The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.ex.LotsE-G,Blk16.1979E 0 • ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES County 00100 — 63711 09609 — 00000 Subdivision/PUD 63712 Special Review 63713 P&Z Review Only 63714 Detailed Review 63715 Final Plat 63716 Special Approval 63717 Specially Assigned City 00100 — 63721 09009 — 00000 Conceptual Application 63722 Preliminary Application 63723 Final Application 63724 Subdivision Exemption 63725 Rezoning 63726 Conditional Use PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00100 — 63061 09009 — 00000 County Land Use Sales 63062 GMP Sales 63063 Almanac Sales Copy Fees Other Name: ?Ob0rt Vt4=,1d5Q11 Project: Lot !m Sox 4486 � � en Colorado 81611 n?r--FnA� Address: R Phone: Check No. 11 -AID Receipt No. P Date: Aug. 22. 1979 9 f CITY OF ASPEN A& qw MEMO FROM RICHARD GRICE 06 A;i4 py .tom f .�„,.o _ • 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer Ron Stock, City Attorney FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Compound Subdivision Exemption DATE: August 16, 1979 Attached please find application for subdivision exemption for Lots E, F and G, Block 16, Townsite of Aspen. This item is scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, November 6, 1979. Therefore, may I please have your written comments no later than Monday, October 29, 1979. Thank you. • • JOHN A. F. WENDT, JR. ROBERT P GRUETER BROOKE A. PETERSON DOROTHY N. WENDT LAW OFFICES WENDT, GRUETER & PETERSON, P C. 430 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 July 16, 1979 Mr. Richard Grice City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Richard, ;�jjJ)�� Ir 1�' 1►�!rI rf ��lry t✓� I ' 925-4544 AUG 16 1979 ASPEN / PI7KIN CO. PLANNING OFFICE Pursuant to section 20-19 of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Joseph Scott Edmondson, Patty Edmondson, Richard Hansen, and Michael Flynn hereby apply for an exemption from the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect to the real property described as Lot E, F 12 G, Block 16 City and Townsite of Aspen County of Pitkin, Colorado The applicants desire is that the parcel of property be divided into three separate parcels according to the original lot lines and that each lot will be owed in fee simple. The applicants submit that the exemption in this case would be appropriate. The application involves the subdivision of a parcel of land which consists of three (3) lots in the original townsite of Aspen. These three (3) lots were the property of Mrs. Margerite Schied, who had owned the three (3) lots for many years. Each lot has a structure (house) built on it, and the structures are within the original lot lines. The purchasers of the property, are all employees of the Aspen School District, Hansen being the principal and Scott Edmondson and Flynn teachers at the Aspen r.1iddle School. Their desire was to be able to buy property in the Aspen area in order to be able to remain here. i Mr. Richard Grice City of Aspen Planning Dept. Page 2 July 16, 1979 The availability of the property was within their financial range if they purchased the property as Tenants in Common. Their wish is to divide this property and in that way each would have title to their own individual lot. The exemption does not in any way increase the land use impact of that property since the structures are already on the land. The applicants submit that such an exemption in the instant case would not conflict with the intent and purpose of the Subdivision regulations which are directed to assist, among other things orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen. The density would not effect the prevailing desired population density on this property as the structures are presently in existence and people have been living there. For these reasons the division of Lot E, F & requirements and a hearing RBE / 1 j the applicants request that G be exempted from Subdivision be set. Yours very truly, WENDT, GRUETER, FRENCH & WENDT NO Mobert B. • • • • #8115 i • LAW OFFICES • WENDT, GRUETER & PETERSON, P C. 430 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 JOHN A. F. WENDT, JR. ROBERT P GRUETER BROOKE A. PETERSON DOROTHY N. WENDT Mr. Richard Grice City of Aspen Planning 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Richard, J303) July 16, 1979 925-4544 AUG 16 1979 Department ASPEN / PITKIN CO. PLANNING OFFICE Pursuant to section 20-19 of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Joseph Scott Edmondson, Patty Edmondson, Richard Hansen, and Michael Flynn hereby apply for an exemption from the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect to the real property described as Lot E, F & G, Block 16 City and Townsite of Aspen County of Pitkin, Colorado The applicants desire is that the parcel of property be divided into three separate parcels according to the original lot lines and that each lot will be owed in fee simple. The applicants submit that the exemption in this case would be appropriate. The application involves the subdivision of a parcel of land which consists of three (3) lots in the original townsite of Aspen. These three (3) lots were the property of Mrs. Margerite Schied, who had owned the three (3) lots for many years. Each lot has a structure (house) built on it, and the structures are within the original lot lines. The purchasers of the property, are all employees of the Aspen School District, Hansen being the principal and Scott Edmondson and Flynn teachers at the Aspen Middle School. Their desire was to be able to buy property in the Aspen area in order to be able to remain here. IF • N Mr. Richard Grice City of Aspen Planning Dept. Page 2 July 16, 1979 The availability of the property was within their financial range if they purchased the property as Tenants in Common. Their wish is to divide this property and in that way each would have title to their own individual lot. The exemption does not in any way increase the land use impact of that property since the structures are already on the land. The applicants submit that such an exemption in the instant case would not conflict with the intent and purpose of the Subdivision regulations which are directed to assist, among other things orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen. The density would not effect the prevailing desired population density on this property as the structures are presently in existence and people have been living there. For these reasons the applicants request that the division of Lot E, F & G be exempted from Subdivision requirements and a hearing be set. RBE/lj Yours very truly, WENDT, GRUETER, FRENCH & WENDT Robert B. Edmondson #8115