HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Lot#1-Cemetery Ln.1980
.'
,
"d. 1-80
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: February, 1980 STAFF: Sunny Vann
2. APPLICANT:_fitY~.fJ\spe,! / ~AYN't3 a/4/Z/AA/4 4////& r~-"?
/ '
Lot #2, Aspen Employee Housin9 No. 1 Subdivision
3. REPRESENTATIVE: Ron Stock
4. PROJECT NAME: City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption and Special Review
5. LOCATION: ~/e//I/<::l'!A1/e
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
HPC
Residential Bonus
__Stream ~1argin
8040 Greenline
View Plane
Condit i ona 1 Use
Other
P.U.D.
)( Subdivision
.-X_Exception
_~_ Exempt ion
70:30
--
____Rezoning
_,~Special Review
~___ Gro'llth ~Iallagement
CXa3'77CX/ ,/e-/'\ Lc,/ ~/?:...I T' 8(a../r7~N /C/\
- r-- ------
c:X-N;-;C/--!/,A//CY #Pf77C"N ,:;:ra:;/At-~/&=/ E/--I/ZcYEe
-,------ --- .,.----r--- - ,~
7. REFERRALS: h0c ~'<"/"7
~\ttorney
v"-Engi neeri ng Dept.
PiouS i ng
City Electric
Sanitation District School District
--
__Fire r~arshal __Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
_-------.rarks _State Highway Dept.
___ Holy Cross Electric ___Oth,'r
~lountai n Be 11
~11 te r
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: ~~~. ~-( ~/c:/~
" /
'"
9. DISPOSITION:
p & Z ~
~--
Date ~/c<::> ~1a5a.
c::)Y 7 Ice ~-1L~/E"=
, ,
~.&:;/At- /)EV/&---/ A/1"'Xtv-/c:.. dX/;7/~/r;:;~ LY'Cy.../
~'V7c/<./cr AL.L ~../;)~5~IC/lLY-h /,/,\/L',R, 73
/~::L-.J-1/-t::c ~ ~. r'6-"f"/ ///
Approved V
Denied
Council t/ Approved_V Denied Date_:;/f:~~/CJ(e~
?/?~/{..:q-'- ijk'/-1L-If,8//&=
, '/
C~L;R~ ::::///12 ~/-#-I8//7A7/C'N
/ '
10. ROUTING:
Attorney
~Uilding
Engineering
Othe r
'j
I' '.
"
,
ME~10RANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: City Duplex Special Review: (McArthur/McClung)-Ist Reading
Lot #1, Aspen Employee Housing No.1 Subdivision
DATE: July 7, 1980
The Aspen City Council has previously approved a subdivision exemption per-
mitting the separation of City Lots #1 and #2 on Cemetery Lane, a subdivision
exception permitting the condominiumization of one proposed duplex on each
lot, and given special review approval for price-restricted employee units
to be constructed on Lot #2 with exemption from Growth Management.
Two ordinances are before City Council for first reading. They would grant
permission to Dan McArthur and Rob McClung to purchase the units in the
duplex on Lot #1. Prior to approving this sale of City property, the Council
must grant special review approval of the employee housing units (as desig-
nated in the covenants signed at the time of subdivision and condominiumi-
zation).
The attached application is for special review approval for the design of
two price -restricted employee units to be constructed on Lot #1 (which
are exempted from Growth Management restrictions according to Section
24-10.2(h) of the Aspen Code).
Pursuant to that Section 24-10.2(h), "Exception to the Growth Management
Quota System", housing unit exempted from the Quota System include "all
housing units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10" (which allows for
low, moderate and middle income housing units) "subli,ect to the special appro-
val of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning
commission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed,
the type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated June 30, 1980,
outlines plans for construction and deed restriction, and also points to
the need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and recommends approval
given the middle income price restrictions previously agreed to.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will examine the
cation on July 8, 1980 and make its recommendation.
will present that recommendation at your meeting.
Special Review appli-
The Planning Office
"
No. 3J.-BC'
CASE LOAD SUMMARY SHEET
, City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: JUhe' /q,gD STAFF: Jolerce Vre-b--fL
2. APPLICANT: C'.A:J.-.-.lr/ fl-sD.P/YL //VJcAv+l1//V 0.1- /vie. C!V.{ff
J I f / '
[of 1f-/ ) /4-s,te"-- Fn.p/oyu -lluU5/"'6 NO, >u6,
3. REPRESENTATIVE: f20 IA c)tD r: k
-
4. PROJECT NAME: 1-0 f- .:# / As~E ""-r)J 1"<" 1-6 u S(teo': 5pc' o'aJ J2..J/I~.L,J
J U. c/ /
5. LOCATION: vVHe.fD/'j L-~
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Subdivision
Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
____Stream Margin
8040 Greenline
View Plane
____Conditional Use
Other
Rezoning
P.U.D.
~Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
7. REFERRALS:
if Attorney
if Engineering Dept.
v Housing
Water
____City Electric
Sanitation District ____School District
Fire Marshal ____Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Parks ____State Highway Dept.
Holy Cross Electric Other
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: P,..J?:-) L C S If' fA 'a.. ( !?e 1/1'2.M..J o--f-
M UHP iJlJYi fn 11-1 6 V l"'I wii'L
,~ /Je47/(97!""~ hCJJs/d/.
HN-h 'i'/Wu:l~
:24 /e, 2 (It J
. .
!'
9. DISPOSITION:
p & Z V Approved V Denied Date 7~jgn
O~J&yP011,..d ---I-ta/+Uf/ /c; f1Md" fh-- ':;v'd I
i'\{J--u ~ / ,?.ef /?, ...J-t. e fA ~11U I) V<--f .,/ .
7T2 ()J':;"~'/~ .w4~ II'-n:-(iJ,iA(A-Ur__d~j DYn/t'd,/
I r ' , /
--k.A/f V...(:5a,/,:/ /{~c?/N'uuJ /s H~ C:;'-;;k-t-~
~", -fb-r 1-0 f qp 2-,
--.
Counci 1 \/
Approved V
Denied
Date --7//11 go
f I
Y(/1/>'c'IA) r2-!/'Yoh;.-td'
/ee ~ ZJ<-
'" t6
/)() bd ~f Jz) oC('t? f:'-/;?c
, I
(ou?<.-cc-< '
e.--c./ '.e' c-J &_ -:; 1 - rh..o
~
10. ROUTING:
V Attorney
Building
vi Engineering
Other
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
aQd Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdominiumization of the proposed duplex. Before
you today is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Section 24-1O.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10 " (which allows for low,
mQlferate and middle income housing units) "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.
~.. ."---. '.,~
-- ,- ..,.
--~~T:..._"
_.
... -, ,.;,.......__._~.~.. . ~~:
,
,
'~
.
t!
r.~.r. ''f,'. _-~- ~_.' .~r'.." "".",,.:
",;
>,
."
..,"0:. ,,:.r
1
t
,
14
it
;
f"
i
~ ,_'.,...\i
-:~". ..
',', 0(; .,'
,I, ,.'" ~.
"',
<
'---
.
.. .'....,-~ -..
...
.,
,
-'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kathleen McCormick, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex Special Review
DATE: June 13, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exception, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the proposed duplex' condominiumization. Before you
now is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their low and moderate income housing
project, also known as the City Duplex.
Pursuant to Section 24-1O.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-1O.1O,"(which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units),"subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning
commission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed,
the type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommendation concerning this application will be
presented at the P & Z meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 1980; Sunny Vann had
been out of town and has not been able to review the application.
~1EMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption/Exception
DATE: February 28, 1980
The City of Aspen owns a parcel of vacant land located on Cemetary Lane
which it wishes to subdivide for the purpose of constructing two duplexes
to be used for employee housing. In addition, the City wishes to condom-
iniumize the proposed duplex structures to permit their sale to individual
city personnel. The parcel is zoned R-I5 and totals approximately 40,000
square feet in size. Consistent with ,the area and bulk requirements of the
R-I5 zone, the City proposes to create two duplex lots of approximately
20,000 square feet each.
The Planning Office, having reviewed the City's request for subdivision
exemption/exception, recommends the following:
1. That the City be granted an exception from compliance with full
subdivision procedures for purposes of subdividing the parcel
in question, subject to the Engineering Department's recommen-
dations which are attached for your review. Specifically, the
City should be excepted from conceptual approval before Council
and preliminary plat approval before P & Z.
2. That the City be granted an exemption from the definition of
subdivision for purposes of condominiumization of the proposed
duplex structures.
The subdivisions of the City's parcel and the subsequent construction of
four deed restricted employee housing units is exempt from growth manage-
ment competition. The employee housing units, however, are subject to the
special approval of the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning
and Zoning Commission. The City intends to request special review approval
upon finalization of its building program.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office's
recommendations at their regular meeting held on March 4, 1980.
\-
(y',
\
\
\
t-1 i
I
"
\
,I ,\
'01' :
.\- \
\
\
\
, '
I.
I'
"
I
I
,.
I
';~.;,
i
(
,-
,
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - - Special Review
(Lot #1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision)
DATE: July 1, 1980
The Aspen City Council has previously approved a subdivision exemption
permitting the separation of City Lots #1 and #2 on Cemetery Lane, a
subdivision exception permitting the condominiumization of one proposed
duplex on each lot, and Special Review approval for price-restricted
employee units to be constructed on Lot #2 with exemption from Growth
Management.
The application before you is for special review approval for the design
of two price-restricted employee units to be constructed on Lot #1 (which
are exempted from Growth Managment restrictions according to Section
24-10.2(h) of the Aspen Code).
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10" (which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units) "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated June 30, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and recommends approval
given the middle income price restrictions.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
-:rlfP(00
p+:c Ae-c-~ Sp. c<lr~ ~'Vt;kcf
--.fLJ- A,--",-......c.,:a-.f.... Ci-~ -fir.-~ "fo
"--'-'-- -f-l---<-- :5~ C'--=- --frn- Lo+ -It: 2. .
Pe..{vr~"",J +t....J- ~ L-. - .. f_ h-rud-f/;.-
~L L~ c.-.:.. +4- QJhvlV-<-&it..(!-:J'
iii
, r
, ,
L-~
1.> j
cd-
,l _
~"" . t-r
. I
/ ,I)
-~~ .'
';'
~I .- f'-~ '
I 2..1- ,,\
j
~
c'
,#" I
( /
J "~'_'" ,."<-_ I
'..-'
. of~l_
.,
"
June 30, 1980
The City Council and
P1anniny and zoning COID@ission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Mouerate
Income Dousing Project under the G.M.P.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 24-l0.2(h) of the Municipal Code of the City ~(f
of Aspen, Colorado, Daniel A. McArthur and SRilF61'1 Y.a~' ~teeJt -1lereby J..1 '1' ,
submit to the City Council and Planning and Zoning COlolmission this' ,cCt..fJ;t,;
written application for special review approval of a low and mod-
erate income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemp-
tion from the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the following-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
'"
Lot 1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision
"
The real property contains 20,000 square feet and is zoned R-15/
(Residential). ,~111i'f:C
'- rh
The applicants intend to construct)a, residential duplex on the-z!'\ "r
real property. Unit 1 will be a:i-wo'bedroom,C2,30CY square foot 5,LA~I,'\
structure with a 530 square foot garage. Unit 2 will be a three
bedroom, 2,300 square foot structure ,lith a 240 square foot gar-
age. The duplex structure will be two stories with the ga~es
providing ,a common wall, /25:feet high, 96 ["",L ..ide:, with:4~ feet
in depth. 'As designed, the, duplex structure complies with{all of
the area and bulk regulatipll~' of the R-15 (Residential) zo "...
L-.,!. ?/.
The a plicants agree to deed restrict the property within the ---',
~ dIe income housing price guidelines and the applicable occu-
pancy imitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-l0.4(b)(3l of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado.
r
,
,
" ,
~0r: - -"r.":-~
',' I
r-'~~r'''''','~>
'~-\-i.'
~.,~. ~.
.....-l.
-'""l'F '7
. l~---r~'F-
, .. '
~'~~:..'
-.,~-
I,
. "'.f'
';"
I "
1 ;
~ : 'I i~
I'
,
. ,; ','
,I' :.
j'
I'
.,."'-.. If
'~Ii
~
- " I' I ; ~
" " I'
r--~' 4;'~-;--....... ~r.~...I' .--.....~ ~
, - _: II .', I 'J ~
...."'...[' (,n ""_', ,r '
, . N 'II Ij/:~// i
i. .' ,:
. '''' J.L ~~ ,',..'_. ___1...__J
r- ' ' ~ ..
"
,I
~:
\',:
. ,
,
~ '.
\
,I
.'
"'l" .
, I
"
.
,
f _;:.::~:f'~ '~", ,~.~~>~~l~';;.:'~,;~"~':~"~:):',~~- .~.T'-'
~ '(," ,..-" "."--"...,, 'f\
'~...-..._!~ i A.~,,"'< ll',. ...~" '~"'... ~t__
,..-.........
.' .... .~,
.... ,^ '
.
,,.
~
:~:;
.,
"
City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
June 30, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being elig ible employees, intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City of Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the con-
struction of such ownership housing.
The applicants respectfully request special review approval to
commence immediate construction.
_-----Respectfully submi t ted,
,~" H)Ss2 v- ~
Ronald W. Stock
Attorney for applicants
'.
,I'/nk'l (ILl ~ :r(8/ go ^.^ __~-I:;; )
ffff '~J1J):~~J IT::U-~b -p~,
flLeeV' J ~-z..-.-- l
, .J'/ to.A/
~ p.,v-'- ,
-~r
. ,
, .
"""'11.'
.'
\ .',
.----"
. ~ ..
,
-,.
~~'..i~"~ '~;:r::~
",\ ""
,
..........o-y-,.
.,.1,.
.-'~-:.~~
1'.'
, ",
T,_ ~ ~f
,-.-......---
.'
"
~"'"1lO"PS-r,.
:ii ;'
.",'
4;
.i .
"~::fI'7~.,- .
t" .
~ : ,: .'
\' ,
"T;""--'
-', .
1'.. . .~,
"
. .1
,~ Ii"'
"
I'
I"
l~'" I' ;}.
1
, Ii
'I, ,."
'.-i!. .
'I.'
. .'!
I
; ,1 '\:\
" \..
. ,
:1
,
(". >r'~ ",- .~.~~::>.~~~t.,.. ,:1.':-.t,"'~,--~'1"~~ ~w~.
il.. "~"---,')'; ..',','.....~, ' .~ (/.
"':";:..:..''t. i . \...,,'0.( ;(',. ...~' '.,;...... '__
,...............'.
........
, ,
...... ,.
r-r
" .~.,.y/'
.l~
.
,If.
\
).,. '. '.'!
-.....::..~._..- }
,
.1,
,
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 20, 1980
TO: Members .,~-C.;i,1Y
FROM: Ron $"tock ,,~
RE; City Attorney Report
Council
LADA VRANY V. CITY
..
I am attaching for your review our answer and counter-claim filed
on August 5, 1978, in the above-entitled litigation. Under the
Fourth Cross-cor.lplaint, page 5, we advised the court that we have
paid more than $14,000 in excess of the maximum contract price for
the third floor construction. The City has a clear and absolute
right to repayment of this amount. At this point Mr. Vrany has
not prosecuted his claim for $70,000 in additional fees. His
failure to act is, I believe, a recognition of the fact that we
can win on that issue. Essentially, Mr. Vrany is claiming twice
the contract price for performance of 98% of the contract ser-
vices.
The reason for this update is to request of the Council authori-
zation to proceed in the litigation of this Fourth Cross-complaint
irregardless of the fact that 1'lr. Vrany has not prosecuted his
original ' t.
CHAPMAN/FREERS HOUSING
On Tuesday, the Planning oning Commission recommended special
review of the Chapman/F s duplex. You have on your agenda the
p cond reading of Ordinance Nos. 24 and 25
which ordinances would approve the sale to these two parties of
the land. If you decide to approve these sales, you \/ill, without
a doubt, grant special review approval under the Growth Management
Plan. Therefore, although we could not ~ut this matter on your
agenda because we were not sure that the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission would cOr.lplete their actions recomr.lending the same, we now
ask that you add this matter to your agenda just after your public
hearings and second readings so as to avoid a two week delay in
the start of construction.
-v..., .
'r
"
~~'
',/
.
"
~
"
j:
r."'"
.1:.\.,....--~ -"_." ""~....~._...-
{I.,
"
r:
,_~....l;.",...;
, -'1 '
!
">.\:
"
.-
"'1
("
'\:
~
"f
(i
4l.
}...,..",/ :/', ;-."
'!,
~.,
1;
'---
.
,..
~._,':_-<~
Memo to City Council
June 20, 1980
Page 2
Attached hereto are the documents that would have been included in
your agenda packet, specifically a memo from the Planning Office
together with the application of the individuals requesting spe-
cial review approval.
RWS:mc
cc: Wayne Chapman
Kathryn Koch
.
.
"--.
'1
.
'.. .
"
..,. .~
...'-.0:..... ..(
1
.:. :.:, ..-"'" .'
"'i
f ;
'--
.
,,.
-r....r .!'t',>-
'i
\
tl
.
1..\
1"
~,'
"
,
"
.. I:
~ I
"
I
i
.-.,....-....;
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sunny Vann, Planning Office
Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering Department ~
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Employee Housing No. 1
DATE:
February 28, 1980
After having reviewed the survey plat for the above subdivision
exemption and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Depart-
ment recommends the following:
1. Conceptual approval be approved subject to owner/applicant
agreeing to enter into a sidewalk, curb and gutter improvement
district when one is formed.
2. The improvement survey as submitted by the owner/applicant
be accepted as a conceptual plat.
3. The owner/applicant follows section 20-14 on the final plat
procedures and submit a final plat for review by the Engineering
Department as per section 20-15 prior to being placed on the
City Council agenda.
""""-
TO:
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM:
Jim Reents, Housing Director i'
DATE:
February 12, 1980
SUBJECT:
City of Aspen Subdivision Exemption/Exception
The city of Aspen owns a parcel of land fronting on Cemetary Lane
which has been proposed to provide housing for key city personnel.
The current zoning on the property is R-1S and there are approximately
40,000 square feet. Under current zoning, a duplex is allowed on
each 20,000 square foot lot. The City proposes to subdivide this
40,000 sq. ft. parcel into two separate lots." On eac:h lot..z-.the citv.
~n'cohJunct~c>rlWlth inalvrauar-cfty personnel proposes to develop a
duplex structure.
Each duplex would be exempt from growth management as designated employee
units.
Subdivision exception is requested by the City. The request is made
for the waiver of full subdivision requirements, more specifically,
conceptual subdivision before Council and preliminary plat before the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
In addition, subdivision exemption is requested from the definition of
subdivision for the purpose of condominiumization of each duplex into
individual deed restricted units.
JR:ds
,,,,........
...'"
PEN
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
July 7, 1980
TO,
Jolene Vrqllo.ta
..,..,~..-
FROM:
Ron Stock
<$
RE:
Stock/McArthur Duplex Special Review - Employee
Housing
The letter submitted to you for special review is
incorrect in one regard in that my clients, who are
petitioning for special review approval, are Daniel A.
McArthur and Robert A. McClung and not as contained in
the letter. In all other respects the application was
correct.
RWS:mc
"'.,"....
""".,,..
TO:
Jolene Vrchota
Jim Reent~Jf2
July 1, 1980
.
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
McCarther Duplex
The Housing Office recommends approval of the above mentioned
duplex. Because of the special resale agreement between the
principles and the City, I recommend the middle income designation.
JR:ds
June 30, 1980
The City Council and
Planning and Zoning Commission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Moderate
Income Housing Project under the G. M. P.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, Daniel A. McArthur and Sharon Kay Stock hereby
submit to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission this
written application for special review approval of a low and mod-
erate income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemp-
tion from the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the following-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
Lot 1, Aspen Employee Housing No. 1 Subdivision
The real property contains 20,000 square feet and is zoned R-15
(Residential) .
The applicants intend to construct a residential duplex on the
real property. Unit 1 will be a two bedroom, 2,300 square foot
structure with a 530 square foot garage. Unit 2 will ue a three
bedroom, 2,300 square foot structure \,ith a 240 square foot gar-
age. The duplex structure will be two stories with the garages
providing a conrrnon wall, 25 feet high, 96 feet wide, with 36 feet
in depth. As designed, the duplex structure complies with all of
the area and bulk regulations of the R-15 (Residential) zone.
The applicants agree to deed restrict the property within the
middle income housing price guidelines and the applicable occu-
pancy limitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-10.4(b)(3) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado.
City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
June 30, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being el ig ible employees, intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City of Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the con-
struction of such ownership housing.
The applicants respectfully request special review approval to
commence immediate construction.
ResJ?e~tfUllY SUbml~'tt~d'
-)("" --""',',
}'" ---"--, '
, " '-...
. ...,..\ / .. """-'--. ~
'~ ...>- ~'-'-
Ronald W. Stock
Attorney for applicants
.
,-
- ..#'
''-
May 22, 1980
The City Council and
Planning and Zoning Comnlission
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Application for Special Review Approval of a Low and Moderate
Income Housing Project under the G.M.P.
Ladies and Gentlelllen:
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado, Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers hereby submit to
the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission this written
application for special review approval of a low and moderate
income housing project for the purpose of obtaining exemption from
the requirements of the Growth Management Plan.
The applicants have an option to purchase the fOllowing-described
real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado, to-wit:
Lot 2, Aspen Employee Housing No.1 Subdivision
The real property contains 20,00U.61 square feet and is zoned R-15
(Res idential) .
The applicants intend to construct a residential duplex on the
real property. Unit 1 will be a four bedroom, 2,000 square foot
structure with a 560 square foot garage. Unit 2 will be a three
bedroom, 1,500 square foot structure with a 505 square foot
garage. The duplex structure will be two story with aU-shaped
configuration, 22 feet high, 98 feet wide, with 56 feet in depth.
As designed, the duplex structure complies with all of the area
and bulk regulations of the R-15 (Residential) zone.
The applicants agree to deed restrict the property within the
middle income hous ing price guidel ines and the appl icable occu-
pancy limitations established by the City Council pursuant to the
terms of Section 24-10.4(b)(3) of the Municipal Code of the City
of Aspen, Colorado.
....
..,..
,
City Council and Plannin<j and Zonin<j Commission
May 22, 1980
Page 2
The applicants being eligible employees, intend to occupy the
residential duplex as their primary residence.
A reference to the Aspen Metro Area 1979 Employee Housing Demand
Report indicates a clear and urgent need for this type of owner-
ship housing within the Aspen area. The City ot Aspen has indi-
cated its intent, evidenced by the adoption of the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Action Report, to encourage and promote the con-
struction of such ownership housing.
'['he applicants respectfully request special review approval. to
co~nence immediate construction.
,,-
Respectfully submitted,
~.~~.~
- 0 d W. 5'ook
Attorney for the applicants
,....."
",",,--,"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
SUNNY VANN, PLANNING OFFICE
46
FRm1:
FRITZ BRUGGEMEIER, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RE: FINAL SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT FOR ASPEN EMPLOYEE
HOUSING No.1
DATE: MARCH 17, 1980
After having reviewed the final survey plat for the above
subdivision exception the Engineering Department recommends
approval for the above exception as long as the following
improvements are added to the final survey plat:
1. Title box with date of preparation
2. Certificates of approval for City
Engineer and Director of Parks and
Recreation
3. Varification of control survey with
closure of 1/10,000
Mr. Mayor and Council Members:
I speak in response to an article in the March 6th Aspen
Times, Page 11-A.
The article refers to approval of subdivision of a 40,000
square foot tract of land on Cemetery Lane into 2 20,000
square lots for the purpose of building and selling two
condominiumized duplexes.
There seems to be an impression on the Council that only
the Golf Course was purchased for Open Space. Instead, the
entire unsubdivided acreage and some of the remaining already
subdivided lots were purchased at one time for Open Space.
The parcel in question was not a subdivided lot, but a
part of the unsubdivided acreage, and I suggest you research
the zoning immediately following the purchase.
There has been no time over the weekend to organize any
opposition, but I can assure you that this attempt to put
Open Space to such use will be opposed by every means
possible. ~~ L~~
Francis Whitaker
Dear Mayor Edel and Council,
From ~emarks made by you and at
least one other Councilman, it soems that you are under the
impression that the residential property ownerS are
objecting to housing employees in the residential zone.
Far from it, to my knowledge no one objects to the
social or economic status of any resident. Our objection
is based on the p~oposed increase in density beyond that in
effect since the North Annexation and the adoption of the
Aspen Area Master Plan.
Please pass this on to Council, as there was not time
to make copies,
Sincerely,
~~'
.--, '-'- 'I () '-f-' i
(-}1~8-w ~,
Francis Whitaker
#",,",
~,..-
-,,..
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdominiumization of the proposed duplex. Before
you today is a pri vate appl i cati on, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Section 24-IO,2(h), "Exceptions to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10," (which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units), "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zonin9 com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.
/'''""",
-,,,,,
..",......
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: City of Aspen Duplex - Special Review, Employee Housing #1-80
DATE: June 19, 1980
You will recall that prior to this application for special review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission had approved both a subdivision exemption, permitting
the separation of the City Lot #2, located on Cemetary Lane, and a subdivision
exemption, permitting the comdominiumization of the proposed duplex. Before
you today is a private application, submitted by Wayne Chapman and Anne Freers,
requesting special review approval for their employee units to be constructed
on the property.
Pursuant to Secti on 24-10.2 (h), "Excepti ons to the Growth Management Quota
System", housing units exempted from the Quota System include "all housing
units constructed pursuant to Section 24-10.10," (which allows for low,
moderate and middle income housing units), "subject to the special approval
of the city council upon the recommendation of the planning and zoning com-
mission which approval shall include a determination of community need
considering, but not limited to, the number of units to be constructed, the
type of units, and the rental/sale mix of the development."
The attached letter, submitted by the applicants and dated May 22, 1980,
outlines plans for construction, deed restriction and also points to the
need in this community for low-middle income ownership housing.
The Housing Director has reviewed this application and finds no problems
with regard to its approval.
The Planning Office recommends approval subject to the execution of all
applicable deed restrictions prior to issuance of a building permit.
The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recom-
mendation.