Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Concept 600 Condo.1973 --"~.,...~_.........--.._.-- '. TO: Aspen planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office SUBJECT: Concept 600 Condominium - Subdivision Exemption DATE: December 4, 1973 The project has been reviewed for its conformity with design requirements, and the planning office findings are as follows: Streets Recommendation: An agreement to join in future street improve- ,~, ment district. Pedestrian easement from Main St. along western boundary and vacated Hunter Ave. Water lines - in place. Recommendation: Condominium map should acknowledge that water supply has not been verifies by the city. Sewer _ Sewer is already connected to public facility. Lots _ Project is on previously platted lots and block. Recommendation: Implementation of an approved drainage plan; a performance bond should be submitted. Agreement to join in a future drainage improve- ment district. ,_..,.v_,,~_............-._____'_~'.~'_V'"___ - "-' ROBERT P. GRUETER ATTORNEY AT LAW FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING P. O. BOX 4226 ASPEN, COLORADO 81en TEl.EPHONE PETER G. DILLON Decanber 4, 1973 92!5_4544 AREA CODE 303 Planning and Zoning Ccmnission City of Aspen Aspen, Colorado 81611 To Whom it May Concern: It is requested on behalf of Jarres R. Trueman & Associates, Inc. that an exenption pursuant to Section 20-10 of the Aspen Municipal Code be granted to the Concept 600 Condominium Project. RPG: cds December 6, 1973 Mr. Charles Vidal P. O. Box 1877 Aspen, Colorado Dear Chuck, The applicants who were tabled for Ordinance 19 review on November 20, 1973 have been requested to make their presentations at a special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 11, 1973. The City Council has authorized the immediate employment of an urban economist to conduct the studies recommended by P & Z. This meeting will be for the purpose of collecting information for those studies, and it is not anticipated that action will be taken by P & z. Although the Clarendon was not heard and tabled, this meeting would be an appropriate time to make your presentation, and I believe you have expressed willingness to appear. Please advise us if you are willing to make a presentation on December 11th. Yours truly, Donna Baer Planning Office ,'" I'",l,() r;L:,ccnL'( 0;:- 1~'({OC!::r::['!;1 'GS 1 OD I.C<IVt~;, _._._--~~-_._.,. -.... ----.-------- - ___________.___ _n..__.....___... [,'1,"-.1 r t;,~,,:l_~~-J!}.9 .-.----..---.~_____!~:~J___,,~L_J~L~_I~~LL~~~L_!'_ Z~?2::.}_~-15[_________~_m_~_g.::~~(~~~)2L~_:~__,~.!._1. <)"/:: , CONCEPT 600 _ 11 SUBDIVISION \:J EXEMPTION '~}](' dcvc:J oi-)~:'r \':ould a~Jrcc to t_ho~-;c condi tiOll,S. dclDl1Ca sti~ted that tIle Lrail was constructed wi_tll tllO ap- proveJl of FJ'c;c] Hooden, forI;icr AssistC::l_nt: Planner. EC:l.:::.~crnC'rlt that is dedicated is not where the trail is constructed. Austin stated that the applicant agrees to adjust the des- cription according to the already constructed trail. Chairman Adams stated that this pro:ject is an already-con- structed project. Gillis stated that he was disappointed in the maintenance of the trail, and feels it should be cleaned up. DelDuca stated that the trail was approved before snowfall. Schiffer questioned if the City Attorney had read the con- dominium declaration. Austin statc,d that he felt she would have no obj c,ctcions. Stated that the condominium declaration is ready to be re- corded. DelDuca stated that the Engineering Department would like to have the casement granted on the plat. Schiffer made a motion to accept this proposal, subject to final approval of the Planning Office and redefinition of the trail easement, seconded by Vagneur. All in favor, motion carried. Bob Gruetter was present representing the developer. Ms. Baer pointed out that Concept 600 was in the same situ- a tion as Ri verViC\\7 Condomini urns. f.ls. Baer submitted the following recornrnenc1ations from the Planning Office: (1) An agreement to join in future s~treet improve- ment district.. (2) Pedestrian casement from Main Street along wes- tern boundary und vacated Hunter Avenne. (3) Conc1omonium map should acknowledge that water supply has not been verified by the City. (4) Implementation of an approved drainage plan; a performance bond should be submitted. (5) Agreement to join in a future drainage improve- ment district:. Gruetter stated that they had everything worked out that needs to be, with the exception of the dedication of the pedestriun easement. Stat,ed that they agreed to post a $1,000.00 bond for the dry well. DelDuca questioned if the City had the right to go onto the proplerty. Hs. Baer stated tdht thc~y could put that J_li th(~ i1gr('f.'Jl~('nt. GiJ liE; Jnclcle a motion to ar")prov\~~f subjl:...:cL to tJi'~ )-CCOI.l'III';<:n- -5- ~<.,->) ,. nL~~COn[' 0:: f';:;OC::E.r-}:r,jGS 100 Lc:\v',,; ".al,'-" ---..-.------. . ___________.n______.__ ._ __n_____ ___ ___..__.__...__.__.__.....__-'_.___ ._._._ __..n'"____ _ __n___.________._______P___.. _'_ !~~~~rlE:_(~_'_~_L~l_sr_~-_ ______._1\..'.;}' c, 11 _J~J~~'_\-'2cL]'__CL_"__2.;-~).~1--~~L!.~t " dations of the PJonning Office being City Attorl1ey, sccoJldea by Vagneur. carried. D0CC:llb0'J.~'-.!:...~ 19.7 ~!~ loot and approvill of tIle 1\11 in favor, motion CI'J'Y PHOPEHTY - IF, AcnE SITE y Bartel stated that the Planning Office had published notice that the Public Hearing on the ll~ acres would be held. Stated that they did not nold a Public Hearing on the pre- liminary plat. Bartel stat:ed that this would be re-published, due to th2 fact that they could not get signatures on the plat in time for the public hearing. Gillis made a motion 1'_0 adjourn the meeting, seconded by Johnson. 1\11 in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. aCl2-YL a"-LZ!:=~__ Jecretary J"