Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.hpc.022-2006RECEPTION#: 551130, 07/15/2008 at 10:14:54 AM, ~ OF 3, R $16.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), DEMOLITION, RELOCATION, VARLANCES, AND 330 SQUARE FOOT FAR BONUS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE, LOT A AND THE WEST 22 '/: FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 60, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION N0.22, SERIES OF 2006 PARCEL H): 2735-124-59-112. WHEREAS, the applicant, John Key, represented by Gretchen Greenwood of Gretchen Greenwood and Associates, Inc., has requested Major Development (Conceptual), variances, and FAR bonus for the property located at 135 West Hopkins Avenue, Lot A and the west 22'/~ feet of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be ~ erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and I\ WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff C analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to y" approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a demolition, according to Section 26.415.080, Demolition of designated historic properties, it must be demonstrated that the application meets any one of the -` following criteria: ~ a. The property has been determined by the city to be an imminent hazard to public safety ~ and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, a b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to ~o properly maintain the structure, i~ c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen, or ", d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance, and Additionally for approval to demolish all of the followin¢ criteria must be met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located, and eJ b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent " designated properties and v c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation oL needs of the area; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.0 of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, for approval of an FAR bonus, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.0 of the Municipal Code, that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; and b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building and/or c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; and/or d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; and/or e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; and/or f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; and/or g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated August 9th, 2006, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines have been met, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 9, 2006, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby recommends approval for Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Relocation, Variances, and a 330 square foot FAR bonus for the property located at 135 West Hopkins Avenue, Lot A & the west 22 'h of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, as proposed with the following conditions; 1. A 330 square foot FAR bonus is granted for proposed rehabilitation to the historic home to be used for the approved design. 2. Demolition is granted for the non-historic rear outbuilding. 3. Relocation is granted for the historic home. 4. The proposed door on the east elevation of the historic home will be reviewed at Final. 5. The skylights proposed for the flat portion of the historic roof will be reviewed at Final. 6. Carry the sloped skylights on the one story element across the entire east side of the one story roof edge. 7. Minimize the size of the lightwell located at the rear of the historic home to an L-shape and pull the south comer about 18 inches away from the edge of the historic home, to be approved at Final Review. 8. Reduce the size of the landing in front of the historic home to be located within the property line. _,. 9. The applicant will bring the depth of the porch into compliance with the 6 foot minimum _ required by the Residential Design Standards. '~" 10. Residential Design Standard variances are granted for the "Secondary Mass" and "Street Oriented Entrance" requirements. 1 1. A waiver of 2 parking spaces is granted. 12. The following setback variances are granted for the historic home: a 10 foot front yard setback, 2 foot east side yard setback, 5 foot west side yard setback, 7 foot combined side yard setback. 13. The following setback variances are granted for the new detached residence: an 8 foot rear yard setback variance for the new house, a 2 foot east side yard setback, a 2 foot combined side yard setback. 14. Staff and monitor will review and approve the height of the historic home and foundation during the relocation phase of the building. I5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant cone-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. 16. Restudy the front porch element to be more in scale with the historic home, to be reviewed at Final APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of August 2006. Approv s to Form: ,~. V, 1 David Hoefer, Assistant ty Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION G~ArC Je rey lferty, Chair A -- -- - --~ Kathy Stri land, Chicf Deputy Clerk ~, . RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPe) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), DEMOLITION, RELOCATION, VARIANCES, AND 330 SQUARE FOOT FAR BONUS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE, LOT A AND THE WEST 22 Yz FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 60, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 22, SERIES OF 2006 PARCEL In: 2735-124-41-007. WHEREAS, the applicant, John Key, represented by Gretchen Greenwood of Gretchen Greenwood and Associates, Inc., has requested Major Development (Conceptual), variances, and FAR bonus for the property located at 135 West Hopkins Avenue, Lot A and the west 22;1, feet of Lot B, Block 60, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.4I5.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a demolition, according to Section 26.415.080, Demolition of designated historic properties, it must be demonstrated that the application meets anyone of the following criteria: a. The property has been determined by the city to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence ofthe owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen, or d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance, and Additionallv. for approval to demolish. all of the followinl! criteria mnst he met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located, and b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area; and 11"111 "III "1111 "" IIIIIII IIIII 11"1 III "III IIII 1"1 :~~ ~i~~ ~ I : 35 Jl=INICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 0 0.00