Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Oches, Lot 29, West Aspen Subdivision Recorded 1:32 PM September 1(:;978 Recption # "-"" Lf7- Ex.. .lm<35.t ~Gt 06 207008 LOl .ca Banner Rccprder STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, GEORGE and SANDY OCHS are the owners of a parcel of land located in pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described as: Lot 29, West Aspen Subdivision City of Aspen, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicants have an existing single family residence located on said property, and WHEREAS, applicants have requested an exemption from the definition of subdivision for the purpose of subdividing the existing property through condominiumization, and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting held July 18, 1978, determined that an exemption from the definition or subdivision is appropriate and recommended that the same be granted, and WHEREAS, the City council determined that the subdivision of the existing residential property through condominiumization is not within the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance set forth in Chapter 20 of the Aspen Municipal Code, THEREFORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado does hereby determine that the proposed subdivision of the property by its condominiumization is not within the intents and purpose of the subdivision ordinance and does, for such reason grant an exemption from the definition of such action, andley, III, ~ I KATHRYN S. KOCH, do hereby c rtify that the foregoing Statement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision was considered and approved by the Aspen City Council at its regular meeting held Monday, July 24, 1978, at which time the Mayor" Stacy St,:mdley, III, was authorized to execute tJ;lji)"'~'~~';;9;n,,;~half of the CJ.ty of Aspen. ,." ,',~. .. (; ,',:. ........ -' '.J;;'. .4 · , /...... ,~> , .. lerk. <', -', '-.:~ - STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. \~.'''',...", ,.:~~~;;~~ ,:~:- -7 n COUNTY OF PITKIN -"" ,- The f,Qregoing was acknowledged before me 'this o('SOVday of".AU9U;Il.t,',,1978, by Stacy Standley, III and Kathryn S. Koch, ,..~e.lfs~tM.l,.t'y""known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, ,,:'.W the 'C'j{.y'.of Aspen. " '",", "\ '1 j / ,'" ,-" ~ .;it I j. I '" '" ",?'," 0'!tine~1mJ hand and f' .....- 'n \, '..- ;',. ,) .'~.: ,,:.,':.-,:~..<~~?,,/' ' ii, '1\\ \", -,' "'" :My'commission official seal. ~J.u.Ad:v<J.(}udJ.<<u( No ary Public eXPires:~. I~ /971 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice RE: Ochs Subdivision Exemption DATE: July 20, 1978 The attached application requests exemption from subdivision for condominium- ization for an existing and a yet to be built second unit on Lot 29, West Aspen Subdivision. As this subdivision received final plat approval by the Board of County Commissioners in September of 1967, a duplex is an allowed use on this property provided it contains at least 15,000 square feet (R-15 zone district). This lot contains 17,139 square feet, therefore this is an appropriate request. The applicants are George and Sandy Ochs. "After having reviewed the improvement survey and made a site inspection of this project the Engineering Department recommends granting this application without condition." The application was also referred to City Housing Director. Mark's recom- mendation is for approval due to the fact that, "one, the only current tenant are the owners of the existing unit, and two there is no tenant displacement due to the fact that the new unit is not even built, and three the existing owners will reside in the new unit, and four the existing unit is not affordable by persons of moderate income as the owner plans to sell the unit at approximately $160,OOO;and five,six month minimum leases are already a covenant in this (West Aspen) Subdivision." The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting on July 18, 1978, recommended your approval subject to the six month minimum lease restrictions of Ordinance 53. sr ..".."--_._-_.~,._~.'----'--' '~"~--'~~"'-' .--- City of Aspen Planning Commission Aspen City Council May 22, 1978 Condominiumization Request Per Ordinance No. 53 This is a request for condominiumization of an existing and a yet to be built second unit on Lot 29, West Aspen Subdivision. A footprint outlining the location of the second unit is enclosed, as well as an improvement survey. Responses to the reQuirements of Sec. 20-22 Condo- miniumization follow. (a) Notice to Existing Tenants. Non applicable. Owner currently lives in existing unit, no tenants involved. (b) Lease Restrictions. Six month minimum leases and no more than two shorter tenancies per year are existing covenants of the West Aspen Sub- division. (c) Approval will not reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing. (l)Minimal Tenant Displacement. The only tenants involved are the owners of the one unit currently in existence, and one more unit will be created, no tenant displacement will occur. (2)Units affordable by persons of moderate income. The current situation is that one unit exists which is unaffordable by persons of moderate income. By creation of and condominiumization of a second unit, that new unit will be affordable to the owners of the existing unit, persons of moderate income. Thus, the end result will be a new unit afforded by persons of moderate income and a likely slie1't c,e'rJ U::ct2.0!l of ';lOrth of the existing unit as it will be half of a duplex rather than a single family home. (3)Right of First Refusal. Not applicable. City of Aspen Planning Commission Page 2 (4)Evidence that ros ective Durchaser is em lo er s who intend to rent to em lo ees. There are no prospective purchasers of the property at this time. It is anticipated that the current owners will hold title and reside in the new unit, selling the existing unit. Respectfully Submitted, '-.5'~ ~ Cfre L ~ George and Sandy Ochs Enclosures M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice RE; Ochs Subdivision Exemption DATE: July 18, 1978 The attached application requests exemption from Subdivision for Condominium- ization of an existing and a yet to be built second unit on Lot 29, West Aspen Subdivision. The applicants are George and Sandy Ochs. "After having reviewed the improvement survey and made a site inspection of this project the engineering department recommends granting this application without conditions." The application was also referred to the Housing Director, but as of the time of this writing, we have not received comment. In my opinion, the applicant has satisfied ordinance #53. The application states that "The only tenants involved are the owners of the one unit currently in existance, and one more unit will be created, no tenant displacement will occur." Since there will be no tenant displacement, the Planning Office feels that your approval is appropriate subject to the 6 month minimum lease restric- tions of Ordinance #53. sr C"'\') ,,-.>~~;:: ,-' '. '-; I~~'. " . :- ..,:~-,-y.,,~' _."-~' 506 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P I T K I N M E M 0 RAN DUM c o U N T Y TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mark A. Danielsen, Housing Director DATE: July l2, 1978 RE: A) Ochs application for Exemption from Subdivision Regulation B) Francis Street Condominiumization-Subdivision Exemption A) Ochs Application: Recommendation is for approval due to the fact that 1) the only current tenants are the owners of the existing unit, and 2)there is no tenant displacement due to the fact that the new unit is not even built, and 3)the existing owners will reside in the new unit, and 4)the existing unit is not affordable by persons of moderate income as the owner plans to sell the unit at approxi- mately$160,000, and 5)six month minimum leases are already a covenant in this (West Aspen) Subdivision. B) Francis Street Application Recommendation is for approval. Purchase price for the units was $100,000 each, and tenant displacement is minimal as there have been no tenants on the property since 4/1/78 with the exception of a caretaker who vacated in May. However, it should be noted that these vacancies were of recent origin, perhaps in preparation for this application. It must also be rea~ized that the rent for the big side of the complex paid by Stacey Swetil in 1978 was $560/month, for a 3 bedroom, 3 bath unit. The small side of the duplex rented for between $380 to $505 per month for the 3 bedroom, 2 bath unit. On a per person basis this would have been affordable by persons of low and moderate income categories. Recommendation is based upon the relative poor condition of the units. Also, a 90 day right of first refusal and 6 month relocation time have been agreed upon by applicant, as well as 6 month minimum lease terms. , MEMO TO: RICHARD GRICE PLANNING DAVE ELLIS \i'--.d:' ENG INEERING'VL-- FROM: DATE: July 11, 1978 RE: Subdivision Exemption Request - Lot 29, Filing 1, West Aspen Subdivision (Ochs) After having reviewed the improvement survey and made a site inspection of this project the engineering department recommends granting of the exemption without conditions. jk M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Marc Danielson Dave Ell i s FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Ochs - Application for Exemption from Subdivision Regulations DATE: June 13, 1978 Dave, attached for your review and comments are the preliminary plat and application for exemption from Subdivision regulations of George and Sandy Ochs for a duplex (second unit yet unbuilt) in the West Aspen Addition. Marc, you should find a copy of the application in which George has ad- dressed Ordinance #53. I have tentatively scheduled this for the July 18, City P & Z meeting. Please return written comments to the Planning Office by Wednesday, July 12. sr Order Number: 7752 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: February 1. 1978 at 8:CO A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: A. ALTA Owner"s Policy Proposed Insured; GEORGE L. OCHS B. ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: FIRST NATImrAL BA,'lT{ IN ASPEN c, '. ,- ,..... _.-- -'f (-,.., , , () C~("'" .~ Commitment Number: CC 79406 r Amount of Insurance PremiulD s 160.!lOO.oO s 90,000.00 s Tax Certificate $442.00 $20.00 $5.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: OONALI) L. SIMPSON AND SA.-roM E. SIMPSON :t.p 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: Lot 29. IIRST ASPEN SUBDIVISION. Filing 1,0. 1. County of Pitkin. State of Colorado. -,- Page 2 406002 . . . ,,: . , STE'\"ART 1.'ITLE OUARAXTY CO~PA.Xl" > 0.'0- -" -SCHEbutEB '::-S"c,ionl Order Number: 7752 Commitment Number: CC 7')1,06 Requirements The following are the requirements to be complied with: Itefll (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. to.wit; (c) Release by the ~ublic Trustee of Pitkin County of Deed of Trust fr~ Donald J,. Si~son and Sandra Po. Si~son for the use of United lIDrt~age Company, A Colorado corporation to secure $77,850.00, dated July 26, 1974 and recorded July 29, 1974 in ~ook 289 at pa~e 602. ' (d) Release by the Public Trustee'~f Pitki~county of Deed of Trust fr~ Donald L. Simpson and Sandra E. Simpson for tbe use of First National Bank in Aspen to secure $68.000.00. dated July 26. 1974 and recorded July 29, 1974 in Book 289 atpage607~.. ij." (e) Deed fr= Donald L. Simpson and Sandra E. Simpson to Ceorge L. Ochs. (f) Deed of Trust from C:eorg'~ L. 'Ochs to the l'uhl~:~ee of Pitkin County. for ".. uoo 0; firo' ".':o.:.,'~' io ':"'00'0, .~ "'.000.00. ~ . .-,,' .~. -- . ,'4'/;;,::)......' .', ," ~>~~:~;':,~;, '. "..>;.:~.~ - .~, '.'. "" ~ ~. ; ~ ~ f 1 , , . r Page 3 STE'W'ART TITLE GUARASTY COMPASY 406003 . .',;.; . ~ Exceptions Order Number: 7752 Commitment Number:CC 79406 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public.records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the dat~ the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any and all tax sales vhich ltave not been properly redeemed or cancelled. Treasurer's Certificate of taxes due bas been ordered. 7.Rigltt of a proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove bis ore should the S8ll\e be found to penetrate or intersect subject property, as reserved by Patent of record. 9.Restrictions, ~hicb do not contain a forfeiture 0 reverter clause, as c:ontained in instrument recorded Se telllber 5, 1967, in l\ook 229 at page 78, as _ended by instl'Ul!Oent reco e October 4, 196 in 1look 229 at page 507 and as .amended by instrt%l!l ecorded V.arch . 1976 in Book 309 at page 497. 8. Easement for utilities over said Lot as shoRn subdivision. : 10. Terma, conditions and 0 ligations conts ned in Articles of Inc;orporation of West Aspen P.0IIle _ r Association, r ded March 6, 1968..~, n 1look 233 st page 496. ' 11.10 feet and abutt 21, 1968 i and scross enbject property, g the County Roa 9 as Bet forth in lnstrutnent 235 at page 118. \ parallel recorded to .January 12.Any tax. asse t fees or chnrges by reason of the inclusion of the subject proper in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District, Tbe City of Aspen and Tbe Aspen Valley Hospital District. Except i.ons numbered are hereby omitted. Page 4 STB"WART TI'l.'LE nTT.f.RANTY COMPANY .. , .' ,~"~-\.. )".. I ,_I 'f~"'I'.1.""~ ..rJi""..u....c-(' ",A",..Lf.<j &. I ,_l ...., . \ Cl : I '.; Certificate that Taxes are Paid to Date STATE OF COLORADOf ss. Pitkin County ,...,Jl.,.., the underSignea.m,m..Cl;':'(&~~~!!:!;..'O.!!........m.....m"h"""""h"'''''''''''''''..'.......h.., ,....... :10 hereby certify that there are no Ta.r;es due and unpaid upon the lands described below, '1nd no Tax Sales of said land unredeemed, except as below stated: T AX LIENS WHEN SOLD AMOUNT SOLD FOR AM"OUNT NECESSARY TO REDEEM Section or TOWD,hip Rarurt or PART OF SECTIONS OR LOT Lot or Block Adclitioa Day Month Year ~-I 0(9. t1J~4 a l}~.-./ ~ P / Oollan Ct>. Dolla... Cto. /971 J.;~ ~l.-t...- . ;~Ttl~ ,~ ~fip":': "<',tiiJ1i} -, -~- Witness my hand, this...h......,h,.....h.1..~,.....day o/.,....h..'..m.'.h......L,,/.-::....,.....191l.,., c2. - s-o 1 J q;~?~":;!J~~:(,d,i{......d..<~g~5;..i;~';;.~;~,;:m ___. A ,,~ ._,~ l , '4 , , .ri 1