HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Erdman Lot Split 1990
-
",",",.,
/~ ..
.
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
city of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 8L07!J0
DATE COMPLETE: ?/:ic./7"
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2735-122-11-005 A49-90
STAFF MEMBER:--t::f'
PROJECT NAME:' Erdman Partnership Lot Split
Project Address:
Legal Address:
201 W. Gille~ie Street
l~,-r.v ~ V,.." ~
APPLICANT: Donnellev Erdman
Applicant Address: Box 12395 Aspen. CO 81612 925-8325
REPRESENTATIVE:
Representative Address/Phone:
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $870.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 2
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~ 2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
CC Meeting Date
~
I
PUBLIC
RIGHTS: YES NO
HEARING: ~@
RIGHTS: \~ NO
VESTED
VESTED
Paid:
Date:
Planning Director Approval:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
)( City Engineer
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
city E1ectric
Envir. H1th.
Aspen Conso1.
S.D.
DATE REFERRED:
f(/;}I )~
Mtn. Bell School District
Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
Bui1ding Inspec~
Roaring Fork Other At/e:.S 17;)'1' ,
Energy Center ", ~.,'
r; .......~'L.._.
, I \Ie "
INITIALS: p-Y ')':::,j' 'p)J,~,f J'/"\
FINAL ROUTING:
DATE ROUTED:
INITIAL:
___ City Atty ____ city Engineer ___ Zoning
___ Housing Other:
Env. Hea1th
FILE
STATUS AND LOCATION:
~ oJ. .It{g(~ 111ll)
,...-....,
,..,..'...
_...,..
ORDINANCE NO. 66
(SERIES OF 1990)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING SUBDIVISION
EXEMPTION FOR THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, DESCRIBED IN
METES AND BOUNDS, AT THE S.E. CORNER OF GILLESPIE ST. AND LAKE
AVE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 7-1003 of the Aspen Land Use
Code (revision date August 1989), a Lot Split is a subdivision
exemption by the city Council; and
WHEREAS, The Erdman Partnership, represented by Donnelley
Erdman, has submitted an application for the lot split of a
32,855.5 square foot parcel described in metes and bounds in the
SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of section 12, Township ,10 South, Range 85 west of
the sixth P.M., city of Aspen); and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Department, having reviewed the
application has made referral comments and addendums; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office, having reviewed the
application pursuant to section 7-1003, and reviewing referral
comments from Engineering, recommends approval with the following
conditions:
1. One joint driveway access will be allowed for both lots via
the 20' access easement.
2. Prior to filing a final plat the applicant shall agree to
join any future improvement districts.
3. The plat shall indicate the edge of street pavement or curb
line and the existing fence and drainage ditch along the
1
/,'"",,,
........
~. ,/
south boundary of the property.
4. The final plat shall indicate that prior to issuance of a
building permit for development on either lot, the applicant
shall submit a drainage plan to the Engineering Department
and do any necessary improvements to the ditch along the
south boundary of the parcel.
5. The following FAR and site coverage limits will be:
Lot 1: FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; site Coverage - 20% (4,791
s. f.)
Lot 2: FAR maximum - 3,449 s.f.(access easement is
subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR); site Coverage
- 30.34% (2,700 s.f.)
6. An Accessory Dwelling Unit must be included on each lot for
which development is proposed as a requirement of this Lot
Split. Each Accessory Dwelling Unit must comply with the
Housing Authority's requirements and must receive
Conditional Use approval by the Aspen Planning and Zoning
commission.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, Deed Restrictions
for the Accessory Dwelling Units shall be approved by the
Housing Authority and recorded by the Pitkin County Clerk
and Recorder's Office.
8. Development proposed for any lot(s) resulting from this lot
split shall conform to the terms and requirements of the
Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) if
applicable.
2
,"'-'"
"'-".
.J
9. A Subdivision Exemption Agreement listing the conditions of
approval shall be included as a note section on the final
plat.
10. The final plat will be signed by the Planning Office and
recorded by the city Clerk only upon complete satisfaction
of all of the above conditions.
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the
planning Office's recommendations for the lot split does wish to
grant the requested Subdivision Exemption for the Erdman Lot
Split.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
section 1:
That it does hereby grant a Subdivision Exemption for a Lot
Split, with the conditions recommended by the planning Office, to
the 32,855.5 s.f. parcel described in this ordinance.
section 2:'
That the City Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the
adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in
the office of the pitkin County Clerk and Recorder.
section 3:
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the ~
day of () ~~ 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the city Council Chambers,
Aspen city Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (l5) days prior to which
a hearing of public notice of the same shall be published in a
3
;<"""',
......''',"''
newspaper of general circulation within the city of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,
by the city
C'
....l..L,'}~'
.
council of the city of Aspen on the ~ day of
~,~~
William L. stirling, Mayor
, 1990.
~
city Clerk
, FINALLY, adopted, passed
(i 1/1/ ' , l~SI.
and approved this )..J-- day of
~~<~
William L. Stirling, ayor
city Clerk
4
.....
<6~
..'"-
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Mayor and city Council
Carol O'Dowd, city Manager .~IJ~
Amy Margerum, Planning Director~
Kim Johnson, Planner
(~
TO:
THROUGH:
DATE:
september 14, 1990
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
ERDMAN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT at the
S.E. corner of Gillespie st. and Lake Ave. (Metes and
Bounds Description in the SE 1/4 NE 1 4 of section 12,
Township 10 south, Range 85 we the P.M.,
city of Aspen); Second Readin~ f ordinance 66 eries
of 1990.)
RE:
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends that the city council
have second reading of Ordinance 65 for the Erdman Lot Split.
The Engineering Department has submitted two addendums regarding
drainage requirements and plat additions for this lot split
(Attachment "C".) Their concerns have been discussed with the
applicant and are reflected in revised conditions 3 and 4.
COUNCIL GOALS: This proposal reflects Council goal #14 which
emphasizes fair and consistent treatment in governmental
processes.
BACKGROUND: The applicant seeks to split a 32,855.5 s.f. lot into
two lots. The site is located in the R-6 Zone district.
Pursuant to Section 7-1003 A.2. of the Aspen Land Use Code
revision date 8/14/89, lot splits are exempt from general
subdivision requirements, but do require a approval by city
Council. Subdivision approval shall be by ordinance. See
proposed plat Attachment "A".
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Engineer Jim Gibbard forwarded a memo
regarding the proposed lot split (Attachments "B" and "C".) His
comments are reflected in the list of proposed conditions of
approval.
PROJECT DISCUSSION: The current use is a 4,318 s.f. single
family residence under construction on the east end of the
parcel. A 250 s. f. bonus is granted to this lot because an
accessory dwelling unit (100% above grade) is included in the
home. This reduces the effective floor area to 4,068 s.f. as long
as the deed restricted unit remains.
The neighborhood is predominantly' single family residential, with
vacant land to the north, which is also in the lot split process
r....
......
(Moores property.) Proposed lot sizes would allow maximum
development of a single family residence on each lot with an
accessory dwelling unit for each (as required.)
The lot split request complies with the subdivision exemption
requirements of Section 7-1003 A.2.A:
CONDITION a: The land is not located in a subdivision approved
by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the
ci ty council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds
parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of
subdivision regulations by the city of Aspen on March 14, 1969.
RESPONSE: The property is a metes and bounds parcel and has
not been subdivided after adoption of subdivision regulations.
CONDITION b: No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot
split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying
zone district and the applicant commits that any lot for which
development is proposed will contain an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
When there is demolition on the property which makes it subject
to the provision of Art. 5, Div. 7, Replacement Housing Program,
the standards of that program shall supersede these requirements.
RESPONSE: No more than two lots are being created, both
conforming to the underlying district requirements. The newly
created lots will be 23,956.4 s.f. and 8,899.1 s.f. (for FAR
calculations, the 1,400 s.f. access easement is subtracted
leaving 7,499 s.f.of lot area.) These comply with the 6,000 s.f.
minimum for the R-6 Zone District for single family residences.
The applicant understands that any lot for which development is
proposed must contain an Accessory Dwelling Unit as required by
Land Use Regulations. Lot 1, with a residence under
construction, contains an accessory dwelling unit approved by the
Planning and zoning commission in May 1990. Upon approval of the
lot split, the following FAR and site coverage limits will be:
Lot 1: FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; site Coverage - 20% (4,791
s.f. )
Lot 2: FAR maximum 3,449 s.f.(access easement is
subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR); site Coverage
- 30.34% (2,700 s.f.)
CONDITION c: The lot under consideration, or any part
thereof, was not previously the subject of an exemption under the
provisions of this article or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to
Sec. 8-104 (e) (1) (a).
RESPONSE: The lot has not previously received a lot split
exemption nor any other subdivision exemption.
CONDITION D: A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded
after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be
granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without
receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this Article and
growth management allocation pursuant to Art. 8.
RESPONSE: The applicant offers on plat notes that a
,......"
;",.,.",
......
subdivision plat will be recorded after approval indicating that
no further subdivision may be granted for these lots, and that
any further units will be developed under the provisions of
Article 7 and growth management allocations of Article 8.
ALTERNATIVES: without a lot split, the property may be
redeveloped as one or two detached residences (single ownership)
or one duplex. with a Conditional Use Permit, the property could
be used for Day Care, Church, School, Museum or Accessory
Dwelling uses.
RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the Erdman
lot split request with the following conditions:
1. One joint driveway access will be allowed for both lots via
the 20' access easement on Lot 2.
2. Prior to filing a final plat the applicant shall agree to
join any future improvement districts.
3. The plat shall indicate the edge of street pavement or curb
line and the existing fence and drainage ditch along the
south boundary of the property.
4. The final plat shall indicate that prior to issuance of a
building permit for development on either lot, the applicant
shall submit a drainage plan to the Engineering Department
and do any necessary improvements to the ditch along the
south boundary of the parcel.
5. The following FAR and site coverage limits will be:
Lot 1: FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; site Coverage - 20% (4,791
s. f.)
Lot 2: FAR maximum 3,449 s.f. (access easement is
subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR); site Coverage
- 30.34% (2,700 s.f.)
6. An Accessory Dwelling Unit must be included on each lot for
which development is proposed as a requirement of this Lot
Split. Each Accessory Dwelling Unit must comply with the
Housing Authority'S requirements and must receive
Condi tional Use approval by the Aspen Planning and Zoning
commission.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, Deed Restrictions
for the Accessory Dwelling Units shall be approved by the
Housing Authority and recorded by the Pitkin County Clerk
and Recorder's Office.
8. A Subdivision Exemption Agreement listing the conditions of
approval shall be included as a note section on the final
plat.
~.
9. The final plat will be signed by the Planning Office and
J /V ~/fwui! ~~ /0 ~M fft/I ~,5A..
1e,'5,/f. ~ ~.
c
'"
.
recorded by the City Clerk only upon complete satisfaction
of all of the above conditions.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to have second reading of Ordinance 66
for the Erdman Lot Split.
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
"A"
"B"
"C"
Proposed Plat
Engineering Referral Comments
- Two Engineering Addendums
Ordinance 66 under consideration
jtkvj.erdman.ccmemo
,.;.......
~,
Attachment "e"
'-"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department ~
DATE: September 26, 1990
RE: Erdman Lot Split Addendum
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
1. The applicant must submit a final plat which shows an existing
fence on the south boundary of the property and which shows an
adjacent drainage ditch on the property to the south of that
boundary.
2. The applicant must submit a drainage plan for this property
which is pursuant to the requirements of Section 24-7.1004.C.4.f
of Municipal Code.
3. If the drainage from this property flows into the existing
drainage ditch on the property to the south, then the Engineering
Department requests that a condition of approval be that the
applicant improve the ditch to the satisfaction of the streets
Department.
jg/erdman2
cc: Chuck Roth
,
"'...
....
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department ~
DATE: October 9, 1990
RE: Erdman Lot Split Addendum No. 2
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit a
drainage plan to the Engineering Department and do any necessary
improvements on the ditch on the south boundary of the parcel as
is referenced in the first addendum of the Engineering Department
referral on this application. This requirement needs to be shown
on the final plat.
jg/erdman3
cc: Chuck Roth
1'"
........
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and city Council
THROUGH: Carol O'Dowd, city Manager
Amy Margerum, Planning Director
FROM:
Kim Johnson, Planner
DATE:
september l4, 1990
RE:
ERDMAN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT at the
S.E. corner of Gillespie st. and Lake Ave. (Metes and
Bounds Description in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 12,
Township 10 South, Range 85 west of the sixth P.M.,
City of Aspen); First Reading of Ordinance ____ (Series
of 1990.)
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends that the City Council
have first reading of Ordinance for the Erdman Lot Split.
COUNCIL GOALS: This proposal reflects Council goal #14 which
emphasizes fair and consistent treatment in governmental
processes.
BACKGROUND: The applicant seeks to split a 32,855.5 s.f. lot into
two lots. The site is located in the R-6 Zone district.
Pursuant to section 7-,l003 A. 2. of the Aspen Land Use Code
rev~s~on date 8/14/89, lot splits are exempt from general
subdivision requirements, but do require a approval by City
Council. Subdivision approval shall be by ordinance. See
proposed plat Attachment "A".
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Engineer Jim Gibbard forwarded a memo
regarding the proposed lot split (Attachment "B"). His comments
are reflected in the list of proposed conditions of approval.
PROJECT DISCUSSION: The current use is a 4,318 s. f. single
family residence under construction on the east end of the
parcel. A 250 s. f. bonus is granted to this lot because an
accessory dwelling unit (100% above grade) is included in the
home. This reduces the effective floor area to 4,068 s.f. as long
as the deed restricted unit remains.
The neighborhood is predominantly single family residential, with
vacant land to the north, which is also in the lot split process
(Moores property.) Proposed lot sizes would allow maximum
development of a single family residence on each lot with an
accessory dwelling unit for each (as required.)
The lot split request complies with the subdivision exemption
requirements of Section 7-l003 A.2.A:
c
CONDITION a: The land is not located in a subdivision approved
by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the
City council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds
parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of
subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 14, 1969.
RESPONSE: The property is a metes and bounds parcel and has
not been subdivided after adoption of subdivision regulations.
CONDITION b: No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot
split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying
zone district and the applicant commits that any lot for which
development is proposed will contain an Accessory Dwelling unit.
When there is demolition on the property which makes it subject
to the provision of Art. 5, Div. 7, Replacement Housing Program,
the standards of that program shall supersede these requirements.
RESPONSE: No more than two lots are being created, both
conforming to the underlying district requirements. The newly
created lots will be 23,956.4 s.f. and 8,899.1 s.f. (for FAR
calculations, the 1,400 s.f. access easement is subtracted
leaving 7,499 s.f.of lot area.) These comply with the 6,000 s.f.
minimum for the R-6 Zone District for single family residences.
The applicant understands that any lot for which development is
proposed must contain an Accessory Dwelling Unit as required by
Land Use Regulations. Lot 1, with a residence under
construction, contains an accessory dwelling unit approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission in May 1990. Upon approval of the
lot split, the following FAR and site coverage limits will be:
Lot 1: FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; site Coverage - 20% (4,791
s.f. )
Lot 2: FAR maximum 3,449 s.f.(access easement is
subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR); site Coverage
- 30.34% (2,700 s.f.)
CONDITION c: The lot under consideration, or any part
thereof, was not previously the subject of an exemption under the
provisions of this article or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to
Sec. 8-104 (C) (l) (a).
RESPONSE: The lot has not previously received a lot split
exemption nor any other subdivision exemption.
CONDITION D: A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded
after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be
granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without
receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this Article and
growth management allocation pursuant to Art. 8.
RESPONSE: The applicant offers on plat notes that a
subdivision plat will be recorded after approval indicating that
no further subdivision may be granted for these lots, and that
any further units will be developed under the provisions of
Article 7 and growth management allocations of Article 8.
ALTERNATIVES:
without a lot split, the property may be
-
'-
redeveloped as one or two detached residences (single ownership)
or one duplex. with a Conditional Use Permit, the property could
be used for Day Care, Church, School, Museum or Accessory
Dwelling uses.
RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the Erdman
lot split request with the following conditions:
l. One joint driveway access will be allowed for both lots via
the 20' access easement.
2. Prior to filing a final plat the applicant shall agree to
join any future improvement districts.
3. The plat shall indicate the edge of street pavement or curb
line.
4.
The following FAR and site coverage limits will
Lot 1: FAR maximum - 4,468 s.f.; site Coverage
s.!. )
Lot 2: FAR maximum 3,449 s.f.(access
subtracted from lot area for calculating FAR);
- 30.34% (2,700 s.f.)
be:
- 20% (4,79l
easement is
site coverage
5. A Subdivision Exemption Agreement listing the conditions of
approval shall be included as a note section on the final
plat.
6. The final plat will be recorded only upon complete
satisfaction of all of the above conditions.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to have first reading of Ordinance ___
for the Erdman Lot Split.
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS: "A" - Proposed Plat
"B" - Engineering Referral Comments
Ordinance under consideration
jtkvj/Erdman.ccmemo
. ' ,Ie: ~o' 0 ~ "
60 00 46'\ '\, <?'lS 0-
(0001< 145,fjGE -'"'-< '01 /l-...A
'", "C,E;;~---- '.'. ,-, ;'Z..':{)n..,
~, ;.r-,/ -- '" '\, """--K '>>u /
1~/ /' ' .-- ~ , '- '\ "\,/-,-_ ."/f;'
.x" liI/ ...y 0- " I"\, ,,__ ~
,CP. ~f,-t/ /'/ /,o,:.'t ,'"' "i "\, " ---0-
.~ 0'/ /'..' --____ ;."/.'\ "\,,, -~_
"J")'I of?/ /' / /" ~ "'1 ~ " "'" ~ _
fo~9" /' /' ( _./-------<;;!::f?.<.;>. I ,,' '\, '\ ""', "'", r:
// ,/' /...."/-' ....._~:J.-~ '\ '" ""'- "I()
",. / "" /' ..........~\, '\, "
/ // / /", "rr/''?''--------------., ::,.~ ~ ~'o.&n,.,'\, "
~/' ,/ / 't ..;( ..... .n.._ , .p ....~~."
/,,/ ,//' / ~ ~~ { - - -?.::::::::~:~:::::.:..~::::::.:.~, i " 1.? 0 ~
.,,/ /' . .....' ~ :::::::::::::::-:':.;.:::::::::.. ~ 3= 8
,,/ / /' fl; ~ I ...................""......... '\, ,
"",...."'" // d /' /..../~ 1 /... :::'''::':':'''::':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':"E.:~:':':: I '\, <-J
.. "" 1t');I' I ................... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. u: ~" a If'\'-.
/ ~ :f~;~i_I'II!,!ll11t<o ~~, '"
8 "I /f=J I....." q ........,..... ...... -4 "'"
r, y/ ~ 1:.:.:.:100." ......n..... ...... -+~,-"",-.LY-
",.1 _ 0 ~ I iZ-1 I on - O.~ I "1.'-'<' "
/1 <<' W 0':::.. I ~ ~ '-....
. I "J :g ~:: I "'- "
I 0::.(1 ~ i ~:n I '"
I Z ~ ~I "'< I :I .:.: - I ~ ",
I If) ",I 1 ." I "
I ~ tul I .:.:.: "lJ I '-',
: @ ")1 m I :::::: ., ------------------___~___-n I
: ~I :'::':':':':':'::':':':::::'J:i::':':':':' 4' :~...- :
I ;:1 :~:~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:{'';';~ l-' 10 /' I
: ~\ :'::,':':':':':':\':':':':':':':1' 1L I' "l /' {) Z :
I l><:IO::':':':~oo:':':':':'I~ C'i' 1>(/' '" 0 I
I \4":::.1 ~ .:.:.:.:. : ~ Q ~:':':.:'J' l\I .f') __-- --',_ I ~ I
: W ti: I :~~~:;:,~,:,:,:~:,:::::::::::l: '-- ~ .... -- ill( "T E::
I I=< 01 .....,........"", ~ Ii;') .....
I Ci. ~ ':':':':':.:':':':': 000' IE-<", Ii( t'"'.
I ,In 1 ':::::',':::,. I 0 .- I 0.....
IDJ ,,- I "'"'''' _ -, I;.:
I r.' IrI """ I , , '" "-
I 'i lJ I I ..... N 'Q OJ ....
I 0=< l- 1 I I", A "'<
I t=l 1 I , "
': c:; <;: ,.n'~ i-------------------~-----------t--'----- ~
: ~ L______~___________________________~
I ':'! : >DWln" 0&'\1...< ;/01" :LJ OZ
I I
I W I
I I
I -0 I
I 0 I <;>Z;'bZI
I ",,0 I Hl>lON II\...
: :,
Q ~ r---J------~~~J2-~~~~y_~_~_____J~
: z ~(5, : l~
J ~~I ~--------- '- ________________}~------
: ~ ~~\: LL " :~
I w '" t~:: N ~ I~ 8 (..-.
I t;l R i'i:" E-< -c 1-;,;;>,,, 6 I
: "'< "'s, I 109:: 1;Ii /'....... l- \
I ~ \.."'1 I ~ 2 'tv \ \
I ;;.; "-~I I l:;j \ )
: ~~L---~----~5y~~~a~~-]HcW}J7017---l~
I I ,~
: : /...-~~-~
: : oOSz,( :<8
-,----------- @ /Hl~ON
1 .--
I , /'
I
J
,
I
I
I
I
I
h "A"
Attac ment
.:::--~W
,
,
"
,
"
,
,
,
,
"
,
,
"
"
In
ILl
:3
o
@
o ~f\'V 9ilVl
~
o
....
~
U
S
o:l
rJ)
.
~
-<
~
~
-<
::c:
NORTH
20 30 40 50 100 FT,
0 10
I I I I I I
SCALE: 1" = 20'. 0"
! ~~ERE !
beo
~~~ ~"-~S
I 2irFD ~ E1 ~
~~tc:j,,~ ~ r;;5"~
~:eieE~f~J~;~
1t:;;;;;}~r--~~c::::J'D~
~~~~,"r--$~~~
t:j D" --..r'--..e:=-.J~D "....~.L:::J;;
-, c::r~~0Cjll~3}~~r;;;;;;~
t;;;;;} D ' L.:::::YJ;;;;J~~~ --..J~~ D,
, c::::::; D r:!!t'"JV-i r::::::::f:D!r!5'l;:::J"c::::::;~
C::::::;C::::::;DDCj~DDt
c::::::; c::::::; D r;!jEf;J C::::::;"D,~
CjC::::::;~D~.~~
/:;:1" c:::::J. D D c::::J
VICINITY MAP ~~lffjS ~
t>CALE' I'" 1a::xJ I cs: ~ _
Revisions
Title
ERDMAN ]
3
"
Attachment "B"
'-...
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department ~
DATE: September 10, 1990
RE: Erdman Lot Split
SEPt'
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. The applicant needs to agree to join a Special Improvement
District if one is ever formed.
2. The access easement shown on the site plan meets Engineering
Department requirements. However, pursuant to Municipal Code
Chapter 19 section 101, access for both lots must be from one
curb cut. If both lots need to have separate driveways, we
suggest a different lot configuration which will allow lot 2 to
have access to the street.
3. The plat submitted by the applicant needs to show the edge of
pavement of the adjacent street.
jg/erdman
cc: Chuck Roth
,...
'-
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Monday, October 22, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm. before
the Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena
street, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Don
Erdman, Erdman Partnership requesting ,approval of a Lot Split.
The applicant proposes to divide the property located at 201 West
Gillespie into two lots of 23,956 s.f. and 8,899 s.f. The
property is more specifically described as being located in
Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M.
For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning
Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, 920-5090.
s/william L. stirlina. Mavor
Aspen City Council
================-----============================
Published in The Aspen Times on October 4, 1990.
city of Aspen Account.
.
, ,
, ,: /
;, j' "',r-:-.,/'
;' . 2,' ,~t:..;..? {/' .
r" .~... '~.-
,49'1.....- / .'" / "
,?; , dj:L()' ;,
v' ~'-
) ,
;
'1"-'~~~/'
( ,,' I
r ATI2\OlMENl'l
"'- lAND USE APPLICATIOO ~
1)
Project Name
"Rr~n P::llrrn~rc:h;r Tnt- C:pl;t-
2) Project Location 201 West Gille'lpi<> Avpnnp, A"ppn <i'lt r....kp Av<>nnel
Meets and bounds description is on Final Plat.
(indicate street address, lot & blcx:k nuniJer, le:Ja1 description wnere
appropriate)
3) Present ZClrliD:J
R-6
4) Lot Size 32.855.5 Sq. ft.
5) Afplicant's Name, J\ddresS & !bone #
The Erdman Partnership
P.O. Box 12395
Aspen. Colorado 81 612
925-8325
6) Representative's Name, J\ddresS & !bone # Donnelley Erdman
P.O. Box 12395
Aspen. Colorado 81612
925-832')
7) Type of Afplication (please dleck all that apply):
Con:litional Use _ ,0JrrePtUal SPA
_ Special Review Final SPA
8040 Greenline _ 0Jrreptual roD
_ stream Margin Final roD
0Jrreptual Historic Dev.
Final Historic Dev.
Minor Historic Dev.
Historic DelOCllition
Moontain view Plane SUb::livision
_ Historic Dasignation
~Condcxniniumization _ TextfMap 1IIoeIrlrIent
Lot SplitjIDt Line
Adjustment
_ GO> Allotment
_ GO> Exemption
8)
Description
approximate
property) .
of Existing Uses (J'1ImhPr and type of existing structures;
sq. ft.: J'1ImhPr of ld.L\A&lb: arry previc:us appx:ovals granted to the
Four- bedroan single family dwelling with attached Accessory Dwellinq Unit. under
=nstruction. FAR = 4068 sq. ft. out of 4468 sq. ft. allowable for Lot 1. Approval
for ADU granted 5/22/90.
9) Description of Develcp:oent Afplication
Application for Subdivision Exemotion and Growth Mani'lgP1TIPnt RxPl11ptirm for
Erdman Partnership Lot Split.
10)
Ha~ ycAl attadled the followin;J?
,/, Response to Atl:ad1Dent 2, Minim.Jm Snhni...c:ian Cbntents
~ Respollse to Attadmlent 3, Specific Snhni<:.c:ian Cbntents
=z RedpallSe to Atta<.i=lt 4, ReIri.ew starrlards for Yoor Afplication
o
:)
August 7,1990
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Co, 81611
RE: Application for Subdivision Exemption and GMP Exemption for
Erdman Partnership Lot Split
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The applicant (The Erdman Partnership) is the fee simple owner of a
lot at the intersection of Lake Avenue and GiJlespie Street, with a currently
assigned address of 210 West GiJlespie Street. Donnelley Erdmanl the
managing partner of The Erdman Partnership, is the representative
authorized to act on behalf of the applicant,
Sincerely,
/ . ~~~&4:b,,-
Donnelley ~n
c
:J
August 7, 1990
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Co, 81611
RE: Application for Subdivision Exemption and GMP Exemption
for Erdman Partnership Lot Split
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The applicant, The Erdman Partnership, proposes to divide its
property, a parcel described by meets and bounds within the City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, into two lots: one comprising 23,956,4
square feet and one comprising 8,899,1 square feet. Applicant seeks an
exemption from the definition of a subdivision as allowed in Section 7-1003
of the Aspen Land Use Regulations,
The Standards for Review of Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split have been
met in the following manner:
Review Standard A: The land is not part of any subdivision or lot split
approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the
Aspen City Council.
Review Standard B: Only two (2) lots shall be created by the lot split,
both of which exceed the minimum conforming lot size for single family
detached dwellings in the R-6 district, currently established as 6000 square feet,
Review Standard C: The applicant can find no evidence that the parcel
was ever the subject of an exemption under the provisions of Article 7 of the
Aspen Land Use Regulations, or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section
8-104(c) (1) (a),
"........
Review Standard D: The applicant has prepared a Final Plat for Lot
Split, which contains within the Certificate of Ownership and Dedication a
statement that "no further subdivision may be granted for these lots, and no
additional dwelling units may be built, other than a single family dwelling
with Accessory Dwelling Unit on Lot 2, without receipt of applicable
approvals pursuant to Article 7 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations, and
growth management allocation pursuant to Article 8 thereof."
Review Standard E: The applicant has stated in the Final Plat for Lot
Split that only one (1) detached single family dwelling shall be built on the
vacant lot (Lot 2), and therefore the Lot Split qualifies for GMQS exemption,
Respectfully submitted,
Donnelley Erd n
Managing Partner
The Erdman Partnership
/
DDNNELLEY ERDMAN. ARCHITECT
210 SOi.lHl G~lle:: : S~le~-<
PO Be" 10010
ASp.,'ll CUIIH(I(!U [~1 G 17
30J-92~)-832S
August 7,1990
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Co, 81611
RE: Application for Subdivision Exemption and GMP Exemption for
Erdman Partnership Lot Split
c
"""
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, In~
Title Insurance Company
601 E, Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766 . (303) 925,6527 FAX
Christina M, Davis
Vice President
Vincent J, Higens
President
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP
Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the
State of Colorado hereby certifies that THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP, A
COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP are the owner's in fee simple of the
following described property:
A parcel of land situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 12,
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, City
of Aspen, Colorado, and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point whence the Easterly 1/4 corner of said Section 12
(a 1954 brass cap in place) bears South 66[42'13" East 894.58 feet;
thence North 86 31'00 East 148.72 feet;
thence North 89 43'00 East 80.23 feet;
thence south 37 06'00 East 43.66 feet;
thence South 07 00'00 East 40.30 feet;
thence south 19 08'00 West 63.23 feet;
thence North 89 52'00 West 54.81 feet;
thence West 184.38, to the Easterly right of way line of Lake Avenue;
thence North along said right of way line 125.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
Liens and Encumbrances:
NONE
This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and
is furnished for informational purposes only.
LE, INC.
nature
1990
,....,
~
....,
...-
OCT . 2 I!-!~,' !
DDNNELLEY ERDMAN. ARCHITECT
1 ': 'I.~ ~ ; 11 ' I, I, \ I:' , - , 1
1)0 h. , 11,:11;)
f''-:',: [_,)!, l.ill 3! I~, 1"
_~) 1 ~-! :J) - ,:;-'
October 10/1990
(
Kim Johnsonl Planner
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Co, 81611
RE: Application for Subdivision Exemption and GMP Exemption for
Erdman Partnership Lot Split. Ordinance #66 of 1990
Kim:
On this day I have mailed copies of the enclosed PUBLIC NOTICE to all
owners of properties within 300 feet of our lot at 201 West Gillespie Avenue,
using the list and address labels provided me by Vincent J, Higens, of Pitkin
County Title Company,
Sincerely,
~o~~~~
,
Managing Partner
The Erdman Partnership
~~
TJ~/ wt dI~~f
fA "
I
I
~
,"'"
"..',.....
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Vincent J, Higens
President
Title Insurance Company
601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925.1766 . (303) 925-6527 FAX
Christina M, Davis
Vice President
ADJACENT OWNER'S STATEMENT
pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of
Colorado hereby certifies the following list is a current list of adjacent property
owner's within three hundred feet of the SU8JECT PROPERTY, as obtained from the most
current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls.
NAMES AND AORESSES
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE REFER TO LIST ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
GNATURE
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Vincent J. Higens
President
Title Insurance Company
601 E, Hopkins. Aspen. Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766 . (303) 925-6527 FAX
ALEX KAUFMAN
KATHRYN BUMGARDNER CHEEK
P.O. BOX 6221
EDISON NJ
LOT I, CHEEK SUB
08818
ASPEN CENTER FOR
ENVIROMENTAL STUDIES
100 E. PUPPYSMITH ST.
ASPEN CO
METES AND BOUNDS
81611
ASPEN INSTITUTE
METES AND BOUNDS
1000 NORTH 3RD STREET
ASPEN CO
81611
CAROL G. CRAIG
LOT 6, N1/2 LOT 7, BLK 100
P.O. BOX 18
WOODY CREEK
CO
81656
CHARLES W. BRADY
LOT I, NORTH ST. SUB
45555 STELLA DRIVE
ATLANTA GA
30327
CITY OF ASPEN
METES AND BOUNDS
130 S. GALENA STREET
ASPEN CO
81611
DAVID PINES
ARONELLE S. PINES
3415 MORRISON T NW
WASHINGTON DC
LOTS 9, 10, BLK 101 HALLAMS
61801
ELIZABETH ANN ALTEMUS
LOTS 7, 8, BLK 102, HALLAMS
620 NORTH 3RD STREET
ASPEN CO
81611
H. ARTHUR LITTELL
TRUSTEE, ET AL
P.O. 80X 1748
OKLAHOMA CITY
LOT 3, CHEEK SUB
OK
73101
Christina M, Davis
Vice President
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Vincent J, Higens
President
Title Insurance Company
601 E. Hopkins. Aspen. Colorado 81611
(303) 925.1766' (303) 925.6527 FAX
HOUSTON R. HARTE
ANNE P. HARTE
476 WESTWOOD DRIVE
DENVER CO
JAMES K. DAGGS
GAY DAGGS
640 NORTH 3RD STREET
, ASPEN CO
JAMES P. HUME
1120 NO, LAKE SHORE DRIVE
CHICAGO IL
JOHN H. CHEEK JR.
KATHRYN BUMGARDNER CHEEK
CLONMEL ROAD
NASHVILLE TN
LE RAY DIGILIA
JOHN WILLIAM DIGILIA
P.O. BOX 4305
ASPEN, CO
LUCY REED HIBBERD
2222 EAST TENNESSEE STREET
DENVER CO
MORTIMER M. DENKER
DORIS DENKER
P.O. BOX 1566
ASPEN CO
MORTON A. HELLER
P.O. BOX 98
WOODY CREEK
CO
PHOEBE MASSEY RYERSON
P.O, BOX 4222
ASPEN
CO
S 1/2 LOT 7, LOT 8, BLK 100
80206
LOTS 4, 5, 6, 8LK 102, HALLAMS
81611
LOTS 7-9, BLK 103, HALLAMS
60611
LOT 4, CHEEK SUB
37220
LOT 2, NORTH ST. SUB
81612
UNIT A, LBH CONOOS
80209
LOT 1" LOT 2 SUNNY ACRES
81612
LOT 2, CHEEK SUB
81656
LOT 3, SUNNY ACRES
81612
Christina M, Davis
Vice President
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Int..
Vincent J, Higens
President
Title Insurance Company
601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925.1766' (303) 925.6527 FAX
ROBERT P. GILLMAN
ELEANOR L. GILLMAN
2390 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
ANAHEIM CA
RONNIE MARSHALL
320 LAKE AVE
ASPEN CO
STERLING A. COLGATE
ROEMARY W. COLGATE
422 ESTANTE
LOS ALAMOS NM
THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP
P.O. BOX 12395
ASPEN CO
WILLIAM K MARTIN
MARY F. MARTIN
710 NORTH 3RD STREET
ASPEN CO
WILLIAM N. JOY
DEBORAH HOFFMAN
1111 CHESTNUT STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA
LOT 5, CHEEK SUB
92806
PARCEL I, MARSHALL LOT SPLIT
81611
UNIT B, LBH CONDOS
84544
METES AND BOUNDS
81612
LOTS 1, 2, 3, BLK. 102 HAL LAMS
81611
~jETES AND BOUNDS
94109
Christina M, Davis
Vice President