HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.C.M. ClarkLotsP-S,Blk28.1977\OM - E��- I I-P
C . PI. CLARK
Lots P,Q,R,S, Block 28
E
X1
Recorded 1005 AM 40 June 6, 1977 Julie Hane
IOOK 329 PAGE 9
STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION FROM
THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, C. M. CLARK ("Applicant"), is the owner
of certain real property located within the City of Aspen,
which location is more particularly described as:
Lots P, Q, R and S, Block
28, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Pitkin County,
Colorado, and;
WHEREAS, lots R and S currently have improvements
situated on them, consisting of a single family dwelling
and an unattached garage structure, and;
WHEREAS, lots P and Q are unimproved except for
a small, one-story wood frame shed, and;
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied, pursuant to
the provisions of Section 20-19(b) of the Municipal Code of
the City of Aspen for an exemption from the definition of
subdivision for the creation of two separate parcels con-
sisting of improved lots R and S and unimproved lots P and
Q so that the lots can be treated as separate parcels for the
purposes of resale and/or (in the case of the unimproved
lots) construction of improvements and subsequent sale of
the lots as improved, and;
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
did, at its meeting held February 1, 1977, determine that
this proposed division of property is without the intents
and purposes of subdivision regulation (subject to certain
conditions) and did further recommend to the City Council
that the requested exemption be granted, and;
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council, at its meeting
held Monday, March 14, 1977, did consider the requested
exemption, did agree that issuance of an exemption is ap-
propriate, and did grant the same subject to certain
conditions,
0 •
"OOK 329 i mE 926
THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City
Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado has granted an
exemption from the definition of subdivision for the
creation of two separate parcels, consisting of lots P and
Q, Block 28 as one separate parcel, and lots R and S. Block
28 as another separate parcel, and has granted the Appli-
cant the right to convey said parcels separately if desired;
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that this grant of
exception is conditioned as follows:
1. That before the construction of any improve-
ments on lots P and Q, the Applicant shall pay to the City
of Aspen the appropriate Park Dedication Fee attributable
to said construction, calculated pursuant to Section 7-143
of the Aspen Municipal Code.
2. That the existing blue spruce tree located
on lots P and Q, be preserved in tact and not be removed,
relocated or in any way interfered with.
3. That application be made and pursued with due
diligence for the real property situated on lots R and S
to be designated as an H, Historic Overlay District and if
so designated that said real property will thenceforth be
held subject to all of the regulations and restrictions in
connection with such designation.
4. That the conditions hereby imposed shall be
deemed covenants running with the land and burden the same,
and be binding upon the Applicant, his heirs, assigns and
successors in interest.
Dated c.c., � /? 7 2
na 32 '
I, Kathryn S. Hauter, City Clerk of the City of
Aspen, Colorado, do hereby certify that the foregoing exemp-
tion from the definition of subdivision was granted by the
Aspen City Council at its regular meeting held March 14, 1977.
`.J
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
zea_-�� �d
Kathryn OW,. Hau er
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
day of n�,e 1977, by Stacy Standley, III
and Kathryn S. Hauter, Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,
of the City of Aspen, Colorado.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: !) -/q-79
�n No Public
�;.
-3-
CJ
SLEMON, MAZZA & LASALLE, P. C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
434 EAST COOPER AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 3219
DAVID R. SLEMON ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ANTHONY J. MAZZA
JOHN D. LASALLE
May 24, 1977
Mr. William G. Kane
City -County Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: C. M. Clark Subdivision Exemption
Dear Bill:
AREA CODE 303
TELEPHONE 925-2043
As you know, in connection with the subdivision exemption
granted to C. M. Clark by the Aspen City Council on March
14, 1977, Mr. Clark was required to pay a park dedication
fee applicable to the two presently improved lots (R and
S, Block 28).
By memorandum directed to Clayton Meyring, dated February
23, 1977, Philip Mahoney agreed to a current market valu-
ation of the property in question at $53,000. Based upon
that valuation the calculation of the park dedication fee
is as follows:
$53,000 = 6,000 square feet = $8.83 per
square foot
2 bedroom house = factor of 2.7
2.7 x .0025 x 43,560 x 8.83 = 2,596.28
In accordance with the schedule of taxes paid on the im-
provements, which schedule is attached hereto, you will
see that Mr. Clark is entitled to a credit of $1,792.12.'-
That leaves a net park dedication fee payable to the City
of $804.16-According to our calculations.
If you and Dr. Mahoney agree with this calculation, please
0 0
SLEMON, MAZZA & LASALLE, P. C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mr. William G. Kane
May 24, 1977
Page Two
so indicate by signing the bottom of this letter in the
space provided.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very trul ours,
John D. LaSalle
for SLEMON, MAZZA & LaSALLE, P.C.
JDL:dr
/
.5 . �_./, ✓��..
Philip J. Mahoney
SLEMON, MAZZA & L.ASALLE, P C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
434 EAST COOPEH AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 3219
DAVID R. SLEMON ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ANTHONY J. MAZZA
JOHN D. LASALLE
iav 24, ? � I
Mr. William G. Kane
City -County Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: C. M. Clara: Subdivision Exemption
Dear Hill:
AREA CODE 303
TELEPHONE 925-2043
As you know, in connection with the subdivision exemption
granted to C. M. Clark by the Aspen City Council on March
14, 1977, Mr. Clark was required to pay a park dedication
fee applicable to the two presently improved lots (R and
S, Block 28).
By memorandum directed to Clayton rMeyring, dated February
23, 1977, Philip Mahoney agreed to a current market valu-
ation of the property in question at $53,000. :Based upon
that valuation the calculation of the park dedication fee
is as follows:
$53,000 + 6,000 square feet $8.83 per
square foot
2. bedroom house = factor of 2.7
2.7 x .0025 x 43,560 x 8.83 - 2,596.28
In accordance with the schedule of taxes paid on the im-
provements, which schedule is attached hereto, you will
see that Mr. Clark is entitled to a credit of $1,792.12.
That leaves a net park dedication fee payable to the City
of $804.16 according to our calculations.
If you and Dr. Mahoney agree with this calculation, please
MW
W
SLEMON, MAZZA & LASALLE, P C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Mr. William G. Kane
May 24, 1977
Page Two
so indicate by signing the bottom of this letter in the
space Provided.
Thant you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
John D. LaSalle
for SL%MO_I, MAZ ZA & LaSALL_,, P.C.
JDL:dr
jj; �e'IIXA 14
�9iIliam G. ne
Philip J. Mahoney
• 0
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
Aspen City Council
Planning Staff (HC)
RE: Subdivision Exemption - C.M. Clark --Two parcel Subdivision
DATE: March 10, 1977
This is a request for subdivision exemption by C.M. Clark to
allow the splitting of a four lot parcel held in one ownership
i.e., Lots P,Q,R and S, Block 28, into two separate parcels,
i.e., Lots P and Q, and Lots R and S. The property is zoned
R-6. Lots R and S are developed with a single-family dwelling;
Lots P and Q contain a small shed and a large (35') spruce
tree which dominates the site.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the
request subject to compliance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance of the City, and a restriction of a 10' building set-
back from the existing house on Lots R and S.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the exemption sub-
ject to the P&Z conditions. T 'vision dedication fee for
the developed lot R and S is 3 846.3 (4 x .0025 x 43,560 x
$8.83).
Lots P and Q are undeveloped and fee payment should be at the
time of building permit ap,J5 ication.
This item is located betkeen 4th and 5th on Hallam Street.
-7IF1, 62
073,73
p11.*0yNT O(ue
Per- -3/9 cll''7 -7
A
YEAR I
IMPRIEMENT AMT fF TAXES ON
LAND VALUE VALUE _ CITY MILL LEVY - IMPROVES PD . TO CITY
_-- 18 8 8
DO
UO
- 1889
1890
1891 �
mod, av
0
/dG'd, oV
_
1892
0 adAoee,
Gv
1893 ;
/, - DD
jG Ott
1894
-
i
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899�
1900
1901 I
�(� OD
1902
,�.SD
1903
1904
e OO
D, Od
1905
Zza o
/mod oo
,�
9 DD
1906
.�.�.�..D
..
1907
Do
�.SG
an
_ 1908
1909
�li0
,S G�J
vTDG'O
/
1910
o0
1911
- 1912
-
40
e)
�
s
1913
1914
1915
--- --
s 0, GO
C'
G, So
---- 1916
1917
/3a caZFC.
e_
so
1918
1919
77
1920
oo
-3ao, Go
Vic) coo_
�Q r
1921
1922
---
1923'
-
�_
-.... �
�........+.o..---...,.�..,.,,--.+.- .. yam.., ,r... ..w.-..mow,.,,,,,,,. .........--.-. A. ... , •—..r.w--------- ;� _
IMPROVEMENT
AMT OF TAXES
YEAR
LAND VALUE
VALUE CITY
MILL LEVt ON IMPROVES PAID TO CITY
1924
s?D, pG
.,7D, OD
�U_. 00
�'-_- A� GD
1925
1
/o,p�
--a19 2 6
- 1927
/.; o Ce
1928
_
/o7v, oo
aov. ec
{
1929
1930
+
1931
i
D .60
wv, Do
v
O
1932
O e
1933
a,4D
S,00
�, c
37S
1934
1935
pp
'
_ 1936
DJ 0
AlvD. DD
�/a, dv
i �lQ
1937
0 04
G o dd
1938
d. DD
v?OD90
i
oe) U
1939
1940
Vi
ea
— 1941
1942
O tJ0
1 e,d
1943
1944
i
1945
i
—
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
ee
1951
- 1952
-�/D. GG
1953
ee
------- 1954
1955
1956
1957
f
'
1958T11
�-
�. CO
�.��U. GO
"% let
I0�
1959
`t
y
---
YEAR
LAND -VALUE
IMPROVEMENT
VALUE CITY
MILL LEVY
AMOUNT OF TAXES ON
IMPROVES. PD. TO CITY
1960
1961 }
�,lp pO
.j,�?o, oo
�DU
1962
-71 /Z 7�11
1963
1964
co
9,: ��oe 4 L
a Z)
1965
f ;Z71
1966
4"ele eel
1967
1968
oo
ae-
1969
ov
1970
Ice
ell
Go
2J
1971
1972
1973
ee7
1974
Z loe, ee
1975
do
AV
I
TOTAL
!I
I I EMORA14DUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Staff (HC)
RE: Subdivision Exemption - C.M. Clark --Two parcel Subdivision
DATE: March 10, 1977
This is a request for subdivision exemption by C.M. Clark to
allow the splitting of a four lot parcel held in one ownership
i.e., Lots P,Q,R and S, Block 28, into two separate parcels,
i.e., Lots P and Q, and Lots R and S. The property is zoned
R-6. Lots R and S are developed with a single-family dwelling;
Lots P and Q contain a small shed and a large (35')- spruce
tree which dominates the site.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconnnends approval of the
request subject to compliance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance of the City, and a restriction of a 10' building set-
back from the existing house on Lots R and S.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the exemption sub-
ject to the P&Z conditions. The subdivision dedication fee for
the developed lot R and S is $3,846.35 (4 x .0025 x 43,560 x
$8.83).
Lots P and Q are undeveloped and fee payment should be at the
time of building permit application.
This item is located between 4th and 5th on Hallam Street.
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM THE DEFINITION OF A SUBDIVISION
UNDER SECTION 20-19(b) OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
Pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 20-19 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, C. M. CLARK (herein-
after referred to as "Applicant") hereby .applies for an exemp-
tion from the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect
to the division of certain real property described as:
LOTS P, Q, R and S,'BLOCK 28 -
City and Tounisite of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado
into two separate parcels; Lots P and Q would be one parcel
and Lots R and S would be the other.
The Applicant, by virtue of a contract of sale dated
October 15, 1976 will become the owner of Lots P, 0, R and S
in Block 28, on January 15, 1977. Lots R and S currently
have improvements situated on them, consisting of a single
family dwelling and an unattached garage structure; Lots P
and Q are unimproved except for a small, one-story wood frame
shed which is located at the Northerly end of the two lots,
abutting the alley between Hallam and Francis Streets (an
improvement survey is attached to this application). The pur-
pose of this application is to obtain an exemption from the
term subdivision so that the two improved lots (R and S) and
the two unimproved lots (P and Q) can be treated as separate
parcels for the purposes of resale and/or (in the case of the
unimproved lots) construction of such improvements as are
contemplated and permitted by the zoning provisions of the
Municipal Code.
The current zoning of the property in question is
R-6, requiring, 6,000 square feet for minimum lot area and
permitting the construction of one or two family dwellings.
As can be seen from the improvement survey submitted with this
application, unimproved lots P and Q and improved lots R and
S conform to the requirements for minimum lot area and permit-
ted improvements.
The Applicant submits that the exemption would be
appropriate in this case for the following reasons:
(1) The division of this property into parcels
consisting of lots P and Q on one hand and R and S on the other,
is not within the intent and purpose of Chapter 20 of the Muni-
cipal Code regarding the regulation of subdivision because the
property in question is located within the original Townsite
of Aspen and all streets, utilities, access easements, storm
drainage and other subdivision design considerations have
already been complied with.
(2) The division of these particular four lots into
two, two lot parcels conforms to the density considerations of
recently enacted land use legislation as reflected in the
zoning provisions of the Municipal Code with respect to these
particular lots, the zoning of which has been outlined above.
For the reasons stated above, it is the contention
of the Applicant that this particular division of land is not
within the intent and purposes of Chapter 20 of the Municipal
Code of the City of Aspen and therefore that exemption from
the definition of subdivision under the provisions of Section
20-19(b) of the Code is appropriate.
The Applicant would appreciate consideration of this
application by the Planning Commission at its next regularly
scheduled meeting.
Dated: January 4, 1977.
For the Applicant:
SLEMON, MAZZA & LaSALLE, P.C.
By �—
-.;-Joln n. LaSa e
-2-
CITY � ASPEN
130 south; alena street
aspen, co lorado, ' 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Clayton Meyring
FROM: Mick Mahoney
DATE: February 23, 1977
RE: Property Owned by C. M. (Butch) Clark
Please be advised that I accept the value of Lots R & S on the corner
at $53,000 and Lots P & Q at $50,000. Please calculate the park
dedication fee accordingly.
Thank you.
PSM/pm
cc: Hal Clark
:7
MEMO
TO: Aspen P&Z Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
RE: Subdivision Exemption - C. M. Clark --Two parcel subdivision
DATE: January 28, 1977
This is a request for subdivision exemption by C. M. Clark to allow the
splitting of a four lot parcel held in one ownership i.e., Lots P,Q,R and
S, Block 28, into two separate parcels, i.e., Lots P and Q, and Lots R and
S. The property is zoned R-6. Lots R and S are developed with a single-
family dwelling; Lots P and Q contain a small shed and a large (35')
spruce tree which dominates the site.
The comments of the Planning Office are as follow:
1. Demolition of the spruce tree could violate the City tree
ordinance. We feel the applicant should present evidence
as to their ability of protect the existing tree from dam-
age or destruction.
2. We recommend approval of the subdivision exemption of the
above concern and payment of the park dedication fee.
HC/mw
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM THE DEFINITION OF A SUBDIVISION
UNDER SECTION 20-19(b) OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
Pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 20-19 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, C. M. CLARK (herein-
after referred to as "Applicant") hereby applies for an exemp-
tion from the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect
to the division of certain real property described as:
LOTS P, Q, R and S, BLOCK 28
City and Townsite of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado
into two separate parcels; Lots P and Q would be one parcel
and Lots R and S would be the other.
The Applicant, by virtue of a contract of sale dated
October 15, 1976 will become the owner of Lots P, 0, R and S
in Block 28, on January 15, 1977. Lots R and S currently
have improvements situated on them, consisting of a single
family dwelling and an unattached garage structure; Lots P
and Q are unimproved except for a small, one-story wood frame
shed which is located at the Northerly end of the two lots,
abutting the alley between Hallam and Francis Streets (an
improvement survey is attached to this application). The pur-
pose of this application is to obtain an exemption from the
term subdivision so that the two improved lots (R and S) and
the two unimproved lots (P and Q) can be treated as separate
parcels for the purposes of resale and/or (in the case of the
unimproved lots) construction of such improvements as are
contemplated and permitted by the zoning provisions of the
Municipal Code.
The current zoning of the property in question is
R-6, requiring 6,000 square feet for minimum lot area and
permitting the construction of one or two family dwellings.
As can be seen from the improvement survey submitted with this
application, unimproved lots P and Q and improved lots R and
S conform to the requirements for minimum lot area and permit-
ted improvements.
The Applicant submits that the exemption would be
appropriate in this case for the following reasons:
(1) The division of this property into parcels
consisting of lots P and Q on one hand and R and S on the other,
is not within the intent and purpose of Chapter 20 of the Muni-
cipal Code regarding the regulation of subdivision because the
property in question is located within the original Townsite
of Aspen and all streets, utilities, access easements, storm
drainage and other subdivision design considerations have
already been complied with.
(2) The division of these particular four lots into
two, two lot parcels conforms to the density considerations of
recently enacted land use legislation as reflected in the
zoning provisions of the Municipal Code with respect to these
particular lots, the zoning of which has been outlined above.
For the reasons stated above, it is the contention
of the Applicant that this particular division of land is not
within the intent and purposes of Chapter 20 of the Municipal
Code of the City of Aspen and therefore that exemption from
the definition of subdivision under the provisions of Section
20-19(b) of the Code is appropriate.
The Applicant would appreciate consideration of this
application by the Planning Commission at its next regularly
scheduled meeting.
Dated: January 4, 1977.
For the Applicant:
SLEMON, MAZZA & LaSALLE, P.C.
By % �%.
o n D. LaSalle
-2 �%
0
I�1 yii�7��1i��1
TO: DAVE ELLIS
FROM: PLANNING STAFF (HC)
RE: SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION; C.M. CLARK TWO PARCEL SUBDIVISION
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1977
This is a request by C.M.`.Clark for subdivision exemption to allow the
splitting of a four lot parcel held in one ownership i.e., Lots P, Q,
R, and S, Block 28, into two separate parcels, i.e. lots P and Q and
Lots R and S. Lots R and S are developed with a single-family dwelling;
lots P and Q contain only a small shed.
Attached for your review is the written application and an improvement
survey.
We will schedule the review before the Planning Commission upon receipt
of your comments.
1
REBAR W/ PLASTIC
L.S. 12707
SET
REBAR W/PLAS
- L. S. 12707
i
HALLAM
ALLEY
SET
REBAR�W/ P7LASTIC CAP
STREET
SET
RFBAR W/PLASTIC CAP
)7
JMENT
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
SOTS R Q, R � S BLOCK 2.8
CITY OF ASPEN
N
_ ------
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
SCALE I" = 10'
BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND CITY MONUMENTS AT S.E. CO,RNF�R OF
BLOCK 28 AND THE N.E. CORNER OF BLOCK 28, N 14° 50 49' E
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, JOHN F BEISCHEL, HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT ON SEPTEMBER 30y,1976
A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF LOTS P O, R AND S, C�LOCk
28, CITY OF ASPEN, ASPEN, COLORADO. THE THREE STkUCTURES WERE
FOUND TO CBE LOCATED AS SHOWN HEREON. THE LOCATION AND
DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-
OF- WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY
OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN.
,t
E
TRI-CO MANAGEMENT, INC.
OCTOBER 15, 1976 FIN F. BEISCHEL L.S. 1270
5.
a
VL E c 'E
tp
NG/NR
c CQO
OLORR
t
7&- ICa5