HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Fisher Mandatory PUD•
Fisher - Mandatory P.U.D.
E
l- J
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
s No. 51-80
1. DATE SUBMITTED: 9/15/80 STAFF: S,�innV Vapp
2. APPLICANT: John E Fisher Box 15059 Aspen
3. REPRESENTATIVE:
4. PROJECT NAME: Fisher Exemption from Mandatory Ply —
5. LOCATION: Lot 6 Sunny Park N r —
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning
P.U.D.
Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
7. REFERRALS:
_jj_—Attorney
_Engineering Dept.
Housing
Water
City Electric
Subdivision
Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
Parks
Holy Cross Electric
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: P & Z only
Stream Margin
8040 Greenline
View Plane
Conditional Use
Other
School District
Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
State Highway Dept.
Other
.• •
9. DISPOSITION: n
P & Z v Approved Denied Date
1. The applicant agreeing to enter into a sidewalk, curb and gutter
improvement district in the event one is formed.
2. The revision and resubmission of the applicant's site plan to include
a parking arrangement that requires only one driveway when future
curb and gutter are constructed.
3. No structure being constructed within thirty feet of the northeasterly
propertly line in order to provide sufficient right-of-way in the
event Park Circle is extended.
4. The applicant granting a 10-foot utility easement along the north-
easterly property line for future water main extension.
5. The submission and approval of a grading plan in sufficient detail
to indicate the proposed cut and fill and the impact of drainage
on the site.
6. The submission of a site plan to indicate the proposed revegetation
in the event it is required.
7. The proposed structure otherwise complying with all area and bulk
requirements of the R-15 zone.
10. ROUTING:
f. Attorney
Building Engineering Other
T P• T""A i"ATM
AGREEMENT dated and entered into on '��'��L�1c,' �'%, 1980,
between the City of Aspen, hereinafter called the "City", and
John E. Fisher, hereinafter called the "applicant".
WHEREAS, the applicant is the owner of a parcel of land
located in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, more
particularly described as:
and
Lot 6
Sunny Park North Subdivision
Pitkin County
Colorado
WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed the construction of
a duplex upon said property; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an exemption from
mandatory planned unit development; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has
determined that the proposed development of the duplex located
on said property meets the objectives of planned unit
development and therefore compliance with Article VIII of
Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen is.
not necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of
the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree
as follows:
The City agrees that the applicant shall not be required
to proceed according to said Article VIII of Chapter 24 as a
planned unit development in the construction of the duplex
on said property, upon the following terms and conditions.
1. The applicant agrees to join in any improvement
district for construction of street improvements (including
curbs, gutters, sidewalks) or to reimburse the City directly
if he should choose to construct these improvements without
formation of such a district, and applicant agrees to join
any improvement -,district for future drainage and underground
•
utilities improvements.
runs with the land.
This provision is to be a covenant which
2. The applicant agrees that no structure shall be
constructed, upon the property, within thirty (30) feet
of the northeasterly property line. This restriction is to be
a covenant which runs with the land.
3. The applicant agrees to grant, by deed, a ten (10)
foot utility easement along the northeasterly property line
for future water main extension.
This agreement and all of the provisions hereof shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs,
executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest
of the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove written.
ATTEST:f,
._'— : � c
��6—
Herman Edel, Mayor
Robin R. Berry
Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF COLORADO)
)SS:
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
F- 17,41, �
�' ro
Jbta E. Fisher
The foreg �.n instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of V 1980, by Herman Edel, Mayor, and Robin R.
Berry, -Deputy City C er .
My Commission expires:
Witness my hand and officia seal.
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of ;!'. 1980, by John E. Fisher.
My Commission expires:
Witness my hand and official,seal.
Notary Public
i
-2
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office ,/W
RE: Fisher Mandatory PUD Exemption
DATE: October 3, 1980
The attached letter of application requests exemption from the mandatory PUD
requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code for the construction of a duplex
on Lot 6 of the Sunny Park North Subdivision. The lot is located at the
end of Park Circle at the base of Smuggler Mountain and is zoned R-15, Manda-
tory PUD. Lot 6 totals approximately 22,669 square feet. The mandatory
application of slope reduction criteria, however, reduces the net buildable
lot area to approximately 16,485 square feet. The proposed development is
located in excess of 150 feet below the 8040 foot elevation and is therefore
exempt from compliance with 8040 Greenline review.
In order for an applicant to be exempted from mandatory PUD, the Planning
and Zoning Commission must determine that the proposed development meets
the objectives of Planned Unit Development, and therefore compliance with
PUD requirements is unnecessary. Additional criteria, which are essentially
the same as the 8040 Greenline criteria, have been established for those areas
designated mandatory PUD. In general, these criteria address such factors
as the ability to provide adequate utility service, the suitability of the
site for development, and the impact of development both visually and on the
natural features of the terrain.
The Planning Office and Engineering Department have reviewed the applicant's
request for an exemption from mandatory PUD, and our comments are summarized
as follows:
1. Slope reduction calculations result in sufficient square footage
to permit construction of a duplex on the lot.
2. Utilities exist to service the proposed development.
3. Soil test results indicate that the site is suitable for construc-
tion of the proposed duplex.
4. Existing access is utilized to minimize site disruption.
5. The proposed structure appears to comply with all area and bulk
requirements of the R-15 zone district.
6. Sufficient access to the property is available from Park Circle to
insure fire protection, snow removal and road maintenance.
In view of the above, both the Engineering Department and the Planning Office
recommend that the applicant's request for exemption from mandatory PUD be
approved subject to the following:
1. The applicant agreeing to enter into a sidewalk, curb and gutter
improvement district in the event one is formed.
2. The revision and resubmission of the applicant's site plan to include
a parking arrangement that requires only one driveway when future
curb and gutter are constructed.
3. No structure being constructed within thirty feet of the northeasterly
propertly line in order to provide sufficient right-of-way in the
event Park Circle is extended.
4. The applicant granting a 10-foot utility easement along the north-
easterly property line for future water main extension.
Memo: her Exemption from PUD
• Octobe 3, 1980
Page Two
5. The submission and approval of a grading plan in sufficient detail
to indicate the proposed cut and fill and the impact of drainage
on the site.
6. The submission of a site plan to indicate the proposed revegetation
in the event it is required.
7. The proposed structure otherwise complying with all area and bulk
requirements of the R-15 zone.
The Planning Office further recommends that the applicant'ts request for appro-
val be conditioned upon the above conditions being satisfactorily met prior
to issuance of a building permit.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office l�>Y
RE: Fisher Mandatory PUD Exemption
DATE: October 3, 1980
The attached letter of application requests exemption from the mandatory PUD
requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code for the construction of a duplex
on Lot 6 of the Sunny Park North Subdivision. The lot is located at the
end of Park Circle at the base of Smuggler Mountain and is zoned R-15, Manda-
tory PUD. Lot 6 totals approximately 22,669 square feet. The mandatory
application of slope reduction criteria, however, reduces the net buildable
lot area to approximately 16,485 square feet. The proposed development is
located in excess of 150 feet below the 8040 foot elevation and is therefore
exempt from compliance with 8040 Greenline review.
In order for an applicant to be exempted from mandatory PUD, the Planning
and Zoning Commission must determine that the proposed development meets
the objectives of Planned Unit Development, and therefore compliance with
PUD requirements is unnecessary. Additional criteria, which are essentially
the same as the 8040 Greenline criteria, have been established for those areas
designated mandatory PUD. In general, these criteria address such factors
as the ability to provide adequate utility service, the suitability of the
site for development, and the impact of development both visually and on the
natural features of the terrain.
The Planning Office and Engineering Department have reviewed the applicant's
request for an exemption from mandatory PUD, and our comments are summarized
as follows:
1. Slope reduction calculations result in sufficient square footage
to permit construction of a duplex on the lot.
2. Utilities exist to service the proposed development.
3. Soil test results indicate that the site is suitable for construc-
tion of the proposed duplex.
4. Existing access is utilized to minimize site disruption.
5. The proposed structure appears to comply with all areaand bulk
requirements of the R-15 zone district.
6. Sufficient access to the property is available from Park Circle,to
insure fire protection, snow removal and road maintenance.
In view of the above, both the Engineering Department and the Planning Office
recommend that the applicant's request for exemption from mandatory PUD be
approved subject to the following:
1. The applicant agreeing to enter into a sidewalk, curb and gutter
improvement district in the event one is formed.
2. The revision and resubmission of the applicant's site plan to include
a parking arrangement that requires only one driveway when future
curb and gutter are constructed.
�. No structure being constructed within thirty feet of the northeasterly
propertly line in order to provide sufficient right-of-way in the
event Park Circle is extended.
L/ 4. The applicant granting a 10-foot utility easement along the north-
easterly property line for future water main extension.
Memo: Fisher Exemption from PUD
October 3, &0
Page Two
,ubmisSion and approval of a grading plan in sufficient detail
►rdicate the proposed cut and fill and the impact of drainage
,,10 site •
sr,brrission of a site plan to indicate the proposed revegetation
elo,r,nt it is required.
' f.�,� �,��•d structure otherwise complying with all area and bulk
�,rta c'nt� of the R-15 zone.
t,irther recommends that the applicant'ts request for appro-
u;.,n the above conditions being satisfactorily met prior
:ter,, ing permit.
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
FROM: Louis Buettner, Engineering Offic
DATE: September 26, 1980
RE: Fisher Mandatory P.U.D. Exemption
After having reviewed the survey plat, exemption application
and soil report for above exemption, and also having made a
site inspection, the Engineering Department recommends that
the P.U.D. exemption be approved with the following conditions:
1. Owner/applicant agreeing to enter into a sidewalk
curb and gutter improvement district agreement to
be a covenant on the property.
2. A design change be made in the parking so that
only one driveway be required when future curb
and gutter is constructed, as per Section 19-101
of the municipal code.
3. No structure be constructed within 30 feet of the
northeasterly property line, this being a covenant
on the property.
4. Owner/applicant grant a 10 foot utility easement
alo ng the northeasterly property line for a future
water main extension.
•
0
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
FROM: John E. Fisher
SUBJECT: Application for exemption from mandatory PUD
DATE: September 12, 1980
I hereby make application for exemption from mandatory PUD restrictions for Lot 6
Sunny Park North Subdivision. The planned duplex structure complies with all
objectives of planned unit development. Therefore, the following statements
support this application:
(1) The slope reduction calculations resulted in sufficient square footage
to permit a duplex structure on the lot. (See attached survey)
(2) The soil test results indicated the site to be suitable for construction
of the proposed duplex. (See enclosed report)
(3) The location of the structure makes use of existing access so as not to
disturb existing trees and natural landscaping.
(4) The proposed structure still complies with all setback requirements as
set forth in the R-15 guidelines.
(5) Two off-street parking areas for each half of the duplex will be provided
as well as a single car garage for each half.
(6) Emergency vehicles will have easy access to the structure from Park Circle
off of Park Avenue.
(7) City water is available at corner of lot.
(8) City sewer is available in middle of Park Circle Avenue.
The proposed structure is a duplex that is to be identical on both sides. One-half
of the duplex is a Scholz plan (see plans) that is to have a single car garage.
Both halves of the duplex will be joined by a common wall at the garage. Each
half of duplex will be three bedroom, two bath, living/dining area, kitchen
and basement under the main structure on each side.
MEMORANDUM
TO: (Acting) City Attorney, Bob Edmondson
City Engineer, Dan McArthur
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Fisher Exemption from Mandatory P.U.D.
DATE: September 16, 1980
The attached application requests exemption from mandatory P.U.D. designation
as described in Section 24-8.13 of the Municipal Code. This item is scheduled
to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 1980;
therefore, may I please have your comments concerning this application no
later than September 26, 1980? Thanks.
FIRE HYDRANT
NO CAP OISTURBE o T.B.M. 100
SEWER MANHOLE
RIM c-7 `4
INVERT eq-M
NO CAP DISTURBED
1, DAV 1 D W. Mc BRIDE CERTIFY 'THAT TH 15 PLAT 15 PLOTTED
FROM FIELD NOTES OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPER-
V[51oN iN MAY 191q
DAVID W MCBRIDE PEG.LAND SURVEYOR
n i!o1Za1
AREA TABULATION
0 - z0% 15,o39 t
20-3o9: 237-T ±
30 - CFO-1e 1, 03.5 2
> 4.0% `+, 2 ao �
2Z,6G4 i Sq rT
LS. a11154
x c/ oo) 15� 039 ;
x ( so) I, I B-
x (25) 2 -15
z(0) O±
9
IG,'t Sq.Fr_ zo
•
0�4 E m (D IT T cf)
• FND '-15 RE -BAR W/CAP AS OESCRI»E.D
+ FNO SPIKE
SURVEY ORIENTED WITH FOUND MONUMENTS
CAL-LS IN C ) FROM REGOFZD SUED. PLAT
EL..EVATIOf\15 A55UN1ED oN A T, B, M. lOp W ITH
CONTOUR INTERVALS EVERY Z FEET
SLOPt AREa.S GALC. L�$ING POLHR P>_ANIMCTCR
STATUg OF EXISTING ROADS ACR055 LO-T NOT
KNOWN.
i
GOO = Sq. Fr.
:5 > L{O
'ICAL. i
EP 0� ® IP (F G:g U LI
pip ��^^ A N D
U ®P®LLD0l�h�_1TT [1Dlnn-❑G 9D-uJMW[E U
OF
LOT 0 SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION ASPEN
COLORADO
BY
SURVEY ENGRS INC-
P.O. BOX 250G ASPEN COLD.
51a/-Iq
SL.op c%".-L.
6/Zo/7�
JoB � �1101 'A
TO-
\ 1
DATES r ! TIME r;
WHILE
YOU WERE
OUT
M
--.-PHONE
-
` �
PHONE 2 /
TELEPHONED
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WANTS TO SEE YOU
PLEASE CALL
WILL CALL AGAIN
RUSH
RETURNED YOUR CALL
REMARKS
Q
SIGNED
CASCADE® L1-C2335 ►OINT[DIMY.f.A.