Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
coa.lu.sp.Aspen Fire Dist.A4287
l�5 rr 1i3?- 3 -3U -wl- (fin 4M-8-T �cz✓�rlco� �/�y sl ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 - 47331 GMP/CONCEPTUAL - 63722 - 47332 GMP/PRELIMINARY - 63723 - 47333 GMP/FINAL - 63724 - 47341 SUB/CONCEPTUAL - 63725 - 47342 SUB/PRELIMINARY - 63726 - 47343 SUB/FINAL - 63727 - 47350 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - 63728 - 47360 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47380 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 - 63730 - 47380 HOUSING 00115 - 63730 - 47380 ENGINEERING SUB -TOTAL County 00113 - 63711 - 47431 GMP/GENERAL - 63712 - 47432 GMP/DETAILED - 63713 - 47433 GMP/FINAL - 63714 - 47441 SUB/GENERAL - 63715 - 47442 SUB/DETAILED - 63716 - 47443 SUB/FINAL - 63717 - 47450 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - 63718 - 47460 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47480 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 - 63730 - 47480 HOUSING 00113 - 63731 - 47480 ENVIRONMENTAL COORD. 00113 - 63732 - 47480 ENGINEERING SUB -TOTAL PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 - 09000 COUNTY CODE - 63062 - 09000 COMP. PLAN - 63066 - 09000 COPY FEES - 63069 - 09000 OTHER SUB -TOTAL TOTAL Name: Phone: Address: - 3< Project: Check #^ Date: Additional Billing: _- # of Hours: 0 0 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED:LDX,2-719� DATE COMPLETE: PROJECT NAME:_ Project Address: Z1P'CEL I� D STAFF MEMBER: APPLICANT: I k qj2 - y - 2 z. Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE:�VPI C� Representative Address/Phone: NO _c" TYPE OF APPLICATION: PAID: �E AMOUNT: 1 STEP APPLICATION: GPD&Z MEETING DATE: '"`-��--'- �'Z PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO DATE REFERRED: �( �0 0 ( INITIALS,-I--fl 2 STEP APPLICATION: CC MEETING DATE: DATE REFERRED: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO INITIALS: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn_ Bell School District City Engineer �� Parks Dept_ Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Fire Chief B1dg:Zon/Inspect Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center S_D_ Other FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Bldg_ Dept_ Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: e(A-. CASE DISPOSITION ASPEN FIRE DISTRICT SPA PLAN AND GMP EXEMPTION P&Z: On December 22, 1987 the Planning and Zoning Commission passed a motion recommending approval of the requested SPA plan and GMP exemption for essential public facilities to build the Fire Station office subject to the following conditions: 1. An SPA Agreement shall be filed by the applicant pursuant to Section 24-7.8 of the Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, addressing: size of the addition, use of the addition, schedule for completion of construction and landscaping improvements, and City's approval as property owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit a final SPA plat for the entire SPA parcel owned by the City shall be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and following the requirements of Section 24-8.12 of the Municipal Code. Included in the plat shall be: (a) a site/landscape plan showing the SPA area and bulk requirements, building location, parking spaces, open space area, landscaping, flagstone paths and benches as presented with additional shrubs along the south elevation, and path lights specified to be low bollard type fixtures with incandescent lights; and (b) south and north elevations as given final approval by the Historic Preservation Committee. 0 Five parking spaces off the with bumper blocks; and two of the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal. alley shall be clearly demarcated the spaces shall be assigned to 4. The applicant shall address before City Council the matter of whether it is adviseable to limit the foundation design to a one story building, considering that if the Fire Distirct would need added space in the future or a new tenant should occupy the space, construction and reconstruction may be minimized. CITY COUNCIL:On January 22, 1988 the requested SPA plan and GMP facilities to build the Fire following conditions: City Council granted approval of exemption for essential public Station office subject to the 1. An SPA Agreement shall be filed by the applicant pursuant to Section 24-7.8 of the Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, addressing: size of the addition, use of the addition, schedule for completion of construction and landscaping improvements, and City's approval as property owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit a final SPA plat for C, the entire SPA parcel owned by the City shall be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and following the requirements of Section 24-8.12 of the Municipal Code. Included in the plat shall be: (a) a site/landscape plan showing the SPA area and bulk requirements, building location, parking spaces, open space area, landscaping, flagstone paths and benches as presented with additional shrubs along the south elevation, and path lights specified to be low bollard type fixtures with incandescent lights; and (b) south and north elevations as given final approval by the Historic Preservation Committee. 3. Five parking spaces off the alley shall be clearly demarcated with bumper blocks; two of which shall be assigned to the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal. Snow removal from the five parking spaces shall be the responsibility of the Fire Protection District. 4. The foundation of the one story office building shall be designed to accept a future second story in the event that added space is determined to be needed and is approved through an amendment of the SPA plan. 2 M l(-c, Sam,-,- ks Pf-� w M-r— nF-JvEwAV AGpcmr- `�� DRivEway P K N FcP—F �= D" T i E � � -� ►�E , � s PikeF� • 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: SPA Agreement for the Aspen Fire Protection District DATE: February 1, 1988 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Attached is the case disposition for the Aspen Fire District SPA, given final approval by City Council on January 25, 1988. I have reviewed the SPA agreement submitted by Albie Kern on January 22 and have the following comments: 1. Chuck Roth and I discovered upon measuring the parking area off the alley that with the concrete path leading to the Thrift Shop, there are only four (4) parking spaces. Therefore, the Agreement should be corrected to state four parking spaces. A sentence should also be added to point 10 of the SPA Precise Plan: "Snow removal from the four parking spaces shall be the responsiblity of the District." 2. Chuck Roth told me the City Clerk will sign the plat for the City as prpoerty owner. The City Clerk should probably also sign the Agreement on behalf of the City as property owner. 3. The Thrift Shop, Inc., Aspen Fire Protection District and City of Aspen were all signators of the Decmber 8, 1983 agreement that allowed construction of the Thrift Shop. Should the Thrift Shop, Inc. also sign this SPA Agreement? 4. Would it be more appropriate when referring in the SPA Precise Plan to "SPA plat sheet 2" to either cite the Book and Page number in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office or have an Exhibit attached to the SPA Precise Plan? firedis.spa • • MEMORANDUM To: Steve Burstein, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, Assistant City Engineer 61_/(:� Date: January 25, 1988 Re: Aspen Fire District SPA This memo is written in response to requests for comments on the most recently submitted plat. 1. It appears that the SPA data has been fully indicated on the plat. It is not this department's responsibility to determine the correctness of the information shown. Apparently that task would be yours or Zoning Enforcement's. 2. Lot area, per code, must be shown to the nearest 0.001 acre. 3. Both the Council and the P & Z certificates should read ".... approved on the day of , 1988. Signed this day of , 1988." 4. Platting requirements for SPA are the same as for subdivi- sions. The plat also needs Owner's and City Engineer's Certifi- cates and notarization of Title Certificate. 5. The surveyor's certificate references the title certificate for easements. The reference needs to be to Title Policy Number of (the date). I have talked with the title company, and it is not at all clear that they have performed the work necessary to determine if there are or are not easements. Also, we do not have a copy of any such work in our file. 6. It is not clear from the plans how the roof and other impermeable surfaces drain to the drywell. Also, the calcula- tions for sizing the drywell must be submitted to this depart- ment. 7. The plat needs a vicinity map and locations of utility meters. 8. The southeast property corner is not indicated as being found or set. It must be one of the two. cc: Jay Hammond, City Engineer CR/cr/memo 88.10 • 0 ALBERT KERN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW 400 E. HYMAN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (SOS( 925?411 January 22, 1988 HAND DELIVERED Paul J. Taddune, Esquire Taddune & Associates 600 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Pahl: I am enclosing a draft of the SPA Agreement and the SPA Precise Plan on behalf of the Aspen Fire Protection District relating to the construction of office space for the Fire District on the property leased from the City of Aspen. I would appreciate your reviewing the draft and advising me of any suggestions, changes or comments. I understand that the District will be submitting the Precise Plan to the City Council this Monday, and I would appreciate your comments as soon as possible. Regards, Albert Kern AK/mc Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Burstein�� City & County Planning Department Mr. Daryl Grob walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. • SPA PRECISE PLAN ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OFFICE ADDITION 1. Zoning: Public/SPA; GMP exemption for essential public facilities 2. Minimum Lot Width: 120 feet 3. Minimum Front Yard: 5 feet 4. Minimum Side Yard: 0 feet 5. Minimum Rear Yard: 0 feet 6. Maximum Height: 28 feet 7. "linimum Distance Between Principal and Accessory Buildings: 0 feet 8. Percent of Open Space Required for Building Site: 150 (does not include area in front of existing fire station) Lot Area = 12,036 sq. ft. Open Space Required = 1805 sq. ft. Open Space Provided = 1806 sq. .ft. 9. External Floor Area Ratio: 1.25 : 1 10. Required Parking: 5 spaces off the alley at the rear of the site; such spaces to be clearly demarcated by bumper blocks; and two of the spaces shall be assigned to the Fi e Chief_ and the Fire [Marshal ,(See SPA Plat, Sheet AI 2) s�'✓wlr•'►Lh** arW410 A WtL i� 4 +k ONTH)'t . oqj� 11. Size of Office Addition: 664 sq. ft.; single story; footings to be sized to accomodate a second floor addition 12. use of office Addition: Office space for Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and District Secretary; space to include one washroom/toilet 13. Schedule for Completion of Construction: The proposed schedule for the AFPD Office Addition once construction commences is 10 - 12 weeks to completion of the building. This schedule may be subject to delays caused by winter weather. 14. Landscaping Improvements: See SPA Plat, Sheet 2. At this time all trees and shrubs have been removed or relocated to their permanent positions. The benches will be stored for winter. Reinstallation of the benches as well as re -seeding of the grass will be done in the spring of 1988 (April/May) as weather and frozen ground conditions permit. The bell located at the front of the site will remain in its present location. Moving the potentially agin , c,�stl� and ry insofar the the of th rk 3.s � ce ed. 0 IMIDO; GO i :_ 6 04I TO: Aspen City Council THRU: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Aspen Fire District Conceptual/Precise SPA Plan and GMP Exemption for Essential Public Facilities (Public Hearing) DATE: January 20, 1988 I. SUMMARY: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning Commis- sion recommend approval of the requested SPA plan and GMP exemption for essential public facilities to build the Fire Station office subject to four conditions. II. PROJECT PROFILE A. Location: The Fire Station SPA contains Lots O, P, Q, and R of Block 87, Townsite and City of Aspen. The proposed addition is at 420 E. Hopkins Avenue on Lot Q and part of Lot R, between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop. B. Zoning: Public/SPA as established in Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) . C. Ownership: The parcel is owned by the City of Aspen and leased by the Fire Protection District and the Thrift Shop. D. Applicant's Request: The Aspen Fire Protection District wants to build an office addition to the fire station approxi- mately 700 square feet in size. III. BACKGROUND Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) rezoned the Fire Station property to the Public zone district with a SPA overlay. Area and bulk requirements for the property were established in Section 1 of the Ordinance as follows: Minimum Lot Width: 120 feet Minimum Front Yard: 5 feet Minimum Side Yard: 0 feet Minimum Rear Yard 0 feet Maximum Height: 28 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal and Accessory Building: 0 feet 1 Percent of Open Space Required for Building Site: 15% External Floor Area Ratio: 1.25:1 The Thrift Shop was approved as part of the rezoning application in 1982. An office for the Fire Marshal and Fire Chief and housing was anticipated in the Fire District's long-range planning; however, no approval was given at that time. A concep- tual design for the office and some second floor housing was prepared by architect Jerry McCarthy but not approved. A lease agreement between the City, Fire Protection District and Thrift Shop was executed in 1983 specifying that the City must consent to the construction of the office and apartments for Fire District purposes. City Council agreed as the owners of the property to sponsor the Fire District's application on November 4, 1987. IV. Other Committee Votes: The Historic Preservation Committee gave conceptual review approval for the office design on November 24, 1987 subject to the condition that the applicant further study (1) the proposed open space off Hopkins Avenue and (2) different coloration of the concrete blocks prior to submittal of a final review application. The applicant returned to HPC on December 8 with revisions to increase the front yard setback, reduce front porch overhang and explain the applicant's reluc- tance to use colored concrete blocks. On December 22, 1987 the Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mended approval of the requested SPA and GMP exemption. A condition of their recommended approval was that the applicant address before City Council the matter of whether it is advis- able to limit the foundation design to a one story building, considering that if the Fire District would need added space in the future or a new tenant should occupy the space, construction and reconstruction may be minimized. Subsequently, Richard Miller of the Fire Protection District wrote a memorandum stating that the footings and foundation would be sized to accept the added bearing of a future second floor. V. PROBLEM DISCUSSION A. Referral Comments: 1. Engineering Department: Chuck Roth commented in his December 15, 1987 memorandum with regard to platting requirements, adequacy of the storm drainage design, and on - site parking. He states it would be appreciated if the parking restrictions on Hopkins were removed and those spaces returned to public use. 2. Parks Department: Bill Ness noted in his November 23, 2 • • 1987 memorandum that the Parks Department is satisfied with the applicant's construction schedule and landscaping plan, including the lighted walk -way and drywell. He suggests the possibility of an automatic irrigation system for the small park area. 3. City Attorney: Paul Taddune noted on December 17, 1987 that a plat should be filed for the property as one was never filed pursuant to the 1982 actions. B. Staff Comments: The Planning Office has the following comments with regard to the review criteria for an SPA plan and exemption from the Growth Management Quota System for construc- tion of essential public facilities. The Planning Director and City Attorney determined because of the prior consideration of this project, its relative simplicity and the direction the Code rewrite is taking, that the conceptual and precise stages of SPA can be combined for this application (making this a two step rather than four step review process). Therefore, we have used the standards for review of precise plan in Section 24-7.7 of the Municipal Code. We will next review the application according to the provisions of the GMP Exemption in Section 24-11.2(e) of the Municipal Code. Criterion 1: Whether the proposal is compatible with neighboring developments in terms of use, density, height, bulk, open space, landscaping and other site and architectural design features. Response: The site design concept is to locate a small one-story building approximately 58 feet back from the Hopkins Avenue property line, add stone pathways and seating areas to the 1,806 square feet open space, and retain five parking spaces off the alley. Five trees and two juniper bushes were removed from the rear portion of the site to permit utility installation (at the applicant's risk), in anticipation of development. The open space has been called the Willard Clapper Park; and as such, we believe it should continue to serve as a quality little pocket park with greenery and a place to sit. The small size of the structure and its large set -back should continue the pocket park character of the property. Revised plans for HPC bring the structure back slightly, making the open space area approximately the same as in the 1982 plans. It is unfortunate that only one of the five trees will be relocated, the others will be lost. However, there is little room for much more planting than presently exists. We suggest that shrubs along the front wall be planted, similar to landscaping in the 1982 plan. The flagstone treatment (3 feet wide) is appropriate in keeping the impervious surface to a minimum. The five "path lights" should be low bollard type incandescent lights that will be in character with the area. The Park's Department suggestion to install automatic irrigation appears reasonable so to retain a pleasant green space; however, we are not recommending that irrigation be required as a condi- 3 tion of approval because the space is relatively small. With regard to the architecture, staff agrees with HPC that the basic concepts are appropriate. There does not appear to be an opportunity for the design of this structure to bring the entire four lots (and three buildings) into better visual harmony with the Commercial Core Historic District. Surrounded by two concrete block buildings, brick and stone on this small addition would look audacious and out of place, as argued by the archi- tect. We still encourage consideration of colored block so to not overly amplify the cold gray character of the Thrift Shop building, while the addition's design features will mainly repeat those of the Thrift Shop. We find the height, massing and bulk of the addition to be principally compatible with its neighbors. All of the area and bulk requirements set by the SPA Ordinance have been met, according to the applicant. The Fire District office use is certainly compatible in this location next to the Fire Station. Please note that the housing has been deleted from this plan compared to the 1982 plan. While that housing may have been an amenity to the District, the reduced bulk as it relates to the park space is also positive. If it is decided in the future that a dwelling unit is desireable, adding the second floor will be possible, given the foundation and footing design intended. Criterion 2: Whether sufficient utilities and roads exist to service the intended development. Response: Because of the central location of the addition, utilities and roads are adequate. Criterion 3: Whether the parcel is suitable for the intended development, considering slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. Response: The land is flat and outside any mud flow, rock fall, avalanche and flood hazard areas. A large drywell has been installed in the front open space to handle runoff from the Fire Station roof and the office development. The Engineering Depart- ment noted that the storm water runoff system appears adequate. Criterion 4: Whether the applicant has creatively employed land planning techniques such as setbacks, clustering, screening, buffering and architectural design to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the suers of the project and the public at large. Response: The proposal is basically satisfactory in setbacks, architectural design, and open space amenities, in staff's 4 • • opinion. The area and bulk requirements set in Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) establish the parameters for development of this SPA site; and those requirements have not been exceeded. Criterion 5: Whether the proposal is in compliance with the Aspen Area General Plan. Response: The Aspen Land Use Plan of 1973 does not identify the Fire Station site as public; however, it was later zoned public. The intention of the public land use category in the 1973 Plan is "to allow for utilization of these lands by the public sector where appropriate expansion of community facilities... are necess- ary." It appears that the Fire Station addition fits this intended use. No public facilities plan or program has been developed as part of the General Plan to address the over- all community needs for public facility expansions by which this proposal should be evaluated, in staff's opinion. Criterion 6: Whether the development will require the expendi- ture of excessive public funds to provide services and facilities for the site or surrounding neighborhood. Response: No substantial increase in public services should be needed in response to this development. The Engineering Depart- ment has expressed concern over the Hopkins Avenue parking spaces reserved for the Fire Station which could be changed to public parking. Two spaces are so posted in front of the Fire Station. The Planning Office believes that clear demarcation of the 5 spaces in the rear of the site will help the parking situation; however, volunteer firemen probably still need places to park when called to a fire. Snow removal by the Fire District to make those spaces available for parking will be necessary. It would seem difficult to create more on -site parking for the firemen without extensive redesign of the site, even though desireable. Criterion 7: Whether the project represents an essential public facility. Response: The applicant has stated that this addition is needed for office space for the Fire Chief, District Secretary, and Fire Marshal. The Fire District is a not -for -profit public entity providing an essential service to the public. Addition of the Fire Marshal position has substantially improved the community's ability to deal with health and safety concerns, and freed the Building Inspector to concentrate on Building Code issues. Fire protection facilities expansion is not a growth generator and is in response to the demands of growth. It appears that the space needs and convenience of location qualifies this project as eligible for the GMP exemption, as discussed in Bob Walker's November 15, 1987 application letter. Criterion 8: Mitigation of project impacts on various services. 5 0 Response: Minimal impacts on water and sewer would result. The applicant states no new employees will be generated by the addition. The parking situation has been addressed above in this memorandum. Snow removal to facilitate parking will be the burden of the Fire District. Staff is satisfied with this project's- drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal and minimal impacts on air and water quality. VI. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that Council grant approval via the following motion: "Move to grant approval of the requested SPA plan and GMP exemption for essential public facilities to build the Fire Station office subject to the following conditions: 1. An SPA Agreement shall be filed by the applicant pursuant to Section 24-7.8 of the Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, addressing: size of the addition, use of the addition, schedule for completion of construction and landscaping improvements, and City's approval as property owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit a final SPA plat for the entire SPA parcel owned by the City shall be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and following the requirements of Section 24-8.12 of the Municipal Code. Included in the plat shall be: (a) a site/landscape plan showing the SPA area and bulk requirements, building location, parking spaces, open space area, landscaping, flagstone paths and benches as presented with additional shrubs along the south elevation, and path lights specified to be low bollard type fixtures with incandescent lights; and (b) south and north elevations as given final approval by the Historic Preservation Committee. 3. Five parking spaces off the alley shall be clearly demarcated with bumper blocks; two of which shall be assigned to the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal. Snow removal from the five parking spaces shall be the responsibility of the Fire Protection District. 4. The foundation of the one story office building shall be designed to accept a future second story in the event that added space is determined to be needed and is approved through an amendment of the SPA plan. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: ���-�-.� mac.✓ �� sb.firedis LI- 1 L • @g�e� gn.. WAYNE L. VANDEMARK, FIRE MARSHAL 0 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-2690 To: To Whom It May Concern I From: Aspen Fire Protection District Date: January 4, 1988 Re: P & Z Conditional Approval at Fire Marshal Office Annex, Condition #4 P & Z requests in condition #4 that we consider building this annex to accept a future second story with minimal reconstruc tion. The Aspen Fire Protection District has no plans for a second story. To cover any eventuality however, we are instructing the contractor to size the footings and foundation to accept the added bearing of a future second story. This minimizes remodel work. PY) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Aspen Fire District Conceptual/Precise SPA Plan and GMP Exemption for Essential Public Facilities (Public Hearing) DATE: December 22, 1987 I. PROJECT PROFILE A. Location: The Fire Station SPA contains Lots O, P, Q, and R of Block 87, Townsite and City of Aspen. The proposed addition is at 420 E. Hopkins Avenue on Lot Q between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop. B. Zoning: Public/SPA as established in Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982). C. Ownership: The parcel is owned by the City of Aspen and leased to the Fire Protection District. D. Applicant's Request: The Aspen Fire Protection District wants to build an office addition to the fire station approxi- mately 700 square feet in size. II. BACKGROUND Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) rezoned the Fire Station property to the Public zone district with a SPA overlay. Area and bulk requirements for the property were established in Section 1 of the Ordinance as follows: Minimum Lot Width: 120 feet Minimum Front Yard: 5 feet Minimum Side Yard: 0 feet Minimum Rear Yard 0 feet Maximum Height: 28 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal and Accessory Building: 0 feet Percent of Open Space Required for Building Site: 15% External Floor Area Ratio: 1.25:1 The Thrift Shop was approved as part of the rezoning application 1 in 1982. An office for the Fire Marshal and Fire Chief and housing was anticipated in the Fire District's long-range planning; however, no approval was given at that time. A concep- tual design for the prepared by architect agreement between the Shop was executed in to the construction District purposes. office and some second floor housing was Jerry McCarthy but not approved. A lease City, Fire Protection District and Thrift 1983 specifying that the City must consent of the office and apartments for Fire City Council agreed as the owners of the property to the Fire District's application on November 4, 1987. III. Other Committee Votes: The Historic Preservation Committee gave conceptual review approval for the office design on November 24, 1987 subject to the condition that the applicant further study (1) the proposed open space off Hopkins Avenue and (2) different coloration of the concrete blocks prior to submittal of a final review application. The applicant returned to HPC on December 8 with revisions to increase the front yard setback, reduce front porch overhang and explain the applicant's reluc- tance to use colored concrete blocks. IV. PROBLEM DISCUSSION A. Referral Comments: 1. Engineering Department: Chuck Roth commented in his December 15, 1987 memorandum with regard to platting requirements, adequacy of the storm drainage design, and on - site parking. He states it would be appreciated if the parking restrictions on Hopkins were removed and those spaces returned to public use. 2. Parks Department: Bill Ness noted in his November 23, 1987 memorandum that the Parks Department is satisfied with the applicant's construction schedule and landscaping plan, including the lighted walk -way and drywell. He suggests the possibility of an automatic irrigation system for the small park area. 3. City Attorney: Paul Taddune noted on December 17, 1987 that a plat should be filed for the property as one was never filed pursuant to the 1982 actions. B. Staff Comments: The Planning Office has the following comments with regard to the review criteria for an SPA plan and exemption from the Growth Management Quota System for construc- tion of essential public facilities. The Planning Director and City Attorney determined because of the prior consideration of this project, its relative simplicity and the direction the Code 2 rewrite is taking, that the conceptual and precise stages of SPA can be combined for this application (making this a two step rather than four step review process). Therefore, we have used the standards for review of precise plan in Section 24-7.7 of the Municipal Code. We will next review the application according to the provisions of the GMP Exemption in Section 24-11.2(e) of the Municipal Code. Criterion 1: Whether the proposal is compatible with neighboring developments in terms of use, density, height, bulk, open space, landscaping and other site and architectural design features. Response: The site design concept is to locate a small one-story building approximately 58 feet back from the Hopkins Avenue property line, add stone pathways and seating areas to the 1,806 square feet open space, and retain five parking spaces off the alley. Five trees and two juniper bushes were removed from the rear portion of the site to permit utility installation (at the applicant's risk), in anticipation of development. The open space has been called the Willard Clapper Park; and as such, we believe it should continue to serve as a quality little pocket park with greenery and a place to sit. The small size of the structure and its large set -back should continue the pocket park character of the property. Revised plans for HPC bring the structure back slightly, making the open space area approximately the same as in the 1982 plans. It is unfortunate that only one of the five trees will be relocated, the others will be lost. However, there is little room for much more planting than presently exists. We suggest that shrubs along the front wall be planted, similar to landscaping in the 1982 plan. The flagstone treatment (3 feet wide) is appropriate in keeping the impervious surface to a minimum. The five "path lights" should be low bollard type incandescent lights that will be in character with the area. The Park's Department suggestion to install automatic irrigation appears reasonable so to retain a pleasant green space. With regard to the architecture, staff agrees with HPC that the basic concepts are appropriate. There does not appear to be an opportunity for the design of this structure to bring the entire four lots (and three buildings) into better visual harmony with the Commercial Core Historic District. Surrounded by two concrete block buildings, brick and stone on this small addition would look audacious and out of place, as argued by the archi- tect. We still encourage consideration of colored block so to not overly amplify the cold gray character of the Thrift Shop building, while the addition's design features will mainly repeat those of the Thrift Shop. We find the height, massing and bulk of the addition to be principally compatible with its neighbors. All of the area and bulk requirements set by the SPA Ordinance have been met, according to the applicant. C The Fire District office use is certainly compatible in this location next to the Fire Station. Please note that the housing has been deleted from this plan compared to the 1982 plan. While that housing may have been an amenity to the District, the reduced bulk as it relates to the park space is also positive. Criterion 2: Whether sufficient utilities and roads exist to service the intended development. Response: Because of the central location of the addition, utilities and roads are adequate. Criterion 3: Whether the parcel is suitable for the intended development, considering slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. Response: The land is flat and outside any mud flow, rock fall, avalanche and flood hazard areas. A large drywell has been installed in the front open space to handle runoff from the Fire Station roof and the office development. The Engineering Depart- ment noted that the storm water runoff system appears adequate. Criterion 4: Whether the applicant has creatively employed land planning techniques such as setbacks, clustering, screening, buffering and architectural design to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the suers of the project and the public at large. Response: The proposal is basically satisfactory in setbacks, architectural design, and open space amenities, in staff's opinion. The area and bulk requirements set in Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) establish the parameters for development of this SPA site; and those requirements have not been exceeded. Criterion 5: Whether the proposal is in compliance with the Aspen Area General Plan. Response: The Aspen Land Use Plan of 1973 does not identify the Fire Station site as public; however, it was later zoned public. The intention of the public land use category in the 1973 Plan is "to allow for utilization of these lands by the public sector where appropriate expansion of community facilities... are necess- ary." It appears that the Fire Station addition fits this intended use; however, no public facilities plan or program has been developed as part of the General Plan to address the over- all community needs for public facility expansions by which this proposal should be evaluated. Criterion 6: Whether the development will require the expendi- ture of excessive public funds to provide services and facilities 4 for the site or surrounding neighborhood. Response: No substantial increase in public services should be needed in response to this development. The Engineering Depart- ment has expressed concern over the Hopkins Avenue parking spaces reserved for the Fire Station which could be changed to public parking. Two spaces are so posted in front of the Fire Station. The Planning Office believes that clear demarcation of the 5 spaces in the rear of the site will help the parking situation; however, volunteer firemen probably still need places to park when called to a fire. It would seem especially difficult to create more on -site parking for firemen even though desireable. Criterion 7: The project represents an essential public faci- lity. Response: The applicant has stated that this addition is needed for office space for the Fire Chief, District Secretary, and Fire Marshal. The Fire District is a not -for -profit public entity providing an essential service to the public. Addition of the Fire Marshal position has substantially improved the community's ability to deal with health and safety concerns, and freed the Building Inspector to concentrate on Building Code issues. Fire protection facilities expansion is not a growth generator and is in response to the demands of growth. It appears that the space needs and convenience of location qualifies this project as eligible for the GMP exemption, as discussed in Bob Walker's November 15, 1987 application letter. Criterion 8: Mitigation of project impacts on various services. Response: Minimal impacts on water and sewer would result. The applicant states no new employees will be generated by the addition. The parking situation has been addressed above in this memorandum. Staff is satisfied with this project's drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal and minimal impacts on air and water quality. V. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends to the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend approval of the requested SPA plan and GMP exemption for essential public facilities to build the Fire Station office subject to the following conditions: 1. An SPA Agreement shall be filed by the applicant pursuant to Section 24-7.8 of the Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, addressing: size of the addition, use of the addition, schedule for completion of construction and landscaping improvements, and City's approval as property owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit a final SPA plat for the entire SPA parcel owned by the City shall be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office to the satisfaction of the 5 City Engineer and following the requirements of Section 24-8.12 of the Municipal Code. Included in the plat shall be: (a) a site/landscape plan showing the SPA area and bulk requirements, building location, parking spaces, open space area, landscaping, flagstone paths and benches as presented with additional shrubs along the south elevation, and path lights specified to be low bollard type fixtures with incandescent lights; and (b) south and north elevations as given final approval by the Historic Preservation Committee. 3. Five parking spaces off the alley shall be clearly demarcated with bumper blocks; and two of the spaces shall be assigned to the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal. sb.firedis R • MEMORANDUM To: Steve Burstein From: Chuck Roth, Assistant City Engineer Date: December 15, 1987 Re: Aspen Fire District SPA Conceptual/Precise Plan Having reviewed the above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. If the application receives approval, the applicant must submit a final plat which follows the requirements of Section 24- 8.12. Two mylars must be submitted, one for recording with the Clerk and Recorder, the other for the records of the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provision has been made for storm water runoff. 3. The applicant is encouraged to provide as much on -site parking as possible. We would appreciate removing parking restrictions on Hopkins and returning those spaces to public use. cc: Jay Hammond, City Engineer CR/cr/caseload.18 �ocJTH �L�VAT/oN �4" ��'o„ 13 ti CAW*-- PAP Hai pr tpo�-� "4-7, 1-- S, A C . 6 0 MEMORADUM ; FD1 �If11i TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office FROM: Bill Ness, Parks Superintendent RE: Aspen Fire District SPA Conceptual/Precise Plan Parcel 1D4 1737-073- 30-007 DATE: November 23, 1987 The Department is in agreement with the Construction Schedule/Landscaping Plan for the Aspen Fire Protection District Office addition. It's evident that the project architect has given a lot of thought to the planning of the small park area. The lighted walk way and the drywell drainage system are both needed. One thing that comes to mind is the possibility of an automatic irrigation system. Other than that, everything looks good. BN/rls • ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S_ Galena Street Aspen, 00 81611 (303) 925-2020 nary• /�� di lf • od A&"a1a4X___ This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application IS NOT complete. Additional items required include: Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed) Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy) Additional copies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the Code, or other specific materials A check in the amount of $ A. Your application i complete and we h1aXe scheduled it for review by the d- J on We will call you if we need any additional information prior to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a copy of the memorandum.. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee. B_ Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you on the next available agenda. If you have any questions, please call -��- the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, ASPEN/PI KIN PLANNING OFFICE F_1 LJ 0 MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer Parks Department FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Aspen Fire District SPA Conceptual/Precise Plan Parcel ID# 1737-073-30-007 DATE: November 18, 1987 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Bob Walker representing the Aspen Fire Protection District requesting SPA Conceptual/Precise Plan to construct a single story office structure 723 square feet. A similar plan was conceptually presented in 1982 but had not gotten final approval. The front (south) wall in the present plan is located an addi- tional five feet toward Hopkins Ave. compared to the 1982 plan. The design of the building is intended to be an extension of the Thrift Shop as it is now constructed. Please review this material and send your comments to this office no later than December 11, 1987 in order for this office to have adequate time to prepare for its presentation before P&Z. Thank you. i � • t: Aspen/Pit �'x yning Office • i}..� 130 s ou_t"h-fig a.Y a n.ati tree t aspen`eolo.rado 81611 Mr. Robert L. Walker Box 2471 Aspen, CO 81612 November 10, 1987 Re: Aspen Fire Station Addition Application Dear Bob: The following is a written record of the points made during our telephone discussion on November 2, 1987. 1. City Council's cosponsorship of the application for the SPA/PUD Plat must be received before we can determine that your application is complete. The Fire Protection District also requested Council to waive the application fee at that same time. These matters were placed on Council's November 9 agenda. Council agreed to cosponsor the application but did not waive the fee. The application fee is $1,570. 2. Your application should include a request for exemption from the growth management quota system for an essential public facility. Review procedures are explained in Section 24-11.2(g) of the Municipal Code. Please address the criteria for this exemption. 3. The Planning Director and City Attorney agreed that the Conceptual and Precise stages of an SPA/PUD Plat can be combined. This will make the review process two steps (P&Z and Council) rather than four steps. As a result, the following matters need to be addressed in your application in order for it to be sufficient for the more detailed precise SPA plan: a. Reviews by both P&Z and Council will be public hearings with notice given to property owners within 300 feet of the property. Your responsibilities for public hearing notifica- tion are stated in Section 24-7.5(b) as follows: "A list and stamped addressed envelopes with the names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the property shall be supplied as the names and addresses appear upon plats or records in the Pitkin County clerk and recorder's office and on the tax records of Pitkin County. The applicant shall post a sign meeting the specification of Section 2-22(c)(3) on the property noticing the public hearing at least ten days prior to the hearing date." b. A more detailed site design/landscape plan is requested identifying more accurately the location, type and caliper of all existing trees on the site and Hopkins Street r.o.w. Note any new trees to be planted and tree relocations. Show street furniture locations, and indicate if the bell would be relocated on the site and if so, where. c. A schedule specifying the time frame for construction and landscaping improvements should be completed. d. Any more detail about the architecture which you believe would clarify the design concept and its compatability with surrounding buildings and the character of the neighborhood - specifiying materials and perspectives, for example - should be presented in your application. e. I suggest that you refer to Ordinance 51 (Series of 1982) rezoning the property to SPA and anticipating more office development. It would also be helpful if you compared your current plan with the conceptual plan presented back in 1982. 4. The Planning Office will schedule this item at the first available meeting once we have a completed application. 5. I suggest that you talk with the City Engineering Department about platting requirements so that you will know what is needed on a plat. We do not need a final plat for the P&Z meeting. 6. HPC conceptual review (public hearing) has been scheduled for November 24, 1987. I hope this letter will be helpful to you. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Steve Burstein, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office sb.11.9 • 11 TO: THRU: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM City Council Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager Steve Burstein, Planning Office N- City Consent to Aspen Fire Station Office Addition and Request to Waive Fees. November 4, 1987 The Aspen Fire Protection District is requesting the City Council to agree to it's application for an SPA plan approval and GMP Exemption for Essential Public Facilities in order to build a 723 square foot office for the Fire Marshal. Similar to Rubey Park, the parcel is owned by the City and leased to the Fire Protection District; and your consent is needed for the project to be reviewed. In addition, the Fire Protection District requests Council to waive application fees. This is a two step process (combining conceptual and precise stages); and the base fee is $1,980.00 For your information, RFTA's request for fee waiver to build Rubey Park Transit Center was not approved. Staff has no position on the request. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: '�u ��'�zi ~"•� ��-'"'�" IK •�� � G ,mac memo . a p � `- �.-a �,1✓�-�-- �G�� �-�-•_--�f- • PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PROJECT: �� `' ��. 5�� ,h 1 olt- S!y ��l�' (►✓l rnwrs�+���s b�t�c1 ��"2� �� APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: GIL WA kly REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: OWNERS NAME: SUMMARY 1. Type of Application: CM--6044 SPA 2. Describe action/type of development being requested: F►r.e 1►'l�rsl,n I l 7�� �p 3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Policy Area/ Referral Agent _``)) /-IAhhih0% t, _ Comments 1 / Sir �oc►,i�r� )AMaSI'Plk , �oY►T�v►Nd>7H w� S�Ari��bvlkrrfs L�IgIM�I-r►�h1 - �/I.II�h, D�IIh C�✓tV14 0 hA rr#viiPmfhtf City Afifio.o.�,, _ CIt ie�rs� �l PL - 2 sfi� r t�c�ls COnl� �4' �" 7'►.+► F rev ' 1 4. Review is: (P&Z Only) (CC/BOCC Only) (P&Z then to BOCC) 5. Public Hearing: (YES) 6. Did you tell applicant OWNERS? (YES) (NO) Disclosure to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY of Ownership: (YES) :(NO) 7. What fee was applicant requested to submit:'" 8. Anticipated date 9. COMMENTS/UNIQUE contvt'Al in »a vi e Vk►n, „) ciDIQs of submission: CONCERNS: CDhr�j o"gl adl'oh SHIN �* 4,Pn{►tl FF fD A ' t Di1I-��I s► t�f to [��i�,► 4b�sr�p* t��,rf/Mlh"�,S1z4, CDYhr -I - .IA/I jt ►s 0lOb4''4 did F6I 10 fgollfPfii iiv pN� `�h� .O'�/�P�'�• Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB Conceptual Submission Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition PHONE (3031 927-4262 PHONE c303I 923-3428 Oct. 26, 1987 Site Location: Portions of Lots Q,R, Block 87, 420 E. Hopkins, City of Aspen, Co. Background Information: The Aspen City Council of Aspen, Colorado adopted Ordinance No. 51 on Nov. 8, 1982, rezoning Lots O,P,Q, and R in Block 87 from CC to Public/ SPA which provided for "the expansion of two uses which benefit the community, those being the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop." The original proposal is shown on drawings prepared by J. R. McCarthy, Architect, dated Aug. 11, 1982 which show three additions to the site: 1.New Fire Barn Bay 2. Thrift Shop Building 3.Fire Station Office/Fire Station Housing The Fire Barn Bay of 1347 SF, single story, was constructed. The Thrift Shop of 1424 SF, single story, was constructed. The second floor of the Thrift Shop, designated "Future Office, 1000 SF" was not constructed. The Fire District Office/Housing structure consisting of 504 SF of office space on the first floor and 1646 SF of living space on the second floor was not constructed. In addition five parking spaces are provided at the rear, alley, side of Lots Q and R. Further, open space and planting, including trees and shrubs, is provided in the area bounded by the Fire Barn, the Thrift Shop, the Office Structure (unbuilt) and Hopkins Ave. Revised Conceptual Plan: The Fire Protection District Offices in this revised proposal consist of 723 SF, on one story, located between the existing east Bay of the Fire Barn and the west side of the Thrift Shop. This differs from the original proposal in the following aspects: 1.One story instead of two is proposed, 2.The living area has been eliminated, 3.The front (south wall) of the proposed Office is located an additional five feet towards Hopkins Ave. Sheet One of the attached construction drawings gives information regarding set backs, parking, height, floor area, and open space for the proposed Office Addition. This data is in conformance with the require- ments set forth in the 1982 Rezoning. P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 s e Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE 1303) 927-4262 PHONE 1303) 923-3428 It is the intention of the Fire Protection District to retain the park/ open space as recommended in the original SPA approval. Any trees, planting, or furniture which may be disrupted or destroyed by the construction process will be replaced or repaired and the park returned to its present condition less the area occupied by the proposed Office Addition. It is also proposed that ground level illumination be provided along the pathway leading from Hopkins to the proposed Office Addition. The Fire Protection District feels that the Addition should be similar in character to the existing Thrift Shop structure; i.e., grey 8x8 grid concrete block with similar window and door details. Because of office use requirements the storefront fixed glass of the Thrift Shop is not being used, rather operable units are proposed. The height of the Addition south wall matches that of the Thrift Shop (14 feet). Elevations are shown on Sheet Five of the construction drawings. Res ctf ly mit/e, obert L. Walker, Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 • El Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE 1303) 927-4262 PHONE 1303) 923-3428 Request for Exemption from Nov. 15, 1987 The Growth Management Plan Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition The AFPD requests that its Office Addition be considered for exemption from the Growth Management Plan as provided for in Sec. 24-11.2(e) of the Aspen Municipal Code. The criteria for exemption are addressed below: 1.The project represents an essential public facility. Response: The Office Addition provides needed office space for the Fire Chief, District Secretary, and Fire Marshall, all of whom provide an essential service to the community. Existing office space is inadequate as well as dispersed. 2. The project provides facilities in response to growth and is not itself a growth generator. Response: The general growth of the community has necessitated an increase in the complexity and responsibilities of the Fire Department and the enforcement of the fire codes. The Office Addition provides work space as a direct responce to this growth for those involved in maintaining the safety of the community. Since the Addition will be used by the existing Fire Chief, Secretary, and Fire Marshall, thus adding no new employees, it does not by itself generate growth. 3.The facility is available for use by the general public, serves the needs of the community, and is a not -for -profit venture. Response: By their very nature the Aspen Fire Protection District and the office of Fire Marshall serve the needs of the community; i.e., protection from and prevention of life and property damaging fires as well as general emergency and rescue services. The Office Addition provides needed space with which these respon- sibilities may be more efficiently and effectively executed. The Addition is accessible to the public in the same way that any governmental facility would be: it exists for the benefit of the community, providing an essential space in which the above mentioned officials may work and respond to community needs. The AFPD operates as a not -for -profit organization. 4.Mitigation of project imacts on various services. Responses: a. Water and sewer: The Addition of 723 SF contains one toilet and one bathroom lavatory. The impact on water and sewer use are negligible. b. Parking demand/new employees: Since the number of employees using the Addition is not being increased ,but merely being transferred from existing (inadequate) space in the Fire P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 7_1 • BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS PHONE 1303: 927 4262 PHONE 1303923-3428 Station and City Hall, there is negligible impact on off- street parking; the five existing spaces at the rear of the site will be retained. c. Drainage control: Site drainage is not affected by the presence of the Addition. There are no surface water flow paths that would be affected by the Addition. Water collected by -=the additional roof area is to be handled by a large drywell on the park site and engineered to be adequate for the roof of the east bay of the Fire Station as well as the Addition. d. Fire and police protection: The Addition is to be constructed of one -hour materials as dictated by the building and fire codes. Its location in close proximity to the fire and police departments would ensure adequate protection in this regard. e. Solid waste disposal: The Office Addition would generate primarily paper waste. There is an adequate refuse disposal area to the rear of the Thrift Shop for this purpose. f. Impact on air, water, and land resources: The Addition con- tains no wood or coal burning devices and will not contribute to the pollution of city air. The Addition has no proximity to any stream, river, or lake and in general has negligible effect on water resources other than the above mentioned bathroom facilities. Retention of the park/open space in accordance with the re- quirements of the 1982 Rezoning Ordinance ensures the existence of open space in the City Core as originally intended by the public/SPA overlay. g. Compatibility with surrounding areas: Please refer to our enclosed letter of Architectural Design Intent. Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 . ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 • • Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 927.4262 PHONE (303) 923-3428 Construction Schedule/Landscaping Nov. 15, 1987 Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition The proposed schedule for the AFPD Office Addition once construction commences is 10-12 weeks to completion of the building. This schedule may be subject to delays caused by winter weather. At this time all trees and shrubs have been removed or relocated to their permanent positions. The benches will be stored for winter. Reinstallation ,of the benches as well as re -seeding of the grass will be done in the spring of 1988 (April/May) as weather and frozen ground conditions permit. The bell located at the front of the site will remain in its present location. Moving the bell would be potentially damaging, costly, and unnecessary insofar as the layout of the park is concerned. Resp ull s ted obert L. Walker Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 OR r Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER PHONE (303) 927-4262 OARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 923-3428 Architectural Design Intent Nov. 15, 1987 Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition As stated in our Conceptual Submission letter dated Oct. 26, 1987, the Aspen Fire Protection District wishes to procede with the approval process for an Office Addition located between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop. Aspen City Ordinance No. 51 (series of 1982) rezoned lots 0, P, Q, and R of Block 87 to "Public/SPA" to provide for the expansion of the Fire Station and construction of the Thrift Shop. Included in the conceptual plans for the Thrift Shop was a two story office/housing structure of 2150 SF as well as requirements for building floor areas, open space, heights, and setbacks. The District wishes to complete the Office Phase of the construction with some revisions to the 1982 Plan. The present plans call for a single story office structure only of 723 SF with the front (south wall) located an additional five feet towards Hopkins Ave. Heights, setbacks, and open space requirements are in accordance with provisions set forth in the 1982 Rezoning Ordinance. The design of the building is intended to be an extension of the Thrift Shop as it is now constructed. Identical materials will be used; i.e., a facade of 8x8 grid concrete block to be painted grey to match the Thrift Shop. The Office facade facing Hopkins will be at the same height as the Thrift Shop parapet (14 feet). Window detailing and trim color will also be similar to that of the Thrift Shop with the exception that the Office windows will be operable. We feel that the location of the Office Addition between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop limits the use of materials to those of the structures which are connected to it at either end of the south facade. The facade itself is 26 feet long by 14 feet high and is the "public face" of the building. The north facade faces the alley to the rear of the lot, looking at the back of the gas station building. The south facade of the Office bridges the space between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop, both structures being constructed of painted concrete block. While other build- ings adjacent to the Fire Station (Isis Theater) and the Thrift Shop (new structure replacing Little Cliff's old building) are of brick it was felt that introducing brick between the Fire Station and the Thrift Shop would be an anomaly. In reality the Office Addition reads as a facade connecting the buildings on either side. Therefore it seems that precedence for com- patibility lies with its immediate neighbors. These are the Addition's direct historical antecedents in both form and use. P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 0 a 0 Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 927-4262 PHONE (303) 923.3428 The siting of the Office Addition bears consideration. In order to main- tain the park/open space originally intended in the rezoning ordinance, the Addition has been sited to the rear of the lot. The open space as it now exists is bounded at the north end by a short wood fence which only partilly blocks a rather dismal view of the back of the gas station buil- ding. Even though there is some planting with trees and shrubs, the park seems more of a narrow vacant lot without any particular character other than a way to get between the buildings from Hopkins to the alley. The Office Addition closes off the lot, in effect making the park a part of Hopkins Ave. rather than a slot from street to alley. This device is often used in creating urban open space where most of the building facades are at or close to the street line. Because of its location to the rear of the property as well as the screen of trees in the park in front, the Office Addition is somewhat hidden, not revealing its presence unless one is standing directly in front of it. The Addition does not wish, nor is there a need, to call attention to itself. We hope that this will clarify our intentions with regard to the design of the Office Addition. *Resctfus m' t d, .lker, Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 0 • Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER 066ONE 30:9 ;9 7-4262 DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 923-3428 ll li� Historic Preservation Committee Dec. 2, 1987 City of Aspen Aspen, Colo. Conceptual Revisions Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition To the Committee: After reviewing the written transcript of our conceptual approval meeting of Nov. 24, 1987 and meeting with the AFPD Board, we are proposing the following revisions to the AFPD Office Addition: 1. The Committee expressed concern about both physical and visual encroach- ment on the park/open space by the south facade and the front overhang. Revised proposal: We will move the entire building 1'- 8" back towards the alley. This does not encroach on the required parking space of 18'. In addition we are reducing the building depth from 25'- 3" to 24'- 6" by moving the south facade back away from Hopkins 1'- 9". We are also reducing the overhang from 4'- 1" to 21- 6". This revision places outside front line of the structure (the overhang) 9" farther towards Hopkins than the original proposal of 1982. The required open space fronting Hopkins is 15% of the lot area or 1805.4 SF. We have provided 1806 SF. 2. The Committee felt that the height of the building should be addressed. Reply: We feel that the parapet should remain as designed; i.e., to align with the top of the Thrift Shop. Wefeel that this parapet helps to screen the back of the building in the alley behind the addition and therefore visually defines the park more clearly. 3. The Committee felt that the addition should be less a part of the Thrift Shop visually as well as having a "softer" look. Response/revised proposal: In general we feel that there is nothing wrong with the design as it now stands. The use of the terms "natural" and "soften by using wood" seems to be somewhat influenced by personal preference and may not be a legitimate design parameter. The most out- standing buildings in the core area of Aspen (the Wheeler, the Brand Building, Ute City Bank, the Jerome, the Court House, and the new buil- dings at Cooper and Hunter) employ little wood on their exteriors. Any wood trim used is painted. The severity of these structures is mitigated by the use of texture, color, and ornament in the brick and stone which are the primary materials in these buildings as well as in the painted detailing of the cornices and the window and door openings. The Thrift P.O. Box 12369 . ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 0 Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 927-4262 PHONE (303) 923-3428 Shop is acknowledgedly a visually severe structure and the Committee felt that this severity should not be extended to the Office Addition. We do not agree with this in principle (it seems to us that it may not be appropriate to introduce a third facade into this group of three buildings). However we feel that since the Committee expressed such a strong concern about color as an antedote to the Thrift Shop coldness we should reconsider this aspect of the design. We would therefore propose the following revisions: a. We will retain the 8x8 grid concrete block but paint or stain the block a terra cotta or similar color; samples to be approved by the Committee. Budget Considerations preclude the use of integral color (too few blocks for a run), or cut stone or brick. We will also have more color options with the paint or stain. b. The overhang fascia will be either of painted wood or painted sheet metal (similar to the material used on the Hotel Jerome porch cornice) in a warm dark maroon or burgandy color (not a bright red like the Fire Barn). c. The windows, doors, and trim will be painted the same color as the overhang fascia. The resulting facade will appear warmer by contrast to the grey of the Thrift Shop. We hope that these revisions will answer the concerns of the Committee. Respectfully submittYd,' fit%/i�1i ✓� Robert L. Walker, Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 L:� NOV 1 81987 Walker/Grob Enterprises, Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTORS BOB WALKER DARRYL GROB PHONE (303) 927-4262 PHONE =3) 923-3428 Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office Nov. 15, 1987 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colo. 81611 Enclosed are the documents for the application for the SPA/PUD Plat submitted on behalf of the Aspen Fire Protection District Office Addition. Included in this submittal are the following: 1.Letter of Conceptual Submission 2.Letter of Construction Schedule/Landscaping 3.Letter of Architectural Design Intent 4.Letter of Request for Exemption from the GMP 5.List of all property owners within 300 feet of the property with stamped addressed envelopes 6.Current surveyers Plat of the property 7.Existing and proposed landscaping plan showing trees, shrubs, and street furniture in their present and future locations. 8.1982 Plans of the Thrift Shop and AFPD Office Addition 9.1987 Plans of the ASPD Office Addition (revised) including site plan, floor plan, and elevations. 10.Application fee in the amount of $1,570. A small study model will be presented at the HPC meeting on Nov. 24, 1987. R?bert f ly R L. Walker, Project Architect P.O. Box 12369 • ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRF NCE REPORT 2589AB $100. 00 Made For: Robert Walker, —City of Aspen STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. HEREBY CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this office that the owner of Lots 0, P, Q and R, Block 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of The City of Aspen and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following: NONE NOTE: There were no easements or rights of way of record affecting the subject property. NOTE: Notice of Historic Designation, affecting the subject property was recorded January 13, 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515 as Reception No. 172512. EXCEPT all easements, right-of-ways, restrictions and reservations of record. EXCEPT any and all unpaid taxes and assessments. This report does not reflect any of the following matters: 1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcies, antedate the report by more than fourteen (14) years. 2) Suits and judgments which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. 3) Unpaid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years. Although we believe the facts stated are true, this Certificate is not to be construed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with any financial obligation or liability whatever on any state- ment contained herein. Dated at Aspen, Colorado, this 04th day of January A.D. 19 88 at 8 : 00 A.M. ST.EWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. BY Authorized Signature Stewart Title Form OEZ 10/82 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ASPEN FIRE DISTRICT SPA CONCEPTUAL/PRECISE PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 22, 1987, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, City Hall, 2nd Floor, Old City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, to consider an application submitted by Bob Walker represent- ing the Aspen Fire District requesting SPA Conceptual/Precise Plan to construct a single -story office structure of 723 square feet. A similar plan was conceptually presented in 1982 but had not gotten final approval. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925- 2020, ext. 223. s/C. Welton Anderson Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on Dec. 3, 1987. City of Aspen Account. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, hereby certity that on this day of Alpmv 198!J- , a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Planning office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the public notice. Nancy Cae Block 86 • 0 First Aspen Corporation / P.O. Box 3318 Aspen, Co 81612 Block 92 County of Pitkin 506 E. Main St. Aspen, Co 81611 Block 93 Tiie Archdiocese of Denver No address for owner available / in the public records J (St. Mary's Catholic Church, Main & Hunter, Aspen, Co 81611 Margaret A. Conner 534 E. Hopkins Av Aspen, Cc 81611 Block 88 Lewis I. Schainuck / 3805 Sandune Lane t/ Corona Del Mar, Ca 92605 City of Aspen l30 S. Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Warren J. Conner ✓ Geraldine Conner Margie Ann Conner Johnston Claude Conner 534 E. Hopkins Av Aspen, Co 81611 Aspen Hardware & Supply, IC. 204 S. Mill St. Aspen, Co 81611 Laura Donnelley / P.O. Box 589 Aspen, Co 81611 Kurt & Lotte Bresnitz P.O. Box 70 J Aspen, Co 31612 Walter F. Hanysel, Jr. P.O. Box 1034 Aspen, Co 81612 Duvike Condos William R. Dunaway Albert Kern George Vicenzi George Vicenzi P.O. Box 2238 Aspen, Co 81612 Levant America C/O Colonial Navigation Co. 17 Battery Place #2246 1 New York, NY 10004 Sabbatini Sport, Inc. 208 South Mill St. Aspen, Co 81611 Harley Baldwin 1 West 72nd St. New York, NY 10023 Mountain Enterprises -80B / 4001 Clasen Blvd. Oklahoma City, Ok 73118 William R. Dunaway P.O. Box E Aspen, Co 81612 Loma Alta Corporation 6210 North Central Expressway Dallas, Tx 75206 Block 88 Continued • • Barbara G. Seidel / 3378 North Lake Drive V Milwaukee, Wi Co-Ordinated Liquor Service 210 S. Mill St. J Aspen, Co 81611 Block 81 Mill Street Plaza Association 434 E. Cooper Av Aspen, Co 81611 Block 94 W.G. Bullock Grant E. Bullock Lavone Kay Staton Lois Ann Hartman John E. Mc Nulty P.O. Box 609 Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Aspen Plaza Co. Box 1709 Aspen, Co 81612 Mason & Morse, Inc.j 514 E. Hyman Av Aspen, Co 81611 Block 80 Aspen Bancorp, Inc. / 119 S. Mill St. Aspen, Co 81611 Carl R & Catherine M. Bergman P.O. Box 1365 Aspen, Co 81612 Block 87 Aspen Properties Company 1565 Jackson St. ,// Oakland, Ca 94612 Richard A. Galuim 2635 North Terrace Av. Milwaukee, Wi City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Maurice Beririo Suite 912 3475 Mountain St. Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G2A4 BPOE #224 P.O. Box 327 Aspen, Co 81612 William G. Clark 1060 W. North Shore Av Chicago, I1 60626 Duane R. Johnson and Margaret W. Johnson 1116 E. Cinnabar Av Phoenix, Az 85020 CanAm Aspen Developments 135 East Cooper Aspen, Co 81611 Jesse J. Maddalone and Esther M. Maddalone C/O First National Bank, Trustee 2265 Tanglewood Rd Grand Junction, Co 81503 • Block 87 Continued Scheer and Associates Trustee of Maddalone Fam ly Box 2289 Aspen, Co 81612 M & W Associates / 434 E. Cooper St. Aspen, Co 81611 C� Marjorie P. Jinkinson / Trust 403 West Hallam St. Aspen, Co 81611 The Hodge Capital Company / 1505 Bridgeway Sausalito, Ca 94965 Rocord2:35 PM January 13. 1975 Reception 2512 aylie, Manewii NOTICE OF 11ISTOR1C DESIGNATION PLEASE TAKE. NOTICE that the following area located in Pitkin County, Colorado, constituting the conunercial core of the City of Aspen, has been designated an 11, Fistoric Overlay District, to wit: flocks 80, 81, 32, 83, F;7, 88, ^9, 90, 93, 94, 95, 96, and the south half of Blocl::: 79, r, 92, of th^ original townsite of the' City of Aspen, and south half of Block 19 of the East Aspen '%,Mition to the City of Aspen. Such 0-signation was made under the authority of Section 24-9.1 of the: Aspen Municipal Code by Ordinance 49, Series of 11174, effective January 8, 1975. As a consequence of designation, no building permit may issue for the (1) exterior remodelinc;, reconstruction of, or any addition to an exterior architectural feature of a structure within the district, (2) the demolition or moving of any structure within the district, or (3) the construction or erection of any new structure or addition to any structure within the district, ;:ntil the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee has reviewed the permit applic- ation and approved the same. The Preservation Committee will judge any proposed remodeling for the preservation of historical, architectural and characteristic qualities, and any new structure for complimentary design with the existing structures within the district. In case of an application to raze, demolish or move a structure, judgment shall be made on the basis of the structure's historical and architectural importance, its importance as a part of the area within which it is located, and M Faxk6` r � J rdC: J the actual physical condition of the structure. All as set forth in said Section 24-9.1, and reference is made to Section 24-9.1 ror a more specific and detailed analysis of the procedures and guidelines for th, Committee's review. THIS Nr)'I'ICI: is given this seventh day of January, 1975, pursuant to the requirements of Section 24-9.1 (e) 5b of the Municipal Cody of the City of Aspen, Colorado. (SFA L) -2- Xatl}lyn Hautcr — City Clerk L F. Ktl7AK 1=. CAP, L.'j. 9184 r o F-X15-TIf1C-7 ONE Z / GONG. BLOCK / ( F I KE hC(-), 75' F L L L Y BLOCK e7 5 75°Crl' I I I' >~ 120 5Co' TEL I I 2 � I I 72P1J9. � II � PAI 7O, I I I I I AP71T I ON 1 a 2.0 S C I✓X I ST I I�I� OtJE d e2TctzH CONC. BLOCK io0.5o�' � Q itil i Ir�l�l� �— ccrvc RE�E tazlv�.wp�v - - CL)AZO I-1 D r f< I N Amino Qo arve%%.r% 1- IA\ V E r 0/ Ipi� `! o ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT N v 5 Iv Lv 30 40 FEET 5CALE, 1" = 10' I3AS15 OF I�AKING-12FOUND MONUMEf,T AS 45HOWN. SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA MAP 5 P A- DATA-, ZONE PUI'2LtG/5PA. AREA OF LET - 12,03& 5Q. ET '- EXI5TIN-& AKt-:A DEVELOPEtD - &24050.FT F-XTE.KN,&\L F. A. IC. - 1.25 : I MINIMUM LOT WIDTH - 120 FT MINIMUM FRONT YAKD - 5 FT. MIN(MOM 510E YARD- 0 FT. MINIMUM YARD- 0 FT M/VCIMUM PE (t& --IT - 28 FT- MIN. DIST. BETWEEN PRINCIPAL 4 ACCE-SSOK`( P2LPO':? : 0 FT PERCENT Of OPEN{ SPACE KF-Q.'D: 15r0 (r,L7E5 NC7T rW-LUDF, AREA IN FRO(,rr OF EXISTfNG FIK.E STATjoN). KEQ'I7 PAfz.Klf IG 5 SF,A�CEaj TO F51L DEM/4\KCATErJ 131f 5UMPEt't, 2 5PAC.E.5 A55IGNED To T"F- FIRE CHIEF ^NrD FIRE MARL FiHAL. OPEN SPACE REQ'D° ((305 5G? FT - Of E- N SPACE, FKCV(Pm (8c(o 5Q.FT- OFFICE ADDITION FLOOR AREP. Co6,4 50. FT. (51NGLE, 5TOKcf). CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THI,5 MAP OF THE ASPEN FAZE PROTECTION 0157KICT c0FECIALL1 PLp.NNED AKEA WAS AfTMO✓ErD FY1 THE. C(T`( COUNCIL. Of THE CIT l OF A5PEIJ, COLOIZALYU, Tt115 DAB( of r l - K/tAq�� ATTEST CIT°( CLERt< PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL TI-415 MAP OF TLIE ASPEN FIRE PROTECTfON FDt5TRICT SPECIALL`( PLANNE.O AIRED WA5 APPKC1VF-D (Zj`l THE CIT`( OF fKSPEN 1'LANNII-ICE AND ZONING COMMISSION Tgt-2 pA`( C) IPs38. CHAI KIVI/o 4 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE i, DANIL.L F M`KENZIf-, !-IE( E5'1 GE.KTIF`( `tP^l T(41I5 MAP ACCUFATf-L`t 0E.FCTS A 5UKVE`I PEIR.rwmf)D UNDER M`I 0%1 CXTOPSEK l(o, 1987, Of 1 c7T5 D, f , Q >? K pLCcK 37, CIT'( /\IJD TOWNS(TE /'-)F A5FF-J, CC4-0K,4,Pr, ALL E.ASEMENT5 OF KECO20 AS 'jET FORTH IM TITLE CERTIFICATE 13ELDW AKE. ACCURA-1EL`( 5HOYVN HEREON. TH15 5UKVE.`f WA17 t7E2F0KME.D I1J ACCOKpANCf WIT" C.K.g-jTATUTE,S 1973, TITLE. 25 ART(CL� 51 ANt7 TWF- rtoct'lDA'rt"( OF TWE PKOPERT`I 3NOWN 1-4I=.2EON GLOSE,S W (T14 AN ACCURACA OF I (J I0,000 EXECUTED 1958. ALPIf.JE 1IJC, DANIEL- F. M`KENZIE, L.S. 20151 CLERK AND RECORDERS ACCEPTANCE Tl-It5 MAP OF TPE. ASPEI4 FIRE PIZOTFCTIOIJ DISTRICT OPEC[,° LLG[ PLANNF-0 AKEA W/AS ACCF-PTF0 FC)K FI1-INCH IN TI-(E OFFICE. C-)F TWE PITK(N COUNT`( CLEfZtt AND IZECOKpER OF_, I-I88, Atjo tiYAS 10UL�( RECOKr7ED IN 15C1DK AT PEE. FF-CEPT)OIJ fJo. PITKiN COUNTl CLERK AND RECOIZ[7EFZ TITLE CERTIFICATE S, r5KIAN COYLE, PR1=S1t7ENT 5TEWART TITLE, OF ASPEJ-A, INC., A L(CE.N5E0 TITLE IN5UKA"C-F. AGENT IN THE STATE. OF COL-OKADD U0 HE.PEr" CFfZTIF'f THAT TWE KECORI`:?ti OF PITKIN COUI�T`f t)�IOyVALL Or THE. I7KOPEKT-4f StiOW'N HEREON 15 OWNE.r7 FKEE /\NfD CLJFAK OF f\LL LOANS AND �ID IN FEE 51 MPLE " TWF- CtT�I OF ALTHOL)C-H WE f'SELIEVE, TWE FACTS STATED ARE TRUE, THIS CEKTIFICATE. 1-� NOT TO r5E. C01-15-rKUF-17 AS AEI AIjSTtzACT Of TITL(-, NOK A-J OPINION OF TITLE, NOK A GRANT OF TITLE, AND IT r=7 UNf7ER.ST0C0 AND AGKEEr7 THAT 5TEWART TITLE DFASPEt�I INC., NEITt-tER, 2°55UME5 I,ICK WILL F3E. CHAIKGEO WITH A.N°I FINANCIAL. Ob)-IGfTION Or- LIAI7(L)T`f WHATEVER ON AN-1 STATEMEf�CAI-A(NEn i�ET�EIN, I'3R (AN COYLE. I"KE.51 DENT STEWART TITLE Cr A15IFEN, P-AC . such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years .1 rom the date of the certification shown - hereon 00 • •.r•• •-- — .�77 , 'UF VCyt:U mevfsfons Title Job No bl -4'5 - 3 Post Office Box 1736 Drafted 1 12 av n.>z. SPA MAP SHEET 1 OF 2 client A. V- f. D. Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2688 w VA 7-10t-4 F; L'e OAc:.N WALL. hINC�l.E MO R•TAC &;ZZVB. *-Iew" w/ TOP � WQ W� JJ N D AFPD /O A VEQ/GY V�/GY 2�-!i^f 4i•Qj' 4'•O" tl'�O` ti'-O` 4-6" Z�•/i"t ✓ERiFY GJ!l1JTf4 ELEVA T/ON ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA MAP ALLcY 7>?HMSfGYZMER A i G4i�/T/[..E✓c�EC7 I ��II To � ,�1PFLei ✓r-O - To DEMO✓4P � �'� ✓UN/ 1'-S 1 7t9 B� REN1p✓rO Arch OF�iGc' .3tJp/ T/ON �I � 'O ¢.. 8LL'c: 5GX1UGc I 1 N TO + \ 72. BE - 2 " A sPP6N To et�-: ' oP o✓E.f�i/A�`t!�-��y'�"A Q�N�7b—f�'c 9 �O✓EtJ 1 A<VL' JUN/P S Jvv+2HA,vC� 9 O ✓ cowc . �aa N tiC" rh�c7TGH J , � t E/.r GNc S 2"ASPEti/ � � WAVK � PATN L/C�sfTs % LOW JViEN�N � 4'f3cl-�� % % /NG�+NOESG�-rf GAMP 9EG�A I r�nn n LX/Sf• �JU�//Pc,�L� Exist. —fol /sT c,. ExP, AG�s CONG. Pcoo�rzry ... � I�Gti/C�Gt2F - L0s1/ ✓!JN/G�25/G:niµ�UEFiJ/L 7N�t/Bf ' h/Oe--WALA::- floP�//-/Z A ✓� , AhPE,v G/,� P:�oTcGT/ON O/sT.�/GT OFFiG� /U6vV --,/T= T>rL nF_7�5?AL I i ,N 'u' I t, GONG . SAD j Z•%•` � GAFiT /.40,Y i3lZATc � ,=.=:AMA Yc.2,<O,C'..aTF-.� 1J.C'Y/✓G`.L- i-=;n,J.7 d �RYrYr:G.1. y�G-'Yon! S PA MAP SHEET 2 OF 2 K&E 19 1184 1-80 MC95411 r SET: L.S8R 9184/PLAS rna XE 4. r� V Q L NO �LN vt .li ................................... ..........,.........,.....:._ ::...... a°' SET: W/ PLAS. CAP 14 RIM. BOX 11 PLAS. CAP 0 IN 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 FT. SCALE: 1 10' BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND REBAR W/ PLAS. CAP SE COR. BLK.87 TO A FOUND REBARW/PLAS.CAP NE COR. BLK.87N14050'49"E S RVEYOo R S CSC RTMOATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON APRIL 15, 1981, OF LOTS 0-R , BLOCK 87, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. ALPINE SURVEYS APRIL 16, 1981 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE by 7,&ES F. RESER L. S. 9184 Gr t;Q�U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON OCTOBER 15TH,1987 A VISUAL INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. � �MR ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: DANIEL F McK01E OCTOBER 16TH, 1987 LS 20151 NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within six years after you first discover such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. Alpine Surveys Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 925 2688 Surveyed 15 APR. 1981 PB Revisions 16 OCT 1987 Drafted 16 APR. 1981 DMIC Title BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY LOTS 0-R, BLOCK 87 CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO Job No 81- 43 Client A.V. F. D. • C� • 9A-rA � ZONE � PL/P�L/G/SPA M/n!, ,eE4R YAeO O f``l. OGGUP�1h/GY f3 2 OF,�/GE MAX. fir. 28 FT. I' TYPc of= GON�.��1JGT/Oh! V - / N�2 M/N. a�sT.a�vc.E �rwE�N P,e/NG/PAL � A�GES���.Y /Irl iN, f,��NT yA=V S FT PE2lENT OF OAPEN „aAC4-� ExTE¢�/aL FG . AgzCA RgT/O G�Az/NCB A�zd=-A ALLOW - -723 ACTUAL - 50ur'N ELEV t /2.6 Z9. O it/ofzTH E1.cV. /<c, 0 S1. 6 h� < 101 . ZZ a� L /C-HT / DENT/L AT/ON IVATu,2AL_ L/lr,(IT ' /O% Fr . A2E4 VE�vT/ 4. frT/oN �o A;zEA AROA m (/6NT/G.AT/O�J z 34S �i /-7, 7h a� -AAA s 2 Z4i *P ,QGTUAL Z Z Z2. I/En/T'/GHAT/o�+ ZZh �% /(• ZS j-''A-, SPAGK : f�, @ S'-Ci" ,, Ie-,o' A DfZYW1<GL ��EG�/per! / ��• s f �Oh 4PE�/ �PAG� GOT A,e6,4 OPEN ��PACE �EQ ,D ZS = / A,Q�A TJTALS ' Fig �A,eN 42�3.G+O AGf'D Of=F/G� 7 Z 3, ToTAC. 6,"770,OD F/N. Ga,Q<i 17& 24-" GAS>T /f�O+V f�IzATE 1=.Z4ME 7, v, x 4- P6GAe•>T 02 rwE LL S�Grio�� GflPFLANCJ GG'�/G�E'� /NG. ,s2/�l.E orz 6qe-1AL-, V � W co O _ U V cn N c Q a 3 "N O I Z W 0 O O �.a .Z CC • W J a >- U) Q a 3 W i cr r I- a Q W d (9 r m ;N N O ;X (M O CO) CC :m -r, zW. Wv o., U. cnU. < O L i�v6 1 Zc�.3G'� O��/c•E <4DD/T/oN 0 ---� 4 \ 2a'-tt5%"*71 g \ OArW/GE AflL7iT/ON % 26F 3 q2 N \ 2 PAP N J 13�NAN�ARTH�ST L/NE _ _ `O N I / / • Z- inV-E-r OPEN 5�.4 G i, /80�o SF " J�lfLJ Pr -S; - - - --- • 11 0 I I I • I i i M 4'•p" 2�-g" 4'.O" �i�-4" 4'-D` 4'•ti`'�'r8� J ■■■■���■■■■■■il�i���l��iiiui ■■■■■■:��i�n N■■MMM■ro ■■■■■■ ■■■N■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■E■■■■■■■■■m NOON■■ ......��......■■■■■ �. ■■■■■■■MM.■■EIn!.■M■■�E■■■■■■� NOON■■ NONE ■■■lm■ -- 1 =-�ao. NOES - - o i�.�...� �� � I■■ min I, m■■m _: ::NOON■ o■C ;I■: , i n , . INN ■ ■ti I■■ ■ ■■ ■■M ■llo■ NN ■NEC■( NOON ■; I■■ ■■ IN■ ._ ■■■■■■■■ ■■ I■■ ■■ lmmon IMMENSE M No I INN IN MEMO MEMO ■■ I■■ ■■ IM■■. ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■MINN C� I■■■� ■E■■■■■■M■■■■r©■E■M■M■■M■■■■ i■■� I■■■. ■■NEE■■■■■■■NI►J■■■■■ NOON■■■ I■■ MINN= (VOKTH 6L�VAT/Ohl //4"� /�-O'• c L a41� l PLAS. CAP I _« cep t� ASPHALT PARKING - _ i 7.30� o I a+ IU5 I M I _ I � 31.3 ----- - - - / I I I I I / I / I 0 I / o O 1 NE STORY• LOCK ,BLDG- i ILO LO O to I 0 � 1 Z I I, I 48.70 ' r i 3 p x CONC. I RAMP I. • SET: • .0X" IN CONC.` S 750 09' 1 1" E TRANS.N ATE . _-1 ❑ TYP-OVERH Op 12 C+ 3 6 7 f Nc-- I v - P0,2cH _ — Ov�QH4N� V• O/j/C rsTO�� - / '7 's / 2 N 2L, 33 r I/ N �Go%vc, PAD IP,eo j-xT�o � DiSTt2iGT j /82�L 7Z s� / a�6�v SPA A I , • 120.36 4 s o A A'- i H v SE TRANs.� RE L.� TELL 0 0 ON= S ; GAY 0 Po.2C q ' • L_J r T. A LI.r;Y -r%2A t9d 2ME2 74 G�'AY�L PAS/�v I I r yy`GG ref r _ Rooms �QA/N To s -� n/r--v✓ OeYWf's�L "� /VEW S/NIoLE I N 2-5 EL, /00� 03�4~ Q • M0 2�ivWN U N 7,1A _ O tors o-,e BLa.,r 67 G/TY c►� ASPEN , Go . O 00(§ m�Q �c7tO _N au- �/�1' D/HENS/ON'.� TEIr . ��� • Jr. -7"- Z1r,B P--AGN7QE-L,=' A - /o0 . 77 ° <ib 1 'k4 lmjaz /�'/MED- Z - hIMGebN o¢ 210 (o'I I ",/b H . G , MAHO!>,/�JrA/PJ vPi4f� ,*m;p6oq oQ Era • h' - 2" 30l08 /3/8 S.G. MAHOlp . / �;IrA//J &;CAZ;1 PEAC,Arg� 6/9 A 7i - Z'S�Sr G�Go ,2El��ivT 13N4 METAL"e" /'/z H¢ Dooe f FRgti►e /lo &4 , ANl�E2o�N GN23s ` ��- S�/4" IZ Gt�s 6", i- 1 O'/Y" 1 u L�F r AGT/ ✓g PA�-,e�IVZ INMr GOG,esC-7' EN7 lr 4.00400Er DEAD �t.T SElt -G GG�a /Nlo H/�%CnES LG+GKSE? 4X 1li x7i(o • IlitiF O� eMASH/Et.,D//N'� 1 4x2o•31"��29,f i• 2xQ�ix'10