HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.co.647 S Monarch St.A64-91
"'"
,I"""'(' '--.
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
city of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 11 ~ 1/ 91 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE:=rt /_ :f./'1) 2735-131-20-005 A64-91
( STAFF MEMBER: ~ t:::.:r
PROJECT NAME: ~dominiumization~'" <eU?-cascade's
Project Address: 647 S. Monarch Street. Aspen. CO 81611
Legal Address:
APPLICANT: Peter and Deborah Cantrup
APPlipant Address: c/- Richard Cook
REPRESENTATIVE: Martv Pickett. MCFlvnn & PicKett. P.C.
Representative Address/Phone: 320 West Main Street
Aspen. CO 81611 925-2211
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
PAID: (YES) NO AMOUNT: $1005
NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 6/6
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
1 STEP:
x
2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO D J=
CC Meeting Date1l\\~PUBLIC HEARING: @ QNcg. Y' r"'0-
g 1- \ '\ VESTED RIGHTS: ~ NO
Planning Director Approval: Paid:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date:
===========~===================================================
REFERRALS:
/City Attorney
\( city Engineer
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
City Electric
Envir.Hlth.
Aspen Con. S.D.
Mtn Bell
Parks Dept.
Holy Cross
. Fire Marshall
Building Inspec~o~
Roaring Fork .--"('
Energy Center
School District
Rocky Mtn NatGas
State HwyDept(GW)
State HwyDept(GJ)
othe~
DATE REFERRED: /9./;M'l' INITIALS: ~
;~;~~=;~~~;~7================;~;~=;~~;~;7:1~Ji)fJl.7~~;~;~~~~-
. _ CitY.Atty i City Engi~ ~oning _Env. Health
--- Hous~ng ~ Other: ~ r-I~
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: t,,~ ~
HOV 15 '93 15:56 MCFLYNN & PICKETT PC
P.,Y3
)ilea
8'1'A'1'EJI2ft'OI' BXIIIIC1''1':J:OIII
I'ROJl 'I'D ~ SUBD:J:ViE8:J:0III nOCRSS
POll TJDI I'tJlUIOSB 01' ClOIIDOJInaUH:J:lII:Utc; TQ CA8<:.1\DB8,
It. C01IIDClIIDIJ:UIl A'1' 1147 lSOUTII KOIlUCK 8TRBB'1',
C%ft or "5'BH, COL01W)()
WlU1tBAS, Peter Cantrup and Deborah C. cantrup (h~einafter
rafel:red 1;0 as "Cantrup") are the owners or a pax-eel of real
property described on Ilxhihit "A" attached h~eto and inoorporat:ed
hel:ein by this reference, and
lY/(
WHEREAS, Cantrup has requested an exelllption from the full
subdivision process for the pU~oses of condominiumizing the
property des=ibed on EXhibit "A" i and
WliEREAS, the city Counoil of Aspiln, ColoradO, at its r$9Ular
meeting on oecE!lll:Qe;J; 16, 1991,. determined that cant;J;up's request fer
suCh condominiumizatien was appropriate and granted the sallle,
s.wjeet to the, conditions des=ibed hereinafter.
NOW, 'l'IlIi:aUORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado, does
determine that the application for except.ion from the full
:iIiUDclivision process for the purpose of subdivisicn of the property
des=ibed on the attached Exhibit "A" is proper and hereby grants
said subdivision.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing exception is expressly
conditioned upon:
1. The Plat depictinq Tne Casoades, a CondollliniUlll, be
aPP;J;oved by the Planning OffiCEl, and filecl with the pitkin County
Clerk and Recorder's office prio:r: to the sale of either unit.
2. cantrup agrees to ~art:i.cipate in any future improvement
districts encollpClSsing the subject property.
3. Cantrup shall pay the Rousing Impact Fee or $8,050.00 per
unit prior to the planning Director signing the final plat for
condominiumization.
Ilo.... "'.. .a~ -d day of 4/JJ;~ 'jjj993_
CITY 01' ASPEN ~ < ~
a MUniC,/Pal c::o~oration _~eant~a ..' ~.-;?'1""-
~I ~' . ~?'f.C" /,'
By;; (~ - ~oa. .' ;4l t!4M7i?79--
Jib Benne ,Mayor c. eantrup . f
t, Kathryn s. Koch, city Cl~k, do hereby (:~ify that the
foreqoing Statement of Exception frOlll the Full Subdivision Process
tor the Purpose of COndOllliniumizing the Property at 647 South
-1-
367382 B-743
SILVIA DAVIS
P-14 02/28/94 02:55P F'G 1 OF 3
PITKIN COUNTY CLERK . RECORDER
REC
15.00
DOC
NOV 15 '93 15=57 MCFLYNN & PICl<ETT PC
P.3/3
Hona:n:h street, Aspen, eOl.orado, Wall considered and llpproved I:lythe
Aspen City COQtlCll and that Kayer John Sennett 0& au1:horized'to
execut:e the saae on behal.f of the Cl~A.pen. _~
' - ---=Q~
ia s. ,2!5I C erk
State of New Mexico )
) lila.
County of Rio Arriba )
The f9~e'ifo;l.ng os sul:lscri.J:Ied. and sworn to berore llIe this ;?t;-t::L.
day of Y..~ - , 1993, by Peter Centt'up and. Deborah
C. cantrup, all owners of The cascades, a COndominiUlll.
witness my hand and pffieial seal.
1 1 i \\\\'''''''''''',,,/
My c:aDlIIl ss on G:lCp res: ,,"'~\,,::;)'j M~ ,,,_,
,('d I.AIL/ r 1. ;~d"~<'''':Y''';''\
(/1Cf..1?~ J.~ J//~ .,~t.~".
Notuy Public II ~ .;J: -r -. ") \1! ~
1~:, <6-(.. ~ <:Y i":
STAn 01' COLORADO ) ". ~.... -I. 0 ::
) IllIll.V~,"" N ....~ l
comrry OF PITJtDJ ) "" ;';'~......::;~<>..
The ~egoinq was aul:lsoribed aU to before IDe th~~"~~,~"",'
day of ~.' ~ __ , 19 , by JOhn Bennet'!:, as Kayor,
and ltathr:yn s. ~O as City Cler of the ci1:y Of Aspen, a
municipal corporation.
Witness lIlY hand and offic~aJ. seal.
My cOl\III\ission expires: .;:1/A7/96"
....._\OlIbdlvl..ex
367382
B-743 P-15
02/28/94 02:55P PG 2
OF 3
-2-
~ '. A to
EXHIBIT A
THE SOUTH FOUR (4) FEET OF LOT
(10) FEET OF LOT 14, BLOCK ONE
TOWNSITE OF ASPEN.
12, ALL OF LOT 13, AND THE NORTH TEN
(1), CONNORS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND
-?7n~
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY FOUR (4) FEET OF
LOT 12, BLOCK 1, CONNOR'S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN WHENCE A
REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "CITY OF ASPEN LS 13166" BEARS N 15046'06" E
301.15 FEET; THENCE N 77038'36" W 3.06 FEET TO A REBAR WITH YELLOW
CAP "LS 9018"; THENCE S 15057'24" W 43.89 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE
A REBAR WITH A YELLOW CAP 9018 SET IN CONC. BEARS S 15057'24" W 20.17
FEET; THENCE S 75027'10" E 3.20 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
NORTH TEN FEET OF LOT 14, BLOCK 1 CONNOR'S ADDITION;
THENCE N 15046'06" E 44.00 FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN EAMES
ADDITION AND CONNOR'S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
367382
8-743 P-16
02/28/94 02:55P PG 3
OF 3
. ~.
./1
~ ~S(~jL
1.17 CD
C(J5C~5
30c
~
vo.-=
366494 8-740 P-644 02103/94 09:43A PS 1 OF 2 REC DOC
SILVIA DAVIS. PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 10.00
CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PETER H. CANTRUP AND DEBORAH A. CANTRUP
WHEREAS,
Peter H. Cantrup and Deborah A. Cantrup ("Owners")
are owners of the real property located at 647 S. Monardh Street,
Aspen, Colorado; and
h'HEREAS ,
Owners have
ha3
,
recently completed construction of a build~ng called
The Cascades
and desire to obtain a
certificate of occupancy; and
WHEREAS,
the Cascades
property
is within a district requiring construction of curb, gutter and
sidewalk prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or, in
lieu thereof, an agreement for future construction pursuant to
section 19-100 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at this time, the city Engineer deems the
construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk on
Gilbert Street
to be unfeasible due to existing conditions."
NOW; THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
..
"
1.
Owners aqree
~'Jr9QC
to construct curb, gutter and sidewalk along the
frontage of their property (approximately
102
feet) at such
time as the City of Aspen deems construction necessary and
feasible. It is acknowledged by all parties that the present
) ;,. .~ C'
... -
3..494 B-740 P-.45 02/03/94 Oq:~3A PG 2 OF 2
-2-
requirement is for two (2) foot gutter, six (6) inch vertical
curb, and five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk.
2. In the alternative, at the city's option, the City may
construct the above improvements and
the Owners
shall reimburse the city for all qosts of such construction.
Reimbursement shall be made to the City within ninety (90) days
after receipt of invoice.
3. This agreement shall be binding and.shall insure to the
benefit of the heirs, assigns, and succeSSOrS in title of the
parties hereto.
By:
"e,L ,
r/,g
~9~.
Entered thi~
By: ,?J( 'C
P ter H. Cantrup
state of colorado)
, )
",,;\\"~IYt1\'!lit){ of pitkin )
,,- ",:~.TH -J. ,,'"
......' ~v ........ '....-0<;'
!~......The "'fo~oing instrument was ackno.
ft7// t\O'/-h, /d-Y (b1J IAI
= day of.. I ~~ _, ~9..i2:'> by
':" :..J) ,~... oF
-;,: uLi ,,' ~
;, "7..... Wilth~ss"$.y hand and official seaL
'" ~>;I. 0" :_~ .~":'
""""~~~I ~~~ission expires: '.~ (51 1 "Iq,,-
."...".."..' fit ~lL )\- !Ji~ I
j Notary pUblic
5/ 'i '?c!../:Uo & tJu<.:&_
(}fC4l cic./ It;, )UA'l fJf0rtb
It!
day of
Deborah A. Cantru~
/-1?7rC'/'c ",e'7 ; A k-/k..-r- /'0/2
:=JeZS"d.-e<Jr/ AJ. a~r--
dged before me this/~~
{l.tJJ;u
Address:
~~'
r
"""'''''11111
,\\' OF L~""
"","'~TY..O,,~~ N,
4~~,;; :B~' :...t~;
(. 7.::) .::~:'~=j
,~.'; Attest: ;;~;
0- ~
FO'pn*9-'~~8 "l
'- - ,,,'0'\
COLO~DO ~icipal
(~~
corporation
(MAYOR)
(CITY CLERK)
~.
."
'l,
30
( 0 V) <<- "-'
,. Y J
'""
C:el S
. eel,. cI
'<..
366493 B-740 P-b41 02103/94 09:22A P6 1 OF 3 REC
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 15.00
DOC
~
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT'
(lCcScq / r
~~ ~
This agreement made and entered into this ,7<. day of f,e-6
. , 19~, by and between the CITY OF ASPEN, Pitkin County,
Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "Aspen" and PEl'ER H. CANTRUP
and DEBORAH A. CANTRUP
hereinafter referred to as "Licensee."
WHEREAS, Licensee is the owner of the following described
property located in the City of Aspen, Pitkin C~unty, Colorado:
City of Aspen, Pitkin county, Colorado
.
WHEREAS, said property abuts the following described public
r~ght-of-way(s) : (on the southerly side): App:r:oximately 102 feet of
G~lbert street, easterly fran, the South M::march Street intersection, in Lot
12, Block 1, Connor's Addition. . , '
WHEREAS, Licensee desires to encroach upon said right-of
way(s) by allCMing the four existing 6' planters in front of the Cascades
building to remain; and by installing a dry well as set f:orth on the attached
proposal fran Gerd Zeller.
_\.
./
(
WHEREAS, Aspen agrees to the grant of a private license of
encroachment as built subject to certain conditions.
THEREFORE, in'
after contained,
follows:
consideration of the mutual agreement herein-
Aspen and Licensee covenant 'and agree as
1. A private revocable license is hereby granted to Licensee
to occupy, maintain and utilize the above described portion of
public right-of-way for the sole purpose described.
2. This license is granted for a perpetual term' subj ect to
being terminated at any time and for any reason'~at the sole
discretion of the City Council of the City of Aspen.
3. This license shall be subordinate to the right of Aspen
to use said area for any public purposes.
4. Licensee is responsible for the maintenance and repair of
the public right~of-way, together with improvements constructed
therein, which Aspen, in the exercise of its discretion, shall
determine to be necessary to keep the same in a safe and clean
condition.
. ~..~
~
3bb493 B-740 P-b42 02103/94 09:22A PB 2 OF 3
5. Licensee shall at all times duripg the term hereof, carry
public liability insurance for the benefit of the City with
limits of not less than those specified by section 24-10-114,-
C.R.S., as may be amended from time to time, naming the City as
co-insured. Licensee shall maintain said coverage in full force
and effect during the term of this License and shall furnish the
City with a copy of such coverage or a certificate evidencing
such coverage. All insurance policies maintained pursuant to
this agreement shall contain the following endorsement:
'It is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance
policy may not be cancelled by the surety until thirty (30)
days after receipt by the city, by registered mail, of a
written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew.'
The licensee shall show proof of this in$urance to the city
before this agreement is filed.
6. Licensee shall save, defend and hold harmless against any
and all claims for damages,' costs and expenses, to persons or
property that may arise out of, or be occasioned by the use,
occupancy and maintenance of said property by Licensee, or from
any act or 'omission of any representative, agent, customer and/or
employee of Licensee.
,
7. This license may be terminated by Licensee at any time
and for any reason on thirty (30) days written notice of Licen-
see's intent to cancel. This license may be terminated by Aspen
at any time and for any reason by resolution duly passed by the
City Council of the City of Aspen. Upon termination Licensee
shall, at Licensee's expense, remove any improvements or en-
croachments from said property. The property shall be restored
to a condition satisfactory to Aspen.
8. This license is subject to all state laws, the provisions
of the Charter of the city' of .Aspen as it now exists or may
hereafter. be amended, and the ordinances of the city of Aspen now
in effect or those which may hereafter be adopted.
9. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent Aspen
from granting such additional,licenses or property interests in
or affecting said property as it deems necessary.
10. The conditions hereof imposed on the grant€d license of
encroachment shall' constitute covenants running with the land,
and binding upon Licensee, their heirs, successors and assigns.
11. In any legal action to enforce the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reason-
able attorney's fees.
, ,
366493 8-740 P-643 02/03/94 09:22A P6 3 OF 3
. '
12. If the structure for which this license was issued is
\ removed for any reason, Licensee may not rebuild in the same
location without obtaining another encroachment license prior to
building. No existing encroachment shall be enlarged without
obtaining an additional license prior to construction.
13. The licensee waives any and all claims against the City
of Aspen for loss or damage to the improvements constructed
within the encroachment area.
~i'I~:':'<"';"<!""~'"
'1,~I;llHjHI,,,.
\\\,. l\f 'S -"~.r..
.' .. ~ .....".,
,"":\"' ....... rlJ! ........
~..(.} .....~.
,::ATTE T:, \ -
'0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed, .t;his, agreement
Aspen the day and year first written. ..,':"~":~:" :.. ".
~\~...' ~'''''',,(;(;:,::::'>''' ,"
~i}',.l;:)Vcc\."''' ~. i,...
"ec~ .........,.
CITY OF AS E~ifcOLORADd~
: ;t64 ~
~ G , Cl
, .
~:*'''
1Ill\l\\\\\'\~ "
at
By
A. Cantrup,
ST.~~~f.;o5 COLORADO
'j>-'?> ...... " j'
Q4'it'ilty ofJ?itkin
J.' ..\o'?' ..
J:," '-'1;: ..:.",
i" r1!.er')f Cl~going
'~ 1. . d.s:rZ of
~"!.ce Ia's,'" l
,...~. ....:~o ......:::
I),t- ......... j-.... .......
!J~w 1';\'<.: ,...\..... .-.
WI-r~SS MY
)
) ss.
)
~a/ (] / -
Peter H. Cantrup S; Licensee
AY/4/
DeJJorah A. Cantrup D Licensee
#i7i>~"'.!!.:Z /'"-1 rA-<=..-r-- ~.'Z.
" ~~O,;fA-H ftl.. e,,77R~
iR.ss~trv. ment was acknow~edged before me this
~ '.; 19 ~'C} , by Peter H. Carjtrup and Deborah
HAND AND OFFICIAf ~EAL.
My c_i..ion ""Pire., -"f' ~ ...".,.
db~liC ~~ .' .... .
Sl~'?a~ ~ ~/hpd~.frt
Address ' , ~d-
spj6j91j ENCRAGREEMENT.KEEP
(
(
r-.
!""'\
Reqular Meetinq
Aspen citv Council
Januarv 13. 1992
deleted, and that #5 be modified to include additional FAR
allowances for optional front porches, and an amendment in the
Whereas clause to reflect P & Z's review and approval of open space
and parking; seconded by Councilman Reno.
Councilwoman Richards asked if this is repudiation of the work of
the pedestrian and bikeway plans because this is an affordable
housing project. Mayor Bennett said the developer can sign an
agreement to join a sidewalk district if there is one formed in the
future. Councilwoman Pendleton agreed a sidewalk should be in this
area; however, it is premature to require one now. Ms. Lamont
pointed out section 2 (4) is the sidewalk improvement district;
prior to filing the final plat the applicant shall sign such
agreement. Ms. Lamont suggested adding "for south Seventh street
and West Hopkins street pursuant to the guidelines of the pedestri-
an and walkway plan". Ms. Lamont said this can required without an
entire sidewalk district. Vann agreed this is acceptable. Mayor
Bennett said this is not repudiating the sidewalk plan. Right now
this would be a sidewalk to nowhere. Councilwoman Richards said
the sidewalk plan endorses installing sidewalks as projects are
built.
Roll call vote; Councilmembers Pendleton,
Peters, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes.
yes; Richards,
Motion carried.
no;
ORDINANCE #53. SERIES OF 1991 - Cascades Condominiumization
Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing.
Councilman Peters moved to adopt Ordinance #53, Series of 1991, on
second reading with Section 1 #2 amended to include requirement to
sign either a subdivision exemption or curb, gutter and sidewalk
agreement; seconded by Councilman Reno. Roll call vote; Council-
members Richards, yes; Reno, yes; Pendleton, yes; Peters, yes;
Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE #54. SERIES OF 1991 - Lower ute Improvement District
Chuck Roth, 'city engineer, reminded Council the district has been
in the works for awhile. The city has no cost Sharing obligations
for this district. The total projected budget is $290,000;
$220,000 construction, $54,000 engineering, construction management
and legal fee and 6 percent of $16,000 incidental and bonding
costs. Staff. recommends approval.
Mayor Bennett opened the pUblic hearing.
Gaard Moses told Council he lives above the district and questioned
why ~e has been included. It does not affect him at all. Moses
9
"f/f.1JE
r"
.'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Amy Margerum, City Manager f . ,
Diane Moore, city Planning Director~
Kim Johnson, Planner
THRU:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
January 13, 1992
~o
r~
RE: Cascades Duplex - Subdivision Exemption for
==========~~~~~=~~=:=~~:~~~:[~::::~==::::::=:::~::==::
SUMMARY: The applicant seeks condominiumization of a duplex at 647
S. Monarch st. Pursuant to section 24-7-1007 of the Aspen
Municipal Code, condominium conversion of an existing development
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council as a subdivision
exemption. The applicant also requests vested rights for three
years pursuant to section 24-6-207. First reading was held on
December 16, 1991.
APPLICANT: Peter and Deborah Cantrup, represented by Marty Pickett
LOCATION: 647 S. Monarch st. (lot 13 and part of lots 12 and 14,
Eames and Connors Additions)
ZONING: L/TR Lodge/Tourist Residential
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Subdivision Exemption to condominiumize a
duplex nearing completion and vested rights for three years. (See
plat, Attachment "A")
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Since first reading, the Engineering Department
has submitted a final draft of their referral comments (Attachment
"B"). The following concerns were raised by Chuck Roth:
1. The plat must indicate how many stories are within the
structure and where the parking spaces are located (marked by XIS).
2. Four planters are in the Gilbert st. right-of-way.
be removed because the right-of-way is only 26' wide
minimum for emergency access). A 31 wide sidewalk is
with curb and gutter to delineate walking space.
require handicap ramp at corners and driveways.
They should
(20' roadway
recommended,
This would
3. The book and page indication at the western boundary is
incomplete. Clarify function of this recorded document.
4. The project must supply drywells in the driveways to provide
storm run-off protection. It is not clear where site drainage
~.
^
currently goes. Roof drainage into public right-of-way adds to
storm run-off in the streets and can be a problem when it freezes
on sidewalks or streets.
5. The survey must be current within 12
meters and trash area must be shown.
district.
6. Prior to signing the final Plaf, the title information
documenting easements must be current within 12 months.
months. Water and electric
Indicate the subject zone
7. The applicant shall consult the city Engineer for design
considerations of development wi thin the pUblic right-of-way.
Permits for such work must be obtained from the City streets
Department.
PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS: The subject duplex is nearly finished
with one unit already in receipt of a certificate of Occupancy. The
shell of the structure was begun in 1987. Each unit is three
bedrooms.
Riqht-of-wav encroachment: Rather than require this project to
demolish the planters in the right-of-way and construct sidewalk,
curb and gutter, Planning staff believes that further study should
be done to determine the neighborhood needs for sidewalks. It is
recommended that this should take place within a review for a
license to encroach in the right-of-way. wi thin this type of
application, information such as roadway widths, existing
pedestrian walks, pedestrian plan guidelines, and other
encroachments could be reviewed comprehensively. The applicant has
agreed to submit a license to encroach before Engineering will sign
off on the condo plat.
The applicant has addressed the requirements of section 24-7-1007
for comdominiumization as follows:
1. Written notice to tenants of condominiumization, giving tenants
first right of refusal to purchase their unit.
Response: There are no existing tenants on the property as it has
been under construction since 1987.
2. Minimum lease requirements of six months except for projects
in the L/TR zone or other zones with a L Lodge overlay.
Response: This duplex is within the L/TR zone.
minimum leases are required.
Therefore, no
3. Acknowledgement of the Affordable Housing Impact fees.
Response: The applicant agrees to pay the housing impact fee
calculated to be $8,050 for each 3 bedroom unit. This fee must be
2
r-,
r-,
paid to the city Finance Department prior to Planning Office
signature of the Condominium plat for recordation.
4. Required inspection by the Building Department.
Response: One unit has already been inspected by the Building
Department and has received a Certificate of Occupancy. The other
unit is nearing completion and must pass final inspection before
it can receive its Certificate of Occupancy.
A Subdivision Agreement must be filed concurrently with any
subdivision/condominium plat. This agreement outlines all terms
of the subdivision exemption approvals. The applicant has
submitted a draft agreement which shall be revised pending final
conditions of approval.
Pursuant to Section 6-207 of the Land Use Code, the applicant also
seeks vested rights for three years. Council shall grant vesting
within the ordinance approving condominiumization.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning office recommends Second Reading of
Ordinance 53 for the approval of the Cascades Duplex
Condominiumization and vested rights for three years with the
following conditions:
1. The plat must indicate how many stories' are within the
structure and where the parking spaces are located (marked by X's).
2. Prior to Engineering's approval of the condominium plat, the
applicant shall submit to Engineering an application for a license
to encroach for the four planters in the Gilbert st. right-of-way.
city staff shall consider existing roadway widths and the need for
sidewalks and curb and gutter in the context of the encroachment
request.
3. The book and page indication at the western boundary is
incomplete. Clarify function of this recorded document.
4. The project must supply
storm run-off protection.
currently goes.
5. The survey must be current within 12
meters and trash area must be shown.
district.
drywells in the driveways to provide
It is not clear where site drainage
months. Water and electric
Indicate the subject zone
6. Prior to signing the final plat, the title information
documenting easements must be current within 12 months.
7. The applicant shall consult the city Engineer for design
considerations of development within the public right-of-way.
3
".....,
I"""';
Permits for such work must be obtained from the City streets
Department.
8. The Subdivision Exemption Agreement describing the terms of this
exemption must be filed with the Pitkin county Clerk and Recorder
concurrently with the condominiumization plat. This document must
include a signature block for the Mayor.
9. Prior to the Planning Director signing the final plat for
condominiumization the applicant shall pay the Affordable Housing
Impact Fee to the Finance Department. The applicant shall forward
a copy of the receipt to the Planning Office. The fee shall be
$8,050 per unit for a total of $16,100.00.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Council could elect to require removal of the planters with
sidewalk installation prior to filing the plat rather than require
the encroachment application.
2. The Council could require complete resolution of an encroachment
license prior to filing the plat. .
PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve the Cascades Duplex Subdivision
Exemption for Condominiumization and vested rights with conditions.
I move to have Second Reading of Ordinance 53, Series of 1991.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Attachments:
Ordinance 53, 1991
"A" - Proposed Condominium Plat
"B" - Engineering referral comments
jtkvj/Cascades.ccmemo
4
,. r
'" r
'" 0
'"
m ;j
... ~
€ ~
~ :;I
... '"
'"
~ '"
'" 0
o '"
~
;!
'"
~
'"
..
q~
(r\
.
.
n
.
.
~
,
~
1"'3:< -irJl
-tot '"
:'j '"
'" ",::l
'" 1:1;:1
g :S'"
,",0
CO ji
;! o~
'" ~~
.,
'" "';j
~ S!
~ H'"
"':::j
""
r r->
~ "'0
~ ...'"
I
'"
"
q n
'"
".
'"
fT1
(f)
,.
'"
'"
~
"
...........-.._~~:.
8 I-IIS.4S'06-E
~
!;;
'"
'"
tHslS7'2..'E 413.89'
". .. .., :"t ;. \...;
,. 0'" "'...
0 "'0 '" OHO "'~ Z
'" 0 '" "'0'"
c> ~;! "'''' ","';! 0",
'" '" g"
:;! ill'" '"
"''" '" ~gP.l ,"0
'" -'" 0 '" '" "i
;~ HH '" "';!~
~ ":::i ~O
., t;M~ ",,,,
~ '" ~ '" -
"'" :;! ",,"
!3 "'''' .", 0'"
~'" wO H~'" "''''
!< ...... ~:3: '" "':;Ir '"'"
~ ,.:~ ~ H '< '"
is 0> i'j::i
r 0>0"1
'" ~ :"'1@ rH
~ ~?ii N~ S@
;j "'''''''
f 00 "''" .,'"
.", ", "..".-. ~<l
~ !;\ H .. l6!2~
"'" '"
(>
i~
I!l'>.
NIS....".OS.E 4....00' 8K_ PG_
- - _--:...
~ ~
--;u;m;--- ~
04.7'
~U I , ;-....
I I ,
'~:.i ~
, ,
.... r- .' I
)'a.i' ~. I i
~ 1.3'
~
h' ,
:( ~ .....
"'''
..... rO'M
...... ;
c:~ r~
<=~ ~.J
.... _o.!
,
~~
-....
'"
iii
~
~
'1:',"
~~;!
~ '"
~,
~ Z
zno
c>0'"
n~;;!
o~t':S
;j.(!!
",,",,,
~,
z"'r
~"'H
z",z
C>~'"
... . ~~~E~ ~~;~~;. ~~:. ." . .. . .... .J ~;;
_ _ _ _ _"__A_""_.. 1
----------.:::. - ii.~ -=.-.::.-.::.-.::.~
~
OJ ~l
m
c
~i
3: a'&
0
z J
):>
::0 ~.J~.
n
I
n '\$ I
0
z S
0
0 !il II
3: ~
- ~
Z ..
(>
;.
- ".
c \
3:
(f}
I
\
~ -"
;;
iii
" a ..
~;.~ I . ~
O!
_.-+--=---~----UJ::--
-~~. '4' ..'.0 '~"''''-rI -~
I ,.... 7'- i
iL ~'''I a
lr.. ~:'~I gE~
i Ii.'''' i ~ l'l
J i _~:J -::jli: 7
! ~ I ';-
\ .....1 :
i-I !~ ~n
:~---
~~- -- -~~
- 1\ i ;
~
".
M
....
..
~
..
!l
"
;;
..
.
~SOUTH ~
%
"
o
~
..v.. J:.NIDffi:)VJ:.J:.V
MONARCA,
WIDTH VARIES
..
.
\
. c
-'1\ R
. . '"
I ~
. iii
l~
I ~
, N
\ w.
II
, I
-iI
8
.~
. .
,
~'!! ~
"\ .'
"l~
,_ I i6
11\.
, ,
,
i.e.
III
~
........
r-
eo
t"Tj
~
~
.t/)
~
~
t"Tj
tT1
.....,
"
ill
r-.
,.-.
:tachmenc "B"
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, city Engineer (2"12-
Date: December 16, 1991
Re: Cascades Condominiumization
~
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made
a site inspection, the engineering department has the following
comments: '
1. It is unclear from,the plat that the condominiumization is of
a three (1) story structure. This should be indicated on the plat.
It appears from the plat that the parking, spaces encroach into the
public right-Of-way. This is not the case because the spaces
extend underneath the footprint of the building envelope. The
parking spaces must be indicated with X's so that it is clear on
the plat the spaces do not 'extend into the right-of-way.
2. There are four planters in the Gilbert street public right-
Of-way that are not indicated as such on the plat. It is unknown
if and doubtful that these were permitted to be constructed with
a permit for work in the right-of-way. It is recommended that
these planters be required to be removed because this right-of-
. way width is only 26 feet. The roadway should be 20 I here for
emergency access and general vehicle usage. We recommend that the
planters be removed and that a 3' wide sidewalk be required to be
constructed instead. There does not appear to be any curb and
gutter on this block. CUrb and gutter may be desirable in order
to delineate the pedestrian walking space. This would require a
handicap ~p at the corner and ramps across the driveways.
3. Tgere is a book and page indication at the westerly boundary
line which is incomplete, and the function is not clear of the
recorded document.
4. In recent past years, the city has acquired storm runoff
protection during condominiumizations. Applicants have been
required to meet subdivision standards and maintain all but
historic runoff flows on site. This helps to mitigate impacts on
city storm runoff infrastructure. This project has not offered to
comply with storm runoff requirements. It is physically possible
for the applicants to install drywells in their driveways so that
roof drains do not discharge into public rights-of-way. It is not
clear where site drainage goes. Roof drains that discharge into
public rights-of-way, in addition to adding storm runoff to the
streets~ can be a problem when the water freezes on sidewalks or
streets.
c.. oVfZ R.)
,
<.. ~
;-.
/-"
, .
5. The survey must be performed within the past 12 months. The
plat must show locations of water and electric meters. The plat
must indicate the zone' district. The plat must show the trash area
so that it is clearly not in the right-Of-way.
6. The easements are based on a four year old title commitment.
Prior to signing the plat, the easements must be documented by a
title commitment performed within the past 12 months. .
7. Given the continuous problems of unapproved
development in pUblic rights-of-way, we would advise the
as follows:
work and
applicant
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080)
for design considerations of development within pUblic
rights-of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or
development within pUblic rights-of-way from city streets
department (920-5130).
co:
Bob Gish, Public Works Director
cr/M91.276
!
r-..
.t'""\,
.~
MEMORANDUM
To: Bill Efting, Assistant City Manager
John Worcester, Assistant City Attorney
Jack Reid, Streets Department
Water Department
Parks Department
Kim Johnson, Planning Office
Bill Drueding, Zoning Office
Building Department
Police Department
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer
(!fZ-
Date: May 14, 1992
Re: Encroachment License for The Cascades
This encroachment application is the. first to fall completely within the new encroachment
procedures. The individuals named above plus myself constitute the review committee.
Anyone else is welcome to attend our review committee meeting which is scheduled for
Friday, May 29 at '10:00 AM in Council Chambers.
This application is for encroachment licensing for (1) existing landscaping planters and (2)
a drywell to accommodate storm runoff.
(1) Concerning the planters, the engineering department would have preferred that a
sidewalk be installed. This was not agreed upon by others, therefore we will obtain an
agreement to construct sidewalk. At such time as a sidewalk is deemed appropriate, the
City will be able to direct the property Owner to remove the planters and install a
sidewalk.
(2) Generally, we have not permitted drywells in the public right-of-way in order to
preserve that space for the use of utilities. In this instance, the condominium is built out
nearly to the property lines. It will be a public benefit to have the roof drain not
ctaylighting into the street as it does now, considering ice, therefore I am willing to
consider granting this encroachment, pending your comments. We have received a report
prepared by a registered engineer. I would require that the dryweIl be located as near
to their structure as possible and that written approval from all utilities be provided.
Please return your comments to me, or CEO me, before our meeting of May 28. If you
have any questions, please call me at xS088. Thank you.
cc:
Bob Gish, Public Works Director
KM92.1S1
-"
r-.
--.,
c
2. REVIEW CRITERIA - Following submission of an application to the City
Engineering Department, it shall be referred to the various City departments
and utilities that may be affected. Following review and comment by the
referral agencies, the City Engineer shall consider the request in light of the
following:
A. Circulation - Does the proposed encroachment or vacation cause a
potential problem with regard to accessing property in the area. Could
the request hinder area circulation or prevent service vehicles or utility
companies from accessing facilities or other structures.
B. Streets Maintenance - Does the proposed encroachment or vacation
create a possible problem for street maintenance or snow removal
operations.
C. Utilities - Could the proposed encroachment or vacation interlere with
existing or future utility needs for the area.
D. Enforcement- Could the proposed encroachment or vacation create
or compound an existing for traffic control,City police, or fire
department personnel.
E. Expansion - Does the proposed encroachment or vacation provide the
opportunity for expanding the floor area of structures. Would such
expansion require Growth Management approval. Vacated streets
may not be included in determining floor area ratios on a given
ownership, they may however, be built on.
F. Income space - Is the encroaching space intended for commercial or
other income-producing space. If so, it may require a rental
agreement with the City.
G. Adopted plans - Considering whether the proposed encroachment or
vacation is consistent with any adopted plan (i.e. trails, malls,
improvement district, etc.)
H. Benefit - Considering whether the encroachment or vacation is
beneficial to the City of Aspen. As a general policy, it is not in the
City's interest to grant encroachments or vacations, thereby giving
public property to private use. New structures should be able to
accomplish their various needs within the confines of their property
boundaries and required setbacks. Granting of encroachments should
generally occur under one of the following conditions:
i) To acknowledge an existing conditions and outline the owner's
------.
liability and responsibility and responsibility for maintenance
and removal of the encroaching structure.
ii) To license an encroachment an encroachment that is a public
amenity. Examples may include awnings on commercial
structures, planters in the right-of-way, irrigation systems to
maintain landscaping, etc.
I. Vacation of public right-of-way should generally occur under the
following conditions:
iii) It can be demonstrated that the City has not used the right-
of-way historically for roadway, utility, or other purposes.
iv)
All affected: utilities and governmental agencies_ do not
anticipate a reasonable future need for the right-of-way.
KM92.152
.
,........,
..-"
McFLYNN & PICKETT
TIMOTHY McFLYNW
MARTHA C. PICKErT
LAWYERS
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THE SMITH-ELISHA HOUSE
320 WEST MAIN STREET. SUITE 1
P.O. BOX J:
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE (303) 925.221'
TELECOP1ER {303l 925-2442
.At.so"D""n~D'NC"U'Offfi'"
April 23, 1992
Chuck Roth
city of Aspen
Enqineering Department
130 South Galena street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: ADDlioationfor Permit to Enoroaoh into Riqht-o~Wav
The Casoades. 647 South Monaroh Street
Dear Chuck:
Pursuant to our telephone conversations and the City Council's
actions on approval of condominiumization of the Cascades duplex,
this letter is to request approval for. encroachment into the
Gilbert street right-of-way for purposes of the existing landscap-
ing planters and for installation of a dry well to meet the needs
for drainage related to the building.
I. REOUIREMENTS
1. Name and Address of Applicant/Representative:
Richard Cook
Peter and Deborah Cantrup
American Cement Company, Inc.
PO Box 38
Espanola, New Mexico 87532
Local Leaal Representative:
Martha C. Pickett, Esq.
McFlynn & Pickett, P.C.
320 West Main street
Aspen, Colorado 81611.
2. Location of the Encroachment: The location of the
encroachment is as shown on the enclosed drawing on Gilbert street,
at the corner of Gilbert and south Monarch Streets, along the front
of the existing Cascades building. The building is located on
Lots 13 and 14 of Block 1, Connor's Addition to the City of Aspen.
~
~,
Chuck Roth
April 23, 1992
Page 2
3. Name and Address of Abuttina Propertv Owners Affected bv
the Area of the Encroachment: There are no abutting property
owners affected by the encroachments which will encroach into city
right-of-way (Gilbert street).
4. Nature of the Encroachment: The encroachment requested
is to allow the existing landscaping planters to remain on the
property at the entrances off Gilbert street (See Plat). The
Council agreed with the Planning Staff's recommendation that these
planters help to create a softer facade to the building and create
a safety buffer between the underground Parking and pedestrians
walking along the street so that people are not walking imme~iately
next to the building when a car comes out of one of the garages.
The second encroachment request is for the dry well. As
you may recall, the Engineering Department had requested that a
dry well be placed in the area in front of the garage on the
property; however, because there is living area below grade Which
would be affected, that is not feasible. Therefore, we would
request that the applicant be allowed to install a dry well within
the Gilbert street right-of-way. (See proposal from Gert zeller,
attached hereto, regarding the proposal for the dry well installa-
tion.)
II. SUBMITTAL ENCLOSURES
1. Executed Encroachment Agreement.
2. Executed Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvement Agreement.
3. site Survey (Condominium Plat).
4. Processing fee of $300.00.
Respectfully submitted,
McFLYNN & PICKETT, P.C.
MCP/ljn
Enclosures
cantrup\roth4ltr
By'~
. MaC. ,Pi "kett
. blZ ~
, l'"' G)
reg..,j ~ '.'
G):>: :I:.' sa
..... t'1 ...
~~'G)
H 2: ..,j
ZOO :I:
: ~~~. tlj.
O:i! ~.
. ~~.~ ~
)\'(j]O< r;J
~~l'""~
...t::I.... -.
Zt1Z~
G)Htlj.;..;,
..,j. ,
I ol>~Sii z
",' ., ,. . . ., ~:~:~'.~ ,~ALET BLOOD. ~~~~. ~
----'''........................ ~
............. .........."..... t
- -::..::..~::..::..--::..::..--------.:._--" - -d'
- - - ---------
. ClIro- - - -.:.
.......:*~~.~.~"! NIS'57'24'E 43.B9'
r -_/
J)
-l
"
j
'1
')
~
"
.~
'1
z:
-l
u
')
-l
I
--J
::>
.0
I
:n
J
')
'J
,/
()
:t"
'1j
:t"
00
z
o
..,j
t':J
t1
m
(Jl
:s:
o
L
)>
:::0
n
I
n
o
z
o
o
:s:
z
c
:s:
en
I ti
~
:t=+~:~~~~~IO..~~~,9 9':-1- , ~q~-:r:~ '.
. ~ ~
I ~ I .
C:J I ~
...... rr1...
- I G;nU1
~ :~ -i ~ ~
~ !~ ...:...., 2E ~
II;' I ~. ~
I
....5.0 PI.
I
-1
fT1
(f)
o
~
f;j
00
(j]
EAMES
ADDITION
NIS'4S'OS'E
44.00'
~~
-~
0)
N
(0
2.25'
!~
~
..
~
~
...
i
..
-
-------------- .
2fL~ER ~ANO 4.7'
I'
~.~ ~
0)
5.03 ,PI.
12.2'
o
"!
~I
c:
~~
g.~
lit
~.
..
I~
G...r--~
I~
CIl
~ ! I
~ .... I
U1 ~ ;~I'
", r- C7\
ut3: ,.A:'
. '" UI
NI2 ~
-.j~ CIl
.~ '"
o 3:
. '"
III %,
.... ,
I,
t', ....
~
rTln
till>
~(,/)
l>
Co
t;rTl
~
(" "'I
, ,
....".
p
..
I\l
o
........,..
lij
~
m
~
~
..
I
.,
,
...
p
'"
"'.
+
"!
,..,~
~ilw
~ ;1
:~,J:~.
U'l V>.I ~ 0.
-~ _.._,,~..
lD
"l
~'.~ ~
_~_~~ 4.75'1
! ~ "l..
0)
N
(0
'" 0
)Ca :...
'"
... .
,,;'fi
r-
'"
n
....
'"
n
'"
~ MONARCH
'"
z
...
SOUTH
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~~. (5
(') re~/)oI o::!o ~~'... z
0': :t" " .., 0.., . 0
z::t ~)oI' z' '
2:~~t/):, ~ :t" ::j _ 0 '
'~:,(j]"il: &i'. ~.8~ rna.,
cO~r i-> aj~"~ ~th ~!,
" S' ~:z:: ~ l'"' tlj ~ ' l;j ~
~re ~~, ~ 00 i:i!gJcO'
o )ol -:0< ':I: '. ,(') to:! I;"
....00 . NO, .......:0 ."')01
..,j..,j\ ~ 3:'.0< . w -il'"',~(O). O'
..... . - -.' ~ "'0<0< .', 0
~ g" ~ ~'?F g: O"l .~~
o-! E'3' tlj, ~- :.., g' f:: ~
oil NZ; '. :21:t":O oz'
~ ,0(').... . ,-,00 , ~tIl
~., -t'1;(') )oI'1j- 00
0.. ..... )01 ::l:ltljol> ....,j.
.." .-.1)01 "l1 OOZ.~ 0
,
. ,
,.......",
.,~.
,.
ww-~/~
NIS'-lS'OS'E .
I
-r -
j,C
~ .
/.;.,
I
I
,
)>
I:~
fT1
'I Z
)4 ~
c
Z
I """"i
)>
:'~'-
I ~ Z
lD
~
: I
I I
: I
1.3' I I'" ";
I
I ......
1:.\ "
f '....
~
(
I,. ..,
'.". ..1
,
, .
o
~
r-
to
t"rj
~
m
lS
~
-
z.
L'
~
~l
Cl!
o
I'll
::c
""""i
o
".~
~
Ii!
".7'
I
I
-,
i' "
~~.
I":
I[
, ",
,~ I <r;.
", e;;.. i <:t. \
'\' i "
\i-..-.\
\-
U1
~;
~.
c
?<
lD
iij
I~
l~
~
I
\
I
.35 I
:lll
" i
,
,
N
tal
-.j
'0)
,~I
STREET
)
"'>' .
~
~
t,
,.-....,
,,-,
McFLYNN & PICKETT
~\:N 'l. \
LAWYERS
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THE SMITH-ELlSHA HOUSE
320 WEST MAIN STREET. SUITE 1
p.o, BOX I
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
" io C( r;;
I~ \~O-00
-,,,5- \"l>
~
TIMOTHY McFLYNN'
MARTHA C PICKETT
TELEPHONE (303) 925.2211
TELECOP\ER (303) 925"2442
. ALSO AO",rITEO INCAC'FORNIA
November 20, 1991
Leslie Lamont
Planning Office
city of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Street
81611
RE: ADDlicationfor Condominiumization of the Cascades.
a Condominium. 647 South Monarch Street
Dear Leslie:
Thank you again for meeting with me on such short notice for
a Pre-Application Conference regarding condominiumization of the
above-referenced property. Please find enclosed an Application for
your review. I am also Submitting a condominiumization plat
prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers for your and the Engineering
Department's review.
We would really appreciate being scheduled on the December
16th City Council Meeting for this condominiumization approval.
I will confirm with Bill Drueding that all matters have been taken
care of with regard to the Building Department's concern.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Thank you again for your cooperation.
sincerely,
McFLYNN & PICKETT, P.C.
BY:~
a tha . Pickett
MCP/ljn
Enclosures
cc: Richard Cook
Linda Martinez
misc\lamont.ltr
,
,
t
,-, ~:t
. J
, , lAND USE APPLICATIOO FOllM
,..-"
~)
Project Nane
The Cascades,2!, OOl1dominium
2) Project I.ocation 647 South Monarch Street, Aspen, Colorado
(legal description enclosed)
(in:li.cate stJ::eet adD::ess, lot & bl=k mmi::ler, legal description TNhere ' .
awlXtlriate)
3)
5)
Present ZOnirg'
L/TR
4) lot. Size 4,537 sq. ft.
Afplicant's Nane, l\ddress & Ihone jI
Richard Cook. attorney in fact
for owners. Peter and Deborah C Cantrup
6) :Representative's Nane, l\&D:ess & lb:me jI Martha C. Pickett. Esq..
McFlynn & Pickett~ P.C., 320 West Main. Asoen. CO 81611: 925~2211.
7) Type of Afplication (please d1ec::k all ~t awly) :
Corrlitional Use
Special Review
Final SPA
_ CoIx:eptual Historic Dev.
Final Historic Dev.
_ 0Xlcept:ual SPA
8040 Greenline
_ 0Xlcept:ual roo
Final roo
Minor Historic Dev.
..
_ stream Margin
Historic Denolition
Mountain View Plane
SUI:rlivision .
_ Historic Designation
x
Cbndaniniumization ~ TextjMap 1\IIerdIEnt
_ lot. SplitjIot Line
Mjustment
_ GQ> Allobnent
_ GQ> Exenption
8)
Description of
approx:Unate sq.
property) .
Existin:.J ,Uses . (r.."'h....... ani type of exist:inJ strucbJres;
ft.; nlIIi:ler of L.:dLuuu:,,; any previaJs awrovals granted to the
One duplex structure, containing two residential units of.three.
bedrooms each. Each unit contains approximately
square
feet.
9) Description of Develq;ment Afplicatian
App1icabion for Subdivision Exemption - Condominiumization
of Two Residential Units.
~O) l:fave you attached the followin::J?
~ Response to Attadnrent 2, Minilwm SlIm"'-<<ion O:lntents
~ Response to Attad1ment 3, Specific Slim; <:sian Contents
~ Response to Attad1ment 4, Review starrlards for YCAIr Afplieation
('\
r-..
APPLXCATXON FOa SUBDXVXSXON EXEMPTXON -
OONDOMXNXUMXZATXON OF THE CASCADES, A CONDOMXNXUM
Pursuant to ~ 7-1007 of the Aspen Land Use Code, the following
is an Application for sUbdivision exemption and condominiumization
of property located at 647 South Monarch street, known as the
cascades, a Condominium. There is an existing duplex being
constructed on the property, which is being built pursuant to a
valid permit, a permitted use on this legally subdivided lot in the
L/TR zone district.
I.
criteria For Aooroval of Condominiumization Aoolication
A. Purchase Riahts of Existina Tenants. This new construc-
tion has been in progress since April, 1987. There are no existing
tenants with purchase rights to be notified.
B. Minimum Lease Reauirement. The Applicant requests that
there be no minimum lease requirement for these condominium units
because the property meets the requirements of ~ 7-1007(1) (b) (2)
and these residential units are located in the lodge/tourist
residential zone district.
C. Affordable Housina Imoact Fee. The Applicant acknowledg-
es that an affordable housing impact fee in the amount of $8,050.00
per unit may be required as a condition of approval. To the
Applicant's knowledge, this property has not been subject to a GMP
approval where employee housing cash-in-lieu fees might have been
paid.
D. Reauired Buildina Insoection. The Applicant understands
and acknowledges that the building proposed for condominiumization
shall be inspected by the Building Department to confirm that it
meets fire, health and safety requirements. At this time, a
certificate of occupancy has been issued for the west unit and the
east unit is being completed pursuant to a building permit and a
certificate of occupancy is anticipated in the near future.
E. Reauest for Vested Riahts. Pursuant to ~ 6-207 of the
Aspen Land Use, the Applicant hereby requests that vested rights be
granted in this condominiumization approval.
II.
Enclosures
A. A check in the amount of $905.00 as an application fee,
$780.00 to the planning Office, and $125.00 to the Engineering
Department.
B. Three copies of this application.
r"\
.~.
C. Three copies of the condominium map, prepared by Aspen
Survey Engineers. (Please note that an Agreement between the
Applicants and the adjacent property owners has been recorded in
Book 652, Page 645 with regard to reciprocal grants of easements
for encroachments shown on the map. A copy of this Agreement is
enclosed for your reference.)
D. Proposed Statement of Exception from the Full SUbdivision
process.
E. Consent to Land Use Application executed by record title
holders.
F. Verification of ownership from Pitkin County Title, Inc.
* * *
If I can be of further assistance in your review or if I can
provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call
me.
Dated this 20th day of November, 1991.
Respectfully submitted,
McFLYNN & PICKETT, P.C.
By:
MCP/ljn
Enclosures
misc\applicat.cas
-2-
'~\JU',
,.v. './.' _
. d
,~334978 07/29/91 16: 07 Re~>10. 00 Bf, 652 PG 645
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty ~lerk. Doc $.00
6S-Llj J- V1
AGREEMENT
1. This Agreement is made this A day o~ 1991, by and
between Silver Shado1J Condominium Associat..i.on, Ir,c., a Cclc:..ado
non-profit Gorporati.on ("Silver shadow"), and Pet'i<r H. Cantrup and
Deborah .'1\. C:antrup ("cantr'-~p"), relative to that pj::opert~l d,=scribed
in Exhibit II A" belonging to Silver Shadow ("Si.lv,;.r Shadow
Property") and that proper~y d~scribe-:>. in Ey.hibit: "B" belo."lging to
Cantrup ("Cclscade Property").. both properties being adjacent on'" to
the other and located in PitJdn County, Colorado.
2. Silver Shadow and Cantrup, in consideration of th.;! mu1:ual
covenants c.,ntained herein b"low, agree as follows:
A. The grants contained below are parpetual covenants
runnin9 with the la.nd, binding upon and fer the b.~nefit of the
respectivlO parties he,reto, their heirs, execu"tors, pers:mal
rep,resentatives, successors, and aS$igns.
E. Cantrup gran1:s to Silver Shadow an E!aSement 2 inches
in 'width along th", Nc.rt:h side of the Sou1c.h p-ropi?rty 1im, of
the Cascade Property for the purpose of providing both support
for th,= exist.ing covere,d walkway and s1c.ora'Je shed of S.i:ver
Shadow as well as providin<; a North wall for both the ccvnrsd
wal'~.way and storage shed.
C. Silver Shadow ,;rrants an easement 6 inches in \-ii.dth
along the South side of th,a North property line of the Silver
Shadow Property for the purpose of allowing the South port:ion
of the existing rock veneer wall of Cantrup.
D. Silver Shadm.. grants an easement for access and
maintenance of gas service and meters and equipment usee. in
connect:ion therewith and being along and acress the most
Northerly 5 feet of the Silver Shadow Property.
E. Cantrup has p12mted certain trees desired by Silver
Shadow in the easement described in D above. Cantrup will
guarantee such trees to survive until August 1, J.991-, but the
re;;opon"i,!-"i' J.~"'~for maintenance and watering of such trees
':'('"."l I h,,~'.,:.~t: U.e Silver Shadow, along ~..ith tr,e maintenanCE' of
t'.h.:: <;,-,,,,;:;i"oer of Sil v'~r Shadow's landscaping.
F. In addition to .the easement granted tc Silver Shadow
for the, encroachment ofth.. storage shed and covered walk.'ay,
Silver Shadow may, at :Silver shadow's :sole option and e,::.:per,se.
use such storage shed arId '.-Ialkway for planter pur;?ose,s for
decorat:ive plantings as (:hcsen and maintained solely by Silver
page 1 OJ: 2
THIS AGREEMENT IS BEING RE-RECORDED TO CORRECT
SCRIVNERS ERROR IN THE OMISSION OF EXHIBITS "A" AND
"E" AND THIS REi;RECORDED DOCUMENT RATIFIES AND CON-
FIRMS THIS AGREEMENT IN ALL RESPECTS WITH THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS ATTACHED.
!J;:> . :':~,: III
:.!lJ:.HI
13
rl-t"...
'4!J VI._;
t""'. ,~.
.3497807/29/9116:07 Ree ;..00 Bf( 652 PG 646
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doe $.00
Shadow. Silver Shadow has the absolute ri'Jht t':J r~move any or
all of such encroachment. at any time vlithout notice to
Cascade.
SILVER SHADOW CONDOMINr'~1
ASSOCIATION, INC. ~
Byj~
JJ;/LCl:::;d.n,
E ter H. cantrup ~ ~
o-\."h._.._~~__(L~.\bi-.n !(-;;;<:';-'i I
rah A. cantrup f""'"
AC1iliPWI.ElJGEMENT~
STATE OF (1(\~rt.t.Ji'i'.)
I ) 55.
COUNTY 0,' ~5t4J/e (~.f )
/{i. !hJ; foregoing ACjreement
~_N~ ~CH:}ft"TfT
ndonunJ.Ul':< AssQciat.ion, Inc.,
was acknowledged befel:e me bv
, President of Silver Shadow
this .J!b- d",y of ~, 1991-
?e,
Witness, my hand and official seal.
My COllUllission expires:
e'..
m. ~ !.
. .
.'
'.
OFFICIAL SEAL
SHARON LOVING
NOTARY PUst1C . CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My comm. expires ore 6, 1993
.-.; . J} .
..2l1 {LA. t'Y1 Vt'V"V11. &._______
Notary Public
Address: ?).5:5. v!i..~,,~-a ;/.
\;I'M {~, r.,t.t.? I cJl c/O (J 17
COUNTY 01"
, Qrrlb~ 55.
The foregoing' Agreemerlt 1.as ackn~wledged before me by Peter H.
Cantrup and Deborah A. Cant.rup this ~5D:L day of ~ 1991-
.;p;ty.
Witness my hand and offi.cial seal.
~efd~.----
Address:
,. .'
.~
,'-'
EXHIBIT "A"
The Silver Shadow. Condominiums according to the Condominium Map
appearing in the records of the county Clerk and Recorder of pitkin
County, Colorado in Plat Book 5 at Page 87
EXHIBIT "B"
The South Four (4) feet of Lot 12, all of Lot 13, and the North ten
(10) feet of Lot 14, Block One (1), Conners Addition to the City
and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado
.r"\.
,~.
BXBJ:BJ:T "A"
THB CASCADBS
647 SOUTH MONARCH STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO
LEGAL DBSCRJ:PTJ:ON
A tract of land situated in Eames and Connor's additions to
the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, COlorado described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of the southerly four (4)
feet of Lot 12, Block 1, Connor's addition to the City of Aspen
whence a rebar with plastic cap "City of Aspen LS 13166" bears
N15'46'06"E 301.15 feet;
thence N77' 38'36"W 3.06 feet to a rebar with yellow cap
"LS 9018";
thence S15'57'24"W 43.89 feet to a point from whence a rebar
with yellow cap set in conc. bears S15'57'24"W 20.17 feet;
thence S75'27'lO"E 103.20 feet to the southeast corner of the
north ten feet of Lot 14, Block 1, Connor's addition to the City of
Aspen;
thence N15' 46' 06"E 44.00 feet along the westerly line of South
Monarch Street;
thence N75' 27' 10"W 100.00 along the northerly line of the
southerly four (4) feet of Lot 12, Block 1, Connor's addition to
the city of Aspen to the point of beginning containing 4,537 square
feet more or less.
misc\legal.cas
NOV-20-91 WED 13:e2 AMERICAN C~MENT
,-, ,,-.,
P.0:2
CONSENT TO LAND US!!; Al'PLICATIOlf
~hQ UndQ~~15ncd, r~tGr H. O~n~~UPt bc~n5 c~~Q~noy in fo~~ {Qr
Deborah A. Cantrup, sole owners of the property known as the Cascades,
at 647 South MonArch (le2Ally dSRcribed on the AttAched E~hibit
"A") eonBonta to the s...bm:l.ss:l.on to the C:l.ty of Aspen, by MeFlynn
& V:l.ckett. ~.O., An. AppliCAtion fo~ o~bd:l.v:l.o:l.on Cscmpt:l.on ond oondum-
iniqmization .pprQval fo~ the .ubj~ct prQperty~
;/,
Executed this~day of November, 1991.
?'fkv/e~-'
Peter 'g. Cantrup
--......
pe~{~Fact
for Deborah A.Cantrup.
.,>
NOV 21 '91 13:56 PITKI~UNTY TITLE AAAAAAAAAAAA
.,-.."
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 EAST HOPKINS, 3RD FLOOR
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
303-925-1766 I 303-925-6527 FAX
P.1/1
Vincent J. Higens
President
Christina Davis
Vice PJ:"esident
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP
Pitkin county Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title InsuJ:"ance Agent in the
state of ColoJ:"ado heJ:"eby certifies that PETER H. CANTRUP AND DEBORAH A.
C~NTRUP are the owner's in fee simple of the following described
property:
THE SOUTH FOUR (4) FEET OF LOT 12, ALL OF LOT 13, AND THE NORTH TEN (10)
FEET OF LOT 14, BLOCK ONE (1), CONNERS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF
ASPEN.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
Subject to easements, rights-of-way and encumbrances of record.
This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and
is furnished for informational purposes only.
. By..:
TLE, INC.
signature
DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 1991