .\ 5 (:44* 01 \ 1 . 1 I 1 x ' - - \/1 \ -+ ' 1126 I - I. \ 0 4 ---0 v . SPECIAL FLOOD -x / 40 \ I / 0 \ -V/797/190 I. I # FLOOD PLAIN) 1 2 \ 1 . Ny \ . , 0 0/ I - / ~ .,//-\ \ \ .1 ' '. .7-- , \ t i.*A . '9<'94. 4 6 1 . - ./b 1//9// \\ i a 7 4 4 ,---\ ATTACHMENT 2 ROARING FORK RIVER YyMilbia~~tia "'.ki /34 -- :b I / 1....0 . HARRIS DITCH ... el<.260, PG.818 , 0.4....4 0-9/7 \ $ k j & 0 9.... 0 00 \ TOP OF SLOPE , ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15. 2005 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK , ' ..2.: r :7 MEAN HIGH WATER 2''t*~A -4- -<44.~ .c-~ -~~~ 0:Â·54. . ....7 REVISIONS \ <k,1451 #I \- - # DATE DESCRIPTION SPECIAL- FLOOD -1 9. - 1/ -:i-f HAZARD AREA ~) f<'.~4 - 2 ~:,L , di / / / / I14 - (100 YEAR , .a , ,* I..~.% - FLOOD PLAIN) 4.. Â¥ ..1/ ,~ \\ I + *48%Â¥t~ 78375'FRINGE ZONE r 4-Â¥ 2 \10/0 \, -- 3 %1/1 - - . 1.-:.- Â® ROARING FORK RIVER \ , \- V . . - 0 DRAWN' HM(_ REVIEWED: HH I '. / STREAM \I . -L- . ... / APPROX]MATE LOCATION OF MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE . 0 *DI f - REVIEW SET ... 1 pi . ..4-1, A 1% PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 ''f'a \A --46 \ EXISTING 3 i CONDITIONS/ \ 3< Â» ' VEGETATION ANALYSIS i >.4 SHEET NU,IBER \ O | Â® i Â® | O ' O 1 d Â® ' 0 ' Â® 1 Â® -Â·- -t~ HiÂ¥33>110'ONOO -- - - - klad-IO.LS 13Â¥HOIIN 00Â¥ZI0700 'NadSÂ¥ DISEIhI kl3d10-LS 3%*_ ._ _ 0 @ 1 @ 1 0 1 @ 1 @ 1 0 1 * 1 0 DESIGNWORKSHOP Landicape Archltil,/1 â€¢ Land Planiho Urban Deslgn â€¢ Tourl,m Plihg A#Alls .,Up- .Dur. Â· Salt I.6 Cir> . s... P.. s.,di.0 . P,-4.. 1.. 71.- 120 East Main Street i Aspen, Colorado 81611 0 \ (970)-925-8354 [EXISTING \ ==N ~ PROPERTY LIME Facsimile {970) 920-1387 ~~<~~~= ~ WWW.DESIONWORKSHOP.cOM 1 / //4 1 // I . MATCH EX]STING , / - U.1 PAVEEF 0 OUEIT ./ A\ / / I. Z \ RELOCATED SHADY LA 1..\ /\ u.1 0/ / b //3~ 0 \ 0 \ .// 0 11 . / I m & 31-7 01--- -\ 4//// ----- \ Ug / -- 0 U.1 _ C~_ ___~ _._ _ --0.amge-=&Â£Lf1i124** -- - \ i 7.2 \ - A:fâ‚¬S-=â€¢th>\ , * '04 X \ O, \ INFV."i)) Â· LON3 LAWN -- i k/'2=0... ...... \ .'.f 1 - (-4~E Â« 10 a 52 1 y. 1 ./1-4. \9...--// /1 ./.-t-\ t.k i .... . 1 O,0 16 \ @ SPECIAL FLOOD ff:.WS -00-- \,A -\ . + 10/ -1 = n- X \ FLOODPLAIN) ~ ~ ' .PAHOT U.&/ \ ' TLm . \ I I U) - -- 0 00 . 1 1 -G< I \ I. ...-0 -- I \ # /-1--1 - \ 2% - ATTACHMENT_ 7 - \\ OUTDOOR' * - - .2 11=~ 'IKY-- I 0 0 .<-'PO \6 u \.4 \ 0N. -#661,6- -7\ 19& ' ...I-/./.*.-I. .....'.I-.I..*Il. lili 1 1 * 1 -- / p.. 1 . r -n- -%. 4\ C .9 - f j :i .0- 0 \ 1~ ~ FU i i \ \11- ROARING FORK RIVER -I'. --- ----. i \t 120Â·00- 4.- I I I --7 . 4 --I g....-/l/ ..... .....2........ Â»34 HARRS DITCH i th>7 -I.1~ . I BK.200, PG 818 ' ~ 0 TOP OF SLOPEZ ISSUE DAnE: DECEMBER 15 2005 15'TOP OF SLOPE SETBACX REVISCHS MEANMGHWATIER 1 ~ - . # DATE DESCRPTION SPEOAL FLOOD MAZARD AREA 9. \ (100 YEAR . FLOOD PLAIN \ I , C...1 =/5. \ 7837.5 FIKNGE ZOK \I \ I \ \ - \ h \ 4 ' \ . \ ROARING FORK RIVER r. 444' . \ \ I \ \ 9 \-- \ \ \ 1% - ORAWIN E~~ REVEWED 101 /\ , STREAM APPROXIMATE LOCATMON OF . \. MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADBATE C - REVI EW SET \ \ 1 ./4 PRO.ECT NUMBER: 3818 N \ \ \:' i ./ ./ LAYOUT Â® PLAN 1 </ 7 61{Er IMMIER 9 \ li i 4 2E O 1 1 * 1 0 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 0 1 Â® 1 @ ......19"101.1.......HOP,INC 12 00Â¥kl0100'NadSV ld1019 13Â¥H ~ CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS CHORC CHOI D ,FARI NO 1 91 Cl 28'25 51 713.33 104.77 5 30'16 26-E C 2 2191 14 .53.33 58 !3 4 33'33 â€¢7*W E ND F 101 E S Â· RED MOUNTAIN 1Â· -30 Â· ~.~~ C, FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DES{:R i BFC. Â· P" 'EL Mr.Â·.14.'iii ROAD ROW .'., P O B TRACT NO 2 j L SURVEY CONTRO! POINT 0 30 60 . 1\: - IliN'EP CREEK 2 FOOT CONTOURS 1-f BEARING ARE GEODETIC BASED ON CITY/COUNTY OP. /fr \4% 1 ' .Es 1 502 6 1 INA' '\ 1 ~F 3,663 5 F \ \' ~ ' 2594/ ~Â¥ 73,6 61 44 -- PETE 1 , Â·91.1, \ n M.t MONUMENTS 112 AND) 111 N 05'41 01-* (GRED BE,RINGI E,As Â· 3 74 Â· 0 0,12 17Â¥ 80* WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 7, i / 9// \ TOINSHI P 10 SOUTH, RANGE ' % , ' ' . ' -I . ~~~ CÂ»'il~\, \ 1 I , Fou.,0~r,o;k#b' 1.-~% -719 STONk MANIOLE 64 IEST OF tHE Bil / M / /- TRACT NO 1 / 1!11 1 \ , 1954 elM. BRASS CAP , - I. \ \\Accl 1 \\ \ 20 4/8 AND ~0640 0 '1.-4Â¥ POLE r gra )&01&> M. /i '-5--' ~ - 8 BR//5 CAP j 7830 . 1 \5. 1 1 4 e. rop "FRIS DICH 15 DOES NO F -,T.E N'ORÂ»-'ON FROV IDED B.i CASE NO PCT 15608L j 9, 56 / -\ ~ 12'3?:"fls: Et:tME4T- S Z 551 , kNK'-Aq%- o \ 14 \ 440\6 \\ 1 4 .fkh \44\ P/KIN COUNTY FITU, INC I.. OC'OBER 6 2000 -p- 5 N :'8000 49 / PAGE 21 ~ C Â·-0, x-.,< 9 '1 s ylf# 46 - tt 1/ TER 'LOOD PLAIN AND FLOOMA DIGIT'ZE.7 C -4 00 ASPEN DEPIRTMENT OF ENG NEER 1 NG MP' & OAVEMENT , -\ \Â»,4 4%11 TREE 6 OR GREITER ~01 'S COVERED W:TÂ·, TREES NOÂ·: 4:. TREES LOCATED PAR/,40 ~IC,TiONS NEED TO ~E FIELD VERFLED BEFORE Clicti/CTION trr.; / l. - .-.---0- 1/7 09 SLOPE s ~I L -- v u,-- â€ž~72~.-f-- ~<] i*.3,- --t~ -*p~~o -- I : 1 11 .u , / ./ht ./ Kill:1 c. 0. ... *\ 1 #i --1 ATrACHMENT 3 \1 0: - 41 / Ai * 5 itl / Hot SE i F 0.8 TRACT NC 4 2 - sEk F.OOR '850 ' h \ 100 YEAR %000 CERTIFICATION 4 \\ 1 1 1-R-- ~| ~~~~~0~ /~~1 1 \ 1 THE UNDERSIGNED STITES TRA' IHE PROPER-â€¢ DESCR BED HEREIN WAS i ate i -_ Â· I - 0."MANG , 0 -15-3 SURVEYED DURING -, 4-1* Z,Cal. 4~12 1 S ACCURATE 2.1~i~ 95- \\ / Â° NSED ON Tâ€¢â€¢E AE.D EVIDENCE AS SHOÂ¥,N, AND twAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L NE CONFL'ITS ENCROACHMENTS, $ 6â€¢SEMENTS OR RiGHTS OF *AY IN W ELD EVIDENCE OP KNOWN TO ME, EXCEPT AS rEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND 03 1 L :- ES â€¢ 4 TH NO ABOVEGROUND 1 â€¢.PPURIENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NO- SUOPL ED TO ThE SURIEVOR ARE Â¢XCERÂ·TECIIAHIS SURVEÂ¥ i S Â¥OID UN_ESS WET STAMPED . k 6 \. -/ 914 -44 Irâ„¢ THE SEAL- .OF ;HE 'So11-fpR BELOW .2. ~ 2 pOS TRACT 40 ~ ANCÂ¢3 -1 i ~ 3--1 f -- *<47 4\ l '0 <RD ' CD'# \ \ \L \ t, \L .... Â¥ - , L oiha i /0604474.95/71574_ 6 -4 - -= 4 ~03-0 9.4&%'IM...~. A. 0 L'.- 4 \ 4\9 \ 4,111'I I 1 i 14, <-zyÂ«47*437-L-~ al. 1 -- S-OPE <7' , C 1-00 444 1'Â·Â·.3. c ,-26. q n I 2 - 1 .6\\% 'TJ v--L - â‚¬\31. 40 - -4277*L< 471 - 1 71 1 0 - 0 \ b. UL- 7%42----t f- 19 2 3:4 1 RAC- 6 1.' \ FTREAM MARG~N REV E* S.RvEY ARING PO 1 1- <I~2.-714t-U ND '/1,\\\ \-1,4 0= BUTTERMU 4/V TAE FO-LOWING TRACTS OF LAND LOCATED N SECION -, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH PANGE 8â€¢ WEST OF THE 6,â€¢ P@!NC/,4. MERID,AN DESCRWED AS FO.LOWSÂ· 6/2 \ k -RACT NO 1 t BEG~NNING AT CORNER NO 1 A PINE 'CST IMENSÂ¥ ThE WES' 1,4 CORNER TO SECTION 7. Â·'OINS/ID 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 IES' ex '46 6Â·, P M BEARS WES, 562.6 FEET: U S.L / \ ..\Nt \.. \ ) /4''iÂ· IN e .\ I. \ 2~5 40 4 BEARS S 28~04 E 3654 4 FEET T.â€¢ENCE EAS' 376 FEET '/nâ€¢.CE SOUTH 200 FEET. I. f . : 41: ...4 1 16 9:. . THENCE NORTH 75 FEET , TO 99 PME OF BEGINNING vAP'AT;ON OF- 14'40 E -6,ENCE N 71'34 W 395 3 FEET. RACT NO 2 BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OR A TRACT DESCRIBED Â·N DEED RECORDED IN 800, 49 AT PAGE 12 PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFF CE < BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEAFT CORNER 04 TRACT 1 ABOVE]. THENCE SOUTE .25 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORT.4 BANK THE ROARING FORK RIVER 4. N \\1 \\&20\\1\\ \:. MOPE OR LESS TWENCE WESTERLY ILONG THE NORTH BANK OF T-6 ROARING FORK RIVER 305 FEET aNCE NORJH :50 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE sou7/ 6,NE OF SAID TRACT DESCR:BED 0 / lit> ~>.i \ Â©4Â£ /6 900, 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK INE RECORDER 5 OFFICE TMENCI 50/TH 71 34 E 34!.3 FEET TO TIE PLACE OF BEG,NNING 're" NO 3 I.\00, BEG:NNING â‚¬ I POINI WHENCE -HE IEST 1/4 CORNED OP SECTION 7. TOWNSHIP 10 SO.// RvNGE 84 WEST OF THF 6,h PM, BEARS NORTH MO 00 FEEt, AND WEI 938.6 ..0 \ NE- .{THE TRUE POIAT / TR:ANGULAR PARCEL MORE FAM DESCQIAED AS FOLLOWS) TMENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT " .,1 6 NE 0, THE COUNTY AC F..03*â€¢, Re,D & DISIANCE OF 300 FEET 70 THE INTERSEST,ON Or SAID ROAD WITH THE NORTH , BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER R UR I DISTANCE 210.0 FEET 70 THE SOUT/EAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRAC -HFICE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NOR,/ BANK OF THE ROAR ING FORK DESCR BED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 57, OFFICE Or â„¢â‚¬ PmTK N COUNT'f CLERK AND RECORDER â„¢ENCE NORTH 125 0 FEET TO THE POIN' OF BEGINNING BEING THE SAME PROPER'Y DESCR,BED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 17,Â· A PAGE :28, PI:KIN COUNTY CLERK K RFCOR[*its OFFICE 'TRACT NO 4 BEG'Nhâ€¢14C /: K FoliT WHENCE THE WEST 1.4 CORNER / SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SCJâ„¢ , R*: 84 IEST 01 THE 6,h PM, BEANG NORTH 175.06 FEE~, AND WEST 938 6 FEET, TMENCC : 44~29 24- 159.10 FEEr 'HENCE 1 7.4-05 00-2 119.84 FEET \ THENCE G 'i/30 00'W 52 FEET MORP OR :855 Â·O 'â€¢~E APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER Â£ INF M 7/ ROARING FORK RIVER SHPLOâ€¢ M...1.AIN /NCE 24.9 F-?El MORE OR LESS TO 1/# POINT OC lf,INNiNG f NCE NORT'l 32'06 24- WEST 258 90 FEE' ~POP'p, riap'INO FROM THE ABO~k DESCA,BED PROPr,1, TH- FotloWING DESCRIBED 8{ 9'NNING " A PO I.r *HE IC# THF <51 ; /4 CORNER OF SECt. 109 7 TOWNSH!P JO SOUTH, RANGE 84 WES-1 OF THE e,h P M REAkÂ·, WEST 802 70 RE[f, :Ill, E-T 63.49 FEEI VNCE 38 4 FEET IONG A CURVE TO 'af 111 ' w,10'P RAD lub 4 153 311 FEET . CHORD MIAG S 33â€¢11 47 E 58.13 /6 ~HPNCr .4-2/ 24'E 5/ 42 /FE, 'vENCE SOUTH 85.62 FEEt TO -HI POINT 0, Bl~ 1 â€¢4 1 NO I t RA/1 3 /MEND[I INCf I /4.29 2/'/ 118.55 FEE, vENC; 05 86 AEr T Al ONG A CURU :0 :8* R :Câ€¢ T WHISI RAD I U. I . 213 33 1-E[ r /08 2 Â·,45 N ;0'16 26-* 10â€¢ 77 FEL TO !6'F P(idâ€¢Â·1 / BEA NNING 011'INNG 93,6.55 50 , ./ .. P; 4, 1/ PREPARED B f +SPEN GUM'.E Y ENGINEERS, INC. 210 .Oul. OALENA STMEN 'OP'I, ..OHADO 8101' M#/19/ 09/03 975Â·3816 uATl (1: 2 .0 260*20 ---10' 9.Â¥ 0 D.10.-- 4%'47 ATTAC+*A ENT ~ THE Crl'Y oF ASPEN OliN o March 19,2001 To whom it may concern, The line defining the top of slope at 17 Shady Lane on the drawings submitted to me bn March 16, 2001 drawn by Aspen Survey Engineer Inc is an accurate representation of the top of slope as defined by the -. . 4 101' Fii -ilginetrillg Departr:Ilent. We 01+v /â‚¬ A en-- u recognize that the property has two different levels and that one is represented by Section F and G with the other being represented by B, C, D and E. The Engineering Department has retained a copy o f these drawings. C-- Richard Goulding, Project Engineer 130 9 161 I I GAI.I NA St RE.rl At,pi.':, C Di.(,RAix, 8]611-1975 hif)KI 970.920.500() FAx 970.920.5197 E-3 ae. 44 AE fs/be - 64 1/ f 4 & _IR#ql=*.1-1 ) 1,6 7.261 97-,i~,7-a .6.Â£181.%~9&*21Lit--1-M...2- a<,282#kjaj- ~ &8*44.4-43~~<9 't ~--- Â·*i*C~~f.~e:tÂ·E~:77-~- .~ . e~ 4~~ 1-tl ..p ~~ ~~ 3~U- '1 - F/*232<],31RIE!,21 :,3.?..Di~' 439,7vy(Â·itvÂ·Â·Â·Â·~_r .i=N//rl-tÂ»V-*. fri .- ~ <uÂ·-1.....44*Ri- L3 __.t_4eq~. ___* ./.1.- 1 1 EL â€¢ 785I 3 1 1 r-) EAST ELEVATION '1 02 8 16 1.----7 0 5% L â€¢ 4 8 --,-IP== 4.*fyâ€ž111 -, .. 1.4. Â·Â· ~'- L ILL j J .r. Ae. L.--E-4 . 'Ag. - / = f:1 '*- 4,~ 7- * 'I+-9' Fi Y, Elfâ€ž . u --2 . -. % - - - --Refijf Â© NORTH ELEVATION 1 0 2 8 16 En 5% 32167 '9 - r-1 .Â¥143 - glill/VI'llill,ilill/M/:UE,1/I'llilillill//Ill-il- Ilmi".41'1*9-*423- imj -2,-Me.~..IIP'REXITII -5,~l-,*#jift~H.81/2/1~f -~FINb~--4~, â€žr,-4;.fro.-:GRP.I':.i.â€ž4 44@se-?fffÂ¢*f Xbf#-121/t A . 4..0....i /.4. - R-* .%*-4*401//,GLe<.Â·Â·41.~Â· imil# IMI,+2691**f#1453 7~:7~~f:*-~-iz~JI.14.:.i:t:'.3 fe; fify~~tyÂ·=Â·Â·tÂ»-Â·--1~ - i :Â·.Â·1Â· /: 44...~ 1//W /4/'021#::41Â·fit:)rÂ·.~~~Â·:1#MARAP#;.#4.7431 r,/41.'ST-7.-i .:1. -Â·{1.1--0. Â·~ ~~ 4-7Â·-Â·'Â·'-Â·-1.-~~Â·~-. r~ /7% jh -: 1Â·~ 9Â· f t'p 0 Ard Â·... -: 1 Z I.'ll--ti Â· ....:,ilfÂ·-t'.li.~ 1..,E 59 ' BASEMENT. /11 Â»O EL â€¢ 189Â· - au f i Â® WEST ELEVATION tn Z 1 0 2 5 16 A N ~ -TY~17*A i.. .........-. 5 /2Â· 1,--eÂ«-:u=---tr~-1': t.44-,2,*'-r'. wrw-rL.;-71'r rt 1 aM"*1 DRAWING COR-TEN STEEL PANELS---- --- - --Â·--c-1--AP l. 4 ...Ce. .....*:Â·4----3,#ltn h wsp- 9#%4.444.Â·4,4*.2 *rE I.'.7---_2- -- -- --- & 1.K-xxyÂ» ISSUE: DATE: n S.M. Review , 11-30-05 _ lit FLOOR 4 ~ - ' EL 2-185I' ; JOB NO. 0516 , ~ SHEET NO. BASEMENT ~~ ~ EL = 183'qi r-) SOUTH ELEVATION A3.1 1 0 2 8 16 c, COMRÂ£HT OWIUS CUNNIFFE ARa41TECTS A-14 ad,mem- Co HE*IV 33=IINNAD S313Â¥143 33NfiC)IS33 33d1O1S LUOD'@DIUUill'MAVA Â£6 :XÂ¥:1. 0690-5,90Â£6 ml. Ze,Ov 03 'SONINds .1Â¥06,Wl[S . COE 115 'Â·aÂ¥ 3,1080 21Nld 03 'NNSÂ¥ . 3AY NÂ¥WAH IS'Â¢3 1 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Lac i -7 S A Â«41 l--u Fle Applicant: ~. L.Â·L ~ 1 l./L, C - n \~ 4? A L C_ Location: in S hql~ Lti p-7<r Zone District: Aillf fl - 10 FL' O Lot Size: 13; 65-3 21 +7- Lot Area: 6/, 15-1 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing. 0 Proposed: \ Number o f bedrooms: Existing: O Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: A~ A Allowable: C \(of Proposed. N or kno.-n .14 Principal bldg. height: Existing: ~ Allowable: -2-5-- Proposed: Not k p.iu-n U~ e r Access. bldg. height: Existing: ~ Allowable: N $ proposed: W A- On-Site parking: Existing: ~ Required: -2- Proposed: -2-- % Site coverage: Existing: ~ Required: N A- Proposed: :V 11- % Open Space: Existing: ~ Required: K A- Proposed: N k Front Setback: Existing: ~ Required: )0 Proposed: 10 Rear Setback: Existing: ~ Required: 43 Proposed: l'a Combined F/R: Existing: Required: ZJ Proposed: -C-,3 Side Setback: Existing: Required: 1 40 Proposed: i y- 10 Side Setback: Existing: ~ Required: 1 5- Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: .,~/ Required: -3 5- Proposed: --s <i-- Distance Between Existing bl KRequired: M h Proposed: N ov Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: fl 01/1 6// Variations requested: C~ Cil\ 674 â€ž*rc,-ul C~32&(9'~7 00 0 0 0 0 0 I. 75'-0' L 61-00 10'Â«7 L 18Â·-ou 14,4 1.-0 8-0. la 1 9 i MEGH,NIGAL 11 4 14 EQUIP. i vâ€¢ 90~F --Â·-LAiME,Rer DROP O' EXERCISE ~ i NEC>ITATION 1 1 ----I 8 1 1 # 1 1 0-1 1 4,14- // F, 0 1 OFFICÂ·E IELEV, 1 1 CZZ~~ E--1 r 1 1 60 22-_-catil=.1- f--7-1- f~--: 1.-- - 0 b g ' --- 11==c~ 1 l--- -1-TEI-ITHIPPI...I..Ii .=.- ~ 1 P--10[fjou U TIJ=21 k- 5 1 1 - El- 'TE=) 0 )4-22-4 -- -- - 0 - ~ SUITE I ----- 1 rL-ke--11%2 1 F [-1-7-dll 4 4 < < SAME ROOM 7~ ii [9 -1_Â¢11* * 6 7-: rt IL SUITE 2 _] [11 9*- 41 12 ; IN : Z LU 9 o 21 me 3-32[-1 - 0 @ 1- -i: ouoh -01 - -- - --- ----- -- - - ---- ---9 9 I 1 11 1 1 Ur)â‚¬LL | C ihIK ROOM 4 - ' li~0~~31 ~% 1, ck 1 ./ Â·9-1.7 i , 441 X.Â¥L-" 1 1 1 11 9 P -417 dE 1 ..1.0 11 'ELEZV~ ~~GUIP MECHANICAL , , 0 11 0 4 4 11 .-------------------1 JO 11 3' C i w ~ 13FI~ Â·. 1 311 - Ill 11 1 LAUNDRY 4 STORAGE 0 DRAWING: 1 T /,E:Hi LIATPELL 4 1 ./ i PLANTER L , ISSUE: DATE: S.M. Review 11-30-05 SOB NO. 0516 1 m i | | SHEET NO. 16 -0. 1 121-0. ; :20 -0" I 21'-0'L 141-0 33'-6 f BASEMENT PLAN rrÂ·j A2.1 1 1221-6. .M'-- 1 0 4 0 8 0 /-102 6 '6 Â©COPY,UQI OV~RLE5 aJNN#yE AIICHMCT5 0 0 3 0.0 <1331IHOMV 333[NNAD 5313Â¥HZ) ZSSEOZQDÂ£6:rÂ¥3 . 065Â§-5E6'DZ6 3111 . 1[910 01 'Nldfy . '3AV NYWAH 199 09 3NVI ADVHS LUOD'a#!UUni'/M'\AA 1050-5Â£80Â£6 XÂ¥:1 . 0690-5Â£8046:3111. 29,09 00 'SDNIMdS 1Â¥06WhiS . ZOZ 315' CIN UAOHD 3Nld 106/ 00'lloloo 'N3dSV 12 -O 18'-O. 0 80 e eÂ® e Â®e ~ 1 80.-O 1 8...Â· 1 34'4 8-0. 20'-O 12'-0 .. toÂ·-O- l 18'-O. 20,4 1 1 1 f 1 -' }-- -.I~~~~~~~~~~-"31-1 K --1, --Â¥ e. 1 6 C . 113) c El - 4 - { 00 1-- -4- - - --- ------- - - --- --- --- --- - -- -- -- - --- - - - F --=r ria (/ 4 Z r j 2 11? i CE ir 4 11 - L-1 1 3 2 9 r --- 1 I 11 1 - 0 ' A At 'rni 2 1 6.- 1 i'111 _22 0 1 -i | I L-.-1 r 4 i n 1-9-111 CC 0-W O 0 n --Ir, pul U L 8 V i . 0 F OILORI- Al, W 7,===21 - 1 01.> L-*J r.-3 - 1L j - i 1 L= 1--! 14 -#r-3 : 'i 4 4 M lili Z 4 5 14 - Â·- Fr-93 1- FLÂ®4 4 1-1 i A 1 1CÂ«=7311 1 1 3 F L___4- .-'11 ,==1â‚¬-11 1 Of, /1 0 1 . - L 6 1 - , -ET- __E.492 1.=. r= (-3 i 4 1 1 [11=a 1 0 : i 1 1 19-UN j 7, . / 1 1 ,-LgEr-3 11. 'f. Ir&.1,1 1.11 1 1 1 1 I. 9-11 1 .111 , i *214/"318 '25#3- -1 -Â·-f ~ 34 1 1 1 14 F. 1 1 It 1 4,0.29 ~ \ - 9%- .- ~ j h 1 1 1 &.....&/n -F--122. i-*' 11 1 Â· Ill . 4 1 1 1 1 0 ' 13 lili 6-On 24Â·-0 e'-0. 20'-0" 12'-O' 10'-O 46'-O" ee 03Â® e Â®Â® 0 6ii 0 STOLPER RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS A - 1 1 ,-15 E z 1'1.1.. S www.cunniffe.com n g Ii:~* 'i SHADYLANE 1 9 1*=M 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 * FAX: 970920-4557 B. 1 1-; ASPEN, COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE RD, STE 201 ' STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487 * TELE: 970875-0590 ' FAX: 970875-0501 00 MASTER BEDROOM T.3.-j 03-13 / "9-1â‚¬â‚¬ M~IN,iND'rnMODIDiNWON 101Â®1Â® 01@1Â®le'Â®1Â®1 - 90%61 DESIGNWORKSHOP Lindic,pi Archit-:tui â€¢ Land PI- ning 1 ~ ' PO.9-TRACTN[J.1 ~ Urban Deign â€¢ Tourlim PAn Ing - t. 1< ' / \â‚¬-22- J 2 7%\: il\ S.Ma Pe Â· S,aru.~0 - PA,M :t - L,k 7'440, Aikade - Alp - D.aur . Solt I.2*Ce / Â® t \ '~ \\ ,~,y FOLN[IATON ,i ii?111/ \14 1 Aspen, Coblado 81611 /1)E[)5-rCÂ»E c 44 (\ 1 1 120 East Mah Stmet ~'' ' (970j925.&354 211. k 1 gy ZONE 1 - j i / j 'jf / Facsimib (970) 920-1387 Ell ZONE 2 WwW.0 .SIGNWOR<SIO P.CO U 1 / 11 < C- ----4,5 1 1 I. \1 \\ /4 lj- --- Â«6Â·A- -,- 1 '4.-011.2 , L < 1Â£ 3 #\ Nfl ZONE 3 1. 00 i , , f. 7/4-4 ' UJ , / 1.- Â· 1- h \\\ \ 1 1 1 El ZONE 4 " C-\\Â»\<-41\\ / , rÂ·r,f ! \ \\Ly/ .1 4-4. ...1 3: , 4?., / 0 314''M&,REV'JffWI'*C 4...:0r N .h'. ~ ZONE 5 ; tÂ· I ? 1 ZONE 6 â€¢ >r - 'er'.3-1'i i. 5 - Â· , '/ . ..4 \ \ - . C :1~ ..3,-L-.4%/f, ... 2/ '441412. ~4% li RW-F~~Â·' ~~' - -r-< Wl ZONE 7 U.| ..r I \ \ ,t 1 \ . 6.19*-u#. p \ ,>-- .2 . 42 1 - . \ . .1-I \ 1 - -1 L .- \ 1 -11# I ,\' \Ptâ‚¬71â‚¬ 1-- /. 1 ! K.57 -2 --.0. ':1; 61 +4â‚¬)-.4:et. Ii{1.44-Njt. , \ t 0,0, ->4.-Â©7:*.4: b. p.9*1* .,4.5 ' ..i Â·24: 1%) --_ , el N. Â·Â·Â· . I . ) .- - ~4,4 .4~2)*--:--#t,j 8.1 14 vs>i ~~,2~ 70>i. ~~Â«< ~1 H ; ii)(~ - CfT-*-* :. 1~~~ji r r- v.> N 11 l;;3 . . i . ..-10 I 'fil--<' 4 - ' 1 1 1 +~Pff,.~iY;Y \ \ 1 4 1 1 O 1, SPEC,N-FLOOD , '< 4.'t - 1 4 . 1 11 \ \ HAER[) AREA i -I \ FlyD PLAN ; el (. /. , /'//5,2/....'. <*. 1-I ' 1.11 11Â¥T 1 ..It. ite :0Â·3-1 ,Â·Â·Â·Â·,Â·-' #.Â·=- ipo VEAR '1-Pal 1 M -i 1 , 13 2 4 41*224>.1 iii i-Ff ." -1 , 111. 1 \ 3% 1 -'.AÂ·.Â· litdÂ· iIiÂ» ...,% i..% .. .4 3 -11] E 6 'l* - ATTACHMENT 9 ..,..Â«7 1 6AE*44\\ -4 1 -1.1 L I 1-' Jk tÂ» . ,0, .p, '* J |i| Â®~, 0_-f' ~.Â»~4,,0 4:). i ... 9 '47 *9'Â·Â«I '57': 14'Â· . Â· A/1-.i.9 - E I ' A-.9.' f . I -.'_1 LIM. 41.- f. ,-7 *Flf\ 9 3 /1 * r. 1 .f \ \0 - - 1 -4-Â» 4--1 r . 94% 0 i K -#Af*--- ROARING FORK RIVER. w ,&4- ftÂ¢444, : :Â·.:ZONE-Â·50.11 1 $ _ 7 1 1,26Â»t--1/I ~ ;|||7#~.;:..( i.Â·:.:Â·.Â·Â·..~.. ' -. ~.. i '-113bl~ \f(j [Dl * 1200C 2/ 40 -757 -/~715.--.1--1 0- C... '.. ... '... ./7 1 ~ ~12~19-ff:1-444( C i :v+5'.3,Â·"..M .1 ,.244 MANNIS DIT ~ ,~ >~ S K250. PC 896 , -A>c:FES:-4,941 \, T 01' OF SLOPEi d zi ~I Dk 35 Â»El L t> Zt 81 - V. ,, 1 Â·Â·Â· 1 ' ' - 2[- , IueDAm DECE,IBER 16.2005 i ---â„¢. 3 16 TOP OFSLOPE SETBACK 9 REV 1% 1015 WEAN HGH WATER - # DAA DESCR/MON '! 4<b-; i ib ~rb**...i< -. Ttru :==r 1 .EX\ 53F<f~W...124>- . -43~-w. 3262 .\\~ . 1 --42Â»2 %\ -1 roD VEAR - â‚¬*4<k62AgE gr K w - 724-- \ * U.--.Z''+'Â·*> --- .-MiQeopLAM + %5%141 6 - -4&%*.0 716**g,cazoi \ \ : 3 N.7. .4 ; I. L , .- r \ 4 r. r_ _ tÂ©kil M 1 \ 1 7~ I J --- ROARING FORK RIVER ... . .Stz.. # f XX6 ::f \ - I \\ - f 6 Â· 4,46\ h \ . --'-P..'I --'.-'.10 Â· \ ~ \4. I. I C A , -- / \ C </ p ' I . 3 i V J . \ * 24-<J< Â·3\.0\ pk,> \ . ~ . \ ~. 4 ..\'( \1\.\ 1\ \\3\ ~ \3\ \ \ --%%'3~~2344pzz:k~ v/ I$4~Â· .. / , 0, DRAWN: ~.- REVIEWED: HH -- APPROXIWATELOCAIONOF ./.r:fr~*%--A.Ibrt'*411<\?jAI'lf //5/~ ''//0,/5===221=:~--1.249<.\44 \ X \3% L NX\\\:\\\ STREAM '1 -*'52- -4\ t\4'i; 310Â»,0 4 COL LAPS 80 011 CHI HEADOATE MARGIN 1, I--* J . \\\\ C \\4 \\\\ C - REVIEW SET \ ..c<I.tic '*. i.Â© 0:3Â«\1 31 .4 i lt\~\''\11 1 1 iv:,BMA /QuECT\IUUMA: 3833 Â« %3:$94Â©N<Aff> 9 11 4 1 / Â»20Â»4496''th / LANDSCAPE 01Â»-3/ Or -3 09< 9%72-/1.-laty 1 87/- PLAN 01*lp-4 WAA,Â· 07 ,\ 1 , \\....... 1 % .Â».2 I-5-01 * /:!11/ 1 4%11 B- . N.\'/ (41 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 !41Â¥d 3)00 01,05 -Â·-Â·- -- klad1019 13VHOIIN 00Â¥bl0100 NadSV DISEIkl Mad1019 ATTACHMENT 5 emt. Stolper Residence Plant Design and Stream Margin Review Zone 1 This area o f the stream margin includes the bank area generally located below the top of slope. This area will remain the least disturbed during and after the construction process. All existing planting within this area should remain undisturbed except as indicated. Species located within this area are best suited to stabilize the bank and prevent erosion. Two main areas of erosion and invasive species have been indicated on the vegetation analysis and will be revegetated per the requirements and species indicated in zone 7. Zone 2 This area is within the stream margin zone and includes the upper bank species. Areas of disturbance during construction within this zone will be revegetated with native species, mostly shrubs, in naturalized patterns. The intent is to allow areas within this zone to grow in to a pre-construction state. Areas closest to the home will be replanted with predominantly meadow grasses and wildflowers to allow circulation around the house. Zone 3 These areas are highly manicured lawn space including turf grasses. These areas have been limited to those spaces necessary only for limited outdoor enjoyment. Zone 4 These areas are required for screening and privacy purposes. Tree species are predominantly spruce and fir and will provide a strong visual barrier to the surrounding roads. The understory in these areas serves as a transition zone between the stream margin areas and the groundcovers in zone 5. The understory is a simple palette of native flowers and grasses. Zone 5 This zone surrounds the entrance to the house and most of the ornamental gardens. This area is generally outside of the stream margin. It is intended to be planted with a very simple palette of three to four plant species, including simple juniper hedges, carpet-like groundcovers and aspen trees which form a contrasting vertical element. Smaller gardenesque areas such as directly outside the entry door and in the sunken garden area may incorporate other species including ferns and sedums. Zone 6 This zone is the boundary between the property line of the Stolper Residence and Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane. It is intended to be planted with native grass and limited wildflower species. The intent is to blend this area in with the more native habitat that exist along both roads. Zone 7 This zone includes strictly riparian species that will be used to revegetate areas indicated in the vegetation analysis as eroded or as areas of invasive species. These stream margin 1 species will be placed in naturalized groupings to closely resemble the surrounding plant colonies and will only be utilized at the water's edge. Zone 8 This area indicates the proposed roof area that may be utilized as a green roof system. While the ideal thought here would be to have the entire roof utilize a green roof structure, the area indicated as a green roo f on the southeastern half of the roof structure would gain the most visual enjoyment both from within and outside of the property boundaries. From the upper lawn terrace, this area of the roof is most visible as well as from those traveling on Red Mountain Road from Aspen and those living in the adjacent units in the Hunter Creek area. A portion of the master bedroom wing could also be a green roof system so that the entire roof structure as viewed from the Rio Grande Trail presented as vegetated. This area has less impact, though, given the grade change between the roof and the trail. The use of a green roof system has not been entirely decided upon but should be reviewed as part of the Stream Margin Review. 2 STOLPER RESIDENCE AT I ACHMENT- 8 corrf. Existina snecies within stream marain: i WILDLIFE SCIENTIFIC NAME 4 Â£6Nlk[Opi ~NAME ' I WETLAND --< . INFLORESCENCEt uÂ«FLOWERING HEIGHT LIGHT ELEVATION 19: STATUS k % 4,2 - COLOR, TYPE rÂ» -- 94/SEASON BENEFITS Food, Alnus tenuifolia Thin-leafAIder FAC,W Red/Brown, Catkin Summer to 26.24 ft Pt-Full Sun 5,000-10,000' Shelter Amelanchier Mountain White, Food, FAC,U Spring 3.28-13.12 ft Pt-Full Sun 5,000-10,000' alnifolia Serviceberry Raceme Shelter Yellow, Ribes aureum Golden Currant FAC,W Summer 3.28-8.2 ft Food Pt Sun 4,000-8.000' Raceme Pink, Spring- Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC 1.64-6.56 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Cyme Summer Yellow/Red, Food, Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine Spring 49.2-98.4 ft Full Sun 5,000-9,000' Flower Shelter Populus Narrow-Leaf Creamy White, Pt-Full Sun 5,000-8.500' angustifolia FAC Spring 26.24-65.6 ft Shelter Cottonwood Catkin Populus Creamy White, Poor 5,000-10,000' Quaking Aspen FAC Spring 26.24-49.2 ft Pt Sun tremuloides Catkin White, Spring- Food, Pt-Full Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry FAC,U 4.92-32.8 ft 4,500-10,000' Raceme Early Summer Shelter Sun White/Pink, Shade- Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FAC,U Summer 1.97-5.25 ft Food 5,500-7.500' Flower Full Sun 1 1 1 Ill SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME HEIGHT LIGHT ELEVATION 9, .WETLAND O INFLORESCENCEL FLOWERING WILDLIFE ' 9 Â·Â·.STATUS 'mr COLOR, TYPE SEASON BENEFITS Pink/Purple, 2.95-3.94 ft None Full Sun Cirsium arvense Thistle Flower Wetland Status: OBL=Obligate. FAC=Facultative, W=Werlana,U=Uplank :~'.-Â·---Â·--- -,'--Â·- Â·f ~~ 9- '~.- STOLPER RESIDENCE . - ZONE 1 - Bank wetland restoration (below too of slone): . WETLAND (A INFLORESCENCE 37 FLOWERING -9 9<9 WILDLIFE - ~ Â° SCIENTIFICNAME Y. -~COMMON NAME y <r. HEIGHT' t LIGHT 1 i ELEVATION IÂ«Â· STATUS f = -9. COLOR, TYPE{Ale'~~ SEASON> u: , i BENEFITS - Food, Alnus tenuifolia Thin-leafAIder FAC,W Red/Brown, Catkin Summer to 26.24 ft Pt-Full Sun 5,000-10,000' Shelter Pink, Antennaria alpina Rosy Pussytoes FAC Early Summer 3 in-1 ft None Full Sun 4,000-8,000 Foliage White, Spring- Food 4,000-10,000' Pt Sun- Cornus stolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC,W 3-10 ft Cyme Summer Shade Blue, Spring-Summer Iris missouriensis Rocky Mountain Iris OHL 0.5-1.7 ft None Full Sun 3.500-10,000' Raceme Best from bulb Brown/Black, Food, Juncus arcticus Baltic Rush FAC,W nia 3-4 ft Full Sun 3,500-11,000' Panicle Shelter Light Brown, Limited Food, Juncus confusus Colorado Rush FAC,W n/a 3 in-1.7 ft Full Sun 5,000-11,500' Panicle Shelter Lonicera Twinberry Shade- FAC,U Pink/White, Raceme Late Spring 3-5 ft Shelter 7,000-11,500' involucrata Honeysuckle Pt Sun Yellow, Summer 3.28-8.2 ft Food Ribes aureum Golden Currant FAC,W Pt Sun 4,000-8,000' Raceme Pink, Spring- Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC 2-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Cyme Summer Populus Narrow-Leaf Creamy White, Pt-Full FAC,W Spring 25-65 ft Shelter 6,000-8,500' angustifolia Cottonwood Catkin Sun Amelanchier Mountain White, Food, Pt-Full FAC,U Spring 3-13 ft 5,000-10,000' alnifolia Serviceberry Raceme Shelter Sun Populus Creamy White, Spring 25-50 ft Pt Sun 5,000-10,000. Food, Quaking Aspen FAC tremuloides Catkin Shelter Pt-Full Agrostis scabra Ticklegrass OBL Foliage Cool Seasons Food Sun Beckmannia Foliage Annual Beckmann's Sioughgrass syzigachne Cool Seasons Bromus ciliatus Fringed Bromegrass Panicle Cool Seasons Calamagrostis Blue Joint Reed Grass OBL Green/Purple, Cool Seasons Food Pt Sun 5,000-11,000' canadensis FAC,W Foliage/Panicle Wetland Status: OBL= Obligate, FAC =Facultative,W=Wetland,U=Upland ~7.;., Â·--2:2 STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 1 - Bank wetland restoration (below top of slope), cont'd.: 14 SCIENTIFIC NAME _. - COMMON NAME -O% WIETLAND 4. INFLORESCENCE 2 01 FLOWERING WILDUFE HEIGHT - gr- STATUS Â«X COLOR, TYPE D SEASON BENEFITS LIGHT ELEVATION Brown, Carex nebrascencis Nebraska Sedge OBL Cool Seasons 1-4 ft Food Full Sun Foliage/Spike Dechampsia Yellow/Brown, Pt-Full Tufted Hairgrass OBL Cool Seasons 2-3 ft Food 7,000-14,000' cespitosa Panicle Sun Brown, Eleocharis palustris Creeping Spikerush OBL Cool Seasons 3 in-2 ft Poor Food Full Sun 3,400-10,700 Foliage/Spikelet Red/Brown, Elymus canadensis Canada Wild Rye OBL Cool Seasons 3-4 ft Food Full Sun Foliage Hordeum Foliage Meadow Barley Cool Seasons 1.5-2 ft brachyantherum Pt-Full Juncus ensifolius Dagger Leaf Rush FAC.W Bunch Rush 1-1.5 ft Food Sun Purple/Brown, Pt-Full Juncus longistylis Meadow Longstyle Rush FAC,W Cool Seasons 0.5-2 ft Food 4,500-10,000' Panicle Sun Yellow, Summer 1.5-3 ft Oenothera villosa Prairie Primrose FAC Flower Light Brown, Pt-Full Poa palustris Fowl Bluegrass FAC.W Cool Seasons 1-2 ft Food 4.500-10,000' Panicle Sun Purple/Brown, 2-5 ft Shelter 4,500-8,000' Scirpus microcarpus Small Flowered Bulrush OBL Cool Seasons Full Sun Cyme New Mexican Pink, Early-Mid Sidalcea neomexicana 2-3 ft Full Sun Checkermallow Flower Summer Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 2 - Bank uoland restoration (above too of slooe): 9 'n : WETLAND. 9 * INFLORESCENCE 0 FLOWERING r WILDLIFE . ~...#.A> 4- SCIENTIFIC NAME.-:1 j COMMON NAME - HEIGHi LIGHT ELEVATION STATUS 3.05 -7 COLOR, TYPEÂ· ~ SEASON BENEFITS - Amelanchier Mountain White, Food, Pt-Full FAC,U Spring 3-13 ft 5,000-10,000' alnifolia Serviceberry Raceme Shelter Sun White, Spring- Shade- Cornus stolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC,W 3-10 ft Food 4,000-10,000' Cyme Summer Pt Sun Dryopteris 11/a 3 ft Shelter Pt Sun- Colorado Male Fern filix-mas Shade Physocarpus FAC,U Summer 3-7 ft White, Food, Pt-Full Mountain Ninebark 4,800-9,900' opulifolius Corymb Shelter Sun Spring- Food, Picea pugens Colorado Blue Spruce FAC Foliage 30-100 ft Full Sun Summer Shelter Yellow/Red, Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine Spring 50-100 ft Shelter Full Sun 5,000-9,000' Flower White, Spring- Food, Pt-Full Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry FAC,U 5-30 ft 4.500-10,000' Raceme Early Summer Shelter Sun Populus Creamy White, Spring Pt-Full Narrow-Leaf Cottonwood FAC,W 25-65 ft Shelter 6,000-8,500' angustifolia Catkin Sun Populus Creamy White, Food, Quaking Aspen FAC Spring 25-50 ft Pt Sun 5,000-10,000' tremuloides Catkin Shelter Spring- Ribes Gooseberry Green 3 -4 ft Food Pt Sun 2,500-8,000' Summer Pink, Spring- 2-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC Cyme Summer Salix Brown/Black, Drummond's Willow FAC, W Spring 7-20 ft Food Full Sun 6,000-11.000' drummondiana Catkin White/Pink, 2-5 ft Food 5,500-7,500 Shade- Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FAC, U Summer Flower Full Sun Blue/Green, Food Full Sun Agropyron smithii Western Wheatgrass Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Foliage/Spike Agropyron Foliage Green, Slender Wheatgrass Cool Seasons 1.5-3 ft Food traciiycaulum Artemisia Silver, 3,000-11,000' Prairie Sage Late Summer 2-4 ft Food Full Sun ludoviciana Flower/Foliage Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative. W = Wetland, U = Upland STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 2 - Bank unland restoration (above too of slooe): 449+WETIAND Vt- INFLORESCENCE:; FLOWERING 9- WILDLIFE SCIENTIFIGNAME - COMMON NAME HEIGHT LIGHT . ELEVATION ' 164:;STATUS 4****COLOR# TYPE 30 4fe- SEASONÂ«- 4 BENEFITS ~ Tan, Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grania Warm Seasons 3 in-1.5 f Food Full Sun 3,000-8,500' Foliage Yellow, Summer 0.5-1 ft Pt-Full Chrysopsis villosa Hairy Golden Aster Sun Flower Rocky Mountain Pink, Mid-Late Pt-Full Cleome serrulata 2-5 ft Bee Plant Flower Summer Sun Light Green, Elymus cinereus Basin Wild Rye OBL Cool Seasons 3-5 ft Food Full Sun Foliage Blue/Lavender, Pt-Full Erigeron speciosus Aspen Daisy OBL Summer 1.5-2 ft Flower Sun Yellow/Orange, Summer- Pt-Full Erigonum umbellatum Sulfur Flowered Buckwheat 0.5-1 ft Poor 5,000-10,500' Umbel Fall Sun Light Brown, Shade- Festuca thurberi Thurber's Fescue Cool Seasons 1-3 ft Food 6,500-12,000' Panicle FuH Sun Yellow/Red, Summer- Gaillardia aristata Perennial Blanketflower OBL 1-1.5 ft None Full Sun Below 7.000' Flower Fall Geranium Sticky Pink/Lavender, Summer- FAC,U 1-4 ft Food Pt Sun 5,300-9,400 viscosissimum Geranium Cyme Fall Blue. None Linum perenne v. lewisii Blue Flax Early Summer 1-2 ft Full Sun 4,500-9.500' Flower Blue/White, Lupinus argenteus Silky Lupine OBL Summer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5.000-11.000' Raceme Green, Oryzopsis hymenoides Indian Rice Grass Cool Seasons 1-2 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-9.000' Foliage Pink, Oxytropis lambertii Showy Locoweed Early Summer 0.5-1 ft Flower Rocky Mountain Blue/Purple. to 3 ft Food 6,000-11.000' Pt-Full Penstemon strictus OBL Early Summer Sun Penstemon Cyme Medium Green, Poa secunda Sandberg's Bluegrass Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-4,000 Foliage Yellow, 1.5-3 ft Pt-Full Viguiera multiflora Showy Goldeneye Flower Sun Late Summer Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate,PAC = Facultative. W = Wetland, U = Upland STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 4 and 5 - Ornamental Native Plants: ty:4 WETLAND_Â«, INFLORESCENCE:'- ~ FLOWERING ~ Â«Â· WILDLIFE Â»- Â» 1,; SCIENTIFIC NAME 9 611-: COMMON NAME f ' HEIGHT< LIGHT ELEVATION :-0 ... - -93f~-STATUS 1.*4 *fCOLOR, TYPE-AÂ·'.Â·ts'27 SEASON ' BENEFITS Pt Sun- Acer glabrum Rocky Mountain Maple FAC Summer 5-25 ft Shelter Yellow/Green, 5.000-10,500' Cyme Shade Blue/White, Aquilegia coerulea Colorado Columbine FAC,W Summer 1-3 ft None Pt Sun 7,000-12,500' Raceme Asperula odorata White, Pt Sun- Sweet Woodruff Early Summer 0.5-lft Food 4,000-8,500' (Galium odoratum) Flower Shade Pink/Lavender Summer- Geranium viscosisimun Sticky Geranium FAC,U 1-4 ft Food Pt Sun 5,300-9,400' Cyme Fall Blue/White, None Lupinus argentus Silky Lupine Summer to 3 ft Full Sun 5,000-11,000' Raceme Yellow, Spring- Pt-Full Mahonia repens Oregon Grape Holly 0.5-1.5 ft Food 5,500-10,000' Raceme Summer Sun Pachystima myrsinites Mountain Lover Foliage/Shrub 2-4 ft Pt-Full Sun Physocarpus White, Pt-Full Mountain Ninebark FAC,U Summer 3-7 ft Food, Slielter 4,800-9,900' opulifolius Corymb Sun Polemonium caeruleum Jacob's Ladder FAC Early Summer 1-3 ft None Pt Sun 6,000-10,000' Powder Blue, Cyme Shrubby Summer 2-4 ft Yellow, Potentilla fruticosa Full Sun 7,000-10,000' Cinquefoil Flower White, Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry FAC Summer 3-7 ft Food Pt Sun 7.000-10,000' Cyme Spiraea vanhouttei White, Vanhoutte Spirea OBL Spring 7-10 ft Food Full Sun 4,000-7,500' (non-native) Flower Juniperus communis Common Juniper 2-3 ft Pt Sun 4,000-9,900' Sedum album Coral Carpet Sedum White Summer 2-3 inches Full Sun 6,000-10,000' Sedum acre Golden Stonecrop Summer 4-5 inches Full Sun 5,500-9,000' Sedum reflexum Blue Spruce Yellow Summer 8-10 inches Full Sun 7,000-11,000' Sedum 'Rosy Glow' Pink Summer-Fall 10-12 inches Full Sun 7,000-11,000' Wetland Status: -OBL=Obligate, FAC=Facultative, W==Wetland,U= Uptand .~ A...3.: i.. 3~.9.I.Â·3: Â·'- ~ STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 4 and 5 - Ornamental Native Plants. cont'd.: - WETLAND f c INFLORESCENCE FLOWERING WILDLIFE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME - HEIGHT LIGHT ELEVATION ~ i Â· STATUS -' ~-- COLOR, TYPE -; Â·* SEASON BENEFITS Acer rubrum Red maple Red Spring 40 ft Pt Sun 3,000-8,500' Linnaea borealis Twinberry Pink 2-3 ft Pt Sun 6.000-10.000' Rubus Wild raspberries Pt. Sun 6,000-10,000- Fragaria virginiana Wild strawberry White Spring-Summer 3-6 inches Full Sun 7,000-10,000' Gentiana linearis Narrow-leaved Gentian Purple Summer 1-2 ft Full Sun 7,000-10,500' Vaccinium Ceaspitosum Huckleberry Red 3-4 ft Full Sun 7,500-10,000' Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W= Wetland, U= Upland STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 6 - Wildflower and arass seed mix to be used in uoland stream marain: SCIENTIFIC NAME -- COMMON NAMEN Â»WETLANDef INFLORESCENCED : FLOWERIN#, ' HEIGHT ~LNDE~I~./62~LIGHTfly, EÂ£EVATION a, ..Â» STATUS. %174''l COLOR, TYPE ~ Â· -- SEASON 90 Blue/Green, Agropyron smithii Western Wheatgrass Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Full Sun Foliage/Spike Agropyron Green, Slender Wheatgrass Cool Seasons 1.5-3 ft Food trachycaulum Foliage Artemisia Silver, Prairie Sage Late Summer 2-4 ft Food Full Sun 3,000-11,000' ludoviciana Flower/Foliage Yellow, Summer 0.5-1 ft Pt-Full Chrysopsis villos a Hairy Golden Aster Flower Sun Pink, Mid-Late Pt-Full Cleome serrulata Rocky Mountain Bee Plant 2-5 ft Flower Summer Sun Light Green, Food Elymus cinereus Basin Wild Rye OBL Cool Seasons 3-5 ft Full Sun Foliage Blue/Lavender, Pt-Full Erigeron speciosus Aspen Daisy OBL Summer 1.5-2 ft Flower Sun Yellow/Orange, Summer- Pt-Full Erigonum umbellatum Sulfur Flowered Buckwheat 0.5-1 ft Poor 5,000-10,500' Umbel Fall Sun Light Brown. Shade- Festuca thurberi Thurber's Fescue Cool Seasons 1-3 ft Food 6.500-12,000' Panicle Full Sun Blue, Linum perenne v. lewisii Blue Flax Early Summer 1-2 ft None FuH Sun 4,500-9.500' Flower Blue/White, Lupinus argenteus Silky Lupine OBL Summer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5,000-11,000' Raceme Green, 1-2 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-9,000' Oryzopsis hymenoides Indian Rice Grass Foliage Cool Seasons Medium Green. Poa secunda Sandberg's Bluegrass Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-4,000' Foliage Pt-Full Yellow, Late Summer 1.5-3 ft Viguiera multi flora Showy Goldeneye Flower Sun Wetland Status: - OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W =Wetland,U=Upland STOLPER RESIDENCE ZONE 7 - Bank restoration at water's edae: f i - SCIENTIFIC NAME .< COMMONNAME - 5 WETLAND v<. INFLORESCENCE i : FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION %- Â»914.147 STATUS : --2COLOR, TYPE : ~Â»- SEASON BENEFITS Betula glandulosa Bog Birch OBL Late Summer 1-4 ft 7,500-11,400' Creamy White, Food, Pt-Full Catkin Shelter Sun Carex aquatilis Water Sedge OBL n/a 0.5-3 ft Food 6,000-11,500' Green/Black, Full Sun Spike Carex utriculata Beaked Sedge OBL n/a 1-4 ft Food Full Sun 6,500-11,000' Light Brown, Spike Deschampsia Yellow/Brown, Pt-Full Tufted Hairgrass OBL Cool Seasons 2-3 ft Food 7,000-14,000' cespitosa Â· Panicle Sun Equisetum hyemale Common Scouring Rush FAC,W 11/a Spring 2-3 ft Food 5,000-8,500' Shade- Full Sun OBL, Blue, Summer- Mertensia ciliata Streamside Alpine Bluebells to 3 ft Food Pt Sun 5,500-13,000' FAC,W Panicle Early Fall Salix monticola Rocky Mountain Willow OBL Spring 5-13 ft Food Full Sun 5,700-11,500' Creamy White. Catkin Scirpus acutus Brown, Full Sun Hardstem Bulrush OBL n/a 3-10 ft Food 3,500-8,500' (Schoenoplectus acutus) Umbel Scirpus pungens Red/Brown, Common Threesquare OBL lâ‚¬a 1-4 ft Poor Food Full Sun 3,500-8,500' (Schoenoplectus pugens) Compact Panicle Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland 0 1 * 1 7 0 1 @ 1 Â® 1 @ 1 1 1 DESIGNWORKSHOP 4 ~ . poe,TRAQZE-~---- ------ LEGEND LandicalÂ» Archliclur â€¢ Land Plannhg Urban M# Â· Tourl- PI-IN / Al.Cle Â· A.pe. . D.- . Solt 1- City / \ s-0,4. s.,i.o. PA-ti . lake r- / p...1 DOSTING CONTOLR LÂ»LE / \ ~ 4 L 7 ,% i L- 120 East Main Street OLD STOME \ C - Aspen, Colorado 81611 / i FOUILOATION ' 1 1 / \Ill ~-I~ PROPOSED CONTOUR L.Â»E (970*925-8354 i -V- -1 / Facsimile (970) 920-1387 C - . i '\~~ ~1 ~~~ ,~ - WWW.DESIONWORKSMOP.COM \ 1.-1 PROP0ED N GIIZE 5 1 / 2=. \ / L- I A / ,&/ 1 - 1/1 -- u j - 4 \ / 1\,3# , P IN\\ 1.0 \ 0 25: \ \ . - .\1 - 2 - N , Er - \ = I \ / 0 0 - --- / -\ I - I \ /---9 -A- - - I / / + + Z=-1 \ *\ - 1 /* -2.. -7./-- ./>' :E /( la -I - I - /4 -,6413\ I. 1 - 1%% FE \ (44 -- /Wz- Lat,ER 1.*WN . 94% % Ul Z E /t P#<rew 1,3 x ~ , 4\ \JO 03 0 1 52 2 ==j I + =U.-1 -*- ~ 3 1 X i . . - i=-. \ I \ (100 YEAR . + it.""1>. F'LOOD PLAIN) + I ze ' -A,Or 44. , = 2 . 1 '4. 1- < 00 U) 81 4- - 1 \311 -ATTACHMENT 01 m :40 1 - -Â« 1.1. -- --' 3.;0~-I' --17/'* -+ -0 - X i \ 1.- - -- \1, == = -- 964 -Â· -+ m FL| I .. e p - 't- -1 0 ,- - L U== A . -2 ROARING FORK RIVER +$0. ~ 2 -*34*~_ , x S A 4.44<4 - NORTH 0 10 20 40 - . ----2 -- -22b / 0 /1 2,0.- ;04 - --I Â»tzÂ».-' -, / -, 44424 ,-3-x- , 144:*czE:5-3 . . -RS m . \ 01<280 Pe 810 ...0 ~~<1~~~ - - - ~ ~ TCPOF,L/E / \Ar i zkÂ·2:42=-77., 1 ~ ~ 16'TOP OF SLOPESETBACK Â»>43*4Â·44,Â»~_~ - f\~ % . # DATE DESCRPTION 1 ISSUE DATE: DECEWBER 15, 2005 REVSOIS WEAN HGH WATER SPECIAL FLOOD HA/ZARD AREA (100 YEAR .. 06- - *'llb' 1, Â·2%,Lf. FLOOD PLAING ~ 14., 7837.5'FRIIGE ZOE \Ri \ 9, 1 - - - N . h \ ROARING FORK RIVER #4 \ . I I - I \ ' -- \ \\ 9 \ 1 \I \ 8 - - \ 11'\ \ DRAWN KY REVEWED: HH /\ STREAM ./.\ \ \ ./\\I \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION oF . 1 MARGIN COLLAPSED DITO,DIADGATE < hh% 0 \ - REVI EW SET \ \\ \\,4 h .4 \\ \ PRO.ECT NUI~ER 3838 1 i Â·1 1.2/// 3,/0 GRADING 00Â£. A \ e PLAN '*r V B r \9/ , ./.ET./.*R \ 16 - 1 0 1 @ 1 @ 1 9 1 9 1 0 1 9 1 W kl3dlO 00Â¥hl0100 el@1@ 01@1Â®101@10 \ \J-/bla ~ \ DESIGNWORKSHOP /V Lindicape Archlf,clur, â€¢ Land Plmâ€¢hg --h ./ 1, C / . , A ' | \, Urban D.*1 . Tourlim PI-N ./. -I. \ . 1 -wn, Â·.6,= â€¢D,~-Â· Sanl~,9 Â· \ 1220 East Main Street S=4: Fe . S.N.0. Moe.Â£.. Le,0 1,16. , / Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970>Â·925-8354 Â» ~1 ~ Facsimile (970) 920-1387 0*<2>.. ~ -|/ WWW.DESIONWORKSHOP.COM -- 4 1 : ZO -1 . ~ 1\26% 1 VÂ« / l -- t 1 / *I # I.-Ill /4 'Ir##C= > a j 1 0\.4 ..\ 4 9 1 / -J 1 ' .4-1---34-+ / 1 / X. --L \0 :\ 00.r#V ..... 1 / - 1 / -1 =: .: f Ng\\ Â» 1 0 / \ X 1 / * ~. 4.---- U.1 M ROARING FOKNVER 11 \ 1.\ === - iONZI bal YA---/A/17 Ni I I 1 A 4-1-<44 1 / L 7-k / 220 /1 1 1 ROARING FORK RNER ~ C .\ - \ 74 4\/~4 . \I 1 / 1 // I - SITE PLAN - -- 7850 11 1 m-2 1 -11 rf # .. 2 \ 2 1 I 7840 ED NORTH 0 20 40 BO ~ U W 6-1 " / / 7830 gh SECTION A - A' L/0/ 1:1000' - ATTACHMENT ID 1 / 1 / 1 mu 1 NORâ„¢ 0 5' 10 20 1:10.0,7 1 / 1 1 / ~SlZE DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2005 _ REVISICIG - * DATE DESCRPTION 1 / - - 1 / 1 1 / - 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 1 - - DRAWN: EL__ REVEWED: 1.1 / 1 ,0 STREAM / MARGIN 1 / 7850 1 - REVI EW SET 1 / - 1 . / ' PROJECT NUMBER 3838 LIZ------- 7840 i. .J PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMITS 7830 /4% SECTION B - B' SHEET IUISM i 1 | O ' @ 1 9 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 0 1 Â® 1 0 OaÂ¥210-100'NadSÂ¥ d 019 73VHOIW Sahl kIEd1019 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER GLEN,Â¥000, 5/RINGS CRESTE[ euÂ·RE A5PEN 118 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 p.o. Box 2155 p.0. BOX 3088 ENGINEERS1SURVEYORS GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ASPEN. CO 8 IS 12 CRESTED BUTTE. Co 81224 970-945- 1004 970-925-6727 970-349-5355 FX: 970-945-5948 FX: 970-925-4157 Fx: 970-349-5358 - r -Â· ;November 23,2005 ATTACHMENT 1 1 Mr. Nick Adeh, P.E. - City Engineer City of Aspen Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Stolper Residence Stream Margin Review, Engineering Analysis Dear Nick: I am writing in follow-up to a meeting and discussion with Planning Consultant, Glenn Horn, regarding the Stream Margin issues for the proposed Stolper Residence at 17 Shady Lane off Red Mountain Road in Aspen. The Stolper property is located on the Roaring Fork River and, due to its location within 100 feet of the high water line of the river, is subject to the Stream Margin Review criteria under Section 26.435.040 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. Glenn requested that I inspect the Stolper property and provide a letter report regarding the relationship of the property and proposed residential structure to the potential flood hazard and related Stream Margin Review issues. Analysis My purpose in providing this letter is to provide an analysis of the technical and engineering aspects of the proposed house location relative to the river floodplain and Stream Margin Review criteria. I would address the criteria of Section 26.435.040 C. Stream Margin Review Standards as follows (1 have endeavored to address only those criteria that are technical or engineering-related): 1. "It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development." Response: The potential flood hazard adjacent to the Stolper building site is shown on Panels 203 and 204 of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Pitkin County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas dated June 4,1987, copies of which are attached. The mapping indicates the potential Base Flood Elevations for a 100-year flood event on the Roaring Fork River adjacent to the site. Base Flood Elevation (BFE) 7836 occurs approximately 20 feet upstream of the old Denver and Rio Grande Western railroad bridge and BFE 7837 is about 200 feet upstream of the bridge. Based on the proposed building site plan (attached) and conversations with the architect, the lowest habitable level of the proposed residence is at elevation 7839 and the entire building footprint is located above elevation contour 7840 (much of it is above elevation contour 7850). The proposed building, therefore, is not located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone AE) to any extent. 2. "The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan, Parks / Recreation / Open Space / Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable." $*p~ November 23,2005 Mr. Nick Adeh, P.E. City Engineer Stolper Residence Stream Margin Review Engineering Analysis Page 2 Response: I have not addressed this item as a non-technical issue. 3. "There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope." Response: My understanding from the site plan for the project is that no grade disturbance or vegetation removal will occur with the exception of permitted driveway and utility improvements outside of a building envelope defined by the relevant front yard (off Shady Lane) and side yard (off Red Mountain Road) setbacks as well as the 15-foot setback off the Top of Slope adjacent to the river as defined on the survey for the property. No significant re-grading, including grading associated with driveway or utility construction will occur within the setback off the top of slope along the river. A minimal amount of grading and some new landscaping may be placed in the top of slope setback areas. This grading will be only associated with regrading and revegetation after construction of the house. There will be no disturbance to the top of the riverbank slope itself. From my meeting with Glenn, it is also my understanding that there has been some discussion regarding what comprises the top of the river bank slope in this area based on a Top of Bank Analysis based on GIS data prepared by a consultant to the City. It is my understanding, again, that this has been resolved accepting the top of slope defined on the survey for the Stolper property. I would only note that, based on my site inspections, the top of slope defined on the property survey would appear to be a natural condition for the site and appropriately defined. 4. "The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and / or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks." Response: The proposed development of the Stolper property will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river. No grading or construction is proposed within the river channel, Special Flood Hazard area or riverbank. The project will incorporate temporary drainage, erosion and sediment control during construction as well as permanent drainage features that maintain historic runoff conditions on the property. 5. "Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency." Response: No alteration or relocation of the watercourse is proposed and, therefore, no such notice would be required. November 23,2005 - Mr. Nick Adeh, P.E. City Engineer Stolper Residence Stream Margin Review Engineering Analysis Page 3 6. "A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished." Response: As noted under item 5, no alteration or relocation of the watercourse is proposed and, therefore, no such guarantee would be required. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain." Response: No work or grading is proposed within the 100-year floodplain. 8. "There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive." Response: Any proposed landscaping taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope shall utilize approved native vegetation. 9. "All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope." Response: My understanding is that the project has demonstrated compliance with this criterion. 10. "A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation." Response: My understanding is that the project has demonstrated compliance with this criterion. 11. "All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150." Response: My understanding is that the project has demonstrated compliance with this criterion. 12. "Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level." Response: Per Item 9, my understanding is that the project has demonstrated compliance with this criterion. I 1 1 &J November 23,2005 Mr. Nick Adeh, P.E. City Engineer Stolper Residence Stream Margin Review Engineering Analysis Page 4 13. "There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones." Response: I have not seen the specific delineation of wetland or riparian vegetation zones that was prepared for the property but it is my general understanding that such areas are located closely adjacent to the river and are not subject to disturbance by the proposed house location and site plan. Conclusion I think that, from an engineering perspective, it is most important to note that the proposed Stolper residence is not located within the Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone AE) to any extent. While the requirements of City of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.435.080 C. 2. c. regarding development proposed in a special flood hazard area are, therefore, not applicable, the proposed structure indicates a lowest habitable floor elevation that is 2 feet or more higher than the Base Flood Elevation on the adjacent river. The project provides appropriate setbacks associated with the riverbank top of slope and will not alter the river channel or floodplain in any way. Subject to compliance with the drainage, disturbance and landscaping provisions of the Stream Margin criteria, I would conclude that the project, as presented, meets all of the technical requirements of the FEMA standards and City of Aspen code provisions. I hope this is helpful and responsive as a technical review of the Stolper residence pursuant to the City of Aspen Stream Margin Review standards. Mr. Horn and our client would request your confirmation of this analysis as appropriate to the property, or comments regarding any aspect of the Stream Margin Review Standards that you feel are not adequately addressed. I anticipate the Mr. Horn will be submitting a Stream Margin Review application on behalf of Michael Stolper within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions in this regard. Very Truly Yours, Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. /37 0 4~<t / ~,/jay W. Hammond, P.E. Principal, Aspen Office JH4h STOLPER1041.doc LUNE V /045.1 /000 Wit' vel... h..1 l./Â¥t -9 11. OL action); no base flood elevltions deler- 7746 v - mined. \ - 775~~f~ 7747 ZONE VE Coaital flood with velocity hazard (wave -Â£42Â» ZONE X action); base nood elev/ions dcterrnined. ~Ck F=739 FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET nza,02d soo 0 500 0 7755 ~4 43 H 0-3 \2~ F---7 OTHER FLOOD AREAS -\00 | | ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood: areas of 100-year flood with average depths aft'- g 77-p $b))# 00 ~ i ZONE X ~ ~ of tess than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100 is year flood. ZONE~V, - ~ 0 OTHER AREAS ZONE X / f ox Nk/r Â« )*#b ..f , 0- 4 ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500- year flood plain. 7 'USS ZONE D Area, in which flood hazards are 11 -1 undetermined 2 1 7771 8 Flood Boundary 0/4 ..t -C-OUNTY Zone D Boundary f d. 111TI0NAL FlOOD INSIIRANCE flotRAM Floodway Boundary ms 8 AS#9730 7-'00. 111% 4 tmÂ· 1781 11_li ~ ZONEAE 494$&954**3&46 Boundary Dividing Special Floo - Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Area of Different X Coastal Base Flood Elevatlons FIRM 7784 Zones. Flooo INSURANCE RATE MAP 40 - -C '2~-----~ Within Special Flood Hazard M 5 79".i ' * : Base Flood Elevation Line; Ele- ROARING FORK RIVER -513- vation in Feet* PITKIN COUNTY, /----00Â· 0 ~ ~ Cros, Section Line COLORADO AND %&/k FrifT 1,20 '. + 9~ 34 t ew 3 INCORPORATED AREAS ; ZONE X @i x Private Drive 0 Base Flood Elevation in Feet c (EL 987) 7798 ZONE X Where Uniform Within Zone* Z 6 % 1 RM7 Elevation Reference Mark PANELZ03 OF 325 302 . ~~ / 9 00 & 2 *Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 #2 ti I~ *Atfi-~~~>1:~, 7806 0 + 3 O NOTES I '.M 7836\ -- _ZE.1_ Â»-â€¢ BE. 1 1 . 'lu - 7833 \ -C.. ,0 ~ Â·Â·78â„¢ Â·Â·,GÂ·i f %41 /0 ......1.- 7819 7874 .0/0 +Ii --* 6*----i z and interpolated between cross sections. The noodway, were . , EFFECTIVE DATE: 94.: % Â«alÂ«~ , 1 I li -I-â€¢â€¢â€¢. 7819 , HALLAM ' X by flood control structures. I 14~ POWâ€¢â€¢ PLA~Â·27:5-- LAKE ~L - Â· ~ 7830 08097C0203 C 7823 2.t f,Â· 7~26 7828 LILI Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections H Â¢ i -h 7836 0 based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements 2 dil,wa JUNE 4,1987 14 1.1 1 ~ 9 7838 N ofthe Federal Emergency Management Agency. 'Agn -- i~.mVimpJ L 4 -*\7829 ~ h\-5' r 7825 ./ Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to 1;~~ Hunter 5Cale. Floodway widths are provided in the Flood Insurance 7833 4 4 Study Report. ~ilm ~ Fede,31 E-flency Minilim/nt Agency 7834 Coastal base flood elevatlors apply only landward of the shorellne. - / 4 F.:..:~--~ix-<--,4---v0~k1uJ 787_~ ~ 7837 Elevation reference marks are described in the Flood Insurance 1 ZONE AE ~~-Â·Â·Â·CZ::2~na=ji Study Report. 1 01 ---am O Corporate limia shown are current as of the date of this map. The d / f.-\,-Clj2< user should contact appropriate community officials to determine if corporate limits have changed subsequent to the Issuance of this map. 1 " 1%2Â»Jf--4/ 93 r. . 14Â«n--3 / For community map revision history prior to countywide map- Abandoned ping, see Section 6.0 of the Flood In.urance Study Report. Railroad Bridge For adjoining map panels sce separately printed Map Index. r 7857 \ // This . an ~Ikcial copy of a potion of tt,0 'tae re*.enced lood mal I See Map Index for Map Repo~itory. w- extracted u,Ing F-MIT OnÂ·Lina ThiI m/p ck,es not relect chang- /7861 \ ~Â« 3-----===j~Lxmm#xL hll,-*4&I846b- 44 1/ -Program,Â¤0Â£Im~p~ChecktheFEMAFIoodMapS,-,tw--In~clerrl,0~V or am"di'*I which may hm Men mnad, 'utÂ»equ-R to tlÂ» ciat, on th, 11 \9 title bloc k. For the 1/41 prDduct Â¢r,brnatle n 'bout Ngtlon' Flood Insu,anci ''- -- -I, 10') '' I' h.' 1 7775 ' DP * 7794 ~ 40/r , J .1.0 012.-11 .7 OZO-13/VISN. -lE#-a -4 4 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN: FEET 44 i 500 0 500 7 - 1-1 - 1 7842 4 7850 9-E, *HA-, ZONE X 1.r 4 +41 7855 156./ ~ * 3 7861 7859 ZONE AE ,_,~-/' 0 /91. 4, 1 7839 7840 * ***E LIMITOF ' 1 1 ' DETAILED STUDY ~ ' NATIONAL FLOOD â€¢SNANCE miRAN Co 4/< 4. 44 ~ ' FIRM 4 KING OR i FLOOD HISURANCE RATE IAP EB 7846 ,- 16 ~~| PITKIN COUNTY, 7 1 COLORADO AND ZONE X || ~ INCORPORATED AREAS p f Jpl e -'V *1 1 â€¢ 4 . # (.LA'*"Ive 14 ~ PANEL 204 OF 325 *F_- C <-1 , 3 \et.-7--39*01Â« ~ 111111 i 1 :111111 - 1 J 2 7856 ' 31, 4.16 16,4/4\ \4\\ %.~"I<%4\ lili 1- c-rgi -0 ~~f) 7854 7861 12 3.9.7. .. 7866~~ Â«3,~ZONE X 1 '1111 -la-"' - C 16-1 te-rÂ¥ . ROARING FOkUP~k.1 - '~1~ '4' ~~" EH ~'~~~~~'~~ ~ ~~ ~ RM~lut.Ir-fligw>< ~ ~~ Â· 2-788785 24~~10 / ~i~ ~'4 CLTYDMASPEN ~'Â·Â·~~~Â«31>_ ' ~ Â·: ~'' 08097CC204 C 11 19 41 1 $---. EFFECTIVE DATE: * loo,bridge N -709-nu/ e 'e .1% 1-1 4 44\ ./ M JUNE 4, 1987 i.Â·, a v ZO .E-22/,w- E // , 1-1 1 k Â£ i \-7 *A e 7898 <~to ~05 0/ J I l t ZONE X~ ~ 7885 ~ .111& >4 2 -Af Â»--37 ZONE X --1-- ~~||||~ Fedml Emer:~,cy Mal,x,cment A:ency 1 rati baz>_J I EJ ,- 1 11 - ..1 12Â»Â»i: 1, 9 ' 7913 1 4 4Â©-JI Fowh,idge ,Â·7917 r- ~i424 l__ 7894 , ~ 5 ~1~~~~~=-~ N /9 1 1 \\ 2 51 11 2----- ~ â‚¬ / n p.-4'Bij / O 5, 7921 lEi -347-- L 6211!122 9 1 rfen-Jt .f --Â»r------- P W 4 01 -7 Par>-4 elrn. e. .304 4 Thâ€ž i. an ofAclal comy of a portion cf the above relefenced Ilood mal It m i W<11 u * /932 1 / 4- extracted using F-MIT On-brle Thls rep d- rk* relect chinges -fl--,riZ~~*uf- a--= /K~ )) Program Aced map- check the FE MA lood Map Store It -- rn,c.fe" gov --9 424'12%\ or Imenammt' which m- hal- bell made .le=,quer,1 to the .t' or, the ~tle block. For the late,t product m./. about Natlon' Flood In'urance /1. .- .6 r- ..j. 19 ROAD mVINAM |FOLD JOINS PANEL 0203 7845 7843 RED MOUNTA IN ROAD~ I , @ i (S> i @ i Â® i @ i I i Â® , 0 DESIGNWORKSHOP _ _ . ~ _ LandsÂ©~pe Arth'tectwre Â· Land PI-â€¢r.. ' P n R â„¢ACT NO 1 Ort- -./. Tou.. Pla-Ing - 120 E- Main Str- Aspen. Colarado 81611 U 1 1, e ' Facsh".f:='387 i... / 1 .. Â« \ 92,< 7 1 I / \7 ...- . 1 I , '0'-/li' ~I.- F / \'' 'hx ~ 1 I. ..4 f \ N ' 1 I I \ \ I *A . 5 80* 10 EL '\ 1 IDOUNO EL \ \ 1 l.56 \ 0/0. \ \ - ' 1- -----211-0----t--7. P~SOXNDEL\' t<17 0 .Ar \ - 1 0\ U ..M...... . 0 1 *0 \ ilgj.fâ‚¬~Mr-4 , 1 1 %----33 .: -20-4*44 4& \~ 2 :/ 1 4'.'24. Rf/-3 - >Ci~*i PA-. w* C7;.ciItkÂ·) ' f i,*1 Uy. 9 . t 7-Â«Â»' Â·L , 5,1 1 f ;\,3 ~aled#FL4*_-fer'*4* - - 5 -~ _ It47fs-=..i;,22 - 4/2 .. 1 \ .4 I -- - - 6 - 1 - w , 1 - 4. " \3* 4 . \ rJÂ·J'\ . ~. 02-469-~Â»i--4 1- f~,~~-> t . , 0 1 1 - 2XX - - ./ I - 4 ROARING F RK RIVER 0 64 Ir..rtri - 1 \.. ..4. El ELJ 3 ..3. 4 Ull At -Â· 1 r. \.1 It. C \ 1 1 64.g .' t.\; T\/ \ / '-I ..1 , Â· I . i I TOP OF SLOPE SETBAO( Ij~ , : -7 \ \ _ I [1~TE .SCIPTION -2 23,...:24 44.-- Ir -T.i\.\ I ... . ,Â·4 V ... '1- co.Ccu,â€¢ ROARING FORK RIVER % % I . PRO,IECT NLÂ»,mER n EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROPOSED BUILDING SprÂ«T ~A-Ell @ 1 Â® 1 0 1 Â® 1 0 - ----- t .......0--- -- 30N3GIS3h1 kl3d101S Elad1019 13Â¥HOIIN 00Â¥hl0100'NadSÂ¥ SCHMUESER ~ GORDON ~ MEYER GLENWOOD SPRINGS ASPEN 118 W. 6TH, SUITE 200 P.O. Box 2155 ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ASPEN, CO 81612 970-945- 1004 970-925-6727 FX: 970-945-5948 FX: 970-925-4157 December 8,2005 Mr. Glenn Horn Davis Horn, Inc. ATTACHMENT , L_etÂ· 215 South Monarch St., Ste. 104 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Stolper Property, Re-Location of Shady Lane Dear Glenn: I am writing in follow-up to our discussion regarding the traffic safety aspects of a proposal to re-locate Shady Lane within the Michael Stolper property, as well as its intersection with Red Mountain Road, approximately 17 feet to the northwest. My understanding is that Mr. Stolper is interested in relocating Shady Lane and the related access easement in an effort to provide for a somewhat larger yard area for his new home at 17 Shady Lane. Based on a further site visit to observe the ramifications of relocating the intersection and an exhibit map prepared by Design Workshop (attached) it would be my general opinion that the proposed relocation will improve sight distances at the intersection with a resulting improvement in traffic safety. The proposed relocation of Shady Lane to the northwest moves the intersection with Red Mountain road closer to the "apex" of the curve in the County road as it transitions from the vicinity of Lone Pine Road to the bridge across Hunter Creek and the climb up to Red Mountain. Relocating the intersection in that direction allows for somewhat better sight distances onto Red Mountain Road both to the north and to the southeast. To the north, the sight distance is improved in the range of 50 or 60 feet toward and beyond the Hunter Creek bridge. To the southeast, the improvement may be closer to 100 feet in that the relocation moves the intersection away from the existing solid fence and vegetation located close to the roadway. While relocating the intersection approximately 17 feet to the northwest is a modest change, the improvements to the sight distances onto Red Mountain Road are noticeable. My only recommendation with regard to the proposed relocation would be that the solid fence along the northeast property line of the Stolper property not be extended along the property line to the new access easement. In my view, the current fence is itself an obstruction to the sight lines at the intersection and any new fence, if one is to be constructed, should be set back from the intersection approximately 30 feet as I have noted on the attached exhibit drawing. I hope this is helpful and responsive with regard to the traffic safety ramifications of relocating the Shady Lane Intersection. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions in this regard. 6 -- - December 8,2005 Mr. Glenn Horn - Stolper Property Shady Lane Intersection Page 2 Very Truly Yours, Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. 00? g- - Jay W. Hammond, P.E. Principal, Aspen Office JH4h Stolper_Int.doc helâ‚¬11 0 2=â‚¬ Vig.. L ft.03.05/*4 *:illt'*9"f '4<072gi.z m,m,m,t â€žIM"#" 14 P.O.B.TRACT NO . 1 \ PROPOSED As PROPERTY LINE \ O \ EXISTING .......... ......... ........... PROPERTY LINE ............... -&9 .............. ............ .....L:r: e STOLPER RESIDENCE , ................ ..-..... .-- .........2................. ....M.... ./ I lili.....dy#.....I - I Â·Â· .. %. .. ......... -,4. .............. * ................. ................. ................... MATCH EXISTING .................................. /. (, PAVEMENT , ~~''''' '*~ ''*''''~'~''~''''''~~'~'~''~-'~ VISION 0 1 - ...... 9.-- - 0 ..... .... CONE ......... \ - ....... EXISTING EDGE 0 0 -'. . ... ........ OF PAVEMENT 0 ..... /6// ... ........9. ......... PROPOSED EDGE epy - 8 e. ................... ... OF PAVEMENT ....................... 5 // ...................................... 00 -. M- 9 .................................. ............................... m ....................... ............. / -20 3 --7- \ -----* -.I -- ~ STOLPER RESIDENCE l ~ ATTACHMENT It rorrf. STOLPER RESIDENCE SHADY LANE REALIGNMENT 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, CO ~ DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscaoe Architectureâ€¢ Land Plannina â€¢ Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning 120 E-t 1.- 9-1 â€¢ Alperf Color- 81611 â€¢ g70Â·82~Â·8364 Fic:-- 070Â·82O-1387 5 10 so 12-15-2005 0,01Â®10'ele,01 1@ 1 1 00.64\ 11 DESIGNWORKSHOP :.1 . 1 Lmdialpe Alchitartui â€¢ Lm, Plinning i ~ ' POB.TRACTNIO.1 . Urban De~gr â€¢ TourIGm PirIng V .43Ude - .43,57, - Daur Â· Solt I.:h CK, c 44 4* Y S.a P. . 5,zau,~a . PAoau - ZAF Tal. i-Â·-.-/ht 1 //lil \ Aspen, Colocado 81611 12Â©East Mah Stmet i ' 4 5~'.13 , /; ----- ----fiÂ·- 0-m~-r - \4 4~- 0-4-7/5 1/ .1 (970)-925-8354 / Factimib (970) 920-13387 Ihi '' \ ft/./.-<,i~ ~9~1~// WWW.DESIGNWOQ<SHO P.CO\( Â» 1 // 44 LMLL,A lf '1 -z W< 7 rf .A 111 \ .g.. - 1 ; 1\ .1, ///35,~/-4 k>~4~Â»/-f..1 >40.~<09'f\> \<l\\\ - U,1 Â»de~ -.13.-~< . X\.4\\t~00,+ \,\, -\\\-- tiNG'I . 9 O C - It- -\ Â® 10 , /-/0370.- </.,-~V .0. :f: 21:.in,63 V. ,:- 0, Â·t, \Ap . U.1 1 \ 1% -,4.-11- ..1, . 0 ..,k 4*, Palic. ./. -- *.1.05 1 49 r 4-8 4Â©/170'.LI-lf 4 44.-\:1 742' - M . 0 \ .. : 7 iN " 7~*. 1 1 15 - 1. 12 %.r:449*0.-40 Â£1*30/ 1.4 *4.:t.-243. : 0- Â·7Â· /-: / Ul a 1 7--7:Will<.17 .2//- - d \/211,1, 6 .% 3 ./ u. - I. Â·C I --9 -> \ 4 \ 0 1 1 . CL Ul I I. -1 .\U- 4- -Wrf#k.\ .A'V -,behdhv '1/ . , t ~4 ,- 4'31 '1. -2,* ~ 22 :**381<4 39-Jilliati#. ~ 3.i %Â£ :. ~ . 6. 12-1/6 - ~ :-- *. %4 : U.1 " < Â¢ .4- 9 21<2 i. r' il :<*2- 216:L 0 9. - &Â»1<, r.tÂ· f \ h X " SP*LFLOOD - i: ' .=~ A.OW-:i'.2 -4 1 f / 4 2 12 X. i> .4,;'.fÂ¥ /4 J 454*0< / 7 1. 1 t \ 'MAE=55 . I I $ Ar.. . 2.L.-4.-al N /1 '129 F.?D PL- \4 N \ I. . Il \ . ~9.~ 9 .4 01: .' <51 ) 5 \.-LA +. tel .. 1 .ATTACHMENT l Z -2-<-=24.-Â·-7' *12 - r. Zi, k '1.19 1,1 J *.3% O -7 1 9â‚¬. \*/4 â€¢41 # ROARING FORK RIVER /-7 . w 4Â», Â·tÂ· Â· 'T * Z . 2 --* . Â»43 . . 2,1 -,4. -2 ~ ' id; . ~ . 4,7- j -1 . 20 40 1 6, .2 -. A : -, Ic< ; : -Ibr. i iI-, Â· ,- - 4 -1,-7 7/ ... 142.40 \ â‚¬ ' .1 b *94Â»44 -L N> C\ 4 21, 2007 HANNIS DITT \ 81_250. P<0818 '' .~1 4~~4~5kith \4 -- V d. 1/ /3.14 ; \34\ \ 41-.4 #pAN--.mAN1# ~ >74M b'Â«*4 \%~ DECEYBER 16. MOZ TOP C>f- SLOPE -- 1 9 TOPOF SLOPE SETBA<* \ h - -: ae,/ I 10,6 WEANFIGHWATM # DAm DESCRPÂ·nON t, .t: 24 ar-// 1 07 MAZAROAREA SPECIAL FLOOD \ .21Â£1 h.. ~-1%1090 PLAN> ~ a.xÂ·x<x ... -/-- / re\%,;1 ...9- 4- 47...1/'\A\*\ V D \ - I .4 ,~ t.=-4. -77- --fi -=24.13 '= .1 -h ROARING FORK RIVER \1. 544<>% .ft, .-2 -2-r- '' . 3 F2 J, 43Â©6\~ki>111 '" ' ~ __ _ i If.. / <ce * 14>.0 .14% 4-<4"-,S\~ \*\05\.1 \0 \ .... Ch Â·144,~ 110334(93414 ~ STREAM DIAWN: 51 RENEWED: HIt Own 1 1 //, //11~~ .\\ \11~~11\\ 1111 \,\ //; 14/ - 14ulb REVIEW SET COLLAPSED 011 CHI HEADCATE APPROXIRATE LOCATONOF cÂ»Â«34*~1Â¢22<~: 6 MARGIN V r + /.u 2Â·Â·Â·Â·:>c.c<i.> kic>tly>ff>ft~~ * 40\ \31 .4-Â»Â©\\\ \30 j.\\\\ ...\ \ PCO.,.CT N JUEER: 3803 \ e lim / STREAM MARGIN 1 4///- :-44<>,441*./ REVIEW PLAN 1 lip/ 4 ---- 2>:49<,r\033.~?~ .0 40/9 \ Na \ 49\ 1 j A'l \ IME.NUE Â»434% 4 :\\ Â»- -13:3 (di---* .4'7 1 iI, â€žu~ " L5-02 r - . \,\\\ \ I 1'0 'Â®''e'Q 'Ble,Â®,Â®, 1 Hi d ENS 'ON 0 - 'Â·- ilad-IO.LS 13VHOIIN @lÂ®l@ @1Â®tÂ®'Â®lÂ®l DESIGNWORKSHOP Landicape Archltectum . Land Planning Urban Doilgn â€¢ Toullim Planning AskeÂ·, Ze . A:pm . Dgm- Â· Saft Lah Cily . Sant,1 Fe . S-iago â€¢ Phoe= Â· Loka Tahoe 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM 4: cL 15/Be- 111 Ligitaki,AA, 202&~es==-.a Â· A * A inz , 6 A h ..1 1 ~11 ~-A\--A-Â»)(c--/b ---1..I. 0 / -2 ... I . R , _ Et 4 111 0 *A~41**tuff -4. 1 4 - h . 4 ' - - 4 .. 15 TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK h. %.1 1111111 Ill 11 , LTOP OF SLOPE . / Â· ~-7837.5 FRINGE ZONE 1- SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ~ EAST ELEVATION 1/18Â·=1 ./Â«..* f 3..7 @ --u -.---Plum#FAML* gh '9~. *4--IdvriÂ£24.T-Â·I.-1---Mp-'- -~f~~~~.i-LA<11Mi- #t- A.4~1~4--~i* LknL-3.Ut~r 4-11# al I 2154 a NOFITH 0 8Â· le 32 1:16-00Â· -' --9#1 9*, 4Â£9029134,31*416.2 $*IlNIA- 2/0,~6 - r.1 1-L_ -le'~2' ni . -jâ€žt / OF /, 1 . ISSUE DATE. DECEMBER 15, 2005 REVISIONS # DATE DESCRIPTION -ENE -,Â· - ~ ~- ~_c-JJ11)4 : t# ~-15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK ~~G~ONE - - SPECIAL. FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) /23 SOUTH ELEVATION DRAWN: EXY REVIEWED. HH 1/18Â· = 1 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER. 3838 SITE Â® SECTIONS SHEET NU.BER A-1406),ruit / 3 | | | O | W | Â® I Â® I Â® I @ Â®COPYRIGHT.............,INC DISEIhI klad1019 il3d10-LS 13Â¥HOIMI 00Â¥10100'NadSÂ¥ -C OÂ«IRÂ© 6-0 ..... 4. Ar . 2,95 51' 713 33 104 /7 . 30'14 26'[ - n.1 1 1W W 48 ,0 13 . 33â€¢JJ â€ž'â€¢ ~ 6 f - 1Â·-30Â· a .,-ND AND NOTES RED MOUNMIN 0 30 80 4---,0--50-~ INACT NO 1 ~4 PO M RGO MOUNTAIN AOAD R " 1 im)NTEP CREEK 2 FOOT CONTOURS 1 8 SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q FOUND OR 5FT SURVEY MONUMFIT AS DESCRIOFD , i BEAR,NG ARE GEODETIC. BASED oN CltÂ¥/COUNTY GP' \ i % DIll, r,~" , /- Â§,003,1 r ./ WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 7, 1 >1,11~ 0 0 701'il MONUENTS 112 AND Ill 4 05'43 01'l IGRID bEARINOF THNIMIP 10 MOUTH, RANOE MANHOLE . 4 1 40 1~54 1.L.M. 8RASS CAP Â· ~~ i- - -fi-L 04 IEST OF THE O,H P M 1 / ///// 1 \\ O IT 11 1 TY BOX 1 4 1/ 1 1 1 //7/ / - 4, 4. a --1 lu/Jr 1 TRACT NO 1 1 --\ I /6, 3 STONA I f F 'UNDAT IO .*i- 0 r=47â‚¬Â°64Â£44. / ../., --, -,#, - - :. E-f /4777\.. 0 /luk POLE Â·g a 7830 1% ~ 8 Â·. . 5 5 . 7.i--35:, ./1 't.1 -75-- /1 2 .\ 'EN/. 'U. -eT'\}t BRASS cAP ME POP HARR U DUCH 15 DOES NO r FiT 0...r / 'elf, I i \ 11 SA - , - 4. %. r.'521:Mt: E:~t"EIL -- - 3 f 3 -5--Il.459<J:~- -Â·)~4-1 + PI TKIN COUNrY 1 Ill,-. INC 'IhE I NFORMAT Â·ON PROVIDED BY ~r 1 4 Â·36 CASE NO PCT15608L MTED OCTOBER 6, 2000 2. /9 - -Ii --F CALLS IN [ 1 BOOK 49 AT PAGE 21 \fs /,CC,4.46 ' -t~ 1 *.M' 3/,9,1 Ep / 1 -8 ' 1 . \ 1 9 P <54 , sET 100 fER CLOOD PLAIN AND FLOODWAY DIGITTZED / -i~ ~ ~ P,YEMENT CITY OF ASPEN DEPIRTMENT OF ENGINEERING MAP - c \./. 1 i Al.-~- V /.*, LO{LIT IONS NEED TO ~E FIELD VERFIED GEFORE CONSTRUCTION WATER'.,Nt \ --2 EL,~_3, tul. 1 1, TPEE O OR GREATER LOT wS COVERED W Th TREES NOT ALL TRIES LOCATED - I-----I- TOP OF 5LOPE - 6 -..1 id // -D \\ CP / (3 .... 1 lIe [ ATTACHMENT _ _a 2, + - IICI 1 / 4:,3 1- /U./ 1 , 0 : - W .\ 1 I 0 \ \ 100 Â¥1- I. s k 000 P: A i N , ' 11 \ 1 , i / ~ CERTIFICATION 1 1 1 , ~ THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTÂ¥ DESCRIBED HEREON IAS : U ov.*â€¢0 9/-2%/ 1 \ a .-T , BASED ON TIE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO - 1 111 lihz=- --' 7 01 SCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LIAE Co*LICTS ENCROACIENTS, :=IE-D SURVEYED DURING ,Â·4,Â£*61* Â· i Z.~El,L 'â€¢4[ -5 ACCURATE -' v-M 1 EASEMENTS O. RIGHTS OF 'AY IN AELD EVIDENCE OR ~NOWN TO ME e \ 1 . 112 008 -*.C- 40 EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE&ROUND Ill.biL:/c,PA Â«\Â« \ - 1206 \ SURIETOR ARE Â¢*CBMEWâ€¢n/51,1 15 SURVEY 1 5 vOID UNLESS WET STAMPED 1 -- DKWStap#9/Â£31*/ jk - 1 . f "Â«f~ -4 I .14. 1 6Â·4 .1.14 TPE,SEAL,~P"PM,jial,1,~D~ BELOW. APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUP,L i ED TO TIE 4\ -< -ILT -YAN * 4 -0,"A IM 7 6. I i~ 0 i . FLOODWAY \ t e\ .' ... JOH,/9 b.0 4271~4059+93 ..7 Top OF (..4 Ah , 7 . Câ€ž-2\0: -/ 2*Â·,i-241 SLOP; - h ----- ----2~ JEDÂ»FIL&h ./ -- . %\4 4, - 111 44../...26/ 40/14/40 ~ \ ..... 22 ,3, i .5. '.\ SE OF BUTTERMILK , . \ 1 \ ~: 0<.....5<~<tur%9=-010\- STREAM MARGIN DEV,EW SURVEY 1 U,94 RIVE .\,41*Toe L.1.-261- 0. \14\ 4.., \ , 4 . 0 \ \\ :\ - - --\- ..\. I. '. \\ NK RANGE 84 WEST OF THE W PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED FS FOLLOWS: -HE FO:LOWING TRICTS OF LANC LOCATED ;N SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH; 02\14,N 12.2-1--7%9 Â»40 4%~~ t.\\ 437 TRACT NO 1 \- 0%9<43-: T tÂ«~oot-Â»' 7 o REGINNING AT CORNER NO, 1, A P'NE POST I+ENCE THE WEST 1 /4 CORNER TO SECTION 7, ~~N~~!0410 SOUTH, RANGE 8â€¢ IEST 0' THE 6:h P M.. BEARS wEST 562.8 FEET: U.S.L. BEARS S 28'04 E 3654.4 FEET 7/ENCE EAST 376 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET 'HENCE N 7i'34'W 395 3 FEET. THENCE NORTH 75 FEET, IO THE PLICE OF BEGINNING. VAR!*TION OF 1440 E. p ~ 4 4,ED BIKE DITH TRACT NO. 2 REG ~ 44 i NG THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT DESCRIBED :N DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12,PITK IN COUNTY C.ERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE 'BEING ALSO THE THENCE SOUTH L25 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BANK 76â‚¬ ROAR lie FORK R 1 VER SOUTHEAST CORNER O# TRACT 1 ABOVE} : \/24\\I \ \\\ \,1h\ MORE OR LESS. THENCE â€¢ESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK RIVER 305 FEET Â«Â«24 1 ..1 z :: THENCE NORTH 150 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH L j NE OF SA ID TRACT DESCR Â·BED BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK IND RECORDER 5 OFFICE. THENCE SOUTH 71 34 E 34!.3 FEET TC THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. TRAct NO 3 100 VE.9 ..000 p i ..j"~ 351.dE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH R IGHT OF #Y L NE Oi THE COUNTY p \\ e~' Bee:INi NG AT A POINT WHENCE -HE WEST 1 /4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOI*ISHIP 10 1... \/ SOUTH, R-GE 84 WEST OF THE e,K P M , BEARS NORTH 200 00 FEET, AND WEST 938.6 FEET THE Â¥RUE POINT OF MINGULAR PARCEL MORE FULLY DESCRJBEO IS FOLLOWS) M FLOODWA~ ROID) 4 D STANCE OF 300 FEET '0 THE .NTERSECTION OF- 5â€¢ 1 2/3 viâ„¢ THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER: -HENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 4-ONG THE NORTH BANK 012 T-E ROAR ING FORK RIVER â€¢ DÂ·STANCE 210.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF -HAT CERTAIN TRACT ~~~D~D IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE 2 -â€¢ . "â€¢ 94 CLERK AND THENCE NORTH 125.0 FEET TO THE Polv-' OF BEGINNING, BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AESCR @ED ..,PON DEED RECORDED IN SOOK 177 AT PAGE :28, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE -RAC, No 4 BEGINNiNG IT A POINT *WENCE THE IEST 2,4 CORNER OF SECTION 7 TOWNSH I P .0 SOUÂ¥1, R.ANGE 84 WEST OF TIE 6,6 PM, BEARS NORTH 175.06 IEEr, AND VEST 938 6 Fl THENCE 5 44Â·29 24Â·E 159.10 FEET THENCE S 34'05 00 E 119.84 FEET -,coâ€¢ - Â·r . . . THENCE S 52.30.00-w 52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE â€¢PARENT MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE ROARING FORK R+VER THENCE 21.9 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE NORTH 32*06'24- WEST 258.90 FEET. / PROPER*Y EXCEP-'NG FROM THE ABOYE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED @iG NNING /f A POINT WHENCE THE WES' 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOCT, 4IGE 84 WEST Of THE 6,k P M BEARS IEST 802.70 FEE~, MICE MT 63.49 FEET TUENCE 7)84 â‚¬5.09 'BET To -RE POMNT OF BEGINNING OF TRACT 3 IMENOED . THENCE 58 48 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO -IE LEFT IHOSE RADIUS is 153.33 FEET, CHORD BEARS S 33'33 47'E 58.13 FEE-. THENCE 5 4â€¢*29 244Â· E 57.40 FEET NENCE 4 44â€¢29Â·1â€¢Â·w L 18.55 FEET -/ING- IMÂ· r â€¢ ING A CURVE -O D.E RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS 15 213.33 FEE 7, BEARS N 32 :t .04 77 FEET 70 PE Poll OF BEG MNI NG iNDAPE'.DI NCL F'/st CONTAIN NG 93,0~>3 SO IT ./. PREPARED BY ES?EN SUR'vEY ENGINEERS, I .e,AF,MFE:â‚¬Er'vy'FPE:PE,Â©Â· 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Ei:F,19,%3~9:it:bESEME'K: PHONE/PAX ~970) 925-3816 DATE )08 - SHEET : OF 2 3/01 280926 81 V' 1 131VbÂ¥/ Nfl Â°4Â· I ..0 '61 I 11 c , :53 37Â¢ 4. 5/ L j . &1.13 ., . IL- *END 10.r E 5 to.-M---1 / 6-3 133 30 ., Q FOUND Oâ€¢ BET WRVEY MOIL-NT M OFICA,8,0 /.0. fRACT NO i , /6/ RFO 11(-TAIN RON) 1' 4 I 1 *ki 0 VA â€¢E 8 r 562.0 1 -_.__-____lf_L , 1 -.~ ... * BEARINO ARE GEODETIC AAUD ON CITY/COUNCY G P 5 11 30â€¢vE i coN,Noi poiwi ~ 1' \' 1-1 94, 1,â€¢,â€¢ O /(11 1 TY BOX t.,r 170 1 \ '.\\ - TOWNSH I, 10 SOUrif, MANOI' ~ ~i i WEST 1/4 CORNER RECTION /, 1 .10:1, MONUMENM [12 AND 111 N 05â€¢41 01Â·W [r/IL, BEARING) - 8411â‚¬,T OF '111 61,1, M .4' , -39+1 , ,/ 1934 8.L M BRAS3 CAP IRACT F. 1 -' 1 MANHOL E (9 l/q )F f /91 ~041"M 1 : / . V. i ill/,DA'if,k ..IMIL 1 20 4 e IND 0 Ul IL I . POLE , 1 I .- â‚¬ 45 hz=k\JEF~ 0 ..I IN~ m-f. AND*IK 178 / - - G BRASS CAP - 'e/ x/0 4 4 i \ / 4 , TIE FOR HARRIS DITCH IL DOES NOT FIT SFORM~~ E::tMENT TITLE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY i'- L 44+ z 1 . I + 4 r 0 49 \ \ PI TRI COUNTY TITLE, INC ' CASE NO PCT15808L 4 DATED OCTOBER 8, 2000 $ CALLS IN { 1 BOOK 49 AT PAGE 2 1 'o>OU f SliT 'Ir \ \ & ,fof~ :Ia 9- / 0,0/ / \%(60, #A,RK ING 2 *ATERL,NE _ .01\1 ~~ER~A~ ~:..It=2<2-\-ivj----\~ ..1,-- \4\--% 11 j 1 \ U' 1 . 5 0 ATTACHMENT 5 : ':18::. 1 11â€ž 'HOUSE :11\, .4 k 1.1 \ PORTRAIT NO. 4 1\\\ 4. 1, -JaL-41 2 Z,/ *- 40 1 MA- 1 . . 9184 ~, THE UNDERSIGNED ST,TES THIT THE PROPERT, DESCRIBED HEREON WAS OUT ' ~L'/ â€¢â€¢110 _|! \ \ ,= -ill--- , 1 1 9 1 ALUM I ' ~ ~\ FIELD SURVEYED DURING inc.-r- 2000 AND IS ACCURATE ~ / 1 1-- 10:i:EMA:':IN:* I PO B 'RACT NO 2 AN@/3 f , 1 1~. \ ExCEPT AS HEREIN SHOWN UNDERGROUND UT ILi T NES Â¥i! TH NO MOVE&ROUND CERTIFICATION 1,1/... \, .0\ D, SCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L t~E CONFLICTS j ENCROâ€¢CHiENTS, - 43% BASED ON THE FIELD EV IDENCE AS SHOWN AND +HIT TAERE ARL NO < 1 1 EASEMENTS OR RIGHIS OF *AY IN FIELD EÂ¥13ENCE OR KNOWN TO ME 1 ~ \ - APPURTENANCES AN[1 0*WENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE -- \ .4\K ,Â«t 1 \ :.\ C I TH THE SEAL OF T# SURIEFOR BELOW SURVEYOR ARE /XCEPTEO. Â¥445 SURVEY :S VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED 0\. L 4, 1 1: 4 OATEO:_aiatop -I . _. s -6\. S \I JOID,11 "0.0,tlprÂ®=I:.7~7 11 91\ e %60+ 0 ' . -0 +* /4-4 2 -=-1 . G /?0/14+ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF \\ 11 0344 00-1 R/v THE FOLLOWING TRACTS OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP to SOUTH E4 RANGE 84 WEST OF T/E Sth PRINCIPA. MERICIAN DESCRI~ED AS FOLLOIS ~ TRACT No 1 =Cl . BEGINNING /T CORf R 40 1 , PINE POST WHENCE THE IEST 1/4 CORNER TO SEC-'ON 5 \ \ BEARS S 28'04 E 3654 4 FEET TOWNSHIP 10 500â„¢, 2INGE ~4 IEST OF THE 6,r, PM, BEARS WEST 562 6 REET USLM UTE NO 4 < THENCE EAST 376 FEET THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET THENCE N 71'34, 395.3 FEET. SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% 26,850 S. At .10- -Â·~ \ \ ,<1 , PAVED BIKE PATH THENCE NORTH 75 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. VARIATION OF 14â€¢40+E TRACT NO. 2 /~4 : \ BEGINNING THE SOUTMEAST CORNER O% A TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12 P ITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE f 8E!4G 41SC TWE C~ \ SOUTHEAST CORNER O~ TRACT 1 ABOVE) THENCE SOUTH 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO TIE NORTH BANK 'r.â‚¬ IDIA z NG Â·Â·091' R , VER \%\ THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH JANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK ~ i VER 303 CEET MORE OR LESS: TMENCE NORTH 150 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SUD TRICT DESCR I BED $ BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12 0 0:TKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER 5 OFFICE: SLOPES BETWEEN 20-30% 3,570 34. A: -tk THENCE SOUTH 71 34'E 341 3 FEET To THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. ~ TRACT No. 3 BEGINNING IT A POINT mâ‚¬ICE THE IEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7~ TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTI, RANGE 84 IEST OF THE 6,h P M BEARS NORTH 200.00 FEE AND WEST 938 6 FEET ; THE TRUE POINT OF TR :ANGULAR P~RCEL MORÂ·E FULLY DESCRI BE6 is FOLLOWS } THEN,bE soUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH IGHT OF WAY L INE OF THE COUNTY ROAD A DI STANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE INTERSECT I oN OF SAID ROAD ITH THE NORTH <, BANK OF THE ROAR ING FORK RIVER : THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK RIVER A DISTANCE 210.0 FEET TO THE SOUThEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTA IN TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOOK 49 IT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE P I TK IN COUNTY CLERK 4.C RECORDERÂ· THENCE NORâ„¢ 125.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING/ BEING THE SAME P#CIERTY AND RECORDERS OFFICE. DESCRIBED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGE i28, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK TRACT NO 4 BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7 TO*NSHIP 10 SOUTH, RINGE 84 REST OF THE 6,h PM, 8EAR 5 NORTH 175.06 FEE4, AND WEST 938 6 FEET, THEN& 5 44~2924E 159.to FEET. THENCE S 34'05 00-E 119 84 FEETÂ· THENCE 5 52'30 00-â€¢ 52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER ,!NE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER. THENCE NORTH 32'06 24' WEST 258.90 FEET THENCE 24 9 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF 8661 NNING EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEGINNING Ar A POINT â€¢HENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION ' fOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6,h PM, BEARS WEST 802 70 FEEt THENC( EAST 63 4 FEET: THENCE 58.48 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS IS 153 33 FEET. CHORD BEARS S 33'33 47-E 51 13 FEETÂ· THENCE S 44Â·29 24'E 57.48 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 85.82 REET TO THE PoiNT OF BEGINNING OF TRACT 3 AMENDED: THENCE N 44*29 24'W 118.55 FEET THENCE 105.86 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THâ‚¬ RIGHT Â¥HOSE RWAUS I 213 33 IEET~ CHORD BE/RS N 30'16 26-Â» toâ€¢ 77 FEET TO THE Poril y BEGINNING CONIANNING 93,653 SO. =T. * PRAPAP:r, ir ASÂ°EN SURVEr INGINE.ERS, i NG. 35.EFEREÂ·ts'Â·?SEWLiHit,=, 210 â€¢,OUT,1 GALINA STREET KiME,5.Fill;)01:it:~.ew$0% /SPEN, COLORADO 816ll PHONE/FIX :970 925 3816 DITE J08 10,00 *92/ CÂ¥0'.V' 1 02 89 --Â·- 390 Â¢ 88 - Â·_ 0988-. . k r 4,; ~~drew Antipas ~ Ecological & Environmental Consulting, LLC 6 Le,[4 .17 ATTACHMENT 11/14/01 Alice Davis Davis Horn, Inc. 215 S. Monarch Suite 104 Aspen, CO 81611 Reference: Bell Residence Stream Margin Review Red Mountain Road, Aspen Dear Ms. Davis, On November 7, 2001 I visited the Bell Residence at the intersection of Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane in Aspen, Colorado. A light rain was falling and temperatures were in the 50's. The proposed project is to construct a new home on this site. Photos of the project area are attached to this letter. Determination I have reviewed Aspen City Planning Code Section 26.68.040, and this project is consistent with the Stream Margin regulations. This project will not impact riparian vegetation or wetlands along the Roaring Fork River. There is a sharp topographic break, which deftnes the top of bank for the Roaring Fork River in the project area (Figure 1 and Photo 1). This topographic break also defines where the landscaped yard ends and where the riparian vegetation begins. Historically, the project area would have fallen within the riparian zone of the Roaring Fork River. However, all that remains of this plant community are mature cottonwood trees. It appears that the cottonwoods were thinned when the existing house was built, and the riparian understory vegetation was replaced with turf grass (Photo 2 and 3). This thinning and understory removal occurred throughout the flatter portions of the property. The steep riverbank appears to be left relatively undisturbed. However, the construction and maintenance of the Harris irrigation ditch, which parallels the river, have also caused regular disturbance within the riparian zone. The construction of Red Mountain Road appears to have disturbed the north edge of the property. The uneven distribution of road fill characterizes this portion of the property (Photo 4). 0285 Crystal Circle, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-963-8297 aantipas@sopris.net Ket, ' I. 0. Wetland Investigation No wetlands were observed in the project area. The routine criteria as described in the Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Delineation Manual was utilized for the investigation. The 1987 manual utilizes the three parameters of vegetation, soils, and hydrology to identify wetlands. No hydrologic indicators were observed and no hydric soil was present. Cottonwood trees can and do occur in wetlands, but this site is well drained. The river and Harris ditch are providing the moisture necessary to support the cottonwoods. Thank you for the opportunity to provide ecological consulting services. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Uu A no-- Andrew Antipas ~ / 1 45' . I / + , f f 9 - - I . 1 I AS , I. -- i ..4-1 9.9 - , 1 N f -- A 67.e# .2.-1 , : JhÂ»7--,- 1,Â·44* u r r--â€¢UÂ»fÂ· . :, - ; -,t -1 - ,â‚¬ J tâ‚¬ ~319 -'4'4 1.4, e 312% . /4 twily&/14 y Rk: I .1.~ es: . .12 '. 1 - ,.. M / . Photo 1. Looking west at the top of bank, which defrnes the boundary between the riparian vegetation and the landscaped yard. 1. '/ 4. ... :Â· - 4 .iI.fâ‚¬*AF -:- n .2 k. 4 Â· ..4 ... . 4 - - , 2.- m .1 - 2#repa:.1-,t<5'2):TW#4*-47 -W-1-' -1646. f*â‚¬~ . .tÂ· I 4,2. r,+ 1 â€¢ .,r . 'Â· iâ€¢k . - J '4 . . I. Photo 2. Looking south from the southeast corner of the house. : W .0 - r - A -7-. Â· Â·. r ,.9 f, 3 4 . i ' - --<13~7'-Â·.39- 1 1 - i - .: 30Â£ .:1* f-*.- ' ..,019"ly.*P....t ./ 1 * :- I. â€¢ - Er,54. SJ/9 I. Photo 3. Looking east. Note the northeast corner of the existing house and the mowed turf g rass. 6,1 - . f .. . .. â€¢â€¢ 4. - - : t. 9 tr-,-1 71 ..M...441 . Â·p- A -Â£- , L. A 3 L - 1 1 ~~wr " 1 1 ...F . M .... Photo 4. Looking north towards Red Mountain Road. The photo illustrates the disturbed nature of this area as a result of the construction of the roadway. 1-TACHMENT-1.0 WILDLIFE & WETLAND SOLUTIONS, LLC - Ecological Services & Consulting Decernber 13,2005 Glenn Horn Davis Horn, Inc. 215 S Monarch Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Stolper Property - Shady Lane Realignment Dear Mr. Horn: As per your request, I have conducted a site assessment of the Stolper Property (Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010) for the presence ofjurisdictional wetlands. The Property is located within the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Jurisdictional wetlands are those areas that meet the parameters (a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and sustainable hydrology), and criteria (soils that are saturated for a significant period (a week or more) during the growing season) as set forth by the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Non-jurisdictional wetlands are defined as those areas that are missing one or more of the wetland parameters, or that are completely isolated (no natural surface or underground connection (piped or culverted) with navigable waters of the U.S.). A site reconnaissance was conducted by foot on November 3, 2005 to identify and assess the general nature and extent of any wetland areas and to become familiarized with the project site. The wetland assessment was conducted by a certified wetland delineator following the routine method as outlined in the COE 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). During the field inspection, representative soil borings were taken, dominant vegetation was recorded, and representative hydrologic indicators were noted in order to identi fy the presence of jurisdictional wetlands within the area o f interest. The area of interest is the area immediately to the north of Shady Lane on the Stolper Property (Figure 1). No wetlands were located within the area of interest. A majority of vegetation was found to be upland (UPL) such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis) or facultative upland (FACU) such as chokecherry (Prunus virginiana) with a few facultative wetland (FACW) plants such as redosier dogwood (Cornus sericea) and narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia).. A few wetland obligate Nebraska sedges (Carex nebraskensis) were found immediately adjacent to Shady Lane. Soils on the site are of the Uracca, moist-Mergel complex (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1985). These soils are well drained and stony. No indication of hydric soil conditions was found within the area of interest. PO Box 1636 â€¢ Basalt, CO 81621â€¢ Phone: 970.618.4740 â€¢ Email: jlowsky@sopris.net Wildlife & Wetland Solutions, LLC. p. 2 Given the results of the site assessment, the realignment of Shady Lane as shown in Figure 2 will not impact any jurisdictional or non-jurisdictional wetlands or other waters of the U.S. Sincerely, Jo?mthant=01*sky Principal Ecologist Wildlife & Wetland Solutions, LLC. p. 3 Literature Cited Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. USDA Soil Conservation Service 1985. Soil survey of Rifle Area, Colorado: parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, Denver, CO. Wildlife & Wetland Solutions, LLC. p. 4 -ililifi~ 1/14Â»11 69' , I ''044 dr rquir..A l . 4/ 2 11%'/.91/ I = r , . i . + I. 4 b 17 M .11 rea 1,49 1* 4 $ .t 0#- Â·-tÂ·â€¢* E 'I 4<79 1 93.*41 R f . 6 t// 0.41Â» tes,~ I t'* 4*1 #.K.:2: *32 zi~ , 4. Ar , 6 -6 ..... 2 ..â€¢Ffirir '4 145*Nel d#.~, 2 4 . gt +47'Ge-9 L 1 kA <*W% . , 6 +.2::/332*TA ' I:â€¢2WJ :. #4/,te:ecu~ ..39 7%.. â‚¬ 'A li & 0, .* ..0," f~ Stolper Property S. .,9.4.- -121-12 . 4 .,X . . 4 . .6 I + 4. 4 .... . 0 A. A 41 ...1-' ,&0. .. .7 + - + 3 >3,1. c %, 0 â€¢ 4 ./ 1-1 4 4.. Â· 4 I I. ..& >1. , t. ...'aLN.L-'ll-/ .. Â·~*li_ij,~*5E/,vil,J& pg~w ...01 1.1 47, f 1. 1 Â¥.44Â· 13.,1-~â€¢~ 1 . , 3.5, 1 e . 4..3.- ~<4'* ':*.f I %*'I 4:~:~>-1 ya *7 4% , j,1. ., 44&..L'?F:.4 .2,9,Â·5< 2 4 /1 . 5, Â¥ 4 4, 1 ~ P .9 '' 4, A " .. 0 14 1%112.Al 3 ... :'1 P 1 Inth IB/* 3241 *0,/ -lii.0 4 9.-- Soer,/1 . t"::A *1 - 4.-' 3;..Z'rlip)< 43-2.~. O 1 4 7, 'AC, 7 ~ ~~.41 /. 6-444,+fla.#â€¢,ti, â€¢2â€¢6 0 Â· 242 T 44Â£ ..4 Wildlife & Wetland Solutions. LLC Location Map Figure p...,tÂ· 051*401 Diar,n 8Â¥: J Low*ky PO Box 1636, Basalt, CO 81621 970.927.4549 Stolper Property 1 .ur Dttember 12.2005 wildlife@sopris.net Shady Lane Realignment sc,te: 1~853 p 0.8.TRAW NO .1 i F- i PROPOSED i , ~Â·, /- PROPOSED EDGE \ i ~ PROPERTY LINE / r E~~TYLINE .Â·*.-~0-~':'~.~~~~1EP \\ \\ \1 1 STOLPER RESIDENCE 7: -: -0~42 3 :'AN*i- " ""i. i -... I'-.I .... ...:I .-:AV.Â·.V.-lAX'.nunWA- 0 ..'.,:.-7.VAAÂ«VAV.: ,Â·.*p' P + MATCH EXISTING / PAVEMENT : * ~~\ Â·~) // 1 ,/ I. . .41 // 9/ r- STOLPER RESIDENCE \\\\ f \ i STOLPER RESIDENCE SHADY LANE REALIGNMENT 17 SHADY LANE, ASPEN, CO R EvÂ»-1 ,/miwim~ 12 07Â·2)03 .- USHEDI OUrI XpEL[S 'Z OmN!1 Wildlife & Wetland Solutions. LLC. P. 5 ATTACHMENT /7 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Aureement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (41/iwin,N iâ‚¬- LLC- (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for e -51-reum Mâ€¢,1 ' n Review (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 1 -7 1 huttl L.42- 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because o f the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment o f an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of applicajion completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S I 5 10 which is for W hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT. By: By: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: jlll)4(/or Billing Address and Telephone Number: Required C 'Â° Micku. 1 Srulper 600 W. Eraul,u.0~ Su..1-e_/ 2-zx g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc ~u- n v , e~ ~ | CA 11/30/04 92/0/-333-5- RETAIN FOR <L,g.~AMENT RECORD ATTACHMENT IS CALLWINNIE LLC MICHAEL STOLPER 600 WEST BROADWAY SUITE 1225 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3355 December 12, 2005 James Lindt City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review Dear James: This letter authorizes Davis Horn Incorporated to prepare and submit a Stream Margin Review land use application for 17 Shady Lane. Davis Horn Incorporated is authorized to represent my interests in the land use review process. You may contact Glenn Horn at 925-6587 if you have any questions. Please send correspondence to 215 South Monarch Street, Suite 104, Apsen, Colorado 81611. I can be reached by phone at 619 231 9102. Thank you. Sincerely, CALLLWINNIE LLC Flu> ~ftb MICHAEL STOLPER Parcel Detail http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce... ATTACHI\,FAIT- 19 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs Tax Account ' Mill Parcel Number Area Number Levy 001 R004421 273707300010 30.387 Owner Name and Address CALLWINNIE LLC 1606 CLEMSON CIR LA JOLLA, CA 92037 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:7-10-84 DESC: TRACTS OF LAND IN NW4SW4 OF SEC 7-10- 84 BEING DESC AS TRACT NO 1 TRACT NO 2 I & TRACT NO 3 ALL DESC BY M/B & 1 TERCERO RR TRACT 1 of4 12/22/2005 3:27 PM Parcel Detail http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce... Location Physical Address: 47 SHADY LN ASPEN I 1 1 1 Subdivision: Land Acres: 2.03 Land Sq Ft: 0 Section Township Range i 7 10 84 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 5,750,000 457,700 Improvements: 110,400' 8,790 Total: 5,860,400 466,490 Sale Date: 8/23/2004 Sale Price: 6,500,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 1 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics FIRST FLOOR: 1,652 2 of 4 12/22/2005 3:27 PM . ATTACHMENT 20 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: James Lindt, 429-2763 DATE: 8.9.05 PROJECT: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review, Residential Design Standard Variance for front door to be located further than 10 feet back from frontmost fagade. REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn TYPE OF APPLICATION: One Step - Planning and Zoning Commission DESCRIPTION: The Applicant would like to construct a single-family residence on the property located at 17 Shady Lane. The preliminary top of slope of the river was reviewed by the Engineering Department when this site originally came in for Stream Margin Review with another design several years ago. Staff would encourage the Applicant to once again review the location of the top of slope with the City Engineer prior to submitting an application. The preliminary design shown to Staff would also require a variance from the residential design standard that requires the front door to be within 10 feet from the frontmost wall of the structure. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.520 Accessory Dwelling Units if ADU is included in design application. 26.710.080 R-30 Zone District Review by: Staff for completeness, DRC for technical considerations, CD Director for recommendation on Stream Margin and Residential Design Standard Variance, P&Z for final determination on Stream Margin Review and Residential Design Standard Variance requests. Public Hearing: Yes, at Planning and Zoning Commission Review. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Minor ($1,320 for 6 hours) Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($190) Total Deposit: $1,510 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $220/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total deposit for review of the application. 2. Proof of ownership. 3. Completed Land Use Application. 4. Signed fee agreement. 5. Completed dimensional requirements form. 6. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number o f the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 7. Street address and legal description o f the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 8. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 9. Site improvement survey performed by a certified and registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado The survey should show the current status o f the property include topography and vegetation, and shall include all easements and vacated rights of way, and the river's top of slope as determined by the surveyor. - 10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. Proposed illustrative site plan showing top-of-slope, proposed building envelope. 12. Site Section drawing showing approximate top of slope and 45 degree line from that point showing compliance with progressive height limit. 13. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. 20 11"x 17"Copies of drawings and complete application package. 2 copies of 24" x 36" of all drawings are needed. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ATTACHMENT 21 For Public Notice Purposes LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY PLATEK PETER PORTER BARRY GRAHAM RICHMAN MARK 0155 LONE PINE RD #A17 4229 EDMONDSON AVE 1700 S BAYSHORE LN #6A ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75205-2701 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 RUBEY WM & RBT BERING KAREN E SALYERS MICHAEL J SAUER CHRISTY L RUBEY 1/4 PO BOX 2853 0155 LONE PINE RD #A-10 4219 WHITMAN ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77027 SCHULTZ RESIDENCE TRUST SHERMAN RICHARD SLADDIN MICHAEL DAVID 3849 PASEO DEL CAMPO 155 LONE PINE RD #B3 205 INDEPENDENCE PL PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH DIANE ST ANDRE ROINE STARODOJ ROBERT F & PAULA A 0155 LONE PINE RD #A17 PO BOX 2972 PO BOX 1121 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-2972 ASPEN, CO 81612 STRAKA VIRGINIA C URBACH OLLIE WABISZEWSKI KATHRYN 0155 LONE PINE RD A-15 PO BOX 11223 PO BOX 943 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEDUM JOHN R WILLIAMS STEVE WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST 101 INDEPENDENCE PL 620 INDEPENDENCE PL 110 N WACKER DR STE 330 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 Impression antibourrage et h sdchage rapide - www. avery.com Fhl AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utllisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-A pOLDSTEIN DEBRA GOSHORN MARCIA L GUFFEY JAMES R 155 LONE PINE RD APT A18 516 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 2158 -ASPEN, CO 81611-3281 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 r GUILTINAN JOHN F JR & HELEN C HAGGERTY BEATRICE M HALL JO-ANN TRUSTEES 308 INDEPENDENCE CT 103 INDEPENDENCE PL 12 RUE DEAUVILLE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 HINES GERALD D HANLE GREGORY L & CYNDY REID HAVLEN NAOMI C/O DUGDALE MARIAN 0155 LONE PINE RD #A19 0155 LONE PINE RD #A12 2800 POST OAK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77065-6100 HIPP CHRISTINE A HOLMSTEDT MONIKA INGRAM PAULINE E 621 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 1141 0155 LONE PINE RD A-3 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 IRELAND MICHAEL C JME LEVINS LLC KIRCH MARK A 515 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 5433 RIDGEWAY AVE 412 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 ASPEN, CO 81611 KIRSHEN VITASHKA KUBASIEWICZ E MICHAEL LASSER JASON M 0155 LONE PINE RD A-5 PO BOX 10416 155 LONE PINE RD #Al ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-1537 LONE PINE UNIT 10 LLC LYETH MARIAN N/SW GUARANTY MACDONALD SHIRLEY M & PAUL V C/O SHAMIE SAM MGR TRUSTEES 3/4 0155 LONE PINE RD A-2 26111 W 14 MILE RD #LL4 ENCORE TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 9 GREENWAY PLAZA HOUSTON, TX 77046 MARZIALE ANTONIO MCCLINTON MICHELE MCKECHNIE JANETTE A C/O HEPTAGON CAPITAL MGMT 618 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 921 1300 POST OAK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77056 ODEN ENTERPRISES ONEILL MARIE D PARKS CAROL ODEN NANCY C/O 2302 ST CHARLES AVE #3A 200 NEWBURY ST PO BOX 660 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 BOSTON, MA 02116 ASPEN, CO 81612 PEGOLOTTI DELLA J PHILLIPS DAVID C & ALEXANDRA M PITKIN COUNTY VICKERY JACK H PO BOX 11449 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 PO BOX 2656 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 r-007 AHaAV-09-008- L 809L5 31V1dVU31 GAX.1 aAV asn Impression antibourrage et & sachage rapide - www.avery.com * AMERVÂ® 5160Â® Utilise le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-A ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADRIANCE FRANKLIN 111 P ALLEN KIMBERLEY A & PADRAIG E STUDIES 10155 LONE PINE RD #87 619 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 100 PUPPY SMITH ST .ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION BALDWIN JOHN F JR BEKLIK ROYA 565 N MILL ST PO BOX 2972 PO BOX 7640 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-2972 ASPEN, CO 81612 BERG JESSICA J BELL ANTHONY R BIELFIELD LAURENCE H JAY MATTHEW J PO BOX 449 311 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 12333 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BONDS MICHAEL STEPHEN & ELAINE BOUGHTON WILLIAM REID BIELINSKI BRIDDGET JOHNSON BOUGHTON JACQUELINE LEE 620 INDEPENDENCE PL 310 INDEPENDENCE PL 102 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRUNSWOLD KIRKW BRADY SUSAN L BRANDS MICHAEL LANE TAMMIE A 155 LONE PINE RD APT A7 0155 LONE PINE RD #A12 413 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611-1587 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BUESCH THOMAS A CITY OF ASPEN COULOMBE RICHARD 206 INDEPENDENCE PL 130 S GALENA ST 0155 LONE PINE RD UNIT B-8 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALY GLENN A DECAMPO RICHARD L & SUSAN K DETURRIS MONICA DALY CAROL CENTER 309 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 944 0155 LONE PINE RD C-11 RIVER BLUFF ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TH ASPEN, CO 81611 ELLIOT BLAIR S ETHERIDGE MARY KATHERINE FARSON ELIZABETH L 0155 LONE PINE RD All PO BOX 1462 PO BOX 10602 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FRANKLIN DAVID MICHAEL & MICHELLE FRIEDBERG MARC S 50% INT GARZOLI DIANNE L 207 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 8747 104 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GINSBERG JEROME D GINSBURG FRANCES GODWIN GAYLE A C/O LANSCO CORP 306 W 7TH ST STE 506 PO BOX 10776 575 LEXINGTON AVE STE 1600 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10022 A~13Ay-09-008-t -Â®09Ld 31Vld'431 qDAIBAV asn ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1 7 661% 1-=cn e_ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 3 in I C 63 , 200-6 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) L Glen n \-loin (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City o f Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V~Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. fPosting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing.and was continuously visible from the 'kO day of Â¥*bruu:~Lrlr , 200 6 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A phb'lograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. i Mailing of notice. By the mailing o f a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners o f real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such,ammdments. / N l- v Signature The foregoing "*fidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1 -~ay of H a-57 , 200.1 by G- le An {-4 j r rh WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission ex ires: -1 1/-Not tice; 6 \.1 i-J Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 17 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, to review an application submitted by Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC, requesting approval of stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and residential design standard variances to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. The Applicants are requesting variances from the following residential design standards: Building Orientation, Fences, Garage Width, and Windows. The subject property is a metes and bounds parcel that is commonly known as 17 Shady Lane; Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 429- 2763, (or by email at jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the application should be sent to the above e-mail or physical address. Applicant: Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC c/o Davis Horn Inc, 215 S. Monarch Street, Suite 104, Aspen, CO 81611 s/Jasmine Tvere Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission AILAL 7Ft.O..Â£af 0>yaj --2_jic> ~ i ATTACHMENT 21 For Public Notice Purposes LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Impression antibourrage et a sechage rapid- - www.avery.com ~ AVEINÂ® 5160Â® Utllisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY GOLDSTEIN DEBRA GOSHORN MARCIA L GUFFEY JAMES R 155 LONE PINE RD APT A18 516 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 2158 ASPEN, CO 81611-3281 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 GUILTINAN JOHN F JR & HELEN C HAGGERTY BEATRICE M HALL JO-ANN TRUSTEES 308 INDEPENDENCE CT 103 INDEPENDENCE PL 12 RUE DEAUVILLE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 HINES GERALD D HANLE GREGORY L & CYNDY REID HAVLEN NAOMI C/O DUGDALE MARIAN 0155 LONE PINE RD #A19 0155 LONE PINE RD #A12 2800 POST OAK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77065-6100 HIPP CHRISTINE A HOLMSTEDT MONIKA INGRAM PAULINE E 621 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 1141 0155 LONE PINE RD A-3 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 IRELAND MICHAEL C JME LEVINS LLC KIRCH MARK A 515 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 5433 RIDGEWAY AVE 412 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 ASPEN, CO 81611 KIRSHEN VITASHKA KUBASIEWICZ E MICHAEL LASSER JASON M 0155 LONE PINE RD A-5 PO BOX 10416 155 LONE PINE RD #Al ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-1537 LONE PINE UNIT 10 LLC LYETH MARIAN N/SW GUARANTY MACDONALD SHIRLEY M & PAUL V C/O SHAMIE SAM MGR TRUSTEES 3/4 0155 LONE PINE RD A-2 26111 W 14 MILE RD #LL4 ENCORE TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 9 GREENWAY PLAZA HOUSTON, TX 77046 MARZIALE ANTONIO MCCLINTON MICHELE MCKECHNIE JANETTE A C/O HEPTAGON CAPITAL MGMT 618 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 921 1300 POST OAK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77056 ODEN ENTERPRISES ONEILL MARIE D PARKS CAROL ODEN NANCY C/O 2302 ST CHARLES AVE #3A 200 NEWBURY ST PO BOX 660 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 BOSTON, MA 02116 ASPEN, CO 81612 PEGOLOTTI DELLA J PHILLIPS DAVID C & ALEXANDRA M PITKIN COUNTY VICKERY JACK H PO BOX 11449 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 PO BOX 2656 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 A}13AV-09-008-1 Â®09LS 31VldIAI31 Â®AlaAÂ¥ asn Â®09L5 Â®AZIiAW \~ WO)*.13Ae'AAMAA ,/Ill'll bunulld aai:1 abpnlus pue uter Imppission antibourrage et a sechage rapide lillill www. avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utllisez le gdbarit 5160Â® ' 1-80040-AVERY ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADRIANCE FRANKLIN 111 P ALLEN KIMBERLEY A & PADRAIG E STUDIES 0155 LONE PINE RD #87 619 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 100 PUPPY SMITH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION BALDWIN JOHN F JR BEKLIK ROYA 565 N MILL ST PO BOX 2972 PO BOX 7640 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-2972 ASPEN, CO 81612 BERG JESSICA J BELL ANTHONY R BIELFIELD LAURENCE H JAY MATTHEW J PO BOX 449 311 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 12333 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BONDS MICHAEL STEPHEN & ELAINE BOUGHTON WILLIAM REID BIELINSKI BRIDDGET JOHNSON BOUGHTON JACQUELINE LEE 620 INDEPENDENCE PL 310 INDEPENDENCE PL 102 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRUNSWOLD KIRKW BRADY SUSAN L BRANDS MICHAEL LANE TAMMIE A 155 LONE PINE RD APT A7 0155 LONE PINE RD #A12 413 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611-1587 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BUESCH THOMAS A CITY OF ASPEN COULOMBE RICHARD 206 INDEPENDENCE PL 130 S GALENA ST 0155 LONE PINE RD UNIT B-8 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALY GLENN A DECAMPO RICHARD L & SUSAN K DETURRIS MONICA DALY CAROL CENTER 309 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 944 0155 LONE PINE RD C-11 RIVER BLUFF ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TH ASPEN, CO 81611 ELLIOT BLAIR S ETHERIDGE MARY KATHERINE FARSON ELIZABETH L 0155 LONE PINE RD All PO BOX 1462 PO BOX 10602 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FRANKLIN DAVID MICHAEL & MICHELLE FRIEDBERG MARC S 50% INT GARZOLI DIANNE L 207 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 8747 104 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GINSBERG JEROME D GINSBURG FRANCES GODWIN GAYLE A C/O LANSCO CORP 306 W 7TH ST STE 506 PO BOX 10776 575 LEXINGTON AVE STE 1600 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10022 AMBAV-09-008-1 Â®0915 31VldIN31 Â®KIMÂ¥ asn Â®og s Â®AM,IW \~ lUO)*13Ae AAMAA - Buquyd eal:1 e6pnuls pue wer PLATEK PETER ORTER BARRY GRAHAM -tICHMAN MARK 0155 LONE PINE RD'#A17 229 EDMONDSON AVE 700 S BAYSHORE LN #6A ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75205-2701 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 RUBEY WM & RBT BERING KAREN E SALYERS MICHAEL J SAUER CHRISTY L RUBEY 1/4 PO BOX 2853 0155 LONE PINE RD #A-10 4219 WHITMAN ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77027 SCHULTZ RESIDENCE TRUST SHERMAN RICHARD SLADDIN MICHAEL DAVID 3849 PASEO DEL CAMPO 155 LONE PINE RD #B3 205 INDEPENDENCE PL PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH DIANE ST ANDRE ROINE STARODOJ ROBERT F & PAULA A 0155 LONE PINE RD #A17 PO BOX 2972 PO BOX 1121 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-2972 ASPEN, CO 81612 STRAKA VIRGINIA C URBACH OLLIE WABISZEWSKI KATHRYN 0155 LONE PINE RD A-15 PO BOX 11223 PO BOX 943 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEDUM JOHN R WILLIAMS STEVE WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST 101 INDEPENDENCE PL 620 INDEPENDENCE PL 110 N WACKER DR STE 330 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 Ak13AV-09-008-L Â®09 L5 31VldIAI31 Â®AteAV esn Â®09L5 Â®AlliAV ~ luo)*JaAe'MAAM I'll'll Bu!:upd aa,3 06pnuls pue wer H-N3 '4 Â·' - -Â·~ 3Â· L .: ~ Â»4 ~ -- . .1 1 -i Il "r ' Ull , 1,1. ,4 , '1 I â‚¬. 1 . 1\ 1 , i 'r, , PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 1/1/06, TIME 4 11, râ€¢, PLACE,I, i. DAL.NA I A,PIN PURPOSE â€ž ,â€ž.0,1 . IN t ./. 1/1 LA~ ...... ....1,/IPâ€¢-I'.... e.â€¢,-,Â£ pr Al,â€¢1â€¢ 69 PLANNIN" 1 Â· -'P4Â· TJA:U Ur-A.-22 (L,/0/Ki 1,"le&,1~10.-,04,11"eR,1 r ' I.- Itpl / - - #7% 2-%, .H/%,. ....co.,i. c...... --iaâ€¢mwoâ€¢Ii. ,. f ' " / '1 4 1 1 f 1. f ' Â»,4.- ,Â· 2 f ' F . 4 ,)4 w t. L -~ PUBLIC NOTICE DATE,/i/ob TIME 4:10 rn PLACE im L CALE WA_91_81Â£151 PURPOSEâ€ž .,i-:j IAN.-- ," E.UL...1-' ...._21 1-I. ill , i AL ./.Â¢6Â·1 ...illd' I.,1,0,-11 .Ill I' f./IN. - /64'll/+ â€¢'INIA' 0.~,ie,Niâ€¢i,8,*NiA.â€¢,Â»iy~N,iâ€¢ i.An~Dâ€¢ .1 6.14 I W iâ€¢,0.-B pâ€¢ 1 1 ..i IM, 1â€¢-i. st'J ':w .-:uVLU.'.1 NÂ·j ,'Ce'%4" P.4 BI " rm 5-,b-Â·DI/-010. 'uNT'ir ./ME., I....LIN/El . . el l#It â€¢On lul,IHi~ Ul' D~'T~ON CONTACTI PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 17 SHADY LANF STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SPECIAL, REVIEW i O DETERMINE RIVER'S TOF OF SLOPE, AND RFSOF.NTIAL DESIGN STANDARE VARIANCES NOTICE IS ~â‚¬REBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the As- pen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sis- ter Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Gatena St. As- pen, CO, to review an application submitted by Michael Stolper and Catlwinnie LLC. requesting approval of stream margin review special review to determine the river's top of slope, and residen- tial design standard variances to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. The Ap- plicants are requesting variances from the follow- ing residential design standardsÂ· Building OrieÂ» tation, Fences, Garage Width, and Windows. The subject property is a metes and bounds parcel that is commonly known as 17 Shady Lane; Parcel ID #27374)73-00-010. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development De- partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 429- 2763, (or by email at jamest@ci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the applica- tion should be sent to the above e-mail or physi- cal address. Applicant: Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC c/o Davis Horn Inc, 215 S. Monarch Street, Suite 104, Aspen, CO 81611 5/Jasmine Tygre Aspen/Planning and Zoning Commission Published ir me Aspen Times Weekly on Febru- ary 19, 2006, (3465) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. a.s*541294-41- Â§16ature 41 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2,7 day of Â£2kiw#*i , 20016 by 4 62 *14 L.1 Fld/f WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL -< Al- 4< 2Â«2-~21209 My commission expires: . Notary Public #ktÂ·:O-[Adj:~ .. .. .. I . 10 (P \ L â€¢ ATTACHMENTS: Uy Commission Expires 09/292009 COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: I 7 -skiorf,1 kn 14 â‚¬ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2>/ Â»36 , 200_ 1 't STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) , I, 4-71 Al Q.6 L--1 1/1OF / (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado. hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code iii the following manner: ~ publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice By posting of notice, which form was obtained from.the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable. waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high. and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. B'y the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department. which contains the information described in Sectioii 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) , AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 7, 2006 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities Room, City Hall I. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public II. MINUTES III. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Hannah Dustin Mixed Use Development-Joyce Allgaier (Continue to 4/4) B. Growth Management Allotment for 2006-Action on Resolution-Chris Bendon (Continued from 2/28) C. 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review-James Lindt D. 719 East Hopkins Multi-Family-Chris Bendon V. BOARD REPORTS VI. ADJOURN JAMES LINDT , .,20 ,*77073~-i:~ A L Wk Y q CITY OF ASPEN 2 PM t \ lÂ· 1 COM DEV DEPT ' 60 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 , 41 15 gER Z J CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 8ielihlbut Luu: ll:,ll&:ll:li :11,1 ll,,,lll,lill,liilll',i,l,I,ill:lli:,l,,1'1 9,281 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 17 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, to review an application submitted by Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC, requesting approval of stream margin review, special review to determine the river's top of slope, and residential design standard variances to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. The Applicants are requesting variances from the following residential design standards: Building Orientation, Fences, Garage Width, and Windows. The subject property is a metes and bounds parcel that is commonly known as 17 Shady Lane; Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 429- 2763, (or by email at jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the application should be sent to the above e-mail or physical address. Applicant: Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC c/o Davis Horn Inc, 215 S. Monarch Street, Suite 104, Aspen, CO 81611 s/Jasmine Tvere Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 6.''I c / /7 ln-Â«ai k.-4 te -3/au Â» Of 2/46Â» PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1 7 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW TO DETERMINE RIVER'S TOP OF SLOPE, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN tliat a public hearing will be held on Tuesday. March 7. 2006. at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. in the Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, to review an application submitted by Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC, requesting approval of stream margin review. special review to determine the river's top of slope. and residential design standard variances to construct a new single-family residence at 17 Shady Lane. The Applicants are requesting variances from the following residential design standards: Building Orientation, Fences, Garage Width, and Windows. The subject property is a metes and bounds parcel that is commonly known as 17 Shady Lane: Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO (970) 429- 2763. (or by email at james]@ci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the application should be sent to the above e-mail or physical address. Applicant: Michael Stolper and Callwinnie LLC c/o Davis Horn Inc. 215 S. Monarch Street, Suite 104. Aspen, CO 81611 s/Jasmine Tvgre Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission L MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-bff below: X........ Community Development Engineer ...... City Engineer ......... Zoning Officer ...........Housing ........... Parks Department .......... Aspen Fire Marshal ... City Water ......... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District .......... Building Department ........... Environmental Health ........... Electric Department ........... Holy Cross Electric ........... City Attorney ........... Streets Department ........... Historic Preservation Officer ........... Pitkin County Planning TO: DRC Representatives FROM: James Lindt, Senior Planner Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-429-2763 Fax-920.5439 - RE: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Residential Design Standard .T Â· v ariances Parcel ID #2737-073-00-010 REFERRAL DATE: 1/12/06 COMMENTS: Please find attached an application for the construction of a single- family residence at 17 Shady Lane. A DRC Meeting will be held on January 1 8th at 1:30 PM in Council Chambers to review this application. Please review the application and return comments to Alex Evonitz (alexe@ci.aspen.co.us) by January 27th. Thanks, James DRC Meeting: 1/18/06 Comments Due: 1/27/06 00*0000>4 2 >12 202>4 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: (ci~ Uu i n n i â‚¬ L L 61 Location: 1-1 Skexcl-Li Lk.he_ / Met-ab t-O> c#vi rÂ«l> / 1.-717 0-73 00 0/0 (Indicate street addressUpt & *Mc number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 01-u L & \--lern D- nc- - 6-lÂ·c- r)n 1-t Of n Address: '1 1 5 5 Â· 0-1 orx o re tn S u. , re- I O 4 Phone #: 9-10 41 5-2 65 9-1 PROJECT: Name: ,-1 9 k c'L: 1- 7 L.,i n â‚¬- Wd)- C r- r.e LA n/-, 01. dri $ fle u ~ e u 0 Address: 9 Ct (AbJUC Phone #: <b-C <_ C.dc> J J -EL TYPE OFAPPLICATION: (please check all that apply): D Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD O Conceptual Historic Devt. Â£ Special Review O Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) gl Final Historic Development El Design Review Appeal O Conceptual SPA 01 Minor Historic Devt U GMQS Allotment ~ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) C Historic Demolition I GMQS Exemption U Subdivision U Historic Designation [2' ESA - 8040 Gremline, Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumizadon) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split U Temporary Use U Other: El Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc,) ~ W<..41 A-r- PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) one_ 5> E 61 u,--'e- li ~AC\ 1-A A L '1~ HaKe you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 1 5 10 OD 6 Pre-Application Conference Summary GliGachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement RETAN FOR PERMANENT RECORD gl Risponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form O/fesponse to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must bc folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. 1/1 'd 866* *ON 1N30IdO13A30 Al INARROO AÂ¥00:9 Â§00( 'll 030 WEZOIUIV VV VAIiQflUIT Urban Design . Tourism Planning 4Â· ~ po.B.TRA93 t!9 - 1 Landscape Architecture . Land Planning -- Asheville Â· Aspen Â· Denver Â· Salt Lake City Â· Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe 120 East Main Street PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE \ \ OLD STONE I Aspen, Colorado 81611 FOUNDATION (970)-925-8354 EXISTING ~ PROPERTY LINE Facsimile (970) 920-1387 W W W.DE SIGN W O RK S HOP.COM I 1 1 //9 / .\\ - MATCH EXISTING , / GUEST ~ PAVEMENT -0.- -c/ / PARKING ~ \ k / A / 1\ \ \ /\\ - -0 ~~ED : i H 35--- N RELOCAT SHADY LANE i \ / \ / / ./ 1. -- \ \ ,/ // 0 i. \ -/ // 1 4 \ \ - -- 1/ // / ENTRY \ \ COURT \ \ ///// \ - - -0 \ \ >46./ 1 \ ---\ -----L -- --OMERHEAD UTILITIE /0112/_11\_ \ \ \ \ i \ - il 40, r tÂ·FECKM.*n + x \ \ 94 1 63*1/- ><1 ) ) LOWER LAWN + TERRACE +* -14 GARAGE \ - COURT ~/4 ~ X + 00 \ 2 4 j X 1 0 -6 \ X 1\ 951 \ 0 0\ X \ @ 1 0 -\X \ SPECIAL FLOOD I x 1-1 * \2 \ \ X -42- 0 /1 \ i HAZARD AREA \+\M (100 YEAR ~~ ~ N w \ \ FLOOD PLAIN) x * GRD N \ '. ,, 6 SPA HOT \ TUB \ r. r. \ \ 11 - \ \ \ 1 \ 1 4 \ \ X \ \\ DINING U \ \Se \\ OUTDOOR\ NeÂ·,2 x b :14- X 0 \ 1 -\3~ i 4 U - e - 1 --=4~ \94 \ \.9, x x \ u.0 \ 0 N \9 \. 1,1- 3- \\% - \ 0 - -\ I . i4404 , /1 .0 4 \ UPPER LAWN ROARING FORK RIVER .- , X TERRACE .ITy - 0 \Sk \ I \1 \ NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' Â¢ 0 lib \ 1:20-00" \ IN \ \ HARRIS DITCH \ 0 \ BK.260, PG.818 ' f # j \ 0 \ 9.2, '--,1,".'.. TOP OF SLOPE 2 0 \ ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15,2005 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK \ I i. \ \ REVISIONS _ MEAN HIGH WATER \~ - # DATE DESCRIPTION 01%026-7 tap - SPECIAL FLOOD : WAVA HAZARD AREA \ 9/4,4, - -32!416 (100 YEAR ,Â«' \ A FLOOD PLAIN) / - + #0961/ 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE ~ I -ter - \ 4'' 44 e /5316 o Ck. L KW ROARING FORK RIVER \ , 1 \ \ 1 h \ \ REVIEWED: HH \ \ i & - STREAM \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF j MARGIN \ COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE /1 REVIEW SET \ \ \ FLVER:- \ =*4 PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 / \-5 \ i - 1 0 LAYOUT -1-OP-OF - C \ /-1 /,0 PLAN 4 , , r / 4-10 SHEET NUMBER \ E Z \ ATTACHMENT 7 CD . 1 -~ | Â©COPYRIGHT DES I GNWO RKSHOP, INC. HiVd EMIS 'ONOO - - - - - BONBDISEâ„¢ hEId1019 hl3d101S 13Â¥HOIIA 00~0100 'NBdSÂ¥ AA'O'kl '9'B 9'(3 - - - 39(lible - F:\PROJECTS_ -Z\363 8-Stolper\D. CAD\Schematic Design\OW-3638-Layout Design.dwg @1@1 1Â®1''i'' i lilli[ 91/WI{* \06%3 1 1 DESIGNWORKSHOP \/ N \6\ i.\\\ 1 1 Landscape Architecture Â· Land Planning i \ ' P.O.B TRACT NO. 1 Urban Design . Tourism Planning ' 0 A,;heville . Aspen Denver. Salt Lake lity - 2 / //9 / / ANN ~-~K)I j ' 2L* I\\ , I I Santa Fe . Santiago . Phoenix â€¢ Lake Tahoe / 1 //ill \ -7 / OLD STONE 120 East Main Street 0 i , " / r.4 - -1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 IN /6 / ~ / /,#~ 3 ~ i Facsimile (970) 920-1387 (970}-925-8354 Nal -AA- ---- ----- \\\ r - - _ *-- RE ZONE 1 t WW W.D ESIGNWORKSHOPCOM I h \ \,1 // / ...A \\) i \\ / 0/f 1 /f''f , 0 ~ -1 E-12\ 41--21_ 1 1 . 17\\ \ / - ZONE 2 1 1 -1-4-7 -T-- I #1 // i / Â« Â«~ , 2~~~7~>~' -/' / ,-r i. ~ '' . f Ir ZONE 3 /It 1 % 1 1-\4 \\ \ gh ZONE 4 - , It. of 1 1 - e \-* 'r- . 0. - / -1 ' t- 131_ 4 Â¢Â· 1. i . Ill<1 1 '.9/ . i , ~ 1 4~~\~1 \ C/\~ // , 1 I 1 . / (' \ , 1. 0 1 -1<1*1' 1 I 2 -1 1 ' t .. Â»\\1 . \Vi\\ . ZONE 5 ' . 0 . r /r-<111 -2 - - 'Apitl-.~~1 1 1.- A '4* -1\ 11 \\ '1~ , I , \ 9, i w p. ... ; '~+Fir t~ 2- ' 1- 1 -9 7,4 \ ---*i / 4, . 1.,f , (61 - . 41 ..3/0All: 1 1 %%% - 12#*; . . / I \ \L-- / / / 52 / . 1 /2 -,.,39*2/ VV ' i.- 071 t. 1 A. i , / ~ *- ,#- I 't 1:t.*~V Al . 4/ 4 -- - 1 W ,Â·Â· i Â·' : [1101| ZONE 8 i# L 1 1-\ 1 , ZONE 6 ---- --V // 1/ ~ ZONE 7 f. 0 \ il.*n, 1 19- 9"W 2 / /0// 0 B 11 -- i 4 - . , I - V , Â·t --r .,1 it i 7 1 , 753/fl,/117 1-'-- f.Â·~''py( 4. i -1 I . 5 41. 11 1-1 I . v. .6 141 1 - I . \ i- f':41 & -i ., 14 1 01 '1.1 1 3% 1 I / \ . f-- 1,; 91 A ) 91*% . 1 â€ž,32- 5 A \ t..0 itt 1 ......' . \ I 1 1Lk-1-+4 1--trr Â·; * - 1 4 \29.Â«i- fÂ·'' , lu 6--+ 4 4 1 F Re.. .. I: .1 \ 11 14% Â»- -/, . , '' 1~al \ 1*, 1 V \ 0 . ~:Â·-'Â»~d/NÂ·\ t 'fzf~ 21-tz..:07*4 4 i 1 li /j -1 1 L/77 5 4 - % 6 /\ 0 2 1 , Nrk W/&12 Y! /4/ 0 b 1 + 'LAZET- . -7 .t \ 1.V j 1 1 - . 4 .. 1/ '1 1\ . > 4 .t' 'arÂ£ ' 1 elk , k_31/ 1--0 :1 rÂ¥Rfiei:'5*Â·-:f hÂ¢'*- -* ......740Nma---24 : 743* 2,6/Mer '' \\\>\ * 0 , 1 \ 1 -I -_11/71 I x .' ) f iÂ·Â·- :. 1 - ... I. . 7- 1,- : .1.. 2 : 0,=S'. 1 I - * , l.: 7.--7 r, , /4 \,F: 9.21 1 1/ 0 \ ./ r I it-1.1 \ . 4, I.'.... I' -Ir ./i A 0. I 61 1 â€¢ 1 4 144.5-7--Nru \Â· - 1 ii<lit=.*4+ N. 2 /:49 - 1 \ \.=-=Arah=+ 043*.'<-1=.=-04 <5-- %2 .Vt-74 ..1' ..09;r , ~il t,4 1 11.r ' C"1*<Altri + . â€¢/3.'Awil. I N . . INL,2752.- I' - I i 31 r 1 ' : 1<14+ 1163131>f .f/ 4 11 11 Ir -141--1.-1#1*9Tic<2XS u -i,UlÂ»~ \i .,AIR.L., ~ ~ ~ \ ~ . 'Po 1 C >tâ‚¬.1 i , 5/,4.>41 *2â‚¬4 !1* 1 -1 . 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1.1 11 IiI.,#-4 , i , 1 1 10 Â«11 i, 11 11:.1 11 1 1 //1,1/~ML' '(btlit:St& ir, r- 6-- 4- 1.1 \\ , -, 1- \1 Zr \ 1 1 -,~141 fR . @ g; 1 3~,Â·t>~~;,'~~&â‚¬p*inl~+ ,~1C~r-1,~*4.-1Â· Tf 1 1 1. : .:. , I 7 - \1 v .+ 1\ 1 * SPECEN- FLOOD 1 ./ ///Â» 1---1 * 91 1 : 4 11 1 4 1 1 -,=a- t - Jt----- --- *4:c:~364/1 Of ~f 4043- EL 1,1 41'4' HA#RD AREA , ..r I , 0-111.1; Il H i]A :< ./u. 7â‚¬1 * 3)00 YEAR , 0\ . '. t- . 9 ..r - ,- , 1 - ./ 4.-/, - 1 i 1 1 1 1 lilli lili FL~@D PLAIN) , , -b ' 40. 1 M It ri W'/1 /5/ 4'' ''5," â‚¬ be ). 4 4 Â·. - - . 11 11 1 11 911 j /1 4 1 1 F'+ " . 1 1 11 1 gly-44 1 1 1.../ i f U'/ 12 /0 :/,0, #A>vu ~1 v 0 65 i - W . 1, , I lilli 1 & 1,1,1 It 1 1 !11- 1 9&/4/,4'/9 //. 7 - - 1 11 4 d J " - Frf/. '3*.' : A=.44 . 1 I 11 i _11 :35 ' '~ ~' ' '/ .' 1~7 lh-e- .- 4 -1.3~ - -9 6 4.. // ... 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 / I.."X I ' 'V f - 1 1-Nk X 1 'r' C * i # 4% i <.?il ' , 'V I I I 1 i #: 11 4: #.. 1,4 , : A T 1 '-4. -- .r 1 1,Â¥> A, 1 1 1 il 1 19 i 1 ! i! 'A t I 4, 1/(Fl â€¢. \ 1 1 | 3; 1 1 1 I. i I| ti :,ic/:9644-/7 'i:,i/:A:1; :40. .0 . 1 1 E 6 L I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. thi 4112.4.~ h V- 9 1 li 5 $ Ur A .. . I */ . / \L-/ 1 1ht. A, .,~ ~..,A '-1.,. Â· ...| ~ IX, . 1 lili 1 r ...h .. AN j J ~; ~ ~' 74' l. - 1 \ 1 *ej vON-4*15* Â»u*i_j U I1 ' ' if i -I i , 5*. i tri '3 1 e V , h l | 1 1 11 - -/ I , , -- 1 'P= -I I 1! li 1 i. til -1. A \ /1 - . "1 1 9 +--, i 21 i 1 /1 .'. 4. 44/tj >$.92 - , -, , 9 . hreÂ·41 -12.-1 /2 ; 1 ' 11 1 1, 1 1 kl .1 3,1k ~M f - , 11 1 9. 1 1 ; , + - 1 \. 4 1 ' .., 11 1 1 1 1' ' 1 -41 ' , I \ <1 1 q. It ' ' - * \\44 M - ,.. --.1, r)'.D,z.AZb jrld#L-14 t- % , iI . 1 1 ' 15:~ % -~-~'4~2 5- 9-:.' \ 6. ' 1 -* 10. trâ‚¬-1 1/ 1 1 /.-~-4.~:1\ 1 ,+01 1 11 1 -9 +2 0 1/7 /4.-,rf .23 Po T-F-jx -1%. I. \O CES@h,X%~374*7- Â» -1 - 4 + , L h r 4 1 Â·:. r if te'rA-- 1' T --I.I---1 ,14 ,- , 1 t.1--h \0 i x-- A v I . .2Â« ,. ./.-... 1 b ~GAKâ„¢. ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 \%3 11> 1 1 -U " . e . 4 - \.4 - \+ 0 \O - I I - 011 I 71= - - -4-. e . 1. LA go - .4 ,+ \.% \ P - I /4.4 N\N *,4 I L..il r TE*Er ttor ---Â· LONE-,33.Â·, 2 ROARING FORK RIVER -%%* 4 I ..17 2 J./*2Â· _ 0.' Â»1 - :4. 1 1 b \ 1-+71 1 111 h ,:... -. - At. 2 O 42 Â° \% NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' 1:20-00" , A .1 -1-:%1, m - Â«*< * >--,=*â€ž4:4Â°_t x4'JittÂ·~ il-ii--2 -1 - : -. , .- r--9 - - 1 4 -- ..' .... . . 'W, ' k./ /4 .,1. 4 % I - N#,--~, j~> 4,7 .,. -, , le-*r. r-L-4....Â» 1 1 1 r /0, til 1 -14- ~j'-4. '7:--L_J_/2-06 ed < dy. 1.-: 4 ...../ 1.lhalt . ' 7 - t. >/ 9Â¢r, 1-4,-4 HARRIS DITC ' it 'tÂ» , -9 I 1 1 14 + 1 \ 71-A BK.260, PG.818 , f -Â«l - , - - n th<~~2~ 1 + A \~2*.\1 1 01 9.141- ,- - 1- , 1/ 1 .,2,4 ' V .- L. , // 1 .I /h... ' '2 - <%Â« 9 VI- ~c- 5.0 h - JlvK<*- ~ Jk;t~~CbpfÂ¥<1 \1N 1\- p.-17 ],;~il lith 1 1- 2.Â·,Â·043*-I,t~ 4 / % + Ir-4-- ~ ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 15 2005 TOP OF SLOPE \ NL - - - - - 2 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK .. - m -* i - I -* 7. - -,#94 -0- h . &3/ -. ...Â»2491-1-YWON*42 14' 4 1 :-1.-42.- f - MEAN HIGH WATER il- I --- -9.- , -- 72 )4/1 REVISIONS 1 - 0 700, - ... 11.1 1 j ../-- -44..1 12*Ld<ki</ .elx / - -N - SPECIAL FLOOD 1 1. ,+02/: - 12*' 1 L N '4â€¢b-Â»ri #DATE DESCRIPTION - # 29%4.-8 I rd#c 4 \ 9 0 44, r-,w. Lf> - 4-~ HAZARD AREA A , 17 t - 4--1 liti I , - 41 (100 YEAR - 0 -3 r-'. Rip,75*4,2 ./1 \32--Vit034772~4 0,7022 t,41+ 17-3 - 3 -0 ..0 3~85775~FRI~GE ZONE $ - -\ 1=Le!2~) PLAIN) LA. , r ..1. tr - ti.x pdu. 4.P -- a 4,4.\ ~ 1 1 4 - .\\\ 14 \\ 1 I - Â«4--.-2 -~tÂ»42 0 \Rh- Â» ROARING FORK RIVER 04 .\ . - / .4,-Ak ... , fi> 12Â«,4.4 \,2\ 6\ 1 \ 1 8 \ , 1 VE, U \\ 3 7 <3\3<1~~~~ 1 \ DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH 1 \ 1 4 1 * 41 pid \ - 1 N \ GATE ..\ 1 19.. 1 L j \ 1 4-0/ 0 Â»4 1 19\\ 4\10\ 10\ STREAM \ \>6\ j \41 1 1131 1\4 14\\1\ MARGIN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF / 0 \ 391 061. 11\ 1 ' ' Li\\41\ \ \ \ - REVIEW SET COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE 9 4 4 11 11 ~~2\\~114 \\\33 111.* /4 - PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 ,-1,4 11.. I..: 121'll'.74 \17, 1. f.,4~Â«1~1''t /0 LANDSCAPE e W.9 3*3*z.. PLAN Â» ATTACHMENT 13 \\ SHEET NUMBER < f f U-01 / I 1 | Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP, INC 30N30ISEIkl kl3d1019 Ardd 3319 01400 -Â·- - Â·- hl3d101S 13VHOIIN 00Â¥kl0100 'NadSV ' Â®I@I@I@I@IÂ®IÂ®IÂ®I@I .TRACT NO. 1 - --- -- -- - \ DESIGNWORKSHOP / 4 \~ Landscape Architecture . Land Planning / ~ ~ ~ ~~ Urban Design Â· Tourism Planning ( ill 11 < Ashevi'Ue . Aspen Â· Denver Â· Salt Lake City Â· - F Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe f 1 \ 1 120 East Main Street 1///lic \ \ 6 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 / 4 11 (970)-925-8354 \ \ Ill ~L___ I x~ hÂ¤**e 9-10)9~5-13KI f \ \ 1 f / /// // // 1 1 //if WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM /- -7848 -- \ // 11 3 i i f iii / / A - <A \ \ \ 1 2/// i %\ \ / ff f Â«f / / 1- 4 1 ./*. / W / 1 /jj YON - I 11 1 -/ / Â«Â« 4/ 1 /2 3 //4.-k 1 \A 3 Lu51 94\ . J 'C 1.67 / 4 h ith b CD 1 91. / 44Â» J I 10 4 GUEST 'F b RKING 11 1> - - <Â«441 --* --- P I-- I /0 3 11 - ff>49\7 - '9 - \ 040 \44 1\\L-- / f \ 1 - --- XZZM- 141 /4 4 \ - \ CO r /4~3 1 / \ -x-M. 4 ~~ ,355- i iw \ - 7840,- -*--C- - . Â·r , 1% c y f /#-1 \ --~ / 1 -61 cp / \ At) 00 / -1 / \ / /30 \ , 4 '~ ~ ENTRY < _ 00 2 00 7 1 < -~ COURT \ A 0 00 1 19 1 j / \ \ C > 9 j VÂ» / 7 4 1 - \ 13,7 /<Â« ,\ 0000 0 / - - f NORTH 0 5' 10' 20' \ / 1 0,00 .4 j - / 0 0 / cb X X 4 1:10-00" // 40 4 71 +10.0 / F -- 1 t 1\ 1 11 1 ~~_ ~ ~ ~ ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15.2005 7851.0 X ~ 1 4--72 /4 \ ~ 7842.5 REVISIONS LOWER LAWN .0 -1 # DATE DESCRIPTION TERRACE 3< 1- - -\ \ , ~ ~7 ~7841. i Ix X li +Zo.o 7840 X ce. A 7 / \35 x + FFE 7851.1 +. / 4 \50 + DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH LOWER LEVEL 7839.1 SPECIAL FLOOD \ 785[ - - 7841.5 .0 HAZARD AREA \ . < < ~ ~ +7848. 9353 4 STREAM (100 YEAR \ 1 SU % FLOOD PLAIN) \ < RE MARGIN 7840 / < . + Â»3\ - REVIEW SET 7841.5 SPA HOT 4//0 1 7848.0 \, '1 > f \\\ r / 93//3 9 00 l < 4-WL TUB 7843.5 - + PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 - A ~0 \ 7842.5 1 + 0 ~7851.0 -A~ ~~12 ///// -1 GRADING \1 7 : ,/1/ PLAN #/ \1 #3, / (- - 1 T7839.0 \ / 1 Â»t-- - - N 7850.0 00 SHEET NUMBER A X f AN .... 7.0..--*/%- A \ C / .-. .eeol. 111'1111'111111 1---1 1 /1111 1 j j f 1 1 \ < 1 = * ~7839 0 ~F - i rn 0 | @ | @ | Â® | Â® | Â® | @ | Â® | Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP, INC. BONBDISBM kl3dl019 hl3d101S 13Â¥HOIIN 00Â¥ZI0100 'NBdSV 0.1 @ 1 @ 1 @ 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 0 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 DESIGNWORKSHOP / 1 3 7 -' Urban Design . Tourism Planning . .4 ~ P.O.B.TRASl- 29.1 /0 LEGEND Landscape Architecture . Land Planning -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 44 -- -L \ Santa FeÂ· Santiago - Phoenix . Lake Tahoe Asheville Â· .4.pen - Denver. Salt Lake City Â· / EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN 120 East Main Street ~ ~ ~~ < FOUNDATION ~ ~LD STONE ~ j ~ 1 ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 \ 1 Â® \\1 1 \ WATER VALVE EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN (970)-925-8354 1. // // WATER VALVEE I \ 2-J r- J Facsimile (970) 920-1387 \ \0 1 WWWDESIGNWORKSHOPCOM \ -</' TREE IN DECUNE - TO BE REMOVED - \ \ 0 1\ \ f \ //1\ 1 \ , 3 //7 L_ / // 0 --1 TREE TO BE REMOVED \ 4 \ C \ Â© -- 1 \ C .3 \ C / \2 2 \ \U J , ' _ 1.' --/'' gli 142 / \ A 0 , \ RIPARIAN VEGETATION \ F -, I I \ \ */ 1 0 / 0.. 0 \ - AREA IN NEED OF RIPARIAN 094- , 2,41 mi/// ./ \ ~ 17~BL54-eÂ·~:~spi . \ . / \ ' VEGETATION RESTOIWION , I \ I \ \ -\ _ BOX NOE \ - - - -% 3-8 40*Er 1 .. 80(NOF[ EEASEMENT*.632, - - --2--- - \ Box \ - .32-:-cl\342>+L/ \ -- --ltf' Boxâ€¢OEL \ -- 171 -*.*.0 -----* \ \/ , 1 -'.--- \ - /. ... IEÂ¢*2EN <..LL- ~~~ - A1-7- - 0-~ \ - -OVERHEN? l~TIES-~---â€že--2-21 P--- - r \ --- ...' /16404'/1/:I"-- -1 \ Â¥J / At /J n \ - / I - 1.Eâ‚¬47....k f 00 1///// i 1.-- % 3- -'.- 4, tr. . 1.0 0, 1 1 - \ :X - 1 1 \ -gA , 4: P \ 7850 - -0 [ 91:X 0 1 \ 1 -1: 0 \ x h x - 0 . - \11 - x. 90 , X X .-- .=< X \ rÂ©~~ k. >er,1.- ./ Â¢1 9\ \ X \ i-0. X \ \\ .7-t--â„¢. ~ ~ SPECIAL FLOOD ~ X - 1 \ ..St YE- ~1; / HAZARD AREA ~ I \ SE _ .. \ (100 YEAR - \ 0' FLOOD PLAIN) ~ x . 0 \ I - I . r \ 1 \L- 1 - ~5533%0', ~ \ r \\ I \ \ in- I. 1 .. \4 -... 1 â€ž414-; 3<i . *: t-- Â·X ' e \Sp 0*4 4, \0 - 1 ~...... \.4- 0 le - A - 000/ :4 .. 70** f $ @.. iR. -\ ROARING FORK RIVER . j 2 \ 1 4 \ \ N i .\ \ \ HARRIS DITCH Â· . 0 .4 \. BK.260, PG.818 , \ ./ , . 1 TOP OF SLOPE \ ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 15,2005 0 . 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK - I . ..4. 4 â‚¬2 REVISIONS B 0 4 ./ MEAN HIGH WATER . .. .. \...<. .434 ...:0 . , # DATE DESCRIPTION 0 - SPECIAL FLOOD .. 1 -0 i HAZARD AREA ... .... ..... IL.J.:U . ..\:.:...... ..t, \ ..:PE'e,ec (100 YEAR > Â·. FLOOD PLAIN) -'fip.2/4 -ilill 148:44â‚¬**:7 . " 41/ 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE . X N X \ /- I G I. 4 \ ROARING FORK RIVER 0. \ Â® \00 0 - i 1 0 \ - \ DRAWN KW REVIEWED: HH C ./ /0 STREAM APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF j 4 -- ....0 . 6 MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE .L .\. -= S REVIEW SET 0.4 - I I t 4 . \/0 PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 . I .1 .43 : I 4 . t EXISTING i // CONDITIONS/ VEGETATION ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER sm , @N \ ATTACHMENT 2. _ gb 3%4 - ' (2 1 @ 1 Â® 1 Â® i Â®|Â®| Â® | Â® Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC 1 1\ / Hlyd 3918 'ONOO - - - - - - 30NBDISEIhI hl3d101S hIEd1019 13VHOIW 00Â¥h!0100 'N3dSV NA'0'8 '0 2 9 'O .__ _ Lff:fÂ¢) 390&18 - -Stolper\D. CAD\Schematt Design\DW-3638-VegetationAnalysis.dwg 00 8 9 8 (30 ' 75'-0" C e i-Oil 10'-Oil . 18'-0. 14'-Oil ~ 1511-Oil . 81-0. 4 . 8. r 1 l, MECHANICAL 4 1 41 --[h\\\4 In~ EGUIP. 1 n / -1/ ~/ |=2 -LAUNDRY DROP ~ EXERCIBE L MEDITATION i %- XETfAM 1 fa /1 I / / / 9 - T---3 E io OFFICE O IELEVi 1 1 ME EGUIP. C C J D 1 1 'r- -, , , , U 1 E~~h i L, , 1 1 0 0 - f -----ELLECTI 1 12 i-f 44 OOM eAME .r- 1 * 1 1 1 1 0 1-1 caz]EZI LI 1 1 9 4 L - 2 b l (3 - EJITE I -419 0 .I E) 1 -r--8 - 'FIE mom eAME ROOM el 1 SUITE 2 00 ELEV. C 0 IIi. 0 0 8 - trul= 1 , 0 1 p--1 9 0 \ â‚¬0 Z 02 4 U.1 Â« & 1 /.CN il 1 - fe 5 2 4 91-1-7-If Â· 9 9--21 7 LI 9 >0 OU IZ LIeHTMELL I BUNK ROOM , Clut/1 - 4-0,0 - *T 1_____----1 - cnai L-_ 12 !hi.1.0. 1 ELEV! EQUIP MECHANICAL 1 1- - - -1 0 6 - \\CI r---------1 - 9 ' lo O ]3 u--0 9 ---1 . -3-Lf ~~~~~1~ SUITES 101 - 1 ~ LAUNDRY 4 STORAeE = ..... 13 1 .r- ~/) DRAWING: LleHTFNELL 4 ~ / PLANTER 1-/ 'IT HE ISSUE: DATE: i S.M. Review 11-30-05 JOB NO. 0516 SHEET NO. PROJECT NORTH \61-0" 12'-0" 2OLO" 2-7~-0 I4'-0" 33'-6" ' ~ * ' BASEMENT PLAN /11 122'-6" A2.1 ' 4 4 4 -* 02 8 16 08@ 8 QU Â©COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITEaS 20'-0" 110-1917 IOnEI S13311HDMV 33=liNNAD S312!VHD 36)543ClISBM kl3dl ZS517-0Z40Z6 :XY=1 * 0655-SZ@OZ6 :3131 . 11919 03 'N3dSV '3AV NVINAH 15Â¥3 00 LOGO-SZ*OZ6 :XY:I * 0650-SZB0Â£6 *3131 * Â£9*09 03 'SDNINdS 1Â¥OGINV31S * ZOZ 315 "CIM 3/\OMD 3Nld L06L 09 0 8 8 9 0 1 1 i 751-0" i i 61-01' 10'-OIl . |8,_O" 14'-0" 19'-O" 3-0 C Caj 1 ~ 0 01 (01 --1 ~3 HIS BATH ~ i-gr -J r.- LAUNDRY - CHUTE-)1 ~ DUAL ~ SHOMER , O A.1.6. HER ~,~ 0 6 5 Il ~ BATH 19 9 4 91 9 U - .-1 ~ 4 LL.1 0 % A ola \ OFF 11 9-UP- Z Ptl-6. U QÂ¢: I ----1 Fll 1 1 DECK ELEVI 1 1 ~ MASTER BEDROOM 1----1 L VII- UL~ 01 0 0 . 1 F=-31(13 ,- ~h) 0 ENTRÂ¥ CA O 7 3 0 fin 1 L./ - r 1 1 GRAG 9 9 DININe 0 0 0 3 01 01 OUUU 00 / 1 % .-6 (0 LILI -- 7 Z 3 9 Â»O 4 wh PANTRY 1 4- 4 J au KITCHEN ~__j ' 00 LU 41 MIN=1 w 1 1 1-=r. 12 E |** < 1 1 Ill A r---1 IMR 1 7 IELEV~ - bl.LL 11 1 ------1 07 (EL - !If l L=r---C------- - 1 1 -Pe--1_Â·2*0 _-- 2 1-09.,=1 2 3 r 0 - all W MUD ROOM *--A (El-- F i 1 E-.-n 6-/4. 1 4 0 U . 1 n Tr ~ 11 # DRAWING: 0 .. , 1 1 1 L.-1 .r- ISSUE: DATE: S.M. Review 11-30-05 JOB NO. 0516 SHEET NO. PROJEGT NORTH 16'-O" 12'-O" 20'-0" 27'-0" 14'-0" 33'-6" 6 1 st FLOOR PLAN ~~ 122'-6" A2.2 64 4 -02 8 16 0 0 0 qu Â© COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 8'-O. L N 181-OIl XY 0655-â‚¬60Z63131 . 11919 OD 'N3dSV * '3AV NVINAH 1SV3 0L9 V 33=!INNAD S312IVHD 3DN3aISBM kljd1O.1.S LUOD'a#!UUnD'/V\A/\AA XÂ¥:1 I 0690-SZ*0Z6 :3131 * 909 03 'SONINdS 1Â¥O<INVilS * ZOZ 31S t]ZI 3AOMD 3Nld L06L OaÂ¥301 150'-O 1.,co/U/V vv uAAorlur Landscape Architecture Â· Land Planning Urban Design Â· Tourism Planning Asheville . Aspen . Denver â€¢ Salt Lake City . Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW.D ESIGNWO RKS HO P.COM STOLPER RESIDENCE STOLPER RESIDENCE STOLPER RESIDENCE ..... SCIENIIACNAint - COIitÂ«ikÂ¢)Â¢AbIE *i .FETIAND INFI,0 Clj# FLOUERING VEEIGIr?:A ~ .IiGH10 EI*,AnON |.SCIENImâ‚¬NAME ~ - COMMONNAME:. ~~~~ sclamndNAME . COMMONMAN*TS 1-~~i~D. 34'CbLOR,TNER 4 1 WMMON,il iNEIGII i' | ~ ~ UGUT | ELIVAIION | AwÂ·'-- Â·Â·:'-*TAIUS,-3Â·:Â·44 :.CÂ¢}I.OkmE[,Â·.1:,i:Â·'aif'SEASONR,4 .ti .... c.. Food, PtÂ·Full ~1Â·BEASOND,>12.9 -â€ž : 2% PAC:U White. Spling 3-13 R 5.DOG-10,ODD' [112!ih@*222221**EZZIZZIEZZIZIEZZ*ZEZZEZZZIZEZEiELLIZIEJJR*Tt---i*i*ial Acirubrum Red ample -r-----r----=-----7--~ii;-r-=rT----r-w=-r--ii=ain Alnus temliblia 1hi*Â·leafAIder FAC.L~lbd,),ong(,9/â€žknmiro26.24*~R-FullS,aS:000-10.000' ahrifolia Sericebemy Raceme Shalter San White, 5,mg- 3-10 B Food 4,000-10,000' Shade- ~-r-*~-T--iwis,000- 1-4:~5:===='/E#,2:/'d%l=nult:'.~4 Corna. 5tolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC.W Cyme Summer Pt Sun |Wild s=wber) . =-*44,IMA),er-3-amihi-*ilSim7,000-18*1 D:yopteria Colorado Male Penn n/a 3 ft Shelter Pt Sun- ~ Gemisnalineins N.:Iow-leaved Gennim Purple Summer -13Ir-T------r-Gli17,Ifiqi/1 Ribes Inreum 1 Golden Currant 1 PAC.W_~~-____1--2==__1-22MLJ__.21__1.-_2.n_1_-2,000-Z.NO' Blix-'735 Shade Incap==1*ilil,=Iyz*ZE=ZEZEZZIZEZE*Emzz=ZIZE*#*Inzi*i**i Phy50[4115 Whi~ Food Pt-Pull Momitain Ninebark FAC.U ShImmer 3-7 * 4.800-9,900' Rosa woodsii Bods Rose RAC __1___Â»*_-_-__1_2,rnâ€žpa_I-64433~PaoiFaad-P&F21ISm_1,50F10,500' -al Corunb Shelter Sun Bull Slm Pice, pugens Colorado Bhle Sprace RAE Foliage Smumer Sbelter 492-98.4 8 Fooi SmiI]g Shelter Sp'in%- 30-100 R Food, Full Sun Yellow,Red. 56-100 R Shelter Full Sun 5.000-9.000 1%:1112 Pinus ponderosa Ponde,osa Pine Spling White Spting- Food P'Full =1- 'QuakingA,pen 1 PAC 1 Cleâ€¢my Mi4 1 Flower Spling 1 25.24-49.2 it i Poor i Pt Son i 5.000-10.000 PnUÂ¤U5 Vi*=ina Choke Cherry FAC.U Racmle Edy Summ/r Shaer Sun 5-30 R 4,500-10.000' Caain White, 1 n 2/ 1 Creamy White Pt-Full ~ E/%~~ 1 4.92-32.80 | &2 1 Pt-M' 1 4.500-10,000'| P0pU1U5 Na.uw-Leaf Cottanwood FAC.W Spling 25Â·05 R Sheiter | Rnms vi*iana | Chae Ch=Iy PACU Raceme Sun 9DglM~lia Caikin Sun 6,0001500' Food, Shade- 1 P.hs Cmamy White, SpliIg 23-50 it Pt Sun 5,ODD-loPOD, FAC,U | Whitamink, 8-â€¢â€¢pos:Ibus *19 ~ ~ Flowe, ~ _S=M tlemoloides QuakingAspen PAC Catkin Sheher i 1.97-5-25 B i Food 5.5004500 | Spung- 3-4* Foed Pt Sum . Ribes Goosebeny Gleen 2.SOO-8,000' Su=lei Rosa waÂ«isa Woods Rose FAC Pink SPIing- 2-7 ft Poor,Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10500' Cyme Summer Sal. Brown/Black. CE#Im antense Flower DIummonds Willow PAC. W Spnng 7-20* Food Full Sin 6.00(11,ODD' dn=nondian, Cattia White,Pitlk. Shade- Symphodcaspialbus Snorterry PAC. U Summer 2-5 ft Food 5,500-7,500' Fl"M Full Sun BlueGreen, Cool Seasons Focd Full Sun Agwpyron smaii Wbtern Wheatgrass 1-1-5 R FoliageSpike AgIDpyron Slender Wheatua55 Cool Seasons 1-5-3 ft Food Greem, tmchycaulmn Foli,ge Artemisia Silver, 3,000-11,000 Prime Sage Late Summer 2-4 ft Food Full Sun hld'viciana Flower,'Foliage I- i || i 2--~ F ,7- MXT-Ell -- - ,-- -' 17 --1- -11 ill 1 uaL=*14.pac=*6-&4=*#8* - -11 1-1 11--91-1 1--22.-Fl- 0- LI-J-I't L 1 1 lilli - T- _ , '. 21-' ' ' U- 1 -_- - ---- --1. STOLPER RESIDENCE STOL.PER RESIDENCE STOLPER RESIDENCE D. I . I. 0 :. I. ... I. I ... 0 - I . .. I. *INT]FI~NAME ' COMMONNAME WETLAND INHOREf FIDWERm G HEIGHT UN~ LIGHT ELE'V â‚¬TION *;ENImCIUME COMMONNAME-zi "~$Â£1&~p.:.. ~~ZA~~E{(:4 Mi~lt"> REIG1TI':Â·~~~~~~~ iLIGHT ELEVATION SCIENIUICNAME COMMONNAME Za,Im /EMOILTUM, ' sE,WON HEEGHT BENEBB ' LIGm 'FLEVAnoN 5TAIU5 1 - ./.--1-â€ž....%.I Foot Pt-Flit Slm 5.000-10,000' Boutelam gnacilis Blue drama Wain Seasons 3 m-1.5 f Food Full Sm 3,000-8,500' Agrop]= smithn Western Wheargmis Cool Seasons 1-1 3 a Food Pul S,m T=nl Folia#ES]pike Blueamen, Ajous temublia Thin-]ea:Aider PACW RedfBtown. Catkin Summe to 26.24 * Shelter Poliage Pt-Full Agmpyron Green Pink. Yellow, SlumnE 0-5-1 ft Slender Wheatgrass Cool Ses..5 1.5-3 R Food Antennana alpina 105> Possymes PAC Early Summer 3 in-1 ft None pun Sun 4,000-8,000' Chly.opsis villosa Haily GoldenAME Flower Sun 01<hycautum Foliap hh, Rocky Mo=lin Pink. Mil-Late Pt-Full Axtemisia Silver White~ Spmg- Pt sun- Cleome sennists Â· 2-5 R Pmine Sage Lste Summer 2-4 ft Food F.H Sun 3.000-11,000' COnm. StotomiSErn Red-Ost=Dogwood PAC:W 3-10* Food 4.000-10,000' Bee Pim Flower Summe Sum budiovidaIL.3 Plow//Foliage Summer Shade 1*Gmen, Food Plit SULD Yellow. Pt-FuIL Ihs misiouzieoils Rocky Mmmrain his OHI. B]114 Spzing-Summer 03.-1.7 R None Pull Sum 3,500-10,000' Ely= i Bian Wid Rye OBL Folia, COD! Se050 I13 3-5 f ChtysopES Vi]1051 Haity Golden Aner Flower Smnmer 0.5-1 R Raceme Best nom bulb Sun BluÂ®Laven* Pt-Full Pik. Mid-I,te Pt-Full BID-Black. Food, Full Sun 3,500-11,000' Edgarce speciosta A~penDaby OBL Summer 1-5-2 R Cteome semlfam Rocky Mounmin Bee Plant Flower Swea 2-5 ft Juncm arairns Ballic Rush PAC,W n?a 3-4& YellowromnIG. Summer- PE-Full Ijght Gme!1, Flower Stm P.kh Sbelt/ Sun La* Brown. 3 in-1.7 ft Limited Food: Poor Sun Foliale Juncus conalsm Colorado Rush PAC-W nja Full Slm 5,000-11,500' Engonum umbell=n SuEfur Floweted Buckwheat 0-5-1 5 5.000-10,500' Ely=15 cmetens Basin Wild Rye OBL CoN Sea,ins 3-5 ft Food pull sun Umbel Ball Pinkle Sbel Btualsvender pt-Fun LOE]iCEIa Â·avinbemÂ· Shalk Femlca thmt}eu Tlmrbers Fecne L.ight Brown, Cool Seasons 1-3 R Food Erigeron Npeciosus Aspen Daky OBL Summer 1.5-2 ft 6.500-12,000' PAC,U Pink/White, Raceme L,te Spling M ft Shelier 7,000-11,500' Panide Flower Sm imrolucrita HoneÂ¥//kle PtSun Yellort Red. Summer- Pt-Pun 5.000-10,500' 1-1.5 5 0.5-1 R Poor Yellow. Gaillardia an#ata Perential Blanketflower OBL None PIR Sun Below 7,000' Erigonimi umbellattmt Sukfar Floweted Buckwheat Yellow,Orage, Summer- Ribes =reum Golden Cunant PAC,W S=m. 3.22#1.2 R iâ‚¬r,1 Pt Sun 4,000-400[}T Flower FaU Umbel F'ill S= Raceme Light Brown, Shade- Geranhim Sticky Pinki/render. Summer- 1-4 R Food 5,300-9.400' Cool Seasors 1-3 it Food 6.500-12,000' Rosa wooddi Woods Rose PAC Pink, 5-6- PAC.U Pt Sun Pesroca timit,Ei Thmbers Fagge 2-7 * Poor. Food Pt-Full Sun 3300-10.500 viscogissimlIm Gemnium Cyme Fall Panicle Pull Sun Cyme Siunmer Populus Narrow-Leaff Cre=ny Wba Pt-Full Linumpemize r. tewigi Blue Plax ~r Eally Summar 1-2 ft None Pull Sum 4.500-9,5001 Ii=n pmmi v. tewidi Blue Ftsx Bhle, FAC,W Spfing 25Â·65 R Shelter 6,000*500 FloweI IEarly Summer 1-2 ft Nane Pull sun 4,500-9,500' augustiRolia Cottonprood CaÂ£kin Sol Bhle,-White, Blue~Whibe. Amelanchi/ Moutain While, 3-13 ft Llwi= =genteus SiIky 1*te OBL Racene Summer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5,006-11,000' I*Im5 argen$8[15 Sing I.,wine OBL S=nmer to 3R None puL sun 5.006-11.000 B171 ~ 5.000-10,000' FACU Sming Raceme alnifolia SaTicebery Rac~e Ckeen Folinge Populas Creamy White. Ptam 5.000-10,000' (hyzop.i.hymemoida Indian Rice Gms; C.01 S.'5015 1-2 8 Food Full Sun 2.0004.000' Orympsis hym/noides Indian Rice Grass Coot Ses// 1-2 ft Food Full Sun 2.000-9,000 Green tr=]loi{les Qu,king Aq}en FAC Spring 25-50 it Foliage C*kin Medium (keen, Pink. @ Pt-Fun Oxytiopistimbertii Showy Locoweed Flower Early Summer 0-5-1 R POR 5ecunda Sandber:15 Blneithil (001 9925:DOE 1-1.5 n Food FuI Sun 2:000,4,000' Agroms Kibm Ticklegnss OBL Foliage Cool Seasons Food Sim Foliage Rocky Mount=1 mae,pu,04 tu38 Food 6,000-11,000' Pt-Pull Yellow. Pe-PuZZ Beam=nia A=1181 Pemstemont 5trictns OBL Early Summer -Viguiera multinon Shmvy Goldenere Late Smnmer 1.5-3 R Bedmignnis Sioughgrass Â¥OliagE Plastemon (hme Sul Flower Sun NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' syzigÂ»,bne Cool Seasons Median Gneem. 1:20-00" Bromu: ciliatus Flinged Bromigms Panicle Cool SeaSOn, POS secundâ€ž Sadkg's Blne~ass C001 Sâ‚¬250.5 1-I.5 ft Food Full Sun 2:0004,000' Foliage Callmlgt051i5 Bhue Joint Reed Grass Vigmera mulnflora Shony Gold=ye Late Sumling 1.5-3 8 OBL Gfee,VAnple Cool Seamts Food Pt Suit 5,000-11,000' Yel.0-4 Pt-Fun canadengs FAC,W Foijagemanicle Flower Sun 7 1-,ir 1-1 - 11 --,1,111-11 i.111:9 -1.r...1.-1 11,9~3=..11 - ri=Ok#*c=lb#*g=*1=TWJ ' HZ=ILWI=;1*41=In-h "' . 4, ' 8 IL=0~~Ncm~,r.W.Â»-U=1- 2 1124 1/ 711 - 1 1,6 1 L 1 L- -1 .1 1 1 I 1 1 - Â· ~ul- - i lili . 11-14*1 1 , "; ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2005 REVISIONS # DATE DESCRIPTION STOLPER RESIDENCE STOLPER RESIDENCE STOLPER RESIDENCE ---*-*----*- --lill--1--Il- - - - 0 .. -LLE_--iniz.__2~121Â£-ial<lrUS:..COI4IPPE.-25..34ZON~11~CU28HZ.BEWEEp~1 b]~P~ i~~LEVAIK*f-| --- Yellow.,Oreen, Pt Sun. 5,000-10.500' Creamy Whiti 1 C~ex nebrascencis 1 Nebmska Sedge 1 OBL I Brown, 1 0001 Seasons I 1-48 I Food 1 Punsun 1 Acer glsbram Rody Mon=ain Maple PAC Summer 5-25 R Shelter Betnla glandolosa Bag Birch OBL Late Sm~na141)FaD4-P~-~---m Cyme Slide - -- Aqdlegia coerulea Colorado Cohmiblne PAC.W Blu,White, Sumlner 1-3 8 None Pt S,m 7,000-12,500 [ZZ=1_--_--1.m-3E~ OBL Gree.Black 03-3 ft Food Full Sa 6,000-1 1,soo' - -- Racenle Spike Asperula odorata Sweet Woodaff Whim Eatly Summer 0-5-lft Food 4.ODD-8.500 1 Cargubitulata 1 ~eLLL-----r-17-T---~4'in'%-2-7-liIJ-F.* Pt Sun-- - (0 11/d"Aph'=_12/.*8*"/I--am'--Ab:i,il, 0./."~ (Galium odoranan) Flower Shâ€¢de Pink 'IL,avender Summer- ~ Desch=psia Yellow?Brown. 2-3 2 Food Pt-FIN - 84â€žm2somidmns4~~21---1---08L_m21___-1---2=1_~_34ft_Food_Ml-~___4 Cyme Fall LE!3Em----___._L-~ -1 ~ Sun ~ 7,000-14,000' Gerantum vt.051.Emim Sncky Gman#m FAC:U 1-4 * Food Pt Sun 5300-9,400' | Tuned Hair#255 OBL Cool S=som ~Maad-BarIey Foliage ~ Coot Seasons ~ 1.5-25 ~ Ligpinus 81@2*5 Silky Lrpine Blue,'White Summer to32 None Full Sun 5,000&115000- dMEM==1==1ItY~MZELI>Â«1222~ISI=IZ24af00aM~k5#0N5I'~ Raceme DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH- Yetky,r. SpIE[lt Pt-Full MErte!15ia ciliata | Summside A*ne Bkiebells ~ OBL, ~ 81,4 Sulnmer Mahonia repem 01*on Gz,pe Holly 03-1.5 R pood 5,500-10,000' to38 Food Pt Slm 5,500-13,000' Pacene Summer SUE K---Â·---------4--Â·--Â·--------Â·~ ~Juncus 101%154* ~MeadowLamgst,le Rmh | RAC,W | *~~~4 | CoolSeasons ~ 0.5-2* ~ Food | p=Il 1 4.500-10,000' I Padly.tm,1 0*USLaites Mountain Lover Foliaga'Shrub 2-4 fr PtÂ·Full SakrmankdalindgMaunii)nFlIowOBL_321___1- Sping | 5-138 | :00& 1 M Sm I 5700-11300' | STREAM Sun Yello'i | SCitpE15 letitia B.,wn. | Oe!,Dthera villoaa 1 Praitie Pli=ose | FAC | 1 St=- 1 1-5-32 1 P*S0C~Fn5 White, Summer 3-7 it Foot Sheltar Praill Flower Mountain Ninebsrk FAC.U 4.800-9,900' Hardiam Bu]Inall OBL :a 3-10 ft Food Full Sun 3,500-8.500' I O*ifolius Corymb Sun LEEMEEEMEE.EEL-_~ U I Umbal 1Lpainsinslpowimi,li155RFAC.W~~~~001S,2,gusIJ#F001~~-GUI Polemonium caeruleum J,[ob'g Ladder FAC ~12%9EEE*emaae*L_t-(411,In=Un,aiIiziI*IELI~~LIEREILEEIEâ‚¬Iiâ‚¬IL*E Powder Bhle, Eatly Single 1-38 None Pt Sum 6,000-10:000 StiIP/5 pung=15 CÂ»e MARGIN [knim,niap<3,Fis[S=Lfhniedhi/â€ždiORI~~~~GaSeam52-S#ShRtifulISt=*Saf)41.000' Potentilla BIKi<05a Shnibby Yellow, S[Immer 2-4 R Pull Sin 7,000-10,000 Cinquefoil Flower White Summer 3-7 it Pt Sun 7,000-10,000 REVIEW SET Rnbus pminorns Thimblebelly FAC Food Cyme Spine, mihimd White, Spring 7-10 ft 4,000-7 500' Unhoute Spies OBL Bood Full S" Â¢non-native) Flower Amip...communis Common Junwer 2-3 2 Pt Sun 4,000-9,900' PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 Sedum album Comt C=peÂ¢ Sedum la~b:ite SUmimer 2-3 inches Ful] Sun 6,000-10,0001 Sedum ace Golden Seonecrop Summer 4-5 inches Full Sun 52506-9,060~ Sedum refiesum Blue Spruce Yel[/W Summer 8-10 inches Full Sun 7,000-11,000' Sedum 'Re- Glow' Pink Summar-Fall 10-12 *125 Full Sm 7000-11.CIO(y APPROVED . - -- -- - PLANT LIST - " -L - . 111-11 1=~=F<-FI.1-.,i~tk~ 7 - _! 7 ' ' 'I___ I 1 I h__7 -- 1 1 - 1 1 1 1*Z ..: TErt â€¢ _2 - -1__~ ~~ 2 _- -__13 1- 1 - 2 -1 1. 1.-2.4- = 4 SHEET NUMBER L5-03 10 (0 go Â® Â® Â©COPYRIGHTDESIGNWORKSHOP. INC. ATTACHMENT _ _icttit. BONBDISBkI kl3dl019 hl3d101S 13Â¥HOIE 00~0100 'NBdSV F:\PROJE r _R-Z\ 638-Stolper\D. CAD\Schematic Design\DW-3638-PlantingDesign.dwg Dec 22. 0 - 9:2 wigiwig l 4) 1 U) 1 *ilg) I \ 1 \)\\\\ \\\\4 \ \ DESIGNWORKSHOP \ \1\\' \ ~ 11 Â«\\: 1 LEGEND Landscape Architecture . Land Planning 0 ./ 9/, Asheville â€¢ Aspen â€¢ Denver â€¢ Salt Lake City . ,1 \ /, P,O.B.TIZCINO.1 ~ \. .1\ \ \I\\\\\\\ \ Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning \ 1 / / , 1 , . 1 \ Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe \1 \ I // [-- 9850--] EXISPNG CONTOUR UNE / 1., \.4 <11) %\\ \\ \ \1\ 2\\\ I ) 1 U-1 120 East Main Street \\1 e.\ \\ i.\ / a / , 11(, , OLD STONE 1 99)\,1 2 - ~ + g~ ' ~ ~ f ~ r FOUNDATION 1 \1 \' \1 /- 0 // // // f hl ~ / 1/ \ 7850 1 PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE Aspen, Colorado 81611 / 1 \ \ M '1 (970)-925-8354 1\ 1 r+ --7848 - ... _ . L__1 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 \ 94\\ \ 1 \\ 1 ,(l / \ 1///ir ; /-- 1/95+74=:12\ / < - --- - - WWW.DE S I G N W O R K S H OP.COM \ \ / -,- j /, // r.t,/ . 111 4 7\ 1 \ / 1 It 1 , \ J // 1 / 1// 1/ 1 / 6/./ 9/ ~ 7850 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE - -2//(1111\1 \\ 3 if ./ \ \ i ,/ ?/4 1. \ \ // \ 1 , r 1 / / /,4... 1 / . / i,. .+40 45 - f ./ \ Â·rW 7854~ / JTW 7849.5 BW 7848.5 . / , 1 \\ \ / \ A / 4/ \9---0 1 1 \.\ 1 C 1 0/ 81,1~7 // \ 1 L - , E , < / 1/,:'fl.<:Â·.'/ ~i ., ' 19 ~ ./ \ 0 42 - \ 1 x \ i /~1. 1 PARKING .0' 'b 3 GUEST O /, TW7849. 1 < < ~/ Â· BW/846.5 , L .-1 1 \ L , / 1 \\ C \ 11 T.7849.5 14' \ \ , *838,0 / \ \ '' I: I w --- TW Z845i) BW --- .----- -- SW ts,1, - -.M . ~ TW .6BW 7 . - / E -1-ill - , I .0 ./7852. 4%4VW 7854 5 \ \ \1\ A~ BW 7849. ~/B*7850~ W 7847. 9449.2 1 \ \\\ I \\ ~- i 0 , 7847.5 , ) 1 \ 1 i .4 ~V / BW 7845 9 +// / %- 4)92 ------ , 0 \ ------ / , 2 / 1 -2 I * 786. \ \ , n \ 1 / , \\ \ 2 I / ral.3 / 1 / 40 * BW 7844. , k. , \\ \ I B - 7.t. f / 1 / ~ TW 7857.0 ---- .7851.0 \ B. 8524 -- - r// 2 J 6 ENTRY ~ // 61 COURT <# ~ --- -- / 1/Â»- \ \ . m > -407 j \ / 0 1 1, $- -./.0 1.785 . , +7852.4\ ,Â·~ . 2 / BW 7850. \\ \ 0- --41, +74go 1 \ 1 -/ 0 - 52 ZE. 7 1 26 - 1Â¢4 1~ 1 7850. ? / BW78524 BW 7852.4 BW 7851.0 ,%)4- ~ C, x - 2 i + / i 50 7851/ t 7852 WI. 1 -1 24- 1 /72-61 ~ 1 / TW 8515| 7854.5 . 7851.$ F ./ , 1 7850.0 , ~W78510 1 X -1_WL j W7651 6 BW78524 0. 7851.0 j j \ l //.L#21 j t. + i TW7853 5 TW 7854 B 10 \ \,&, ULKV X A J 3 1 842. 1 ./ , \\ 4% 9:X BW 7850.8 LOWER LAWN 1 1. -7+ 1 0- -A CP TW 7853.5 TW7852.5 \ / 0 TERRACE ibr 78510 BW/850. / 1 BW 7851.0 Ull / 1 GARAGE ~ ~ < 0*1.5 ~ 4 / 7851.0 +Zo.o j COURT 1% 0 f 3/'/,t + - , - 2 0 78Ao X TV 7841 5 0 \ W78390 0 X \,1% \c54 Nt) \ + FFE 7851.1 + i LOWER LEVEL 7839-1 \ X .7853.0 1 / 4 0 7852.5 / SPECIAL FLOOD X \\ 1 1 1 / TW 7860.0 \ Bll %k -ix C //47852.0 ~ f .1 HAZARD AREA I / 1 s SPA HOT 70590 V / 8%7839.0 -Uflk,El 1 00 1 2 W70#7.0 49Â· '~~Â· Â·' 0 ~771177 -771 0 4-' S 7856.5 I FLOOD PLAIN) 7840 0 4,st-FDEI ' >\ e.,1, 3 1 : L 1 1.. 1 ~ 8625 .A BW 7851.0 - 851. - BW 7857.8 r TW 7854 5 7856.0 / 1 BW 7841. -L 7 - + 7851 / 5 TW 7851. 7848.0 M "" ..~Bl W .0 i W7860.0 40 / r Ty - 1 784 k 4 <5 I \ TW7854.5 ~7851.0 ~ 0 4 0 | e TOR l \ 4.1. W 642. ~ l/,1. A, ~ BW 7846 0 4 W 7860.5 4:~ 7664.5 00 . i 5 T.lilli \ e\ .4 , 4 17884.5 1 1 - W7839, TW 7853. W mr 1 7. 1 Â»1,7,1,41,91,1 BW . A 1 .7861.0 ' C \74 - BWN.5 j /% N- 1 -178390 \43, N ..1 i - -TI/ 78685 (A -+ ~ 1 + \\ OUTDOOR\ * 4% 7 BW 7861.7 \~ 78500 ~ 0 W7861f5 \3Â« 7 44(11 - 78~8. 7854.5 \\ DINING \\ 0 7847. BW 7-0 1 \ 9 - 1 '11 \ 2 7854.5 7859.0.. 4 i j .0 1 4 X / 3 ' .- 0 9- ---- ,-mp 1 - , + + 8.78/0 I f + 7851 Oil $ T7839 m \00 -2-- 78510 , h i 0 0 77039.0 1 \ . --\S I + \ 4 5 ew /$.O -+0 7 478S90 ,$7 - 43 - ----2...22Â»Â»- - U *-- 70 11% i \ 4 .4 ..04 1 1 '/ + \\ *+1\1 \ Af j v -- 46 \90 N \ -- -- UPPER LAWN < ~ k .* 478660 \ X x TERRACE \ 0 48.2 u .4 ROARING FORK RIVER ~ 4 1 1 1.1 ./ j - . 1 0 J .+ - 4 it , Af $ 9 \ $ .0 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' 1:20-00" 3,- 2 5 1 \ , e \ #N Â»446,0 4 -)-1.. - - :- i --Â· -~ ..... - - -% .1 , 1 1 X \ HARRIS DITCH f i ae .2-- 1 \ BK.260, PG.818 ' P $ . i ~ TOP OF SLOPE 1307 4 - )/ .9 - 1 \ ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15,2005 . .i 1 -16 1.-* 40 ;1 4 r i \\ L4 &42 - 4, 0 7853 / 1 1\ -\ ' 1 REVISIONS 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK .0'' p~~X'W=/I V-0.-/. ----- - \-- M.. 0 \ : MEAN HIGH WATER 01 %-ff#t ~--1 .0 I 2, N*9 ' \ # DATE DESCRIPTION \ N - SPECIAL FLOOD \ \ -1 1 --- - \ HAZARD AREA '' \- Â»L. 1119, . t h - (100 YEAR - 019192â‚¬985 \ 02,51/ 0 3=\:-1Â«1-\1\2--1-33-2-2-2-222-1---% -0 --017 \ \\ 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE .o, \ 9 4 /4 , 444 144 \\\\. ROARING FORK RIVER 9. i - -1 %-\. \~ \ - \ x I I \ i b Fl \ I 1 0 - \ 11 ~ \ DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH C 1 1,7 1 -~ -a-0-0 1,-1-* '4-ii~.'--24. 11>0.3-0-~9,-0,2-0,~ STREAM \\\\ \ \ \\~ \ \\\ \\ - I f \ \IERriNg- \\\\ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF j MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE \11* 1\ hz 7 t x\O '# '1 - REVIEW SET 1\\2 2 :- ' Â»0\ 4 1 C (64 \ -- 1\1 O C - T. 78420 \ 1 X J 0 4 X 4 \A op \ 4 0 ' 7859.0 0 -1 - TW7866.5 \6 0 I / - 2/ I I \ 1-7 j \ 0 -- \ o 0 0 0 0 4 PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 \\ Ii\\\d GRADING Â® PLAN \/ 4 \ SHEETNUMBER \ ATTACHMENT q 02 - - | 0 | @ | < @ 1 Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP, INC. i--04 HlÂ¥d 3>ile 'ONOO - - - M3d1019 13Â¥HOIIN 00Â¥kl0100 'NBdSÂ¥ it 'M'O'W 'Eni 9'0 - - - 8-Stolper\D. CAD\Schematic Design\DW-3638-Grading Design.dwg LPCOIWIN VÂ¥ UIU~onur \ F., '.9/., . 5 Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning \ r . I 1 Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning \ I / .0 Ashev#leâ€¢Aspen Denver Â· Salt Lake City Â· / Â· GUEST I. C M /&/ 'i/ \ Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe . I I ' ....3 // ~ \ s ~ 120 East Main Street \ Aspen, Colorado 81611 - 7810 - - - -- \ (970)-925-8354 * S -- - 1 Â· ENTR, , ccum ' 0 ~ Facsimile (970) 920-1387 1 / v / t # WWW.DESIGN WORKSHOP,COM $*i / - 1 , I \// -- / h + . I 1 / / 1 0,& 10, L 1 -a@--2\, N~ 99, ..i\ -la, . 1 / 'ERR~E " B'= - 18. / / 0. . ' '10 3046 g - \ 0 \ /. 2 -6 1 / \A' U. \ \ -0 I N~ I - I 1 / - / 1 / \>eva : 30 \ I I a /0, 1 / I r , - I OUTDOOR ~ Â» ONING , \,0 / -- NA. a B < - 0/ r<-:1 - 4 1 N *-- --- I :9 m \- I N .96 -Â»34..%. 7 %- UM'mLA./4 1\ * 1 / --4-h ..L./ Â» 1Â·Ema~E ROARING FORK RIVER Â·-- - \16 / -0. 1 1 17/ N, /., , K ... \ / HARRIS DITCH BK 260. PG.818 A- ~i.2 -4 . * 2 '---- - - <b Â·. ='< _2 -17 1 / 4.I. N ~ .\ I I 1 / TOP OF SLOPE A ...... r - 1 V* -- 15Â· TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK MEAN HIGH WATER - ~ SPECIALFLOOD 1 / HAZARD AREA 1 (100 YEAR | FLOOD PLAIN) 7837.9 FRINGE ZONE - 44 0 2, ---- /-6 .529!55'91 ROARING FORK RIVER - 7852 V-- 7850 - - SITE PLAN 7848 i\.- 7846 / 0- 7844 7842 / Cj I'llill/ 7838 ~/ U L.-1 ILL] 7840 c NORTH 0 20' 40' 80' / - 0 1"=40'-00" 7836 / 7834 / / 7832 / 7830 <1) SECTION A - A' <#7 - 1 : 10-00" 1 / -7.Ir m - /I' 0 1 / / Illy - | ~ NORTH 0 5' 10' 20' 1:10-00" 1 / 1 1 / ~ ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15,2005 - 1 / REVISIONS . * DATE DESCRIPTION 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 1 DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH 1 / . - ' STREAM 1 / / MARGIN 7852 7850 , 1 - REVIEW SET 7848 - 1/ - 7846 --- 7844 / PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 7842 --i -- u 7838 M- --- PROGRESSIVE 7836 --- 7834 -- 7832 / 7830 HEIGHT LIMITS /~\ SECTION B - B' SHEET NUMBER SE ATTACHMENT 10 1 : 10-00" ZP go . -| | Â©COPYRIGHTDESIGNWORKSHOP, INC. 0 1 0 1 0 ' Â® ' Â® ' 0 ' Â® i @ ME I 1 70\'0'W'OÂ·kl9Â·01-----'~ BONBDISBkI k!3d-IO.LS hIEd1019 13VHOI.1 00Â¥k!0100 'NBdSV 8-Stoiper\D. CAD\Schematic DesigriDW-3638-ArchitectureSections.dwg 10 0 @1@1@1Â®101Â®1Â® 1 1 t.# i>\il i DESIGNWORKSHOP ' P.O.B.TRACT NO.1 Landscape Architecture Â· Land Planning , \ , 31 / 1-1 9 44 -1- <\ 8 Urban Design . Tourism Planning 1 1 Asheville . Aspen. Denver . Salt Lake City . O ~ Santa Fe. Santiago Â· Phoenix . Lake Tahoe r '25 f. f ~J j i ' ,<lot\ \ 1 \4 - 120 East Main Street L __~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 OLD STONE 1 1 l//l / )41 (970}-925-8354 - ~4~. FOUNDATION -4--\lf,<4/ -~ 19 <=- 1> i \1 f 1 l// tlif Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WW W.D ESIGNWORKSHOPCOM 1/0 t# \ 1 1// i / <9 ~ -1,~ f 1 < L 1 i : li i / / firf;, / '' .3*...... 1- 4Â¥ 2-~ T ' f <\1 \\ ' / / 1, Â» /43 /5 7 I 2 7- : C 05- I 1 A . 9 2-1-20 9,14{f - 23\\ I 12 -- 44 . I 4 -'-1, . I 1 Â»\\1 r.: Â·#rv. ~' k. Â·Â· /// // Â«,fÂ»ks. E ~-/--/ 44./26 - O - C j\X_._/-~ / / 22 -95% -I-~ ,- 49,1 1 A.\1\ ' I .:. A< 6 .. 22 2 \ \ 1 \ , i~ --I 4. 4 ~ A -, - -4Â¥i2240 2 -2-2-1....././.-k A i,L.. , 6. r , 1 >45 t 0 9 ../J %//0 ~ '' I , t . r ~.- %/1 , 7 2 1. 4 -> I: 7,41.: . ..4 \3 43 + / Immis R P . '1 .. I. 14 , /A k t . I F Â£â€¢ - J Itt. . ix i 1291 1. . ~ ' ;:6 21.34: \ . 1,1 1 1 . . K \ rvil"IL . - .& . - ., 1 ~ , V ' 3 ; I -* I.' 'B. . . . . M . A .3 1 C \1)1 , 1 %4 - . 4 /1.. r ' .* ./ 4 . $ .0 ~ "~;1~ ~~ -*, 44". iÂ·... I < , 1 . : . 44 4 f- 1- 5 -Vt. 19 4 1 f .*. 9 14\6.>- -30**"FUNI, 9-42 -..\ 14 \ . 1 - . . 40 A Ir.4. .'24 . 01 h C." 0 -1 . 10 - 1 .... .-,i U. g ~ - 4.6 31 "-A~- .174, 1469e -4~ F Il ~11 t. 1. . . ...44 -47 2.1 , @ 3 A 1 1 . Atfi. 0 ; r lL SPECk FLOOD /\ 4 I '. Â· HA;~RD AREA . 9100 YEAR ' *'*' '~1,~ ~ Tâ€¢th: ' "2 # r .F 4 -6.'Ji + .. FL~OD PLAIN) - 1 -*.. ./ . -4 1 '.4,6 2 p ,\ 5. 7 Â· N '. : ' .,4 I 4 f 'll. ./ 0 1 - \\ Vt? 9, K 14 1 , + 4. e IiI, ..1 / 1 10, /_ - - J ' 1 .2- .2 ..<1 - . 4 . 1. : * r g..9.. 91 - 9 1- 0. , ..~509 , 9 V 'O .4- I â‚¬ 1.04 -- . EL Op i O 10 2< ./-4 4 . X Ity....M'~ Ne= . 'ta ' 76 - 1 .. ., I I \ 1-I,-4<. rÂ» -- ---- -Â«â„¢42 -- I ..0-, -0. ~ 6 4<W ~ 00- ty. %24 7 .1 k..~- -7Â£-0Fs,47 1 t. Â©' 'd . t, 164\ 1 -/0 -- * # ROARING FORK RIVER Â·~0.1-- . 4 I \ 1 , 1 6 O NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' F 4 4 4 . 1:20-00" 4 UJ'' A L v#* Â· 42 ' 4 --l 4 liu / HARRIS DITC 44Lru . -,A>-AAA- \. Â».O 31.a * -y.. 'Â» i f f .-- t #'. - â€¢, - ' L :â€¢.~ . 7 . flor" 229 29â‚¬.12331 -9 1Â»34 >.tii f_* c+ , 4 BK.260, PG.818 ' ' ~ - TOP OF SLOPE L , ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2005 A I */ REVISIONS 41- 5, \X>\ 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK -- IMA . 9 N - -<-M 3 700, - # DATE DESCRIPTION I -- 0-- j.- MEAN HIGH WATER *&*: 7047*,Ili.J&*#* *6#* u - 7 - 1, I 4 1 - --- V,1044 ~/01 \ SPECIAL FLOOD * - -44441 - W i li .\ 7.-52 1 - -4/ N HAZARD AREA - LA @ijAPE- 04 -, -. fic<h - \-- 4% (100 YEAR 7 % i. 49*G//V 02 \ PLee PLAIN) 7 ---- 2 --mt- ~ A \\ . 44 - '4 L r ~4,+NLNGE ZONE I 4 - 14 KNF~-ZON> 1 <1 1 \26\ 3 2 .. pewr \Â©14\1134\\ 1./1 . + 0\\ /2 \ 3.-2 . fir ~\\3\Â° 1 0 - r :,49 4 .i i . 1 \ 64 \ 1.1 \30.1 \\\\ 9 j ' ' L. 1 1 + ' v &Â»14 .1 0 2 , f << ~(p DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH Â»0 .Â« t '11'Z\Â» o STREAM \hzÂ©.1 \ 1-â€ž'PJ.9 1 )\\ , APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF \\ 1 4 1 MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE \~\Â»19--r: \\\L \ *41 \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ - N REVIEW SET f .1 'fri \I< 11 1,1 c 1\\ 1 Â« 41 91 - 9, PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN 41 3\ 44 ~*~f 9.4 X SHEET NUMBER 1 \ L5-02 < | | |< | Â® | (DCOPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP. INC ATTACHMENT i 1- HIVd 3>Ile 'ONOO 1 BONBDISBkI kl3dl019 klad-1019 13Â¥HOIIN 00~0100 'N3dSV 390#238 $ 'M'O'hi '9'B 9 'O -01@1@1@1@1Â®101Â®10 1111~ DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture Â· Land Planning Urban Design Â· Tourism Planning Asheville Â· Aspen â€¢ Denver . Salt lake City â€¢ Santa FeÂ· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe 120 East Main Street Â® Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW.D ESIGNWORKSHOPCOM unt 51.7-w - .Cu~/-'C.b'J-tv,- - I I././. C-2 '. - 12.../'-/..J...V- .. Â·~...........L, 4/h .A L r ' ./. 4/ $. . . .11; I '. . r :,15* 1.-lk 1 .. 4Â¥Â· 4 2..1'* J Â· ' 44 , ,; 7- - - , t ~~ -r t ~ 14Â· ~ y 4 - 1 . : /4 1. ' .- Â¢ 0 A' ..r I. I . .r ru- , 4 ./ ./2 . ~#t.15,1.. 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK . 1.' I .Li 1 1 TOP OF SLOPE thÂ£ A,926-=*XviÂ·Pt Vial~P . I .. . - C ill,im*/3/6 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) /~h EAST ELEVATION 1/16'= 1' .,Â»_*/ - - 1/ 3 L_j- Ut.,f 2 .&1 . - 0, 1 4 r I L d - NORTH 0 8' 16' 32' r-, 1:16-00Â» - + 1**,#2... . . 4 . frA 1- - M~ - : .4 .31 #43# r..47 . 11 ... d='ll Y : 317 . . , 4 - . ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15,2005 4\_ REVISIONS # DATE DESCRIPTION I - /- *6-- ./ - . , ... .- ., ...9..411* - v>Afb: . I. 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK 4.- TOP OF SLOPE 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE - SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) /2% SOUTH ELEVATION DRAWN: KW REVIEWED HH 1/16" = 1' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 SITE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A-+tach me-nt- 1 3 | < Â® | Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC 30NBDISEIZI kl3d101S h!3d101S 13VHOIIAI 00Â¥kl0100 'N3dSV r/1 PhAP"GNEN V V "** Aty '3,% i U/13411Â£*0?te-r 136 Ir,1 0+*m BUiP~131 1 1 Hllm=1 L.--11 1 I lilli#1 11-711 1 1 Ill W L ,1 -fl~ 7 110Â¥1 411.1~.1.41 - \ 9 .44,1 11 11.i;..vt' . 1-,1. 4 1. .1 16 KNIN HJ/#TED#rer-fo iâ‚¬42 1->4.*39%*.:51*:f- 2~ - '; 1 - 1. 112. -- 1 1 Ji - - *In [111 .*21 p 13. -'Â»un im*t&4Tr- - i.LfL f 3 1 1 1 - ~ 2:0 -1 -.2 '- 4.Â· Â· 423 4 ' 204Â»..56 -~ - ~1Â· 11' 1 I. 26 L f 4 .' D. - .,11'.1 1- r \*Â»4645--,49 till k-1-= 1 1 - i,,..,02.64/1 1 '9'altlki #,4 + 1 * 3 #4 + t!(24>th :1 1 JU,Il,JAA,miBA :..94 " LL-MF117'11_]l li-Cti] 11&11Jtlin "I Ul!-411. * 45%w 4 . - _:i .'Nâ€¢- <Ii.9.- -4*,-tgf - 1. '. 1, 11. r, Â·â€¢râ€¢?r-4 / 1, *1!$;.9,Â·- ~(Â·I Â· 9'lÂ· , 0% 1.. .... I-lflr~filf 1.1 a 1.i. 1 1, -2-191 4 ''1 1 ' 14 . fT Â·Â· 111/ TI| Ilr|%/1/ 1 IMTI! 1 /1 9~*H Â»04~*Â»*f 9% Â»41 '11 1 11.. 1.1 P - 1 1 - -Â·Â· fliti 7 1.\1 11 4.79, N.,0 Â§49 22 9.4 - C L r.). . ..1.2.3.9 .ft?,1.-7 . I h 9 - 16 - - - -1 -1- #Â«22#Wn@-1411., '' 1. . 1.-1 1 14 , R'Â·Â·3Â·- lit- 1 1 11 1.1 IA f 1 -1 .. 14 ./ 29 Eli- . --- ...#- --1-- I., ...... .... 29->fi92iÂ«.2-:.li?~.~ -,- t IL. ~ - "trIMNhrk/=11Â»41/ '-1 . 1 1 1 @ L ~L' i Ltil~-rl- E .*N . 1 , 4- F ---.. 1 . 1-1 :.1.-1. 1.154 62~7' . 1 -7-r -11 1 ... 1 , 1 +1 1- :lili .. 11 r- 1 11 rnÂ¥ 7#1Â»t *F :. '4--Â· Â·..:: Â·.f ::Â·...b. i ' 1 1 [3 11 2'214% P1 .â€žr 11 'r--L , I â€ž, *C~i:* A 1 IhÂ· 11 1 i af**14Â»11Â·11 b, 17. . 7 - -.- 1 It: . 1 1 - . .1'' 1 ii,. , - ~I*% 41'-- *Aff.6 *iÂ· #26 - .-I . 1 .)1?ul fPE M':9 Â¢" 1 _U- . Y Al- 'rn,gui 611 qpuâ€¢ .. . - i 1 11 1 , 7 .4 1 <r-rÂ»Â¥ylle A 9 - 9 --- w. 1 1 ] - r 11 -- I. A / 2 J 1 3 ' w . 7\ 1 :0, 1.1 - / / 1 1 11 494 -/ 0 1 5 7/12 1 1 . b / 1 )1 - i *c-4-1/~Â« t.-f 111 1 / F f .. 1 11. 1 ~111 j F : 4 = - 6, .~ 1 1. Plt. 1 : 3-1 /1 4 d. / 4 - 1 11 -1- I i F / : <1 -* f ?3043'f[-2 r = 1 // .1 :1 1. 11 - . 111 A 1- - - 11 11 11 - : / 1. 11 11 1 1 1 1 , M 9. 1 /1 /// 5 :1 . 1 .r 'll /l .. . r- 1 ' 32 1 lf., I - |1 <4 '1 I L_rh 14Ff.~16.39 t~Â»'Â¥,4 ---Ill--------- 7~ 2 Â· ~ ~ ~ eNÂ¢4*:1' - 4 2,531>/f, 9 %#5,8. 0 0 9 fl) PÂ»Â¢k, 0---- 4 14*KMÂ¢2Nlitk.k.FAL Jr y y' 'aw=a - '40. h .of' _,475 (CD) l -1 j \VK/*aM#444'Mbrell~PAWL#,10 3 N Â»rÂ»e-\044 / 1 3?MMA#Nfm,&*1 If 1 J,A 1.-74-- '1-P'.k\'voÂ·~ 2nr 4 20: ~pv MA h 0 D 1--2/r 0 1 2 77/#1:M,<,YA/nk Ol Z 0 1 m -' ~ r# tCP ~tiÂ©tiy 0 3, M 0 (h G 1 Ut> 9 91 Â»61; iN?A~97= 1 Ill - 9 9 1% lcD * Ng . -It 1 -1 1 ' M IL ,% I , E m 1 1]1 9 .r 1 i m -- iii 05 I r ~-4 r 11 ~1 Â» 11121 348 6 --1 W d~ - 610 0 3 0,2 = 70 4-1 3> 4-1 - .8 7 O Z O Ch Z 0 0 Z 7IT 4 - s STOLPER RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS O. O 5 z â‚¬ www.cunniffe.com P f C 51 Ch SHADY LAN E 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 9~5-5590 * FAX: 974920-4557 ASPEN, COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE RD., STE 202 * STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487 * TELE: 970875-0590 * FAX: 970475-0501 t 013NVd 17219 N31-hIOO G.-2,2 -1 . - 0: I t L.EV NOI1VA313 HlflOS 4 .tuid,1& 4 =IL 31 EL =~5~ 9 9-U@lu 491211-9 S.103.LIHmIV WINNn) S31)IVH) 1HDIMAd0)Â® ON 133HS 50-0Â£-LL Ma!91 'W'S :3lVG :inSSI @I@i@IÂ®IÂ®IÂ®t@IÂ®IÂ®l 1 TRAIL IFT WICE DESIGNWORKSHOP \ Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning P.O.B.TRACT NO.1 ---- ::.4 :All Â£ i . / .i./2~47 --- 03 1 # 69,\\ i # A Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning / . Asheville . Aspen . Denver . Salt Lake Cit.v . / I / /,/// 9 1 L *l rri'\ : ~'~ Santa Fe. Santiago. Phoenix â€¢ Uke Tahoe / 1 ' 120 East Main Street , FOUNDATION (970>-925-8354 / -1 L L L ,'UnsTONE \\ \41%11/ iÂ· -l 1 \ .\1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 \ \ \- \ \111 El f 1 I 1 2 14 -j Ct i \ / /-6- 1 -1/ r--- I /--<1% \\*14\ \lit \ 2 ZONE 1 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 l // 'A.) f /. /. 0 47/771*PLijj} 1 p \ ZONE 2 - \#& WWW.DESIGN WORKS HOP COM C --1\ - \,4 I I. - , I i i i il'~ 1: 1./ . A 1 4 V.-t> ~t 1 -~r--44\ - 5, \ -1 . I. f \ 1 \\ // '' / 2 Â»/ 1 1 .4 0 1 1\11 7 f, 1 b : w 6~-AL, ...1-4 1 \ \\ 4-f ZONE 3 '' i ./ 77 -0 L r /1/ 1 -1-22>IA 1 1 \ L..1- A 11 : i 00% -, Â·Â·g J.-4~_L/A~ ' i Â·! / ' 1 / kil) - '.1 Arr5*C-\1'~ Ail 1 ''~'~~ ~-- ~ Lf.f"- ..F- 'L , 1 / /5 ZONE 4 - LU 1 \ I '- , , 0 1 44 1/19- r -1 ... 1.11 rv , % 4\\ , ; 1,0 ,r ' ZONE 5 0 Â»\\1 12 *A 0- I al.V 7>L h ~~~~Â¢~v~- Â· \ V. , 1, I \ '' / . -- .-L- $. 2 ~~ ~~ ~0~ ~ ~~02225~~i;I~ ttf~/r/1~*tpI ~ i,-1- i tii,t j~,.0-*0, -Â· . = 42~4 ' , -02 -a.P , R \Ii\\ I /7 4, , J 4 *f.'-7 , . .4 1 . 0 A.fi'.I- , -4 11 4%~ ZONE 6 -7 Â»\ i .r ....P 1/ aKI C-~k.,d>t' 4 1 \f 1,*rr ,- i,Â· ' -- ./M- f : I 4\ h..& 1 IrvAV I L -- 2 ZONE 7 7 1 1 4 \ I % - 7 ..4, I 1 + .1 78*2--r-3 - 1.bL It ./ / _211 1 / I /2. 1 - 04'.A,Â«49 PA., thja' 1 ! 't 241.14-17-,4 A . \ - - - /,0 7 ZONE 8 1- -- --- - U V - -1 I N \\ 1 4:.Al 1, 1 \ . . 3-40& 1 1 I 1 1 Â·*\ : 1..1 4 > 60 1 1 [ 1}4 1 Ju r<!~--*----- -, . . irs<v*# 1 1' Â»A -/. -'.Â· 1\1 1 / ~ '~~ -*' i f' * 1Â·Â· I i 1,Â· f : 1.1, 1,1-#-*- 1 11 14 1 ' ) 142-77,4Ll,--rr~ 1 * 7 \ E /Â«79\ 1 \ 23 +MN 525 . 4- 7 - h :riI , 2~<1 h > r // 1 1% 3_I I .,+L - Mf---1-N#. 1-w KN AL. i * I .g-- . / I i * - r 42--0--73~%.f'<1 If---37)94Nu 7-54 -- t A . 'A,4 1' \ 1 ~~1/ , I . 1 :.- af / 19 \ 1 - .. .42-3-1-2 1 "ili,-p*411 -/ \\\ .)Ivb ' / e< 0 - \ .,1....'. \ 1+ a , AÂ© 5 .V Â»0% 1%6 > 13 I h I. 1.1.1 ne- 7 , -&. 40 ZONES --- 4 -ta-9 Â«'P.:.-4 0 .*r .. O -L / --S. . r, , 11 V'. 78* -/~- " k -9 1 1 ~ // --0 --- , | ~ N \1% 6 - 1 ..ri 1 1 ' il,9/1.&/ --- I U h \1 F \ 1 134 ...ar 5---- .- - y' 11 11 t.'.7 \ F . 2 . k I /4 - I le . ' 1 2 -a / 2.SM<nites.7111 IL.EL- \ . 11 ..4.1.- 1 . 1 - L t 1 =1.-- 01 7 9...44 It lili - \61 /4 1.U t i I ../4. 1 90 - / *99<k~4 -*4 1 Â« , v ... ' Y, 32.tkz ...â€ž P\.39 A \, 11 I 1. It .. 1 .11 Ch'-1 Â·Ch , . ' r Â· D. .- i . I s , , /... , 04~ l| It il I li I I It I / :*'/., 47'Â§.e.JtÂ©1*U ~,AN.Wy III i :i ti !1 1 1 :1 11 1 11:.4 !1 11 1! 4 1. A , 6 - 4 4 1 16 A*Â« lit ,1 1, Â· I ~ 52, _~/ * ~~//v***A--1~--~&=t#r*j/-----*w /1 1 f .4 Â· ---- *Kiek -*-r-' A L.\ 4~ I I - 2 FA i 04% 1 11 i !1 .1 11 ' 'li w ~ H .I lili '1'1!ill 1 1 SPECIAL FLOOD A, /1 -- 1 11 1 1! 11 11 1 -,7, 1. I ." . ' , r 0.0 4 â€¢. . 1 1 -1 :E 4 .Â· - i 1 15547/5:,47>Â»L N Co x'll '- 4 -IJ-f ....~-- b... X lilli I~ it : , r =-r .... , 1 11 1 L HA#RD AREA 11 1 1 / - -- p.\ I 1 1 '4.... C. - 1 11 11!:11 t ' Ar,i,611- LI! 11 It :1, 11 1 / A 7 -1 * . .:'424*trtâ€¢twdewric K i :2. c . 1 * 1 1 42:ff ~ 1 11111 1 1 1 ' 1 1 H-FB ,.1 r, Pe J 3 j 00 YEAR 17/- / !/ / / A~ l\ lur~ . 1 ~ - 1, 11 'XI ~~ 11 Il 1, - 1 1\\ FLB@D PLAIN) , / 1 1 > 1 1, 1 1 4 *NI , 1 iâ€¢ 2 . 'lili . .. .~ - i~ 1 W / .1/ 44 I . . 1 It -â€ž 1 1 11 11 i: 14 11 11 1 ~trx ,-35/ ~ r. 1 a '1 , t -1 i *0 #1~i'al ~~I~" 1 1>7 t 1 . a . / 1. , I i. 7 -1-1~ 1; ~ '~ --- :. 1 2 , , 1-- % * Mv 3 , h , 1 . I . .. 1 I 1 1 r k \A , v 7 , / i _ + , -' gÂ·: 11 il 11 ii 1 1 1 // i i '-1 9/ At *44 1 1 1 1 1 1 . , 1 , \ , I I 1/ / 6 1 1 1 1 : 1 - .1 <UL -1 . 1. ''11 .4 i:i! 1' 11 It 1 11 0 3.>54 \0120&3&+W* hii= /. ,:.i 1 I I L. I 4[ 1 1 1 1, 4 41) A- . 4 -9Â« 0 F AANT##. 20Â£ 1 L.1 1 | I | i , ' li t' - f 'm . 1- /.-1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! , Â¥ , 1 1/ . 4 - -%*-71- 1 , 0-' ' ..1/ ,/A \-1 ; i .1 ii i ! I 1/' lili. 11 5 I ip '1 li !1 1 , - \ <01 \ hililli 1 1 4- n ..6 I D Â» to /m , p r- tz /-1.-1 1 I. \ 9 I -- 11 1 i't- . tx ./04 . , -11. .d, rh | - k /1 -~. - - =-- r , 4, <a \ O - 0 1 -4 / k; i \.4 I--- .---: - . . i Â« i- r-ir .5- i $ 1 1' 47 - ID 2/~<p~~EAYIL + 44V) 4 V. ... 11 1 \ , 7 - "-41.e.~. 1 y f . -4 - - 1 -1 E rt I r t-k lilli - '0397*--, . -, IC - .....*.........., \ 4 11 % r., 91Â».6.1 ! le ..r I - al '' u' '11 \9 .\47 U" -4-- . 7 -. /a.' 43 k AL- -- ly, 3<93. 3 ' 141 1 1 1 7/ .~ --- Â· 4- iâ€¢Â·~ ru ..4-47 1=et-1--40 .O .. 1 ~27;-'il 1. .0 I - 7-r - - 1 . 1, . Â· * . .5- '3 ~Vi k /54D .26. ~_4 : A- --/..2 1 ~'r'y W W p , a -6- 41.2/ 4 r. ~ 4- ./ k 7 1 -1 11 -1 : 7 '771*. 'ar.J -10'.7 4 \ 0 7 " u '.r \ A- 1, 0Â» 0 _U,2 4-9 422/3/,;-1/ 1 1 . . . . V'.' JÂ»- ' 1 T. . wa. -PI : ZONE -. tI1 1 7-f: V,Â·rt i F SM..- - . .-...@j..Â·41~Xy:bÂ¢'~-ft- 1 \06 1 -,9.4- ' - r- m +Ck=â‚¬ ./. 4 - 9 --~* 4 A- // i NU# ~ ROARING FORK RIVER 7,77- 48.0 + 9- . 44Â£*U, 12'46-4 3 - A.- - -44 . \I / > I. 1 Â¢* ,-I , - ..1 1 \~(ih .4 j - I 1 - lA i. â€¢ '. 22UV - , 4 '.â€ž2 1 1 NORTH 0 10 20 40 .... 0 -1 . X -- 17* e 1!/ ! , 1 1 1 R :/30.--/ - / - ,4: lk14--K-1,~ 1 - , / I ,~ A-~T'Â¥~t/~~Ch-1--+- .0 i --54 1#9 1 A 1 1 20-00" 4, t 1 = 4 0-2ll - 33- - _2 1-1 1 .., wIll . 1 1 .1 - I HARRIS DITC - Z / 4/ Â«24 / / h.. /1/ Â»qk~ " \ --Vt . - t.. h. %. - Â· L BK.260, PG.818 194 -1 V - TOP OF SLOPE 1 - - f- 24. / 1 < 1<--,24$<L<:SC~Â¥>In"4?--1.- - < f 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK ~ 1 ISSUE DATE. DECEMBER 15, 2005 1 - - --4 - -02= L - - .1 1 261 REVISIONS 4 0 - k # DATE DESCRIPTION * 1 .i ------ h-X MEAN HIGH WATER -Pg= . as,##rw i\\\ \N \\\234 1 : N ] 7' 1 tti 141, ~ 2, SPECIAL FLOOD -#4 43<CK# , A 6 J - -- 10\. HAZARD AREA 4 \s.Nky* \ er 1 i 07,4 -1992 ; 1*; +-1-14113 9Â»Â»e/4 ht*- 421. 1 1Â«x <44~1_[16] t, fÂ«0\ , \ L \\- (100 YEAR - \- 1UOD PLAIN) - ./2, L /0--i 3 \2\- J ' IN.â€ž----irÂ», #- \ 7 --5 Â«t,;4.41 \ r 1 /96**PuNGE ZONE ~1,1,3~ -\Ck \1~ \"21--U-Â»- ~-91 \\ \\\\ . 45* ~~440:6344/.~ +pr~--x -6.4.\ \ - / 7 41 \ Â£0 0 4,= - hi-Â·-*92 Tri#rc;; #6.*1\ Aib,w~r*f\\ '. 3 . - \\41 ROARING FORK RIVER -,% ~ f Al , \ d~i~filâ‚¬pjâ‚¬1 1 ,-9 --~ 4~< F <:U.)Y\ 7835 ~ \ O \ i e \ - \\\ \\ 1. 1.\.319\13\9\\\\J\.\ ,\. 13 \ DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH / 0 1 :4>4 0 %*- 0 GATE .0 ' lili\\ \19 ':\ Â«:\J STREAM ff Â» X X \Â» \ I.\ \ \ \%21 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF _j 0 1 ' 4 \01 j thil ),30.:i\ MARGIN - COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE 0 \06 k REVIEW SET / 0%3 \\>1 44 3 $ I-....40--- 1 1/1.1\ 1 1 C i../I./41/1,/ ./. ~1 \ > 0, 01\ ...F\All\\\A \0, - : \ I \ lilli\\\ \Zk \,0 PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 VAÂ» 34*At: PLAN %Â«Â»0\ i.\19\> \3 Â» i:&144.01.'9.0/0 LANDSCAPE f 9>\61 ::IDY. \ ATTACHMENT 2 f f h .... SHEET NUMBER / N I 1 ff . 1 q L5-01 | Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC HlÂ¥d 3>HEI ONOO - - hlad1019 1 VH NBOISBkI 00Â¥hl0100 NadS 'M'O'B 'D'El 9 'C] - @l@l@l@I@lÂ®l@lÂ®IÂ® DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture . Land Planning ' P.O.B.TRACT NO.1 Urban Design . Tourism Planning 1 Asheritle . Aspen . Denver. Salt Lake City Â· 0 )\ 1 9 4 , 4 \ 1 Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix . Lake Tahoe /\ \\\\ XI .6 120 East Main Street OLD STONE L _.~ j~ FOUNDATION 'Â·,~4~\/ 1; 1~ 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 iii''43 ,i ./0- h \ (970}-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 (2< C 1 1 ~0'~ - WWW.DESIGNWORK SHOP.COM <11 2 Ar i 15//7/96* 4 --- -,1 1 / / ' A / / . - / //4.twi~ 6 <~i// r~ ,x ii.2,i . --1 . . 2,72 \ 4 A~ 1 . CU,(k t- A 4 \\\\ ,@P, .- ..A, -6\\ f / ) / 2// /1/ *..f< - PMA.. I f j - l %% Â£9 -- :...7. p--el- - 1~' 17. I *t 9 - I . I t U.X . 1 6 C. 1 \ 634Â· i r,A~J ~ ./ O f. 61 L L i21 - 3 --0 -/ 0 / 77 17-<4 --0-- -- -co 3 Â«23,7 /'/ 71 X â€ž ~.. ~.7/ .730 \> A ... I Â· L- _ . 94 > 4 - -h / / . - 4.& _. 2 -2 - %0'tr J.,ti , ~ ~ il '.4 k~ '. I .ti: t. / t. I , .. . 1 1 - 4 -> 31 1\ \1.10 + , 14 .L... ~.W .,\ 4. . I , \' U. 79 M N 1 Â· . 1.Â·0'- . ..\. I ., 1 .. , 1: l. + -1 . .4 - , / 0 1 4 r.Â· 0, r . . I % . \4 . Â©r, ~ , 44 f ~ 1 â€¢ . . 1 , . I / , 4 ; / > 4% 1 14- 1 %* - . . 4 / ../.7 t '1 .4 $ . f. \ . .1, .1.2. . -f' << 1 -4 'as ':tf- Â¥,1 . 'i \. f -- I * 1- 74 , 4 06 . 1 / L-/ 9 /3 ::Â·> -U t. I. 1, U -14 f 1 -i-9, . Â»4 + - I Â· 'K.2.Â· u Â»Â».1.....- 21.2 N. ...# , VU . Ne&Â« 4,7,4 , .-t'*--1/A.â€¢ a - 2 FL,I .. 0/ p AM % 1 -1 :. . 1' 4 51- .%- NCAL z -72 4-*:4~~4- I '45LT' p~,3 ~ ~ 2. ./. , 7/\\ - 3 C t Â»0-L...â€¢ 1 1 1 4%\3 , . lf\ .54 SPECk FLOOD $ F . - ..7 ...1. I : L I. I I HA~RD AREA Â· 0, th*:h . FU 9100 YEAR ' -n 'r,â‚¬%1 ' .14 '9Â¤4,/ ift, id.~ - f 1 ' ./. /4 "th,- \ \V FL~OD PLAIN) ~ ~ ~V .1 & t. ..4, - In :.rÂ·.rÂ« B. / I Â»Â·,24 M }IN . J - 3 I ..r -2,1- 1 . .9 - ' 91. M if' ./ 3, . 0 / 06' 864_. e e 4 27 -- I - 1. 1 1/Ift - (9 1 t. n 0..... % 'I - ILJ $./t '. I 11--4-1-: f .iÂ»\ ~ *ar* 6, \\ I. t 'aL ' -1 ~44* 24Â£ i le f w yx. ,~Chi - .1~ I 1 '' ., , L I* I * Â· A 4, m.. e Xur--4694 627\.afrl?''Prwhl 9/gr ./ . - .= t. fÂ».4 , b#g :-:_0 0 t- 9-NA~ 4*b,9.4N=* 2 - 2 . L . 3. h 4-~R>k~'...A, i 6,VEÂ£0 4~1 - - ~.,-,/ - -- 1 + ' I VI. 2 . 4. , r; --li'* .., N-h~ i J EN\0*Â£ x <*:7-, r.- t-1 . - -9 KÂ© 0 k --/~i////Ti-% 14/4 \42--f--4 Â»40,9.. -FS=-4. 1 11 .J,4 .9, . 0 ..... Nek + . Ph r.' -T Ii.... Â»* *44Â»Jile#irriT .Ut \ 4.Â». ., , /t- - 1 O L.+ 4 j .. - 7TZ -I - O 1 ~L~ Â¥,\ 4 . J. 4 \ . 4 J ./- 4 r:- 1 .... . 04 42, .4 ROARING FORK RIVER 1 - ...IST:Mil ./-6 - , 4 u-~ , /*4** 4'i_-3* j ' 11.4~....Â·- 6 \ , 9 1 *. 1 ' ,\, 43 NORTH 0 10' 20' 40' ./ , 1:20-00 --LA - 42 Ok, 9,%4.A- 42 !42. lid, h J./* 44' - HARRIS DITCh ./ . .4. i / 44: 7 4.., ./, P. 4 - - , X \\ ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2005 BK.260, PG.818 i 4 ~ C -2 1.4 P 1, . \ \ -Â·6 4 31 2* 44 TOP OF SLOPE , . â€ž a ~ * ~Â«Ct~ ~*Â« ' 4- REVISIONS -r - 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK 0 ..~ ell-. -~ 0 - h 1.All - - 6-, n . .4. Â· ' - - --- -I MEAN HIGH WATER --, ~ ~. ~ - ,- \ 700,86'h - # DATE DESCRIPTION SPECIAL FLOOD 1 f+ 1 ~. 4:4 tAN &6APE ~'0 _ -f~<1 Ch 1, * 1.... .2,~ ; ~ -24 HAZARD AREA -- #-* \1,2/ligni.f ,râ‚¬441 A. ~~6,jpt~SCAIN) \: 1 1...EK.i '6Â»4\\ --I ---- .41*Gr /2 - 0 27 \1 4,%12, - 470 - S.Na--4 6 \ \ 4 4 ; ta.,r 4,9- f-th ~tÂ·. xjo~ - /71;37:5;lkleGE ZONE ~ 2 -. 9 -4- -- 1424\Â» \1\\ '64 36.h\ Â» li.x--43:9110 1-< 4\ r\ , 7 l- ft- 1 4%44>0 21 3 it Ual 1-1 0 0 1 ROARING FORK RIVER - / Ar*43 7 Â·, 41 414 1 Â»e Â»*h i 4 ,,\kir 41,49.4-4<t \ 6\ 0 1 8 1 1 -13 /1 . Â»34>14-6 +\ (Ji \ ,,I~ \1\\ 01\ 4 \ 0\ 1 1 - DRAWN: 1<W REVIEWED: HH 1 \ \\\ 1 6/\ I. -- brib< \ Â»\ \\4 \\\ \3\ 0 STREAM APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF \ \\:.4 A.41 ir Jil 3 . ij. MARGIN COLLAPSED DITCH HEADGATE 1401 \1 \ f \\\ 1 1 \\ i \\ - f -\ 4\ \\ C \ \\\ REVIEW SE 1 \\ 0 \ 1 0. 0. - - I -- 2.%34<19\\ 09 11,1 1 '1 PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 t~~1Â»91\-00 1 \ 631 6 STREAM MARGIN 0 '~ 44 11 4\19% i REVIEW PLAN SHEET NUMBER L5-02 | Â® | Â® | Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP iNC ATTACHMENT & 1 HlÂ¥d 318 'ONOO BONBOISEnl kIEId10 klad1019 13Â¥HOIIN 00Â¥kl0100 'NadSV ' AA' O'bl ' 923 9 . a 390189 l@l@l@l@lÂ®IÂ®l@lÂ®I@ 1111~mlll~~ DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture . Land Planning Urban Design . Tourism Planning Asheville . Aspen . Denver . Salt Lake City â€¢ Santa Fe Â· Santiago Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahoe 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970*925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WW W.D ESIGNWO RKS H OP.COM - ' - Â·Â· VUM+ 3-4-; 0-A --t:L~~_.,â€¢- -* + -4-2 ..e.....JIL/-,_w~. ~..U-AL-btl JIEV.A-Â»Â»*C-/, 4 -. UPX.-- 1,1 *lificik I i , , /4 . . 4 . WN Jir 'Â· I'lfV. r . / T 4.-i Â£ g - 44 . 4 , r Â· 1 ' 7 4: , Y . I r .#r y j... . -Â· Â·Â·Â·-4 Â·Â· Â· I Â· : ./ ... 1. 4 I ..7 ' . I .: I . P ,â‚¬- I I -4,4- Ai . - - 'Jettl --I------%.---*.4 . 75=: 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK - TOP OF SLOPE ., PE jilll -- -6Â¢t21mpf%:9!k, 1 1 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ~ EAST ELEVATION 1/16~=1' - y/L--, -Â£- L--3 â€ž.5 47 4- ' L,r 0 *Lk-.JA- - 4, 4 - r 9. /35r / L - 6 d NORTH 0 8' 16' 32' 32;Vit:Fli,i:Blifiks:5.'#ilifitilili. 1:16-00â€ž T. I. r - - I I - ---- .. 4 .r, 1.1 - 1- Â·Â·, 4' Â· . ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 15,2005 .47 i I '' I. REVISIONS 6 I . l i :r... - - / - -*--521* # DATE DESCRIPTION 13% f M. . / 1 3 14 . ' 15' TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK . ,Â»1 w:*:f TOP OF SLOPE . 7837.5' FRINGE ZONE - SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) /'21 SOUTH ELEVATION DRAWN: KW REVIEWED: HH 1/16" = 1' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET PROJECT NUMBER: 3638 SITE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A.4-tach,Not- 13 Â©COPYRIGH1 DESIGNWORKSHOP INC 30N30ISEIZI ZI3d1019 hlad1019 13Â¥HOIIA 009%10100 'NEdSV