Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.066-06 RESOLUTION #/OW (Series of 2006) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, IN OPPOSITION TO THE 2006 BALLOT ISSUE KNOWN AS "PETITIONS", AMENDMENT 38 TO THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, THAT WOULD MAKE CHANGES TO THE PETITIONING PROCESS AND ADVERSELY IMPACT OPERATIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND ALL ITS ENTERPRISES, AUTHORITIES AND RELATED GOVERNMENT ENTITITES TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE CITIZENS OF ASPEN WHEREAS, an initiated constitutional amendment, Amendment 38 to the Colorado Constitution, has been certified for consideration by the voters of the State of Colorado at the coordinated election to be held in November 2006; and WHEREAS, Amendment 38 proposes to supersede and overrule all conflicting provisions of the Colorado Constitution, Colorado Statutes and City of Aspen Charter to implement a new initiative and referendum petitioning process in Colorado; and WHEREAS, severely impairs the ability of local governments to promptly respond to the needs of their citizens by postponing the effective date of ordinances to 91 days and in some cases for up to 11 months; and WHEREAS, Amendment 38 severally limits the information the public will receive on a ballot issue by requiring governments to distribute a 1,000 word statement, exactly as written by the proponents, to every registered voter in the municipality, while opponents' statements cannot be longer than the proponents' statement and must be summarized by an election official before it is distributed to voters; and WHEREAS, Amendment 38 prohibits public resources or staff time to be used to "discuss" the pending ballot issue. This radical change from current law will not permit a government to answer questions from the public concerning such issues, pass resolutions expressing the local city council's point of view, or put out balanced information on the local impacts of various ballot issues; and WHEREAS, Amendment 38 states that "no district resources...shall aid accused violators to repay expenses." creating an unreasonable personal financial liability for public employees. Public officials would have to pay their own defense expenses regardless of whether they are ultimately found to have violated the law. If a local official is found to have improperly "discussed" a pending ballot issue while on public time, the official and the government must each pay a minimum of $3,000 to the State General Fund; and WHEREAS, Amendment 38 is a very bad choice for the citizens of Aspen and the State of Colorado; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL that it is opposed to the ballot question known as "Petitions", Constitutional Amendment 38 that will appear on the November 7, 2006 coordinated election ballot and urges the electors of the City of Aspen to oppose said proposed amendment and to vote "No" on its passage. D."'do U-4/ r ~/ 2tJp ~ .j I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held August 28, 2006. ~