HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.222 W Hopkins.1980nqjz) —le�*--1'",)
CHATMAS (The Garrett)
_ Lots N & 0 . Block 52
E
X
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
DATE. June 11, 1980
TO: Sunny Vann
FROM: Ron Stock
RE Chatmas Subdivision Exemption
If the above entitled subdivision exemption is granted, the
approval should be conditioned upon the applicant meeting the
following requirements of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code of
the City of Aspen:
[x] Notice and option provisions to current
tenants
[x] Each unit restricted to six-month minimum
leases with no more than two shorter tenan-
cies in a calendar year.
RwS:inc
• 0
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Reents, Housing Director
DATE: May 27, 1980
SUBJECT: Chatmas Subdivision Exemption
In regard to the Chatmus subdivision, Gideon Kaufman proposes
an agreement by which the five bedroom unit is deed restricted
as employee housing and four units containing five bedrooms be
unrestricted as free market units.
With the following stipulations, the Housing Office has no objections
to the aforementioned proposal:
1. The deed restricted unit be inspected and any necessary
improvements affecting health and safety be made.
2. The restricted unit be restricted to the moderate price
guidelines for both sale and rentals for a period of 10
years.
JR:ds
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
i
FROM: Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering Office -
DATE: May 22, 1980
RE: Chatmas Subdivision Exemption; Lots N & 0, Block 52,
City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State
of Colorado.
After reviewing the survey plat for the above subdivision
exemption and making a site investigation, the Engineering
Department recommends the following:
1) The owner/applicant shall revise and resubmit the
improvement survey plat to include the following:
A) Identify areas and/or structures reserved
for common use.
B) Location of existing driveways and parking
areas.
2) The owner/applicant shall be required to join a
sidewalk improvement district if and when one is
formed.
The Engineering Department recommends approval for the
above subdivision exemption subject to the owner/applicant
correcting the above conditions under #1 & #2.
The Engineering Department also strongly feels special
note should be made of the following:
1) Minimum set backs for side and rear yards in an R.6
zone are not met. Structure abutts both property
lines.
2) The structure is not a permitted sy or a conditional
use for an R-6 zone. The twelve bedroom struc-
ture on a 6,000 Sq. Ft. lot also exceeds the maximum
density in a R/MF zoning.
3) There are only four (4) off-street parking spaces
available.
4) The Building Dept, should be notified of possible
Code violations.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Ron Stock, City Attorney
Jim Reents, Housing Director
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Chatmas Subdivision Exemption
DATE: April 28, 1980
The attached is an application for subdivision exemption submitted by
Rob Chatmas for his property located at 222 West Hopkins. This item is
scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday,
June 3, 1980; therefore, may I please have your written comments no later
than Friday, May 23, 1980. Thank you.
• 0
April 23, 1980
Sunny Vann
Planning Office
City of Aspen
Re: Chatmas Condominiumization
Dear Sunny,
This letter will address the Chatmas properties
compliance with Ordinance 39. In the event the Aspen City
Council does not delete the low, moderate -middle income
housing guidelines from this condominium ordinance, the
following figures will apply. The Chatmas property consists
of: A one -bedroom of 307 square feet that rents for $200.00
a month, a one -bedroom apartment of 397 square feet that
rents for $240.00 a month, a 378 square foot unit that is
owner occupied, a 416 square foot one -bedroom that is rented
for $300.00 a month, and a 790 square foot two -bedroom unit
that is rented for $500.00 a month. There is also a five -
bedroom unit which is 860 square feet and rents for $700.00
a month. Based on the low, moderate -middle income guide-
lines, only the 397 square foot one -bedroom that rents for
$240.00 a month would fall within the highest of the low,
moderate -middle income guidelines.
Mr. Chatmas is, however, willing to make an unusual
offer. In return for free market units of the five front
units, he is willing to designate the five -bedroom unit in
the back as employee housing for a ten year period. He is
also willing to sell this unit on very reasonable terms and
for a low cost. I feel that this flexible price, financing
and this units long-range commitment as employee housing
would be a bonus to the community and is a generous offer,
which goes well beyond that which would be required under the
present ordinance.
I will be discussing this matter with Jim Rents.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
� l
Gideon Kau man
GK kw
11
•
No. 14-80
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUP)HITTED: mid -May, 1980 STAFF: Sunny Vann
2. APPLICANT: Rob Chatmas
3. REPRESENTATIVE: Gideon Kaufman 925-8166
4. PROJECT NAME: Chatmas_Subdivision Exemption
5. LOCATION:_, 222 W. Hopkins
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
_____Rezoning
Subdivision
Stream Margin
P.U.D.
Exception
8040 Greenline
_Special Rev-iew
Exemption
View Plane
Growth Management
_70:30
Conditional Use
HPC
Residential Bonus
Other
7. REFERRALS:
ttorney
Sanitation District
School District
Engineering Dept.
Fire Marshal
Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
_Housing
Parks
State Highway Dept.
Water
Holy Cross Electric
Other
City Electric
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
� �
9. DISPOSITION:
P & Z_Approved Denied_ Date
Council ✓ Approved_/ Denied
10. ROUTING:
✓Attorney Building _Engineering
Date_
Other
f 72-:71 � -A5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Chatmas Subdivision Exemption #14-80
DATE: May 27, 1980
Zoning: R-6, Residential
Location: 222 West Hopkins, (Lots N & 0, Block 52, Aspen Townsite)
Lot Size: 6,000 square feet
Rental History: There is one structure located on the property which
contains three one -bedroom units, one two -bedroom unit,
and one five -bedroom unit, all of which are renter -occu-
pied. The structure also contains one owner -occupied
unit. Of the five renter -occupied units, only one, the``
one -bedroom unit,falls within the City's low/moderate/
middle income housing guidelines.
Engineering
Comments:
The Engineering Department recommends approval subject
to the owner/applicant revising and resubmitting their
improvement survey to include a number of items outlined
in the Department's memorandum dated May 22, 1980 and
the owner/applicant agreeing to join a sidewalk, curb and
gutter improvement district in the event one is formed.
Attorney's
Approval subject to notice and option provisions and the
Comments:
six-month minimum lease restriction of Section 20-22.
Housing Director's
Comments:
The applicant has proposed to deed -restrict the five -
bedroom unit in exchange for the one -bedroom unit which
currently falls within the low -moderate income guidelines.
The Housing Office has no objection to this proposal sub-
ject to the following stipulations:
1. The deed restricted unit be inspected and any neces-
sary improvements affecting health and safety be made,
and
2. The restricted unit be restricted to the moderate price
guidelines for both sale and rentals for a period of
ten years.
Planning Office
Recommendation:
There are a number of problems associated with the
structure in question. The structure is a non -conforming
use in the R-6 zone and a non -conforming structure with
regard to various area and bulk requirements. In addition,
there are only four off-street parking spaces available.
Council's recent revision, however, of Section 24-9(c)
of the Municipal Code permits condominiumization of both
non -conforming structures and non -conforming uses. As
a result, the Planning Office therefore recommends appro-
val of the applicant's request for subdivision exemption
subject to the conditions outlined in the Engineering
Department's memorandum dated May 22, 1980, the notice
and option and 6-month minimum lease restrictions of
Section 20-22, and the imposition of a ten-year deed
restriction on the five bedroom unit as proposed by the
applicant; said restriction to fall within the moderate
P & Z
income price guidelines.
Recommendation:
Concurred with Planning Office recommendation.
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made on behalf of ROB CHATMAS
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") under §20-19 (a) of
the Aspen, Colorado, subdivision regulations for an exemption
from the definition of the term "subdivision" with respect to
real property described as 222 West Hopkins, Lots
City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado.
An exemption in this case would be appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing
structure. Requiring strict compliance with subdivision regu-
lations for the subdivision of a lot with a six-plex on it
creates conditions which will deprive the applicant of reason-
able use of land. If an exemption is granted, owners of the
property will have a common interest in the land; and there
will be either a condominium declaration or use and occupancy
agreement applicable to the property which will not in any way
increase the land use impact of the property. An exemption in
this case will not conflict with the intent and purpose of the
subdivision regulations which are directed to assist the
orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of
Aspen, to ensure the proper distribution of population, to
coordinate the need for public services and to encourage well
planned subdivisions.
The granting of this application will not undermine the
intent of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly within
the area intended for exemption under §20-19. The building is
already in existence, and there will be no change in density,
which is presently in line with the desired population density
for the property.
ri
0
A follow-up letter addressing Ordinance 39 questions
is attached.
The applicant would appreciate your consideration of
this application at your next regular meeting.
Dated: April 16, 1980
Gideon I. Katifman
Attorney for Applicant
-2-
0
I, HAROLD W. JOHNSON, (JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 8, ASSOCIATES, INC.) A
REGISTERED SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT ON THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION OF LOT N AND LOT 0, BLOCK 52 ASPEN, COLORADO, SHOWN
HEREON AND THE IMPROVEMENTS WERE FOUND TO BE AS SHOWN ON THIS
PLAT. ALL EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO
ME ARE SHOWN. SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 81 ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY
ALLEY
HOPKINS AVENUE
p
O
MEN
0 5 10 20
SCALE I"=10'